ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Sotomayor, Day 2

Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:19 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Domenico Montanaro, and Ali Weinberg
*** Sotomayor, Day 2: Yesterday was all about the opening statements in Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Today, beginning at 9:30 am ET, come the more important questions and answers. Each senator will be allowed 30 minutes in this first round of questioning (and if past experience is a guide, some will not consume their full time allotments). Watching the Senate Republicans’ opening statements yesterday (save for Lindsey Graham’s), it seemed clear that -- at least politically -- they realize there's a bigger penalty being FOR Sotomayor than being AGAINST her. This is a non-election year, and any Republican seen defending her at this point might find themselves under siege from conservatives on talk radio or on TV. Of course, Democrats wonder if the Senate Republicans will go too far in their questioning (see Sessions vs. Sotomayor today), and whether that could cause pain at the ballot box next year. One Democrat even thinks the phrase, "and even voted against Justice Sotomayor" could be an effective TV or radio ad tagline. We'll see. Bottom line: We're watching Senate Republicans having to play base politics over Sotomayor in the same way Democrats felt pressure to do the same with Roberts and Alito.

*** Talkin’ about my education: President Obama heads today to Michigan -- a battleground state he won last year, 57%-41%, but which now has an unemployment rate of 14.1% -- to give a speech on the economy and education at 3:45 pm ET. In particular, per NBC’s Athena Jones, Obama will use the address to announce his plan to spend $12 billion over 10 years to boost the success of America’s community colleges. As he wrote in a Sunday Washington Post op-ed, “We believe it's time to reform our community colleges so that they provide Americans of all ages a chance to learn the skills and knowledge necessary to compete for the jobs of the future. Our community colleges can serve as 21st-century job training centers, working with local businesses to help workers learn the skills they need to fill the jobs of the future.”

*** Time to bring in the lefty: After making his pitch on the economy and education, Obama heads to St. Louis to make a pitch … at tonight’s Major League Baseball All-Star game. It won’t be his first ceremonial opening pitch; the White House tells First Read that Obama previously threw out a pitch at a minor league game in 2004 and at a White Sox playoff game in 2005. According to CBS Sports, Obama will be the fourth U.S. president to throw out the first pitch at a Major League All-Star Game, following Kennedy (in Washington in ’62), Nixon (in Cincinnati in ’70), and Ford (Philadelphia in ’76). By the way, baseball legend Willie Mays will travel with the president on Air Force One on his Michigan-to-St. Louis leg.

*** Sooner rather than later? After meeting with President Obama to discuss health care yesterday afternoon -- and also after Obama said not to bet against achieving reform this year -- House and Senate Democrats emerged with a renewed sense of urgency to pass a bill in each chamber before the summer recess, NBC’s Ken Strickland reports. "The urgency barometer is going up," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said. "Sooner rather than later." But with less than a month to go before recess, neither the House nor the Senate has a bill ready for votes in their respective committees, much less votes on the floor. Yet that changes today, when the House is expected to introduce its bill. "It won't be the finished product,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, per NBC’s Luke Russert. “It is a mark, to be marked up by committee to go to the next step."

*** Whatever it takes: There is a worry among some House Democrats that they will lose some moderate support if the Senate decides to go home for August without a vote. So they want to hear a public pledge, and key Senate sources tell us that public pledge is coming -- possibly as early as today. Also, Obama publicly reiterated his pledge that he will NOT raise taxes on households making $250,000 or less; that was something the White House believed congressional Democrats needed to hear. Moreover, sources tell First Read that Senate and House Democrats were reminded that the president is not a fan of taxing health-care benefits, and that they should be doing everything they can to avoid passing a plan that includes it. Bottom line: The White House has "cleared the decks" and is focusing almost exclusively on health care for the next three weeks -- or however long it takes -- to get separate bills through the House and Senate before the August recess.

*** Boehner’s rebuttal: Meanwhile, with Obama heading to the Detroit area today, GOP Reps. John Boehner and Dave Camp pen an op-ed in the Detroit News criticizing Obama on health care. “[O]ur plan gives middle-class families and small businesses better access to affordable health care without job-killing tax hikes and mandates that will deepen our economic crisis, leave more Americans out of work, and keep quality care out of reach for far too many. If the president is serious about true health care reform, he'll urge congressional Democrats to scrap their costly government takeover and work with Republicans on better, bipartisan solutions.”

