ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Obama gets to work

Posted: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:15 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Obama gets to work: In his first full day as president, Barack Obama participates in a prayer service this morning at Washington’s National Cathedral. He also will sign a few executive orders, including one that bans any White House staffer from lobbying the Obama White House if he/she leaves. The big meetings of the day takes place later in the afternoon, when the president sits down (1) with his economic team and then (2) with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Gen. David Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen. This second meeting fulfills a promise that Obama made during the summer, as the AP reminds us. “My first day in office, I will bring the Joint Chiefs of Staff in, and I will give them a new mission, and that is to end this war responsibly and deliberately but decisively,” he said then. Sources tell us that Obama will indeed ask for a plan to begin the process of troop redeployment in Iraq in the next 16 months. As for Gitmo news, it appears the military lawyers quoted in the various news stories circulating got a bit ahead of themselves; still, it’s the intent of the new administration to begin closing it. And new White House press secretary Robert Gibbs plans to hold his first briefing at noon ET, though this could get pushed back a day. By the way, yesterday’s immediate change at whitehouse.gov was pretty striking, and what stood out to us were all the issue pledges the Obama team included. Many are not detailed, but the pledges are there for all to see. The Web site has more of the feel of a campaign Web site than the official White House site. It also appears a bit more interactive than Bush’s or Clinton’s sites.

*** Looking back at the inaugural address: As for yesterday’s speech, the rhetoric might not have been as soaring as we’re used to, but Obama pivoted from being candidate Obama (the inspirer), to President Obama (the guy elected to get things done). “For everywhere we look, there is work to be done,” he said. “The state of the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act -- not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth.” As others have noted -- including Maureen Dowd, who compared it to Stephen Colbert’s brutal roast of Bush at the ‘06 White House Correspondents’ dinner -- Obama’s speech also was a not-so-subtle rebuke of the past eight years. The market’s “power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control, and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.” More: “[We] reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.” And: “[W]e will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.” And don't let it go unnoticed that Obama laid down a marker when it comes to dealing with the Muslim world. Obama goes down in history as the first president to say the word "Muslim" in an inaugural address. Historians will use that anecdote some day. Of course, yesterday was a memorable day for Obama and the country on a whole other level. But, even as the new president reminded us, it will last the test of time not for what happened yesterday, but what happens afterwards. “In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given,” he said. “It must be earned.”

*** Another busy day on the Hill: By unanimous consent, the Senate yesterday confirmed seven of Obama’s cabinet picks -- Chu (Energy), Duncan (Education), Napolitano (Homeland Security), Orszag (OMB), Salazar (Interior), Shineski (Veterans Affairs), and Vilsack (Agriculture). The notable absence from this group, of course, is Hillary Clinton, whose confirmation was held up by GOP Sen. John Cornyn. NBC’s Ken Strickland reports that Clinton’s final confirmation vote will occur sometime this afternoon after three hours of debate (the hope in the White House is that she'll be confirmed in time to participate in the national security meeting). In addition, we’ll see two confirmation hearings today -- Geithner’s for Treasury at the Senate Finance Committee at 10:00 am ET, and Ray LaHood’s for Transportation at the Senate Commerce Committee at 2:00 pm. Also today, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on Holder’s confirmation at 10:00 am.

*** The GOP’s demographic challenge: With Obama now in the White House, it’s as good of a time as any -- especially with the RNC chair contest coming up next week -- to break down some of the challenges the Republican Party faces heading into 2010 and 2012. We’ll begin today looking at the party’s demographic hurdle. In short, the GOP has increasingly become a party that’s appealing only to white voters, hardly good news when you consider that the United States will become a majority-minority country in three decades. In the presidential election, McCain grabbed just 4% of the black vote, 31% of the Latino vote, and 35% of the Asian-American vote -- all down from George W. Bush’s haul in 2004. Put another way, some 90% of McCain's voters were white; that’s compared with some 60% of Obama's voters. In a country that's now just 74% white (at least via its voting electorate), no national candidate can expect to win the presidency based on just white voters.

