ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: New York state of mind

Posted: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:07 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro

*** New York state of mind: Ready or not, the campaign season -- for 2009, 2010, and 2012 -- essentially begins today with the first competitive race of Obama’s presidency: the special congressional election in upstate New York (NY-20) between Democrat Scott Murphy and Republican Jim Tedisco. As we’ve said before, this contest has it all. It has become a battle over the economic stimulus (Murphy supports it, while Tedisco opposes it); in some form or fashion, it has featured national figures (Obama, Michael Steele, Sarah Palin, even Pat Boone); it will be an early test of the GOP’s health in the post-Bush era (if Republicans can’t win this slightly GOP-leaning district, where else can they win?); and it will be an early test of Obama’s coattails (if the Democrats lose, Republicans will see it as a sign of the end of the president’s honeymoon). Oh, and one other thing: The race is about as close as it can get it. Analysts say it’s a toss-up, with a recent Siena Research Institute poll showing Murphy ahead by four points (47%-43%), after trailing Tedisco by four points in early March (45%-41%) and 12 points in February (46%-34%). Polling places open at 6:00 am ET and close at 9:00 pm ET. 

*** A little caution for pundits: Our gut tells us that a dead heat probably slightly favors the Dems, only because their turnout operation is probably better than the GOP’s. Then again, a super low turnout favors the GOP because the most reliable voters in this district skew Republican. But for all of us who will no doubt over-interpret tonight’s results, political analyst Charlie Cook gives some important advice in his CongressDaily column today: “Assuming that the margin in this upstate contest to fill the seat of newly-appointed Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is three or four points or less, my advice is to respond ‘that’s nice,’ then yawn, and walk away… What is more important is if there is a uniform direction to several odd-year elections. If, for example, Republicans were to win tonight and knock off Gov. Jon Corzine in New Jersey in November, and pick up the open governor seat in Virginia, then it is fair to say that they will have exorcised the demons of 2006 and 2008.” More Cook: “If Democrats hold NY-20 as well as New Jersey and Virginia, they can enter 2010 knowing that even if the wind isn’t at their backs, there also isn’t a headwind.”

*** A significant day: No doubt we’re all getting a bit numb to bailouts, emergency government action, and major announcements from this new president. But don't let this numbness obscure the fact that yesterday might be one of the five- or ten-most significant moments when the history of the Obama presidency is written in either 2013 or 2017. He didn't just fire any CEO; he fired the head of an American industrial icon. And let's not forget the decision to make the White House the center of auto policy for this country. Some on the left are hitting Obama for not firing more CEOs, while the right is hitting him for looking like a nationalist or a government interventionist. But it is also worth noting the critiques on this auto plan were somewhat muted. The reason: It was a very well-executed rollout. In fact, it's in stark contrast of all the other bailout announcements that have taken place so far. Here’s perhaps why: Every detail of this auto plan seemed to be communicated so well. There's an auto task force (is there one for AIG?); there's an auto czar (is there one for the banks?); there were more strings attached to GM and Chrysler (are there strings for the banks?); and there was the appointment of a disaster recovery czar (have we seen anything like that regarding, say, folks who have seen their 401ks disappear?).

Video: NBC’s Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd discusses the political significance of President Obama’s aggressive auto plan.

*** London calling: The big White House news today, of course, is President Obama’s trip to London for the G-20. The president and first lady already departed from Andrews Air Force Base earlier this morning, and they will arrive in London later this this afternoon (ET). And with his departure comes a brand-new Washington Post/ABC poll showing the president with a 66% approval rating, and a 60% approval rating on the economy. Also before Obama lands in Europe, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports that Moscow sent a message to Washington yesterday that President Medvedev is interested in a broad agreement with the Obama administration on the major disputed issues between Russia and the U.S. -- including missile defense and Iran. Medvedev has a Washington Post op-ed making the same point.

Video: The global economy tops President Obama’s agenda as he heads to the G20 Summit in London, his first trip to Europe as president. NBC’s Savannah Guthrie reports.

*** With friends like these…: Turning to the current budget battle, President Obama met behind closed doors with House Democrats yesterday, and Obama’s visit went pretty well, according to NBC’s Mike Viqueira and other news accounts. But writing in the New Republic, Jon Chait raises this interesting question: Why have recent Democratic presidents (Carter, Clinton, and now Obama) received less deference from congressional Democrats than GOP presidents have received from congressional Republicans? “George W. Bush came to office having lost the popular vote, with only 50 Republicans in the Senate… [Still,] Bush managed to enact several rounds of tax cuts that substantially exceeded those in his campaign platform, along with two war resolutions, a Medicare prescription drug benefit designed to maximize profits for the health care industry, energy legislation, education reform, and sundry other items.” Meanwhile, “Obama has come into office having won the popular vote by seven percentage points, along with a 79-seat edge in the House, a 17-seat edge in the Senate, and massive public demand for change. But it's already clear he is receiving less, not more, deference from his own party.”

