First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Chuck, WA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:29:00 GMT

When Republicans say the President is raising taxes and the President says if you make less than $250K your taxes won’t go up, what do you hear?

When the Republicans say we are spending like a drunken sailor, when do you hear their plan for fixing things?

When air bag talk show hosts state the economy died, when did you hear their plans to fix things?

Unless these obstructionist Repukes and Wing Nuts come up with a well thought out plan of their own, just shut the f*^k up!!! If all you are going to do is moan and groan, then we have already achieved change because America said it doesn’t want your attitude anymore.

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have
to say something." Plato

Next.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Palomino — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:29:47 GMT

Don't even put McCain in this. Obama has the pen to sign it into law or nix it.

Obie signed it. The spit is on him.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Pat, Boston, MA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:33:46 GMT

They’re baaaaaaaack –

Definition of armchair quarterback: A person who offers advice or an opinion on something in which they have no expertise or involvement.

Yes, we all know that the presidential campaign is over and Barack Obama won. But I think many in the media forget that this man put his political future on the line when he stood up against the Iraq War when he was running for a Senate seat. He did not buy into the echo chamber that was festering throughout the media that if we didn’t stop Saddam Hussein, we would be met with a mushroom cloud. What we learned about this man was that he was able to think independently. Because as it turns out, Barack Obama was correct in his assessment of Iraq. One of only a very few who was correct.

So now we have back again - the arm chair quarterbacks in the media, in their cushy studios in New York and DC, gossiping with their rich inside the beltway friends who are unhappy with the President. And so the pundits go on the air and once again repeat the same nonsense over and over - that the President isn’t reacting quickly enough to the economic crisis. Just what do they think he’s been doing for the last 7-8 weeks?

I hope President Obama tunes these people out. They’re unprofessional, ignorant and with no patience or appreciation of what this country is going through. We didn’t elect a man who was going to be on the same level with these pundits. We elected a man who is more intelligent, more sober, and who learned –and taught us all - that just because the majority of the pundits all believed one thing, it doesn’t mean they’re correct.

They rarely are.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Johnny Walker — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:35:13 GMT

Obama on the campaign trail promised that he'd go through each spending bill, line by line, cleaning out the pork and cleaning up the earmarks. As President he told congress he would hold them accountable for their wayward spending.

So how'd that line by line clean up this bill go Barack? How many earmarks did you get pulled out? None you say?

All that blather sure sounded good when Obama was campaigning. He certainly does a good job at talking the talk, but apparently doesn't walk the walk.

I guess we'll have to read all the Obama kool-aide drinkers excuses for this nonsense. At least watching someone trying to defending the indefensible is amusing to watch.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

cindy, Las Vegas, Nv — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:35:27 GMT

I for one am so proud of our First Lady. Such dignity and grace. Laura Bush seemed nice, but was to frew frewey for me.
John Edwards is a puke. My prayers go out to Elizabeth. Always liked her, still do.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Eric, Salinas, CA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:07 GMT

I'm getting tired of hearing the earmark chumps whining about earmarks in a bill from the bushwhacker's reign of terror. They account for 1% of the budget and do help spur the economy in the locales where they are spent. Time to end the tax cut welfare of the rich and greedy and make them pay their fair share of taxes to balance the budget.

I am so happy that the Democrats crammed yet another good piece of spending legislation down the thoats of the repugnant ones. Time to show them who's in charge and the republic party is impotent to stop the progress our country needs. They had their chance and blew it with Tyrant George.

In Obama We Trust!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

matt — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:38 GMT

McCain will never compromise with Obama on earmarks because he wants it to remain, at least in his mind, his singular defining issue. He loves to grandstand on the topic, like when he trashed the president for a bill that should have been passed in October.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Dan, NY — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:54 GMT

The GOP just got very favorable Senate polls in 2010, with Republican candidates LEADING in Dem-held Connecticut and Delaware, somewhat unexpectedly. Will 2010 be a better cycle for the GOP than expected? (Polls: http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/10/senate-polls-find-worrisome-news )

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Emily, Natick — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:37:22 GMT

just because the majority of the pundits all believed one thing, it doesn’t mean they’re correct.

Really? I bet when the majority of the pundits talked about the thrills up their legs, you took that as proof positive that Obama was awesome.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

cindy, Las Vegas, Nv — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:38:27 GMT

Hand clapping to Pat, well said.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

OBAMA IS LOOKING MORE INEPT EVERY PASSING DAY ... — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:38:30 GMT

THE PRESSING QUESTION ABOUR OBAMA IS --- "DOES HE HAVE WHAT IT TAKES?"

MORE & MORE ... DAY AFTER DAY --- THE ANSWER IS "NO."

WASHINGTON INSIDERS SAY HIS 'INEPT LEADERSHIP' STYLE & 'BUMBLING STAFF' CAN'T DO THE JOB!

OBAMANUTS ARE MISTAKING HIS DOING MANY THINGS AS PROGRESS --- BUT THE MORE THINGS OBAMA DOES CLUMSILY --- THE MORE THAT WILL MATERIALIZE IN FAILURE.

JUST LOOK AT THE INEPTNESS OF HIS SO-CALLED 'FOREIGN POLICY' IN A FEW SHORT WEEKS === HE IS CAUSING SERIOUS DISCONTENT WITH SOME OF OUR MOST LOYAL ALLIES === AND INSTIGATING TROUBLE WITH OUR ENEMIES ==== NONE OF WHICH MAKES ANY SENSE.
.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Tyler Texas Joe — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:40:20 GMT

For the banks, it's nice to see that Obama is closing the barn door after the horse is already gone. Guess what Barack, the banks don't need any more of OUR money. Citi is projecting a $8 billion dollar profit this year, and other banks are expected to do the same. It sure is nice that you now have strings attached to money that isn't needed anymore. Day late, and a dollar short, that seems to be the way your amateur looking administration operates.

By the way, can we have that money you spent on the banks back now? You know, just we can get something to eat, and maybe fix the roof? Many thanks.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Stephanie, Prescott AZ — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:41:04 GMT

Say what you will about McCain, his conscience is clear and he's no hypocrite on earmarks. He's never requested one in 27 years.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

C. Chanel — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:42:07 GMT

Did Michelle buy a new dress for the Women's Day event??

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

It's A Mystery — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:42:19 GMT

Why do the Democrats keep punishing success?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Ron Indiana — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:42:32 GMT

Chuck Todd: If you are thinking about a good question to ask the President or Robert Gibbs, How about, "When will habeas corpus be restored? It seems to me that it should be a high priority.

Chris Matthews isn't sure if Emanel's comments rearding Rush Limbaugh was a good idea or not. Well, it was a good idea. It has been facinating to watch how Rush responds to attacks, like the one lately by Newt Gingrich. Rush loves being the de facto head of the Republican Party and he will use his microphone to counter attack any Republican who does not bow low to him. This clearly will not help the Republicans in 2010.

I see on Huffington Post that Steele will have a no confidence vote after April 1. He will be replaced by Katon Dawson. A white man from the Confederacy. That will only decrease the support from people of color.