*** Latinos and younger voters: The struggle that McCain -- a senator from the border state of Arizona -- had with Latinos could be particularly troublesome for Republicans. Matthew Dowd, who served as Bush’s chief strategist in the ’04 election (and who later parted ways with Bush and the GOP), says that future Republican presidential nominees will need to get more than 40% of the Latino vote to be able to win. What’s more, McCain lost voters ages 18-29 by more than 30 points (66% to 32%). That represents an entire generation of first- or second-time voters who pulled the lever for the Democratic Party. “Losing young voters by 30-plus points is a major fire alarm,” Dowd said.

*** Filling Dean's shoes: Meanwhile, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine will be formally elected as the new DNC chairman when the Democratic National Committee meets today at 1:00 pm ET in DC.

*** Mr. Franken comes to Washington: And Al Franken ended up attending Obama’s swearing-in yesterday. “It was a great honor to join so many hopeful, excited Americans in Washington today to witness the inauguration of our new president,” he said in a statement. “The next few years will call for bold action and courage on the part of our leaders and our citizens. And I know that, with all of us working together, we will meet that call.” Sounds a lot like he’s prepping for another return to DC. By the way, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid secured Franken's swearing-in tickets, according to informed sources.
 
Countdown to RNC winter meeting: 7 days
Countdown to NJ GOP primary: 132 days
Countdown to VA Dem primary: 139 days
Countdown to Election Day 2009: 286 days
Countdown to Election Day 2010: 650 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Yesterday was more than shattering barriers.  It was more than transformation.  Yesterday was a day to fall in love, or fall in love again, with America’s soul and the joy of the human spirit.
HAIL TO THE CHIEF... http://www.enewsreference.com
Doing what?
My congrats to Tim Kaine.  He seems to be the right man for the job.

If McCain has problems with Latinos, must be well like in Arizona eh!  
Get to work guys.
In a country that's now just 74% white (at least via its voting electorate), no national candidate can expect to win the presidency based on just white voters.
------------------------------------------------------
How about this- maybe a candidate should focus on being the best person to do the job?  That's certainly what this white, middle-aged suburbanite paid attention to during this past election season.  I proudly donated and worked hard to educate people on Obama's policies, because I believe that this country needs his leadership right now.  Some may disagree- that's their right, but they shouldn't expect me to take their viewpoint seriously if they don't bring substance to the discussion.  Hateful talking points lifted from Rush and Sean only serve to spotlight their inability to think for themselves, and no intelligent person will take them seriously.

The media needs to seriously overhaul their assumptions re: voting by race.  You guys were way off this season on what was going on across this country- completely tone-deaf.  The 18-29 year-olds are moving past the old ways, and hopefully will continue to do so for future generations.
President Barak Obama.
Vice President Joe Biden.

Former Pres. George W. Bush.
Former VP Dick Cheney.

How sweet it is!
Even though I get impatient with her, Maureen Dowd can still make me laugh out loud. Calling Chief Justice Roberts administering the oath to Barack Obama "that match of the titan smarty-pants" was priceless. Nobody has to worry she is going to go all respectful towards the powerful with the departure of Bush.
Yesterday was a wonderful day as Barack Hussein Obama took the oath of office and then gave a most excellent speech.  I am so glad that he publicly declared a clean break from the lunacy of the Idiot Boy who preceeded him.  Best of all was Rahm Emanuel declaring that all of Idiot Boys federal regulations had to be put on hold.

I'm glad that Senator Franken got to go to DC for the inauguration, now we need to get him working his new day job.  That self serving jerk who's holding up his seating needs to stop his useless petty partisan politics and let the election end.

Yes We Did!
Americans are all anxiously waiting for our new president's first executive decisions!
I found it amusing that immediately after the President's speech asking us all to abandon childish ways of thinking, many pundits immediately begin to complain that President Obama (boy does that sound good!) did not deliver a speech filled with pre-digested soundbites for them to mindlessly regurgitate.

