Early thoughts: Both on message

Roxie Pruit — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:55:17 GMT

Chuck bends over backwards not to give Obama the credit he deserves. Chuck is the original pollyanna .
If subject of the debate was McCain's strong suit, then you have to say Obama won the debate,

Early thoughts: Both on message

Mayra Garcia, Miami — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:58:10 GMT

McCains refusal to look at Senator Obama was rude and uncalled for. He showed his disdain for a Presidential candidate who deserved to be there. Many minorities will take this very personally. Ask any of us of any race or walk of life maybe even republcans. This was disheartening, DISRESPECTFUL, and disgusting.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Hugh Graham Illinois — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:06:53 GMT

Voters desperately want change but wonder if Obama is capable of being the president. I think Obama's performance last night went a long way towards quieting those concerns

Early thoughts: Both on message

myw — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:07:59 GMT

I think only viewers who were leaning Obama would have gotten turned off by McCain's dismissive comments. I think the rest of the viewers either wouldn't care, or would come to agree with him.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Mario Peralta, Lilburn, GA 30047 — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:11:31 GMT

Here we go again.
Don't you realize that McCain really is a very good candidate and knows what he is doing?
Obama is a very good charmer but THAT DOES NOT make a President. He does not have what it takes for that Job.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Michael, NYC — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:13:49 GMT

Honestly, McCain didn't look or sound presidential. He appeared every bit as angry, close minded and impetuous as he acted in these last several months. I don't him or Palin any near 1600 Penn. Avenue.

Early thoughts: Both on message

dorothy miller — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:15:50 GMT

David Gregory and Norah O'Donnell are definately inferior in reporting on national affairs. Where was John Harwood? He's definately the class act at NBC and MSNBC.

Early thoughts: Both on message

harkin banks — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:16:17 GMT

This is substance? McCain clearly wins the debate and all this Obama supporter can offer is a VP teaser?

This is the guy who some said could replace Russert?

Early thoughts: Both on message

Don R., Albuquerque, NM — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:16:30 GMT

Obama was the clear winner, just as all the instapolls showed. To begin with, in his measured, cogent responses to questions from the moderator and comments by his opponent, he appeared the much more presidential of the two. This impression was reinforced by McCain's condescending approach toward Obama, demonstrated over and over again by his refusal to look him in the eye (or even glance in his direction) and his constant reiteration of the phrase, "Senator Obama just doesn't understand." Obama usually gave a response to the latter put-down that showed he did indeed understand--probably better than his adversary.

My only quarrel with Obama was his neglect of the economic issues that are hurting the average American right now (i.e., unemployment, health care insurance, etc.), issues that comprise McCain's greatest vulnerability. In addition, I would like to see him ditch that prhase, "John McCain is right, . . ." after which he would then go on to show that he wasn't. I know he was being courteous (something McCain apparently is incapable of), but come on, your opponent wants a bare knuckles fight, so leave the gloves home next time!

Early thoughts: Both on message

RL Fargo — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:17:41 GMT

Obama on message, Higher Taxes, Unlimited Abortion, Gay Marriage, Reperations?

Early thoughts: Both on message

RH, Fredericksburg, VA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:18:04 GMT

I watched the entire debate and thought that Obama looked more presidential. It was relatively gaff free for both candidates (except the reference to the Republican Guard of Iran instead of the Revolutionary Guard...Iran...Iraq...even smart people can get some of the details mixed up in the heat of the moment)The election is about CHANGE. McCain may try to align himself with it but it is hard to swin against the tide of his record of support for a very unpopular president.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Cheryl Mac Donald, Warren, MI — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:18:19 GMT

i have been listing to Morning Joe. No one mentioned the errer Obama made in regards to what "Henry Kissinger" said in having negotiations with Iran. On CNN last night Henry Kissinger sent a statement to CNN that Obama was wrong in saying that Henry Kissinger would have no preconditions on a face to face negotiations and that John McCain was absolutely correct. I fine this to be a big flaw in your coverage of debate. As an independent gearing towards McCain I am very much aware of the danger of an Iran that armed with nuclear bombs.