Capitalism will be different is the headline from Huffington. Being different is not socialism! Different means regulated, which it should have been all along. I was intrigued by a post on FR that the L word, Liberal, was being replaced by the S word, Socialist. Progressives are not socialist and name calling will not bring back the White House to the GOP. It will not.

People forget that this is a global recession, not just a US recession. It will take several countries, China, European governments to turn this around. It is unfair of the GOP or the Media to even start to call this President Obama's recession. It is not. Thank Alan Greenspan, Bush 43, Phil Gramm, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell for this economic mess.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Juan,Ft Lauderdale,FL — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:42:57 GMT

Coleman is the ultimate sleaze Boss tweed like who refuses to accept the fact he LOST by 225 votes and using tax paying money to sleazy attornies out of the George Bush/Rove family of dirty tricks. It should be obvious to most people that the Grand Obstructionist Party is behind it because they want to aviod the 59 Democrat majority. I kind of feel less bad about FloriDUH of 2000!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Luigi Baltimore, Md. — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:14 GMT

President Obama should have never said he would go through line by line and eliminate earmarks, but he did, now when he signs this bill he is indeed a liar.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

J. Freida — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:21 GMT

Did Edwards cut back on his $400 haircuts in order to help the poor??

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MsRoman — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:32 GMT

Amen. Thank you Pat, Boston Ma. I totally agree

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Eric, Salinas, CA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:43 GMT

Sore Loser Coleman is quickly losing any chance to run for office in Minnesota with his self serving attack at the majority's desire to have Senator Al Franken seated. He needs to quit this childish obstruction of the voter's will and start the healing process he urged Franken to do the day after the election.

I'm glad that John Edwards is out speaking in support of the poor. Only deadbeats want to know about his affair.

Jon Stewart has made some good points about how clownish CNBC has become. I gave up on it as CNBC is nothing but clowns whining about politics and ideology instead of real business. I prefer CNBC International to CNBC because the international crew, while bland and somewhat boring, talk about business the way it should be talked about. Mad Moron Cramer has some gall to call Jon Stewart a comedian when his buffonish business show is nothing but a clowinsh attempt to snag the idiot crowd. Jon Stewart makes Mad Moron Cramer look like the idiot he is.

In Jon Stewart We Trust!
In Mad Moron Cramer We Bust!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:44 GMT

...it’s fascinating how the political world turned President Obama into … John McCain....'

the 'political world' hasn't done this....
the Lazy, ignorant media/infotainment industry

You don't want to' name names on earmarks
After all this talk about earmarks, WHY NOT ??

Talk about actual issues and facts, not political perceptions and gossip

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Now We Pay For Our Mistake — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:43:57 GMT

Nice diversion, focusing on McCain when you should be pointing (or giving) the finger to Obama. We sure picked the wrong guy last November.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Diane from Illinois — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:45:07 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

gepa — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:45:13 GMT

Obama was absolutely right, he said earmarks account for only 18 Billion; But Mccain is willing to give 3oo Billion in Tax Cuts To the Wealthiest Corporations and individuals in the country. That's all the Republicans care about, tax cuts for the wealtiest..

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:45:17 GMT

‘...then how can we expect Obama to stand up to Bibi Netanyahu and his even more radical ally, Avigdor Lieberman, when they confront Obama over Middle East policy?...’

‘...hard-line Jews of the Democratic Congress, including Senator Charles Schumer of New York, Rep. Steve Israel (yes, he is actually named "Israel") of New York, and of course, that former Democrat, Joe Lieberman...’

From TheNation.com:

‘....Israel Lobby Defeats Freeman Appointment
posted by Robert Dreyfuss on 03/10/2009 @ 6:31pm

The withdrawal of Chas Freeman as chairman of the National Intelligence Council, following two weeks of vituperative attacks on him by the amen chorus of the U.S. Zionist lobby is a black mark on the Obama administration.

As I wrote two weeks ago, when the campaign against Freeman began, if Barack Obama can't stand up to the likes of Marty Peretz, Jonathan Chait, Steve Rosen, and other snarky critics, and if the White House can't defend a critical intelligence pick when that person is savaged by Republican sharks smelling blood in the water, then how can we expect Obama to stand up to Bibi Netanyahu and his even more radical ally, Avigdor Lieberman, when they confront Obama over Middle East policy?

It's sad, and worrying.

Expect gloating in the pages of The New Republic, National Review, The Weekly Standard, at Fox News, in the corridors at the American Enterprise Institute and AIPAC, and in the right-wing and neocon blogs.

Joining in on the trashing of Freeman were the (let's face it) hard-line Jews of the Democratic Congress, including Senator Charles Schumer of New York, Rep. Steve Israel (yes, he is actually named "Israel") of New York, and of course, that former Democrat, Joe Lieberman -- all of whom crowded into the amen corner with AIPAC.

The Post, writing this morning about opposition to Freeman by seven Republican members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, quoted Freeman from 2007: "The brutal oppression of the Palestinians by the Israeli occupation shows no sign of ending. ... American identification with Israel has become total."

You can, apparently, believe anything but that.

Nearly four years ago, I interviewed Freeman about the disastrous appointment of Porter Goss as CIA director, who was installed by then-President Bush as a political watchdog over an agency that is supposed to speak truth to power. Goss, Freeman told me then, was sent to Langley to "impose a vision on [the CIA] that its analysts and operatives reject as simply not based on reality," he told me. "It's totalitarian. We are going to end up with an agency that is more right-wing, more conformist, and less prone to produce people with original views and dissenters."

I guess we know, now, that there's no room for dissenters in the intelligence community, now, either....’

Presumably, we’ll continue to rubber stamp all Israeli policies

After 8 years of the Neo-Cons.... Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Kenneth Adelman, Douglas Feith, Scooter Libby, David Wurmser, Elliott Abrams, David Frum,...

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Spend It Like You Own It — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:48:11 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:50:32 GMT

GIVE IT UP !
for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid

From WashingtonMonthly.com:

'...CONGRESS GETS ANOTHER APPROVAL BOOST....
Low approval ratings for Congress have become so routine, it's kind of odd to see the legislative branch get a significant boost in the polls, especially in the midst of an economic crisis.
0ht92lp5mko26m1teo2spw.gif

And yet, that's exactly what has happened lately. After a 12-point increase in a Gallup poll last month, Congress has seen its approval rating get an 8-point bump this month. It would be a real stretch to consider Congress "popular" -- its approval rating now stands at 39% -- but its current level of support has reached its highest level in more than four years. That's up from 19% in January.

There's no real mystery behind the numbers. Self-identified Republicans still hold Congress in low regard (22% approval, up slightly from February), but support among Independents has doubled since January (17% to 34%), and Democrats are especially impressed, with 57% expressing their approval.

The overall 20-point swing for the institution in just two months is the biggest since 9/11.

This almost certainly isn't what GOP leaders had in mind. The apparent strategy in recent months was to avoid excessive criticism of the popular president, and go after Democratic congressional leaders. Indeed, after the stimulus fight, Boehner, McConnell, and others suggested a public backlash against Congress was inevitable.

At least for now, the opposite seems to be happening...'

Things have REALLY IMPROVED since we started ROLLING OVER those nasty Republicans !!

The ratings for Congress will improve even more after we ABOLISH the FILIBUSTER !!

Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Reid saving us from ignorance and Republicans (one and the same?)