It seemed that the thoughtful speech was not quite inspiring enough for a media class used seeing our complex problems reduced to the simplest of phrases  - "Mission Accomplished", "With Us or Against Us", "Sharing the Wealth".

I found it deliciously ironic that even after President Obama layed it out so very plainly, many in the media did not immediately grasp that THEY were the very cynics to whom the President referred when he mentioned the shifting of the political grounds beneath their feet.

President Obama is not in the entertainment industry. He is in the leadership business - and by that standard - he is a master of his craft.

Let the cynics nitpick and complain. I will join our new President in the hard work of making our country better.

P.S. The Obama family is a beautiful representation of the American dream! The are truly breathtaking!
The decrepit republic party has "Minority Envy" and until they change their racist intolerant tone they will always be a white supremacist party in the minority.  I find great poetic justice in the fact that now they are the minority.

I feel much more confident that Obama is now our president.  I know he will do a much better job for all the people than his petty partisan predecessor.  He needs to get his Cabinet appointments confirmed ASAP to get to work undoing all the damage of the past 8 years.

I thought it poetic justice that the bushwhacker got a big Bronx Cheer from the crowd yesterday as his exit cheer.

Good Riddance bushwhacker!
Yesterday was a grand day.  My wife and I opened a bottle of wine, had cheeze and crackers, and toasted Obama and the country.  

I was wondering if anyone at MSNBC ever tracks to determine the validity of the analysts comments. You know, are they right, sometimes right, seldom right.
I was surprised Pat Buchanan liked Obama's speech, but when he blamed Obama for yesterday's stock market drop, without acknowledging the real reasons for the drop makes is clearly politics as usual.  Maybe Pat and Cornyn  can go to their own little island and create their own little conservative government.
In short, the GOP has increasingly become a party that’s appealing only to white voters...In the presidential election, McCain grabbed just 4% of the black vote, 31% of the Latino vote, and 35% of the Asian-American vote...Put another way, some 90% of McCain's voters were white...In a country that's now just 74% white (at least via its voting electorate), no national candidate can expect to win the presidency based on just white voters.
==========
If THE GIFT is still sulking somewhere back in Alaska wondering why she and McCain lost, she should perhaps take these statistics to heart, then look at the crowds she attracted to her rallies.

Actually, it's a pretty good object lesson that Obama learned by watching other failed Black candidates like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.  Catering to the base is all well and good, but it doesn't win elections.  Obama knew he needed a broader appeal, and tailored his message accordingly.  He got 97% of the black vote, but he would have gotten close to that number anyway.  He needed to covince apprehensive Whites and those in the center to vote for him.  The GOP can certainly take a lesson.

Prosecute Bush/Cheney for war crimes!
http://jawillie.blog.com
Americans are all anxiously waiting for our new president's first executive decisions!

Kathy, Charlotte

Avoid the rush, make you adoring approval comments now!
Some may disagree- that's their right, but they shouldn't expect me to take their viewpoint seriously if they don't bring substance to the discussion.  Hateful talking points lifted from Rush and Sean only serve to spotlight their inability to think for themselves, and no intelligent person will take them seriously.
------------------------------------------------------
That goes both ways, Suburban Mom.  Rush and Sean tend to screech their points, but they are no more offensive than Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow on the left--all four of them have an utter inability to see good on the other side.   And guess what, none of us are required to listen to any of them.  
There is so much going on in the nation right now. It is exciting to see change. Yes, even in the GOP as they grapple with who should lead the party and at least 3 major factions all vieing for the job. Meanwhile President obama got right to work. He has alreadey made decisions regarding putting a pause to the trials of the Guantanimo detainees. He signed an exectutive order and papers acknowledging the approval of some of his cabinet appointees. Today he meets with Pentagon officials regarding bringing home the troops from Iraq. Gee, the President of the United States doing the will of the people. How rare that has been for nearly a decade.

President Obama won't get everything he wants the way he wants it and maybe not as soon as he or we would like it but the Congress will give him legislation he can sign. They have already begun.