You lack of knowledge of what Henry Kissinger said leads tobe believe that you either have no connection with his statements or you are biased. I know Keith Oberman and Rachal Madow certainly are bias but I find your show to be more in the middle. Kind of surprsed you did not mention this.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Opus — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:20:54 GMT

My comment having watched the debate is that Obama showed little or ver low class in interrupted McCain at least 390 times while he was speaking. Imagine doing that to all of the foreign leaders he claims he will meet with? More the ugly American would come up

Early thoughts: Both on message

Lorrie Roch, NY — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:22:08 GMT

I rarely watch debates but this one was important and very enlightening. I was especially impressed w/Mr Obama as I felt he was talking to me.. He sounded very intelligent even though his message was vague. I got tired of watching and hearing Mr McCain say Obama isn't ready or experienced. There are alot of politicians in Washington and the state governments who have experience but have let us down..I would love to get their real ideas instead of same old things mentioned over and over just in a different way. I like both men but I felt Mr Obama was more on the subject and more forthright than Mr McCain..

Early thoughts: Both on message

McCain intimidated — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:27:34 GMT

I think McCain was intimidated by Obama, it's that simple!
Everyone is beating around the bush about the reasons why he wouldn't look at Obama.
Why did his voice tremble at times, too?
He was trying to bully and intimidate Obama and it didn't work!!
When someone can't look you in the eye, they're intimidated!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Peggy Phillips, Waemgo, KS — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:29:28 GMT

I thought that Senator Obabma presented himself as very much a sound presidential candidate. He was easily conversant with all the issues, and presented his views concisely and wisely. Whereas Senator McCain was downright rude and at times when giving his opionions he seemed very angry. Every time Senator Obama tried to speak to him directly, McCain would smirk and not even have the decency to look at Obama. Is this the type of behaviour that would befit a man in this country's highest office? His attitude distracted from what he was saying -- I'll remember his distainful looks and actions far longer that any remark he made. And Senator Obama remains as always a class act who will have my vote on election day, because I truly beleve he has the american people's best interests in mind.

Early thoughts: Both on message

D Richeson, Norwalk, Iowa — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:50:09 GMT

I am surprised that no one is talking about McCain's statement that he would freeze federal spending except for defense. It's symbolic of the fact that he is a one-issue candidate and out-of-touch with the day-to-day issues that affect Americans. McCain's statement showed him for what he is: a war monger.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jen, Denver — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:50:09 GMT

After watching 75 minutes or so, I had to go do something else until the commentary came on. I just couldn't stand watching any more of McCain and his constant sneering and condescension. I was totally turned off by it. My husband said that men are fine with that, but I certainly wasn't. My guess is Obama definitely won with women last night. McCain acted like a huge jerk, and though I was pretty young, I kept thinking he reminded me of seeing Nixon on the tv--awkward, old, mean-looking, and kind of scary.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Margaret — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:51:08 GMT

I thought it was very risky on McCain's part to continue to hammer the 'inexperience' nail into Obama considering his Palin pick. This could work against McCain big-time in the Palin debate if the moderator of that debate remembers to bring it up.

I'm not a McCain voter but I do think it's possible that he pulled a few more votes from those 18 million undecideds than Obama did. Those voters know all there is to know about Obama. I think they were waiting for the McCain press ban to lift to finally hear what McCain was all about - I was and I watch the news all the time. Hard to get anything out of McCain other than sound bites.

I think the Obama poll drift will continue its upward drift. Perhaps it will depend on the upcoming ads and how many one-issue moronic voters will base their vote on ads. Too bad for America.

Early thoughts: Both on message

An Bo — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:33 GMT

Bottom Line:
- YES McCain has foreign policy experience (the past), BUT Obama ALSO held his own! Moving forward, Bush / McCain "experience" cannot help us - it has gotten us into so many conflicts!

-Obama was the only candidate that tied the Iraq war to the financial crisis. We spend $10 billion per month in Iraq when we are at a point where the USA does not have any money. If we don't withdraw, we will have more financial danger. During the debate, Obama noted that Iraq made alost $80 billion from oil last year. Omaba's withdrawl plan will not be dangerous if it is done with the full support of the Iraqi government. It is well known that Iraqui leaders favor withdrawl of US troops.

