Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JoeCHI, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:48:05 GMT

You can take the community organizer out of South Chicago, but...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lewis, Cincinnati, Ohio — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:48:13 GMT

Go Obama go!! It's about time that he shows that he's not afraid of the Clintons!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

William, Reston, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:51:28 GMT

Wow, excellent response Senator. I think Clinton's attempt to try to discredit Obama at this early stage is really starting to backfire.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Samuel Doe, Toronto, Canada — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:52:19 GMT

Wow,
This is what I have been waiting for from Obama. In my view, Obama is the best thing to happen to American politics in a long time.
I dont think it is compulsory that Obama wins the democratic nomination but I think we as Americans must ask this shit***ds who took us to Iraq some tough questions.
I be coming home to Iowa to vote for ya, Obama

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jerry/corpus christi texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:57:17 GMT

What say you Hillary? Now I know the GOP will win the White House in 08.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Justice — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:59:22 GMT

Awesome; Obama nails it.

Cynicallary Clinton is in trouble.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bruce, NV — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:00:16 GMT

This was defcon 3? My, you pundit-types get excited easily.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jerry/corpus christi texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:08:04 GMT

Smoke coming out of the Senate buildings. I figured both Hillary and Obama were getting fired up but....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Carrie, Eastern Iowa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:08:54 GMT

Has Hillary clarified what she meant by preconditions? Perhaps all she meant by that was sending envoys and pursuing lower level diplomacy first. In which case, his clarification does nothing more than equalize their positions on this issue.

The difference, as Albright put it, is in the nuances. No one is suggesting that Obama would be inviting these leaders to tea in the Rose Garden his first month in office. But it is important that a foundation is first laid, and the response that he is now giving indicates that he is aware of that.

I sincerely hope that everyone who was touting him yesterday for wanting to meet with the dictators himself rather than have lower level diplomats lay the foundation blasts Obama as much as they blasted Hillary. So much for that big change, huh?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dane, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:09:26 GMT

An OUTSTANDING response from Senator Obama, and another demonstration of why his brand of leadership is exactly what the USA needs desperately.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Peter V — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:11:34 GMT

At last, Obama is starting to counterpunch. Now, if he can just learn to give straight answers in the debates, he can beat her.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tom, Burke VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:12:30 GMT

Sounded very Presidential. A true leader. We need a President who is able to ask the tough questions and make decisions, not more of the same.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Doe, Seattle, Wash — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:13:10 GMT

I think Media was trying to put Hillary Clinton on a pedestal and Obama has put the media in it's place :-)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Donna Stewart, Kingston Jamaica, West Indies — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:14:18 GMT

I am very impressed with Obama's frankness and sincerity. I'm rooting for him from Jamaica and I hope that the American people will give him a chance !!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Phyllis, Littleton, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:14:58 GMT

Go get'em Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Howard, Columbus, OH — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:15:07 GMT

Obama's approach to the world political stage is coarse and oversimplified.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

CJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:15:21 GMT

Obama has to do this...otherwise he is concedes to Clinton. Clinton in that part is tough b/c she does not ignore a slight unlike Kerry.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Big MO, Atlanta, GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:16:25 GMT

OBAMA! I have you your BACKA !!! Now we are hearing what we wanted to hear when we sent you our hard earn cash. Bush/Clinton same wolf in a A** or Sheep clothing. I am working Georgia for you big man. If you need me in SC just holla.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sandy, Arkansas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:16:28 GMT

For the Clintons it depends on what "is," "is."

Juanita Broaddrick, who appeared on "Dateline NBC" in January 1999 to accuse then-President Bill Clinton of raping her in Arkansas back in 1978, is supporting the most serious rival to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Democratic presidential contest.

According to a money-in-politics database at www.opensecrets.org, which is operated by the Center for Responsive Politics, Ms. Broaddrick has contributed $450 so far this year to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

steve G — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:16:50 GMT

I can't believe anyone who would support any freshman Senator..who really thinks he can make a difference in the Middle East..by inviting himself over there..to make a fool out of all of us..and especially Obama!! He has no clout with other countries head of government! Of course they would agree to meet him..and show the world that the US has sunk to new lows sending a kid to do a mans job.
Hey..let's just pull out of Iraq....and watch the countries people get slaughtered by the thousands...!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lucy, Buford, GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:12 GMT

Sorry but I have to go with Hillary in that Obama is NOT seasoned enough to be President of the United States. He will be good at shaking things up but he's not our guy. Go HILLARY!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Robert Stelling, Chandler, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:15 GMT

In 1961 a Young Democrat said that the United States would never negotiate out of fear now would we fear to negotiate. In 2007 a youg Democrat states the he does not fear to negotiate and the old folks are calling him irresponsible.
Hillary she is so ninties!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

DE — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:24 GMT

Sounds Presidental..Only two days late! And I guess it's easy to criticize a vote on a war when you were in the Illinois Legislature not forced to make the tough decisions. But I guess we can deal with another rookie learning on the job, it seems to have worked well for the last 7 years.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lyn, Silver Spring, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:27 GMT

Doesn't look like Hillary wants to engage!!!! She knew it was a weak agruement to begin with and was hoping that Obama would let it pass. Rookie misstake number #3 Hillary. For a "SEASONED PROFESSIONAL'" YOU ARE BATTING 200 LATELY.

If you think you were right, BACK IT UP in person, ENGAGE. You OPEN THE DOOR. See what kind happen when you let your temper get the best of you.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John J Lynch, S.J. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:30 GMT

Precisely. Hilary sounds like more of the same. We need to change.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steve — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:49 GMT

Obama's Answer is very well reasoned and perfectly on point. I don't see a hint of tough talk in it. Obama is laying out his position without nastiness. HE actually shows respect for her. So isn't this a refreshing change in politics. I agree - Go, Obama Go ! What makes journalists think this is an escalation toward a fight? Oh.... yeah.... a cheesy attempt to market their wares.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott Fuentes, Portland, Oregon — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:50 GMT

Billary's comments only reaffirm what Obama is criticizing them for. Why should there be "conditions"? This is why we are viewed so unfavorably throughout the world - because we think we are better than everyone else. Go Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Howard, NY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:17:57 GMT

Yes Obama needs more substance and more diffrentiation from Hilary. he also needs to be careful and not attack too boldly. Hillary will not be intimidated!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Noah, Studio City CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:18:05 GMT

I don't know, maybe he sounds different to other peoples' ears but, for me, the irony is that Obama just isn't well-spoken!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lyn, Silver Spring, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:18:16 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Betty, Abilene TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:18:57 GMT

Sorry Obama fans - he was brash and irresponsible. Comments like his may fuel a feeding frenzy with the media and his fans, but he is showing me over and over he is not ready for prime time.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

George Richards. Fort Saskatchewan Alberta Canada — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:14 GMT

America has lost the ability to talk. Gun boat diplomacy does not get the job done. This was proven by Nixon and Regan

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Melody — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:18 GMT

You know what they say when you underestimate people. Obama is not the one to underestimate.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David Voss, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:22 GMT

I'm a Republican and I admit I'm looking closely at the Dems for my possible vote this time. Obama handled this perfectly. He tied Clinton's behavior to what we are trying to get away from, that is, Bush diplomacy (an oxymoron). Score one for Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Theresa, Clermont, Florida — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:29 GMT

Please, we do not need another administration with the same intimidated by the enemey so I won't talk to them theme. Hillary is so insecure she wouldn't step into a pool with out someone checking out for her first.

Great response back Obama, you are the real winner, and will be in 2008 for the White House.
Theresa

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jon Davis, Las Cruces, NM — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:29 GMT

It's true, Obama is young and naive (as was John F. Kennedy in 1960). Still, how can anyone like Hilary? She is *exactly* the type of cold, calculating politician who makes most of us cynical of cold, calculating politicians, regardless of the politician's sex, race or political affiliation. If the primary comes down to Obama or Clinton, Obama gets my vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Phillipsburg, NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:36 GMT

Wow. Nice to see he keeps pace with his ideals to change the way Washington does business. Time to get the old cronies out of power and get someone with real diplomacy in mind.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

sick ain't it? — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:37 GMT

How will any democrat make headway with Iran without the support of half the country? You didn't stand with us. Why should we help you?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Charles H, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:19:42 GMT

She made a bad move - the naivety is on Sen. Clinton's part to think the United States President is so omnipotent as not to speak with other world leaders. It's that mind concept that's gotten us in the bad eye of a good portion of the world. I'm an Army veteran, and love my country - but this political elitist crap has got to stop...and I feel confident it will with Sen. Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jerry/corpus christi texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:20:51 GMT

Hillary hasn't had a debate yet. Her day is coming.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kelley, Gardner MA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:21:00 GMT

I think Obama nailed it on Monday night. To refuse to even consider meeting with our enemies is completely ridiculous. The question was "would you be willing" to meet in the first year, and Obama said he's willing and Hillary said she wasn't. That shows me two things, Obama is ready for the job, and not afraid to do it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michelle, Shelbyville KY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:21:23 GMT

I think Obama nailed it and I can't wait to see how he turns things around on Clinton in the next few months. I can only hope that the uneducated realize how great Obama will be for our country.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Elizabeth McLellan Portland Maine — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:21:24 GMT

I see no reason at all why a President should not meet with leaders throughout the world. A sign of a positive gesture. you are headed down a great road and stand up to her and make her answer the questions, which she continues to avoid most of the time.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Elaine, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:21:48 GMT

Sen Obama is good to be critcal of of Senator Clinton, but my question is if he was so certain that the war was a bad choice then why didn't he do something about it, why didn't he try to open the eyes of those that voted to give permission to go to war if needed. My second questions is what information did he have and where did he get it that convinced him that the war was a bad choice? I wish he could move on pass who did what and discuss what he can and will do for this country. I don't find Hilary is irresponsible or naive, she didn't have a crystal ball to tell her what Bush was going to do, maybe Obama should have loaned her his crystal ball since he know before anyone that going into Iraq was bad. I think it is very important to pre think and have a plan when dealing with those from other countries

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

J.P. Minneapolis MN — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:22:06 GMT

I don't know why people are getting so pumped up about Obama. He has virtually no experience. For me he is basically just an invention of the media. If he is the best thing to come around in American Politics in a long time then this country is really in trouble!?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

J.P. Minneapolis MN — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:22:47 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Pat D, Saint Louis, MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:24:00 GMT

Time for a change - he seems like the biggest one available. If the vote were today... mine would be for Obama. I've gotten on the "anyone but Hillary" bandwagon.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Wesley Perry — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:24:11 GMT

Bottom line - no BILLARY in the White house - period. If she is elected, that's 28 years of the same 2 families (with questionable pasts - both of them) running our country. Hillary feels entitled because she's the first "woman" running for president. Obama is right in blasting her - and he won't be the last.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Bob Milwaukee Wisconsin — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:24:56 GMT

I don't like Hillary but Obama blew it in the debate. If he has to explain himself after, he didn't get it in the first place. Hillary's answer was the more mature and experienced answer. She doesn't rush into anything. If Obama learns from her and moves on he might make it but he does lack the experience.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Adam, West Orange, NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:25:26 GMT

Obama needs to be Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. And Jimmy Stewart didnt back down when somebody attacked him and Obama needs to show that same back bone.

Clinton has a terrible non existant personality and shell say absolutely anything to get elected. In the past 5 months I have seen her take almost 4 different positions on the Iraq war. Obama is the only one who can bring her down and he has to do so by showing teeth. Defending yourself from negative politics isnt negatively politicking, Obama needs to hit back and hit back hard and never stop hitting till January of 08.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larry, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:25:35 GMT

I don’t believe that Hillary has done anything but bash the president. The more I read about O’bama the more I like what he stands for. I have yet to see a politician that can keep any of the pre campaign promises. The only difference from the two parties is the spelling of the names.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kendall Thomas, Houma, Louisiana — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:25:51 GMT

Personally I feel that Obama's response was very thoughtout and well put together. Of course we need to resume talks with other countries. We cannot fail to resume talks with foreign countries and isolate ourselves from them. Is this not what the United States did after War War I? Did we not isolate ourselves from other countries, which in turn eventually brought us into War War II! True, going into war did bring our country out of economic depression, but it also brought along more enemies than friends. Well done Barack Obama, you are exactly the type of leader this country needs and has been waiting for.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tony Palm Beach, Florida, USA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:25:51 GMT

Why has noone asked Sen. Obama about being a muslim? The fact that he grew up in an radical islamic family, and that he is trying to hide it by being a member of a racist church in Chicago. Hilary Clinton is going to be the next President. Obama does not have the experience as a politician or a diplomat. He obviously is trying to distract from his comments and has had over 24 hours to prepre this response and has great writers. Anyone can look back and say I should have said this and that but Obama, not having the experience is not able to think on his feet. You DO NOT really want him as a president.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Alan in Phx — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:26:01 GMT

This is the reason only 50% of th peole vote. This non issue dust up is nothing more than media theater. It solves nothing and proves nothing.

The question asked was would you talk yes or no simple enough. The rest is just Hillary puffing out her chest to prove that she is man enough. counter balance that big booty that was on display in the CNN show.

I do suggest that the Obama campaign watch out as the machine hates it when Hillary is attacked. The opposition research that they have been doing will start to come out sooner. They will not make this a 12 round fight before the knock out, but if his insabordination continues, by holloween it could be over as anything in his background that is damning will be fling all over the media. HIllary is ruthless and the people that work for her are even worse.

Be aware Obama be aware

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kim, Pasadena, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:26:07 GMT

The media is really making the most of this, are they not? But, to me, Hillary just lost my vote. We are all sick and tired of the same old politics in Washington, and we need a big time change. I think Hillary was awful to do what she did to Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Don M, San Diego, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:26:12 GMT

If Senator Clinton has so much experience then she MUST answer why she voted to authorize the war when so many inside and outside of government were saying there was no imminent threat and no WMD. Her experience is limited to being married to the former president and being a carpetbagger senator from NY. It is Democrats like her that failed to stand up to the Bush administration on things like the Patriot Act, Guantanimo and the Authorization for War. If she failed to stand up then as a Senator what can we expect of her as President

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

david - los angeles, ca — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:27:02 GMT

Osama has a better chance at beating Clinton than Obama does.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Robb, STL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:28:19 GMT

I don't know Carrie. When I hear "preconditions", I'm thinking "Stop enriching uranium...then, we'll talk!" But that's me. I could be wrong.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kyle — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:28:23 GMT

This country IS in trouble, and I'd rather have someone FRESH that can make a difference! Look where sticking with the usual has got us. Obama is better off with less Washington experience as far as I'm concerned.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

yiannis, baltimore, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:29:25 GMT

Howard what is coarse and oversimplified is the GHWB-BC-GWB-HRC approach that we won't talk to people we don't like.

The idea of lower level diplomacy means that we won't meet with you unless you bend over backwards. It is the same arrogance that has empowered jihadi lunatics around the world and the same thinking that led Clinton to vote for the Iraq war.

As a result of this arrogance the world is LESS SAFE than before and the US less safe than before 9/11

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard, Spanish Fork, Utah — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:29:31 GMT

It is nothing more than lip service! It is so much easier to analize our situation in Iraq with hind-sightedness. I know he didn't vote for the war - that's troubles me. Would he wait until the bombs drop on our soil, or what was he waiting for? Yes, we had bad info - cool - I understand that, but however the point remains - what conditions would he want before taking some kind of action. Obama scares me to death.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

LDumond Fredericksburg VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:29:45 GMT

Obama is full of BS. He talks on both sides of his mouth and says things that people want to hear, he is certainly not ready to be President.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David Voss — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:30:14 GMT

Why do you need political experience to be a good leader? I guess George Washington was a bad leader?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris, Boston, MA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:30:30 GMT

Obama's definitely hit back on this issue given his comparative lack of foreign policy chops, but he's got to be careful in how he goes about it or he's not only going to look inexperience, he's going to look petulant. And don't think Clinton's camp isn't working overtime right now to figure out how to do just that.

Whatever he does, it's got to be better than:

"I know that she has said in the past that we have to talk to our enemies -- well that’s what this is about. And if we say that we will not talk to them unless they meet a series of preconditions, then that’s the same position that Bush and Cheney have maintained over the last six years, and it has made us less safe."

Either you're with me or you're wish Bush? Silly, Manichaen dichotomies are the specialty of the current administration--and not any candidate of who claims to be about change.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Walter Payne, Perry Fl. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:31:08 GMT

Communications is one way to lower world tension and is NECESSARY.
We cannot go around telling the world they will do things our way or else. This world is a rather large area and there is room for all kinds of different systems. We cannot force our system on the whole world.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jen, Houston, TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:31:08 GMT

Barack Obama RULES!!!! Hillary needs to put her claws back in. She's showing that she is worried about him...I love it! Barack's answer was awesome! He might be inexperienced but he's not retarded! Give him some credit. GO OBAMA!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stuart chicago — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:31:22 GMT

I dont get this whole thing. What i got from Clinton was that she would send someone from her office 1st before meeting with other heads of government. I didnt think she said she was not going to talk to anyone. I am very confused by this whole thing. I rewatched the debate and I still dont understand this. Tell me if I am wrong Obama said he would meet with them during his 1st year in office while Hillary said she would send a lower level person to meet with them 1st. Did I miss something ???

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stephanie Engle — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:31:47 GMT

Democratic hopefuls should act out of their heart, mind, and conscience. Rather than take strategy lessons from lobbyists/image consultants - they desperately need to communicate effectively with Americans.

I implore all AMericans to visit the FEC website and look at campaign expenses for an eye-opening account of what is really happening behind the scenes - or, check out some newspaper archives: they can be "diary like" - revealing truths that may need to be brought to the forefront of this election.

We were sold short: by the Bush/Cheney White House, by Congress, and even by our own complacency -

We allowed these people to take us to war, to shamefully sacrifice our loved ones, and those of the Iraqi people - for what?

Every one of you should be raising hell, demanding that both Bush & Cheney are impeached. To refuse to do so is the ultimate offense for those who were shuttled off to a war based on pretense and marketed spin.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stephanie Engle, Alexandria, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:33:13 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

TL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:33:17 GMT

Oh I see. You can meet with "Ahmadimwitjihadist" and say "Go F your slimy deranged self" and he can say "Kiss My Camel Loving Azz" in person and that counts a major diplomatic breakthrough.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

London Fletcher — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:33:30 GMT

You know what they say when you underestimate people. Obama is not the one to underestimate.

He may not have experience, but he's got something just as good if not better, at least in politics. Money.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

M. Coffey, North Carolina — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:34:05 GMT

I just watched Hardball about this topic. Even Hillary's supporter dodged questions like she does. Instead of answering the question they deflected the blame on Bush and tried to incorrectly frame Obama. The only questions I want directly answered is: 1)If you were so experienced, why didn't you read the NIE report before voting for the war? This was the most important vote of your career!!!! 2)Did you vote for the Iraq war because you wanted to seem PRESIDENIAL at the time or did you believe your were doing the right thing? Bush tricked me isn't a good answer or "PRESIDENTIAL". Can some of the Hillary supporters directly answer my questions without double speak.

Finally...since when does being the First Lady translates into PRESIDENTIAL experience? Does that mean Barbra Bush has MORE presidential experience since she was in the White House for 12 years? About that great Bill Clinton economy...INTERNET BOOM then the BUST...I lost my job and didn't really recover...

I'm independent but I really like Obama

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Simeon, Indianapolis, Indiana — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:34:43 GMT

This is what am talking about. See, clarity ... I don't need to add anything more. This is a clear sign of competency in a commander-in-chief ... keep shining Barack!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Doe, Milpita, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:35:03 GMT

Talking never works. Nukes do.

That's why Iran, NK, and the turd world are working on them so hard.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Catherine, San Antonio, Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:35:47 GMT

Obama is presidential, intelligent , impressive and a true representative of the people!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michael, Pensacola, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:36:18 GMT

Are these two really the best the Democratic party has to offer? Seriously? I'm very disappointed. They're both green Senators without any other relevant experience (first lady doesn't count!)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

M. Zakharin, Hartland, WI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:37:02 GMT

Hey, great idea... why don't Obama and Clinton just nit-pick each other apart over minute definitions and after-the-fact over-explanations from the very beginning, turn everyone off--then Edwards can get the nomination, and we can get stuck with four more years of Republican rule.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David Kelsey (Los Angeles, CA) — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:37:28 GMT

Obama is like a petulant kid playing in a room full of adults. Did anybody ever suggest that he would be inviting Mussolini over for tea? No. All Hillary said -- sounding much more experienced and rational than he does here -- is that you cannot meet these people without testing the waters, sending envoys, and having preconditions. Obama makes himself look like a fool now when he usurps her position, essentially agrees with her, but still tries to look like there is disagreement on her part. No, Barack, it is you who disagreed first and then backpedaled by agreeing with what she already said: you have send lower level people first. Clinton never said she would never meet with these people Bush-Cheney style. She said she would do it with maturity, diplomacy and decorum. I was intrigued by Obama's candidacy at first, but Hillary is simply more mature and experienced. Obama made a gaffe that he cannot correct. Nice try, though.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

D.C., Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:38:12 GMT

Say it isn't so Obama, not you too. How can you lower your self to Republican standards of attack to your own colleague. Please don't let your experience show and stand aside if you can't handle the pressure. If you are breaking under the stress now what makes you think the presidency is going to be any easier. You still have a future in the Clinton Administration.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Paul Rhodes, Palo Alto California — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:38:41 GMT

What a clear, forceful and on-point answer by Obama, in response to the always over-cautious Clinton's standard attack the day after. He has the guts to hit back. I want Obama to be the one to lead our country, and look forward to his forthright and direct communication with the American people during his years in office.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dal Kent, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:38:57 GMT

I think Obamas "people" told him to issue this statement to make him look better and to discredit Sen. Clinton. he just needs to let it go now and focus on real issues, not argue over comments made earlier. I guess they will keep going on this until they recieve good feedback for them and negative for Sen. Clinton.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lynn, Millington — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:39:11 GMT

Jim Bob from Milwaukee Wisconsin,

Senator Obama articulated a hypothetical situation with honesty and forth rightfulness. The only reason this story still has legs is because Hillary Clinton opened the door and let Senator Obama come right in. He has NEVER said anything remotely about being irresponsible and naive. But she opened the door and he writing the vision and making it plain. She distorted what he said in the debate.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Brooks, Eugene, Oregon — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:39:40 GMT

...and Obama *should* attack Hillary. She not only supports outsourcing jobs, she and her husband owns part of the largest provider of Indian workers to this country! Those workers take jobs from Amercian's. While 30% of our own software workers and engineers cannot find jobs, why on earth is Hillary Clinton supporting and even funding additional alien workers to take even more Amercian jobs. Hillary Clinton doesn't deserve to be President, she s no friend of the Middle Class and is no friend of working men and women. It's about time someone got after her. This country doesn't need another Bush neocon President. Heck, we don't need a neocon U.S. Senator!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eric Rich — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:39:46 GMT

Being a conservative and certainly no fan of HRC,Obama is naive if he can't see that the exit stategy for any war is victory.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:39:56 GMT

It's interesting watching people who obviously don't understand politics or political campaigns comment on this issue. Hillary, like her or not, was exactlly right on Monday night. Obama, like him or not, again showed his novice status. This is why she is going to win the nomination; no one who understands politics or leadership can credibly argue that he has what it takes to lead us in 2009. Maybe someday. Maybe. We don't have time for on-the-job training, folks. And if you think Obama's comments today showed anything resembling "freshness," then, again, you really are clueless. That was a speech prepared by his team, who hunkered down over the last two days and tried to figure out how best to counter this latest blow to his credibility as a national figure. And many of you fell for it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

SM, Illinois — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:39:58 GMT

I still think Hillary is right. First Obama says that he didn't vote for the war in the first place, now he's saying we shouldn't be afraid to face our enemies because were America. Sounds contradicting to me. We should face our enemies, but in a smart way like Hillary said. We shouldn't go into situations blind folded like Obama is talking about.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nick Tomasello, Mays Landing, NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:40:34 GMT

Senator Obama showed us all in his statement that not only is he extremely intelligent, well-calculated, and competent (as we already knew), but that years and years of so-called "experience" in what ultimately amounts to a flawed governmental system are uneccessary in order to promote genuine change. Hillary's attack on the refreshing stance Obama has taken just solidifies my opinion that she represents the stale and outdated politics-as-usual which has engulfed our country. Go Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

P.S. H., Tulsa, OK — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:40:49 GMT

Go Obama stay on the "pace card" not the "race Card"
Just what America needs another JFK think alike and do alike.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

rick,ky — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:40:50 GMT

WAYTOGO,OBAMA!!!! I for one an sick & tired of the same ole, same ole. Bill Clinton was the right man for the job in 1992, but his wife is'nt my choice. Barrack has my vote & i hope many more people vote for change. It's time for young & bold leadership, not this same cronyism we have witnessed in my lifetime(51 years). Hillary pumping up her number's to show people on an email list as supporter's, just shows me, she is the same Corporate leader as we have NOW. Obama is a grass roots thing, that hopefully will overcome the Corporate political machine That is Hillary. America has had enough bush, clinton. Move On. "DELUSIONAL THINKING BY COOMON SENSE AMERICAN'S IS OVER"

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chapter Cavanaugh, formerly of Brooklyn Park now of Seattle — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:40:55 GMT

Mr. Mulligan's (J.P.), Obama represents the level of progressive thinking that is desired by many people of the liberal side of the spectrum. Hilary is a safe bet, if there is one to be made, but Obama is just the kind of gamble that would propel us into 21st century America. The kind of America where we grow past the need for conspiracy theorists because our actions speak louder than diplomacy and the need for diplomacy over the counter and under. Whether or not it's a gamble the Americans will take will be made known at the next DNC convention. But ultimately he's needed if not for president, for control of the DNC bullhorn and those that support it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bona — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:41:20 GMT

Yes, you have made me day Obama. I have prayed for this day to come and here it is. Thank God!!! Hillary needs to be stopped from pandering. She never means anything that comes out of her mouth. She speaks for herself and not to the people. We need more of this. They thought that Obama will just cower to one corner and start weeping in defeat. No, he will fight back regardless of his desire to change the tone of politics. He did not start this fight and will not abandon it without drawing any blood. This will serve as a caution for the future. She likes decking her opponents, but this time around, she will kiss the canvas first and be decked. Warning!!!!!!!!! Dangers ahead, Beware Hillary!!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hank — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:41:23 GMT

I agree with the last post. Obama is just media hype. The media is trying to influence the election just like they always have. Clinton is light years ahead of the kid. Yes, Kennedy was new and fresh, but he had been in politics for years; not a state legislator. And take a look at his record. we almost had a nuclear war under his leadership. I loved him; but he wasn't this perfect human some want to make him out to be. Go Hilary!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Wallace Young — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:41:31 GMT

I'm sorry Ba - Rock Star, your inexperience shined through on Monday night. The fact that Senator Obama is now coming back and trying to explain his position indicates that in situations involving international decisions he isn't ready. That was the problem in 2000 when the President was elected. I remember watching a debate between President Bush and then Vice-President Al Gore, and thinking that if Bush was elected foreign policy would be his most difficult task. As we have seen Bush has never done well in this area.

I make this comparsion to say that Senator Obama's lack of international experience will continue us down the wreckless path of tbe last 6 1/2 years. Senators Biden, Clinton, Dodd and Gov. Richardson are prepared to lead.

Senator Obama maybe you should consider the 2016 election. I really think you would be ready then, until then keep reading the books on the Oprah book list.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bona — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:42:03 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rita, Chicago IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:42:08 GMT

Just when I had thrown in the towel on ever seeing a change in this country, OBAMA has shown that he can and will make a positive change for this country! Can anyone say, A Breath of Fresh Air?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Randy, Mobile, Alabama — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:42:09 GMT

Hilary was right. I think Obama has a very bright future but his youth and inexperience is showing in the debates. 2016 would be more his time. And for the republicans in this thread, you can hang it up. After Bush, there won't be a republican in the White House for a very long time, thank God.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chuck Ellison, San Jose, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:42:37 GMT

The complete question during the debate asked if the candidate would meet with those leaders in the 1ST YEAR of their presidency. Hillary Clinton is absolutely correct in saying that she would not. We have enough problems mounting due to the Bush Fiasco that should keep any president occupied at home and in reassuring our long-time allies that sanity has returned to Pennsylvania Ave. As she clearly pointed out, she would be willing to engage with them at the proper time, under the appropriate circumstances. To rush to meet with them in the 1st year gives them a position of prominence that could only hurt our interests.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Latte Liberal — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:42:55 GMT

Screw both of them. Defeatists.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Katie, Seattle, Wash. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:43:21 GMT

I agree with all the above responders who feel that Obama is too inexperienced...and yes, he does oversimplify the political world. I see no problem with the Clinton's being back in office - to me, Bill wasn't perfect, but compared with the current administation, his era seems like the golden days to me.

oh yeah, and when clinton lied, NOBODY DIED!

Go Hillary! I'll do whatever it takes to get you in office!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bee — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:43:34 GMT

Go Barack! point out the difference between you and Clinton. It is time America see what Hillary is made of - another Bush incarnate.

