ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



CIA chief: 'Ignore the noise'

Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 2:48 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , ,

From NBC's Andrea Mitchell and Mark Murray
In a statement to agency employees regarding the back-and-forth with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, CIA Director Leon Panetta tells them to ignore the political controversy.

"My advice -- indeed, my direction -- to you is straightforward: ignore the noise and stay focused on your mission. We have too much work to do to be distracted from our job of protecting this country. We are an Agency of high integrity, professionalism, and dedication. Our task is to tell it like it is -- even if that's not what people always want to hear. Keep it up. Our national security depends on it."

Video: CIA Director Leon Panetta says officials from his agency "truthfully" briefed lawmakers on interrogation methods in 2002, countering House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's claims. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

Yet also in the statement, he appears to take Pelosi's charge head on. "Let me be clear: It is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress. That is against our laws and our values. As the Agency indicated previously in response to Congressional inquiries, our contemporaneous records from September 2002 indicate that CIA officers briefed truthfully on the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, describing "the enhanced techniques that had been employed." Ultimately, it is up to Congress to evaluate all the evidence and reach its own conclusions about what happened."

Below is the full memo.

Message from the Director: Turning Down the Volume

There is a long tradition in Washington of making political hay out of our business. It predates my service with this great institution, and it will be around long after I'm gone. But the political debates about interrogation reached a new decibel level yesterday when the CIA was accused of misleading Congress.

Let me be clear: It is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress. That is against our laws and our values. As the Agency indicated previously in response to Congressional inquiries, our contemporaneous records from September 2002 indicate that CIA officers briefed truthfully on the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, describing "the enhanced techniques that had been employed." Ultimately, it is up to Congress to evaluate all the evidence and reach its own conclusions about what happened.

My advice-indeed, my direction-to you is straightforward: ignore the noise and stay focused on your mission. We have too much work to do to be distracted from our job of protecting this country.

We are an Agency of high integrity, professionalism, and dedication. Our task is to tell it like it is-even if that's not what people always want to hear. Keep it up. Our national security depends on it.

Leon E. Panetta

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

From previous post:

"So in other words: as long as its a republican being blamed for some BS it is okay. When the shoe is on the other foot it becomes irrelevant.

You talk out of the side of your neck constantly.

YOU think your an intellectual, upstanding with GREAT integr-i-t-y, individual with no flaws that can come in here and just bash at republicans with no one coming back at you. I can stand toe to toe with any of you...... " - InTheMiddle, TX
==============================================
Talking out the side of my neck?

Wow . . . haven't heard that one in a while! lol

Take a few hours to attend Fied Day at my kids' school and THIS is what I come back to? Mercy! :)

I am sorry if using facts to back things up has cast the Republicans in a bad light . . . I really am.

I am not an "intellectual", but I do know how to think for myself. And as far as you being able to stand "toe to toe" with me?

I never doubted it, glad you are feeling empowered today.

Your problem is not with me . . . your problems is with the results of Republican policies - unregulated theft and deception and the heartless application of dogma to the exclusion of common sense.

I'm no better or worse than anyone here . . . and it's not about me . . . it's about changing America for the better.

Off to get some milkshakes . . .

P.S. For the record, I don't really care about alot of this internal, ethical, congressional BS at all . . . it consumes too much time from the people's business . . . if it's a crime . . . put them in jail . . . if it's not . . . do your jobs and stop all the political posturing.
SLAM DUNK!!!!
Oh wait has that line been used already.
Thanks CIA
The GOP is desperate, taking the focus off Cheney finding his voice to the slime-ball Rove testifying today - Friday, how convenient - reminds me of all those "Document Dump Friday's" during the Imperial BushCo Presidency!! Just send Cheney and Rove to prison - they've stolen enough of our money!!
The more Dick Cheney talks, the more determined the democrats should be to investigate his role in the illegal activities that took place during his time in office! How ironic he couldn't find his voice to speak up for the soldiers he put in harm's way, or those ill affected by the policies he helped shape while in office, but is now a squawk box on every media outlet that will listen to him try to save himself!!




I agree with Leon Panetta there is much work to do to dwell on he said - she said. Lets not make a mountain out of a mole hill.  Nancy Pelosi had her say the CIA had their say - lets get on with business of protecting our country and support President Obama.
Hello?!  Doesn't Panetta remember that HE wasn't CIA chief when this supposedly happened?  So how does this relate to "our" policy?  Unless he's already received marching orders on this.  I'm betting; anyone taking?  
Well the last time a Democrat from the Clinton Administration ran the CIA he lied George Bush into war with Iraq, so who really knows? Just going by what I've learned from watching main stream liberal media.  Bahaahaaha
Of course it is all about integrity under Panetta. Was it so under his predecessors? I remember the mess the CIA was in when he took over. Perhaps they didn't "emphasize" the integrity part as much as Panetta does.
IGNORE THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN SLAM DUNK the CIA never lies niether did BUSH and his cronies who you gonig to believe me or your LYING eyes.SADIST will torture for free why pay these people?
It is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress. That is against our laws and our values.

-----------------------------------------------------
Those high values like torturing Prisoners of War.

And for those who want to disput the whole enemy combatant vs. war prisoner thing...

It's called the "war" on terror
Integrity This same bubnch of fools got us in a worthless war lying for the past BUSH team where they gonna line up behind the sickos who hired thier sadistic bloodhungry patriotism they would torure your mother if cheyeney told them too that is not the USA thats SOVIET UNION my friend.
"Ignore the noise."

Great advice.  But then bloggers and MSM talking heads would be out of business, and where would you and I get our daily adrenaline rush?
Yes, but what was the CIA's task under Cheney? That is the $64,000 question.
A lot of funny stuff went on during the Bush Adminstration.