*** Just what the doctor ordered? Besides the work on the budget, the other big news on Capitol Hill today will be HHS nominee Kathleen Sebelius’ appearance before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pension Committee (which is a courtesy hearing because it doesn't approve her nomination; the Senate Finance Committee does). In her opening statement, Sebelius will say that health-care reform must occur this year. “Inaction is not an option. The status quo is unacceptable, and unsustainable.”

*** That’s “special”: Turning back to NY-20… With tonight’s Murphy-Tedisco contest being the first competitive House race of Obama’s presidency, our friends at the Cook Political Report and Rothenberg Political Report take us on a trip down memory lane. The first special congressional election in Bush 41's term was to fill Dan Coat's (R) seat in Indiana, after Dan Quayle became VP and Coats filled his Senate seat. Jill Long (D) won that contest, so the seat flipped. The first special congressional election in Clinton's term was for Mike Espy's seat, but the first competitive one was in Wisconsin, where Peter Barca (D) barely beat Mark Neumann (R) to replace Les Aspin (D) in Congress; Neumann beat Barca in the '94 general. And the first special in Bush 43's term was when Bill Shuster (R) took his dad's seat in Pennsylvania in a surprisingly close race against Scott Conklin (D). The Cook Political Report’s David Wasserman makes this other point about recent special elections: What made Herseth/Diedrich ('04), Schmidt/Hackett ('06), Foster/Oberweis ('08), Childers/Davis ('08) so notable is that these districts were so heavily D or R, and the seat flipped or the race was surprisingly close. By contrast, NY-20 is pretty competitive (registered Republicans outnumber Democrats, but Obama won 51% there in November), and probably won't tell us much about the national climate -- at least not yet.

*** Show me the money: And just to give you an idea how much activity has taken in this special election for the NY-20 congressional seat, ad-tracker Evan Tracey notes that nearly $2 million have been spent on TV ads. Interestingly, Democrats have slightly outspent the Republicans -- $1,053,141 for the Dems ($716,731 by Murphy, $336,410 by DCCC, DNC, SEIU) vs. $924,112 for the Republicans ($485,697 by Tedisco and $567,444 by other GOP entities and groups). It’s striking that the GOP outside groups have outspent Tedisco’s campaign. Also worth pointing out, the DCCC says it has spent nearly $600,000 versus $817,000 for the NRCC, and the DNC has spent some $20,000 versus $280,000 for the RNC.

Countdown to Obama’s 100th day: 29 days 
Countdown to NJ GOP primary: 63 days
Countdown to VA Dem primary: 70 days
Countdown to Election Day 2009: 217 days
Countdown to Election Day 2010: 581 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I don't think it's a big deal that Pres Obama has to work with congressional democrats to promote his agenda; for the most part they are onboard with his health care issues, energy and education.  Democrats have always been independent thinkers.  Republicans have always been good at marching in lockstep and obeying their party chiefs; unfortunately, that does not usually benefit the American people.  We have only to look at the yes votes to anything and everything Bush requested without questioning anything, and the end result:  two unfinished wars, massive debt with nothing to show for the money, economic meltdown.  At least McCain did question the Bush tax cuts for awhile before he, too, fell in lockstep.

Pres Obama will be received well overseas, the people like him; just because the country's don't agree with everything he has proposed doesn't mean the honeymoon is over.  The Medvedev article proves that Pres Obama's foreign policy is pointed in the right direction.  Bush, under the direction of Cheney, was so trapped in ideology that great harm was done to America and far too many opportunities were lost.

The press seems to have forgotten that many banking CEO's are gone.  Pres Obama didn't have to fire them because it was done under Bush.  David Shuster, you let me down on that hypocrisy watch but you'll again be right.  There's been so much turmoil and daily news, it's no wonder the happenings last fall have receded in our minds.  What I found humerous was the clips of GOP Sen Bob Corker last fall demanding that the union auto worker take pay cuts so their wages would equal those of foreign automakers--that was OK for the Government to request but yesterday, he was having a fit that Pres Obama dared to fire the GM CEO.  More proof that republicans are anti-union, anti-middle class, anti-blue collar worker.

Pres Obama does more than talk, he gets things done and in the process he tells us what he is doing.  What a change.  
We can no longer use the term "war on terror."

Hillary has become an embarrassment. Rice was much better. Hillary kisses too much butt. She's an international groupie. Another bad choice for Obie.

