<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx</link><description>From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro





In an interview with the Quad City Times Clinton called Obama’s answer to whether or not he would meet with leaders who oppose the United States “irresponsible” and “naïve.”The Davenport, Iowa paper wrote: “Clinton</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287165</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287165</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Morgan, Austin, TX</dc:creator><description>Of all issues of the debate, Hillary has made a concerted effort to ensure this dominates the news cycle. &amp;nbsp;How long will this go on, and how much longer will we play along?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287166</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287166</guid><dc:creator>lyn, Silver Spring, MD</dc:creator><description>Gosh, &amp;nbsp;I guess he is really getting to her. &amp;nbsp;The pigs are starting to squeal. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I don't think she wants to take him own. &amp;nbsp;Better watch those negatives Hillary. &amp;nbsp;LOL</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287169</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287169</guid><dc:creator>Jim, Washington, D.C.</dc:creator><description>This just in from MSNBC: Vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we won't stop tipping the scales in her direction until you, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we can't say it enough, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287171</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287171</guid><dc:creator>Jim, Washington, D.C.</dc:creator><description>This just in from MSNBC: Vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we won't stop tipping the scales in her direction until you, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we can't say it enough, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287177</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:11:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287177</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>I think by November 2008, the country will regret Hillary Rodman Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287214</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:20:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287214</guid><dc:creator>Shadow, Hamden,CT</dc:creator><description>What an intellectually insulting argument by Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Obama never said he wouldn't make preparations before meeting with those world leaders, and simply did not get to address that point because he was not allowed a rebuttal after she spoke; Clinton's attempt to take advantage of something Obama did even not get a chance to respond to is dishonest and misleading. &amp;nbsp;Why pundits are not calling her on this and just amplifying the misconception is beyond me. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reality check on the propoganda issue: any non-democracy with state owned media is inevitably going to use a meeting with a US President as propaganda, no matter how much preparation, planning, or lack of prior disclosure about the meeting. &amp;nbsp;That's just the way countries with state-owned media operate, and if propaganda is the deal-breaking reason not to talk, we will continue not to talk with those countries just as we haven't been under the Bush administration. &amp;nbsp;This is all obvious logic that responsible political analysts would be interjecting with right now, instead of being a copy machine for Clinton press releases. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287224</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:25:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287224</guid><dc:creator>Rick Spence Austell GA</dc:creator><description>Neither have what it takes to lead this country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287226</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:25:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287226</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary will send Maddy not so bright over there instead. &amp;nbsp;Hillary will only meet with leaders who will kiss her ring.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287238</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:27:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287238</guid><dc:creator>Patrick High, Miami Florida</dc:creator><description>She jumped on that like flys on ...... He could come back with a sound bite that says he didn't mean him personally as president but his administration if elected</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287254</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:30:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287254</guid><dc:creator>Bush Republican</dc:creator><description>The woman's a charlatan. Learned from her scum bag husband.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287255</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:31:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287255</guid><dc:creator>TheTruth</dc:creator><description>But both have more than the current president, which makes one wonder</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287264</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:32:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287264</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary is using the issue to cover up her lack of experience as a presidential candidate. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287267</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:34:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287267</guid><dc:creator>Dee of VA</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Direct Negotiations (with enemy states) are not a sign of weakness; they are a sign of leadership.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The Bush Administration's refusal to talk to anyone on the evil side, as some have called idealistic, I call it dangerously unrealistic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;--Hillary Clinton, October 31, 2006 at the Cuoncil of Foreign Relations</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287269</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287269</guid><dc:creator>manny  Calvin</dc:creator><description>We will be in big hurts if Mrs Clinton gets in, once a liar always a liar, ARkansas remember how that went.Demo or repub I don't believe a woman should be in that high office, no offense ladies, but that is not a womans job. she needs to stay out of it,and Mr Clinton Mr First Man, come on </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287270</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:34:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287270</guid><dc:creator>malarson2 Beaverton, OR</dc:creator><description>Regarding Clinton experience: &amp;nbsp;I read last week that Bill Clinton is campaigning for his wife like he is &amp;quot;running for his third term in office&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp; While I do feel horrible for the way he was hunted down by the Republicans in Congress during his second term (they clearly had an agenda to destroy him), I still can't see the justification for a Clinton third term. &amp;nbsp;No amount of fundraising, campaigning, governing or authority will change the past. &amp;nbsp;It's not fair to the American people to have the office of the President used as a way to avenge the misdeeds done to him during his time in Washington. &amp;nbsp;It's just too late to go back and make it right. &amp;nbsp;It will do absolutely nothing but mire us in the partisanship that has frozen our country for 20 years. &amp;nbsp; And now that I think of it, it makes me understand the current President Bush's motivations: &amp;nbsp;it's feasible that a small part of him wanted to be President, and in turn invade Iraq, to avenge his father's re-election loss and his failure to oust Saddam Hussein. &amp;nbsp;Well, enough already. &amp;nbsp;No one should be running for office based on what has happened in the past. &amp;nbsp;It's time to move forward. &amp;nbsp;Just remember, you can't have a dynasty without the nasty. &amp;nbsp;Go Obama!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287273</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:35:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287273</guid><dc:creator>JBS, Kansas City, Missouri</dc:creator><description>1) &amp;nbsp;What's more irresponsible and naive:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's trusting the Bush administration enough to cast her vote to authorize the war, when other U.S. Senators (and Illinois State Senators) knew better...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OR&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barack's choosing to meet with hostile world leaders who the U.S. happens to disagree with on foreign policy, rather than continue the diplomatic style of the Bush administration...?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) &amp;nbsp;Does anybody really think that Barack would allow himself to be used as propaganda by a hostile foreign leader, or that he would haphazardly just sit down, shake hands, smile, and give anything away that was contrary to U.S./World long-term interests?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287277</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287277</guid><dc:creator>manny  Calvin,,Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>We will be in big hurts if Mrs Clinton gets in, once a liar always a liar, ARkansas remember how that went.Demo or repub I don't believe a woman should be in that high office, no offense ladies, but that is not a womans job. she needs to stay out of it,and Mr Clinton Mr First Man, come on please</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287279</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287279</guid><dc:creator>Gary, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Jerry, we agree on something!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm already sick of her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and Jim in DC-- right on. &amp;nbsp;so sad and true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and Rick in GA-- who does in your mind, slimey Mitt Romney? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287280</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287280</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Jackie Rankin, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>She who voted FOR the Iraq war is now calling him who did NOT vote for the war irresponsible? &amp;nbsp;I fear Hillary is getting shrill and shrewish. I admire Obama's courtesy and candor. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287281</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287281</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Clinton, irresponsible is not reading intellegence reports before sending our men and women off to war. irresponsible is sending our jobs overseas, thank you NAFTA. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287283</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:37:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287283</guid><dc:creator>Dontrelle, Portland, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Refusing to meet with foreign leaders has gotten us into the wonderful situation we find ourselves in now. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287285</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:37:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287285</guid><dc:creator>Elaine Ells</dc:creator><description>It makes me &amp;quot;sick&amp;quot; that so many millions of dollars that could go to good use, is spent on &amp;quot;crap&amp;quot; like this and negative campaigns.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287286</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287286</guid><dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator><description>MSNBC. Will you ever question or challenge Mrs. Clinton? &amp;nbsp;Are you paving a non obstructive super highway for her from Iowa to Super Tuesday? &amp;nbsp;Sure seems like it. &amp;nbsp;Don't make me start watching the Fox Noise channel. &amp;nbsp;That just wouldn't be nice.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287287</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287287</guid><dc:creator>Chris, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>Anyone is better than bush and his warmongering empirialist cronies</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287288</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287288</guid><dc:creator>MikeB, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>If Ms. Clinton wants to talk about iresponsible, she needs to answer about her support for continued outsourcing of American jobs, her calls for more H1-B visas when 30% of our own engineers and programmers are out of work, her proposals to allow in foreign medical workers (like nurses) to platcate her supporters in the overpriced health care industry who object to paying Amercian nurses $50,000 a year and want to bring in tens of thousands of foreign nurses to drive wages down. She needs to answer for her vote forbidding American's from bringing in perscription drugs from European pharmacies, where every batch is tested, but allows for discount chains to bring in Chinese and Indian drugs that are not tested and are now in many cases known to be poisonous. Ms. Clinton is nothing more than a corporate puppet, pretending to stand for working men and women. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287290</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287290</guid><dc:creator>Andre A. Johnosn,RRT,CPFT.PSGT.HBOt,AE, Waimea, Hi 96796</dc:creator><description>Comment- Do we as Americans want another 4 to 8 years of the same thing (Clinton)( Bush). &amp;nbsp;Obama has a fresh outlook for what the people want. &amp;nbsp;When Mrs. Clinton use a sounthern tone in the south, It showed that she is a fake. &amp;nbsp;That mean the truth is not within her. &amp;nbsp;If Obama wins the primary, I will vote for the very first time in my life. &amp;nbsp;I am 49 years old</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287291</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287291</guid><dc:creator>Dane Drefke, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>Of course she said that. Obama's message is resonating with people and they are starting to realize that Obama is a geniune chance for changing business as usual in D.C. &amp;nbsp;Clinton is more of the same tired old political mud. She has to try and tear him down or he'll run right by her. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287292</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287292</guid><dc:creator>greg, Houston</dc:creator><description>Go Hillary! Obama IS very inexperienced. &amp;nbsp;No matter what you may think of Hillary, she has years and years of experience, and Obama doesn't. &amp;nbsp;To think otherwise is foolish.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287293</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287293</guid><dc:creator>Gabriella, Springfield, MO</dc:creator><description>It seems to me that Obama used every question to try to boost his rating for the presidential race instead of just discuss the issues, he put down everything about Hillary to try to make himself look better. &amp;nbsp;Doesn't he know that people can see right through that kind of bull? &amp;nbsp;I don't appreciate it when someone tries to use a public forum like this to help himself get votes. &amp;nbsp;Hillary clearly seemed the most prepared and knowledgeable of the group and she did it without trying to make anyone look bad. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287294</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287294</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Don, Philly, PA</dc:creator><description>The words petty and vindictive come to mind. &amp;nbsp;Typical Haillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287296</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:39:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287296</guid><dc:creator>Bob, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>MSNBC. Will you ever question or challenge Mrs. Clinton? &amp;nbsp;Are you paving a non obstructive super highway for her from Iowa to Super Tuesday? &amp;nbsp;Sure seems like it. &amp;nbsp;Don't make me start watching the Fox Noise channel. &amp;nbsp;That just wouldn't be nice.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287297</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:39:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287297</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Don, Philly, PA</dc:creator><description>The words petty and vindictive come to mind. &amp;nbsp;Typical Haillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287299</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:39:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287299</guid><dc:creator>Momo</dc:creator><description>This shows again that Obama is about change and Clinton is supporting the same old arrogant diplomacy that led us to this stupid war in the first place. Diplomacy is what helped us put the pressure on Iran. JFK met with soviet leaders and Reagan met with the bad guys as well. Now Obama is linking his philosophy to JFK and Reagan and Clinton is linking it to George Bush. I think this tells us who can lead us to a new Iraq war and who on the other hand would handle crisis such as the cuban missiles crisis. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Diplomacy could have saved so many lives in Iraq but Clinton and others chose to let our men and women die because they did not feel like hurting their own politicAL ambitions. Clinton is so into acting tough she lost common sense. If you want soldiers to get into another war Vote Hillary. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287300</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:39:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287300</guid><dc:creator>Wayne Packard, Mulberry, Fl.</dc:creator><description>The last time we had a Democrat for a President we had peace, a zero deficit, and the poverty level was lower. &amp;nbsp;Our men and women were not being killed in a useless war.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Bush said at the beginning of his second term there are 45 million people without insurance. &amp;nbsp;Now there 46.5 million. &amp;nbsp;Congress wants to give free health care to the uninsured children. &amp;nbsp;Bush says he'll veto it.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Republicans DON'T care about people. &amp;nbsp;They are for big business.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;If you want to continue to see our men and women get killed and have this country continue to go down the drain, vote Republican.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Wayne Packard</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287305</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:40:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287305</guid><dc:creator>Gail, Dallas,Tx.</dc:creator><description>It is ashame that the media pick and choose what they think the public shuold be allowed to hear. &lt;br&gt;the media should just let ia all be told to its completion, that way we as the people can get the full picture. I nthink that you guys are not playing fair or should &amp;nbsp;say are playing only on one side. Let us hear and see it all. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287310</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:40:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287310</guid><dc:creator>Readergirl, Las Vegas, NV</dc:creator><description>Hillary is an extremely accomplished and able woman. &amp;nbsp;I look forward to electing her our next president. &amp;nbsp;Not only will she be a vast improvement over President Bush (anyone is), she is more qualified than most of the other candidates from either party. Barack Obama is inspiring and promising, but I don't think he's built enough of a resume to lead our country. &amp;nbsp;Edwards is ok. &amp;nbsp;There's things I like in most of the democratic candidates and practically nothing I like in the republican candidates -- they're too preachy -- pro-life (yah, right; i.e., Iraq), anti-gay, too moralistic (uh-huh, e.g. Guantanamo, torture). &amp;nbsp;And more important, it's the republican party that has led us into this disaster and thumbed its proverbial nose at our constitution. Hillary Clinton will get my vote.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287312</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287312</guid><dc:creator>K.Ahmed, Wildwood, fl</dc:creator><description>Given who sits in the White House today it obviously doesn't take very much to lead this country. &amp;nbsp;I believe GW ran on Gods coattails and then ran the country into the ground. &amp;nbsp;I'm not a big fan of Hillary but good grief either her or Obama have more sense than any of the kow towing to the Religious Right Republicans that are out there now. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287313</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:40:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287313</guid><dc:creator>New York City</dc:creator><description>I think Obama and Hillary would both make fine presidents. I am voting for Obama, but WHOEVER wins the Democratic nomination is getting my vote. The ONLY person I am praying DOES not win is Guliani. People are really not aware of how polarizing that man is. If you think Bush is bad this guy is 100 TIMES WORSE!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287315</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:41:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287315</guid><dc:creator>Bonnie J. Bohanon</dc:creator><description>I am not a Baby Boomer; I am not a member of the Greatest Generation. &amp;nbsp; My father did not go to WWII. &amp;nbsp;4 Uncles and one Aunt did. &amp;nbsp; I was born in 1940. &amp;nbsp; Who represents us, as I find I am liberal on issues but also conservative. &amp;nbsp; I am also a believer in individual responsibility. &amp;nbsp; Look in the mirror and act like you run this country for the best interest of everyone. &amp;nbsp; I have no problem voting for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama if they say what I need to hear. &amp;nbsp; Hot buttons: &amp;nbsp;the Environment, Eminent Domain (watch the Supreme Court), Healthcare, Immigration (most of us are illegal except those documented through Ellis Island but there were not safety nets when my ancestors came) and securing a future for our descendents. &amp;nbsp; I very much need to hear there is a future. &amp;nbsp;Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287318</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:41:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287318</guid><dc:creator>Andre A. Johnosn,RRT,CPFT.PSGT.HBOt,AE, Waimea, Hi 96796</dc:creator><description>Comment- Do we as Americans want another 4 to 8 years of the same thing (Clinton)( Bush). &amp;nbsp;Obama has a fresh outlook for what the people want. &amp;nbsp;When Mrs. Clinton use a sounthern tone in the south, It showed that she is a fake. &amp;nbsp;That mean the truth is not within her. &amp;nbsp;If Obama wins the primary, I will vote for the very first time in my life. &amp;nbsp;I am 49 years old</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287319</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:41:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287319</guid><dc:creator>Steve T., Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator><description>Way to go Hillary! She (and maybe Joe Biden) are the only ones to understand the realities of today's world. &amp;nbsp;She's idealistic yet realistic and obviously has the ability to think through an issue before responding. &amp;nbsp;The others should learn from from her for 2016.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287320</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:41:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287320</guid><dc:creator>Hao Trinh Lansing, Michigan</dc:creator><description>I surely don't want another CLINTON or BUSH. &amp;nbsp;Over twenty years of these two family in power is enough!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287322</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:42:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287322</guid><dc:creator>Lisa Hampton, Newark NJ</dc:creator><description>I am so sick of the media acting like Hillary's answers are so great. Why is it a bad thing to think outside the box instead of the publice getting practiced answers which Hillary is good for. I agree with Obama. I think it would be a good idea for United States to meet with our enemies. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287324</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:42:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287324</guid><dc:creator>lyn, Silver Spring, MD</dc:creator><description>Hey Hillary, you know how you love to court the Black vote. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;You try to call the brother out&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;you will defintely lose. If you're going to try to be a &amp;quot;sista&amp;quot; they're not going to let you get away with that. &amp;nbsp; Come on I've been waiting, &amp;quot;Do it, please Do it&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;show your true colors...so to speak. &amp;nbsp;Remember what happen with DG, last spring . &amp;nbsp; LOL</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287325</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:42:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287325</guid><dc:creator>Dan H, Bellevue, WA</dc:creator><description>Anyone who still prefers Clinton to the other candidates in the field would think much less of her if they actually ever met her in person or spoke in a media-free environment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd like to see more genuinely concerned candidates for President than power-hungry, reactionist individuals with a mental clarity dictated by polls and consultants.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287326</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:42:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287326</guid><dc:creator>David Erickson  Scottsdale, AZ</dc:creator><description>I liked Obama's response. &amp;nbsp;I think what he was speaking to, was the current administration's use of noncommunication as a way to somehow bring these leaders and their countries to their knees or keep them on the back burner until the Iraq issue stops hemorrhaging. &amp;nbsp;At the very least, it's akin to giving the cold shoulder and who needs that? &amp;nbsp; I thinks its a fresh perspective to say this far in advance that Obama would speak with them (and not &amp;quot;at&amp;quot; them). &amp;nbsp;It really underscores for me a difference between he and Clinton that I suspected was there. &amp;nbsp;I get the feeling that another Clinton administration would engage in business as usual and that isnt what Americans want right now. &amp;nbsp;We can't afford business as usual. &amp;nbsp;The news clips of her campaign already out today saying that his remarks were naive are certainly politics as usual. &amp;nbsp;I also don't think that people are that idiotic to believe that as President, Obama wouldn't be advised and would ultimate go after he sends a diplomatic point-man first. &amp;nbsp;I think he would not add the laundry list of preconditions that Bush has to Iran. I think that he would meet with Korea without demanding that they only meet in 6-party talks or nothing at all. &amp;nbsp;I think that is what Mr. Obama was trying to convey.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287327</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287327</guid><dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator><description>Mr. Spence...probably voted for Bush twice. &amp;nbsp;He have no creditability as far as his thought who can lead this country. &amp;nbsp;People like him is why this country is going to the devil in a hand basket. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287328</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:43:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287328</guid><dc:creator>Patrick, Torrance, California</dc:creator><description>Why is MSNBC so obsessed with electing Hillary Clinton? &amp;nbsp;Obvious bias...racism?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287329</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:43:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287329</guid><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><description>lets just have an anarchy, children can run the country better then politicians from any of the parties. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287333</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:44:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287333</guid><dc:creator>Doug Rose</dc:creator><description>Neither candidate understands or appreciates the nature of the threat our country faces.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287335</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:44:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287335</guid><dc:creator>John from Tulsa, OK</dc:creator><description>I watched CNN's you tube debate. It was a big joke!!!The whole political process in this country is a joke. It's all about who raises the most money. All their pockets are lined with special interest groups. The lies, the deceit, the wishful thinking.....All talk no action...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287336</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:44:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287336</guid><dc:creator>Rod, Long Valley, NJ </dc:creator><description>Just like sequels of great original movies never are great, neither do sequels of presidents; Adams and Bush, are two. America, let's not add a third sequel. Bill was great, Hillary is not. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287339</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:45:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287339</guid><dc:creator>Chuck, Louisville, Ky</dc:creator><description>Can we PLEASE just quit with the Clinton bashing on this issue? Firstly, I don't think MSNBC gives a crap about who wins the next election. They report what happens. Second: The question that Clinton is getting guff for was a blanket one: &amp;quot;Would you as President agree to meeting the following world leaders?&amp;quot; The question was &amp;quot;will you&amp;quot;. Meaning, &amp;quot;do you, right now, plan to&amp;quot;. Obama gave a blanket 'yes' and then went into the importance of diplomacy. In short, his answer was impulsive and naive. Would he agree to meet them with no pre-conditions or groundwork? I am sure he wouldn't, but that's not what he said. Clinton was commenting on the exact verbage of his comment. And as stated: He's wrong. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW...I am looking forward to a Clinton/Obama ticket, so I am not dissing the guy. I just think many of you are being unfair. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287341</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:45:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287341</guid><dc:creator>David Lee, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>By what standards are we qualifying what it takes to lead this country. By cronism, lies and deceit. Or by trying to uphold what this republic stands for, or use to be for the current administration came into power.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287342</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:45:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287342</guid><dc:creator>Lorie, Tacoma WA</dc:creator><description>She's a very intelligent woman, but the comments today about Obama were uncalled for. There was no chance for a rebuttal in the debate format. If she gets the democratic nomination, he'd be an excellent choice for VP. &amp;nbsp;Play nice!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287343</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:45:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287343</guid><dc:creator>Jason, Osage City, KS</dc:creator><description>Personally, her answer to this question, and her response to Obama prove to me that she has exactly what it takes to be President of the United States. &amp;nbsp;Even though Obama got the answer right, she got the answer even more right</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287345</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287345</guid><dc:creator>Dan, Whitter,CA</dc:creator><description>I like Obama because he seems to be logical in his thinking and responses. If there is no dialogue, then how do you expect to come to an agreement or an understanding which leads to more dialogue?&lt;br&gt;Clinton's response is standard for someone who's been in politics for so long: suspicious of everyone's motives.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287346</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287346</guid><dc:creator>Celestine</dc:creator><description>Hilary must apologize for authorizing this wrong war. Stop the politics and get real.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287349</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287349</guid><dc:creator>Ryan, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Then who does have what it takes because you make it sound like it's a breeze in the park?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287350</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287350</guid><dc:creator>Jerry, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Shallow in Hamden, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You miss the point, predictably. &amp;nbsp;Obama attempted to do what he always claims he doesn't do: &amp;nbsp;play politics with sound bites on complex issues. &amp;nbsp;Clinton rightly used his shallow sound bite against him, since this is, after all, politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He is a fool. &amp;nbsp;She is an excellent politician.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate them both, and pray they never set foot in the Oral Office alive.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287351</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287351</guid><dc:creator>Yiannis, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator><description>There's nothing intellectual put forth by the Clinton campaign. They are betting that there are not enough intellectually inclined democrats to recognise that we've had enough:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Special Interests&lt;br&gt;2) PR and pollster run campaigns&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How funny is that Hillary is accepting the contributions from the HMOs who &amp;quot;scarred&amp;quot; her</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287352</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:47:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287352</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn Hatcher Sunnyvale CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is not afraid of Obama. &amp;nbsp;She is doing her job to make it clear he doesn't have enough experience. &amp;nbsp;She has it all, leadership, experience, poise and she's smart. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287357</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:48:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287357</guid><dc:creator>Vivian Fauntleroy</dc:creator><description>The question was not the WHEN (timing) of a meeting with Syrian, Iran et al., but if elected President, WOULD the newly-elected president consider meeting with these countries. &amp;nbsp; Obama answered the question correctly. &amp;nbsp;Clinton put a carpe diem spin on it. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287360</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:48:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287360</guid><dc:creator>PGx, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Obama (and any other President) should immediately speak to, and negotiate with, Ahmadinejad , Bashar al-Assad, Castro (or his predecessor), Chavez, and Kim Jong Il. It's the mainstream media that has allowed the hateful neocons to frame the deabte. Conventional wisdom be damned! This is serious. We need to salvage what's left of this country's reputation before all is lost. And it WILL be lost if we don't begin to quickly &amp;nbsp;remedy our huge international blunders and mistakes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287361</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:48:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287361</guid><dc:creator>U KNOW</dc:creator><description>Whatever happens - Clinton - Obama - They are both BETTER PEOPLE - I'm just saying - THAN GEORGE &amp;quot;I love dead Muslims &amp;amp; Oil&amp;quot; BUSH!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287364</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:49:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287364</guid><dc:creator>Bill, Cape Coral, FL</dc:creator><description>I don't consider myself as gender blind as some, but time and time again, Hillary has proven herself to be the most equipped and most experienced candidate to lead this country. Her decisions are both wise and well thought out. I just hope that this country can get over it's gender bias long enough to vote for her, or else we will miss out on the most talented potential leader to step forward in recent time. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287365</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:49:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287365</guid><dc:creator>stan</dc:creator><description>This is another reason while this country need the change that Obama represent. Clinton's are too negative to take this country forward. She know Obama outdo her in the debate and here they go negative too much for Clinton's so called change. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287366</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:49:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287366</guid><dc:creator>Lorie, Tacoma WA</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin-your post about &amp;quot;it's not a woman's job to be President&amp;quot; is offensive to all the educated, hard working women in America. Mr Bush is the liar. Get out of the dark ages.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287367</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:50:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287367</guid><dc:creator>Jessica I love Bush, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator><description>Does Hillary ever say anything? Does anyone understand her position on anything, other than she opposes everyone else's positions? For that matter, isn't this the problem with most politicians. Love or hate Bush (I love him), at least the man has a position. I'm tired of hearing what he did wrong; tell me what the Dems would have DONE. Nothing. Bombed an aspirin factory maybe. And btw, where's all the cheering on N Korea's backdown from nuclear mischief??</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287369</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:50:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287369</guid><dc:creator>Ray, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>I believe that this question is proof that Obama is the only choice if you do not want 4-8 more years of business as usual in Washington. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287370</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:50:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287370</guid><dc:creator>Jane Mallon-Czajka Williamsburg, Virginia</dc:creator><description>Listen, I'll take Clinton, or Obama over those morons that run this country now. We were not in a war, with a country where the folks we set free now, would like to kill us too! Illegal immigration is out of control, and we are 9TRILLION $$$$ in debt, and beholding to Mexico, China, and Japan who are paying the tab for us to fund this war, at least for now....Way to go Bush &amp;amp; Cheney, you know the guys that were in the Air national guard, and no one ever really saw &amp;amp; Cheney, who deferred 3x's.Good move America, thanks for giving us not one, but two terms. I cannot wait for 2009.ANYONE would be better for AMERICA, and we can rightfully reclaim our standing, internationally..... </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287371</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287371</guid><dc:creator>JD, Alexandria VA</dc:creator><description>The left leaning slant of this page is disgusting. &lt;br&gt;I can't stand Clinton, or Obama.. I am a registered Dem that is disgusted with this party.. &amp;nbsp;I am going to throw &amp;nbsp;my vote to either Rudy or the ACTOR... &lt;br&gt;JD Alexandria&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287374</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287374</guid><dc:creator>Celestine, Dover, DE</dc:creator><description>Hilary must apologize for authorizing this wrong war. Stop the politics and get real.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287375</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287375</guid><dc:creator>mark in Cali</dc:creator><description>This country will not elect a woman or minority, at least not yet. &amp;nbsp;So stop wasting your time on these two and look at someoen who has a chance!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287376</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287376</guid><dc:creator>Dan, San Dimas,Ca</dc:creator><description>To eliminate someone for leadership based on their gender is moronic. Bush is a fine example of leadership. He should have stayed in baseball; he always fielded a winner- or did he?&lt;br&gt;Republicans appreciation of Bush and the fine job he's done is reminiscent of a Titanic passenger praising the job of it's captain.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287377</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287377</guid><dc:creator>James, Pickton, Tx.</dc:creator><description>Hillary and Obama put togeather wouldn't&lt;br&gt;make a pimple on a good presidents rear end.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287382</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:52:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287382</guid><dc:creator>Louis Roundtree Phoenix, Az. </dc:creator><description>I think that Obama made the absolutley correct statement. The President should speak to the leaders of these countries. Yes, with preparation. There will be propoganda spin on both sides as always, but unless and until the leaders sit down and talk how will there be any accord reached? Ignoring them until they go away has not been a successful plan of action thus far. Clinton was using a cheap shot to score points, playing on the press that Obamna doesn't have experience enough to lead. He has lead, in political life for nearly two decades. His only lack of experience is Washington experience. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287384</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:53:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287384</guid><dc:creator>rachel, taylor, MI</dc:creator><description>when clinton lied, no one died.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287386</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:53:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287386</guid><dc:creator>Ray, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>I believe that this question is proof that Obama is the only choice if you do not want 4-8 more years of business as usual in Washington. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287387</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287387</guid><dc:creator>Aidyn, NY, NY</dc:creator><description>I am glad Hillary fired back! Her asnwer was right and that is what bother Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287388</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287388</guid><dc:creator>kelly c</dc:creator><description>It's not about a woman being in office. &amp;nbsp;It's about what you believe it and what you can do. &amp;nbsp;And she isn't what this country needs. &amp;nbsp;As far as leadership goes, she isn't really what any country needs!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287389</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287389</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Hmmm, Clinton is attacking Obama. Maybe she's not feeling so securely in the lead anymore.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287391</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287391</guid><dc:creator>emmy</dc:creator><description>It is funny how Hillary Clinton is more concerend about beeing used for propaganada. I think she shot herself in the foot there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nancy Pelosi didn't have a problem with being used for propaganda when she went to Syria. She just did the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where she needed to exercise this caution was in voting to authorize the war that has killed more Americans than 9/11</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287392</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287392</guid><dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator><description>What this country needs is to show the rest of the world that we don't just talk about the land of the freedom but we stand by it as well. &amp;nbsp;Electing Obama in 2008 would send the right message. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287393</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:54:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287393</guid><dc:creator>Jon, Portland, OR</dc:creator><description>Clinton's right. &amp;nbsp;Obama's just full of happy talk and it is scary thinking this wimp would be in charge of dealing with terrorism, dealing with Iran, dealing with Syria. &amp;nbsp;Obama's going to at least have to talk tough on these horrible people around the world like N. Korea before he could be considered for the Commander in Chief position. &amp;nbsp;His stupid little fairy land comments like that and that his response to another 9/11 would be to make sure the first responders had all that they needed, just shows he's too inexperienced. &amp;nbsp;Obama can get over this by finally starting to have some original ideas or at least ideas even if unoriginal, and stop his lame generalities and weak foreign policy ideas. &amp;nbsp;I reckon if ah talk to Ahmadinejad he'll stop being racist.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287394</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287394</guid><dc:creator>Jennifer, Rochester, MN</dc:creator><description>Frankly, I'd much rather see my country's leader take the bull by the horns and meet with 'problem leaders' himself than sending his lackeys over to do the dirty work for him. I'm not sure where Hilary is really trying to go with this except to make herself &amp;quot;different&amp;quot; from Obama in any other way but her 'go-ahead' vote for the war.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287395</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287395</guid><dc:creator>Rhonda Minden </dc:creator><description>Have you all forgotten that Hilary stole White House paintings and furniture as Bill's term was over? This woman believes she had rights &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; over anyone. Do you really want Bill back in the White House? Saddam Hussein was the first to voice his nasty oppinion World Wide about Americ's Government right after Bill's affair, or fling, while on your tax dollar. Our Country began suffering extreme and disasterous Weather Changes- as well as 9/11, in 2001, just 8 months after the Clintons left the White House with all their stolen goods. Blame global warming all you want, and simply ignore the signs of the times. I know that America will get what it deserves if this couple manage their way back into &amp;quot;our&amp;quot; White House. Free speech, so please post this.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287396</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287396</guid><dc:creator>Richard M. Breidenthal</dc:creator><description>It appears that RUSH Limbaugh's avid Republican listeners are following their orders...Get Clinton&lt;br&gt;They don't know why. &amp;nbsp;Sen.Clinton has never done anything, I mean anything wrong. Not one thing. &lt;br&gt;Oh, yes. She has frightened Republicans that they might lose the Whitehouse. &amp;nbsp;You people are not voting in your own interest. &amp;nbsp;Bush has favored the RICH in every way. &amp;nbsp;You are losing in the economy race. I guess you prefer to help the list of Billionairs grow. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287397</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287397</guid><dc:creator>Bill, Cape Coral, FL</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvan, you are a shovenist pig. And it's sad that you let your prejudices cloud your judgement. It just makes your opinion bias and dismissable. Sorry, but if Niger and England can have a woman leader, aren't we socially developed enough to handle it??? I guess you are not...and i am sorry to hear it!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287398</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287398</guid><dc:creator>Angie Combs, Lexington, KY</dc:creator><description>I will vote for HIllary!!! Go Hillary! Hillary 2008!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287399</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287399</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Dunkirk, NY</dc:creator><description>She needs to re-think this one. &amp;nbsp;Look at the Presidents who put out that hand JFK or Richard Nixon before Watergate got him traveling to Russia and China. &amp;nbsp;Obama could ask to have a meeting, they could decline. &amp;nbsp;Or have a meeting on the tarmac somewhere like Ford did in Iceland. &amp;nbsp;Hillary is a pathetic Senator, I can say that because I live in Upstate NY, we are still waiting for all the jobs she promised when she ran the first time for Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C-a-r-p-e-t-b-a-g-g-e-r, Carpetbaggar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She will go down when her husbands women chasing appears again, a leopard never changes its spots &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287400</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287400</guid><dc:creator>Vote Against Hillary</dc:creator><description>Pushing Hillary is the biggest mistake the Democrat mainstream has made since John Kerry. Obama is a better person and candidate. &amp;nbsp;I'd much rather vote for someone 'irresponsible' and 'naive' than someone craven and opportunistic.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287402</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:56:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287402</guid><dc:creator>J Rod, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;The woman's a charlatan....&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I don't believe a woman should be that high office....&amp;quot; &amp;quot;She jumped on that like flys on....&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I guess inteligence is not a requirement for these emails.