Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Jeffrey C. Timmons, Minneapolis,Mn. — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:10:43 GMT

It's all about Hillary. hillaryclinton.com see why.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Beth Monroe, New Orleans, La. — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:11:51 GMT

Lookie here... hillaryclinton.com

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Nathan E., Hanover, NH — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:15:29 GMT

Richardson finally started to get traction once he started running ads in Iowa. I suspect you'll see the same thing with Biden, now that he's got ads up, too. Remember, his campaign has more of a central, focused message than Richardson's. That was Dodd's problem - he ran ads, but had no central message behind them. So I imagine that now that Biden is out of Committee hearings and has ads on the air, something will start to move.

It would help, of course, if you people in the MSM gave as much attention to Biden, Richardson, and Dodd as you do the "big" three. Remember, Kerry only had 3% in the polls in December '03.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Chris Young — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:32:33 GMT

This was an intelligent debate. I actually like what I heard from Biden and Dodd today. While I know they've got experience, I didn't know much about what they stood for in terms of their aspirations for President. Obama and Clinton held onto their frontrunner status, but again Biden and Dodd deserve a second look.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Don Short Pasadena. CA — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:52:18 GMT

This was a rather weak debate but, one thing has struck me lately.There must be a reason everyone is so threatened by Obama. His presence and common sense approach seems to intimadae people of the right as well as his running mates and the media. If any of the other candidates had his record (voting against the war) they would be spouting it every two sconds and using as a weapon. He seems vey humble aout this. He still may be the cadidate to beat in my book.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Jennifer Westin — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:17:15 GMT

The more debates I watch, the more I realize that I will not vote for Hillary, Obama or Edwards.

C'mon MSM! Shutup about the top tier already. I have a decision to make. And I need to learn more about Joe Biden, because I am liking him more and more.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

cms — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:41:20 GMT

Sorry, Chuck, but the media IS obsessed with the horse race.

Starting this campaign, I'd actually considered Richardson as a possible number two. He's now in the Gravel, Kucinich camp, as far as I'm concerned. The biggest disappointment of the lot by far.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Erica — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:42:28 GMT

It is unconscionable and pathetic that Kucinich was not given more time. The comment from Chris Young above exemplifies that the efforts and platforms of the so-called lower tier candidates are being discounted by those who have vested interests in steering the nomination in the direction of Obama, Clinton, Edwards. We as average Americans can no longer let money and media influence override our common sense. Thanks to the internet, we are at least better equipped to learn the facts for ourselves. With it being so far from the actual nomination, this CAN be the year that everything changes. www2.kucinich.us or dennis4president.com - first steps to learn more about the most silenced candidate today. Thank you.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

craig chicago — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:07:25 GMT

Hillary won - just as she has in ALL of the other debates. Calm, cool, poised and ready to lead - day 1.

Obama stuttered and hemed and hawed his way through once agian. Totally medicore. Where is this great speaker we were reading so much about? He hasn't shown up at any of the debates.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Edward, Sacramento CA — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:10:24 GMT

Obama should welcome the referendum on him if he has the experience to lead. Whether Clinton raised the experience issue or not, it would have been a huge factor in the minds of electorates. Having raised the issue at the this point in the campaign offers Obama the opportunity to address it in a very frontal fashion. That is why Obama is saying that Dick Cheney and Rumsfel have the most experience but how did they get us in this quagmire in Iraqi. Is judgment stupid?

Former President Bill Clinton is a factor and will continue to be within Democrat political power base. Some public office holder Democrats are endorsing Hilary not because of her electability but to avoid crossing Bill Clinton’s power-base within the party that may come back to hunt them. If these people are endorsing Hilary out of conviction, then they will deploy their network machinery into electing Hilary. Else, you can force a horse to the stream but you cannot force it to drink water.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

va. — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:15:58 GMT

Joe Biden: consistant! Staight forward and honest answers on his positions on the issues! Hang in there Senator,don't drop out. I suspect you have more support than most people realize. Making another contibution to the Biden Campaign!

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Carol, Long Valley NJ — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:17:45 GMT

With the exception maybe of Gravel, I would be happy to evaluate and eventually vote for any of the democratic candidates. As a victim of NJ's superfluous Tuesday, I welcome the chance to see and hear ALL of the candidates, warts and all, in order to make an informed decision from among many choices, not just the choices selected for me by other states and/or the media.