Enough of Bush-Clinton's policy. We need a new direction.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

T.R.BOSTON,MA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:08 GMT

This country is afraid of change.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Conrad Archer San Antonio, Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:12 GMT

It is a tired old saw that thousands of Iraqis will be killed if we pull out. Can't you guys see that thousands have already been killed? The killing is going to continue with or without us. Just today 50 Iraqis were killed celebrating their national soccer team's victory. Were we able to stop that? Will we be able to stop the hundred who will be killed next week---just because we are there? Iraqis killing Iraqis: before we came, while we were there, after we are gone. Get used to it. Let's bring out troops home now.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

CinderellaNot, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:15 GMT

Gosh, if he only had two days to respond to every question and check with his advisors and do a little research - well, at least he'd be ahead of Bush in that category. But, as another poster said, we do not need another rookie learning on the job. Sorry. I think he'll be great as a VP

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marne D, Missoula, MT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:32 GMT

I thought Obama responded very well to Billary's comments, he was quite frank and sincere. I think Obama has what it takes to lead our country, considering how varied his work experiences are and how well he appeals to the American people. He is an advocate of change, and quite frankly if Hillary got elected I'd be scared to death- 4 presidents in a row with either the last name clinton or bush...plus the fact she's stone cold....ugh. We need some new blood, desparately! GO OBAMA!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris, Virginia — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:53 GMT

Let these two destroy each other and vote for John Edwards!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Reggie F, Nashville, TN — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:45:07 GMT

How seasoned was Bill Clinton when he ran and won the election? Let's get real people, this isn't about being seasoned, it's about allying yourself with a Political machine, The Clinton Camp. Hillary has too much luggage to be effective as President. We need someone fresh and not tainted by Washington.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

STAFFORD, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:45:26 GMT

This will be the problem with President Obama....
He has to refer to his playbook to respond.
I don't think that will work in today's WORLD

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Daniel Becker, Miami, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:46:11 GMT

I can never understand why people are so critical over Clinton voting for the war. In 2002 the majority of Americans backed the military invasion of Iraq, so why should we criticize her for making a mistake when she was only doing what her constituents wanted? Either a lot of people who supported this war have died between 2002 and now, or we've got a lot of people who refuse to take responsibility for their actions (Which is typical of Americans). At least Hillary has taken responsibilty for her vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ben, Chiago IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:46:34 GMT

steve G: what an uninformed post. "He has no clout with other countries head of government!" Umm, I think he would have some clout if he were president. Call it a hunch. "Hey..let's just pull out of Iraq....and watch the countries people get slaughtered by the thousands...!! " I don't want to watch any country's (not countries) people be slaughtered, but since when is it the US's job to sacrifice our own soldiers and our own well being by paying for the war? And you're making a big assumption that things in Iraq will be much worse off. Check out the history of what happened with Vietnam after we left. Better yet, go back to high school history (and english).

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matt — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:46:46 GMT

The question never said would you be willing to meet with them, it was basically saying you will meet with them under any circumstances, which is rediculous to say. I was on the fence between Hillary and Obama, but now I am all for Hillary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jade Sepolen, Seattle, Wash. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:47:12 GMT

As the Presidential race gains speed global poverty is an issue that needs to be critically addressed by all potential candidates. Too much time is being spent on a candidate’s character and not enough on the issues. The United States has agreed to the Millennium Development Goals, plan that will put an end to global poverty by 2015. Unfortunately less than half of aid from the United States goes to the poorest countries where people earn less than $2 a day. Groups such as the Borgen Project are working to bring global attention to global poverty. For any candidate to receive recognition it is crucial that their foreign policy addresses these issues.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

GAnn, Atlanta,GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:47:34 GMT

Obama is charismatic and well-scripted.......isn't that how Bush was packaged for election in 2000? We don't need another "poster boy" in the White House again. He has some good ideas, but can he deliver with his lack of experience? I hope the Dems don't blow the chance to nominate a truly qualified candidate.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Daniel Elliott, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:47:59 GMT

Unfortunately for Mr. Obama it took him two days to give the same answer that Mrs. Clinton gave on her feet. Mrs. Clinton sounded presidential as soon as she gave her answer and much of the talking heads agreed that she “nailed” it and he looked inexperienced. If he meant to say we should lay the ground work with high level talks before a president meets with these leaders he should have said so. To try to clarify his position now sees to be asking us to accept a “do over” to his original answer. Not very presidential in my opinion.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tux, Cincinnati, Ohio — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:48:33 GMT

I really like Obama, but I have to say it, he dropped the ball.

Without preconditions, shaking the hand of the president of the country that thinks America is the Great Satan? I don't think so.

Obama, you'll make a great Veep for Hillary, though. :)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

wil ny ny — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:48:44 GMT

Hillary Clinton is like a teenage boy trying to score. She will say anything that she thinks you want to hear to get to hear ultimate goal. She has the ethics of a wolverine. You can not believe anything she says, as she continually changes her stance. Where are the missing papers Hillary? How can she run a country when she cann't even control her husband.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sara — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:48:56 GMT

Obama also, in an "off the record" chat, said that he alone of the Democratic candidates is the "most qualified" on foreign policy. You hear that Mr. Richardson and Mr. Biden?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jane Doe, Springfield, IL. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:49:01 GMT

The last nine people to challenge Hillary all committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head. Watch out Obama

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Louis, The Orange Bubble, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:49:27 GMT

***UPDATE**** Clinton pulling at strings to keep her lame political views alive.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eric, Denver, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:49:58 GMT

What neither candidate has really discussed is what specifically they will do differently. What will they do to decrease the threat of terrorism, what will they do to make us safer? It's all well and good for them to critisize each other and President Bush, but at some point if one of them is elected they will have to stand up and take action. What will that action be?

We know they want to leave Iraq, but then what? Wait for the terroists to attack again? It's time for these candidates to articulate an actual plan for national security.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tyrone, Atlanta — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:50:02 GMT

I wouldn't trust Obama. He grew up in a madrassa, so he's gonna cuddle up the Moslem nations. He's a disaster in disguise.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jimmy T., Colorado Springs, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:50:04 GMT

Sen Clinton is up to her ole tricks. She "played" president while Mrs. Bill was in office. This country needs a dramatic change and I believe Obama may be the one.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mari , North Brunswick, NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:50:13 GMT

I think when Obama answered, he was shooting out of his A--. They may have meant the same thing, but unlike Clinton, he did not fully articulate what he meant. As a future President, you have to think before you speak. Because things can and will be taken literally.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris G ~ NewYork, NY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:50:23 GMT

20 years of Clintons & Bushs is too too long. This country needs to wake up and sends these people (Hill & Bill back to Arkansas). In her second term as a senator she still hasn't done a thing but blow smoke (i.e. like the senate building right now in DC). This woman might have a fine education behind her but she is NO leader. Obama must be careful of allowing Ms Clinton to take advantage and to put a spin on his or anyone's responses. This is the same woman who hugged Arafat's wife then begged the Jewish community for forgivness so she could get there vote. Just for the record her responses to these questions being posed at her are lame

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michael H — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:51:01 GMT

Say no to eight more years of Bush/Clinton. Vote for change!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

SRHannah, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:51:15 GMT

Hmmmm....Hillary voted for a war based on the assumption that we (America) had been terrorized by Osama Bin Ladena who was "hiding" out in the Middle East. Oh yeah, and then our Federal Government told us that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

How easily you people forget that not only were congressmen & women lied to but so were we, the public. It's so typical. Obama is wasting his breath in picking this fight. The deception lies within the presidency, not those he and his constituents lied to.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Linda Love Jones — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:51:35 GMT

Why is Hillary Clinton attacking Barack Obama anyway!?! Each time Hillary trys to attack Barack, it makes her look stupid. She should be attacking Bush and his cronies! Everytime Barack states his contributions he's received, Hillary always tries to do him one better, or one-up him. Hillary, you ain't no Bill Clinton!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Laura, Columbia MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:51:52 GMT

Way to go Barak! Take the Clinton machine to task. Keep throwing this back at her and you're in like Flynn. Women for Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Buglebil — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:01 GMT

Fred Thompson we need you.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Mccarthy Channel Islands Ca. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:02 GMT

OBama is changing politics in Washington Clinton is going to maintain the status quo. Obama - you got my vote

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Errol.Barbados — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:13 GMT

Greetings from Barbados, you bring the type of toughness we in the caribbean like to hear and see.Keep on doing and saying what you believe in,we are with you.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JakesonSaunders, atlanta, ga — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:21 GMT

On the other hand, Obama is a pro-choice man methinks? So he will not fight for the unborn, who are slaughtered every day. Or do I have my facts wrong? I invite feedback.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JakesonSaunders, atlanta, ga — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:22 GMT

On the other hand, Obama is a pro-choice man methinks? So he will not fight for the unborn, who are slaughtered every day. Or do I have my facts wrong? I invite feedback.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chuck Mercer, Roseburg, OR. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:35 GMT

Obama,
Your response to Hillary is what it took for me to make up my mind. I am happy thta you are not afraid to fight the big machine Kudos! You have come of age.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jacquie, Clayton, NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:53:17 GMT

I knew Obama had it in him, Go Obama Go A True Leader

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Donald Boardman, Northfield, Vermont — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:53:20 GMT

Right on Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ib — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:53:38 GMT

Thanks Obama, it is time some tell the truth the clinton machine.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott, Ft. Lauderdale, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:53:46 GMT

It sounds to me like Obama is backpedaling here. First he said we should meet these unruly leaders and now he wants to stop and further clarify his intentions with the same words that Clinton used to say we shouldn’t meet with them! Obama could make a great president some day – just not today! Hilary Rules!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Doug Klein, Bloomingdale GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:53:52 GMT

Who really gives a squat about these two or what they are willing to say to get elected? The Democrats at one time had a real voice of reason, common sense and straight talk, Joe Lieberman!! And what good did it do him? all the entrenched Pygmies dumped him.
It mostly makes me sick to listen to these pompous a**es in debates (both parties)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Russ Davidson, Burleson, Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:54:08 GMT

I'm sorry Obama, Hillary and George but I am sick of all politicians. We are supposed to have a representative government. Unfortunately we do not.This will only happen if we place term limits on these people and get these nuts whose only interest is to line their pockets with graft money from their sponsors. I am fed up with all of them. I want a government who will represent the people and not their own personal interests.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Russ Davidson, Burleson, Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:54:09 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Brian Cranford NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:54:27 GMT

Obama's overreaction proves what a lightweight he is. What possible difference can it make that Hillary "authorized" the war? Even if she didn't, those eggs can't be unscrambled. It's not important for her to "answer" for her authorization of the war; what's important is that we as a nation find a solution for Iraq.

By the way, Barrack - usually the best way to "get out" of a war is to win it. And that's the problem with both Obama and Clinton. There needs to be some form of resolution in Iraq before we leave -- not just a pell-mell evacuation. It seems that Clinton is at least savvy enough to understand this.

Regardless of who wins the '08 election, you can bet your bottom dollar that US troops are likely to be in Iraq until at least 2012.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

cms — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:54:51 GMT

Excellent! This is perfect - highlight the stark differences between them and constantly remind the country about Hillary's Iraq judgment. She may yet rue the day she twisted Obama's words and made them sound like something they were not - lying is rarely the right choice, something she presumably already knows a great deal about.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rod, Media PA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:55:23 GMT

The next time Obama gives actual details on how he plans to do anything will be his first. All flash and no substance. This country needs alot more than that.

I can't believe so many people are getting excited over his political spin machine kicking in 2 days AFTER the debate. Pretty easy to come up with a witty response 48 hours later.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bona — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:55:28 GMT

Adam, you are a great guy!! I agree with you completely. The harder he lands those punches on Hillary the better and happier I will be.
She thought that no other person can deck his/her opponents? She will be shocked to know that Obama has what it takes.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jan, Chicago, il — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:55:45 GMT

Going by what he says, I like Obama also...however I am concerned about the friends and business associates he keeps here in Chicago. Do your research carefully folks.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

PHyllis Little rock — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:55:58 GMT

I love Bill Clinton, but Hillary should have never voted for the WAR... As a lawyer, she should have been the 1st person to read the entire contract.. Obama has to win in places that will be quite difficult, but the world is changing!!!! Go Obama....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tom Harrow, Denver CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:05 GMT

Like we need another Clinton in the house! So when they decide to strick again which part of a Clinton's anatomy will someone be yanking this time when people drop bombs on us! Perhaps if Bill hadn't been lying down when the WTC was hit the first time we might now be in this endless pit! I'm not saying that the policies that are in place now are working, but we shouldn't be taking a steps back to the 90's!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chandler, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:06 GMT

I like Obama a lot more than Hillary - he's honest, direct, and seems to truly want to make a difference. However, I still think that democrats are weak when it comes to national security, and that's why I'll vote republican.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Laurence Jones, Newport News, Va. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:09 GMT

Between now and December the country will begin to witness the manisfestation of a good leader become much better, and the months immediately following we'll see better transform into GREAT. Barack Obama is the real deal and there's no other politican with the same genuiness of heart or level of integrity at least not from any other major name in this country. Bar none! He will over take Hillary in the long run and in doing so will destinguish himself as the best candidate of any party this election cycle. There is no doubt that as time passes and momentum continues to build for Obama, Hillary and her war room will out of fustration and desperation when she sees that his rebuttals become more luminous mount what will be likened to an ole' fashioned republican styled "mud slinging" campaign against Obama. But in the end I don't believe it will work. After this administration heads for the checkout counter, America for the most part will have by then seen the light. We had a chance in the early sixties but ignorance stopped what could have been the start of something totally great. I don't think we want to revisit those dark days again. Obama you the man.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

katnip — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:10 GMT

This just made my day to see how many people are truly realizing the gift that Obama has! I love Hillary as well but it does piss me off that she didn't use her balls when the current President was taking us to Iraq in the first place and speak up then. I almost think she is playing the game too much and it's starting to be used against her. I am voting for Obama and I can't wait!!! GO OBAMA GO!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ken(seattle wa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:31 GMT

too raw, a rookie.....obama has a great future but would be wise to position himself now as a vp choice for hillary - for someone wishing to rise above the normal political fighting, he's learning that life just doesn't work that way, in the beltway or in the world....a little more seasoning and he's our man in 2016.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim, Portland, Oregon — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:57 GMT

Please, Hillary, shut-up and try not to make so much out of nothing. Any thought that Obama would run next door and play with Fidel or Hugo without asking permission and having a safety check is ridiculous. In short, Hillary, try not to be what so many people perceive you to be.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

GJ, Huntsville, AL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:57:23 GMT

I am so sick of hearing that Hillary is more "experienced"! Being someone'e spouse does not count as "presidential experience". Lots of women have had that kind of "presidential experience" with Bill Clinton. Maybe they should all run for '08.Go Obama!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mary, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:57:38 GMT

America, in the last two elections you voted-in the wrong guy. Voting for inexperienced Obama would be strike 3 and may culminate in a Perfect Storm for the U.S. Let Obama first build a solid track record before you blindly give him your vote. Don't tell me about how you "would have voted", but rather, show me how you will vote in tough situations yet to come.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

t.j. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:58:43 GMT

Hillary! Who do you think you are? Why are you a U.S. Senator? In New York? Please! Everything.. I mean EVERYTHING you are doing is politically motivated. You are nothing but a socailist. I don't want no Socalist ideology framing our consistution by this mad woman name Hillary Clinton. As far as Obama goes... Hmmmm... Got a lot of good theory just like many other democratics do however, most of them will never work! Conservatism is the only principle that can really work when everyone is on the same page. Communism on paper looks wonderful but put it into everyday life and its pure hell! Sorry Dems. I consider myself Independent but I'd rather have a Republican in office to prevent the country going left left left.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Aminah Yaquin Carroll — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:09 GMT

The media has not "invented" Obama...the Billaries are trying to use their media celebrity to lambaste him and it's not going to work because a sincere and intelligent individual with guts and integrity like Obama is so rare in politics that he is going to continue to shine ...Realness and honesty are luminous in Life and shabby posturing glibness, and lying like the bushes and Billaries do is degrading to our nation and its people.

Terry you are correct The Clintons won't step in a pool with out taking a poll and if she wants to swim why guess what outcome the tricky pollsters will spin for her?

Barack Obama has a date with destiny...if we get past the rabid racists and effete elitists in the deep corporate pockets of the past two adnminstrations, then our country ahs a chnce to be retored and uplifted in common decency and traditional idealism.

the idea that Bill Clinton or Bush was more prepared for the candidacy than Barack is bosh.

the bi-partisan nature and socio-economic extent of his support tells us that.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

SPC Booker, Ft. Bragg, NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:12 GMT

Obama is saying what soldiers, such as myself, was wanting our current president to say. How, as a leader, do you turn your nose up to another country and say basically, "I am to good to talk to you all. Pay homage to America or suffer our wrath." That is basically what President Bush is saying and soldiers, such as myself have to suffer the outcome such as 2nd and 3rd diplomacies. If you ask me that is a brilliant idea that the senator gave and its funny how all of these people have such die hard support for the war, yet never stepped foot on Iraqi soil. Ask me and I can tell you how it feels to be on a convoy in the middle of Baghdad with hundreds of people staring at you and you not knowing weather or not you are going to make it back to the camp to call your family to tell them that you are alright. I say go Barrack, we are routing for you over hear. Bring us home.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

M. Coffey, North Carolina — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:12 GMT

Seriously...can a Hillary supporter answer my questions in my earlier post? Forget the talking points. I want a straight answer...help please.

"I just watched Hardball about this topic. Even Hillary's supporter dodged questions like she does. Instead of answering the question they deflected the blame on Bush and tried to incorrectly frame Obama. The only questions I want directly answered is: 1)If you were so experienced, why didn't you read the NIE report before voting for the war? This was the most important vote of your career!!!! 2)Did you vote for the Iraq war because you wanted to seem PRESIDENIAL at the time or did you believe your were doing the right thing? Bush tricked me isn't a good answer or "PRESIDENTIAL". Can some of the Hillary supporters directly answer my questions without double speak.

Finally...since when does being the First Lady translates into PRESIDENTIAL experience? Does that mean Barbra Bush has MORE presidential experience since she was in the White House for 12 years? About that great Bill Clinton economy...INTERNET BOOM then the BUST...I lost my job and didn't really recover... "

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steve Sallis, San Diego, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:38 GMT

I will be glad when Clinton wins the nomination, and can ask Obama to be her running mate. That would be the perfect answer to me, as I believe that they both have something to bring to the table, in a substantive, positive vein.
Steve Sallis
San Diego, CA

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John, Springfield, Virginia — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:55 GMT

Obama sounds more and more naive with his each outburst. An experienced person would learn from his mistakes and if I were him I would do more reading and talking with experts to gain more wisdom. He has been a senator for only 2 years. He does not have much real life experience and he wants to be a President. We should learn from Bush's presidency and find someone who has depth and vision. Great leaders do not react in the way he is reacting to this minor provocation.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Phil Phelps — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:00:03 GMT

Barack Obama is a smooth talker who is essentially clueless. Maybe he can throw a big party for Fidel, Chavez, Kim Jong, Amadeena whatever, and all the rest of them, and show them what a great guy he is and how we're all just one big family. This guy would be a good replacement for Bryant Gumbel, perhaps. Not our President, please.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jerry Rosenstein, Endwell, NY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:00:39 GMT

When the original vote to authorize the war in Iraq was held, invasion and the use of force was supposed to be the last resort. Bush was supposed to thoroughly pursue every other option including following through with the inspectors in Iraq first. No one expected Bush to ignore the proper actions and go right to war. Hillary, like most other senators, did NOT want Bush to go to war, but to THREATEN war to be able to do complete inspections. In hind sight even Barrack can "predict" what would happen, but he wasn't in that situation at that time.
As to promising to meet with any Dictator or other world leader in his first year, that really shows Barracks inexperience. A president can't let others call the shots any way they want. What if their demands for meeting location, setup, or personnel were totally irresponsible or unsafe for the president of other American diplomats. A president can't just promise! There always have to be minimal conditions.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Amare, Chicago — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:01:27 GMT

Senator Obama's stand that America, the most powerful nation on the face of the earth, must not shy away from meeting any world leader if there is a need to meet is a pragmatic stand. To say this is naive and irresponsible is nothing but avoiding discussing the central point. In fact, what is irresponsible and naive at this age and time is to flow with the river for popularity's sake and vote for a war that should never have been waged in the first place.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jane, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:01:29 GMT

I think Senator Obama needs to take some classes in international relations...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott Bell, Woodbridge, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:01:47 GMT

Oh boy...Only a little more than one whole year left of this....Can we at least take a month off during the holidays just to have a break? PLEASE!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dirk Pt, Pt Charlotte,FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:01:50 GMT

Still support Hillary. We need a woman plus wouldn't it be great to watch the mass suicides by the neocons and absent minded GOPers!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jo-Ann,Lakewood,NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:02:18 GMT

Obama is histerical. Sorry, there are no do- overs. He blew it by not carefully listening to the whole question. He blurted out a YES. Hillary only made her response known in her turn. Them's the breaks. Since Obama is a "protege" of Joe Lieberman, perhaps he's not so interested in talking to Syria and Iran after all. Lieberman stood with him at his swearing in as Senator. The righties might love to "work" for Obama in the campaign too.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Don, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:02:36 GMT

Hillary couldn't keep her own house in order during Bill's term, so what make anyone think she will be able to run the country any better. We need a change in thinking and O'bama is doing just that!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

john adams valinda california — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:03:01 GMT

Go obama go, tell it like it is, i like you
by the way, i am 50 yers old and white

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark Houston Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:03:40 GMT

Obama blew it in the debate and is now falling all over himself trying to convice people that what he really ment was exactly what Clinton said.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

S. Tyree Henderson, Phila., Pa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:03:48 GMT

We need a change. I am hoping that O'bama is the one to bring it about - that's if he can get pass those lame a## "good old boys" that have this country in a mess.
Senator Clinton is not going to bring anything new to the table. She's part or wants to be part of that "good old boys" culture. They all need to be
uorooted.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe, DC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:04:07 GMT

This is ridiculous. Forty-eight hours after the debate, Obama can come up with the right answer. Wow! Fact is, his answer during the debate was quite different. Would you promise to meet with Ahmadinajed, Assad, Castro, Chavez, and Il separately and without preconditions in your first year as President. Answer: Yes. Nothing equivocal about that. And nothing "new politics" about post-debate spin. What is so Bush is the way we have to repeatedly have these corrections that tell us what Sen. Obama really meant when he said something else.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard, Jacksonville, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:05:04 GMT

Edwards/Obama08

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dirk Pt, Pt Charlotte,FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:05:18 GMT

But "bashing" the Crawford Texas Village Idiot is easy and really a good form of cheap entertainment. The reason many voted for GWB must be so they could feel smarter than the CIC. Wonder how foolish he would look on" Smarter Then a 5th Grader"??

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ina Ayliffe, Dallas, Tx. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:05:23 GMT

Obama is on the right track, but needs more seasoning. Who could be better qualified than Hillary Clinton, 8 years in the White House (perfect training ground) with the master trainer, and years as a United States Senator. I would absolutely trust Hillary with the future of our country and the world. If it made political sense, I would like to see Obama as VP, and then he would have 8 years in training.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bryan Hopper, Roseville CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:05:31 GMT

It'll be fun watching Obama try to tell Guiliani or McCain how to win the war on Terror when his ideas are "Pull out now" "screw the civilian casualties" and "I'll talk to any of the bad guys, no conditions".

He's a nice guy with good talking points, but then so is Bill O' Reilly.

I don't want either of them running this country either because they have no experience as a leader.

Besides, we need Iraq as a base to wage war on Iran.

You're stupid if you don't know that's one of the REAL reasons our troops are there.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ravi Kanwal — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:07:33 GMT

Dear Mrs. Clinton & Mr. Obama,

Enough is enough. It's way too early. Keep this up and you'll be nixing each others chances. Play nice or at least cordial. Stick to Bush/Cheney failings.
Stick to Whitehouse disasters. Stick to Republican nominee attacks and defense and offense. Talk to each other and have an understanding. At least until we get closer.
If you as the probable final democrat nominees play hardball so early, you'll make it tougher for yourselves and easier for the Republican nominees.
And neither off you have the lock on the presidency, yet.

So GROW UP and play nice.

Sincerely,

Democrat

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Brandy, Louisville, KY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:07:34 GMT

"I think what is irresponsible and naive is to have authorized a war without asking how we were going to get out -- and you know I think Senator Clinton hasn’t fully answered that issue."

correct me if i am wrong, but people in glass houses should not throw rocks.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ken, Seattle WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:09:09 GMT

Obama's going to make a fine vp.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rev Noah Wiggins, Sr, Hampton, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:09:42 GMT

I believe that Sentor Obama is the best qualify person to led America out of the mess which Mr. Bush has placed this country in. Therefore, Obama is getting ready to show the whole world slowly but surely.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dirk Pt, Pt Charlotte,FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:10:01 GMT

Perhaps some of these male commentators(in this room) need to check their "cahones" as they seem scared to death of a woman. Perhaps they are akin to GWB and are wusses or perhaps retired cheerleaders :)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

troy, Houston, Tx — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:10:21 GMT

Has anyone paid attention to Clinton's thesis work when she was in college? She supported communism or at least its ideology. She has a socailism agenda for this country and is going to run this country according to that ideology if she elected. What is even worst is both the Senate and Congress are both left and that's all it takes. Three things to watch for if she is elected: 1) Tax hike, 2) Tax hike, 3) Tax hike. You can espect that from any democrats. Hey Democrats! I don't need for you to take my money and develop so called socail program when I can do it myself! Its we the people and not we the government!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Allen Dohra, Henderson, NV — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:10:27 GMT

The main reason John Kerry lost the last election was because he found it necessary to continually appologize for any stand he took that someone else took exception with. If he had stood his ground and explained what he meant whenever anyone put a different spin on what he said, he would be president today.

Good to see there is a democrat out there that has learned that lesson. Go for it Obama. Say what you mean, explain it if need be, but never apologize for saying something you believe!! Name callers kept many in Congress from standing up against going into Iraq in the first place, out of fear they would be labeled unpatriotic. Obama is not the naive one here.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matt, Charlotte NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:11:30 GMT

This entire exchange is ludicrous. Neither Hillary nor Barak have done anything to merit even being in the race for the Democratic nomination. Barak has only one term of Senate experience and Hillary has done absolultely nothing to earn anything she has. No one would even think of her as a political heavyweight if not for her last name. She is an inherently dishonest person to her core from her days in Arkansas to the present. Bill Richardson or Joe Biden are the only ones that have the experience and gravitas to lead the Democrats. It is a shame that only money matters.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Aleigh Acerni, Charlotte NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:11:47 GMT

Bah. I'm so tired of hearing this from Obama. Why doesn't he tell us what he plans to do in the future instead of arguing about entering this war in the first place?

Pointing fingers at our response to 9/11 isn't forwarding the debate--our country is at war. That's not going to just go away because he says he wouldn't have voted for it. It's a moot point entirely.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Erin, Anchorage, AK — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:12:18 GMT

Either of them will be better that what we have now!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Zachery, De — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:12:41 GMT

I hope you people realize that hillary getting the nomination will simply result in another Republican president.

I think Edwards/Obama is our best bet.. that's the ticket I'm hoping for.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chet Leigh, Santa Cruz, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:12:55 GMT

Hillary Sucks. Plain and simple. She is a pandering politician, unwilling to answer for her mistakes. this will be her downfall. she is walking down the same path to the same cliff that McCain jumped off. And while i think that the 'defcon 3' remark is quite an exaggeration, this is the beginning of the inevitable back and forth sparring between rival candidates that we see in all political races. what remains to be seen is who stoops the lowest and whose integrity will prevail. Unfortunately, the best candidates aren't really given a voice, I'm talking about my main man Dennis Kucinich, a man who has led with honor, who, if elected, could really elevate this country to a new high, make good on america's promises to the world. But failing that, I support Barak.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Karen Durling, Davison, MI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:13:25 GMT

Obama has spunk and Hillary is a wishy-washy flip-flopper.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steve Ingersol, Monument, Colorado — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:14:19 GMT

Obama is once more showing that he is a diplomatic ingenue by ignoring the historical record of diplomacy with Iran - Republican or Democrat. He is not only a freshman senator, he hasn't done his homework necessary to pass 1st semester International Relations 101.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sherrie - Reeds Spring, MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:14:30 GMT

Be careful "Obama". I'm afraid with your lack of experience and your "I'm going to meet with the top leaders ONLY" is almost as scary asdealing with Bush. The only difference is that Bush says it like a little child "if you don't give me this,. then you can't have that". Obama says "I talk to the to man only or I don't talk at all". Hillary what exactly do you say?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

gman gray, me — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:14:43 GMT

FEINSTEIN?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Momo — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:14:45 GMT

This is what the election should be about: letting people know that America is here to reclaim its position as leader of the free, open for discussion world. Ike met with Russia, Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan met with our ennemies and that kept us out of blowing the world apart (Vietnam aside). Good job Senator Obama let mama know what is going on in this world.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MO Joe, Springfield, Missouri — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:06 GMT

A true politician in the making. Say something and then change your story and try to re-direct the negativity to the other candidate. Why can't people see through the games these people play. Neither one of these morons have an answer to our current problems. All either one of them has done is blame someone else instead of offering a real and substantive answer.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stan — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:15 GMT

I used to support Clinton but now I am pro Obama. Their attack on Obama explain while her negative is up their in the poll. Overall, I am going with Obama because he is the tomorrow in this run for white house….also on experience...Let's say you needed open heart surgery and your options were a young cardiologist or the homemaker wife of a former top surgeon; who would you choose? I don’t know about you but as for me and my family our choice will be the young cardiologist…Also, Phil Jackson a great basketball coach won a lot of NBA Championships. Maybe his wife should be in line to be the first female NBA head coach.

On experience President, Kennedy noted in one speech that "experience is like tail-lights on a boat which illuminate where we have been when we should be focusing on where we should be going"

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michael Richmond, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:25 GMT

How can we say Obama is inexperienced. We have a C student president that thinks 50% is good. I don't know if everyone on this page has went to school but 8 out of 16 is 50% and on a grade scale that is still an F. I guess that's good for a C student president.
GO OBAMA!!! RICHMOND VA IS ROUTING FOR YOU.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jeff, Iowa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:27 GMT

We just need to remember that the republicans are the ones we need to attack not other democrats.

The only way that republicans can win the White House is if democrats attack each other.

Lets cool the temperature.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sal Fino — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:27 GMT

I am a decorated Vietnam Combat veteran and while I am not crazy about Hillary, I fear the ignorant masses comprising the voters of this country will be afraid to elect a black man named Obama. The same may be true of electing a woman, and a Clinton at that.
I only pray that we can get out from under the republican yoke that is trying its hardest to hold down and control this country.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bill Frisk, Wash. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:32 GMT

They don't call him the Obaminator for nothing.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Yiannis, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:15:59 GMT

Obama opposed Bush's war in Iraq, Hillary gave him a blank check.