On Nancy Pelosi: Anybody who flusters and stutters as much as she does cannot be lying. Most liars are straight forward and have their stories consistent and rehearsed.

I could tell that Nancy was trying to keep the public informed without revealing confidential information.

And we all know that the CIA has misinformed on a steady basis to everyone.

Going forward I am sure it will be different under Panetta's watch and I for one agree with Prez Obama. Let's go forward!
Make no mistake, Panetta is setting up domestic wiretaps to help The Chosen One generate his Enemies List.

Once ACORN gets control of the census the road is paved for a complete Bolshevik takeover.
Yes, by all means, ignore the man behind the curtain

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123600509352009745.html

Fight amongst yourselves, and attack those who might or might not have heard anything rather than those who wrote or authorized all this.
ALLENDA from chile assasinations of world leaders ring a bell the CIA never lies dropping acid on american citizens lying about wmds yellow cake they are a money makeing machine for all the lunitic fringe who subvert democracy top save it .
Dir. Panetta speaks in the present which is where we are living now. These issues are from the past when the spinless syncophant, George "Slam Dunk" Tenent was in charge.

His advice is good for present policy, but we still need a full investigation of the role CIA briefers played in this under Darth-Dubya.
I think Panetta is correct--ignore the noise.  The CIA Panetta runs is not the same as under Bush & Cheney; records kept may or may not be accurate.  Most likely there's truth from Pelosi and from the CIA.  As someone else commented, whether Pelosi knew or didn't know is not the issue but the GOP wants to that to be the topic.  The issue is whether we tortured and who was the mastermind.  What doesn't make sense to me is why the GOP would blame Pelosi when they were part of the same briefings.  Why would they want to draw attention to the fact that they also were informed and did not raise issues?  The briefings were classified and there was nothing the democrats could have done to stop it UNLESS republicans were equally concerned because the GOP was in the majority.  
I guess the Republicans have plenty of time on their hands for making political hay — since they aren't coming up with any new solutions for helping our country to get out of this mess that the Republicans got us into over the past 8 years… OR for that matter, they aren't interested in stopping their stupid, expensive and dirty oil wars.

While I have no doubt that Pelosi and Dems in general are at least complicit in not stopping waterboarding (and other Dick Cheney fun and games)…. I doubt she aided and abetted torturing…

We all know that Cheney wouldn't have allowed any Dems to participate – and attempts by Congress after 2006 to top the practices were vetoed by Bush (Cheney's sock puppet).

But getting back to the Republican so-called "outrage" over whether Pelosi knew or tried to stop waterboarding in the past…

PUL-EEZE! If the "Party of No" really cared, they should have stopped that war criminal Dick "Darth Vader" Cheney after he outed Valerie Plame.

What a bunch of hypocrites the republicans are! It's like a Chinese Fire Drill every time they think they have some sort of scandal to defer attention away from the pathetic party they belong to.
It is very possible that the Bush Administration did not fill in the Speaker of the House in-depth (which happens to be a Dem), my goodness we all know that administration did some pretty horrible things and this doesn’t seem to go against that norm.

The possibility is very likely that the Speaker was not given in-depth details of what was going on as far as how which techniques were being used… where are the details of what she knew, that would be the biggest help in getting this matter resolved not to mention she's asked for the release of these documents. Sen. Graham & the Speaker appear to be singing off the same sheet, so…
We need to fit Nancy for a nice, Gucci straight jacket. For a seemingly, experienced, successful politician she has made a series of errors that are so
amateurish we have to wonder how she ever became speaker.We can chalk it up to her sinicism and belief that the CIA briefing records could never become public or at least not any time in her political carrer. From that assumtion it is easy to see how she began the over the top attacks on the Bush administration, the US military and every republican who dared stand in her way.Was Nancy making these attacks out of confusion of what she was told by the CIA or simply hitting below the belt to score political points believing she would fly under the cover of the security issue? Other than  the left wing frothing class many democrats must realize that she has become a dangerous side show and liability to their party. Smart dems are seeing that she could be a sinking ship and they don't want to be too near her when ship goes under. This is great!
Nancy Pelosi has now been contradicted by two CIA chiefs, her own former staff member, and members of her own party. Her defense is that it was "not her job" to disagree with the briefings, because she had an election to win in the House. Excuse me…. but her job is to represent her constituents, and members of the US House of Representatives as Speaker; and finally the people of the US as a member of the House Intellegence Committee. She has been exposed as purely a political hack and should be replaced as leader of the House of Representatives.
Well the last time a Democrat from the Clinton Administration ran the CIA he lied George Bush into war with Iraq, so who really knows? Just going by what I've learned from watching main stream liberal media.  Bahaahaaha

Dave, Tn (Sent Friday, May 15, 2009 3:11 PM)

If I remember correctly, Tenent was/is a family friend of the Bushes and that is why he was kept on board after W's takeover.
Make no mistake, Panetta is setting up domestic wiretaps to help The Chosen One generate his Enemies List.

Once ACORN gets control of the census the road is paved for a complete Bolshevik takeover.
Robert Underdunk Terwilliger, Springfield, USA (Sent Friday, May 15, 2009 3:29 PM)


LOL.....ahhh, thanks for making my day with this baloney.  What a great way to end the week!
Pelosi is a withered candle in the wind whose wick has suddenly turned a shriveled black to match her lord and master.
Andrea, You are being very kind to Pelosi. I think that some Botox leaked out of her face and into her brain. She was talking out of botyh sides of mouth when her face is so tight ahe can hardly speak out of one side


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1934136

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google