ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama: Dems unified on health care

Posted: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:44 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
President Obama issued a public letter to Sens. Ted Kennedy and Max Baucus, the two Democrats seen as most key to the design of potential health-care legislation.

In the letter, the president sets the ambitious timeline of having health-care reform passed by October.

It also gives the appearance that Democrats are all on the same page. Earlier in the week, the narrative was building that there was some disagreement between Kennedy and Baucus factions on how health care should be dealt with.

Obama also expresses explicit support for a public health insurance option in the letter and calls on Republicans to jump on board.

"I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health-insurance option operating alongside private plans," Obama writes. "This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest."

He concludes, "I know that you have reached out to Republican colleagues, as I have, and that you have worked hard to reach a bipartisan consensus about many of these issues. I remain hopeful that many Republicans will join us in enacting this historic legislation that will lower health care costs for families, businesses, and governments, and improve the lives of millions of Americans. So, I appreciate your efforts, and look forward to working with you so that the Congress can complete health care reform by October."

Full letter below:

June 2, 2009

The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy

The Honorable Max Baucus
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Kennedy and Senator Baucus:

The meeting that we held today was very productive and I want to commend you for your leadership -- and the hard work your Committees are doing on health care reform, one of the most urgent and important challenges confronting us as a Nation.

In 2009, health care reform is not a luxury. It's a necessity we cannot defer. Soaring health care costs make our current course unsustainable. It is unsustainable for our families, whose spiraling premiums and out-of-pocket expenses are pushing them into bankruptcy and forcing them to go without the checkups and prescriptions they need. It is unsustainable for businesses, forcing more and more of them to choose between keeping their doors open or covering their workers. And the ever-increasing cost of Medicare and Medicaid are among the main drivers of enormous budget deficits that are threatening our economic future.

In short, the status quo is broken, and pouring money into a broken system only perpetuates its inefficiencies. Doing nothing would only put our entire health care system at risk. Without meaningful reform, one fifth of our economy is projected to be tied up in our health care system in 10 years; millions more Americans are expected to go without insurance; and outside of what they are receiving for health care, workers are projected to see their take-home pay actually fall over time.

We simply cannot afford to postpone health care reform any longer. This recognition has led an unprecedented coalition to emerge on behalf of reform -- hospitals, physicians, and health insurers, labor and business, Democrats and Republicans. These groups, adversaries in past efforts, are now standing as partners on the same side of this debate.

At this historic juncture, we share the goal of quality, affordable health care for all Americans. But I want to stress that reform cannot mean focusing on expanded coverage alone. Indeed, without a serious, sustained effort to reduce the growth rate of health care costs, affordable health care coverage will remain out of reach. So we must attack the root causes of the inflation in health care. That means promoting the best practices, not simply the most expensive. We should ask why places like the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and other institutions can offer the highest quality care at costs well below the national norm. We need to learn from their successes and replicate those best practices across our country. That's how we can achieve reform that preserves and strengthens what's best about our health care system, while fixing what is broken.

The plans you are discussing embody my core belief that Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it, while seeing their costs lowered as our reforms take hold. But for those who don't have such options, I agree that we should create a health insurance exchange market where Americans can one-stop shop for a health care plan, compare benefits and prices, and choose the plan that's best for them, in the same way that Members of Congress and their families can. None of these plans should deny coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition, and all of these plans should include an affordable basic benefit package that includes prevention, and protection against catastrophic costs. I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest.

I understand the Committees are moving towards a principle of shared responsibility -- making every American responsible for having health insurance coverage, and asking that employers share in the cost. I share the goal of ending lapses and gaps in coverage that make us less healthy and drive up everyone's costs, and I am open to your ideas on shared responsibility. But I believe if we are going to make people responsible for owning health insurance, we must make health care affordable. If we do end up with a system where people are responsible for their own insurance, we need to provide a hardship waiver to exempt Americans who cannot afford it. In addition, while I believe that employers have a responsibility to support health insurance for their employees, small businesses face a number of special challenges in affording health benefits and should be exempted.