The GOP is going to likely have to change to attract more people. Some in the party won't want to change. After all change rarely comes easy. But change they will and hopefully more toward the center. If they stay on the radical right wing fringe they will be an even smaller minority than they are right now.

As for the Democrats; if Keane keeps the 50 state strategy going the party will win more Congressional seats in 2010.
I thought it poetic justice that the bushwhacker got a big Bronx Cheer from the crowd yesterday as his exit cheer.
-----------------------------------------------------
Only a clueless, classless person like Eric in Salinas would applaud that act.  What was the point of that-wasn't yesterday about coming together as Americans?  That was totally uncalled for.
The Democrats have become the party of taking from the producers and giving to the non-producers. That kind of governing will work, for a while, until the producers get tired of supporting the lazy, the complainers, and the whiners. It's also called vote buying. Don't think so? The bottom 50% of wage earners in the country pay less then 3% of the income taxes. Obama will slant that number even further, possibly making it the bottom 60% of wage earners not paying income taxes. That's called buying votes.
I don't understand why some parts of the media are already trying to bring the new president down. Where were they when the Bush administration was going down hill?

President Obama has a big weight on his shoulder to revive a nation that shatterd over the past eight years and bring it once more in the posiion of the most powerful country in the world. Instead of America being the most hated country in the world.

I'm happy he's willing to extend a hand to, what I call, the real muslims. Because terrorists are not real muslims!!! They are nothing less then people who kill for they're own gain.

So give president Obama the chance to at least try and put America back on her feet. And in this process everybody should lend a hand.
Obama gets to work? That wasn't my first thought. It's my last thought because he's never made a decision.

Thanks W!
When Obama won the election, the stock market plummeted.....when Obama got inaugurated, the stock market plummeted...sounds like the nation's current mood is helplessness and despair.
Who ya kidding (Sent Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:42 AM)
-------------
Then explain why the stock market is rebounding today, on his first full day one?  The market plummeted yesterday because of a very bad banking report that came out at the same time.  The same was true right after the election.  Geeze!  Get a grip!
2things:  Obams's transition to the presidency was made possible by the generousity and cooperation of President Bush and Mrs. Bush.  You never give Bush the credit.  Irritates me when I read Latinos only interested in their own agenda.  I am Latino but American first and foremost.  I want what is good for ALL Americans, not special groups.  Usually what they want is entitlements for illegals paid by ME!!
"...I found it amusing that immediately after the President's speech asking us all to abandon childish ways of thinking, many pundits immediately begin to complain that President Obama (boy does that sound good!) did not deliver a speech filled with pre-digested soundbites for them to mindlessly regurgitate. ..." Nashville_fan (Sent Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:46 AM)

What's even more interesting to note is that people like you complained for eight years about George Bush's lack of public speaking skills....But, when your guy gives a mediocre (at best, probably better described as "lackluster") speech, and same is noted by the media, you whine and moan about it.

Furthermore, it is / was Obama who "regurgitated" the same catch phrases and buzz words over and over during his campaign. So why wouldn't we expect it from him now?

Your problem, and that of most obaMANIACS is that you aren't used to media being journalistically / critically-honest about him.

It was absolutely hilarious to watch him speak over Justice Roberts yesterday as the oath of office was being administered. He can't keep his mouth shut for ten seconds, and that's what caused the flub up.

Lastly, I have a serious question for you...and that is; why is the Obama family anymore "breathtaking" than mine, yours, or anyone else's who's worked hard to build, raise, and maintain a family in this country?
We're not exactly talking about a rags to riches story here. He lived a good piece of his early life overseas, and when he returned home to his grandparents, they lived in Hawaii.
He didn't come from an underpriviledged situation, so your "hype" about the American Dream is no more applicable to the Obama's than it is to you or me.

We'll see what Obama does.
But, I can tell you one thing; I will not compromise my patriotism, nor my principles for the sake of expediency. The media has done NOTHING but laud and cheerlead this guy. They did not fully vett nor report on the scandals that he has been associated with, as they were so willing to do with others.
I will judge Obama on his actions, not on the things that lemmings like yourself and the media tell me about him.