-Obama was the only one who talked a out the USA dependence on foreign oil making us a
target for national security. Get off foreign oil means that we will be less obligated to fight wars when oil is a motivation.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Betsie / St. Pete, FL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:37 GMT

The difference between Obama and McCain

Obama
Comes from Main Street and had rather build bridges for the benefit of all.
Will reach across the table and communicate with others to try and settle differences.
Looks at a person with respect when talking with them and tries to establish a bond or link with them.

McCain
Comes from military privilege and had rather blow bridges up.
Will NOT communicate will others – will only demand or drop bombs on them.
Is disrespectful, thinks he is better than Main Street - refuses to look the other person in the eye and build a line of communication – he attacks.

Think about this – if you (Main Street) invited the two candidates to share a meal with you what would happen?

Obama would come and share the meal and converse with you and “listen” to you because he has something in common with you.

McCain just would not come.

Now Main Street America just has to decide who they want in their home and at their table.

Early thoughts: Both on message

charles hawver , LaBaule , France — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:38 GMT

McCain continues to lie and distort the facts and he is still a patsy for big business and the lobbyists in spite of his declaration that "change" is needed in Washington

Early thoughts: Both on message

ANTHONY SABATO NIMELY — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:39 GMT

I believed the debate went well on several issues.Senetor John McCain's attitude on the podium,
wasn't diplomatic.Is this how Senetor McCain will treat
foreign leaders that do not share his political views,
by not acknowledging them? He did not look in Senetor
Obama eyes once.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Gloria, Newport News, VA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:43 GMT

I agree with your comments. However, one thing that stood out to me was Obama's facial responses throughout the debate. He seemed to be smirking a lot of the time. I don't think that was helpful for him.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Leslie — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:55:54 GMT

McCain seemed angry and would not look Obama in the eye. He had a uncomfortable smirk on his face whenever he was put on the spot by Obama. He did not seem Presidential at all. He seemed very juvenile and immature. McCain was having a hard time keeping his cool. How can he possibly be considered for President when he obviously has a HUGE ANGER MANAGEMENT PROBLEM?

Obama came out on stage, looked McCain in the eye (or tried to), shook his hand and seemed very gracious. He was on top of all the questions, and when McCain spoke he kept his cool and waited his turn to rebuff any of McCain's many lies. He spoke about helping the middle class which is something that McCain failed to even mention!

Obama won the debate hands down!!

ONE MORE REASON WHY I AM VOTING OBAMA/BIDEN '08

Early thoughts: Both on message

fangorina — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:57:39 GMT

Elections are about the future. Obama spoke about the future. McCain stayed mired in the past: his own past bragging about accomplishments. McCain
rude, demeaning and erratic. Obama was predidential and diplomatic. Look, we have had eight years of this bullying,"with us or against us" cliff-
diving. McCain came accross as a meaner Bob Dole. We need change and leadership. No dismissive soundbites.

Early thoughts: Both on message

M.A. Downey — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:59:18 GMT

I am sorry to say that every body missed Senator Mccain's mistake on Republican Guards being an Iranian organization, It's an Iraqi Organization that was disbanded in 2003. If with all his expertise on world and military affairs, he did no the name of what he was referring it, incidentally it's the Revolutionary Guards!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Reese Perkins, Bangor, Maine — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:02:42 GMT

Was I the only one who noticed that Obama made considerable eye contact with McCain? Meanwhile, McCain seemed to avoid looking Obama in eyes, even when they shook hands. Is McCain simply rude, does he dislike Obama so much he can't look at him, or is he intimidated by him??

Early thoughts: Both on message

Ron Webber, LaPlace, LA. — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:04:37 GMT

I believe McCain lost because of his tactics to try and win the debate by constantly saying Obama don't understand and it seems like he tried to get pity points in the way he started most of his answers. He wasn't straight forward with hardly any of his answers. I think the republicans know that their time is short.

