ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Posted: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:19 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Becoming John McCain: When it comes to the topic du jour -- legislative earmarks -- it’s fascinating how the political world turned President Obama into … John McCain. That’s right, for those of us who followed the two-year-long presidential campaign, it was McCain who crusaded against earmarks, not Obama (who instead said he would work to reform the process and make it more transparent). In fact, had earmarks been the public’s top concern in November, the Arizona senator probably would have won the election. But, as we all know, it wasn’t. “As president of the United States, I want to assure you, I've got a pen … and I'm going to veto every single spending bill that comes across my desk. I will make them famous. You will know their names,” McCain said at the first debate. Obama countered, “[L]et's be clear: Earmarks account for $18 billion in last year's budget. Senator McCain is proposing … $300 billion in tax cuts to some of the wealthiest corporations and individuals in the country, $300 billion.”

*** Obama’s reform: Yet at 11:20 am ET today, President Obama will make an announcement on earmark reform, which comes after the Senate last night passed its $410 billion omnibus spending bill that contains $7.7 billion (or less than 2%) in earmarks. Of course, Obama deserves some of the blame (or credit) for all the focus on earmarks. He celebrated the fact that his stimulus didn’t contain earmarks. Also, given the humongous price tag of the stimulus, the bailouts, and the home-foreclosure plan, it was inevitable that every bit in extra spending -- i.e., $7.7 billion in earmarks -- would receive extra scrutiny. And during the campaign, in response to McCain’s rhetoric, Obama promised to reform the earmark process. “When I'm president,” he said, “I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely.” What has gone largely ignored, however, is the philosophical debate over earmarks. Indeed, one person’s wasteful spending and pork is another person’s important project and constituent service. After all, unless your name is John McCain, chances are that your constituents back home expect you to bring home the bacon. As the Washington Post points out, only five senators didn’t add pet projects to the omnibus: McCain, DeMint (R), Coburn (R), Feingold (D), and McCaskill (D).

*** CYA time: But let’s also make no mistake: Today’s announcement on earmark reform is intended to give Obama cover for signing the omnibus legislation, which he’s expected to do today. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said yesterday, per the Washington Times: "Although it's not perfect, the president will sign the legislation, but demonstrate for all involved rules moving forward that he thinks can make this process work a little bit better.” But does Obama sign the bill publicly? It is important to note that the president set himself up a bit for today's criticism, since he decided to jump on the anti-earmark bandwagon and his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was one of the more aggressive anti-earmark members when he was in Congress. Emanuel, in fact, was among the first to go public with his requests and push the disclosure angle. In many ways, Obama wants to take a victory lap today, noting that his push for disclosure is among the reasons we know who ordered up what earmark. Still, congressional Dems did him no favors with allowing this leftover bill to be on THIS president's desk rather than Bush. The Dems got a bit greedy.

*** Desperately seeking another spokesman: As voices from the left -- especially Nancy Pelosi’s -- keep alive the chatter about a second stimulus, the White House is looking for another spokesman to talk about the economy. White House aides admit it's difficult to find a strong voice, other than the president's, that can inspire the same level of confidence in dealing with the economic crisis. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke doesn't have the same perceived Yoda-like hold over Wall Street that his predecessor, Alan Greenspan, had in the '90s, although Bernanke’s comments yesterday did provide some comfort to investors. Treasury Secretary Geithner was hailed as a potential savior when Obama appointed him, but stumbled early. But last night, Geithner was on “Charlie Rose.” And now the White House is pushing out chief economic adviser Larry Summers and Christina Romer -- who appeared on TODAY this morning -- to play more public roles. They need one or more of these four key folks to catch fire among the muckety-mucks on Wall Street.

Video: Christina Romer talks about how Obama is handling the troubled economy.

*** Strings Attached: Isn't it good news for the government bailout plan that some banks want to give the money back because they don't like the strings? The New York Times: "Some bankers say the conditions have become so onerous that they want to return the bailout money. The list includes small banks like the TCF Financial Corporation of Wayzata, Minn., and Iberia Bank of Lafayette, La., as well as giants like Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. They say they plan to return the money as quickly as possible or as soon as regulators set up a process to accept the refunds.” Also, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that some investors now don't like the papers they have to sign to participate in the TALF investment plan to buy up toxic assets. Isn’t this what Congress wants to hear? 