Obama's speech yesterday SUCKED, and he flubbed his oath. These are the things that will be remembered about his innaugural whether you like it or not.....and there's no amount of obaMANIAC-RAH-RAH that will change those facts.
Ron Indiana:

I saw that Pat Buchanan praised Obama's speech (the parts that he thought matched his conservative philosophy). I also saw by Buchanan's expressions it was hard for him to admit the majority of this country is behind and excited about Obama and his administration. But don't worry, Buchanan will always follow-up with any praise for Obama with his "buts". He will never be able to just give praise without adding some criticism, deserved or not. Also remember, Buchanan also thinks Palin is the cat's meow. That says enough about Buchanan's political mentality. But I will give you, he is struggling with this Nation's ever growing rejection of the hard core right positions and attitudes. Judging by our youth today they are disappearing, slowly but surely.
Respectful dissent is necessary to move our country forward (emphasis on respectful).  Fellow Democrats should probably get off their high horse and stop acting so smug...the power in D.C. is always shifting from one party to the other, so we should remember that fact before we cast off the GOP as "losers".  I am hopeful that this election has ushered in an era of civility, but I am disheartened when I read the comments of people on both sides of the aisle on this blog.  Hateful words will not move our country forward, and Democrats should be upholding the ideal that Obama portrayed throughout the campaign.  If we, as a nation, have any hope of getting our country out of the mess we are in, Democrats must address the concerns of the GOP with facts and reason, not hateful rhetoric that just serves to inflame.  Disagreement between the parties is a given...I mean, that's why they are two separate parties.  The real test of our leaders is the ways in which that disagreement is resolved.  I just hate seeing the petty, mean, hateful, spiteful comments posted on this blog by fellow Democrats.  It's so antithetical to Obama's message and does nothing to further the idea that change has come to Washington and our country.
To all of yyou saying "Yes we did" please tell me what you did besides electing BO?
As for the stock market rebounding the day isn't over yet.
It was a great day.  I want to mention how much I admire the civility with which the transition was handled by BOTH administrations.  I have never been more proud of my nation, largely because the public's imagination and action were captured by a single quote:  "Yes WE can!"  Now, let's all get to work.
>>>I was surprised Pat Buchanan liked Obama's speech, but when he blamed Obama for yesterday's stock market drop, without acknowledging the real reasons for the drop makes is clearly politics as usual.  
Ron Indiana (Sent Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:48 AM)
==========
Again, I laugh at the logic of some conservatives.  On the one thing, they say that Obama hasn't done anything to warrant the office, but on the other hand they blame him for the stock market, and everything else.  It's like they're so livid with anger that they didn't get their way that they've become schizophrenic.

Other topic...I know I posted this link, but I just can't watch this enough, it was so beautiful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-pzlZPRvx8


Prosecute Bush/Cheney for war crimes!
http://jawillie.blog.com
Thank you, Jill F.  I completely agree.  I began reading blogs to understand and appreciate the viewpoints of others, but am so turned off by the hateful and childish comments, from the left and the right, that I believe I'll go back to my pre-blogging days.

I think Obama was speaking to many of you yesterday.
J. Merle, there were no Obama scandals.  The press didn't go "All Wright, All The Time!", so you think they dropped the ball.  There's even less to Reczko.  Ayers?  Geez, imagine a candidate associating with a professor of education! Can't have THAT, can we?

As far as the family, are you saying that they AREN'T well-educated and photogenic?  Get a grip!  Whaddaya gonna do, hold your breath for the next 4 years?  We can't get that lucky!
Lastly, I have a serious question for you...and that is; why is the Obama family anymore "breathtaking" than mine, yours, or anyone else's who's worked hard to build, raise, and maintain a family in this country?
We're not exactly talking about a rags to riches story here. He lived a good piece of his early life overseas, and when he returned home to his grandparents, they lived in Hawaii.
He didn't come from an underpriviledged situation, so your "hype" about the American Dream is no more applicable to the Obama's than it is to you or me.

