<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Mark MurrayIn the latest issue of National Journal, Kirk Victor breaks down Obama's possible veep choices -- assuming he becomes the nominee, of course -- into five categories and lists&amp;nbsp;names for each one:
-- The Dream Ticket: Hillary</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031976</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031976</guid><dc:creator>Liz in SD</dc:creator><description>CHUCK HAGEL!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031978</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:10:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031978</guid><dc:creator>Andrea, New York City</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I vote for JIM WEBB!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GO OBAMA '08</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031985</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:11:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031985</guid><dc:creator>Enrique, Chicago</dc:creator><description>I really like the idea of Chuck Hagel. Chuck is a tough guy. This would truly demonstrate Barack's desire to bridge the partisan divide. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031989</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:12:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031989</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter who he picks. Obama is doomed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are several groups that won't vote for Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Latinos&lt;br&gt;Bitter white Americans&lt;br&gt;Hillary supporters&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;what does he have left?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blacks &amp;amp; College kids.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When was the last time college kids showed up on election day?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031991</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:12:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031991</guid><dc:creator>Mark R., South Montrose, PA</dc:creator><description>I think Hagel would be an excellent choice. &amp;nbsp;Aside from the fact he would draw some moderate Republicans from McCain, he would be a good, experienced addition to the cause.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031992</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:13:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031992</guid><dc:creator>Rhoda</dc:creator><description>I like Sellibus because he captures the experience of a governor that echos his own messsage. I like Hegel for the Independent streak and the way it is a nod to social conservatives and allows them to feel more comfortable. I think that was something Kerry was thinking about with McCain in 2004 and had he done it I think he would have won the election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a lot to also be said for picking Richardson, despite the fact he's not great on the stump. He brings resume and an ease to the ticket and could potentially be parked in the southwest and west and Florida to shore up the Hispanic vote and Independents who will love his resume.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He gets a foreign policy czar and governor in one with Richardson which is why he has to be up there on the list for consideration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think over all, the reaction to HRC exit is going to go a long way towards determining the ticket.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031993</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:13:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031993</guid><dc:creator>Dan Salsibury CT</dc:creator><description>ANYone who suggests Clinton is part of the ticket is politically naive. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1031998</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:13:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1031998</guid><dc:creator>Abe MI</dc:creator><description>Sen. Joe Biden is my #1 pick. He is old school and a tough S.O.B!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032000</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:13:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032000</guid><dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator><description>Seriously, can people in the media stop propogating this absolutely absurd notion of an Obama-Clinton &amp;quot;dream ticket&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;Dream ticket&amp;quot;, more like a nightmare.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, if Barack Obama wants to sink his political venture for the presidency, it makes sense. But on whole, it's political suicide and frankly asinine. Yet the media keeps on spewing. I love you guys (Chuck Todd is my hero) but come on, you gotta get off this Clinton-Obama crack.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032001</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:13:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032001</guid><dc:creator>TEH, Gibsonia, PA</dc:creator><description>Bob Casey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Catholic white politician that covers the &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; especially in PA.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032003</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032003</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Burlington VT</dc:creator><description>The Obama message is &amp;quot;Change&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that is going to decide this election the choice is the Lady from Kansas, KS for short.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032004</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032004</guid><dc:creator>CC, Sedona, AZ</dc:creator><description>Tim Kaine, possibly Richardson. Otherwise, none of the above.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032006</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032006</guid><dc:creator>Dave Lash, Hamilton, MA</dc:creator><description>The out-of-the-park home run would be Al Gore. On the surface, implausible. On the other hand, might there be a synergy of interests in a powerful VP role centered on transforming our energy industry, fighting climate change, fostering a green economy, and negotiating global energy/climate alliances?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama would gain:&lt;br&gt;- party unity&lt;br&gt;- a seasoned ally in &amp;quot;fixing Washington&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;- a signature champion on a knotty set of top priority issues&lt;br&gt;- instant international respect and cooperation&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;	...Obama seems confident enough to share power. His &amp;quot;new politics&amp;quot; are going to need lots of experienced allies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore would gain:&lt;br&gt;- leverage to save the planet (he has the knowledge, vision, and network already...)&lt;br&gt;- the executive authority to make the US the energy/climate leader&lt;br&gt;- the backing of a transformational president and partner&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;	...Gore seems confident enough to work under a younger, less-experienced person. Gore's potential legacy is now beyond domestic politics.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032007</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032007</guid><dc:creator>Dem &amp;quot;sweetie' NO MORE</dc:creator><description>*** BILL RICHARDSON IS A JUDAS !!!&lt;br&gt;Shameful and spineless fraction of a man!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032008</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032008</guid><dc:creator>K., Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>I would love love LOVE to see him pick Joe Biden or Kathleen Sebelius. I think either of those choices would appeal to Clinton supporters. Biden is obviously experienced, intelligent and wise. And Sebelius is another woman with lots of experience and who's pretty brilliant herself. Also, a VP from a good ol' midwestern state such as Kansas might appeal to a lot of white working class voters who associate the midwest with traditional American values.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032009</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032009</guid><dc:creator>Paul, Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>Nancy Pelosi is the best VP candidate for soon to be nominee Obama</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032010</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032010</guid><dc:creator>john doe, seattle, wash</dc:creator><description>i'd heard the idea of hagel earlier this week. &amp;nbsp;interesting....</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032012</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032012</guid><dc:creator>Dan, New York, NY </dc:creator><description>Sebelius, Sebelius, Sebelius. &amp;nbsp;Reinforce change, strengthen your midwest creds, park her out in Ohio, Iowa, Wisconsin, Colorado. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't go for the old Washington hand, bring in an outsider. &amp;nbsp;She's a great governor and she will speak to the fact that Americans' number 1 concern will be kitchen table issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Politically: gets a lot of women who were enthusiastic about Hillary still voting to make history.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032014</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032014</guid><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator><description>Hagel!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032015</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032015</guid><dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator><description>I think Jim Webb or Chuck Hagel would be excellent options from the choices you presented. Joe Biden would be a good campaigner, but I think he's probably better suited for a Sec. State cabinet position.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of all the options you presented, I think Ted Strickland makes the most sense politically.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032017</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:16:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032017</guid><dc:creator>Jon, Brooklyn, NY</dc:creator><description>Where is Ed Rendell on this list? &amp;nbsp;Can anyone explain why this guy is either at the bottom or completely absent from most people's projected short lists for Obama. &amp;nbsp;I can think of at least 5 individual reasons why Rendell should be strongly considered: (1) He virtually guarantees PA goes blue, an absolute necessity in November; (2) He brings experience -- and executive experience at that -- to the table; (3) He is Jewish, which helps Obama with that much needed demographic, and puts FL strongly back in play; (4) He's a big Clinton surrogate, which hopefully allows Obama to bring in Clinton supporters without actaully putting Hillary on the ticket; and (5) Rendell is a guy who is a Washington outsider, and is known to speak his mind -- which means he would be consistent with Obama's &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; message. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So what's the rub on why Rendell is so notably absent?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032018</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:16:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032018</guid><dc:creator>Tanya L. Lee's Summit, MO</dc:creator><description>I want a woman as VP period. &amp;nbsp; Either Clinton or my home girl Sebelius. &amp;nbsp;I would even accept my other home girl McCaskill from Missouri. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032020</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:16:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032020</guid><dc:creator>Lisa in New Britain, CT  Inspired by Obama!</dc:creator><description>LOL, I'm entirely undecided on this right now, truthfully it just gives me a headache.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This campaign has been run so great, I totally have confidence in their VP judgment (although truthfully I'm a Sam Nunn fan, have been for awhile).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will feel free to read any and all speculations though!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032021</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032021</guid><dc:creator>obama Supporter, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Has to be Hagel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YES WE CAN!!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032022</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032022</guid><dc:creator>Obama 08</dc:creator><description>It's an easy pick - check the electoral map - HE NEEDS THE OHIO GOV!!! &amp;nbsp;Withit he doesn't need CO, or MO or FLA or any southern state. &amp;nbsp;Its an easy map for him. &amp;nbsp;ABCNEWS.COM has an interactive delgate map. &amp;nbsp;First Readers run it. &amp;nbsp;Obama doesn't need southern states or NV. &amp;nbsp;Just old standby Blue States and OH. &amp;nbsp;The OH Governor can deliver OH and the race is over.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032023</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032023</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Schoettmer, Bloomington, Indiana</dc:creator><description>Well, that doesn't say much at all, when you think about it. Basically, he wrote an article outlining common sense. If anything, I'd add a 6th category, that being the &amp;quot;Conciliatory Pick&amp;quot; which would be a prominant Hillary supporter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I like Richardson as a pick. I think he hits three of the 5 categories.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032024</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032024</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description>If MSNBC is on Air and nobody is watching does it make noise?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032026</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032026</guid><dc:creator>Morning Jack</dc:creator><description>It's an easy pick - check the electoral map - HE NEEDS THE OHIO GOV!!! &amp;nbsp;Withit he doesn't need CO, or MO or FLA or any southern state. &amp;nbsp;Its an easy map for him. &amp;nbsp;ABCNEWS.COM has an interactive delgate map. &amp;nbsp;First Readers run it. &amp;nbsp;Obama doesn't need southern states or NV. &amp;nbsp;Just old standby Blue States and OH. &amp;nbsp;The OH Governor can deliver OH and the race is over.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032028</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032028</guid><dc:creator>George Taylor, Memphis, TN</dc:creator><description>Practically and politically speaking, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius would make the smartest, strategic choice for the following reasons:&lt;br&gt;1) Female Vote -- consistent voters, key to the election&lt;br&gt;2) Helps with the blue-collar voters in the midsouth-southeast areas of the country (he does fine in the midwest and pacnorwest -- you guys are spinning this a little to much by making a generic assessment that somehow includes all blue collar workers -- that's not true. &lt;br&gt;3) She embraces his vision yet brings her own gifts to the table -- very talented woman based upon my research.&lt;br&gt;4) Will energize his base even more and bring in even more new voters. &lt;br&gt;5) Helps minimize defectors of HRC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032030</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032030</guid><dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator><description>TEH, Gibsonia, PA: Maybe he gets a few Catholic votes, but let's not kid ourselves: However the Democratic nominee is, PA is clearly in the Dem column this election. Not even close.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032031</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032031</guid><dc:creator>Dan, New York, NY </dc:creator><description>Another note:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama CANNOT pick someone who voted for or supported the Iraq War. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel is not a Democrat - he just is a Republican who is upset with the war. &amp;nbsp;But he will not turn out the Dem base.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032035</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032035</guid><dc:creator>Cate</dc:creator><description>Hagel or Webb!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032037</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:18:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032037</guid><dc:creator>PD, Boston</dc:creator><description>Jim Webb #1 (similarities between his message from response to state of Union and Obama's message are uncanny) Sam Nunn #2 and Strickland #3</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032038</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:18:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032038</guid><dc:creator>Terry, IN</dc:creator><description>There are probably good options none of us have thought of. &amp;nbsp;I'd say Obama has a gift for selecting a support team. &amp;nbsp;He's been one to be innovative, and follow the road less traveled. &amp;nbsp;I trust he will choose the best fit. Stop trying to shove people down his throat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; If it ain't broke....... </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032039</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:18:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032039</guid><dc:creator>ken, motown wv</dc:creator><description>where's ed rendell? look i am huge for obama and while i beleive that bill clinton sucks the air out of the room the minute he enters , i still don't know how we ignore hillary, she brings 17 milvotes and 1500 delegates, i know she doesn't share the message, but can you think of a better team of campaigner and attack dog than bill and hillary. &amp;nbsp;besides i don't think the rep attack machine has the teeth it did back in the day,and 16 mil votes covers a lot of negatives</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032042</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032042</guid><dc:creator>Shel</dc:creator><description>Jim Webb would be a good VP for change and to reach conservative Democrats and people on the Hill, add Bill Richardson as Sec of State for the Good Cop, Sam Nunn or Colin Powell as the Bad Cop for Sec of Defense, John Edward as AG to make sure justice is enforced equally</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032043</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032043</guid><dc:creator>The Dead Guy</dc:creator><description>Choosing Clinton would be the dream ticket for the RNC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where's Gov Napolitano (AZ)?&lt;br&gt;Where's Gov Ritter (CO)?&lt;br&gt;Where's Gov Henry (OK)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All re-elected Governors from West/Southwest states.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032044</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032044</guid><dc:creator>Jon, Brooklyn, NY</dc:creator><description>I think it's great that Obama is considering a cross-party ticket, but the problem with Chuck Hagel is that he's not pro-choice. &amp;nbsp;In the aftermath of a bruising primary, Obama needs to bring women back under his tent. &amp;nbsp;Right now, he can easily do that by contrasting himself against McCain's pro-life agenda, but if Obama brings in a pro-lifer, he will only further aggravate an absolutely essential portion of the Democratic base.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032045</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032045</guid><dc:creator>Chris, MI</dc:creator><description>I would have to think long and hard about voting at all if Clinton were on the ticket, sorry, and I do not think they would complement each other well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My preference would be for Sebelius: She's tough, from a great state, and choosing a woman as his running mate would be a salve to Clinton supporters who wanted to see a woman in the White House. I'd like to see Janet Napolitano on the list, too, though. A Southwestern state, and a chance to make immigration a better issue for Democrats.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032047</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032047</guid><dc:creator>sara, mesa, az</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel by far -- what a great way to unify the country! &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032050</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032050</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator><description>Joe Biden showed yesterday what an effective, forceful and knowledgable partner he would be, esp in foreign policy areas (a perceived weakness). &amp;nbsp;And he has the in-depth knowledge of how things work and who can be depended upon in Washington, knowledge that is absolutely essential if someone wants to change the system. &amp;nbsp;And while he's been in Washington 'forever' in his own way he has exemplified the politics of straight talk, cooperative work with many different people and interests, and responsible statesmanship. ---- Plus they are both very intelligent and I believe there is genuine respect between them.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032051</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032051</guid><dc:creator>Sick of corruption, sick of the Clintons</dc:creator><description>I like Sebelius and I would also add Janet Napolitano. &amp;nbsp;That would force Hillary supporters to accept the fact that we do not oppose her based on her gender: &amp;nbsp;we oppose her because of her corruption, her race baiting, her pathological lying, and her pandering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, if Obama picks Hillary Clinton, he will have to sleep with one eye open for the next eight years. &amp;nbsp;He would be the one person standing between Hillary Clinton and the White House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama in 2008. &amp;nbsp;Integrity matters and the Clintons have none.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032053</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032053</guid><dc:creator>Cate</dc:creator><description>By the way, any Dem who says he/she will vote for McCain in November if their candidate does not get the nomination, is no Democrat.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032054</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032054</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel on the ticket would assure victory. Independents and disaffected Republicans, who may want military expertise, would pull the Obama lever with Hagel as VP. Plus, I think Barack would really get along well with Hagel. They seem sympatico.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032057</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032057</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca.... stop using my name</dc:creator><description>to the OTHER patty,sd,ca- are you back again... didn't you flunk school you biggot...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;which klansman are you supporting this fall?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032060</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032060</guid><dc:creator>Sandra, TN</dc:creator><description>I'd go for JIM WEBB, second choice JOE BIDEN!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032061</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032061</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, SF, CA</dc:creator><description>I'm all about Biden. I believe Biden would echo Obama's message with a contrasting tone that would enhance the ticket. For example, Obama's eloquent lash back at Bush was good, but is completely enhanced by Biden's &amp;quot;This is bullsh*t&amp;quot; response. Bad cop, worse cop. Great results.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032063</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032063</guid><dc:creator>TOM TYSKIEWICZ, FOREST HILLS, PA</dc:creator><description>RICHARDSON, POSSIBLY HAGEL, STRETCH FOR BIDEN!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032065</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032065</guid><dc:creator>save the inheritance</dc:creator><description>Chelsea Clinton&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's see if the Clinton supporters vote against her!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032066</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:20:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032066</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Norfolk MA</dc:creator><description>Fast Eddie Rendell. &amp;nbsp;Delivers PA plus Billary supporters.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032071</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032071</guid><dc:creator>Cate in somerset</dc:creator><description>Rhoda, Sibelius is a woman.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032072</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032072</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description> Bob Casey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Catholic white politician that covers the &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; especially in PA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TEH, Gibsonia, PA (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:13 PM)&lt;br&gt;______-----------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YEAH!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;we saw how much Bob Casey helped Obama in PA. LOL</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032073</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032073</guid><dc:creator>John Brooklyn NY</dc:creator><description>I personally feel that it comes down to three people:&lt;br&gt;Gov. Strickland, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, or Chuck Hagel. All three of them would make great VPs for Obama, and it's such a hard choice for him to make because of political considerations for working-class voters, women/change voters and bringing Republicans into the change fold/unity. &amp;nbsp;I can't choose because all three are too good!