http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspxFrom NBC's Elizabeth WilnerFormer Sen. John Edwards (D) told NBC's Matt Lauer on TODAY this morning that he's running for president to urge people to take action to change things and make the country better. He rejected the suggestion that his lack ofen-USCommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23049Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:09:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23049Amy Robillard, Bellows Falls, Vermont, 05101My first feeling was relief when John Edwards made the official announcement. Here is someone no one can fault for experience, education, street-smarts, compassion, personal strength, integrity, and an EXCELLENT sense of humor! In fact, I'd like to see an Edwards-Obama ticket, which I believe would be unstoppable. Any lack of foreign policy experience can be ignored since the mess we have and have had in foreign relations can't get much worse. New ideas, a new plan, and CONCENTRATION ON THE PROBLEMS OF THIS NATION SHOULD BE FRONT AND CENTER. At all times except in cases of national emergencies. Our country in close to bankruptcy due to our "generous loans" and outright gifts to other nations. Our own people are going without and carrying debt loads that are unbearable becausse of this. There is no longer a feeling of hope and conviction that hard work will lift you out of your current circumsstances and let you have a chance to better yourself. The table has been shifted to where only the priviledged to begin with have the chance to improve their holdings. Even the CHANCE to get ahead is gone from most of America today. I intend to try to get involved any way I can in the Edwards campaign for purely selfish reasons. I would love to see the same sense of hope, challenge, opportunity, and downright JOY that pervaded this country when Kennedy was President. I haven't had a personal "president", someone I thought a lot of and respected, since JFK. I think John Edwards just might be that man.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23051Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:37:39 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23051Cinncinatus; Mt Vernon VACan he stop Hillary..that is the question. Can any Dem stop her machine w/ has "star power" + Bill. Will America view Edwards as a retread failure; linking him w/ the arrogant elitist of the East coast liberal wing of the Dem Party? Can he shake his corporate lawyer image and project wisdom, expierence and the ability to guide America along the rocky shoals of global debate?http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23054Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:12:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23054Geoff Gilson, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaI am an English-American humorist and broadcaster who lives in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, along with John Edwards. In response to his announcement to run, I have set up watch9.blospot.com , to keep a friendly but gently irreverent eye on his Campaign. This is the first post: "England has David Cameron and Notting Hill. Here in America, we have John Edwards and Chapel Hill - currently my home town in North Carolina. Both politicians affect a concern for the less fortunate. David talks of Compassionate Conservatism; John of Two Americas - the one rich, the other poor. John Edwards will shortly be announcing his candidacy for the Democratic Presidential Nomination in 2008. He will be doing so from the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans, the area worst affected by Hurricane Katrina. He tells all and sundry that this is reflective of his genuine concern for the poor in society. However, what might be more reflective is where he has situated his new Campaign Headquarters: a suburban village in Chapel Hill, which I have lovingly christened the Upper Ninth. As in the houses you can buy there reach into the Upper $900K's; or the average income is in the Upper Ninth percentile of all Americans... The HQ itself occupies the upper floor of what can only be described as a luxurious faux rendition of the sort of Mediterranean villa you might find in the smarter parts of Palm Beach, Florida. The moral, I guess, is: beware politicians who affect concern for an issue, but then have a lifestyle that belies that affected concern. We have an abundance of that in Chapel Hill, where the 'progressives' tend to be what we call Merlot Democrats. There used to be an equivalent in England - the Glenda Jackson, Hampstead set of Champagne Socialists. Have they been overtaken by the Cameron, Notting Hill set of Beaujolais Tories?"http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23055Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:17:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23055Jonny B Bow, NHBill's philandering may stop Hillaryhttp://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23056Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:18:50 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23056Valerie LambrosAt first, I thought it was too early to begin really thinking about the presidential elections of 2008. But now that I think again, it makes perfect sense. The reason Democrats were so successful in the November elections wasn't just because the Republicans seemed to need no help in tripping all over themselves, it was because the Democratic party started early and maintained its enthusiasm. I am delighted John Edwards has decided to run for the presidency. He is a direct and straightforward man who looks you square in the face when he talks with you and shakes your hand with warmth. For someone who has done well for himself in his life, he's never forgotten where he came from and it shows in his words and in his deeds. He is unmistakably human as is his wife (a positively adorable lady) and his experience and determination is only superseded by his drive to help make things better for all of us. I recently attended an event at which George Stephanopolous interviewed and talked politics with the long-serving and now-retired Sen. Paul Sarbanes and his son, the recently-elected John Sarbanes. The younger Sarbanes related a story that perfectly captures the growing gap between the American Dream and ordinary Americans efforts to grasp it. He said it was at a campaign stop that an early middle-aged woman approached him and said, "I have three children who will soon want to go to college, but I don't think I can afford to send them. My husband and I have always worked three jobs between us, we've saved, we did everything right - everything we were supposed to do and we still can't afford it. What did I do wrong?" The answer is that there isn't anything she did wrong - the system itself is broken. When the concept of going to college seems as unattainable for the average, hard-working American public as climbing Everest, the system is what's wrong. This is what I believe John Edwards sees when he talks of the two Americas. The American Dream isn't just for the wealthy. It's for all Americans and it's time we made that a reality again.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23059Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:34:43 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23059Mike F, Irvine, CABelieve it or not folks, America will not put a woman, a muslim or a black in office yet. Nothing about prejudice, and yes I will claim the status of a prophet here and if I'm wrong you can hang me with Saddam... LOL http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23060Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:47:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23060Tyrone Ellington; Dallas TXHere goes nothing folks- I am a member of the GOP; voted that way my whole life. I beleive in less government; more in my bank account and working for a living in order to support my family. I feel that America should not become a European social state; which, in my opinion and observation; attempt to coddle and cradle one from birth to death with all sorts of enabling government sponsored programs while taxing one to death. With that said; let me continue- I do not buy the whole cloth as espoused by the RNC nor the Bush administarion. I may have believed in Iraq in 2003 but I see where the Bush group went off the map and has lost their way in the muddled politics of known as the Mid East. As a Republican- here is what I want to see in this country: a negotiated solution to Iraq that benefits us w/o setting up a terror based government in the country; more global dialouge in regards to Latin America ( Cuba, Venezuala, Mexico); Far East, Africa and the Mid East; a policy to get guns out of the hands of teenagers and felons w/o touching the Second Admendment; abortion- I am opposed but leave what is on the book alone, but give the parents of underage women some rights; same sex unions- state matters, not a federal issue, not the centerpiece of any major policy push; fix FEMA and the mutlitude of border security forces under DHS; a workable, smart plan to clean out the illegals in this country ( enforce the written laws), make companies who knowingly employ illegals pay; set up a guest worker program; spend $$$$$ to fix the waste of Katrina, Rita and wildfires areas; no more earmarks on any legislation; depose the crooked, ill begotten despots who rule in Congress and the Executive Branch; safe schools, using federal money; modify both the Patriot Act and No Child Left Behind but do not discard these tools; more training and funding for teachers, EMT, law enforcement; fire fighters; medical services; counselors; trim all the obsolete programs and agencies from the federal budget; more research for Alzheimers; lukemia; ALS, cancers of all sorts; less for cloning animals. That is but the beginning. I amy appear more moderate than the usual GOP right side; so be it. Now- whom will I select in 2008? I really do not know. I will read, listen and pick who I feel is best suited for the job! Republican- yes; party lackey, mindless drone- no. 100% supporter of GW Bush- heck no. Believer that Dems are the answer- heck no. Stuck in the middle w/ you!!