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287403</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:57:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287403</guid><dc:creator>David Erickson  Scottsdale, AZ</dc:creator><description>I liked Obama's response. &amp;nbsp;I think what he was speaking to, was the current administration's use of noncommunication as a way to somehow bring these leaders and their countries to their knees or keep them on the back burner until the Iraq issue stops hemorrhaging. &amp;nbsp;At the very least, it's akin to giving the cold shoulder and who needs that? &amp;nbsp; I thinks its a fresh perspective to say this far in advance that Obama would speak with them (and not &amp;quot;at&amp;quot; them). &amp;nbsp;It really underscores for me a difference between he and Clinton that I suspected was there. &amp;nbsp;I get the feeling that another Clinton administration would engage in business as usual and that isnt what Americans want right now. &amp;nbsp;We can't afford business as usual. &amp;nbsp;The news clips of her campaign already out today saying that his remarks were naive are certainly politics as usual. &amp;nbsp;I also don't think that people are that idiotic to believe that as President, Obama wouldn't be advised and would ultimate go after he sends a diplomatic point-man first. &amp;nbsp;I think he would not add the laundry list of preconditions that Bush has to Iran. I think that he would meet with Korea without demanding that they only meet in 6-party talks or nothing at all. &amp;nbsp;I think that is what Mr. Obama was trying to convey.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287405</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:57:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287405</guid><dc:creator>Barry Newport News, VA</dc:creator><description>I don't care for either candidate, but I do agree with Hillary. &amp;nbsp;This is not just a Bush administration's POV, but several administration's before. &amp;nbsp;...and why is it so important to talk to these other countries. &amp;nbsp;Why are Americans, which I am, so eager to be liked. &amp;nbsp;Who cares if people like or dislike us. &amp;nbsp;There will always be people who hate Americans and we don't have to deal with them (Iran, N. Korea, etc.). &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Actions are louder than words. &amp;nbsp;If they (these other countries that don't like America) want to join the civilized world then free their people, invest in their people. &amp;nbsp;Stop the terror in their own societies and we will speak with them. &amp;nbsp;The ball is in their court!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287409</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:58:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287409</guid><dc:creator>Tic Short</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin must think a woman should not have such a high office because all the fellas have been doing such a great job, come on.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287413</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:58:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287413</guid><dc:creator>Michelle Roberts-Roy  Fisher, IL</dc:creator><description>Was enjoying the different thought processes until I got to Manny Calvin's. &amp;nbsp;Speaking as a strong woman who has survived breast cancer and the loss of a husband to leukemia all at the same time raising 4 children and working full time, you are an idiot!! &amp;nbsp;I dare you to do what I did in a 6 month period and not have your little ..... tail tucked between your legs!!! &amp;nbsp;Surprisingly enough, I as a woman, can change a tire, roof a house, use a circular saw, change the oil in the mower. &amp;nbsp;This is all at the same time as making dinner and folding laundry. Try that one!!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287414</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:58:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287414</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, The Peanut Gallery</dc:creator><description>The context of the question has yet to be mentioned in this thread. &amp;nbsp;The question revolved around President Sadat's visit to the Israel in 1977. &amp;nbsp;The visit had no preset conditions and no agenda other than what was decided upon once he arrived. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***That visit resulted in a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt that has stood to this day, despite the on going strife that has continued between the other factions.***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone -including Senator Clinton- thinks that opening lines of dialogue is &amp;quot;irresponsible and naive&amp;quot; they lack even a basic grasp of diplomacy. &amp;nbsp;When it comes to First Read posters, it is simply what I expect from party line shock troops like Jerry, Dave, and Bush Republican. &amp;nbsp;Coming from a Presidential candidate, it is disheartening and makes it impossible for me to vote for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing that is irresponsible and naive is thinking that the current global strife we are enmeshed in can only be solved with force.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287415</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287415</guid><dc:creator>MARC EVANSVILLE IN</dc:creator><description>ELECT BUSH A THIRD TIME HELL WITH CLINTON AND OBAMA</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287417</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:59:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287417</guid><dc:creator>Jamie Farr</dc:creator><description>Lyn, Silver Spring, do I hear a bit of sarcasem and dislike for Hillary Clinton, could you be one of those BUshies!?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get over the fact she is smart and would make a great president. &amp;nbsp;You male schovenustic pig</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287418</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287418</guid><dc:creator>Rob Johnson Fort Myers, Fl.</dc:creator><description>We could vote in Ketmit T Frog at this point. Anyone is better than Bush and the Republican Party. In regards to Hillary, she is incredible. She has the brains and the no how. Obama should run for VP and that way the Democratic Party could hold on to the White House for the next 16 years. It will tak that long to fix the mess Bush and the Republican party has created.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287419</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:59:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287419</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Woodlawn, MD</dc:creator><description>How sad that so many obvious Republicans send in these comments about the next presidet. &amp;nbsp;Although there are questions about all of the candidates, it seems that no one seems to question the FACT that she is an intelligent, articulate and strong person who would definitely be an improvement to whats in the White House now. &amp;nbsp;I truly believe she would not only be a strong president but also bring some bright, new, young talent to Washington.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287422</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:00:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287422</guid><dc:creator>Megan Miller, Pasadena, CA</dc:creator><description>Not a woman's job? &amp;nbsp;Welcome to the 21st century, Manny Calvin, where women can and do run Fortune 500 companies, have top positions in academics and research, and serve in the presidential administration, on the Supreme Court, and as the Speaker of the House for the United States. &amp;nbsp;I'm not saying that Hillary is necessarily the best person for the job, but that has nothing to do with her having two X chromosomes. &amp;nbsp;Sexist, misogynistic remarks like the one you have made are a reminder that, regardless of how far the U.S. has come regarding women's issues over the past century, we still have a long ways to go. &amp;nbsp;Your comments are the ones that are &amp;quot;irresponsible and naive&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287424</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287424</guid><dc:creator>Betsy Bayers</dc:creator><description>None of the candidates in the CNN/You Tube debate last night stood out as much different than the other. &amp;nbsp;What we need is AL GORE!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287425</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:00:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287425</guid><dc:creator>Rick  Baltimore Maryland</dc:creator><description>WHO CARES WHAT EITHER OF THESE TWO THINK. HILLARY IS SO FULL OF GRAP AND OBAMA HAS BEEN COACHED AS TO WHAT TO SAY AND WHEN TO AY IT, HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE. I AM NOT A DEMOCRAT BUT PEOPLE BETTER START LOOKING AT SENATOR BIDEN</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287426</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:00:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287426</guid><dc:creator>Mike App, Syracuse, NY</dc:creator><description>As a New Yorker, I did not vote for her, she has made a constant and targeted plan to attack and derail any opposition to her and her policies. &amp;nbsp;She seems to forget, or overlook, that SHE has advocated such great plans as the health care program with Bill, a program SHE WOULD NOT SUPPORT TODAY, she has gone from I love the war to I know nothing of it. &amp;nbsp;She is the most ireposnisble person in the field. &amp;nbsp;Take a stand Hilary and live with it, oh yea you did that when you and your husband destroyed anyone who came out against you, fill in the blank(Willy etc.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hilary has got to go, the polls will tell her where since that is what she follows, that and focus groups.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287427</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287427</guid><dc:creator>Walt Doering</dc:creator><description>Obama never said that he wouldn't go through a process before meeting with Hugo Chavez. &amp;nbsp;In the time alloted, in essence, he gave a simple answer of &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; to the question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad he will talk to people who will or may disagree with us. &amp;nbsp;And Obama is correct, it is Hillary who was irresponsible and imbued with naivete in giving Bush the authorization to go war in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;It is she who was &amp;quot;chicken-little&amp;quot; at that crucial time.It is she who needs to admit she made a big plunder and mistake. Until she does, I can't believe what she says about what she will do with the Iraq War.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287428</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287428</guid><dc:creator>Mary Morgan</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin, Get a grip you are so stupid. &amp;nbsp;Look at the mess that the rich old white mens club has given to us. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;We are better off with someone that has sense and work all channels before sending troops into harms way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The current occupant of the white house is nothing but a shell for cheney and his hawks.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287429</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287429</guid><dc:creator>ICAP, Memphis TN</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton has everything it takes to lead this country, and so much over all the other candidates. This country is such a mess right now and she is smart, articulate, cares about all Americans not just the rich, has experience in the the Senate Arms Committee, and better, in the White House itself. &amp;nbsp;She will have almost no learning curve in getting our country back on track which is going to be a daunting task for anyone next in the Oval Office. Most other world leaders loved the Clintons and Bill Clinton will be a huge plus in getting some positive standing in the world community.(Dispite what some unforgiving people think about his hanky panky, whereever he goes the crowds go wild with applause and cheering, here and abroad.) So I'm with Jim, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton.....Please vote for Clinton! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287430</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287430</guid><dc:creator>Rod of North Carolina</dc:creator><description>Much to MSNBC's dismay Hillary Rodham Clinton as she used to like to be called as proof of her feminine ways who now wants to be called Hillary Clinton for name recognition tied to her disgraced husband will never get elected Who out there would vote for her?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287431</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:01:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287431</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Todd</dc:creator><description>Its not a womans job? Wow. If George W Bush is a &amp;quot;man&amp;quot;...you can cut off my penis. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287433</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287433</guid><dc:creator>franklyn mohammed, melrose, ma</dc:creator><description>Obama showed true and forward looking leadership re meeting with foreign leaders. Our country should talk with everyone. That's how you get the opportunity to change history and keep us in the driver's seat. Hilary is old school.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Franklyn </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287434</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287434</guid><dc:creator>Jane Rowe, Arlington TX</dc:creator><description>Wow Manny, nice misogynistic comment there. &amp;nbsp;I dare you to tell that to the English, the Indians, the Germans, the Chileans among others... all have elected very successful female heads of state. &amp;nbsp;Funny you bash Hillary. &amp;nbsp;Bet you wouldn't say the same of Maggie Thatcher. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287435</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287435</guid><dc:creator>JOE GROSS BALTIMORE MD</dc:creator><description>LETS SEE HOW MANY STUPID DEMOCRATES ARE IN THE COUNTRY ? WE HAVE THEM HERE IN MARYLAND VOTING FOR THIS SO CALLED GOV.O'MALLEY WATCH YOUR BACKS THERE COMING . </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287436</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287436</guid><dc:creator>May West</dc:creator><description>Jerry/Corpus CHristi, grow up. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287437</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287437</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Keene NH</dc:creator><description>Obviously most of the people making coments don't understand the goof his response really was, it ill thought, to quick, and showed his lack of understanding and the need to think before he answers. &amp;nbsp;In answer to a woman in that office, how many women have run this country, I can name 4, can you?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287440</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287440</guid><dc:creator>franklyn mohammed, melrose, ma</dc:creator><description>Obama showed true and forward looking leadership re meeting with foreign leaders. Our country should talk with everyone. That's how you get the opportunity to change history and keep us in the driver's seat. Hilary is old school.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Franklyn </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287442</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:02:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287442</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Cathy Townsend, Seattle, Washington</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I shall make it my focus in life to buy out Mr. Calvin's company and fire you for your sexism (as well as your inability to use the English language). &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Not a womans (sic) job&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;Take your opinions back to the stone age where they belong. &amp;nbsp;America deserves better.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287444</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287444</guid><dc:creator>Fidel Castro</dc:creator><description>The time for communist revolution is now!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287446</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287446</guid><dc:creator>Santiman</dc:creator><description>Nice to see an little argument in public between the next president and vice-president of U.S.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287447</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287447</guid><dc:creator>Jane Rowe, Arlington TX</dc:creator><description>Oh and Manny? &amp;nbsp;Perhaps you should brush up on your history as well:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_heads_of_state"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_heads_of_state&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287448</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287448</guid><dc:creator>Phil,Sarasota , FL</dc:creator><description>All of these candidates are forgetting one simple fact and that is they were elected to serve their constituents not run around the country campaigning for the next office. We have another 15 months of this to go. By that time either they or the electorate is going to be quite fatigued.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287449</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287449</guid><dc:creator>Carly, Fort Wayne, IN</dc:creator><description>Message for Manny:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is 2007, and I *do* take offense. Not a woman's job? That is such a lame argument. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287450</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287450</guid><dc:creator>P. Brown</dc:creator><description>I still say that the best Democratic Ticket for the 2008 Presidential Election would be Edwards - (President) and Obama (V. Pres.) &amp;nbsp;Two senators on previous from the South and one current from the North. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287453</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:03:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287453</guid><dc:creator>Toasty, Indiana</dc:creator><description>Shadow is absolutely correct. &amp;nbsp;Why isn't the media calling this exactly what it is.... A strategic rebuttal to Obama's initial comment in an effort to make him sound like some inexperienced schoolboy. &amp;nbsp;I love Obama's reaction! &amp;nbsp;Its about time we had a candadite that is ready to get up off thier a*% and start addressing issues that we have in our foreign policy. &amp;nbsp;Lord knows it needs tweaking since Bush and his cronies have been in office.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287454</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287454</guid><dc:creator>Dave from San Diego</dc:creator><description>Do we really want 24 consecutive years (and possibly 28) of Bush's and Clintons in the Whitehouse? &amp;nbsp;Whether you agree or not with their politics, isn't it time for a change? </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287457</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287457</guid><dc:creator>Dennis, St. Louis MO</dc:creator><description>Jerry in Corpus Christi,&lt;br&gt;Is it not a good thing to be inexperienced as a Presidential Candidate? &amp;nbsp;Otherwise you become a joke. &amp;nbsp;Hence the reason Kerry isn't running again. &amp;nbsp;But Edwards and John McCain continue to try. &amp;nbsp;Once you fail the country doesn't become anymore sympathetic to your cause the third and fourth time. &amp;nbsp;I don't want an Experience Presidential Candidate in the office. &amp;nbsp;I want someone who knows what it is like in the OVAL OFFICE! &amp;nbsp;GO HILLARY! &amp;nbsp;BTW Manny Calvin, you are a sexist pig who should be strung up to the nearest tree in ARKANSAS!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287458</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287458</guid><dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Mean Girls&amp;quot; may have been a funny movie, but it's hardly a basis for foreign policy. This concept of &amp;quot;I don't talk to so and so because they are not in the cool clique&amp;quot; is absolutely sophomoric. A real leader is one that values the power of dialog as a means of influencing others - even the bad people. Bill Clinton understood that. It's a shame that his wive doesn't.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287459</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287459</guid><dc:creator>J Adams, Riverside, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is anxious to do for or to all of us what she and Billy did for Arkansas.....Arkansas became an economic leader under their dictatorship. Obama, I wonder if we all will have to face mecca should he get in, both are snakes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287460</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287460</guid><dc:creator>Patty C. of San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary was by far the most sophisticated and well spoken candidate during that debate. &amp;nbsp;She was right: she's not arbitrarily going to meet with these people unless the meeting has an actual function. &amp;nbsp;Sen. Obama was good, but you can tell she was the most experienced leader up there. &amp;nbsp;BTW--I would take an intelligent woman over a stupid man as President any day. &amp;nbsp;If you wouldn't, then do us all a favor and don't vote.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287461</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287461</guid><dc:creator>Isa Lapaz</dc:creator><description>Clinton is a fragment of the old floor mat. &amp;nbsp;And Obama means well for all including those in Alabama. Dialogue is the best way out &amp;quot;and God spoke to man&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peace</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287462</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287462</guid><dc:creator>Rhaab</dc:creator><description>I like Mrs. Clinton but I hate dirty polotics. Hopefully this will not be an issue that is blown totally out of proportion and we will stay with reality and the basics of what Nov 08' should be, this is a totally new type of election for a totally new United States of America. Let's do it right and keep it clean.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287464</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:04:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287464</guid><dc:creator>Greer Prather, Baton Rouge, LA</dc:creator><description>The fight that Hillary is picking is absurd. &amp;nbsp;Last night's debates were not debates at all, so now afterwards, in the comfort of her publicists and office, she can pick out what she is going to attack Obama on. &amp;nbsp;I am a conservative, but if there is going to be a change in parties, I sincerely hope it is Obama, and not Hillary. &amp;nbsp;She never fails to find a way for me to lose faith in her abilities...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287465</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:05:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287465</guid><dc:creator>Dob, Los Angeles</dc:creator><description>Manny - what century are you livin in? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287466</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287466</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Dee - Again, what is your point? &amp;nbsp;Hillary never said her administration would not have dialogue with &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; nations. &amp;nbsp;She said she personally, as President of the United States, would not meet with leaders from those countries without certain things first being accomplished. &amp;nbsp;(I am paraphrasing, as I don't remeber the exact words she used.) &amp;nbsp;Nowhere in any of the statements that you have quoted today has she said that the President should, within his or her first year in office, meet with leaders of these nations without first laying the diplomatic groundwork. &amp;nbsp;Show me her saying that precise thing and I will happily concede she has reversed herself. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Obama not having a chance to respond - perhaps he should have had a better answer to begin with, rather than a &amp;quot;oh that's what I meant!&amp;quot; when confronted with how his answer may appear. &amp;nbsp;The point is, he did NOT qualify his answer; he simply said he would meet with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to the propaganda issue, Hillary has a legitimate point. &amp;nbsp;She also didn't say that she would refuse a meeting simply because it would be used as propaganda if that meeting would otherwise prove useful. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's funny how many people pick away at every little thing that Hillary says, but expect you to cut Obama and others slack at every turn. &amp;nbsp;The more people harp on Hillary, the more I want her to succeed. &amp;nbsp;And by the way, I don't see all this &amp;quot;Hillary can do no wrong&amp;quot; in the MSM. &amp;nbsp;I read several articles on First Read today touting Obama's performance as being the best of the debate. &amp;nbsp;But of course, anything positive about Hillary means there is bias. &amp;nbsp;Anything positive about the other candidates means the MSM is being fair. &amp;nbsp;How silly.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287467</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:05:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287467</guid><dc:creator>Jane Mallon-Czajka</dc:creator><description>This one's for Manny Calvin&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; Sorry, Manny, here's what I think....I'll bet my life that you have very little education, and educated, smart, articulate woman frighten the lot of you mental midgets. The men I know that are intimidated by her, are minimally succesful. limited education, and insecure as hell,and sorry men,of course, no offense!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287468</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:05:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287468</guid><dc:creator>J Adams, Riverside, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is anxious to do for or to all of us what she and Billy did for Arkansas.....Arkansas became an economic leader under their dictatorship. Obama, I wonder if we all will have to face mecca should he get in, both are snakes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287473</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:06:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287473</guid><dc:creator>DK, Knoxville, TN</dc:creator><description>The great thing about the Hillary/Obama debate is that they'll sling arrows and barbs at one another, break one another down so all American can see their true colors as liberals suffering from a mental disorder. Neither candidate has focused on protecting America's borders, culture and language. They are open-borders proponents who want to see America, Canada and Mexico become one big free-trade zone that will turn America into a multi-lingual, multi-cultural country. Read your history, folks. There has never been a society, nor has there ever been a country that has survived being both multi-lingual and multi-cultural. No matter what our ethnic backgrounds we should all be Americans first...and unfortunately many of the illegals who have overrun our country have no interest in adopting the American way of life. They are merely here to take advantage of our system, of the at least 18 social entitlement programs available to them and to take jobs from legal Americans while in many cases sending all their money back to Mexico. Voting for either one of these candidates will lead to the downfall of America, potentially civil war and the complete destruction of everything we hold near and dear.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287479</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:06:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287479</guid><dc:creator>Terry, San Diego CA</dc:creator><description>Wow! I am a male and embarrassed by manny calvin's post. Shows how stupid and redneck we are becoming in this country. Perhaps we should revert back to the stone ages when old, fat and slow folk like manny would be dragged out in the bushes by younger and stronger men and beat to shreds. Besides, if women were to stay home and cook, wouldn't that require a real man with the ability and intellect to support her? Lazy welfare bums like manny aren't able to be real men, so that proposition circled and drained long time ago. PS: I am a republican and would welcome a female president - even hillary if duly elected by a majority of the people.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287481</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287481</guid><dc:creator>Jake, Fargo, ND</dc:creator><description>Saying Hillary is trying to cover up her own lack of experience as a presidential candidate compared to Obama is the pot calling the kettle black (no pun intended). &amp;nbsp;Neither her nor Obama have anywhere near the experience to lead a country. &amp;nbsp;That goes for Guiliani and Thompson, too.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287482</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287482</guid><dc:creator>Jerry King</dc:creator><description>Blab, blab, blab, blab. &amp;nbsp;Who listens to politicians anyway? &amp;nbsp;There isn't one of them (since Harry Truman) who will not say anything in order to gain a political advantage. It's what we get for voting for lawyers.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287483</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287483</guid><dc:creator>ROBERT/KCKS</dc:creator><description>WE WILL ALL BE SORRY IF WE HAVE ANOTHER CLINTON AS PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!! BILL WIL RUN THE SHOW FROM THE BACKROOM WHEN HE DONE WITH THE INTERN OF THE DAY. WAKE UP AMERICANS GET YOUR HEAD OUT AND INTO THE GAME. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287486</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287486</guid><dc:creator>PaulG, Morrisville, NC</dc:creator><description>I think it's a complete mistake for Obama, in a public forum, to announce his intentions to talk to foreign leaders of countries hostile to the US. &amp;nbsp;I think that is irresponsible and naive. &amp;nbsp;Obama could have said - without sounding indecisive - that he was not opposed to the talks in principle but would need to explore the other side's intentions before committing to that particular course of action. &amp;nbsp;(Similar to Bush in 2000, when he advised that Bush was not opposed (in principle) to talking to Arafat, but it would not be a simple exercise of photo ops on the front lawn of the White House...something constructive would need to be in the offing.) Instead, Obama all but committed his administration to talks - and this does indicate weakness. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps those leaders will make a donation to his campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary did a much better job of qualifying her position and it indicates a higher level of experitise and knowledge about how to deal with foreign affairs.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287487</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287487</guid><dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator><description>Well, I gotta agree with Mrs Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Obama clearly showed his lack of experience when dealing with this question during the debate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She said the truth. &amp;nbsp;He is inexperienced, and he is naive. &amp;nbsp;He could possible be a great president, but the needs more years in Washington to get to that point</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287488</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:07:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287488</guid><dc:creator>Darrell, Foxboro, MA</dc:creator><description>Until this statement I did not consider myself anti-Hillary, just more pro-Obama. &amp;nbsp;I can now say that I will not be voting for Hillary in the primary and will only vote for her (if she wins) in order to keep a conservative (notice I did not say a Republican) out of the White House. Hillary is a political person, pure and simple. &amp;nbsp;She does not have principles, she has positions. &amp;nbsp;I don't see how she is any different from Kerry was (who still would have been better than Bush II). &amp;nbsp;I really think Hillary is hurting herself by going negative against Obama on this issue.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287491</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287491</guid><dc:creator>don</dc:creator><description>bet edwards is loving this-lol-but it doesnt matter anyway-nation aint gonna vote for a black or a woman and especia;lly if they run togeether-we want the actor dude</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287492</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287492</guid><dc:creator>Daniel,Mesa Arizona</dc:creator><description>The more I listen to Hillary the more I wonder about, why she is running. The more she defends herself about her gender (manly) the more manly she becomes. Hear what I didn't say …(&amp;quot;I'm women here me roar&amp;quot;). She is worried and has to prove her worthiness. I admit she has an adversary in the campaign wings (Bill’s chorizemas) which maybe an advantage, or maybe a disadvantage (her not having it). I believe most people believe that, if she is elected, they will get a another chance to get Bill in the Whitehouse by proxy, as an advisor.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287493</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287493</guid><dc:creator>Joyous, Birmingham, Al</dc:creator><description>Ah Hillary more of the same, the US as center of the universe and too good to talk to the little, or people they perceive as evil. &amp;nbsp;Oops isn't the US now talking to at least two of the Axis of evil. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is a statesman who understands diplomacy and that fact that we need to learn to live together on the planet. What's that quote from the Book of Proverbs &amp;quot;when a man's way pleases the Lord, he makes even his enemies to be at peace with him.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287495</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287495</guid><dc:creator>Patrick, NYC, NY</dc:creator><description>I find it funny she would make such a stink about this since she stated in April she would do exactly the same thing. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287496</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287496</guid><dc:creator>Mike      Lompoc Ca</dc:creator><description>It's time we all realize that neither of these so called candidates has enough experience to be President. The White house used the same information that the pervert Clinton did on Iraq and now that the war is not going the way they expected all Democrats want a &amp;quot;DO OVER&amp;quot;. What clowns!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287497</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287497</guid><dc:creator>Rich Breidenthal, Columbia, MO</dc:creator><description>Dear Bush Republican: Bill Clinton did not start a war; Bill Clinton did not run up the deficit; Bill Clinton did not out an American Spy; Bill Clinton balanced the budget and reduced the deficit leaving Bush with money to give away to the 1% of Americans who own more than 80% of this countrys wealth. &amp;nbsp;Clinton played with a cigar and your jelous. Stop listening to that Republican Fraud Rush Limbaugh. The other countries loved Clinton which is not what I can say about a President who only has 26% approval rating in his own country. It's the old Republican trick. Bad mouth the Demo Candidate until everyone is convinced they would be crazy to vote for them. &amp;nbsp;Have the Demos gone after Mrs.Bush..no. &amp;nbsp;The Republicans went after every Demo wife in the Whitehouse which is gutter behavior. I was a Republican until the Church people took over our Constitution and called it the Bible.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287498</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287498</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Kalvar, Eugene, OR</dc:creator><description>Will the born-in-America Baby-boomers please get out of the way and let the generation of the future take the reigns of power. The best they have offered us is a flag burning draft dodger and a chicken-hawk; enough already.&lt;br&gt;This is from a 100% disabled Combat-Veteran with way too much silver in his hair.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the debate, non of them had the courage to tell all of the suplicants with their begging hands out, that their concerns are not that of the President; but, rather, those of the Senate and House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To do so, of course, would mean an admission of their complete and total failures at the jobs they already have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287502</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287502</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle, Wash</dc:creator><description>'I don't believe a woman should be in that high office, no offense ladies, but that is not a womans job' - Manny Calvin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People with outdated viewpoints like this are why at times, I'm embarassed to be part of this humanity.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287503</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287503</guid><dc:creator>unhappy camper</dc:creator><description>MSNBC seemed to overlook this gem throughout their Vote For Clinton spamming process. &amp;quot;Clinton was asked three times whether she would put U.S. troops into the Darfur region of Sudan before she answered no.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Even in an &amp;quot;average joe&amp;quot; format, Mrs. Clinton attempted to zig and zag her way out of an answer. &amp;nbsp;The die-hard clinton fans (and msn), have somehow spun this as a positive, while anyone with a few kicking brain cells and a pulse sees this as a weakness. &amp;nbsp;Other people have said how important this election is to elect the &amp;quot;right person for the job,&amp;quot; and it is unfortunate that the media only focuses on who can SAY the &amp;quot;right things&amp;quot; for the job. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287508</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287508</guid><dc:creator>Jim, Longview, Wash</dc:creator><description>I don't think this country is ready nor wanting another Clinton in office. watch !! every little slip and she'll start slinging crap.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287509</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287509</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Chiappetta</dc:creator><description>Two typical democratic politicans who will say anything to anybody to attempt to get elected. &amp;nbsp;What a sad commentary on the great system our country is blessed to possess. &amp;nbsp;The greatest fear we have in this country would be the election of either of these two interested only themselves. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287511</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287511</guid><dc:creator>Bryant DuPree, Bear, DE</dc:creator><description>I think both Hillary and Barack would be more open-minded as leader of the free world and not lead us down this dangerous path that Bush has. &amp;nbsp;The dangerous path being &amp;quot;stay the course&amp;quot; and to hell with what others think.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287513</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287513</guid><dc:creator>Nicolas Douze, Delray beach, Florida.</dc:creator><description>what this is all about,all thus negative word, november 8 will tell the world.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287514</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287514</guid><dc:creator>Tracee J. Robinson, M.A.</dc:creator><description>how can you say that neither has what it takes to run the country? Bush does not have what it takes!!!! Yall keep voting for him! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287515</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287515</guid><dc:creator>barb</dc:creator><description>I have to say, I think it would be a horrible thing if Hilary Clinton was elected president, I am a woman, but I think she would do this country more harm then good... I personally like John Edwards, and just because he has money, I dont think that makes him unable to be concerned about those without money. It doesnt make him a hypocrit. I really really hope Clinton doesnt get the nomination, plus she was asked if she didnt get the nomination would she accept vice president and she said no, which means she just wants the title she couldnt careless if she can help the country or not she wants a title...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287516</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287516</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Dallas, TX.</dc:creator><description>She had to give back the china and antiques from the first stay. Oh yea, and the crystal from Air Force One. &amp;nbsp;She is trying to get all that stuff back.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287517</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287517</guid><dc:creator>Beau - Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>It must have been a very non-event. &amp;nbsp;Is this all they had to argue about?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287518</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:11:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287518</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Hines</dc:creator><description>There is something that has emerged in DC in the past 15 years or so...it's an arrogance of power, an attitude in which those who breath the rarified air of the Beltway by so doing are bestowed with knowledge that exceeds that of us in the Heartland. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The result is that the puruit of the continued proximity to power becomes more important than the reason for an election in the first place--to govern--not to rule.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe Ms. Clinton is wrong in her comments about Senator Obama. IF she is the Democrat candidate, I will support her, but she needs to step back, reconsider her approach to the effort to promote the inevatibility of her election (I am so tired of hearing she hasn't lost since runnng for class President) and do a check to see if she is suffering from the arrogance of power. &amp;nbsp;It used to be called Potomac Fever, but it has mutated itself with the current occupant of the White House being a poster boy for this Beltway disease.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287520</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:11:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287520</guid><dc:creator>SUNNY, TEANECK, NEW JERSEY</dc:creator><description>WE NEED CLINTONS BACK TO SAVE THE COUNTRY!&lt;br&gt;BRING CLINTONS BACK AND SAVE THE COUNTRY!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287521</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:11:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287521</guid><dc:creator>Martha, Foley, Alabama &amp;amp; Omaha, NE</dc:creator><description>Give the lady a chance. &amp;nbsp;How does anyone know that a woman cannot do the job???? &amp;nbsp;Men have certainly not shown good judgement as of late.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287523</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287523</guid><dc:creator>Brian, Denver CO</dc:creator><description>It's funny that Clinton would call Obama naive. &amp;nbsp;Wasn't she the one who voted to authorize this Iraq war. &amp;nbsp;And then she said &amp;quot;I trusted the president&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;You wanna talk about naive. &amp;nbsp;How is it that Obama had the foresight to know this war would be a disaster, and Clinton gave Bush a blank check. &amp;nbsp;She just dropped down a couple notches in my book.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287524</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287524</guid><dc:creator>Debra W., Denver, Colorado</dc:creator><description>This does not surprise with Hilary Clinton, she has no idea what she is talking about. &amp;nbsp;First, she is not a black man trying to hail a cab in New York or any other city for that matter. &amp;nbsp;So she really cannot comment. &amp;nbsp;Racism is alive and well in this country!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287525</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287525</guid><dc:creator>lou</dc:creator><description>that scum bag ,Bush, got us in this mess!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287526</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287526</guid><dc:creator>Matt of Fla</dc:creator><description>It is absolutely rediculous not to sit down with world leaders who represent countries that we disagree with, it is called diplomacy and it is what needs to be done to keep us from being forced to fight...State run media may do no more than churn out the government's propaganda, but it is not much worse than corporate-run media churning out their propaganda...and their is no room in any intelligent discussion for &amp;quot;its not a woman's job,&amp;quot; manny Calvin, can you not see how poorly our country is being run by the man in charge now?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287527</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287527</guid><dc:creator>lyn, Silver Spring, MD</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;In your face Hillary&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;you really don't want a piece of this&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;If you want to debate irresponsibility and being niave let's discuss your Iraq vote and trusting GWB&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;How many lives did that cost? &amp;nbsp;Bring it on. &amp;nbsp;LOL</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287528</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:12:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287528</guid><dc:creator>Clam trap, D.C., MD</dc:creator><description>Go Hillary! &amp;nbsp;Winning the democratic nomination guarantees a Republican President in '08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287530</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:13:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287530</guid><dc:creator>Williamb, LA, CA</dc:creator><description>Interesting triangulation by Hillary, straight from Bill's play book. &amp;nbsp;However, why when they say we need to talk to our enemies, do they point out Reagan, he only talked AFTER he had the Soviet Union on its knees. &amp;nbsp;You negotiate from a position of strength ONLY! What do they think -- only if we asked NICELY would Syria and Iran stop meddling in Iraq? Talk about NAIVE!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287532</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:13:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287532</guid><dc:creator>James, Cheyenne, WY</dc:creator><description>Meet with world leaders who oppose the U.S.? If they oppose the freedom and liberties that the U.S. stands for then there is really no forum for significant correspondence. If they oppose the U.S. then they are our enemy and should be dealt with quickly and harshly!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287533</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:13:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287533</guid><dc:creator>Kristian O</dc:creator><description>Hilary is a fraud riding on Bubba's coattail, among other things. Eventually the mascara will wear off and she'll fold up like that cheap jacket she had on last night. Stick a fork in her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287534</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287534</guid><dc:creator>Fidel Castro, Havana, Cuba</dc:creator><description>Just think, if Al (the Bore)Gore would have won the election people say we wouldn't be in this war with&lt;br&gt;Iraq. Just think about that for a minute.....then we would of surely had a war here in the good ol US of A</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287535</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:13:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287535</guid><dc:creator>Brooksville Tomas</dc:creator><description>Wise up guys, Obama needs to take more lessons, and come back in 8yrs after Clinton's second term.. then he'll be ready to lead. &amp;nbsp;Clinton '08...the country needs her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287536</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287536</guid><dc:creator>k-doe, mechanicsburg, PA</dc:creator><description>I think that it is about time a women got to the highest office. &amp;nbsp;Seeing that we have a better nack at running things and the skills to do it. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287537</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287537</guid><dc:creator>Martha, Foley, AL &amp;amp; Omaha, NE</dc:creator><description>Liar???? &amp;nbsp;Let me tell you a thing or two about the current folks and then we will talk about liars.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287538</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287538</guid><dc:creator>J. CASEY</dc:creator><description>ITS TIME FOR THE STOCK MARKET TO RUN LIKE THE BULLS AGAIN....LETS THE CLINTONS BACK IN </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287540</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287540</guid><dc:creator>christinenorth bend oregon</dc:creator><description>Why does this surprise anyone. &amp;nbsp;This isn't the firt time Hillary has done this and it &amp;nbsp;won't be the last!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287543</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287543</guid><dc:creator>Bob Howell, Canton, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Wow, you bloggers better watch out cause when Hillary becomes Queen your the first ones her henchmen will come after.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287544</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287544</guid><dc:creator> harry truman</dc:creator><description>All you people are forgetting how good we had it under bill clinton and I think we can have it with hillary, I dont think obama is smart enough to tie his own shoes let alone be presdent. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287545</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287545</guid><dc:creator>Jeffrey Todd</dc:creator><description>The media has all but crowned Queen Hillary as Madame Prezident based on polls and the almighty dollars raised. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember dear friends the previous election in which polls suggested that Republicans would maintain control of Congress .... well they did not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only deciding factor as to who will be the next President of &amp;quot;The Homeland&amp;quot; will be the tally at the end of the vote next November.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287546</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287546</guid><dc:creator>Ian, Redmond, WA</dc:creator><description>I LOL at people who say &amp;quot;we will be in big trouble if Candidate Foo gets elected.&amp;quot; Really? How could it get any worse? Right now W is telling us that Al Queda in Iraq is a part of the war on terror and so we must stay and fight. No duh. Too bad HE CREATED Al Queda In Iraq. What's next, the police allowing goons to rob your house and then telling you to support the police so your house won't get robbed? W and his administration is no better than the mob and its protection rackets. I fail to see how even a retarded monkey could be wrose than our current chicken hawk, deferal getting, fear mongering neo-con coawards could be any worse.