*** The never-ending recount: As we’ve said before, the Minnesota Senate race -- which has now extended 127 days since Election Day -- will someday, somehow come to end. And today, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reports, we’re reaching another milestone as Al Franken’s (D) team calls its final witnesses in the trial over the recount. This means that the trial will soon be over (but that also means that we might be headed next to the state Supreme Court and then the U.S. Supreme Court). Appearing on Capitol Hill yesterday, Franken said, "I believe that we're going to win the election contest, and after that Sen. Coleman (R) can choose to do what he wants." Then Franken predicted that Coleman would appeal the contest to the state Supreme Court, if the Republican loses the election trial.  and

*** Michelle Obama watch: The first lady, celebrating International Women’s Day, heads today to the State Department, where she will join Secretary Clinton in presenting the Secretary of State’s Award for International Women of Courage. Tomorrow, she travels to Fort Bragg, NC to visit with military families.

Video: Rachel Maddows reports on Michelle Obama's visit to Fort Bragg.

*** Remember him? And remember John Edwards? He spoke in public last night, and the lead to the story was about the topic he did NOT address. “Former U.S. Sen. John Edwards took another tentative step into the public spotlight tonight, speaking at Brown University about extreme poverty around the world and urging Americans to get involved in what he called a ‘fundamental moral issue.’ Edwards, a two-time candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, has struggled to get his message heard since a scandal about an affair he had with a former campaign staffer enveloped his personal life.”

Countdown to NY-20 special: 20 days
Countdown to Obama’s 100th day: 49 days 
Countdown to NJ GOP primary: 83 days
Countdown to VA Dem primary: 90 days
Countdown to Election Day 2009: 237 days
Countdown to Election Day 2010: 601 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

When Republicans say the President is raising taxes and the President says if you make less than $250K your taxes won’t go up, what do you hear?

When the Republicans say we are spending like a drunken sailor, when do you hear their plan for fixing things?

When air bag talk show hosts state the economy died, when did you hear their plans to fix things?

Unless these obstructionist Repukes and Wing Nuts come up with a well thought out plan of their own, just shut the f*^k up!!!  If all you are going to do is moan and groan, then we have already achieved change because America said it doesn’t want your attitude anymore.

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have
to say something."  Plato

Next.
Don't even put McCain in this. Obama has the pen to sign it into law or nix it.

Obie signed it. The spit is on him.
They’re baaaaaaaack –

Definition of armchair quarterback: A person who offers advice or an opinion on something in which they have no expertise or involvement.

Yes, we all know that the presidential campaign is over and Barack Obama won. But I think many in the media forget that this man put his political future on the line when he stood up against the Iraq War when he was running for a Senate seat. He did not buy into the echo chamber that was festering throughout the media that if we didn’t stop Saddam Hussein, we would be met with a mushroom cloud. What we learned about this man was that he was able to think independently. Because as it turns out, Barack Obama was correct in his assessment of Iraq. One of only a very few who was correct.

So now we have back again - the arm chair quarterbacks in the media, in their cushy studios in New York and DC, gossiping with their rich inside the beltway friends who are unhappy with the President. And so the pundits go on the air and once again repeat the same nonsense over and over -  that the President isn’t reacting quickly enough to the economic crisis. Just what do they think he’s been doing for the last 7-8 weeks?

I hope President Obama tunes these people out. They’re unprofessional, ignorant and with no patience or appreciation of what this country is going through. We didn’t elect a man who was going to be on the same level with these pundits. We elected a man who is more intelligent, more sober, and who learned –and taught us all -  that just because the majority of the pundits all believed one thing, it doesn’t mean they’re correct.

They rarely are.
Obama on the campaign trail promised that he'd go through each spending bill, line by line, cleaning out the pork and cleaning up the earmarks. As President he told congress he would hold them accountable for their wayward spending.

So how'd that line by line clean up this bill go Barack? How many earmarks did you get pulled out? None you say?

All that blather sure sounded good when Obama was campaigning. He certainly does a good job at talking the talk, but apparently doesn't walk the walk.

I guess we'll have to read all the Obama kool-aide drinkers excuses for this nonsense. At least watching someone trying to defending the indefensible is amusing to watch.
I for one am so proud of our First Lady.  Such dignity and grace.  Laura Bush seemed nice, but was to frew frewey for me.  
John Edwards is a puke.  My prayers go out to Elizabeth.  Always liked her, still do.  
I'm getting tired of hearing the earmark chumps whining about earmarks in a bill from the bushwhacker's reign of terror.  They account for 1% of the budget and do help spur the economy in the locales where they are spent.  Time to end the tax cut welfare of the rich and greedy and make them pay their fair share of taxes to balance the budget.

