ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Reactions to Obama's Iraq plan

Posted: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:44 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro (Statements compiled by NBC’s Mike Viqueira, Kelly O’Donnell and Ken Strickland)

Reactions to President Obama’s Iraq withdrawal plan have been mostly universally praised by Republicans, but approached cautiously by some Democrats.

Video: President Barack Obama visits the Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune, N.C., to announce his plan to end the U.S. combat mission in Iraq.

House Minority Leader John Boehner calls the plan “responsible” though, like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell gives the credits Gen. David Petraeus.

"The plan put forward by President Obama continues our strategy of bringing troops home from Iraq as they succeed in stabilizing the country," Boehner said. "I believe he has outlined a responsible approach...." 

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor complimented Obama, and took a swipe at other Democrats.

“President Obama deserves credit for not listening to the chorus of voices calling for a rapid drawdown of forces regardless of the consequences for Iraq, our military and the American people," Cantor said.

Last night on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow show, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would like to see troops at lower levels by 2009. She amended her wording in the statement below, but choosing them carefully, she said, “[T]he remaining missions given to our remaining forces must be clearly defined and narrowly focused so that the number of troops needed to perform them is as small as possible.” 

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called it a “sound and measured plan,” but added that the U.S. “must keep in Iraq only those forces necessary for the security of our remaining troops and the Iraqi people.”

Liberals like Dennis Kucinich, among those Cantor would be referring to, said, “I support President Obama for taking a step in the right direction in Iraq, but I do not think that his plan goes far enough,” Kucinich said. “America must determine at some point to end the occupation, close the bases and bring the troops home. We must bring a conclusion to this sorry chapter in American history where war was waged under false pretense against an innocent people.”

Full statements:
BOEHNER: "The President's announcement today is a testament to the success of our troops in stabilizing and significantly reducing violence in Iraq, and to the strategy put in place by General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker two years ago. This strategy has helped us preserve U.S. national security interests and allow the Iraqi people to more firmly take control of their own destiny as a sovereign, representative, and independent nation in the heart of the Middle East. The plan put forward by President Obama continues our strategy of bringing troops home from Iraq as they succeed in stabilizing the country. I believe he has outlined a responsible approach that retains maximum flexibility to reconsider troop levels and to respond to changes in the security environment should circumstances on the ground warrant. On a recent trip to Iraq with some of my colleagues, we were reminded by both our military commanders and diplomatic officials that while the progress on both security and political reconciliation in Iraq is real, those gains are also fragile and reversible. I am pleased that the President is listening to our military commanders and that we have a plan in place for victory while also ensuring the safety and success of our military forces."

MCCONNELL: "It is encouraging to see the Obama Administration embrace the plan of Gen. David Petraeus that began with the successful surge in 2007, and continues shifting combat responsibilities to our Iraqi allies. I commend our men and women in uniform, our military leaders, and the President's decision yesterday for making it possible to take another step toward realizing our goal of a stable Iraq."

CANTOR: "Having just seen the progress that our troops have achieved in Iraq firsthand several weeks ago, I hope that President Obama's plan reassures the American people that the men and women of our Armed Forces will continue to successfully carry out their mission under the steadfast leadership of General Petraeus and General Odierno. The honor, courage and dedication of our Armed services has been the key to attaining our successes in Iraq, and today's announcement makes clear that the Iraqi people can take a huge step forward in assuming greater control of their nation and future. The President's decision appears to be informed by the advice of our commanders and the fluid nature of the events on the ground, which was reinforced during my trip to Baghdad earlier this month. President Obama deserves credit for not listening to the chorus of voices calling for a rapid drawdown of forces regardless of the consequences for Iraq, our military and the American people."

PELOSI: "President Obama's announcement of a withdrawal schedule for US combat troops in Iraq is good news because it signals that the war is coming to an end. I join the President in commending our troops for the patriotism, courage, and sacrifice, which has characterized their service in Iraq. As President Obama's Iraq policy is implemented, the remaining missions given to our remaining forces must be clearly defined and narrowly focused so that the number of troops needed to perform them is as small as possible. The President's decision means that the time has come at last for Iraq's own security forces to have the prime responsibility for Iraq's security."