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032074</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032074</guid><dc:creator>paulf, brooklyn, ny</dc:creator><description>wes clark! he won OK primary in '04 - he's a hillary supporter, army general, negotiated with milosevic to end the balkan action, he has jewish ancestry, but is i think a baptist, and he's from arkansas </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032075</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032075</guid><dc:creator>No birth control for YOU</dc:creator><description>Women will never allow McCain to criminalize Birth Control - That is what happens if he gets to pick next Supreme Court Justice. &amp;nbsp;That is what &amp;quot;Strict Construcionist&amp;quot; means- No right to privacy in the marital bedroom - because the Constitution does not say the word privacy or birth control - therefore there is no right to these things, that is strict construction and that is what Roberts and Alito and Thomas etc.. believe. &amp;nbsp;PS so do the state legislatures in 38 states (see OH, IN and PA). &amp;nbsp;They will criminalize all forms of birth control. &amp;nbsp;Case is Griswald v. Connecticut. &amp;nbsp;Look it up.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032076</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032076</guid><dc:creator>Beverly, Chicago</dc:creator><description> Hillary will be asked out of Fomality; but she will not Accept.&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson more foreign or Chuck Hagel crossover appeal.Chuck Hagel most definitely crossover appeal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely Hillary’ get a more VP nod IF...&lt;br&gt; Once Hillary’s 3 new economically-focused ads come out in Kentucky and in Oregon.&lt;br&gt;Their scripts should really &amp;nbsp;read change would be if she wants the nod...&lt;br&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;What's Right&amp;quot; should emphasize instead of...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who’s up and who's down, but in Oregon we care about what's right and what's wrong.&amp;quot;?&lt;br&gt;We-e-e-e-e-l-l, since Hillary &amp;nbsp;factored in the cultural paranoia; an African American leading the nation is scary to some uneducated whites. How about saying we‘re moving up because no longer will we put down the Black guy. &amp;nbsp;That’s why we care about what's right!&lt;br&gt;Partner's script should emphasize...&lt;br&gt;Edwards—unions, and poor working class &lt;br&gt;Obama--change, inclusion of grassroots people which has generated enthusiasm, participation and huge voter registration is why...These two men’s models is now what is going to be emulated by me your candidate(me Your Girl, Hillary)because that's &amp;nbsp;what a true leader does for UNITY of the party and the nation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right Track's script should emphasize...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It is wrong that a Wall Street money manager making $50 million dollars a year pays a lower percentage of his income in taxes than a nurse or a teacher or a truck driver or an auto worker making $50, 000,&amp;quot; Clinton says.&lt;br&gt;	&lt;br&gt;We-e-e-e-e-l-l, since Hillary sent jobs across the sea; she has made the people of the United States of America the stock exchanged. She should say ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will no longer allow the people of the United States of America to be THE STOCK EXCHANGED.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032079</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032079</guid><dc:creator>C.K. Steele Fort Lauderdale, FL</dc:creator><description>I was originally thinking that Webb was a no-brainer but after a closer look there might be a problem there: &amp;nbsp;He has a woman problem and also I don't think that the Democrats would be able to hold onto his Senate seat. &amp;nbsp;Strickland would be a solid possibility because he did an exemplary job for Hillary in OH and I think he could get the job done. &amp;nbsp;Rendell should also be included in this list for the same reasons as Strickland but he does tend to get off message sometimes. &amp;nbsp;That Hagel ticket would be explosive but I worry that they might not agree on enough issues. &amp;nbsp;Richardson's presence could help to blow up the electoral map and immediately place FL, NM, CO, NV, and very likely AZ into the win column. &amp;nbsp;For me it's a toss-up between Hagel and Richardson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First Read, I think you should also calculate for the negative effect of a McCain veep choice as well. &amp;nbsp;The inclusion of Huckabee would immediately put Utah into play (they abhor the Huckster there) and he would probably lose every state north of NC immediately. &amp;nbsp;Romney's addition could place some of the South in jeopardy but he would do better out West. &amp;nbsp;Crist would alienate some of McCain's conservative base but he would deliver FL.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032080</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032080</guid><dc:creator>LENI,WESTLAND,MICHIGAN</dc:creator><description>Anyone but Clinton. Hagel is an interesting choice. I like Biden better for Sec. of State (except for that foot in mouth problem he sometimes has). Edwards for Atty.General? </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032082</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032082</guid><dc:creator>Lo in OR</dc:creator><description>Joe Biden... He's tough, doesn't mince words, and has more foreign policy knowledge and experience in his little toe than both Bush &amp;amp; McCain do put together. He would make an execellent VP!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032084</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032084</guid><dc:creator>Scott Freeman, Tampa, FL</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel is out of the question due to the inability to reconcile his social conservative record with Obama's platform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The targeted picks would be considered pandering to many people like myself and rub them the wrong way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary as a running mate would be a disaster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Biden: he has the experience (most notably foreign policy wise) that Obama needs to balance the ticket without the gravitas of a Hillary or Edwards. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032085</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032085</guid><dc:creator>Reality, NY</dc:creator><description>Hagel would be a great pick but wont happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The VP is a spring board to the presidency and Obama is too smart to put a Republican in that position, even if its Hagel.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032086</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:22:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032086</guid><dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator><description>JIM &amp;quot;No-Nonsense Pragmatist with a progressive streak&amp;quot; WEBB!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nuff Said!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032087</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032087</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Albany</dc:creator><description>Webb - good choice, but we need to keep his Senate seat blue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius - Good choice, would bring in the old, white lady vote. But she is not exactly the most vibrant public speaker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson - Good choice, all around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel - Good guy, but would most likely not accept the offer.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032088</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:23:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032088</guid><dc:creator>Fast Eddie, NYC</dc:creator><description>Hey, patty. How's it feel to have a bumpersticker for a head?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032091</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:23:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032091</guid><dc:creator>voter</dc:creator><description>Patty sd ca, Do not speak about who Latinos and Caucasians are voting for. I am a Latina voting for Obama and so is my family. My Caucasian friends are also voting for Obama. By the way, we are middle class. If you have no plans to vote for Obama, than speak for yourself. Do not speak about other racial and ethnic groups and who they will vote for. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To return to the topic, I like them all. Good choices. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032094</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:23:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032094</guid><dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator><description>Oh patty,sd,ca give it a rest already. Is this the only form that you have to try and get negative attention? Go play in traffic or something and leave the politicking to adults!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032095</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032095</guid><dc:creator>Zoolie</dc:creator><description>Everyone ignore patty,sd,ca&lt;br&gt;He or she is just playing games</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032096</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032096</guid><dc:creator>Jamar DC</dc:creator><description>I'd love for him to pick either Chuck Hagel or Governor Katheleen Sebelius. I'm for drastic change adn a total break from the past, and both would be groundbreaking choices. Sebelious brings the midwest and women, Hagel negates any attacks from McCain. If he picks Hagel, then the repub's should concede outwright, b/c they wouldn't be able to win at all...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032098</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032098</guid><dc:creator>jim</dc:creator><description>OBAMA &amp;amp; HAGEL vs MR MAGOO &amp;amp; ELMER FUDD (Lieberman)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032099</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032099</guid><dc:creator>David Matthews</dc:creator><description>Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of NYC</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032102</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032102</guid><dc:creator>mh, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>I always thought Sibelius would be an excellent choice--goes directly to the GOP swing states, brings in an experienced governor, speaks to change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for those who feel Obama is doomed--you are soooooooooo wrong. &amp;nbsp;And frankly your prejudiced views are getting tiresome.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032108</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032108</guid><dc:creator>Debbie, Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>Please, NO Clinton on the Obama Ticket!! &amp;nbsp;Anyone but Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032109</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:25:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032109</guid><dc:creator>Ohio will break McCains Back</dc:creator><description>Getting Ohio in the General would put a dagger in the Republican party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Strickland can deliver, there should be NO DOUBT he should get it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama can get the nomination without Ohio but winning that would put Dems strong for the Midwest.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032111</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:25:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032111</guid><dc:creator>TY</dc:creator><description>Sebelius all the way...also good for that female vote. I think Biden would go against his change from the old washington ways. I dont see how the chemistry between him and Strickland would work (remember seeing him in that &amp;quot;Shame on you BO..&amp;quot; clip). Webb isnt bad but then a female candidate is necessary. I was thinking McCaskill. She could ensure he takes MO and she has been his attack dog passionately lately.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032114</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:25:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032114</guid><dc:creator>DVS, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>oh, patty. &amp;nbsp;aren't you late for your town hall meeting in Oregon? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;This white 35 year old woman doesn't fit into your neat little boxes of the 2 groups that will vote for Obama. &amp;nbsp;Don't worry, he'll be a good president for even you.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032120</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:26:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032120</guid><dc:creator>Fontapa, Portland, Maine</dc:creator><description>You can't say someone is unqualified to be president, endorse the Republican for commander in cheif over him, and work overtime to convince your supporters that his nomination would be illegitimate cheating, and then hope to serve as his VP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is what everyone tried to warn her about. This is what everyone meant when they said she was being too negative. &amp;nbsp;This was a contest between two dems. &amp;nbsp;There are some things you just don't do, because if you lose, you'll have to eat your words. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The mere act of becoming his VP choice would be hailed by the Republicans as a the biggest flip-flop in political history. &amp;nbsp;Like what they did to John Kerry times 10. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As someone who actually still likes her somewhat, it was painful to watch her disqualify herself like this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032124</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:26:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032124</guid><dc:creator>Kate in Atlanta</dc:creator><description>Webb would be great - but, you can't take Webb away from his newly won seat and trust that it would remain in the democrats column. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love Joe Biden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, it's got to be Hagel - he's the total package.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is no one's dream ticket. &amp;nbsp;Her negatives are extremely high and NOT coming down. &amp;nbsp;She would energize the base on the right. &amp;nbsp;And, Barack would need a food taster around her and Bill.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032125</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:26:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032125</guid><dc:creator>Class Warrior, D.C.</dc:creator><description>Webb, or Hagel. &amp;nbsp;Webb is a relatively young vet who knows how to stand his ground, and Hagel is the experienced bipartisan.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032127</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032127</guid><dc:creator>Dottie, Swarthmore, PA</dc:creator><description>Anybody but Senator Clinton. She does not represent change and this campaign has been all about change. Do we really want President Clinton anywhere near the White House.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032128</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032128</guid><dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator><description>I think Hilary would be best as a majority senate leader. She'll make a ton of difference and will serve the country well. Her attendance is exemplary - even as she's campaigning. She's tough as nails yet able to cross the aisle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is better for her than a sitting duck VP who will simply attend funerals and stuff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's not waste her expertise on such non sense.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032129</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032129</guid><dc:creator>Dave, AZ</dc:creator><description>Wesley Clark. It brings instant national security cred to the ticket and a Southerner. Richardson or Biden for Sec'y of State. Edwards for Se'y of Labor or HHS. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032131</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032131</guid><dc:creator>Beth, Denton, TX </dc:creator><description>1st choice: Sellibus &lt;br&gt;2nd choice: Biden (His name is too &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; though--LOL!)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032134</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032134</guid><dc:creator>KLAHSDL</dc:creator><description>Women - especially Catholics in OH and PA will NEVER allow McCain to win once they realize that McCain will make abortion a CRIME even in the case of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother (he voted that way last year) and will criminalize sale or possession of birth control (see Griswald v. CT). NARAL and EMILY's LIST and all women's groups will make that abundantly clear. Obama has only one choice - HE MUST WIN OH. &amp;nbsp;It's an easy pick - check the electoral map - HE NEEDS THE OHIO GOV!!! &amp;nbsp;Withit he doesn't need CO, or MO or FLA or any southern state. &amp;nbsp;Its an easy map for him. &amp;nbsp;ABCNEWS.COM has an interactive delgate map. &amp;nbsp;First Readers run it. &amp;nbsp;Obama doesn't need southern states or NV. &amp;nbsp;Just old standby Blue States and OH. &amp;nbsp;The OH Governor can deliver OH and the race is over.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032135</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:27:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032135</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>I might bother to vote if McCain picks Tom Coburn for his VP otherwise I'm going to sit this one out and watch democrats get what they deserve. Which of course is what they think they want right now.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032136</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:28:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032136</guid><dc:creator>Katie Buford</dc:creator><description>Hagel!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032138</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:28:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032138</guid><dc:creator>Kodiak, Austin</dc:creator><description>I'm thinking Richardson. This will go a long way in shoring up the hispanic vote (the fastest growing segment of the voting population if I remember correctly), not to mention his pro 2nd amendment stance will likely speak to many of the Reagan dems. Lump that all together with his foreign policy experience and his record as the Gov of NM, and he seems to cover all of the bases that Obama is percieved week on. Oh, just for kicks, this is the only way to put Texas in play.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032139</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:28:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032139</guid><dc:creator>Kayla, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>patty,sd,ca- Underestimating Obama and his supporters is partially what has gottn him so far in this race. So, thank you and please conitinue to sit by obliviously and watch as we make Barack Obama the next President of the United States of America. Enjoy :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA '08!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032141</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:28:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032141</guid><dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator><description>My politically savvy favorite, Chuck Hagel would be great, reinforcing his change message, and get A LOT of positive press. To have &amp;quot;one of them&amp;quot; reinforcing Obamas message? Wo!! But my personal favorite, more traditional, but covers Obama's perceived weaknesses, and a great attack dog...Jim Webb</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032142</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:28:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032142</guid><dc:creator>TDP, Houston TX</dc:creator><description>John Edwards will take it if asked. My pick from the beginning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama Delegate to Texas State Democratic Convention</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032159</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:30:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032159</guid><dc:creator>Doug Crawford  Whitefish,  MT</dc:creator><description>Please, not Clinton. Anyone but Clinton. She does not align with the spirit of Obama's way,or his vision for change. Also, he can not afford the energy it would take to watch his back and deal with her (and Bill's) personal agenda. The Clintons have shown us who they are throughout this campaign; and have clearly demonstrated what they are capable of doing to further their own interests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Integrity matters, and the Clintons don't even wish to pretend to have any.&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032160</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:30:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032160</guid><dc:creator>Texan for Obama</dc:creator><description>I noticed that Mayor Bloomberg was not on the list. &amp;nbsp;I think he'd be a good choice as well.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032162</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:30:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032162</guid><dc:creator>Kim M--AZ</dc:creator><description>Janet Napalitano would be a good choice, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She knows Arizona history. Speaks her mind. Gone up&lt;br&gt;against Joe Arpaio and McCain many times....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032164</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:31:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032164</guid><dc:creator>jeff D evanston IL</dc:creator><description>Sellibus will bring the hillary supporters to the ticket as well as moderate republicans,my wife has had her on the radar for a long time, also she worked really hard to help him win kansas.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032167</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:31:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032167</guid><dc:creator>Colleen, NY</dc:creator><description>#1. Biden&lt;br&gt;#2. Webb&lt;br&gt;#3. Strickland&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel is a Republican - I'd have to see where he stands on other issues fbefore deciding if he was a good choice or not...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius seem's good, but I remember when she gave the Democratic response to the State of the Union Address -- she was pretty boring...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardsdon is not so good in debates - remember how often he embarrassed himself?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032171</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:31:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032171</guid><dc:creator>chuck, richmond, tx</dc:creator><description>It'll be Strickland, though Richardson is probably my choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patty -- your angry screeds never cease to humor me. &amp;nbsp;Thanks!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032175</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:32:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032175</guid><dc:creator>what-does-hillary-want</dc:creator><description>If Hillary wants it, she gets it via supers. &amp;nbsp;Mainly because of her continued good standing in the polls.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032177</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:32:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032177</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas: Minnesota</dc:creator><description>I like Mike Bloomberg for the Jewish, unity, new politics ticket. &amp;nbsp;That would be my choice, but it doesn't necessarily build up (aside from the Jewish vote) Obama's supposed white working class weakness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other pick I like that wasn't mentioned (neither of mine were) is PA Gov. Ed Rendell. &amp;nbsp;A strong Clinton supporter to unify the Democrats, strong with blue collar, executive experience, speaks his mind (Ted Strickland seems more dull) and is very politically savvy--I think this would be the smart choice for Obama. &amp;nbsp;Chris Matthews sold me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tim Pawlenty for McCain--a little shout out for MN.&lt;br&gt;VP or not VP: Pawlenty's wife has taken to calling him &amp;quot;45&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.minnesotamonitor.com/tag.do;jsessionid=418D35D512732E5CC16851E395CE11E2?tag=VP+or+not+VP"&gt;http://www.minnesotamonitor.com/tag.do;jsessionid=418D35D512732E5CC16851E395CE11E2?tag=VP+or+not+VP&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032178</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:32:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032178</guid><dc:creator>Ron Indiana</dc:creator><description>Not Hillary--there is this 800 pound gorilla named Bill that you have to hide.&lt;br&gt;Ted Strickland and Bill Richardson are a toss up. If you need Ohio, then Ted. &amp;nbsp;If you want West and Hispanics, then Bill. &amp;nbsp;Bill would be a good Sec of State. &lt;br&gt;Kathleen Sebelius, I like, but substituting another woman for Hillary may not go so well.