ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Obama marks break from Bush on intel

Posted: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:01 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum and Ashley Codianni
At today's news conference, President-elect Obama's intention was to officially announce his choices to head the CIA and the Director for National Intelligence -- Leon Panetta, who had come under criticism by Congressional Democrats, and retired Admiral Dennis Blair.

However, the economy and jobs report remained the news of the day.

"This morning, we received a stark reminder about how urgently action is needed," Obama said in the beginning of his press conference. "Five hundred and twenty-four thousand jobs were lost in December across nearly all major American industries. That means that our economy lost jobs in all 12 months of 2008 and that nearly 2.6 million jobs lost last year amount to the single worst year of job loss since World War II."

Although Obama is facing criticism from Democrats on the stimulus plan, the President-elect said he recognized it will not be easy to come to a compromise but has confidence they will reach one.

"There are going to be a whole host of good ideas out there, and we welcome all of them," he said. "And we're going to sift through all of them, and we are going to work in a collaborative fashion with Congress. What we can't do is drag this out when we just saw half a million more jobs lost."

He continued, "You know, the American people are struggling. And behind the statistics that we see flashing on the screens are real lives, real suffering, real fears. And it is my job to make sure that Congress stays focused in the weeks to come and gets this done."

Obama also said they will refine the package during the next few weeks. On criticism that the plan is not big enough, he said some people say it is not big enough and others say it is too big.

"I want this to work,” he said. “This is not an intellectual exercise. And there's no pride of authorship. If members of Congress have good ideas, if they can identify a project for me that will create jobs in an efficient way, that does not hamper our ability to, over the long term, get control of our deficit, that is good for the economy, then I'm going accept it."

On his national security appointments, Obama stressed the need for an evolving intelligence to deal with "a world of unconventional challenges from the spread of stateless terrorist networks and weapons of mass destruction to the grave dangers posed by failed states and rogue regimes."

He continued, "Good intelligence is not a luxury, it is a necessity. Here in Washington, we've also learned some tough lessons. We've learned that to make pragmatic policy choices, we must insist on assessments grounded solely on the facts and not seek information to suit any ideological agenda."

The president-elect also announced CIA veteran John Brennan will be his homeland security advisor and deputy national security advisor for counterterrorism serving the rank of assistant to the president. This appointment may allay some of critics’ concerns that Panetta has a light resume with regard to intelligence for director of the CIA.

Obama said Panetta, who was White House Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton, "knows how to focus resources where they are needed, and he has had a proven track record of building consensus and working on a bipartisan basis with Congress."

Panetta said, "I commit to consulting closely with my former colleagues in the Congress to form the kind of partnership we need if we're to win the War on Terror."

Blair, a former admiral and commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, promised Obama he would not just tell the President-elect what he wants to hear in terms of national security.

"You've made it very clear, sir, that you are best served by hearing different perspectives and by respectful debate," he said to Obama. "And the intelligence services will support you with facts, interpretations, assessments in a straightforward manner, and we will tell you how well we know what we know and what we don't know."

Obama declined to directly answer a question if his choices represent a softening of the U.S. stance on Iran, stating he would discuss that after Jan. 20th -- though what he said on Iran and on torture, in particular, marked a clear pivot from the Bush administration, and perhaps, the clearest sign since Obama has become president-elect of the country’s new direction on foreign affairs and security.

“I was clear throughout this campaign and have been clear throughout this transition that under my administration, the states does not torture,” Obama said. “We will abide by the Geneva Conventions that we will uphold our highest values and ideals. And that is a clear charge that I've given to Admiral Blair and to Leon Panetta. And I think it is important for us to do that not only because that's who we are, but also, ultimately, it will make us safer and will help in changing hearts and minds in our struggle against extremists.

“With respect to Iran, I'll have more to say about Iran after January 20th. I have said in the past during the course of the campaign that Iran is a genuine threat to U.S. national security. But I have also said that we should be willing to initiate diplomacy as a mechanism to achieve our national security goals. And my national security team, I think, is reflective of that practical, pragmatic approach to foreign policy. And when we have a policy towards Iran that has been shaped by my national security team, we will release it.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Obama's first bite of the bailout apple failed miserably. Congress flatly rejected his first bail out plan. Rookie mistake. There will be a lot of those. Next time he should have Nancy and Harry walk him through the process so he gets in right.
Panetta. Lousy pick. Then, rather then gracefully back out of it, Obama continues the mistake. That pick will cost lives.
Pelosi smacked Obama around pretty good on his budget plan. Change? Nancy gave Obama some change he can believe in.
I prefer AMD to Intel
Panetta said, "I commit to consulting closely with my former colleagues in the Congress to form the kind of partnership we need if we're to win the War on Terror."