REID: "President Obama and his bipartisan national security team are putting in place a sound and measured plan to draw down our forces in Iraq and transfer responsibility for Iraq's future to the Iraqi people. I strongly believe that we must responsibly end the war in Iraq to make America more secure, and must keep in Iraq only those forces necessary for the security of our remaining troops and the Iraqi people. I look forward to further discussing this plan with the President and working with him to ensure we are doing what is best for America's security interests and ensuring our military remains the strongest fighting force in history."

KUCINICH: "I support President Obama for taking a step in the right direction in Iraq, but I do not think that his plan goes far enough. You cannot leave combat troops in a foreign country to conduct combat operations and call it the end of the war. You can't be in and out at the same time. America must determine at some point to end the occupation, close the bases and bring the troops home. We must bring a conclusion to this sorry chapter in American history where war was waged under false pretense against an innocent people. Taking troops out of Iraq should not mean more troops available for deployment in other operations. In February of 2007 I presented H.R. 1234, legislation that would end the war in Iraq, and the process I outlined is still necessary. We should immediately bring home American service members and contractors, convene a regional conference to prepare an international peace-keeping force and accelerate Iraq-driven reconstruction.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hey Chuck,

Here's a tip for you... instead of your little cub reporter 'Courtney' fact checking Obama's speech - why don't you have her fact check poor widdle Bobby Bo Jindles??? Seems he made up the Katrina story in his prime time speech Tues nite.... Say it isn't so... bwhaaaa haaa haaa!  You just can't make this sh*t up!

Ps:  I finally figured out who Piyush looks like... he bears an uncanny resemblence to the Rat Mascot from Chucky Cheese :0)
David Gregory

It doesn’t matter how hard you try to push, President Obama never said “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED” You keep trying to put him in the same category as your President Bush but “NO ONE” is falling for it not even General McCaffrey; when David Gregory asked the question what was President Obama declaring, General McCaffrey said  there is a danger of over interpreting President Obama’s Speech, General McCaffrey went on to say that he thought President Obama speech was straight forward and from a military audience this was a homerun, The General also said it literally brought tears to his eyes.

Arie Fleischer already admitted last Saturday on the D L Hugely show that David Gregory was a supporter of the George W. Bush White House and so his performance today is totally signaling that. I think even Chuck Todd was bewildered by David Gregory’s questioning of President Obama’s speech.

David Gregory is no Tim Russert and that is why Meet the Press is no longer worth watching. I think David Shuster would have been worth taking over this spot at least he doesn’t work off of Republican talking points.
ANNA MOLLY,

WHERE THE HELL HAS C A GONE?
did O_DUMB_AH clear this with the kos-kiddies
LMAO
Throughout the campaign, Obama said:

'We'll be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were reckless getting into it'

He's leaving slower than I'd like
But, if he leaves a stable nation, that's fine



Btu, then start whatcking the Military budget
It's BLOATED !!
More money for teachers, less for Death
We have a date for complete withdrawal based on the conditions on the ground just like candidate Obama said and now President Obama is implementing.  With McCain and Bush there was no end in sight.  This is a good plan.  Shut up already.
I guess this is the bipartisanship the Democrats and Obama were looking for. Rather then be like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi, and shoot down every plan the Republicans have, the Republicans are willing to give Obama a chance and back him up on his foreign policy. McCain supported Obama's policies, and now other Republicans are coming out with the same support.

Lets hope the Democrats provide some real bipartianship back to the Republicans at some point and walk the walk rather then talk the talk. Lets not hold our breath on that one though.
Naturally, McCain and other Republicans, would agree to leave that number of troops. It so lucrative for the industrial complex(taxes pay for those jobs, btw); who are mostly Republican constituents.

It's time to concentrate on the Pakistan/Afghan border
The Repugs have to play poltics with EVERYTHING. Cant they just say its great to end the war????