&lt;br&gt;I really like Joe Biden, but he puts his foot in his mouth too often. Maybe a great Sec of Defense. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My favorite dream ticket would be Obama/Hagel. That is a winning combination. &amp;nbsp;It shows Barack will work with Republicans and beat McCain and whomever he picks. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032180</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032180</guid><dc:creator>John, Columbus</dc:creator><description>Biden, Hagel, or McCaskill (from Mo.) </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032181</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032181</guid><dc:creator>William, Alabama</dc:creator><description>He has to pick Hillary if she wants the job. &amp;nbsp;If he publicly rejects her then the party won't be unified and he will lose in November. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032182</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032182</guid><dc:creator>brian, dallas, tx</dc:creator><description>HRC is laughable... she brings no value to the ticket, he'll get NY regardless and she's too polarizing. &amp;nbsp;Richardson or Biden would be good.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032187</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032187</guid><dc:creator>Mike, California</dc:creator><description>I love Joe Biden...but he doesn't bring enough electoral votes to the dinner. Sebelius would be interesting but it may serve to simply infuriate the women voters (if you don't pick Hillary, you can't really pick a woman at aal). Nunn is TOO OLD, and Richarsson just doesn't bring enough horsepower ...although he will be grreat along with Edwards on the stump. (edwars for A.G...and Richardfson for Sec. of Sate?) I think you have to have a combination of experience, electoral votes, geographic differential, and a bit of a bulldog mentality. My picks would then be narrowed down to Webb or Caine, Hagel, Strickland, or ......what about on a long shot pea to blue collar voters ... Rendell?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032189</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032189</guid><dc:creator>Valerie,CT</dc:creator><description>Definitly Joe Biden. And to patty,sd,ca, you are very annoying ! I'm not AA or a College kid (although sometimes I wish I were), but a 47 y/o white women who knows that voting for McCain is a grave mistake. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032193</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032193</guid><dc:creator>Marihelen</dc:creator><description>RESUBMITTED WITH CORRECTION:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think he needs someone who appeals to the new states on &amp;quot;his&amp;quot; map (West, Midwest or Eastern seaboard states) and who makes up for his experience issues. &amp;nbsp;I don't think the rust belt is as helpful but it should still be relevant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say Hillary is just not helpful with Barack's map, nor is she helpful with his message, nor in resolving his weaknesses. &amp;nbsp;And she brings her own weaknesses via high negatives. It also may be too much change for more conservative Americans to swallow in one ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd go for most of the targeted and weakness picks, other than Hagel. &amp;nbsp;Richardson, Kaine, Strickland, Rendell, Nunn, Dodd, Bayh, those would be my choices and I'm sure there are others that would be fine. &amp;nbsp;I think it needs to be someone who is appeals to both the people he's trying to get in the West AND someone with experience who might be attractive to Rust Belt state voters. &amp;nbsp; It would also be great if it was someone Hillary supporters love, as he needs to reach out if choosing someone other than Hillary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032194</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032194</guid><dc:creator>stopsmoking, california</dc:creator><description>TO:Dan Salsibury CT (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:13 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stop smoking that stuff! </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032195</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032195</guid><dc:creator>Dirk</dc:creator><description>It's going to be Mark Warner</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032196</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032196</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Kerrville, TX</dc:creator><description>Take no democratic senators...don't dilute the control of the senate! &amp;nbsp;Go with Richardson...get a bit more Hispanic support.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032198</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032198</guid><dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator><description>Hagel!!! He hits hard! just like Joe Biden.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032199</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032199</guid><dc:creator>Old and mellow</dc:creator><description>WITH HILLARY CLINTON ON THE TICKET AS V.P.&lt;br&gt;OBAMA LOSES MY VOTE!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032201</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032201</guid><dc:creator>dazzled by the possiblities, santa fe, nm</dc:creator><description>Especially in this cycle the Veep will need to be the bad cop to Obama's good cop. I love the idea of Bob Casey or Jim Webb both for thier toughness and thier states! I also LOVE the idea of Biden or Dodd, old school- smart and tough! Richardson would also be a great choice for several reasons. Clinton is not a dream ticket and I'd love to see her in a position like Senate Majority Leader (yes I know we have one already) or Supreme Court Justice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, patty,sd,ca I continue to be shocked at HOW very offensive you can be. I can't understand why MSNBC keeps posting your vial spewings. The Youth Vote is part of what is so exciting about Obama's campaign. It's not just college &amp;quot;kids&amp;quot; it's an entire generation that is inspired to get involved in our democracy!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032202</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032202</guid><dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator><description>Would love to see Obama go outside the box on this one and tap Chuck Hagel. The guy, though Republican, fits within the change mantra and what a stake in the heart for the GOP. His creds are great:&lt;br&gt;1. Nebraska, Catholic, conservative but not close-minded.&lt;br&gt;2. Purple Heart Vietnam vet&lt;br&gt;3. Self-made millionaire CEO of several companies.&lt;br&gt;4. Shown himself willing to work across the aisle (sponsored immigration act with Kennedy)&lt;br&gt;5. Member of Council on Foreign Relations and has worked with other senators on Iran's nuclear ambitions&lt;br&gt;6. Was one of only 3 Republicans supporting Iraq troop withdrawal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And was re-elected to his Senate seat by highest margin in his state's history. And is NOT running for re-election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be more than a symbolic gesture. It makes sense for the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032204</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032204</guid><dc:creator>KNR-CALI</dc:creator><description>I'm courious about Webb but Joe Biden would be an excellent choice. Joe Biden his a good choice and would complement Obama greatly, experience, well respected. If Joe is not the VP how about him for Secretry of State. But I really see Joe a big part of the administration. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032205</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032205</guid><dc:creator>LW, TX</dc:creator><description>How about Colin Powell?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032206</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032206</guid><dc:creator>Kim M--AZ</dc:creator><description>Patty, are you a Republican or just a bitter woman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're rants indicate medication might help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, your woman, Hillary has not been paying all of her bills, lately. Here's a web site to visit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/clintons_debt.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032208</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032208</guid><dc:creator>Shannon S</dc:creator><description>Any thoughts re: Wes Clark's possible place in the mix?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My personal favorites are Biden and Hagel (but I'm guessing that, ultimately, neither of them will fly).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though after all is said and done, it seems the place Hillary might do the least damage in the future would be as V.P.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032210</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032210</guid><dc:creator>Janice, Waco ,Texas</dc:creator><description>I think Richardson is the best choice. He will really boost Obama's foreign policy credentials. Unfortunately I don't think the Clinton's would work all out for this ticket!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032211</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032211</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Nashville</dc:creator><description>Sebelius, Richardson, Hagel...in that order</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032212</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032212</guid><dc:creator>Ivan, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>MSNBC - You missed one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Claire McCaskill would be a good choice as well. &amp;nbsp;It puts a woman on the ticket and she is from a key swing state.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032215</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032215</guid><dc:creator>fg, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Another ideais Ed Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania. &amp;nbsp;This brings in many of Hillary's supporters, Pennsylvania and Ohio, and the Jewish vote. &amp;nbsp;It may also bring Florida into play as well.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032216</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032216</guid><dc:creator>claudette Dubois, monrovia, ca</dc:creator><description>Actually the Democrats have a great list - Joe Biden, Bill Richardson, John Edwards, Chuck Hagel would be an interesting choice,,,Jim Webb is also interesting. I Don't think Hillary would be that good - maybe she should be attorney general?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032217</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032217</guid><dc:creator>Matt, Idaho</dc:creator><description>Sebelius or Hagel. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Change and unity, the two things we need most.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032220</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:36:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032220</guid><dc:creator>Mark S, NC</dc:creator><description>All of these names except Clinton are exciting to contemplate. I would certainly add Dianne Feinstein and perhaps Janet Napolitano to the list.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032225</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:36:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032225</guid><dc:creator>Old Mellow, Missouri</dc:creator><description>WITH HILLARY CLINTON ON THE TICKET AS V.P.&lt;br&gt;OBAMA LOSES MY VOTE!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032226</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032226</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Buffalo NY</dc:creator><description>Wes Clarke?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032229</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032229</guid><dc:creator>Frank, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Jim Webb or Chuck Hagel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But not sure what the rules are with having Hagel on the ticket, does he stay a Republican? And if so I'm not so sure about having a Republican next in line for the President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anybody know what the rules for Hagel would be???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Frank&lt;br&gt;Chicago&lt;br&gt;Obama '08&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Joe Biden too, old school</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032230</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032230</guid><dc:creator>James G., Oak Park, MI</dc:creator><description>Kathleen Sebelius.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One - she has a great record as Governor of Kansas.&lt;br&gt;Two - she has demonstrated a real ability to reach accross the aisle and get stuff done.&lt;br&gt;Three - she brings executive experience and does indeed solidify the change message.&lt;br&gt;Four - she will be a strong potential successor and would make a great candidate as the first woman president.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032231</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032231</guid><dc:creator>Keith (Wayne, NJ)</dc:creator><description>Strickland is a good choice if Obama's camp needs to continue making inroads with the working class democrats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Webb is the war hero who can match McCain on foreign policy and 'patriotism.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebilius has a history of working across the aisle, and may help in bringing back female voters holding out for Hillary, but she is an awful public speaker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite the Anti-Bush/Anti-Iraq war position, socially and economically speaking Hagel doesnt make much sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Might I add Janet Napolitano of Arizona into the mix, too? She has built an administration on her education policies, but may hurt the dems on her views with immigration reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall, I'd probably say that Webb makes the most sense right now, but things could change over the next month or two.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032233</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032233</guid><dc:creator>Matt, NY, NY</dc:creator><description>Hagel would send a great unifying message;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius would send a great change message;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson would help him with the Rocky Mountain states and Latinos;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Bloomberg would make a great veep also, Obama/Bloomberg would destroy McCain/whoever on economic issues.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032237</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:38:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032237</guid><dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator><description>When was the last time college kids showed up on election day? &lt;br&gt;patty,sd,ca (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:12 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um every primary this election cycle? And they voted overwhelmingly for Obama, so it's not surprising that you want to dismiss us.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032241</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:38:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032241</guid><dc:creator>Chris Peterson, Amherst MA  </dc:creator><description>It will never be Chuck Hagel. Outside the anti-war sentiment there is nothing the two agree on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FirstRead staff: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd be interested in hearing what you think of Brian Schweitzer, governor of Montana. He's been my dark horse pick for VP for Obama for some time now. He's a pro-gun, pro-clean coal, agribusiness Democrat from a Red State who speaks five languages including Arabic. I don't see his name tossed around a lot but he seems to be perfect for Obama to me. Not a ton of experience in Washington but a lot of experience outside the Beltway; young and groomable for the Presidency himself; white, favorable to working class gun owners, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would love to hear some high end analysis of this pick. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032242</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:38:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032242</guid><dc:creator>ID, GA</dc:creator><description>Sam Nunn, GA</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032243</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:39:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032243</guid><dc:creator>Steven Balazic Chicago , Illinois</dc:creator><description>I think Gov. Strickland would be a great choice for Obama. For the following reasons. swing state, with the way Obama spreads the electoral map, I see no scenario that if Obama wins Ohio he won&amp;quot;t win.Also the fact that Gov. Strickland supported Sen.Clinton may work in his favor. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032245</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:39:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032245</guid><dc:creator>d-Syracuse NY</dc:creator><description>ME!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032246</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:39:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032246</guid><dc:creator>Marcus, National City, Ca</dc:creator><description>Definitely in my top 3 would be Sebeilus, Webb, or Richardson, but my 1st choice is Sebelius for these reasons:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Upsides:&lt;br&gt;1. She brings executive experience of being governor (since 2002)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Involved in politics since 1986, as a state legislature, then state insurance commissioner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Being the first female vice president would help bring in Hillary supporters who wanted to see a woman as president&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. As a Roman Catholic could helps Obama with his weaknesses with the Catholic vote&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. Has close ties with the battleground state of Ohio; Her father is a former governor, and she was born and raised in Cincinnati.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6. Could switch the traditionally red state of Kansas, blue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;7. Hels Obama with the generational gap, as she herself is a baby-boomer and could appeal to the older voters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8. Solidifies Obama's message of change, not only as a woman, but her record of fighting the lobbyists and special interests in the state of Kansas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;9. High approval ratings in a republican-dominated state, and known for her bi-partisan approach to solving problems (her husband is a republican).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Downsides:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Very little foreign policy experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Can sometimes be a boring speaker (anyone remember that January rebuttal to the State of the Union?....Zzzzz)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032249</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032249</guid><dc:creator>Bonnie, Ut</dc:creator><description>I also love Chris Dodd who was one of the first to break strongly for Obama. &amp;nbsp;And he's a veteran. &amp;nbsp;I'm against a woman VP at this point. &amp;nbsp;Too much all at once. &amp;nbsp;And yes...I'm a woman...just trying to be practical.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032250</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:40:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032250</guid><dc:creator>ejh</dc:creator><description>Claire McCaskill (spelled right?)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032252</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:40:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032252</guid><dc:creator>Dave in AL</dc:creator><description>1. Hagel&lt;br&gt;2. Webb&lt;br&gt;3. Sebelius&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel would be most brilliant, and I think it would secure the election for Obama. He'd definitely pick up a number of Western states.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032256</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032256</guid><dc:creator>BJ, CA</dc:creator><description>Head Rep. Pelosi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She'll watch Hill on the Hill</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032259</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:40:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032259</guid><dc:creator>Carly, Bolivar NY</dc:creator><description>Hagel would be great! &amp;nbsp;If not, I look to Richardson or Strickland.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032262</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032262</guid><dc:creator>Tom, Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Senator Jack Reed would be my choice. &amp;nbsp;Army Ranger, Armed Services Committee, voted against the Iraq War. &amp;nbsp;Has all of Jim Webb's benefits without any of the issues.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032263</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032263</guid><dc:creator>Cory (SC)</dc:creator><description>John Edwards or Bob Casey!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.politivine.com"&gt;http://www.politivine.com&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032265</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032265</guid><dc:creator>Steven, Highlands Ranch, CO</dc:creator><description>Bloomberg. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patty, you are sounding more and more bitter every day. &amp;nbsp;Now you know how I felt the last TWO times GWB was voted into office. &amp;nbsp;Go ahead and try put Bush Lite [TOM (The Old Man) McLame] into office for a third term. &amp;nbsp;You are on the losing end of this one (kind of like with Hil). &amp;nbsp;Anyone that would vote for Hillary, should have NO problem voting for Obama because they are SO close on the issues. &amp;nbsp;Unless there is another reason you won't vote for him...?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032268</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032268</guid><dc:creator>Stephen, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator><description>If by dream you meant nightmare, you would be right on.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032270</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032270</guid><dc:creator>Michelle, Denver</dc:creator><description>Obama/Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh look WEST VIRGINIA...a WHITE MAN ON THE TICKET!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, I like Edwards, and always have. I think Obama and Edwards would make an excellent team.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032282</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032282</guid><dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator><description>1. Sebelius&lt;br&gt;2. Edwards (VP or AG)&lt;br&gt;3. Kaine&lt;br&gt;4. Napolitano&lt;br&gt;5. Hagel&lt;br&gt;6. Web&lt;br&gt;7. Richardson (I don't think he should be in ticket)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden - secretary of state&lt;br&gt;Powell - secretary of defense</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032283</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:42:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032283</guid><dc:creator>G-Pi</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter who he picks. Obama is doomed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are several groups that won't vote for Obama &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Latinos &lt;br&gt;Bitter white Americans &lt;br&gt;Hillary supporters &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;what does he have left? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blacks &amp;amp; College kids. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When was the last time college kids showed up on election day? &lt;br&gt;patty,sd,ca (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:12 PM)&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You must of been neglected as a child, you just love stirring the pot. &amp;nbsp;I'm sure that anyone not wearing a white hood is not the candidate choice for you as they say everyday...you don't like it, move to a different country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Change will happen whether you like it or not. &amp;nbsp;You're perturbed because higher educated people did their research and decided to choose the candidate they thought would do the best job of bringing america out of the mud. &amp;nbsp;Tough...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course AA voters are going to vote for Obama, this is the first viable and capable chance at history they have encountered...Jesse Jackson ran a while back, and nada, nothing, zip &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Alan Keyes ran, and again nothing....so this has little to do with skin color and more to do with Obama's abilities...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His Ideas are great, and they take care of real people. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish he could validate putting bloomberg on the ticket, but i'm sure that's a long shot. &amp;nbsp;So my second choice would be Biden.