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287547</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287547</guid><dc:creator>Pat McHugh</dc:creator><description>We don,t need another Bush, nor a Clinton in the White House, there are more qualified individuals living in this country, then these familes!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287548</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287548</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>Its not about being a woman. Women have run nations before and did it quite well. What its really about is that since 1988, we've had either a Bush or a Clinton in office. Time to stop that and find some new blood.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287549</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287549</guid><dc:creator>T  Sacramento ca</dc:creator><description>The world has changed from the days of old, something fresh and new needs to lead this country. To not talk with what is believed to be the evil countries will just lead us down the path of 9/11 one way or another. Hillary is opportunistic, she will jump in whenever she see's an opening, where as Obama has stayed with the issues and havent jumped in on the non issue side of things. Just keep it honest, dont say what you will do and get into office and do nothing! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Bush is a bully an idiot for not listening to the people of this great country or Congress, History will portray him as the worst president ever next to Nixon and Reagan! PERIOD!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287550</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287550</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Moultrie, Ga.</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter what gender a person is or what race or religion....we need someone who can run this country like a business and start vetoing all the pork and save money where possible including turning certain aspects over to private companies, etc. &amp;nbsp;We also need someone who can REALLY see what is happening to this country with no restrictions on illegals and SECURE OUR BORDERS! &amp;nbsp;So far I haven't heard much from any of them that fits all the necessary qualifcations from any party! &amp;nbsp;I don't believe I could ever vote for Hillary and I am pretty much democrat. &amp;nbsp;At least Obama hasn't been in Washington long enough to be completely corrupt!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287555</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287555</guid><dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator><description>Obama has her scared and will say anything to deffer attention away form her inability to stand alone as a candidate without the shadow of her husband. injured animals are unpredictable and will do anything for self-preservation. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287556</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287556</guid><dc:creator>IMPEACH BUSH AND CHENEY</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton the next president of the United States of America. &lt;br&gt;Women are the MAJORITY, vote early and vote often.&lt;br&gt;Any woman can do a better job than the IDIOT POLYP in the spin house now.&lt;br&gt;IMPEACH the scum and elect a REAL leader.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287557</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287557</guid><dc:creator>Erin, Detroit, MI</dc:creator><description>Manny, numerous studies have found that women make better leaders and managers than men. &amp;nbsp;Mostly because men strive to achieve their own agenda while women do what is best for the group. &amp;nbsp;Regardless, I think we need a president who will do what's best for this country not what's best for him/herself. &amp;nbsp;Whether that's a man or woman is really not important.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287558</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287558</guid><dc:creator>B, Roanoke, VA</dc:creator><description>Obama’s position is na&amp;#239;ve. &amp;nbsp;Whether Clinton is a hypocrite or not does not change that fact. &amp;nbsp;Every administration since the revolution has refused to meet with Iran. &amp;nbsp;No President dating back to Kennedy has met with Castro. &amp;nbsp;I could go on, but the point is this: does Obama think that all those Presidents were stupid? &amp;nbsp;Does he actually believe that they chose not to meet with these regimes because they were just stubborn? &amp;nbsp;There are many reasons why the US President should not meet with a religious fanatic or a half wit like Castro. &amp;nbsp;Whether you like her or not, Clinton is right.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287559</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287559</guid><dc:creator>d. miller</dc:creator><description>hey she'd be better than any one has to this point from say around the 50's on !</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287560</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:15:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287560</guid><dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator><description>It's amazing to me to see so much intellect and influence coming from the South, and especially Texas. &amp;nbsp;Isn't that where the Bushes are from? &amp;nbsp;Precisely. &amp;nbsp;And &amp;quot;Not a woman's job&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;Good grief. &amp;nbsp;What stone age did some of these idiots crawl back from? &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton is not a liar--many, many peopel have tried to bring her down, and she is still standing. &amp;nbsp;She has a great deal of experience, and happens to be respected by many world leaders, in case you haven't done your research. &amp;nbsp;She will do America a great deal of justice, and remedy many of the disasters of the Bush/Cheney era. &amp;nbsp; Thank God! &amp;nbsp;Now, enough is enough... &amp;nbsp;from Texas that is... all the way around. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287561</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287561</guid><dc:creator>clinton fan of MO</dc:creator><description>Where did that guy come from? &amp;nbsp;Hillary would make a better president than any of the other choices. Ladies she needs our help to win it. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287562</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287562</guid><dc:creator>boski</dc:creator><description>Clinton said she would retaliate if we were attacked. I feel safer already. She may consider telling us what she would do to prevent an attack, then she wouldn't have to retaliate. The woman is a SNAKE!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287563</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287563</guid><dc:creator>Bill, Herndon, VA</dc:creator><description>She is a joke. &amp;nbsp;There was NOTHING wrong with Obama's answer. &amp;nbsp;The media wants her to win in the worst way. &amp;nbsp;It still doesn't make up for the pounding she is taking in the fundraising race. &amp;nbsp;Go Obama!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287564</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287564</guid><dc:creator>IMPEACH BUSH AND CHENEY</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton the next president of the United States of America. &lt;br&gt;Women are the MAJORITY, vote early and vote often.&lt;br&gt;Any woman can do a better job than the IDIOT POLYP in the spin house now.&lt;br&gt;IMPEACH the scum and elect a REAL leader.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287565</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287565</guid><dc:creator>Utubedout</dc:creator><description>I think that she is scum too. Problem is her husband is a rock star ex-president, she will get the nod from the democrats and probaly win the election. Look nobody thought she would win her seat in New York, and look where she is at now, and most people today are only going to beleve what the media tells them too. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287566</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287566</guid><dc:creator>spanky detriot mich</dc:creator><description>vote for hillary you must be as niave as her by standing by her man. wasnt it her that said it was a right wing conspericy after her husband on tv and he let her hang in the breeze. do you really want these two clowns back in the whitehouse. lol</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287567</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287567</guid><dc:creator>Gery, Tampa, FL</dc:creator><description>Direct Negotiations (with enemy states) are not a sign of weakness; they are a sign of leadership.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The Bush Administration's refusal to talk to anyone on the evil side, as some have called idealistic, I call it dangerously unrealistic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;--Hillary Clinton, October 31, 2006 at the Cuoncil of Foreign Relations </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287568</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287568</guid><dc:creator>Dan, New Yor City, NY</dc:creator><description>I totally agree with jerry from texas, she is covering up her lack of experience and like obama said, &amp;quot;irresponsible and naive' was voting to authorize the Iraq war.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287569</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287569</guid><dc:creator>RH Oregon</dc:creator><description>Obama's camp doesn't need to respond to this. Hillery won't do it any different than Bill. The RCI Method (Rectal-Cranial Inversion).&lt;br&gt;By the way Hillery how's those Chinese donations coming? If it's a little slow, try asking for it with your chinese accent. It's better than your down south one.&lt;br&gt;Clinton foreign policy = The selling out of America&lt;br&gt;Clinton domestic policy = Socialism (Communism with a smile)</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287571</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:16:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287571</guid><dc:creator>John - Michigan</dc:creator><description>As a &amp;quot;swing state&amp;quot; Independent voter who does not want to see any of George W. Bush's failed policies dragging on past 2008, I feel compelled to offer Democrats my two cents on the next presidential election. &amp;nbsp;And I hope that Democrats will listen, not just to me, but to Independent voters in general, because the votes of Independents will ultimately decide which party's nominee will become the next President. &amp;nbsp;My point here is simple: &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton does not represent the change that Independent voters are looking for, and we will not make her the next president. &amp;nbsp;This is not simply my own perspective - polls have shown that, although voters would prefer a Democratic president in 2008, Hillary Clinton does very poorly in head-to-head matchups against all of the major Republican contenders [1]. &amp;nbsp;For example, a recent Zogby poll indicated that Hillary Clinton would lose against Giuliani or McCain, while Barack Obama would defeat any potential Republican candidate [2]. &amp;nbsp;And when Independents choose among Democratic primary candidates, Obama leads Clinton 31% to 22% [3]. &amp;nbsp;The message from the American electorate is quite clear: &amp;nbsp;if Democrats nominate Hillary Clinton, Republicans win in 2008 and the White House is GOP-occupied territory until 2013. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if Democrats insist on ignoring polls like these, there are other practical reasons why nominating Hillary Clinton would be a strategic disaster. &amp;nbsp;One concern is that she has already alienated far more voters than the other Democratic contenders. &amp;nbsp;Polls have shown, for example, that 46% of American voters say they would definitely vote against Hillary Clinton [4]. &amp;nbsp;A more serious concern yet: &amp;nbsp;no other Democrat's candidacy has as much potential to re-unify the GOP and mobilize the conservative base in opposition. &amp;nbsp;For that reason, the head-to-head polls may even underestimate the difficulty that a Hillary Clinton ticket would face in 2008. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton has long been despised by Republicans, but more recently she has lost the support of most liberals (by voting to authorize the Iraq War and the Patriot Act, for example), and the polls above suggest she isn't very popular with Independents either. &amp;nbsp;The only group that seems to like her are Democrats who don't belong to the passionately anti-war bloc. &amp;nbsp;This support may make her a serious competitor for the Democratic nomination, but when it comes to the general election, Hillary Clinton's narrow support base renders her unelectable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aside from the pragmatic arguments, there are deeper issues that make me doubt that Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for her party or for the country. &amp;nbsp;I realize she often does a good job of talking the &amp;quot;party line&amp;quot;, but when the money is on the line, will she stand up for everyday Americans or will she shift with the winds of political expedience? &amp;nbsp;I think one good predictor of Hillary Clinton's loyalties as president can be found in her fundraising - to whom would she owe her election? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Revealingly, Hillary Clinton relies on relatively fewer but larger political contributions than her Democratic adversaries. &amp;nbsp;She has taken more of her money from $2300+ donors than any other candidate from either party, and her percentage of money from small donors (&amp;lt;$200) is lower than Obama, Edwards, or Richardson [5]. &amp;nbsp;But more disturbingly, unlike Obama and Edwards, she freely accepts money from corporate PAC's and lobbyists [6]. &amp;nbsp;Clearly these donors must believe that Hillary Clinton will support their interests if elected. &amp;nbsp;And while Hillary Clinton did try to reform the health care system 15 years ago, the fact that she has now become the largest recipient of health industry dollars in the senate [6] makes me wonder if she would act with much boldness on that issue as president. &amp;nbsp;But perhaps the most worrying source of Hillary Clinton's recent fundraising is none other than the owner of Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, who hosted a fundraiser for her last summer [7]. &amp;nbsp;I can understand it from Murdoch's point of view: &amp;nbsp;of course he'd prefer to have a Republican win in 2008, but that looks difficult, so it makes sense to also support the Democrat who is least threatening to his ideology and interests. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, Hillary Clinton's ties to conservative corporate elements don't end there. &amp;nbsp;She served on the board of directors of WalMart from 1986 to 1992, a time when that company was expanding, along with its union-busting policies and dismal wages without health care [8]. &amp;nbsp;And it's said that Hillary Clinton &amp;quot;was a part of those decisions&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;The campaign staff she has surrounded herself with are even more entwined in the interests of big business. &amp;nbsp;Her top pollster, who has worked on Enron-style energy deregulation, continues to work for a very un-progressive PR firm which has helped tobacco companies fight new regulation and coached companies on how to resist unionization efforts [6]. &amp;nbsp;Can Independents be blamed if they view Hillary Clinton as a continuation of the same dysfunctional and special interest controlled government that we have endured for much longer than just the last seven years?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the picture I paint above seems to contrast with the public image Hillary Clinton has tried to cultivate, that's a big part of the problem. &amp;nbsp;Who is the real Hillary Clinton? &amp;nbsp;Character and trust go a long way toward winning the votes of many Independents, and I think this is where many people are uncertain about Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;From her I hear carefully rehearsed and crafted soundbites, lacking in both substance and sincerity. &amp;nbsp;I would like to see a woman president in the near future, but I think American women deserve a better first president than Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Even though I don't like any of the likely Republican candidates, I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton either, and the numbers suggest I'm not the only one who finds her lacking in authenticity. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton is unelectable as a presidential candidate, and probably for good reason. &amp;nbsp;I hope that Democrats will think very carefully about the merit and the consequences of nominating her in 2008 before they make their decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[1]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-dems17jun17,1,1842149,full.story?ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true"&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-dems17jun17,1,1842149,full.story?ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[2]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1316"&gt;http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1316&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[3]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-06-04-poll_N.htm"&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-06-04-poll_N.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[4]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/poll_giuliani_has_biggest_base_of_support_lowest_base_of_opposition"&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/poll_giuliani_has_biggest_base_of_support_lowest_base_of_opposition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[5]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp"&gt;http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[6]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20070604&amp;amp;s=berman"&gt;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20070604&amp;amp;s=berman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[7]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/10/nyregion/10hillary.html?ex=1304913600&amp;amp;en=ff6d1ba374427b83&amp;amp;ei=5088&amp;amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/10/nyregion/10hillary.html?ex=1304913600&amp;amp;en=ff6d1ba374427b83&amp;amp;ei=5088&amp;amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;amp;emc=rss&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[8]&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-hillary19may19,0,5168474.story?coll=la-home-center"&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-hillary19may19,0,5168474.story?coll=la-home-center&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287572</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287572</guid><dc:creator>Faye North, PA</dc:creator><description>Obama is the most intelligent, sincere, thoughtful presidental candidate in the race. &amp;nbsp;I would call his comments refreshing, and representative of powerful change for the better that a Barack Obama administration would create. &amp;nbsp;Obama does not play in the mud like the Hilary camp...we do not need more of the Clinton-Bush legacy....we need an outsider and Barack is the right person at the right time....Democrats are being fooled into losing by following Hilary; Republicans are grinning behind their backs because she will never win in a general election...Obama on the other hand will WIN...if only Dems open their eyes!!! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287573</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287573</guid><dc:creator>John West</dc:creator><description>Why are we forced to listen 2 years in advance to all this jibberish?? Before Bush leaves office, the terrorists are going to try another attack to embarress him one last time. &amp;nbsp;If they do, it will ensure that neither of these clowns gets elected since the Democrats would only want a hug, and the Republicans will want to Slug!! Libertarians, anyone?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287574</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287574</guid><dc:creator>MTR BX NY</dc:creator><description>The man was right to say it the way he said it. I would rather have a bunch of idiots talk smack over a radio or tv about how glorious their 3rd world regime is than have to put boots on the ground to hold some ridiculous territory. Truth of the matter some of our own friends think the US is a silly empire and are waiting for the day we fall flat. (Never will happen) Truth is if we had a different mindset about about US power we would truly be a force because everyone would respect our true power. That power is actually the application of freedom and trust me everyone wants to be free. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287575</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287575</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Seattle,Wa</dc:creator><description>The people that believe that a vote for Hillary will be a &amp;quot;Vote for Change&amp;quot; are the one's who are irresponsible and naive.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287576</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287576</guid><dc:creator>willis smith, wash. DC</dc:creator><description>We all have our own ideas. &amp;nbsp;Jerry of corpus christi I beleive people would rather kiss mrs. clinton ring than your a--. &amp;nbsp;I will vote for her and hope she wins the election and I centainly beleive she will as she is the only contender except for mr. Edwards. Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287578</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287578</guid><dc:creator>Megan, Miami, Florida</dc:creator><description>I am sick and tired of Hillary Clinton and her adoptive style of &amp;quot;politricks.&amp;quot; Lets face it I cant imagine Bill Clinton Being First Man, come on, thats like going from promotion to demotion.Obama has a better vision for the country, though I doubt he will become president...Hillary sucks, and its all an act. Has anyone forgot how she pretended to stand by her man during her torrid affairs, instead of leaving him, as an example to all men who cheat. I guess she would do ANYTHING to become president. Come on, Hikkary, frget the White House. I know you loooooooooved living there, but your time has been up ages ago.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287579</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287579</guid><dc:creator>DaTruth, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>I find it amazing that there are so many internet-based Obama fanboys, yet he's constantly far behind in actual scientific polls. &amp;nbsp;I know, it's all a conspiracy, right. &amp;nbsp;The MSM wants Hillary, blah blah blah. &amp;nbsp;Those are the kinds of excuses losers make. &amp;nbsp;It's time to support your nominee: &amp;nbsp;Hillary in 08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287580</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287580</guid><dc:creator>Tim Bienvenue, New Orleans, LA</dc:creator><description>This is nonsense - Obama is naive, but Hillary is naive also. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, the republicans will win the next presidential election, most likely with Giuliani. &amp;nbsp;It is too bad the democrats cannot come up with better candidates than these, as I am concerned about the fact that &amp;quot;we the people&amp;quot; are quickly losing all of our civil liberties. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287583</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287583</guid><dc:creator>A FLoyd</dc:creator><description>Why don't you print the whole story? Hillary flip flopped on this very issue...she actually said the same thing as Barack back in April...sorry MSN, here's the link to the real story:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_112220939.html"&gt;http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_112220939.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287584</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287584</guid><dc:creator>spanky detriot mich</dc:creator><description>vote for hillary you must be as niave as her by standing by her man. wasnt it her that said it was a right wing conspericy after her husband on tv and he let her hang in the breeze. do you really want these two clowns back in the whitehouse. lol</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287585</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287585</guid><dc:creator>Thomas, Orlando, FL</dc:creator><description>Obama did not have a rehearsed answer for this question, and to be honest it is not always best to sound like such a politician. Especially for a YouTube debate that featured a snowman asking a question about Global Warming. &amp;nbsp;When did she get the impression this was time to be so serious? &amp;nbsp;Clinton needs to stop telling other Democrats what to think, or creating a Democrat version of GOP 'talking points'. &amp;nbsp;If DEMs wanted this, they would be voting GOP. &amp;nbsp;She is off target with these comments.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287586</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:18:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287586</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Myles, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Vote for Hillary Clinton....Obama is starting to sound more and more like John Kerry when he ran for president...flip flopping on every issue. Clinton is the ONLY candidate Dem or Republican with the back bone to turn this country around in the right direction.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287588</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287588</guid><dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator><description>For those who think being president is a man's job, think about this... who really wore the pants in your family growing up. &amp;nbsp;I know for a fact, since I lost my mother at a very young age, that the woman is really the one who runs the family and keeps things running smoothly. &amp;nbsp;So don't be fooled naive boys... women already have proven that we can do big jobs... we've raised you haven't we. &amp;nbsp;Too bad you listen to all the lies and don't give women respect for all we contribute to this great world. &amp;nbsp;I don't know who I'll be voting for yet, but I certainly won't be narrow minded when it comes time to push that lever. &amp;nbsp;Man or woman, the best person needs to be decided on the issues.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287590</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:18:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287590</guid><dc:creator>Peter, San Rafael, CA</dc:creator><description>I agree it was a cheap shot by her, but having said that, Obama needs to repeat that rebuttal about a dozen more times in the next 48 hours.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287592</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:18:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287592</guid><dc:creator>Dave Bronx, New  York</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin you are an obvious women hater and you probably think you're straight as well. &amp;nbsp;Women are good for birthing babies and cooking your dinner? &amp;nbsp;Bush is supposed to be a man, albeit a cowardly man but he's proven to be the worst president this country has ever seen why not give a woman the reins and see what she can do. &amp;nbsp;You probably subscribe to the &amp;quot;barefoot and pregnant&amp;quot; philosophy. &amp;nbsp;It's attitudes like yours that has helped to keep women repressed. Do you have your woman walking 10 paces behind you wearing a black veil on her head? You don't deserve to even have the right to vote. We need a leader with a brain and less testosterone. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287593</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287593</guid><dc:creator>C. Mcghie</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;He likened the position to a continuation of the Bush administration diplomatic policies,&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this is exactly why I support Obama over Clinton. Hilary is just like Bush but on the opposite side of the political spectrum. She seems bound and determined to make all of the same mistakes Bush has made, unilateral decision making, self alienating foreign policy, partisan domestic political mindset.&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287594</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287594</guid><dc:creator>Tip, Calif</dc:creator><description>And this is what we have to choose from? &amp;nbsp;Yikes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287596</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287596</guid><dc:creator>phil, laguna niguel</dc:creator><description>hillary doesnt want things in the USA to improve. that's her opportunity. hillary wants only one thing. hillary wants to be Madam President. it so easy, even a caveman (like bill) can see it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287597</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287597</guid><dc:creator>Rep. in  Louisiana</dc:creator><description>I don't like Obama, and I don't like Hillary. I need another choice. These two are all about smoking mirrors. Neither has any sense of what it takes to run a country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287598</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287598</guid><dc:creator>Ken, MN</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I don't believe a woman should be in that high office, no offense ladies&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;that is not a womans job&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;(Manny Calvin 3:34 post)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHAT???? Geez man, what century are you from? &amp;nbsp;You sound like like my ex-son-in-law who proudly proclaimed &amp;quot;Women should never be supervisors&amp;quot; in the workplace. &amp;nbsp;He was a sexist jerk and you sound suspiciously similar. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want Hillary, but that is because she is Hillary. &amp;nbsp;Being female is not a reason for disqualification from high public office.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287600</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287600</guid><dc:creator>Cassie, Pea Ridge, AR</dc:creator><description>OK - Hillary Clinton is exactly right. &amp;nbsp;She has had more experience, much more. Just lay off. &amp;nbsp;Have any of you ever been president?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287601</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287601</guid><dc:creator>Andrew, Harmony, FL</dc:creator><description>Hillarious - she is - she needs to be Hannitized!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287602</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287602</guid><dc:creator>Jim Richards Port ludlow WA</dc:creator><description>I think Clinton fatigue is finally settling in .See Dee of Va to assess Hillary's flipping on any and all issues .Why won't she and Bill just go away.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287603</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287603</guid><dc:creator>Lou Anderson</dc:creator><description>I think one of Barak's strong points is his confidence to engage anyone on any subject. &amp;nbsp;He is not afraid to talk to anyone. &amp;nbsp;I surely did not take his response to the question of meeting with other leaders without any pre-conditions as a sign of weakness, naivete or irresponsibility. &amp;nbsp;What I heard was a man confident of himself and willing to listen to the other side to explore. &amp;nbsp;If the leaders on the opposite side take him for a fool they do so at their own risk. &amp;nbsp;The stick is always available to Barak if needed. &amp;nbsp;Candidates who think he would be taken advantage of only reveal their own weakness. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;We need this kind of person as president not only to deal with the world but to deal with the bigger problem we've had in congress where Republicans don't talk to Democrats and Democrats don't talk to Republicans with the end result of nothing getting done. &amp;nbsp;He is a refreshing voice in a sea of politicians who say what they think the people want to hear instead of speaking their minds. &amp;nbsp;We saw plenthy of this during the debate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287604</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287604</guid><dc:creator>Bobbie Zenker, Helena, MT</dc:creator><description>The simple truth is that Mrs. Clinton is the most internationally experienced candidate from either party. &amp;nbsp;Whether you like her or not, she is a savvy politician and respected diplomat throughout the world. &amp;nbsp;You just watch - when all the fun is done and the smoke clears, it will be Clinton AND Obama in '08!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287605</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287605</guid><dc:creator>Penelope, SC</dc:creator><description>Wow. &amp;nbsp;Good leadership has nothing to do with sex. &amp;nbsp;I am not a Hillary fan, but the right woman could run this country as well as a man.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287606</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287606</guid><dc:creator>Hillman, Kingsport TN</dc:creator><description>I think Hillary is starting to feel threatened by Obama &amp;amp; is starting to pull out the Clinton bag o'tricks to begin discrediting whatever he says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that I intend to vote for any of the current Dem (or Repub for that matter) candidates. Both parties are pathetic, pandering charlatans.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287607</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287607</guid><dc:creator>Springfield, VA</dc:creator><description>Hilary disppointed me a little bit.I have come to realize that she would rather be right than reasonable! Politics of appeasement are what has spoiled the integrity of real politics of &amp;quot;bread and butter&amp;quot; for the masses. Obama on the other hand should not allow himself to be drawn in petty politics. He should instead emulate leaders like Jimmy and Bill who were genuinely interested and worked tirelessly to improve the Middle East relations by meeting Yasser Arafat and the Israeli Prime minister. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287609</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287609</guid><dc:creator>Dan in Ohio</dc:creator><description>Either one of these two will be disasterous for our foreign policy. I haven't heard a concrete plan from either on any subject. Obama standard policy statement is &amp;quot;we can do better&amp;quot;. Every statement from Clinton finds fault with the Bush administation. They had both better discover very soon that Bush is not running for office in 2008. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287610</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287610</guid><dc:creator>Leo of Las Vegas, NV</dc:creator><description>Why wouldn'tHillary turn to Omama and at least say one positive thing about him. The question was to turn on your left and say one positive &amp;amp; negative about the Candidate. &amp;nbsp;She loved them all. Wow!! &amp;nbsp;That's not sincere, that's not what democracy is about</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287611</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287611</guid><dc:creator>Faye North</dc:creator><description>Democrats are irresponsible and naive if they vote for Hilary...The Republicans are praying that the Dems don't wake up and vote for someone who would win like Barack Obama...he offers genuine sincerity, intelligence, leadership and a rare opportunity for our positive change in our world!!! Please Dems WAKE-UP....Hilary will never win in a general election...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287613</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287613</guid><dc:creator>John, Hackettstown, NJ</dc:creator><description>To BR,&lt;br&gt;There is no bigger pair of 'scum bags&amp;quot; than B&amp;amp;C. &amp;nbsp;They are traitors and should be arrested and jailed for life.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287614</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287614</guid><dc:creator>Emily J, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton would have been attacked had she made the mistake that Obama did. &amp;nbsp;I think that she responded in an experienced way that proves her qualifications as president. &amp;nbsp;She did very well last night in providing direct answers that were honest and personable. &amp;nbsp;Obama also did well, but why is everyone up in arms over her criticism of Obama, yet no one takes issue when he pushes her on her vote for Iraq. &amp;nbsp;This is politics and these candidates need to prove how they are stronger than their opponents. &amp;nbsp;And I believe that Hillary Clinton is stronger than Obama right now. &amp;nbsp;She will make a great president, and I think her being a female will not limit her in any way and I happy to see that most Americans take no issue with her gender, despite what they believe about her politics.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287616</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287616</guid><dc:creator>conservative woman, wife &amp;amp; mother</dc:creator><description>Here we go! This is the point where DEMS &amp;amp; REPs move from attacking the the other party to each other. I would like, for once, to see participant not say a word about their opponent and only talk about the issues. One day we'll get back to running our own country with morality and conscious back at the forefront of this nation.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287617</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287617</guid><dc:creator>Judi Harris</dc:creator><description>To Mr. Manny Calvin: &amp;nbsp;I think your comments about a woman in that high office just won Hilliary many many many more votes!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287619</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287619</guid><dc:creator>Lee Scott Theisen, San Francisco, California</dc:creator><description>Hillary is right, you do not just jump in to meet leaders without knowing what you are meeting about. &amp;nbsp;How many photo ops do these other leaders need if they can get them without substance. &amp;nbsp;Bush republicans are the ones who blindly lead us into war following a liar whose administration is the most corrupt in our history. &amp;nbsp;Scott</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287621</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287621</guid><dc:creator>SMOKEHOUSE</dc:creator><description>Clinton, President AGAIN,Yikees. Give it up Hillary, stay home and cook for BILL. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287622</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287622</guid><dc:creator>Trev, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>I'll take either of them over the current dictator any old day...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287623</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287623</guid><dc:creator>todd....boise, idaho</dc:creator><description>who cares...they both suck</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287624</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287624</guid><dc:creator>bob, Indianapolis, In</dc:creator><description>Clinton made much ado about nothing. &amp;nbsp;I like that Obama would try to have more dialogue instead of political positioning like Bush and it seems in which Clinton would engage.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287625</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287625</guid><dc:creator>Voted for Bush  Oklahoma City Oklahoma</dc:creator><description>Hillary is a joke, lets all remember when she let her husband make a laughing stock out of her. &amp;nbsp;I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN. How can she lead a country when she can't even take care of her house. &amp;nbsp;I do not have any respect for her, because power was more important to her then this country or her child. &amp;nbsp;What message did she send to this country of women when she allowed her Cheating Husband make a mocker out of her and this country. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287626</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287626</guid><dc:creator>Michael Chieco North Arlington New Jersey</dc:creator><description>Clinton was correct. You dont get boxed in to a &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;you will meet every lunatic leader around the world in your first year of office . I like Obama , but it was a &amp;quot;sucker: question and he fell for it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287628</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287628</guid><dc:creator>Colan Powell , Washington DC.</dc:creator><description>Bush republicans don't have a leg to stand on, when it comes to being a charlatan.&lt;br&gt;Laura Bush is guilty of killing her ex boyfriend. And G.W. Bush is guilty of Treason, War Profiteering, War Crimes against humanity, Genocide and aiding and abed ding the enemy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287629</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287629</guid><dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator><description>HMMMM...wonder if Maggie Thatcher would agree??</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287630</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:21:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287630</guid><dc:creator>M. E. Mical, Wilmington, DE</dc:creator><description>Will someone tell &amp;quot;Jerry&amp;quot; for Corpus Christi Texas to shut up. &amp;nbsp;I am so shocked by the small minded and inept women haters who have thus far responded .. Hillary is imperfect as all the others are, but she is heads and tails, superior in intellect, global experience, and compentency that the current president. &amp;nbsp;As far as being a women, isn't it about time all of you guys with small .... brains get over it! MEM of Delaware</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287631</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287631</guid><dc:creator>Ray, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>Sorry, but Hillary's got the most experience out of any candidate this year. Rudy's a joke, Obama, although I like him, is a light weight and the rest are utterly unmentionable. And however thinks a HIllary can't be president because she's a woman needs to go crawl under a rock and go work for the F*%king Taliban. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287632</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287632</guid><dc:creator>L.  Louis</dc:creator><description>I would never vote for Clinton! &amp;nbsp;I am really sorry that she is the first serious contender to represent the female sex. &amp;nbsp;I believe a woman can do the job,just not this woman! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287633</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287633</guid><dc:creator>Jack, Seattle, Washington</dc:creator><description>Love to see the Dems squabble. &amp;nbsp;Look out for claws, Barrack, she can scratch - meowrrrrrrrowrrrrr -fsssssst</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287634</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287634</guid><dc:creator>Bety Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>Gee Mr. Calvin, do you agree, with keep'em barefoot and pregnant??? &amp;nbsp;What are your thoughts on the colored guy?? Or can your small mind really grasp that concept. Bigot!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287636</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287636</guid><dc:creator>Delmar Fairchild, Barron, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>Whatever Hilary does, it has to make a buck for her and her relatives, or it won't get done.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287637</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287637</guid><dc:creator>Dorrie, St Louis, Missouri</dc:creator><description>Basing your decision to vote for someone on the sex, race or religion of the individual is a terrible, faulty basis of reasoning. &amp;nbsp;You should decide between the candidates based on political issues. &amp;nbsp;I beleive the attitude displayed in the previous post is very outdated, and its shameful that there are still people in this day and age that think that way.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287638</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287638</guid><dc:creator>Proud Dem in TN</dc:creator><description>It seems to me that all MSNBC has responding to their blogs are bunch of male chauvinists! &amp;nbsp;Manny - it is offensive to us &amp;quot;ladies&amp;quot; and hope if you have children - they are not girls or young women! &amp;nbsp;You stated that it is not a &amp;quot;woman's job&amp;quot; - I haven't seen Mr. Bush doing a great job and last I checked he was a man - not much of one but still a man. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as far as the statement from Bush Republican... &amp;quot;The woman's a charlatan&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;- you have no right to call a leader of our country such names. We have the right to our own opinions and have plenty of slanderous words that I could call Mr. &lt;br&gt;Bush but I keep them to myself - as should you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You people just can handle a woman who is well educated (way smarter probably than any of you that are responding in this blog!), articulate and is not afraid to speak her mind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, any democratic candidate or president (woman or man) would be better than the republican leadership we have had to endure since 2000. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287639</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287639</guid><dc:creator>Chicago JMill</dc:creator><description>If that's not sexist, Manny, I don't know what is. &amp;nbsp;I'm not a Hillary fan but if that's your rationalizaion for disqualifying her as a legitimate candidate you, my friend, should have your voting rights taken away. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287642</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287642</guid><dc:creator>Robert C.  Rochester, Michigan</dc:creator><description>Oh come now, this IS an issue that the Clinton camp needed to address. &amp;nbsp;This really boils down to Obama's lack of experience, and Clinton's amazing credentials. &amp;nbsp;She has been working in the public arena, helping the less fortunate and children and women for decades. &amp;nbsp;She was first lady, now a two-term Senator from New York. &amp;nbsp;She is Ready To Lead. &amp;nbsp;And I am ready to vote for her. &amp;nbsp;Go HILLARY! &amp;nbsp;Obama, your fine, but it's not your time to be president, yet...maybe vice president? &amp;nbsp;It will put you in line, and give you some &amp;quot;maturing&amp;quot; time.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287643</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287643</guid><dc:creator>Tammie, Summerville, SC</dc:creator><description>I admit Senator Clinton is not my first choice for the President's seat, but how dare anyone say that is not a job for a woman. &amp;nbsp;All of our president's so far have been men, and look were our country is today. &amp;nbsp;You men do the math on that one. &amp;nbsp;And I feel that Obama should have been allowed to give a rebuttal on his comment.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287644</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:22:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287644</guid><dc:creator>Beatriz, Texas</dc:creator><description>Based on the comments posted ...it appears that there is a very unbreakable glass ceiling mentality...the political issues are certainly important; how many NEW candidates can be experienced running the Oval office????? COME ON!!!!; Women not IN OFFICE; &amp;quot;no offense&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;what are the issues, panties or boxers?????</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287645</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287645</guid><dc:creator>Suzie, Wheaton, IL</dc:creator><description>The best thing going for the Republicans is this ridiculously long pre-primary campaign time span. Current events show it doesn't take a republican to point out the lies, deception, manipulation and outright demogoguery of the top democratic candidate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287646</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287646</guid><dc:creator>Pat of Dallas, Oregon</dc:creator><description>I am 70 and have lived through several presidents. &amp;nbsp;Some very good, some medicore, some should not have been in office at all! I have raised 9 children, helped with 24 grandchildren while working. &amp;nbsp;I have always felt a WOMAN would make a better president or at the least as good as ANY MAN! &lt;br&gt;Women are usually stronger mentally than most men. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287648</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287648</guid><dc:creator>Donald in  Maryland</dc:creator><description>The fox group started this spin of a fabrication. I watched the debate and Obama answered the question as it was asked. Anyone in their right mind would not sit down with an enemy without taking in all considerations. This is what make me sick of the political process. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287649</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287649</guid><dc:creator>charlie, brooklyn, ny</dc:creator><description>this is typical Hillary Clinton oliticking. She cannot be trusted as we have seen over the brief campaign. She refuses to admit her mistakes (iraq war vote) and she tries to go after others negatively when she should be trying to solidify her position. I think Hillary is in for a big fall from grace sometime soon. Barack is too classy for her. She fears him cause he's smarter, more direct and has better handlers. If he's not the best man in this race for the job i'll eat my head. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287650</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287650</guid><dc:creator>Moe , Little Rock, AR </dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin&lt;br&gt;I am not a Clinton fan, but what do you mean by that is not a woman's job.Please look outside your window it is 2007. Have you forgotten the year woman gained their rights to vote - &amp;quot;1920.&amp;quot; What am really trying to say is that your comment was ignorant.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287652</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287652</guid><dc:creator>G.M. Palmdale CA</dc:creator><description>Come November 2008 we will regret Hillary Rodham Clinton? We REGRET IT NOW!!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287654</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:23:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287654</guid><dc:creator>Martha G.