Who's naive?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MarY Will, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:16:21 GMT

Obama is certainly charismatic and intelligent but he has very limited experience and he rarely answers questions directly. Hillary has it all over him, while not as charming and personable she just seems more presidential. She will have my vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jimmy Sanborn — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:16:26 GMT

Who is Obama, What happen to his high school friend, the one his campaign said wanted money for information. Maybe we should pay him. Was Obama a good football player. was he in boy scotts. What do we know. Nothing that only experience and time can tell us. We do not know how he will stand up to world troubles and neither does he. Come on folks maybe he will be ready in 2016. Senator Clinton won this little duel that Obama has been trying to start by continuing to talk about her vote on the war, the majority of the Senators at that time did, thats why it passed. The whole world already knows all about this, so let it go. Lets move on. Again his continuous blows over her vote is immature.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MC Michigan — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:16:59 GMT

I have always voted Dem, if Obama or Hilliary get the nomination, I will vote Rep. Hilliary will tell you what you want to here to get elected and Obama is simply not ready.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Mesa Az. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:17:43 GMT

If You And Your Family Want To Stay Safe In This Country , Please Don't Vote For A Democrate ! Has'nt A Dem. Congress Showed You Enough !

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Judy Peterson, Rochester, MN — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:05 GMT

Hillary still appears calculating, hard-hearted, willing to say and do anything to get elected. Obama is refreshing and believable. Let's give him a chance!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sarah,Philadelphi,Pa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:06 GMT

I think the media is being very biased against Obama and they want to use this one thing to get votes for hilary.But election is way of as of yet.I don't think Obama will lose votes for this.The person who asked the question actually prefered Obama's response as did many focus groups,but the media is not saying that.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John S. Tampa Florida — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:33 GMT

Wake-Up all you Clinton & Obama lovers. Dialogue without preconditions is plain stupid. Have you forgotten, these are the same people who want to kill all infidels. The last time I checked if your not muslim your an infidel. Granted, G W is not doing a very good job at this point and I think we need to cut our losses and get out. It's just to bad January of 09 is so far away.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MIchael Houston, TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:51 GMT

It is a hard toss between Hillary and Obama. I don't know much about his tract record, okay he voted not support the war. Well you have to really look back at that time and how high America's emotions were. I supported the war then, but after finding out more I changed my mind. So did a lot of Americans. I think Hillary has the smarts and the know how to play the game. Obama seems just a little like a little boy playing with a toy that might be a little to big for him. Sure he brings a fresh new look to Washington, but he lacks the experience to be president. My fear is that he would get there and realise that it is a bit much for him to handle, like the retard we have in office now......

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MIchael Houston, TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:53 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

M. Navolio Chicago , Illinois — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:19:08 GMT

My goodness, we all sound naive, not just Senator Obama. We have a long way to go to find out what both these candidates will do relative to taking America in a positive direction. It's amusing that so many of you are ready to say Obama's the man simply because he responded intelligently. These are two serious candidates and I hope we'll all be serious voters and hold out for whichever one actually comes up with a genuinely different AND ACTIONABLE platform. I like them both, but still waiting to see either one present that.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

V, Las Vegas, NV — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:19:12 GMT

OBAMA HAS MY VOTE NOW! Clinton sounds like she will bring more of the same old jargon and closeted politics to the White House. Obama will bring a fresh, unprecedented, uncorrupted perspective to the presidency. Obama has pretty much sealed my vote, in my opinion. I was a republican, but I will change my party affiliation and vote for Obama in the primaries.

If only, he could reach out to Evangelical Christians. It would be nice to have a pro-life, pro-environmental issues, pro-marriage, moderate democrat in office in 2008.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

pablo montagna — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:19:16 GMT

This is perfect!!.. I guess these incidents discard the possibility of an Invincible
Clinton-Obama ticket??.. so now who's it gonna be?
Clinton-Edwards??

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Fred Johns, Vancouver, Canada — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:20:43 GMT

I agree with Samuel Doe above - Obama is the best thing to come along in a long time. It was also interesting to note that Mr. Doe is a Canadian citizen coming home to Iowa to cast his vote. As a fellow Canadian, I admire that quality quite a bit - you must have deep convictions and I'd like to talk to you about it more. Feel free to email me at King_of_Chips@hotmail.com if you would like to discuss your decision further. Canada does have a vested interest in what happens in the next election and Obama seems to be very, very good for us.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hao The Trinh — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:21:10 GMT

Now is the time for a new name other than BUSH & CLINTON. BUSH Sr. & Jr. got to war (Iraq1 & 2), CLINTON got us sex,drug,lies and war with terrorists. O'bama, Biden, McCain, Joe Smith will be fine with me.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steve, Simpsonville SC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:21:47 GMT

We have enough of the Clinton's. They have both lied thru their teeth about everything from his sex life to their financial dealing.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Toni Lozrioti, El Paso, TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:22:14 GMT

Anyone but Billary...anyone but Billary...anyone but Billary...anyone but Billary...this should be every American's mantra.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matt Shirley — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:22:30 GMT

This is a tempest in a tea cup. I do not see any substantive difference in the two Senators' positions. For the record, I'm an Obama supporter, but I don't feel that matters much to my concerns about all this Hoorah about an alleged argument over diplomatic technique. The media, and you folks in First Read, are hyper-focused on the "horse race" coverage of this campaign, and I think it is leading you to seek out disagreement and a "smack down" spectacle where none exists. Unfortunately, the candidates feel obliged to accomodate you on this matter. I'm glad to see Sen Obama is willing and able to defend himself from disingenuous criticism. However, this insatiable appetite for controversy is what sabotages the ability of the ultimate winner to govern. We're not helping ourselves form stable, thoughtful government here.

Please people, it's over six months before any primary votes are cast. Let's stop hyperventilating about money, and campaign organizations, and most absurd of all national polling numbers. As if a nation poll meant anything in State by State primary elections, let alone a poll taken 6-9 months before the people responding actually cast their votes.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:22:32 GMT

Now, I like Hillary. She is a tough lady and has been through a lot ( marriage problems, etc ) and I think she was one of the most classiest 1st ladies ever, but I do disagree with her stance on not having direct talks to leaders of countries America finds aggressive. Just because Senior level officals ( including a president ) meet with Leaders of a hostel country doesn't mean that America can't still be strong and tough on world issues and stand our ground. I agree 100% with Obama's statement about how we should converse with these Radical Leaders while letting them know we will not tolerate any hostile country and their threats to our close allies. I like you both ( Obama and Hillary )

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Brown, Van Dyne, WI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:23:00 GMT

When you go to war, you go to WIN, not when and how will we get out.
We have not WON as a country since before Korea when the political establishment started making the decisions and getting our people killed to protct the pockets of big buisness.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Deb, Weatherford TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:23:16 GMT

Barack has 25+ years of completely relevant experience to lead this country out of its current morass. Once again, Senator Obama I am VERY proud of you!! (Hillary, you're a fine senator...stay just where you are...Bill has gone on record as saying he thinks it would be a mighty fine idea for you to stay a senator and travel, relax, etc. Listen to your spouse Hillary....he's got the right idea.) Obama is the right guy to lead our country.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chuks, uk — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:23:20 GMT

why all the fuss u pro obama people. hillary sounded to me more mature and delibrate in her answers. that to me is how a leader should behave. she didnt say she would not meet with the leaders from other countries, she said she would have lower diplomats meet them first. this is so she wont have to make a fool of the US. thats important and not a nuance. the question was to the effect of a promise to meet with thoseleaders in the first year. hillary simply put things in perspective. am not american but i feel that hillary would b good for u guys. dont blow this and put in another bush....pls dont.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:23:34 GMT

Obama was absolutely brilliant during that exchange. He was right! Diplomacy should not be marred by another's misguided preconceptions. Obama should make every attempt to advance our nation's interests, and policies despite his predecessor's failures, using every avenue at his disposal. For instance, we recently had Putin visit G.W. at Kennebunkport. Kruschev and Nixon's had a fireside chat in a makeshift American House in Russia, on July 24th, 1959. As we all know Nixon and Kruschev were, diametrically opposed to much of what the other had believed ideologically. But dialog had opened the door for democracy, "the two had actually met face to face", and Nixon's subsequent successors had taken full advantange of it, thus freeing eastern Europe from the grip of the Kremlin. Diplomacy is absolutely fundamental, kudos Obama! Well spoken!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jon Roberts Portland, Or — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:23:56 GMT

Well, I don't think you really ask before a war "how do we get out of it", you plan to win and once you've won, then you get out of it. So that's pretty weak of Obama. I'm sure Hillary figured we'd win and then there'd be some kind of Iraqi govt with our help and then we'd bail. Asking before you fight a war "how do we get out of it" suggests a post-Vietnam mentality that it's impossible to win, so there'll just be a future time where you have to extricate yourself from a still violent situation. I think the one and only US idea in the few wars we should ever be involved in, is: this is how we get out--we win!
If before the war, you're thinking as Obama suggests, "how will we get out of this", don't go in the first place! You go in to win, or you don't go at all.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dave W, Campbellsport, Wisconsin — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:24:19 GMT

It's time for some real change and someone who has new ideals.We cannot continue with closed minded, short sighted thinking like we have now in the White House. Obama is right for our country, we need to be world leaders not arrogant and thumbing our nose at the world.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

B-man, Polson, MT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:24:27 GMT

Obama is the only candidate who can stand up to someone, explain why their position doesn't make sense, and seem intelligent and polite as he is doing it. Obama would make a terrific statesman, and he is showing us that in this exchange with Hillary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

DE, Scottsdale — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:25:53 GMT

STEVE G - youre an idiot.. "Of course they would agree to meet him..and show the world that the US has sunk to new lows sending a kid to do a mans job."
HEY MORON>. Bill Clinton was 46 when he took office.. guess how old Obama is? Thats right 46 ya dumbass...and if he's elected he'll be 47.. you MUST be a right ring wacko. go back to your budweiser and enjoy the rodeo or whatever youre watching on TV

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kathleen, Florida — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:26:17 GMT

No one should have backed this war and we are most certainly concerned about our troops. This was apparent after 2000 that we should not have voted FOR THIS WAR....
Bring our troops home and repair all these relationships, please!
Great job, Senator Obama!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jim boski — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:26:27 GMT

We need someone in Washington who can inspire the people. Someone who gives our children the ability to look towards washington and say" I want to be like him". They can't do that today. Besides, how many Presidential candidates have actually inspied a website like"ANYBODY BUT HILLARY"?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Priscilla — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:26:38 GMT

I've never voted Democrat but I will this time...For OBAMA!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

paul, Flagstaff, Arizona — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:26:38 GMT

Obama makes sense and is not afraid to speak up with some common sense. Too many pols are afraid to think for themselves and must consult with everyone before they speak. It is refreashing to hear someone in politics who can think and speak coherently on his own.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Priscilla — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:26:39 GMT

I've never voted Democrat but I will this time...For OBAMA!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

DLuka, Chicago, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:27:01 GMT

OBAMA..OBAMA you made me proud, You battled the Billary and were heard clear and load. You said the right thing because it came from your heart, not a political sound bite..like the one from that shark.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JUAN HERRERA SEATTLE WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:27:09 GMT

GO OBAMA TEAR HER APART GOP HAVING GOOD LAUGH HA HA HA

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Trollkong — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:27:12 GMT

The most important issue has not yet been raised:
How soon are we going to impeach King George, Baron Cheney, and his incompetent and ruthless cohorts? The present dictatorhip must go! They must called to account for their crimes!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kathryn Carpenter Phoenix Arizona — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:27:54 GMT

I have been a Republican my entire adult life and at the age of 48 you have converted me over. I am with the Obama Team. Forget what party you are, look at the man. I believe in him. I have put a sign up in my cubical at work Obama'08. The sign says it all. I hope we can all make a change, to change the country. I am counting on Mr. Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mo Du, Los Angeles — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:29:32 GMT

They should kiss and make up, then run as Pres and Vice Pres. They could play Rock, Paper, Scissor to decide who will be which.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dave, Visalia, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:30:11 GMT

Please, all Obama did was make another statement trying to make up for a crucial rookie mistake at the debate. Mountain from a molehill...that's what we need, an inexperienced president who continually backtracks and makes excuses for his inexperience.

Go Hillary!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kevin, Crystal Lake, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:30:58 GMT

They're both a couple of liberals that want to raise your taxes and control your life. They appear to have no concept of what pulling out of Iraq too soon would unleash in the Middle East and the ensuing slaughter and refugee. I don't agree with all of Bush's decisions but these two really scare me if they truly plan to follow through on their campaign rhetoric. It's a shame the Democrats don't have a legitimate leader among the so-called front runners.

Obama continues to see haw far left he can push Hillary. It'll be interesting to see either of them justify their previous positions come the general election.

Oh yeah - great economy! (if anyone noticed)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Charles Walton,Norco,California — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:31:20 GMT

Why insult the cowboy? I'm tired of cowboy's being used as an example of what not to do...July 28th is National Day of the Cowboy..Real Cowboys have ethics and a life code that well worth living and learning. Bush and Cheney are not cowboys.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Antdrew, Palmdale, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:31:32 GMT

You go Obama! Hilary, play nice. Everyone knows this is how you play the game. I bash you... you bash me. One of the two will win the Democratic nomination. So when the bashing stops, I hope the two will team up.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joymarie Lakeview, Arkansas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:31:34 GMT

1. How childish to call her Billary! How clever....not. Let's grow up.
2. She has answered the Iraq question many times. She, like so many others BELIEVED President what's his name when he said he had intelligence (now that's funny right there) that Iraq had WMDs.
3. You say she will say anything to get elected...untrue; but what do the other candidates do? Jump in with the fairytale of sitting down with leaders of other countries? Thats' like taking a bath once a month whether you need it or not.
4. Obama? How about talking about the real issues? How would you, in your perfect hind sight have voted after listening to our "oh so truthful' leader? Let's hear it....and why didn't you JUMP IN and say we shouldn't do that.
5. You make serving your country sound so easy and that's beacause you are so inexperienced that you know absolutely nothing about it.
6. As far as I am concerned you have no credentials to back you and your arguments are nothing but repetitive and the American people will see that soon enough.
7. You say the people want something different...what would Obama bring to the table that is different.
To vote for Obama would certainly bring a difference..we would go from a bad president to a worse president...that's your difference.

It should not be tearing down Hillary or Obama..it is about choosing what is best for US for this country.Think America and look at all the candidates..make up your mind on positive thinking and then VOTE!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

RJ, Redmond WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:32:09 GMT

Obama is back pedaling here because he said something naive and frankly stupid in the debates. "Obama said, in response to a question, that he would meet with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea in his first year as president without any preconditions."

He said HE would meet with them, WITHOUT preconditions. Now he is saying exactly the opposite. He knows he stepped in it, and playing it off like he didn't doesn't endear him to me.

I'm a democrat who is not a huge Clinton fan, but this points up Obama's lack of experience. We've had enough of an unqualified person as president with Bush. Let's not go there again, please!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris C. Maniquis Longbeach , California — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:32:34 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Paschal, San Francisco, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:32:36 GMT

Go, Obama, go. You have won this nomination. Hillary is doomed. We do not want same old lyrics that failed us. America's credibility need to be restored by people like you. Thank you for your strong response. Please keep it up.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Danny Moeckel Milan, Tennessee — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:32:46 GMT

AWWWWW SNAP. Obama bounces off the ropes and shuffles his feet while winding up his right hook. Hilary, a deer in the headlights, bobs and weaves but still can't dodge the barbs form Obama. A quick left jab to the head followed by an even quicker right hook to the body. DOWN GOES HILARY, DOWN GOES HILARY. Sad thing is, she didn't even know she was underclassed. Must have missed the weigh in.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Greg, Atlanta,GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:33:03 GMT

Good for Obama!! All of these politicians are always giving us some mumbo jumbo about setting up the proper diplomatic channels and preconditions for meetings, blah, blah, blah. Hell, they spend more time trying to create the proper conditions for a meeting than they do sitting down discussing the issues with the other leader or country. Where I come from, you gotta beef with someone you go straight to them rather than through some crony mediators. Stuff always gets lost in the translation. Finally, some straight talk.

P.S. The "Prestige of the Presidency" went out the window with the election and re-election of George Bush.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

csh chicago, il — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:34:12 GMT

Hillary was right and she won the debate AGAIN.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JanNow Baltimore, Md. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:34:25 GMT

I just LOVE it! See what happens when you "soft-sell" this young man as just another pretty face with a Harvard law degree. He didn't spend time on Chicago's South-Side for 'nothin. (But I am kind of sorry that he couldn't have given the senator from New York a little more rope before he had to show her and the rest of the 'nay sayers his stuff.) Count me as another proud "Obama Mama!"

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sierra, San Francisco — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:34:33 GMT

Lucy, Buford: 'Obama is NOT seasoned enough to be President of the United States' really ?
Jillary is 'seasoned', but she voted to go to war with Iraq.
Was that a good decision ? Was that the decision of a 'seasoned' politician ? Your call, Lucy.....

Betty, Abilene: 'he is showing me over and over he is not ready for prime time' So you have to be a Washington insider to be 'ready for prime time' ??
FDR wasn't a washington insider. Niether was Harry Truman or Eisenhower.
If Hillary doesn't want to negotiate with our adversaries, she should name John Bolten her Secretary of State, name Bush her roving ambassador and make Bill her ambassador to the Playboy mansion and all of America's trailer parks...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Delmar Fairchild, Barron, Wisconsin — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:34:50 GMT

Hilary's mouth piece is now saying she said the same thing Obama said. Now Obama is saying the same thing he said Hilary said. Whose on first??? What. I said whose on first? What is on first.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tom M, Vancouver, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:35:16 GMT

The man has class. You couldn't make me to vote for either of them, or any other Democrate for that matter. It's sort of funny how many prople are talking about how experienced Clinton is because she was the First Lady for eight years. As if that experience somehow enables her to hold the most powerful position in the world. If she is so influential because she was in the White House for eight years with lovable Bill, does that mean she will take credit for not getting Osama when she had the chance? Probably not. She was too busy talking about the "vast right wing conspiricy" and not "standing by her man". Oh wait, she did that too didn't she. I guess that does qualify her.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

mshook12 — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:35:21 GMT

J.P. Minneapolis MN hit the nail on the head for sure.
To quote for emphasis:
"I don't know why people are getting so pumped up about Obama. He has virtually no experience. For me he is basically just an invention of the media. If he is the best thing to come around in American Politics in a long time then this country is really in trouble!?"

Anyone excited by this "statement" from Obama is rather easily impressed. Many of you are preoccupied with the notion of change, but change for the sake of change-without any substance to it-is not necessarily a good thing. Our situation may not be great at the moment, but don't fool yourself things can always get worse.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

wendy, malaysia — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:36:46 GMT

i have seen obama only once on the telly and i don't think he got any substance of any kind.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Easley — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:36:50 GMT

I think H. was just "baiting" B. to see how he would react. Clever for sure, but he didn't react quick enough for me. Good response though. He's definitely a thinking man. H. is foxy though and will keep him on the defensive as long as she can. Democrats love a good political boxing match, and since our next president will most likely be one of these two, they owe us a good fight. From the fight, we voters will be able to see more about the person we are voting for and hopefully feel better about who we vote into office. I don't think it'll get as ugly as most Republican or Partisan spats we have seen in the past. I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't good friends out of the public eye, and remain so after the election.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nick Dorsey — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:36:52 GMT

I believe there are some sincere Obama supporters here though I will be upfront and say I'm a Clinton supporter and think Obama is grandstanding.

However, there is an interesting sidelight to this thread. Please note that a number of posters that are usually pro Bush are now posing as Pro Obama. This is a typical Republican disinformation campaign to create
dissension and chaos in the Democratic ranks. Divide and conquer. I will vote for the Donkey if necessary come 2008, but I deplore the insidious Repug tactics.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Christi, Aurora, Co. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:36:59 GMT

Obama has shown his mettle here. He is well spoken and clear in his beliefs and ideals. I like his ability to say what he wants without resorting to retoric. I say respect his "youth & inexperience" in fact I support that. We need someone new - and I vote for him.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

paul, st paul, mn — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:37:22 GMT

If either Clinton or Obama is elected president, it surely signifies the end of the world. Anyone who votes for either is a fool.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tony Hodg,Vancouver,BC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:37:34 GMT

I am going to see a person tonight who I would like to be a friend. Should I send an Envoy with a six pack before I go??

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

William Browning, Greenville, KY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:37:34 GMT

I'm a conservative Democrat(believe it or not). I say Go Obama!. He is a guy with real views, who thinks before he opens his mouth, and analyzes the facts for himself instead of letting the pollsters tell him what to think, reminds me of Harry Truman in that respect. Hillary is a carpetbeggar from Arkansas, who moved to NY to get elected, her only claim to fame is being first lady to a ladies'(Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, etc.)man. She has made a fool of herself multiple times--real estate ventures in Arkansas, voting for Iraq war, and health care reform. Comparing Obama to Hillary?? There's no comparison! VOTE Obama, send Hillary back to Arkansas. (Are any New Yorkers listening?)

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Greg Atlanta — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:37:45 GMT

IF HILLARY OR OBAMA GET THE NOMINATION THEY SHOULD PICK THE OTHER AS A RUNNING MATE.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Cleveland, Ohio — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:38:30 GMT

Nice try Obama. She is absolutely 100% right on here response at the debate and he showed a sort eagerness instead of thoughtfulness in his response. Hillary is right and Obama is to eager, I want thoughtfulness. Open your eyes America, she is right!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Leah PettePiece, Long Beach, Ca — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:39:30 GMT

Obama just is too naive and young, he isn't old enough or I dare sauve enough to be president yet, he gets far too hot under the collar for no good reason and obviously in this instance he sat aside good judgement! For heavens sakes! Hilary certainly is the better candidate, all personal problems aside she is a strong, sensitive, forthright woman who has stood the meanest test any wife can endure, and she survived! She will also I predict servive this!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Williiam F. Logan Astoria, Oregon — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:39:53 GMT

I think that Senator Hillary Clinton is wrong. I admit i donated to her campaign, but regreted so. Obama is right when he confronted her, but i also think he is wrong. I will be voting for Congressman Kuciich. If none of you have heard him spead i suggest you go to Youtube.com and listen to him. He makes more sense than the whole bunch of them put together, on domestic issues as we as foreign. You owe it to yourself to listen to what he has to say about the Washington electorate. I didn't understand him at first, but truly the more i hear, the more i like. I think all of the Democrates should rally behind this powerful man.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Berna Vadurro — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:40:14 GMT

Hillary Clinton is UNELECTABLE! If she wins the Democratic nomination the Republicans will win the White House once again! No more Bushes and No more Clintons. I continue to be impressed with Obama's ability to fight back in an honorable and respectable manner!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark Caughthran San Diego, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:40:36 GMT

We need a real leader in the white house Omama 1 Clinton 0.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Teri, Jacksonville, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:41:18 GMT

Thank goodness Obama has stepped up to the plate and hit a home run! I was begining to worry, I swore I would move to Canada if Hillarious got elected. Keep up the fight Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Andrew, Danville CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:41:37 GMT

Basically when Obama was asked whether he would engage in diplomacy he said "yes" and Hillary said "no".
Hillary needs polls, campaigners, and most of all corporations to tell her who she should meet. I want a leader…not a Stooge in the presidency.

If you want the same calculated seasoned, never knew what it was like to be an avg American, politician, then vote for the one who is most polished. If you want something different, if you want someone real vote for the new guy. His career reflects someone who is dedicated to serving his country without playing the political game.

But in the end either one is better than the uneducated, silver spoon, cowboys who want to expand Gitmo, and torture “Jack Bower Style” that the GOP is offering. They’re just plain disgusting.

GO 08AMA!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Reginald B, Maryland — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:42:33 GMT

The more I listen to all of these these candidates...It is clear that Barack Obama NEEDS to be the next President of the United States of America!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Pat, Portland, OR — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:42:42 GMT

I'm impressed with Obama, and his refreshing directness, but I still think he lacks the experience that Hilary brings to the office by virtue of her eight years as a kind of Co-president. She'd have the benefit of Bill's counsel, and his prestige around the world. I'd love to see Barack and Hilary on the same ticket, and hope they don't alienate each
other so as to foreclose that possibility

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

connie canfield — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:42:44 GMT

WE NEED RUDY FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

De Roy — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:43:01 GMT

OBAMA IS BEST THING GOING AND IS TRUELY A STRONG LEADER. HE HAS THE WILL AND PATIENT TO GET US OUT OF THIS SITUATION WE ARE IN. LET US ALL PRAY FOR HIM THAT GOD WILL DIRECT HIM.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ItsTimeToTurnThePage — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:43:06 GMT

Hillary sure did wimp out on this one. She had to go find her peeps to respond, huh? She was talking big and bad like Bush yesterday. What happened?

It's time for Hillary to stop the word games. The question was "willing to meet." Clinton, in her usual dishonest spin changed it to "committed to meet" and "promised to meet." Obama has not "committed" or "promised" anything. I watched the debate. He said he is "willing to meet." An intelligent position to take.

It's getting more difficult to stomach Hillary. She's a spineless bully, plain and simple.

Hillary had to go find Richard Holbrooke to finish the fight she started. What a wimp!

Let me tell you something Hillary, when you start a fight like a man you have to finish it like a man. Don't talk big and bad and then go find a man to hide behind.

As a woman, I'm not impressed at all.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

PI, Atlanta, GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:43:14 GMT

1st Point:
Bill Mahrer said in his standup Americans need to travel and understand the world better. He is so true.Hillary is exploiting America's ignorance and fear with the world like Bush does.
Obama is not afraid because he is a worldly individual.
Kenya, Indonesia, New York, Hawaii, etc.
She is exploiting America's fear with her comment.
I've been around the world and Americans stop being so afraid. The whole world is not out to get us.
2nd point:
Bush deals with the many leaders in the world that are dictators and exploits women like
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc.
3rd point:
I saw a while back on CNN "Madeline Albright" footage of her with the North Korean dictator during the Clinton Years. She is such a hypocrite.Can anyone verify this?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jack, Iowa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:43:16 GMT

Obama don't try to turn away from the mud you're in. We're talking about US diplomacy and not trying to hide it away by bringing up past issue of the US-Iraq invasion that Hillary approved. We are talking how to deal with foreign enemies if you sit on that throne. So stick to that answer and not try to sway attention away. If I bring up your weaknesses, there are plenty. And the topmost of it all is the STUPID & NAIVE & INEXPERIENCED ATTITUDE you have shown on the debate. You're not ready to lead..yet!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Irene, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:44:08 GMT

Get ready and brace yourselves for the ultimate mudslinging of words till the 2008 Primaries! I figured sooner or later the war of the words were going to clash with Hillary and Obama. While I like Obama, I just don't believe he is experienced enough to become President. I'm for Edwards - and unlike Hillary, he HAS apologized and has a great exit strategy for Iraq.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

C. Torres, Orlando, FL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:44:16 GMT

I see qualities in O'bama but not enough to take the lead. I believe in Hillary because she has experience and a take charge attitude. We need a President that is not afraid to defend and stand behind the USA!!. We were a country of leadership and respect until Bush took over he has taken us from surpluses to deficits, from loyal to our neighbors to being bashed by our neighbors. How can anyone expect for USA not to be hurting when we can't even see beyond our own fears and misjudgements to comprehend was is really going on. I simply believe the world needs more love and less prejudice towards man kind. We need to take care of our own country to bring it back to a more stable, respectful, progressive country and then we can divert our help to others at this rate we will help to save ourselfs with noone there to help. On the senators comments O'bama can say what he wishes but he needs to be responsible for what he says and not try to justify his words by attacking others like Hillary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bobby C, Greensboro, NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:44:41 GMT

I just have to respond to you idiots who say that Obama is a freshman. Keep in mind the Bush was only a governor and Giuliani was just a mayor. What foreign experience did they have?

I was on the fence with Clinton and Obama before this (talking to our enemies’ issue) but now my decision has been made. Back in January, Hillary said that "we should talk to our enemies" and now she is saying the opposite. Obama states his opinion and sticks to it - just as he did the war.