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032286</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032286</guid><dc:creator>James Tn</dc:creator><description>Bob Casey &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Catholic white politician that covers the &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; especially in PA. &lt;br&gt;TEH, Gibsonia, PA (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:13 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***********************************************&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I to like bob Casey he is pro gun, could help with the white vote in Ohio, Pa, Floida etc...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032289</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:43:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032289</guid><dc:creator>James Tn</dc:creator><description>Bob Casey &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Catholic white politician that covers the &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; especially in PA. &lt;br&gt;TEH, Gibsonia, PA (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:13 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***********************************************&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I to like bob Casey he is pro gun, could help with the white vote in Ohio, Pa, Floida etc...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032293</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:44:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032293</guid><dc:creator>dan, st.l, mo</dc:creator><description>MIKE BLOOMBERG!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032298</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:44:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032298</guid><dc:creator>Amy, </dc:creator><description>Bill Richardson. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032299</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032299</guid><dc:creator>Kathy H, HI</dc:creator><description>Nope. Ohio gov - Sebelius' father was, so choose her and get Kansas. Richardson so much more needed as Sec of State, he knows diplomacy and is competent, something missing from that department. He can campaign as if, so comes out a twofer. Kaine, unknown, let's bring something to the table. Webb, hmmm, great guy, solid performer, outstanding military credentials, so I'd lean there of the group. Not like the veep needs charisma with Obama, &amp;nbsp;who's got plenty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't mention Clinton again, it's not a dream ticket, it's a nightmare. She and her husband will double tag getting all the attention, they simply don't know how to take a back seat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden, love him, especially after yesterday's tirade, a man who cares and knows his stuff, but that's also the flip side, can be a loose cannon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Hagel would be fantastic but may cause more of a stir than is helpful. Still.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032302</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032302</guid><dc:creator>Jessie, Columbia, MD</dc:creator><description>To patty in sd,&lt;br&gt;Time to give it up, girl! HRC is done and done! Dems will rally behind a true visionary BHO!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032303</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032303</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>BIDEN!! He's the &amp;quot;off the cuff&amp;quot; kind of politican needed to battle the rethuglicans. He has more foreign policy experience than McCain, which is the policy that the republicans will try to pin on Obama.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032304</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032304</guid><dc:creator>BobW Mendon, NY</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;When was the last time college kids showed up on election day?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When several million showed up to vote in the primary elections. Don't act like my peers (50+ year old white males) and under estimate the zeal of those college kids. Afterall, it's their generation fighting and dieing in Iraq.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032305</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032305</guid><dc:creator>Middleman, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>Clinton - Ticket may be too historic for the meat and potatoes type. &amp;nbsp;She certainly has a devoted following, but she also has her devoted detractors. &amp;nbsp;Also, these two may be too much alike philosophically. &amp;nbsp;Toss up.&lt;br&gt;Strickland and Kaine- &amp;nbsp;Strategically feasible, though they may not be necessary to pull their respective states. &amp;nbsp;Good default choices if there is a bitter battle, with a very slight edge to Strickland.&lt;br&gt;Webb - Has already said &amp;quot;No, thanks.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Richardson - A good man, to be sure, but again may be too historic.&lt;br&gt;Sebelius- &amp;nbsp;My personal choice for our first female President, but experience is already going to be an issue for Obama. &amp;nbsp;Also, see &amp;quot;too historic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;She's quite impressive, though, and I would be happy to see her on the ticket.&lt;br&gt;Biden- &amp;nbsp;Probably the best all-around choice, except perhaps for the limited number of electoral votes he would bring from his home state. &amp;nbsp;I would love to see him debate anyone that the Republicans choose. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Nunn - I doubt seriously that he would put himself through the rigors of a national election.&lt;br&gt;Hagel- He's a Republican. &amp;nbsp;Won't happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;Biden&lt;br&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;Clinton?&lt;br&gt;3. &amp;nbsp;Richardson&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(with a shout out to Gov. Sebelius)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032307</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032307</guid><dc:creator>J.D., Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>What about Jack Reed? &amp;nbsp;A senior statesman respected by Democrats and Republicans alike, boasts strong national security credentials and a presidential persona. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032308</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:45:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032308</guid><dc:creator>Matt; Valparaiso, IN</dc:creator><description>Gen. Anthony Zinni - &lt;br&gt;No one packs more military and foreign policy muscle than General Anthony Zinni. &amp;nbsp;In addition, he's been an outspoken Iraq War and Bush critic; he's also an old, white man with a semi-academic background, who could connect with Obama as well as a multitude of voters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gov. Kathleen Sibelius - &lt;br&gt;This Midwestern governor has a strong, progressive track record in a red RED state where she is incredibly popular. &amp;nbsp;She has stood up against big insurance and energy companies, and has relied on progressive principles to guide her judgement and her veto pen. &amp;nbsp;She's also an older, white, Catholic woman, whose demographic alone would help bringing in some of Clinton's dissenters. &amp;nbsp;Gov. Sibelius has been a strong supporter of Obama's since before Feb. 5th, after she gave the DNC's response to the SOTU address.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While these two also have their weak points, they are far fewer than some other names that have been thrown around. I believe these two will be atop Obama's list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel - &lt;br&gt;This pick would surely embolden Obama's &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; message and symbolize the non-partisan unity our country badly needs right now. &amp;nbsp;However, it also has the potential to turn off the far left and does nothing to help reign in Clinton supporters and pro-choice advocates. &amp;nbsp;Need I remind you that Chuck Hagel is certainly pro-life? &amp;nbsp;A great idea for the good of the nation, but due to potential problems with electability, probably a pick that's best suited for Secretary of Defense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any other thoughts?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032311</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:46:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032311</guid><dc:creator>Kathy H, Honolulu</dc:creator><description>Oops, forgot to mention Sam Nunn, which right there is the problem. Well respected by insiders but long forgotten elsewhere, so only if a southern accent is the criteria.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032315</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:46:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032315</guid><dc:creator>Bryan, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>Patty in SD, girl you sound mighty bitter. &amp;nbsp;I tis must unappealing and less attractive! &amp;nbsp;Why would anyone want for the GOP candiate to win when so much is at stake. &amp;nbsp;The policy difference between the two candiates is minimal. &amp;nbsp;The primary is intended to determine who is best suited to lead that agenda. &amp;nbsp;The voters and the superdelegates have spoken and they feel that it is Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;get on the bus or else we risk losing the supreme court for a generation, more war, more give aways to the wealthiest of our country. &amp;nbsp;How selfish of you to prove a point you would risk the future of our nation! &amp;nbsp;Don't be a sore loser. &amp;nbsp;Stop pouting and think logially or is that something you are incapable of? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032317</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032317</guid><dc:creator>JWHICK, American Fork, UT</dc:creator><description>I vote for Sebellius. She is a popular second term governor from Kansas, was born in Ohio, has a history of getting Republicans to switch parties to run with her, is catholic (think Pennsylvania catholics). Has broad working class appeal in the midwest, and, of course, offers Hillary's female supporters the possibility of a Woman president in 2016 without the negatives that come with Clinton. She also keeps a vacation home in Michigan. The draw backs are not providing foreign policy experience.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032318</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032318</guid><dc:creator>Dan Colorado</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel - this is the dream ticket!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius would be a good pick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So would Bloomberg (not mentioned above)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032319</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032319</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Hot Springs, AR</dc:creator><description>Richardson, Biden or Nunn are all great choices due to their experience. &amp;nbsp;Obama is going to need foreign policy strength, and especially Biden / Nunn give that to him. &amp;nbsp;Best of all worlds would be Chuck Hagel...what an intriguing ticket THAT would make. &amp;nbsp;I like Sebelius, but foreign policy will be a much bigger issue vis-a-vis McCain than anything else, economy notwithstanding. &amp;nbsp; No way, Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Too many bridges have been burned, and who wants the Bill &amp;amp; Hillary circus back in town?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032320</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032320</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Chattanooga</dc:creator><description>How about Napolitano? Dont really know much about her, but good geography and a woman. Unfortunately, &amp;quot;OBAMA-NAPOLITANO&amp;quot; does not exactly roll off the tongue....</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032321</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032321</guid><dc:creator>Doug, L.A., CA</dc:creator><description>Hagel or Webb would be good choices. &amp;nbsp;I also like Bloomberg, but that ticket would be subject to the &amp;quot;Elitist&amp;quot; attack.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032322</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032322</guid><dc:creator>JLL</dc:creator><description>I'm latin and I'm a woman. &amp;nbsp;I'm not a college grad. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;I have always been an Obama supporter. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032325</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032325</guid><dc:creator>Debbie,Ewing,NJ</dc:creator><description>Patty, get real will you. &amp;nbsp;Obama has won 32 of the 50 contests so far, including 5 of 12 primaries where blacks made up less than 10% of the voters. He also won in caucus states that are overwhelmingly white – places like Iowa, Idaho and Wyoming. &amp;nbsp;He beat Hillary by. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;75% - DC&lt;br&gt;67% - Georgia&lt;br&gt;65% - Illinois&lt;br&gt;64% - Virginia&lt;br&gt;61% - Mississippi&lt;br&gt;60% - Maryland&lt;br&gt;59% - Vermont&lt;br&gt;58% - Wisconsin&lt;br&gt;57% - Louisiana&lt;br&gt;57% - Utah&lt;br&gt;56% - North Carolina&lt;br&gt;56% - Alabama&lt;br&gt;...and 18 other victories over Clinton. &lt;br&gt;I think you have some whites and hispanics in there.&lt;br&gt;And come election day you will find some Hillary supporters there too, including Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032331</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032331</guid><dc:creator>Candice Hughes Lebanon TN</dc:creator><description>Sen Webb would be the most logical choice.&lt;br&gt;If you look at the electoral map that Obama has set out Webb would help him.&lt;br&gt;Not only was Webb under Sec of the Navy under Reagan...but he opposed going to war with Iraq for exactly the same reasons that Sen Obama did.&lt;br&gt;AND he gave a wonderful speech on WHY the senate should vote NO on the LIEberman resolution.&lt;br&gt;The list is endless as to why OBAMA/WEBB is the REAL DREAM TICKET&lt;br&gt;Hagel would be the 2nd choice...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032332</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032332</guid><dc:creator>Rosemary, California</dc:creator><description>I say it should be Webb or Biden, long shot Hagel. &amp;nbsp; Hillary, I hope, if it is offered, &amp;nbsp;turns it down. &amp;nbsp; She has shown in my opinion to be a panderer and will say anything at the moment that is popular without &amp;nbsp;thinking it through. &amp;nbsp;I think she would be a drag on the ticket. &amp;nbsp; The people mentioned above would be a good balance for Obama.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032334</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032334</guid><dc:creator>Dave in OC</dc:creator><description>Patti in SD, looks like you forgot your meds (again).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where's Ed Rendell? He's shown he'll support Barack, a military veteran, governor, lots of gravitas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the biggest problem with Hillary as VP is that Bill is part of the deal. &lt;br&gt;They'd probably demand that Chelsea get a cabinet position, too, ha.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032335</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032335</guid><dc:creator>feeling good in ne</dc:creator><description>Richardson needs to be saved for Sec of State.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Webb would be good but there is his Sen seat to think about. &amp;nbsp;But definitely a great pick...hmmm...Sec Def?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel would be great for VP - doesn't want to be president, won't be campaigning for himself and if it's a turn the page, new politics that pretty much says it all and he can slam the door on the pro war Repubs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kind of nice to have a plethora of good choices ;)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032336</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032336</guid><dc:creator>Candice Hughes Lebanon TN</dc:creator><description>Sen Webb would be the most logical choice.&lt;br&gt;If you look at the electoral map that Obama has set out Webb would help him.&lt;br&gt;Not only was Webb under Sec of the Navy under Reagan...but he opposed going to war with Iraq for exactly the same reasons that Sen Obama did.&lt;br&gt;AND he gave a wonderful speech on WHY the senate should vote NO on the LIEberman resolution.&lt;br&gt;The list is endless as to why OBAMA/WEBB is the REAL DREAM TICKET&lt;br&gt;Hagel would be the 2nd choice...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032338</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032338</guid><dc:creator>Mary Lou</dc:creator><description>Patty, you should just vote for McCain! No true Democrat wants the likes of you on board the party wagon. You have too much negative vibes! I'm a Hillary supporter and if Barack wins the nomination, my vote is surely his and whoever his running mate is - even if it isn't Hillary Clinton. Patty, politics just isn't for people like you. At this rate you will burst a vein or something!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032341</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032341</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>The pick will be Evan Bayh.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032345</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:49:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032345</guid><dc:creator>PDX for Hillary</dc:creator><description>I vote for Obama, after Hillary takes over the convention !!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hill '08: B*tches get things done!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032347</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:49:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032347</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>This guy is just regurgitating stuff he's read other places. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton as the dream running mate? Not with those negatives. Why isn't Richardson counted under Washington experience - and executive branch at that? Kaine couldn't carry Virginia like Warner could. Webb might as well, but he's really a Republican. Nunn is a long-shot because of his age, but he has a great resume. Biden doesn't play well with independents and is ridiculed by Republicans, who still remember the plagairism thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the real short-list, I believe: Bayh, Stickland, Sebelius and Warner, with second-tier though interesting consideration of Zinni, Hagel, Casey, and Richardson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson is a poor candidate - in the end, that kills him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Casey is pro-life - in the end, that kills him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel and Zinni might not be willing (one would have to cross the aisle, and the other enter politics to begin with).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warner might not be willing, and besides there's suspicions he didn't run for president because the Clinton camp found some skeleton - the type of which probably won't come out in a Senate run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius is too much like Obama, and wouldn't look comfortable with attack responsibilities the number two usually has.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By elimination we're looking at Bayh and Strickland, with the outside possibility of Hagel, Zinni or Warner.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032351</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:49:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032351</guid><dc:creator>Evan, Omaha, NE</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel is a fantastic choice! What better way to cross party aisles than to have a unifying ticket?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032352</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:49:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032352</guid><dc:creator>CB, Hadley, NY</dc:creator><description>I love the Al Gore option somebody posted. If he doesn't want the VP slot, maybe he'd be willing to head up the Energy Department instead? Although.....he's done so well in the private sector why would he want to wade back into the muck &amp;amp; mire of Public Service?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the OB/HRC &amp;quot;dream ticket&amp;quot; concept? Disaster! &lt;br&gt;No Way!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032353</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032353</guid><dc:creator>Brendan D, Niles, IL</dc:creator><description>Sebelius, Sebelius, Sebelius!!! I can't say it enough. All Obama would have to do is say, &amp;quot;Look, you want change? How about 33 consecutive months of economic growth in a state that was stagnant before that? See? Yes we CAN fix the economy!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032354</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032354</guid><dc:creator>Patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description> Everyone ignore patty,sd,ca&lt;br&gt;He or she is just playing games&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zoolie (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:24 PM)&lt;br&gt;__________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah ignore the truth. Lets see how well ignoring the truth works in November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;good work .</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032357</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032357</guid><dc:creator>javier san antonio,tx</dc:creator><description>hey what about gen. ZINNI !!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032358</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032358</guid><dc:creator>LB, Virginia</dc:creator><description>I would love Webb--if the Republicans in Congress give Barack any lip, he'll shoot 'em!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love Hagel, but he's pro life and women won't go for that. put him as defense secy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love Sebelius, but I'm worried that the US isn't ready for an African American AND a woman all at once.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rendell would also be on my list, he's a charmer and will work his heart out. He is a bit on the goofy side though. For boring Ohio, we could go for the Strickland guy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson is too sweet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kaine is good and a Catholic, but we need him in VA and I'm worried creepy George Allen will try a comeback in the Gov race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden is a good guy but talks too damned much. At Secy of State, he'd be good because our enemies would agree to anything to get him to shut up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nunn is great but a bit too old--he'd look like Obama's granddad!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032359</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032359</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Shaeon, MA</dc:creator><description>Jim Webb - VP&lt;br&gt;Joe Biden - Secry of State&lt;br&gt;Hagel - Secry of Defense&lt;br&gt;Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Wolfowitz -- The Haguefor war crimes trial&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032360</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032360</guid><dc:creator>Jeff B., Washington DC</dc:creator><description>You guys have to stop thinking that he's going to pick someone over 60. &amp;nbsp;Its against the Obama brand. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He needs a young white male governor to be VP.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032362</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032362</guid><dc:creator>Deborah, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Either Jim Webb or Sam Nunn for VP slot...Webb is smart, likeable and doesn't put up with a whole lot of bs (good bad cop to Obama good cop) --- Nunn could be a definite assist with southern working class whites. &amp;nbsp;However, Nunn may be of better service as Chief of Staff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a happy predicament to find yourself in, President Obama ;)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032364</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:50:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032364</guid><dc:creator>jp,michigan</dc:creator><description>Hillary doesn't need him. &amp;nbsp;He will need her more, he is unelectable other wise!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032371</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:51:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032371</guid><dc:creator>stlpoet</dc:creator><description>If he weren't complete anathema to the Clintons, possibly continuing the lack of party unity, Bill Richardson would make sense, helping possibly with the Hispanic vote and containing McCain's strength in the Southwest, as McCain is from AZ.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032372</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:51:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032372</guid><dc:creator>buymerc, Los Altos</dc:creator><description>Obama needs a white working class woman who tilts republican and is good looking?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Time to find one :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032373</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:51:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032373</guid><dc:creator>adrian pan</dc:creator><description>Obama doesnt have a blank check to pick whomever he wants. He has to offer Hillary the spot first, and despite what some say, she is the toughest and strongest politician among all these mentionables.&lt;br&gt;It's another question whether she'd accept it. But he can't bypass her.