Of course not. They are so out of touch it kills me

And Palamino!!! You are a god dam idiot along with Obamanation the market watcher. Ask Maddoff, Stanford and all the PONZI bastids why the market is doing poorly
I am glad that Dennis mentioned the military bases.  That is a very big issue that most Democrats have been avoiding. This is critical to understanding how we got to where we are. One of the REAL reasons we invaded Iraq was to establish bases in the Middle East.  When the first Bush president (GHWB) got us (wrongly I believe) involved in the first gulf war we needed bases for operation which Saudi Arabia reluctantly supplied. It was these bases of "infidels" in the midst of the muslim holy land that (wrongly) incensed Bin Laden and caused him to take up the cause against the United States and with Al Qaeda was "determined to strike" the US. Hence we had the 9-11 tragedy.  After losing those bases the neocons were determined to establish bases elsewhere in the Middle East to fulfill their crazy dreams and used 9-11 as an excuse to invade Iraq and set up bases. This really rallied people to join and support Al Qaeda. Thus after the first Bush gave birth to Al Qaeda the second Bush greatly strengthened it.  The danger of leaving the bases is that they will facilitate the neocons dreams of remaking the Middle East by attacking and/or invading other countries such as Iran and will be the incentive to keep the anti-american insurgencies and terrorists well stocked with recruits and provide them with a nearby target and Americans to attack.
“President Obama deserves credit for not listening to the chorus of voices calling for a rapid drawdown of forces regardless of the consequences for Iraq, our military and the American people," Cantor said.
------------------------------------------------------
As usual, Cantor hasn't been paying attention...

All along the campaign trail, Candidate Obama stated that he would LISTEN to his commanding officers in preparing for drawdown.  He was never a proponent of rapid and reckless disengagement.  Yes, many on the left think that our troops should have been pulled on January 21; but our President understands that this massive undertaking requires a very well-planned and coordinated effort.

And for McCain, McConnell and Co., who just cannot seem to let go of THE SURGE cheerleading- you must be very pleased that General Shinseki is in the Cabinet.  Had Rumsfeld actually listened to the General in the early stages of this conflict, we would have had sufficient numbers in Iraq from the beginning.  A "surge" may not have been necessary at all if someone other than Mr. "Lean-and-Mean" had been in charge.

Luckily, our President recognizes what an extraordinary individual General Shinseki is.  The VA is fortunate to have him- and Tammy Duckworth.  
I am always amazed by the short and selective memories of both some in Congress and the media. President Obama said over and over during the campaign that he would in sure that we take a measured course in drawing down our troops. He consulted with the commanders on the ground and extended his 16 mo. time to 19mo. I also recall that Clinton argued for a larger (50K) residual force than many wanted.

We certainly need to end the War/occupation. We also need to help the Iraqis maintain order and keep the forces of chaos from getting control.

The party of NO seems to be taking a breather from its nay saying to support the President in this. Perhaps the lesson here is that bipartisanship will come slowly with slips and bumps. The GOPers indeed know how to read the polling data and seem to be looking for an opportunity to seem agreeable, lol
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor complimented Obama, and took a swipe at other Democrats.

“President Obama deserves credit for not listening to the chorus of voices calling for a rapid drawdown of forces regardless of the consequences for Iraq, our military and the American people," Cantor said.

I checked...despite his chatter about being a tough talking American Eric Cantor did not serve when his nation needed him...he likes to criticize others but the fact is he doens't have the right stuff to be a tough guy...my 2 1/2 years old grandson has bigger stones than this chickenhawk...
BOBBY LIED !!
So it ain't so.....

'...a Jindal spokeswoman has admitted to Politico that in reality, Jindal overheard Lee talking about the episode to someone else by phone "days later."...'

It just depends on what the definition of is' is

But government is STILL bad !!
Right, Bobby ???


From TalkingPointsMemo:

'...Jindal Admits Katrina Story Was False

By Zachary Roth - February 27, 2009, 12:39PM

Looks like the game is up.

Remember that story Bobby Jindal told in his big speech Tuesday night -- about how during Katrina, he stood shoulder-to-shoulder with a local sheriff who was battling government red tape to try to rescue stranded victims?

Turns out it wasn't actually, you know, true.

In the last few days, first Daily Kos, and then TPMmuckraker, raised serious questions about the story, based in part on the fact that no news reports we could find place Jindal in the affected area at the specific time at issue.