I'm starting to see some of the same old BS from Hillary that we've been fed for the past 6 years. Obama now has my vote in the primaries.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tarvin — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:44:47 GMT

One's performance in a debate doesn't matter. It's how likable one is. That's why Kerry lost the presidential race despite have schooled Dubya in the debates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sylvia Sparks, Green Valley, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:44:47 GMT

We don't need another old-time politician in the White House. We especially don't need the Clintons who have a sordid past, which includes questions about Vince Foster's death, Bill's being accused of rape by Juanita Broderick, Hillary's going on national TV, lying, and saying there was a 'vast right-wing conspiracy' against Bill when his affair with Monica Lewinsky was uncovered, the White House's trashing of anyone that criticized Bill. Yes, Hillary is experienced - in promoting herself. She cares naught about our citizens; she only cares about achieving power. GO ABAMA!! We need a change.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

William F. Logan — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:45:21 GMT

The lawlessness is rampant in Iraq. Everyone and their 2 year old daughter carry guns. What do you expect a society with that many arms to do? Your not going to take them away form them. As long as there are weapons in the hands of everyone, you will have shooting. Just last week they talked about several citizens killed because the masses were celebrating and firing bullets into the air. DA-- What goes up comes down. They just don't get it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Danny Moeckel, Milan, Tennessee — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:45:32 GMT

It looks to me that everybody is looking ahead already between Obama and Clinton or vice versa. May I remind the media that there are 8 presidential candidate . Can we read about their side as well .
2008 is new one for America when it comes to foreign policy , what we need is a strong minded person that can not be bullied by other country or individual . A person of dignity and honor , a person that can be forcefull and resourcefull at the same time . We need more time and choices than what the media are giving the voters .
Chris C. Maniquis Longbeach , California (Sent Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:32 PM)

Well, let's be realistic now Chris. You can really narrow it down to three. The aforementioned Hilary and Obama, and John Edwards. No other candidate stands a snowballs chance in hell of securing the nomination. Personally, I foresee a ticket of Obama and Edwards or Edwards and Obama. People have had more than enough time to hear Hilary talk out of both sides of her mouth and do her best John Kerry impression by flip flopping on issues. If she were half as charismatic and articulate as Obama she would have had it in the bag by now. You CAN'T teach an old dog new tricks. Time for Hilary to hit the showers.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

C WIlliams, Washington — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:45:41 GMT

Folks, I am always amazed on how ridiculous these comments can be. All politicians are going to tell us what we want to hear! I have served in the Middle East, Asia, Eastern Europe; I have seen senior US politicians from ”both parties” who have came to get the low down on what is happening - who cut meetings short to go shopping...to include buying Cuban cigars to take back to the US. We don't have any candidate on either side right now that will serve our purpose both domestically and internationally. The amazing thing is that our allies still look for us for leadership and guidance, but our diplomats and politicians are killing us with their indecisions and inability to govern. What we need are politicians who will put aside the party line and will work for the betterment of the US - - - does any one know such a person...I don't! God help us, because the politicians from both sides won't.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bob — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:45:55 GMT

Obama's a muslim...of course he is going to say let's talk to extremist islam, like the good little muslim he is.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

andi Kulp — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:47:21 GMT

Any confidence I had in Obama he just lost. He is a day short but a dollar and sound bite richer with his late comment and his fussing about "he said, she said". Forget that, we heard it all first hand.
Many will rally to this political strategy, not me.
Obama may not have voted for the war, he couldn't - he wasn't in office. He did not see the intellence assessment(slanted to the sick Bush and Cheney wishes we now know they insisted on). By the way the law toward open campaign fund disclosure Mr. Obama says he got passed into law isn't a law yet at all, he was a little fast with that answer too. Maybe Mr. Obama is too young, too quick with the fast answers, too little experience. The only thing I've heard from him I liked was his speech at the last Democratic Convention. There is a lot more to being President than giving one speech and so far that's all I've really seen from Mr. Obama. Finally, Mr. Obama shouldn't be affraid of Mrs. Clinton, but he should be affraid of his own quick mouth.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Paul Taylor — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:47:33 GMT

Now, if Obama would return the money he accepted from AIPAC, I might be able to trust him, but.... Allegiance to Israel means neglect of Americans.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

steve morales — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:47:51 GMT

SENATOR CLINTON SUPPORTED PRESIDENT BUSH OVER THE INVASION OF IRAQ,SHE ALSO VOTED FOR THE WAR...SHE GOT BE CONFUSED..

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark, Portsmouth, Oh — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:48:23 GMT

I can't see why everybody is so excited about a inexperienced politician who hasn't done anything but talk and use emotion to make everybody think he is so wonderful. Have you forgotten that Hillary spent 8 years in the white house with Bill and the country was prosperous and peaceful? She has alot of experience and is a tough customer. I am not looking for a president who is cute and warm but someone who is smart and can get the job done. Yes, she was fooled by the Bush regime into believing that Iraq was dangerous but hind site is 20/20. Hillary has basically already done this job once before and everything was good with the economy, deficit, and foreign relations. So why not let her do it for another 8 and maybe she can clean up Bush's mess.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Betty, Maysville, Ky. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:48:46 GMT

It is difficult to kill people you have had a conversation with. As long as we don't talk to our enemies we can see them as something less than human. Obama is right. We should talk to anyone who wants to have a dialog. Talking to world leaders doesn't mean we're going to let them have their way with us. This idea that America's too important to talk to leaders of other countries without first sending the Madeline Albright's of the world is insulting.
A am a Republican that just boarded the Obama train. We'll see if he can keep me from jumping off before Nov. 08

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

SCOTT, BISBEE AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:49:00 GMT

HAVE ALL YOU IDIOTS THAT ARE SUPPORTING THIS BUM FORGOT THAT HE IS A MUSLIM PIG? HE IS PART OF THE WORLDS PROBLEM. ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE ELIMINATED!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

nancy, missouri — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:49:20 GMT

great, instead of keeping the focus on the gop and the band of thieves, once again we are attacking ourselves. agghhh when will we start stop shooting ourselves in the foot?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

D.G. Hamilton Ca. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:49:46 GMT

If you are the "leader of the free world", why would'nt you meet with other leaders face-to-face so you can look them in the eyes and explain your position, why what you stand for is right, and why you think their wrong, and work the problem out. that just shows me you are a true leader, and not afriad to face your adversaries.
GO OBAMA!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eileen Williams — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:04 GMT

We're lucky we have a candidate with the maturity and experience of Hilary Clinton. I think Hillary's answer demonstrated both. The student should learn from the master.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard, NM — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:25 GMT

Wake up morons!! Every time I see this Obama creep on the news, he's bashing Hilary on her support of the war. Alot of people supported the same thing at that time. Who could we have known how badly Bush was gonna screw up our nation and world and how many of our boys were gonna die for nothing. Nothing has changed over there except they have gotten stronger. I'm not a Clinton lover but she's not the one who's at fault here. He's currently still running the country.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larry Shumaker, Grass Valley, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:49 GMT

J.P., you have it right about a couple of things:1.Obama has no experience as president (and, except for a small group of others, neither has Hillary or anyone else.)2. You're right. We are in deep trouble.
But, the remarks from Obama and his commentary are not the invention of the media- they came straight from him.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cassidy McFarr - Dubuque, Iowa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:51:58 GMT

The absolute bottom-line here is that Barack Obama answered that debate question like a naive rookie.

THAT is the cause of the attacks. You can't buy experience and competence.

Obama has hurt himself, possibly irreparably. Today, Steve Soto, a confirmed Progressive Democratic blogger endorsed Hillary for President.

I am sorry to see Obama have to muddle and fuddle and try to have it appear he is as "on" as Hillary on important issues, but he isn't.

He needs to remain a Senator for a few more years.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

usfa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:52:18 GMT

It really make no sense to attack her on the Iraq vote. Most people at that time were fooled by Bush. Attack her on this is like there is no other thing to say against her. We all know, like her or not, she is smart and able enough to be a great president. Also, she tackled health care when nobody else dared to deal with that issue at the level she dealt with.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JR, Greenville, SC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:52:34 GMT

MSNBC conveniently forgot to mention that Obama's comments were his response to Clinton's comment that he was "naive" for saying that he would talk to America's enemies instead of immediately resorting to bombing them (such a novel idea). Once again, MSNBC blatantly displays their pro-Clinton bias .

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jill,Mt. Pleasant ,NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:53:42 GMT

I'm disappointed Hilary twisted what Obama said and started mud slinging.I wasn't expecting that from her.She knows what he meant when he said it,but used it a chance to try and make herself look smarter.He's held an office for years now.She was just a presidents wife,and now senator.
I will no longer vote for her because she has shown me that she is just like these other politicians.She stooped real real low.EDWARDS/OBAMA or OBAMA/EDWARDS.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kel, Syracuse, NY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:54:12 GMT

Go Obama Go. Obama is speaking sincerely and not attacking negatively. Hillary is fake and wants the white house back to play vengeance against her husband's political nemesis. We're done with that type of politics. We want a president who will stand for the American people and not for special interest. Maybe Hillary should stop taking special interest money like Obama. Obama will catch up in the polls with her in December and will beat her in Iowa and new Hamshire, then it will be all over for Billary. I'm a republican and a military oficer and will vote for Obama in the general.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

mike, pottstown, pa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:55:11 GMT

Wow, some people are all upset because Obama didn't give a 10-minute drawn out answer on exactly what he would do to talk to other foreign leaders. He answered the question as it was asked. Basically said "yes, we need to talk to people, even those we don't like." Didn't need to mark down every minute detail.
Hilary tries to out-detail everyone and I'm getting tired of her act that no one can do the job but her. Aside from Obama, I think Bill Richardson and Joe Biden could do the job better than her.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Anita, San Diego, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:55:47 GMT

Sorry folks but Senator Clinton was right in her assessment. If you go back and listen, the question was would you meet with these leaders in your FIRST YEAR in Office. She said No she wouldn't, she didn't say never. Get over it. Senator Obama is green behind the ears and it shows with responses like that. You can't compare the world in 2007 to the one in 1961. That's talking apples and oranges.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matt, Huron Twp., MI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:56:01 GMT

WOW!!...So, all we need to do is have the "right" person talk with with these murderous radical enemies
who are hell bent on the destruction of our way of life??...Why didn't we think of this sooner?
WAKE UP!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Martiz, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:56:24 GMT

Go Obama, This is the type of President that we need today. He may not of fit in 10 years ago, but the world has changed, and we need to change with it. The old politics of the past have only alienated us from the rest of the world. We need someone like Obama who is not afraid to take America in a new direction that will bring back the respect we once had in this world through diplomacy.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark W Denver, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:57:39 GMT

I think that many people are beginning to understand that 4 years of Hillary is just 4 more years of the same old inside the beltway crap. I say, no more Bushs, no more Clintons, no more McCains, no more Kerrys; as for Washington experience...throw the bums out! Give me the new kid...Go Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

momodou L. sankareh, Everette WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:57:54 GMT

Go Obama. Now you begining to sound more presidential.I love that.It's all about consistency.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Wagner, Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:58:51 GMT

I see I wasn't the only one who received an email from the Obama campaign asking me to post a reply in support of his statements on this site.

Too bad Obama's experience and ability don't match the campaign's coordination skills.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ItsTimeToTurnThePage — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:59:19 GMT

There's a picture floating somewhere of Madeleine Albright toasting Kim Jong Il in North Korea while she was Bill Clinton's Secretary of State. The Bushies made hay of it a while back.

The whole lot of that Clinton group is dispicable.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larry Cooper, Houston Texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:00:49 GMT

Yeah... we've seen what "experience" has done for lying criminals Bush and Cheney. America needs a freash start. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!!! It's the right thing for America! GO OBAMA!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Erik B San Jose, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:01:02 GMT

Defcon 3...come on. Let's be real. Clinton and Obama are in agreement. They are just trying hard to separate themselves from one another...but it's difficult. The bottom line is Hillary's response was more complete and a reflection of her experience; Obama's response was another incomplete answer reflecting his lack of experience. In the end, let's all get behind Hillary, push her to pick Obama for VP, and then vote for President Obama in eight years.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

exiledknight — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:03:13 GMT

Maybe Hillary will set the smae level of pre-conditions that Bill did with the Chinese. Open the vault to our nuclear secrets and our missle technology for some empty promises and some magic beans! Climb the beanstalk and come up to the real world...You don't negotiate with terrorists, dictators or wacko's. You smack them back into place!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Shirley, Calif — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:03:23 GMT

Media headlines are certainly over reactive, Obama's respose was very measured though a bit defensive. But the reason their answers to the question are causing so much polarization,(besides that it is a contest), is that both spoke the truth, each emphazing one aspect. We're learning about the candidates, both Obama and Clinton have great qualities and could really compliment each other. Edwards is good too, so is Biden - we're lucky to have so many excellent candidates. Let them all show us their best and if we can keep an open, intelligent mind we'll get the best one for president.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ashely cavali — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:04:18 GMT

experience is an important element of a good president ,we barely surviving the bush lack there of.so its important in the international arena of politics to keep your self at a distance and not readily available to all countries to be a super power we need to play the part to gain the respect we have lost so hillary is the one .

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

L. Womack, Atlanta GA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:04:43 GMT

I think Obama does a much better job of representing the American view point than Hillary. Why would we elect another puppet to use the presidential to create a family legacy rather than to create a better nation for future generations? Obama shows that he is not afraid to voice an unscripted opinion and I like that! ALOT!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cristina — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:05:15 GMT

I think it is obvious who the more experienced canidate is. Clinton sounded like a pro while Obama stumbled through his words.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cameron, Ithaca, NY — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:05:57 GMT

Obama has just as much experience as Clinton. She was a first lady for eight years and served one term in the senate. She SOOO experienced. Let's elect laura bush while we are at it since being a first lady now gives you more qualifications than being a state senator.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

malarson2 Beaverton, Oregon — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:06:09 GMT

Ok, here we go! I've been waiting for Senator Obama to rev up and I like what I see. Like someone else said, it's nuanced, but the differences come down to brains and delivery. I work with someone whose sister was in a rival law school debate situation against him a long time ago and this was her take on Senator Obama: she said they were all forewarned about this super-brain wunderkind before the debate started and then they were summarily unimpressed by him for the first couple of days. He then proceeded to blow them all out of the water on the last day and there was nothing they could do but just sit there and watch. She said it was like he waited until the right moment to show how smart he was and by then everyone had so underestimated him and therefore couldn't stop him. If you read the great article about him in The New Yorker a couple of months ago, I think you would see the same evidence. He's just getting started. Watch out, Hillary, go Obama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Aloisius DuPree — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:07:07 GMT

Did he really say SPADEwork?!?!?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

American with Opinion, Seattle, Wa — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:07:54 GMT

Hillary's position of the war changes because like anything else in life, the situation changes, predictions change, forecast change, and our international focus changes. People change their mind and in some cases, if they don't, then it's like playing follow the leader as they jump off the bridge.

As for Obama, it's easy to come in and make bold brash statements where he will meet with all of our 'enemies'; well, easier said than done, I will be more interested to see how he does when all of the domestic issues come to debate, that's where we will see who really has a plan and who has illusions of grandeur.

If this is the best the Democratic party has to offer, then the Republicans just might be looking at a 12 year stint!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Geoff , Lake Balboa, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:08:19 GMT

Obama is a very well spoken man who presents himself exceptionally well. With that said, he has less political experience than Bush did when Karl Rove got him the presidency. His presence is refreshing but he is nowhere close to being seasoned enough for the job yet. Imagine what the backlash if Hillary had run for President 4 years ago with only 2 years in the Senate under her belt. She would have been crucified! It is time for the Dems. to work together because bickering is just making the whole field (of candidates) look like kids fignting over a toy.
I still do not see anyone that is going to give Hillary a run for her money in the long run...at least with the field as it is right now.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rudy — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:08:40 GMT

The Clintons??????????---The Bushes?????????

We need to break the cycle with someone else...but who???/

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Anna Cunningham, Minneapolis, MN — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:08:41 GMT

Call me naive, but I'm not sure why working things out with our adversaries by talking with them would be a bad thing. I find Obama's common-sense approach to be refreshing. His "lack of experience" is not enough to keep me from voting for him. GO OBAMA!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ephraim Calbert, Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:08:54 GMT

We have had experienced leaders who have been awful. We have experienced ones that have been good. We have had inexperienced leaders that have been good, and we currently have Bush (I will not insult any of our past leaders by including him with them). All that to say...experience means nothing. It is the desire to place all of us, and the future of our nation above "legacy", that seems to separate past leaders we respect from those that fattened their own egos or coffers. My personal opinion.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matthew Neel, Cali — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:09:21 GMT

Not talking to other contries is a new thing. I don't remember any of the presidents telling the U.S.S.R. we don't agree with you therefore we won't meet. That is how you get people to see things your way, meet. To not I believe is being a coward. To use force is the week way out, just like on the school yard, you don't have the skill to communicate so you just use force, can't get people to respect you, use threats. Basic life skills. Obama should have a simplified view of it, it is simple... For those with inteligence! Go B-Rock!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

mitch thomas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:09:51 GMT

None of the candidates are effectively dealing with how to bring a positive resolution to Iraq. All Obama has engaged in here is to try and undermine another candidate because of a decision that many agreed with at the time. As a Vietnam Vet, I well recall the death and destruction that followed our "surrender" of South Vietnam to the North. Forget whether or not we should have been there or not. We were there, we had incurred responsibilities to many many people that trusted us, and when it became politically difficult, we shrugged our collective shoulders and walked away leaving those that had trusted us to their fate. We are about to do the same in Iraq. I don't know what the solution to Iraq is, but shrugging our collective shoulders and walking away as most of Congress and the nation seems inclined to do is a poor answer. The US is about to prove again that it can't be counted on when the going gets tough. I, for one, have lost faith in our country due to our weak will. If we can't be trusted abroad, can we be trusted at home? I am ashamed of our short sightedness and unwillingness to value anyones lives but our own. Pulling out of Iraq prematurely will cost thousands upon thousands of innocent lives, people that counted on us. But just as in Vietnam, we won't worry about those lives just so long as we are comfortable. Shame

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dan, Spokane, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:10:46 GMT

Sorry Hillary and Obama, neither of you will get my vote. Hillary is a warhawk who blows with the wind, is propped up by AIPAC, and a corporate sellout. Obama may be a rockstar in politics, but he too is propped up by AIPAC and supported by corporations. We live in a coporatocracy that has two political parties: Democrats and Republicans. Both parties dance to the tunes corporations play, but when the American public plays a tune, the parties do not respond. It is time to look at Third Parties that represent the American public's interest and not exclusively those of corporations.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Allan, Phoenix AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:11:32 GMT

Ok I hear a lot of Obama does not have experience. But what was the current presidents experience prior to being in office ? Owning a baseball team, and as for Hllary her experience ? oh she was the wife of the president who affair that she was unaware of. I will take the freshman senator who has a vision of change instead of a senator who is intrested in being a carbon copy of every other president for the past quarter century.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Gil Seattle — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:12:11 GMT

O'bama is sounding more like Bush everyday.I'm
the big tough guy

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cover Girl, Seattle, Washington — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:12:53 GMT

Obama - is exactly what we need to tame our country. He cannot change the world or people but perhaps he can make a difference in this world that we will think twice before we make these senseless acts of war.

Hillary - Not that she isn't a fighter, but with the type of world leaders we have out there; I am not too sure she will get the respect she should as a woman carrying out a Presidential term. As a woman they will only see weakness and not leadership. Only the strong will survive...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lyn — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:13:01 GMT

Who was naive? She authorized GWB to go into war believing that he would do the right.

It seems that Hillary is now trying to back off her statement through surrogates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rae, Tucson — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:16:39 GMT

As a reporter I can say that both Senators Obama and Clinton are trying to play out something in the public eye that does not warrant so much attention. I give kudos to Obama for answering the question at hand- "Would you be willing to ..."- and consider Sen. Clinton's response to be the product of speaking without thinking first. That being said, I don't think that either of them have proven themselves FULLY capable of handling the pressures of the Oval Office. I have high expectations for the Commander and Chief and am waiting for someone with the political steadfastness and ideals of someone like Sen. Dennis Kucinch, but more political clout to step up. I hope that one of our nearly worthy democratic candidates will fulfill that role.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Dpo — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:17:36 GMT

I do not understand how anyone can even be considering Obama for the presidential election. He's inexperienced, brash and ridiculously naive. Please, show some intelligence Americans and vote for someone who not only sounds intelligent but has the experience to back their words up. Obama is an overconfident political child who needs spanked and put to bed. Hillary's just the woman to do it. Grow up ppl, please.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kumquatmae, Santa Rosa, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:18:18 GMT

To Elaine in WA: Your question, how did Obama know "before anyone" that the war would be "bad?" A lot of us knew that, Elaine, because we were listening to alternative radio like Democracy Now - with in-depth interviews with the inspectors themselves, CIA agents, mid-East experts, former diplomats, agents of other governments who warned us that the intel Bush was touting was bogus, that there was no legitimate reason to invade Iraq and that, if we did, it would be a quagmire, another Vietnam. We knew before the invasion that Hussein, a secular dictator, was actually an enemy of Al Qaida and had no connection at all with 9/11. Maybe, like many of us, Obama read Project for a New American Century - signed by Rumsfeld, Cheney, et. al., years before 9/11, which detailed their plan to invade Iraq once they could find a marketable excuse.

I was with at least 250,000 people demonstrating in San Francisco before we went into Iraq. And guess what...we were right. So was Obama and millions of other people who made the effort to find out what was really happening instead of being spoonfed the pablum of the mainstream media.

For those of you who regret having bought the bs on Iraq, it's not too late to start getting informed, because the hits just keep on coming.

I'm glad to see Obama standing up - have been disappointed when he said something real (like that the lives of our servicepeople in Iraq have been wasted), then backed down when criticised (or "handled").

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

steve — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:18:23 GMT

ya know that nappy head is a moron, i wouldnt vote for his black nappy headed ass if he was the only one running for president, i think he willmake a lousy muslim president, looks more like he is part of a terrorist cell to me, plus who wants a drug dealer in office ? he admited he was adope dealer in school

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rob — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:19:13 GMT

We've already slaughtered thousands in Iraq, pulling out will not slaughter as many. Secure the freakin' borders and screw everyone else! Let's be self sufficient like we us to be people! This adm is only letting in all the illigals so big corp can sell their Coke and Chito's as most Americans are realizing the consumer trash being feed to us at every angle (organic craze). Obama's got the people on his side, Clinton has the corporation and we all know what else the corp are doing, move our jobs to China. My company is closing down laying off thousands while Clintons pockets are getting stuffed! We don't need insiders, we need unity on the planet before everyone, including the rich rot...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

FJ, Seattle, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:19:14 GMT

You can not negotiate with the enemy because there is only one intention that is in mind, and that is to kill, steal and destroy, whether you take Obama's approach, or Clinton's approach. If you open the door an inch, the enemy will take a mile. America has been faced and called out by the enemy of 911, and instead of going after the man who blatantly took full responsibility for attacking America, we went after Sadam, which was commendable because we took him out of power, and his own government punished him, but why are we still there, and not focusing our attention to the real enemy, who has had time now to retreat, rest and prepare for His next move. We have no idea where he is, or how to find him. Our troops will be too thin, to handle another attack if it were to hit us now...We better pray, that God will hear us, heal our land, and protect us from the enemy, who is waiting for his next attack, while we leave our house un-attended...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

toni,charlotte,nc — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:00 GMT

you know you fools on here that talk about obamas inexperience need to know two of our greatest presidents abraham lincoln and john f kennedy didnt have experienece either! ans look at the legacy both these men have left on out country! hillary you were my top choice but i think you are definately blowing it! way to go obama! you have my vote! we need a new voice in washington and hes the man to do it!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Obama Support, SF Bay Area — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:14 GMT

It's definitely time for a change. Obama is straightforward and to the point. There are a lot of unanswered questions, and I think America will embrace Obama as the next President....when he first gets the democratic nomination. We'll see from there.
www.obamaforchange.com

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard L. Smallwood — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:43 GMT

Wonderful!! The more those two scratch each other's eyes out, the better for the REAL patriots of this country. If they keep this up, as I know they will, we can expect another and even greater Republican president in 08. C'mon Mrs. Bill Clinton, your turn.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larry, MI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:21:25 GMT

Honestly, at the debate Monday night I thought that Hillary got the best of Obama in this question. But after this fuller response from Obama today in the aftermath, I think Obama really has put Hillary on her heels. He's essentially forced Senator Clinton into a position where she is either advocating Bush-style gunboat diplomacy, OR she will have to back off her comments and admit that her policy and Obama's policy is essentially the same. I'll be curious to see if Clinton can come out with some type of 3rd response that does neither, or if she'll simply let this flap die down until the next salvo between the two campaigns.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larry, MI — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:21:28 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ed Bates, Rockport, TX — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:21:29 GMT

Senator Obama does lack experience, but as noted above, so did JFK. As a highly dissatisfied moderate Republican, I see Senator Obama as a great opportunity to redirect American politics and international affairs in a positive, constituent oriented direction. He'll need to choose a strong cabinet and other advisors, and he'll need to listen to them. Right now he is my choice out of the top contenders from either party.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jennifer Portland, OR — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:21:40 GMT

Obama might be ready for prime time in a few years - he's still a little green. and a cowboy is a cowboy - democrat or republican - we need someone with experience and responsibility. Obama just doesnt have the experience - neither did GW and look where we are now....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

steve — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:21:54 GMT

i thank obama is a republican runing as a democrat he wont,s to give the white house back to the repulicon he is no good for the usa

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dan Elliott, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:22:13 GMT

Its the media that is making this a huge deal. Both Clinton and Obama are just responding to questions aked of them.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

G. Roy, California. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:22:45 GMT

OBAMA, read this: YOUR PARTY PUT AMERICA IN THIS PREDICAMENT. WHILE BILL CLINTON (ANOTHER CLINTON) WAS PLAYING WITH HIS DICK AROUND AN INTERN, YOUR DEMON (NOT DEMOCRAT) PARTY PUT THEIR HEAD IN THE SAND WHILE THEY SHOULD HAVE WORKED AT LOOKING OUT FOR AMERICANS. YOU ARE ONE OF THEM AND I WILL NOT VOTE FOR YOU EITHER. A WAR MUST BE WON OTHERWISE YOU ARE A LOSER. AND YOU ARE A LOSER...I.E. I MEAN YOU BRING ALL THE TROOPS BACK HOME TO PROTECT US. WELL, LET ME TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE GONNA NEED EVERY OTHER COUNTRIES TO HELP, 'CAUSE OUR TROOPS AINT GONNA BE ENOUGH TO PROTECT US FROM TERRORISTS AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT IS AT STAKE. GET REAL, VOTE REPUBLICAN...PEOPLE CAN HATE YOU BUT YOU KNOW WHEN YOU ARE DOING THE RIGHT THING.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bob — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:23:17 GMT

Yes! This is exactly what Obama needs to do to expose the lies and hypocracy of the Clinton campaign.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John H — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:24:26 GMT

The recent dialogue between Hillary and Obama leaves you wondering why Hillary has her panties all bunched up but even Bill could not answer that one. He is always out there inspecting his aides for ticks instead of his wife. Obama and Hillary are both spewing the same rhetoric and just using different words. They both blame the GOP with no real solutions other than the standard excuses for the failure of American policies. America needs a no nonsense leader that is not afraid of the ACLU, Communist or Fascist World Leader Opinions, left or right wing journalists, or their constituents that have personal agendas. Let's elect someone that puts America first. Let's take care of American interests and let the other countries take care of their own. Let's pull our troops out of the countries that allow terrorists to survive and thrive and stop all economic aid to these countries. If the oil producing countries can supply their citizens with 4 gallons for a dollar oil and our soldiers are protecting their collective political a s s e s; should American citizens be subsidizing their future with $3.00 a gallon gas? Let Alquaida and UBL have Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakastan and Afghanistan....who really cares? These countries aren't worth having. Israel certainly has the capability of protecting themselves and will kick the crap out of any country that tries to muscle them out of the area. We even gave them nuclear superiority just for this occassion. America needs to take care of Americans. When they finish their semetic killing sprees in the Mid East, they will realize that they need to sell the oil to someone and it will be America.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

garfield plantation fl — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:25:40 GMT

Time for change. Those old enough to remember JFK knew that. Now, Americans, fed up with the lies that led to the gun boat diplomacy that got us into THE EASY VICTORY IN IRAQ may be learning the lesson all over again. It really is time for change with fresh minds and different approaches to the politics of the world in which we must be, and indeed are a member, not an enforcer. We should have been leading the charge in Darfur or Afganistan where we would be respected for our leadership. We screwed up big time with our invasion of Iraq. Lead on Mr.Obama. You have my vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Christopher, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:26:51 GMT

Will Clinton supporters please see this as an opportunity to review Hillary's voting record. She sides with Republican's frequently. She voted FOR the Patriot Act, if that is not enough of a reason she does not deserve the Dem Nom, I don't know what is.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Arthur W. Mingo III, Hampton, VA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:26:59 GMT

They are agreeing in principle, but the main point that the Obama camp has missed is that the question asked at the debate is would you meet with said leaders after you become president without prior conditions. So in that regard Clinton won the question.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Denver, Colorado — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:27:47 GMT

Black candidates do drugs when they are in power. It's getting even for the hardship they incured under white America. They are never to be trusted.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

gary, fremont, calif. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:27:52 GMT

obama is the only rational choice. those who sent is into this war, republican AND democrat, richly deserve to be shown the door.

let's start fresh.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Din o0 Fenton Grayslake Illinois — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:28:35 GMT

Does it really matter what he said, she said, we need someone with intestinal fortitude to take the lead. I remember Vietnam and it is getting clearer. Stop talking, and start acting, we have to end this situation, I've got two boys at home and they are staying home!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Janet Wright, Chandler, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:28:42 GMT

I respect Hillary and she is smart, but Obama has my vote as he projects a vision of an America that is strong and powerful but not arrogant and demanding. He has a vision of change that is unlike the last 20 years of Bush/Clinton/Bush. I find him refreshing and bright.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kirk Concord NC — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:29:00 GMT

Before moving to North Carolina from Illinois, I cast my vote for Obama as Senator happily. As a moderate Republican, I liked what he said and did in Illinois. I was high on him right up to the time of the debate.

He can change or attempt to change or modify his debate statements about hostile nations to the US but his ultra liberal I can talk to anybody and "hug it out' approach is completely naive. For Iran, Syria etc. it is exactly what they want to hear. I am certainly not endorsing the current policy by any means but the question was in the first year of his presidency... These countries support terrorist elements, not only ones that kill Israelis but that killed hundreds on Marines in Beirut (hezbollah). Talk of the annihilation of a state, repress its people, the press and any other outside influence to consolidate power. First year? Well if that is the case Mr. Senator, you just lost my vote!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

valerie,tampa florida — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:29:54 GMT

"Hillary had the most mature and experienced answer", so did Bush when we went into war with a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. So what does that tell you about experience. It tells me that some of us didn't get the right training, therefore, sometimes more is less and i'd rather take a chance with honesty and sincerity than mis-guided rehearsed experience. What more can we lose? This country has already lost its intergrity. I don't think theres a country out there today that respects the US and thats saying alot. How can you feel safe in a country when no one likes you. It's time to stop being politically correct and time to just start being correct. I want to live in a country that I can be proud of and i'm sure i'm not alone!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

G. Roy, California — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:29:56 GMT

Yeah,
I guess you PROHIBIT a Republican to voice his opinion???
ARE YOU ALL DEMS APPROVED TO RUN THIS COUNTRY???