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032374</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032374</guid><dc:creator>Pete - Albany, NY</dc:creator><description>There won't be a Dream Ticket...Senator Obama won't offer the VP to Senator Clinton and she wouldn't accept. &amp;nbsp;At this point she's looking more at Senate Majority Leader or Majority Whip if not a possible cabinet post (DHHS).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like all the choices you've listed otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...but wouldn't Chuck Hagel be a smack right across the face to the GOP, especially since you have to figure that BFF Lieberman is on the short list for McFlipFlop?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032375</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032375</guid><dc:creator>CA voter</dc:creator><description>wow, this patty character is really out of touch. &amp;nbsp;Why not talk about all the people who won't vote for McCain? &amp;nbsp;Like 60% of the American public, that's who. &amp;nbsp;And as for college kids, the last time they turned out to vote was... duh... the last primary!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032376</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032376</guid><dc:creator>Marissa, Arlington, Virginia</dc:creator><description>NOT Jim Webb. He ia a lousey campaigner and has a history of making very bad remarks about women. He trashed the women at the Naval Academy. If he is the candidate, you will lost all of the women's votes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And we have Clinton fatigue. They cannot be trusted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson, Tim Kaine or Sebelius would all be good possibilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032380</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032380</guid><dc:creator>z</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel. &amp;nbsp;That would be experience AND change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson may help with some latin votes, but unless he can assure NM or make TX and Florida red, probably not worth it. Puerto Rico doesn't vote and other states with high latino populations will probably go Blue anyway (CA, NY, NJ)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Jim Webb stated he wasn't interested. &amp;nbsp;Besides we could use every democratic senator we can keep. &amp;nbsp;How about Gov. Tim Kaine? He's term limited.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gov Sibelius would be interesting, but lacks in national experience and it's doubtful she can help make Kansas blue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strickland seems rather boring. &amp;nbsp;Joe Biden is a cool dude, but will he really help bring more new votes?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sam Nunn, will he help in the south, or has he been out of the picture for so long that people down there don't view him as favorably. &amp;nbsp;But if he can bring in southern votes, and Obama near maxes a heavy southern black turnout, Nunn might be a good choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032383</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032383</guid><dc:creator>Ann J Utica NY</dc:creator><description>I would love Webb, but he needs to keep that VA seat. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe Biden, Clark or another military person. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032384</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032384</guid><dc:creator>Pete - Albany, NY</dc:creator><description>Thanks for the input, Patty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See ya for our victory party on November 5, 2008!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032405</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:54:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032405</guid><dc:creator>iowan</dc:creator><description>Edwards really is closest and best.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not only has the 'populism', but is known for good ideas and is married to a much more respected woman than Mrs. Bill Clinton.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032407</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:54:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032407</guid><dc:creator>j oakdale, ct</dc:creator><description>As much as I like him my only reservation with Biden is his seeming inability to keep from bloviating. If he comes with a gag then he would be my v.p. choice, tons of foreign policy experience and a no nonsense approach.&lt;br&gt;Richardson would also be a viable choice, every seems to forget he was a diplomat, again good foreign policy experience, had some good ideas during the pres. run just never seemed to get any traction.&lt;br&gt;As others have mentioned Hagel would be a good choice if the ideological differences between he and Obama could be bridged.&lt;br&gt;Hillary, just wouldn't work because with Hill you get Bill</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032410</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:55:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032410</guid><dc:creator>Betta, Wingdale, NY</dc:creator><description>Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. She has an incredible record and could help Obama attract Clinton's women voters.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032411</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:55:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032411</guid><dc:creator>Barb, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagle, it would re-enforce the idea of change and bipartisanship. &amp;nbsp;Sam Nunn is a close runner up. &amp;nbsp;These should be the top two. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032414</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:55:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032414</guid><dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator><description>I don't think that this choice should be politically-driven. &amp;nbsp;I think that Obama should choose his vice-presidential candidate based on one criteria only: &amp;nbsp;who could best lead the country if anything happens to him.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032417</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:55:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032417</guid><dc:creator>Mike Jarvis, Arlington, VA</dc:creator><description>I'm surprised that many people are discounting Hagel. Everyone seems to forget that Obama ran on a platform of unifying this country and giving everyone a seat at the table - picking someone like Hagel would be a great way to do that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But my pick is Ambassador Joe Wilson. Former Republican, staunch Hillary supporter, and ambassador to Iraq during the first Gulf War. But moreover, you can't tell the story of Joe Wilson without reliving his and his wife's disturbing betrayal by the current administration. He'd be a media poster child for everything the Executive Branch did wrong in the last eight years. If I were McCain, I'd cringe at the prospect of running in that environment.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032419</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:56:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032419</guid><dc:creator>jeff Missoula Montana</dc:creator><description>Jon in Brooklyn is right on the money. &amp;nbsp;Ed Rendell brings the most to the ticket. &amp;nbsp;He would guarantee both Ohio and Pennsylvania and possibly Florida. &amp;nbsp;Eliminates all the Jewish issues and is a hell of a campaigner.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032421</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:56:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032421</guid><dc:creator>C A,  Tuscaloosa, AL</dc:creator><description>Obama needs someone on the ticket who is already fairly well known nationally. Some of these people suggested may be good ones but many are people that folks across the US do not know well and would have to learn more about. Not enough time for that at this point thanks to Hillary. So I'll go with: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rendell - 1st&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden - 2nd&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both are tough and both would give the Republicans and McCain hell to pay. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards - Attorney General&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson - Secretary of State&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden (if not VP) - Secretary of Defense &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032423</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:56:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032423</guid><dc:creator>Linda Montgomery AL</dc:creator><description>JIM WEBB!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032425</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:56:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032425</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Chicago</dc:creator><description>Umm... Ed Rendell's not on the list because he endorsed Clinton! Duh!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032431</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:57:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032431</guid><dc:creator>Donald Wineke, Wichita, Kansas</dc:creator><description>Richardson's out (alienates all the Clinton people); Sebelius is out (Kansas); Biden's out (another East coast elitist); Hagel's out (Republican, Dem's won't vote for him).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Webb's a maybe (defense creds).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strickland and Rendell are both good possibilities (Clinton supporters and swing-state govs.--and Rendell would help with the Jewish vote).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That leaves Hillary (women's and swing state vote), who is the short-term pragmatic choice. &amp;nbsp;She might not help him govern, but she would help him win.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032435</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:57:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032435</guid><dc:creator>Christine, Connecticut</dc:creator><description>He needs someone with a lot of foreign policy expereince Hagel or Biden.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032437</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:58:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032437</guid><dc:creator>Joe Bob Halley, Floydada, TX</dc:creator><description>It'll be Webb or Hagel.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032439</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:58:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032439</guid><dc:creator>Smick, Georgia</dc:creator><description>Anyone BUT Hillary....</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032440</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:58:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032440</guid><dc:creator>Flat-earther, Georgia </dc:creator><description>We have a changed electorate. 08 will be a unique general election. BUT, BHO cannot win the GE. The sheep (Dems) are being led to slaughter, once again, by Carl. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032443</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:58:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032443</guid><dc:creator>eric-nj</dc:creator><description>Bob Casey would be his best pick. &amp;nbsp;I wonder why no one is mentioning him. &amp;nbsp;He has appeal to blue collar workers; catholics; older people and moderate to conservative Dems. &amp;nbsp;He is also pro-life which might be a problem for NARAL and others, but the Dem party should stand for diversity.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032447</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032447</guid><dc:creator>Jo, Chicago</dc:creator><description>President - Barack Obama&lt;br&gt;Vice President - Ted Strickland&lt;br&gt;Secretary of State - Joe Biden&lt;br&gt;Attorney General - John Edwards&lt;br&gt;Secretary of the Interior - Al Gore&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Veterans Affairs - Jim Webb&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Defense - Wesley Clark&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Homeland Security - Dissolve&lt;br&gt;Ambassador to the United Nations - Bill Richardson&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Education - Kathleen Sebelius&lt;br&gt;House Majority Leader - Nancy Pelosi&lt;br&gt;Senate Majority Leader - Hillary Clinton&lt;br&gt;All others TBA on January 09</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032449</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032449</guid><dc:creator>Carly, Bolivar NY</dc:creator><description>Contrary to what some are saying, Obama is getting a much bigger group than blacks and college kids. &amp;nbsp;I should know, as an Obama supporter, I fit into niether of those groups.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama could use some help with the white working class as they are called. &amp;nbsp;To help him here, he should go with Strickland or Rendell. &amp;nbsp;If he doesn't think he needs that group (and he may not) he should go with Richardson. &amp;nbsp;I do think he needs to get out of the Senate...and go with someone with the much needed &amp;quot;experience.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, I think Hagel would be great...an unbeatable ticket. &amp;nbsp;Hagel should take it if it's offered to him...it's a chance to make history.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032450</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032450</guid><dc:creator>Vote for MCSAME = 3rd Bush Term</dc:creator><description>Patty from CA. &amp;nbsp;What does McCain have left. The bigots and the uneducated. that is it. &amp;nbsp;Obama will win November in a landslide because McSAME is bumbling, angry man who flip flops on all issues. &amp;nbsp;He said to talk to Hamas just two years. Go to Huffington Post and you can see the video. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MCSAME and Bush will make this easy for Obama. Just like Bush jr. &amp;nbsp;opening his mouth in Isreal. I bet you the Obama camp was jumping for Joy. &amp;nbsp;McSAME and Bush &amp;nbsp;on video saying these horrible things. I love it. What a bunch on idiots. &amp;nbsp;Patty if you support Hillary and then you vote for McCain then you voted against your girl HIllary. She is not for McSame, regardless of what people and media say &amp;nbsp;She will be behind Obama. It is in the best interest of ALL SHE STANDS FOR. &amp;nbsp;A VOTE FOR MCSAME IS A VOTE AGAINST HILLARY&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary for vp-Ok. but not first choice. Cabinet member absolutely. &amp;nbsp;Maybe Sec. of State. She is tough and would do a great job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CHUCK Hagel: HE IS MY #1. What a statement this would make. &amp;nbsp;First time we would have a ticket with both parties represented. &amp;nbsp;Hagel is against the war. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gov. Kansas-Love her and voted for her both times. &amp;nbsp;Not ready yet for VP. Doesn't help with working class &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Ted Strickland and Gov. Ed Rendell. He was not so nice to Obama in Primary but he is an exceptional leader in his state and carries great weight in the Dem party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS. &amp;nbsp;Patty I bet you are happy about NARAL supporting Obama aren't you. They are highly educated women and the most active Abortions right group. &amp;nbsp;Are you against women also? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patty, Angry women yells at cloud!! &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHITE 40 year old Male for Obama.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032451</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032451</guid><dc:creator>Tom, Burke, VA</dc:creator><description>1) Richardson - Experience as Governor and foreign policy/Locks up NM, CO, NV and puts TX and FL in Play, 2) Strickland - Experience as Governor/Voted against war/Locks up OH, PA &amp;amp; MI, 3) Biden - Experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First lets get them vetted to make sure there are not hidden skelletons.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032453</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032453</guid><dc:creator>Kris STL</dc:creator><description>NO Clinton!!! She needs to keep her senate seat and put all her great ideas to work there. Not to mention she brings baggage He does not need ( i mean no disprespect here, but that's real talk)!! Biden would be great, Hagel is nice, but a pipe dream. Just pick someone who has experience, but not the excessive baggae. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032457</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:59:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032457</guid><dc:creator>Susan, Nashville, TN</dc:creator><description>Hagel or Ed Rendell</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032461</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:00:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032461</guid><dc:creator>Jon - Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>Leave it to Patty to be a jackass! &amp;nbsp;Please move to Canada as we don't need people like you in our country.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032462</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:00:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032462</guid><dc:creator>eric-nj</dc:creator><description>Bob Casey would be his best pick. &amp;nbsp;I wonder why no one is mentioning him. &amp;nbsp;He has appeal to blue collar workers; catholics; older people and moderate to conservative Dems. &amp;nbsp;He is also pro-life which might be a problem for NARAL and others, but the Dem party should stand for diversity.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032466</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:00:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032466</guid><dc:creator>PEM59, Central Jersey</dc:creator><description>Seriously, can people in the media stop propogating this absolutely absurd notion of an Obama-Clinton &amp;quot;dream ticket&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;Dream ticket&amp;quot;, more like a nightmare. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-------------------------&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Gavin (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:13 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You took the words right out of my mouth.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032467</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032467</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description>I love Obama, and I think the winning combo would be him and Clinton. I supported Clinton before, but she is a sore loser and i want to move on to the winner now.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032468</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032468</guid><dc:creator>Jane mcSame </dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I likey </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032470</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032470</guid><dc:creator>Laura Long, Wilmette, IL</dc:creator><description>Why not Rendell?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032471</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032471</guid><dc:creator>phi, oakland, ca</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;When was the last time college kids showed up on election day?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sorry for the cheapshot in advance patty:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;when barack won more states, votes, and delegates.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032472</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032472</guid><dc:creator>David, CA</dc:creator><description>HRC should not be the VP choice for Obama. It would be a disaster and there is no chemistry. Especially having the Clintons back in the White House under Obama. The Clintons would under mind Obama and ... It won't work. It's a disaster ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama/Edwards </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032473</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032473</guid><dc:creator>Cloudy Future, Fort Sill, OK</dc:creator><description>Jon, Brooklyn, NY -&lt;br&gt;about why Ed Rendell is not on the list. He was on one of the news channels and they asked him if he was interested in Veep since he was a HRC supporter that could be picked. Rendell said no he had no interest in VP and if Obama wanted a HRC supporter he should pick HRC herself. Although I can imagine that could chnage.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for my guess I think he has three or four top people on that list Hagel, Strickland, and Sebelius, &amp;nbsp;maybe Webb. Do not have a perference myself but would be nice to have Strickland or Sebelius....Finally get OH or the woman vote and KS and OH vote (since Sebelius is from OH). &lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032476</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:01:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032476</guid><dc:creator>Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY</dc:creator><description>As my wife says, putting Hillary on the ticket would be a disaster and would eliminate any possibility of her (my wife) voting for the ticket. &amp;nbsp;I couldn't agree more. &amp;nbsp;Hillary represents the antithesis of the change theme that is the hallmark of Obama's campaign. &amp;nbsp;For me, it's her war vote but also, I think that her behavior during this campaign has been repugnant. Barack needs an enthusiastic turn out with the youth and with Black voters and Hillary on the ticket will suppress that turn out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary has much work to do to redeem herself in the eyes of me and my wife; for now linking the idea of Hillary with the term dream-ticket is oxymoronic - nightmare is more like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as other choices, I feel that there is no best one. &amp;nbsp;The most important choice will be the one that best represents change. &amp;nbsp;Sebelius, Webb, McCaskill are all good change candidates who bring with them, red states (sometimes more than one) that could be in play. &amp;nbsp;I have no objection to Biden (although he is still stubborn about his war vote - still ya' gotta love Joe and he'd be a fierce contender, great VP attack dog). &amp;nbsp;Richardson showed bravery in bucking the establishment and my hat is off to him (however, he might want Sec'y of State but - Susan Rice is very impressive; she has more brains in her little finger than most have in their head). &amp;nbsp;Dodd has been another bucker of the establishment but I see him more as Senate majority leader or whip. &amp;nbsp;I see Dick Durbin as chief of staff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel's position on choice makes him a difficult choice for VP but I think both he (Defense - or Wes Clark) and Bloomberg (Treasury) would make good cabinet choices. &amp;nbsp;Hillary should be Sec'y of HHS and there she would have the chance to finally get it right on a universal health care package - no joke, historically it would be big!...her magnum opus realized.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's not forget John Edwards as a VP consideration. &amp;nbsp;I think that if he wanted it, he would be great. &amp;nbsp;He has really seasoned as a candidate and he and Elizabeth might be able to put NC into play this time. &amp;nbsp;Still, I think that AG is where he'd prefer to be. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are some other dark horses. &amp;nbsp;Ted Strickland would be valuable in the midwest (did great for Hillary in Ohio) and Ed Rendell was a winner for Hillary in Pennsylvania (both afford the opportunity to extend an olive branch to camp Hillary) &amp;nbsp;And, don't forget Bill Nelson who beat Kathryn Harris in Florida (for the Senate) by a gazillion %) - man, with Florida in the tank, the election would be a foregone conclusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too many good choices to be had; it could make for some confusion. &amp;nbsp;Still, it's a great position for Obama to be in. &amp;nbsp;I am cautiously optimistic for November.&lt;br&gt;Obama '08 </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032482</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032482</guid><dc:creator>tina, ar</dc:creator><description>I personally like Sibelius or Hagel. &amp;nbsp;I really like Hagel and I have been a lifelong democrat. &amp;nbsp;Hagel is a Vietnam Vet which would give this stupid flag pin issue to rest and would bring in tons of vets and military personnel. &amp;nbsp;Sibelius is wonderful, but I also like Claire and it would give us Missouri for sure.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032484</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032484</guid><dc:creator>Rick ~ Martin, OH</dc:creator><description>Whoever it is it has to be someone who represents change from the past.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032485</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032485</guid><dc:creator>Gerry, Buffalo NY</dc:creator><description>Forget the 'Dream Ticket' Obama would need a food tester and night watchman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim Webb would be my choice. He would likely ensure a win in Virginia for Obama as well as help with the southern white vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Richardson would help in many states. He would secure New Mexico and California plus put in play Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Forida. This might be the most logical choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would not consider Rendell who believe it or not has his own problems with Farakan. Google it if you don't believe me. This would not help Obama who many are trying to link to Farakan anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Hagel but I want a democrat who is young enough to take the presidency after 8 years of Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ted Strickland would definitely help secure Ohio so for a selected pick that would be OK. