ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Auto companies' trips, by the numbers

Posted: Thursday, December 04, 2008 5:47 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Frank Thorp
The heads of the Big Three lost the public relations battle the last time they were in town asking for bailout money. Congressmen attacked them for flying in on private jets -- and they didn’t even plane pool, so to speak.

So this time around, they drove to Washington, in hybrids no less.

But was that good for business?

Video: Newsweek’s Howard Fineman discusses the Big Three automakers’ plea for more bailout money and how some Congressmen weren’t too happy with them on Capitol Hill Thursday.

After talking to representatives from both Chrysler and GM and culling some details about the trips their CEOs took to DC this week, here is some math as to how much they might have spent (minus food). 

One thing to think about is the amount of time that they wasted by driving. By turning what would be a 90-minute commercial flight into a 10-hour road-trip they are spending more than eight hours more on travel time. 

Ford's Alan Mulally made $17 million in 2007 in salary and incentives, according to the Wall Street Journal. Broken down, that means he makes $1,940 an hour, which means the extra eight hours he spent on the road cost the company $15,525 -- one-way. 

GM's Rick Wagoner made $3.8 million in 2007 ($443 per hour) in salary and incentives.  Wagoner spending that extra eight hours on the road costs the company $3,531 one way.

Bob Nardelli has not disclosed how much he makes at Chrysler, but judging by the fact that he was making $25 million a year at Home Depot last year, his time is worth a bundle as well.

Chrysler: Nardelli made the trip over a two-day period. Leaving late in the evening on Tuesday, he stayed at a Holiday Inn in Youngstown, Ohio. According the Holiday Inn Web site, it's about $120 per night, per room. Assuming there were four of them each in their own room that's about $480 for the stay.

They drove a Chrysler Aspen Hybrid SUV, which gets 21 miles per gallon highway. (They could have driven a Chrysler Sebring which gets 30 MPG highway if they were trying to be really efficient). Nardelli came with a couple of other executives and did some of the driving as well.

-- Getting 21 MPG for 525 miles at $1.79 national average for a gallon of gas means they spent about $44.75 on gas for the trip.
-- On Wednesday, they stopped at a truck stop in Breezewood, Pa. That stop has a Dairy Queen, Dominoes and Subway, if they were feeling hungry.

Travel Expense Breakdown: $44.75 for gas + $480 for hotel rooms = $524.75

GM: GM CEO Rick Wagoner made a non-stop trip to D.C. yesterday, leaving Wednesday morning at 7:00 am ET and arriving just before 6:00 pm ET. Wagoner traveled in what you could call a fleet compared to Ford CEO Alan Mulally's trip, which used just one Ford Escape Hybrid. Wagoner took three cars, all of which he drove periodically throughout the 10 hour, 525 mile, trip:

-- A Chevy Malibu Hybrid (34 MPG-Highway: $27.64 in gas for the trip)
-- A Chevy Cobalt XFE (37 MPG-Highway: $25.40 in gas for the trip)
-- A Buick Lucerne E85 (an ethanol fueled car -- no fuel efficiency statistics released yet, so say about $25)
-- They went with five or six people total: Rick Wagoner, John Smith who is one of the top executives involved with putting together the plan for Congress some drivers and a security guard. ("They'll have plenty of time to talk," a GM rep said.)
-- While we know they made stops for food and to stretch, there were no specifics as to what kind of restaurants they ate in.

Travel Expense Breakdown: $78.04 for gas for all three cars

*** UPDATE *** Representatives from Ford pass along this response: "In your calculation of the cost of Mr. Mulally's trip, I would think it would be more accurate to use his 2008 compensation, since the trip didn't happen last year. His salary is $2 million and he is forgoing any performance bonus for 2008, as are all Ford executives and other salaried workers. Another point is that he was able to do some work on the trip when he wasn't driving, conducting media interviews, reviewing materials and so forth."