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Karl, DuQuoin, IL — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:30:04 GMT

Excuse me, how do you negotiate (diplomacy) with someone who has one intention. KILL YOU. Duh!. Let either one of these political experts define this. No matter what you say or offer....nope....WE WANT YOU DEAD.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tom Cannon chiefland florida — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:30:24 GMT

Everybody is jumping on senator hussein obama's wagon but look how he popped off at the question he is not in the white house yet, there you don't get second chances to corect you reply there could be big bangs if he was unclear in the whitehouse he is to inexspernce to be presdent

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

dem dem — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:30:27 GMT

oh yeah - obama says he knows mor about foreign policy because he studied international relations in college ---jeeze! what a dopey thing to say! no wobder he is losing in 35 of 36 states.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jim baghdad — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:03 GMT

well bush may be a cowboy, but after 911 i guess maybe we needed to shake the world up a bit. let them know that america will take it to anyone at anytime. they need that once in a while. but now its time to get them back on our side. fortunately democrats are good at kissing the worlds ass. so either one of these candidates could come in to look like a hero. won't take much after bush. then they can suck up all the credit for things he put in play

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Harry Standon, Ballard, WA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:36 GMT

Media has apparently bought into the line that Hillary is the "experienced" candidate, and so issues like this one are framed in accordance with that idea.

To set the record straight: Hillary was *first lady*, ok? Does this mean that Laura Bush would be a more experienced candidate, too?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tellingit like Itis — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:32:16 GMT

All the great promises by Hillary and the Democratic party have fallen by the wayside. The truth and proof is in the inability of the Democratic party to agree on anything of value and their consistent and historical approach of spend, spend, spend and they cannot even agree on what to waste our tax dollars on. Look at the moral values they bring to the table. Hillary did not have the moral stability and values to kick her husband out of the bedroom after he was sharing his cigar with his aide in the oval office. Granted Hillary may not be a "catch" and possibly only got laid once but she should have took a stand on Billy Boy and showed the American Public that she was a non nonsense leader and impeached him from her life like the Senate did. The Clinton legacy will forever be linked to cigars, blue dresses and DNA samples from gooey stains and sadly Hillary was a bystander instead of a participant.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Trisha, Lima, Ohio — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:32:18 GMT

Obama voted against the war because he has ties in the Middle East not for the protection of the USA. I would be afraid of a any person running our country who has strong connections to the Middle East. Where are his loyalities? Not with the USA. He showed that with his voice against the war. I want our troups home to and believe things are not right but I believe the war was waged for the right reason, OUR FREEDOM!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Phyllis, Mesa, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:32:21 GMT

do we want the first clinton administration all over again....every rep for Hillary seems to be from the previous clinton administration.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Roxanne Putney — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:33:05 GMT

Senator Obama, I guess the best defense is an offence huh? I am not fooled by this positioning. I would not support you for a candidate for Presidency.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David, Phoenix,AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:33:42 GMT

It's quite entertaining to watch these two change their answers to fit the next days evaluation of their statements. They will have answers 180 degrees from these in a couple of months as the tide changes. Just watch.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Beverly Wicks, Castle Rock, Colorado — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:33:47 GMT

I'm afraid,in the last analysis, it's all about supporting Isrial. Both of them seem commited to protecting Isrial at all cost and the cost may be terrible. I think both of them intend to reinstitute the military draft. And, I don't want my 19 year old grandson drafted and killed for Isrial -- or oil.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Brian, Reno, NV — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:34:09 GMT

Why don't any of the Clinton supporters see her for what she really is? She jumps on whatever cause is popular at the time and then when that cause becomes unpopular she turns around and says that she never really supported it or that she was duped. Like many liberals, she doesn't really know what she believes. Whatever her current "belief" is at the time will change within a day or so depending on whatever the polls indicate is popular or unpopular.

When her husband was President, she stated many times that Hussein had WMDs and that he was a threat. Then before 2003, she concurred with a lot of other people that using force to get Hussein out would be justified. Now years later, she turns around and says that Bush duped us and Hussein never had WMDs and that she was duped into voting for the war.

Hillary and most of the other Dems, it would be absolutely fantastic if all of you could state your beliefs and stick to them longer than a few weeks without changing your tune. Obviously I'm not a Dem supporter but Obama seems to be the only one who states what he believes and actually sticks with it longer than a day.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joymarie Lakeview, Arkansas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:35:04 GMT

Anyone heard of Bill Richardson? He is the very best by far...fresh, experienced.personable..look him up and read about him and then make up your mind.He is the right man for this job. Thanks for listening to a Richardson supporter. This in -fighting is so juvenal!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Brandon, Billings, MT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:36:04 GMT

I'm not convinced that any of the 2008 candidates are worthy of the US Presidency yet. With politics, it seems like we ask a few questions, the candidates answer, or dodge the question, and then later on may or may not back up their claims. I'm thinking we need to treat this like an interview. They need to come up with a plan for many of the problems facing the nation and detail it out. Health care? What is it going to cover, how much is it going to cost? Can citizens opt out? Iraq? Are we withdrawing the troops? If so, how do we leave the mess we created in a stable situation while leaving? What are the contingencies? How are we going to recover the costs of the war? I think its time we quit letting the politicians lie and run all over us while arguing like 5 year old kids in public.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rick, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:36:11 GMT

Al Gore, where are you, man? You can fight global warming from inside the White House. Please get in the race before these two clowns hand the Presidency back to the Republicans again!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jen — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:37:04 GMT

I think Hillary Clinton hit back at Obama as hard as she did because immediately after the CNN YouTUBE debate on Monday CNN announced that their New Hampshire focus group not only felt that Obama did the best job in the debate (i.e. that he WON the debate), but the focus group participants went in there supporting Hillary Clinton and left supporting Barack Obama. They were quite clear on that. It’s too early to say whether the change in sentiments mean that Obama will pick up more votes, but this does appear to be the beginning of some Clinton-to-Obama conversions. These future "undecided" and independent voters liked what they saw in Obama.

Fox News supported another focus group for that debate (a South Carolina focus group) and the result was the same – they felt Obama won the debate (they went in for Hillary and came out for Obama).

Many also felt that Obama recently won the NAACP democratic debate, which wasn’t as widely televised. So, basically it looks like Obama is starting to get the swing of this whole debate thing. He’s got some work to do, but he’s coming along very well.

In two of the early primary states – New Hampshire, and South Carolina – CNN and Fox News focus groups pronounced Obama the winner of the YouTUBE debate.

The focus groups heard Obama’s debate response regarding meeting dictators (as well as Hillary’s rebuttal), and they DIDN’T CARE – the pronounced him the winner of the debate anyway.

I’m willing to bet that Hillary Clinton is PISSED about the focus group results and that’s why she’s hitting Obama about that response as hard as she is. She wants to tarnish his win as much as possible.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nancy, Monmouth, Maine — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:37:14 GMT

The best thing that ever happened to the Republican race to the White House is Obama & Hillary. If either one of them wins (which I doubt), we'll all be singing Kumbaya with Iran, Syria & North Korea in Spanish!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dave — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:38:16 GMT

Obama is off-base and this will only hurt the party. Hillary will get the nomination. Obama needs more experience.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lisa McNeil,Alpharetta,Georgia — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:39:47 GMT

I think that if Senator Clinton, Senator Obama or any one of the candidates can sit down with these leaders and make reasonable progress or maybe even great progress towards peace. Then more power to them!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dr. Douglas, Rockville, MD — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:40:02 GMT

If the next president were to meet with these leaders, and present solid evidence on the supposedly things they are doing in their countries, it would increase the level of accountability for them to make improvements. They would have to take things more seriously.

By not meeting with them, and continuing the same approach by sending representatives is not enough to reinforce our ideas. Do you think they would treat anyone we send seriously, especially without a change in policy?

With Hillary's approach, not meeting within the first year, we would be dragging things out for another full year, while things continue to sag and get worse.

Successful recovery of cancer depends on timing and directness.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Beatrice Healey — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:40:41 GMT

I personally think Joe Biden should be our next president...........so what those two do or say just isn't relevant to me. They are going to outfox themselves right out of the nomination

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chun Tong — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:40:43 GMT

I speculate some Democratic president candidates may want to meet Osama bin Laden to get a "peace agreement" to secure the "safety" of U.S.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Rehyansky — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:40:47 GMT

What a couple of clowns. My "dream ticket" for the Dems is Clinton/Obama. I could beat them without leaving home.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Sherwwod , Glen Mills PA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:41:18 GMT

All this chatter about these demo-publican candidates. As if there were any difference in this one-party system ( Socialistic - Communist ) disguised as two. Wake up America, you've long since forfeited your constituional rights to a group of corporate, treasonous rogues who have brainwashed you into believing that they are following the Constitution. They're simply two sides of the same coin intent on controlling the masses for their own purposes just as all tyrants have over the ages. Please, read the Federalist Papers, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Also ( I am not a memeber ) check out the Libertaraian Party and their platform. Maybe you'll understand what true patriotism is about.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ashe, SF, CA — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:41:34 GMT

Looks like HRC needs her surrogates to speak for her. First Madeline Albright and now Richard Holbrooke. Sen. Obama is just reacting to Hillary's nonsensical and naive outburst. As a democrat, I'm disappointed in her and she's lost my vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Shirley, California — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:42:25 GMT

I feel sorry for the country if we elect another amoral Clinton to the office. So far I haven't seen anyone in either camp that deserves a vote.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

R.T. Henley — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:42:58 GMT

Obama is just another looter, typical of democrats in general. It is scary to think that there are so many people who would actually vote for him, and for Hillary. Let's hope that the idiots who would vote for them come to some accord with reality before the election.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Elena Kleiner — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:03 GMT

How can anybody vote for Hillary? She is ACTING LIKE IN OSCARS. aLL she think is how to get elected. How can Americans not see her real face. SHE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE COUNTRY. IF SHE BECOMES A PRESIDENT 'GOD HELP US ALL'. YES, I agreed O'BAMA is young but He speaks from his heart. When He speak He is confident and He explains his thoughts and justifies them. Hillary has her answers prepared in advance. I do not trust HIllary period. I would rather have O'BAMA then hillary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jan, Nashua, NH — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:08 GMT

First, I want to agree that, if this is "DefCon3" or whatever, the MSNBC pundits need to get a life. This is nothing!

Ya wanna see filthy politics?
Two words: MAX CLELAND

I'm a Clinton supporter (who will proudly be voting for any Democrat who wins the primary) and I must say, I think the whole thing is helping both of them. These are two GREAT candidates (and, just think, we actually have even MORE).

So, this much press -- explaining both the positionS clearly and, dare I say, articulately -- is excellent for all Democrats.

Bottom line, neither of them is going to do it like Bush. I like that message.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Karl Bratcher — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:34 GMT

My personal choice for our next President is none other than Collin Powell, however it appears it will have to be a write in. Other than that I enjoyed hearing Hillary stick her foot in her mouth followed by Obama making her have to crew it. Hillary is wordless letting all her support losers speak for her, she's afraid of sticking her other foot in her mouth too. Unlike wher Bill Clinton run for president, Hillary has great competition that will not take any of her BS, she needs to make herself qualified for the office which right now doesn't exist.

Collin Powell for president.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Slackie Onassis — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:44:32 GMT

Excellent response, Senator Obama! Concise, clear, and right to the point.

The additional Clinton responses reflect their floundering for a proper positioning of Clinton -- to the right of Obama, but to the left of Bush/Cheney. Not a very comfortable place to be for a Democrat.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Galahad, Denver, CO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:44:39 GMT

The frightening scenario about a Black President, is the REVENGE factor. Once they got the power in the most powerful nation on earth, watch out, it's gonna be all Black Priority. Revenge the 100 year slavery, guaranteed.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Fed up with biased reporting — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:45:19 GMT

Why is it these two clowns get so much press time from you people. If I ever see unbiased news from this site I think I would simply croak.

MSM in this country is so politically involved that it's impossible to get a balanced view of things.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

lynda,texas — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:45:28 GMT

Obama is still "wet behind the ears". He may possibly sometime in the future (with lots more experience)
be able to lead this country, but not now.
With the situation as it now stands - we need executive experience.I would not vote for Hillary just because she's a woman. But I am excited that we have a woman who is capable of making well-thought out
decisions. She is qualified to lead us in a new direction. If she does not follow through with promises - then we'll vote her out in 2012. She can hardly do more damage than Bush has. My vote goes to Hillary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lou N. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:46:21 GMT

Talking about Obama inexperience? An old wisdom says," once you are gifted, the amount of experience weighs less in your success." Besides, there are plenty experinced people out there who can be great advisors to Obama. A presodent is a startegic leader; not a functional leader. He just needs to have the right vision and plans and let the experienced functional leaders do the tasks they are assigned to do.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

George,seattle — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:46:43 GMT

Wow, Senator Obama hit that one out of the park. The US need not be afraid of talking to anybody; Hillary's approach was timid. I don't think I have ever seen a politican say exactly what I have been thinking before.

There is a woman who is better, though. I just saw Michelle Obama here in Seattle and if Obama is a 10 out of 10 she is a 15 out of 10. Holy moly, she is the big gun in this fight; you should all try to get a chance to see her. Straight forward, sharp, funny, intelligent, charismatic, real -- man oh man if she were running for the President I don't think anybody else would bother from either party. She will make the best First Lady we have ever had. I'm glad she will be there to keep Barack in line.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:47:26 GMT

I disagree with most posters on here and with Obama himself. You can't commit to engaging all countries all over the world to talks, that's just unrealistic. If that were the case, we'd be having weekly chit chats with Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez. The President of the United States has much more on his or her plate than to engage rogue nations on diplomacy anytime they misbehave. I know we need something different than Cowboy Bush but the President of this nation isn't just there to be our national diplomat. He (or she) is there to run our government. And, if it is required, talk one on one with world leaders. But who is going to run our country when Obama is having chats with the misbehaving leaders of our world? After all, he's already committed his time to do just that if he gets elected.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Amos Ajo — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:48:02 GMT

If you have not heard it, today five Bulgarian nurses and a doctor were set free from that dictator called Gaddafi. Do you know how it happened? It took less than 25 minutes by the visit of French President Nicola Sarcozy. He told Gaddafi that before anything else let us free the five Bulgarian nurses and the doctor.
These people have been in prison and were about to be executed. They have been in prison for over 8 years - during the so called Hillary Diplomacy Model going back and forth but nothing happened. President Sarcozy with one visit got the job done. Presient Kennedy said, nations do not have friends, nations have interests.

Hillary claims to have experience but the truth of the matter is, she does not have a brain of her own. She often called the old guards during her husband presidentcy to use their brain for her. When Hillary voted for the war, she claimed that her vote was based on her experience in the White house. What experience?

I am very pleased to have Obama bring sense to what appears to be a joke among these people claiming to have experience. They have made this Great nation built by great minds look like a joke. How many times have you seen Sec. Rice, dress nicely, smile, wave her hands and meet with the servants of these dictators and come back empty handed?
Obama will meet with the the Iranian dictator and said, we can not allow you have nuclear bomb. I guarantee, he will stop it.
The Diplomacy Sen Clinton is talking about is like the old days of buying a car. You have the manager in the back - well back. The salesperson comes to meet with the buyer, the buyer makes an offer, the salesperson takes the offer to the manager and it goes on and on.

I am pleased someone has finally come around to make sense. Keep up the good work OBAMA!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

melanie, boston, ma — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:48:33 GMT

Obama is a well marketed machine politician from Chicago I initially supported the guy, now I can't stand him. He is constantly positioning himself as a savior. I don't want a savior. I want a competent president. GO HILLARY!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Wes San Rafael, Ca — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:50:37 GMT

Senator Clinton can not continue to deflect criticisms of her War Vote toward George W. Bush. Everyone can see his administration was an utter failure; probably the worst ever. With that said the fact is Hillary, just like the Bush administration has the blood of this war on her hands; and bears as much responsibility as the Bush administration does. Obama needs to pin that to her; and full court press that as a fundamental flaw in Judgment. Turn the page on two family rule in America.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dumbo — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:52:20 GMT

That's great Obama! Now, if we can only do something about those ears of yours.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sam Aderinsoye — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:53:24 GMT

Oba......What....? experience from Illinois legislature..... does not meet Presidential pre-requisite. Candidate…? may be President…. Nooooooooo!!!!!
Go Hillary.!!!..go..!!!..

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Matt B. — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:53:52 GMT

The world of international diplomacy is lofty and rarified and, like a royal court, rife with protocol and etiquette. That's why diplomacy is the responsibility of the professionals in the State Department, who would presumably implement any Obama directives in a diplomatically acceptable fashion. Clinton's scolding was shallow (like someone who insists on correcting your grammar) and obviously an attempt to exploit a supposed weakness.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hope 2008 — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:56:49 GMT

Any Democrat who votes for Hilary is being naive...Hilary will not win in a general election....Obama would...he offers new leadership and a willingness to listen and speak to others both here at home and internationally...Please Dems wake-up and vote for Obama....our country can not take another Republican Administration run by special interests and fear mongering...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Vee, Chesterfield, NJ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:58:12 GMT

It's time for a change in America; it's ObamaTime! Keep fighting the good fight, Barak.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Keith, Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:59:30 GMT

This is politics as usual. A candidate makes what appears to be a clear statement, is criticized by another candidate for what they said, responds by saying that is not what they meant, then attacks back to obscure the original issue. The supporters of each will think their candidate wins the skirmish, which results in no change to the standing of either candidate. Wonderful.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Fernando Smith, Palm Coast, FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:47 GMT

Hey Hillary since you and Bill love the people of color so much in this world why did Bill not do one thing to stop the GENICIDE in RAWANDA??? wake up African Americans !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

James Forney, Bowie MD — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:01:16 GMT

I wasn't sure about Senator Clinton before this issue, now I am. She has lost my vote forever in this race for the presidency. As a black man, I resent highly the degradng language Ms Clinton used in response to Obama's comment. She could have said the same thing without the obvious disrespect, she has lost this voter's respect. I am sure that there are many other black men who feel as I do. Ms Clinton obviously does not belive that one can disagree without being disagreeable, we've had enough of that from George Bush and his cronies.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Warren, Seattle, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:02:07 GMT

Obama's response to the U-Tuber was well-intentioned, and I agree with the premises underlying his response. But I have to reluctantly agree with Hillary that he went too far in unequivically answering 'yes' to such a front-loaded question (no less than five hostile world leaders within the 1st 12 months?). In defending himself against the shape-shifting viper, it would serve him well to offer frank acknowledgement that this may not be feasible as specified in the question. At the same time, he should continue to emphasize the main differentiator: that he at least has the political courage to suggest it is not only possible, but necessary for the US to sit down with and glare at it's greatest enemies at the world table - no matter how bad the stench wafting in from across it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mensah Bonsu, Worcester, Ma — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:03:40 GMT

Obama is now trying to change what he already said in the debate. He's a flip flopper. He has no experience and it's beginning to show. He should not change what many of us saw on TV that day and try to be a tough guy the day after.His advisers told him he goofed but he's trying to show that he knows what he's talking about.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Larisa C., Anaheim, California — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:03:41 GMT

Obama, you're the man!. I was going to vote for Hillary, but if she's going to wait a year before she decides to begin dialogue with other countries, then she doesn't have what it takes to be President. Diplomacy is a President's job. We're still in Iraq because there has been no dialogue or diplomacy for years!. Is Hillary really a Republican at heart?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Sherwwod , Glen Mills PA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:07:01 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Charles O., Fairfield, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:07:21 GMT

The point is to deal with your problems head-on, from the top down. It's time to stop letting the peons do all the work only for the high level folks to blow it off. Our current foriegn policy has left us as one of the most hated nations in the world and the way to change it is by doing some hard work, including dealing with people that we have extremely strained relationships with. And you can only do that face to face.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Redmond, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:08:59 GMT

I was waiting to see how long it would take for the Clinton's to start rolling out the Clintonistas to
cover Hillary's incompetent behind. And lo and behold, today they've rolled out old Bill Clinton Administration puppets (Madeline Halfbright Albright and Richard Hollbrook) to try to paint Hillary as the savvy diplomat that she widhes she was. In the interim, Obama is playing it cool and addressing the
real issues versus Hillary's constant littany of bashing Bush. She has no plan and no answers with the exception of "search and destroy" anyone who gets in her way. Watch your back Obama as the Clinton's are starting to move on you.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe, DC — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:09:31 GMT

But of course, former U.N. Ambassador's views on this mean nothing in the face of the statements of Sen. Obama--the self-professed most qualfied foreign relations person on the planet. Based, as he himself said today (chuckle, chuckle) that he lived in foreign countries as a child. I mean, you can't make this stuff up.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stephen, Houston, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:09:31 GMT

Experience is great at getting you more money on the job but I think the Enron Exec.'s had a lot of experience too and all we got for that experience was a lot of people with no retirement. All experience does is make the American people buy your BS and since Obama is fresh the American people are going to hold him responsible for what he does while in office and he wants them to.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

leslie russ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:09:42 GMT

He can blow it out his a-- anyway. because Hilary Clinton is our next president.
AMEN

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris, SC — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:10:38 GMT

After the debate, I and my friends have decided that Obama is the best leader we can ever get for 2008 presidency. We think Clinton will be just the same old politics as usual; she did not give straight aswears to honest questions at all. I don't think that a president should live in a bubble as to think that to talk to other nations without demanding conditions be met is the right way to go. This is exactly the same policy that has failed and gotten as in a worse position!!. We really need common sense and Obama really gets it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

rossypi — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:10:41 GMT

OBAMA HAS NO EXPRIENCE/NO SUBSTANCE ALL HE DOES JUST TALK HE BARELY TWO YEARS IN THE SENATE; HES A SARCASTIC GUY- MANILULATIVE ASKING LOTS OF MEONEY FROM POOR PEOPLE. HE THINK HE CAN WIN HES A BALCK GUY AND HES A BAD DUE...THW WR IS FROM THE BUSH NOT FROM THE CLINTONS- ALL AMERICAN PEOPLE AND CONGRESS AND SENATE WAS MISLEAD BY THE LIED FORM BUSH NO WMD; AFTER WARDS CANT YOU UNDERSTAND WHY BLAME HILLARY- IS BUSH WAR.UR BRAIN IS HAMBURGER SO STUPID DONT UNDERSTAND.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

George Thomson — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:11:13 GMT

A black president,...a yellow president...a green president...a purple president. Obama is a many would call Black or coloured or what have you...but he is if anything..intelligent. Albeit everyone in politics has to play the polls...and Obama has to also. Your democratic vote to you seems to be a vague moment by checking a box and giving away your vote for another 4 years. So why do you ask do i not support Hillary; obvious to me. Obama is passionate towards his views and not towards a presidency...yes he does desire the presidency but not at the cost of his passions....Hillary,...not so much. America will be justly represented by Obama. It is time for Obama..not because of colour but because of what is needed...a man who is built to lead. Why not Clinton....not because she is a woman because if there was a woman of strength to give Obama a run then perhaps that particular She would draw the desire. Step out of your shell Obama and do what America needs...not just for Black America but for all Americans. You Sir are the JFK we have all been waiting for

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Trudy Irwin — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:11:32 GMT

Yes, Obama! We need a fresh voice in the White House.(Hillary will be too busy arranging the furniture she left behind during herfirst year, while Obama will be forging a presence). It is ridiculous for Hillary to say that any meetings would not have some prior groundwork and briefings, as the paid staff of any president do those things as a matter of course for the leader of the land.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:12:09 GMT

In actuality, our candidates should heighten their awareness of domestic matters. I have never seen so little
concern for the well being of their fellow Americans, as is now being displayed by our trusted political servants.
Gas prices...Health care.... costs of college education, gas at the pump, prescription drug costs, local, state,
and federal income taxes up up and away, cell phone, land line taxes, property taxes, housing costs,
apartment costs, cable television costs, food costs, mortage rates causing record foreclosures. Fascinating, one would imagine that these issues should have more practical importance for our candidates, and the leaders whom are serving...and the media, than a continual focus on the Iraqi abyss.
Their problems have somehow become our problems, and they to you...are more important than us, but their issues are as alien to the common American as Obi Wan Kenobi. Please break this destructive pattern and put the United States Of America first and foremost on your agenda. We deserve much better....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

rossypi — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:13:07 GMT

OBAMA THINK HES NICE-HE A BULLY NEGRO- NO EXPREIENCE AND NO SUBSATNCE- OABAM GET OUT THIS COUNTRY AND GO BACK TO THE EKNYA COUNTRY UR NOT BELONG EHRE USA.
WAR IS FROM BSUH NOT CLINTON A VICTIM AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE-UR VERY SARCASTIC GUY UR AN OX YEAR BORN ..

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

rossypi — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:13:49 GMT

negro oabam qaurrel with the white dignified woman- shame on you obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dean Martinez — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:14:31 GMT

It is about time to clarify to the tainted politicians in Washington that we support a fresh and new generation of politics. The fact that everyone says that Hillary is the best option is exactly the reason for our problems today. She voted for the war and everyone wants to put a medal on her, c'mon people she is a tainted politician who will do whatever to fulfill her ego. Too many ignorant people in this country want to continue with the same 'ol thing. OBAMA is our Generations leader. Today we move to creating a new face of Politics with new ideas, and cander. The Regan BUSh, kennedy and Clinton Eras are the past generation. We are the Future and our new Future is with Barack Obama. Go Barack!!!! New Mexico is pulling for you.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hakim Rasheed — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:17:21 GMT

At last Obama is turning up the heat on Clinton. Way to take it to her! Clinton has been getting a pass on her Iraq vote for way too long. Obama's got to keep the pressure on her!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jeff Mallaber, Conifer, Colorado — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:20:03 GMT

I'm impressed...Obama, the more I here from you the more I like you, you haven't got my vote yet but I'm starting to lean towards you!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John M, Phoenix,AZ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:20:10 GMT

Prestige of the presidency. This administration has probably done more to undermine the "Prestige of the presidency" than anything Hillary or Obama could possibly say or do. Obama may be naive in some Geo- political circles, but for Hillary to say I don't like the way you play this game, so I'm going to take all my toys and go home is immature and just bad politics. Hillarys got to get over this woman scorned thing.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

CinderellaNot, CO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:20:53 GMT

The most amusing thing about this thread is the ignorant rantings of GOPpers, who are so afraid of a woman or a black. Too funny!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Absaalom, NJ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:21:04 GMT

The devil is in the detail; for all of you online chatter with short memories, when the then 2000 Republican Presidential candidate George W. Bush was quiz on the names of the leaders of three foreign countries and to everyone’s astonishment he fared poorly. But consequently his standing did not disintegrate; in fact it gained momentum by the truly “naive” in this country. That always allows the usual habitual offenders of abuse of power to package the status quo rogue policies in a different package; this time instead of a tie they wrapped it in a skirt; at least give the power elite a challenge in for the next administration and maybe we can buy sometime until a cure for this plague of narcissism that is ravaging this country.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Terry, Chesapeake, OH — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:23:03 GMT

Go Obama! We have to start talking from a position of strength or we're going to beg to be heard from a position of weakness.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

George,Seattle — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:26:00 GMT

I can't believe that Hillary supporters think that she is presidential because she is afraid to talk to world leaders without knowing in advance what they are going to say! I say at least talk to the other world leaders before bombing the hell out of them. In the end, that it is helpful war propaganda to say "well, we tried to talk sense into them."

Oh Hillary, you picked the wrong guy to tangle with. Attack Edwards if you want to show that you are tough. You can bicker about hairstyles. Obama is real, authentic, and cares more deeply about the issues than about being elected. Please realize that the talking heads who are pushing you still hate you -- they just love the idea of setting you up for a fall (especially if it means that the Republican wins.)

Your team already makes enough money by selling your vote to the special interests ($41 million in Bill's speaking fees and counting), you don't have to lose the Democrats an election in the bargain.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

POLpursun — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:26:06 GMT

Would you allow me a suggestion?: Go read the speech Barack Obama gave on October 26, 2002. People, pray tell what is the purpose of experience in the context of the position of U. S. President? I opine that it is precisely for the purpose of making decisions consistent with the principle that prevention is better than cure (it is also much less costly, both financially and in terms of human grief). Read the article carefully. What judgement. Not unreasonable to give some consideration to prescient. In fact, I agree with Hillary Clinton ---- FOR HER. For Obama, on the other hand, with the kind of judgement he has demonstrated, WHEN IT WAS NOT POPULAR, I doubt that other leaders will, successfully over any sustained period, use him for propaganda. Further, TO WHOM ARE THEY GOING TO USE IT? Us little people out here in this world outside the borders (i.e. the borders you speak about when you talk about immigration; not the ones you imply when you talk about "national interests") of the U.S. will not be open to being propagandized by those who would attempt to "make Obama look bad". The real problem, if Obama became President, is whether the rest of the U.S. population will act such that the goodwill of having done so in November '08, is not dissipated by U.S. citizens themselves, being unable to throw off the imperial mindset. In fact, to be frank, President Obama's grief from propaganda is more likely to come more from inside than outside. I don't mean that there won't be those outside who won't attempt to embarrass him. It's just that, if his being elected means that the U.S. electorate is prepared to lead (there are only two ways to lead, by inspiration and by example and they are not mutually exclusive) in lieu of dictating arrogantly as they strut the world, it will augur well for U.S. prestige outside. It is interesting to see the Foreign Policy eatablishment coming to Hillary Clinton's defense in this spat with Barack Obama. All they do is signal same ol', same ol', in terms of foreign policy, if she becomes President. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not jumping for joy over Obama. After all, he IS trying to become President of the U.S. That, in and of itself, is reason to know, that there would be severe restrictions on his flexibility of maneuver. In fact, it is likely that he would be the one afforded least flexibility. That's just the world as it currently works from day to day. Scientific and technological sophistication organized for creativity, innovation, production and the provision hi-tech services, economics and the protection of personal wealth are all more important than politics. Scan the globe, were are these capacities largely resident? The extent to which one provides for self, is the extent to which one can define self.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Justine Baxter, Ft. Pierce, FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:26:31 GMT

Obama needs to continue to answer questions honestly without fear of controversy because Hillary's two-faces will soon meet each other. Hillary's blatent lies will ultimately come back to haunt her with a vengeance!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:26:42 GMT

I got her about 300 messages too late, but I agree with Bruce on the first page. If this is what the media calls "defcon 3" then they are easily excited.

