ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Obama's coattails

Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Domenico Montanaro, and Carrie Dann 
*** Examining Obama’s coattails: How much did Obama’s name on the ballot benefit Jim Martin (D) a month ago? Consider that during the general election, he trailed Saxby Chambliss (R) by just three percentage points, 49.8%-46.8%, with a third-party candidate garnering more than 3%. But in yesterday’s run-off, with 97% of precincts reporting, Chambliss won by 14 points, 57%-43%, preventing Democrats from obtaining a filibuster-proof 60 seats. How many House or Senate Democrats who believe they won because of Obama coattails -- especially in states like Alabama, North Carolina, and Virginia -- saw the run-off result and said, "Uh, oh. 2010 is going to be tough"?  

Video: NBC Deputy Political Director Mark Murray offers his first read on how rough confirmation might be for Bill Richardson as commerce secretary and looks at other cabinet possibilities.

*** Bill Richardson’s day: At 11:40 am ET today, Obama will hold yet another press conference, where he will announce Bill Richardson as his Commerce secretary. Although Richardson didn’t get the coveted job at State, Commerce could end up being a good fit for the New Mexico governor. While message discipline isn’t one of Richardson’s strong suits -- remember when he initially said at a gay-rights forum during the Democratic primary season that he thought being gay was a choice? -- he has proven to be a talented negotiator, and business was a fan of his tenure as New Mexico governor. The Commerce position can be seen as a business cheerleading post, and Richardson is certainly an optimistic cheerleading guy. Also, the next Commerce secretary, especially given the nation’s economic woes, is going to have to work with foreign governments to smooth out trade deals and disputes. But there is some baggage. Take this Politico article, which reports that “Richardson traded on the prominence and expertise he accrued as Bill Clinton’s ambassador to the United Nations and as energy secretary to land more than 20 paying gigs, yielding hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of directors’ fees and stock options -- much of which came from entities dealing in areas directly related to his work in the administration.”

*** Cornyn's challenge: Yesterday, we mentioned that candidate recruitment matters in politics. Well, so do retirements. Florida GOP Sen. Mel Martinez's announcement on Tuesday that he won't seek a second term in 2010 not only increases Democrats' chances of winning that open Senate seat, but it also serves as a reminder that incoming NRSC Chair John Cornyn will have to convince several of his colleagues not to follow in Martinez's footsteps. Possible GOP retirements include Sam Brownback (Kansas), Jim Bunning (Kentucky), Chuck Grassley (Iowa), George Voinovich (Ohio), David Vitter of Louisiana (he may WANT to retire), and even John McCain (who has said he intends to run for another term in 2010). As we've said before, it's only natural for members of the minority party to consider retirement. But if they end up leaving, it makes it more difficult for the minority to later win back the majority. This job is doubly tough for NRCC Chair Pete Sessions. If Cornyn and Sessions can limit retirements, then they both can play more offense in 2010. One other thing about Martinez’s upcoming departure: It marks the loss the GOP’s most well-known minority elected official.

*** Jeb to jump back in? The Atlantic and Politico are reporting that former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the current president’s younger brother, is considering a bid for Martinez’s Senate seat. Jeb himself responds to the Politico by email, and confirms he's considering it. “A source close to Bush said he'll be thoughtful and methodical about the decision-making process. He will consider the impact a race would have on his family and his business and whether or not the U.S. Senate is the best forum from which to continue his advocacy for the issues on which he’s focused, such as education, immigration, and GOP solutions to health care reform.” If Jeb jumps in, it would be very similar to Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate bid, and would propel the Florida Senate contest to the premiere race of 2010. A Bush hasn't served in the Senate since Prescott's tenure in Connecticut. Jeb's father failed to win bids for Texas Senate.

Video: President-elect Barack Obama promises federal economic relief for the states at the National Governors Association meeting in Philadelphia. NBC’s Savannah Guthrie reports.

*** Obama loves the govs? Obama won plenty of praise yesterday from the nation’s governors -- Democrats and Republicans alike -- for his commitment to make the states full partners in trying to solve the country’s economic troubles. In fact, some Democratic governors who spoke with First Read yesterday said that it was a noticeable break from the way in which the Bush Administration has dealt with the states. “I felt there were a lot of situations where we were not being listened to,” Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter (D) said of the Bush team. Some notable examples: No Child Left Behind, funding for state health insurance programs for children, and a lack of direct aid to the states during the past economic slowdown. What’s ironic here is that Bush was the two-term governor of Texas before becoming president. Obama isn’t a former governor, although he did serve in the state legislature prior to winning his US Senate seat. 