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23061Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:50:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23061James BarberI like John Edwards, and I listened to his stump speech back in '04 a number of times. But I don't remember that he offered many specific solutions for the "Two Americas" problem that he cites. I suspect that if he outlines what actually needs to be done to support the middle class and poor people, however, he'd lose the election. Such things include imposing reasonable limits on so-called "free trade," strengthening union rights, and toughening laws on hiring of illegal aliens. It's just sad but true that, with no evidence except outdated economic theory to support it, people have been sold by Republicans on the benefits of "free trade" and vote accordingly. On the other hand, if former Sen. Edwards remains mum about what he's really going to do, that seems likely to result in defeat again too. So what's he to do? Well, I think he has to take a chance and lay it all out. But he's got his work cut out for him in trying to educate Americans about what happened to all the good jobs they once had. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23063Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:53:58 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23063Paul L., Randallstown, MarylandGREAT NEWS!!! John should choose Hillary as a Vice Presidential running mate, maybe with Obama for Secretary of State...http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23064Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:56:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23064Bobbie, Houston, TXAlthough I find Edwards quite interesting and charming, he is in a crowded field of perhaps more competitive candidates that promises to be a big challenge for anyone seeking a go at the white house.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23066Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:00:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23066Deborah Johnson, Ft Lauderdale, FLI am very happy to have John Edwards running for president. My circle of friends and I, are huge democratic supporters. He has my vote and many of my friends. Now, if only Barack Obama becomes his running mate vice president, we will have the "Dream Team" America has been waiting for and needs so badly. Today when I watched the news and heard about his announcement for presidency, I smiled and felt hope again. Stay in the race John Edwards, and fight to win! http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23068Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:06:26 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23068Mary Dill, San Antonio, TexasMy first introduction to John Edwards was in the last campaign. My thoughts during that entire ordeal were - "Why isn't John Edwards running for President instead of John Kerry? Can no one in the Democratic party see that the people need a candidate they can identify with and who can connect with them?" John Kerry and Hillary Clinton are equated wealthy elitists who have no real connection to working class people. They are too far removed from people who struggle every day to put food on the table - pay bills and have nothing left over for savings - live without health care because they can't afford it. John Edwards may not now live in this world, but he still sees and understands it, I believe. I'm an independent and have always strongly resisted supporting candidates from the two majority parties, but America needs a change desperately and I think John Edwards is our best chance at that change. I intend to fully support him.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23069Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:07:11 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23069JesseJames, Northwest, NAJohn Edwards is a criminally complicit/compromised fraud, involved in the same scamming, pillaging and destruction of the U.S. as his Republican/Bush administration counterparts. He is not trustworthy. Voting for him is no different than voting for the opposing Republican. Do not vote Republican, and do not vote Edwards.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23070Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:07:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23070George L. Wands Erie, PA.The Former Senator is dead in the water, so to speak. Once Maureen Dowd has tagged you as the "BRECK GIRL" it's all over.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23071Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:07:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23071Wilbur Streater Jr Huntersville NCI think that John Edwards should pay his taxes that he owes and pay off his bills that are not paid from the last time that he ran, how can he tell people what he beleives in until he does these things. He would be a very bad choice for the Highest office.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23072Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:09:08 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23072Elisabeth S., Dunedin, FLEdwards-Obama!! Oh, Mama...what a team. This gives us languishing Dems a new lease on life - perhaps!! Always liked Edwards. Go Dream Team...http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23075Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23075Howie Olshan Ft. Lauderdale FlThank God this country still has a way out of the mess we are in ,and that way is John Edwards and Barak Obama . New young blood and new ideas. The combination of these two on the Democratic ticket is a win win situation . It could never be worse than what we have now,nomatter who was in office,and only cared about the wealthy. There is no experience and schooling better than hands on ,which is much better than we have now.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23076Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23076Lisa Buch, St. Petersburg, FLGo John Edwards! You were the better half of the Kerry/Edwards team in my opinion back in 2004. It is hard to believe we need to get a Democrat back in office to have some fiscal responsibility in the white house again. I will vote for you. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23081Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:25:21 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23081Steve Turner Cedar Falls IowaGeoff. Oh yeah? We're building Tom Vilsack a Log Cabin AND a Sod Dugout, just outside of Sioux Center. With a split-rail fence and NO electricity. We call it the Zero-K neighborhood. We call the style NeoPaleolithic, the newest thing in Iowa.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23083Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:29:12 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23083J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NYJohn Edwards is as honorable a man as there is on the political front today. He devoted his professional life to ensuring that working families didn't get stiffed by insurance companies or employers, and he knows what it's like to come from a hard working blue collar background. Better to have someone like that, as opposed to the current "silver foot in mouth" jerk who currently occupies the white house. We could do, have done much worse for representation at the executive level than John Edwards. Good luck to you sir. You aren't my first choice but if you get the nomination you will get my vote.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23084Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:29:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23084Robert Catalano, Salem, ORJohn Edwards is a good candidate; can he win? One of the worst things the Republicans have fostered has been tort reform and lowering the funding for the poor to fight civil and criminal cases. I am not a lawyer and I know plenty of lawyer jokes, however, I feel if the saying, "do the crime, do the time" is accurate for criminal trials, corporations and organizations should be punished severely for malfeasance. The problem is these corporations have the politicians and the misinformed public on their side when it comes to tort reform, and the poor are left at the mercy of judicial benevolence and trial lawyers like John Edwards to stand up for them. Over the past twenty years, since the Raegan era began, access to our legal system has been limited, many unions have been busted, our Constitutional rights abridged, and our tax dollars spent (on war, tax cuts and reform, and no-bid contracts) to support those who already have more money than they will ever spend. I know conservatives believe only the good, hard-working, native-born Americans deserve the fruits of the American Dream, but, what isn't told are the people who have done evrything right and still have nothing to show for it. Those are the people who I want our leaders to stand up for. If John Edwards can say there are two Americas and actually come up with some substantive ideas to eradicate the problem, he has my vote. Personally, I am tired of self-serving, fundamentalist pandering, moral hypocritical politicians running this country. Problem is, we still vote for them. Could this mean that we believe in equality until we are promised it is only right for ourselves, and everone else be damned? I am beginning to wonder.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23085Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:29:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23085Cinncinatus; Mt Vernon VAFolks- before we put our feet in our throats- does Edwards owe from 2004? Does he have monies squandered, hidden away? Before he preaches to the masses, let him come clean before us all with 2004 campaign money issues. Show us before trying to lead us. Is your cloak as white as snow; or are the stains hidden from view? Oh speak to us Mr Edwards...http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23088Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:34:05 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23088Diana Hardy, Marble Falls, TexasJohn Edwards just might be what this country needs! He bring quite a bit of freshness to our stale political arena. I do not believe the American people will put a woman nor a minority in office. But, a lot of people will cross-over party lines for Edwards!