I'm glad Obama struck back and called Clinton on her overplayed hand. But I'm also guessing that all this will matter little when the other 98 percent of the party starts paying attention. These squabbles are games for the 24-7 media - what matters now is financial health and organization.

Maybe when we hit a point where campaign rhetoric does matter more, Clinton will have learned not to overplay her hand, and she may be a more formidable candidate.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:27:45 GMT

As a conservative independent (former republican), I am seriously considering voting in the Democratic Primary in Texas (for the first time)for Obama. Why? Only Ron Paul would have my vote on the Republican side. Ron Paul is a good man and I may yet vote for him (assuming he is still running during the Texas primaries). The rest of the Republican candidates are amazingly poor choices (neocons). I believe whoever wins the Democratic nomination will win the Presidential Election. That being the case, it is not even a contest between Obama and Hillary Clinton. I see Hillary as a liberal Bush in a dress. She has the very same personality disorders as George Bush. The paranoid need for secrecy, loyalty at all costs, the need for petty revenge against opponents, and the track record of supporting disasterous foreign policies.

Obama would not be my ideal for President, but he is no Hillary or brain dead neocon. Besides, I am tired of a divided nation. Does anyone seriously believe Hillary could unite our country? Nowadays, you have to take the best you can get. I'm afraid Obama is it among the so called "top-tier" candidates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

joe — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:28:33 GMT

sad thing is, when its done and over with,,, Obama's name is going to prevent him from ever being voted president

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Wilson, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:28:33 GMT

Re: EXCLUSIVE: OBAMA HITS CLINTON -- HARDER

Thank you Senator Obama for the strength and clarity of your statement here. Sound bites are often counter-productive and your discourse here is incisive and useful.

There are many, many reasons you are qualified for the presidency ~ our job is just to see that the majority of voters find this out and know it well - then VOTE.

With deep appreciation for who you are and what you stand for....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dave W., Evergreen, CO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:28:40 GMT

Pay attention everyone - Mrs. Clinton, while not nearly as bad as George Bush and friends, represents politics as usual. The country clearly needs the change that Senator Obama represents so well.

Thank you for standing up for common sense, Barak.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JungleJIm, Great Smokey Mtns — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:29:10 GMT

Sounds to me like Barack Oslimmy keeps RE-ADJUSTING his position to suit his needs !!!
In other words he'll say anything to get a vote !!!
Next he'll deny being mobster Tony Rezko's puppet or even knowing mobster Tony Rezko for that matter.
Just remember Oslimmy...you owe mobster Tony Rezko about $500,000.00 right now !!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Talala Mshuja, Los Altos, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:29:39 GMT

The notion that the only person intelligent and savy enough to be president (white male) of America is long past due. Considering all of the negative policies and actions of so called experienced white males has ruined things for America. Starting with George Washington & Thomas Jefferson (owning slaves as well as making babies with black women while they were president is so hypocritical) & so many other white male presidents who have messed up America for so many years....I hate to put into words. I think B. Obama is a breath of fresh air...and he has more common sense than any presidential candidate in a long time. I only hope that white Americans can get past the idea that only white males can be president and experience someone like Obama who can turn this country around in four years, not mentioning eight years. America please be smart enough to give him the chance that he has earned and deserve. Being that he was born of a White American female and an African American male gives him the experience and insight that is very much needed at this time in American History. Go Obama!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lupe, Decatur, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:32:08 GMT

I don't care if you are black, white or red.. bottom line is that we need a woman to lead this Country back to where we were many years ago. And to the dumb bunny up there who says she is the first woman to run for president... remeber Geraldine Ferraro? She may not have run for president but she sure gave us something to think about.... It's time America, let's put ourselves together and put the right man in the White House and that is H Clinton....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michelle, Smithtown, NY — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:32:42 GMT

While I like Obama a great deal, his comments just go to prove he is inexperienced and should run in another 8 years (when Hillary's leaving office!). The President of the United States cannot simply meet rogue leaders without setting forth diplomatic guidelines. With respect to Hillary's Iraq vote, does anyone remember that she voted based on what she believed were valid intelligence reports. Let's place the blame for Iraq where it should be placed - squarely on the shoulders of those in the Bush adminstration who led us into war with lies. Hindsight is 20/20, and just like Hillary Clinton and all the others that voted to go into Iraq, most Americans only now know the truth.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Darlene, dublin, ohio — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:33:04 GMT

I am generally very conservative and therefore, forced to vote republican. However, I listen and pay close attention to all issues. Over time, I have lost any respect for Hillary Clinton I once had and wish Obama well.

I am glad he stood up for his comments and did not let her run all over him! I may/ may not be voting democratic in the next election but I assure you, my vote will never, ever be for Hillary. I dispise her and her lies, money and control/ power hungry attitude. It was a gift to this country when her and Bill left the White House. Please don't let them back in. She's lucky to hold her current position!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joshua Smith — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:35:34 GMT

Clinton, Edwards and John Kerry all supported the invasion of Iraq. They believed Saddam still had WMDs, as did the United Nations, the CIA,British and Russian intelligence agencies. Now they rail against the war they helped start even though the main problem was that we didnt put more effort into it. Bush isnt going to be running in the 2008 presidential election and neither is anyone in the current administration. The top candidates are a senator who left Washington 4 years ago and the former New York City mayor. They are not Bush. They will not win attacking Bush.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Les Young, Norwood, NC — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:36:03 GMT

It's high time someone challenge Senator Clinton's October 2002 vote to relinquish all decisions regarding invasion of Iraq to President Bush. Before that vote, President Bush first floated at West Point (in June 2002) and later pronounce in his National Security Strategy, the Bush Doctrine (in Sept 2002) that America assumes the unilateral right to first-strike attack anyone whom we fear may someday wish ill to America, our friends or our interest. Mrs. Clinton, as well as all senators and congressmen, and all who followed the news closely, knew full well that Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Rice were itching for war with Saddam. The American public was itching for war too. And, the Press piled on. America wanted to demonstate our strength and our will to use it. What Senator Obama and Senator Clinton each conspicously fail to do is to publicly acknowledge that America's failed first-strike warmaking policy is perilously wrong-headed and is leading us toward more disastrous wars - intentional or accidental. Serious candidates for the Democratic nomination should be strong-willed and attempt to lead America onto a sane path to diplomacy and co-existing with our neighbors everywhere. Let's renounce today the Bush Doctrine of first-strike warfare, regime change, and political assassinations.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Drew, Louisville, Ky — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:36:57 GMT

Cease the insanity, hair splitting and political hyperbole; this is all a bunch of semantics play. Obama was simply (and rightfully) stating that the US must be open to dialogue, and Clinton tried to turn it around to make it seem as though he was idealistic and naive regarding the foreign affairs process. The sprit and intent of what he was saying is the right answer, so let's not allow Hillary Clinton insult the intelligence of the American public and speak down to us by insinuating that Obama is a foreign affairs rookie who misspoke. Let’s be grownups and recognize the gist of what he was really trying to say: America needs to be very open and inviting of dialogue with states like Iran and North Korea, as insane as their leadership seems to be. It at least provides an opportunity for us to create a statesman’s venue within which we can directly communicate our intentions and policies, even with those whom we currently have adverse/strained relations. Hillary is trying to lessen Obama’s credibility, whereas Obama is speaking concepts that resonate with logical and enlightened minds. By the way, I am a lifelong GOP man to the core, and I am actually more inclined to vote for Obama at this juncture. At least his intentions seem true and real. He is far better than the same 'ol junk we've been getting from the Clinton dynasty and GOP talking heads.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

pizzasteven@hotmail.com — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:37:05 GMT

Once again the Obama fans try to spin his obvious lack of experience, The question was "Will YOU agree to meet, WITHOUT ANY PRECONDITIONS,... (these nations)... your first year in office. Obama's answer was "YES". No do-overs the next day trying to put some context to your total lack of experience. We've already spent 7 years listening to that.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Potee — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:38:42 GMT

Let me get this right Obama:Breakfast with Kim off to lunch with Hugo then maybe a quick flight for dinner with Amahdinejad, OOPS! cant forget the Syrians what good would a party be without them.Obamas foriegn policy inexperience is starting to show.When the Clinton campaign "MACHINE" gets rolling Obama will get crushed and Billary will get the nod, it's already a done deal,it always was, the whole race for the nomination is just a formality to rev up the base and generate interest.Say hello to 8 more years of the GOP, this country is ready for a woman president, just not Hillary

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ray DeBlois Seattle — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:39:45 GMT

I'm not about to risk the security of the US on someone whose loyalties may lie with Islam or a female who let her husband humiliate her..she'd turn the other chhek to an enemy attack.

We need someone with guts and none of the Democrats have any

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim Potee Sea Isle City — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:39:50 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ms. Bettye — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:41:37 GMT

To the response to the person about religion. Being Islam has nothing to do about nothing. Do you think all Islams are terrorist? It's the close minded people like you that will have this country always in an uproar and racism will always be an issue. I don't believe that any Church of Christ is a racist church. It seems to me that you are the racist. Can we in America ever stand for unity the way we say we are, without race or religion being an issue. Maybe you should do some research on the Islam faith, all faith as far as that matters...maybe you will have a different perspective once you do this...I know it has helped me to not judge people by their religious faith. Christianity is not the only religion you know.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

The bad-bad-bad people, Anytown, Earth — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:42:05 GMT

Noooo! We want the cute blonde lady to talk to us, not this guy!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lance Riley, Houma, Louisiana — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:42:17 GMT

China is going to be drilling for Oil off the coast of Cuba. Do you think the Chinese care about our beaches in Florida.If any candidate is afraid of talking with Castro,I don't want them to represent me.Hillary just go bury your head in the sand.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Don- San Francisco, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:43:03 GMT

Perhaps now Hillary will realize that the nomination isn't just hers for the taking. The naivety was on her part for believing that Barack Obama, who has fought his way up his entire life wouldn't hit back.
I hope she drops the hit and run tactics and gets back to the campaign issues.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Munir, Eugene, Oregon — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:43:07 GMT

At last- someone is confronting Hillary with her duplicitous varying positions on foreign policy. She is a hawk-in-hiding. The establishment “gurus” who are endorsing her foreign policy expertise are the failed voices of the past.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Political Individual, California — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:43:53 GMT

Hillary and Obama. How many of you really think Obama would actually meet with those leaders his first year in office? Even if he agrees with the idea, I am sure he really wouldn't get around to doing it even though he isn't closed to the idea.

Hillary knew she wouldn't do it. She is the master of propaganda, marxist, elitist, universal health care sellout and ex President of the Young Republican's Club. I have no faith in her what so ever.

Hillary did have a chance to win me over by running in 2004. But again she proves that the Bush and Clinton families are a dynamic duo. I was young when Clinton was in office and quite naive to his charisma. The fact is that he pushed the Bush crafted NAFTA and signed a UN Peace Treaty that supercedes our holy constitution.

Bush Senior 8 years VP 4 years P
Bill Clinton 8 years P
Bush Junior 8 years P
--------------------------------
28 years

I am 28 years old. I have 2 young kids and the direction of this country scares the hell out of me.

I'm definitely voting for Obama.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Munir, Eugene, Oregon — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:44:12 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ken, Seattle WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:46:51 GMT

Wow! People sure love a good drama!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard Illinois — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:47:43 GMT

I believe that either of them would say whatever it took to win an election, 'Bama is not any better then Clinton, live in Illinois for awhile and you'll see that, they both have the same position, but explain it to the public in a different manner. You have to ask yourself, what do you want in the whitehouse, a seasoned political person, or a wanna be from Illinois. I think they both suck, but I'll take Clinton over Obama any day, at least when her husband was in, we all made money and the country as a whole did good, what can Obama give or do for us, hooray, lets put a Black man in office, it'll be cool. God save the queen.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Everstone, NY — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:22 GMT

I think Obama is the best candidate for the democrats. Believe me, if Clinton wins come january, then the white house will be for republicans again cause America is not ready for female president. I will not waiste my vote on clinton

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

KURT CANADA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:45 GMT

I GUESS IN TIMES OF CRISIS OR ON THE DIPLOMATIC LEVEL HILLARY DOSNT LIKE TO TALK, THAT IS WHY BILL DID THE THINGS HE DID AND GOT AWAY WITH IT, WAY TO BE TOUGH HILLARY, WAY TO BE IN CHARGE HILLARY, IF YOU COULDNT CONTROL YOUR OWN MAN HOW ARE YOU GOING TO RUN AMERICA,HARD WORKING AMERICANS OBAMA SHOULD BE PRESIDENT.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kris — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:49 GMT

Obama shanked it on this particular question. He doesn't quite understand the nuance of it all. It's not that Hillary is promoting Bush-Cheney policies. I think all of us Dems know she isn't insane. It's simply that she understands that on the world stage an American president can't just meet with whomever. You have to be smart about it. Obama isn't quite ready for the big-time yet. He's good. I like him as a Dem. But Hillary and Bill are better. Don't forget about Bill.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MIKE JOHNSON — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:52:54 GMT

LAST THING WE NEED IS SOME ONE-TERM PERSON IN HTERE. ESPECIALLY A BLACK UNCLE TOM. THE ONLY REASON HE'S THERE NOW IS BECAUSE HES ACTUALLY CAN SPEAK ENGLISH UNLIKE MOST AMERICAN BLACKS, IE, RAPPERS SNOOP DOG, AND THE REST OF THE RAPPERS. AND LETS NOT FOREGET RACIST AL SHARPTON, JESSIE ANOTHER KID OUT OF WEDLOCK JACKSON AND THE BIGGEST RACIST OF ALL BILL TAWANEY BRAWLEY COSBY
SEND THEM ALL BACK TO AFRICA WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Urich, Waltham, MA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:54:33 GMT

Way to go Obama!! You have my prayers!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

MIKE JOHNSON — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:56:45 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Will Oliveira, Northborough MA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:57:35 GMT

Hillary for President?! Are you kidding?! Obama has 8 years in office in state politics and now a few under his belt in a national office. Hillary doesn't have half the experience Obama does. Hanging the drapes in the White House doesn't count as legislative experience.

Sorry Hillary, you are the inexperienced candidate who in times of crisis have shown that you can't make the right decision. Iraq anyone?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Debbie — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:57:57 GMT

Obama has been virtually hailed as the second coming his every utterance assailed as profound wisdom. Our country is so desperate for a hero that that they will blindly follow a media created superstar. All I see is Obama and his ego his "listen" as a preface to most utterances. Completely condescending. He never discusses specifics because he has set himself up to be all things to all people. There is something not right with him and his run for the Presidency. I think someone needs to do some investigative work on this man. I fear he is potentially very dangerous. When I look in his eyes I see shark eyes, there is an important story here. I know he introduced us with 2 books creating his own history, the one we can all admire.Why? What is the real story??? Please do not blindly trust this man.... I really wanted to like him and support his run. But I know in my heart somethings wrong here. We are being duped in our desperation for change....

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

andy, bruceville,in. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:58:54 GMT

is ''iraq'' all anybody is concerned with here?what about securing the border?...passing the fair-tax plan(not ''flat-tax'' like most dems like to call it)?...and if a democrat gets in,be prepared for ''socialized health-care''...you think our health care is screwed up now,just wait...wake up folks...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

glenn Anchorage, Ak — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:01:31 GMT

To say that this is not the correct way to handle our foreign policy, I say to you "what we have been doing is not working". We, as American's, feel that everything needs to be met upon our terms. There is always another side to the story, it has been past time that we listen to what other countries say, that does not mean that we conceed to their wishes, but listen and maybe we can find common ground. Did anyone notice that Hillary never responded to the comment over lack of forethought on the withdrawl of our troops from Iraq. The focus then became how irresponsible Obama was.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe, DC — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:03:16 GMT

Consistency? What have you been smoking. At the debate, Obama says he will meet unconditionally with all foreign dictators one-on-one. Now, he says there is no difference between his position on this and Sen. Clinton's--who said at the debate, not forty-eight hours later, that she favors vigorous diplomacy but not promising one-on-one meetings in her first year. Not only is ol' Saint Barack naive, but he's a Bush-type spin machine.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Deaniac, Claremont, NH — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:05:39 GMT

I agree with most of the commenters, and would only add that the best part of this is Obama is showing us that he can fight back. Yeah, he ain't going to start it, but when it's over the instigator is going to realize he/she picked on the wrong guy.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Munir, Eugene, Oregon — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:11:03 GMT

Hillary is at last showing her true colors as the nominee of the hawkish Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). They claim to be centrists but in fact their positions are very hawkish, and they support military interventions abroad willy-nilly. In addition to her vote to support Bush in invading Iraq in 2002 (which she still has not apologized for), she is clamoring for only a partial withdrawal and for leaving troops behind. Now she is staking out a position not much different than Bush vis-a-vis a dilaogue with hositle regimes. Is this what we want in our future President? As a lifetime Democrat, I cringe at seeing her in the White House for what it means regarding our foreign policy.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Moses Foster, Jackson, Mississippi — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:13:09 GMT

I'm thrilled...absolutely thrilled about our countrymen waking up and actually preparing to start up their old tractors and coaxing their mules out of the shed in order to make their voices heard by way of internet. I hope we don't lose this ambition when it comes down to the point of voting. We the American people have seen so much and in recent past done so little. PLEASE...if it comes down to it... we can't let ballots go missing. We will need every viable vote... that means...rolling out the lame and the stroke victims...strapping them in wheel chairs and getting them all registered and to the polls...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mitchel J Flicop — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:13:47 GMT

First and fore most, it is time to look past all the bias and prejudice that blind us from making clear conscious decisions. The need to close our eyes and not see differences in culture or skin color is so apparent. The need to rid ourselves of the same self defeating behaviors that continue to sabotage our thought process. We are a great nation, but not greater then ! Our own history and evolution as a nation has made us what we are today. Other nations as they evolve, as they create their own history, as there people suffer and learn, they too choose which direction to move towards. We as a people can not live in harmony within our own nation. Inequality, Racism, Corruption. We venture to third worlds to fix what is broken but we still can't get it right at home.
It is time for a paradigm shift, to respect others differences, To understand that we are all brothers in the flesh and in soul. No war has ever ended war, violence only perpetuates violence.

We need a new beginning,a fresh start before it is to late for or children. We need Obama. When he speaks we no longer hear what we have always heard.
Continue the fight to win the hearts of Americans as we learn to embrace a future president who does not look like or sound like any who have come before him.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Leonard Serrano, San Jose, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:20:17 GMT

I give more weight to Senator Clinton's response than that of Obama because it is apparent he himself has subsequently recognized the deficiency and irresponsibleness of his answer which prompted him to make all these follow-up clarifications.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nikki, UT — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:20:56 GMT

Frankly, if Hillary is afraid of being used as a propaganda tool, she's looking for the wrong job. Being President of the United States basically assures your image and words will be exploited by our enemies. She also should have chosen her words more carefully in the You Tube debates because what she said carries more propaganda potential than Obama's response. For instance, one could say that once again America is being arrogant because we are only willing to meet on our terms.

If anyone is being irresponsible and naive, it's Hillary...the one who trusted Bush.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Brian, Tampa FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:21:15 GMT

All this talk about who was more polished is pointless. Whoever becomes President has a real mess on their hands...domestically and internationally. The real question is whose philosophical approach to solving problems is rooted in the traditions that made America great in the 1st place.

Clinton, as documented by her last 7 years in the Senate, has played politics well, been careful to protect her reputation, and has used her husband's success to try to steer people into believing that she can respond to the challenges of 2008 in the same way. Obama, as documented by his so-called inexperience, has said what he meant and meant what he said, every time. What he predicted would happen with the war has happened, and he is right to expose those who didn't have his foresight.

He understands that we are in 2007, and with the globalization of this world happening as rapidly as it is, for a Presidential candidate to express hesitation about meeting with the leaders of other nations in this New World is scary to me. Her political response about sending envoys was just shows that she is into the same bureaucratic nonsense that hinders us from getting things done in Washington.

We don't need bureaucrats. We need solutions. We don't need glowing resumes with years of experience that only show how archaic one's ideas are. We need the hungry young hot shot who has the knowledge and just enough experience to get things done in a new and brave way. Obama in '08!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tess, Seattle, Washington — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:22:06 GMT

Nevertheless, I still strongly support Senator Clinton’s stand on several issue in her campaign. Thus far, most media attention has focused on the war in Iraq and recent scandals in the White House. There are critical topics of great importance that I would like to see our candidate address each and to the public, especially with the issue of global poverty. As one of the nation that has pledge to fulfill the goals of Millennium Development Project, whose goal is the elimination of world hunger and poverty, this administration has not shown any substantial action to bring this fundamental problem to a stop. According to the Borgen Project, dedicated to fighting and ending Poverty around the world, only $19 billion dollars are needed annually to stop world wide poverty, hunger and malnutrition. However, more than $340 billion dollars has been poured into this “war on terror.” And each year, our country has a military budge of $522 billion dollars. It's time for a new leader who will be addressing an issue that affects 1.2 billion people everyday worldwide.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Leslie tarr, Aberdeen, UK — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:22:26 GMT

Watched the debate, Obama shows real class, I am sure he would work with our PM Brown here in the UK to make a better world. Perhaps Blair saw the writing on the wall, someone of principle and intelligence was going to the White House, time for his exit.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

jr,wash.dc — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:22:53 GMT

what a country!?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Leonard Serrano, San Jose, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:22:53 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Raj, Virginia Beach — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:23:32 GMT

Sen. O'bama...is right in his approach. When Hillary had a misunderstanding with Bill, does she call Geroge? That has problem with Bush and needs to be changed. We need to sit down face to face with our enemy and solve the problems.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

las vegas — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:23:44 GMT

this is what i am talking about,go obama if the the president of the united states cant talk to iran he or she plays chicken,then have the guts to send soldiers,i bet for some of you guys thats experience and or presidential.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Tyson, Seattle, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:23:59 GMT

Clinton is the candidate the GOP is hoping wins the Dem nomination. The right-wing base is so demoralized that only their hatred of Clinton can motivate them to get involved this time.

A vote for Clinton in the primary is a vote for a Republican in the general.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dale, Birmingham, AL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:29:15 GMT

Obama sounded good today. His points are well-taken. Hillary's are as well. I think the real issue is that the format of the debates does not allow the moderator to probe the answer more fully. Both are very similar in their approaches when they are not forced to respond in a very quick sound bite. Do either of the campaigns really think the American people care about these symantics? My guess is that only some bloggers do.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dale, Birmingham, AL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:29:16 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dale, Birmingham, AL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:29:16 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kimo, Honolulu, Hi — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:30:22 GMT

Obama, Obama, Obama... the 1st true Global Diplomatic Presidential Candidate- he displays genuine character as well as high-intelligence (what a refreshing change for the US and the world- has anyone traveled to other countries and asked how they feel about Americans right now? Its ugly!) You've got my vote Obama- hopefully the election wont be fixed again!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steve Cantrell, San Francisco Ca. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:34:58 GMT

While I personally like & respect senator O'bama, senator Clinton had the most logical response to this question. Both said they would talk to these adversary governments within the first year but senator Clinton's answer was that she would first use top US envoys to make certain that these governments are sincere and prepared to "come to the table" to reach successful negotiations. Then she would meet.
I truly believe senator Clinton is the best qualified democratic candidate to become President, though I would support senator Obama. I would really get excited by a CLINTON/O'BAMA ticket!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Arnaiz Fl — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:36:06 GMT

What say are very clear ,Mean going to talk Bin Laden,Fidel Castro,Hugo Chavez, North Korea, Iran ,
we want to what do you want . Do really think ca we trust those Bandit ,what Hillary say you have to naive to believe those criminal, look now Putin are step on get more power armament this one then never you trust or enemies for many years and history probe that what Senator Hillary say to Obama you to Naive " Obama

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sally, Geenwood Village, CO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:37:21 GMT

RE the sarcastic comment about Obama's crystal ball -Obama didn't need one to know that getting into Iraq would be a mistake. He just needed the good sense to learn the history of the region, study the various cultures/religeous beliefs involved, or at least, listen to the experts who repeatedly tried to warn him. Bush, bless his redneck heart, seemed to take pride in proclaiming he didn't need to learn anything; he, Cheney, and Rumsfield already knew everything.

That's why I'm such an Obama fan - he puts in the work to learn about an issue before he decides how it should be handled.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Goodwin, Honolulu, HI — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:41:48 GMT

Obama is absolutley a stupid interlopper who does not know how to take care of his own let alone what he is saying about Hillary and others. He should serve his time and keep his mouth shut for we will find out what a stupid person he is and the voters will decide his fate. Send him back to the farm as we here in Hawaii are ashamed to have him associated with us in any way.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark, Dunkirk, NY — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:43:42 GMT

Three Presidents have had the guts speak candidly on the world stage with friend or foe in the last 50 years, Kennedy, Reagan and Nixon. Each called a spade a spade and we as a country were better for it. The thing that impressed me in the debate was Hillary's true colors came out. As a resident of upstate NY who is both underemployed and under insured I am still waiting for one of those thousands of jobs she promised when she ran for Senate the first time. I tend to vote conservative Republican, if the election would be held tomorrow, I would vote for Obama. We as a country need to take a chance on this man.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Benson Kanda — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:56:57 GMT

I am Kenyan student here in Texas and I have been following debate more often.Of all the people I have been taking to,( class and at my internship) and discussing various issues, they have been asking me what to people think about America.When I ask why,here is the response, and I am not making this up. ( our president is misleading us about war,and issues about Iraq and Iran and the rest of the world).One guy basketball player to be specific told me
that America is F** Up. These are my school mates,young Americans,why would they tell me this? Your country needs a change and a real desperate change.so please think,and think before denouncing that someone is inexperienced, or blah blah blah.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jacqueline Downie, Aliquippa, PA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:58:49 GMT

Hillary has a lot of unanswered questions left over from her husband's presidency and the Rose Law Firm. It is time for her to stand up and tell the truth. The American Public can easily see through her lies. Obama doesn't have all "the baggage".

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jacqueline Downie, Aliquippa, PA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:58:51 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ralph West, Philadelphia, PA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:05:54 GMT

Hillary cannot work her way around the fact that she supported this unethical, stupid invasion. Her judgment is therefore fatally flawed, and she should not be considered for the White House. Obama is the superior of the two.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joven Kuan — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:08:41 GMT

While Clinton and O'bama are destroying each other the Republicans are getting stronger will win this coming election.

Foolish Democratic candidates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kokou Agbemadi, Woodbury, MN — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:09:48 GMT

I think Senator Obama and Clinton were saying the same regarding engaging with foreign in solving problems. The mistake that she made was trying to play politic by discreding Senator Obama. She still showing the American people that she don't know any other way of doing politic. I think it is time for the Clintons to stop playing politics with people lives. Senator responded very well and hit her straight. We need to put this country in a new direction. Things are not working well and I think the only candidate who is showing compassion and leadership for the American people is Senator Barack Obama. Let's stop politics as usual and turn this country around. I am confident that senator Obama is the best guy out there.
Thanks!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tim Jones, Portland, OR — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:15:06 GMT

Obama's "fierce criticism" is some of the tamest milquetoastery I've ever heard. I appreciate his intelligence and charisma, and the leadership potential that gives him, but if he can't speak plainly on something as clear-cut as Hillary Clinton voting for a war the vast majority of Democrats were against from the beginning, then how is he going to defeat the Republican hate machine? Contrary to popular opinion in the DLC, it isn't the mild rabbits who brought Congress back to the blue, it was Rahm Emanuel going medieval on the Republicans. Obama needs to figure out that this is a primary, not the general election, and you win primaries by hammering your opponent from the base.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eddy Njubigbo, Middletown, DE — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:16:09 GMT

Democrats must not forget that the main reason why Senator John Kerry lost the 2004 presidential election was because the Republicans successfully portrayed him as antiwar and weak on national security. It will be another political suicide for the Democratic Party to nominate another candidate that may be considered weak on defense or national security during the 2008 presidential election. In my view, Senator Clinton intends to apply the same approach that President Reagan used successfully in resolving global conflicts – that is, extensive and result-oriented diplomacy backed by the super power strength of the United States. Obama’s position appears weak and may not bring the desired result, just like the current President Bush conducts hard-nut foreign policy that has never resulted in any desired result.

Senator Obama’s response is an honest defense for his position on U.S. foreign policy. He must however be careful about people trying to push him into a dog-fight with the Clintons. Such an encounter will be contrary to his style of politics and most likely not end in his favor. In addition, any mud slinging among the democratic candidates may have negative consequences during the general election.

The critical thing for all Democrats is to ensure that the candidate that has the best chance of winning the general election in 2008 is nominated.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lance, Texas City, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:19:42 GMT

Obama showed in the debate why he is NOT ready to be president yet. Hillary is correct in this argument. Its easy to come up with a good response when you've had two days to sit around with your staff and clarify your response. Hillary is what this country needs!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Smith, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:20:14 GMT

Clinton did more harm than good by attacking obama. He's been passively waiting to tackler her on Iraq. Now, she's forced him to take his gloves off. Although her husband might have all of the kings men to say otherwise, Americans know that Obama was right, and clinton was entirely wrong. She's been dishonest about her vote, and now that the gloves are off, she will have to face the music. She thinks, like bush, if you lie and repeat something enough, you're right. Unfortunately people realize that she's wrong, and won't buy it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jenny, Boston — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:21:14 GMT

How is Hillary the "experienced" one? She has seven years in the Senate (as a carpetbagger in an election won by her husband granting clemency to hundreds of Puerto Ricans who happened to live in New York) vs. two years in the Senate plus several years in the Illinois legislature? I don't really see the big experience gap, unless you count her eight years of chasing interns out of the Lincoln bedroom as political experience. Then again, maybe that would help her negotiate with Iran...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jestin, Dallas, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:22:34 GMT

Obama's 2nd to Hillary right now w/the numbers and Edwards isn't going to take that spot. So the idea of changing politics as usual by not being too partisan or petty is what he's touting, at the same time, when Hillary attacks him calling him irresponsible and naive, he has to call her out. He has to take it to her, because although he may bring swing voters to the party (Hillary doesn't, she has who she has and isn't growing), he has to TAKE her support. This means truly differentiating yourself without coming off like a typical politician. So he's being more aggressive now which has to be, and if you think you saw significant improvement in this debate from the last, wait til the next one. "The kid" is just warming up.