Countdown to Electoral Vote Count: 36 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 48 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

*** Ever notice that the states that are in trouble are run mostly by Democrats? blah blah blah  Many of the midwest states are run top to bottom by Democrats, and are in ruin. ***

They're in ruin because of the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas, which is due to globalization.  That's pretty far above the pay grade of a state legislature or governor, brainiac.

The states that are basket cases by their own doing are mostly in the south -- Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, etc.  Red states, every last one.
I live in Texas and NCLB has been a debacle here since it began,  it is one of many reasons I did not vote for GWB ever.
"Don't run Jeb"...yes, Bill Nelson, the other FL Senator is a Democrat, but last I checked, he can't run for both Senate seats.  I was referring to the current slate of candidates.  The GOP holds every statewide office but 1.  Just saying that when it comes to statewide name recognition, the GOP has more power than the Dems.
The only thing democrats are worrying about is getting this country out of the mess left behind. We need to survive 2009 before worrying about 2010.
I'm an Obama supporter, but he needs to put an end to the birth certificate story.  His paternal grandmother has claimed she was present in Mombasa for his birth.  The birth certificate he put on his website has already been debunked as inauthentic.  Why doesn't he just produce it and put an end to it? Before pompous know-it-alls like Clara in KC trash me, remember I support the guy, I just don't know why he doesn't come out on this with legitimate proof.    
To J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY:

this is idiotic. If Obama were not born in the US, don't you think the GOP sleaze would've JUMPED on that????

Seriously, let this ignorant hysteria go...
On the Obama Birth Certificate:

The birth certificate presented online was a phony with a phony certificate of authenticity. A real copy of a birth certificate will have a govt seal stamped on it and notorized as authentic. The question is not whether Obama was born in the US (because it is likely he was) but what his citizenship was listed as on the certificate. If he was listed as a Kenyan or an Indoneisan then he is not a US citizen no matter where he was born. Why on earth is the birth certificate sealed for twenty-years? If if were a republican it would front page news everyday until it was released. He could solve this whole matter by unsealing it and displaying it for all to see. Can you say President Biden.
Why is it that people cant respect anything right wing. With all the left wing bias going on with all these coments. I dont under stand what the deal is with anything religious? Besides bashing all these things and looking at your presedent elect with suposed religious background and his cabinet choises with some being right wing.. its pretty comical. Besides the economic problems was not just Bush, but the house and senate and the democrats being the majority and democrats having relatiopns with companies he is supposed to over see. Thanks left wing for all the problems
June Bug:

If he was born in Mombasa he is not a US citizen and cannot be president. It would violate the constitution. Obviously he could not serve then - so this may explain why he had it sealed for twenty-five years. More likely he is not listed as a US citizen on the document which again means he cannot hold office of president
Demcrats have a lot to worry about --- now !

They are taking over during hard times.

Barack Obama is not a change candidate.

Richardson had experience as ambassador, Hillary does not; yet, she is SOS ?
To those that think that "no party should have a fillibuster proof majority",did you think that 6 years ago. REemember when the rebulicans were so angry that the democrats fillibustered their judicial picks they threatened to change the rules so a simple majority could over ride it. Remember when John McCain suggested it would be a great idea,if only he was certain that the republicans would stay in control forever. Remember when McCain and others said that the congress should respect the republican choice of the electorate and aprove all of the Bush picks. Were sitting there in front of your TV nodding your head and agreeing with everything. What about now. Do you still beleive that.

Now we get to see the difference between those of us who love democracy (and America) and those who simply love power. Now we get to see who still says,filibusters are an important tool of the minority party. Although I would have no problem with a supermajority of democrats (that just means that enough Americans wanted it) I would have real problems with the senate changing the rules to eviscorate the minorities power to fillibuster.

 Remember,as it sits now,there IS a fillibuster proof majority ... on some issues. Depending on what is up for debate,some republicans will side with the democrats. Sometimes some dems will side with the republicans.  On the other hand, minority power is certainly important. That will give the conservatives an imprint on policy and prevent more extreme appointments. Had the electorate chosen say,65 democratic senators,then it would be different. That would be the electorate in effect asking for those extreme picks.

