ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama agenda: New head of the CDC

Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:17 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

The New York Times was the first to report on Obama picking Dr. Thomas Frieden to head up the CDC. “Dr. Frieden, a 48-year-old infectious disease specialist, has cut a high and sometimes contentious profile in his seven years as New York’s top health official under Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. He led the crusade to ban smoking in restaurants and bars, pushed to make H.I.V. testing a routine part of medical exams, and defended a program that passes out more than 35 million condoms a year.”

“At the C.D.C., he will inherit a host of immediate and long-term problems, including a looming decision about whether and how to produce a swine flu vaccine. Health experts say the agency must resolve serious morale and organizational issues even as the administration struggles to overhaul the nation’s health care system.”

“President Obama on Thursday declared that ‘enough's enough’ when it comes to high credit card fees and sudden interest rate hikes and called on Congress to immediately protect consumers from abusive practices by credit card companies,” the Washington Post says. “Speaking during a packed town hall meeting here as senators debated credit card legislation back in Washington, Obama used the rhetorical power of the presidency to push Congress along. As he did last week, Obama urged lawmakers to pass legislation that he can sign into law by Memorial Day.”

Politico: “Attorney General Eric Holder was the man in the middle Thursday, pinned down between liberal Democrats chafing at several of the Obama administration’s recent moves and conservative Republicans warning grimly that the president’s actions, particularly on Guantanamo Bay, are putting Americans at risk.”

“President Barack Obama's pick to lead the Census Bureau is ruling out the use of statistical sampling in the 2010 head count, seeking to allay GOP concerns that he might be prone to put politics over science,” the AP writes. “Robert M. Groves, a veteran survey researcher from the University of Michigan, faces questioning in his confirmation hearing Friday before a Senate committee. In prepared remarks obtained by The Associated Press, Groves said he would not pursue statistical adjustment next year -- despite his support for it in previous censuses -- because it is now legally barred for the use of apportioning House seats.”

Get your Jimmy Rollins jerseys ready… The 2008 World Series champion Philadelphia Phillies head to the White House today.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I'm glad that Obama is going after the stinking ripoff bankers on credit card rapes.  Too bad he is abandoning single payer health care.

Geez more whining about the census from the repugnant ones.  I can't wait for redistricting to start so we can watch the limpwristed conservative crybabies whine about losing seats in Congress.  Let's not forget what happened under bushwhacker's reign of redistricting terror!
Now we won't be able to take the CDC at it's word or even seriously.

Let Obie explain why taxpayers should have to pay for abortions.
Good move...some one was behind the eight ball..
It is about time someone took on the greedy bankers. Why should I be punished with higher rates because some fool can't pay off their card or for a longer term loan? As a reliable source of money to keep the bank solvant credit card holders seem to be holding up some banks. This will have to stop.

As for CDC, I don't know about Dr. Frieden but I trust the President to make a good choice.

Another desparate attempt by the Republicans to gerrymander, in their favor of course, the look of Congress so they whine about how there won't be averaging or statistical tricks or whatever. If the shoe was on the other foot the Democrats would be whining and the Republicans would want to stick to the ACTUAL counts.

-----------------------------------------------------
Let Obie explain why taxpayers should have to pay for abortions.
Fortunate Son (Sent Friday, May 15, 2009 9:44 AM)

= == = = = = = = ===
Just who do you think should pay? Many of those women are hardly able to buy food let alone pay medical costs for something like that. I, frankly, would rather pay what, for me, amounts to a few pennies to allow a clean place with trained medical professionals so a woman can stay out of alleys or filty, cheap, psudo clinics for their abortion. If a woman has her mind set on doing that she will do it one way or another. While I personally oppose abortion I realize that my opposition is not important to a woman whose mind is made up so, for her safety, I'd rather see her in a clean place with trained professionals than a dark alley with a coat hanger or some guy who re-uses rubber gloves.
<Let Obie explain why taxpayer should have to pay for abortions> I guess Fortunate Son, whatever that means, has no problems if abortions are outlawed and women are raped and resort to back alley abortions. It incredible how you right ringer/relgious nuts defend life when it's a fetus BUT will not lift a finger to help financially if the infant lives in poverty, abused and/or neglected homes. God forbid if you right winger/holier than thou becomes foster parents and adopt thousands of minority children that end up dying.Furthermore, if men all of a sudden wake up and have to deal w/ what women have to ABORTIONS WOULD BE ON DEMAND.      
Eric, I agree that there needs to be major shake-up in the credit card industry. A personal note: I have a family member who was part of Citicorp. This relative got to the point that to advance further in the industry, he'd have to become the kind of person he didn't want to be. He left, went back to school and just graduated in a total diferent field. It was a hard choice (has wife and kids), but better to tighten the belt then become less of a person.

We know that card companies are bad. That said, we cannot cross over the line of what is legal and right either. A lot of the things they do is legal, and you cannot protect an idiot from hurting themselves. Companies have the right to do legal business, and fools have the right to accept the bad deals.

To take away these right would make us as bad or worse than the card companies. There are some cases of breach of contract and issues like that. Those should be prosecuted per the law.

About the redistricting, the dem's cried too when the shoe was on the other foot. Both play this game--it goes back and forth. Better to end the game than wallow in it until the next cycle. It goes back to the concept of being a better person.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1933545

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google