Early thoughts: Both on message

BJ, CA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:07:53 GMT

on points...McCain same old stuff different debate
on points... Obama attacked that stuff as needed

Early thoughts: Both on message

Benny, the Midwest — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:09:46 GMT

Chuck...I always enjoy your insight and commentary on television and in print. I think you hit this one very close also. The VP debate will be a inertia breaker one way or another. After the lessons learned from this debate by the respective campaigns, and the outcome of the VP debate, the next two should get to scratching the itch we all still have. Keep up the great effort!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Marilyn Kendryna, Tucson AZ — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:11:50 GMT

Body language speaks volumes. McCains unwillingness to look at Obama, even when Lehrer requested he talk to the candidate, shows how superior he feels he is. This is a man who always feels he's right and better than anyone else. Scares me to think he could represent all of us.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Marty, New Hampshrie — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:12:49 GMT

As always, Chuck Todd is right on. Both were fine on message. Two major points, however. Obama needed to pass the Commander in Chief test. He clearly showed himself to be strong, solid and presidential. McCain needed to show that his policies are different than those of George Bush. He did not. He effectively delivered the case for George Bush. On both of these points, Obama wins. In addition, McCain looked cranky and irritable.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Ardyce C. Whalen — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:18:21 GMT

Obama won. McCain's constant refrain--"Obama doesn't understand"--was irritating but it stuck in the mind. [It could be used more truthfully by Joe Biden about Sarah Palin in their upcoming debate.] Obama needs a "mantra." Perhaps one that emphasizes how much McCain lives in the past. We need a President that recognizes that the world has changed drastically; the old rules no longer suffice. My husband did not like Obama's "John's right" remarks; he thinks he needs to stay on offense.

Early thoughts: Both on message

tracy in arkansas — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:23:02 GMT

I just find John McCain's behavior in the debate so rude. I expect grown-up behavior from my next president and Senator McCain's behavior appeared impudent and hostile.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Thom Scott, Windermere, Florida — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:24:38 GMT

On substance, both candidates stuck to message and therefore didn't likely win any new converts. On style, McCain's sneer was a bit off-putting, as was Obama's having to look at his bracelet to remember the name of the dead soldier in whose honor he wears it.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jake, Houston, Texas — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:26:18 GMT

Check all of the polls, it seems that Obama won the debate.

As for my views, I thought McCain came off as very grumpy, to be honest. He didn't even look Obama in the eye. It all just seemed very unpresidential.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Tony, Missoula MT — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:26:19 GMT

What debate were you watching? Granted, neither candidate made any career ending gaffes, but the contrast in temperaments was astounding. Any honest observer had to see one calm, steady, intelligent leader (Obama) and one who was angry, explosive and barely in control of himself.

The undecided voters (the only ones who matter at this point) will make the choice on which of these personalities they want running the country and the world. How can the so-called Maverick work with people he doesn't agree with when he can't even look at them? Give me a break...

Early thoughts: Both on message

Bets — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:26:38 GMT

Obama looked very nervous and unsettled as McCain took control from the onset. McCain made very good points during the economic portion of the discussion, talking about freezing spending. Anyone who works in business knows every organization is handed budgetary challenges and at a time of financial crisis that needs to happen in goverment. If business did that every time they had a budget shortfall they'd be out of business.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jim Crush, San Diego, CA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:28:10 GMT

I wathced the debate twice last night and my initial impression after the first view was that McCain had the better night. After the second view it was VERY clear that Obama got hammered by McCain almost the whole time. Obama looked pissed off on several occassion as Mccain hammered him on Iran, earmarks, Kissenger, his niaveness.etc... Obama looked frustrated much of the time, and was looking to the moderator for help at times, or so it seemed. No McCain never looked at his opponent and I'm sure this was by design. However, I do not know who how that will play in the big picture other than to show America that McCain disrespects Barak Obama. Yes,that could be some sort of subliminal ploy. To be fair I also thought Obama was strong at times but I saw McCain really take it to him last night...JMHO

Registered inde...

Early thoughts: Both on message

Dave D, Chicago, IL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:29:59 GMT

I agree mostly. But if Obama wants to seem presidential he shouldn't say I agree so much. Also for the commenter who mentions smirks and the other one who talks about McCain being less than polite. To call McCain John once or twice is okay, but as much as he did was not; it was like saying "Hillary you're likable enough". Also, Barak was smirking a lot more than McCain. I think if you were a person who watchs a lot of this you'd say it's a draw. But those undecideds are for the most part blue collar whites in the midwest, I don't think Obama continuing to mention that he was against the war is going to sway them.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Juanita, TX — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:30:21 GMT

Why isn't any media mentioning McCain's huge gaffe?