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23091Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:46:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23091J Merle Stanley, Westchester, NYTO TYRONE ELLINGTON of DALLAS TX; I have to laugh at your post, which, I guess is supposed to describe the kind of platform and Presidential Candidate you want in 2008. You talk about "coddling" people with "entitlements from cradle to grave," and paying for it by taxing others to death. (That whole "schpeel" is part of the Rush Limbaugh "mantra' by the way, which tells me exactly where you're coming from.) Interestingly enough, you mention NOTHING about CORPORATE ENTITLEMENTS that cost the taxpayers of this country BILLIONS more annually, than the $20.00 worth of weekly food assistance that a single working mother of two might get if she's lucky. All one needs to do is look at Enron, World-Com, and Tyco if you want to know where that money ends up. I'm not going to go on too long here because the "instructions" say not to attack the comments of others. So I won't attack you. But, I would ask respectfully that you not distort the facts with CANTservative rhetoric. Your arrogant, eliteist, southern republiCANTS certainly have not "gotten it done" these last few years. If you think they have, take a good long look at the national crime statistics just since Bush took office. GO DEMOCRATS! Take the country BACK, and BRING IT HOME IN '08'!!!!!!!!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23092Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:50:03 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23092Mark KleinUnless Al Gore gets in the race, which seems increasingly unlikely, John Edwards is my candidate. Like others who have posted here, I think an Edwards-Obama ticket would be ideal. Edwards is the one hope this country has to protect and rebuild the middle class. He understands that the way to do that is to unfetter the union movement. While pundits and the right wing will scoff and ridicule him for openly aligning with Labor, the fact is that the vast majority of American workers would join a union if they were allowed to do so. I thank Mr. Edwards for his courage in openly embracing unions. I hope and expect that Labor will return the favor. Finally, for those who assume that Senator Clinton is the inevitable nominee, I suggest that money and name identification isn't enough. A candidate has to excite passion. Triangulation will just not get it done this time. I believe voters want to look to the future, not the past. She is a great Senator. I hope she stays in the Senate for many years; in fact, she would be a great partner for the Edwards-Obama administration as Senate ajority Leader .http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23093Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:50:06 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23093mikeeg,abdn,wai see the swift boaters are after edwards already that just means they fear him so the lieing smears start .http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23094Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:52:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23094Nestor Grullon, Danvers, MAJohn Edwards, I hope you could count with Latino Vote that it is growing this country. I Hope I could see you win the next election. You are a good man who really care about the poor people of this country.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23095Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:08:10 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23095SamThis is a dream come true.Alas,we have real guy to look up to in the next elections. Bravo John.Get the nomination and you get my vote,simple.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23097Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:12:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23097Carolynn Trog, Waxahachie, TexasI think that John Edwards is the man we need to help run a great nation, but I also think that the people need proof that he is going to do all the things he says he will do.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23101Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:24:18 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23101Diz Catlettsburg, kyAlthough it may still be 2006, candidates such as John Edward's need 2 be outfront of the Hillary machine. This is probably the reason for announcing so early. Once the Hillary machine start's up, it's going 2 be hard 2 stop. Now that the American Voter has awakened from their ( Koolaid Induced Coma) I don't think it's Remotely possible 4 Hillary 2 be Elected President. Edward's/ Obama may be the Ticket 4 the Democrat's. With that being said, a New Direction is needed 4 our beloved USA. New faces, new idea's ( Not the same old Father know's best) direction. I don't know if Edward's can capture people,( like Obama can), but Both of them together, sure seem's very Appealing. The Democratic primaries will be very interesting 2 say the leasthttp://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23102Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:24:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23102Kathy Johnson Galloway, Ohio I really believe this is the BEST NEWS I have heard in years ! John Edwards running for President,this is GREAT and of all days to miss "THE TODAY SHOW".. I will find a replay on the internet.All I can say is: "GOD BLESS AMERICA, because there certainly is two AMERICA'S. Rich and Poor! Everyone should have affordable health insurance and I feel all things are possible with the right person in office. I am a Democrat and proud of it, my dad was always a hard worker and didn't make the best of money, but he sure provided for his family. I always say we had what we needed, not everything we wanted but we had love which doesn't cost a dime. I am a true believer that John Edwards can and will make a difference for all the people, poor, homeless, jobs,the whole economy will be much brighter. Mr. Edwards you definitely have 2 votes and I promise you many more from friends and family. This is the way it should have been the last time, you number #1 on the ticket.It will be GREAT in 2008 when JOHN EDWARDS is president of the UNITED STATES!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23104Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:29:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23104Pat AdlerTen years ago I attended my sons graduation. As the valedictorian gave her speech I was dumbfounded as she spoke of the same heroes that were used at my graduation some 25 years earlier. When I graduated John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Neil Armstrong were still relevent to our times. It is a sad state that our country has not produced any great leaders that our young people can look up to since 1970. I see in John Edwards and Barack Obama a return to great visionary leadership for the common people of this great country. I too felt that the wrong man was leading the ticket for the democrats in 04, and have been hoping ever since that Senator Edwards would once again seek his parties nomination. Be assured that I will be working non-stop for the next two years to do everything possible to return dignaty and leadership to the white house.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23105Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:34:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23105Steve, Fort Wayne, INA word about Edwards' electability, compared to Clinton and Obama. Edwards has always been leading the polls in Iowa, where people know Edwards personally and connected with him during the 2004 campaign. In October, he had a big lead, which has since becoming only a marginal lead, thanks to all the attention being paid to Clinton and Obama. But the interesting thing here is not that Edwards lead has shrunk, but that Clinton hasn't gained any ground at all. The race in Iowa is now a two-man race between Edwards and Obama, and seems likely to stay that way, given Clinton's cold and aloof demeanor, which may play well in New England but isn't going to work anywhere else, no matter how much money she spends. As for Obama, he is a real challenge. But if Edwards--who is brilliant on policy and very substantive, if you're willing to dig a little beyond the stump speech--is perceived to have a problem with depth, Obama has problems with depth up to his ears. He hasn't laid out a specific plan for anything. He mainly just talks about hope and optimism, and that's fine, but he'll need to change that if he wants to remain a serious challenger to someone as emininently qualified as Senator Edwards.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23106Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:37:40 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23106Jeanne VanMeter Fayetteville, NCLet's not forget that while John Edwards may live in an expensive area, have offices in "swanky" buildings, he grew up in a much more modest situation in Robbins, NC with a father who was a mill worker. He worked his way from there to where he is now. Nothing was ever handed to him, and that was in no way easy to do. He is an extremely intelligent, successful, motivated man, who knows it is possible to rise above, and will serve as a wonderful motivation and role model to not only the youth of today, but to anyone with an inkling of a dream. He signifies the American Dream. With all this country has been through in the past several years, we definitely need a leader who is tuned into what we all know is now wrong with our country, who knows how to overcome obstacles with a relentless passion, who genuinely knows failure is not an option, and who will motivate us all to bring America back to what it was and will be again. He is absolutely correct in his statement that government and politicians will not be able to repair our current state alone. It will take a strong leader, who knows what's going on in all levels of America, both inside and outside our borders to lead all of us to fix our country together. After all, that is the job of the president...to lead the country in the direction that it should go, to make us all strong and a part of the building of our country, not to take over and make us just bystanders watching it all fall apart, as we have been at the hands of current leaders who seem to have forgotten that the citizens exist, much less asking for any input, or listening when input is given. I listened carefully to what John Edwards had to say this morning. I was very motivated by the fact that I could tell he had paid attention. He knows exactly what the problems are. He knows and has lived in all economic levels. He wants all of the citizens of America to come together to work to become a strong, proud, respectable nation, and as he put it this morning "To regain our status as the stabilizing force of the world". I realized when he said this, that it is absolutely true. If America loses it's footing, and continues in the downward spiral I have had to sit back and witness in the past few years, what will become of us and the rest of the world? I look forward to having John Edwards as our President. He has plans, ideas, a strong will to succeed, and he's ready to go to work. I encourage everyone to help John become our new leader. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23107Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:39:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23107Lee in CAAt least with Edwards the GOP will have to field some real choices, and not just GOP lickspittles like (I hate to say this, I really do) John McCain. I'm sorry the BushCo machine has corrupted John, but it has, and NOTHING with the stain of BushCo should EVER be in Washington DC, EVER again. (I laugh at anyone who says he lacks foreign policy experience - it's only been in the last couple years Bush could find Iraq or Afgahnistan on a map.)http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23109Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:43:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23109al tinoly, north barrington, illinoisdubya will hand the white house to the dems ( no matter who is nominated ) as he continues to seek his "victory". therefore it is important that the voters in every primary forget the usual beauty contest mentality and gravitate towards the best and brightest candidate. who will lead this great country out of the wilderness? oh mama, it's obama!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23110Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:43:35 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23110larry olathe ksOH BOY, ANOTHER JIMMY CARTER YEP THAT'S WHAT WE NEED.HIP HIP HOORAY.WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER SOFT/WHINEY/FEEL GOOD PRESIDENT.FIND SOMEONE TOUGH AND WILLING TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT NOT WHAT MAKES PEOPLE FEEL GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!! http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23114Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:48:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23114R.M. ClarkI too will do everything I can to get this wonderful man elected...It is time. We need a healer now. Strange, that he comes along just when we need someone like him to bring our country back from the abyss of the last eight years. He will be a true,honest, moral and experienced leader... with many years of experience as a Senator. In addition, he is very intelligent; one Scmaaaart cookie.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23115Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:52:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23115Wanda, St. Lous, MoWow. We Dems finally have a canidate we can get behind. I truly believe if Mr Edwards can get the nomination he will take the White House. Go John Go.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23116Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:55:09 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23116James Wanjohi, Victoria, British ColumbiaIn Canada we are all excited to hear that John Edwards has declared to vie for the White House. Were Canadians allowed to vote in USA John would surely win hands down. This man connects with common folks. He lost his son and moved on just like the rest of us. He has a young family, his wife looks warm and motherly, and john knew poverty in his youth. This man elicits deep connectivity just like the way the world felt when JF Kennedy run for presidency. Go for it all the way to the White House. John is going to make history in America and the whole world. Pick MR Barrack Obama as your running mate and all Afro/Latino votes will all be yours.America is ready for a Black VP.Make it happen. Canada supports Edwards/Obama Ticket 2008 God Bless America. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23117Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:00:21 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23117Lucille CoxI am pleased that John Edwards is running for President in 2008. He has my vote!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23119Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:01:30 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23119Michelle T., Williamstown, NJYeah!!!!!!!! Finally a canidate who cares!!!!!! You have my support and vote!!!!!! Will be glad to get this man in the White House!!!! The next "healer"!!!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23120Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:02:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23120Jamie, Elmwood Park, ILBeing from Illinois, I am a huge supporter of Obama, but an Edwards/Obama ticket would certainly put a smile on my face. Neither was born with a silver spoon; both are intelligent, hard working and speak of America with hope - and I'd certainly prefer to live my life with hope and not the "fear" that has been the mantra of the current administration. It is also that hope that makes me believe that Americans CAN elect Obama. Edwards/Obama or Obama/Edwards, either way, American wins. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23125Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:13:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23125James Wanjohi, Victoria, British ColumbiaIn Canada we are all excited to hear that John Edwards has declared to vie for the White House. Were Canadians allowed to vote in USA John would surely win hands down. This man connects with common folks. He lost his son and moved on just like the rest of us. He has a young family, his wife looks warm and motherly, and john knew poverty in his youth. This man elicits deep connectivity just like the way the world felt when JF Kennedy run for presidency. Go for it all the way to the White House. John is going to make history in America and the whole world. Pick MR Barrack Obama as your running mate and all Afro/Latino votes will all be yours.America is ready for a Black VP.Make it happen. Canada supports Edwards/Obama Ticket 2008 God Bless America. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23130Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:22:09 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23130Montagard Forugrad; Dover, DEMy fellow Americans: As I read all these posts by those of you , like me, not elected to office, I wonder why we allow ourselves to bash and destroy others on these blogs? Each is allowed to opinion, position and beleif, but some on here acts as demagouges whose opinions are expert and all other minions and morons. What gives any American the right to destroy others here on these websites, acting as thouogh you are the best and brightests and all others are kindergarten dropouts? I see a disturbing vein of hate and slander here in this cyberroom and it truly disturbs me. I ponder to wonder how many of you bloggers are filled with vitrol, venom and hate and would, if pushed move words to acts of violence against someone who does not tilt in the direction of your self styled weather vane of political acumen. Gladly, for most of us, many of those who write here are too enabled by their own fears to actually act out anything, such as spoeaking out in a public forum or even running for some public office. Still, as an American, I am appalled at the many on here who continue to degrade and demoralize others by the blogged word. There will never be a poltical time in this country in which all spectrums of the walks of life will fully agree. But, to malign and slander with so little accountability and responsibility..this reminds of me of Goebbels and his Nazi progoganda machine, that was protected by the Furher. Only here, hateful bloggers who demean and blast others for opinions not to thier liking hide behind keyboard and screen, like a bully who hides behind thier mother's skirt, Eddie Haskell- like, taunting while trying to screen the returns.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23136Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:27:44 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23136Joe, New York, NYJohn Edwards had his chance in 2004 and couldn't carry a single southern state which he promised to do. He couldn't even win his home state of North Carolina losing it to Bush with over 60% of the state. If he would HAVE staied a senator from North Carolina then maybe he would have had a chance in 2008, but he did not. My choice for 2008 would be Senator Hillary Clinton from New York. She has done so much for new York and she would continue to do that as President. She is the only candidate in this race who can raise money the GOP can only wish of. She can also win purple states like West Virgina, OHio, Iowa, New Mexico, and Colorado. Visit votehillary.org http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23137Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:28:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23137Jay Raleigh NCMy question is this, what did John Edwards do for North Carolina while he was our representative. We all have a story, his is not better or worse than anyone else's. I'm from NC and wouldn't vote for him if he was my neighbor. It's easy to get caught up in what the "sense" of the man may be, we need a strong, proven leader to get us out of this hole. I'm sure this is a good guy, but has proven nothing in the leadership/law making role. He made his money on a few lawsuits that although tragic, had nothing to do with policy that will change the direction of this country. Don't be fooled by the "looks", check out the record, it's public, it's online, and it's not impressive. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23138Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:30:14 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23138J. Round, Dallas, TexasI am happy to see a neutral candidate. A candidate that can offer a pleasant transition from our current breakdown. I hope that the Dems can mend our ravaged reputation throughout the world... one that Bush ripped apart selfishly for his own gain (like a child with candy). Edwards and Obama '08! http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23146Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:38:57 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23146Isabelle LevinsonEdwards, Yes! Because he is the candidate who can win. Winning for the Dems is what counts now. If a Republican is elected all the gains we made in 2006 will be in vain. The Democrats must wake up and realize that trying to prove how PC we are by nominating a woman or minority candidate is not the way to go. We have to do more than attract the Party Faithful--they would vote for anyone the Democrats nominate. We need a candidate that can pull in Independents, disenchanted Republicans, and rouse the apathetic to get up an vote. Edwards has it all going for him: First, the proper progressive adgenda, and that's what really counts. But--and this is what really wins elections whether we like it or not--he is a white male, from the South, handsome, articulate, and oozing charisma from every pore. That's what it will take to win in 2008. He must not make the mistake of choosing Obama or Hillary as running mates. There is still too much prejudice in this country to take the chance that a woman or minority could kill the ticket. He needs a strong, respected, non-controversial Democrat to balance the ticket--someone as likeable as himself. The Republicans are not going to sit back. They will nominate the strongest candidate they can find--a McCain or Guiliani. Neither Hillary or Obama could beat those guys. Only someone like Edwards can do it. Let's get with it and support a winner who can inspire and get this country back in balance and restroe our democracy.