Points taken.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I would like to see some comparison to the numbers if they had taken a commerical plane and/or private jet.  

Their whole trip is a huge tax write off anyway. They only drove to Washington to "con" the Congress into giving them more money. Again!
We all need to grow up here. The private jet issue could be raised with almost every witness before Congress. The jets still exist in all Fortune 500 companies. They cost them money whether they fly on them or not. Pilots, maintenance crews, schedulers, all get paid on salary to keep a fleet available whether they are in the air or sitting on the tarmac somewhere. Yes, they could have flown commercial but i am certain that the ceo doesn't travel alone either. Tickets for twenty underlings along with security is going to add up to the same relative expense to the company. Why can't we focus on what really matters when we are having any important discussion? Could it be that "IMAGERY" has become everything in every conflict and debate. What was Sen. Corker trying to do to Gettelfinger with the attempt to "labor negotiate" away pension payments into equity holdings?????? Is that his job????
Is that all you media types do is b*tch and moan? I mean come on! How much does it cost to support the Royality that we also call our Congress? Why do those Kings and Queens get a pass for their extravagent lifestyles of the Rich and Famous? Going to Washington doesn't mean you automatically are supposted to get rich.
You guys obviously have way too much time on your hands. That's probably why a lot of you and your ilk are being layed off.
It didnt cost the companies anything.  Never heard of a blackberry, cell phone and lap top?  They work just as  much...just have less time for golf.
Why won't MSNBC post my comments? Why does NBC hate middleclass hr.workers? Chris Matthews took the New York congressman to task about not driving a Big 3 car> GO Chris. David Gregory is a repub tool. His wife works for Fannie or Freddie. He loves Wall st. and hates Main street. Why can't MSNBC hire people that understands real people. Joe and Mikia are almost as bad. GO Chris Matthews. Run for office in Penn. Speak up for the real people and manufacturing jobs. Your the best! D Gregoery-boring as watching paint dry. David Schuster you should have 1600 Penn. show D.B.
My only question after reading this is:

Slow news day, or slowest news day ever?
Obviously no business majors working at msnbc. With the CEO being out of town for a greater period of time because he's driving means he's not managing his direct reports. All these CEOs are hands on types, so the lose to each of their companies for the time they we're not there would probably be closer to a million dollars rather then a few thousand. Sure, you'll say Telecommute! Not too many CEOs work from home though.
Hey !

We subsidize FOOTBALL TEAMS, BASEBALL TEAMS....
Some Southern states even subsidize foreign car companies

Better Ford than AIG !!
And with Ford it's only a loan

With AIG and the Banks, it's a handout
Are all you lefties starting this nonsense again where you compliment your posts by posting under another name? I thought you all got over that once you turned 18.
I guess the Left in this country isn't going to be happy until the government controls every industry in America. People like Dodd and Shelby wouldn't know the first thing about building a car, yet they make jokes of the auto company representitives that are appearing. If Dodd and Shelby, and the other Senators, don't want to give the automakers the money, then just don't give them the money. It's not there's to give away anyway.
Jesus Christ Domenico and First Read People... I'm definitely not supportive of these auto bailouts, but like Michael Moore pointed out, where was this questioning and analyzation of companies who are receiving/asking for bailout money when it came to the Banks and Wall Street Executives???

You guys are now criticizing or at least pointing out that for the Auto Execs to be driving is possibly costing the companies more money due to hourly wage while you guys KNOW is not a fair statement or comparison, because there isn't an executive in the country who gets an hourly wage... With the Auto Companies, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't because either way you'll be sneered at by the politicians, press, and elite wall street.
So is there ANY WAY the auto execs can win with the MSM? When they arrive by private jet (admittedly stupid), they get slammed. When they arrive by car, they get slammed. What do you want them to do? Must be a slow news day again.
Sigh.  Here we go again.  