J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY

Excellent question. The Left in the country need their heros. That was clearly demonstrated with Clinton, and is ten times more apparent with Obama. The Left looks at politicians as rock stars, heros, and by reading some posts on the liberals boards, gods. For some reason the Left needs their symbols to further whatever "cause" they are interested in for that day.

The Right though looks at politicians as tools, people that do something, but don't regard themselves as the center of the universe. The Right really looks at pols as useful idiots, as not the smartest knives in the drawer, but able to to do the mundane tasks of taking care of the governments business. This is why there is such a disconnect between the Right and Left in the country. The two groups look very differently and with much different expectations of their politicians.

You would never see the turnout we did yesterday for a Republican. It's not in their nature. For Democrats though, it is required. The Left tells the country their presence must be acknowledged and worshipped. It is their nature.
"What's even more interesting to note is that people like you complained for eight years about George Bush's lack of public speaking skills....But, when your guy gives a mediocre (at best, probably better described as "lackluster") speech, and same is noted by the media, you whine and moan about it. "
-J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dear J. Merle,

Thank you for taking the time to read my comment and respond. I have decided to extend the same courtesy to you.

First, I am not "whining" about the media's assessment of President Obama's speech.  The point of my post was not to rate Senator Obama's speech. Whether or not you, or me, or the media enjoyed the speech is subjective, and ultimately irrelevent.

The larger point that I wanted to make was that Senator Obama's job is not to entertain us, not to make us feel good - it is to lead us out of the many dire situations we currently find ourselves in.

Second, I am not a cheerleader. I am a supporter. I worked for President Obama's election, and I will be right there with him for the next four years. If you have a problem with that, I make no apologies.

Lastly, the First Family is breathtaking because they are poised, real and loving. I enjoy watching them interact with one another. This does not make them better than my family or your family, and I am confused at why my positive statement made you so uncomfortable.

J. Merle, you are entitled to your opinions, your bitterness, your skepticism. I am sure that it is all well earned. However, try to view me as an individual (as opposed to some faceless obaMANIAC), and I will extend the same courtesy to you.

P.S. My problems with George Bush have nothing to do with his speaking abilities, or lack there of. It is a problem with lies, deceipt, and bad policy. No where in the Constitution are you required to be a great speaker to be President. As I said before, it is about leadership, not entertainment.
No, Obama goes to church. Which is lovely and
important. But really, with all that's wrong, he needs to get to his desk! So does the VP and Congress and his cabinet secretaries, so far. Enough with the (terrific) ceremonies for a bit.
It's a new day in the US and the wake up call was 'Stop yelling, 'Mommy, Mommy, I want.'  Most of us were ready for it.  The next few weeks will tell us if the GOP is going to be 'the loyal opposition,' or the petty obstructionists.  If they think the millions out of work are going to vote for the people who keep anything from being done, because little got done, they're going to prove they think 'common' people are just sheep to be herded to the shearing shed, by the elite.  We constantly hear, "middle class."  That obviously implies there's an upper and lower.  Of course, the 'politically correct' term, "middle income" doesn't really apply any longer, does it?
Arrived in DC and it was very cold, windy, crowded. Roads and metro stations inaccessible at every turn. At one point we had to walk about 40 blocks to get to the metro. Couldn't get on a train for about 30 minutes; just too many people. Our flight coming home last night was delayed.

None of that mattered to us. It was the most memorable day. My young granddaughters listened to every word President Obama had to say, even though we were pretty far back in the crowd on the mall. They asked a million questions. They took a million pictures. People everywhere were unbelievably kind. After the inauguration we walked over to the American History Museum and spent hours in there. It's a grand museum with the most astounding exhibit on Abraham Lincoln especially. But in exhibit after exhibit, our whole history is on display beautifully.

Yesterday seemed like a day to reflect one last time. We're in a new century and being led by a president from a whole new generation.