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

no joe, no bo, nj — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:51:02 GMT

So, the Big O signed the pork-laden package, but threatened that he wouldn't next time. Next time, we'll get the same thing - and the time after that, and the time after that,...

The problem isn't the projects, per se, but the process by which they are added to bills. If a project is necessary and fundamentally sound, stand up and push for it. If is sounds like a pay-off for some lobbyists, show the country why it is not. It's fairly simple. No company would allow managers to slip things into their budgets-they have to justify each and every item in there. Why in the world should not the American people, who are paying for this, demand the same from Congress?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Cherubim — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:51:12 GMT

I thank God, that John and Elizabeth Edwards have worked hard and preserved their marriage. We need both of them as advocates against poverty and for Universal Health Care.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

J. Ellis, Virginia — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:51:17 GMT

So, the TARP conditions are so unappealing to the banks that they want to return the money? They don't like being transparent and upfront with how they are spending taxpayer dollars? Excellent! Funnel the moeny back to the states where more fiscally responsible people can do a better job of managing the people's money.

Bankers are becoming almost as trust-worthy as Cash Advance Check Cashing franchises.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

It's A Mystery — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:52:03 GMT

Why are Democrats so bad at living their lives? Most unhappy people I've ever seen.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Beverly in Chicago — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:52:37 GMT

It will be a delight to observe two of the top women in American history. As well as, being history maker's for firsts in American women 's achievements: Elegant First lady Michelle Obama: the first African American First Lady we have been waiting for and Hillary Clinton: the first lady to put a dent into the glass ceiling by garnering 18 million votes to become a first female president. So celebrating International Women’s Day this year is extra sweet.
++++++++++++++++$$$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++++++++
Palomino (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:29 AM)

Don't even put McCain in this. Obama has the pen to sign it into law or nix it.

Obie signed it. The spit is on him.
++++++++++++++++$$$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++++++++
You can’t equate Obama with McCain. President Obama is young, exceptionally, talented, able, and the leader of who has the majority behind him. that’s why he’s president and gets to sign bills. I doubt if John McCain will get a copy of the pens signed by our President.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Bakers Dozen — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:54:37 GMT

Did Michelle buy a new dress for the Women's Day event??
C. Chanel

Rumor has it she made cookies! She used Hillary's receipe.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:54:47 GMT

SOMEBODY CALL A HOOKER !!

Temper ! Temper !!

From HuffPost:

'...David Vitter Throws a Tantrum After Missing Flight

Louisiana Senator David Vitter screamed at a United Airlines employee last week after arriving 20 minutes too late for a flight from Dulles to New Orleans, Roll Call reports (subscription required).

According to Raw Story, when Vitter learned he didn't make the flight, he tried to open an alarmed security door.

After setting off the security alarm, the Louisiana senator proceeded to dress down an airline employee who told him entering the restricted area was forbidden. He invoked his standing as a senator, delivering a "do-you-know-who-I-am" tirade, the paper said.

Vitter wouldn't calm down, even after the employee threatened to call security.

"Vitter, according to the witness, remained defiant, yelling that the employee could call the police if he wanted to and their supervisors, who, presumably, might be more impressed with his Senator's pin," the paper's Heard on the Hill column noted. "But after talking a huffy big game, Vitter apparently thought better of pushing the confrontation any further. When the gate attendant left to find a security guard, Vitter turned tail and simply fled the scene."...'

He just needs his diapers changed !!

They're FULL OF IT !!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Tim, Harrisburg — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:55:11 GMT

*** Strings Attached: Isn't it good news for the government bailout plan that some banks want to give the money back because they don't like the strings? The New York Times: "Some bankers say the conditions have become so onerous that they want to return the bailout money. The list includes small banks like the TCF Financial Corporation of Wayzata, Minn., and Iberia Bank of Lafayette, La., as well as giants like Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. They say they plan to return the money as quickly as possible or as soon as regulators set up a process to accept the refunds.” Also, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that some investors now don't like the papers they have to sign to participate in the TALF investment plan to buy up toxic assets. Isn’t this what Congress wants to hear?

****************

This is good news. If the restrictions are too "onerous" for a financial institution, that means it doesn't really need our help. This insures that only the banks that REALLY need the money will keep it. "Free" money isn't so free then, huh?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Shutter Bug — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:55:44 GMT

Are we going to get any photo-ops of the Obama's today, or this the one day of the month they take the day off?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

JoAnn, Moundsville, WV — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:58:28 GMT

I really don't think you can get rid of earmarks completely. Every state has projects that need to be upgraded that have been ignored for quite a while and some of these need to be included in spending bills. However, some are a little over the top. Everyone that requests money for projects think theirs is important, but ones for the public good should be passed.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Anna Molly — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:00:33 GMT

Oh, good. Earmarks. A day without earmarks would be a day I might have to think about what really matters. That would hurt my little liberal head.

Mystery ~ you know, that beats me, too. I can't think why I'm so unhappy, despite everything George W. Bush did for me -- like all these unnecessary wars costing us thousands of productive lives and unimaginable sums of money, the stock market in the tank, meaning I'll never retire, messed up health care, global warming, failed social security reform, and failed education reform. And not to mention, of course, two mass shootings in the past 24 hours alone that senselessly killed at least 25 people because republicans ARE bitter and DO cling to their guns.

Don't worry. Be happy.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Brian Crooks, Naperville, IL — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:01:04 GMT

Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill. This bill was intended to fund the government, so vetoing it would have further jeopardized the already tenuous budget situation. I place the blame solely on the congressmen and senators who inserted the earmarks. Both Democrats AND Republicans, since their per-capita earmarking was roughly the same.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

jesse St.Paul Minnesota — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:01:34 GMT

Can you guys be serious,John McCain would have one if the election was about earmarks ,where you get your facts from bathroom stalls?Earmarks are 2% of the entire budget,I think most of us don't think earmarks first when we think about our economy,or how earmarks can be a good thing.McCain is a old out of touch gravy train regular.So we can now conclude that the banks really didn't need the money we gave them,seems that they have no time for strings that they will have to play by if they want more money,see they have gone 8 years with no rules they,they liked how the republicans have let them do what they wanted.So now they see that someone will be paying attention to how they use the bailout money,and they say no thanks,we still want to give out huge bonus's for our failures.FR, Bush said he would not sign the bill,quite the drama will ya, The Dems got greedy,no they knew George had not done a damn thing the last 6 months of his term,he must have thought he had screwed up our country enough,and took a powder and hid behind his desk.Classic Republican obstruction in the Frankin case,the repubs know how important the votes are,so they will do everything they can to hold this vote up.But in the end Norm will have to except the facts,YOU LOST NORM so take your army of RNC-GOP lawyers and get out of Dodge,you will need time to prepare for your other lawsuit .

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

We've got your back — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:04:47 GMT

I usually like Fineman, but he needs to shut his trap. The republicans screwed over this nation for the past 8 years and within a month of a new democratic president, they expect it all to be cleaned-up, fixed and just like new. What a bunch of hooey!
President Obama is doing just fine and will continue to do fine. He has alot more integrity, fortitude and resolve in his little pinky than in the entire make-up of the republican party.