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23164Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:51:32 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23164K. D. SaulLet's hope that this time people will use their heads and vote for the most intelligent, charismatic candidate. I could never understand how Kerry jumped into the lead in 2004. In John Edwards, we have a candidate who can speak without reading notes or speeches, figure things out for himself without having to depend on aides or outside consultants, and for those who insist on making the run for the presidency a popularity contest - he has the charisma to attract a large number of people. Go Edwards, and don't be mislead into thinking that you need Obama or Clinton as your vp choice to win. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23168Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23168Doris Columbus INGo John!!! What a relief to know someone really cares about AMERICA!!!!!!!! and truly wants change and improvement for this country that has been worn down by the rich in political control. Thank you John for standing tall!!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23170Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:01:19 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23170Jeanne Van Meter Fayetteville, NCAl, You are correct. Certainly noone should ever be elected president based on good looks. Nor should their good looks be held against them. Many people thought JFK was a very handsome man...and a great President.[as well as many others] I would never consider that a reason to elect anyone to any position and I give my fellow Americans the same credit. By the way, Mr. Obama is also a nice looking man, should he not be considered? Larry, There is a vast difference between John Edwards and Jimmy Carter. John is by no means soft, whiney, or out just to make you feel good.[although you are certainly entitled to your own opinion] Neither is he a peanut farmer who left the farm just long enough to be President. I would never have voted for Jimmy Carter, although he is a good man/humanitarian, because he does not possess the abilities John Edwards has. John has all the qualities of a great leader, when a leader is what we need, and the smarts to make it all happen.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23175Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:10:57 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23175Coy Reese, Shady Spring, West VirginiaWell, John Edwards is correct about one thing, decades of foreign policy experience have apparently not assisted the Bush regime from the massive military blunder known as the War in Iraq. The usual GOP operatives will begin immediately to demonize Edwards, portray him as a "traitor" and the rest of the hatemongering that failed so miserably November 7, 2006. The last thing America needs is remnants of this miserable "administration" nor clones (Sen. Mc Cain) of it either....in 2009. I wish Senator Edwards the best of luck, and fortunately he knows exactly what a viper's nest of hate he has entered, having endured that despicable behavior in 2004.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23180Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:16:53 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23180Robert Catalano, Salem, ORLarry, go back to studying the Bible and thinking Charles Darwin is the devil. Kansas, aside, we've had a guy who stood up and made tough chices. The problem is, all the choices were wrong. Being strong doesn't mean someone who is unyielding and resolute. Strong means being able to make tough choices, accepting responsibility for those choices, not blaming someone else for mistakes and being able to admit when mistakes were made. We haven't had a President like that since Franklin Roosevelt. Therein lays the problem: he once said, "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." Now we have a President who wants us to fear everyone and everthing which is not in agreement with him. Sorry, that's not strength. It's more like being tough to mask his insecurity and inadequacies. When people stop being afraid, inconsequential men like George Bush will not be able to lead the greatest nation on earth. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23197Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:38:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23197Lee in CAHey larry - how's that banning of evolution thing going? (And when did you ever hear Jimmy Carter "whine"? Did he call you one night?)http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23223Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:04:45 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23223CSLarry: the last time a president did something he believed was "the right thing to do," we sent troops into Iraq. Its time we get an honest, upfront president who's more concerned about poor and struggling Americans than his own "legacy." I too believe an Edwards-Obama ticket would be terrific because it would bring someone into the office who isn't there just for his own glory and because it would give Obama the experience he needs so badly to become president himself. I believe both men would be wonderful in the office, but Obama needs some more concrete plans and ideas first.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23279Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:24:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23279Grace, Alexandria, VAI will vote for John Edwards and he is very nice normal guy, except his good looks. I like his story of son who died by accident years ago. I too believe an Edwars-Obama ticket would be great.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23282Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:28:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23282DLamb, Tampa, FLI've been a life-long conservative, but on more than one occasion have voted for liberal candidates whose ideas, background, and political resume have made them the best choice in my estimation. This is certainly the case with John Edwards. In fact, I've yet to see any Democratic candidate who would cause such a significant crossover of Republicans as Edwards. As for tagging Obama as the VP, it would likely make that "Dream Team" ticket win by the largest margin ever - unless, of course, the Republicans come up with an even better duo. Frankly, given the baggage virtually all GOP possibilities carry, I think that's highly unlikely. Unless something changes drastically in the race, Edwards and ? will get my vote in a little less than two years.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23299Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:49:58 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23299Deborah Johnson, Ft Lauderdale, FLThank you Montagard Forugrad; Dover, DE. You wrote exactly what I have been thinking reading some of these blogs. Why do we need a "bully" in the White House? The tone of some of the writers, and a very small percentage, is one of hate and the unwillingness to join together with all people, even when we agree to disagree, and make the United States and the largest percentage of people who live here, happy again.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23300Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:50:55 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23300Chad S, Dallas, TexasLet's make something perfectly clear. Edwards didn't lose NC in '04. Kerry did. Edwards won the primary even after he dropped out of the race. Make no mistake - Edwards appeals to the left and the middle. He will win if given the chance.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23311Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:02:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23311Marcia Black Easley, South CarolinaI am thrilled! John Edwards is the candidate that I voted for in the Democratic primary in '04. This is a man that has vision and that I sincerely believe will do his very best to make decisions that is in the best interest of our country. That is what this country is so hungary for. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23314Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:07:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23314Dave G, Chandler AZ A note on an Edwards / Obama ticket, I don't see it happening. I think it would be redundant. Both Edwards and Obama project a "can-do" optimism, and seem to talk about a less partisan state of politics. I think they have similar respective strengths, and similar weaknesses (the experience question). Unlike Kerry/Edwards where Edwards was supposed to bring the charisma and empathy, both Obama and Edwards have charisma to burn. It will ultimately turn on a question of who is more likely to get elected, and who is able to withstand the republican negative campaign onslaught. In that regard, Edwards has a campaign experience edge over Obama. Anyone who spent 3 months defending John Kerry has got to be wiser for the experience.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23362Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:26:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23362Larry Joens, Rock Island, Il.I have just watched a film titled "AMERICA, FREEDOM to FACISM" and highly recommend everyone to have a look. It is not a conspiracy documentary. I was very surprised to learn that our Federal Reserve is privately owned by the fat cats. If John Edwards can restore the Federal Reserve back to the people, he has my vote. The National debt will disappear along with taxes. John Edwards and Obama would be a dream team!! http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23368Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:50:40 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23368Jeanne VanMeter Fayetteville, NCHi Joe from N.Y., When it comes to electing a President, and we need a really good one at this point in time, I don't think I'll consider who can raise the most money in my decision. About Edwards losing to Bush in the last election, I say we take another vote...right now, today. I don't think you would get the same result. Also remember, Edwards doesn't have Kerry in his way this time. That's surely what spoiled it for most of his NC voters last time.