From February 2007 in Springfield, ILL to yesterday. Here's to America. The United States of America.

The efficiency and covering all bases of the Obama organization and the President rivals Marshall and the Berlin Airlift. But isn't that what you want at the top?
We've had too many not-quites and not-even-close's at the tops lately.
Jill F., Tulsa, OK (Sent Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:55 AM)

==========
I agree with you wholeheartedly.  However, let's at least acknowledge that it was former president Bush and the neo-cons who started the whole "with us or against us" argument, and maintained this philosophy of using "patriotism" as a whipping stick to keep the constituency in line.  My biggest hope is that we can get past this idea that any dissention is tantamount to treason.

Prosecute Bush/Cheney for war crimes!
http://jawillie.blog.com
Yesterday was a day to remember for a lifetime. I finally feel like I have a competent President once again; one that will treat us all as adults and ask for our assistance in getting America back on track. I firmly believe, in my heart, that he is the right man for the right time and that yesterday we turned yet another page in the history of our great country.
J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY: You are one of the very few that didn't (or couldn't) see anthing positive about yesterday. It was Chief Justice Roberts that "flubbed" the oath, not Obama. Obama gave him time to correct himself, but then adjusted. Regardless of placing blame, however, President Obama will be YOUR President for the next 4 years, so you might as well get over it and accept it or live with your anger for the next 4 years. I feel sorry for you because 80% of the American public want Obama to succeed. Perhaps you got nothing out of his speech because it was too in depth for your thinking or perhaps you've closed down your mind to anything Obama has to say; whatever the reason, it's your loss.
J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY:

Get a grip J. I'll agree that Obama's speech was not the best (or as expected) yesterday, and that he may have had part in a slight flubbing of the oath, and most likely he'll make more now and then. But to compare Obama' making verbal gaffes to the constant barrage of gaffes made by Bush during his entire Presidency is ludicrous and you know it. And all this proves is that no, Obama is not perfect by any means and will make gaffes and that Bush made plenty if gaffes due to a learning disability. Big deal.

The only true difference is that any bad or mediocre speech by Obama would still be far better than the best speeches given by Bush.
Jill F, that may be the wisest thing ever posted on here.  Eric in Salinas, Clara in KC, MSierra and jawillie, please take note.  No matter what view you have, please remember that both Democrats and Republicans have good ideas and it's going to take the best ideas from both parties to move this country forward.    The GOP performed badly and got what they deserved in the last few elections but Democrats, as they did in 1994, have not performed very well when they have total control.  So acting superior will surely bring Democrats to their waterloo in the midterms in 2010.  
No one has been a bigger critic of Bush & Co. than me; I think he trashed large parts of the constitution and probably comitted or condoned feloneous actions. BUT, I think Pres Obama is correct. It's time to move forward and focus on the future; quit playing the "I win, you lose" kind of politics and try to reach some compromises. We've got real problems to be solved. I'm gay and want my full rights but we can argue that another day. First things first.
In keeping with the lavish way that Obama has presented himself and maintaining his image of President Lincoln, Obama should first and foremost criticize (but allow) an overly extravagent budget for remodling the White House.
Ayers?  Geez, imagine a candidate associating with a professor of education! Can't have THAT, can we?
---------------------------------------------------
Spare me.  He's in the past, but please don't describe that loser as a 'professor' without describing him as what he also is:  an unrepentant former terrorist who bears no regrets for his actions.  Obama's not responsible for this man but please don't give him any credit-he'd be sitting in jail right now if not for faulty police procedure.  
CA - you're ranting. Listen to what you said.

"Obama messed up his first speech and flubbed the oath." (paraphrased)

Then you go on to compare Obama's FIRST DAY screw-ups to 8 years of Bushism's. Are you mad, man?

My point is that everything Obama did so far was not good. Try to find a silver lining. We all assume it will get better but only if and when the Clinton team kicks him in the a-- and says "hey, you want the Republicans back in here? Settle down and get to work."

Respectfully, Palomino


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1754542

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google