ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Understanding Obama's education vision

Posted: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:31 PM by Chuck Todd
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Chuck Todd
The White House beat is more than just what happens at the Oval Office. We're doing out best to cover every department and every utterance made by members of President Obama's Cabinet. To that end, here are the most intriguing portions of Education Secretary Arne Duncan's interview last night with Charlie Rose.

Duncan gave a vision for public schools that I haven't yet heard the president articulate as clearly as Duncan did on Charlie Rose.

Duncan envisions a public school becoming a community center, meaning that when he advocates the lengthening of the school day, he's not necessarily calling for more public money to be spent on after-school programs. But, literally, using the building as a community center. So private groups, like the Boys and Girls club or the YMCA would hold classes there; maybe private arts foundations would do the same and maybe these private groups would help pay for equipment they would need and the school could get the benefit. This, of course, is done in many communities at many schools on an ad hoc basis, but hasn't been part of a national mandate.

Again, I'm highlighting because this was the light bulb moment for me when I truly understood what the president was attempting to advocate for his education programs.

Here are the direct excerpts.

I'm starting with Duncan being asked to describe the length of an average school day:

DUNCAN: I think our schools should be open 12, 13, 14 hours a day. So it’s not just length --

ROSE: So eight to eight, or something like that?

DUNCAN: Yes, and let me tell you what -- not just lengthening, obviously, the school day, but a wide variety of after school activities: drama, arts, sports, chess, debate, academic enrichment, programs for parents, GED, ESL, family literacy nights, potluck dinners. At home, we attached health-care clinics to about two dozen of our schools.  Where schools truly become the centers of the community, great things happen.  So I think we need the schools open much longer hours, and by the way, we don’t have to do this all ourselves as educators.  You can bring in great nonprofits:  the YMCAs, the Boys and Girls Clubs, mentoring and tutoring groups to co-locate their services and bolster the community from the school.  And every neighborhood in our country, you have schools.  In every school, you have classrooms, you have computer labs, you have libraries, you have gyms, many have pools.  Those buildings don’t belong to you or I.  They don’t belong to the unions.  They belong to the community.  We have these great physical resources, and we even maximize them.

ROSE: Keep them open 12 hours a day, 12 months a year.

DUNCAN: Yes.

ROSE: Twelve hours a day, 12 months a year.

DUNCAN: And I would go to six or seven days a week, not just Monday through Friday.

ROSE: Seven days a week. So the school becomes the center of community life.

DUNCAN: When the school becomes the center of community life, great things are going to happen for those families, and great things are going to happen to those children.

ROSE: Okay. Then tell me why that hasn’t happened before. I mean, who has stood in the way of that happening before? ...

DUNCAN: I don’t think there’s one person that’s stood in --

ROSE:  I don’t mean an individual, but has there been an organization? Has it been an institution? Has it to do with resources? Has it do to with a mindset about education?

DUNCAN: I think it’s the latter. I think it’s the lack of creativity and it’s a lack of understanding what our children need. And this is what I think we’ve just been slow to react. If you go back 30 or 40 years ago, the average child could get out of school at 2:30, mom was at home, child would go home to mom, dad was working, and get a peanut butter and jelly sandwich at 2:30. Today, you have more two-parent working families. You have more single moms working two, three jobs. You have unfortunately maybe children going home to no-parent families. So our society has changed. Our schools have not kept pace, and this is a chance to really create what I think the 21st century school needs to look like. This needs to be the norm, not the exception. Time matter tremendously, and all of our families need our stores open longer hours.

ROSE: Is this a big-ticket item in terms of financial resources?