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23385Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:44:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23385MaryBeth Voelkel, Isleton, CaliforniaI started to dread the upcoming onslaught of career politicians that would be vying for the Democratic nomination. As a bit of profile, I was a life-long Republican that had had enough of the elitist attitude and sneaky ways of the Republican party from negative campaigning, campaign slurring, etc. during the Kennedy, Nixon, Bush eras. Therefore, during Bill Clinton's 2nd term, I made up my mind to change my party affiliation to the Democratic side. I was very excited when John Edwards joined the primary race! How novel - a fresh face with fresh ideas to turn things around and make Amercia strong and accountable once again. I regretted that the DNC nominated John Kerry, but saw a bit of hope with John Edwards as his running mate. Alas, no one was fooled by the Kerry/Edwards ticket and the loss was felt all across the nation. I am so excited that John Edwards has chosen to run again! Since when was "experience" the criteria for running? I have always felt Mr. Edwards roots will be a reminder of the goals he has for this country. He brings vision and has our country's best interests at heart. You GO John Edwards! Where can I sign up to help get you elected???http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23389Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:49:29 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23389TSH, Angels Camp, CAI want to see the next leader of this great nation be someone who will restore this country to what it once was. A leader who will bring back the jobs that have been lost to outsourcing to other countries. A leader who will bring the factories back to AMERICA. I am sick of so many items made in china. A leader who will work to make it so many Americans can afford to live and not just scrape by because they decide to go without the perscriptions or eating or some other necessity. Bring OUR TROOPS HOME. We can not save the world or suppport the world or even police the world. Get all illegals out of America. If they can not come into this country the legal way they do not belong here. Make the criminals pay for their crimes. There is a lot to be done to bring this country back to where we should be and to fix the disaster that we have now. Is John the right man?? We shall see. Show us your plans. Pay your debts like an honest hard working American should. We need a leader who will be strong as well as compasionate. for all AMERICANS FIRST and then the rest of the world. Get America out of debt. Stop supporting other countries and making their leaders rich. As the saying goes clean up your own backyard before you try to tell others how to clean theirs. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23406Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:49:42 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23406Peter, Pittsburgh, PALarry, you screamed out, "FIND SOMEONE TOUGH AND WILLING TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT NOT WHAT MAKES PEOPLE FEEL GOOD!" Well, I think everything Bush has done is wrong and it makes me sick and angry to even think about it. That he dropped the search for bin Laden to go after Saddam was wrong. That he used lies to justify the invasion of Iraq was wrong. That he botched the occupation is wrong. That he didn't provide the best armor to protect our troops from the very start is wrong. That he is ignoring global warming is wrong. That he is ignoring the billions of dollars that are unaccounted for in the reconstruction of Iraq is wrong. That he is ignoring the billions of dollars that are unaccounted for in the reconstruction of New Orleans is wrong. That he allowed the budget deficit to explode is wrong. That he ignored the contributions to 9/11 by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is wrong. That he set up the gulag at Gitmo is wrong. That he conducts wiretaps without consulting the courts is wrong (especially since he can consult after the fact). His building of a costly and disfunctional antimissile system is wrong. His desire to privatize social security is wrong. I could go on, but you get the idea. I feel insecure, angry, frustrated, abused, sick, and outraged. Now, about his being tough. Aren't you confusing toughness with pigheadedness? If you voted for Bush, you didn't get what you wanted.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23407Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:50:29 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23407Kathie HansenWhy do you have a bunch of babies as your anchors??? Like I care what they think about politics??http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23431Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:00:18 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23431JIrby, Colorado Springs, CoIf I knew voting for Hillary would get us a Bill Clinton type presidency, I would go for Hillary. That kind of two for one deal doesn't happen often. Imagine if we could have Bill in there for eight more years! The best prez since JFK. And not hampered by a Republican led congress continuously starting fires for them to put out instead of running the country. A team like that could just about shovel up the mess Bush has made all over the planet. I would vote for Edwards over any Republican now on the radar screen, but I'm not sure this board today reflects much red state sentiment, or even a majority of blue state sentiment. He needs to go way further into what he has planned for this country and what he's about. The fact that so many respondants were pleasently surprised to learn he was running makes me wonder how much you know about him except his initial curb appeal. He could be part of the Democrats' driving genius for losing elections. I feel if there's a way possible to lose to Giuliani or McCain, the Dems will find it. What have we got going to counter the Republicans formidable dirty tricks department? The people who own America, whom Larry Joens, above, refers to as "fat cats", could suprise us with their capicity and willingness to explore the depths of human tawdriness, as was demonstrated in 2002.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23445Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:46:43 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23445Val McDowellNow we have the big three and I think the democrats can be proud that we have three leaders who bring different qualities and stregnths that can benefit the country, and prove valuable in the campaign. I am most excited that Edwards has returned to the top tier of the pack, with Hillary and Obama. Of these three, I think he has the most to offer, in terms of experience, compassion, relating to the middle class person and I will be supporting him enthusiastically and looking to find my role in his campaign proudly. He is in my view, the best candidate the democrats have had to offer since JFK, and I think they rather foolishly turned over the keys to the brass ring to the wrong man in 2004. In Edwards, we can be proud that we have a well experience, sincere, well qualified, people person family man to support. That's the ticket for Dem's in 2008. Put Obama on the ticket, which reading these blogs seems almost to be a unanimous consensus, and how can the Democrats loose. Obama will be class to the Vice Presidency and play a vital role in and Edwards administration. Man, I like the sound of that. Let's go make it happen guys, starting today. We got two formidable candidates on our hands, and can't be complacent. By the way, if you haven't checked it out, look at his oneamericaommitte web site. It's trend setting in presidential political and could hardly be improved. You'll come to respect our man's qualities even more, and be inspired that there are still such decent politicians in our country whose greatest gift is hope and the knowledge that we got work to do and together we can get it done. Let's go do it guys, we got our work cut out for us, but it's very doable.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23456Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:00:36 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23456Jane, Southern MississippiJohn Edwards is the right man for the job, and I like Joseph Biden also. How about an Edwards/Biden ticket? Both men are independent thinkers who have a lot of common sense. Biden has been speaking out about getting our troops home for over a year. John Edwards is correct when he speaks about the "two Americas." I think the two of them would help turn our country around. I also think Hillary and Obama can't get elected, even though both are good people. I just want the Democrats to get behind someone who could win in the presidential election. Edwards is the man. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23474Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:31:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23474Maria A. Pflug, Deerfield Beach, Florida 33064John Edwards has a date with destiny. He possesses a vision of an America where a return to the pedestal of worldly respect is paramount. John wants to even the playing field for hard working Americans helping them achieve their American Dream. John Edwards will successfully reinvent his push towards the White House. He has a date with destiny. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23483Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:37:20 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23483dianeHillary is calculating. she is also despised as much on the left as on the right. I am not a supporter of Edwards but, wish him luck. I think his supporters are a little too fanzine but, let them have thier fun.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23486Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:40:52 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23486dianeI just saw Jamie from Illinois. Had to comment. We all here in Illinois support our senator. He has been a fabulous senator. His record is quite impressive and has done alot in the senate. Let's hope he runs.