Bring them all on -- let them all speak -- let us hear everything, and then let the electorate make their decision. I will probably still be undecided in January, but it won't be for a lack of information.

520 days and counting . . .

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

stephen, Niagara Falls, NY — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:21:01 GMT

that was one of the WORST debate setups yet (along with CNN of course). George S. shows why he really is a hack, the network showed their true colours by posting the poll numbers, and the question positioning was so blatantly skewed.

Why is Richardson running btw? He has nothing to offer. And why is Kucinich so ignored? He is adding substantive content to the debates.

This one gets an F on my report. And I will also be making a point of boycotting ABC and their sponsors from hereon in.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Joe Mathews, Manchester, VT — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:33:10 GMT

I recorded the debate and just watched a portion of it again. I'm impressed with the quality of the candidates and lamenting that the GOP field is not in this same league.

Suprisingly, I was most impressed with Joe Biden and his well thought out position on Iraq. I've known a little bit of his background and reputation as sometimes being a little long-winded. He brought that up and rather joked about it which I liked.

The press, and all of us, have to stop looking almost 100% at the troika at the top of the polls and examine the rest. I agree that Senator Biden's support will go up in Iowa. He would be a great President with his years of experience in not only foreign but domestic policy. A good running mate would be Barack Obama.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

diane — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:29:30 GMT

But, Clinton's endorsements come from their little club known as the DLC in which she is queen of.
progressives do not endorse or support her. Check out the member list.
though I thought ABC made this more of a clinton and obama debate I must say I got a kick out the second question. About how she is causing the party alot of concern of electibility. I also loved that they put those headlines on the air!
I really liked it when Obama pointed out America cannot be the ones to partition iraq. this is something I am impessed with for it's common sense.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Lil Stantson, Indian Shores, FL — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:20:10 GMT

Richardson said this, Hillary passed gas, John picked his nose, Obama was drunk, Biden ate a doughnut. Oh, so what!!! It is 16+ months before the election. We're going to be sick of all these staged events from the Democrats by Thanksgiving.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Stephen Cassidy, CA — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:42:35 GMT

Today's debate was a preview in how the Democrats could lose in '08 by being too cautious on Iraq and out of touch with the American voter. Clinton, Obama and Edwards aren't confident enough in their judgment and lack the foreign policy expertise to order a complete withdrawal should they get elected. We saw this today again at the debate in Iowa. They'll keep forces in Iraq for years to come.

What difference then will there be on the most important issue of the campaign between the Democratic and Republican Presidential nominees? No Republican will be advocating an endless commitment to Iraq. Everyone will be critical to a degree of how Bush has prosecuted the war.

The path out of Iraq for Clinton, Obama and Edwards will be long march spread over years. That will be true as well with any Republican Presidential nominee.

I am supporting Richardson in part because he has the best plan for leaving Iraq, and the diplomatic experience to see that we leave without the region descending into further chaos. William M. Arkin who writes on National and Homeland Security for the Washington Post recently commented:

"It is on Iraq though, that Richardson really shines. "I believe that we need to withdraw all of our troops within six months," he writes. "Other than the customary Marine contingent at the embassy, I would not leave anyone behind. And if the embassy isn't safe, they're coming home too. No airbases. No troops in the Green Zone. No embedded soldiers training Iraqi forces, because we know what that means. It means our troops would still be out on patrol -- with targets on their backs."

We are spending $10 billion a month on Iraq, Richardson says. "Of the many ways in which Mr. Bush's ill-conceived war has distracted us from our real national security needs, this is the most dangerous," he concludes. "There is not a single sign that Iraq is improving. To the contrary, every indication is that it's getting worse, and a smaller force will do nothing to change that."

And so Bill Richardson says something that the other candidates evidently can't or won't: "A regional crisis is worthy of military intervention. A true threat to our country's security is worthy of war. But a struggle between a country's warring factions, where both sides hate the United States, is not worthy of one more lost American life.""