Keep on Truckin' President Obama!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Ken Randell, MT — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:04:51 GMT

So, the TARP conditions are so unappealing to the banks that they want to return the money?

===================

So what's Obama's point of trying to help the banks? See, Obama is obvioulsy not clear on what the overall goal of helping the banks is. The goal is to keep the banks liquid so the economy doesn't go from a recession to a depression. What Obama is doing is trying to score his usual amount of populous points by making it something that benefits him politically, and not the country. Now Obama puts so many restrictions on the money, the banks can't use it. So now we're back to the country being on the path of going from a recession to a depression.

This is what happens when you need a President that believes "Country First", but you get one that says "Me First"

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Houston — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:06:25 GMT

As the Washington Post points out, only five senators didn’t add pet projects to the omnibus: McCain, DeMint (R), Coburn (R), Feingold (D), and McCaskill (D).
-------------------------

Note that Kyle, the other Repub senator from Arizona is not on that list. That's the scam that McCain is running. He can posture about pork and earmarks while and distract attention while his pal Kyle brings home the bacon to Arizona.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Sheila R., Pikesville MD — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:10:39 GMT

Somebody needs to tell Joe Scarborough that the banks don't want the money because they don't like the "strings attached". Joe and Pat Buchanan have been screaming all weeks about President Obama needs to fix banking.

Well, it seems as if banking has fixed itself if they don't want the TARP money or TALF. isn't that special?

Why should President Obama drop everything and kiss the a$$ of the bankers whenit was their greed that gotus into this mess. I love the pundits who say it was poor folks who bought homes they could not afford that caused the problem. Well, who were the idiot bankers and mortgage companies that made this possible? Did the poor folks walk in with guns drawn and yelled "I want a mortgage I can't afford and I want it now!"

Get real folks. It was greed on the part of everyone involved but it is easy to blame the poor folks because they have no voice.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Pat, Boston, MA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:12:58 GMT

Crooks & Liars: Brit Hume got very honest for a change on FNS when he closed his "gold buying" rant by the rich with this:

...they fear a wave of inflation or hyper inflation, so the people who are voting with their money are not voting in favor of these policies.

Decoded: The very rich hate Obama just like they hated FDR. Under FDR we saw the expansion of the middle class and a shrinking of the Court of American Royalty.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

pat huntington ny — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:21 GMT

Earmarks are not all bad and wastefull, per se. It is the job of Congressmen and Senators to stear federal tax dollars back to their respective states. The real question is whether the particular project is worthwhile or a waste of tax dollars. Obama said he'ld weed out the wasteful earmarks, not all earmarks, and he put forth a plan of utter transparency so no "bridge to nowhere" type of earmarks are sneeked through. People who criticize him on this matter are just flapping their lips and spewing the same old politcal garbage for their own political gain as the obstructionist opposition.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

E. Mark — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:41 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Last Thoughts — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:14:08 GMT

Your columns are making less and less sense. How is Obama the same as McCain? And does anyone actually care about this issue? It's a nice-to-solve, but I don't think it's the reason our economy has been ruined.

Maybe you guys should focus only on elections. You're not making valid points on anything else.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Sheila R., Pikesville MD — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:15:43 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Claire — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:15:56 GMT

...they fear a wave of inflation or hyper inflation, so the people who are voting with their money are not voting in favor of these policies.

Decoded: The very rich hate Obama just like they hated FDR. Under FDR we saw the expansion of the middle class and a shrinking of the Court of American Royalty.
-------------------------------------------------
Give me a break Pat. We all vote with our wallets. And all of us, rich and poor, are going to be affected by the inflation around the corner.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Paul Gillian, Richmond VA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:16:07 GMT

Brain Crooks - Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill.

================

So veto the bill. Either that, or admit he lied when he was campaigning. It's not like Obama didn't know the process.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Mark Murray — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:19:36 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

southern liberal, columbia,s.c. — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:20:10 GMT

I just have to say, I am getting exactley what I voted for, I want the rich to pay more taxes, I want it bad. Its has nothing to do with punishment, it has to do with paying the price for the freedom you have to stick it to the little guy every chance you get. This little guy can be your employee, he can be your client, he can be a small investor thats is fed the crap stock. He can be the guy who has to pay the highest intrest rates because he has the least. Really the h-ll with you rich people, it really is time you paid for the great lives you have, we dont owe you, you owe us. You get the biggest breaks on everything, when you buy a house, you get the break, when you buy your car or boat, you get a big break, you know it and I woulnt mind if you had to pay 45% instead of 39%. When you ask is there a war against the rich? I say I want to be a Captain in that fight.
I can do without John Edwards, I was between Edwards and Obama, settled on Obama, when I learned of Edwards affair, I lost all respect, forget him, hes trash. I dont know Mrs Edwards, but anyone deserves better than that.
As a true liberal, I am glad Gitmo is being closed, glad our troops will come home from Iraq (one day). Hope we finally find a way to catch or kill Bin Laden, I think that is a big priority. Glad congress is looking into the crimes by Bush and Company. As I have the patience of Job, I will not make hasty conclusions about our economy, it really did take 20 or more years to get in this mess, with the help of the last 4 administrations, including Clinton (nafta,cafta,closing military bases). So as my pride in my county soars again ( I wasnt real proud for the last 16 years), I say God Bless America !!!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Vote For Pedro — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:21:02 GMT

pat, ny --> Earmarks are not all bad and wastefull, per se.

Earmarks are taxation without representation. How did your congreesman/woman vote on the earmarks? He/She didn't you say? Someone else just stuffed them in a spending bill with no vote taken? That's taxation without representation.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Chandler W. — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:24:21 GMT

Shut up about earmarks. Who cares! Some of the earmarks create stimulus for states.

Hasn't the press already sunk so low during the last 8 years that they lost credibility?

Start writing about the news....start earning the respect from the public.

The Republicans have no message and no desire to work together with Democrats to help this nation. How sad for America.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

LB, Virginia — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:24:39 GMT

I'm confused. Six of the ten biggest earmarks were requested from Republicans. 40% of the total was from Republicans. Yet they voted against their own earmarks, because why? Because they are complete hypocrites and only voted no because they knew it would pass. If it was in trouble, they would have voted yes. Even that slimeball Lindsay Graham was on MTP saying he'd add the Myrtle Beach convention center earmark again if it didn't pass, even though he was voting no??? He claims as a US Senator, he has the right to bring home the bacon to SC. I say, ok, but then why is it wrong for the Dems to bring home that same slab of bacon to their states? It's just complete nonsense and I sure hope the country is paying attention! Thankfully, David Shuster takes this on each night with his fabulous Hypocrisy Watch.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Scott Dale, Texas — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:26:22 GMT

Last, we didn't write that Obama is the same as McCain. We were pointing out how the political press and Obama's opponents are holding him to a cause that wasn't his -- but was rather McCain's. And now, under criticism for earmarks in last year's spending bill, Obama is today rolling out his proposal to reform them.
Mark Murray

This is absolute blather. Come back to reality. Obama ranted about earmarks and wasteful spending on the campaign trail, and how he was going to clean it up. First chance he got to prove it, Obama failed. Revisionist history doesn't cut it MSNBC. Once again, you are way out of line and way behind the truth curve.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Kahn,WV — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:26:25 GMT

I like how Obama Bashers have nothing positive to say. But please tell me how does it feel to be apart of the GOP, the same people that ran the global market into the ground and let fools take over planes bring down a tower when the attack was preventable. they have never started to rebuild and a plan didn't get under way until now.....HUMMMMMM. The GOP had the whole world laughing at us..... But notice they are starting to shut up because "THE DEM'S ARE BACK"......... Once again we clean your mess up, From Surplus to Nothing.... & from Nothing to Surplus..