2nd, part of his differentiating himself is making bold choices like saying he's willing to meet w/our enemies, to differentiate himself from the Bush-Cheney Admin. This also means realizing that you can't lay down a million pre-conditions like Hillary wants to (she's ubercautious, that's why people say she doesn't make mistakes), and expect for anyone to want to deal with you. Bush took America on a unilateral path, and Obama has to show that is not what America is. An admittedly coarse example of this (but listen to the logic): A girl saying she won't speak to a guy unless she meets this 100 page document of requirements..no guy's gonna want to date her then! That's all I think Obama was trying to say, you have to talk to guys, they might not be perfect but they never are. Doesn't mean you're not gonna put the filters on and end up marrying a mass-murderer. And anybody that says Obama lacks substance or details, rewatch the debate and count how many times Hillary DOESN'T answer the question. Ask her about the healthcare plan she HASN'T put out. As far as sending a boy to do a man's work, we sent the village idiot in Bush(with bad experience, what did he do good for TX?) to the White House; can anybody say Obama's not super-intelligent, has enormous people skills and is not willing to be tough when he has to be? Who do you think a dictator in a 3rd World country will respect more: a woman in a pink jacket who stuck around with a husband who was guilty of infidelity and lied about it in front of his country and comes off as a fake, or a young guy (JFK was young)who's brilliant, actually listens instead of dictating from her assistant's scripts, and then is tough but fair on what he will and won't tolerate. Hillary showed she's not about a change of politics when she attacked him insinuating that he won't do any envoy work, that he's going to come over for said cup of tea. That was the best she could come up with? Obama just helped reveal how petty she is. Now all he has to do is keep doing what he's doing now, and he can actually win.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

kennethchew.S'PORE. ASIA. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:22:41 GMT

We in Asia are aghast at the off the cuff reply of O'bama in wanting to meet the bad guys without first checking the groundwork shows his inexperiences in foreign policies. He is just a young kid ,wet behind the ears by all his previous answers.America's allies will be shocked if such a yound in-experienced person becomes the next president.One bad one is enough, and u have seen what he did to America when he called China as one of the axis of evil., but now is fully engaged with for the benefits of world peace and prosperity.My vote goes to Hilary.Kennethchew

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

kennethchew.S'PORE. ASIA. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:23:09 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim, VA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:24:03 GMT

i think that it is fascinating to watch the Surrendercrats - I mean Democrats - try to out french each other in their desire to pull back. Let's look at 2 important historical contexts. In Korea, GOP Congress kept supporting our troops and our ally in the face of 15 times the casualties we have in Iraq. Result: S. Korea is free and an economic power. In Vietnam, Surrendercrat Congress abandoned the troops and our ally. Result: bloodbath, refugee crisis, 30 years before Vietnam had any real standard of living. Which one do we want to see in the Middle East.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Amy, Milwaukee, WI — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:24:32 GMT

Finally, Obama asserts himself and succinctly addresses Hilary's lack of foresight/vision when she voted to authorize the war. I hope he keeps going and going and going. Obama in '08 for change.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ansu — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:29:38 GMT

Here is what I found on Hillary website.
QOUTE:
We know we need global coalitions to tackle global problems like climate change, poverty, AIDS, and terrorism. And to keep our country safe, we need to start engaging our enemies again. During the Cold War, with missiles pointed at us, we never stopped talking to the Soviet Union. That didn't mean we agreed with them or approved of them. But it did mean we came to understand them -- and that was crucial to confronting the threats they posed.
For more http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/security/

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jestin — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:30:38 GMT

Tony from Palm Beach, FL, get your head out of the sand. Pick up a book and actually read articles when Obama talks about his CHRISTIAN faith. Turn off the BS blinders telling you Obama's a muslim. Yes, at one point he went to a school that was Islamic. He ALSO went to a Catholic school. Does he send his kids to Muslim schools? This is another example of how McCain came off as an idiot saying Obama having actually lived in other countries and being multi-racial and thinking he would be better at foreign policy is like McCain saying I watch sports on TV so I can run a decathlon. Well first off, you don't run a decathlon, because its 10 diff. events, not a marathon (maybe McCain is taking Bush's stupid pills or really is getting old and losing his faculties..ginseng anyone). 2nd, McCain's logic behind him or Bush being president and understanding foreign affairs, IS EQUIVALENT to watching sports and thinking you can play it at a high level. If you've never been out of country (Cancun for Spring Break on daddy's money w/the frat boys doesn't count), and don't really deal w/people of other backgrounds in your own country cuz you think they're right and they're wrong, you are not ideally prepared to deal with anybody from another country, much less that country's fascist leader. If you're actually cultured, have lived elsewhere and understand other mindsets, you might have a clue as to how to deal with them. That's how Bush/Cheney think. Obama knows these dicatators are dictators, he's not some cartoonish liberal who thinks if I hug them enough, they'll break down and put down the nasty weapons. He understands you have to use diplomacy.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

R. D. Moore, Kimpo City, Republic of Korea — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:33:01 GMT

"Get serious folks!! we need someone in charge, who can put the United States back on track. Things are in a complete mess. This time it's not just about the economy. The entire country is going downhill fast! We need people in charge who understand economics, foreign policy, trade, education, drug problems, crime, defense and every issue you can think of. I'm voting for Senator Clinton because she will surround herself with educated people who will save our country. Buttering up to Castro and his kind, won't put America back on track. The biggest worry to me is, "have we allowed ourselves to get to the point where our nation will crumble from inside?" In my opinion, the United States, has become OVERLY involved overseas and has ignored the American people. Foreigners are getting rich while the American worker is living from payday to payday. This is the worst mess I ever saw the United States, get into during my lifetime of 71 years."

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tyler Chicago, IL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:33:39 GMT

I believe U.S. should abandon Israel and join with the Middle Eastern forces but Obama was in the right this time I believe he would take action but cool and clam while Hilary would act I believe to timidly and over calculate the situation.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Robert, Houston, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:35:27 GMT

Well I'm a republican, but I am keeping a close eye on the democrat side as well. I would choose Obama over Clinton any day of the week and twice on Thursday. I don't care for Clinton since the days of WHITEWATER, which seems to slip everyone's mind. Obama doesn't have the experience to run the country either. Although I would take his lack of experience over a lying, cheating, pathetic excuse of a (sub)human like Clinton. But after listening to both sides of Democrat and Republican alike I still have to throw my vote towards Ron Paul. I know this isn't the forum for it, and no I'm not one of the "right wingers", but I do believe that he has the experience and conviction to do the right thing. He has always voted the way he believes in and what he believes in is the "CONSTITUTION". Shoot even Bill Mahr a complete left wing individual calls Ron Paul his hero and Dr. Paul recieved a standing ovation on Bill Mahr's show. That has to say something about the man. But do your own research and find out for yourself. Don't let anyone (including me) make this decision for you. Go into it with both eyes wide open and decide for yourself.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Pauline, West Palm Beach, FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:38:24 GMT

Coming form someone who likes straightforwardness, it appears disengineous for Sen.Obama to keep harping on the fact that he didn't vote the war in the beginning. He was not in the senate.

Unlike Mr. Obama, Mrs. Clinton takes responsibility for whatever transpires in her campaign. Mr. Obama likes to blame others for any negative that comes out of his campaign. He needs to make up his mind, he is either the leader or he isn't. The buck stops at the leaders desk.
Mrs. Clinton is experienced, steady and assured. I believe she hs the discipline and the strenght to make the tough decisions when necessary.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marie, Seattle — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:39:56 GMT

Sometimes more "political experience" can mean becoming better at covering up lies and questionable activities. Do any of you remember the Whitewater scandal which the Clintons were involved in: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/arkansas/etc/friends.html
I'm voting for Obama - hands down.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

J. Henke, Salem, Illinois — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:41:34 GMT

Does anyone remember Whitewater when the McDougals went to jail so they didn't incriminate Hillary. When will someone bring that up?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Doe Iowa — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:43:49 GMT

Obama, he talks so well, just like decent raised 20 year olds, do. But his substance, well let us just say,there is lots of eloquent(yes I MEAN ELOQUENT IN THE FEM form)talk, but no substance! He speaks AROUND the issues, directly to the un educted. Educated people can see right through this bull. I will take Clinton. Hillary knows more about how to get things done in Washington, in her sleep, then if Obama had 10 years of her sleeping to catch up. Obama would get nothing done, here or anywhere else, WAKE UP! Obama will finish second, and if he is Lucky, he may be the Vice nominee, but I doubt Hillary is so nieve to leave control of the US to someone who is so un qualified. Good for her ! Bidden as Vice.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Patti Doe , Scottsdale, Az — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:44:02 GMT

Obama needs to go home and get some experience.."2 years does not a senator make", maybe he can come back in 15-20 years when he has some substance to him.. go make the mistakes before you get into the white house not when you have the whole house to loose. As for Hillary, how much of her is really Bill talking??? I think I'll just watch and listen for a while..

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tania, Santa Cruz CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:45:24 GMT

Obama only mentions the ENVOY after Albright mentions so. He is definitely NOT ready to be president. I like the guy, but he lacks too much. Clinton has spent many years in public service, and enough years in public office. She WILL be president in 2009..without a doubt! I'm a woman, hispanic and a lesbian. I am going to make sure, that all the women I know as well as don't know-to vote for her. Get all the Hispanics and gay, lesbo, bi, trans to vote for her..Because I know she is REAL! For the people, those especially labeled by thos high, unethical, uncaring, program cutters (Replubicans) that don't care for the poor, minorites and programs for Families and Children. She will be the Second Clinton in that White House, Made by and supported by the people in this country! I am proud to say, I SUPPORT HILLARY CLINTON ALL THE WAY! I read all the comments on "GO obama" "Obama nailed it" ect..What are ya'll trippin' on???

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ramona, Phoenix, AZ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:46:06 GMT

Hillary is just plain scary. She sold out to her husband to get where she is now, and I'm sure that's just the tip of the iceberg. Obama is spot on with what we need in terms of diplomacy- he may be young and relatively inexperienced, but look at where the "experienced" politicians and advisors have taken us?? We NEED a change! Go Barack!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rob, Ca — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:47:54 GMT

Oh good answer. Give me a break! If you think this was some fantastic presidential reply from Obama and not from his staff sitting up all night to figure out the best answer after he screwed up in the debate you are truly naive. Hell anybody can pay for a politically correct response if it is delayed but you can't pay to prevent hoof n mouth disease when it is off the cuff.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cheryl — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:50:07 GMT

Hillary is the worst choice for us, and if anyone thinks she can make changes they are crazy. If you want everyone to walk all over us then vote her in. She is just the same as her lying husband,naive, insecure, cold, calculating,and will be bad news for us. I for one will not vote for her EVER!!!!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John R — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:51:44 GMT

He said what he meant, but didn't mean to say it that way. Possibly a hint that more experience is needed.

In my prediction, Mrs. Clinton will win the nomination, as she should. She does have the vast experience and ideas that we all need.

If the Democrats want the white house for the next 16 years, then the party needs to get these 2 together and have him join her on her ticket. If that would happen, there is no doubt in my mind that they would be elected. She would then be re-elected and after 8 years of vice, he would be perfectly groomed to be president.

That's how I feel and how I hope.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Renny — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:51:46 GMT

Both Clinton/Obama supported the amnesty bill last month. Although I have always voted democrat, their willingness to sell-out American citizenship to illegal aliens, has ended any chance I would vote for either.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Don Shorey — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:52:07 GMT

Well done Obama, well done now keep the pressure on and she will fold like Bill allways did.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Cincinnati Ohio — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:59:02 GMT

I think Obama has nailed it also. Being a Veteran, I am NOT in favor of the Clintons in the White House again. I say this as a Republican -- I could vote for Sen. Obama. If he wins the Democratic nomination I'll consider it. Of all the candidates running for the Democratic nomination, he deserves it most.

I'm of course waiting for Ron Paul to pull out in front. Wishful thinking but if he can do it he's got the same line of thinking as Sen. Obama. With these 2 winning nominations in their respective parties, we'd have a real choice for the first time in a long time.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Cincinnati Ohio — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:01:21 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Fran, Graham, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:03:05 GMT

This is why I'm voting for Edwards.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Todd, Springfield, VA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:04:26 GMT

Another example why Obama is clearly the better choice for president in 2008. Hilary continues to flip flop and dodge questions on serious issues debates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

S.S.Saad, Ringoes, NJ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:04:54 GMT

In my opinion Americans support for Hillary coming from their appreciation to Bill Clinton whom we love as intellegent president for this country, but yes, I agree Hillary isn't the person who'll defeat the republican,
Saad,NJ

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Paul Fraser — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:08:17 GMT

You're all idiots. Obama is trying to salvage a bad loss on this issue. Hillary's answer was correct and very professional. Obama is trying to reverse this back on her but it just doesn't fit. It doesn't work.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Berkeley — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:13:24 GMT

Hillary supporters will continue to rag on Obama's lack of experience. However, the most experienced politician doesn't equate necessarily equate to a good leader and a consensus builder. Obama has shown both of these qualities already.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Claudis Polk,west bloomfield,mich — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:16:15 GMT

senator Obama you are ready for the job.you are the politician we need at this time you proved it during the debate monmday night.you bring back memories of R.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Claudis Polk,west bloomfield,mich — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:16:19 GMT

senator Obama you are ready for the job.you are the politician we need at this time you proved it during the debate monmday night.you bring back memories of R.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Scott Tepper — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:17:23 GMT

Obama is now massaging his message. What he says now is certainly good, but it's not what he said in response to the question that was asked. Clinton's initial criticism was correct has caused Obama to start spinning. And I like the guy.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nick, Minneapolis, MN — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:18:11 GMT

What Obama may lack in political (not leadership) experience, he makes up in wisdom.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nick James — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:19:51 GMT

Steve G are you crazy? So if you think they will get slaughtered by the thousands and have such a problem with it why not bring up the Congo and the fact that than Secretary of State Colin Powell said that Genocide was going on. Probably cause you dont really care and dont want to admit to your friends neighbors and family how wrong you were voting for the retard Bush and his cronies. I cant stand to even hear you idiots talk anymore about staying the course and giving it time. WE HAVE GIVEN IT TIME! We cant stay there forever and these people have no real intentions of making their country a better place. Why should we help a country that doesnt want our help and doesnt even want to help themselves. The whole Al Quida had something to do with Sadaam and the weapons of mass destruction is just poilitical propaganda meant to distract people from the real issues. Its not about Democrats and Republicans anymore its about morals, values and integrity. I am still young and never have I felt like our country was so torn! Its sad that in todays world we vote for the best of the worst instead of the best man for the job.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Michelle, San Mateo,CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:21:03 GMT

Way to go Obama! Don't let Hilary pin you down and put words into your mouth (like the Bush Admin always tries to do to everyone that doesn't agree with them).
Hilary right now is acting like a scared politician. She should be scared...she is seeing that this country needs a true leader...someone who will fight to make a difference. Someone who understands and will work for regular people. I just don't see that in Hilary...she's too much a politician and someone who I see as always looking at the poll numbers.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Karl Kolb, Eau Claire, WI — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:21:35 GMT

The more Obama speaks out like this the more I like him and his politics - his is exactly what we need, time for a change, no more Bush/Clinton dynasties.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe Conservative — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:22:32 GMT

Say no to Hillary,she is an ungrateful, hateful left-wing candidate. Also say no to Obama, he is a Black muslim, grew up in the muslim faith,America is not ready for him. Stay conservative so we don't cut and run and bring the fighting back to the U.S.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:24:32 GMT

doyou really want a repeat of this?

To understand why clinton failed so utterly to protect America from bin Laden, we begin by examining what clinton, himself, has said on the matter:

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

We note first that this is classic clinton snake oil, exploiting liberal credulousness and the gestalt concepts of structural economy and closure (the tendency to perceive incomplete forms as complete), sleight of hand that enabled clinton to tell the story of his utter failure to fight terrorism, his failure to take bin Laden from Sudan, his repeated failures to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda, without explicitly admitting it.

"The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again; [so] they released him [to America]."

Note that the linkage between the above two sentences and the indirect object of the second sentence are each implied, giving clinton plausible deniability.

"[H]e had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

This position is surprising because:

clinton has never been one to let the rule of law get in his way.

We now know the State Department warned clinton in July 1996 that bin Laden's move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven, that bin Laden sought to expand radical Islam "well beyond the Middle East," that bin Laden in Afghanistan "could prove more dangerous to US interests... almost worldwide."

Bin Laden had repeatedly declared war on America, committed acts of war against America.
Clearly, the impeached ex-president treated terrorism not as war but as a law enforcement problem, which, by definition is defensive, after-the-fact and fatally-too-late.

He appears not to understand that when terrorists declare war on you…and then proceed to kill you… you are, perforce, at war. At that point, you really have only one decision to make: Do you fight the terrorists… or do you surrender?

Critical to the understanding of the clintons' (and the left's) inability to protect America from terrorism is the analysis of clinton's final phrase, "though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

"I did not bring him [Osama bin Laden] here... though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

This phrase is clinton's explicit rejection of both bin Laden's repeated declarations/acts of war and the (Bush) doctrine of preemption to fight terror.

This phrase underscores clinton's failure to understand that:

a terrorist war requires only one consenting player

the War on Terror is global and irreducible, the Left's postmodern posture notwithstanding.

defining bin Laden's acts of war as "crimes'' is a dangerous, anachronistic, postmodern conceit (It doesn't depend on what the meaning of the word "war" is) and amounts to surrender preemptive action, and even more so, preventative action, serve a necessary, critically protective, as well as offensive function in any war on terror.
The sorry endpoint of this massive, 8-year clinton blunder was, of course, 9/11 and the exponential growth of al Qaeda.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

C. V. Viano — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:27:16 GMT

People I hope you realize that if Obama gets the nomination, it will guarantee 8 more years of a republican president. Myself I think our country has been dragged down enough. GO BILLARY!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ObaMama, Illiois — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:33:55 GMT

Obama begin to sound more presidential? You must be kidding! He is beginning to sound more like a kid! Obama, try meeting Osama!!! And see what you can get out of it! A stray bullet in your head or a stop to terrorism. Stupid and ridiculous kiddie reply. You are not ready for the big job. America needs experienced people like Hillary not a 2 year old mama's boy!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sohan Pieris — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:34:32 GMT

They are both RIGHT. They chose different methods of
reaching out & achieving the end goal. Far better than shutting out your adversaries like the present
mal-administration has done & achieved NOTHING in six years. At this jucture, the best man for the job is a WOMAN - the men have blown it. GO HILLARY GO!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Vaughan — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:38:50 GMT

Not talking to enemies sure is working for the Iraqi Parliament, isn't it?

NO! We're asking Iraqis to talk with enemies and people have murdered relatives. Yet we can't talk to our enemies because, what, we're above that??? Obama is right! Go O!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jamie Silva, Atlanta, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:39:06 GMT

Do any of you supporting Obama have any unbias? If you re-read the question asked during the debate, "would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition..." WITHOUT PRECONDITION! It was very clear that Hillary's answers was correct and Presidential, and Obama's was inexperienced. Obama comes back a day later and copies her answer, then tries to divert the issue to the war, maybe Obama should ask Hillary to be an advisor for him, he obviously needs her answers. Hillary: Experience 10 / Obama: Experience 1

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

TONY SACCO, CAPE CHARLES, VIRGINIA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:40:59 GMT

I BELIEVE YOU GOT HER SEN. OBAMA, WHERE DO I SEND YOU MY CONTRIBUTION.

AND KEEP IT UP, YOU GOT TILTING A BIT.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jane Doe, Lincoln, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:41:41 GMT

I think it is sad that both Hillary and Obama had to explain what they meant what they said during the debate. We need a President who does not need to explain what he meant. Let's hope someone else will come to us before super Tuesday in 2008. Neither of these two are presidential material. No more Clinton's or Bush's.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

D Scully — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:42:21 GMT

When did it become okay for anyone besides the president or his emissary to negotiate foreign policy? Private citizens, congressmen, and candidates do not have the right to speak for the rest of the nation.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Stephen, New York — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:44:09 GMT

Are you people kidding me? I can't believe that you would undercredit Senator Obama because of his age and him being in freshmen in the Senate. That is unbelievable. What makes you think that a powerful leader like him can not lead our great nation with the aid of experienced, non-leaders below him? All he needs is some good aids in his office when he gets there...he is just the leader we need. Strong and loud. Not to mention intelligent and, quite frankly, straight-forward unlike Hillary Clinton. Obama for '08...wouldn't want it any other way.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marc Kenyon, Chattanooga, Tn — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:44:12 GMT

I remember about 20 years ago a guy named Reagan decided to break with all the standard protocols and just go have a face-to-face with a guy named Gorbachev, much to the dismay of his staff and to the criticism of many that "you just don't do diplomacy like that". But a funny thing happened in that unconventional meeting - it lead to the end of the cold war.

What we need now is another bold leader that is willing to take risks, who will stand up, but also reach out at the same time. We don't need someone who wants to "lawyer" every issue into the ground. We need decisive action and a decisive leader - Barack Obama is the person we need in the Oval Office.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Better Days Are Coming — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:45:53 GMT

I think there are alot more imortant issues.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bryant, Scott AFB, IL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:47:10 GMT

Anyone but Hillary. Let’s turn the page please. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. The same page of the same book. On second thought let’s not turn the page, let’s get a new book. Go Obama

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Christie, Columbia MO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:48:19 GMT

For all the people who think that Obama doesn't have enough "experience", I suggest you read his autobiography: "Dreams of My Father". He has long been serving the needs of people, first in Chicago, then Illinois, and now America. He's not naive - he's just blunt & honest, concepts we're not used to in politics. Plus, he has the human, educational, and political experience to get the job done as President.

Try reading the book, you might like it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard Pearce, Topeka, KS — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:48:53 GMT

Obama's original statement regarding meeting anti-American national leaders without prior groundwork WAS naive. His clarification that preliminary diplomatic work would "of course" be done is a bit belated, but both candidates seem to agree now, so where is the conflict? Taking pot shots at your opponents is what politics is all about, for each candidate. I would call this discussion foolish if it did not show serious polarization within the Democratic Party. As has been previously observed, I do not belong to an organized political party: I am a Democrat. All Democrats should reconsider making mountains out of mole-hills and remember that at the end of the day, their real opponents are the Republicans, who are no doubt enjoying a sly laugh over this silliness.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ramona Fulton, Preston, MS — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:49:04 GMT

Last night I requested that I be taken off of Hillary's email list. Her acqusations against Obama were petty. If she can be that nasty over his comments about meeting with presidents from ALL countries, she is no different than the current Bush misfits. Obama, you definitely NOW HAVE MY VOTE!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Kenneth Alexander, Anchorage, Alaska — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:55:00 GMT

'OKAY,' "forget the tough questions for a moment. Lets try a very simple question - why did Sen. H. Clinton authorize the war in the first place?" Was that an irresponsible and/or naive move. Actually, it doesn't even matter at this point, whats certain, however, is that the move he made (authorizing the war) turned out be a HIGHLY DANGEROUS ACT OF IRRESPONSIBILITY!!!

Can Obama 'screw' things up that bad? I think not!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JH, Thousand Oaks, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:57:53 GMT

Obama is just stubbornly sticking to his naive position that we should be willing to meet with rogue states. He's trying to rationalize his response, as he doesn't want to be wrong, twisting his response to fit some sort of rationale even if it doesn't make good sense. Obama is making it clear that he just doesn't have enough experience for the job.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jerry E. Davis JR. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:59:05 GMT

Either way you go on this we all lose, we have very serious problems here in the u.s. that are hardly ever debated. Me being a kid who grew up in the bronx and harlem, seeing little hope for america's youth. What I think is important is not important to america. The next generation needs help, trust me when I tell you. Both hillary & Obama should speak directly to them. The reason most inner city kids don't care about America, is because they feel America doesn't care about them. Yes the world is important, this new war on terrorism is important, but so are all the could be doctor, lawyers, etc who are dying everyday over the lack of hope of help to feel important from America.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ryan, Oak Hill WV — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:00:42 GMT

Obama made a terrible mistake by promising to meet with leaders of rogue and dangerous countries without preconditions. Senator Clinton has once again showed her strength and ability to lead by promising rigorous diplomactic enjoys for any country. She is right to keep the prestige of the presidency at its highest by not being used for propaganda. She is the right person to lead, the right one for change!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dennis Higginbotham, Salem, OR — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:02:35 GMT

Senator Obama needs to be more careful when he speaks.
On the big stage, there are consequences for the spoken word. He will learn with experience.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Diane McDuffie — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:03:53 GMT

I believe it was Obama (or his campaign people as he said) who threw out the first shot against Hillary. Obviously he doesn't like it when the shoe is on the other foot. If that is truly what he meant to say, then that is what he should have said in the first place. I for one am quite tired of all the sneaky, double talk being done. Especially by our leaders. Shame on them all!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Diane McDuffie, Billings, MT — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:04:23 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

L. Johnson, Mantua, NJ. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:06:52 GMT

To meet or not to meet, does it really matter? For me, it's about dumping this BIG BULLY approach that breeds us more enemies than friends - and really has no place in today's world - for something more responsible (there's that word again). From what I have seen of Obama, we can sure do a hell of a lot worse! So what say we quit with the recycling and break out something new, huh?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sarah, Hebo, Or — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:08:26 GMT

Having a winning personality is not a requirement to be President. Hillary may not have a great one but she beats Obama hands down. Also she has the expierence and common sence to be a great President. Being a woman is not what it's all about either. She is smart, direct, and diplomatic enough to get the job done and done WELL. Edwards can beat Obama anytime.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Richard L.A. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:15:03 GMT

This just shows again neither Clinton or Obama are presidential material. The only canidate with the experience, knowledge and morals to lead is Bill Richardson. I hope everyone will stop being brainwashed by the media and think about where our country is going. Obama can't give straight answers in a debate, what do you think will happen when he meets hostile leaders? And Clinton has so much bad baggage in her past and no leadership abilities. She has never been elected to any post of straight out leadership. If things don't change and the media stop promoting the worst 2 canidates we are doomed!!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

david r vashon island, wa — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:16:00 GMT

for the sake of our fledgling democracy, let's address the real issue. We must get the national debt and spending under control. we are digging a very deep hole and no one wants to address it. 12 billion a month in iraq, for what? think about it. wake and smell the coffee, the bacon's burning....................

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

david r vashon island, wa — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:16:07 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jeff Parker, CO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:17:52 GMT

Obama is finally starting to sound like a President.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Joe, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:23:43 GMT

O'bama makes a great point. Only thing is, if it takes a follow-up interview with a news organization to get your point across, then you've lost the debate... like some idiot Republican did re: evolution.

If you're telling everyone that it's important to get it right the first time, why should you get a second chance to clarify your position?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

L Carr — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:28:22 GMT

Oh no! Obama in the White House? We better brace ourselves if he gets in. He's scary. You don't compromise the standing of the US by unconditionally meeting with dictators. They're dictators, remember?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Desmond Webley, Boonton, New Jersey — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:30:45 GMT

The idea of both Hillary and Obama in the White House together, really appeals to me, with Hillaty the Chief of course. With respect to the question of early dialogue with adversarial heads of state, both candidates appear to aggree fundamentally on policy and Sen. Obama was correct in reprimanding her on such a cheap shot.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Cade Holleman, Seoul, South Korea — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:37:42 GMT

It's fine now for Senator Obama to parade the fact that he didn't vote to authorize the war and rag Senator Clinton for doing so but Obama wasn't even a senator in 2002. He was sworn in much later, in 2005 and in the interim months was witness to the fallout of Iraq. To listen to him go on and on about not voting for this war, and position himself on some sort of morale high ground, is about as transparent as the air in front of my face. She has answered for that vote and I respect her for not apologizing for it; the apology, as we all know, isn't Clinton's to give. This talk about meeting adversarial world leaders, or committing to it far before it could ever happen, just shows that Obama is still too new to this game. The problems we face with North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Syria should, as they ever are, be handled first at ambassadorial levels, through mediators or in the context of regional discussion. I doubt Obama has the capacity to single-handedly sway these leaders pro-American or atleast to friendlier ground. There are experts in these fields and two years on capitol hill wouldn't qualify anyone for the sort of whirlwind foreign policy he's advocating. And if he did actually do it, I'm not sure I would trust the results. If there were any.

Experience matters in 2008 and Obama hasn't got it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tim Eureka Mo. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:37:57 GMT

The only real chance we have to chart a new course in this country is with Senator Obama. I respect what president Clinton did in his term, but it's time to turn the page. We must engage the rest of the world and act not as the worlds policeman, but as partners with other nations to help solve our common problems.
Senator Clinton statement that she is not willing to meet with other leaders will only continue the problems we face today. The Bush policies have put us in a hole so deep that I beleive only a true visonary
of Brack's quality can help us start to dig out.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

ekim yenrab, denver — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:39:51 GMT

say what you want, but O'bama just demonstrated that rational humanistic thought that believes, at the bottom of it all, all people in all nations just want to be respected, is alive in national politics. You call it naive, I call it encouraging. Join us in Denver to celebrate the victory!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike, Addy, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:40:32 GMT

Are all of these people touting a "seasoned professional" in politics really happy with the seasoned pro's we have now? The corruption, self-interest, etc? If so, then yeah... GO HILLARY!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Saturnino D'Oliveira — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:41:54 GMT

The Republican performance in the majority has been a disgrace to this country. Bill Clinton was supposed to be impeached because of having an act of fellatio performed on him and lying about it and countless tax payer money was spent on this persuit. Bush has defiled our constitution to a criminal extent yet he remains in office. This fact only shows me that the Democrats lack of the backbone of leadership. Both parties are failures at this point.