Bringing up a VP who does fewer interviews than a high school football coach, was a blunder.

McCain brought up his VP and saying she's a maverick. CNN's viewer ratings for McCain dropped like a rock.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Mister B Lorton Va — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:31:11 GMT

Debate 101, never focus on the person you are debating. If you are actually scoring this like a debate Obama lost because he McCain got his opponent to focus on hm instead of the topics at times. McCain had a clear and detailed grasp of the issues and people involved. Obama lacked a level of detail and seemed to stretch to tie McCain to Bush (how many times did he say "John was right...".

Bottom Line: If you liked one of these two, tonight did nothing to change that. Neither had a major gaffe. Obama had a couple moments where he was clearly flustered and McCain was tongue tied twice. Obama did nothing to reassure voters who have doubts and McCain did nothing to sway anyone who hates Bush to not follow Obama.

Early thoughts: Both on message

sandy mohan, ontario, Canada — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:32:20 GMT

I think if we take a moment to pause and reflect - last night I wonder why Obama did not show more fire, while McCain was so condesending,know it all attitude.Obama tried to engage McCain,he looked the other way,is it his disdain of Obama as "who do you think you are "punk". Obama won for substance and poise but has to lose part of his upbringing philosophy to"respect the old man" meaning McCain.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Dave D, Chicago, IL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:32:34 GMT

Check the polls on Tuesday, at the time people like to think they are pro-positive it rarely settles in that way. Furthermore those polls are very blogcentric, not ever going to be proMcCain.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Dennis, Miami, Florida — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:32:34 GMT

McCain's demeanor towards Obama was dismissive and his facial expressions approached a sneer. His campaign commercials have always had the message that Obama was naive and that he "did not understand" this issue or that issue. But, face to face, McCain's use of this "Obama doesn't understand" phrase came off as insulting to someone who you are supposedly having a conversation with(albeit you are supposed to at least glance at the person you are conversing with once in a while. McCain never made eye contact with Obama). I think McCain hurt himself severely by his approach to Obama. On the other hand, Obama came off as gracious and friendly and to some degree, complimentary of McCain on some issues. He appeared to be a nice guy. McCain appeared to be a grumpy old man. Both were knowledgeable. But the average voter pays less attention to what is said and more attention to what type of person they see in front of them. Obama passed the test for the millions of people who were seeing him for the very first time. It's over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Earl Boyd, Rockford, IL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:34:02 GMT

I was impressed by McCain's energy at 72, and knowledge. But I think Obama has a better approach on foreign policy that will make America safer and restore our image around the world. McCain look angry and dismissive towards Obama, which is unbecoming of the POTUS.

Early thoughts: Both on message

arsben jennings, fort wayne, indiana — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:35:01 GMT

the reason why john mccain is going down in the polls is because of his lack of judgement. it has been clearly exploited these last two weeks. but whats going to put mccain out of this race is his choice of sarah palin which was demonstrated this pass week with her interview with katie couric. that interview was the beginning of the end of john mccain's aspirations to become the next president of the united states. palin is going to pull mccain down in the polls and the october surprise may be him replacing her on the ticket with pawlenty, romney or giuliani. he is not going to recover from the tremendous mistakes that she has already made and the mistakes that she is going to make in the debate with joe biden thursday night.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Chuck Erickson, Bloomington, Illinois — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:24 GMT

I always wonder if Chuck Todd watches the same debate that I watch. Is he seeing what he wants to see or for what it is. I am a McCain supporter. I do not think he won but he did not lose by much on the Economic portion of the debate. On the foreign policy, he won clearly but probably not enough to have done any real damage to Obama. I absolutely did not see McCain being dismissive of Obama. I supose if you are a Obama supporter, Chuck, you might have seen it that way. Because a candidate thinks the other is naive does not make him dismissive. I thought Obama looked visibly upset at times when looking at McCain. Then his best response was I agree with John. Obama kept calling McCain by his first name. That is nothing more than a grade school technique to get your opponent to see you more as a friend than and adversary. So when that doesn't work, then according to Chuck Todd, you are dismissive. Chuck, work on the logic a little more.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Bruno, Florissant MO — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:55 GMT