Health care reform must not add to our deficits over the next 10 years -- it must be at least deficit neutral and put America on a path to reducing its deficit over time. To fulfill this promise, I have set aside $635 billion in a health reserve fund as a down payment on reform. This reserve fund includes a number of proposals to cut spending by $309 billion over
10 years --reducing overpayments to Medicare Advantage private insurers; strengthening Medicare and Medicaid payment accuracy by cutting waste, fraud and abuse; improving care for Medicare patients after hospitalizations; and encouraging physicians to form "accountable care organizations" to improve the quality of care for Medicare patients. The reserve fund also includes a proposal to limit the tax rate at which high-income taxpayers can take itemized deductions to 28 percent, which, together with other steps to close loopholes, would raise $326 billion over 10 years.

I am committed to working with the Congress to fully offset the cost of health care reform by reducing Medicare and Medicaid spending by another $200 to $300 billion over the next 10 years, and by enacting appropriate proposals to generate additional revenues. These savings will come not only by adopting new technologies and addressing the vastly different costs of care, but from going after the key drivers of skyrocketing health care costs, including unmanaged chronic diseases, duplicated tests, and unnecessary hospital readmissions.

To identify and achieve additional savings, I am also open to your ideas about giving special consideration to the recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), a commission created by a Republican Congress. Under this approach, MedPAC's recommendations on cost reductions would be adopted unless opposed by a joint resolution of the Congress. This is similar to a process that has been used effectively by a commission charged with closing military bases, and could be a valuable tool to help achieve health care reform in a fiscally responsible way.

These are some of the issues I look forward to discussing with you in greater detail in the weeks and months ahead. But this year, we must do more than discuss. We must act. The American people and America's future demand it.

I know that you have reached out to Republican colleagues, as I have, and that you have worked hard to reach a bipartisan consensus about many of these issues. I remain hopeful that many Republicans will join us in enacting this historic legislation that will lower health care costs for families, businesses, and governments, and improve the lives of millions of Americans. So, I appreciate your efforts, and look forward to working with you so that the Congress can complete health care reform by October.

Sincerely,
BARACK OBAMA

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Let's just "Get Er Done" people. Come to middle ground. We have insurance, supposed to be a good one, and yet it costs us tons of money for the simplest procedures.  My heart goes out to those with none.  Let's get this done.  
I vote for a private plan and a public plan. Why folks are dragging their feet, I cannot imagine. The Health insurance companies are losing customers. Folks cannot afford the payments. The jig is up. It is time for a change.
Obama is worried that healthcare cost is unsustainable. How about that "stimulus package," omnibus bill, various multi-billion bailouts and other spending that are unsustainable?

Oh, Obama is going to let people keep their private plans and allow public options as well. That equals no choice because whether you want to public option or not, you'll pay for it anyway in terms of taxes.

Total economic disaster coming.
The Republiklan response has been to encourage the murder of doctors in church, and then to deny responsibility.
Answer for another thread:

Obama should spend more time reminding muslim countries of what America has done for them instead of apolgizing for our arrogance.
DG, Houston, TX
__________________________________________________

We had no business there. We still have no business their. Because someone doesn’t look like us or worship like us doesn’t make them an enemy and it certinally doesn’t make them stupid.  Did you post that comment or are you just joing the fry by attempting to parse my words. Duhhhh he had no frigging business there.

We haven’t done a damn thing for them that given time they wouldn’t have done for themselves. You are so touched in the head by the brain washing that the Bush Administration gave you all until it sickening.

I suspose that the shoe throwing was done because we were greeted as liberators? Are you aware of their customs enough to know or understand what that symbolized? Read your “holy Bible” to understand the full meaning of what that symbolized sir.
And then we are all reminded of how incredibly smart President Obama is and why many of us worked so tirelessly to get him elected.  I still think single payer long term contract (not government run) needs to be on the bargaining table in the beginning.

This is an excellent framework - now let's get busy and start filling in the margins.
The Taxpayers are unified against the government spending more of money. See what happened in California Obama? All the crying and teeth grinding fits the California pols had over raising taxes, and the people voted them down. Same thing happened in Illinois. Colin Powell was wrong, people do not want more government, they do not want to pay more taxes. You too Obama, you'll find out soon enough the US people don't want to pay more taxes either, especially not for this so called halth care you want to impose.
Democrats are seldom fully unified. They are independent thinkers that follow the directions of their constituents and not the "talking points" of the party like the Republicans who are in 'march step' with talking points from the RNC.
DEMS UNITED ---- FREE HEALTCARE FOR ALL ILLEGALS.
Of course, there should be a public health insurance. It's the only way you can keep the very greedy for profit providers in line. Those receiving some assistance with healthcare premiums should not be taxed. After all, we are paying for the bailout plus, very high insurance rates, plus deductibles, plus co-pays, stc.--it's not like insurance is a free ride. Why is Barcus head of this committee? I'm sure the "For Profits" are very pleased.
Health Care Reform by October...I like that. Music to my ears.
You know its Wednesday afternoon when things come to a screeching halt around here.

