ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Pete Williams (RSS)

Is it over? Practically speaking, yes

Posted: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:28 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , , ,

From NBC's Pete Williams


As a technical matter, Norm Coleman has the legal option to appeal today's decision over the Minnesota Senate recount to the U.S. Supreme Court. As a practical matter, however, it's over.

Five members of the Minnesota Supreme Court today rejected every legal argument Coleman raised. Though the court has seven members, the ruling was unanimous.

Two members -- Chief Justice Eric Magnuson and Justice Barry Anderson -- recused themselves from the case, because they were on the statewide canvassing board and could not be in the position of essentially ruling on their own earlier conclusion about the election.

Today's decision does not order the governor to act, but it says Al Franken "is entitled" under state law "to receive the certificate of election." The court put the legal effect of its ruling on hold for 10 days -- time enough for Coleman to seek relief from the U.S. Supreme Court.

Many legal scholars agree, however, that it's nearly a certainty that the U.S. Supreme Court will stay out of this. It was one thing for the court to take up the Florida election challenge in 2000, because that involved the presidential election. No such pressing national concern is present here, and there's every reason to think Coleman received fair consideration from the Minnesota courts.

DiscussDiscuss (0 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Raising the SCOTUS confirmation stakes

Posted: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:53 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams


While the Supreme Court did reverse the ruling that Sonia Sotomayor joined in the New Haven case, it also raised the stakes for getting her confirmed early.

The court today took the unusual step of holding one case back and asking for additional argument from the lawyers, which the court will hear on Sept. 9. Justice David Souter, as of today, is gone from the court. So the justices will hope Sotomayor gets confirmed before Sept 9, to avoid the possibility of a 4-4 tie.

The case held back is a challenge to a part of the campaign finance law restricting broadcast ads in the periods before primary and general elections.

DiscussDiscuss (19 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Sotomayor

Posted: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:41 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams


Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed her support last weekend for Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

At a conference of federal judges, she said: "As much as I will miss Justice Souter's company, I was cheered" by the nomination and added that Sotomayor would bring "a wealth of experience in the law and in life." 


"I am glad no longer to be the lone woman on the Court, and look forward to a new colleague well equipped to handle the challenges our work presents," Ginsburg said.

It's unusual -- but not unprecedented -- for a sitting justice to express support for a Supreme Court nominee.

DiscussDiscuss (4 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Despite report, no change on Miranda

Posted: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:27 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams


The Justice Department says there has been no change in policy on giving Miranda warnings to detainees picked up in Afghanistan.

An article in the Weekly Standard says the Obama administration has ordered a change in policy, requiring agents to give Miranda warnings to all detainees. In fact, agents have from time to time given Miranda warnings to some detainees who, it's thought, might end up being prosecuted in U.S. courts. This began in the last administration.

A DOJ spokesman says there's been no new policy directive.

"There has been no policy change and no blanket instruction issued for FBI agents to Mirandize detainees overseas," spokesman Matt Miller said. "While there have been specific cases in which FBI agents have Mirandized suspects overseas, at both Bagram and in other situations, in order to preserve the quality of evidence obtained, there has been no overall policy change with respect to detainees."

*** UPDATE *** Stephen Hayes, the author of the Weekly Standard article, points out that he did not write that the Obama administration has ordered a policy change mandating a reading of Miranda writes for "all" detainees, but just for "high-value" ones. Nonetheless, the article does suggest that there has been a policy change, which is what the Obama Justice Department disagrees with.

DiscussDiscuss (34 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

DC couple accused of spying for Cuba

Posted: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:39 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Pete Williams


Federal officials say a Washington, D.C.-area couple has been arrested and accused of spying for Cuba.

Officials say both are former U.S. government employees -- he from the State Department, she as a Congressional aide.

One official says the spying went on for more than two decades.

We expect to learn more details later today when a federal indictment is unsealed. For now, officials will not disclose the names or any other details.

DiscussDiscuss (35 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Newt backtracks on 'racist' remark

Posted: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:16 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , ,

From NBC's Pete Williams


Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich now says he should not have used the word "racist" to describe Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

Writing in the conservative "Human Events," he said, "The word 'racist' should not have been applied to Judge Sotomayor as a person, even if her words themselves are unacceptable (a fact which both President Obama and his Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, have since admitted)."


"My initial reaction was strong and direct -- perhaps too strong and too direct. The sentiment struck me as racist and I said so. Since then, some who want to have an open and honest consideration of Judge Sotomayor's fitness to serve on the nation's highest court have been critical of my word choice. With these critics who want to have an honest conversation, I agree," Gingrich added.

DiscussDiscuss (54 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Wait, when is Souter stepping down?

Posted: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:59 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams

Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Judiciary Committee Republican, appears to have misstated when David Souter intends to retire from the Supreme Court.

Sessions said today that there's no need to rush the confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor.

"We have a good advantage in that Justice Souter's resignation doesn't take effect until October 5th, when the term ends," Sessions said, adding, "and I do think that gives us the ability to take our time and do it right," he said.



But when Justice Souter sent his letter to President Obama on May 1st, he wrote, "When the Supreme Court rises for the summer recess this year, I intend to retire from regular active service as a Justice." CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (30 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Sotomayor -- conservative on race?

Posted: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:35 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams
An analysis of Judge Sonia Sotomayor's most recent appeals court decisions shows that nearly every time, she voted AGAINST people who were claiming illegal discrimination, according to a lawyer who appears frequently before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The analysis, done by DC lawyer Tom Goldstein for his legal website SCOTUSblog, looked at her court's 50 most recent cases involving the issue of race. He found that the three-judge panels on which she participated upheld claims of discrimination only three times. In 45 other cases, the discrimination claims were rejected. Each time, the judges -- including her -- were unanimous. And the three panels that upheld discrimination claims included at least one Republican-appointed judge. 

Two other cases were decided on technical procedural grounds. 

"It seems to me that these numbers decisively disprove the claim that she decides cases with any sort of racial bias," Goldstein says.

DiscussDiscuss (15 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Sotomayor's '78 discrimination complaint

Posted: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:51 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams
When Sonia Sotomayor was in her final year at Yale law school, she pulled a gutsy move by filing a complaint against a law firm that was interviewing her for a job. She forfeited any chance of working at that firm, but ended up getting an apology.

After a Yale student-faculty hearing determined that one of the firm's lawyers asked her discriminatory questions, the firm said his actions were "insensitive and regrettable."

All of this arose after a dinner in October 1978 at which the lawyer met with Sotomayor and other Yale students. The tribunal concluded that he asked her, "Do law firms do a disservice by hiring minority students who the firms know do not have the necessary credentials and will then fire in three to four years?"

It also found that he asked if Sotomayor would have been admitted to the law school if she were not Puerto Rican, and whether she was "culturally deprived."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (29 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Videos target 3 SCOTUS front-runners

Posted: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:03 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , ,

From NBC's Pete Williams

Saying it wants to be prepared when President Obama announces a nominee, a conservative group has prepared short internet-only ads, attacking three of the women most often mentioned as potential Supreme Court choices.

The Judicial Confirmation Network, which pushed strongly for the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito during the Bush administration, says Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Diane Wood are not moderates or centrists. "They are hard-left activists who would decide cases based on their feelings and their personal political agendas," said Wendy Long, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas

The video on Elena Kagan criticizes her decision, as dean of Harvard's law school, to re-impose a ban on allowing military recruiters access to law school facilities. Kagan said Harvard's anti-discrimination policy required the action, because the military does not permit gay people to serve. The ad says she "kicked the military off campus, incredibly during a time of war."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (27 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

More posts: Next page

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google