</dc:creator><description>I feel sorry for politicians they grab on to conflictive debats and hope that the many (ignorant) will get confused and the few will fall off (well informed inquisitive minds). It's not about play on words it's about actions. &amp;nbsp;Does it occur to anyone being open to talk could save lives </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287656</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287656</guid><dc:creator>Voter</dc:creator><description>Eight awful years of Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Eight awful years of Bush. &amp;nbsp;Where will the country be if we have another eight years polarization and moral bankruptcy in the Oval Office? &amp;nbsp;Please, anyone by Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287657</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287657</guid><dc:creator>Jasin Dayne</dc:creator><description>Their surrounding machines will do the work. &amp;nbsp;The President is a figure head (or scape goat). &amp;nbsp;That's all. &amp;nbsp;We all have to read between the lines to see just how the country will be run. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The people they appoint will tell the story. &amp;nbsp;Hilary wins, Bill is back. &amp;nbsp;Obama wins, you will see more cross party associations. &amp;nbsp;Hilary already has many enemies from Bill and her own past. &amp;nbsp;If Hilary can avoid talking about how she allowed her husband to cheat on her, she has the advantage. How can she look the American woman in the eye as a leader and encourage strength, freedom individual forward thinking? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;If Obama can avoid having anyone but himself speak on his behalf (ie no wife in the picture) he has the advantage. Obama will need a southern democrat to help him win the southern vote. &amp;nbsp;Edwards is the likely candidate to help Obama. &amp;nbsp;His run at Leadership is over. &amp;nbsp;We heard his story and America is over it's love crush of the Carolina lawyer.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287658</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287658</guid><dc:creator>Toad Barleyman, Phoenix, Kansas</dc:creator><description>As Bush once said, it will take time to restore chaos. (Its your money, you paid for it!!!) &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287660</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287660</guid><dc:creator>Johnson, Just Johnson, Ma'am</dc:creator><description>Obama is being charitable when he characterizes Hillary's vote for the Iraq war as &amp;quot;naive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;irresponsible&amp;quot;; I, and many others, call it incompetent -- to actually vote for the war without reading the National Intelligence Report. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287661</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287661</guid><dc:creator>R. McDonald, Pocahontas TN</dc:creator><description>I cannot agree with the statement that a woman would not make a good president - women all over the world have done extremely well as leaders - BUT I am afraid that I can agree that Mrs. Clinton is NOT the person to lead this country. &amp;nbsp;We really need an honest (Yea right!) person in the office. &amp;nbsp;One that can get away from all of the big businesses that contribute to their war chests and expect 'favors' in return. &amp;nbsp;The only problem with that is an honest person could never get elected - &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287662</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287662</guid><dc:creator>John, Hackettstown, NJ</dc:creator><description>To MC,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you base this theory on the fine job done by Bush and Cheney; they are nominally male after all. &amp;nbsp;Although, their personal cowardice places them pretty far down the testosterone scale.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287663</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287663</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Dallas, Texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary, is in it for Hillary. Don't get in her way that's when people disappear. She is a socialist who believes in a &amp;quot;New World Order&amp;quot; which would of course position her for an even grander stage. Her motto is undoubtedly, &amp;quot;the end justifies the means&amp;quot;. As for Bill he's always been the puppet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287664</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287664</guid><dc:creator>Cathie/Houston</dc:creator><description>Enough already from Jerry/Corpus Christi and how anyone can sign &amp;quot;bush republican&amp;quot; is a very scary human being. How easy to bash Hillary when Republicans have no one running that is presidential material. They only have &amp;quot;fred&amp;quot; and he appears to be wearing Harry Potter's cloak. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287665</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:24:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287665</guid><dc:creator>Leo of Las Vegas, NV</dc:creator><description>Why wouldn't Hillary turn to Omama and at least say one positive/negative thing about him. The question was to turn on your left and say one positive &amp;amp; negative about the Candidate. &amp;nbsp;She loved them all. Wow!! &amp;nbsp;That's not sincere, that's not what democracy is about.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287666</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287666</guid><dc:creator>CCB, Portland, OR</dc:creator><description>Obama is, in fact, Naive. &amp;nbsp;If Hillary is any less so.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287667</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287667</guid><dc:creator>Nancy, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Both Hilary and Obama are relatively green when it comes to leadership. &amp;nbsp;I understand the Hilary's husband did well during his terms and that the country was running just as... but her last name does not define what she will do in 2008.&lt;br&gt;Obama leading by example, and that can only help so much. &amp;nbsp;Its like a kid watching tv and imitating what he sees, only a few things work in real life. &amp;nbsp;As much as I cared for Clinton HIMself, I am not to sure about his gung-ho/voted for the war wife. I would prefer the husband to return then have his wife in in place. Bush, clintion, bush, clinton, - i'd rather not see the patern. &amp;nbsp;But I would rather have someone with a great deal of leadership then those 2.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287668</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287668</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Moultrie, Ga.</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter what gender, race or religion anyone is as long as they can run this country like a business! &amp;nbsp;That means they need to make a REAL budget &amp;amp; stick to it and that should probably mean that a lot of programs should be cut or cut out. &amp;nbsp;That could mean turning certain things over to private companies or what ever else it takes, but, of course, that can't be done by any President unless he/she can convince Congress. &amp;nbsp;The first thing that needs to be done is to SECURE OUR BORDERS! &amp;nbsp;The people in Washington have no idea what the illegals are REALLY doing to this country! &amp;nbsp;I don't think I can every vote for Hillary and I am basically a democrat. &amp;nbsp;At least Obama hasn't been in Washington long enough to become completely corrupt! &amp;nbsp;Also, follow the money and see who is contributing to whom. &amp;nbsp;Right now, I don't think any of the ones running, democrat or republician, are good choices!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287670</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287670</guid><dc:creator>TRACY THOMAS, FORT JACKSON, SC</dc:creator><description>The Bush Administration's refusal to talk to anyone on the evil side, as some have called idealistic, I call it dangerously unrealistic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;--Hillary Clinton, October 31, 2006 at the Cuoncil of Foreign Relations. &amp;nbsp;How easily we forget the things we say about others. &amp;nbsp;It seems Mrs. Hillary Clinton needs to go back an review any statements prior to lashing out on someone else. &amp;nbsp;Obama has way to much class to bash her for being irresponsible and naive her self. &amp;nbsp;I'm sure he has the right stuff to keep the Democratic Party strong without bad mouthing Hillary in the process. &amp;nbsp;Vote for Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287671</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287671</guid><dc:creator>Charles Saint Ann MO</dc:creator><description>Hillary is so busy trying to look presidential that she's looking like she would not consider other options just like George W Bush</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287672</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287672</guid><dc:creator>Wilbur Walker,  Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>First of all to say that Hillary Clinton should not be in high office is an insult to all women politicians. Second of all neither one has that much experience with Clinton having a slight edge. Senator Obama hasn't even fufilled his duties as an Illinois senator yet and is trying to capture lighting in a bottle because of his new found celebrity. Can you all see whats going on here it's not about the issues it's about the lesser of two evils. A democrat will be the next President and the mess they have to clean up will tarnish the legacy of the First woman or the First african American president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287673</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287673</guid><dc:creator>Terral Olds     Portland Oregon</dc:creator><description>Ah, the smell of politics... What happened to the age when the politicians were actually representatives OF THE PEOPLE,AND FOR THE PEOPLE. &amp;nbsp;They all are pressing towards &amp;quot;WHAT IS IN THIS FOR ME' attitudes. Definitely leading our nation down the toilet.. &amp;nbsp;Too many things/rights leading us away from the once mighty nation we were.. Too many liberal concerns that are tearing our nation down. &amp;nbsp;Rights now are prevailing over RESPONSIBILITIES.. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287674</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:25:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287674</guid><dc:creator>Pat Hernandez</dc:creator><description>You can count her out if she's not your choice, but come on-not a woman's job!!! &amp;nbsp;Do you think she should stay home and bake cookies?????</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287680</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287680</guid><dc:creator>Cindy, Phenix City, AL</dc:creator><description>I think Hillary needs to stick with the facts and that is it! &amp;nbsp;If she gets into a pithing contest with Obama, she gives him fuel. &amp;nbsp;Althought I htink they both have an agenda, I do think that Obama is a little naive. My problem with him is that he doesn't have the political background that he needs to be the next president. &amp;nbsp;I do like him, but if only Colin Powell would have run! &amp;nbsp;He would knock them all out of the play.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287681</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287681</guid><dc:creator>skapes</dc:creator><description>Why shouldn't a woman be in that high office manny? Dee of VA (a woman?)provided the smartest response yet, and you (a man?) provided the dumbest......</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287682</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287682</guid><dc:creator>Ronald from Georgia</dc:creator><description>I think that all the country felt bad for Mrs. Clinton when it came out that former President Clinton had cheated on her. That seniment no longer holds true for her now considering some of the shrewd remarks that she has be alledged to have said recently.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the Democratic race started, I thought that it would be refreshing having a woman in the race because her presence might cause everybody to tone down their rhetoric. However, she has become the &amp;quot;ring leader&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287683</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287683</guid><dc:creator>Louis Roundtree Phoenix, Az. </dc:creator><description>Nice rebuttal from Obama. It is a serious time for a serious leader and it seems to me, Barack is the man. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287685</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287685</guid><dc:creator>Thad Stovall Douglasville, Georgia </dc:creator><description>To &amp;quot;Bush Republican:&amp;quot; I find it amusing that anyone who appears to be an apologist for George W. Bush would have the nerve to refer to Hillary Clinton as a charlatan that is married to a scum bag. Those so called &amp;quot;scum bag&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;charlatan&amp;quot; have far more integrity that Bush, Cheney, or Rumsfield will ever have. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287686</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287686</guid><dc:creator>efor elmo Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>Obama’s comment was na&amp;#239;ve and it does show his inexperience. There are very clear and important reasons for not opening direct talks between heads of state of countries with whom we have not had diplomatic relations in the past. &amp;nbsp;Low level talks play a critical role in opening diplomatic channels. They set a context for future talks and establish a framework which will lead to more stability down the road. &amp;nbsp;They are better at creating a sense of give and take that is below the media spotlight. &amp;nbsp;They provide the President and the foreign head of state an opportunity to reset the tone of the relationship if things start to go badly. &amp;nbsp;All experienced diplomats know this. Obama is a smart man and I suspect that his comment was more about scoring political points than a policy statement. &amp;nbsp;However, if we take him at his word, and we should, statements like that make him look immature. &amp;nbsp; Someday he will make an excellent president. &amp;nbsp;He is simply not ready yet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287687</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287687</guid><dc:creator>Tony Vazquez</dc:creator><description>Once a liar always a liar also applies to our current commander in chief</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287689</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287689</guid><dc:creator>monica oak grove ky</dc:creator><description>Just bring our boys home and take care of home first.Then deal with the big issue woman/man or black/white?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287690</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:26:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287690</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Kennedy Fairfax, OK</dc:creator><description>I think Obama is right. &amp;nbsp;He had the nerve to stand up and say that we need to talk. &amp;nbsp;Diplomacy calls for that. &amp;nbsp;That's a new idea. We need to formulate dialogue with the leaders of all nations. &amp;nbsp;You've got a lot of spunk Hill, but I think you have missed the message as well as the boat. &amp;nbsp;We the people of the United States want a refreshing leader that isn't afraid the poll numbers will drop. &amp;nbsp;A true leader wouldn't worry about such things anyway when we have fellow citizens dying in a foreign land at the hands of zealots.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287691</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:27:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287691</guid><dc:creator>Robert Wessel</dc:creator><description>Neither has the guts to be president. Period.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287694</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:27:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287694</guid><dc:creator>gomez, Fontana, CA</dc:creator><description>For all those who have submitted negative comments regarding Hillary or Obama voted for Bush and look at the mess he has made. &amp;nbsp;Think twice before you inpute your comments</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287696</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287696</guid><dc:creator>B W N</dc:creator><description>While I do not like Sen Clinton, she shows me that she has a much clearer understanding of world affairs than Obama. &amp;nbsp;He is downright frigtening is his lack of understanding. &amp;nbsp;Maybe I need to take a closer look at Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287697</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:27:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287697</guid><dc:creator>Wilbur Walker,  Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>First of all to say that Hillary Clinton should not be in high office is an insult to all women politicians. Second of all neither one has that much experience with Clinton having a slight edge. Senator Obama hasn't even fufilled his duties as an Illinois senator yet and is trying to capture lighting in a bottle because of his new found celebrity. Can you all see whats going on here it's not about the issues it's about the lesser of two evils. A democrat will be the next President and the mess they have to clean up will tarnish the legacy of the First woman or the First african American president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287700</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:27:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287700</guid><dc:creator>Larry Lewis Corpus Christi, Texas</dc:creator><description>If Hillary wins we lose.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287705</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287705</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Moultrie, Ga.</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter what gender, race or religion anyone is as long as they can run this country like a business! &amp;nbsp;That means they need to make a REAL budget &amp;amp; stick to it and that should probably mean that a lot of programs should be cut or cut out. &amp;nbsp;That could mean turning certain things over to private companies or what ever else it takes, but, of course, that can't be done by any President unless he/she can convince Congress. &amp;nbsp;The first thing that needs to be done is to SECURE OUR BORDERS! &amp;nbsp;The people in Washington have no idea what the illegals are REALLY doing to this country! &amp;nbsp;I don't think I can every vote for Hillary and I am basically a democrat. &amp;nbsp;At least Obama hasn't been in Washington long enough to become completely corrupt! &amp;nbsp;Also, follow the money and see who is contributing to whom. &amp;nbsp;Right now, I don't think any of the ones running, democrat or republician, are good choices!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287706</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287706</guid><dc:creator>Scott in Iowa</dc:creator><description>Debate is healthy, but only when the facts debated are legitimate. &amp;nbsp;How can you actually debate a theoretical? &amp;nbsp;Reading through this string of responses is further proof that we are a nation divided, not united. &amp;nbsp;If you look at the underlying message of each political candidate, you will find only one candidate that is willing to cross party lines and try to bring our country back to being the United States of America. &amp;nbsp;That candidate is Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, unless we are willing to try to get along with each other, it doesn't matter who is President because WE are the ones who will be responsible for stopping progress. &amp;nbsp;WE will be the ones responsible for the fall of our future generations.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287707</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287707</guid><dc:creator>jose M Avila</dc:creator><description>I have follow these potential presidents debate, and so far i am unimpressed by their coments and stands in international &amp;nbsp;issues. I am waiting for the next leader to lead my beloved country to the leader we once was.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287710</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287710</guid><dc:creator>Kelly PA</dc:creator><description>I do not believe we need a lady as a president. It may sound like I'm anti-women rights, but that's complete opposite. Trust me as a woman myself, I'd prefer to see somebody with a better head on their shoulder run this country, rather then Hillary trying to run a country. She's better off being remembered as on of The First Ladies...Then as a President</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287712</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:28:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287712</guid><dc:creator>Anna, Seattle, Wash</dc:creator><description>voting in support of the Iraq war is what's irresponsible and naive...right back at you Billary...enough said...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287713</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287713</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Moultrie, Ga.</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter what gender a person is or what race or religion....we need someone who can run this country like a business and start vetoing all the pork and save money where possible including turning certain aspects over to private companies, etc. &amp;nbsp;We also need someone who can REALLY see what is happening to this country with no restrictions on illegals and SECURE OUR BORDERS! &amp;nbsp;So far I haven't heard much from any of them that fits all the necessary qualifcations from any party! &amp;nbsp;I don't believe I could ever vote for Hillary and I am pretty much democrat. &amp;nbsp;At least Obama hasn't been in Washington long enough to be completely corrupt!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287714</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287714</guid><dc:creator>Pam W Cincinnati, Ohio</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Naive&amp;quot; like she is for thinking we want her for President???</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287716</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287716</guid><dc:creator>nancy walsh, trenton, nj</dc:creator><description>if its a man's job, how come this country is the way it is.... because MEN are running it.... we need a change - we need Hillary!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287717</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287717</guid><dc:creator>Ed - Philadlephia</dc:creator><description>Hillary was accurate in insisting on the existence of quantifiable deliverables before she would agree to a meeting. &amp;nbsp;This is just a good strategy to have. &amp;nbsp;I am sure that she could send VP Obama to iron out the details. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I started out saying “anyone but Hillary”; however, with every debate, she shows how well prepared she really is. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never thought I would say this, but she may turn out to be as good as DFR or Truman.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287718</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287718</guid><dc:creator>John Fleisher</dc:creator><description>I thought it was a little harsh of Hillary, but it will play well to people who think a woman would be easily taken advantage of by rogue nations. &amp;nbsp;I liked both Hillary and Barak's responses to the question. &amp;nbsp;We do need to engage those countries. &amp;nbsp;Getting on track again with the rest of the world may start with something as silly as finding some common ground on a personal level with those leaders. &amp;nbsp;Whether it's business or politics, personal contact usually pays dividends......</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287720</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287720</guid><dc:creator>Jose M Avila</dc:creator><description>I have follow these potential presidents debate, and so far i am unimpressed by their coments and stands in international &amp;nbsp;issues. I am waiting for the next leader to lead my beloved country to the leader we once was.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287721</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287721</guid><dc:creator>Bill Jackson</dc:creator><description>*ahem* &lt;br&gt;This is why I'm pushing for Biden in the primaries. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287722</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287722</guid><dc:creator>R</dc:creator><description>When asked if Obama meets all axes of evil leaders, he quickly said &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; without any pre-conditions. It is definitely an irresponsible statement by a would be commander in cheif.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287724</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:29:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287724</guid><dc:creator>C. Baird, Glendale CA</dc:creator><description>I hope Hillary wins. &amp;nbsp;She is smart, capable and ready to be president. &amp;nbsp;We need a woman to clean up the mess George W. Bush created.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287726</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287726</guid><dc:creator>Buffalo, NY</dc:creator><description>I think that both Hillary and Obama have a lot to learn about what the American public actually needs and wants. &amp;nbsp;It is amazing that Hillary can 'recall' or 'remember' anything. &amp;nbsp;As I recall during the whole Whitewater case, she and Bill could not recall or remember anything, but when it came to writing Bill's memoirs for 2 or 3 million dollars, it is amazing how much they could remember, or is that only selective memory based on dollars? &amp;nbsp;Do the American people not read or research any of these canidates and see what they lack in so many areas? &amp;nbsp;America will be a scary place to live if Hillary or Obama get into office. &amp;nbsp;It will be just like during the Vietnam War with all the draft dodgers trying to get into Canada so they didn't have to fight in the war, only this time it will be to get away from the 2 most unqualified, inept politicians out there. &amp;nbsp;If you think that Bush is bad, these 2 are worst. &amp;nbsp;Read and research people and then you will see the truth.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287727</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287727</guid><dc:creator>Allison in NC</dc:creator><description>Does anyone REALLY like any of the candidates?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None of them can hold a candle to AL GORE!!!&lt;br&gt;Why even debate the issue; no one else will do!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AL GORE in 2008!!!!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287728</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287728</guid><dc:creator>Louis, The Orange Bubble, CA</dc:creator><description>She's such a sad example of what we have had in the past to choose from. &amp;nbsp;Time to move on to something better. &amp;nbsp;No more media scuffles, there's work to be done. Enough with the political huff and puff. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287729</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287729</guid><dc:creator>rick,ky</dc:creator><description>Get past your fear's, Manny, a strong willed woman is an asset. No doubt if there's one in your life, she tells you How, When , Where. As for clinton calling Obama Naive, it tells me the gloves have come off between the two, &amp;amp; Obama has far more ammunition in the chamber than she does. She is feeling the heat from the polls( not her own campaign polls) that have him winning on all sides, left, right, independent. We have had enough dictatorship's for the last 24 year's. Move On America, time to put this nonsense behind us for good.&amp;quot;DELUSIONAL THINKING BY COMMON SENSE AMERICAN'S IS OVER&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287730</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287730</guid><dc:creator>Lee, TN</dc:creator><description>A woman is very capable of being president of the United States of America. &amp;nbsp;We are going through the ringer right now, so anybody is better than this administration. &amp;nbsp;All of the Democratic candidates sleep is better than the current administration bright eyed and bushy taled. &amp;nbsp;It is time for a woman to be President, someone needs to come in and clean house!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287731</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287731</guid><dc:creator>Buffalo, NY</dc:creator><description>I think that both Hillary and Obama have a lot to learn about what the American public actually needs and wants. &amp;nbsp;It is amazing that Hillary can 'recall' or 'remember' anything. &amp;nbsp;As I recall during the whole Whitewater case, she and Bill could not recall or remember anything, but when it came to writing Bill's memoirs for 2 or 3 million dollars, it is amazing how much they could remember, or is that only selective memory based on dollars? &amp;nbsp;Do the American people not read or research any of these canidates and see what they lack in so many areas? &amp;nbsp;America will be a scary place to live if Hillary or Obama get into office. &amp;nbsp;It will be just like during the Vietnam War with all the draft dodgers trying to get into Canada so they didn't have to fight in the war, only this time it will be to get away from the 2 most unqualified, inept politicians out there. &amp;nbsp;If you think that Bush is bad, these 2 are worst. &amp;nbsp;Read and research people and then you will see the truth.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287732</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287732</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Patterson Columbus,Ohio</dc:creator><description>Someone should mandate daily physical education in schools. Just my thought. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287733</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287733</guid><dc:creator>JT, Nashville, TN</dc:creator><description>No offense, manny Calvin? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Well, then, do please tell us: &amp;nbsp;What IS a woman's job?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287734</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:30:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287734</guid><dc:creator>Hank Raymond, Nespelem, Washington</dc:creator><description>Hillary Pot calling the Barack kettle black, imagine that? Except in this case Barack committed to being willing to take on serious responsibility that at times requires saying simply and honestly &amp;quot;I would.&amp;quot; His proclaimation was meant to answer a direct question with a direct reply. That's what was great about the format last night. It was a call for honesty. As for the intrigue associated with facing dark characters you distrust and might seek to take advantage, well that's takes courage. Showing courage is by no means a publicity stunt. You either have it or you don't, so show me more. Hilary, smoke if you got it! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287735</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287735</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Dee, Clinton never said she wouldn't talk with them. Likewise, Obama didn't pledge to and never said it would happen without diplomatic groundwork. But their respective answers fit the time allotted...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In short, this strikes me as a non-difference between the two. The fact that Clinton's campaign is all over it tells me they are looking for any opening to attack. Very unusual for a frontrunner, lol.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287736</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287736</guid><dc:creator>S. Feistel</dc:creator><description>Manny Calvin,&lt;br&gt;As a women, I take no offense. I live in a man's world every day. But please, do not show your ignorance for all to see.&lt;br&gt;Confident Women </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287737</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287737</guid><dc:creator>Sheila from IL</dc:creator><description>Why shouldn't a woman be in that high office manny? &amp;nbsp;Dee of VA (a woman?) provided the smartest response yet, and you (a man?) provided the dumbest.&lt;br&gt;Still, Senator Obama has my vote at this point. I just care for Senator Clinton's style. By the way, any opinion on blacks in office manny?.......</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287738</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287738</guid><dc:creator>aaron, brooklyn ny</dc:creator><description>It's ironic that the person who doesn't believe a &amp;quot;woman should be in high office&amp;quot; is also the person whose post reveals a severe lack of basic grammar, punctuation and spelling skills.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287739</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287739</guid><dc:creator>Chris Berryhill, Lubbock, Texas</dc:creator><description>vote Edwards= Hillary is almost a big of a crook as Bush/Cheney. Obama is a little inexperienced.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287740</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287740</guid><dc:creator>Gary, VA</dc:creator><description>As a republican it would be fun to see Hilbilly elected just to watch the liberals squirm with regret!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287741</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287741</guid><dc:creator>TruthTulip</dc:creator><description>Fantastic Hillary.. Keep it up!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287742</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:31:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287742</guid><dc:creator>Mark McLaughlin, Culver City, CA</dc:creator><description>Obama '08!! &amp;nbsp;His message is right on Target</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287743</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287743</guid><dc:creator>Michael K</dc:creator><description>This entire thread from the debate between Hillary and Obama needs to be on MSNBC's front page banner. Let people see BOTH sides, including Obama's recent comeback, the one he would have made last night had he been given the opportunity to respond.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let people see how low Hillary will go to get what she wants. Let people see that she is no better than the sack currently occupying the White House. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The media would rather keep it under wraps. They love the story of Hillary being the front runner. Why is that?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287744</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287744</guid><dc:creator>Phil W., Aurora, OH</dc:creator><description>She is actually correct. &amp;nbsp;Obama's comments are naive. &amp;nbsp;Sitting down to chat with people who only want to distroy you is not going to solve anything. &amp;nbsp;There are some people you sit down and work things out with, and there are others you just can't. &amp;nbsp;Hugo is not one of those rational types. &amp;nbsp;On the other hand, Hillary will say anything that she thinks will play with the current audience. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, Obama is naive, and Hillary cannot trusted? &amp;nbsp;Exactly who is our third choice on the Democrat side?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287745</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287745</guid><dc:creator>Mike Vance, Anna Texas</dc:creator><description>We need people to run for government office in this country that actually care about this country and not about how much money they can line their and their families pockets with. &amp;nbsp;We need a government that will seal our borders, deport all persons that are in this country illegally, bring all our troops home and place them on our borders and spend our money on our people and our resources and tell the world to kiss our _ _ _ !</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287746</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287746</guid><dc:creator>Marty from Michigan</dc:creator><description>Hey Jim from Washington - Everybody in the Whitehouse and America got screwed by the first Clinton; the Mrs. is setting herself up for the same; vote for Clinton and we get more lies, wavering, and probably Bill to boot! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287747</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287747</guid><dc:creator>Eck Spahich, Fritch at Lake Meredith, Texas </dc:creator><description>MEETING, OR NOT MEETING WITH OTHER LEADERS IS A NON-ISSUE. &amp;nbsp;IT IS A WELL-KNOWN FACT, WE GOT THE BEST POLITICIANS MONEY CAN BUY: FOLLOW THE CAMPAIGN MONEY&lt;br&gt;DONATIONS TO BOTH PARTIES.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287748</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287748</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Hillary &amp;quot;Cankles&amp;quot; Clinton is bad for this country</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287749</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287749</guid><dc:creator>Pat  in Indiana</dc:creator><description>I am tired of Obama playing the &amp;quot;I didn't vote for the war&amp;quot; song. It is very easy to say that 5 years into the war knowing what we all now know. &amp;nbsp;Clinton screwed up. &amp;nbsp;She is human. &amp;nbsp;And no, I am not a Clinton supporter. Nor am I a Bush supporter. &amp;nbsp;Just sick and tired of the nonsense.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287750</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287750</guid><dc:creator>Becky in Minnesota</dc:creator><description>Manny, this is 2007, women can vote and own property and even make as much money as a man.....A woman could be just as qualified as any man to be President of the United States, whether Hillary Clinton is the right woman for the job remains to be seen, but don't work with a false arguement.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287751</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:32:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287751</guid><dc:creator>cindy, phenix city, AL</dc:creator><description>manny calvin &amp;nbsp;We will be in big hurts if Mrs Clinton gets in, once a liar always a liar, ARkansas remember how that went.Demo or repub I don't believe a woman should be in that high office, no offense ladies, but that is not a womans job. she needs to stay out of it,and Mr Clinton Mr First Man, come on &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WOW, what an idiot statement that was! &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;not a womans job?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Mister you really need to get a grip! &amp;nbsp;Women are just as good as any man, where did you come from? &amp;nbsp;Unbelievable comment. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287752</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:33:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287752</guid><dc:creator>Pretty Browneyes, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>I pray that GOD sends our country a responsible, competent and most of all honest person to be our next president. &amp;nbsp;For me, that candidate is none other than Mr. Barack Obama. Yes, he's the man that can eagerly get the job done right. &amp;nbsp;Now for all those knuckleheads out there who voted our current president that whiskey drinking dingbat (yes, trust me Bush still drinks) back into office for a second term must be kicking themselves in the rear by now. &amp;nbsp;He is nothing more than a cold blooded killer as well as his counterpart Cheney. &amp;nbsp;Remember, these two idiots are currently running our country. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the troops overseas...someone PLEEEEEEEEASE bring them back home to their families &amp;amp; loved ones safe and sound. &amp;nbsp;This country has already lost way too many dedicated and brave young souls due to Bush's stupidy and ignorance. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's time to stop his insane madness once and for all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, for all those dummies bashing Ms. Clinton simply because she's a woman all I can say is just remember, a woman brought you into this world. &amp;nbsp;So who says a woman can't run our messed up country. &amp;nbsp;I tell you one thing for sure, I'd bet the US would no longer participate in wars if a woman were in charge!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peace to all,&lt;br&gt;:)</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287753</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:33:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287753</guid><dc:creator>Warren Jackson</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is cheap politicking. Her kind of reasoning is why the United States is in such a mess in the middle east. Fear of photo op situations should never substitute the president of the United States willingness to find ways to peace with our enemies.Failure to talk at the highest levels breeds suspicions that are countered and followed by counter moves and sometimes war.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287754</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:33:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287754</guid><dc:creator>B. Daniels</dc:creator><description>Remember what Sen. Clinton said, and I paraphrase, I'm not going to used for propaganda .... Sen. Clinton, it's not what's best for you or about you, it's what's best for the country, it's about America!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287755</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:33:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287755</guid><dc:creator>HMT</dc:creator><description>Obama just deoesn't think faster than Hillary---he should have stated that first there would be planning prepared with his cabinet.If being the president is just a man's job guess Bush is a drag queen.There are women leaders all over the world and they all make the man Bush look like a stupid jerk.A woman would be a needed change.But I must say all the Dems were on the mark</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287756</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:34:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287756</guid><dc:creator>Gerry Carter</dc:creator><description>Why do we have to walk on egg shell everytime we take on Obama - the sacred cow. God forbid we take him on when he is wrong. On this matter, experience shows. Clinton was right and Obama, the novice, was wrong. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287758</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:34:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287758</guid><dc:creator>Dee Sargent,Florida</dc:creator><description>...maybe these two incompetents &amp;nbsp;will beat each other up on this issue so much that &amp;nbsp;the brilliant Al Gore will slip in.....God forbid!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287759</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:34:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287759</guid><dc:creator>Tom Spencer; Austin, TX</dc:creator><description>My reaction: &amp;nbsp;unmitigated disgust, nauseated ... at Hillary's so-called tactics, I reckin' even more so, at transparent way that The Media has spun this thing.&lt;br&gt;Above likes of Jim, Washington and Shadows, Hamden nailed it. &amp;nbsp;Well done! &amp;nbsp;Unbiased press? &amp;nbsp;Where??</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287760</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287760</guid><dc:creator>Kathy Braun Mandan, North Dakota</dc:creator><description>She should look at her back door before jumping on Obama's case. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287761</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:34:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287761</guid><dc:creator>Frank, Houston</dc:creator><description>Clinton should not be waisting her time on Obama, I don't believe he is qualified to be running for presidency and should be left to die down.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287763</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287763</guid><dc:creator>Lynn, Florida</dc:creator><description>Hey Manny how about you join the 21st century! &amp;nbsp;Sen. Clinton may not be the best person for the job, but it has nothing to do with her being a woman.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287765</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287765</guid><dc:creator>Creep, Lancaster, PA</dc:creator><description>Amen Manny</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287766</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287766</guid><dc:creator>Armando Cruz, Grand Praire, TX</dc:creator><description>Obama is a breath of fresh air and I am saying that, although I am a conservative republican. I am willing to cross over the line and vote for him because his Team building approach to politics is long overdue. Hillary, the other Democrats and the Republican front-runners are all too old-school for today's world.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287767</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287767</guid><dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator><description>Obama's americas best bet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287768</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287768</guid><dc:creator>Ryan, New York</dc:creator><description>Never vote for anyone on a trilateral committee or the CFR member... Lets sell out the country first hand and lose our constitution and freedoms!!! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287770</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287770</guid><dc:creator>John, Athens, Georgia</dc:creator><description>Ever notice how scared Hillary looks when she hasn't set the stage. She would probably cry if anyone asked her a question that wasn't scripted</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287772</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287772</guid><dc:creator>LTD, Detroit</dc:creator><description>This is all that needs to be said...&amp;quot;Direct Negotiations (with enemy states) are not a sign of weakness; they are a sign of leadership.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The Bush Administration's refusal to talk to anyone on the evil side, as some have called idealistic, I call it dangerously unrealistic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;--Hillary Clinton, October 31, 2006 at the Cuoncil of Foreign Relations..good call from Dee of VA...She has no idea what side of anything she is on..</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287773</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287773</guid><dc:creator>Joseph, Ellensburg, WA</dc:creator><description>They are both morons. Vote for Rudy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287774</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287774</guid><dc:creator>EH, Freehold, NJ</dc:creator><description>Most of the politicians are more or less lier. Unfortunately we have to select the person who lies less to serve general people's interest. My openion is Hillary is big lier then the Obama and she has less foresight vision about future consequence (look at the Iraq war vote!). </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287775</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287775</guid><dc:creator>EH, Freehold, NJ</dc:creator><description>Most of the politicians are more or less lier. Unfortunately we have to select the person who lies less to serve general people's interest. My openion is Hillary is big lier then the Obama and she has less foresight vision about future consequence (look at the Iraq war vote!). </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287776</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287776</guid><dc:creator>Concerned Canadian</dc:creator><description>Say what you want about her, deconstruct her, analyse her, but know that she is the smartest choice. The republican alternative is scary. And I hate to say it but America will never elect a minority into the Oval office. Hilary is your man.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287777</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287777</guid><dc:creator>AJ, Houston TX</dc:creator><description>I think Obama answered the question well. The question was whether he was going to meet with ... . The answer should have been YES or NO. These stupid people should just keep quiet. Obviously Hillary and her team are just looking for some air time. They just want to be in the news. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, did Hillary say she has been an agent of change for 35 yrs...how old is she anyway? She must really think everybody is dumb! She is as inexperience as Obama. Being the wife of the president is not the same as being the president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287778</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287778</guid><dc:creator>Jyl, Utah</dc:creator><description>I think putting a women in office is stupid, and even more stupid to put this particular woman in office. &amp;nbsp;Woman shouldnt have that much power. &amp;nbsp;This is coming from a woman. What does that tell you?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287780</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287780</guid><dc:creator>K, NYC</dc:creator><description>Well Jerry, to be truthful Obama doesn't have a lot of experience either! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Manny? She's probably doing a hell of a lot better than you would be doing. And she's a woman. Wow! Even India elected their first woman president, it's people like you who hold women down everywhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was pretty inappropriate of Clinton in my opinion--the purpose of a debate is to articulate your beliefs and opinions and to show fault in others'. By attacking Obama in a way where he couldn't readily respond and defend himself, she ultimately makes herself look petty and cheap.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287781</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287781</guid><dc:creator>Amy, Sand Springs, Oklahoma</dc:creator><description>I believe that if a woman wants to be president more power to her. &amp;nbsp;I think a woman is just as capable of running the country as a man is. &amp;nbsp;Look who we have in office now!! &amp;nbsp;Hillary could do a better job than him any day.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287783</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287783</guid><dc:creator>Roy M Savary, Comfort, Texas</dc:creator><description>After reading some of the feedback to the comments made by these candidates for President; will someone please give me a call when a qualified candidate is running for office? Signed, disillusioned...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287784</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287784</guid><dc:creator>Jim Leavitt Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>Funny how something as important as a presidential election can turn on a few misunderstood phrases. Voters must THINK to make a good decision. &amp;nbsp;DEMO</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287785</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287785</guid><dc:creator>Becky Burchfield, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>I think the RIGHT woman can do the job. &amp;nbsp;Look at Margaret THatcher and the working reputation she had with diplomats and other governments, and at home also. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leadership doesn't involve making disparaging comments about opponents. &amp;nbsp;Discuss the ideas, not the personalities! &amp;nbsp;At times it seems that the real leaders don't want to deal with politics. &amp;nbsp;My grandmother used to say, &amp;quot;Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287786</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287786</guid><dc:creator>ANARCHY IS THE SOLUTION</dc:creator><description>Hilary is a 2 face hypocrite. Would anybody stay with a cheating husband if it was not for politricks? Obama stutters way to much when he talks. &amp;nbsp;And both candidates are better than Bush. &amp;nbsp;People dont realize how bad the current administration has been. &amp;nbsp;They are too busy getting brainwashed. &amp;nbsp;Kids in middle school in Europe are doing calculus and complex geometry while college students in the states are doing basic algebra if not basic math. America is turning into the &amp;quot;LAND OF IDIOTS&amp;quot; just like their president. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287787</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287787</guid><dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator><description>We need Al Gore to come to rescue us from these bunch of naive candidates. &amp;nbsp;In the current crop of candidates none of them has what it takes to be the strong leader and president. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287788</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287788</guid><dc:creator>Neil, Ithaca, MI</dc:creator><description>I think we should all take a step back and forget about all of this he said-she said stuff. &amp;nbsp;Who is real, who seems to speak from the heart? &amp;nbsp;Hillary says Obama is naive, maybe thats what it is going to take. &amp;nbsp;Someone who isn't afraid of learning from others mistakes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287790</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287790</guid><dc:creator>F.Igwealor, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is only ready to lead on international affairs after the first year in office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She's evidently not ready to be the commander-in-chief like Ronald Reagan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If elected, Hillary will be another Bush on international affairs.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287791</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:38:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287791</guid><dc:creator>Chris Stoner, Catonsville, MD</dc:creator><description>What is with all of the anger in these responses?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is one country, one United States… &amp;nbsp;there are 300 million Americans, with many varying views and opinions… who all tend to share the same basic desires, with differing opinions of how to accomplish. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of my friends are Republican.. Myself I am a Democrat, and am sure I will be voting for Mrs. Clinton next November - unless Mr. Gore suddenly feels compelled to enter the race. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, even if my candidate wins.. There will be no mandate, as roughly 1/2 &amp;nbsp;of the voting populace will have opposed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same thing is true if the Republican candiate wins… &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When are we going to get past some of the rethoric, and address the issues that plague this country??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Dad taught me when I was a young boy, that if you have two people arguing vastly differing opinions, that the truth usually lays somewhere in the middle. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take the opinions from either side, and find the common ground… </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287793</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:38:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287793</guid><dc:creator>J. Martin</dc:creator><description>I don't really care much about their differences. Im voting for Rudy anyways.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287796</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287796</guid><dc:creator>Teresa Lynn Davenport, IA</dc:creator><description>I would agree with both of their statements. &amp;nbsp;As a leader of the free world, I expect the President, after conferring with his/her staff to meet with leaders whom we may disagree with. &amp;nbsp;Clinton is right in not 'just jumping in' and Obama is correct in saying yes, he would meet with them. &amp;nbsp;Better than what our current president is doing.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287797</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287797</guid><dc:creator>Chip RIchmond, VA</dc:creator><description>If I were a third world tyrant, I wouldn't want to speak to either of them! Unless Hillary wanted to fix my state run healthcare program or if Barry wanted to vote against the.....</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287799</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287799</guid><dc:creator>Carl Sagan</dc:creator><description>This just in from MSNBC: Vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we won't stop tipping the scales in her direction until you, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, we can't say it enough, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton, vote for Clinton... </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287800</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287800</guid><dc:creator>Larry Hardwick,Wilmington, N.C.</dc:creator><description>Hillary Is the more Qualified than any in either party to lead our country..What a great first man bill will be for us all!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287801</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287801</guid><dc:creator>Dan, St. Louis</dc:creator><description>All Democrats need to take their blinders off, and relize how the eight years of the first Clinton had put us in bad shape with the economy. &amp;nbsp;All though he takes all the credit for all the work the Republicans did to restore it in their 12 years prior to him. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287802</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287802</guid><dc:creator>Tom Spencer</dc:creator><description>Why oh why oh whyo -- can't (read: won't?) anyone in High Places, in postion/s of authority do one simple &amp;amp;&lt;br&gt;honest thing?! &amp;nbsp;Just one: &amp;nbsp;publicize, otherwise make known, one simple statement made by Hillary - to whit:&lt;br&gt;as Dee of VA caught: &amp;nbsp;Hillary's statement of 10/31/06</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287803</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287803</guid><dc:creator>Linda, los angeles, Ca</dc:creator><description>Clinton's comment is fair game. But, it's still a game and Obama knows that. He's got to get better at handling those remarks. And, he has to start sounding more presidential. The world needs a leader for the good guys. It's not Hilary. So far, it's not Barack. It's Al. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287804</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287804</guid><dc:creator>Raymond Spears  Bucyrus, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Mrs Clinton once a liar allways a liar just look at her face it shows evil! look how she treated her s.s guys when she was first lady</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287805</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287805</guid><dc:creator>Edward Checker Bethesda, Maryland</dc:creator><description>Hilary is really saying that Obama was naive to vote against the Iraq war. &amp;nbsp;Obama was brave and honest to stand up to all of the patriotic, drum-beating paranoia. &amp;nbsp;We never should have occupied an Arab country with an American army. &amp;nbsp;Our army killed a lot of Arabs and even drove Iraqi girls into prostitution. &amp;nbsp;It's also naive to believe that people do not want revenge for that. &amp;nbsp;Regarding naivete, it's naive to believe Hilary cares about the troops. &amp;nbsp;Why should she? &amp;nbsp;She doesn't have any of her own sons. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287807</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287807</guid><dc:creator>Eric Steiner, Daly City, California</dc:creator><description>If she had never been &amp;quot;first lady&amp;quot;, Hilary would be a total nobody. &amp;nbsp;I think the US is ready for a female president but only one who has earned her creditials in her own right, not one whose only claim to fame is having been married to a president. &amp;nbsp;Look what happened when George Bush was elected. &amp;nbsp;His only claim to fame was being the son of a former president. I will never vote for Hilary. &amp;nbsp;I think I probably would vote for Ombama. &amp;nbsp;So far, I have been impressed by what he has to say but I want to hear more about what he will do if elected. &amp;nbsp;Too bad he is so short on national experience, but he is starting to emerge as the best of the announced candidates.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287809</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287809</guid><dc:creator>P.A., Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>I agree with what Clinton said to the Council of Foreign Relations, but obviously forgot. &amp;quot;Direct Negotiations (with enemy states) are not a sign of weakness; they are a sign of leadership.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The Bush Administration's refusal to talk to anyone on the evil side, as some have called idealistic, I call it dangerously unrealistic.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want a President who is strong enough and wise enough to engage our opponents in something more beneficial and thought provoking than war. As far as propaganda goes, our invasion and occupation of Iraq is providing far more propaganda to the enemy than any one on one talks would provide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mr. Obama has my vote, even though I would like to see a woman President, at long last.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287810</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287810</guid><dc:creator>Pablo, Torrance, CA.</dc:creator><description>Once again we have to choose a candidate from a field of misfits. &amp;nbsp;Clinton is certainly not ideal, but she has the most to offer of those who are running.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287811</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287811</guid><dc:creator>ike, waukesha, wi</dc:creator><description>vote republican if you like the freedoms you now enjoy.if you do not like freedom or democracy than by all means vote democrat. but before you vote democrat learn to speak chinese or some middle eastern dialect so youll be able to communicate with your overlords. it is too bad bush cannot run for a 3rd term because i would vote for him again 3times</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287812</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287812</guid><dc:creator>D Campbell,Raynham, MA</dc:creator><description>Clinton is right on the mark. I don't want the president of the United States running around courting and pandering to every overeaching,dominant and cruel dictator on the planet. She answered it prudently, Obama mis-stepped and got called on it...fair game. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287813</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287813</guid><dc:creator>Linda, los angeles, Ca</dc:creator><description>Clinton's comment is fair game. But, it's still a game and Obama knows that. He's got to get better at handling those remarks. And, he has to start sounding more presidential. The world needs a leader for the good guys. It's not Hilary. So far, it's not Barack. It's Al. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287814</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287814</guid><dc:creator>Mr. Williams, Monroe, LA.</dc:creator><description>This is just raw politics. &amp;nbsp;Mud slinging in the being, but at the end of the day they just will be backing each other. &amp;nbsp;Please just focus on the issue of doing the right thing for the PEOPLE (remember--the &amp;quot;ones&amp;quot; who put you in office).</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287815</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287815</guid><dc:creator>randy irvan</dc:creator><description>you all can say ,or believe what you think ,but she is americas first lady and she is ahead on the polls by far. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287816</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287816</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Bulat</dc:creator><description>It's amazing, the United States has a history of talking to hostile states, Stalin, Mao, even Iraq before we made them one of the axis of evil. Why is now naive? Id the democrats want to loose, vote for Hillary</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287817</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287817</guid><dc:creator>defiance mo</dc:creator><description>all this he said she said lets get down to doing what is right for this country while we still can. That is some other people take over it from within!!!!! DR from Missouri</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287818</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287818</guid><dc:creator>Big Sexy/Pikeville,Ky</dc:creator><description>Hey there &amp;quot;Bush Republican&amp;quot;....you need to slither out from under the rock you live under. Regardless of what party you represent, you are the true &amp;quot;Scum Bag&amp;quot;. Furthermore, I highly doubt that you even have a clue as to what you are supporting. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287820</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287820</guid><dc:creator>Nisha</dc:creator><description>Either person is ok for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck Hilary and Good Luck Obama</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287821</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287821</guid><dc:creator>Debra Oshkosh WI</dc:creator><description>I still want to know how a woman who: Can't keep her husband in check, has no idea what he's up to,or with whom. &amp;nbsp;She's gonig to keep track of this country and others. &amp;nbsp;She needs to take care of her own problems first. &amp;nbsp;Can't respect any woman who would stay married to the jerk. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287822</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287822</guid><dc:creator>Farrah</dc:creator><description>wow, manny's statement above goes to show that no matter how far society progresses there will always be people who insist on retaining antiquated and just plain incorrect views. &amp;nbsp;though I do agree with you that hilary would be a baaaad choice, that does not in any way mean that NO woman could hold the office. &amp;nbsp;get real man: the reason a woman has not become president yet is close-minded people like yourself. &amp;nbsp;it's not your place to say what is and isn't a woman's job.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287823</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287823</guid><dc:creator>Nick Petry, Billings, MT</dc:creator><description>Some one called it right, Neither are qualified to run the country. In fact, there hasn't been one candidate who has the qualifications. &lt;br&gt;It is a matter of who raises the most money, wins Presidencies, bottom line.&lt;br&gt;American voters should be outraged at the subpar candidates their party leaders are pushing forward.&lt;br&gt;So keep on picking the better of the evils to run your country, state, city and neighborhoods. Your country only reflects the way you vote. And right now, we are in some really sad shape!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287825</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287825</guid><dc:creator>John D'Ambra</dc:creator><description>Well, BUTCH Clinton is starting to display her high level of testosterone more and more. As I swore before, if she ever won other than a Senate seat I will leave this country and give up my citizenship...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287826</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287826</guid><dc:creator>David Mulenex</dc:creator><description>bad luck fo obama to preced hillary, who played a clever game of gotcha. let's just remember who voted for the war in Iraq without reading the classified intelligence report, and who has yet to regret the tragic consequences of her uninformed decision. There are more than 3,640 readons for every American to vote against Clinton. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287827</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287827</guid><dc:creator>rick  hastings,mn</dc:creator><description> after all the adverse baggage the Clinton's have brought on by themselves, it is unfortunate she still has the impudence to discredit our highest office. Where there hasn't been a fire, there has been a great deal of smoke on other matters in their lives.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287829</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287829</guid><dc:creator>Mary W. Fields, Wash DC</dc:creator><description>Hillary is doing it all for herself, not for the country, not for those in need, but for her own ego. &amp;nbsp;She wants to be president to get back at those who she called &amp;quot;right wing conspiracists&amp;quot; whom she later hated to amit were telling the truth all along. She failed miserably to manage the health care system and now she wants to run a nation? Give us all a break!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287831</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287831</guid><dc:creator>Mitchell Thomas</dc:creator><description>Clinton's issue with Obama's statement is sounding like more politics as usual. We have to get away from these types of politics. Why vote for her, unless you want more of the same bull we've been getting.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287835</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:43:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287835</guid><dc:creator>Anthony, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>I believe that we elect Presidents to lead our country. I believe that they generally try to do good things since we are a Christian nation and Christians make a valid attempt to help those in need. President Bush has made a great attempt to do the right thing. In the event that people of this nation study cultural diversity, they will see that there are many people from many cultures in this counrty, so, President Bush cannot possibly please everyone with every decision. As President, the right to meet with leaders as necessary is His, so if he chooses to meet or not with radical leaders, all I can do is support his decisions because I understand that he has a council of wise people to draw advice from prior to making decisions. I believe that the President has the ability to form a bright and proper team to surround him and he must rely on their input to run this country, I think we often forget that no man or woman knows everything, and needs others to succeed. Being in the military, we have to make decisions and work as a team to accomplish our mission. It would behoove this country to do the same. United we stand, divided we fall. We must support our leaders in order to succeed as a nation. So, whether Hilary of Obama would meet with World Leaders is not an issue to me, whether they have the guts to use our all volunteer force (myself included) to defend our freedom is a valid issue for me. Freedom is not free, 4500 years of recorded wars throughout human history teaches us that man has always had conflict and always will. Wise people study history and can often predict the future through it. The real issue is, will we be a safe nation with either candidate in office, I know we are with George Bush.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287836</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287836</guid><dc:creator>EH</dc:creator><description>I have another question for Clienton- Did she want to escape the consequence of white water scandal! That's why she move from AK to NY ???? May be that's why I will not choose her as a President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287838</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:43:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287838</guid><dc:creator>Tom Spencer</dc:creator><description>SAY WHAT?! &amp;nbsp;Some people, so easily show their ignorance, i.e. see Buffalo NY comment. &amp;nbsp;I cannot help&lt;br&gt;but wonder, if he (or she) listen's to their own advice, has actually read any of Mr. Obama's books.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287839</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:43:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287839</guid><dc:creator>lady true</dc:creator><description>Naive maybe Hillary should look in a mirror,she's naive to believe that a leader of a country where woman a treated as second rate citizens will take her seriously, sweetie you weren't in charge of the countries at those meetings. &amp;nbsp;I think its going to be something totally different if and when she becomes president. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287841</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:44:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287841</guid><dc:creator>Stephanie, Perkasie, PA</dc:creator><description>Talk about being naive, manny.....a person's gender has NOTHING to do with capabilities or experience, both of which Senator Clinton has a lot of. She wasn't a sitting around, playing hostess and looking pretty kind of First Lady - she was very involved in her husband's presidency. And that's a strength that puts her above the rest of these candidates. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287844</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:44:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287844</guid><dc:creator>Fred W. Higgenbottom, Fletcher, NC</dc:creator><description>The practice of personal attack for political gain turns the stomach of most &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; American voters. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The recent Presidential debates have steadily degenerated into &amp;quot;one upmanship&amp;quot; and sound bites disguised as dialogue. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately such shrill and backward behavior isn't confined to just Democrats. &amp;nbsp;Candidates from both political parties regularly engage in such behavior. &amp;nbsp;Don't politicians realize that pursuing this type of destructive behavior only alienates intelligent people? &amp;nbsp;It also diminishes the respect that the rest of the world has for America, the democratic process, the high office of President. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most Americans want serious Presidential candidates from both parties to focus upon what they would do to confront the serious issues that currently face this country and not engage in the practice of personal attack of the beliefs held by other candidates. &amp;nbsp;I only hope that this type of disappointing behavior will be clearly remembered in the privacy of voting booths during November.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287845</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:44:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287845</guid><dc:creator>Elias Ford</dc:creator><description>it's important to say here that Hillary Clinton should not be allow to go on meriting the credit of her husband just for the fact that Americans want woman president like the Germans or Chileans the voter must decide through their vote and I’m without doubt she will not emerge as president of the United State of America please OBAMA go on and do what you know how to do best as our next president. Elias Ford</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287847</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287847</guid><dc:creator>Stacy Whitworth</dc:creator><description>The Bush Republican who posted needs to go hide his head in the bush..... &amp;nbsp;What a worthless administration it has been..... nothing accomplished in 8 years except EXON getting richer, richer, richer, richer, richer, need I go on...........</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287848</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287848</guid><dc:creator>George,Seattle</dc:creator><description>The takeaway from this is that Hillary is afraid of a debate with Chavez -- and Obama is not. &amp;nbsp; Hillary Clinton thinks that it is irresponsible for the President of the US to talk with other world leaders? &amp;nbsp;I think she had better re-read the job description. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287849</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:45:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287849</guid><dc:creator>cpaul. N.Y.</dc:creator><description>If you guys do not know what was the question: it was about meeting with leaders of these countries in the first year (if elected). Obama showed a little inexperience by saying &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;, while Clinton said: no, you will not want to be used as propaganda, you'll have other conversations at lower levels to find out what their real intentions are first, but not meeting promise (Smart). she did not say not to talking to this countries. &amp;nbsp;So, please refrain from doing a disservice to people that really want to get to the Bottom of issues.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287850</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:45:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287850</guid><dc:creator>papi</dc:creator><description>Let’s right-size the issue and adequately assess the politics. A foreign policy exchange during a nationally televised debate by presidential candidates is not insignificant. Hilary obviously got the better of it, and that’s why she’s hyping it. Obama knows he got bested, and that’s why he’s downplaying it. What’s the significance? By November 2008 it’ll be no more than a dot on a very long line. But right now that dot matters a tiny bit, because money and activists are lining up behind candidates. Obama’s got an uphill battle. He needs all the momentum he can get. Between now and the primaries, he’s got to outscore Hilary every chance he gets. Last night he didn’t get it done. He’ll have other chances. But the biggest winner last night was Al Gore, because every time these midgets line up, he's that much more attractive. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287851</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:45:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287851</guid><dc:creator>Janis Cook</dc:creator><description>While I like Obama, he is TOTALLY inexperienced and I don't believe he is ready to lead this country. I am also putting Edwards in the No vote catagory - basically because of his loud mouthed wife (I don't want her as first lady). My vote is going to the next President of the United States - Madam President - Hillary Clinton!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287852</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:45:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287852</guid><dc:creator>Steve,Chattanooga,Tn</dc:creator><description>Three greatest fears for America! Osama,Obama,and Chelsea's Momma</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287854</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287854</guid><dc:creator>anwhere_usa</dc:creator><description>everyone who even responded to this is a comedian. NO current politician will ever take the oath of office and not, in some way, make errors. &amp;nbsp;NONE OF THEM. &amp;nbsp;Also, How many of the current candidates, Repub or Demo should we EVER TRUST? &amp;nbsp;NONE. &amp;nbsp;They all want to push their own agenda. &amp;nbsp;Just like Clinton, Bush, Regan, etc.... &amp;nbsp;This, unfortunately, is what we have with our system.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287856</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:46:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287856</guid><dc:creator>George, Washington D.C.</dc:creator><description>When you read the words; lies and misleading policies, who do you think of? weapons of mass destruction.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287857</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287857</guid><dc:creator>Linda - California</dc:creator><description>At this point either Obama or Clinton would be a great relief as President after enduring the 8 years of Pres. Bush &amp;amp; his administration.&lt;br&gt;President Bush has not accomplished a single positive domestic change while in office, he's ruined the United States reputation world wide!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287858</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:46:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287858</guid><dc:creator>Al Walsh</dc:creator><description>Hillary jumps on things like this because she hasn't got anything substantive to say. She sounds like a little girl arguing in a school yard.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287860</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:46:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287860</guid><dc:creator>nate, columbus, ohio</dc:creator><description>I hated Mr. Safire at NYTIMES but he was absolutely prescient when he called Hillary a &amp;quot;congenital&amp;quot; liar. THat's what she is and no amount of BS will ever change that. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287862</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287862</guid><dc:creator>m0ney, Ks</dc:creator><description>For all of the people that are trying to put intelligent comments on here, just a word of advice. &amp;nbsp;Learn how to spell! &amp;nbsp;It's 'axis' not 'axes', I'm not even a Hillary fan but I know that her middle name is 'Rodham' not 'Rodman'. &amp;nbsp;The list goes on....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 'voters' that are represented by these comments are for the most part, not people I want helping decide the future of this country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287863</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287863</guid><dc:creator>Andrei Varney. Appleton, WI</dc:creator><description>Wow everyone...this election is going to be very interesting. My only hope is, that with the new leader, things wouldn't change dramatically, but gradually. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First of all...Barack Obama is is probably the least qualified candidate and although I do not support Clinton, I agree with her statement that Obama is quite naive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considering our stance in the world, and our relations with foreign nations, we need someone who has experience. Whether our relations with these nations are legit is not the question.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287864</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287864</guid><dc:creator>Tracy, Atlanta,GA</dc:creator><description>Um, I'm not defending Bush by any means but after seeing some on here attack him the way they have let's just remember that Saddam was shooting at our boys for nearly 10 years in the no fly zones and breaking every sanction in the book before we finally said enough and went to war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two, just in case no one has listened closely enough, Hillary is preaching Socialism at it's finest at almost every stop on her campaign tours. What's scary is that almost no one has noticed. Keep those ears open everyone.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287865</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287865</guid><dc:creator>Rick of Kansas city</dc:creator><description>Wake up America, we need to have all the exeperience we can get in the next president. Mrs Clinton has that experience. We don,t have the luxury of experimentation, thanks to Pres. Bush and the Repub. party.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287866</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287866</guid><dc:creator>John - Athens, GA</dc:creator><description>Who is in the office of the Presidency should not be gender specific. But it should be off limits to incompetent power hungry self serving fools. What ever happened to the &amp;quot;Statesman&amp;quot; who took office to serve the people?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287867</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287867</guid><dc:creator>Gary, Va</dc:creator><description>Cindy, phenix city:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not whether &amp;quot;women are just as good as any man&amp;quot; but whether HILLARY is right for this country, don't vote for her just because she is a woman. Can anyone tell me two or three things Hillary has accomplished since being elected to the senate?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287868</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:47:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287868</guid><dc:creator>Quiet One, Kealakekua, Hawaii</dc:creator><description>My gut feeling is that -- I know what she can do and what she won't do. &amp;nbsp;She can manage, but can't lead nation or country. &amp;nbsp;Plenty and good with words, but way less with deeds.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287874</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287874</guid><dc:creator>George,Seattle</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;You don't meet with every lunatic leader...&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't have to meet with every leader, just the lunatic leaders who are working on nuclear weapons or hold control of the US oil supply in their hands. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287875</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287875</guid><dc:creator>Gerry Carter</dc:creator><description>Lord! This is going to be a long campaign!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287877</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287877</guid><dc:creator>RJ, Hampton, VA</dc:creator><description>Obama is a proven leader. He turned down millions to go and organize in Chicago. It showed true leadership skills to do it on your own, not lean on your spouse. This woman is not capable of winning in a general election. The Republicans will make her look like a housewife when they finish trashing her and Bill. Dems get real and go with a winner. Barack Obama 2008!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287878</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287878</guid><dc:creator>PutinTang</dc:creator><description>BY the people, for the people,or should I say children...Grow up! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287880</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287880</guid><dc:creator>brutus maximus</dc:creator><description>so far, the only candidates qualified for the job of the national chief executive are Bill Richardson (D-NM) &amp;amp; Huckabee (R-AK)(and Romney, of course). if the job was for CEO of a major corporation does anyone think the board of directors would cosider people who had NEVER held a similar position?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287881</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287881</guid><dc:creator>Rick of Kansas City Ks.</dc:creator><description>Wake up America, we need to have all the exeperience we can get in the next president. Mrs Clinton has that experience. We don,t have the luxury of experimentation, thanks to Pres. Bush and the Repub. party.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287882</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287882</guid><dc:creator>AppleJacque, Columbus, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Why is it that everytime there is a thread about Barack and Clinton, somehow someone manages to put Colin Powell in the picture. Because Powell is intellectual, likable, and BLACK?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tell it like it T.I. is. Powell WOULD have been a formidable Dem candidate, but his image was tarnished because he backed the Bush Administration in saying that there WERE weapons of mass distruction to be found, but WERE'NT. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;,...and I DARE any Dem or Rep voter on these boards to say anything other than that. Keep in mind many of Bush's cabinet that DID NOT want to be a part of his second term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Barack,....people will see Hillary's true colors soon, which would make Barack more likable than he is now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark my words,.....there WILL be a Dem president this next term. The American people are tired of what the last Rep president did, and their children are either suffering or died in the desert,....but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax half of you folks wont even touch,.....</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287884</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287884</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Silver Spring, MD</dc:creator><description>Wow, most of you all are so ignorant it hurts me. &amp;nbsp;Hopefully none of you will be voting in the next election. &amp;nbsp;I'm pretty sure 90% of you are Republican anyway.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287886</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:50:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287886</guid><dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator><description>To Jerry/Corpus Christi and the rest of you closed minded people of our country...I ASSume that you all voted for Bush?...Well sure you did, and look where that got us! When are you rednecks going to open your eyes and realize that one day because of your back wood mentality you will be holding back women in your own family. So I guess the question to you and Most, but not all men is...&amp;quot; Are you saying that your Daughters, Wives, Mothers, etc... are not smart enough or strong enough to run this country&amp;quot;???? And for that matter are you????</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287891</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:50:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287891</guid><dc:creator>C.Epic, Tallahassee, FL</dc:creator><description>I agree with the person who said Hillary and most of the other candidates are too old school. I think that the BabyBoomers have wrecked this country with their partisan divisive politics that seek to keep arguments going instead of solving problems. Those saying Obama lacks experience say that like experience in that high of office is an easy thing to get. NO-ONE running for President has experience as the President so what are you really saying? You're buying into the psychology of the past and that, to me is the biggest problem we face as a nation. Vision is what we need. Take a long look at Obama's response to the reparations question and you will see someone who thinks beyond the status quo and has a vision. I weep for our country because alot of the reasons you people are citing as reasons not to vote for Obama are idiotic AT BEST. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287892</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:50:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287892</guid><dc:creator>David, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>To &amp;quot;Bush Republican:&amp;quot; Scumbag is one word, you imbe cile.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287895</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:50:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287895</guid><dc:creator>R.DeHart</dc:creator><description>Hillary is right. Obama is naive. Go Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287896</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:50:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287896</guid><dc:creator>Jack McGuire,Wasilla,AK.</dc:creator><description>Put&amp;quot; God &amp;quot;Back in this country and let&amp;quot; God &amp;quot;Do his work! Our founding Fathers looked to God for answers! And so should we! The Bible and the Book of Mormon give the answers to this complex World! Have faith and pray and the holy Spirit will tell us who we should put in office! God Bless America!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287898</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287898</guid><dc:creator>Linda - California</dc:creator><description>At this point either Obama or Clinton would be a great relief as President after enduring the 8 years of Pres. Bush &amp;amp; his administration.&lt;br&gt;President Bush has not accomplished a single positive domestic change while in office, he's ruined the United States reputation world wide!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287899</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287899</guid><dc:creator>Tracy,Atlanta,GA</dc:creator><description>Doesn't everyone think it's time to be a little more idealistic? We simply as a nation don't demand it enough from our leaders. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Obama not a lot of experience? NO, of course he doesn't but all that means to me is that he hasn't had as much time to be AS corrupted as the rest of them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give me someone that wants to these things and they'll get my vote:&lt;br&gt;1. Introduce term limits&lt;br&gt;2. NO pork barrel spending&lt;br&gt;3. No lobbyists&lt;br&gt;4. No corporate money for campaigns&lt;br&gt;5. Spending limit on presidential elections</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287900</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287900</guid><dc:creator>Debbie, Everett Washington</dc:creator><description>We need a woman in the White House but Hillary is not the RIGHT woman for the job. We have got to have someone who can straighten out the mess Bush has created. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287902</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287902</guid><dc:creator>So tired of being Bushed, Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>Yet more proof imo that Hillary Clinton is a divider when this country (and this world) most urgently needs a uniter! &amp;nbsp;(And these sheenanigans of hers only smell like old school politics to me...carries the stink of ol' cigar smoke from the spinmeisters in the back room.)</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287903</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287903</guid><dc:creator>Rick Savolainen, Eau Claire, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>When have past candidates, once elected, follow through on debate promises ? </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287904</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287904</guid><dc:creator>Miles from Michigan</dc:creator><description>Manny - you are a chauvinistic pig. Grow up - we have males currently in power and they (Bush and the dark lord Cheney) are the least suited to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary may have experience, but diplomacy is about talking, and Barack has it right - we need to speak to get to the place where we can start making compromise. It would be nice to have someone who can be diplomatic in the Oval Office - not someone who wants all the difficult compromises to be done before they start talking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; All this buzz here about the term 'leadership.' Isn't that what this current Administration tried to campaign on? Has that red-flag word caught your imagination so much? We need someone who not only leads but can form compromise, have conversations, and help the world, not just the US's national interests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Just keep saying leadership, and denying diplomacy, and watch us end up balls-deep in North Korea and Iran and God-knows-where-else, with another incompetent 'decisive leader' in the White House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Hillary look like Bush by backing up his policies. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287905</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287905</guid><dc:creator>Jack McGuire,Wasilla,AK.</dc:creator><description>Freedom Brother! Freedom!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287906</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287906</guid><dc:creator>Tom S</dc:creator><description>Many of you have said that we will regret voting for Hillary, not a smuch as we do voting for G.W.!!!!!! I think it is time for the right to take a look at what the country is saying, no more GOP. Bye bye.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287908</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287908</guid><dc:creator>DICK HAVEN, VA</dc:creator><description>Obama is nothing but an opportunist and shallow politician. &amp;nbsp;soon or later people will see through and it is truly sad he thinks he can do better than his kind who didn't do anything but kissing their masters behinds. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287909</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287909</guid><dc:creator>Quentin, Chicago, Il</dc:creator><description>Will white men in the south really ever vote for a woman or a minority? &amp;nbsp;If the responses on this blog are any indication the answer is a resounding no! &lt;br&gt;Shouldn't we be talking to everyone, isn't that a better strategy than putting our troops in harms way under false pretenses.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287911</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287911</guid><dc:creator>T Hewatt, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>People that are holding the fact that she voted for the war needs to remember when they have done something that the regreted in their life. &amp;nbsp;If we knew then what we found out later we would not have done the stupid thing. &amp;nbsp;She has admitted that she voted on the war based on the information she had at the time. &amp;nbsp;As far as the issue of experience yes both her and Obama have not got the experience of being the president but what president did when the won their first election. &amp;nbsp;She at least does have some insite of how things are ran in the White House.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287912</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287912</guid><dc:creator>Jerry, Nashville,Tenn</dc:creator><description>Al Gore would have been President in 2000, if he had won his home state of Tennessee. We know Al very well here and understand that global warming is really caused by all of his HOT AIR! Fred Thompson is a Tennessean who can win his home state and the election. GO FRED!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287913</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287913</guid><dc:creator>it may be time for a woman, but it ain't time for an idiot in office.</dc:creator><description>Hmmm,&lt;br&gt;a woman who evidently has no problem with their husband sleeping &amp;nbsp;with any person with a vagina calling ANYONE naive and irresponsible is a bit laughable. the concept of burying your head in the sand while your mate potentially spreads or brings home both illegitimate offspring and incurable diseases....now THAT is the very definition of Naive</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287914</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287914</guid><dc:creator>Gerry Carter</dc:creator><description>This country needs: Experience, Honesty &amp;amp; Brains. Vote Dodd!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287915</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287915</guid><dc:creator>Nancy, Indian Rocks Beach, Fl</dc:creator><description>I don't know who the next President will be, but I would lay odds that it won't be a woman or a black man.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287916</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287916</guid><dc:creator>will juniel  phoenix, az </dc:creator><description>i'd vote for a dog before i vote for a republican!&lt;br&gt;how soon america forget about bush and his cronies murdering all those people on 911... obama and hillary would make a great team. they wouldn't be a part of a secret society like mr. satan bush/cheney!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287917</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287917</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, The Peanut Gallery</dc:creator><description>Huh. &amp;nbsp;My previously submitted post seems to have not been posted. &amp;nbsp;I hope it was lost in the crush and not held back as it wasn't any more offensive than what our friends Jerry, Dave, et al have spouted into this thread. &amp;nbsp;Anyway, here goes again...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What hasn't been mentioned, so far as I can tell (sorry, I stopped reading the thread after the guy who claimed that the Presidency is for men only) is the context of the question that was asked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The question was centered around President Sadat's visit to Israel in 1977. &amp;nbsp;That meeting was without conditions and had only the vague adgenda of conciliation. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***The result of this diplomatic step was a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt that has stood to this day!***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing irresponsible and naive is thinking that the world's strife can only be solved through millitary force. &amp;nbsp;For a Presidential candidate to say otherwise merely ensures that they will not receive my vote. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287918</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:53:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287918</guid><dc:creator>John McClelland, Canovanas, Puerto Rico</dc:creator><description>As a Republican, I think I could probably be about as impartial as it get in a Dem debate, so here's my two cents: &amp;nbsp;Regardless of which candidate you support, don't overlook what happened here. &amp;nbsp;Obama made a comment that could be easily criticised and capitalized upon. &amp;nbsp;This is not what I would expect of a President. &amp;nbsp;Clinton outfoxed him in this case, there's no point in trying to spin it. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287920</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:53:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287920</guid><dc:creator>DICK HAVEN, VA</dc:creator><description>Obama is nothing but an opportunist and shallow &amp;nbsp;and naive politician. &amp;nbsp;soon or later people will see through and it is truly sad he thinks he can do better than his kind who didn't do anything but kissing their masters behinds. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287922</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:54:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287922</guid><dc:creator>Lauren, VA</dc:creator><description>Wow, Kelly PA. &amp;nbsp;As a woman, I would like to ask you not to post such idiocy and tell people your gender. &amp;nbsp;I have had the debate with many a republican and they have conceeded that the Clinton term was one of the better in recent history. &amp;nbsp;Hilary was a huge part of that. &amp;nbsp;She is smart, gutsy and isn't afraid to take on big issues. &amp;nbsp;I'm not saying she's the best choice for the presidency, but to say she would make a better first lady is really &amp;quot;naive&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287924</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:54:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287924</guid><dc:creator>Tracy,Atlanta,GA</dc:creator><description>To: IMPEACH BUSH AND CHENEY&lt;br&gt;Bush may not have a lot going for him but one thing he does have that I admire is that he doesn't bend to political will. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly, I don't care if a woman, man, black, white or otherwise is in the white house I just want the best person. Any real person with any morals or ethics would. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly, I wish Colin Powell would run.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287925</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:54:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287925</guid><dc:creator>Ron, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>Wow. A man's job? More proof that education in this country is severely lacking. Also proof that those who are biased against Ms. Clinton will never vote for her and that is her biggest problem. Never mind the fact that she is clearly the most experienced &amp;nbsp;democratic candidate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287926</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287926</guid><dc:creator>Rick King  LOs Angeles California</dc:creator><description>Geez, one little comment and things get all blown out of proportion! &amp;nbsp;THe media is fueling this fire between Obama and Clinton, lets all look at the real issues this country faces right now. &amp;nbsp;It is the fact that people refuse to look at the real issues that gaves us this moron that we have today as a president. &amp;nbsp;WE get what we deserve, because it is up to all of us to focus on the issues and not all this hype.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287927</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287927</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Louisville Ky</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton farts, MSNBC says smells GREAT, she will make an excelent president!! Obama buys grocey store of beans and declares 2 can play this game. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287929</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:55:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287929</guid><dc:creator>M. Montgomery, TX</dc:creator><description>It seems that a lot of people fail to see either for who they truly are. &amp;nbsp;Democrats have no platform or issues that they can truly deine as solutions to their problems and they both ignore what's at stake here. &amp;nbsp;Instead of paying attention to the major issues concerning our country, they are waging their own war for supremacy and power in the federal government. &amp;nbsp;It is not Congress' job to run the military or set foreign policy. &amp;nbsp;Their job is to legislate and be a part of the checks and balances for the three parts that make up our federal system, not have the only say in what is right or wrong. &amp;nbsp;How many issues other than the Iraq war and a half-hearted attempt at immigration have the Democrats resolved since being elected a majority? &amp;nbsp;Not very many, if any at all!! How much bi-partisanship have they demonstrated isnce being elected a majority? Zero!!! &amp;nbsp;And you want to elect one of these whiny senators the leader of our nation? &amp;nbsp;For decades, the Democratic party has touted itself as being for the people and yet, has deceived the peoplefor that very same reason. &amp;nbsp;They were the party in power during Viet Nam but it took a Republican president to bring the troops home. &amp;nbsp;None of them balked when our troop size got escalated largely by a draft which has not been the case for the current war. &amp;nbsp;3600+ is small in comparison to 50,000+ military men and women to die in Nam and a lot of them were forced to go by the draft. &amp;nbsp;This war is in its fourth year while the Dems started with President Kennedy and it finally was ended by Nixon, a republican. &amp;nbsp;Back to the caandidates, neither has the experience to run a war and the first thing they will do is order a retreat from our enemies. &amp;nbsp;Slick Willie can't wait to get back in the White House and you can bet he'll be up to his usual tricks. &amp;nbsp;Wake up and smell the coffee, America!! &amp;nbsp;With either of them, hard times are coming!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287930</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:55:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287930</guid><dc:creator>James  Aguilera, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>This country will go hell in a hand basket if any Democrat is elected to be our president. &amp;nbsp;If Al gore were to have won, I would be dead and the women of this country would all be wearing burkas. &amp;nbsp;Enough to say about the wacko Democrats. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287931</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:55:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287931</guid><dc:creator>Kim, New York</dc:creator><description>Who in their right mind would vote for Obama....We do not want another Clinton scandal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287932</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:55:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287932</guid><dc:creator>Wayne Hoyt,Juneau,Alaska</dc:creator><description>Every time I see the Capitol One commercial, the one with the lady and the monkey on her back. I picture Hilary as that lady. Now I wonder who the monkey is?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287933</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287933</guid><dc:creator>Jim - Seattle, Washington</dc:creator><description>Neither are impressive. I might add that none of the candidates that have stepped into the ring are impressive from either side of the aisle. Anyone that would &amp;quot;throw their hat&amp;quot; into that ring and suffer the indignities of a campaign isn't worthy of holding that office. Those that are competent to hold the office of president wouldn't subject themselves to the humiliation of a run for president. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287934</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:56:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287934</guid><dc:creator>Jayson, Boston</dc:creator><description>Hillary is absolutely right on this issue. &amp;nbsp;I think her answer showed that she has a deeper understanding of what it takes to deal with rogue leaders throughout the world. &amp;nbsp;Some of you are implying that Hillary doesn't want to engage in diplomacy or that she'll refuse to have discussions with these leaders. &amp;nbsp;That is a gross misrepresentation of what she actually said in last night's debate. &amp;nbsp;She said she wouldn't PROMISE to meet with them in the first YEAR in office - that is completely different. &amp;nbsp;She has consistently said throughout all of the debates (and I've watched all of them) and even before the debates that she believes diplomacy is the most important aspect of regaining our crediblility, respect and standing in the world. &amp;nbsp;However, she was right to point out that Obama's statement (while in theory great) was somewhat naive and it shows that she has a firmer grasp on the realities of the world and the realities of being commander-in-chief. &amp;nbsp;For those of you who are saying this is just an extension of Bush-style diplomacy (or, I would say lack thereof) that is absolute lunacy. &amp;nbsp;She is not even close to being in the same ballpark as Bush's reckless foreign &amp;quot;policy&amp;quot;/non-diplomatic efforts. &amp;nbsp;In my opinion, she is the best qualified, positioned, and able to be president. &amp;nbsp;I think many of you know it, but you refuse to admit it because you've been led to believe the mischaracterizations about her that have been beaten over ours heads for years with character assassination and innuendo. &amp;nbsp;This all being said, I like Obama. I think he's an incredible asset to the Democratic Party. &amp;nbsp;I just wish he was a little more experienced. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287935</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:56:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287935</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>I think that Senator Clinton sounded very PRESIDENTIAL and as much as I like OBAMA, he screwed in answering that question. &amp;nbsp;NO matter how you read it, that was an opportunity to show some leadership and Senator Clinton came as a winner by a wisk.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287936</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:56:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287936</guid><dc:creator>Dr J</dc:creator><description>I think Obama represents what the Democratic party is really supposed to be. &amp;nbsp;I am a Republican, but if he wants to get Republican votes, he would, after winning the democratic nomination, pick someone like John McCain as his VP! &amp;nbsp;There would be a cross-party leadership team that could actually make some changes in Washington....</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287938</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287938</guid><dc:creator>Wale, Cleveland</dc:creator><description>Ed - Philadlephia, I'm sure you meant FDR not DFR. &amp;nbsp;Cheers</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287942</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:57:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287942</guid><dc:creator>John Nesavich Denver Colorado</dc:creator><description>If either Hillary or Obama are elected we better start preparing to fight the Radical Mosulims on American soil.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287943</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:57:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287943</guid><dc:creator>Reservoirdog</dc:creator><description>I watch every minute of last nights DEM Debates. Hillary is twisting Obama’s statement entirely...Hilary in my opinion barley answered any of last nights questions honestly or with substance. She danced around every issue wasting time thanking the YouTube person asking the question, for there service or for there commitment, etc then giving a standard political pat answer and ignoring the issue completely. Were as I think Obama answered the questions with heart. I think Hillary is definitely feeling the pressure and dirt politics will be used as needed. A DEM in 2008 ...but which one</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287944</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:57:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287944</guid><dc:creator>RFC in NC</dc:creator><description>I really am worried now, after reading these comments about the debate, of which I missed. &amp;nbsp;These are voting folks? &amp;nbsp;What IS important to you? &amp;nbsp;Wake up Americans! &amp;nbsp;Don't be so blind to the state of affairs our country is in. &amp;nbsp;This is a very dangerous time. &amp;nbsp;We need more than ever to have someone in office with experience in dealing with both our affairs at home and this tangled web our current commander in chief has spun for us. &amp;nbsp;It will take someone with a clear head &amp;amp; experience to get America back on track. &amp;nbsp;Keep on sleeping &amp;amp; exhausting your energy with nonsense, &amp;amp; we'll be caught totally unprepared for the dangers that await us with an inexperienced president. &amp;nbsp;The republicans have shown us what they are all about, and Clinton is the only level headed Dem. that can truly take us in the right direction. &amp;nbsp;America is playing right into the hands of our enemy; man / woman / republican / democrat / white / black &amp;nbsp;-- it doesn't matter; we need someone with some serious experience. &amp;nbsp;I am amazed at how America is asleep.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287945</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287945</guid><dc:creator>Inc</dc:creator><description>Whoever wins, I want them to creat a new HEALTH CARE SYSTEM! A SOCIAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM! everyone needs to watch &amp;quot;sicko&amp;quot; the documentary to know what I am talking about!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287947</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287947</guid><dc:creator>Rene Sumallo, Nanuet, New York</dc:creator><description>people easily forget about the CLINTONS when they were in ARKANSAS. A woman opted to spend time in jail, somebody committed suicide because of guilt while in jail - all these to protect the CLINTONS. When Mr. CLINTON was president, he appointed Mrs. CLINTON to work on the HEALTH CARE SYSTEM to make it simple and affordable for everybody. What happened? When the system was messed up and in disarray, she disappeared and nothing was heard from then on. Now medical insurance is so expensive and complicated. Also, from ARKANSAS to NEW YORK, first as senator now as presidential aspirant, it was all calculated moves.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287948</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287948</guid><dc:creator>a registered voter, OH</dc:creator><description>didn't Hilary put all those &amp;quot;parental advisory stickers&amp;quot; on everything as my generation was growing up (im 30 now). Didn't she have a part in trying to ban a lot of material (music, video, ect..) because it was not to her taste. Sounds like that politician that started yelling burn the books back around WWII. &amp;nbsp;Now she wants what is left of my land of free 15 or so yrs later ? Thats just insane! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287949</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287949</guid><dc:creator>Jane Romero, Albuquerque, NM</dc:creator><description> So, manny, Calvin, according to you, this is no job for a woman? &amp;nbsp;Well, we keep putting men in there and they keep screwing up. &amp;nbsp;It's hard to believe what this administration has done; so, what's left? &amp;nbsp;Seems a woman in there will surely straighten things out. Give it a try. &amp;nbsp;Can it get any worse than what we're going through now? &amp;nbsp;Don't blame me, I didn't vote for him; I'd rather vote for HER!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287950</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287950</guid><dc:creator>yelsnar  Meridian, Idaho</dc:creator><description>COnservitive wife/mother How great it would be if that would happen. &amp;nbsp;What we need are fewer politicans and a few statesmen who think of the country and not their party or their own ambitions.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287952</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287952</guid><dc:creator>Bree</dc:creator><description>I think all the members of Congress that voted for the war, should do a tour of duty in Iraq and then we will listen to their comments. &amp;nbsp;That includes Mrs. Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287953</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287953</guid><dc:creator>Joe Bid, DE</dc:creator><description>AL Gore is the only person who can take us out of the Iraq mess and all the other political mess we are in right now. &amp;nbsp;He can take the country in the right direction you know why because he is the one person got real experience that no one can challenge. Hillary and Obama doesn't have experience as an executive/decision maker. If any one of them is elected he/she will be a puppet just like Bush. &amp;nbsp;President with no powers and the decision maker will be someone else just like now Cheney is the decision maker. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287954</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287954</guid><dc:creator>Pat Guest</dc:creator><description>I am a Republican, however, I appreciate the fact that Hillary Clinton is the most informed, realistic and qualified candidate on US foreign policy. I'll vote for Rudy but Hillary is a serious and very qualified contender. Hillary is right about Obama. He is Naive when it comes to Foreign Policy. I believe he is a good person and is sincere but probably not qualified to be President. But we have elected individuals who are qualified to be President in the past.... &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287955</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:58:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287955</guid><dc:creator>John - Athens, GA</dc:creator><description>Rick of Kansas City Ks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is a Socialist! Where have you been??? She is a power hungry control freak. She wants to take your rights AWAY from you! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287956</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287956</guid><dc:creator>Steven Anderson, Cottonwood Heights, Utah</dc:creator><description>Keep these contrived and made up/distorted &amp;quot;controversies&amp;quot; about Obama coming Hillary... &amp;nbsp;the more she keeps doing this the better Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination are. &amp;nbsp;She's playing the dirty politics game with mud slinging and he's not. &amp;nbsp;I'm a Republican who can see it will most likely be a Democrat winning in 2008 and I want that person to be Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287958</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287958</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton looked more Presidential as any of the other candidates. Give this lady credit, not only does she have the experience to be President, but the backing of a former President......the country can't go wrong with her! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287959</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287959</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>If you are voting based on the color of your candiates skin or your candidates gender then you are either a racist or a sexist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rudy Giuliani for presdent!!!!! He is the only candidate with what it takes.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287960</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287960</guid><dc:creator>Tyler from MI</dc:creator><description>What are you people saying, that this is no job for a woman? &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton may have faults, but on her worst day, she and the other candidates have more sense and perspective about the state of this country than our current president has or will ever have. &amp;nbsp;It's like people are blind to his arrogance and &amp;nbsp;unwillingness to listen to the very ones whom he was elected to represent. &amp;nbsp;Personnally, I don't think the person exists that can straighten out the mess in this country. &amp;nbsp;I wouldn't want the job.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287962</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287962</guid><dc:creator>Frank, Houston</dc:creator><description>We all have our own opinions and I respect each one of them, but one should think and wonder where would Obama take this country if he ended up in high power position... &lt;br&gt;what is his background again???&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287963</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287963</guid><dc:creator>Tobian, Topeka, Ks.</dc:creator><description>How can one feel that neither Clinton nor Obama are capable of running this country? Look at who they will be following!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287964</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287964</guid><dc:creator>EZ, Lufkin, TX</dc:creator><description>The entire political scene sounds like a couple of two-year-olds fighting over something the dont want anyway.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287965</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287965</guid><dc:creator>Don, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Barrack Hussien Obama isn't just naive, he's dangerous. &amp;nbsp;When has diplomacy EVER worked? &amp;nbsp;Libs keeps pretending it's the best way, it's not unless it's backed up by force. &amp;nbsp;World learders will eat him alive - just like they did Carter. &amp;nbsp;Talk about lack of respect. &amp;nbsp;It's okay the world hates President Bush -- they also respect him and wouldn't try anything as foolish as they do when Democrats are in charge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take that to the bank! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287966</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287966</guid><dc:creator>John Wimmer, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>Considering the embarassment sitting in the currently sitting White House, and the Republicans in Congress who are more interested in partisanship and ideology than truth and effectual leadership, I don't think commenting on any Democratic candidate ultimately really matters. How this nation could have fallen as far as it has under the misleadership of Bush and the Republicans, especially considering the quality of leadership our nation grew accustomed to in the likes of Kennedy and Eisenhower just a couple of generations ago, is profoundly humiliating as an American. How could Hilary Clinton or Barack Obama possibly be so bad, considering that there's no conceivable way things could be worse than this insidious disease known as the Bush administration?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287967</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287967</guid><dc:creator>Patrick in DC</dc:creator><description>I have ONE question: if Obama were WHITE, would ANYone even give him the time of day?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His awful performances in the past debates has once and for all proven he has NO business being up on that stage. &amp;nbsp;Talk about 'no THERE there!'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go git 'im, Hillary. Don't be afraid. He'll probably just whine and send his wife after you to fight his battles, much like Girly Man John Edwards!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287969</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287969</guid><dc:creator>JT, Nashville, TN</dc:creator><description>To expand on my point: &amp;nbsp;the man that's in right now is really &amp;quot;doin' a heckuva job,&amp;quot; manny.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287970</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287970</guid><dc:creator>P. Smith, Port Charlotte FL</dc:creator><description>Neither Mr. Obama nor Hillary have what it takes to lead our country at this particular time due to their inexperience dealing with international terrorism or the emergence of rogue nations, including Russia. Regardless of Hillary's connections in the past I do not feel that she can run our intelligence agencies nor our military when the time comes for serious action. &amp;nbsp;The same with Mr. Obama. He hasn't been in politics or on the world stage long enough either. We could be in for a long, tough, horrible fight, one that could cost us dearly if mishandled. A leader of FDR's or Eisenhower's stature comes to mind. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287973</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:00:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287973</guid><dc:creator>Rick Bayless</dc:creator><description>It's sad to see that Clinton is just as ignorant as Bush.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287974</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:01:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287974</guid><dc:creator>Wale, Cleveland</dc:creator><description>Ed - Philadlephia, I'm sure you meant FDR not DFR. &amp;nbsp;Cheers</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287976</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287976</guid><dc:creator>C.Epic, Tallahassee, FL</dc:creator><description>I agree with the person who said Hillary and most of the other candidates are too old school. I think that the BabyBoomers have wrecked this country with their partisan divisive politics that seek to keep arguments going instead of solving problems. Those saying Obama lacks experience say that like experience in that high of office is an easy thing to get. NO-ONE running for President has experience as the President so what are you really saying? You're buying into the psychology of the past and that, to me is the biggest problem we face as a nation. Vision is what we need. Take a long look at Obama's response to the reparations question and you will see someone who thinks beyond the status quo and has a vision. I weep for our country because alot of the reasons you people are citing as reasons not to vote for Obama are idiotic AT BEST.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287977</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:01:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287977</guid><dc:creator>Matt, Scarborough, Maine</dc:creator><description>People who fight about which President/Candidate is better amuse me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please continue, slaves to the two party system. It's nice to know that there are people spending time and energy beating the dead horse of this fading republic, intently obsessing over who the next President will be (as if it matters either way).</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287978</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:01:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287978</guid><dc:creator>Stormy, Jacksonville, Alabama</dc:creator><description>I DARE to say and beleive that there are and has been weapons of mass destruction!!!!!!!!!!!! &amp;nbsp;I love and support the Bush admin. War is ugly and people die. But our freedoms are being protected. There has not been an attack on American soil since the war on terror.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287979</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:01:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287979</guid><dc:creator>Joe IN</dc:creator><description>once again, a lot of talk as candidates with the promise of little action as the president. they're just saying it to get elected. How does saying you never supported the war in the first place show support for the troops? Support their mission, dont give your enemies a date to look forward to for their victory when we leave. Getting off point, but we dont need a Bush then Clinton then Bush then Clinton. Who's after hillary if she gets in, Jeb then Chelsea? Time for something different</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287981</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:02:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287981</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Jackson</dc:creator><description>The Marxist Billary is a chameleon and takes on the color that she needs at the time. &amp;nbsp;One has to feel some sympathy for the old Democrats, they just don't realize that the Clintons hijacked their party and is using the Democrats as a store front for their socialist agendas. &amp;nbsp;NATIONAL SOCIALISM, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, does that sound familiar? &amp;nbsp;Read the Nazi manifesto and the foundation of the Gestapo. &amp;nbsp;The only true Democrat was Joe Lebermann and the Clintons tried to railroad him, but it backfired. &amp;nbsp;Socialists scream at the top of their lungs and shout people down (Rosie Odonnel) because they fear what others might say. &amp;nbsp;Socio-Marxists are a cancer in these United States and are hell bent on divide and conquer. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287982</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287982</guid><dc:creator>Sefie Anaya Socorro,NM</dc:creator><description>Bill will lead us to be a proud country again go Bill Richardson.....</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287983</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:02:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287983</guid><dc:creator>Isiah Washington, Hollywood, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary's response to Obama is just another example of the White Woman trying to keep the Black Man down.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287984</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:02:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287984</guid><dc:creator>Rick King  Los Angeles California</dc:creator><description>Woould all you yahoos out thought stop going on aqbout how a woman can be president. &amp;nbsp;Jeusus it is this king of ignorance that got us the leader we have gave us this mess wehave today. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps you people should pick up a paper once in a whilw and stop watching FOX NEWS.!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287993</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287993</guid><dc:creator>Jane Doe</dc:creator><description>Thank you JOhn Doe in Seattle, your profound wisdom is part of what makes this country great!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287994</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287994</guid><dc:creator>Art, Gerry, N.Y.</dc:creator><description>Yes, it would be nice to have a woman in the President's Office such as Golda Mier or Margaret Thatcher. NOT this person after refreshing my memory by reading www.cpwys.org/Hillary Type ACU_NYSCP_09_11_06.pdf . I would like to encourage everyone to read this article to refresh their memory about the Clinton Regime.&lt;br&gt;By the way, Hillary has done NOTHING of significance for N.Y. State since she has been in office. Talk about a carpetbagger!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287996</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287996</guid><dc:creator>Tom S</dc:creator><description>Repeat after me....Hillary is a joke, her husband a hypocrite, and thank goodness for the democrats as they have all the answers.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#287998</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:287998</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Beckerman, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>Gotta love how she never actually gives an answer to any qustion put in front of her. &amp;nbsp;Every single time it's &amp;quot;well I might do it, but I also might not.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I've watched the debates, and not once have I caught her answering a question by actually stating her stance on anything. &amp;nbsp;Never have I heard anyone use such wordplay and avoid all the issues while still maintaining so much support. &amp;nbsp;She bashes every other candidate while avoiding giving her stances on anything in an attempt to keep people who feel differently from turning on her. &amp;nbsp;Imagine what would happen if she actually became the president. &amp;nbsp;Her choices would only reflect what the people who happen to be around her at the time want, just to make them support her. &amp;nbsp;She'd probably start pardoning criminals just like Slick Willy, all for the money and added support. &amp;nbsp;If Obama had given a complete 180 degree answer and said he wouldn't meet with them, Clinton would have bashed that answer to. &amp;nbsp;And just look at how, right after insulting his answer, she still refused to actually state her position on the matter, giving the &amp;quot;maybe yes, maybe no&amp;quot; answer she always does. &amp;nbsp;She might even be worse than her husband, which I thought would never happen. &amp;nbsp;I wonder which one taught the other to be such a con artist. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288000</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288000</guid><dc:creator>w carroll    gadsden al</dc:creator><description>al least we would have a true american in the white hose, with our beliefs.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288001</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288001</guid><dc:creator>H P Boston</dc:creator><description>Barack is likeable now, they (the dems) are all great candidates. &amp;nbsp;We need to stop and think of A DEMOCRATE&lt;br&gt;as President. Biden has experience, Edwards has Strength and a vision for America, Clinton is, as is Biden very experienced, Obama needs some more senate time but could do the job also.&lt;br&gt;POINT IS JUST VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT, find your pick of the litter and by pass the runts. Your choice, your vote. Just do it, tell us what you like about your choice and leave the rest alone. Let's not feed the press or tell them how we REALLY feel.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288002</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:04:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288002</guid><dc:creator>John, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>No President since Kennedy has met Castro! &amp;nbsp;What effective non-meetings those have been! &amp;nbsp;Castro has continued to run Cuba during the terms of Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush. &amp;nbsp;And Castro is still the darling of left wingers so he is hardly isolated. &amp;nbsp;Yet George Bush went to Vietnam and met the folks who killed more than 55,000 Americans and who violated the 1972 Paris Accords by invading Vietnam? &amp;nbsp;And Bush just recongized Moammar Qaddafi despite the fact that his agents were convicted in a court of law of planning the explosion on the Pan Am flight over Lockerbie. &amp;nbsp;And yeah, just a couple of weeks ago Bush had his good buddy Putin over to the family estate for some fishing despite Putin's links to thugs and killers in Russia and his nastiness in Georgia and Checnya and his seizure of private property. &amp;nbsp;Gee, if Obama decided he had to meet some unsavoury folks in order to further US national security, he certainly would be setting a new low! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288004</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:05:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288004</guid><dc:creator>Burbank Ca</dc:creator><description>None of them impress me. We need another Reagan!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288006</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:05:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288006</guid><dc:creator>Blue in CO, Denver,CO</dc:creator><description>Lee, I didn't take Obama's reponse to mean that he would just walk in completely unprepared and just shoot the s**t. This is not a man who is going to go blindly into anything (unlike our current &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot;). As for Hillary attacking him on this I think it comes at an excellent time where we can see who's talking about being different and who's ready to really BE different. No, no other president has sat down with Castro or Iran, &amp;nbsp;but maybe we start exploring the possiblity that it might be a good idea to show that America is not just a country full of bombs, but that we can engage in a constructive dialogue as well. By using the fact that no other president has been open to these talks leads me to ask this question, where has it gotten us? It's time for someone who wants to do it differently. If Hillary gets the nod, of course I'll back her. God forbid we have more right wing crazies running the country. However, we as Dems need to get away from what is comfortable (Clinton) and start backing the candidate that is demanding the same changes we are, namely Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288007</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:05:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288007</guid><dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator><description>MSNBC is just as big a failure as CNN. They keep praising Edwards and Clinton saying Clinton won the debate. Yes when you side step nearly every single question with a politically rehearsed speech of course you &amp;quot;look good.&amp;quot; That is the objective of playing political games, which if you remember was exactly what Senator Clinton was asked how she was going to stop. Even the people who asked the questions said they didn't like the answers given by Clinton. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288009</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:05:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288009</guid><dc:creator>sorry i dont like Hillary</dc:creator><description>didn't Hilary put all those &amp;quot;parental advisory stickers&amp;quot; on everything as my generation was growing up (im 30 now). Didn't she have a part in trying to ban a lot of material (music, video, ect..) because it was not to her taste. Sounds like that politician that started yelling burn the books back around WWII. &amp;nbsp;Now she wants what is left of my land of free 15 or so yrs later ? Thats just insane! </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288010</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288010</guid><dc:creator>Tom </dc:creator><description>Hillary speaks very well!&lt;br&gt;The Clinton's need to get back in the big office to clean up the mess from Jr. Bush and his daddy!&lt;br&gt;Shame on the Bushs' for sending us into a conflict!&lt;br&gt;If you are really a Pro Bush fan than you need to serve time in Iraq and then say you are a follower (if you survive). </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288011</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:06:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288011</guid><dc:creator>Adam , Gloucester Ma</dc:creator><description> I will vote for the 1st Person, Male, Female, Black or White, ( No Democrats, No Republicans, ETC) &amp;nbsp;that has never been a Politician. How about someone who wants a Flat Tax, Definition of Marriage as Man and Woman, Allows Gay folks to have rights, Medical Insurance for all (Elimination of Ridiculous Lawsuits should help), reduction in welfare to Workfare, and most Importantly TERM LIMITS. Who's is going to step up?? I will run just to implement these policies if no one else will.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288012</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:06:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288012</guid><dc:creator>Kraig Feighery , Fort Myers, Fl</dc:creator><description>I may be naive at times, but it is clear, whether we like him or not, that Barack Obama is going to be our next President. He has the &amp;quot;presidentials &amp;quot;(credentials) to be President. Stature, personality, and statesmanship. &amp;nbsp;Hilary is good and some what effective. (no denying that) BUT ask your self this question: Should the ideal candidate have: Obama's personality, Clinton's experience, and Edward's heart? If you feel these 3 ingredients would make a great democratic candidate, then pick the person who embodies if not all of them, most of them! My gut truly tells me that Obama is the closest to having all 3. It just comes natural to Barack; rehearsed from Hilary, &amp;amp; overly zealous from John... Bye </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288013</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:06:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288013</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth Morrison   Adairsville, GA</dc:creator><description>No one has experience as the President of the United States unless you are going into your second term, so what experience does Hillary have? She takes credit for Bill if it helps and starts that lawyering talk when it doesn't suit her. So, my question is when are the hard questions going to start for Hillary? How is she going to play with grown men if you can't ask her anything but lady questions and by the way she &amp;quot;ain't&amp;quot; no lady as the world will find out if she wins the presidency. She knows where the bodies are buried and Washington is afraid of her and so are the &amp;quot;big newspapers and reporters&amp;quot; who make sure they keep the Hail Hillary out front and you are nuts if you don't like Hill and Bill. I hope she doesn't just get beaten but plain ole whupped and we never hear from them again, ever, never!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288016</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288016</guid><dc:creator>Carreon Ward, C. Springs, CO</dc:creator><description>Bush is already the worst President in US History</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288017</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288017</guid><dc:creator>Ken Jones, Austin, TEXAS</dc:creator><description>Ron Paul is the only reasonable candidate in the whole line-up of Republicans and Democrats. He's the only one who consistently votes to do what's right. Read his speeches, check out his voting record. Please forget the whole Donkey vs. Elephant paradigm. That's just idol-worship, anyway. Vote for someone with brains and integrity. Vote for Ron Paul.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288018</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:08:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288018</guid><dc:creator>Doug Bergren, Mt. Carroll, Illinois</dc:creator><description>This is the 21st century for God's sake. &amp;nbsp;We shouldn't even be discussing as to whether a woman is capable of being president of this country. &amp;nbsp;Indira Ghandi, Margaret Thatcher, &amp;amp; Golda Meier are just a few who can prove otherwise for their countries. &amp;nbsp;I think it strange though, that it's the Democratic party that has a woman, a Black (although half white), and a Hispanic as candidates. &amp;nbsp;It's my humble opinion, that if experience would be the key determinate, Bill Richardson is the most capapble. &amp;nbsp;But given the sorry state of campaign finance, we'll never find out. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288019</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:08:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288019</guid><dc:creator>JA  Tampa, FL</dc:creator><description>What a bunch of uninformed idiots in here. &amp;nbsp;To the genius that said Oblame-a &amp;quot;had the foresight to know this war would be a disaster&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Where was Oblame-a when the vote for the war was made? &amp;nbsp;Not in Congress. &amp;nbsp;20/20 hindsight is always perfect.&lt;br&gt;And for the genius with the quote &amp;quot;ITS TIME FOR THE STOCK MARKET TO RUN LIKE THE BULLS AGAIN&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;You might want to read the newspaper of watch something besides the Simpsons on TV. &amp;nbsp;The Bulls are and have been running. &amp;nbsp;The Clit-on era stock market was smoke and mirrors just like the Clit-ons.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288020</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:08:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288020</guid><dc:creator>Virginia H., Texarkana, AR</dc:creator><description>Sad, many of you males out there in I land cannot take a strong woman - as you consider her a B_ _ _ Buster. The election is not a sports competition of male vs female. Think back on that strong female boss you had - had the same opinion of her I'll bet. Look inward on why you have these feelings We're not out to beat you in some competition. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288022</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:08:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288022</guid><dc:creator>George,Seattle</dc:creator><description>Clinton exemplifies what is wrong with Washington -- totally concerned with the next news cycle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The President has the power to turn any country in the world into a slag heap, and she is worried that talking to our &amp;quot;enemies&amp;quot; might look bad? &amp;nbsp; They might use it for propaganda? &amp;nbsp; She forgets that we gain from talks (propagandawise) as much as any enemy. &amp;nbsp;If the talks fail, we have good propaganda on our side that &amp;quot;we tried to prevent this terrible conflict.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who cares what the Sunday talk shows say after the talks. &amp;nbsp;What matters is results. &amp;nbsp; Yes, we want to keep little Bush jr. away from world leaders because he would make an embarassing mess -- but I can see no downside to having any of the serious people who are running for the Democratic nomination give any tinpot tyrant a peice of their mind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary does not, in fact, understand how diplomacy works. &amp;nbsp; The diplomacy that accomplishes anything starts with a meeting of the minds at the top, and then the underlings work out the details. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Hillary has made a huge mistake here, because now Obama has a great opening to attack her for her lack of judgement. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288023</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:09:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288023</guid><dc:creator>Joseph Joe</dc:creator><description>Bill Clinton is my hero! &amp;nbsp;The man is brilliant and his wife is very, very smart. &amp;nbsp;What more could you wish for in the leader of your country, than someone who has the ear and expertise of a past global, and current internationally respected icon. &amp;nbsp;I wish we had someone in Canada ( dreaming ) with the stature of a Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288025</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:09:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288025</guid><dc:creator>Ashe, SF, CA</dc:creator><description>Looks like the gloves are coming off and Obama is ready to take Princess Hillary on. &amp;nbsp;The fact is she lost the debate again...despite MSN, CNN et al attempts to declare her the winner. &amp;nbsp;So, she has to send out Madeline Albright to make an issue out of a non-issue. &amp;nbsp;Obama never said that he wasn't going to do the prep work beforehand when it comes to meeting world leaders. &amp;nbsp;HRC's diplomacy eerily matches Bush's. &amp;nbsp;What a load of crap, Hillary! &amp;nbsp;Imagine if JFK refused to talk with Khruschev? &amp;nbsp;Or Reagan refused to talk with Kruschev? &amp;nbsp;Or Nixon did not visit China? &amp;nbsp;Grow up Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288026</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288026</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Dallas TX</dc:creator><description>Hillary rocked last night. &amp;nbsp;I watched and thought she was great. &amp;nbsp;Obama is naive. &amp;nbsp;Bush is a moron. &amp;nbsp;I'm voting for Hillary....sending money when I can and encouraging all my friends with brains to do the same. &amp;nbsp;Most are in complete agreement with me. &amp;nbsp;I'm glad I don't hang out with some of folks on this site. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288029</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288029</guid><dc:creator>PuddleDuck in SC</dc:creator><description>Yes, it is sad that any Democrat, running for president is preferred over our current president, and all GOP contenders. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trolls can't help but be pissed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Poor jerry is going to need some serious anger management counseling, if he hopes to continue to follow Hillary's campaign. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288030</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288030</guid><dc:creator>John, Birmingham, AL</dc:creator><description>Hillary has no track record. &amp;nbsp;She speaks her mind like someone looking only for an oppurtunity to raise the hair on people's back. &amp;nbsp;Being a first lady twice, does not give her any reason or credibility that she can do the job of her husband. &amp;nbsp;As of now, we need some one with experience, a track record, and the honest ability to do something of positive value. &amp;nbsp;Talk has been cheap, and the current administration has been talking their heads off and costing us waaay to much money. &amp;nbsp;For once, we don't need to bank on chances; because we're not bucking for a lottery here. &amp;nbsp;This is our lives we're talking about.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288031</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288031</guid><dc:creator>S. Newborn, Ga </dc:creator><description>This is the best our 'great' people will support? I think we would be alot better off if Napoleon Dynamite ran for president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288032</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288032</guid><dc:creator>Linda - San Diego, California</dc:creator><description>I am a democrat and would like to thank &amp;quot;John in Michigan&amp;quot; for providing the information on Hillary Clinton, I will certainly take it into consideration before casting my vote.&lt;br&gt;Thank you!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288033</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288033</guid><dc:creator>Catherine, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>Go Obama Go! &amp;nbsp;Communication is the key to conflict resolution in the world today. &amp;nbsp;Obama is the most progressive and capable of al the candidates. &amp;nbsp;Hillary's fear is shining through when she makes nieve and ignorant comments such as those!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288034</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:10:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288034</guid><dc:creator>Kraig Feighery, Fort Myers, Fl</dc:creator><description>O by the way, if Hilary thinks that only certain communication tactics can work for diplomacy, then what about when you are married and your best friend tells you that you can only talk to your husband when on certain terms. That school of thought is straight out of the play book Mrs. Clinton. Communication of any sort, especially when it comes from the top will always be taken seriously and we all know that the answer Barack Obama gave was quite intuitive..... Bye </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288036</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:11:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288036</guid><dc:creator>Dalton, Detroit, MI</dc:creator><description>I respect the fact that there are political leaders willing to engage those countries that may not be our allies. The world dynamic is changing and nations that were once weak are growing stronger and America can no longer afford to play bully with our geo-political adversaries. We have ignored Castro and Cuba for over 40 years and it hasn't done a thing to bring about a change in that country and as far as Iran and Venezuela, there oil makes them nations we have to engage or face an oil shortage worse than the oil embargo of the 70's </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288037</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288037</guid><dc:creator>john barras,phila.pa.</dc:creator><description>the other half of bilary is doing her best to get people to reject her as a viable candidate.the more time we have to see her real self the less chance she has to win and the more time she has to self destruct.&lt;br&gt;she keeps loading the gun that dick morris has popinted at her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288038</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:11:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288038</guid><dc:creator>Dee Dee Harrison</dc:creator><description>Let Mrs.Clinton hang herself,Obama has a lot of support out there.The Clintons are one of the richest families in the U.S.A.,she will make it until election time.I done Bill once myself.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288039</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:11:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288039</guid><dc:creator>Troy, Forest Lake, MN</dc:creator><description>Any one of these candidates is better then the village idiot we have in office today. At least the Clinton's had a $500 billion surplus when they left office. Bush and the Republican Party have put our country in serious debt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe us as a nation in the 2008 election need to get rid of our domestic enemies and make America strong as it was during the Clinton years.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288041</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:12:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288041</guid><dc:creator>Danny,Bakersfield, Ca.