DUNCAN:  Finances is a piece of this, and we, again, have significant financial resources, unprecedented financial resources coming to the table. Let me be clear. This is thinking differently and being creative. What if the school system runs from 9:00 to 3:00, and what if they give the school to a great non-profit partner, the YMCAs, the Boys and Girls Clubs, whatever it might be, to run it from 3:00 to 9:00, not charge them rent, open the buildings and put them -- have all of their resources into better tutoring, better mentoring, and then bringing other non-profits. The money that I spent on this to open our schools long in Chicago was arguably the best money I spent because it was so highly leveraged. And you had all these phenomenal partners coming in, working collectively and collaboratively to one spot, provide this vast array of academic enrichment, social, even medical services to children and their families. So, yes, you need resources to do that, but it’s not just about resources. It’s about thinking differently, partnering, collaborating and understanding what our children need today to be successful.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

An interesting concept to keep schools open longer and turn them into multitasking ventures.  I'm sure the religious freaks won't like this secularizing of our population and will whine about it to no end.  I'm just not sure that Americans would ever be smart enough to make schools into community centers and that's a pity.

I would like to see our public schools get away from the old traditional way school has been run to something more like the way charter schools are run.  We need better ways of reaching students and charter schools that use new teaching techniques should be the way they get changed.

More Money for Education!
Amazing what kinds of ideas come out of an Administration when a President actually nominates intelligent, creative people that aren't hellbent on destroying government and "proving that government doesn't work".  

Cool stuff - thanks for sharing, Chuck!
Hey, maybe teachers could gaps! try working a full workday and all year like their bosses the taxpayers do...how about teachers? Can you find your way to out in a full workweek for a whole year?
"This, of course, is done in many communities at many schools on an ad hoc basis, but hasn't been part of a national mandate."

And why should it be?  National control of the school system?  "State schools" in the sense of national central control of local school systems?

The only schools I have ever known are open from 8 to 8 and available to the public for a massive variety of uses.

We need a national mandate/control of these activities?  Do we have say in what is defined as a national mandate?

I know Mr. Duncan isn't trying to be frightening, but he isn't succeeding.  He's also not being original, except in the sense of nationalizing a system of state schools.


I like it.  This is the "Change we need."
What Duncan is prosposing are not schools, but re-education camps. Those length of days he's talking about are designed not to teach but to indoctrinate the students to what Duncan and the federal government think are important.

Duncan should do some real work rahter then smoking what ever he is smoking to come up with real ideas. Real ideas like figuring out why private schools staff is 80% teachers and 20% administrators, and why public schools staff is 50% teachers and 50% administrators. But that would require messing with the unions, so that's not happening any time soon.

there is a deparate need for civics classes to be mandated in all schools (and home school).  The level of ignorance the public has of what our constitution says and how our government is supposed to work and how politicians mislead is dangerous.
It is so gratifying to see that we once again have a bunch of creative thinking people in the federal government (not seen since the Kennedy administration).  This is what I voted for when I voted for Obama.  I love the 'vision thing'.  That's what will make this country better for my children and their children.

For those who are so afraid of government becoming a too great an influence in our lives I can only say that any group that has too much power, whether it is government (who can control business and a military- socialism) or a private sector oligarchy (who can control business and a military - fascism), is dangerous and, we, who make up the proverbial little guy must be vigilant against abuses of power from either element.  Still, when I see government marshalling all of its good, all of its creative energy for the improvement of our society by maintaining social mobility, there can be little fault to be found.  I think that although I am a free-marketeer and I believe in the invisible hand of capitalism, that invisible hand will only push us in the right direction if the people participating in the free market have the wisdom, the long view, to maintain 'the vision thing'.  I find that most of the captains of industry (with their no accountability - golden parachutes) to be lacking in the necessary character and smarts, to make the decisions necessary for the future of a stable and growing economy.

It really takes ideas from all sides (and trust) to make this whole thing work and I think that this administration is only the second, that I have seen in my lifetime, to attempt to get this thing done.  Government doesn't have to be 'the problem'...it can truly be part of 'the solution'.
Oh, goody, more Pie in the Sky blather.  

Schools ARE open on weekends-there are sports programs, arts programs, drama programs, etc., every day in schools all across this country.  Know what doesn't happen?

First of all, the 'at risk' student isn't involved in any of this-and neither are those students' parents.  

Second, as far as instruction goes, I'll take my school district as an example:  during a six hour school day, by contract, our teachers have 200 minutes of what is called 'face time', which means that for three hours and twenty minutes, they interact with students.  That includes instruction time, lunch and recess monitering, any interaction with any student for any reason.  Three hours and twenty minutes.  So what are they doing the other two hours and forty minutes?  Writing lesson plans and grading papers.  Hanging out in the teacher's lounge, where suppoisedly they are having in depth discussions about education and how to improve, (I don't know where the Super Bowl pool and March Madness pools fit in, but they have a great fantasy baseball team in the local high school).