I am so happy that the Democrats crammed yet another good piece of spending legislation down the thoats of the repugnant ones.  Time to show them who's in charge and the republic party is impotent to stop the progress our country needs.  They had their chance and blew it with Tyrant George.

In Obama We Trust!
McCain will never compromise with Obama on earmarks because he wants it to remain, at least in his mind, his singular defining issue. He loves to grandstand on the topic, like when he trashed the president for a bill that should have been passed in October.

http://www.political-buzz.com/
The GOP just got very favorable Senate polls in 2010, with Republican candidates LEADING in Dem-held Connecticut and Delaware, somewhat unexpectedly. Will 2010 be a better cycle for the GOP than expected? (Polls: http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/10/senate-polls-find-worrisome-news )
just because the majority of the pundits all believed one thing, it doesn’t mean they’re correct.

Really?  I bet when the majority of the pundits talked about the thrills up their legs, you took that as proof positive that Obama was awesome.
Hand clapping to Pat, well said.
THE PRESSING QUESTION ABOUR OBAMA IS --- "DOES HE HAVE WHAT IT TAKES?"

MORE & MORE ... DAY AFTER DAY --- THE ANSWER IS "NO."

WASHINGTON INSIDERS SAY HIS 'INEPT LEADERSHIP' STYLE & 'BUMBLING STAFF' CAN'T DO THE JOB!

OBAMANUTS ARE MISTAKING HIS DOING MANY THINGS AS PROGRESS --- BUT THE MORE THINGS OBAMA DOES CLUMSILY --- THE MORE THAT WILL MATERIALIZE IN FAILURE.

JUST LOOK AT THE INEPTNESS OF HIS SO-CALLED 'FOREIGN POLICY' IN A FEW SHORT WEEKS === HE IS CAUSING SERIOUS DISCONTENT WITH SOME OF OUR MOST LOYAL ALLIES === AND INSTIGATING TROUBLE WITH OUR ENEMIES ==== NONE OF WHICH MAKES ANY SENSE.
.
For the banks, it's nice to see that Obama is closing the barn door after the horse is already gone. Guess what Barack, the banks don't need any more of OUR money. Citi is projecting a $8 billion dollar profit this year, and other banks are expected to do the same. It sure is nice that you now have strings attached to money that isn't needed anymore. Day late, and a dollar short, that seems to be the way your amateur looking administration operates.

By the way, can we have that money you spent on the banks back now? You know, just we can get something to eat, and maybe fix the roof? Many thanks.
Say what you will about McCain, his conscience is clear and he's no hypocrite on earmarks.  He's never requested one in 27 years.
Did Michelle buy a new dress for the Women's Day event??
Why do the Democrats keep punishing success?
Chuck Todd:  If you are thinking about a good question to ask the President or Robert Gibbs, How about, "When will habeas corpus be restored?  It seems to me that it should be a high priority.

Chris Matthews isn't sure if Emanel's comments rearding Rush Limbaugh was a good idea or not. Well, it was a good idea. It has been facinating to watch how Rush responds to attacks, like the one lately by Newt Gingrich. Rush loves being the de facto head of the Republican Party and he will use his microphone to counter attack any Republican who does not bow low to him.  This clearly will not help the Republicans in 2010.

I see on Huffington Post that Steele will have a no confidence vote after April 1.  He will be replaced by Katon Dawson. A white man from the Confederacy.  That will only decrease the support from people of color.

Capitalism will be different is the headline from Huffington.  Being different is not socialism! Different means regulated, which it should have been all along.  I was intrigued by a post on FR that the L word, Liberal, was being replaced by the S word, Socialist.  Progressives are not socialist and name calling will not bring back the White House to the GOP.  It will not.