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius is a good pick but I worry about asking Americans to put both a black man and a woman on the same ticket. Too much change may not be a good thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032486</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032486</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Pt Washington, NY</dc:creator><description>Reinforce the Message: Congressman Robert Wexler Florida&lt;br&gt;Target Pick:Congressman Robert Wexler Florida&lt;br&gt;Balancing The Ticket w/Exp:Congressman Robert Wexler Florida&lt;br&gt;Out of The Box: Congressman Robert Wexler Florida...Jewish, Wnat to Subpoena Rove and Impeach Cheney. Great Attack Dog</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032487</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032487</guid><dc:creator>BenjaminAndrewMoore</dc:creator><description>People--Jim Webb is not an option. As much as I'd love to see him on the ticket, Democrats can't lose that seat in the Senate. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032488</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032488</guid><dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator><description>Tim Kaine.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032490</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032490</guid><dc:creator>Howard, NYC</dc:creator><description>I agree with Dead Guy. Obama-Clinton is only a dream ticket if you're Karl Rove. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best choice is Biden, but Webb and Hagel would be excellent, too. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032491</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:02:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032491</guid><dc:creator>Obama '08    TN</dc:creator><description>If we ignore Patty, do you think she'll go away? &amp;nbsp;Inquiring minds want to know...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032492</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032492</guid><dc:creator>james, los angeles</dc:creator><description>ADMIRAL FALLON</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032494</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032494</guid><dc:creator>KATHY, CHICAGO, IL</dc:creator><description>MY FIRST CHOICE IS CHUCK HAGEL! &amp;nbsp;MY SECOND CHOICE IS EITHER SAM NUNN OR JIM WEBB!! &amp;nbsp;GO OBAMA!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032498</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032498</guid><dc:creator>Limbolk, RI</dc:creator><description>Naming a Republican or two or three for the cabinet is one thing... but as Veep? &amp;nbsp;I doubt it. &amp;nbsp;Richardson and Strickland are good options. &amp;nbsp;What about Rendell--wouldn't he help bring in PA and FL? &amp;nbsp;I personally like Richardson, but I need to learn more about Strickland of OH.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032500</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032500</guid><dc:creator>james, los angeles</dc:creator><description>***************ADMIRAL FALLON********************</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032501</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032501</guid><dc:creator>Julie W in Seattle</dc:creator><description>Wesley Clark - I second that!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032502</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032502</guid><dc:creator>Christian, New York, NY </dc:creator><description>It has to be someone is older, more experienced, and be able to bring some military &amp;quot;clout.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The lady from Kansas is nice, and she would probably make a great candidate one day, however, with 2 war's going on, we can't have a Dem ticket with 2 people with zero armed services/military experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion, Obama has to go with either Biden or Hagel. &amp;nbsp;They both are experienced and well versed in foreign affairs, policy, and the military. &amp;nbsp;And after watching Biden on Hardball last night, he's one dude I would not wanna mess with. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In conclusion, BO needs to balance his message of &amp;quot;freshness&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;toughness.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Enter Biden or Hagel. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032505</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032505</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Phoenix AZ</dc:creator><description>After Obama's speech this morning I think all republicans had best keep their mouths shut. Obama knows history and the constitution. I can't waite for a debate between McCain and Obama. McCain and Bush don't even sound like they got out of highschool! Anyone of your choices would be great. I do think he might owe it to Clinton. It should be her choice to say no. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032506</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032506</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Albany, New York</dc:creator><description>Hagel would be a great choice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially if McCain does the smart thing and picks that hack Lieberman. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032507</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032507</guid><dc:creator>Stephen S.</dc:creator><description>Actually, how about this for balancing the ticket: Evan Bayh. He was a two-term governor (exec. experience); he's been in the senate for more than one term(legisl. experience); he is from a red state with 11 elec votes (and he's very popular there, gvien record re-eelction margin as governor); he is a Clinton supporter who would signal a knitting together of two factions; and he woud be a good president in his own right, given his experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan Bayh: Remember where you heard it first. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032508</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032508</guid><dc:creator>PaulE, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator><description>It is going to be Al Gore. Just watch and see. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032511</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032511</guid><dc:creator>mike ca</dc:creator><description>i would like to see john edwards on your list but... biden may be to far left to put on the ticket. richardson would be the best to overcome the experiance question.&lt;br&gt;strickland and clinton seems to much like old politics so hes out.&lt;br&gt;i wont rule clinton out completely. but thats a hard sell.&lt;br&gt;the rest have little or no name reconition outside of their state they may bring a state but little else.&lt;br&gt;now if you could build a time machine and get me mcain 90's i could be happy.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032512</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032512</guid><dc:creator>James, Wichita, KS</dc:creator><description>Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius would be a great choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Governor of a red state. She is a she and that appeals to a lot of people plus she is pretty dang tough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My second choice is Jim Webb because he is so darn scrappy. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032513</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032513</guid><dc:creator>phi, oakland, ca</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;So what's the rub on why Rendell is so notably absent?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Jon, Brooklyn, NY &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd say that the main reason is because he doesn't have any national security experience.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032515</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032515</guid><dc:creator>Frank G.</dc:creator><description>Clinton - NO!&lt;br&gt;Richardson - No, two AA/Hispanic would be too 'new' still&lt;br&gt;Webb - Already declined&lt;br&gt;Sebelius - Now, YES! Plus she is a strong, HONEST woman!&lt;br&gt;Biden - I would like that. Good for &amp;quot;white&amp;quot; Americans.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032516</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032516</guid><dc:creator>k cinci, Cincinnati, OH</dc:creator><description>Gov. Rendell of PA has a Louis Farrakhan problem. See &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032520</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:06:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032520</guid><dc:creator>David, CA</dc:creator><description>HRC should not be the VP choice for Obama. It would be a disaster and there is no chemistry. Especially having the Clintons back in the White House under Obama. The Clintons would under mind Obama and ... It won't work. It's a disaster ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama/Edwards </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032525</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032525</guid><dc:creator>csh, IL</dc:creator><description>Considering that she received over 49% of the votes cast, it better be Hillary or a lot of her 17 million voters wil stay home or go with McCain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody else has her leverage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you win 60 percent pr 70 percent of the primary vote (as Kerry and Bill Clinton did), you have earned the right to choose your own VP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But when Obama can only manage 50.2% of the vote, he has not earned that right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary - OR ELSE!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032526</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:06:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032526</guid><dc:creator>PEM, Central Jersey</dc:creator><description>Where is Ed Rendell on this list? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; So what's the rub on why Rendell is so notably absent? &lt;br&gt;Jon, Brooklyn, NY (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:16 PM)&lt;br&gt;-----------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recently moved from PA. &amp;nbsp;To me, Rendell represents the old school party politics. &amp;nbsp; He may have more skeletons than a cemetary. &amp;nbsp;I can't wait to see how he would answer questions about his indicted friends / contributors like Louis DeNaples (Mob ties) and State Senator Vince Fumo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032533</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:06:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032533</guid><dc:creator>Rd, Dallas Texas</dc:creator><description>If he wishes to truly (and the other choices are certainly good ones), I'd think Chuck Hagel &amp;nbsp;A great way to show true change. &amp;nbsp;It'd be gutsy, and new, but the people are ready for gutsy and new as long as it's totally upfront and honest. Just my $.02</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032537</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032537</guid><dc:creator>C A, Tuscaloosa, AL</dc:creator><description>FirtsRead:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You ask a question about a VP pick and I put in my vote for VP as you asked and it is not posted. Yet you post two nonsensical comments from sick patty,sd,ca. What gives? </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032538</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032538</guid><dc:creator>cscwuff</dc:creator><description>Instant credibility. Plugs some perceived holes in Obama's resume:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sam Nunn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cscwuff in NC</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032540</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032540</guid><dc:creator>You can call me sweetie anytime</dc:creator><description>Hagel</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032545</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032545</guid><dc:creator>Mike D in Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>I like Ed Rendell. He is a great party man, Jewish, Army Reserve member back in the day, strong Clinton supporter, and can deliver Pa along with states with similar demographics. I also love his sense of humor and homespun qualities.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032546</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032546</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Albany, New York</dc:creator><description>If MSNBC is on Air and nobody is watching does it make noise? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;^^^^^^^&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Says the prolific MSNBC.com contributor and republican hack. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032547</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032547</guid><dc:creator>Doreen Augusta Maine</dc:creator><description>I think it useless for us to guess at who Barack Obama will choose as a running mate. It is truly his choice and his choice alone.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032548</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032548</guid><dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator><description>Tsk, Tsk, Tsk for not mentioning Evan Bayh or Wesley Clark. And it's hard to take you seriously when you mention Chuck Hagel. Are you sure you're in the right line of work?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032550</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032550</guid><dc:creator>Cathy Axline</dc:creator><description>I don't care who Obama gets to be his VP...Jesus or Fred Flintstone...I still will not vote for him!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032554</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032554</guid><dc:creator>Walldog</dc:creator><description>It all depends on what the Obama campaign feels will best round out the ticket and help him. &amp;nbsp;What type person would make the best VP to go with him... &amp;#160;Does he want a Woman? &amp;#160;A Governor? &amp;#160;A Military guy? &amp;#160;Somebody to help with &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;? &amp;#160;A Southerner? &amp;#160;A Republican (or former Republican)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strong cases could be made for any of the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Women:&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton &lt;br&gt;Kathleen Sebelius &amp;nbsp; (also a Governor) &amp;nbsp;(former Republican)&lt;br&gt;Janet Napolitano &amp;nbsp;(also a Governor)&lt;br&gt;Diane Feinstein&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Military:&lt;br&gt;Gen. Wesley Clark&lt;br&gt;Gen. Anthony Zinni&lt;br&gt;Sam Nunn (also a southerner)&amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;Jim Webb &amp;#160;(also a southerner)&amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;) &amp;#160;(former Republican)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Governor:&lt;br&gt;Ed Rendell &amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;Ted Strickland &amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;Evan Bayh &amp;#160;(former Governor) &amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson &amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;Tim Kaine &amp;#160;(also a southerner) &amp;#160;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Southerners: &lt;br&gt;John Edwards &amp;nbsp;(appeals to &amp;quot;Hardworking White People&amp;quot;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republican/Former Republican&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My prediction (as of what we know today): &amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;Even though there are some hard feelings, Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;They would not lose very many supporters from either side (all feelings would be healed by November). &amp;nbsp;This would tie together almost every coalition the Dems need. &amp;nbsp;The only possible achilles heel would be some independents and some who would not vote for an African-American or a woman (but who could Obama possibly put on the ticket to convince such a person?).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Webb, Rendell or Strickland&amp;#160;(depending on which one of these guys the Obama campaign will best help with Ohio/Pennsylvania/Michigan/Virginia).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032555</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032555</guid><dc:creator>fa</dc:creator><description>sebelius. &amp;nbsp;I like and &amp;nbsp;Obama is very comfortable with her. &lt;br&gt;It does depends anyway who Mccain wil pick. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032558</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032558</guid><dc:creator>BL, Cincinnati OH</dc:creator><description>Hagel would be a great pick but wont happen. &lt;br&gt;The VP is a spring board to the presidency and Obama is too smart to put a Republican in that position, even if its Hagel. &lt;br&gt;Reality, NY (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:22 PM)&lt;br&gt;__________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel would be 70 in 2016, he won't be running for President. &amp;nbsp;He's not even running for re-election this year for his Senate seat. He's also worked with Dems on numerous issues. There is always the chance that he'd choose not to serve a second VP term, thus allowing Obama to run with a Dem VP to put them in position to run in 2016.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hagel - Good guy, but would most likely not accept the offer. &lt;br&gt;Mike, Albany (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:23 PM)&lt;br&gt;____&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He already said he'd accept if Obama asked.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032560</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032560</guid><dc:creator>JAMES MCCOY  FRANKLIN, N.C.</dc:creator><description>By the way...The blogger that liked Sebelius.....She is a woman &amp;nbsp;not a HE....:)</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032563</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:09:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032563</guid><dc:creator>m wiggins torrington, ct</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;1. ...darkmood achmeintinjihad &amp;nbsp;iran&lt;br&gt;2. ...bugle charface &amp;nbsp;venezuela&lt;br&gt;3. ...rend~a~choir lite &amp;nbsp;chicago &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032575</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032575</guid><dc:creator>mb, baltimore, md</dc:creator><description>Joe Biden gives him the foreign policy and experience background that he needs. OBAMA/BIDEN 08!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032581</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032581</guid><dc:creator>Bill  Honolulu, HI</dc:creator><description>I think he needs a strong, experienced governor for balance. &amp;nbsp;Ed Rendell of PA is not a good choice as he is &amp;quot;too machine&amp;quot; politics - something Obama does not want in a new, change administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius is not experienced enough and the GOP would attack them both hard in that regard, though I do like her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also like Jim Webb and could see that. &amp;nbsp;I think he would be the best 'balance' person.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Hagel would be interesting but having a split-ticket might be too mind-numbing considering the fact Obama is the 1st serious African American contender for the top job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strickland could help shore up the midwest blue collar vote which could easily bleed over into PA and IN.&lt;br&gt;Sen Bayh has gubernatorial experience and is very popular in IN. &amp;nbsp;He could be on a short-list as well, but I think his ties to HRC are too strong to change now. &amp;nbsp;We'll see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HRC needs to be offered the job, but I think it would be symbolic only. &amp;nbsp;He wouldn't mean it and she wouldn't accept it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, HRC should be offered an spot in the administration. &amp;nbsp;How high he would go with her is a tough call, but no one can deny she is made of iron. &amp;nbsp;She is a fighter and could prove invaluable to an Obama administration. &amp;nbsp;Would her heart really be in it though?&lt;br&gt;I think John Edwards would make a great AG. &amp;nbsp;Richardson has tons of foreign experience and needs to be in the cabinet, but honestly I think he's too soft on the terror issue so he would not be my choice as Sec of State. &amp;nbsp;For that, I like Gen Clark. &lt;br&gt;There are great choices out there.&lt;br&gt;I think it will come down to J.Webb or Ted Strickland for VP.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Democrats must unite regardless who he chooses. &amp;nbsp;There is too much at stake. &amp;nbsp;We say that every election but I think means more now than ever. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And this is from a guy who has voted GOP since 76!)&lt;br&gt;I registered as a Democrat so I could caucus for Obama, but much as I have some remaining issues with HRC, I guarantee she would get my vote in the fall. &amp;nbsp;We cannot afford a Bush &amp;quot;third-term&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;UNITE THE PARTY&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032582</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032582</guid><dc:creator>Beth, Orlando, FL</dc:creator><description>A couple of thoughts ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;The VP choice cannot have been an Obama supporter.&lt;br&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;The VP choice has be to acceptable to those who supported Sen. Clinton.&lt;br&gt;3. &amp;nbsp;The VP choice has to be Sen. Clinton herself or we LOSE in November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way ... on the thoughts of the VP choice made by Sen. McCain. &amp;nbsp;The only way Crist delivers Florida is that millions of Floridians would love for him to go away. &amp;nbsp;He's bad for Florida and would be terrible for the country.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032583</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032583</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Shawnee, Oh</dc:creator><description>Dan Abrams says that I hate Hillary, he is wrong. We just want to clean up DC and she has too much baggage. No, I am from Ohio, and Ted Strickland is nothing but a bobblehead for Hillary. This country has too many good people that thinks as Barack does, does not answer to Wall Street, cares for me, a poor person, and will not be bought and paid for by lobbyists, for him to pick from. I would love to see a woman take over the White House, after the mess that the men have made, just not that woman. And if he were to pick her, would you trust her and Bill? NOT!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032584</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032584</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Shawnee, Oh</dc:creator><description>Dan Abrams says that I hate Hillary, he is wrong. We just want to clean up DC and she has too much baggage. No, I am from Ohio, and Ted Strickland is nothing but a bobblehead for Hillary. This country has too many good people that thinks as Barack does, does not answer to Wall Street, cares for me, a poor person, and will not be bought and paid for by lobbyists, for him to pick from. I would love to see a woman take over the White House, after the mess that the men have made, just not that woman. And if he were to pick her, would you trust her and Bill? NOT!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032587</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032587</guid><dc:creator>austin, Boyertown PA</dc:creator><description>No Edwards? &amp;nbsp;Helps with the the blue collar voters and should put North Carolina truely in play</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032589</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032589</guid><dc:creator>Brian Hussein</dc:creator><description>#1 - Gov. Sebelius: &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;red state&amp;quot; governor, executive experience, father was Governor of Ohio, etc.&lt;br&gt;#2 - Gen. Clark: &amp;nbsp;former General, from Arkansas, helps combat the silly anti-american meme, Clinton supporter, etc.&lt;br&gt;#3 - Gov. Richardson: &amp;nbsp;for all the obvious reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My $0.02.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032591</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:11:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032591</guid><dc:creator>Susan, Cary, NC</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel, but I agree he would not likely accept. &amp;nbsp;If Obama made the offer and it was refused could make him look weak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone but Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032597</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:11:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032597</guid><dc:creator>Eric Henderson, Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>Richardson, please...or Obama taking VP and giving the Goreacle the top of the ticket!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032602</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:12:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032602</guid><dc:creator>Jay, The Batcave</dc:creator><description>I'm all about Richardson. Some sh*t would get done!