</dc:creator><description>More political double speak from Hillary. How long before she tries the ole Jedi mind trick and convince she never voted to go to war.If she trusts Bush i really don't trust her judgement.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288042</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:12:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288042</guid><dc:creator>E Connelly</dc:creator><description>I have read the comments, and I must say, most of the people who have responded, must not have passed English in school or spelling for that matter. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;As for Hilary Clinton, she has lied contrary to what some of you think. &amp;nbsp;And Bill, he's the biggest liar of all (just think I did not have sex with that woman). &amp;nbsp;A complete fabrication. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;As for the Bush haters, (there seem to be a few), GET OVER IT! HE'S OUR PRESIDENT, IF YOU CAN'T RESPECT HIM, RESPECT THE OFFICE, STOP ENABLING THE ISLAMOFASCISTS WITH YOUR RHETORIC.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288043</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:12:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288043</guid><dc:creator>greg larger  gallion ohio</dc:creator><description>the man is dennis kucinich---honest-nothing left on the table--why can't america buy into him? greg</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288044</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:12:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288044</guid><dc:creator>Daniel R. Beckerman, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I don't consider myself as gender blind as some, but time and time again, Hillary has proven herself to be the most equipped and most experienced candidate to lead this country. Her decisions are both wise and well thought out.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What experience? &amp;nbsp;Her and Obama both have less experience than most of the other candidates. &amp;nbsp;As far as experience goes, she's actually on the bottom of the list of candidates. &amp;nbsp;Can't agree with you on the wise and well thought out part either, since she hasn't actually made any real decisions. &amp;nbsp;She just agrees with those around her before changing her mind to agree with the next group she passes. &amp;nbsp;And if she doesn't know which way a group stands, she pulls out a statement where she says that she might support whatever the issue is, or she might not...and then doesn't elaborate any more and changes the topic. &amp;nbsp;That's not very wise or well thought out, unless you're talking about being a wise, well thought out con artist. &amp;nbsp;Gender has nothing to do with it, if she was a man she'd be the worst possible candidate to lead this country. &amp;nbsp;Being a woman, she's still the same worst possible candidate. &amp;nbsp;Gender really has zilch to do with it, she just has absolutely zero positive aspects to offer this country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288046</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:12:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288046</guid><dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator><description>Jake,&lt;br&gt;That is one of the things I like about Senator Obama; the fact that he has not been in Washington for very long. &amp;nbsp;He actually seems to care about the welfare of the nation and its citizens. &amp;nbsp;Most politicians in Washington care about what is best for their respective party.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288047</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288047</guid><dc:creator>sam hallyburton, glen alpine, nc</dc:creator><description>it is very refreshing to listen to intelligent people debate the issues. &amp;nbsp;george bush &amp;nbsp;can not communicate an intelligent message. &amp;nbsp;anyone who voted for bush should be baned from voting until they can prove they are mentally capable of making a selection. &amp;nbsp;i will vote for hillary clinton and whom ever she selects as her running mate. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288048</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288048</guid><dc:creator>Felix  Walla Walla, WA</dc:creator><description>JFK, MLK, Malcom, RFK... Obama. &amp;nbsp;We need a new dynamic and charasmatic leader. &amp;nbsp;I hope the powers behind the scenes in the U.S. let us have &amp;quot;the people's choice.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I'm praying for you Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288049</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288049</guid><dc:creator>Michael, NY</dc:creator><description>I think Obama is right on the money. &amp;nbsp;The person B brought up how a long string of Presidents did not do something. &amp;nbsp;And?? &amp;nbsp;Throughout the US' Presidents many have either gone against or in a totally new/different direction than their predecessor's. &amp;nbsp;Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, etc. &amp;nbsp;An alternative view is that Obama could be ending the agenda that a string of past presidents either endorsed or just followed (for either lacking in leadership ability or not wanting to start a mess). &amp;nbsp;And speaking about leadership, what was Bush doing for Katrina victims while Castro was offering help, to an &amp;quot;enemy&amp;quot; country? &amp;nbsp;Finally, the world is a very different place than 40 years ago, the USSR is no more for example. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288050</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288050</guid><dc:creator>Maxx Folsom CA</dc:creator><description>I don't know makes me cringe more when they speak:&lt;br&gt;Bush 'cause he sounds so inarticulate&lt;br&gt;or Hillary because she sounds so calculated and fake.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288051</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288051</guid><dc:creator>Robert J. Fugate, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>I believe all Political debates are simply Shows and have no depth or breathe or meaning. Anyone, who lowers theirself to the level of the answer from a politician while performing in a show, is lost and is doing what the canidates are doing, saying anything to get elected or be heard. However these shows are put on they are just shows and will not give us any indication of what the person will do when he or she gets elected. However, these shows do influence voters, beause of some weird, unimportant statement which usually has little to do the the real issues facing us. AS an example, lets look at military leaders, we don't remember them for how they look, religion, or many other unique characteristics, we remember them if they win wars or perform their jobs in an outstanding manner. Thats what we want from the politicians, just do your job in representing the the will of the people who elected you. After all our electing you did not make you God. There should be way of monitoring the performance of elected officals and removing them from office if they are not representing the people who put them in office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is almost impossible to determine what a canidate will do after being elected. This one way we might have some control. The president should have one person from each state on his governing board, and when signing a bill or pushing an issue, this board shold vote yes or no, with president only voting to settle a tie.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288052</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:13:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288052</guid><dc:creator>JanNow,   Baltimore, Maryland</dc:creator><description>How low can you go? The senator from New York uttered these very sentiments about meeting with our enemy leaders in April. How dare she call Obama &amp;quot;naive.&amp;quot; She getting more and more like Bill every day. All she needs to do now is learn the words to some black hymns and show up at a few A.M.E. churches and she'll have Bill down to a science!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288053</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288053</guid><dc:creator>Move the U.S.A. Forward! Baltimore, Maryland</dc:creator><description>Hillary is just a tired old &amp;quot;I deserve to be president with everything I have had to endure!&amp;quot; queen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's time for REAL CHANGE, Miss Thing! and You are NOT IT!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288056</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288056</guid><dc:creator>Rick King  Los Angeles California</dc:creator><description>Woould all you yahoos out thought stop going on aqbout how a woman can be president. &amp;nbsp;Jeusus it is this king of ignorance that got us the leader we have gave us this mess wehave today. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps you people should pick up a paper once in a whilw and stop watching FOX NEWS.!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288057</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:14:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288057</guid><dc:creator>Maverick in Minnesota</dc:creator><description>I can't believe that there is anyone left that remembers 9th grade civics. &amp;nbsp;The Democrats are not running for prisidency, they are trying to get nominated in a system of two (sometimes more) parties. &amp;nbsp;If you're not a Dem or Ind. hold your comments until November 2008. &amp;nbsp;Right now, alls fair in politics. &amp;nbsp;This is what it is all about. &amp;nbsp;The Dems will nominate someone through the process and folks will vote in primaries all over the country. &amp;nbsp;Hopefully they will try to line up what they believe in with which ever candidate closely relates to them. &amp;nbsp;Was Hillary right? &amp;nbsp;Is Obama prepared to be president. &amp;nbsp;Give you opinion during the primaries and stop thinking any of this is about being elected president, it's about getting nominated.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288059</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288059</guid><dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator><description>With an attitude like that of course a woman nor a minority will be elected!! In my opinion they should join forces. I think she would have a better chance, because right now I don't find her to credibal.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288060</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:14:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288060</guid><dc:creator>Cat, St. Cloud, Minn.</dc:creator><description>CLINTON IS A FLIP-FLOPPER!! First she criticizes Bush for not engaging in diplomacy, promises that she sill engage in diplomacy, then calls Obama naive for saying he would do the same as her. SHE WAS IRRESPONSIBLE AND NAIVE FOR SENDING US TO IRAQ WITHOUT READING THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT! Shamful, Hillary....your losing my support in the general election (after I vote Obama in the primary).</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288061</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:15:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288061</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Tampa, Fl</dc:creator><description>Clinton isn't going to win. It may be 2007 but the nation won't vote for her to be the president. The other guy doesn't stand a chance either and let's remember the real tuff election questions won't be answered until next year. I love watching all those dumb socialist liberals eat each other alive already. I like to see Hilary losing it in a PMS rage in front of the camera. &amp;quot;Obuma&amp;quot; you're a Bumma too. Dem's don't have nobody worth a spit again this time. Looks like we get another Republican I think. Really, how could we sit and listen to Clitton or Bumma for an hour or two on TV if either got elected? I don't think I could take it. I'd turn it off and lose all hope. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288063</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288063</guid><dc:creator>CHRIS OJOMON</dc:creator><description>MRS CLINTON SHOULD NOT FORGET SO SOON THAT SHE IS PARTLY RESPONSILBLE FOR THE HUMAN LIVES LOST THUS FAR IN THIS IRAQ WAR. DID OBAMA VOTE ?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288064</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288064</guid><dc:creator>Brendan from Chicago</dc:creator><description>The only thing either one of these idiot politicians understands about the &amp;quot;threats&amp;quot; faced today is that they're multi-pronged -- they don't just involve Iraq or even strictly the Middle East and its hordes of terrorists. &amp;nbsp;The threat we face today is the crumbling of our empirical forces and the changing face of the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's face it, though: Neither Barack nor Hillary is at all ready to face a world where the United States is A force, rather than THE force. &amp;nbsp;None of the major candidates does, and neither do the party-liners like Dodd or the faceless second-tier Republicans (there's so many of them that I've stopped caring). &amp;nbsp;Ron Paul does; so does, believe it or not, Dennis Kucinich (in world affairs, not domestic policy). &amp;nbsp;In fact, Mike Gravel has a better pulse on what's going on than most other Democrats. &amp;nbsp;Somebody please listen to that bat-sh** crazy old man!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288066</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288066</guid><dc:creator>Al Swavely, Alta Loma, CA</dc:creator><description>We are allowing our country to be taken over by the muslims and the muslims want a democrat in office.&lt;br&gt;We are removing &amp;quot;In God We Trust&amp;quot; from our heritage and somehow politicians think they can make it right by diplomacy.&lt;br&gt;Continue removing God from our society and we WILL lose everything that is dear to us... Freedom of everything we do and believe. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288068</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288068</guid><dc:creator>William Darcey</dc:creator><description>I would bet that a lot of this negativism toward Clinton is coming from the Republicans. &amp;nbsp;They know their man Bush has royally f*$#!+ up from the beginning and would rather fight than admit &amp;quot;they&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;him&amp;quot; have been wrong all along. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, it is going to take years, theirs and mine great-grandchildren, to correct the mess and blunder Bush and the Republication Party have created. &amp;nbsp;You guys probably still think &amp;quot;no-bid&amp;quot; contracts are okay? &amp;nbsp;No questions at all on the over 12 millions dollars the Vice has increased in his worth. &amp;nbsp;I could go on forever.&lt;br&gt;Now, do you elect the First Woman or the First African-American; (Obama is African-American..right?), to the Presidency?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288069</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288069</guid><dc:creator>Jim Harron</dc:creator><description>Hillary has lots of experience but her adolescent jab at Obama proves only that it means little. &amp;nbsp;We've had great Presidents with limited experience. &amp;nbsp;(&amp;quot;W&amp;quot;, stands for WEASEL,) was a Govenor, and may well go down as one of the most inept Presidents in history.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288070</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288070</guid><dc:creator>James, Austin, Tx</dc:creator><description>I've voted both ways over the years. Don't consider myself Dem or Repub. And, being from Texas doesn't mean that I have agreed with all things Bush. Looking at the current candidates and possible candidates, I think Fred Thompson may be able to straighten some things out and get our nation back on track in many different areas of interest.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288071</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288071</guid><dc:creator>Mariann Pepitone, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>In reading over the comments made about Hillary, there seems to be a lot of jealously towards her because she progressed in life and many wish they planned their life differently. Vote for Obama? &amp;nbsp;Like hell. &amp;nbsp;He isn't going to get the nomination or be president of the United States. &amp;nbsp;If you think so then your dreaming just like he is. &amp;nbsp;He's a wanna be president who can't be because the majority of the people in this country are not going to vote him in including myself. You know it so accept it. &amp;nbsp;Clinton is right you have to plan what you are going to say to world leaders. You just don't jump the gun like Obama would do. &amp;nbsp;That leads to trouble. &amp;nbsp;He is not experienced enough to talk to them because he's lucky he go thru the debate. He smiles alot showing those big white teeth. &amp;nbsp;You know the old saying? &amp;nbsp;Money talks but BS walks. &amp;nbsp;Is he walking in it?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288073</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288073</guid><dc:creator>R. Little, Umatilla, Or.</dc:creator><description>If you will allow your spouse to have sex in the oval office and you accept it. What will you stand by and accept from unfriendly countries of the world?&lt;br&gt;Clinton has no backbone!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288074</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288074</guid><dc:creator>Jesse Washburn, Lafayette, Indiana</dc:creator><description>It is unfortunate that MSNBC fails to provide fair, equal, and unbiased coverage of ALL the candidates. &amp;nbsp;Frankly I am sick to death of your love affair with Clinton and Obama (an occasional bone is thrown to Edwards). &amp;nbsp;I will try to find another news source that gives more attention to all contenders so that I can make an informed decision.&lt;br&gt;With six months to go until any form of organized voting takes place in any state it is silly to use your influence to trim down the field. &amp;nbsp;Shame on you all. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288075</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:16:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288075</guid><dc:creator>J N</dc:creator><description>It doesn't surprise me that the republicans bashing the Clintons have such poor grammer and they can't spell either. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288076</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:17:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288076</guid><dc:creator>jeff-NYC</dc:creator><description>everyone knows how to get elected now a days buy a state or have a brother in control of &amp;nbsp;state that has residents that all think they won 1 million dollars from a sweepstakes letter.&lt;br&gt;I hate to say it ,but our leadership in this country&lt;br&gt;is a P.C controled bunch of wimps.I cant stand to look at any of them..both parties</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288077</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:17:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288077</guid><dc:creator>CHRIS OJOMON, MIAMI FLORIDA</dc:creator><description>MRS CLINTON SHOULD NOT FORGET SO SOON THAT SHE IS PARTLY RESPONSILBLE FOR THE HUMAN LIVES LOST THUS FAR IN THIS IRAQ WAR. DID OBAMA VOTE ?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288079</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:17:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288079</guid><dc:creator>Gary     Milwaukee, Wi</dc:creator><description>I met Hilary once. She swore to me that her husband &amp;quot;did not have sex with that woman.&amp;quot; Three days later he was on TV saying, Well, I kind did.&amp;quot; She lied to me then asked for a $200 contribution. That's Hilary in a nut shell. As far as I can see, she hasn't changed.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288080</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:17:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288080</guid><dc:creator>Shay, Roanoke, VA</dc:creator><description>The comment from Clinton was unwarranted and arrogant. &amp;nbsp;Obama may not be a &amp;quot;seasoned&amp;quot; politician, but that means he's on less of corporate America's payroll and less likely to push their agenda versus the that of the people. &amp;nbsp;I think Obama has a pulse on the needs of the American people and would genuinely try to do what's best for the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is too concerned with what she thinks the people want and not listening to what we're telling her we need. &amp;nbsp;Either way you slice it, the current regime on Capital Hill has got to go. &amp;nbsp;They're sending America to hell in a hand basket and making off with the spoils.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, Manny be quiet...that was narrow minded and sexist. &amp;nbsp;You sound like a Bush lover.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288082</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288082</guid><dc:creator>Jane Smith</dc:creator><description>I think most Republicans are afraid of strong women because most of their wives listen to them. &amp;nbsp;I hope you understand that Bush is a liar, cheater, drugger, alcoholic, chases women, stupid, and can not make a correct sentence nor does he use the Enlish language well. &amp;nbsp;Most people in other countries think Americans are stupid and not smart people because they listen to Bush and Cheney. &amp;nbsp;We are not liked nor respected anywhere in the world. &amp;nbsp;This is the worst administration in modern day times.&lt;br&gt;Any body would be better than the status quo.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288083</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288083</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>I think Obama is exactly what we need in the White House. People say he is too inexperienced. In my opinion, we have had presidents with more experience but with a lot less intellect. Yes, he is young but he is intelligent and insightful. Those are 2 qualities that have been missing from the White House for some time. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I have seen in the last 30 years is that the more &amp;quot;experienced&amp;quot; the candidate is, the greater the risk of corruption. Let's get a breathe of fresh air and fresh ideas.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288084</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288084</guid><dc:creator>Carole Q. Portland Or</dc:creator><description>Everything was going along quite predictably until this question and I thought to myself I wonder if I'm going to be the only one that is offended by the arrogance of Mrs. Clinton's answer. &amp;nbsp;Rather than answer with the good of the nation in mind, she chose to be coy and address her clever response to the general voting public who still harbors too many folks who would rather nuke 'em than negotiate. &amp;nbsp;Very sad and very disappointing...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288086</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288086</guid><dc:creator>LADONNA,RENO,NV.</dc:creator><description>WHAT DID OTHER PARTYS SAY? OR IS THIS IT</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288088</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288088</guid><dc:creator>Froggy,   Arcadia, Iowa</dc:creator><description>WHere are all the leaders of this country. &amp;nbsp;All I heard was the same old lines from the same old faces. Time for some one to step up to the plate with a new plan of action. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288089</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288089</guid><dc:creator>Froggy,   Arcadia, Iowa</dc:creator><description>WHere are all the leaders of this country. &amp;nbsp;All I heard was the same old lines from the same old faces. Time for some one to step up to the plate with a new plan of action. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288090</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288090</guid><dc:creator>Michelle, Columbus, OH</dc:creator><description>This is the first time I have looked at all of these posts. Wow, I think some people need to get some of their facts straight on all the candidates before throwing stones. &amp;nbsp;I have not decided on anyone yet but I would advise to you, instead of thinking someone is racist or pick them because they are like Bush or are a woman or your ethnic group, please get the facts. I am really sick of other countries laughing at us because we dont do our homework. Isnt time we quit griping and start learning? &amp;nbsp;Get your eyes to web pages or history books or even policies and then make decisions. I think it has been proven its up to us to make the US stop looking so stupid.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Oh and by the way, everyone lies, even those who kill almost 3,000 soldiers for no reason.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288091</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:18:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288091</guid><dc:creator>&amp;quot;D&amp;quot; san antonio,tx</dc:creator><description>Obama is promising way too much. &amp;nbsp;He can't possibly do all like he's promising.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288092</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288092</guid><dc:creator>john doe</dc:creator><description> The Democrats will be watching and learning from the new Republican president</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288093</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288093</guid><dc:creator>B.Claycomb,   Avon Lake, Ohio</dc:creator><description>If Hillary Clinton had the intelligence and the self- esteem to send Billy Boy packing when he humiliated her and the rest of America, I would then have the confidence that she could run the country. She did not and so I pray that voters will remember and vote accordingly. &amp;nbsp;We just got the stench cleaned out of the white house from their last stay there. &amp;nbsp;Let's keep it that way. After all it is &amp;quot;OUR HOUSE&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288095</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288095</guid><dc:creator>Dj_DiaLogic</dc:creator><description>Obama was right. &amp;nbsp;I want &amp;nbsp;a president that welcomes diplomacy regardless. &amp;nbsp;The only propoganda that meeting these leaders could do was to tell the world that America, after Bush, will now lead with civilized depomacy instead of blind agression. &amp;nbsp;This is the kind of &amp;quot;propaganda&amp;quot; that we need to sell the world especialy now. &amp;nbsp;Besides it's not as if Obama said he would meet these people without an established set of goals and stratagies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;08AMA</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288096</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288096</guid><dc:creator>Lalo, Miami, Florida</dc:creator><description>Politcs by its intrisic nature is a dirty business, but for God's sake to elect Hillary as the President of the United States will be the most horrific mistake any voting and decent citizen of this country of our can do. She is one of the most dirtiest politicians the U.S. has ever elected other than her husband.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288097</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288097</guid><dc:creator>C. Mike, Los angeles,CA</dc:creator><description>Hilary dosn't need to call Obama naive or irresponsable to make her point. I am sorry but she no right to call anyone who desagree with her point such thing. &lt;br&gt;Make you point and wait for the public to respond.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288098</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288098</guid><dc:creator>Diana, Elkridge, Maryland</dc:creator><description> Hurrah for Hilary</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288100</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288100</guid><dc:creator>Doug, Renton, WA</dc:creator><description>Irresponsible and naive??? &amp;nbsp;Thank you Hillary Clinton, for allowing Mr. Obama to prove by simply replying to your shortsighted statement that he is a far more thoughtful and intelligent candidate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288101</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288101</guid><dc:creator>Michael McNulty, Beloit, WI</dc:creator><description>Like most SENSIBLE Americans, I get sick and tired of hearing that GW got us into this war. GW didn't do it alone (remember congress) AND more importantly, if the first liar (B. Clinton) would have done his job right instead of trying to do everything in a skirt there's a good chance we wouldn't be in this fix. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton or Obama, liar #2 or this inexperienced kid. You people need to stop ONLY listening to the soundbites of today and try and remember what people have done in the past. Clinton has repeatedly been involved in scandal and caught in lies along with the (dare I say) next First man, and Obama has been involved in nothing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What choice?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288102</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288102</guid><dc:creator>Nik Nak Prov, RI</dc:creator><description>VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!!!! VOTE 4 OBAMA!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288104</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288104</guid><dc:creator>Nikki, Sarasota, FL</dc:creator><description>All I saw was Hillary kicking butts all over that stage. Frankly, I think Obama is insinscere and the adjectives she used to describe his answer were right on. HE IS NOT READY TO BE PRESIDENT. I have nothing against having a black president. What I have against him is the fact that he is completely unqualified to be the president of our country at this time. If he really wants to be president, he'll be Hillary's VP and by the time the 8 years are up, he'll be ready.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288105</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:20:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288105</guid><dc:creator>Young Liberal, Portland, Oregon</dc:creator><description>While I do think it's sad that these two candidates are at each other's throats, I do not believe this incident really warrants a big change in opinion on either candidate. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is right in that promising to talk to hostile countries is a tad niave. &amp;nbsp;So is acting like the only reason we have problems with these countries is because we haven't sat down with them. &amp;nbsp;We have problems with countries due to extreme economic, political and ethical belief differences. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;However, opening communication with 'enemies' should be something that happens, always. &amp;nbsp;When has the silent treatment ever worked? &amp;nbsp;But acting like this will fix everything IS a little niave.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the same time, Hillary made it sound like she was opposed to such negotiations, which is dumb, because she is not. &amp;nbsp;I think she's just a little more realistic, and YES, experienced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Obama should have said is that one of the major goals of his administration would be to focus on communication as a means of foreign policy rather than ignoring 'bad' countries. &amp;nbsp;And Hillary should not have jumped on his statement in such a rude fashion, it doesn't help her image.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288107</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:21:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288107</guid><dc:creator>Greg, Boise, Idaho</dc:creator><description>Debate? I don't think so. We need real debates instead of these silly scripted question and answer sessions. What we've seen is not enlightening in any way.&lt;br&gt;This seems to be a good &amp;quot;Whiner's&amp;quot; forum though. The port side is so emotional!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288111</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:21:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288111</guid><dc:creator>SDK, Pikeville, KY</dc:creator><description>Just read all the comments here and you see why the USA in such a mess. Neither Dem nor Rep will make any difference unless they BEGIN to care about something larger than themselves. Some reads here have that same familiar ring.....its all about me...I'm the only one who is right. Bah-humbug! &amp;nbsp;Maybe some of you should run for president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288112</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:21:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288112</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Quincy IL</dc:creator><description>I agree with the writer who said 20 years of the Clinton's and the Bush's is enough. &amp;nbsp;Obama has a clean record of honesty and is not only well educated, but well spoken. &amp;nbsp;As an American, I will be proud to call him Mr. President. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288113</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:21:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288113</guid><dc:creator>lyn, Silver Spring, MD</dc:creator><description>For all of you who want Hillary to discuss someone being niave or irresponsible &amp;nbsp;we say &amp;quot;that's a discussion we want to have...bring it on&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;That's what got us into this war irresponsibility...so Hillary let's go</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288115</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288115</guid><dc:creator>tom madsen, gresham, wi.</dc:creator><description>Of course the Leader of the Free World should talk to leaders from other countries whether they are our friends or not. &amp;nbsp;The Oval Office was made to give the president &amp;quot;home Field advantage&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Why not use it? &amp;nbsp;Think how the world would have been if we would have taken the time to talk to some of our perceived enemies instead of taking the military route. &amp;nbsp; Obama was right. &amp;nbsp;Hillary was just taking a cheap shot at him. &amp;nbsp;I think that shows how worried the Clinton camp is about Obama. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288116</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288116</guid><dc:creator>Bob Murray, Tulsa, OK</dc:creator><description>The first women President of the United States has to be an exceptional person. &amp;nbsp;Like our first President &lt;br&gt;George Washington, our first women President HAS to be the best woman we can find.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton is NOT this person; not even close.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is not of the caliber of Jane Fitzpatrick, Margaret Thatcher, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is a failure and an embarrasment; I cannot understand how she was elected to the senate after her failures at health care reform and so many investigations into her and Bill's pasts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wish up voters, she is simply not Presidential material.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288117</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288117</guid><dc:creator>Las Vegas, NV</dc:creator><description>Hilary might need to take some time and read Obama's books......she might want to vote for him after she realizes he might just be the fresh new face that Washington needs.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288118</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288118</guid><dc:creator>J.BURGER</dc:creator><description>CLINTON-OBAMA-EDWARDS---- ALL 3 ARE HIGHLY QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT.&lt;br&gt;ANY ONE OF THEM WOULD BE A HUGE STEP UP FROM BUSH.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288119</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288119</guid><dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator><description>Hillary all of the way. We need to balance out this mess that the Bush's put us in. Wow, it just goes to show you, America can't handle a strong woman. You know the saying, An aggressive woman is a____, and aggressive man is assertive&amp;quot; If Bush was saying half the stuff that Hillary was saying, it would be praised. Pretty sad. Look who's causing all of the problems in the world, what gender??</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288121</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288121</guid><dc:creator>Rick, Denver Co</dc:creator><description>Look I say give them both a chance. The current admin has screwed everything up in the name of money and power, they can't do any worse. Besides it is time for a drastic turn around, this country is at wits end and the only solution I see is fresh new blood, new ideas, and a leader who doesn't have a personal grude. What we have now is a lost cause, they don't even listen to the people anymore, they keep doing what ever they want and you and I are suffering from it. Do you want this kind of hell to continue? WELL?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288122</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288122</guid><dc:creator>steve kilbry</dc:creator><description>I love it those two couldnt act liberal enough last nite and they showed all of America that they are both incapable of leading this great country of ours. I hope Hillary at least wins the dum's nomination so we can be assured of a republican winning again. Dont you people understand Obama cant win no matter what he does or says his middle name is HUSSIEN PEOPLE!!!! Wake up we are killing muslums who want to kill you and your families.Join the REAL world.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288123</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288123</guid><dc:creator>Derek Fort Smith, AR</dc:creator><description>As a Republican who's gonna' cross the party lines in the Primaries, (and vote for Obama) I can tell you this, there are GOP guys I don't like, there are Dems I don't like, there are also those in both camps I do like, but I despise Her Royal Clintoness... in a way, it's self defeating, nobody gets the GOP base fired up like the Clintons, so I may be, in effect, handing Obama the White House. &amp;nbsp;That's okay. &amp;nbsp;Obama is a good guy, I wish all Dems were more like him, and I wish more GOP members would take note of him instead of asking me to vote for RINO's like Rudy and Mitt...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288124</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288124</guid><dc:creator>Dr. T</dc:creator><description>India, the biggest Democracy in the world, has just elected a woman President. &amp;nbsp;It seems still we are not ready to accept a woman as president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288127</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288127</guid><dc:creator>Rich, St Clair Shores, MI</dc:creator><description>To the PC Taliban: Why can't Manny have an opinion without people threatening him or making equally stupid comments, as posted below? Oh, I get it, I guess free speech is OK, as long as it conforms to what you want to here. Let the guy have an opinion. What's next for him: sensitivity training? Re-education Camp? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People with outdated viewpoints like this are why at times, I'm embarassed to be part of this humanity. &lt;br&gt;John Doe, Seattle, Wash&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a male and embarrassed by manny calvin's post. Shows how stupid and redneck we are becoming in this country. Perhaps we should revert back to the stone ages when old, fat and slow folk like manny would be dragged out in the bushes by younger and stronger men and beat to shreds. &lt;br&gt;Terry, San Diego&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; shall make it my focus in life to buy out Mr. Calvin's company and fire you for your sexism (as well as your inability to use the English language). &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Not a womans (sic) job&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;Take your opinions back to the stone age where they belong. &amp;nbsp;America deserves better. &lt;br&gt;Dr. Cathy Townsend, Seattle, Washington&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This one's for Manny Calvin &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Sorry, Manny, here's what I think....I'll bet my life that you have very little education, and educated, smart, articulate woman frighten the lot of you mental midgets. The men I know that are intimidated by her, are minimally succesful. limited education, and insecure as hell,and sorry men,of course, no offense! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jane Mallon-Czajka&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288129</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288129</guid><dc:creator>Linda Smith, Ft. Worth, Tx</dc:creator><description>I don't know how anyone can stand to listen to Hilary, much less vote for her. She says whatever suits her at the moment. I want someone with some ethics and principles who isn't afraid to stand up for what they believe whether popular or not. I don't know who I will vote for yet, but I know it won't be her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288134</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:25:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288134</guid><dc:creator>lisa, heber springs,ar</dc:creator><description>I remeber the Clinton's well since I live in Arkansas. I am glad they moved to N.Y. and there is noway that I would vote for her. I do not want another liar, cheat in the White House...enough of them already there.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288135</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:26:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288135</guid><dc:creator>Tammy, Grandview Missouri</dc:creator><description>Hilary is just plain mean. &amp;nbsp;I do not care how hard she tries to be cute, charming and fun to be with; she cannot hide her inner core. &amp;nbsp;Even the pink jackets and the sad attempts at bright smiles cannot mask her mean spirit and harshness. &amp;nbsp;Maybe we need a president who is na&amp;#239;ve enough to actually believe in America. &amp;nbsp;Do we really want someone who has been jaded by decades of hard-ball politics, someone who sold out years ago?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288136</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:26:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288136</guid><dc:creator>Morris Valentine</dc:creator><description>The only Democratic candidate who really knows anything about negotiating with the world's bad guys is Bill Richardson -- because he's already &amp;quot;been there and done that&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Why waste your vote on either Clinton or Obama? -- neither has any experience in foreign affairs.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288139</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:26:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288139</guid><dc:creator>Ono Olivieri</dc:creator><description>No man wants war and war is neither Republican or Democrat. Bush may have used the wrong pretext or we may have been less than professional in how we conducted the war but sitting by and watching Hussein gas his people and not intervene on account that it is not a threat to the US is the same as watching Hitler gas Jews, Hutu exterminate Tutsys, women and children raped and killed in &amp;nbsp;Darfur, and so on. Pulling out of Iraq will confirm that we Americans are nothing buit yellow bellies that will faint at the sight of blood plus endure that Iraq becomes a terrorist training camp.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288140</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:27:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288140</guid><dc:creator>rick,lincoln, IL</dc:creator><description>God Bless America, and keep Hillary out of office. &amp;nbsp;This is my humble prayer. &amp;nbsp; Besides, how smart is someone to spend millions of dollars to land a job that pays $400,000? &amp;nbsp; Duh, just say your runnin' and pocket the campaign funds!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288141</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:27:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288141</guid><dc:creator>Den Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>I live in Chicago, so I knew long ago that Obama is nothing more than a puffed up kid with a privileged upbringing, and clever and arrogant smirk. &amp;nbsp;He's very similar to the character Chauncey Gardener in the film &amp;quot;Being There.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288142</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:27:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288142</guid><dc:creator>Tom, St Joseph, MO</dc:creator><description>What she was pointing out is that Barrack Obama is inexperienced in foreign diplomacy. &amp;nbsp;It is true that Obama probably would do exactly what Hillary said, but the fact that the accepted practice of sending diplomatic envoys wasn't part of his response shows that he would be relying on help from advisors in that area rather than having hands-on involvement in the process. &amp;nbsp;I still like Obama better though.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288145</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:28:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288145</guid><dc:creator>Stu, Wilmington , NC</dc:creator><description>Let me just say that if Hillary gets elected this country is finished. People should have to work for what they want, if you want health care pay for it if you don't make enough get a better job. All of the Democrats to me seem to be communists, and hand my hard earned money to lazy good for nothing morons. No one likes war but are we expected to sit back while more innocents are slain by scumbag terrorists? I don't believe any of the Dems have the stones to stand up for this country. Diplomacy only works when the other side cares about living, these P.O.S. terrorists want to die so why don't we help speed that process along? When did America become so full of P.C. hippie cowards. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288147</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:28:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288147</guid><dc:creator>OKD, Everett WA</dc:creator><description>We are going through a very critical moment and it depends upon American public to take this country out of this tricky situation. We should not act as Republicans or democrats and vote on party basis and repeat the history of 2004.The current war- monger administrators brought the image of this country at the lowest ebb for their own oil profits. After the primary is over US public should vote for regime change and choose Hillary who is sharp and smart enough to bring the image of this country back and &amp;nbsp;will bring the country back on tracks. Obama, right now the time is not ripe for you but keep on working, the time will come to you some day. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288148</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:28:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288148</guid><dc:creator>PUCK       LAFLIN, PA</dc:creator><description>Readergirl in Las Vegas has it right. The time for Hilary is NOW. The learning curve for Obama is a liability we can't afford.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288149</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288149</guid><dc:creator>The Realtor</dc:creator><description>Think of it this way: If Osama Obama was president now, we might all be wearing turbans and carrying prayer carpets. &amp;nbsp;These animals will killed over 3,000 US citizens and we are fighting them now on their turf. &amp;nbsp;Does this liberal--nieve--rookie think they would not have proceeded with their campaign to kill all US citizens if we were &amp;quot;nicer&amp;quot;?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288150</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:29:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288150</guid><dc:creator>bob gross los angeles ca</dc:creator><description>ever hear of queen elizabeth 1 or golda meier or margret thatcher or jeane kirkpatrick ? let hillary be&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288152</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:30:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288152</guid><dc:creator>papi</dc:creator><description>Dear T Hewatt, Atlanta, Ga.&lt;br&gt;I feel your pain, but we’re not talking about regretting this or that personal mistake. I'm a decorated veteran, and I can tell you that the most important decision by far that any president makes is putting our blood and treasure at risk. Hilary flunked that test big time, and that disqualifies her to be president. Moreover, unlike Edwards who has admitted his vote was a mistake, Hilary still insists she did the right thing based on the information she had. As a US senator she had access to plenty of alternative information on which to base her decision. Her yes vote can only mean two things, she lacks judgment to be president, or she lacked courage to stand up against a popular president pushing a disastrous policy. Either way, she’s unqualified. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288154</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:30:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288154</guid><dc:creator>American Woman, Birmingham, Alabama</dc:creator><description>Wow! all this talk about Democrat...Republican.&lt;br&gt;Nobody is born either way and no particular individual can clearly define all the characteristics&lt;br&gt;of one political party.&lt;br&gt;Fools! &amp;nbsp;This is the reason we have difficulty selecting a &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; president. They are first and foremost judged on Political PARTY rather than competence, intelligence, integrity, etc. &amp;nbsp;When this country was founded, there was no such division between the men responsible...Men who would have glady&lt;br&gt;sacrificed their lives for GOD and COUNTRY.&lt;br&gt;GOD was integral. &amp;nbsp;Also, war is/was necessary to ensure to freedom of this country.&lt;br&gt;Spoiled.&lt;br&gt;Arrogant.&lt;br&gt;Godless.&lt;br&gt;Hypocrites.&lt;br&gt;yep. That sums it up.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288155</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:30:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288155</guid><dc:creator>R-Chicago</dc:creator><description>America.. get with the times!! Trying to keep the woman down. Many of you live in a bubble with your small views based on the small world you live in. Get a clue. It's about time we get a female in office. Someone needs to clean up this mess.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288156</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288156</guid><dc:creator>AL</dc:creator><description>I think people need to stsrt thinking. There are more choices,than Hill &amp;amp; obama. look at Biden or Edwards.Remeber our future is going to be in there hands. Chose wisley.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288157</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288157</guid><dc:creator>DAN, CHICAGO,IL</dc:creator><description>CLINTON AND OBAMA HAVE ZERO EXPEIRENCE.&lt;br&gt;BUSH SHOULD VETO SPENDING FOR INSURANCE FOR EVERYONE,&lt;br&gt;I CAN'T AFFORD IT, IF YOU CAN, THEN YOU PAY FOR IT.