As an educator myself, I am knocking both teachers AND parents, who allow this nonsense to continue.  The union's answer to at risk students is that 'we can't kick them out of public schools'.  Who's asking for that?  Most of these students need someone, anyone, to believe in them-a single teacher could do it, and change a child's life.  

Don't get me started on the parents, who seem to think that their child is anyone's responsibility but their own.  If an at risk child is doing something wrong, the parent blames the person who caught them in the act.  

There are a great many motivated teachers, motivated students, and motivated parents who want the best for their children no matter the sacrifice of time.

Sadly, there are many unmotivated teachers, at risk students, and parents who cannot be bothered to take any action but to complain to any who will listen that their child does not have issues, the teacher does.

You can't solve that by bringing in the YMCA.
Obama admits to being Christian (?), like so many others, but chooses to vote the legality of snuffing out life in it's most innocent form, even after partial birth has begun. That's barbaric and would question his faith-based background.
Monkberry Moon (Sent Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:21 PM)
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obama is a Christian. He has stated this very directly in his books and on national TV (unlike McCain). You have his positions on abortion all wrong, taking what you have read on right-wing sources as the truth.  What is the truth is that Obama wants to see reductions in the number of abortions--by supporting women economically, providing low-cost birth control (McCain voted against insuring this), providing information about family planning, and emphasizing the "sacredness of sex" (his words from the third presidential debate).  He voted against the partial-birth abortion ban ONLY because it didn't have a clause that allowed for the very rare cases where it might be necessary to protect the life of the mother. As an authority on constitutional law, Obama is a stickler about things like that.  

He is more to the left on this issue than I am, but I appreciate what he says about reducing the number of abortions while keeping women safe if they choose to have one (I disagree with this choice, but I know that some women will choose to have one regardless.  I'd rather they be legal and safe than illegal and unsafe.) The abortion rate has steadily gone down since 1980; however, the rate is higher for the economically disadvanted (minorities and single mothers). The key, then, is to work towards lifting women out of poverty and making sure that they have access to good health care--things that Obama has certainly made a priority so far in his presidency.

And I'd sure like to see men be a lot more responsible. My brother has six kids he can't afford just because he was unwilling to use a condom and forbade his wife from using barrier methods ("God will close her womb if he doesn't want her to have any more babies.") How do we overcome this kind of thinking? Maybe when men can get pregnant, they'll stop being so judgmental of women!
This is wonderful. I love it. Yes it will take some money up front, but the rewards a excellent!

I think that the idea that the "School become the most impotant part of the community" is EXACTLY the right approach to our educational (among others) problems we're currently experiencing.

Imagine Pre-teen and teen crime rates; What if they had a program like this to come home to? What about drugs and sex?

Instead of that empty house I always came home too (getting myself in much too much trouble), if I had a worthwhile place to spend my time, amongst freinds and adults that were there for the betterment of my education, I really think this would've improved my education.

Single parent households who can't afford day care? Send them to math tutoring, followed by a Computer hardware workshop! Less time for idle hands, the math grades (or whater troublesome subject) go up, and Little Johnny or Jane can build a PC out fo scrap parts!

Great! I can go on and on about how I beleive in this approach. And, finally IMHO,  we would be killing MANY birds, with this one stone.
The nanny state is certainly ramping up under Obama. Just what we need, the schools babysitting our kids before, during, and after "school". Why don't they just bed them down for the night too, that way we won't have to bus them in again in the morning.

And of course there's no cost to the expanded use of schools. Not until you get your property tax bill (property taxes are used to fund most schools) and see that it's doubled.

But it's for the kids, right? How can that be bad?
Hmm, so if you've spent several generations throwing money at a problem, and the problem has only gotten worse. Would you a). throw MORE money at it, or b).  rethink things? We've spent nearly $1.65 Trillion since 1965.