*** Sarah Palin as Charles Krauthammer? So we now know why Sarah Palin is resigning her job as Alaska governor later this month: to write more op-eds criticizing the Obama administration. All kidding aside, her op-ed today in the Washington Post -- on her favorite topic of energy -- is perhaps the clearest sign yet that she’s trying to position herself as a national opponent to the president and his policies. (Focusing on energy is something fans of hers have been advising her to do for months, only now she appears to be taking the advice.)  “I am deeply concerned about President Obama's cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy,” she writes. “It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.” The conclusion to the piece: “Can America produce more of its own energy through strategic investments that protect the environment, revive our economy and secure our nation? Yes, we can. Just not with Barack Obama's energy cap-and-tax plan.”

*** Hillary in the news: We haven’t talked about this in a while, but Secretary of State Clinton raised something we mentioned plenty earlier this year: vetting issues. "The clearance and vetting process is a nightmare, and it takes far longer than any of us would want to see. It is frustrating beyond words," Mrs. Clinton said. "I mean, it is ridiculous. Some very good people just didn't want to be vetted." In fact, there are a lot of little Clinton-related nuggets out there today. Politico is playing up a speech she's giving this week, saying it's a sign she wants to "reassert" herself. (But don't get too heated up over it as some sort of Clinton-vs.-Obama sign; it's no different than speeches Tim Geithner and Larry Summers have given to key groups that care about financial issues.) And is Lanny Davis hurting his credibility with his friends in the Clinton State Department by lobbying on behalf of the current Honduran government, which ousted the president in what some in the Obama administration and the Clinton State Department worry looked too much like a coup?

*** Morning Joe recap: Earlier this morning on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Liz Cheney continued to speak out against Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democrats in the wake of reports about a secret CIA program to capture and kill Al Qaeda leaders. Cheney decried the “political” nature of Pelosi’s comments that former Vice President Cheney ordered the CIA to hide information from Congress. She asserted that “this is not a partisan issue.” Cheney continued to defend her father against Democratic criticism stating, “For the Democrats to politicize this … strikes me as incredibly irresponsible.” After defending her father’s intelligence practices, Cheney responded to claims that she is currently weighing a political bid. When asked if a political run is in her future she replied hesitantly, “It is something I might do down the road.”

*** Christie up 10 In NJ: Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie “has a ten point lead” over Governor Jon Corzine (D), according to a new Quinnipiac University poll. Christie leads Corzine, 50% to 40%, among likely voters. Clay F. Richards, assistant director of the university’s Polling Institute, said Corzine must focus on the “19 percent of Democrats who are voting for Chris Christie, Christie’s 24-point edge among independents, and the 44 percent who say the Governor is not honest and trustworthy.” *** CORRECTION *** We published the results from an earlier Quinnipiac poll. The latest Q poll has Christie up 12 points, 53%-41%.

*** All about Chu: Finally, if it's Tuesday, it's Election Day somewhere in America. And that somewhere this week is in Los Angeles for a special congressional election to replace Hilda Solis, who vacated the job to become Obama's Labor secretary. The favorite is Democrat Judy Chu.

Countdown to Palin Stepping Down: 12 days
Countdown to Election Day 2009: 112 days
Countdown to Election Day 2010: 476 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Cut Your Loses - Elect Republicans

WHAT? The Rethug-li-Cants are all about frightening people into thinking that the government is going to ration healthcare. There must be health care reform is this country and now is the time. A public option is what the President's plan offers. Please do more reading and far less listening to the CPR propoganda pitches on TV. It'll rot your brain.
How many more distractions do the Democrats need to cover up their messes? Palin, Bush, Cheney, . . ., what, no Sanford?

Unemployment continues it's rise. 15% is not out of the question. Big ticket programs, job killing programs, are what Obama wants to pass. Foreign policy is nothing more then Obama apologizing to everyone. Obama's Russian trip was nothing short of a disaster.