Jindal had described being in the office of Sheriff Harry Lee "during Katrina," and hearing him yelling into the phone at a government bureaucrat who was refusing to let him send volunteer boats out to rescue stranded storm victims, because they didn't have the necessary permits. Jindal said he told Lee, "that's ridiculous," prompting Lee to tell the bureaucrat that the rescue effort would go ahead and he or she could arrest both Lee and Jindal.

But now, a Jindal spokeswoman has admitted to Politico that in reality, Jindal overheard Lee talking about the episode to someone else by phone "days later." The spokeswoman said she thought Lee, who died in 2007, was being interviewed about the incident at the time.

This is no minor difference. Jindal's presence in Lee's office during the crisis itself was a key element of the story's intended appeal, putting him at the center of the action during the maelstrom. Just as important, Jindal implied that his support for the sheriff helped ensure the rescue went ahead. But it turns out Jindal wasn't there at the key moment, and played no role in making the rescue happen.

There's a larger point here, though. The central anecdote of the GOP's prime-time response to President Obama's speech, intended to illustrate the threat of excessive government regulation, turns out to have been made up.

Maybe it's time to rethink the premise....'

NO !!
NO !!
Bobby's a GOOD BOY !!

HE wouldn't LIE !!
This sort of revisionist history always cracks me up.  Before republicans try to take too much credit for where we are today in Iraq, they need to remember a few important details.  

First, and most importantly, it's taken us six years to get here.  Not the six days, six weeks, or six months that we were initially promised.  And 4,250
American lives (and untold number of Iraqi lives) later, it's beginning to be clear that we're still nowhere near the end.

Next, any reasonably intelligent person who was paying attention could see right from the start that there weren't enough troops.  But apparently not George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, or Donald Rumsfeld.  Or, alternatively, they saw it, but, for their own cynical purposes, they chose to ignore it.  

Next, knowing how to fix the obvious problem of understaffing wasn't exactly rocket science that required the unique expertise of David Petraeus.  Several other generals and admirals who had initially voiced concerns about under-staffing the Iraq war were summarily shoved aside or forced into early retirement as a result of having spoken out.  One might assume that any one of them, given the same authority Petraeus has been given, might have accomplished as much, or even more.

Next, it still wouldn't have been fixed had not the politics turned against Bush.  It wasn't until he faced the very real prospect that the republicans might lose Congress in the 2006 mid-term elections that he actually began listening to someone else besides Donald Rumsfeld and that little voice inside his head.  And it wasn't until they actually lost Congress that Bush worked up the courage to get rid of Rumsfeld, leaving the door open for Petraeus to do what should have been done long before.    

And finally, it wasn't until President Obama proposed his own withdrawal timetable and Iraqi President al-Maliki said "good idea" that Bush caved in to the idea.  
responsible plan by the president. it is to the presidents credit. it is his decision to make after suggestions and ideas from many advisers.
Obie is a cut & run guy.

Spend all the money America has on cheap, dime store policiies and allow Iraq to reverse itself.

Typical, spineless and pathetic ... as expected.
This "debate" about Iraq has been over for months.

Everyone agrees we have to leave, and only President Obama has the authority to make the final decision.

So probably all these comments form both parties is just political posturing.

As usual.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(reply from a previous post)

To Pete, Salinas, CA:

I read your post . . . thanks for taking the time to reply.

You say that rises in the cost of living effect everyone equally. I assure you that people trying to live on the minimum wage would disagree. When you can't earn an honest living doing an honest job, your remaining options aren't good for you or our nation.

Under normal circumstances, I would agree that a private sector solution would be preferable.

However, under the ACTUAL circumstances, the private sector has proven itself to be short sighted, deceptive, and in all too many cases, morally bankrupt.

I would agree that all of these characteristics also apply to the government.

The difference is that we have elections where we can hold the government accountable. Not a perfect solution for sure, but this country is paying a very high price right now for the unregulated private sector.

Until we reign it back in, I'm willing to take my chances with the government.

But as you said, time will tell what the American people ultimately decide.
I watched the news conference live at Jacksonville (Camp Lejune). The Marines did not seem to excited about the message.

Having been to other Presidential addresses to the troops, the reception is normally very loud applause and cheering.