The term "war on terror" was coined by President Bush so they obviously want to eradicate it like it doesn't exist. More Dem political insanity.
===============================================
That's because "war on terror" is a catchphrase that doesn't make any sense.  You can't fight a war against an ideology.  If we were going to fight a war on terror, we would start with groups like the KKK and the neo-Nazi groups here.  We would also look to take out the Tiger Rebels in Southeast Asia, the Wighurs in China, the FARC in Central America, the warring factions in Africa, etc.  We're not fighting a "war on terror," we're fighting a war against a specific terrorist group in a limited part of the globe.  I know that's not as catchy a catchphrase, but it's more accurate.  Saying we're fighting a war on terror is just like saying we're fighting a war on drugs or a war on illiteracy or a war on hatred.  Sounds good but doesn't actually explain what we're doing.
I would like to know the demographics of the people being polled.

I would also like to know why these people are being so easy on President Obama.
=================================================
The demographic is "American voters" and they're "being easy" on the President because they think he's making the right decisions.
Just Sayin' ~ Depends on the game, doesn't it?  
>>>Once again I see FIRST READ picks and chooses which posters get unrestricted access to the board, and which posters are censored.
The Obama-Rama-Ding-Dongs get unlimited posts and free speech...the rest of us aren't allowed to express our concerns and opinions.
I'm beginning to think the right wing-nuts are correct. The media IS leftist-leaning and has an extreme liberal agenda.
...and this is coming from a moderate-liberal-leaning Democrat.
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY (Sent Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:04 AM)

==========
And yet, as always, your postings manage to get through with startling regularity.

http://jawillie.blog.com
All,

Haven't you noticed that *Moon*.anything = same Rush talking point du jour?  I suspect that Bad Chiuahiua and Palomino are also one in the same.  They show up together, eat the same crap together and spew the same garbage together.  That's what happens when the teenagers skip school.  Pretty soon someone's going to end up strung out and pregnant.  Where are the parents, I ask?
"I would like to know the demographics of the people being polled.

I would also like to know why these people are being so easy on President Obama. " - Jill F., Tulsa OK
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"These people" are your fellow AMERICANS, the same folks that made Barcack Obama the President of the United states less than 5 months ago.

What do you propose that the President could have done in the past 60+ days that would have made everything all better?

What does the President's positioning in, above, or below "the fray" have to do with it?

Since the President represents "politics as usual", why does he make you so upset? You should be used to it by now, right?

What do the the "demograpics" of those being polled have to do with anything?

Your argument basically boils down to "I don't like the President, and I don't understand why anyone else would."

Perhaps a little more patience and a little less political posturing will make it all come into focus for you eventually.
PS.  I don't think Jill F., Tulsa, OK or J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY are ever going to get over Hillary's loss.  And while they constantly remind us what Liberal Dems they are - their vitriole against President Obama is just petty, at this point.  Seriously, ladies, give it a rest.
When is the president going to start firing some of the wall street scum who caused this economic downturn? i know the republicans will bitch about socialism but when those companies took taxpayer welfare then they should have expected government ownership...duh hello
The election in NY is not nearly as crucial as the media makes it out to be. This area is a republican stronghold and will be very hard for a Democrat to win.
FR, saying that if they win they are getting rid of their demons is stupid and of course bias. They create more demons every day, everytime they open their mouths and continue their hypocritical postering. They are not the politicians we want leading our country.  
"But writing in the New Republic, Jon Chait raises this interesting question: Why have recent Democratic presidents (Carter, Clinton, and now Obama) received less deference from congressional Democrats than GOP presidents have received from congressional Republicans?"

Ummm.... hello?!?  Several things:

1) Democrats have liberals, moderates and conservatives.  Republicans have - well, mostly conservatives.  Do the math.  That one ain't hard.

2) You're really comparing what - 70 days or so of the beginning of a Presidential term with the whole of Bush's first term?  Give the guy a break!  He got a 787 billion dollar stimulus package through in a few weeks, and still has great approval ratings.

3) Democrats have ALWAYS been different than Republicans in this regard.  Republicans swallow hard, and line up behind whoever is their "leader."  Democrats actually bother to think and have differing opinions, even if they do eventually fall in line.  But they make some noise in the interim.
MSierra, SF - I'm right with you!  Hope they go after them.  I don't know what this country is waiting for!  Torture is illegal!~  And NOBODY is above the law!
The world is not happy with Obie these days. He wants to bankrupt the world's economy the same way he's bankrupting that of the United States.

BOOOOO!
Palomino (Sent Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:29 AM)
------------------------------------------------------

The world is not happy with america...

While we are at war we will always hear boo's
I would like to know the demographics of the people being polled.

I would also like to know why these people are being so easy on President Obama. " - Jill F., Tulsa OK
---------------------------------------------------
Jill, the readers of the Washington Post are being polled.  In case you don't read the Post regularly, their masthead might as well have the words 'the official mouthpiece of the Obama team' beneath it.  So it's hardly reliable or representative of most Americans' views.
The make up of the district should push it republican. It will say more about the republicans if it does not go their way.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1872082

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google