>>Ever notice Anne Molly and C A post at the nearly the same times? I wonder why? Clair, MO (Sent Thursday, December 04, 2008 4:38 PM) (from another thread)

Clair -- I am not C A, nor do he and I coordinate our posts.  I should be so lucky, and so should you.  Then maybe you would make some sense.

^^^^^^^^^^

>>Clara, C A, Tuscaloosa, AL, and Anne Molly are all the same person.
All In The Family (Sent Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:58 PM) (from another thread)

All -- Please believe me, I’m not fit to wipe the blogging boots of either of the other two folks.  I do admit to knowing C A; in fact, I’m proud to know C A; I’ve never met Clara, but I am flattered that you would associate me with her.

And by the way, it’s Anna Molly (aka Anomaly), and I’m proud of that, too.


To First Read: Your per-hour calculations seem to be based off a 24 hour working day... shouldn't an 8-12 hour day be more useful for the purpose of comparison to the average person?
Poor babies they had to rough it in the cars they build. No more limos or executive jets. The symbolism is worth every penny spent.

Now, I can get into my GERMAN made care and drive to where I gotta go right now.
My only thoughts reading this are twofold:

1.  17,000,000/2,080 hours = $8,173/hour
2.  CEO Frat Boy Road Trip - who packed the beer bong?

I have been in trouble all day with my sarcastic sense of humor - which I use equally on almost everyone.

I am not related to CA Tuscaloosa or Anna Molly; but I consider them both kindred spirits.  My thoughts are my own, and I'm not here seeking approval.  I just love the forum to share.
Although I don't like the idea of "bailing out" any more American companies, I believe that we MUST give bridge loans (with restructuring) to our auto industry. There are many arguments on both sides for allowing these companies to fail, but the ONLY argument that stands out above all others in my book concerns the American people and how the Big 3's failure will affect the lives of families, friends, neighbors and communities.  Here's some of the consequences of shutting down America's Automotive Industry:
* Loss of 3 + MILLION American JOBS
* Loss of 3 + MILLION Americans covered by employer based Health, Dental & Vision Care Plans
* Loss of 3 + MILLION Americans paying Mortgages, Insurances and House-hold Utilities
* Loss of 3 + MILLION Americans paying Soc Security, State, Local and Federal Taxes
* Loss of 3 + MILLION American Incomes assisting in reviving our economy through purchasing goods such as Food, Clothing, Houseware and services such as Beauty care, Child care, Entertainment, Travel and Restaurants.

If you consider all of the jobs that may be dependant on the American auto industry, failure could mean the devastation of more than Four (4) MILLION American Jobs!!!  Do we really want to devastate lives in order to make a point concerning bail outs? Should we refrain from trying to help our economy in the long-term?

I think we should have stood up in strong opposition to the REAL bail out (hand-out) of the banking industry when we had the chance, but most of us were in Full-blown Shock and had not really taken the time to research all that should have been demanded before the bill was signed & the funds distributed. This time We the People, Congress and the Pres. Elect's Economic team are demanding accountability and restructuring for a 21st Century transportation product that will bode well for America's future. Therefore, I believe we must support the bridge loan. What say you my fellow Americans???
you know, this bailout is peanuts compared to the financial industry, has a direct tie to how many more jobs and livelihoods, and isn't a direct blank check to anyone, yet congress is balking at them.  but if it was their banking or insurance buddies they'd bend the american people over and stick it to us again.

This highlights everything that is wrong with our government, society, and priorities in general.  The wealthy have power, they look after themselves, and to hell with those less fortunate.  after all, this is the OWNership society.  welcome to wage slavery.  

and its likely that we as a people are too apathetic to change it.  we'll continue on in our own self interest and to hell with those who aren't me.  and we wonder why people hate us... pathetic
So it would've cost them more to fly commercially in coach as well.  What's the point of this?  Where could they possibly win in this argument?

How did the bankers fare under this same line of questioning?  Oh, that's right - the bankers didn't have to worry about travel, because their friends in Congress were already there.  

