<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx</link><description>
From NBC's Ken Strickland and Elizabeth WilnerDemocrats nabbed the Virginia governorship in 2005 and one of the state's two Republican-held Senate seats in 2006, but their chances of snagging the other in 2008 will hinge to a large degree on whether</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21074</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:42:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21074</guid><dc:creator>Desmond</dc:creator><description>Senator John Warner said,"If the conflict in Iraq is labelled a civil war then it is our responsibility to leave." So, Senator, is it a civil War or not?Inquiring minds want to know.</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21194</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:22:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21194</guid><dc:creator>JWilson, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>80?!?! Good grief!!!  These people just don't know when to let go.  Has he not done enough in all of his terms? If he hasn't accomplished it by now, then guess what John, its probably not going to happen. This is what is so wrong with our system. People get elected, get in office, and then get comfortable.  we need term limits people.  To the people of VA: you mean to tell me there is no one worth of electing that you have to send this old coot back???</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21270</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:22:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21270</guid><dc:creator>Desmond</dc:creator><description>David Brooks was on "Meet the Press" Sunday a.m. He said, and I paraphrase, that the REPUBLICAN ELITES IN WASHINGTON, would be going to the White House to tell our President to solve Iraq so the next election would not be about Iraq. If you saw the broadcast, please tell me if you saw the program and interpreted the statement diffferently. One thing I did hear "REPUBLICAN ELITISTS." </description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21279</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21279</guid><dc:creator>Elisabeth,Akron,Ohio</dc:creator><description>Another statement, I would like all those Republicans in the House that were involved in the Mark Foley case to join the catholic Church and hide behind their albas. Because our President said a lesbian mopher would be a loving soul to her child and her partner would make a good parent.The lesbian parent, Mary Cheney, our V.P. 's duaghter.So  glad you cleared up for me all you evangical christian hyprocrites. Every day I try to move forward from my past, I still see my brother-in-law. I am so tired of seeing my brother-in-law in the Republican base.</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21314</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:01:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21314</guid><dc:creator>DrFrankLives, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>One thing is for certain.  Warner would win that race.</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21347</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:10:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21347</guid><dc:creator>Robert Catalano, Salem, OR</dc:creator><description>To make things clear they would have to put "old Warner" and "young Warner" on the official ballot.</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#21362</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:00:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:21362</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Purser, Royal oak,MI</dc:creator><description>I think it is time to park the old horse and leave the racing to the young race horse. </description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#499314</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:47:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:499314</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>book</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#501122</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:48:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:501122</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>dollar</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#504940</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:55:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:504940</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>huyndai</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#506329</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:24:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:506329</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>huyndai</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#507352</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:07:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:507352</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>money</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#507363</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:23:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:507363</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>money</description></item><item><title>Warner vs. Warner II?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21046.aspx#527540</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:527540</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>keyboard</description></item></channel></rss>