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Brian, Carmel, IN — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:46:40 GMT

Wow, there really isn't anyone who debated today that is more in tune to what America needs right now than Dennis Kucinich. Don't fall for the poll numbers, folks, Dennis is rising, his message is getting out, and he truly is the only democratic candidate worthy to lead this nation. No one but Dennis 2008! Check out dennis4president.com for more information.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

EKSwitaj — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:37:57 GMT

The treatment Kucinich received is contemptible and demonstrates how the corporate media has come to believe that it has a right to select candidates for the population. Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate with an established record of voting against the war in Iraq and the appropriations that have allowed it to continue; he best represents the wishes of American voters-- if only the media gatekeepers would let the people hear.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Jennie McBride — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:03:32 GMT

No matter who is "in the lead" I want to hear from all the candidates. Kucinich could have been a cardboard cut-out for the amount of time he got to speak. It would have been obvious to a first grader that the latest ABC debate was totally biased.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Jack McGrath, Valley Village, CA — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:59:50 GMT

I viewed the Iowa debate, and after viewing Joe Biden's 30 second spot, I sent him a contribution for $50.00. His use of the killed young solder in the C- 130 carco plance was emotionally powerful. And yes, I do not want to see any grand children being killed in Irag.
Biden's global understanding of our nation's friends and enemies will give us a President with proper, thoughtful judgment.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Turner, Spokane Washington — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:22:54 GMT

After watching all of the debates to date, I must say that Senator Biden has impressed me the most. As an Independent voter I am leaning strongly towards Biden.
I must also agree with other viewers that the debates seem to be somewhat bias in the airtime for each candidate.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Elizabeth Sullivan, San Diego, CA — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:54:14 GMT

FINALLY! Biden is getting the respect he deserves. He is the candidate best positioned to take on ANY of the Republicans.

With all the debate discussions why is it that no news program counted the number of times one of the other candidates said "Joe is right."

To donate go to: www.joebiden.com

Biden/Obama 08
Today, Tomorrow, Together

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Chris, Morristown, NJ — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:16:51 GMT

They've gotta get a few of these candidates out of the debate so they have more time to have some back and forth exchanges between a candidates where they can really get into some details about issues. As it stands now the few times they actually get a good exchange going (Biden & Richardson), they've got to stop it and bring all 8 candidates in and then the momentum is lost.

Gravel, Kucinich and Dodd all have ZERO chance so they should drop out now for the good of the party. They just cloud the issues by having too many people and all that will do is help Hillary remain the front runner, and that is not good for the Democrats.

Gravel seems like he might be getting senile. He knows the issues and speaks the direct truth on many issues, but he's not sharp enough to make coherent points without going off on all kinds of irrelevant tangents.

Kucinich has repeatedly said he would not give the order to kill Bin Laden if he were president and had the chance. This disqualifies him. Also, he's like a little boy scout who's just having fun trying to get attention for being a good little boy scout. Sure - he's a good, honest guy who means well, but in a Brady Bunch sort of way; and who really thinks we're going to elect The Brady Bunch to be Commander-in-Chief and fight against terrorism.

Dodd is a good, solid, experienced senator; but he's Biden lite. It's good to have an experienced, pragmatic, long time senator in the debates; but we've got one in Biden - and he's better, more experienced, more intelligent, more of an authority on the issues, more charismatic and more of an original act than Dodd, so what does Dodd bring to the debates then?

If we could get the field down to 5 or less than we might start to really see some good exchanges and more substance at these debates.

Tape-Delayed Live-Blogging Thoughts

Meline Baron, Harpers Ferry, WestVirginia — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:30:18 GMT

I am so glad to see that I am not alone among those of us who are interested in (obsessed by?) the campaign/candidates who is vehemently bothered by the media's bias toward their "back-story" favorites, to the detriment of the other candidates...and was surprised to see such comments made by a member of the media itself (altho' MSNBC does seem to be more even-handed than most of the other outlets.)

As a fervent fan of JOE BIDEN's, I am also heartened to see that others may be joining his band-wagon. He is, without question, the most qualified candidate. Period... And pair him with Bill Richardson as VP and you've got a real winning combination, both demographically, geographically, and "resume'-ically"!

BTW, Biden For President bumper stickers can be had via the CafeExpress website (no $ to Biden campaign, but it gets his name out there)

"I'm sidin' with BIDEN"