Seriously, as much as I like this blog - this was a pointless post.  
The bailout is supposed to preserve jobs. The plans submitted by both GM and Chrysler close plants and CUT jobs.  Closing plants will also ripple through the industry support stream, therby negating the impact of the bailout funds.  A better plan would be to redirect the mission of those targeted plants to mass transit (light bus & rail) production.  Redesign shouldn't take longer than the time it took to gear for war production in the 1940's.  If we treated this economic condition as seriously as we treated the threat of world domination we would be far better off.  The threat of economic meltdown will leave us as devestated as the domination threatened by despots during that war.  We need to address it as seriously as we did then.  We must not go with the half-hearted leadership fits and starts we have used so far in every crisis since after the First Gulf War.  That war was conducted with a serious command, from Bush (41), Shwartskof, Powell to Cheney (God save us). If the industry heads are unwilling to lead this effort, can them or deny the funds and let the bankruptcy court settle the matter, for the bailout will only be the first step in an ongoing support stream of funding.
   
   
So now they suck up. The problem I have is verification of their claims. Who is going to have oversight of what they do with the money WE are giving them. Well, I have to go. I will drive my GERMAN car to the store to get a few items.
Honestly, the planes were stupid.  But at some point you have to lay off.  What were they supposed to do?  Crawl in hemp clothing?  How much did the entire staff of NBC spend commuting this week?  

Honestly - what would you have had Wagoner, et al., do, given that you can't change the past?
I sincerely wonder if-in u folks are not becoming a bit holier than thou with such an article. Why?  Well, having been a "journalist" since 1962 I have mellowed to the point that I am able to realize that there is as much pavement on one side of the centre line as there is on the other. Would you want your USA secretary of State sitting either commercial or even first class on an aircraft reading the latest terrorist threats to the country not knowing who their seat mate is?  Or ... would you want the Secretary of State in a commercial airliner during a major crisis where they could not be in communication and thus possibly use their built up energies to ward off an "incident"?  Or, would you seriously desire that the CEO of a major USA company be on a commercial airliner ... a bus ... or a train ... which might expose his/her documents, communications, etc., to industrial espionage?  Please get off of the silver perch and shake hands with reality.

I've spent a good part of my life advising politicians and busines folks to avoid the "norm" when doing business. Use blue tooth in a mall and your competition will produce a fantastic new car before you such as a "Mustang".

The world is in crisis. I am not certain at age 64 after having had 2 strokes -- where the fault lies. Regretably, I know that the primary fault lies in what is known as "filling the void"  -- non-stop cable news -- the land where fact is not accepted prior to the reportage of rumour -- and the first report has the primary impact on the listener in the same respect as an animal lives by its first image.

We ... quote un quote journalists have become monsters of untruth/ratings. I am so proud of my days in the craft of being what WAS known as being a "REPORTER" of honestly garnered facts.

Today I would be laughed off the block for having such integrity in my profession.

Lordie me.

Blessed Holidays Greetings To One & All From Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

rtj@gbp.net

rtj/PM
Great analysis, but not really fair to include their time as a cost of the trip since cell phones and Blackberrys enabled them to be fairly productive on the trip.  Still, not really all that smart to drive.
Hey, Frank?

Way to much time on your hands...  Get a Life!
Maybe Chris Dodd should have just asked them to call in.  Of course, this would prevent the wonderfully sad MSNBC machine from trying to gin up another controversy.  Keep up the good work.
When someone makes the same amount of money in 2 days as a factory worker makes in a year, something is definitely wrong.  No matter how the 3 CEO's brought the tin cup to Washington, same bad taste.  After watching how the banks and Wall Street used tax payer's money, no more blank checks.