People forget that this is a global recession, not just a US recession.  It will take several countries, China, European governments to turn this around. It is unfair of the GOP or the Media to even start to call this President Obama's recession. It is not. Thank Alan Greenspan, Bush 43, Phil Gramm, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell for this economic mess.  
Coleman is the ultimate sleaze Boss tweed like who refuses to accept the fact he LOST by 225 votes and using tax paying money to sleazy attornies out of the George Bush/Rove family of dirty tricks. It should be obvious to most people that the Grand Obstructionist Party is behind it because they want to aviod the 59 Democrat majority. I kind of feel less bad about FloriDUH of 2000!
President Obama should have never said he would go through line by line and eliminate earmarks, but he did, now when he signs this bill he is indeed a liar.
Did Edwards cut back on his $400 haircuts in order to help the poor??
Amen.  Thank you Pat, Boston Ma.  I totally agree
Sore Loser Coleman is quickly losing any chance to run for office in Minnesota with his self serving attack at the majority's desire to have Senator Al Franken seated.  He needs to quit this childish obstruction of the voter's will and start the healing process he urged Franken to do the day after the election.

I'm glad that John Edwards is out speaking in support of the poor.  Only deadbeats want to know about his affair.

Jon Stewart has made some good points about how clownish CNBC has become.  I gave up on it as CNBC is nothing but clowns whining about politics and ideology instead of real business.  I prefer CNBC International to CNBC because the international crew, while bland and somewhat boring, talk about business the way it should be talked about.  Mad Moron Cramer has some gall to call Jon Stewart a comedian when his buffonish business show is nothing but a clowinsh attempt to snag the idiot crowd.  Jon Stewart makes Mad Moron Cramer look like the idiot he is.

In Jon Stewart We Trust!
In Mad Moron Cramer We Bust!
...it’s fascinating how the political world turned President Obama into … John McCain....'

the 'political world' hasn't done this....
the Lazy, ignorant media/infotainment industry

You don't want to' name names on earmarks
After all this talk about earmarks, WHY NOT ??

Talk about actual issues and facts, not political perceptions and gossip
Nice diversion, focusing on McCain when you should be pointing (or giving) the finger to Obama. We sure picked the wrong guy last November.
President Obama would have to lose several million brain cells in order to become John McCain. That statement in FR is laughable. On the topic of future earmarks, however, I would like to see the names of the people asking for earmarks and what they're asking for transparent for all of us to see. Let the people decide whether or not their representatives should hold the seats they current occupy or whether they should be replaced in the next election. That should settle some of them down a little.
Obama was absolutely right, he said earmarks account for only 18 Billion;  But Mccain is willing to give 3oo Billion in Tax Cuts To the Wealthiest Corporations and individuals in the country. That's all the Republicans care about, tax cuts for the wealtiest..
‘...then how can we expect Obama to stand up to Bibi Netanyahu and his even more radical ally, Avigdor Lieberman, when they confront Obama over Middle East policy?...’

‘...hard-line Jews of the Democratic Congress, including Senator Charles Schumer of New York, Rep. Steve Israel (yes, he is actually named "Israel") of New York, and of course, that former Democrat, Joe Lieberman...’



From TheNation.com:

‘....Israel Lobby Defeats Freeman Appointment
posted by Robert Dreyfuss on 03/10/2009 @ 6:31pm

The withdrawal of Chas Freeman as chairman of the National Intelligence Council, following two weeks of vituperative attacks on him by the amen chorus of the U.S. Zionist lobby is a black mark on the Obama administration.

As I wrote two weeks ago, when the campaign against Freeman began, if Barack Obama can't stand up to the likes of Marty Peretz, Jonathan Chait, Steve Rosen, and other snarky critics, and if the White House can't defend a critical intelligence pick when that person is savaged by Republican sharks smelling blood in the water, then how can we expect Obama to stand up to Bibi Netanyahu and his even more radical ally, Avigdor Lieberman, when they confront Obama over Middle East policy?

It's sad, and worrying.

Expect gloating in the pages of The New Republic, National Review, The Weekly Standard, at Fox News, in the corridors at the American Enterprise Institute and AIPAC, and in the right-wing and neocon blogs.

Joining in on the trashing of Freeman were the (let's face it) hard-line Jews of the Democratic Congress, including Senator Charles Schumer of New York, Rep. Steve Israel (yes, he is actually named "Israel") of New York, and of course, that former Democrat, Joe Lieberman -- all of whom crowded into the amen corner with AIPAC.

The Post, writing this morning about opposition to Freeman by seven Republican members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, quoted Freeman from 2007: "The brutal oppression of the Palestinians by the Israeli occupation shows no sign of ending. ... American identification with Israel has become total."

You can, apparently, believe anything but that.

