<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx</link><description>
From NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski 





Pentagon officials are carefully deflecting questions today about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's flying habits on military aircraft.The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch has posted a series of e-mails from</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832200</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832200</guid><dc:creator>Juan in Pelosi's Vineyard</dc:creator><description>But these are new and changing times. &amp;nbsp;Evil rich people like Pelosi should give up her use of the planes and save the taxpayers some money and help the ecomomy. &amp;nbsp;If the CEOs aren't allowed jets, she shouldn't have one either.</description></item><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832206</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:37:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832206</guid><dc:creator>Clara Kansas City, MO</dc:creator><description>Well reported piece, except that the snippets appear completely out of context. &amp;nbsp;What are we talking about? &amp;nbsp;Oh that a DEMOCRAT feels entitled to something; let's lead with that story. &amp;nbsp;Whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am no fan of Pelosi; but in this Post 9/11 spending bender - she should be treated exactly as her former male counterparts would have been treated. &amp;nbsp;Moving on.</description></item><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832209</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:38:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832209</guid><dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator><description>I don't get it. If I just read the first few paragraphs of the story, it would seem the speaker is a prima donna demanding planes and perks. Only when I click on the whole story do I find out it was the Bush administration that decided the speaker should fly &amp;nbsp;military flights after 9/11 and the DOD makes the flight decisions,not the speaker. This is really shoddy journalism and something I would not expect to see on your site.</description></item><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832211</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:39:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832211</guid><dc:creator>B.O., DC</dc:creator><description>Oh no - - sure can't expose the whole truth on this. &amp;nbsp;The Queen will get mad and heads will fly.</description></item><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832213</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:41:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832213</guid><dc:creator>ace</dc:creator><description>yawn</description></item><item><title>Pentagon mum on Pelosi flights</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/11/1832174.aspx#1832215</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:42:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1832215</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Washington State</dc:creator><description>Is there something surprising here? &amp;nbsp;Republicans don't have the market on arrogance cornered.</description></item></channel></rss>