You've got a lot to cover up liberals. And the thread-bare excuses you keep throwing up are getting a little old, okay a lot old.
and, not to live too deep in the past - but this one struck me as classic hypocrisy:

“…You’ve been called on this before, but you still keep repeating the lie.  The unemployment rate under Reagan peaked at 10.8% in 1982 – and then declined dramatically throughout the remainder of his term.  Get your facts straight and stop with the lies.”  Bill, Fairfax, VA (Sent Friday, July 10, 2009 1:45 PM)

Is it fair to say that Reagan inherited a mess from Carter and the unemployment actually RAMPED UP on Reagan’s watch?  I mean that’s how I read the history of it.  So how is that different from where we are now?  I’m curious how this gets twisted back around to Reagan GOOD, Obama BAD.  Your team simply can’t have it both ways and then claim some credible foothold on the issues.

But go ahead, the world loves a good story – type away.
Clara Kansas City, MO (Sent Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 AM)

====================

What planet are you from?  The purpose of the post you reference was to correct a persistent misstatement by one of your leftist colleagues that the unemployment rate under Reagan was 15%.  The post had nothing to do with Reagan GOOD or Obama BAD, it had nothing to do with Reagan inheriting a mess from Carter.  It was just a straightforward correction of a factual error, pure and simple.

How you twist that into being a case of ’classic hypocrisy’ is just astonishing.  And if your comment is an example of the ‘A game’ Feisty is always bragging about, well you should go back to your room and leave serious discussion to the few adults who hang out around here.
Was Sarah so deeply concerned about cap and trade when her running mate proposed it during the campaign? I just thought I'd ask.

Hypocrisy still reigns supreme in the Republican party.
eagle1776


Obama and Biden disagree on the economy. Biden says the stimulus has failed, Obama thinks it's working great. Do these two ever talk?
Allen L. Roland:

“The Bush /Cheney crime syndicate of smoke, spin and deception is finally now becoming obvious to the mainstream press, although the alternative press, including myself, have known and reported this for years. New revelations of abuses of power, lies and deception are being revealed almost every day and all the lies eventually lead to the chief architect himself ~  Dick Cheney.

Think of Cheney as the CEO, War Czar and holder of the secrets ~ who gave Bush his marching orders and Bush complied ~ as witnessed in the sudden resignation of Bush's best friend  and advisor, Karl Rove in 2007. Cheney wanted no competition for Bush's ear as he implemented his grand neocon global end game ~ the stakes were too high. Plus, Cheney and Bush are tied at the hip in lies and deceptions that go all the way back to the 9/11 cover-up.  (Remember, they refused to testify under oath and would only be interviewed together in the 9/11 commission investigation )  

Cheney made his last power stand and eliminating all but his staunchest supporters in the process . But what he can't escape is the trail of lies and deceptions which all eventually lead to himself and Bush, who as President, shares equal responsibility for them.”
______________
Yet the excuses are allowed to continue in large segments of the media by apologists, such as the little lady Cheney. Just who are the “real” Americans in this country? It sure ain’t the Bush Administration apologists.

The Bush Administration DID NOT KEEP US SAFE from anything, whether it be terrorists or the economy. They’re lying.
Republican Rex - that's the funnies thing I have heard in a while.

So - when did they let you out of the mountains of West Virginia?  

I will help you understand - the year is 2009! Liberals work hard and don't want easy free money.

Unlike you conservatives that want the government to make it easier for you to steal tax payers dollars

We liberals like to earn our money and treat each others like human beings - and not slaves to slave owners.

Conservatives are leeches and heartless – you hide behind religion as well, you think ill of people that are not as evil as you.

We pay taxes like everyone else and your typical BS stereotyping wont change that fact, but only emphasizes your ignorance.

Thank you and GOD BLESS AMERICA
Why won’t the Louisiana governor and other top Republicans denounce the Young Republicans’ new chairman, Audra Shay, who's accused of spreading racial hate on Facebook?  check TDB
EMPATHY IS HER CODE WORD FOR PREJUDICE...

Perhaps you should vist your nearby Webster's to learn the meaning of empathy. In lay terms, it means I know what you are going thru and I feel your pain.