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

LB, Virginia — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:26:44 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Chris - IL — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:30:03 GMT

President Obama would have to lose several million brain cells in order to become John McCain. That statement in FR is laughable. On the topic of future earmarks, however, I would like to see the names of the people asking for earmarks and what they're asking for transparent for all of us to see. Let the people decide whether or not their representatives should hold the seats they current occupy or whether they should be replaced in the next election. That should settle some of them down a little.

Diane from Illinois (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:45 AM)
_________________________________________________

I completely agree that those requesting earmarks should be called out and identified. But I wouldn't expect it to have much impact. Most people probably don't view earmarks going to their state or district as bad, only those to other states and districts.

Personally, I think all this talk about earmarks is a big distraction. They are a fact of life and not likely to go away. They've been a way to get money for pet projects and a way for senators and congressional representatives to get support on their bills. It is part of the negotiation process.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

LB, Virginia — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:31:47 GMT

Pedro. Earmarks are added because if someone wanted say, that convention center in Myrtle Beach, like Lindsay Graham does, they do it as a tag on to another bill.Otherwise, it would take years to get that money through the system. That's the same for many road and other infrastructure projects. I don't want my money going to an illegal war in Iraq, but it's going there. I don't want my money going to the banks, but it's going there. You can't pick and choose where every tax dime goes. You can elect those that share your priorities, which is EXACTLY what the American people did on November 4th!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Ted Janseen, Ohio — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:33:04 GMT

southern liberal, columbia,s.c.- I just have to say, I am getting exactley what I voted for . . .

Unemployed?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

The Gate Keeper — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:36:13 GMT

LB Virgina

I'm confused. Six of the ten biggest earmarks were requested from Republicans.

---------

So? An earmark is an earmark. Why isn't Obama cleaning those up, just like he promised he would?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Marks On My Ears — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:38:25 GMT

Obama rambles on and on how he is going to make the banks, the congress, the health care industry, the <fill in the blank>, be "Accountable". So who's keeping an eye on Obama? Who is making him accountable?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Howard F — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:39:09 GMT

I usually like Fineman, but he needs to shut his trap.
----------------------------------------------------
Typical. You like Fineman until he dares to cast a doubt about Obama, and then he needs to shut up.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

mike, Sarasota, fl — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:42:55 GMT

I dont understand this whole line of thinking that the rich are going to be paying more taxes. My understanding was that Bush LOWERED their tax rate from 36% to 33% in an attempt to stimulate the economy (which didnt work) with the provision that the rate would return to normal in 2010 which is exactly what is happening. Noone is raising taxes on the very wealthy they are just returning to the non discounted rate.

The whole thing reminds me of the athlete who signs a 3 year contract today then wants more money a year later.

Please explain to me how the taxes on these people are being raised and why they are in such a rage about returning to their proper tax rate after 5 years of discount.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Stephanie — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:43:31 GMT

Hey Stephanie in Prescott. that's not entirely true. He did ask for them before running for president in 2000. Also, he had that snake Kyl add them to his bills or pass them under the radar. So don't hold ol McCain in too high esteem. He's just a grandstander who is trying to make up for his dad's disgust of him.
----------------------------------------------------
I don't know where you get your information, either about his father or his alleged earmarks. Probably the Daily Kos, because you haven't read any of his biographies. Every nonpartisan watchdog group, Taxpayers for Common Sense is a good one, can give you the info on earmarks. His hands are clean on this one.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Molly Anna — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:43:49 GMT

Diane In Illinois

Obama DOES have less brain cells than McCain with all those cigarettes he keeps sucking on.

Yours was a put-down. Mine's a fact.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

LB, Virginia — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:45:28 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:51:00 GMT

Stephanie, Prescott AZ: '...Say what you will about McCain, his conscience is clear and he's no hypocrite on earmarks. He's never requested one in 27 years...'.

McCain got a BIG EARMARK for Charles Keating
McCain pressured regulators NOT ot look at Keating's criminal enterprise
That way Keating was able to keep swindling investors

Crooked Charles Keating was the Bernie Madoff of his day
He wasaided and abetted by John McCain

But, no earmark ???

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Gate Keeper — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:51:46 GMT

To the Gate Keeper: Oh I agree the whole process is a mess and needs to be redone so that smaller money requests, or earmarks, can be done through the regular channels. However, my issue is with the Republicans who are out in force trashing the budget and the earmarks, some of which they put in there!!!
LB, Virginia

===========

All Republicans in congress are not for getting rid of earmarks. They are the pigs at the money trough just like the Democrats. It's wrong for both. Obama promised to clean it up. He hasn't.

So just who are we to hold accountable? I say both Obama and Congress. McCain and Feingold are the heros on this one. They need our support too.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

jilli — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:52:01 GMT

If mccain was a true "leader" he wouldn't have just had theatrics going on earmarks, he would have actually accomplished something in that regard. He's ineffective and actually pretty irrelevant in his own party - the republicans could have made a statement and followed mclames lead and removed their earmarks from the budget - but no, Kyle, Graham and the others just proved themselves to be hypocrits and leaders of the "do as I say not as I do" party.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Bobby, Bossier City, La. — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:52:10 GMT

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

SDR, Pikesville, MD — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:54:05 GMT

LB, Virginia (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:24 AM)
I too appreciate the David Shuster "Hypocrisy Watch".

Those lawmakers who vote NO to grandstand when they are up to their eyeballs in earmarks are just plain lunatics. Don't they know that in this new era of transparency we will know their names.
Candidate McCain vowed to call them out but he lied. If not, why isn't he railing against Sen. Kyl (R-AZ)?
Can you say HYPOCRIT?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

let it be — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:54:04 GMT

It's a shame that this forum has been hijacked by all the anti-Obama nuts. The President is doing a great job; no one can say he doesn't put in enough thought or hours to what's going on. The last 8 years of Republican leadership as well as the 10 years (96-06) of congressional dominance left the country in a big hole. Unsurprisingly, none of those responsible wants to help us get out of that hole, they just want to complain and complain in the hopes that once President Obama has made progress, they'll be voted in to ruin it yet again. The government needs proposals, not tax cuts -- people who aren't earning money won't be paying taxes. People who (in this economy) are still earning $250,000 or more (very few of whom are small business owners) shouldn't complain about having their rates go up marginally.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Nashville_fan — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:56:09 GMT

"Last, we didn't write that Obama is the same as McCain. We were pointing out how the political press and Obama's opponents are holding him to a cause that wasn't his -- but was rather McCain's. And now, under criticism for earmarks in last year's spending bill, Obama is today rolling out his proposal to reform them. - Mark Murray
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you First Read for shining a spot light on this phenomenon.