Again, John McCain appeared condesending. In the past, he has offered to take Barack Obama on an over seas trip, to travel with him across the nation campainging and to have town hall meetings with him. During the debate he often stated that Barack Obama didn't understand. This from a man that finished almost last in his class while Barack Obama finished with high honors. This from a man that was one of the Keating Five and had a number of crashes before being shot down. A man that selected Sarah Palin after not more than two conversation with her.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Me in NY — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:42:36 GMT

Focus on content, not gazing into someones eyes. Can't imagine Obama talking Chavez and Putin off the ledge, Obama is just not commanding. Anyone remember what happened when a green and inexperienced Kennedy was challenged by Khrushchev? Can't imagine Obama making any difficult choices, can't vote present when you are the president. We have difficult times ahead that requires a leader that can make decisions in the best interest of this country.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Tim, Chicago IL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:43:12 GMT

John McCain wants us to know that he has “never won the ‘Miss Congeniality’ award”. But neither has our current President. With that kind of bulldozer approach, George W. Bush has failed to lead America, and the world, to meet the challenges of the 21st century. We cannot risk another four years with a President that leads us to fight in the wrong war, or drives our economy down the wrong track. We cannot risk another four years of an Administration that circumvents the Constitution, or fails to rescue our flooded cities. We cannot take another four years of bad policies on energy and the environment, and we cannot afford the hidden taxes on Americans from our borrowing nearly a trillion dollars per year. Precisely because McCain won’t be able to bring our allies together with his ‘take-it-or-leave-it” style, we cannot risk four years of the same with McCain.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Zoe, Overland park, Ks. — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:44:47 GMT

If only all this was a bad dream and I would wake up and find some peace that OBAMA is our new President. Thank you Chuck Todd, Keith Olberman and Rachael Maddow and MSNBC for allowing these programs so I can watch the news without having to take extra medication.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Edward F. — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:45:45 GMT

Both of the candidates demonstrated a good knowledge of international affairs. Given the expectations, this probably favors Obama. It was raises the bar of knowledge for the VP debate which should have MCCain handlers very concerned. Gov. Palin is frigtening in her lack of knowledge, depth or nuance. What trumps this for me as a previously undecided voter is that McCain seemed mean and angry. He was condescending to Obama which seems consistent with his all over the board approach during the last two weeks. I am much more comfortable with Obama and therefore have decided to vote for him.

Early thoughts: Both on message

G. Smith, Dallas, TX — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:03:34 GMT

Chuck, my brother and I retired USAF after 20 or more years of active duty service. Three of my uncles served in the Vietnam war; one passed away due to agent orange. My son wishes to become a Marine. Senator McCain is shameless in seeking to draw favor to his military service. Many of us in America have served and sacrificed. However, honor demands that you do it for country with God's blessing and nothing more. Senator McCain's service as a pilot and former POW does not without more qualify him as a better canidate for the position of Cammander In Chief. Many non-service members have dedicated their lives to the United States of America without wearing the uniform. Thus, please stop the clear favortism that you show in favor of Senator McCain. America deserves the best. Beginning today, Chucky T, following last night's debate, will you now change your attitude and treat Senator Obama with the same respect deserving of a party's nominee? Recognize that Senator Obama is safer and less eratic and more intelligent on the subject of foriegn policy. I understand that you have a boss to answer to and you must follow orders in your rhetorical attempts to assist Senator McCain. But, please tell us that it is by instruction from above when you slight one over the other. Thanks.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Rlouden, Bellevue, Wash — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:03:44 GMT

Thank you for this neutral summary

Early thoughts: Both on message

rick ellis fitzgerald, georgia — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:09:18 GMT

the debate once again showed the difference in the candidates. Mccain is mean and untruthful.he is not a candidate of the working people although he tries to appear as he is. He not once mentioned ' middle class worker yet he repeatedly mentioned tax cuts for business. Obama repeatedly spoke of the future and the need to improve the status of the middle class.