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23561Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:17:49 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23561Dirk, Brunswick, GeorgiaJohn Edwards will win the Democratic nomination in '08. He'll be the first Democrat since former V.P. Mondale (also a failed V.P. nominee in the previous election of '80) in 1984 to win the nomination while in private life. Sen. Obama is a SuperNova, and SuperNovas burn out. Sen. Clinton will, indeed, win the N.Y. primary, and others (i.e. Maryland), but won't be nominated. To be crass about it, the U.S. elected GWB in '04, and isn't about to turn aound and elect a woman or an inexperienced black person in '08. Dems sense this---they'll want a winner in '08, and they'll nominate Edwards.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23564Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:30:56 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23564Amy, Bellows Falls VermontTo Peter, from Pittsburgh, Pa. As for those "unaccounted-for billions" from the various disasters, how does the hint "in the pockets of the same elitists who started one and ignored the other" strike you? Cheney is collecting millions from Halliburton and I do not believe for a moment that it is all from "work previously done and not paid for", it is for providing those no-bid contracts that have allowed some of those billions to be unaccounted for. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, bush, and the rest of the current excuse for an administration will leave office multiple, multiple millions richer than when they took office. Where did it come from? Where do you think? Proof of this statement at the moment? I have none, but public records released after others with similar (NO ONE will ever top bush & co. for corruption.) sneaky, closed-door administrations have all shown a TREMENDOUS increase in their personal wealth immediately upon leaving. I would like to how how a person increases their money exponentially if they pick up any of the costs they claim to, on salaries that are public knowledge. bush ahs failed miserably at everything he has turned his hand to and I will still bet he leaves office a billionaire or close to it. I would like to see a great change in the way one very important thing is done. I want to see these pensions STOPPED for these ex government employees who are convicted of crimes or have to resign in disgrace. I find it insulting that anyone in the working class would have their financial situation severely changed if they were caught doing wrong but politicians can get away with anything and still have a life-long wallow at the public trough.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23580Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:22:07 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23580Lee in CAThe reason you see such "hate" is because it is a reflection of the souless hate mongers adn despicable war criminals we have in the White House. Does my "blog hate" bother you more than the slaughter we unleashed in Iraq for VERY questionable reasons? And we already have the "Bully in the White House." He's been neglecting US security while plundering for Halliburton. PS - I don't feel even a little guilty about calling BushCo the murderous blackhearts that they are.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23658Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:33:08 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23658Dan, MichiganHey, message to all you Bush haters out there. HE CANNOT RUN AGAIN. The Dems better come up with some kind of a candidate with some sort of an idea on what he stands for, or he will lose big to Romney or McCain. As for you conspiracy people always yelling about Haliburton and such, look who Pelosi is picking for the top jobs in Congress. Face it people, politics is about money, always has been, always will be.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23687Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:35:34 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23687Larry, Rock Island Illinois"PRAISE THE LORD" for 8 year terms. Yes, Dan your right about that. BUT, if we keep the mind set that politics is about money, always has been, always will be. Then they have won. I believe with the technology we have at our hands today with the internet, the people can take control of America again. There is the old adage...There is power in numbers. Have you noticed how cockroaches run and hide when they are exposed to the light? We must challenge our elected leaders to walk the straight and narrow or end up on youtube.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#23770Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:29:18 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:23770JIrby, Colorado Springs, CoFee, fi, foe, fum - I smell the blood of a Republican.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24151Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:37:41 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24151MJ USAEdwards...oh no..what shall he do?? he doesnt have daddy Kerry anymore which means he might actually have to answer a question without saying... "Well..John Kerry and I...." Can he do it..doubt it...who is going to hold his hand?? I hope this country doesnt vote democrat...if we did that we might as well hand ourselves to terrorism...and all that liberal...love you love me view...GOD HELP US....good thing we still have Republicans!http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24383Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:48:26 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24383Lee in CASorry Dan - you're right again. There is NO evidence* that Halliburton is making any money from this Iraq adventure. That's just my crazy "conspiracy" nonsense. Thanks for the balance. BTW - the cancer known as "Bush" is a medical condition not limited to the retarded monkey himself - many have it and could run for president. ....(*unless you can read!)http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24387Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:55:01 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24387Ron Gray, Browning, MTOnly one thing to say: Edwards & Obama, this is the winning ticket. There is not a more attractive duo. The republicans do not have the personalities to match Edwards & Obama.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24417Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:22:57 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24417Stahowiak, Paul John who? So What.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24453Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:28:31 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24453Olivia, Peoria, Ill.Regarding John Edwards' current comfortable circumstances...it's an unfortunate truth that, even after campaign financing laws and others that supposedly level the playing field, the only people who really have the time, money, and know-how to go out and mount political campaigns (at least, for major offices) are those who are affluent. People of modest means who have to go to work every day would find coming up with both time and money difficult. And, back to Edwards, he did have humble beginnings, so he wasn't always so well-off. As long as Edwards keeps the "two Americas" idea as part of his political stance, he will be a decent candidate for all people. It's too early for me to make a decision because we don't know yet who else will be running--but I like what I've seen. Some have suggested an Edwards/Obama ticket--that sounds good. And kudos to Edwards for choosing New Orleans as the place to kick off his campaign. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24457Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:45:14 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24457Joe Radmacher, Kansas City, MoHello all I hope everyone is doing well. The more I have thought about John Edwards the more I like the idea of him running for President. More important we as Americans need to stop being hateful to each other just because we are Democrats or Republicans. All Americans need to pull together and quit being pulled in by negative campaigns. We have gotten to the point that we are hostile to each other instead of being proud Americans. I think that they should make it illegal to run Swift Boat type campaigns. Let’s face it if they have to win races by making their opponents villains that should mean they can’t run on their own good merits. How many of us are proud to be Americans right now? We need to pull together and stop the partisan rhetoric and vote for the best candidate instead of who has an R or a D by their name on the ballots. Americans need to come together and demand honest politicians. Excuse me if I just used an oxymoron though we should demand that politicians lead by example instead of empty promises. Our children should be able to look up to these woman and men in public office and not hear about a bunch of scandals. We as Americans have lost our personality and our pride and we need to get it back. There will always be corrupt public officials but it would be nice to make them the exception instead of the rule. Thanks for reading. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24575Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:07:43 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24575Herman, Pittsburgh, PaTime is marching on and some must we the people. We must begin to start our honest search for our next leader and not depend on those who believe they are the right ones. This country has been at the hand of those who has the less to lose and therefore leave very little in way of substance for the future and our youth. When will we wake up and take back what was not a perfect dream to begin with and start all over again for a true method to make our country alive and well for the first time.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#24643Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:23:23 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:24643Alex, Los Angeles CAFight On John, We need someone in the highest office to fight for the poor and needy. It is only then that this country can reach its full potential. A potential so lacking now.