Instead of giving free money, government should take this opportunity to 'invest' in the 'small 3' by buying stock equivilent of the loan, also with appropriate number of seats on the board to represent tax payers.  There should be an improvement plan, not necessary tied to the money, but targets to meet environment, efficiency and labor goals.  If company fails to meet the target at any time, replace failing parts of the management team.  If company meets the goals at the end of period, sell back the stocks and pay down the deficit.

This may be socialistic in some views but this is the best way to maintain economic confidence and not to destroy capitalistic principles.  The need to firm up middle class outweights and avoid wider class gap, outweights a little sacrifice in conveservative economics.
What a stupid story. Come on guys, this is pretty trashy journalism.
NO BAILOUT!!! These companies have BAD management. Mulally spent $760,000 on "personal" (not business) corporate jet use. He has total compensation of $22 million. Ford also gave away free computers to its employees in 2000 when it was losing market share! IN 2008, FORD GAVE OUT HUGE BONUSES TO ITS MANAGEMENT in 2008 even though the company is going down!!!! NOW THEY ARE AFTER THE TAXPAYER DOLLARS IN THE SAME YEAR???? NO WAY!
The most absurd part of this story is you cannot explain something this simple to a Member of Congress.  They seem to only be capable of thinking in sound bites and then only in the simplest of terms.

Now, these three CEO's should be wired enough to do their job from anywhere, but to think they each will have wasted 20+ hours in travel alone is sad, simply to combat the nasty, gotcha-style version of political discourse we now enjoy in our seats of government.  

What a great article.  I think it may actually illustrate both how desperate the Big 3 are right now to get the bail out, and how weak they are as managers that they caved to public opinion in the face of a very simple cost/benefit decision.  It somehow reminds me of their excuses when they continued to build large SUV's (while facing $3-4/gal gas) because American's wanted large gas guzzlers...
As much as I hate to give money to bail out bad management / business practices, something needs to be done w/ the auto industry.  We cannot afford to lose the manufacturing industry.  Yes, I believe the big 3 need to do some serious restructuring - starting from the top down!  However, what does it insinuate, when the financial industry gets a bailout w/ no strings attached?  They basically got their bailout handed to them on a gold platter.  I don't get it.  The rich just keep getting the breaks, while the middle class continues to get trampled on.  
I was wondering how long it would take some one in the press to realize that blasting the corporate jet thing is really trivial.
When I heard the congress man blast the big three for taking there jets, I thought what a idiot.  

I am a retired person, and I still understand that time is money and that driving is a waste of time for these guys.

Also is there not some thing on the "books" of anti-trust laws that keeps these men from "Jet Pooling" unless they get permission from the government?

The congressman was just looking for a sound bite.
Hmmm - I'm glad they decided to drive, but can't justify what those people make.  It's incomprehensible to me these guys need a bailout.  I say no.  File chapter 11, deal with the consequences, get your crap together, take care of your employees.  This makes me madder by the day.  I feel for those who may lose their jobs, but lets be real, look at United Airlines now after filing bankruptcy. They came back stronger, as many others have.  The slight humbling these CEO's have shown is not enough.  I can't imagine what their bank accounts have in them!!!  Actually, I don't want to know.  Would piss me off more!!!!!!!
This was simply a case of over-reacting to the criticisms about their Private Jets. They should have just hopped aboard a commercial flight for this round of begging sessions with Congress.  

Another bit of over-reaction by these Executives was stating they would work for (what was it one cent or one dollar) if Congress would bail out their company. As if such a pay cut would place these multi-millionaires in some kind of economic painful situation as your average production worker. I saw this offer by the Executives as somewhat condescending didn't you?

I don't know what it is with these auto Executives. They are supposed to be the very cream of the crop in Executive material yet they seem unable to handle themselves very well before Congress, before the public, and in their ability to come up with some common-sense non-knee jerking strategy to secure federal funding.  
Couldn't they have shared a van or organized a bus for all of them?  That would have been better.  Why didn't they learn from the Japanese car makers?  The major reason why they have made fuel efficient (and smaller) cars is that the Japanese have to import most or all of their oil.  