Nearly four years ago, I interviewed Freeman about the disastrous appointment of Porter Goss as CIA director, who was installed by then-President Bush as a political watchdog over an agency that is supposed to speak truth to power. Goss, Freeman told me then, was sent to Langley to "impose a vision on [the CIA] that its analysts and operatives reject as simply not based on reality," he told me. "It's totalitarian. We are going to end up with an agency that is more right-wing, more conformist, and less prone to produce people with original views and dissenters."

I guess we know, now, that there's no room for dissenters in the intelligence community, now, either....’


Presumably, we’ll continue to rubber stamp all Israeli policies

After 8 years of the Neo-Cons.... Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Kenneth Adelman, Douglas Feith, Scooter Libby, David Wurmser, Elliott Abrams, David Frum,...



When Republicans say the President is raising taxes and the President says if you make less than $250K your taxes won’t go up, what do you hear?

When the Republicans say we are spending like a drunken sailor, when do you hear their plan for fixing things?

When air bag talk show hosts state the economy died, when did you hear their plans to fix things?

Unless these obstructionist Repukes and Wing Nuts come up with a well thought out plan of their own, just shut the f*^k up!!!  If all you are going to do is moan and groan, then we have already achieved change because America said it doesn’t want your attitude anymore.

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have
to say something."  Plato

Next.

Chuck, WA


Apparently Obama's plan is to spend more money then God ever imagined. What could go wrong with that?
GIVE IT UP !
for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid

From WashingtonMonthly.com:

'...CONGRESS GETS ANOTHER APPROVAL BOOST....
Low approval ratings for Congress have become so routine, it's kind of odd to see the legislative branch get a significant boost in the polls, especially in the midst of an economic crisis.
0ht92lp5mko26m1teo2spw.gif

And yet, that's exactly what has happened lately. After a 12-point increase in a Gallup poll last month, Congress has seen its approval rating get an 8-point bump this month. It would be a real stretch to consider Congress "popular" -- its approval rating now stands at 39% -- but its current level of support has reached its highest level in more than four years. That's up from 19% in January.

There's no real mystery behind the numbers. Self-identified Republicans still hold Congress in low regard (22% approval, up slightly from February), but support among Independents has doubled since January (17% to 34%), and Democrats are especially impressed, with 57% expressing their approval.

The overall 20-point swing for the institution in just two months is the biggest since 9/11.

This almost certainly isn't what GOP leaders had in mind. The apparent strategy in recent months was to avoid excessive criticism of the popular president, and go after Democratic congressional leaders. Indeed, after the stimulus fight, Boehner, McConnell, and others suggested a public backlash against Congress was inevitable.

At least for now, the opposite seems to be happening...'


Things have REALLY IMPROVED since we started ROLLING OVER those nasty Republicans !!

The ratings for Congress will improve even more after we ABOLISH the FILIBUSTER !!

Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Reid saving us from ignorance and Republicans (one and the same?)
So, the Big O signed the pork-laden package, but threatened that he wouldn't next time.  Next time, we'll get the same thing - and the time after that, and the time after that,...

The problem isn't the projects, per se, but the process by which they are added to bills.  If a project is necessary and fundamentally sound, stand up and push for it.  If is sounds like a pay-off for some lobbyists, show the country why it is not.  It's fairly simple.  No company would allow managers to slip things into their budgets-they have to justify each and every item in there.  Why in the world should not the American people, who are paying for this, demand the same from Congress?
I thank God, that John and Elizabeth Edwards have worked hard and preserved their marriage. We need both of them as advocates against poverty and for Universal Health Care.
So, the TARP conditions are so unappealing to the banks that they want to return the money? They don't like being transparent and upfront with how they are spending taxpayer dollars? Excellent! Funnel the moeny back to the states where more fiscally responsible people can do a better job of managing the people's money.

Bankers are becoming almost as trust-worthy as Cash Advance Check Cashing franchises.
Why are Democrats so bad at living their lives? Most unhappy people I've ever seen.
It will be a delight to observe two of the top women in American history. As well as, being history maker's for firsts in American women 's achievements: Elegant  First lady Michelle Obama: the first African American  First Lady we have been waiting for and Hillary Clinton: the first lady to put a dent into the glass ceiling by garnering 18 million votes to become a first female president. So celebrating International Women’s Day this year is extra sweet.
++++++++++++++++$$$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++++++++
Palomino (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:29 AM)

Don't even put McCain in this. Obama has the pen to sign it into law or nix it.