Haven’t been able to figure out if it’s because of staff meetings… long lunches or nooner’s   ;0)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You owe me an apology Feisty, think about it...

Joe T, Alexandria, VA (Sent Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:43 AM)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After further review… your right and I stand corrected!  

But take your whining somewhere else… all of a sudden your all self righteous and incensed because you don’t get your way!  Typical GEENOPEE behavior however not surprising!

For you to claim that FR shuts down the blog so that mine & other posters go unanswered is PURE unadulterated BS and you know it! I know the truth is a bitter pill to swallow for you but newsflash… Doesn’t EVERYONE complain now and again about things getting shut down to soon?  Your kind does there fair share at taking ‘shots’ as well so save us the indignation!

Oh.. and if you haven’t figured out by now that this is a ‘left’ leaning site  - you’re on the wrong bus… again…  If you don’t like it then DON’T come here – but pssst… you don’t get to make the rules around here!  Waaa Waaa Waa… Why is everybody always picking on me???

So in closing you’re right… you don’t appear to be a racist…
Answer's from another thread:

We are not a far right country. And never will be.
Pat, Boston, MA
___________________________________________________
Pat I certinally intend to. People like Newt, Rush and the other silent appreciators of the type of racist language I’ve heard recently will not be squashed so easily. They have nothing except vile verbage to offer as their defense and soloutions to correcting the mess they’ve made of our great nation.

America answered in November and the America that answered is the America that I love and respect.  I am just grateful to God that I’ve had the privilage to live to witness such a blessing and I certinally intend on keeping their feet to the fire. Thanks for the vote of confidence and support Pat, with all of us banding together, they won’t stand a chance  of slipping back into the cess pool of hate, racial divide and greed that once plagued our nation.
This is a great approach and I hope they are successful. The only thing that is for sure is that the current system doesn't work like it should.

Somehow we need to get universal coverage and it needs to be affordable. It will be interesting to see how we get there and it will be interesting to see whether the republicans try to help find a solution or just say, "No, it won't work and will ruin our country." If the republicans have problems with it, tell us specifically what those problems are and how we can meet in the middle to solve those problems. Let's see if they can avoid coming back with, "This is our way and the only way we will support."
Answer from Another Thread:

Ed, FW, TX

He is as you call him “ a sterotypical old white person” that has lost his way and refuse to seek further educatiion. His remarks are unfounded and laced with hate and disrespect for females and other coultures until he reeks of the stench of jim crow.

I had to let him know that we are a nation and people of diversed coultures…since he seems to lack knowledge.

I loved my grandparents and love my family and it’s diversity most of all. We are a close family that doesn’t tolerate racisium.

Perhaps now he will choose his words somewhat wisely, Oh Ed, my son just expaned the gene pool further. I am happy to report that I have a “new daughter- in- law”, she’s white, beautiful and “my daughter”, her family loves their new addition (my son) and I would dart hell and back to protect both of my children. If he spouts off again…I’ll get him. lol, lol
I like my coverage, and I don't want it taxed for income tax purposes!
Why is single-payer off the table???  This is ridiculous - every other industrialized nation has great health care, and companies are not burdened with determining the best way to provide health care.  Obama and the Dems in congress should step up the the plate and completely overhaul our health care system!
Oh, please!  Let the Savior-Messiah tax health care benefits for those who EARNED it and redistribute those funds to lazy welfare recipients who will continue to vote his socialiast a$$ back into office.  There, my friends, is an economic IED guaranteed to get unexpected results.
The Democrats are not going to be so unified when they find out the voter backlash over either a VAT taqx, taxing healthcare benefits, or both is going to be swift and angry.