As for who loves america. If you said "you must support your president in time of war four years ago" but dont support Obama in January, you dont love America,your a hippocrite. If you said that the senate should rubber stamp all the appointments the president made 4 years ago,maybe you dont love America as much as you said you did. If you said it was a good idea to change the rules to eliminate fillibusters 4 years ago,but now are fine with them,maybe you really just want your own agenda implemented and dont really love America like you said you did. America IS her freedom AND her democracy. Its not the nice car you drive,or the food you can go buy (as much as you want of) at the grocery store. Its not the home that allways has heat and running water and electricity. Those are all nice to have,but they are just a side effect of living here.
I do agree, be reporters and not gossip mongers. Stop with the 2010 nonsense. Campaign is over for the time being; respect the President elect. There will be time to talk about 2010 and its contenders.
If we are going to talk about Georgia....I can say it to you all this way...Georgia is NOT Florida.  They share a border and that is all.  Georgia is one of those states that with the "Right Stuff" could have gone Democratic this time.   Also, regarding Martin....he was NOT the kind of candidate who could have won.  He did not have "IT".  Obama saw this probably, and did not go down there....to Obama's credit.
Ro bad for Jeb. He will have to livve dowbn what his brother did. Our relative from Texas warned us that George was either dum or crooked or both.
"Besides the economic problems was not just Bush, but the house and senate and the democrats being the majority..." L M

Why can nobody admit that the dems only had a majority for two of eight years. And still not the votes necessary to override a veto.

Many parties are to blame, but mainly Bush/Cheney/Rove.

Many people are responsible to fix it, but mainly Obama and HIS choices for his cabinet.

Let's all get behind him and hope that the vast majority of Americans were right on Election Day !!!
keep on gloating and bashing cause it betrays your true nature. You don't have much more time as soon O will have to start making decisions and being accountable. And the tide will start to turn once again...so enjoy the childish banter while you can
The democrats should be afraid. When the likes of Harry Reid says stupid things like he doesn't have to smell the tourists anymore (shouldn't he have said, we the people, the ones who pay taxes and elect or not elect people like him). Harry Reid, when your time to get re-elected comes around, We will remember.
Cornyn is (ugh!) my Senator and Sessions is (ugh!) my congressman. Everyone please accept my sincere apology.
I hope that the Republicans are smart enough to curtail the use of  filibusters.

They are in sad enough shape already and across the aisle co-operation would work better than the filibuster tactic of delaying or showing their displeasure of a bill on the floor.

Things need to change and they have to work for the good of ALL the people.
I would not overread the tea leafs on what the Georgia results mean for 2010, Obama's coattails, or Sarah Palin's coattails.   There is a hard core group of fundamentalists in the US, but/and there are going to stay that way, and they are also not going to grow much bigger.  The thought of Sarah Palin "debating" President Obama is mind numbing.
Please, Please do not take the Chambliss win for anything more than the public stupidity of people in this state.  They would have voted for a vampire if the vampire was running as a republican! The people here are still hoping for a repeal of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights act is at the bottom of all this "I am a conservative" talk.  Everyone in this state is not living in la la land and I, for one will be so happy when the president-elect takes office and can actually begin to put his policies in place.  Maybe some of the republicans who have lost their jobs, their retirement, and their homes will wake up and realize that they are not rich, they have not benefited from republican policy and most of all they will see that they have been tricked into voting for people like Chambliss.  Perhaps the problem here is Georgia and the fact that only 30-40% of the people in this state have a high school diploma.
I'm tired of people saying bush did so terrible. It seems that whenever anything goes wrong everybody blames him. Why don't we take a look at the majority democratic house and congress who turned down every bill that bush proposed that would have a benefit upon this country. It is because of selfish people in those seats that our country is doing so terrible. President George W. Bush did the best he did with the time he was given. I guess all of you complainers just find it so easy to complain because he has insured our protection as a country. But thats my bias
Georgians simply proved that they are idiot hypocrites (not unlike Tennesseans) ... here, they had a draft dodger who called a war hero soft of defense ... 'nuff said ...
Well, this is some good political news at last! The Republican winning by more than 10% in a runoff election in GA. The bloom is hardly off the Obama rose and they are raining on his parade already! Maybe it has something to do with Obama (mr change -small chnage that is!) filling his cabinet with Clintonistas to include the wicked witch of the west herself for Secretary of State!
I don't understand how so many are spinning this Georgia election as some kind of a huge Republican victory.

If anything, this should be a moral boost for the Democrats that a Republican incumbant was forced into a run-off in one of the reddest of red states in our country.

For Republicans to be jumping for joy over this is like Laker fans celebrating a 2 point overtime win over the Knicks!
Lets take a wait and see aproach on Obama.
The left is so full of hate. He will have a hard enough time just keeping them off his back.
I hope he gets the colleage palyoff he wants.

Longhorn fan TX


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1696883

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google