Early thoughts: Both on message

J Shaw, San Diego, CA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:10:48 GMT

Simply put Obama does not have the experience or qualifications to be president. It was very obvious that McCain is the only qualified presidential candidate.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Sandy, Sst Augustine,Florida — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:14:50 GMT

OH Todd, looking to replace Russert so you have to be so diplomatic in your response. Get real, McCain looked like an old man, he couldn't even look at Obama and he had to rush away from the initial handshake as he also looks short next to Obama. I'm old and I'm sick of McCain same old, worn out stories - we need change and we need to move beyond the old Washington establishment - let the next generation take over - the certainly can do better than what has been going on over the last 8 years - Those who gave us Bush now want to give us McCain - POOR AMERICA - NO WONDER THE REST OF THEWORLD LAUGHS AT US!!!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jill Heavenrich Milwaukee Wi — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:15:00 GMT

McCain's fake smile while attacking Obama made me very
incomfortable. He did not show any ability to be diplomatic. Obama seemed confident, knowledgeable and
courtious. He seemed willing to comunicate with McCain while McCain was condescending and dismissive.
One was presidential the other scarey.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Ruth Norris, houston, TX — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:15:10 GMT

When someone doesn't or can't look you in the eye, don't trust him/her. McCain couldn't look Obama in the eye. He is a weak man not to be trusted. Also, when watching the debate we saw an old man (McCain) vs. a young man with new ideas (Obama).

Early thoughts: Both on message

Terri — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:15:43 GMT

Senator Obama clearly won this debate on substance and style. McCain's low blows of constantly referring to Senator's Obama's lack of understanding was demeaning and clearly unsubstantiated. This man demonstrated his command and knowledge of Foreign Policy, even the most bias McCain supporters need to give Senator Obama credit for this,it is undeniable. McCain's disdain,and reluctance to look Senator Obama in the eye and even the American people lets me know he doesn't have the character to lead this nation.
Obama,laid out a vision,as well as our challenges. He has clearly demonstrated himself as a visionary, leader who has the brilliance,knowledge and judgement to be commander and chief.

Early thoughts: Both on message

D.Bradshaw — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:16:18 GMT

I am a Texas independant, who was undecided..after watching debate, found McCain very "surly" disrespectful, hard to imagine him crossing lines to be bi partisian, absolutely didnt like his demanor, trying to treat Obama like a "child" saying he is inexpierienced, my goodness, if he thinks that waht is Palin ? she would also have to have on the job training, as ALL presidents do unless your a past president..even Clinton admitted it is always on the job training ..I was very impressed with Obamas intelligence ( and his education that he worked hard to get ) and his JUDGEMENT..Obama had good judgement to surround himself with other intelligent minds, like Biden, Hillary..they will help him ..Pbama is aslo very respectful, true gentleman, can probably handle himself well in any crisis, nOT a hothead, name caller, or mocking attitude..sooooo, our votes gor to
OBAMA
D Bradshaw in Texas

Early thoughts: Both on message

katiec Pekin, IL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:17:51 GMT

Ithink Barack Obama handled the debate with intelligence, thoughtfulness and class.
Mccain looked like an angry old man, who, as
usual, resorted to lies and attacks.
Obama looked presidential, Mccain looked and
thought like a has been.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Sarah, Tampa, FL — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:18:33 GMT

After 8 years of bluster, bullying, and cowboy diplomacy, it is clear that McCain will be rejected for embodying more of the same. McCain crystallized last night that he is completely incapable of treating competitors, adversaries, or those with views that differ from his own with basic respect and decency. McCain's utter lack of diplomatic ability is astounding and downright scary considering he aspires to be the next president of the United States.

Early thoughts: Both on message

K Baker — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:21:08 GMT

Kissinger's trying to spin a pro-McCain message....BUT if you read what Kissinger said, Obama was correct!

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/kissinger-backs.html

Read it yourself, folks. "Without conditions...."

Early thoughts: Both on message

Huntington Beach, CA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:24:25 GMT

I love how in past McCain supporters gave Obama grief for not wearing a flag pin, yet in the debate, only Obama was wearing one. Maybe McCain supporters can go after their own candidate for trivial things for a change!