I have been very dismayed that so many people have been calling President Obama a liar for breaking promises he never made.

I appreciate your clarification of the matter.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Give Me A "B" Give Me An "A" — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:00:45 GMT

Thank you First Read for shining a spot light on this phenomenon.

I have been very dismayed that so many people have been calling President Obama a liar for breaking promises he never made.

I appreciate your clarification of the matter.

Nashville_fan

Ahh, the head Obama cheerleader has arrived, now we can start. Showing a little more leg today I see.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Greg in WA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:04:38 GMT

Ah yes, the all-too-predictable has happened again. It came a little faster than I expected, but it did come. Now that the glow surrounding our new king has diminished, the media have turned on their chainsaws for the next four years. I wrote on this list before the election last fall stating that it didn't matter who won -- the media would do their job and turn the winner into chopped liver. Obama is no different -- he is mortal like the rest of us (though liberal happy-children would beg to differ), and he will go the way of Jimmy Carter -- especially when the double-digit inflation kicks in and the truth of our economy being too chronically anemic to recover sinks into the head every average American.

The only part about this whole thing that perplexes me is that liberals were all hailing the pundits and poll numbers when Obama appeared to be in favor with the media -- now that he's becoming their victim, they all discount the media and everything it has to say (and yes, conservatives did the same thing with GWB). Take the blinders off, boys and girls. The media never was your friend, and Obama is no deity. He has made some grave errors in the first few months of his presidency while dragging level-headed economists kicking and screaming, and now we will be paying for those errors for a long time to come (and please keep your mouths shut about GWB and the last 8 years, that point is nauseatingly clear by now -- Obama took the reins with the understanding that his mission was to fix the mess -- not reminisce about how it wasn't his to fix; and no, I'm not defending GWBs economic policies by saying that Obama is wrong and failing in his effort -- both administrations messed up -- and we the voters (or I should say, we the "stupid" voters) have no one to blame but ourselves. We're supposed to look for the best qualified people to lead us based on the problems we're dealing with today -- not the cutest, most attractive, most eloquent, most influential, or most politically-correct -- this isn't senior achievement day, folks). Until America decides to take its tonic, we will all continue to suffer. No magic bullet, kids, is going to save us from ourselves. Reagan handled his Black Monday the right way -- this fire needs to burn itself out. We spent many years stoking the fuel for this blaze, now all we can do is wait for it to go out on its own. Messing with it (especially if its the government) will only make our overall situation worse.

And as for Pat in Boston -- what would you be saying of Obama if his assessment of Iraq was wrong? In fact, he has spoken nearly the same words GWB spoke 7 years ago after 9/11 -- specifically, use the best intelligence available when making decisions about foreign relations. Bush made the same (stupid?) disclaimer. Was Obama just a benefactor of fortunate dumb luck on Iraq, or did he actually know something? We will never know -- nor will we ever know whether his "best intelligence" is any better than GWBs intelligence before the Iraq invasion -- until after it all plays out. As with GWB, Obama will either look like a fool, or be heralded as a prophetic leader. As for GOP plans -- they've been presented and discounted (yes, yes -- much the same as democrat plans were discounted during most of GWBs tenure -- tit for tat). Just be sure to remember that conservatives and liberals can agree on two things -- bipartisanship is bogus, and the person in charge will make decisions that the other side doesn't like. It's the American way -- like it or not.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

*Handing you a Quarter* - Call someone who cares — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:07:26 GMT

At least watching someone trying to defending the indefensible is amusing to watch.

Johnny Walker

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Believe me, we know the feeling! We were forced to watch, & listen to all of you for the last 8 years.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

You people are amazing! — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:09:44 GMT

So what's Obama's point of trying to help the banks? See, Obama is obvioulsy not clear on what the overall goal of helping the banks is. The goal is to keep the banks liquid so the economy doesn't go from a recession to a depression. What Obama is doing is trying to score his usual amount of populous points by making it something that benefits him politically, and not the country. Now Obama puts so many restrictions on the money, the banks can't use it. So now we're back to the country being on the path of going from a recession to a depression.

This is what happens when you need a President that believes "Country First", but you get one that says "Me First"
Ken Randell, MT (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:04 AM)
___________

So we should just fork over the money to the banks and allow them to use it however they want, without any restrictions? Isn't that one part of how this mess got out of hand in the first place? Well, excuse us for trying to make sure it is used properly.

I always the love the "talking points against Obama, no matter what he does" campaign. If he had given the banks money with no restrictions, all we would be hearing is about how he forked over all this money without any accountability whatsoever. So, he tries to show accountability, and now all we hear is "how dare he".

The man can't win for losing.

The banks had it their way, and it wasn't working. If they want government money, too bad if it comes with a little regulatory compliance. Maybe they need a little bit of that right now.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Monkberry Moon — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:13:02 GMT

Bobby in Bossier City

Anna Molly has been off her "game" for some time now. Looks like her radicalism is finally coming through.
Personally, I think Obama's misrepresentation of everything in sight is getting her down and it's affecting her judgement. Poor gal.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Facts are fun — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:15:42 GMT

Obama DOES have less brain cells than McCain with all those cigarettes he keeps sucking on.

Yours was a put-down. Mine's a fact.
Molly Anna (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:43 AM)
_____________________

And yet American still preferred Obama to McCain.

Mine's a fact too.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Jody, Iowa — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:16:57 GMT

Pat Boston and Sheila R, appreciate the thoughtful comments which are so true.

FR says McCain would have won if the election had been about earmarks. You did that to get the discussion going, good job. I don't recall a single election that was ever about earmarks.

Amazing that the GOP and the media are like dogs with bones about earmarks. Earmarks are how people back home get programs that are needed. In the words of GOP Senator Kyl, his earmarks aren't earmarks by definition--what? Their names are on the legislation. As FR has stated, Pres Obama never said he would do away with earmarks, just that the process would be reformed. Personally, why should he veto this bill? Brian, Naperville is right, there is no line-item veto. I don't think we need Government to shut down right now which is what will happen if the bill is vetoed. We can't blame Congress for not getting it done last September because the economy went into freefall and they were kept busy by Paulsen and Bush dealing with TARP, failing banks, and car companies.

If republicans are so outraged about earmarks, then why did they leave their 40% in the bill--sounds like they're saying GOP earmarks don't count, you only count the democratic ones. Nonsense. Sign the bill and move on.

Speaking of that, it makes me wonder why Sen McCain has spent 27 years fighting against earmarks, 2% of the money spent, yet never achieved getting rid of them. Is it important, yes, but if he was so dedicated to fighting earmarks, why are we still talking about it 27 years later? Years ago, McCain could have proposed the legislation to reveal names on earmarks but it took Obama and democrats to get it done.

As for John Edwards, he messed up, as many others have, both republican and democrat. Glad he and Elizabeth have worked through it and moved on. Now it's time for the rest of the chattering class to move on, he and his wife are good voices for the poor and effective at bringing awareness to the rest of us.

Good news, the banks don't like rules with their money. They're really going to like regulations which should never have been discontinued. Private companies drive the free market and with it comes unscrupulous, greedy behavior; it's the job of Government to regulate to prevent unscrupulous and greedy behavior for the good of the public, us.