I don't think that their memories are so short.  Or am I the only person who remembers what happened the last time a Democrat president and congress tried to push this kind of agenda down our throats?
Max Baucus's representatives got an earful back in his home state recently, he did'nt attend any of the 20 meetings himself.

Democratic voters along with Independents & some Sane Republican's, have been waiting to many years for a Public Health care system & ANYONE who stands in the way of it, is UNPATRIOTIC !

BANKRUPTING America any longer, is Not an Option for Insurance companies, pharmicutical companies, etc.
We really need to have a single payer option,  otherwise the insurance companies will continue to rip off America.  The public insurance will keep the private insurance companies a bit more honest.  For those who like their insurance as is (lucky you), you will be able to keep it.  But are you sure you will have a job in the future?  Is anybody really sure?  Then what do you do when you have no insurance or money - wait til a small problem is huge and go to the emergency room where they have to treat you with an exorbitant pricetag.  This is the year to fix the healthcare problem.  This is one of the main reasons Obama was elected; everybody knew the republicans would do absolutely nothing about the problem; they do not solve problems, never have.  They are all about the next election and pretty much nothing else.
"I know that you have reached out to Republican colleagues, as I have, and that you have worked hard to reach a bipartisan consensus about many of these issues."

Translation: Let the Republicans keep saying no while the rest of the country know that we are the ones getting health care reform done.  

Sometimes I wonder if the republican party think the health care system is not broke.
I like my coverage, and I don't want it taxed for income tax purposes!
pat huntington ny

Should have thought of that before the last election. Elections matter, and this last one will have a lasting negative influence on the country.
Eric, St. Paul, MN:

I don't recall single pay ever being on the table. President Obama never taunted it...I think that there were those that perhaps wanted it.
in other news; apparently Osama bin Laden has better healthcare than most Americans.

Hasn't he been 'near death' for his chronic kidney disease for years?
No FREE health Care for Illegal Aliens in this bill!
The Taxpayers (Sent Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:00 PM)

You are speaking for yourself, not all of us. Americans are "unified" on very few things, and that is one of the many things that makes this a great country. It is great that we can have an orderly transition from a far right warmongering administration like the bush administration to a centrist, practical, diplomacy seeking administration like the Obama administration.

I can't speak for all liberals, but I can say that while I am not for more government for the sake of a bigger government, I am for a bigger government if it means solutions to problems like the need for universal health care.

And please spare me from the rant about how government is inefficient and doesn't solve problems. Government is no less efficient than big corporations. It is a problem of size and empowerment and when managed properly, with good people that have clear goals and clear levels of authority, it can work well.
Thanks Feisty, but a simple 'I'm sorry' would have sufficed.  But I come here and will continue to do so because it's fun to tweak folks like you with some sensible thinking.  As for my so-called 'indignation' well apparently it worked.  Cheers :)
For those of you who are saying that single-payer health care system is the only way to go you are missing the big picture here.  Listen that idea will never fly.  The second that Obama says something like that every insurance company in the US will go balistic.  It will basically put all the health care providers out of business.  

That said Obama is a VERY VERY smart person.  Listen the government health care system will be cheaper than any others available.  He can get that passed with much less criticism from the right and insurance companies.  That said in the end that will be the only health insurance available by a simple fact that it's the cheapest and best health care on the block and people always gravitate towards what's cheap.
From what I have read, the proposals under consideration to tax some health benefits are to tax the over-the-top plans such as companies give to executives. The blanket tax exemption of anything which can be construed as a health benefit should be on the table.

Sometimes I wonder if the republican party think the health care system is not broke.
Fixed News Translator


You take your cue from Obama, he's said the same about banks, insurance companies, etc. Health care is not "broke". There is an access problem for a small percentage of people in the country, and no that number is not the 40 million number activists would like you to believe.

There is much more to the health care industry then a person going to the doctor. For example, there is the Research and Development wing of the health care that would be totally destroyed by socialized health care. All the money that drug companines need to create new and better medications, all the money that medical supply companies need for new and better tools, most of that would be rolled into providing care for people that can't afford health care. Don't think so? Look at the R&D done in countries with socialized health care, it's next to nil.

So rather then tear down health care and start over, Obama and the Democrats better focus on figuring out a way to solve a problem without creating a dozen more problems in the process.
Here is the "P.S" in President Obama's letter to senators Kennedy and Baucus.....