We, as Americans, need to learn to do with less and work with smaller things.  We consume too much and learn too little.  That can be seen in the American automobile industry.  If they had spent the money on R&D for better materials for body frames (stronger & lighter steel or other non-steel materials), more fuel efficient engines, non-internal combustion engines, we as Americans would be better off.  We'd be beating the Japanese at innovation, have a larger share of the car sales world wide and have more people innovating.
>>>Travel Expense Breakdown: $78.04 for gas for all three cars

==========
So what.  Make them suffer like the rest of us.

46 Days Until Inauguration Day!
http://jawillie.blog.com
What's the average per hour pay of the average auto industry union member?  Ford's Mullaly is making almost $2000. an hour!  The gap between rich and poor is the problem folks.  When the gap gets wide enough countries fail.  Limits pertaining to the disparity between lowest paid and highest paid within companies should be instituted or we could possibly join those nations that have failed.
I understand completely the bailout fatigue that our country and Congress is going through.  The way in which the TARP funds are being allocated by Treasury is confusing to the mind and boggling to the eye.  So it seems only natural that the auto companies would be put under a little more scrutiny in coming to ask for a loan (Congress is trying to prove it's learned it's lesson).

However, I think people are starting to take it to the extremes.  It's like the auto execs can't do anything right.  Admittedly, they've made some mistakes.  But it's not as if the auto companies can just change overnight.  All 3 CEOs who testified in front of Congress are relatively new to the company (2-4 years they've been in their position).  They are int he process of rebuilding and restructuring.  But seeing as it takes 4 years for a car to go from concept to the showroom, this economic crisis has hit them at the worst possible time.  

Remember, we Americans are partly to blame to.  For the last decade we've been demanding bigger and less fuel efficient cars.  Remember the "glory days" of Soccer Mom Vans and SUV Dads?  With the sudden (at least in terms of economic trends) shift in demand to smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles, the change in the production has a lag in time it much catch up to.  Yes, the auto companies should've had some sense this was coming.  But they were in the midst of restructuring and changing when this hit.

Also, I find a lot of fault with the comparisons to the foreign car makers.  Let's not forget that Toyota and Nissan are given supplements from their government that far exceed any tax breaks the Big 3 may receive.  Yes, they can pay their workers less and that saves on production cost.  But even the UAW is making broad concessions to do whatever they can to save the American auto industry.

In conclusion, I'm not arguing that the companies be given a blank check free of conditions or regulations.  It's our tax dollars, so we need to be sure that they're being spent right.  But Americans and our Congress need to get a cold doss of reality about the situation at hand, and the implications that could come of a bankruptcy of one of the companies is more far reaching than people really seem to grasp.  If one of those companies fail, that's that many more people on unemployment, competing with you for jobs and other resources.  You really think you wouldn't be paying for it then?  You really think the costs to the government won't be more with all those unemployed employees looking to the government for help?
Well, let's see. They are criticized for flying so they drove. They are criticized for driving because it took too long. I'm not sure what else is available. However, as you can see, they are desperate to do anything to the get help after being so short sighted. They went after the money right in front of their face, instead of working for the future good of the company. Very poor management skills. There needs to be significant oversight if they get helpDidn't Obama say something about requiring that they get the gas milage WAY up etc etc?
Though it's fun to look at automaker CEO's trips to Washington, the numbers we should be looking at are C.A.F.E. (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) numbers, which would have required automakers to meet certain gas mileage goals. Beginning in 1975, Congress set future fuel economy standards, which the Big Three have continuously fought through lobbying, marketing and the courts.  Successfully. Every time CAFE standards come up, they're delayed or in some other way made ineffectual, and have increased exactly zero since 1984. If Ford's, Chrysler's and GM's fuel economies we were in 2008 where Congress originally envisioned them to be, they would be selling cars Americans want and need.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1698838

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google