I see the usual President Obama naysayers are out, he's inept, can't do anything right, blah blah. Wishful thinking gets you nowhere.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Nashville_fan — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:21:39 GMT

Ahh, the head Obama cheerleader has arrived, now we can start. Showing a little more leg today I see.

- Give Me A "B" Give Me An "A"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
lol

It's called being positive . . . give it some time . . . you'll get used to it! :)

I actively campaigned for President Obama's election and the implementation of his policies for two years . . . did ya really think I was going to sit back and not help him combat the forces of misinformation that always seek to distract us whenever real change is at hand?

Not a chance!

You know what is the most curious thing though?

Folks who remind us out of one side of their mouth that President Obama is not the messiah, and then out of the other side they bemoan the fact that the President has not magically healed the economy in 51 days.

Who's drinking the Kool-aid now?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

MSierra, SF — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:22:45 GMT

Gate Keeper: '...All Republicans in congress are not for getting rid of earmarks. They are the pigs at the money trough just like the Democrats. It's wrong for both. Obama promised to clean it up. He hasn't....'

Actually, earmarks were John McCain's issue, not Obama's

That said WHY didn't McCain call out the ear markers ?

McCain PROMISED to MAKE PUBLIC those people putting in EARMARKS !!

McCain promised to EXPOSE Earmarks !!

McCain LIED !!

He was afraid to expose Mitch McConnell
He was AFRAID to expose Lindsey Graham
He was afraid to expose John Kyl

Some Hero

McCain LIED !!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Dennis, Columbus, Ohio — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:23:22 GMT

By the way, can we have that money you spent on the banks back now? You know, just we can get something to eat, and maybe fix the roof? Many thanks.
Tyler Texas Joe (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:40 AM)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
First the TARP money was given to the banks by the Bush administration with (as usual) no oversight or strings.

Second the money was a loan and WE, the people, will get the money back with interest [9%].

Need I go on with all the errors in your statement?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

nuanced — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:23:46 GMT

I hope Franken sues Coleman personally to recover his lost senatorial wages for the delay.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Mel — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:25:35 GMT

I'm happy to see that someone finally pointed out that not all earmarks are necessarily bad. Many of them create much needed jobs. It's true that some are ridiculous - but most are not - they are projects that create jobs in a faltering economy.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Diane from Illinois — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:30:58 GMT

Obama DOES have less brain cells than McCain with all those cigarettes he keeps sucking on.

Yours was a put-down. Mine's a fact.
Molly Anna
==========
It was MEANT to be a put down. McFossil has early Alzheimer's and shouldn't be anywhere NEAR the White House.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Dennis, Columbus, Ohio — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:34:51 GMT

Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill.
Brian Crooks, Naperville, IL
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
The Supreme Court has said the "line item veto" is unconstitional.
Like it or not the president can not over-ride the congress.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

The - Democrat Soldier — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:36:47 GMT

In fact, had earmarks been the public’s top concern in November, the Arizona senator probably would have won the election. But, as we all know, it wasn’t > FR this is by far the dumbest and most bias statement you guys have made so far this year.

Are you serious - how many Americans do you know that really gives a damn about ear marks to the point it could sway an election.

You media guys are some arrogant sons of bitches, how do you call your opinions - a fact.

Please stop with this BS, it ruins your credibility.

Thank you and GOD BLESS AMERICA

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Iowa attorney — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:38:15 GMT

Juan,Ft Lauderdale,FL

You are missing the point of the Minnesota recount, if you feel less bad about Florida, because of the experience in Minnesota. In Florida there was no real recount, as a result people argue Gore won, others claim Bush won. Although clearly if some elderly people in Palm Beach county had not been confused, and if over 90,000 liberals hadn't thrown away their vote for Nader, there would have been no question and Gore would have easily won.

The problem with Florida was partisanship controlled the post election process. My neighbors to the north, have done everything possible to avoid a partisan recount. They have done this by following their statutory law, including the following, 1. In elections this close there's the mandatory hand recount. The hand recount follows a prescribed procedure. 2. The hand recount was open and transparent. People actually could watch it in person, or on TV (I would think with 10,000 plus lakes most Minnesotans would find more enjoyable activities, but the process was open to anyone interested) 3. The make up of all governing boards was equal in representation, there wasn't an all GOP or all Democratic board. 4. After the hand recount showed Franken ahead (by 20 something)the improperly rejected absentee ballots were counted. The one error Minnesota made was here, the MN Sup. Court ordered that only rejected absentee ballots that the county officials and both the Franken and Coleman campaign agreed were improperly rejected would be opened up and counted. Coleman abused this order and objected to several hundred ballots the local election boards had determined were improperly rejected, which Franken's campaign agreed. After the absentee ballots that every one agreed were improperly rejected were counted Franken’s lead rose to 225. Under Minnesota law Coleman had a right to appeal.

One can rightfully criticize Coleman’s motivations in his appeal. As an attorney it is a violation of the canons of ethics to pursue a frivolous appeal. However, Minnesota law provided the right, and because Minnesota has done its best to remove partisanship in the process, the Courts have not limited Coleman’s appellate rights. Eventually the appellate trial will end, and Coleman will lose, because he has failed to prove his claim that properly cast ballots weren’t counted (except of course the ones his own campaign objected to being counted). All that his appeal has done was increase Franken’s lead. In the end Franken will be seated. Hopefully the good citizens of Minnesota will see who has drawn out this process, and will not only punish Norm Coleman in any future attempts at elected office, but will hold other Minnesota Republican’s who didn’t stop the procedure after it was clear Norm lost from continuing.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Dennis, Columbus, Ohio — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:42:34 GMT

Until the President is given the power of a line-item veto, he can do little to combat earmarks short of vetoing every bill.
--------------------------------------------------
Actually Brian, it would take one veto of a bill for Congress to get their act together and strip future bills of earmarks. I think Obama, and Bush and Clinton before him, should have done exactly that.

E. Mark (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:13 AM)

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
If / when the president were to veto a bill and congress wanted to make their point that the president can not controll them they would all get together to ensure an over-ride of the veto telling the president "you can't tell us what to do".

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

The Gate Keeper — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:56:24 GMT

The banks had it their way, and it wasn't working. If they want government money, too bad if it comes with a little regulatory compliance. Maybe they need a little bit of that right now.
You people are amazing!

------------

Then don't give the banks the money. Obama is trying to micro-manage something he and his administration either do not understand, or would need thousands of people to monitor each and every bank each and every day. Obama is process orientated, not results orientated. He understands process, but he doesn't understand what the results of the process should be. And Obama needs to lean not to put unneeded regulations and process controls on everything.

The problem is that Obama is running scared. All this stuff could have been hashed out if he had taken his time (months even) to understand the problem, work with the banks and his administration on a plan and a solution. But no, Obama said "We need to act now!". His words. He jumped the gun and made himself look like the fool he is. Now he's trying to go back and put the toothpaste back in the tube, and again he looks like a fool.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Sara, Cedar Rapids, Iowa — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:58:43 GMT

Diane In Illinois

Obama DOES have less brain cells than McCain with all those cigarettes he keeps sucking on.