P.S. As we all know our administration is committed to transparency only when it increases our public approval ratings and NOT when it doesn't. With that aim, please make sure the word "abortion" does not appear any where in the health care bill.  It will be our little secret that it is covered under a much more positive heading of "Reproductive services".  Thanks, guys for doing all you can to help America buy into this bill without really understanding what it's all about.  This will be another bill we'll need to forget doing the 5-day public viewing of (which I had promised but have already broken several times) before signing because we don't need to give the public too much time to catch on to what we're doing.  Your buddy, Barack.
Where in the Constitution does the federal government have the power to create nationalized health care? Wouldn't we need an amendment in order to take it out of the hands of the states?
Let us not be confused between the terms "single payer" and "public option".

As I understand it, single payer means that the Feds will do everyone's insurance, while public option means that current companies and insureds can stay as they are OR folks can change to the public option.

Since the early 90s when managed care (HMOs) became the rage, health care decisions were made not by MDs consulting with patients. but by HMO admins.

The Public Option as a number of posters note, will serve to keep the private companies more competitive and help reduce costs.

There is NO magic bullet here folks, but we have to get something done this year. The insurance companies are working to weaken the legislation as we speak with proposals that will allow a "trigger" to determine when the public option kicks in. Huff post article from yesterday explained that the trigger  will be "fixed" so it never kicks in!

We need the public option to keep the pressure on!
Info based on many other posts:

Anita and Red ... both of you are from another time in space, passing through this horrific time in America where Obie has even taken control of alien minds. It's a real life version of "Men In Black."
I am 68 years young on Medicare. I & my family have been blessed with good health all of our lives. Paid group insurance for over 40 yrs. supporting others not as lucky as we. What happens when one of us gets very ill and our gov't says we will not treat you and besides if you die we will not only have your social security money but also not have to pay for your med. care. Don't think for a moment this can't happen! Young people you need to wake up. Ask what benefits your senators and congressmen receive? They deserve only what you deserve. They just happen to be at the public trough
@The Taxpayers
See what happened in California Obama? All the crying and teeth grinding fits the California pols had over raising taxes, and the people voted them down.

The propositions in California did not raise taxes. Read 1A through 1F here.
http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/
These had more to do with moving money into different buckets than raising taxes. Prop 1C for example was to borrow lottery money for the general fund. The lottery money is currently supposed to be for education.

In terms of the health care thingy, having the option for government insurance is encouraging. I'll admit I haven't done enough reading to form an opinion on a single payer system. I am lucky to have insurance (paid for mostly by my employer) but am not fully satisfied with it.
1. It's really expensive (mostly for my employer but for me too).
2. My wife has spent dozens of hours on the phone with insurance company bureaucrats getting them to pay for cr*p they should have just paid for without fuss.
3. I personally know of people with insurance that have gone to the emergency room when away from home and ended up with huge bills out of pocket.
4. As I get older, it will become nearly impossible to avoid having a pre-existing condition. If I switch jobs (and switch insurance as a consequence), I'm screwed if I get sick and some insurance lawyer determines it's the pre-exising condition. Please note they won't refuse to collect the premiums in the mean time.
5. The insurance companies decide what procedures and/or prescriptions they will pay for. It's not the doctors that decide. I can have whatever procedure done that I would like if I'm willing to pay for it. With Government insurance, that won't change.
6. If I get laid off from my job, I lose my insurance and it's extremely expensive when my company isn't picking up a large part of the premiums.

Remember folks: Insurance companies have one goal and that is to maximize profits for their shareholders. If you get sick, they don't care.
DEMOCRATS ARE UNITED TO RAISE OUR TAXES ---

THE AVERAGE FAMILY WHICH ALREADY HAS HEALTH INSURANCE

WILL PAY ABOUT $2,000 MORE IN TAXES PER YEAR SO THAT

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, TOO, WILL HAVE FREE HEALTHCARE.

GREAT! ... THAT'S SURE TO UNDUE OBAMA!
Don't you just love it when someone like "taxpayer" speaks for all taxpayers.  You do not speak for me.  The republicans think what is in their heads is also in everyone else's heads - either the heighth of arrogance or just plain not "grown up".  Grow up republicans!  Get an actual plan.  Have an actual idea.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1952113

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google