Several years ago, two Christian talk DJ's were discussing the fact that Virginia was considering a new State Song since "Carry Me Back to Ole Virginny" was offensive to African Americans. They saw nothing wrong with the song and wondered why it should be replaced. The lyrics are as follows: Carry me back to ole Virginny. There's where the cotton and the corn and taters grow. There's where the birds warble sweet in the Springtime. There's where this ole darkey's heart am long to go.

Wait, it gets better.

There's where I labored, so hard for ole massa. Day after day in the field of yellow corn. No place on earth do I love more sincerely. Than ole Virginny, the state where I was born.

I would like to think that the Justices that sit on the bench, that serve ALL Americans, would be sympathetic to how offensive these lyrics are. It has nothing to do with affirmative action, but should be able to walk a mile in someone else's shoes.
Bill,

The point about taxing the rich isn't how much they already pay, it's about how much they already control.  The top 1% of Americans may pay 17% of the taxes, but control 50% of the wealth of the country; property, investments, stocks, etc.  When you expand that out to the top 5%, who pay 57% of the taxes (and I'm just accepting your numbers), they control almost 95% of the wealth of the country.  So, it seems that they are really paying a smaller percentage of their total wealth than those who make minimum wage.  BTW, do you think that all of these people earned all their money, or do you think that a considerable portion of it was inherited; think DuPont, not Buffet.
"Now you know why he wants this passed before the August recess.  He does not want members of congress to be confronted by their constituents on this issue.  If these members actually go along with him,they will lose their seats. "
-no joe, no bo, nj
=====================================================
First, Washington, DC is not that hard of a city to find . . . we can let our congressional representatives know what we think of pending legislation while they are there . . . so the whole premise of your post is pretty much baseless.

Second, the members of Congress are going to lose their seats if they DO NOT give us the healthcare reform that they have been promising us for YEARS. We the people DESERVE affordable health care, and we will have it. OUR NEEDS should come before private insurance company profits.

Thirdly, the whole "poll numbers dropping" story?

Predictable and meaningless.

The President said it best "time to put away childish things" . . . like the poll of the week for example . . . the entire concept is SO OUTDATED.

Before an election? Great.

Minute by minute analysis of a presidency?

Waste of time.
Most people in the country like their health care plans, and they see what Obama is doing will destroy that for them. One thing you don't mess with is families and their health, and that is exactly what Barry is doing. People, working people, tax paying Americans, see that they'll be paying more for health care and getting much, much less. Procedures that used take days to take care of will now take weeks and even months. People know that. Families know that. Obama is just trying to blow enough smoke (Marlboro's, right?) into people's faces to get this legislation of his passed. God help us all if it does.
Love the ones with heavily subsidized healthcare whinig about reform plans to include all Americans...

Hw do you socialists on medicare, tricare, VA, civil pensions or any other taxpayer funded benefit program get off claiming the rest of us are socialists for wantig your deal?
How you twist that into being a case of ’classic hypocrisy’ is just astonishing.  And if your comment is an example of the ‘A game’ Feisty is always bragging about, well you should go back to your room and leave serious discussion to the few adults who hang out around here.

Bill, Fairfax, VA (Sent Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:15 AM)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Geeze Bill... little testy today are we...?

Repeating the same old tired mantra... doesn't make it magically come TRUE!
MIka's "interview" this morning was embarrassing.    She chose a line of questions that boiled down to "Did your Dad break the law?"   "Did he?"   "Really?"   What the h*** did you expect to get out of that Mika?   And then she finished the "interview" with what was essentially an apology to Liz and a slam of Democrats.
I doubt if you'll publish this, but someone needs to say it -- again and again until people listen.

The complete lack of respect for various public officials ("Lizard Cheney," "Quitter Palin," etc. from respondents on this blog demonstrates an unreasonable anger that endangers all of our public officials. Because of this kind of disrespect, which sows seeds of resentfulness, people go to extremes of murder and mayhem. PLEASE take the responsibility for being respectful of people -- discourse is far too angry in this country.

It is sad to see what President Obama is doing to the nation -- socialism is a fair description and those who object to the term need to consult some good history books.

