<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx</link><description>
It sounds like Dick Durbin would like the Burris issue to just go away. “Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) suggested Sunday evening that Democratic leaders may not require that a Senate panel review the appointment of Roland Burris before he</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741363</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741363</guid><dc:creator>Monsters Inc.</dc:creator><description>That's just the problem with the Democrats. They don't want to solve problems, they just 'Want them to go away!' Durbin, like Obama, is just another one with his head under the covers whimpering for the monsters in his room to go away.</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741367</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:21:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741367</guid><dc:creator>Gary Granes, NY</dc:creator><description>First Read: Reid's inability to force intransigent Senate Republicans to heel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, those intrasigent Senate Republicans. Don't they know they are there just as more props for the Democrats? Don't they know their place? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republicans should just vote no on everything. Let the Democrats sink on their own with thier idiotic ideas.</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741440</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741440</guid><dc:creator>C A, Tuscaloosa, AL</dc:creator><description>The Burris issue is just a reminder that often times the Dems are as inept, incompetent and more interested in playing politics than doing what they need to do to lead and run this country then are the Republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This issue has come down to whether the Illinois Secretary of State has to sign (certify) Burris's appointment by the Ilinois Govrnor. Here's the arguement some of the leading Dems have gotten into regarding this argurment.....He does, does not, he does, does not, he does, does not, he does, does not, he does, does not. Oh, the maturity of it all. Do you think they ever realize just how childish and ridiculous they appear to the public? Do you think they care?</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741442</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741442</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Pasadena, CA</dc:creator><description>Does the CQ story &amp;nbsp;contend that Feinstein is a serious candidate for governor of California? &amp;nbsp;With one more face lift, she'll look like Joan Rivers. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps a gig in broadcasting is in the cards.</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741507</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:46:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741507</guid><dc:creator>A Jones, MD</dc:creator><description>The Democrats can't even seat the members of congress. How in the world are they going to get any real work done?</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741601</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741601</guid><dc:creator>Pacheck, Huntington Beach, Ca.</dc:creator><description>Whaaaaa. The Democrats won't do this, the Republicans are saying that. It's Americans stupid! We need to try and get away from the nasty habits. Some children will just plain ol refuse to play nice. Gotta whine and blame their brothers.</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741790</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741790</guid><dc:creator>Russell   Fox   Wells, Me</dc:creator><description>This &amp;nbsp;is just a stall tactic until certain people get there way and show ous the stick they carry. Just polics at its best.....Why do you think ordinary people who are not lawyers or millionaires cant run or dont run because of an elite club whos main purpose is to take care of themselves and there friends (MONEY PEOPLE) &amp;nbsp;WE BITCH ALL WE WANT BUT IT DOESNT CHANGE A THING...oNLY AT ELECTION TIME AND aMERICANS HAVENT FULLY WAKENED UP TO THE FACT THAT THOSE THEY THINK REPRESENT THEM DONT......</description></item><item><title>Congress: Wait and see on Burris</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/12/1741354.aspx#1741922</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:05:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1741922</guid><dc:creator>Maria G, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>It is sad that the Democrats are more interested in their pride than following the Constitiution. &amp;nbsp;If they focused on the law they would not be in this position.&lt;br&gt;The party of Obama has created a new position a second class Senator.</description></item></channel></rss>