As for the debate, I think Obama went toe-to-toe with McCain on McCain's own comfort topic and I believe Obama actually showed a wiser foreign policy leader. His calm and cool demeaner is exactly what our country needs in issues both foreign and domestic and appeared to be the strongest presidential candidate we've seen since Kennedy. If undecideds aren't going for Obama now, they clearly weren't paying attention!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jay Lusk, Newcastle, WA — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:30:49 GMT

For the next debate, I would urge Barack to transition from the conceptual "We can..." to a more commanding and persuasive "I will..." Look the red states in the eye and make them believe. That's all that was missing for me last night. Otherwise, it was like watching the Superbowl. Outstanding TV. We were all shouting!

Early thoughts: Both on message

Carol Avrin, San Marino, California — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:33:47 GMT

Compared to Kennedy vs Nixon, this wasn't a high caliber debate.Obama is highly intelligent, but his reflective style doesn't lend itself well to this venue. I do,however, appreciate his cool demeaner in all things. As Commander in Chief he would not act precipitously. Moreover, I think he would work to achieve a coherent policy at home and abroad.
McCain did better than I expected;however I got tired of listening to earmarks and victory in Iraq. I also wasn't impressed by John's catalogue of places he had visited and world leaders he had known.For Mc cain, winning in Iraq is a metaphor for the war he thinks the US should have won- Viet Nam. I'm 76 years old; I'm tired of war, especially ill-conceived, preemptive war.I was a Hillary supporter, however I prefer Obama's deliberate, coolness to MCain's knee-jerk fighter pilot mentality.Carol in California

Early thoughts: Both on message

Sharon Miller, Ocala, Florida — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:35:32 GMT

Mc Cain is aging faster than rotten bananas. Curmudgeon, mean, and quite horrible to look at. All we have is image. His image is one of rude and distain. I think he is a racist. You could see it last night by the fact of his not being able to even look at his bi-racial opponent.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Glo NEW York — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:38:04 GMT

Who was debating Bob Dole? McCain is old man who lives in the past which is what happens when you don't have much of a future,OBAMA is a breath of fresh airand i hope in the next debate he tells MC PALIN that he's a rude .narcisstic self rightous fool.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Sums - Ohio — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:38:34 GMT

Clearly I do not think that McCain was saying that Obama is too stupid to understand...I think his point was that Obama just does not have the experience/history to understand. You can not argue that McCain has a significant background in international issues and resume to resume McCain is more qualified in this matter

Early thoughts: Both on message

RO in Reno — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:39:21 GMT

McCains obsession with Obama giving him credit for the surge was again apparent, but McCains insistance this is evidence of a shortcoming in decision making is ludicrious.
The worst foreign policy decision in the history of this country was the decision to invade Irag in the first place.
Every thing you needed to know was on the front pages of the newpapers, even the evidence the war was being built on lies, McCain either was part of the lies or bought into them.
I think Obama should have pointed this fact out.

A second issue regarding foreign policy is the statement by McCain he "hates all gooks and always will" Hardly a statement from an individual we expect to negotiate with Asian countries, not that McCains version of foreign policy is likely to be based on negotiation.

Obama was too kind, much too kind.

Early thoughts: Both on message

perry — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:39:47 GMT

viewing the debate mccain showed a lack of character by smerking, looking away from Obama, never looking him in the eyes when directing comments to him. that shows me a sign of weakness. This shows a lack of respect for Obama and what he has to say

Early thoughts: Both on message

Sums - Ohio — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:41:51 GMT

Is there anyone who reports for MSNBC that is not bias towards the democrats? Even Fox News tries to get a couple people from both sides to report the news. Chuck's article states a "no one won" and goes on to say that McCain did this wrong, McCain did this wrong. For good measure he puts in that BOTH candidates did poorly on the Econ. issue. WOW - great reporting Chuck.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Allen Monticello MN — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:47:57 GMT

I didn't and I still don't like both parties. But I have to make a choice. I feel Obama is a better speaker but looking at his past record he would lead this country in a bigger mess. We cannot continue to go the path of more spending and I believe this is where Obama will take us. My vote will be for McCain.

Early thoughts: Both on message

Jim, Seattle — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:42:55 GMT

Obama will pay another $800k to Acorn to fix the election.... just like he did against Clinton.

Do your research -- What Caused Our Economic Crisis?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5tZc8oH--o