It is also heartbreaking to see such artifice coming from a nominee to the Supreme Court who, after prefacing statements of racial bias with "I shouldn't be saying this..." sits before Congress and tells them what she knows they want to hear instead of truthfully owning up to her own expressed prejudice.  
but WAIT… if you order in the next 10 minutes you’ll receive a trial size can of Rabid Rat Repellant ABSOLUTELY FREE!***  Sorry no COD's
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

How many cans of rabid democRAT repellant can we get?
"Obama and Biden disagree on the economy. Biden says the stimulus has failed, Obama thinks it's working great. Do these two ever talk? "
-Carnie Woods, Nashville Tennessee
=============================================
Hey Carnie . . . when did VP Biden say "the stimulus has failed"?

Oh I know . . . HE NEVER SAID IT!

Also, we have now returned to the Constitutional model of government, you know the one where THE PRESIDENT is in charge . . . welcome back to the real world!

Thanks for stopping by though . . . good to see you!

WHAT? The Rethug-li-Cants are all about frightening people into thinking that the government is going to ration healthcare. There must be health care reform is this country and now is the time. A public option is what the President's plan offers. Please do more reading and far less listening to the CPR propoganda pitches on TV. It'll rot your brain.
J. Ellis, Virginia


"We need to pass this stimulus plan quickly, because if we don't, unemployment may rise above 8%."

BHO Washington DC - February/2009
Its amazing how many people on this board won't acknowledge when a politician is screwing up. To be honest here people, the bailout is not producing. You can still be a democrat and understand this.
The top 0.1% of taxpayers by income pay about 17% of all federal income taxes, the top 1% pay about 37%, and the top 5% pay about 57%.  Oh, and the bottom 50% pay about 3%.

So it sure looks like the federal income tax structure is already quite progressive with evil rich people (and even not so rich people) carrying the vast bulk of the tax burden load.  But now the clueless want to add to that burden.  Makes no sense to continue to squeeze the most productive earners in our society in order to implement the extravagant visions of our socialist president. Bill, Fairfax, VA (Sent Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:54 AM)
-----------------------------------------------------

The top 5% own 90% of the wealth in this country Bill...you want to belong to the club, you need to pay a premium.  So 57% of the taxes is a discount...also 2/3rds of corporations pay no taxes at all, which is bunk.  You try not paying your taxes and see what happens.  They out and out evade taxes, through loopholes and creative accounting.

Back in the day the wealthiest paid capital gains of 80-90%...and we grew just fine.  Why??  Because they were reinvesting to avoid those capital gains rather than taking the money and running (like today).

RE: *** Sarah Palin as Charles Krauthammer?

Anyone else find it ironic that Palin is attacking a cap and trade program just nine months after running on the Republican Presidential ticket with a man that supports it?
Tim, PA (Sent Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:31 AM)
_________

Not at all...after all, this is the same woman who decried socialism, yet had no problem cashing that oil dividend check every year...that wonderful socialist program in Alaska, don't you know.
So many of you really should save your few brain cells for something more productive.
The whole my team is right and your team is wrong just gets ridiculous.
Bad Chihuahua please make a point at least sometimes. I can't believe you are given so much space here.
Sotomayer is qualified and Palin will never be anything more than a silly puppet. Bush is a failure and I suggest all of you should give the current President his term time before you suggest it's a complete failure. You just sound ignorant and you look like an impatient child throwing a tantrum.
Grow up and try making this an adult conversation. That goes for both sides.
My newest best friend is Jon Voight. This great actor is not afraid to air his complaints againt Obie, inspite of the expected attacks from the Huff Puff Post and Daily Kos.

He is ruthless in his verbal disrespect for Obama, and I agree with every word he said. The bottom line is Obie doesn't care if he bankrupts this country.
It's all about Obie.


Bad Chihuahua (Sent Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:46 AM)
______________

I always find it amusing that the conservatives love to berate "liberal hollywood" and how it should stay out of politics, UNTIL....anytime an actor makes an anti-democrat comment, and then suddenly, POOF, the GOP doesn't mind trotting out an actor into the political frey.

Imagine that!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1995672

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google