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#25819Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:35:27 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25819Bill FergusonI cannot believe some of these statements that I have read about name calling a such. Look at the facts before you talk about someone. Look who has run this Country for the past 50 or so years and tell me that it hasn't been going down hill since the 50's. You call Bush a murderous backheart when we the people have been allowing doctors to kill innocent unborn babies for years in the name of choice. A bunch of you want to sugar coat real with names like fetus, abortion and choice. I and everyone else in the world makes choices everyday. It is all just a legal way to get away with murder. Some of these same people that want this choice harp about the way we put people to death in our prisons. Well at least they had a chance in our society to prove themselves as hard working citzens and didn't. Now you want them to be treated better than the men and women that was accused of mistreating those cowards called terroist. John Edwards is not going to be our savior. We put him to death over 2000 years ago. Oh, But lets not talk about that either, right. We took control out of our schools and have tied our teachers hands on keeping our children in line. John will probably do good in the polls only because of the liberal media portrays everything that republicans do as bad and whatever democrats do as ok. Look at when clinton was in the highest office and all the media could say was does character really count. As soon as he was out and Bush was in that is all they talk about was he character. We need to quit giving all our hard earned money to illegals and lazy people that don't try to earn their keep. Also anyone that is against the consitution and waves any other flag around like it is above the US Flag should be thrown out. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#25920Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:10:09 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:25920Peter, Pittsburgh, PAAmy in Vermont, I'm awaiting the Congressional Investigations. What really drives me crazy is that in addition to the unaccounted for billions going into the pockets of the well-to-do, the tax cuts allow them to keep more of what they "make" (or steal or defraud, maybe a better word is "get"). All this while the numbers of uninsured, homeless, and hungry skyrocket. And, some people want to call this a "Christian Country." It is beyond disgusting.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#30329Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:10:19 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:30329LarryHappy New Year Coalition Members. It happened, many incumbents got voted out of office in the November election! It proved the people are still sovereign as the Constitution provides. At least we have some balance of power now in Congress. But the work isn't over. Many Democratic and Republican Congressmen are ignoring what the vast majority of Americans want. They represent Corporate America, especially mult-national corporations that through lobbyists, buy the loyalty of congressmen and get the laws they want. Remember Nafta, Cafta and Shafta! Are opportunities for our descendants getting better? Through normal caucuses and elective procedure it seems that the will of the people is lost. The Constitution was not set up this way - the Sovereign in a Republic is supposed the will of the citizens and the Congressional law is supposed to represent that will. The Coalition, CMCL, thinks the only way to restore a government of, by and for the people by use of the internet. The CMCL believes that the news services are restrained. The only person in the media that is diligently reporting the effects of offshoring jobs through corporate welfare and subsidy, the destructive effects of permitted Illegal Immigration and the intended failure to protect our borders is Lou Dobbs on CNN. What can we do about it? VOTE. How? Promise Congressmen that if they fail to legislate to preserve the quality and safety of the United States, they will be in office only one term. The Internet provides the freedom to convey information we generally don't get through the news services. With complete news through the internet, voters can restore integrity to Congress, change the contaminated elective process where m oney buys loyalty and Congressmen ping pong between government and industry. Fear of loss of elections and fairly balanced competition through nationally controlled elections would restore honesty to the system. It wouldn't hurt, either, to get Congress to remove the hurdles they have erected making it nearly impossible to have any other parties have a voice. Other news: It is obvious that many corporations and therefore many Congressmen and the Administration wish to dismantle Social Security and Medicare. Why? They don't want to pay anything. It's not enough that many multinational corporations pay no taxes, they feel they have no social responsibility either. The latest - a bill being proposed now, will give Illegal Immigrants the rights to Social Security if they have worked here 1 and 1/2 years, regardless if they have stolen the identity of someone else, or used a forged SS card! For we legal citizens to qualify we get benefits based on the average of 40 quarters or ten employment years at retirement. Finally, the plan to open the borders of Canada, US and Mexico and eventually all of North and South America, with free flow of labor and a new currency has has exposure nationally through Lou Dobbs, This is a continuation of a plan to eventually combine North and South America into open borders for a 2 continent labor pool and adopt a new currency for all countries. Also it would combine social safety nets (if there are any). This information was reported by a Senior Citizen group who sued under the Freedom of Information Act and was finally revealed after three years of litigation. The plans were being made by the Council on Foreign Relations. Guess who would benefit? These things mentioned today pose a serious threat to at least middle-income America, and especially to the future of our descendants. As citizens are learning of them, more are voting. That's good! The internet allows the CMCL and other groups to provide information the news services aren't providing. Congress is unlikely to seriously address most of their flaws. As in the past, they will talk about it only as campaign rhetoric. An alerted public who are concerned about their descendants need to make Congressmen concerned about their jobs through our votes. When we are successful in Making Congress Listen about problems listed here, we can get the tainted election process changed from Lobbyists vote to the popular vote by nationalizing the election process. If you are concerned about these things, please forward this information on to people on your address lists. Best wishes, The Coalition to Make Congress Listenhttp://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#52321Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:44:54 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:52321R. Largent, San Clemente, CAJohn Edwards is not a "Corporate Lawyer" - that I could probably forgive - he's an ambulance chasing trial lawyer, who hit the jackpot by making specious and highly questionable claims on behalf of his clients. He has never made nor produced anything. And if anyone should know about 2 Americas, it would be Edwards, who would probably be the richest man ever elected to the White House. Why doesn't he "give" a little of that fortune away? That might make all of his 2 Americas rhetoric seem at least a little bit genuine. And before you jump on his bandwagen, please find and listen to his Tim Russert interview. His inability to explain his various positions - and the timing of those positions - on Iraq is pretty illuminating. But even more telling - and certaining far more amusing - is the internet video of Edwards spending about 10 minutes "fixing" his hair. I'm sure it would get his some votes on Castro Street in San Francisco, but he'd better hope it never surfaces in Iowa.http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#98265Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:30:30 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:98265D. Barger, New Baden, IlI think that John Edwards is the best politician out there at this time. Seems to have less garbage than the rest. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#100506Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:35:33 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:100506MARGE CONNOLLY, FT.WORTH, TX.I WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR A CANDIDATE THAT PUT HIS OWN AMBITIONS BEFORE HIS FAMILY!! I DON'T CARE THAT HIS WIFE WANTS HIM TO CONTINUE, MAYBE SHE SHOULD STAND BACK AND TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT REALLY MATTERS IN LIFE. SHE SHOULD BE WITH HER CHILDREN TOTALLY AND GIVING THEM THE MEMORIES THAT THEY WILL CARRY INTO THEIR LIVES. I LOST MY MOTHER AT THE AGE OF TWELVE YEARS FROM CANCER AND I CAN TELL YOU THOSE LAST TWO YEARS OF HER LIFE WERE WHAT I REMEMBER. SHE WAS VERY WEAK AND NEEDED HER FAMILY 100%. EDWARDS WILL NEVER BE THERE FOR HER AND THE CHILDREN AT THE END---HOW COULD HE? THIS IS A MAN THAT THINKS THE COUNTRY WON'T GO ON WITHOUT HIM----HOW MANY FOOLS HAVE THOUGHT THAT ONLY TO FIND THEY ARE ONLY A RIPPLE IN THE POND OF HISTORY. I WOULD ADMIRE HIM MORE IF HE WOULD SAY, "MY FAMILY COMES FIRST AT THIS TIME". http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#168951Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:07:24 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:168951Carl E. Zeh, Des Moines, IowaAs the only canidate that has a comprehensive plan for eduction, health care, rural policy, as well as a plan to get us out of Iraq, I have no choice but to help John Edwards for President, as a person of substance1http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#395730Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:28:47 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:395730Richard Johnson Lorain,OhioClinton ,president Clinton is or was responsible for the flight of jobs to China,why should I assume his wife as president would be any different VOTE FOR EDWARDShttp://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#410248Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:10:49 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:410248Lyn SnyderCan someone explain what is going on with the Florida primary date and whether a Florida voter can ever vote for a Democratic candidate in the primary?http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/28/23047.aspx#410249Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:10:58 GMT8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:410249Lyn Snyder