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032603</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:12:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032603</guid><dc:creator>patty, sd, ca</dc:creator><description>John McCain should realize that he'll never be as good as Bush. &amp;nbsp;Poor guy. No wonder why George McGovern switched from HRC to Barack. &amp;nbsp;McCain will make his(McGovern's) loss look like Barack's loss in Indiana. &amp;nbsp;He was so close no one really talks about it as a loss. &amp;nbsp;HA!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm for Nader, don't you people know!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032608</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:12:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032608</guid><dc:creator>Littleoldme</dc:creator><description>I got one for you patty,sd,ca (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:12 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check this out!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IF A PASTOR IS KNOWN BY THE COMPANY THEY KEEP! &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;When the Rev. William Procanick put his hand on the Bible during his &lt;br&gt;sex-abuse trial in Oneida County Court earlier this year, he swore to &lt;br&gt;tell t he whole truth and nothing but the truth. &amp;nbsp;But as the former &lt;br&gt;Clinton Pastor was sentenced Friday to three years in prison for &lt;br&gt;Inappropriately touching a 7-year-old girl at his home last March. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Judge Michael L. Dwyer said Procanick sacrificed his honesty the &lt;br&gt;day he testified. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Okay, so now that Bill and Hillary Clinton's pastor has been convicted &lt;br&gt;of child molestation, will we see the same furor directe d at Hilary tha t &lt;br&gt;Obama has had to endure these last few weeks? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;IF A CANDIDATE IS KNOWN BY THE PASTOR THEY KEEP ....... &lt;br&gt;Then you need to email this article to everyone you know. &amp;nbsp;Here &lt;br&gt;the Clinton's Pastor is convicted of child molestation. &amp;nbsp;So, if Obama &lt;br&gt;be ars the guilt for his pastor's comment; then Hilary has to be &lt;br&gt;equally tainted by this man's crimes. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;GIVES NEW MEANING TO SHOE ON THE OTHERS FOOT .... &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032609</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032609</guid><dc:creator>Felicia Clemens, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>Whatever the absurd hype, Clinton excludes herself by &amp;nbsp;refusing to disclose recent tax info and Clinton foundation donors. Bet on Obama's VP choice to disclose all financial info before anyone asks. Kathleen Sebelius helps in Ohio (her dad was governor), bipartisanship (her father-in-law is a Republican and she converts Republicans regularly),change (strong governor, no stranger to Washington, but not tainted either) her style compliments his, and she is an eloquent answer to those who rightly say that it's time for a woman at the highest levels. Big bonus points for an honorable magistrate husband. An early announcement (please let it be May 20) puts the ticket out there to campaign all summer, doubles retail campaigning efforts, shuts down Clinton, shuts down endless, pointless VP speculation, ensures explosive media coverage (to put it mildly), picks up the slogging pace and rockets Democrats forward. And grateful nation will thank him!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032613</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:13:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032613</guid><dc:creator>heres a cabinet for ya</dc:creator><description>Sebelius as VP, Biden is Sec. State, Hegel is Sec. Def, Edwards is Attorny Gen.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032616</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:13:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032616</guid><dc:creator>Littleoldme</dc:creator><description>I got one for you patty,sd,ca (Sent Friday, May 16, 2008 2:12 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check this out!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IF A PASTOR IS KNOWN BY THE COMPANY THEY KEEP! &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;When the Rev. William Procanick put his hand on the Bible during his &lt;br&gt;sex-abuse trial in Oneida County Court earlier this year, he swore to &lt;br&gt;tell t he whole truth and nothing but the truth. &amp;nbsp;But as the former &lt;br&gt;Clinton Pastor was sentenced Friday to three years in prison for &lt;br&gt;Inappropriately touching a 7-year-old girl at his home last March. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Judge Michael L. Dwyer said Procanick sacrificed his honesty the &lt;br&gt;day he testified. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Okay, so now that Bill and Hillary Clinton's pastor has been convicted &lt;br&gt;of child molestation, will we see the same furor directe d at Hilary tha t &lt;br&gt;Obama has had to endure these last few weeks? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;IF A CANDIDATE IS KNOWN BY THE PASTOR THEY KEEP ....... &lt;br&gt;Then you need to email this article to everyone you know. &amp;nbsp;Here &lt;br&gt;the Clinton's Pastor is convicted of child molestation. &amp;nbsp;So, if Obama &lt;br&gt;be ars the guilt for his pastor's comment; then Hilary has to be &lt;br&gt;equally tainted by this man's crimes. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;GIVES NEW MEANING TO SHOE ON THE OTHERS FOOT .... &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032617</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:13:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032617</guid><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><description>The clear choice is ED Rendell. &amp;nbsp;1) He was part of the Clinton camp &amp;nbsp;2) He's a brilliant attack dog and 3) He'd help deliver PA</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032620</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:13:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032620</guid><dc:creator>Mr. Bradley, Ca</dc:creator><description>Anyone but Hillary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;oh yea and Patty in SD LOL LOL &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama 08</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032624</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032624</guid><dc:creator>CAH, Everett, WA </dc:creator><description>Sebelius or Richardson</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032634</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032634</guid><dc:creator>Rosalynd, Orlando Florida</dc:creator><description>Nagel or Sebelius would be great choices for VP.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032635</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032635</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Boulder CO</dc:creator><description>Wesley Clark deserves some consideration. &amp;nbsp;He opposed the war at the start. &amp;nbsp;His NATO experience and military pedigree help along with the fact he was a Hillary supporter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe Evan Bayh (sp)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius would help bring in the &amp;quot;cougar&amp;quot; constituency.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032636</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032636</guid><dc:creator>Jai  Kim, Lewsiburg, PA</dc:creator><description>Go w/Sen Bob Casey or Gov Sebellius.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032637</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032637</guid><dc:creator>Peter, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>I like Sellibus, a good solid choice. &amp;nbsp;Curious as to why Janet Napolitano didn't make it on this list, though. Having a VP form John McCain's backyard would be ideal, I'd think.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032639</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:14:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032639</guid><dc:creator>dw, kansas city, mo</dc:creator><description>Who cares! He is going to lose anyway in November. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032640</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:15:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032640</guid><dc:creator>linda, New Jersey</dc:creator><description>I like Richardson but what an amazing ticket it would be with Hagel as VP. Hopefully we'll find out sooner than later.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032642</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032642</guid><dc:creator>Kristopher, VA</dc:creator><description>My vote is for Jim Webb. I wouldn't count out Nancy Pelosi or Claire McCaskill. Two powerful women, one from a potential Nov. Swing state.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032643</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032643</guid><dc:creator>Betty Coutant</dc:creator><description>Hagel or Biden. Both are tough and experienced. No women -- that's too much change for one year. No Richardson -- that's too ethnic. I don't like it, but I believe that's the way it is.&lt;br&gt;I'd love to see Edwards. They look great together and TV is here whether we like it or not...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032649</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:16:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032649</guid><dc:creator>Y</dc:creator><description>everyone has a choice. &amp;nbsp;but I really like Sebelius. &amp;nbsp;Her demeanor is such a contrast to HRC. &amp;nbsp;But if you really want to make me happy go with Collin Powell. &amp;nbsp;Smart man and he got out when the gettin was good and he know where the skeletons are buried.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032650</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:16:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032650</guid><dc:creator>unionsalt, NY</dc:creator><description>Gee....Since when does a King need a VP?&lt;br&gt;Well...how about William Ayers, they seem to be kindred sprits...&amp;amp; we already know the way the wind blows~~~</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032651</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:16:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032651</guid><dc:creator>Auntie Mame, New Mexico</dc:creator><description>Obama needs someone solid, &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;, and experienced. O. himself represents enough &amp;quot;change&amp;quot;--no need to go overboard there. Someone with solid foreign affairs experience (Biden, Nunn)to counter the Republican's main attack angle or someone with executive experience who mollifies Hillary supporters--not necessarily a woman, but a strong Hillary supporter, like Strickland. Richardson has upset the Hillary base and isn't good on the stump. And definitely not Hillary--she would dilute Obama's &amp;quot;new politics&amp;quot; message, has too much baggage, would mobilize the right, and would team with Bill to undercut Obama once in office. Plus my sense is everyone except die-hard Hillary supporters has really severe Clinton fatigue--we need a new face out there. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032656</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:17:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032656</guid><dc:creator>Ricky, OH</dc:creator><description>Patty, your view that only &amp;quot;Blacks &amp;amp; College Kids&amp;quot; will vote is not proven out in the data. &amp;nbsp;If you look at the data carefully ........ them most determining factor in the race between Hillary and Barack was &amp;quot;AGE&amp;quot;, then race. Tell me what state you're in, and how old you are, and I'll tell you who you voted for. &amp;nbsp;For all the &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot; that has been said about folks not voting for this person or that person because of race simply isn't backed up by data. &amp;nbsp;While it maybe true that race is a factor, its not the dominant factor. &amp;nbsp;On your other point; it has been true that in past elections, these so-called College Kids haven't shown up to vote ........... neither in the PRIMARIES or the General. &amp;nbsp;But, this time they're showing up in the primaries, and driving the campaign. &amp;nbsp;There's no data that suggests that they won't show up in the general given the fact that they have shown up in the primaries. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now this gets me to the question at hand: &amp;nbsp;The VP! &amp;nbsp;I think it should be Sen. Jim Webb of VA. &amp;nbsp;My reasons.&lt;br&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;It puts VA in play&lt;br&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;It helps address the white male vote thing - Webb is not from aristocracy. &amp;nbsp;In fact, far from it. &amp;nbsp;He's an Appalachian mountain man, whose family fought on both sides of the Civil War and he often talks about that heritage much like Obama speaks about his multi-racial background.&lt;br&gt;3. &amp;nbsp;He's a kick-ass angry White man that can give Obama &amp;quot;street cred&amp;quot; in the rural South . . . sorta vouch for Obama&lt;br&gt;4. &amp;nbsp;Webb has as much, if not more Military and foreign policy experience than McCain ........ Sec of the Navy, Assistant Secretary of Defense, metal winning Vietnam Vet, etc, etc, etc.&lt;br&gt;5. &amp;nbsp;He's the perfect angry attack dog that allows him to go after McCain, while Obama talks about the more loftier issues.&lt;br&gt;6. &amp;nbsp;Webb is a former Republican who didn't support the war from the start. &amp;nbsp;And much like Obama, publicly criticized the Administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reasons why not to pick the others for VP.&lt;br&gt;Clinton: &amp;nbsp;She would try to undermine him at every point, and if the whole thing is about Change, then how does having a Clinton on the ticket help ..... then there would be all those commercials that republicans would run showing her calling him unqualified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ted Strickland: &amp;nbsp;Too new to the national scene. &amp;nbsp;When you pick a VP, you want to pick someone whom you don't have to spend a month introducing to the electorate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson: &amp;nbsp;Black and a Latino on the ticket is too much change for the public to ask for at one time. &amp;nbsp;And, I think he'll get Latino voters anyways. &amp;nbsp;Especially if he sends the most popular Latino elected official in the country on a Bus Tour to New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, and even Arizona. &amp;nbsp;Don't underestimate what Richardson said to 40+ Million Hispanic American during his endorsement of Obama. &amp;nbsp;He put his arm around his shoulder almost fatherly and said in Spanish, &amp;quot;This man is good people ..... he will respect us!&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;To latinos, this was a very powerful endorsement!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kathleen Sebelius: &amp;nbsp;Picking a woman would seem like Pandering to the Nth degree, especially after having beaten Hillary. &amp;nbsp;Plus she would be like STrickland, &amp;nbsp;you'd have to introduce her to the national scene. &amp;nbsp;- &amp;nbsp;Furthermore, you will get the bulk of the women's vote anyways. &amp;nbsp;I don't care what the polls say right now. &amp;nbsp;Black folks aren't going to vote republican, and women, (for the most part) aren't going to support a guy who says that he's going to appoint judges like Scalia and Thomas ........ Roe v. Wade???? &amp;nbsp;Are women really going to risk that ...... nothing like a $10 Million campaign in swing states like MI, FL, PA, OH, &amp;amp; MO to remind women of the types of judges McCain would appoint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe Biden: &amp;nbsp;Good, but doesn't give you the cross-over appeal that Webb gives you ....... he's not Southern. &amp;nbsp;He's tough, but he is too much &amp;quot;Washington&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sam Nunn: &amp;nbsp;Too much of the Dick Cheney effect ........ seems like Obama would be trying to reinforce his weakness with an old white guy. &amp;nbsp;Doesn't retain the generational theme in Obama's appeal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuch Hagel: &amp;nbsp;While I like this guy because of his war stance and so-forth, he is pro-life, and anti-gay. &amp;nbsp;So the far women, gays and left won't be happy. &amp;nbsp;And where does that set up the pipe-line for potential future presidents? &amp;nbsp;(Secretary of Defense Hagel)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On other stuff .......... Send Hillary to talk to white suburban women in Swing States to shore up that vote, and to remind folks about McCain and Roe v. Wade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama should send Bill Clinton to Arkansas and have him get that state in the Blue Column. &amp;nbsp;He can do the same thing in Arkansas that he tried to do for Hillary in North Carolina. &amp;nbsp;Hit ever rural community in Arkansas on a bus tour, and break out the Bubby Accent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have John &amp;amp; Elizabeth Edwards do the same thing in North Carolina. &amp;nbsp;(Attorney General Hagel)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Deploy Bill Richardson to New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado &amp;amp; even Arizona speaking Spanish to our Hispanic bretheren - (Secretary of State Richardson)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try to snag Mike Bloomberg's endorsement to shore up Jewish voters ........ (Lieberman would have been nice to have)........ send Bloomberg to Florida.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Needless to say, both North Carolina and Virginia will be in play this year simply due to demographic changes. &amp;nbsp;And in key swing states like Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Obama has the added benefit of having popular Democratic governors and senators with state political infrastucture to help him out. &amp;nbsp;Strickland in OH, Rendell in PA, and Granholm in MI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then Obama should get on a bus with Webb and tour the entire Appalachian trail having Obama talk about econimic issues, and Webb talking about his war background and his Scots-Irish Appalachian roots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then Obama and Webb get on that same bus and do a tour of the Deep South ......... MS &amp;amp; LA. &amp;nbsp;These states WILL BE IN PLAY. &amp;nbsp;During the general, black voter turnout will be even higher than it is right now, and he won't have to share any of it with Hillary. He'll get 99%. &amp;nbsp;In Lousiana and Mississippi, the black population is in the high-30%s; something like 35% and 37% respectively. &amp;nbsp;All Obama has to do is secure roughly 1 in 4 white voters, and he's got both states.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sprinkle in a little Al Gore and Colon Powell here and there, and Obama-Webb win this thing!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032657</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:17:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032657</guid><dc:creator>Renee, PA</dc:creator><description>I am a bitter white American...voting for Obama, don't stereotype all whites with your racist comments. I am also a woman, from Pennsylvania. &amp;nbsp;not everyone here enjoys Billary's years of scandals and lies. Also, many college kids showed up, hence his outstanding numbers. &amp;nbsp;Hillary is the doomed one. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032658</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:17:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032658</guid><dc:creator>RENEA,PLYMOUYH,MI</dc:creator><description>BILL RICHARDSON.THEY HAVE THE SAME TEMPERMENT.RICHARDSON BRINGS SUCH A WIDE ARRAY OF EXPERIENCE AND STATES INTO PLAY.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032660</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:17:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032660</guid><dc:creator>MSierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown.... a REAL POPULIST&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wisc Senator Russ Feingold... a reformer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill .... to appease feminists&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO CROOKS, NO LIARS for VP</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032662</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:18:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032662</guid><dc:creator>BobW Mendon, NY</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;(5) Rendell is a guy who is a Washington outsider, and is known to speak his mind -- which means he would be consistent with Obama's &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; message.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also doesn't know when NOT to speak his mind causing much embarrassment in many circles. Great guy but not a stable package politically. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032667</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:18:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032667</guid><dc:creator>Pam, SF, CA</dc:creator><description>How is Rendell not on the list?!&lt;br&gt;He is a guy who could make people who *want* hillary on the ticket happy...&lt;br&gt;He's her boy, and those people who say they wouldn't vote for Obama, (who we know will when it gets down to the knitty gritty) would have a much easier time if one of her &amp;quot;people&amp;quot; were on the ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, the guy is loved in his state, and some might argue in many other places as well. &amp;nbsp;He's got that blue-collar down home feel...I'd certainly much rather have a beer and a shot with him!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032669</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:19:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032669</guid><dc:creator>Geoff, Brooklyn, NY</dc:creator><description>Obama / Hagel 2008 &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Change we can believe in&amp;quot;!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032670</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:19:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032670</guid><dc:creator>karen</dc:creator><description>patty,sd,ca...I think you need to give it a rest I don't think HRC is as bitter as you are. &amp;nbsp;If the bitter white voters, women and blue collar under $50K voters stay home and we get John McCain I hope you can relish in that victory and the defeat of the United States if he is elected. &amp;nbsp;Grow up maybe you should go back to school and get educated maybe than you can see what is at stake here ie..our economy, our security, our homes, healthcare, gas prices, tuition but you sound just like the bitter people who would rather stay home and pout because your candidate gave it her best try. What are you going to do Patty, sd,ca when HRC starts to back Obama and campaign hard for him when she decides she is not going to get the nomination because she cares for her party and that she wants to see a democrat win regardless of if it was her?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032672</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:19:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032672</guid><dc:creator>T_Crawford</dc:creator><description>Rendell!!!&lt;br&gt;besides the safety of PA, an outsider with an inside line, was always careful to not cheap shot obama, always said he was a good candidate, can keep the clintons, russert, matthews and aparently anyone in line, executive and campaign experience, tough AND fair, populist appeal with an eye towards progress. &amp;nbsp;he could be helpful in OH, MI, FLA, and even the mountain states just based on his campaign skills and, forgive the term, straight talk appeal. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;here's something no one really mentions...he'd be REALLY good at the job, post election. &amp;nbsp;if you watched what he did in PA, no one this entire election has rallied ranks to the cause like rendell did. &amp;nbsp;truly a master. &amp;nbsp;that is a very good quality in a VP, working behind the scenes to advance the president's agenda.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032673</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:20:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032673</guid><dc:creator>N. Gallup  Spokane, WA</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel..talk about a unifying ticket!&lt;br&gt;I bet he would take it if offered, Sellibus second choice..women's vote..also unifying.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032674</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:20:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032674</guid><dc:creator>Vanessa, Montebello CA</dc:creator><description>I am a Latina and I am a diehard Obama supporter. I would support a female VP like Sebelius or even McCaskill--NOT Clinton... and Hagel would make things interesting...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032676</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:20:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032676</guid><dc:creator>Ramon Richmond, Virginia</dc:creator><description>I love Governor Kaine and would say him but I dont think Governor Kaine wants to leave Virginia right now before his term is over. Jim Webb would be a great pick but we realllllyyyy cannot afford to lose that seat in Virginia since Mark Warner is running there really isnt a deep bench of peopel who could run and win it. I think the best choice and most likely is Bob Casey of Pennsylvannia his a white male Catholic and hasnt been in Washington long not to mention he is pro life he makes Catholics like myself fell really comfortable.