Here's a possible solution. I'll just throw this out for grins:
i). Provide block grants to states for 3 years. 3 years will allow states the time to figure out how to pay for education on their own.
DUNCAN: When the school becomes the center of community life, great things are going to happen for those families, and great things are going to happen to those children.

Why does Duncan think that? Whats so wonderful about spending time at a school vs. say, spending time with your family?
Chuck Todd, terrific information.  Wow, this makes sense, many positives in the concept.  Talk about thinking outside the box and moving education into the 21st century.  I'm impressed with this forward thinking.  Mr. Duncan is right about mindset; we are still operating schools the way we did in the 50's.  This would be beneficial not just for children, and parents but entire neighborhoods.  
I just got the same light bulb, Chuck.  Eureka.

Such a refreshing change to have vision, competence, and intelligence coming from our Secretary of Education.
Personally, I think keeping schools open for this length of time is a bit much.  I really think charter schools are the way to go, along with getting rid of the complacent teachers who are in the profession only because of the summer vacations. Dallas has some of the worst schools in the nation.  This administration is made up of embezzlers and couldn't care less about these kids.  I sacrificed and sent my daughter to private schools because most of the teachers here just aren't motivated/equipped/qualified enough to get the job done.  Unconcerned parents are another big problem, just as President Obama has stated. Duncan has some great ideas, but everybody (even kids) need a break.
A primary skill of a leader is VISION. Vision of where we as a country are going.  Vision in education, health care, manufacturing.  The country has been without vision for a long time.  Conservatives' vision is looking out the rear-view mirror. It will take work, hard work, but we don't have much of a choice.  Follow the leader who has a vision...or vote no and get out of the way.
People in more affluent areas of our country will think this is useless and will no doubt call it a waste of taxpayer money. As the husband of a teacher that has taught in three different areas in VA, my opinion is that this is exactly what is needed in many citys and rural areas.
I would guess that many teachers would want the facility use limited to libraries, cafeterias, and gyms as much as possible.Many of our best teachers have thousands of dollars of personal materials in their classrooms and do not like the idea of having that material unsecure. Just as many of you would be uncomfortable about opening your house to a group when you aren't there.
This is a great idea!!  Why let the school buildings that cost so much to build sit dormant half the time?  Use them and using them in this way by providing after school activities in conjunction with other phenomenal partners, UMCA, Boyd and Girls Clubs to help with costs. . . Give the kids a place to go, to learn more, play sports, additional tutoring. . Great idea!
Thinking outside the box-that's exactly what we need! As an educator, I truly applaud this. I am so happy that teacher unions seem to be supportive of the president's plans (that could be one big barrier admittedly.) I think we all know that our education system is broken and we need more than a band-aid.
Proud member of RepublicansforObama.org
Schools in our community are used by boys and girls clubs and scouts. There are sporting teams, soccer, youth baseball, cricket and basketball that use the facilities on a regular basis. We could do more but things cost money, something most don't have. With those groups on the premisis they have to also have janitorial service to ensure the place is cleaned up and locked when the groups leave. If someone gets hurt does the school have adequate insurance to cover the situation? Some do for the students attending normal class schedules but not for extra curricular activities. It would be great if teachers could spend time after school with students as they did in my day. However some are so poorly paid that they beat the kids off campus as they dash to their other job as they try to make ends meet. Teachers spend their own money on school supplies because there isn't enough money in the school district to purchace basic supplies or text books. Parents often can't help either as they are further burdened with expenses. Too many parents today are caught up in their own lives that they don't have time for their kids at home or in school. Then they wonder why the kid isn't doing well in school. It is because they don't really care. Selfishness, me, me, me, and maybe you next because you are the person I care about next after me. We have evolved into that kind of society in many respects. We sat our kids down after school and no one did anything or went anywhere until mom or dad checked the homework to make sure it not only was done but done correctly. To paraphrase Hillary Clinton (as much as it pains me to have to do so) it takes a village to educate a child. Don't depend on the schools to do it alone. Parents and others in the community must help out too. That is our future, you know.
I need to see more of Obama's plan on education.

If it helps the students, it's great but it must also help the teachers and teacher applicants.