Yours was a put-down. Mine's a fact.
Molly Anna

Really Molly Anna, you're comment was a fact, based on what? I'm as anti-smoking as you get, one reason I didn't support Obama in the Iowa caucus was he smoked. I considered it a substantial negative when deciding among the Democratic choices. However Obama could be a chain smoker, as opposed to a closet smoker, and the pro's versus the cons in a choice between Obama and McCain were so overwhelming that cigarette smoking wasn't even a consideration.

You do not have facts to support your claim "Obama DOES have less brain cells than McCain with all those cigarettes he keeps sucking on." Assuming arguendo that cigarette smoking decreases intelligence to a measurable degree, for your BS statement to be true McCain and Obama would need to start with the same level of intelligence, and age couldn't be a factor in intelligence, and of course you'd need to know the number of cigarettes Obama smokes, the rate of diminished brain capacity per cigarette etc., none of which you have knowledge of.

However, your assumption that Obama's smoking means he has less brain cells than McCain ignores McCain's age, and the relationship that plays with his brain cells. And ignores the objective evidence we have regarding their respective intellect. McCain graduated near the bottom of his class at the Naval acedaemy (I believe 3rd from the bottom), he jokes about his poor academic record. Obama on the other hand graduate with honors from an Ivy league college, and later graduated from the nations best law school Harvord, again in top of his class. He was editor of Harvard law review, which is an indication not merely of academic sucess, but intellect. The idea that McCain has more brain cells than Obama is a joke, the idea that it is fact, and not merely a foolish undeucated put down is a joke!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Stoch, MA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:59:36 GMT

If / when the president were to veto a bill and congress wanted to make their point that the president can not controll them they would all get together to ensure an over-ride of the veto telling the president "you can't tell us what to do".
Dennis, Columbus, Ohio

So what you're saying is that Obama didn't know what he was talking about when he brought up the issue of cleaning up earmarks because it's not his issue to resolve?

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Ted, Mid Michigan — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:10:27 GMT

This is what happens when you need a President that believes "Country First", but you get one that says "Me First"
Ken Randell, MT (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:04 AM)

------------------------------------------------------
You, so-called "Country First" types make me want to puke.

Where is "Country First" in regards to health care, education reform, and energy?

Where's "Country First" when it comes to letting the Tax cuts expire AS GWB SCHEDULED!?!?

Where's "Country First" when it comes to actually coming up with NEW ideas to help stabilize and rebuild this nation?

"Country First" my A$$! Greedy, selfish, and reprehensible, the whole lot of ya!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Nashville_fan — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:10:53 GMT

"I'm not defending GWBs economic policies by saying that Obama is wrong and failing in his effort -- both administrations messed up -- and we the voters (or I should say, we the "stupid" voters) have no one to blame but ourselves. " - Greg in WA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I will leave you to your pessimism . . . just wanted to point out that you can't really compare an 8 year Administration with a 50 day one.

At least you can't do so and be taken seriously.

P.S. President Obama was right about Iraq. It wasn't dumb luck, it was common sense. President Bush and his team just didn't use much.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Chris - IL — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:42:28 GMT

The line item veto would be a disaster! Imagine the power the President would have if they could strike out individual lines of a bill. It would insure than the minority party (when the President was of the majority party) would have no say in virtually anything.

Our form of government isn't perfect and never will be. But even with earmarks and partisan bickering, it is the best form of government in existence!

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Tzalaran — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:42:47 GMT

Iowa attorney (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:38 AM)
******************************************************
Thank you for that breakdown. that was the easiest to understand explanation of the situation i've seen.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Anna Molly — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:09:36 GMT

because republicans ARE bitter and DO cling to their guns.

ANNA MOLLY -
This is the most stupid statement i've ever come from you. these shooters could very easily be democrats. Many criminals use guns to commit criminal acts. I assume you think all criminals are republicans too. wise up and don't make blanket, generalizing, ignorant statements. Bobby, Bossier City, La. (Sent Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:52 AM)

Bobby ~ Oh, shucks; you give me WAY too much credit. I've made MUCH more stupid statements than THAT one lately, as my dear Monkberry appears ready to confirm. I don't know. Maybe I'm just not getting as much neo-conservative kool-aid as I used to get, causing my already tiny brain to shrink even further. Like a grape to a raisin, really. Just for the record, I didn't say the shooter(s) were republicans. One was German, so I suppose that probably makes him a republican (Germany being a republic, and all), but as for the other, I have no idea. And I'm happy to concede that not all criminals are republicans. What I said was just shorthand for the truth that republicans are the ones who push fear and stridently insist that the right to bear arms necessarily includes assault weapons that exist for no other legitimate purpose than to kill -- and kill multiple times over. Republicans are the ones who constantly block laws that would ban these kinds of weapons and keep them out of the hands of madmen and madwomen. You're not ashamed of that, are you, Bobby? You ought to be proud of how the rightwing interpretation the Second Amendment was validated by these two shootings. Give everyone a gun and let God sort it out.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

As for you, Monkberry, I have no idea what you're talking about. Being a liberal, I never had any judgment to begin with. As for being off my game, you're probably right. But always be careful what you wish for. If you've got the time, I've got the rhyme.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

CdV LA CA — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:21:31 GMT

I like the idea I read a few days ago concerning earmarks: any senator or congressman who puts earmarks in a bill should be required to vote "yes" on that bill. If they vote "no," the earmark should be stripped because they obviously changed their mind/don't want it/don't need it. Make THAT a law and we will effectively stop enabling the hypocricy that runs rampant in Washington.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Candice, Aztec, NM — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:25:49 GMT

I hate to blame the media for our woes but since there is a lot of blame to go around its time the media truly takes its hit. Yes, the economy is in shambles. Armageddon is near and the world is coming to an end. Yadayadayada. Sorry, but I am just tired of it! They say consumer confidence is the problem and then the news will only cover BAD news. What did you expect? I was delighted when I heard a major news broadcaster say he was looking for GOOD news. And what is all this talk about how Obama is doing? He's only been in office 1 1/2 months!!! It took years to cause this problem. Anyway, I know political pundits make a living being critical but how about giving our politicians some pep talks? Both Dems and Repubs needs to believe they can help solve the problem together. They won't believe that is possible if we never do. Lets just try to see the light at the end of the tunnel. If we don't, we dig our own grave.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Adam — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:34:04 GMT

I'm glad that someone finally printed this. Obama did not say he would cut pork from all bills, that was McCain.

Going line by line to make sure programs make sense is different that cutting out Pork... the Taliban-GOP and MSM should be careful they don't get more egg on their face.

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Kent Brockman, Springfield — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:35:06 GMT

If I may step out of my role as a news reporter and share my opinion with you. It is this reporter's belief that PETA and the SPCA have gone too far! Apparently a horse has spit on our President after he signed some new legislation. My fellow Americans, it does not matter if you support this bill or not, we shouldn't have horses spitting our President. Stay tuned for updates.....

First thoughts: Becoming John McCain

Brenda — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:35:06 GMT

I can't even believe we are still talking about a man who couldn't run a campaign to save his life, he is still and old man yelling at clouds only now an angry one because he lost. He should sell his seven houses to help the economy or at least some of Cindy the fake cookie makers jewery.

Keep going Obama your doing great and your numbers in gallup keep soaring.