&lt;br&gt;WE PAY TO MUCH ALREADY, AND IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE&lt;br&gt;WITH A DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288158</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288158</guid><dc:creator>Iamaha, Madison, WI</dc:creator><description>Be aware as these debates are merely positioning and the two beneficiaries of the left-wing ardor from the drive-by media and others are Obama and Clinton. &amp;nbsp;When push comes to shove the lefties will control the Democratic Convention forcing Hillary and Obama to kiss and make up so they can formulate the unbeatable ticket - Hillary for President and Obama for Vice President. &amp;nbsp;The election will come down to the Dem's groups - women, African Americans, Spanish Americans (legal and illegal) the uninsured, the poor, the gay, lesbian, transsexuals, the greens, and any other minority you can think of versus the poor sacrificial lamb annoited by the helpless and hapless GOP. &amp;nbsp;The USA as we've known it is in for a big change and many of you will not like it. &amp;nbsp;We'll no longer be a republic but a democracy where majority rules. &amp;nbsp;The loss of &amp;nbsp;World respect will further diminish and we will grow ever ripe for domestic violence from within and without. &amp;nbsp;Is there a potential candidate from either party out there who is a statesperson with business acumen, international experience and leadership skills who is not beholden to special interests and monied groups? &amp;nbsp;Frankly, it should sadden us all that there is no such person currently in view. &amp;nbsp;We, the people need to take the government back from the politicians and special interests. &amp;nbsp;We need to elect a President (man or woman) who can lead this country back to the dominant World power we once were. &amp;nbsp;We need to reverse stupid deficit spending and get back to fiscal responsibility. &amp;nbsp;We need to tell people who can work to work. &amp;nbsp;We need to tell people here illegally to go home and apply to come back legally. &amp;nbsp;We need to regain our confidence as a people and a Country. &amp;nbsp;We need to provide everyone with the opportunity to secure quality health care AFTER we make it clear to everyone that they have a responsibility to lead healthy lifestyles. &amp;nbsp;We need to help those who can't help themselves, not those who won't help themselves. &amp;nbsp;We have to use whatever force and diplomacy is necessary to convince the Islamic World that we will not tolerate any compromise of our safety or the safety of all other democratic countries around the World. &amp;nbsp;We have to rise above the petty bickering between the far left and the far right and get back to the basics folks, and if we don't I shudder to think about the consequences. &amp;nbsp;The clock is ticking toward the most important election our country has ever had. &amp;nbsp;I hope and pray that we get lucky and the right person emerges from the shadows to lead us back to greatness.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288159</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288159</guid><dc:creator>GA Reece Louisville KY 40208</dc:creator><description>Had &amp;nbsp;the Senatoer from IL been in office at the same the vote cast with the disorted informantion I wonder how he voted. Yea or nay. The country , the congress, and Senate were lied to. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288160</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288160</guid><dc:creator>Dingles</dc:creator><description>I wouldn't vote for a Clinton if they were running against the devi</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288161</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:32:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288161</guid><dc:creator>Rebecca, North Carolina</dc:creator><description>Obama is naive. &amp;nbsp;Clinton has my support, as a strong, intelligent candidate--something we haven't seen for years.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288162</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:32:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288162</guid><dc:creator>Andy Kay</dc:creator><description>I think Hillary was iresponsible when her husband was assaulting Juanita Broadbrick, Katherine Willy, Paula Jones, &amp;amp; she didn't say anything.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288164</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288164</guid><dc:creator>me again</dc:creator><description>Ok so now this is a racist issue. Is Obama gonna get elected because we don't want to offend anyone. If Hillary was going up against a white person, you'd have different issue. Stop making this a race issue. Always have to pull out that card. Reminder: Woman are minorities too. Are you making this a woman issue?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288166</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:33:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288166</guid><dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator><description>If you continue to vote for the same old people, then you'll comtinue to get the same old &amp;quot;hear no people, speak to no people, see no people.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288168</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:33:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288168</guid><dc:creator>bo pensacola fla</dc:creator><description>what the heck was that last night no mention of immigration at all, i say make all of them citizens, make them pay taxes and social security,get with it 12 million or more paying into taxes and social programs what a boom for both, but np mention by the democrats of it at all.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288169</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:33:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288169</guid><dc:creator>An instrument, VA</dc:creator><description>Matt is absolutely correct. It doesn't matter who is president. The president of the United States doesn't run, lead or make policy for the United States anyway. The president is there to distract you, give you someone to point your finger at. The people NEED that. All the while, the same small band of truly powerful people continue twisting the world, and everyone in it, in the ways they see fit.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288171</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288171</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Heath, Ohio</dc:creator><description>I left the Republican party because the Democrats promised to get something done- they LIED.&lt;br&gt;The Congress &amp;amp; Senate cannot agree on anything, and are not working for the people who voted them in. I do believe Obama would meet with other world leaders to confront the many issues facing everyone. I think that Hillary Clinton would say anything to get a vote. I think it is time for the Clintons and Bush to leave the stage (16 years is enough)and bring in someone like Obama with fresh ideas to turn this country around and put us back on the right track. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288172</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288172</guid><dc:creator>yiannis, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator><description>I have to laugh: They don't know why. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Sen.Clinton has never done anything, I mean anything wrong. Not one thing.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Iraq vote: WRONG&lt;br&gt;Healtcare Initiative: FAILED&lt;br&gt;Government and Reform: PAC $$$</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288173</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288173</guid><dc:creator>Molly, Jackson, MS</dc:creator><description>J Adams said, &amp;quot;Obama, I wonder if we all will have to face mecca should he get in...&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; Are you aware that Obama is a Christian? &amp;nbsp;So please explain why anyone would have to face Mecca? &amp;nbsp;Please educate yourself on the facts before you go making ridiculous statements. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GO BIDEN!!!!!!! &amp;nbsp;But I'd vote for Obama or Hillary also. &amp;nbsp;I'd vote for Perot as long as it's not another Republican! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288174</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288174</guid><dc:creator> A concerned taxpayer</dc:creator><description>Largely, the shift of the blame for this country's problem has been to the shoulders of the president and away from congress who has benefitted from that shift. &amp;nbsp;Every word from their mouths shields them from any blame or wrongdoing that affects this country and no one is chiding them for being the worst congress in American history. &amp;nbsp;We are paying their salaries and since the election of 2006, has done nothing to earn their paychecks. &amp;nbsp;It must be nice to just criticize &amp;nbsp;or accuse the opposition of being innept and still get paid a hefty salary and do absolutely nothing to help this country. &amp;nbsp;yeah, some of you think Hillary or Obama are the cat's meow but remember, they are part of that bunch who are not doing the job they were hired for. &amp;nbsp;How many of us would still have a job if we didn't produce but was still able to point fingers at someone else? &amp;nbsp;If they are not producing results for this country's sake now, what makes you think they will do it when they reach the White House? &amp;nbsp;They talk a good show when it comes to beating up the president but they are not devoting much time to their current employment. &amp;nbsp;These slackers are not what is needed to lead this nation. &amp;nbsp;If talking was the only requirement for being elected president, they will have no problem doing so. &amp;nbsp;Their current track record is being largely ignored as to being a contributor for our benefit. &amp;nbsp;Let's make them do their job first, campaign later. &amp;nbsp;Senators legislate first, campaign later or get someone who can do the job right.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288175</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288175</guid><dc:creator>Gary Sheffield, Detroit, Michigan</dc:creator><description>African Americans deserve and are entitled to Reparations and the Presidency (but Obama is not black enough...Al Sharpton For President).</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288176</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288176</guid><dc:creator>DAVE IN OHIO</dc:creator><description>ALL THE MONEY BOTH PARTIES HAS RAISED TO MAKE THIS CAMPAIGN AND THIS IS THE BEST YOU TWO CAN DO. THE AVERAGE AMERICAN DON'T CARE ABOUT THIS ISSUE, WE JUST WAN'T AN HONEST PRESIDENT THAT CAN SHOW TRUE LEADERSHIP. DON'T THROW TO MUCH MUD BILL, WE ALL STILL REMEMBER YOUR PAST. GOOD LUCK TO THE BOTH OF YOU. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288177</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288177</guid><dc:creator>Kristian O</dc:creator><description>This is nothing more than a Hilary smokescreen for what's really bothering her. Even though the polls(fiction) have her in the lead, he real fear is the money(fact) that Barack has accumulated over the past 6 months. She knows that it's only a matter of time before truth crushed to the earth will rise. Amazing ain't it. I Love It.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288178</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:34:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288178</guid><dc:creator>Vinchenzo</dc:creator><description>Anybody is better then who we have now ... I mean come on ppl... </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288179</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:35:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288179</guid><dc:creator>john manzione jensen beach florida</dc:creator><description>How do I say this? &amp;nbsp;Hillary is Bush Light and an AIPAC avid supporter. Her money comes from Big Pharma, Big Oil, Big Health Care, and Big Finance. She seems to adore money a hell of a lot more than she 'adores' the people. Obama was correct and never said he would unconditionally support a meeting with anyone. She is a fraud and a snake and she calls him naive! &amp;nbsp;Iraq, Clinton, Iraq, we won't forget. She wants to directly take Obama on. &amp;nbsp;Big mistake, fraud liar, Iraq War enabler</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288181</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:35:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288181</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Austin, Texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary is the clear front-runner in this election. Obama is struggling to stay in the running. He lacks the experience and the knowledge required to be The President of the United States, in 10 years, he would make a great candidate, however, not in this election. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288184</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:36:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288184</guid><dc:creator>Robert Fredricks</dc:creator><description>Wayne Packard hit the nail on the head - end of discussion! This administration is out to get me, as an administration they truly are out to cut any programs for people, Republicans are for the rich and the saddest thing is a lot of folks dont know they are one illness from poverty - believe it </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288185</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:37:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288185</guid><dc:creator>Cabob, Las Vegas</dc:creator><description>Oh so many pathetic people........Those people know who they are. Anything that is said by H.Clinton those people will find something wrong with it because she is a woman. Anything that is said by b. Obama the same people will find fault because he is black. We've had nothing but white males in office and they have ran this country into the state that it is in now. Anybody with a modicum of intelligence knows that it isn't a good state. Don't be so narrow minded, give someone else a chance. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288187</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:37:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288187</guid><dc:creator>RALPH DOZIER  SHERMAN OAKS, CA</dc:creator><description>I CAN'T BELIEVE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THINK OBAMA IS READY TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY, A ONE TERM SENATOR. HILARY HAS MUCH MORE EXPIERENCE, AND WILL DO US PROUD. I'M SO SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY WOMEN, NOT GIVING HER A CHANCE BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN CHARACTER FLAWS. HILARY ISN'T PERFECT, AND I GATHER NONE OF YOU ARE EITHER. STOP THE JEALOUSY TRIP. SHE COULDN'T BE ANY WORSE THAN THE PERSON IN THE WHITE HOUSE RIGHT NOW, AND THAT IS EVEN AN INSULT/EMBARASSMENT TO COMPARE HER TO.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288188</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:37:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288188</guid><dc:creator>winston, harrison new york</dc:creator><description>Voting to give a loon the power to go to war whenever he feels like it..naive or experience? Hilary can win on her established strengths. If she is attacking this way, she may warrant more scrutiny.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288190</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:38:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288190</guid><dc:creator>gary, Ft. Lauderdale, FL</dc:creator><description>When the Iraq war was in vogue, Clinton votes &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot;. Now when the Iraq war is not in vogue, Clinton is the biggest whiner of all. The Clintons like it both ways and there are always lots of morons ready and willing to allow them to have it.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288194</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:38:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288194</guid><dc:creator>Lisa Lawson</dc:creator><description>I love the commments from our brilliant states that brought us not once but twice our current administration. &amp;nbsp;I am so sick and tired of listening to rednecks with a fourth grade education make ignorant comments about a woman not being able to run a country. &amp;nbsp;(Newsflash, women run other countries all over the world). &amp;nbsp;I am also tired of the Bill Clinton remarks about his morality. &amp;nbsp;George Bush is quite possibly the worst president this country has ever had. &amp;nbsp;This administration is the most corrupt ever. &amp;nbsp;They have lied and lined their own pockets. &amp;nbsp;Financially, I was much better off when Bill Clinton was in office. &amp;nbsp;I mean, are you kidding me, really?!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288200</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:39:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288200</guid><dc:creator>Andi Kulp</dc:creator><description>I liked the way Hillary Clinton answered the question. She has the experiance and the backbone to be a great President. &amp;nbsp;Obama did say &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; too soon seemingly without thinking. &amp;nbsp;His intentions are good, I think, I just do not believe he is ready to be President or even Vice President now, maybe later. &amp;nbsp;He looks good, speaks with optimisim about the future, and has an easy way about him. &amp;nbsp;Somehow I don't think that demeanor will last long if he is elected and is expected to straighten out the mess the Bush administration will leave us all with.&lt;br&gt;Hillary would be much better she obviously knows what the job she is running for entails and she is seems ready right now. And by the way, I don't think CNN is pushing Clinton in fact I'd like to hear more from Clinton, Biden, Obama, Edwards and Richardson. &amp;nbsp;All the other candidates seem a little frustrated already. Thanks &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288201</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:39:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288201</guid><dc:creator>Andres, G Trevino, LMSW, Dallas, Texas</dc:creator><description>I do not care who will be the president, I want someone who knows what he/she is doing in the white house. Someone who really care for us, for our safety, economy, health, not because we are a skin color. we all are american people</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288202</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:39:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288202</guid><dc:creator>Bob Patwick</dc:creator><description>What the BLEEP and BLEEP is a matter with you guys. This is what is so BLEEPing wrong with our country, we are way to BLEEPing divided. Anyone ever heard of teamwork? If we all BLEEPing unite we can overcome any BLEEPing thing. But no, we are to BLEEPing worried about fighting over who is Republican and who is Democratic and who's dumb BLEEP ideas are better. e already have a BLEEPing problem with racism, and now we are dumping more God BLEEP gas to the already burning fire. Ridiculous, what the BLEEPing BLEEP is wrong with this country. Actually the country is fine, its the BLEEPs who run it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288203</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:39:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288203</guid><dc:creator>Stan, Texas</dc:creator><description>Obama didn't vote for the war because he is a Muslum. And then you have Omama what a theif. come on Fred!</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288205</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288205</guid><dc:creator>Linda Anderson, Minneapolis, Minnesota</dc:creator><description>I'm just tired of the attempts at one-uppedness that takes place in these debates -- people lying in wait to pounce on something said so they can misconstrue and misinterpret it. &amp;nbsp;Anybody capable of coherent thought knows that a president-to-president meeting is going to warrant some preparation, so the point of the question was not on what terms would you meet with those leaders, but as President of the United States, would you meet with them. &amp;nbsp;It's clear Barack Obama was the only one with the guts to understand that.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288206</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288206</guid><dc:creator>Hoping The Best</dc:creator><description>W. Walker, I think you have made a very good point. Whoever the next president is will definitely have a lot of mess to clean up!! Regardless of what we think of President Bill Clinton I think most of us that have paid attention to presidential terms of office will have to agree that our country was much better off during his term. The Republican term definitely began with our country in much better shape!! Should the Democrats prevail I really feel sorry for the individual that will replace Bush as their term in office will be marred by the mess created by this current administration. Woe, to a first in office (Whether a racial minority or a woman!!). They will be crucified unmercifully and used as a scapegoat to keep women and racial minorities in their place!! &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288208</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288208</guid><dc:creator>James Holben, Hampstead, NC</dc:creator><description>It is a real shame the ballot does not have a place t check off....NO OF THE ABOVE....What we need is to roll back to the Farmer/Ststesman that represented his area and knew what the real issues facing the common man were. &amp;nbsp;NOT THE INTERESTS OF BIG BUSINESS AND LOBBYISTS who line of pockets of the very people who are supposed to be representing US. &amp;nbsp;We need to have a serious house cleaning and get this country back on track.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288209</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:41:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288209</guid><dc:creator>Ken Cruickshank, Santa Clara, CA</dc:creator><description>EVERYONE STOP TALKING ABOUT BUSH. We are voting for a new president hopefully based on the abilities of the candidate. &amp;nbsp;Just because Bush has done a bad job DOESNT mean that someone different will do better. &amp;nbsp;I am all for a woman president, but seriously, the &amp;quot;men have been doing a bad job&amp;quot; stance is juvenile. &amp;nbsp;Every good president has also been a man. &amp;nbsp;All I'm saying is that the past presidents are largely irrelevant - or at least they should be. &amp;nbsp;Vote on who you think will be a good leader, not simply a different person from the current president. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I think more people should consider Mitt Romney. &amp;nbsp;I know he will probably not get elected because people are afraid to vote for a mormon, but i think his sheer intelligence and leadership abilities speak for themselves. &amp;nbsp;No one mentions that he ran one of the most successful businesses in the world, and also founded another one of the most successful businesses in the world. &amp;nbsp;Not to mention the way he literally saved the Salt Lake City olympics. &amp;nbsp;It is often said that leading a country is somewhat like leading a company, and it is. &amp;nbsp;I have been in many important leadership positions in my life and I have found this to be true. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288211</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:41:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288211</guid><dc:creator>Victoria Allen</dc:creator><description>Whether it is Clinton or Obama our country would still be better off than we are now. I am retired with 22 years in the Army and ladies and gentlemen one thing &amp;nbsp;our soldiers must govern their words. These soldiers are tired of the war. Military Divorce rates are soring, soldiers deaths are mounting, and Who knows where disabilty treatment for these poor soldiers is going. Soldiers are coming back so distraught until they are killing their families. I am not talking to be talking I am talking because I have been there. Someone needs to stand for something and not just stand for anything. Bring those Soldiers Home. And for many of you I am a Retired Military Woman and Diabled. So let's be real for those of you that think those soldiers are happy when they don't know from day to day if your coming home. The Democrats are right. Bring them home.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288212</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:41:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288212</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Patterson, California</dc:creator><description>Name calling or labeling other folks is just a tactic&lt;br&gt;to divert the attention off of the real issues at hand. I think as real Americans we are much smarter than that kind of tactic by now. Let's deal with the &lt;br&gt;nation. Not character assasignation. We have real problems at home that need to be dealt with. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288214</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288214</guid><dc:creator>Robert Fredricks</dc:creator><description>Wayne Packard hit the nail on the head - end of discussion! This administration is out to get me, as an administration they truly are out to cut any programs for people, Republicans are for the rich and the saddest thing is a lot of folks dont know they are one illness from poverty - believe it </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288215</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:42:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288215</guid><dc:creator>Mike Louisians</dc:creator><description>What the democrats seem really good at is spending our taxpayers money on (witchhunts.) I wish they would put more effort in moving forward instead of backwards.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288217</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:42:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288217</guid><dc:creator>Robert Fredricks</dc:creator><description>Wayne Packard hit the nail on the head - end of discussion! This administration is out to get me, as an administration they truly are out to cut any programs for people, Republicans are for the rich and the saddest thing is a lot of folks dont know they are one illness from poverty - believe it </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288219</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:43:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288219</guid><dc:creator>Daniel, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>If Hillary cannot talk to America's enemies, she will lose the moral authority to get Israel and her neighbors to talk, and other warring nations around the world. It will be business as usual in Middle East. I agree with Obama, Dems should talk to Republicans for the sake of America, and America should talk to enemies (perceived or real) for the sake of peace in the world. It's not naivity it is maturity.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288220</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:43:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288220</guid><dc:creator>Chris, St. Louis</dc:creator><description>Oh, Hillary Hillary Hillary, &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;irresponsible and naive&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;I believe you think we all are! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you can decide what side of an issue you are really on. &amp;nbsp;You, know... the WAR....well maybe then &amp;nbsp;we'll listen. &amp;nbsp; How about NO MORE FLIP FLOPPIN ! &amp;nbsp;But that's OK...votes count...I think they do...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh Yeah, I guess, many of us can think of a few good things to say about Baraka, and other candidates for that matter, only you can't say nice huh. &amp;nbsp;How Sad, &amp;nbsp;you missed that opportunity. &amp;nbsp;To busy &amp;quot;lookin&amp;quot; presidential :)&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288223</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:43:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288223</guid><dc:creator>Joe Michalik, Virginia</dc:creator><description>First off: WWI and WWII and now 911 all three show us that trying to &amp;quot;talk&amp;quot; to countries that have communism, dictators, or muslim terrorists does not work. Trying to stay out of wars or reason or talk to these type of counties does not work but for some reason the Lib Dems and the UN dont learn form history and think they can talk to these people. However history shoes that by doing nothing, trying to stay out of Iraq or Iran, and the terroist, natzis, or communists will attack us. &amp;nbsp;The reason being is they want controle and power. Dems are extremely naive to stick to there parties play book and not learn from history. &amp;nbsp;When have we ever entered a war to loose, thats what the Lib Dems want to do. &amp;nbsp;They are bringing this country to its knees. Read your history books and the letters of the leaders of the allied forces and you will see a will and determination only seen in the Bush today to have the courage to take on evil. Mark this down you will see in the future more attacks by muslims because they are going un checked. Has anyone one reading this actualy read what they are taught? If anyone wants to know more about the muslims teaching read their crazy teaching or i will send you links of there books. I have &amp;nbsp;studies many religions all across the world and let me say they are evil. No one is brave enough to say these things today but i am.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288225</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:43:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288225</guid><dc:creator>Ahamas, Howell, NJ</dc:creator><description>Good call Lyn from Silver Spring, MD! &amp;nbsp;What a weak person she is! &amp;nbsp;Hillary slew a paper tiger that she made in art class. &amp;nbsp;She insulted all of us who knew what Obama was saying and she made herself look desperate. &amp;nbsp;May that pig never have the reins of power. &amp;nbsp;Go Obama! &amp;nbsp;You’re a true gentleman and we need you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288226</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288226</guid><dc:creator>C Russell</dc:creator><description>When will the nepotism end? Hillary Clinton is about as qualified as George Bush to President. If her last wasn't Clinton we wouldn't even be talking about her. Sen. Obama is clearly bringing a breath of fresh air to the national political scene. America needs someone with a different life experience in the White House. We can all see through her shameless tactics. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288227</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288227</guid><dc:creator>Art, Renton, Washingtong</dc:creator><description>I wish Ms. Clinton and the Democratic party would come to the realization that she won't be electable. &amp;nbsp;The idea that a presidential race is about capability was left behind when this nation elected Ronald Regan. &amp;nbsp;No matter if she is the best person for the job, she won't get it. &amp;nbsp;The facts are, our country isn't ready for a woman, and even if it was, Ms. Clinton is undoubtably the most polarizing candidate in the mix right now. &amp;nbsp;She has proven to be a very savvy political animal, but this particular criticism of Obama is diametrically opposite to her criticisim of Mr. Bush. &amp;nbsp;How can you be critical of talking to those who don't agree with us (Obama) and of NOT talking to those who don't agee with us (Bush)? &amp;nbsp;I'm a Democrat, and I can tell you, if she runs, we'll not gain the Whitehouse...</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288229</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:44:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288229</guid><dc:creator>Jan E., Brea, CA</dc:creator><description>Queen Hillary did not learn from her husband..he learned from her. And remember she was disbarred from practicing law...She also tried and many times got people fired who did not agree with her while her husband was in office..This is not someone I want representing my country...Also one question Hillary...how much is Mexico and La Raza paying you and the other traitors to try and give amnesty to close to 20 million ILLEGALS. Included in those are sexual predators, drug dealers, and murderers.OH yes...one illegal was found working for DWP in L.A. making over $100,000 per year..yeah who would want that job.... Anyone who voted for that stupid bill does not deserve to represent my country now or ever.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288231</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:45:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288231</guid><dc:creator>Robert Fredricks</dc:creator><description>Wayne Packard hit the nail on the head - end of discussion! This administration is out to get me, as an administration they truly are out to cut any programs for people, Republicans are for the rich and the saddest thing is a lot of folks dont know they are one illness from poverty - believe it </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288232</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:45:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288232</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Whalley San Diego CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is most likely the smartest person to ever step foot in the white house ... she doesn't have Bill's charm ... but she is a worker bee, effective, well intentioned and ready to hit the ground running. &amp;nbsp;Her point is legitimate ... she has understands foreign policy. &amp;nbsp;She made her point the way politicians make their points these days -- I don't understand -- she was wrong to capitalize on that debate opportunity -- if Obama did it he would be brilliant ... Hillary does it and she's a sneaky bitch ... I have news &amp;nbsp;for you knuckleheads -- Hillary is brilliant ... she could restore our world standing and financial state. &amp;nbsp;She'll win if not in spite of ... then because of your ignorant comments. &amp;nbsp;Cheers.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288233</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288233</guid><dc:creator>susie smith</dc:creator><description>obama is too inexperienced to lead the us</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288237</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:46:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288237</guid><dc:creator>Mike Delehanty</dc:creator><description>Irresposible and navie? &amp;nbsp;Humm. Does this mean a democrat who can raise more money than Hillary is not qualified to be President? &amp;nbsp;So, if he gets the nomination, Who will Hillary Support? &amp;nbsp;Humm. &amp;nbsp;Would she rather have a qualified Republican or an irresponsible and naive Democrat leading our country? &amp;nbsp;The poor dear, she will have a lot to contemplate in the coming year. &amp;nbsp;Do good for your country, or do good for your party? &amp;nbsp;What would a mature and savvy politition do?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288238</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288238</guid><dc:creator>Donovan, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator><description>I find it funny that Wayne thinks that when Clinton was President that we had peace and prosperity. &amp;nbsp;What about sending all those troups to Somalia weeks before Christmas only to let them be slaughtered and drug through the streets behind trucks? &amp;nbsp;What about the Croat/Serb war? &amp;nbsp;What about the USS Cole being attacked by terrorists, and being forced to watch them come up to the boat because they were forbidden to fire? &amp;nbsp;What about our Embassy in Africa being blown to bits? &amp;nbsp;Is that peace??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I lost my job at the end of the so-called prosperity due to the Clinton administration's over-inflation of technology market. &amp;nbsp;Then rejoining the workforce was made even more difficult due to all the foreign workers that the Clinton administration ushered through our borders. &amp;nbsp;What about NAFTA and all the jobs that were lost to Mexico, because they would work for far less than an American worker. &amp;nbsp;Yeah, that is prosperity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The LAST thing this country needs is Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Vote anybody but her. &amp;nbsp;We already have scored a victory since George Bush Sr. doesn't have any more family running for President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288239</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:47:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288239</guid><dc:creator>Brian J. in Libby, MT. </dc:creator><description>I am wondering where the hand basket is that &amp;quot;Darren&amp;quot; says we are going to hell in? And how large would this hand basket have to be? Bigger than Al Gores ego? Bigger than Bill Clintons skeleton collection he has in the closet? I am guessing it dont matter who the next president is. We took a wrong turn about 1994 and never corrected the wheel folks. You can blame Bush, you can blame Clinton... I do. The fact is Barak Obama is a fresh face, hell if he were on an Independent ticket he might fair better than being on the Dem ticket. When Perot ran he was there for a change to the game. Now more than then do we need a new tune to hum while we pack our &amp;quot;hand basket&amp;quot; and make for the sulpher sea. I dontthink Bush has steered us to far off the wrong track clinton has us on. I know, lets have the people pick policy... we could call it a democracy... no, nevermind. Pelosi is one of the people. I withdraw all comments, see you in the basket.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288240</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288240</guid><dc:creator>Tony Sperkowski,  Rockford, IL</dc:creator><description>Obama lacks experience and Clinton, forget it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A third Clinton term? &amp;nbsp;Let's examine what they gave us. &amp;nbsp;World Trade Center bombing, 1993. &amp;nbsp;USS Cole bombing 2000. &amp;nbsp;US Embassy bombing Tanzania &amp;amp; Kenya, 1998. &amp;nbsp;And finally, the Clintons' tough stance on terrorism led to 9/11/01. &amp;nbsp;Lest we forget, Bill Clinton had the opportunity to take out Bin Laden but it wasn't good for his image. &amp;nbsp;Hilary, you're the one who is naive. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stick with the GOP. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288243</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288243</guid><dc:creator>Audie Murphy, NY</dc:creator><description>2 Words: &amp;nbsp;IMPEACH BUSH</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288244</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288244</guid><dc:creator>G. Khan,  Remsen, Iowa</dc:creator><description> Pillory Hillary</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288245</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288245</guid><dc:creator>Frank, McHenry, Il</dc:creator><description>Obama all the way..... We need a fresh face with a fresh start. One thing I can say good about Bush, he totaly distroy`d the Republican Grand Ol Party. At least we can have a &amp;nbsp;country the world will look up to again after 08.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288246</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288246</guid><dc:creator>BOB, Midwest</dc:creator><description>Obama should just be a model for GQ or the like. He IS naive and weak. Being a pretty boy and speaking softly may get him some votes, but the head of every state around the world can smell a weakling and the terrorists are salvating at the thought of having him anywhere near the whitehouse!! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288247</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288247</guid><dc:creator>John Gallagher, New York NY</dc:creator><description>I don't think Obama was naive. I think he understood that the question's intent was to see if the candidate would do what the current administration refuses to even consider. His answer was to the point: yes, he would. I say good for him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary played the typical political game: I'm not promising anything. She also scored a cheap debating point that has been made into much more than it really was by the media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does anyone really think that Obama meant that he would hop on a plane or whatever without guaging the intent of others? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288249</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288249</guid><dc:creator>John T. Clendenin</dc:creator><description>Mrs. Clinton:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I donated money to your campaign. &amp;nbsp;I won't any more. &amp;nbsp;I am sending my money to Obama. &amp;nbsp;You need to have some decor about you as it relates to different views. &amp;nbsp;Especially with your fellow Democrats. &amp;nbsp;There is always more than one way to skin a cat (so to speak). &amp;nbsp;If you were President you wouldn't expect everyone to share your way of doing things. &amp;nbsp;Respect that, let it go! &amp;nbsp;That is the constitution of a great leader! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I work hard for my money and if I am going to give it away [with nothing gained] I at least expect to feel like I have given it to someone with qualities that I can appreciate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288250</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288250</guid><dc:creator>Kris, NJ</dc:creator><description>I am concerned that we are seeing Clinton as a viable candidate at all-people seem to think that she has done so much already, but let's not forget that when she had the chance to change something-the healthcare system-she failed miserably-walking away to let someone else try to pick up the pieces. &amp;nbsp;Is that the person that we want running the country?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288252</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:49:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288252</guid><dc:creator>Jean H. Lewis, Champaign, IL</dc:creator><description>It is interesting, isn't it, that the majority of people posting here today against Senator Clinton ARE MEN!! &amp;nbsp;Take notice women! Vote for Hillary! Pay attention to the polls about gender. Also, to those of you who think Hillary is Bill or vice versa, are, I think, rather heterosexist in your view. That is, must a woman always be viewed as being and believing the same as her husband? &amp;nbsp;Geesh!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288253</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:49:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288253</guid><dc:creator>PissedatAmerica</dc:creator><description>First, a monkey smoking pot would be a better president than Bush, second, Hilary is the only candiate with any experience what so ever. &amp;nbsp;If not for any other reason than that, I will vote for her. &amp;nbsp;I like Obama, I think he's a decent man, but way to naive, period. &amp;nbsp;Sorry. &amp;nbsp;And anybody who votes republican now is in a sorry state of mind. &amp;nbsp;Big business and corporations and greed are all they are about, plain and simple. &amp;nbsp;Bush actually tried to sell of our ports to Dubai? &amp;nbsp;doesn't that tell you anything here folks. &amp;nbsp;And so what if Bill Clinton is running her campaign like he's running again, he was great, and more than half of America and world thought so. &amp;nbsp;What the republicans did to him was a disgrace and we Amreican's should have never sat back and watched it happen to him. &amp;nbsp;More power to both of them....As for the idiot who said this isn't a job for a women, your a complete moron and need to back to your dirty stupid cave.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288257</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:50:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288257</guid><dc:creator>Greg, Rockford, IL</dc:creator><description>Barack does understand the nature of the threats facing our nation, he once said that Iran was the greatest threat to the safety and security of the U.S.A, and judging by recent events, he is correct. &amp;nbsp;As mentioned earlier, Hillary is a shill for big business first and foremost. &amp;nbsp;That's what side her bread is buttered on, and she's too shrewd to forget it. &amp;nbsp;Barack is less experienced with the insider politics of Washington, and frankly I believe that is a good, good thing. &amp;nbsp;He is also exceptionally bright, and a gifted communicator. &amp;nbsp;He was the only democrat I voted for in the last general election, and he will be my choice for the next President of the United States. &amp;nbsp;I'm a conservative Republican, but this country needs a new direction, and it needs hope. &amp;nbsp;I see these things in Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;I don't see them in any other candidate, on either side of the aisle.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288258</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:50:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288258</guid><dc:creator>Al, Castle Rock, Colorado</dc:creator><description>The threat to our country came from with in. As soon as we dump the Texas Cowboy (aka: village idiot) we will be able to become whole again. Dump the republicans before we fall further into the darkness.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288259</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:50:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288259</guid><dc:creator>Mr.D Michigan</dc:creator><description>Hillary is being too tough. &amp;nbsp;We already have a toughone in the White House and do not need another. &amp;nbsp;Mr. Tough Guy in the White House has got us stuck in Iraq, with the help of Hillary of course. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288260</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:50:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288260</guid><dc:creator>wes</dc:creator><description>She is simply smarter than the young guy and you people are scared she will in fact win.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288261</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:50:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288261</guid><dc:creator>RLT</dc:creator><description>Lets wake up&lt;br&gt;The current Democrates have no New Idea's&lt;br&gt;We need a leader that can lead,and unite, not bicker.&lt;br&gt;Mabe its time for an Independent to lead us.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288262</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288262</guid><dc:creator>Who is John Galt</dc:creator><description>Does it really matter? &amp;nbsp;They are all socialists, just like any of you who support them. &amp;nbsp;The Republicans are all becoming Socialists, as well. &amp;nbsp;Hopefully, someday producers will wake up and Atlas will shrug. &amp;nbsp;When and if that day comes what will all of you dependent people do?</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288265</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288265</guid><dc:creator>Casey Russell, Oklahoma City, OK</dc:creator><description>If Clinton or Obama gets elected the country will regret it. Neither one believes in free enterprise. &amp;nbsp;The both think that all they have to do is pass laws and what they want to happen economically will happen. What everyone to have great health care, pass a law. &amp;nbsp;Want to end poverty tax the snot out off everyone with any income and spend it on programs. Want to end the war, hey just quit fighting. &amp;nbsp;The Dems like to think Bush is stupid, but the biggest light weight in the mix is obama and Clinton may be smart but she only cares about power and not the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The economy is in great shape and we have taken the fight to the enemy. &amp;nbsp;Five years from now people will long for the Bush administration. </description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288266</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288266</guid><dc:creator>ROBERT HACKENSACK NJ</dc:creator><description>its time for new leadership and that doesn't mean a homophobic, racist, bigot, bully in the school yard like little cocaine head alcoholic georgie bush.&lt;br&gt;the republican party is dead in the water and the democrats need a man of new visions who can lead the country on rules we follow and not break them all like dumb bush and chihuahua chaney have done. all bark no bite 2001-2007. sorry hillary you had your eight years BARACK its his turn?. is he getting under&lt;br&gt;her skin finally?&lt;br&gt;SUPERMAN NJ</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288267</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288267</guid><dc:creator>R. Ashe, Oceanside CA</dc:creator><description>I enjoyed all the response's. Democrary in action. I am sure we will get it right this time. Electing the candidate that is best for the job.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288269</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288269</guid><dc:creator>Mike Soffer</dc:creator><description>Obama had the chance to express any pre conditions to such a meeting. &lt;br&gt;The question that he answered was a meeting with no pre conditions. He agreed &lt;br&gt;Clinton didn't say she wouldn't meet with these leaders before testing the waters.&lt;br&gt;This shows careful thought before making such a significant step in our foreign policy. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288270</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288270</guid><dc:creator>Homer, Wayland, MI</dc:creator><description>For those idiots who keep saying that Obama is inexperianced, I have two points to make. &amp;nbsp;First George Washington was the greatest president we ever had and he had no political experiance before getting the job. Second Obama actually has more experiance then Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Obama has ten years of experiance in politics versus Clinton's six years.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288273</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:52:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288273</guid><dc:creator>True AMERICAN</dc:creator><description>Well anybody is better than electing the muslim for president they said they would destroy the USA from inside out. What a better way to do that. I'd rather have her than a radical raised muslim.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288274</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:52:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288274</guid><dc:creator>LJ</dc:creator><description>Mr. Obama promises lots of changes and he will never be able to accomplish them all. &amp;nbsp;I think he is playing the race card because he mostly related about his black heritage but now is trying for the votes of all people which any politician does. &amp;nbsp;He needs much more experience for my vote.</description></item><item><title>Clinton: Obama 'irresponsible' &amp;amp; 'naive'</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/24/287144.aspx#288275</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:52:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:288275</guid><dc:creator>scott</dc:creator><description>Last time we had a Dem. President (He was the only one with a piece!), we gave every country against us the opportunity to build up and now North Korea has nuclear power for harm, terrorism is at an all time high and we are finally trying to attack these problems before they are in our back yards. Obviously New York has been forgotten. I beleive useless Diplomacy put our public in the middle of a useless attack. As for (0) deficit, (That shows (0) brains!!! As Reagan said the government is 