If a person has a degree in math or science, they should be certified quickly without education department impediments in the form of licensing roadblocks, testing or fees.

If you are a few points short on an ETS Praxis test but have skills in research, you should not be forced to teach remedial math, adult programs or special education. Give these folks their full certification in math or science.

Timed, standardized testing including constructed responses has caused great harm to students, teacher applicants and long term teachers.

We need to prevent teacher testing from blocking good teachers from entering our nation's classrooms.
This takes me back to the 50's when I first started school - the parents were as involved as the teachers, and we had to 'mind' our teachers as though they were our parents.  The 'mean' teachers didn't last very long because of the parents presence.

I get so tired of hearing about how much the Reagan years brought such glory to this country.  It was during this period that women entered the work force enmasse and families became 'two income' families - it was also the beginning of 'home alone' after school, and lowered parental involvement in schools.

If only this model could be reborn in America, perhaps we could solve multiple problems.  
Are you for real????A longer school day?? Are you prepared to pay teachers more for this? It sounds like the Obama Administration wants babysitters not educators!! I am appalled at this article! This is more like change we really can't believe we're hearing!!
Just when I thought I'd lost all confidence in today's media, Chuck Todd comes on the scene, and revitalizes journalism, like a life guard giving the kiss of life to a half drowned swimmer. Thank you for highlighting the Education Secretary's ideas. I read an article, a few years ago, on how some rural schools in Maine outperform those in wealthier districts, in part, because the school is an integral part of the community. I'm glad to see Duncan is familiar with what has worked in certain districts.

PS. I love Chuck Todd!
I can see extending school hours to 5pm and going year around with quarterly 2 week breaks...but 8pm, 6 or 7 days a week??

That's taking alot of time away from family to bond and cannot be a healthy atmosphere...plus it would put too much stress on our teachers.

I think obama will come out and ground these comments a bit.
This sounds great but people need to realize that teachers and tutoring only do so much. Parents need to be responsible for there kids and take time to work with them as well. Too many parents dont take the time to interact or care about what their child is doing. If these services were available would parents take the time to use them?
 If this is implemented, what will happen is apathetic parents who don't want to be bothered with their kids will drop them off for 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.   It sounds great in theory, but in practice I predict a failing program.  In the area of Virginia that I live, the YMCA does have before and after care in all of the elementary schools.  And while it was a perfectly adequate program, it wasn't something I was overjoyed about leaving my kids in every day either.    
Where in the Consitution does it state that the Federal government shall provide for education?
WHAT A WONDERFUL & PROGRESSIVE IDEA.  I DO THINK THAT SOME POLITICIANS WANT TO KEEP THE "HUMBLED MASSES" ILLITERATE & DUMB SO THAT THEY NEVER ASK QUESTIONS AND WONDER WHAT IS GOING WORNG IN THIS COUNTRY.  THE US IS NO LONGER #1 IN EDUCATION.  I HAVE LIVED IN CANADA AND ENGLAND AND SAW THE DIFFERENCES IN THIER SCHOOLS AS COMPARED TO HERE.  THE RICHER YOU ARE THE BETTER EDUCATION YOU GET AND THAT IS JUST WRONG.  NO WONDER THE RICH WANT TO KEEP THE STATUS QUO SO THAT NO ONE CAN INFRINGE ON THEIR SUPERIORITY.  THEY & THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WOULD PROBABLY THINK SCHOOLS SET UP LIKE ARNE DUNCAN IS PORTRAYING WOULD BE SOCIALIST
The real problem with education is these two things,first there are way to many days when students are not in school,Three months in the summer is way to long,kids forget what they learned the year before and the first month the teacher is going over what they forget.Most months there are many non-contact days,the teachers union has fought hard getting these days.They have catchy names they use for these days.but the facts are the students are not being taught.I don;t see education changing ever,they are more stubborn then a new born,and there union is a feisty bunch,and they do fill pockets of people they think they can buy.So if education wants to they will fight any change,there are a lot of these folks that only got into the biz for the days off,and the short days.and the healthy wages.Arne who will be paying for these schools to stay open,schools are cutting hours,it's time parents raise there own kid and let teachers teach,not babysit.
It really make sense folks. Think about the 3 months summer vacation we have now. It came from the age when this country was an agriculture bases economy and parents needed kids to help with crops. Now my kids are not helping me to grow or harvest corns but school is still closed for 2.5 to 3 months. As the secretary said, the society evolved from one parent working model to both parent working to mostly single parent working. So schools and teaching should adjust to this kind of chages in society. Obviously it's not an issue for people like Gov. Romney who is a millionaire and stay home wife with 4/5 kids and may be can hire a nanny for each kid and tutor at home for each too. But unfortunately, not all the people are this lucky. If you think about minority kids (not looking down on anyone) and minority population that are mostly (NOT all) in economically disadvantaged situation and the demography is shifting toward them, the future of our education and our country will depend on how well we can close the achievement gap and make them well educated. Otherwise half of our population with poor education will be a drag on our economy in a time global competition and survival of the excellent. THANKS Chuck!
I have been a teacher now for 38 years. My building is open until 9 PM some nights. There are at least 75 to 80 activities offered which are supervised and/or taught by teachers - without pay.