Obama, as Commander in Chief, telling the troops we are quitting had to be a very negative blow to the ego and esprit de corps.

It was a let down realizing we are walking away. I served our country and know the pride that comes in wearing the uniform and fighting for ours and others freedom.
Hey Chuck,

Here's a tip for you... instead of your little cub reporter 'Courtney' fact checking Obama's speech - why don't you have her fact check poor widdle Bobby Bo Jindles??? Seems he made up the Katrina story in his prime time speech Tues nite.... Say it isn't so... bwhaaaa haaa haaa!  You just can't make this sh*t up!

Ps:  I finally figured out who Piyush looks like... he bears an uncanny resemblence to the Rat Mascot from Chucky Cheese :0)
While I am dissapointed tht our troups are going to have to stay longer in the theater of war, I aggree that we must do it in a responsable manner. I also believe that there must be accountability for the crimes commited by those in power who brought us into this war on false pretences. In the name of freedom and democracy we have killed or caused the deaths of so many civilians and troops that were unnesacary in the first place. We must end this occupation and take responsability for the wrongs we have done and undo some of the corrupt rules we initiated in their country in the process of setting up their government. We must close our bases and leave their country.
Kucinich is as far to the left as Cantor is to the right. They're both nuts.
If only they would apply the same logic to the economy:

“[T]he remaining missions given to our remaining dollars must be clearly defined and narrowly focused so that the number of dollars needed to perform them is as small as possible.”  N. Pelosi
David Gregory is no Tim Russert and that is why Meet the Press is no longer worth watching. I think David Shuster would have been worth taking over this spot at least he doesn’t work off of Republican talking points.

Grier (Sent Friday, February 27, 2009 2:58 PM)

Shuster????Are you ignorant? Shuster is one of the biggest partisans on MSNBC besides Maddow, Olberman, Matthews. 3 or commentators, 1 is a journalist but a biased one.
ME (above)

"Where has CA gone?"

One would assume one of the following.

1) CA is really Anna Molly
2) CA is on extended vacation
3) CA got tired of the dribble on FR and took a
  break.
4) CA is still here operating under another handle
5) CA is in the hospital or 6 feet under
6) Still looking for that lost golf ball





Anna Molly:

What Bush used to say and what is happening now is virtually indistinguishable and has been headed this direction since the surge began.  The only difference is Obama has said "Labor Day, 2010" and even then it is not without the same caveats.  

Bush never indicated anything other than a responsible withdrawal when the time is right.  I would challenge you to find anything meaningful to the contrary.

And weren't Al-Maliki's comments in complete keeping with prior Bush statements that the U.S. would begin plans for withdrawal when the Iraqi government indicated the time was right?

I guess if it gives you a small pleasure to say that Bush caved I'm certainly not going to stand in the way of your small pleasures.

It's all about the "O" after all.
Are they coming home from Iraq or just being rerouted to Afghanistan?Amember of my family just came out of Iraq but could still be sent back like so many others.I feel they are not coming home earlier because there are no jobs--even those that were promised to be waiting are gone.Many have lost their homes and families----everyday you read about somebody stationed in Iraq and Afgahanistan have lost their houses to foreclosure.
"ME" ~ Sad to say, C A doesn't report to me.  Maybe he's taking a well-deserved vacation.  I only hope he's okay and didn't get too discouraged by all the times someone accused him of being me and me of being him and us of being in league together.  As you can see, we're not.  If only.  C A was always a good friend to me.  Good friends are hard to find, especially out here.  I, for one, miss him, and apparently you do, too.  
Hello very one

My concern is that we went to Iraq to find the WMD but the didn’t find them??!!! and after all you saw what happened for all Iraqis the were killed by whoever want to  kill’s Iraqis ,now P Obama said well we going draw out of Iraq in 19 month's even while security still bad over there???!!!!!!!!

And just like to put like this the U.S have a lot of responsibility toward Iraq and the Iraqi people you can’t just walk way like nothing happened over  800.000 Iraqi’s died in the war I mean WTF’’

Thanks
Smash'em all (Sent Friday, February 27, 2009 3:33 PM)

You must love 5 deferment Biden then.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1814064

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google