Translated: "I'm in deep and don't have clue about what is going on".
no more torture is a good thing and rightfully so. putting us back in line with geneva convention is definitely the right thing. the stimulus package will get modified and refined through debate. i just hope it doesn't take to long. the economy is almost at breaking point. mr. obama will appoint a staff in intelligence that is forward thinking. he will bring that field in to a place of 21st century thinking. the man has a plan. he can only do better than his predecesssor.

I think it's going to take Congress awhile to wake up to the fact that this man is serious about working together and making things WORK. They haven't had leadership in 8 years, so they need some time; they will eventually come around and work WITH Obama and not against him. Now if we can get jerry/corpus chirsti to just come along................    :)
>>>Although Obama is facing criticism from Democrats on the stimulus plan, the President-elect said he recognized it will not be easy to come to a compromise but has confidence they will reach one.
==========
What the Dems in DC need to realize is that they're coming into a congress with an even lower approval rating than Bush.  They also need to face the fact that more than 2/3 of the nation approve of this plan, and if congress is seen as being obstructionist, or just whinny petty children, the public will likely blame them and not Obama (and there goes your Democratic majority).


>>>"Good intelligence is not a luxury, it is a necessity. Here in Washington, we've also learned some tough lessons. We've learned that to make pragmatic policy choices, we must insist on assessments grounded solely on the facts and not seek information to suit any ideological agenda."
==========
There's a change I can believe in.  The president using intelligence to DETERMINE a course of action, not to JUSTIFY one.

11 Days Until Inauguration Day!
http://jawille.blog.com
As long as his testimony occurs *after* the testimony Cheney, Rove, Meiers and Gonzalez were subpoenaed for, and never did.

Funny how conservatives aren't *nearly* as interested in that.  Go figure
Jackson, Seattle

Yeah, funny like how liberals don't acknowledge Clinton's attack of Iraq or impeachment. Or Carter's failed hostage rescue mission or Obama's, Hillary and Bill's snuggling up to lobbyist and big money.
Is it true that Bernard Madoff was a contributor to the Obama/Biden 08 campaign? I heard that mentioned this week. If true, that would be a shame.
Why should PE Obama comprise his stance?

PE Obama said..."I want this to work,” “This is not an intellectual exercise. And there's no pride of authorship. If members of Congress have good ideas, if they can identify a project for me that will create jobs in an efficient way, that does not hamper our ability to, over the long term, get control of our deficit, that is good for the economy, then I'm going accept it."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So do I President Elect Obama. And you are correct" this is not an an intellectual exercise". It is a ploy to drive all of your work into negative opinion and poll numbers by republicans and other idiots. They are trying to do the same to you as they did to Clinton before he could raise his hand to swear in

No one has creative,intelligent and work ethics like you PE Obama  and your teamwork one has  your fund-raising skill, no one has reached out so successfully  awed foreign audiences. There are still people, plus your supporters who will not allow the country to further plummet. You said .and I believe you, it starts from the bottom up. How many other presidents have worked as hard as you pre-inauguration; plus, outlasted a grueling campaign to come out with such work hard ethics. It's true we have one president at a time. I and I think others realize that.
If those people don't understand whoever is in the white house is always affected by decisions made by the previous administration, regardless, who comes to the White House.  

Our enemies must be very happy now.  This is what terrorist have to worry about now. No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind.
I'm sure they will do the same. NOT
Whether one agess with his future policies or not one thing is clear. Intelligence is certainly going to be part of the White House after Obama takes office.
I aprreciate President elect Obama's decision to not torture. But President Bush, Dick Cheney and their administration DID violate the Geneva Convention and should be put on trial for War Crimes. That is what a Free and Just society would do anyway.
I aprreciate President elect Obama's decision to not torture. But President Bush, Dick Cheney and their administration DID violate the Geneva Convention and should be put on trial for War Crimes. That is what a Free and Just society would do anyway.
It is nice to hear him say it's our economy, not Bush's economy.  Does that mean the campaign is over?

             11 more days of infamy and shame.



Pragmatism not partisanism what a refreshing change.
I, for one, am proud of the fact that America "Will not torture."  Of course, it will take years to reverse the damages perpetrated by the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld debaucle, but this is a good first step.  It is the only way to restore honor to our great nation.  

And to those who are "afraid" of the consequenses of no more torture (Bill O and the rest of faux news) I say, get over yourselves.  If anyone else did it to us, we would be the first ones at the world court condemning such treatment and demanding our pound of flesh.  Just like we did after WWII and people who engaged in such acts were hanged.  