Obie signed it. The spit is on him.
++++++++++++++++$$$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++++++++
You can’t equate Obama with McCain. President Obama is young, exceptionally, talented, able, and the leader of who has the majority behind him. that’s why he’s president and gets to sign bills. I doubt if John McCain will get a copy of the pens signed by our President.
Did Michelle buy a new dress for the Women's Day event??
C. Chanel


Rumor has it she made cookies! She used Hillary's receipe.
SOMEBODY CALL A HOOKER !!



Temper ! Temper !!

From HuffPost:

'...David Vitter Throws a Tantrum After Missing Flight

Louisiana Senator David Vitter screamed at a United Airlines employee last week after arriving 20 minutes too late for a flight from Dulles to New Orleans, Roll Call reports (subscription required).

According to Raw Story, when Vitter learned he didn't make the flight, he tried to open an alarmed security door.

   After setting off the security alarm, the Louisiana senator proceeded to dress down an airline employee who told him entering the restricted area was forbidden. He invoked his standing as a senator, delivering a "do-you-know-who-I-am" tirade, the paper said.

Vitter wouldn't calm down, even after the employee threatened to call security.

   "Vitter, according to the witness, remained defiant, yelling that the employee could call the police if he wanted to and their supervisors, who, presumably, might be more impressed with his Senator's pin," the paper's Heard on the Hill column noted. "But after talking a huffy big game, Vitter apparently thought better of pushing the confrontation any further. When the gate attendant left to find a security guard, Vitter turned tail and simply fled the scene."...'


He just needs his diapers changed !!

They're FULL OF IT !!

*** Strings Attached: Isn't it good news for the government bailout plan that some banks want to give the money back because they don't like the strings? The New York Times: "Some bankers say the conditions have become so onerous that they want to return the bailout money. The list includes small banks like the TCF Financial Corporation of Wayzata, Minn., and Iberia Bank of Lafayette, La., as well as giants like Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. They say they plan to return the money as quickly as possible or as soon as regulators set up a process to accept the refunds.” Also, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that some investors now don't like the papers they have to sign to participate in the TALF investment plan to buy up toxic assets. Isn’t this what Congress wants to hear?

****************

This is good news.  If the restrictions are too "onerous" for a financial institution, that means it doesn't really need our help.  This insures that only the banks that REALLY need the money will keep it.  "Free" money isn't so free then, huh?
Are we going to get any photo-ops of the Obama's today, or this the one day of the month they take the day off?
I really don't think you can get rid of earmarks completely.  Every state has projects that need to be upgraded that have been ignored for quite a while and some of these need to be included in spending bills. However, some are a little over the top.  Everyone that requests money for projects think theirs is important, but ones for the public good should be passed.
Oh, good.  Earmarks.  A day without earmarks would be a day I might have to think about what really matters.  That would hurt my little liberal head.  

Mystery ~ you know, that beats me, too.  I can't think why I'm so unhappy, despite everything George W. Bush did for me -- like all these unnecessary wars costing us thousands of productive lives and unimaginable sums of money, the stock market in the tank, meaning I'll never retire, messed up health care, global warming, failed social security reform, and failed education reform.  And not to mention, of course, two mass shootings in the past 24 hours alone that senselessly killed at least 25 people because republicans ARE bitter and DO cling to their guns.  

Don't worry.  Be happy.  
Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill.  This bill was intended to fund the government, so vetoing it would have further jeopardized the already tenuous budget situation.  I place the blame solely on the congressmen and senators who inserted the earmarks.  Both Democrats AND Republicans, since their per-capita earmarking was roughly the same.
Can you guys be serious,John McCain would have one if the election was about earmarks ,where you get your facts from bathroom stalls?Earmarks are 2% of the entire budget,I think most of us don't think earmarks first when we think about our economy,or how earmarks can be a good thing.McCain is a old out of touch gravy train regular.So we can now conclude that the banks really didn't need the money we gave them,seems that they have no time for strings that they will have to play by if they want more money,see they have gone 8 years with no rules they,they liked how the republicans have let them do what they wanted.So now they see that someone will be paying attention to how they use the bailout money,and they say no thanks,we still want to give out huge bonus's for our failures.FR, Bush said he would not sign the bill,quite the drama will ya, The Dems got greedy,no they knew George had not done a damn thing the last 6 months of his term,he must have thought he had screwed up our country enough,and took a powder and hid behind his desk.Classic Republican obstruction in the Frankin case,the repubs know how important the votes are,so they will do everything they can to hold this vote up.But in the end Norm will have to except the facts,YOU LOST NORM so take your army of RNC-GOP lawyers and get out of Dodge,you will need time to prepare for your other lawsuit .  
I usually like Fineman, but he needs to shut his trap.  The republicans screwed over this nation for the past 8 years and within a month of a new democratic president, they expect it all to be cleaned-up, fixed and just like new.  What a bunch of hooey!
President Obama is doing just fine and will continue to do fine.  He has alot more integrity, fortitude and resolve in his little pinky than in the entire make-up of the republican party.