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032682</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032682</guid><dc:creator>Roberta Browne</dc:creator><description>What about Claire McCaskill of Missouri? She's had his back throughout the primaries, is female so might assuage Clinton supporters, and is from a swing state. Also I like Bill Richardson, who would bring Latinos, the west, and has strong foreign policy experience. Both would help, instead of hinder and try to usurp the Obama Administration.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032689</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:21:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032689</guid><dc:creator>MSierra, SF</dc:creator><description>patty,sd,ca: '...There are several groups that won't vote for Obama &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Latinos...' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry patty, I'm a Latino and I'll GLADLY vote for Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't get the memo... &lt;br&gt; WHO MADE YOU OUR SPOKES VILLAN ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't speak for Latinos patty&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an example of how the Clinton campaign tried to pit minorites against each other....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO SALE !!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032693</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:22:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032693</guid><dc:creator>Ken, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>Anyone short of Hillary would be just that... short.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius would be most likely to appease HRC supporters at this point. Public will need time to learn about her though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson? &amp;nbsp;He completely lost that chance with his public endorsement of Obama. &amp;nbsp;And Sam Nunn? &amp;nbsp;Ha! &amp;nbsp;There go all the gay votes. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032694</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:22:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032694</guid><dc:creator>Marihelen</dc:creator><description>Shannon S, Wes Clark should have been on my list. &amp;nbsp;He meets a lot of the weaknesses, has targeted appeal in a lot of different ways and is part of the Clinton camp. &amp;nbsp;That was a very smart addition. Kudos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson is probably not viable anymore, given that the Clinton camp considers him &amp;quot;Judas&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Then again, knocking him out of consideration for VP might have been part of the reason for the whole Carville dustup.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032695</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032695</guid><dc:creator>austin, boyertown PA</dc:creator><description>Problem with Rendell, who I like very much, is that he is a bit of a loose cannon. &amp;nbsp;Very blue collar in his approach to things, which while that has its benefits, can be slammed really hard in a debate. &amp;nbsp;I think Rendell would deliver PA, help with the Jewish, and Clinton votes, and help a lot more than is realized with blue collar voters, I'm just not sure how he would fare on a national stage. &amp;nbsp;Plus - then he wouldn't be able to do the Philadelphia Eagles post game show.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032699</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032699</guid><dc:creator>ToastOnDayOne</dc:creator><description>Webb.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032700</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032700</guid><dc:creator>Scott Ruesterholz, Basking Ridge, NJ</dc:creator><description>I think Webb is the best option because he has national recognition, bring independents and white rural democrats to the table, and he also helps Obama in an important swing state.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032703</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032703</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Seattle</dc:creator><description>Biden would be my choice. He brings the foreign relations experience the country needs.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032704</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:24:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032704</guid><dc:creator>Steve Dallas</dc:creator><description>Hagel would be inspired. &amp;nbsp;Tough enough for attack dog role and smooth &amp;amp; conservative enough to appeal to swing voters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He would also symbolize broad inclusion politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First Read, do a follow on poll.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032710</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032710</guid><dc:creator>SPB Richland WA</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel with Sam Nunn Secretary of Defense this is change Colin Powell Secretary of State Hillary to the Supreme Court That is change</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032711</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:24:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032711</guid><dc:creator>ben</dc:creator><description>Senator (Fmr Sect. of the Navy) Jim Webb &lt;br&gt;or &lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Supreme Allied Commander&amp;quot; Gen. Wesley Clark - Big Rural Hillary Supporter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both have Millitary/Foreign Policy Credentials very little connection to Washington insiders, both go along with the change message. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032715</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:25:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032715</guid><dc:creator>Sam, Muncie, Ind.</dc:creator><description>Since Obama is still unknown by a lot of voters, he can't bring along a VP who he must also introduce to the electorate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As mentioned, Biden is extremely tough and brings great experience that could shore up doubts about Obama for some.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Choosing Hagel would send a clear message that Obama is interested in a new political landscape and they would pick off a ton of Republicans and Independents in November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another person whom I truly cannot believe hasn't been considered is Claire McCaskill. She has an outstanding personality, knows her stuff, would be perfectly suited for VP duties, and would undoubtedly help with Obama's &amp;quot;older white women problem.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://gibbsv.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://gibbsv.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032716</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:25:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032716</guid><dc:creator>Elise            Denton, TX</dc:creator><description>No Clinton! &amp;nbsp;No Way! &amp;nbsp;No How!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032720</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:25:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032720</guid><dc:creator>Burton, SLC, Utah</dc:creator><description>Claire McCaskill would be better than Sebelius. &amp;nbsp;More charisma and personality. &amp;nbsp;She easily helps with the women/Hillary vote, reinforces Missouri and helps across the Midwest, and she best complements Obama's style and message. &amp;nbsp;Sebelius is boring and dry. &amp;nbsp;Reminiscent of John Kerry? &amp;nbsp;Rendell is another notably missing name from the list. &amp;nbsp;Both of those individuals should be on the short list. &amp;nbsp;Biden should not. &amp;nbsp;That joker failed miserably as a presidential candidate and he is trapped, like Hillary, in an old school political mentality. &amp;nbsp;He also has foot/mouth disease, not a good quality in a VP.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032721</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:25:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032721</guid><dc:creator>Bobby K, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>You don't want to use democrats that are in office unless they come from a safe state. Rendell or Biden or Corzine. I like the Chuck Hagel idea, but I don't think Hagel would go for it. How about Mayor Mike Bloomberg? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032722</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:26:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032722</guid><dc:creator>Tim H T, Chicago IL</dc:creator><description>Wesley Clark, a Clinton supporter, and his military/foreign experiences John McCain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this wont get posted because mine never do. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032723</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:26:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032723</guid><dc:creator>Marzies</dc:creator><description>My favorites from that list: &amp;nbsp;Webb or Kaine (I know Webb a little better, and I like his kick *** attitude)&lt;br&gt;Sebelius - I like her, but she's not a real rousing speaker. &lt;br&gt;Richardson - si se puede! I've always liked him - don't know how great a campaigner he is, though. Appreciated his guts in coming out for Obama at a really difficult time for him. &lt;br&gt;Hagel - a cool, out of the box choice. However, many Democrats might be uncomfortable with a non pro-choice Republican &amp;quot;a heartbeat away&amp;quot; from the Presidency - how about Secretary of Defense?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Biden, but maybe as Sec. of State rather than VP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Hillary Clinton is concerned: No, No, a thousand times no! Not after what she's done in this primary. Not to mention that the Clintons are the antithesis of Obama's change message.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032724</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:26:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032724</guid><dc:creator>gatorchick</dc:creator><description>Hagel!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032726</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:26:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032726</guid><dc:creator>T_Crawford</dc:creator><description>I'm very hesitant about Webb, there's an accident waiting to happen, he's not a number two kind of guy. &amp;nbsp;and the woman problem he has will come up. &amp;nbsp;plus he's an &amp;nbsp;asset on the senate floor for many years to come, why sacrifice that? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Rendell, Biden, Nunn or Sebelius. &amp;nbsp;dark horses: sen. kent conrad (ND) and congressman lloyd Doggett (TX) </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032728</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:26:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032728</guid><dc:creator>Sally, ventura</dc:creator><description>John Edwards, he's not a consideration?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032729</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:27:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032729</guid><dc:creator>Rachel, PA</dc:creator><description>Kathleen Sebelius would round out a great ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second choice is Ed Rendell. &amp;nbsp;Great guy and sure to deliver PA. &amp;nbsp;I would love to agree with Gavin comment above but in my area of PA (Between Philly &amp;amp; Harrisburg) people are FRIGHTENLY (sp?)unknowledgeable...YIKES! &amp;nbsp;Had one women tell me Obama SCARES her. &amp;nbsp;Geez...I need to move.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032730</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032730</guid><dc:creator>austin, boyertown pa</dc:creator><description>Obama should NOT choose any sitting US Senators - the Dems want to increase their leads in congress, not put up an open seat they might lose (Casey or Webb) &amp;nbsp;Those two senate seats were red for a long time, now they are blue and can stay that way - you can't risk losing that for a VP when there are so many talented and qualified options. &amp;nbsp;Look for governors who are term limited - Like Rendell, is Sebelius term limited as well?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032733</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:28:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032733</guid><dc:creator>Rhoda, New York</dc:creator><description>Bill Richardson, baby!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032734</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:28:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032734</guid><dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator><description>Hillary: how could that be a dream? It would contradict several of his messages. Also, don't forget her high unfavorable rankings. Finally, how on earth could they work together? Her reputation for being untrustworthy was based on actions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kathleen Sebelius -- in general, a governor is better bc of the executive experience, and among those above, she's the best: awesome choice, great executive experience and great at working across the partisan divide. Since many women inexplicably supported Hillary because she's a woman, they may feel better about this choice. (I find it strange that she's not considered a &amp;quot;targeted choice&amp;quot; above for this reason.) I would be wildly enthusiastic about Sebelius -- a stellar leader who also happens to be a woman who earned and worked her way to her position without riding on someone's coat-tails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richardson -- another awsome choice, as is Biden, except that he's also a senator. Either great on foreign affairs. Richardson impeccable on ethics -- Biden has that ancient plagiarism flap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who's got a great economic portfolio...&lt;br&gt;Other news sources speculate on Michael Bloomberg?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, a similar story on McCain would be interesting...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032735</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:28:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032735</guid><dc:creator>Carol Owen, Mesa, Arizona</dc:creator><description>Just for revenge, I would love to see Gov. Sebelius on the GE ticket...wouldn't that just tick off Her Royal Clinton!!! &amp;nbsp;It would certainly satisfy a lot of women voters who are so eager to get one of their kind into a lofty office position. &amp;nbsp;BTW, I am a white, 65 year old woman who has supported Sen. Obama from the beginning. &amp;nbsp;So much for demographics, huh?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032742</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:29:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032742</guid><dc:creator>Pat, Orlando FL</dc:creator><description>Hagel for sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything about this campaign has been extraordinary. Veep should be out of the box. Hagel is perfect.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032745</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032745</guid><dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator><description>*Sibelius!*, Webb, or Hagel, and no matter what, they ALL end up in the administration somewhere!&lt;br&gt;I thinks it's wrong for someone to say a woman has to be VP no matter what, after all there are larger things at stake right now: like fixing the country and our standing around the world. Ultimately it should be who's the BEST for the job, not political correctness. That said, I do think Sibelius is the best choice for a number of reasons besides her gender. She has executive and foreign policy experience, she is INCREDIBLE at reaching across the aisle and would be a strong support for his platform of change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is an absolute NO! She doesn't play well with others (particularly Obama people), she draws way too much attention to herself rather than the message, and if you put her a hands reach away from the crown, she'll be to tempted to snatch it. I just can't deal with an assassination, I just can't! And I haven't even touched upon who'll be looming in the background..... BILL!!!! BILL F*ING CLINTON BACK IN THE WHITEHOUSE!!!! OMFG!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032746</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032746</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator><description>Strickland is out -- as is Clinton. &amp;nbsp;How many times do you want to see the clip of her screaming &amp;quot;Shame on you, Barack Obama!!&amp;quot; with Strickland in the background nodding his head (not happy, I don't think, but still nodding). &amp;nbsp;Or the tape of Clinton saying that she and McCain had passed the C-i-C threshold but Obama had not. &amp;nbsp;She has to know that she's left far too much ammunition lying around to become his running mate. ----- And having a woman other than Hillary would be a slap to her (or at least perceived as such by her supporters)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden -- he's a great balance in so many ways: age, experience, foreign policy, 'scrappy' v Obama's cool ... but both have integrity and are straightforward. &amp;nbsp; (And he would have to be too restrained as Secy of State. &amp;nbsp;You want someone to be able to rattle off things like that quip about Guilaini - &amp;quot;every sentence contains a noun, a verb and 9/11&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Not so good for a Secy of State, fine for a VP.) &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032747</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032747</guid><dc:creator>MSierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Jon, Brooklyn, NY: '...Where is Ed Rendell on this list? ...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, Jon&lt;br&gt;Ed Rendell helped the Clintons race-bait before the PA primary.&lt;br&gt;He was the one who said: 'white voters wouldn't elect a black candidate'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THAT'S WHY he's not on the list&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He seems a little too slick and a little too oily for a 'change' ticket</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032748</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032748</guid><dc:creator>markus, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Kathleen Sebelius would be a great choice. She impressed me greatly in her Democratic response to the last State of the Union...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and to point out the obvious, she IS a woman.&lt;br&gt;History would be made on both fronts...</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032750</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032750</guid><dc:creator>Mike Jarvis, Arlington, VA</dc:creator><description>Pam, SF, CA: Rendell is not on the list because he's flat-out said he doesn't want it. &amp;quot;I don't like being told what to do,&amp;quot; I believe were his exact words. But I agree with you, he'd be an excellent choice.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032751</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032751</guid><dc:creator>James J, Orange, California</dc:creator><description>Dream Team?</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1032754</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1032754</guid><dc:creator>Jackd2001  Canton, Oh</dc:creator><description>Why isnt anyone pushing Richardson, this would lock the southwest and put texas and Florida into play</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034490</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034490</guid><dc:creator>DW</dc:creator><description>JIM WEBB - read his book Born Fighting and you will gain some insight into his Scots-Irish history in Appalachia (and elsewhere). Didn't someone say Obama has a problem in Appalachia...&lt;br&gt;Decorated Vietnam Combat Vet as a Marine Officer, Ass't Sec. Def/Secretary of the Navy under Reagan(first Annapolis grad to take post), Son fights in Iraq, Military bloodline equal or greater to McCain's, Used to be a Republican, beat George Allen in a squeaker, will never back down from a fight!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034501</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:43:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034501</guid><dc:creator>Susan, New York</dc:creator><description>Surprised Mark Warner's not on the list. Former Virginia governor, born in Indiana, national security experience.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034510</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:47:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034510</guid><dc:creator>Brian Missoula, MT</dc:creator><description>Very keen on Hagel. &amp;nbsp;A stand-up guy with solid committee credentials and a move that would show we're not messing around when we talk about transforming the broken partisan system. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034512</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:47:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034512</guid><dc:creator>deborah poole san diego ca</dc:creator><description>Why not Edwards? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd also be glad to have Webb, Clinton, or Richardson.</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034575</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034575</guid><dc:creator>teopa</dc:creator><description>put hagel, biden and webb somewhere in the cabinet by all means. &amp;nbsp;but i really think obama needs a govenor or former gov. for the experience/washington outsider points. &amp;nbsp;too much anti-congress sentiment to pick any (especially current) member. &amp;nbsp;Under no circumstance a CLINgON!</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034856</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:40:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034856</guid><dc:creator>danny in Pittsburgh PA</dc:creator><description>Jim Webb. Bill Richardson. &amp;nbsp;Chuck Hagel. &amp;nbsp;(my spidey sense tells me Hagel...a long time ago, having opposing party White Houses was a staple of ultimate checks and balances government).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sebelius is impressive enough to actually RUN for President in eight years...right now? &amp;nbsp;This country, though desperate for change, can only comprehend just so much of it. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton cannot make this list...as her choice of attacks throughout this campaign already UNDERmine her boss' credibility. &amp;nbsp;You can't have a #2 thinking they're better for the job than #1...NOTHING will get done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034865</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034865</guid><dc:creator>Stephen Graff, Woodbury, NJ</dc:creator><description>Agree with many of you: Chuck Hagel. &amp;nbsp;He is a veteran, a socially conservative republican, but he shares Obama's views on the Iraq war and, to a large extent, his views on diplomatic engagement with countries like Syria and Iran. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034868</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:00:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034868</guid><dc:creator>Bluntworld</dc:creator><description>Dream Team&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vice President - Webb&lt;br&gt;Secretary of State - Joe Biden second Choice Bill Richardson,&lt;br&gt;National Security advisor - Sen. Sam Nunn&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Defense- Chuck Hagel&lt;br&gt;Attorney General - John Edwards&lt;br&gt;Secretary of Labor - Gov. Kathleen Sebelius&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034887</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:31:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034887</guid><dc:creator>Julie in VT</dc:creator><description>Richardson is my first pick, but Hagel would be interesting....</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034900</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:53:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034900</guid><dc:creator>Wendy Horgan, Beverly Hills, Fl.</dc:creator><description>Chuck Hagel then Jim Webb</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034906</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:09:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034906</guid><dc:creator>Jersey Dave, Ocean City NJ </dc:creator><description>If they're just going to be honest, have someone with the same experience, world view and likely effectiveness: Obama/Pollyanna..... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Obama should have done with Hamas is repudiated them when they made their dumb endorsement of him, not shot the messenger. Either very sloppy or very disturbing. </description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034907</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:12:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034907</guid><dc:creator>Hillary Supporter, NYC</dc:creator><description>Hillary</description></item><item><title>Veepstakes: Obama's 5 options</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/16/1031952.aspx#1034926</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:35:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034926</guid><dc:creator>bw cinti,oh</dc:creator><description>OK Chuck Todd. explain how Obama wins without Clinton?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why has MSNBC not mentioned Marie Cocco article in the Washington Post?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since when has Chris Matthews been loathe to use or imply someone is an idiot? &amp;nbsp;According to him anyone not supporting Obama is an uneducated bigot. &amp;nbsp;I am not concerned about my bigotry. &amp;nbsp;It is lingering concern about the Obama's view of whites that concerns me.</description></item></channel></rss>