No more torture.  
Please someone write a book entitled, "Politics in the Windy City"  The television producers can not wait to get going on this one!
I enjoy reading and listening to Obama's words. He knows what he wants to say and sticks to his message without posturing. He's intelligent, well-focused and shows signs of being a great leader, which these times call for. Once in a generation do we get it exactly right.

With so many challenges facing our nation I feel he will find a way, one by one, to resolve each crisis and put us on solid ground.

I've taken to gushing; I'm just happy and proud it all came together so perfectly, even if it will seem a bit bumpy on occasion.

And then I hope we finally realize that it's everyone's responsibility to stay on track. This economic crisis was preventable, pretty much everyone dropped the ball.
The Bush Intelligence was pretty much right on. Whether you like Bush or not he DID keep us safe, foiling at least 26 possible attacks since 9/11.

Obama has torn that Intelligence apart. We'll see if he's as good as Bush on this one. I seriously doubt it.

Liberals are blind in one eye and can't see out of the other when it comes to President Bush.

They give him credit for nothing and tout Obama as an already great president when he's done NOTHING for this country and his new National Intelligence is strongly in question.

Bush's strong point is/was National Security. That was his priority. It's not Obama's.
That's right Obama. Someones gotta abide by the Geneva Convention! Bush sure did'nt want to abide by too much! And diplomacy is the right way. Seems like it was considered something foreign these past eight years! The world looks upon us as bullies and we need to change that!
Absouletly LOVE THIS PRESIDENT...WE ARE BLESSED TO HAVE BEEN AWARE ENOUGH TO ELECT SUCH A SMART, CALM, REASSURING, CONFIDENT, FOREWARD-THINKING MAN TO RUN THIS CTRY.....

WELCOME PRESIDENT OBAMA.....THE WORLD IS WAITING FOR YOU!!
Bush intel was simply told Bush what he wanted to hear. Obama wants the truth even if it isn't what he really likes to hear.
You know I am not for the govenor of IL I think he's a pig to be quite frank however, I find the democratic party that I voted for to be a bunch of jackass's who hee haw over the wrong things.  We have a sitting president who has committed far worst crimes and Dick Cheney yet when you talk about prosicuting the two and their band of of gypsie's that's right I said GYP'S of the American people these things LIFE, LIBERTY AND A RIGHT TO FAIR RIGHT'S IN THIS COUNTRY the two should be behind bars but these mealy mouth dems speak low when the ones they should speak out about and LOUD AND CLEAR when it comes to beating down their own CROOKS who by the way would do them more good then bad as where in the hell would they be if a speacial election would happen and one of GOP got the seat! STupid I tell you especially Harry Reid he must need his brain exRAIDDD!! he speaks when he should shut up and when he should speak again you can hardly hear those dems speak  as I'd like to know where all the money went just spoof in the air to Irak we don't hear anything about that anymore what about talking up when the GOP fuses about giving the middle class a tax cut since they've had them for so long and if their having the tax cut is suppose to be a good argument for stimulating the economy then what explains the mess were in since they have had them thos DEMS know how to speak low oh there's so much more I know that should be talked about and about those who should have already been going on 4 or more years in prisons still taking pictures preteding and using the American people for their arguments when the time their crap hits the fan so as a Chicagoland point of view I can say I could care less if they left  Rob or Elvis wanabee right where he's at and if they want to send him to jail they should take a number and get in front because all of them that have been there feel they can do whatever and because the  The senate along with the many public officials are crooks with special privillege's there's a few that are innocent but not many.

Leave The Crook In The Office!
Republicans need not say a single word about anything Obama proposes unless and until they do two things:

Take at least SOME responsibility for where we are now.

Propose something to fix where are now that's not just more of the same thing that got us here.

Any takers, rightwing bloggers?    
This is too easy...bush has no intel
OBAMA & PANETTA ENDANGER AMERICA!
Very pragmatic. I like the tone and believe this is the best course. Leon Panetta is very intelligent. I don't like how he dealth with Jessie Brown who was the VA secretary under the Clinton Administration but he did what he was told to do. He is a good messenger, incredibly intelligent and reads people well. Obama is wise and if his presidency is consistent with his pre-presidency style this country will benefit and the world will react accordingly. We need someone to restore confidence in the United States Goverment. The world is watching. I am betting on a good future with this presidency. God help our president and God help our world.
Now we can ask a radical Islamic what his next target is, he will say "I'm not telling " we say "OK what do you want for dinner have a nice day".  I feel safer already!!
Now we can ask a radical Islamic what his next target is, he will say "I'm not telling " we say "OK what do you want for dinner have a nice day".  I feel safer already!!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1738721

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google