Keep on Truckin' President Obama!
So, the TARP conditions are so unappealing to the banks that they want to return the money?

===================


So what's Obama's point of trying to help the banks? See, Obama is obvioulsy not clear on what the overall goal of helping the banks is. The goal is to keep the banks liquid so the economy doesn't go from a recession to a depression. What Obama is doing is trying to score his usual amount of populous points by making it something that benefits him politically, and not the country. Now Obama puts so many restrictions on the money, the banks can't use it. So now we're back to the country being on the path of going from a recession to a depression.

This is what happens when you need a President that believes "Country First", but you get one that says "Me First"
As the Washington Post points out, only five senators didn’t add pet projects to the omnibus: McCain, DeMint (R), Coburn (R), Feingold (D), and McCaskill (D).
-------------------------

Note that Kyle, the other Repub senator from Arizona is not on that list. That's the scam that McCain is running. He can posture about pork and earmarks while and distract attention while his pal Kyle brings home the bacon to Arizona.

Somebody needs to tell Joe Scarborough that the banks don't want the money because they don't like the "strings attached". Joe and Pat Buchanan have been screaming all weeks about President Obama needs to fix banking.

Well, it seems as if banking has fixed itself if they don't want the TARP money or TALF. isn't that special?

Why should President Obama drop everything and kiss the a$$ of the bankers whenit was their greed that gotus into this mess. I love the pundits who say it was poor folks who bought homes they could not afford that caused the problem. Well, who were the idiot bankers and mortgage companies that made this possible? Did the poor folks walk in with guns drawn and yelled "I want a mortgage I can't afford and I want it now!"

Get real folks. It was greed on the part of everyone involved but it is easy to blame the poor folks because they have no voice.
Crooks & Liars: Brit Hume got very honest for a change on FNS when he closed his "gold buying" rant by the rich with this:

...they fear a wave of inflation or hyper inflation, so the people who are voting with their money are not voting in favor of these policies.

Decoded: The very rich hate Obama just like they hated FDR. Under FDR we saw the expansion of the middle class and a shrinking of the Court of American Royalty.

Earmarks are not all bad and wastefull, per se.  It is the job of Congressmen and Senators to stear federal tax dollars back to their respective states.  The real question is whether the particular project is worthwhile or a waste of tax dollars.  Obama said he'ld weed out the wasteful earmarks, not all earmarks, and he put forth a plan of utter transparency so no "bridge to nowhere" type of earmarks are sneeked through.  People who criticize him on this matter are just flapping their lips and spewing the same old politcal garbage for their own political gain as the obstructionist opposition.  
Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill.
--------------------------------------------------
Actually Brian, it would take one veto of a bill for Congress to get their act together and strip future bills of earmarks.  I think Obama, and Bush and Clinton before him, should have done exactly that.
Your columns are making less and less sense. How is Obama the same as McCain? And does anyone actually care about this issue? It's a nice-to-solve, but I don't think it's the reason our economy has been ruined.

Maybe you guys should focus only on elections. You're not making valid points on anything else.
Somebody needs to tell Joe Scarborough that the banks don't want the money because they don't like the "strings attached". Joe and Pat Buchanan have been screaming all weeks about President Obama needs to fix banking.

Well, it seems as if banking has fixed itself if they don't want the TARP money or TALF. isn't that special?

Why should President Obama drop everything and kiss the a$$ of the bankers whenit was their greed that gotus into this mess. I love the pundits who say it was poor folks who bought homes they could not afford that caused the problem. Well, who were the idiot bankers and mortgage companies that made this possible? Did the poor folks walk in with guns drawn and yelled "I want a mortgage I can't afford and I want it now!"

Get real folks. It was greed on the part of everyone involved but it is easy to blame the poor folks because they have no voice.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1831603

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google