So while that is really nice.......the main problem is NCLB and its Annual Yearly Progress, which, for some studdents, is unattainable, and because of this schools are labeled as Failing!

Unitl we stop making kids learn for one meaningless standardized test, we will continue to fail in teaching our kids how to think and how to solve problems. Because so much rides on NCLB and AYP, teachers are going to teach to the test.

We need to dump the whole test thing, come up with an assessment that is based on those skills that our kids really need. We need to stop laying the blame at the feet of the teachers. True, there are some teachers who are functioning as they should, but there are bad doctors,too. Yet no one blames the enitre medical profession. Of course, many people do not see teaching as a profession. So that has to change, also.

Here's something else we need to do: stop dumbing down our standars and curriculum. The students I had ten years ago were held accountable for much more than the kids I teach today.

One other thing: Stop worrying about self-esteem. Make parents and kids learn that self-esteem comes from hard work. No one can give it to you. And don't expect a pat on the back for doing virtually nothing.Just because you show up physically for a class, does not give you the right to demand a B .

One more rant: It is amusing to me that the people who decide on educational policies have either never taught in a classroom, or can't remember when they taught in a classroom. Here's a thought: Ask some teachers. And don't give me words about the union. Most teachers become teachers, not for the money, like the pay is so wonderful. Most teachers I know say that at some point they were "called" to this profession. They knew forever that they wanted to be teachers.

And I can say all this because I have been deemed a "master teacher" and I supervise two departments.
If you support these core initiatives:

• Effective, empowered teachers and school leaders;
• Student assessments that stress 21st century skills;
• Universal access to high-quality early education;
• A safe, healthy learning environment; and
• Affordable college for all students;

Then let President Obama know! Visit EDVOTERS.ORG and sign the petition today!
To Ralph and Overtaxed - a couple of points. First, I don't get that much time "off" in the summer. Usually I'm attending professional development programs, often at my own expense. When I worked for a corporation, not only did they pay for these programs, they sent us to nice places for a week at a time. No such luck for teachers.

Second, I'm making less as a teacher than I made 35 years ago working the graveyard shift while going to graduate school. My wife (a retired educator) and I live in a 2 bedroom house. We get a short vacation maybe every 3 or 4 years. Our cars are more than 7 years old. Overpaid? I don't think so.

Then there's what I call the Teacher Tax. Every year I wait for the back-to-school loss-leader sales at Office Depot so I can buy the notebooks and other supplies for my kids that they can't or won't buy themselves. We have a small budget at school for supplies, but it's springtime before the money is available. I've paid for SAT registration, financial aid fees, and other college application expenses for students who just can't afford it. When a student loses a bus card, it's a teacher that "loans" then a dollar for the bus. Etc.

Maybe your real problem is that you don't believe everyone shares a responsibility to educate ALL children. So think about it in selfish terms. How much are you paying for prisons? Police protection? How much extra in taxes do you pay because of what all the dropouts DON'T pay due to their low incomes?

As the saying goes, if you think education is expensive, try ignorance.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1833878

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google