Anyone stating that Obama is not seasoned to lead this country might do well to examine how far down this country has fallen under the leadership of the "so called seasoned" candidates. We did not deserve the attack of 911 but, we should indeed examine why we did not have dialouge that could have prevented 911 from every happening. Keep your friends close but your enemies closer. We had a "COLD WAR" with the former U.S.S.R that never became "HOT." Why? Because we had a constant communication with our enemy at that time and through out the skemishes we never went to war. We met with the U.S.S.R constantly and we nor they met "these so called conditions." Grow up people. It is time for a political change that so far neither party has demostrated. I will give Obama this, he is representing a change of policy that is needed and that he realizes his party has not given the American people. Hillary has some very good detailed ideas but, she is also very "UNCLEAR" about issues that need radical changes. I don't see "EITHER" party or specifically, either candiate behind Socialized Medicine; which, we could have in this country without "EVER" suffering from reduction in the quality of care "IF" it is managed correctly. I haven't heard either party talk about how cost effectively Solar energy could solve our energy issues. In 1900 1/3 of all automobiles in NYC were powered by electricty. Ring any bells for you about what we could do now?

To point: It is excellent to see Sen. Obama's reponse to Sen. Clinton. I think she was out of line with her comments towards the Sen. Obama.

To point: I don't think the Republican party can lead this country at this time simply because Bush, his administration and the scandals that surround that party has caused it to much damage. To that end the "ONLY" way that the Democratic Party can lead this country is not by just verbally distancing itself from past performance (sheer lack of backbone) but, by demostrating a true visual effect of change. Pound for pound Bill Clinton's administration did a better job of leading this country, for all his mistakes than the Bush Administration. But, to move even further I believe we need even more radical of a change.

It remains to be seen who will demostrate these qualities and move beyond the failures of the past (Democratic and Republican) and the influence of lobbying conglomerates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ernest, San Antonio, Texas — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:45:59 GMT

Now let's shake things up. Go OBAMA GO!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Anthony Pascual — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:46:00 GMT

It is time for a change of policy! Obama can lead us in this direction. I've already have seen what experiance brings America........ OBAMA IN 08 let every country embrace that America is good.........

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Dave, Milwaukee, WI — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:48:41 GMT

Obama seems to be a well versed Dem. It is obvious to me that Hillary is losiing her position in this race for the White House. I don't know about you but I and many others would prefer not having Bill Clinton running free in the White House. As Former President and possible First Man, he'll know all the back doors and hideouts he can use. NOT GOOD LADIES!

Second, Why is it that most people expect the President to be a seasoned politician. Those are the ones that get us in the most trouble. They are the ones that owe the most to lobbyist and other supporters. They are the ones that compromise!

Thank you Obama for reminding us that we are on the plain with everyone else. We may be the greatest country in the world, however, we shouldn't think that we stand taller and should be looked up to by all the others. When you're elected I look forward to the breathe of fresh air that will sweep through the White House and Washington politics.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jon - Tulsa, OK — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:49:35 GMT

Somebody on here wrote the the next Pres would be GOP? Only if Lincoln's DNA is cloned.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marc, Spokane, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:50:57 GMT

You know, if being a more seasoned politician makes you perform the way Ms. Clinton does, then I'll go for a less seasoned politician like Obama any day. Seasoned politicians are all about telling us what you can't do because of this, this and this. The less seasoned will look at those obstacles and do what it takes to knock them down to actually ACCOMPLISH something rather than more or less retaining the status quo, which at this point is pretty darned poor. I know all politicians can effect change, but I think Obama will stir things up in a way that no other politician seems to be able to do. If nothing else, it's going to be an eye-opener, and I really hope Obama gets a chance to realize his vision.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

dave, columbia, Missouri — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:52:10 GMT

If Hillary has to argue with Obama on a weekly basis my gut tells me Obama is going to come out on top. This is the best thing that could have happened to him at this stage in the camapaign. She should have just kept her mouth and let surrogates fight for her. Even if she gets nominated battles like this with obama really hurt her chances of winning the general election.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Plucky Purcell, Washington State — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:52:19 GMT

Way to substantiate that opinion Mr. Holbrooke. This is the exact kind of outdated thinking that got us into this mess in the first place. Alienating our "enemies" in the Middle East has backfired as a strategy. Our current military efforts haven't made Iraq more safe. Rather, they have fueled hostilities and polarized religious factions. Whether we like it or not, we need to engage our enemies in diplomacy. And it may take someone from a younger generation, like Obama, to bring about that change. I applaud Obama for standing up for his beliefs. Hilary Clinton should be embarrassed for sounding like such a isolationist. This is the 21st century, surely we have evolved enough to give peace a chance.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David, Atlanta GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:56:27 GMT

Honestly, most of the people voicing criticism of Obama state that it's due to his supposed "Inexperience", "Naivity", or some "Other" Notion. But, the truth of the matter is that 99,99% of those criticisms are because of his ethnicity. Most Americans won't admit it, but it's the truth. I'm presently a 3rd year medical school student, I finished a masters degree in August of 2006 and previously I attended law school; and during these time I have witnessed so many cases where "Ethnic Minorities" are questioned in the same circustances where "white males" were not. Was President Bush question about his "Naivity" or "Inexperience"? No... But, Obama is; The Double standard is so obvious that it's not funny. But, we live in a land where people would rather have a president who's been an alcoholic and a coke-head but has "Good Old Boy" Values rather than an intelligent one. It's a sad state of affairs; but it does represent America to a large extent. If Americans spent a significant amount of time in Europe, they'd come to see just how racist and prejudiced most people are in the US. I mean, MLK's march in Selma Alabama was only about 3 decades ago; My mom marched with him and Corretta Scott King is a distant relative of mine. The Best Phrase that I can think of to describe the "changes" that people say have come about in race relations in the US is this: "Disturbing the Surface of a Lake or an Ocean has little effect at the bottom of it" America's surface has changed, but the core beliefs expressed by most white in this country have not. And, as far as most African Americans in this country, it appears that most would rather support Rap Stars, Hip Hop Stars, and OJ rather than a Brilliant Articulate AA Presidently Candidate. The state of this country is sad; but don't think for a minute that it has somehow gone bad... America is no worse than it's ever been; it's just that we can't keep up that false appearances anymore...

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lisa Graves, Eastpointe, MI — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:57:14 GMT

I want a President who will talk to other leaders, one who is personable enough not to give them the wrong impression of what USA stands for. One that can maintain composure and speak intelligently as a human being as opposed to an artificial being! Obama '08!!!!! Regarding experience? Obama is very experienced in protecting civil rights... and that in my opinion is the best experience I could ask for in a leader!!!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bob Walters, Danville, Illinois — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:57:56 GMT

I think Hillary' comments were right on the money.As is often said, " don't send a boy to do an adult job."

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mike Stern — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:58:49 GMT

I am inclined to support either one if they win the nomination, but Hillary is twisting what Obama said and the media is falling for it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

DKC — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:01:02 GMT

The candidates being offered to the Amercan voting public,republican,democrat,liberal ;etc; are not the true representation of the heart of this country.

Government today is a self- contained bueraucracy(?) of continued hand-shaking,back-slapping good ol' boys that has spilled over into a certain kind of mesmerizing Hollywood media drama testground for sensationalism.

We as Americans,need to elect a President that is a Spokesman for all The People of the United States of America,not for the ones that pay for him to be there!

It's up to US to set the standards for Presidency,NOT for the President to set standards for US!

I say we start lookin to our neighbours and our friends and search for the next Leader of this country ,one that can lead with heart and soul vs: check and balance/change

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jeff Yowell, Tulsa, Okla. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:01:06 GMT

We have tried not talking with other nations for eight years now, and it has been a disaster. Hillary saying she would not meet with anyone for a year is laughable. We've tried it that way, Ms. Clinton. It doesn't work. GO OBAMA!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Robert Miller Gastonia NC. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:01:41 GMT

I am 43 years old and in my life the only president I have any respect for at all was Nixon.

Every one of the candidates are liars and hippocrates and I don't like or trust any of them.

I would feel safer and freer if we took all Americans that make under $100,000 and put there names in a pot and randomly draw a name for presidency.

It is time to make it easier to create new parties and one of them is the fix America party and stay out of the internal affairs of foreign governments.

Let Israel defend it's self and let the middle east have a big war to create the type of nation it wants with out America putting people like saddam in power who create more messes. We have been supporting Israel for fifty years it is time they took care of them self's

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John Doe — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:03:20 GMT

I think everyone is acting too quick to place victory in Obama's hands, I'd be a little leery of Obama, and his Islamic history

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

steve east LYNN WEST VIRGINIA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:10:16 GMT

OBAMA IF YOU ALL WOULD GET LOUR NOSE OUT OF HIS A.. THEN SOMONE WHO IS CAMPAING FOR PRESIDENT COULD WEN

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

W. B. , Tucson, AZ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:10:31 GMT

Experience counts and so far all O'bama has done is demonstrate he can sell with his mouth. I have yet to be impressed with his results. Remember the last guy that sold his party on a bill of goods. Look where that has gotten us. I'll take the experience of a wise person over a sell job any day.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

xo, los angeles, ca — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:11:29 GMT

Most of you sound down right foolish. All the woman and Feminist men are voting for HIllary because she is a woman. *Who cares about her past. *Who cares that she stood by while Bill Clinton was accused of sexually assaulting 3 woman. (Which was swept under the rug. If he was a rapper or athelete, you guys would have protested until he went to jail.) *Who cares that her brothers were invoved with the criminals that Bill pardon. *Who cares that they both have been involved in numerous scandals since Arkansas. *Who cares that he tried to play the American people like fools by denying he received a Presidential Blow-Job in the Oval Office. *Who cares that SHE sent American soldiers out to die in Iraq. * Who cares that SHE did not value thier lives enough to do her damn job and read the NIE report. *Who cares that both she and her hubby invested in contractors in Iraq and cashed out when she announced she was running for President. Who cares that she held a meeting with Indian Elites pledging to increase HB-1 visas so they could consume more American jobs. *Who cares that SHE said she would meet with the dictators and did not set any specific conditions. The woman is a fake as a 3 dollar bill. Her and her business partner "Red Bull" BIll and as corrupt as they get. They accomplished nothing while in the White House except get paid. Now you think they are going to do so much now. Obama would never disrespect himself and team up with Hillary. Obama did not need a crystal ball to predict the outcome of the war. Remember, Obama has been arougd more the Hillary. He is obviously more educated than both the Clintons. And you can tell he actually reads. All you needed to do is open a history book and you have seen that a war would have been a big mistake. Not only that. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Obama Won that debate hand down. We don't need the most experienced person. He has enough to get the job done. George Bush was more experienced that both of them. Now look at us. We need someone we can TRUST. Hillary and Bill will lie to you with a straight face (Like with the Blow Job case) and try to attack anyone who calls them on it. They only tell you want you want to hear. So go ahead and vote for Hillary. Take off your bra, set it on fire and replace it with the American flag. It will make it easier for Bill to sexually assault you. GOD BLESS AMERICA. Because if Hillary wins. we're going to need it.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jerry Bradford, Washougal, WA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:11:39 GMT

I hope obama continues to demonstrate the courage to state his convictions, and to offer his wisdom and leadership to this country. He is the best statesman to come along in a generation. America is sorely in need of more leaders with his level of integrity.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Christy Lexington, Ky — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:11:51 GMT

Let's all make sure the change we need happens! Let's put the best canidate in office. OBAMA IS THE CHANGE WE NEED!! Make sure you VOTE!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sean — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:13:02 GMT

Anyone but a Clinton or Bush for President in '08. Hillary will do ANYTHING to be president -- she's the same ilk as Bush (corporate b.)and can't be trusted. I'll vote Obama, if he survives (which I doubt). Read the Audacity of Hope. This guy is the real deal. Clinton is more of the same.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Sean — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:13:45 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

DKC Princeton Id — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:16:45 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marc Schroeder San Clemente California — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:19:22 GMT

I was impressed with O'bama but please shut up about your "faith" keep it to your self.Anyone who belives that BS strikes me as an idiot or lying to get elected.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Bawb, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:28:33 GMT

'Scuse me! A John Edwards-Jim Webb ticket would beat a GOP this side of Reagan. Since that's not getting past the DLC, chances are Hillary gets her Vanity WH run. The Senate's in lower repute than even Dick Cheney. No matter: Together with Bob Shrum, she'll lose to a GOP Holoid. Obama's found his voice a bit too late. As Veep under Al Gore, the 'inexperienced' tag goes away....but THAT'S not gonna happen either. Never mind: I've depressed myself.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

JB Idaho Falls ID — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:29:35 GMT

Speaking of crystal balls.....I wish we had one and could look back and see what any of todays candidates would be doing in the world. I sincerely believe we'd be a whole lot worse off. Better yet, a crystal ball to see what will happen in 3 to 4 years under a new president. I sincerely believe we'll be a whole lost worse off.

Every President elect should take a "Pre-Inaugural Agreement" that if under their administration the economy goes to hell, if the employment rate goes to hell, if our national security goes to hell, if our border control problems go to hell, in other words, if we become much worse off, they should agree in advance to resign so America can cut it's losses. Let the VP take a shot at it.

Seems like everybody is bashing actions that under the same circumstances they may have made the same decisions, or worse.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lani, Lithonia, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:35:04 GMT

Go Obama! Let the Hillary camp know if they strike negatively, you will strike back and then some! Keep them playing to your tune...let them and the media know she too much a George Bush wannabe! Don't be like John Kerry always playing to George Bush's tune instead of his own!

Keep Hillary talking about her decision to authorize the war, and not being accountable to the American people for her decision; if she's truly qualified to lead on her on merit, then why does she has her husband at her campaign stops to validate her?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Chris F, Texas — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:35:06 GMT

This is scary to possibly have a democratic in office! A woman senator, a Clinton; and a Muslim American, Obama. You people think the politics are screwed up now, ha, wait until you get one of these quacks in office and see what happens then!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Wayne Nelson Minnesota — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:35:57 GMT

Fred Thompson is my President

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Nick, Phoenix,AZ — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:38:26 GMT

Obama is as naive as Kerry was when he was up against Bush. The foresight of Senator Clinton is simple and brilliant. The dirty tricks that the Republicans will pull when the primarys are over and we are in a general show down will show that Senator Clinton was absolutely right!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

TiBaw — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:38:54 GMT

The game is on and I am ready. Barack, you will get my money again, and again and again. I was scare but noe I feel peace because I have seen that you are ready for prime time. Anywere Hillary goes, they got her number. She better becareful if she want to be in the race by December.

I am Ready for take to street with Barack. Are you Hill? bringing on.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lani, Lithonia, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:39:23 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

King, Dallas Texas — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:42:32 GMT

Obama knew it might well cost him his ambition to become a US senator in 2004 when he voiced his opposition to this stupid war from the beginning. But, he stood for a principle. Hillary Clinton knew she wouldn't be in any jeopardy if she voted "no" to the war. However, after calculating her chance of becoming a president in 08, she voted for the war and bragged about her vote for years till it became so unpopular. She knew the intelligence was faulty because that was what they were told at secret meeting for the foreign intelligence commeete members, at least that is what Senator Richard Durbin recently said when asked about the pre-war intelligence.

What a contrast! What a choice!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Giancarlo, Cambridge, MA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:43:36 GMT

If voters really want "experiece" then don't vote for Obama or even Hillary -- Dodd and Biden are your dream team.

I think what people want is change. How is what Hillary Clinton saying any different than what has been "business as usual" in Washington for the last 6 years? You think because she wears a skirt things will automatically be different?

America needs a foreign policy overhaul. It has been proven time and time again that "experience" isn't as important as good judgment. Who had more experience prior to 2000 than Cheney and Rumsfeld? Nobody! But who can argue today they showed judgment when getting us into Iraq?

Obama is showing leadership and bold good ideas. Hillary is demonstrating more of the same and political calculation.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Mark Flanders, Bellingham, Wash. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:04:55 GMT

Great response. To Scott: Sure, Obama has good advisors, but her writes his own speeches, and speaks his mind straight up. It would have been wrong not to hit back, and he did it with class, bringing it back to the issues. Go Obama.

mjf.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rene Plata, Pittsburg, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:13:35 GMT

I can't fathom why Clinton attacked Obama. She doesn't have to. She is leading the Democratic field anyway. By doing so, she simply invited a response from someone without the Washington mold.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Daniel Roman, Orlando, Fla. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:16:28 GMT

"THE WAR OF WORDS!" IS WHAT THIS IS REALLY ABOUT.
Obama says what he thinks the People want to hear
and Clinton focuses on what America really needs.
Fancy talk, Manipulations, were never a Solution.
Positive, Effective Change in Gov't is necessary.
It requires Experienced and Wise decision making.
Senator Obama, I do respect your political status
But! America thirsts for a Responsible, Respected Leader of Experience who Commands Cooperation and better results, Domestically and Internationally.
Hillary and Billary Clinton do Factually Qualify!
Overcome humanistic exaggerations and allegations
by concentrating on needed Solutions for Success.
Leading a Nation via Advisors, is Not the answer. Try again in 2012 Sen. Obama, Clinton rules 2008.
Now's a good time to review Clinton Achievements,
not Obama suggested, Politically Ideal Ideologies

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Edward Smith, Las Vegas NV — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:16:51 GMT

I also think Obama nailed it on Monday night. Hillary saying she would "refuse" to meet with the other leaders is "naive" on her part... The question was "would you be willing" to meet in the first year, and Obama said he's willing. and Hillary said she wasn't.

Yes, Obama sounded very Presidential. A true leader. he is not afraid of Hillary or any other leader, his training as a lawyer and a professor shows he can handle sensitive and tumultuous questions, and issues not by deflecting and side stepping... but head on and proactively.

Not only is he the best Dem candiadte, he will show he is the BEST candidate!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tom Ravena — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:19:47 GMT

To Obama and Hillary fans! As Swartznager said about
Linbaugh - they are irrelevant! I would add naïve and lightweights. I'm still waiting for a serious candidate: perhaps Thompson,Edwards,or Romney.

TR

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Daniel Roman, Orlando, Fla. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:19:59 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Lonny Awerdick Ponte Vedra Beach FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:21:11 GMT

Obama blew the answer to a very specific detailed question in the debate. Clinton made the correct response. Now Obama is trying to rewrite his answer with statements like "well obviously I would not just invite them all over for tea".
It does not work that way! To suggest that Clinton would not aggressively use diplomacy is absurd -- the difference is she said she would do it the right way. Obama got taken to school the other night and is now trying to redo his homework for extra credit to make up for a D- on the first try -- a serious plunder!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eugene FRANK MD — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:33:05 GMT

Perhaps the perspective on Hillary's attack on Obama should focus on her need to denigrate and nit pick and clearly take a defensive position as Obama's reasoned and temperate approach contrasts with her arrogant, aggressive and politically motivated, vote-aimed put-down. The shoot-from-the-hip Clinton stance is just more of the same: lets leverage the spin and avoid vulnerability, we are too weak for that.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jim, Boston,MA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:39:28 GMT

Idle thoughts:
Obama better be careful, Arkancide can strike at any time.
He ain't no JFK! The last time we elected a president that promised "change", we got Carter. He's not ready for "prime time", but the thought of Hillary as president is repugnant.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Rev. Dr. Lilia Lopez-Rahman — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:49:13 GMT

That's exactly what I meant when I wrote the first time. A man like Obama, young, intelligent and perceptive, and not bound by old politics will not be afraid to meet all leaders of the world. Meeting peers does not mean agreeing with them, but it reflects the strength of the leader and his character. Madam Clinton relies on old politics inherited from the old guards whose ideas are passe and frozen in time.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Eric, Whittier, CA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:55:12 GMT

So, Hillary is afraid of "risking the prestige of the presidency"? That was already blown away by going into Iraq like a bunch of idiots. The Cold war would have never have been resolved peacefully if there were no Summit meetings between Gorbachev and Reagan. If Reagan had required preconditions for the summit, we would probably be in a nuclear winter right now, if we were still alive.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hewitt Ryan — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:57:54 GMT

Bush I, Bush II. Clinton I, Clinton II? You've got to be kidding. We don't need and the world can not afford more of the same. Obama may well be our last, best hope.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Hewitt Ryan — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:00:02 GMT

Bush I, Bush II. Clinton I, Clinton II? You've got to be kidding. We don't need and the world can not afford more of the same. Obama may well be our last, best hope.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

L.Lopez, Kihei, Hawaii — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:00:31 GMT

Sen. Obama is fresh, intelligent and perceptive. In this postmodern world, things have changed and politics have changed. Senator Obama is not afraid to talk to all the leaders of the world but it does not mean that he will sell the U.S. What he will reflect is his courage and ability to deal with his peers diplomatically. Senator Clinton boasts of her experiences which may be irrelevant. Say no to the old, bring in the new!!!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

L. Rahman. Kihei, Hawaii — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:03:09 GMT

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Jeff Morgan, Austin, TX — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:09:23 GMT

Hillary's problem: she touts her resume, but judgment isn't in her resume. She needs to imply judgment with 'experience,' however Obama attacks her lack of judgment directly.

Here she took the opportunity to show judgment. The problem is that although her answer is correct for beltway insiders, Obama's answer was correct for the average American. What the public wants to hear are definite answers; 'if they meet not-yet-determined preconditions' sounds like a political escape clause.

The problem I have with this is:

Hillary defends her position on the grounds of 'being used for propaganda,' and 'not risking the prestige of the presidency.' Is this what is important to her? Her image, her prestige? In her responses I hear a self-centered person who is unwilling to let go of how they are perceived. By the way, there isn't a ton of prestige in the presidency internationally right now.

This almost makes me question how she sees her role as president. To Hillary, is being president about 'prestige?'

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John, Schenectady — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:11:21 GMT

Once again Hillary offers us the tired statements claiming she would engage difficult nations in vigourous diplomacy, but only do so with preconditions. In other words, she wants to stake out both sides of the issues. She will engage, but she wont engage.

Obama is clearly more direct and straightforward. He is proud of our nation and will take our nation's message to anyone directly -- even the difficult nations. I think this direct approach will leave nations like Iran and North Korea feeling uncomfortably exposed. They will not be able to hide behind preconditions as they do now and as Hillary would if she could. Our nation would get more prestige from Obama's direct approach.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

pfc mannie jamison — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:11:22 GMT

Hillary is OLD news. Hell, Hillary is OLD period. Thank the Lord she's the current frontrunner because EVERYONE knows the frontrunner in July is toast by winter!

Rock on Obama! We love you here in at our station in eastern Baghdad and I hope you get a chance to come over during the campaign.

Vets for Obama
Fighting Dems. Com
http://www.fighting-dems.com/

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ryan, Portland — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:17:06 GMT

J.P. Morgan once said, "A man generally has two reasons for doing a thing; one that sounds good, and a real one." If you don't favor Obama, so be it. But, what is the REAL reason? Almost everybody here has said it is his lack of experience.

Look to Bill Clinton (which many of you Hillary supporters seemingly remember fondly), what was his vast reserviour of experience (Governor of Arkansas??)? Also, experience in Washington means exposure to Washington lobbying. Lobbying is one of American democracy's biggest vices due to its inherent ability of favoring those with resources and means, the deterimental examples of this are too numerous to list. I think most can agree we need a new direction for our country in 2008. I am not saying Clinton would be a bad canidate, just that Obama represents a much clearer alternative direction.

Obama's lack of experience may be a "good" or convient reason to dislike him, but it certainly doesn't seem like a "real" or substantive reason.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

faith white nederland CO — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:23:13 GMT

HELLO
WAR: WHICH INCLUDES THE MASS SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENT, AS A SOLUTION TO TERRORISM: THE MASS SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENT, IS AS IDIOTIC AS IT IS BARBARIC. ANYONE THAT VOTED FOR WAR SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED. KUCINICH DOESN'T GET HIS MONEY FROM THE SAME PEOPLE THAT BROUGHT US THE IRAQ -FOR -CORPORATE - PROFIT DEBACLE AND HE IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO IS FREE OF THE CORPORATE FASCIST MAFIA PAYROLL. DEFINITELY NOT MORE OF THE SAME "RULING CLASS" HILLARY!

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ira Phillips Atlanta, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:24:53 GMT

It appears that Obama is a bright, young man who is not afraid to present his story. However, I have been involved in government as a politician in the past and feel that Obama is to young, to inexperienced, to slick in his speeches, and definitely not the person the Democrats should choose as their presidential candidate. However, my greatest concern is him growing up in a Muslin family that was involved in terrorism activities. Can a leopard change it spots?
Hillary's claim to fame is her decision to stick by Bill during the Monica scandal.
Where are all the great leaders in either party???

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ira Phillips Atlanta, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:27:49 GMT

Remember when Bill first became President and Hillary was very heavily involved in a land deal scandal in Arkansas? Other went to prison, but she was not indicated? Wonder why?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Merlin H, Benson Arizona (Veteran) — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:34:41 GMT

Nuances are media "STUFF". Not the general population. We are not so tainted yet, we cannot read between the lines, when O'bama talks with us, You Tube or not. This whole thing has been nothing but filler for the media which couldn't do it's job, Like Hillary, when it was crucial, before you all gave George the drug called un earned power. Shame on Congress & the Senate & the media for not doing THEIR work!!!! mgh

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Marty Monroe, Bay Harbor Islands, Fla. — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:38:48 GMT

Talk, talk, talk.

ALL candidates always say whatever they think will help get them elected.

Bottom line: Like it or not, Hilary has the experience necessary for the job; Obama doesn't. And, as someone said above, we don't have time now for another Learning-On-The-Job rookie.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tristan, Maquoketa, Iowa — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:44:43 GMT

I think Obama has it right, and we need to leave Iraq. Who care's if their people get "slaughtered by the thousands" as Steve G puts it. It's not our fault, they wouldn't give a rats ass if it were us. We have our own problems to worry about here in the States and I think he's right in wanting to pull our troops out.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

John, Hawaii — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:50:41 GMT

Republicans would love to see Obama win the Democratic nomination. He is statistically weak against Clinton, but I believe that he is dead-money once it goes to a general election. I do not see that white, Christian, rural and suburbia are going to vote for a black candidate. No one will say it, but in the privacy of the voting booth, it's not going to happen for Obama.

What's more, he is urban. He is "sexy". He is Intelligent. That's not going to be enough substance for anybody, in the end. Hillary has a difficult road as a female, but at least she has a mountain of experience.

Also, someone compared Obama to Kennedy. That is ridiculous. JFK had his family's empire and entire political infrastructure behind him, and that gave him international diplomatic finesse and experience from his earliest childhood years. JFK was groomed for the presidency and had a massive war hero image.

Obama made editor at Harvard Law Review (which I am desperatly tired of hearing) & worked as a community organizer in Chicago.

Finally, the media created Obama, in the end the media always destroys what it creates.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

moses sivi from london — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:55:18 GMT

well the issue has simply been obama is not experienced enough.i think the debate put an irony on that and simply what this proves is that hillary is the car that will lead to where bush led us.simply saying she would not the leaders shows the coldness in her and further more why didnt she make a big difference when her husband was president.we need change and believe you me if you want change turn the page people because this is not a family thing from bush to bush the son now and next it may be from clinton to clinton the wife.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Tim, Arlington, VA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:00:27 GMT

This exchange is the best argument yet for the Richardson - Obama ticket. Executive and diplomatic experience meets new ideas and moral courage. Sorry Rudy. It's not that I don't love you, but...hey, maybe you can be governor of NY.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

C Hill E.C. Ohio — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:33:56 GMT

It is still early and we are jumping too soon on anyones wagon. If they appeal seperately, imagine what they would be like together. Change is the mandate. Make it so America.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Moreira, Maputo - Mozambique - Africa — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:42:47 GMT

I think Obama is a nice guy.

Moreira

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

David, Waycross, GA — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:58:10 GMT

"If Obama has to inform Iran that Israel is our ally, then we ARE in trouble!" The rest of what Obama says is "blah, blah, blah", just a bunch of political rhetoric in attacking President Bush and trying to lump Hillary in with him (imagine that!).

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Steven Lacks, Orlando, FL — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:49:01 GMT

Obama's statements are a breath of fresh air. This has put him in a new light for me. While opening up communication may sound simple, that is what we need.

Bush has been simple, but simple with an agenda of American imperialism, elitism, mouthing off, and lies.

Opening communication, honesty, and tact are simple but tried and true. I am tired of living in an America that is hated and feared around the world.

I am not saying to get rid of the military or back down in a tough situation. I am pointing out that we can take the hard, but rewarding route. We can have the most effective military in the world, the most effective diplomacy, the most effective healthcare, and the most effective educational system.

We can have freedom and security, if we stop using bad practices to gain economic dominance and begin phasing out the military-industrial complex we can expand american influence more than threats and force ever could.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Ann — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:56:31 GMT

Obama suddenly become Irish? What's with the O'Bama?

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

Fred, Charlotte, North Carolina — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:56:39 GMT

The interesting thing is the nature of the criticisms of Obama. They seem to criticize his style or just the fact that he exists as a political force. Come on America, let's not let our bigotries ruin our destiny as it has during the 6 1/2 years of Cheney/Bush.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

claudiu dijmarescu — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:18:42 GMT

Oh my,this country can do better than all this bunch of puppets.Gore shall run.Obama shall realize that relations with Israel brought us on the hit list.None of those loosers told ME why we became one of the most hatred nation yet.None (except Cucinich)have a clear Iraq agenda.`nuf said

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

um fatima, amman, jordan — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:20:38 GMT

"Hey..let's just pull out of Iraq....and watch the countries people get slaughtered by the thousands...!!

steve G "

that's what i'm seeing seeing already steve.

Exclusive: Obama hits Clinton -- harder

James Smith — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:32:18 GMT

What is missing here is what Ronald Reagan always said "TRUST BUT VERIFY". Niether Obama or Hillary are going to negoiate through strength because both are against the miltary. Look no further than Bill Clintons responses to the various attacks on American interest including the bombing of the USS Cole. HIllary is surrounded by the same people Bill had in his administration and Obama is completely against any miltary response which is demonstrated by his conitinued anti war stance. We need a strong leader in the White House niether Obama or Hillary meet that critera.