<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Mark Murray, Chuck Todd, and Andrew MertenOn his site now, Drudge has this provocative headline: "Obama Wife Slams Hillary?" It's taken from this Chicago Sun-Times story today. "At another stop, in Atlantic, Michelle said she travels with her</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#325984</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:14:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:325984</guid><dc:creator>Lyn,  MD</dc:creator><description>I am sure she probably didn't mean it that way...but it doesn't make it not true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326004</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:21:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326004</guid><dc:creator>lets think Okc Ok</dc:creator><description>For the record where has Bush (the present admin )not &amp;quot;walked the walk&amp;quot; on family values? Maybe thats refering to not suporting entitlements? </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326010</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:23:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326010</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>Oh that evil Drudge. Kudos on not &amp;quot;biting&amp;quot; on this one. Save all that biting for stories from the NYT where the headlines doesn't really match the story, and then that ends up on the nightly news, Olberman, or Mathews. Of course all those stories are directed at Republicans. </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326017</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:27:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326017</guid><dc:creator>scott</dc:creator><description>well, you already bit. too bad for the rest of us that major news organization are reporting on what a conservative blog has to say about the democratic primary.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326023</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:28:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326023</guid><dc:creator>Yiannis, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator><description>Political maneuvering: Drag down Michelle to blunt her passionate appeal and conviction about her and her family.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326029</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:31:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326029</guid><dc:creator>Jennie Denver,CO</dc:creator><description>lets think Okc- possibly getting drunk and high on cocaine while you have young children and wife at home. Not really sure how that screams &amp;quot;family values&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326032</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:33:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326032</guid><dc:creator>Henry L.</dc:creator><description>Full context of Michelle Obama's statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/aug/21/obama_campaign_denies_michelles_speech_was_attack_on_hillary"&gt;http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/aug/21/obama_campaign_denies_michelles_speech_was_attack_on_hillary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a good to see First Read call out Drudge's lies.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326041</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:39:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326041</guid><dc:creator>jus sayin</dc:creator><description>Maybe rudy knows who she is referring to.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326050</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:42:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326050</guid><dc:creator>Cd, NC</dc:creator><description>Jennie...once again YOU show your ignorance, like on the other post when you said he din't go to Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he admits to that when he was in his teens or early twentys. &amp;nbsp;He did not meet Micheele until much later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. &amp;nbsp;Other than having &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; do you know what &amp;quot;your cousins&amp;quot; were doing in their youth. &amp;nbsp;LOL&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326055</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326055</guid><dc:creator>Dem, NY</dc:creator><description>Let's Think,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Make sure you don't use any social security or medicare if and when you ever need it. &amp;nbsp;Just send those checks back to the government because no one likes entitlement programs. &amp;nbsp;Better yet, I'll take them. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326074</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:57:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326074</guid><dc:creator>TOLD YOU So</dc:creator><description>I'm always amazed that the term 'entilement programs'. &amp;nbsp;So after years of paying social security and medicare taxes, one should got get checks when due?</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326083</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:03:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326083</guid><dc:creator>jt. okc</dc:creator><description>Thanks firstread for defending the obama campaign.. you're doing your job well!</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326087</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:05:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326087</guid><dc:creator>AOwaytogoOhio</dc:creator><description>typical lying republican smear machine. I can't wait til the Clintons go after the repubs-they will chew them to pieces.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326097</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:10:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326097</guid><dc:creator>thebaby'sdaddy, DC</dc:creator><description>Jenna bush is pregnant</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326098</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:11:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326098</guid><dc:creator>Gary, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Hey &amp;quot;let's think Okc&amp;quot;-- the only &amp;quot;values&amp;quot; George W. Bush has brought the nation's children are Greed, Entitlement, and Capitalism. &amp;nbsp;By holding no one accountable, Bush also teaches our children that competence and integrity are meaningless. &amp;nbsp;His failed Iraq War has also destroyed many brave American families for life. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would be thrilled to have a President that actually taught our children to respect for one another and work hard. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for having the guts to call this one out, FirstRead. &amp;nbsp;Drudge is trying pretty hard on this one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326102</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:13:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326102</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, San Francisco</dc:creator><description>Thank you First Read....&lt;br&gt;Anything BUT ISSUES....&lt;br&gt;Just the horse race, just gossip&lt;br&gt;(has Paris Hilton endorsed anybody?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is a good point, anyway.&lt;br&gt;Do we need another 4 years of the dysfunctional Clinton family circus ?&lt;br&gt;Has Bill reformed ? Has he found Jesus ?&lt;br&gt;Where's Lorena Bobbit when you need her ?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326104</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:15:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326104</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, The Peanut Gallery</dc:creator><description>It looks like all the neo-cons in the forum are alittle annoyed that Drudge's latest peice of yellow journalism didn't get repeated without being critically examined. And when neo-cons and kool aide drinkers are annoyed it probably is a sign that you're doing real journalism. &amp;nbsp;Good job First Read team on analyzing the story instead of just being an echo chamber for the right wing noise machine. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326117</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:22:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326117</guid><dc:creator>lets think</dc:creator><description>If I live to a hundred there is no way I will recieve what I have paid and what that money would earned in private investments. We as a country rely too much on government. Its our job to support ourselves and our families. There are no doubt times where the govt. could and should help, but there should be stringent regulations. I think that what was to be a saftey net turned out to be percieved as a way of life. That needs to change, people need to prepare for retirement. Our country cannot continue this way. We both know the shape that SS and medicare are in. Now we want socialized health care. If so many are uninsured and cant get med. care why do you hear how much money is lost by treating illegal aliens? There is an answer but throwing money at everything is not the answer. We can and should be able to do better than that.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326210</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326210</guid><dc:creator>bb</dc:creator><description>Sierra is really Jerry, pretending to be a woman.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326234</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:01:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326234</guid><dc:creator>Ollie  frenchburg  ky</dc:creator><description>Sierra is a married male.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326244</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:03:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326244</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Sierra - Bush reformed and found Jesus. &amp;nbsp;Look where that got us. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326277</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:14:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326277</guid><dc:creator>Orin Thomas</dc:creator><description>MSNBC commenting about Drudge. &amp;nbsp;Gee, I wonder which way that message is going to go? &amp;nbsp;Also, you msnbc guys got guts calling yourself a &amp;quot;news division&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326288</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:17:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326288</guid><dc:creator>Tuck</dc:creator><description>ONce again , the obama campaign says something nasty, then denies it. Is Rove working for obama now?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other spin would be that obama is so henpecked,his wife sets his whole agenda</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326313</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:22:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326313</guid><dc:creator>AOwaytogoOhio</dc:creator><description>sierra, I dont think you are who you say you are. AND youre certainly not from California. bb is right, sierra is jerry.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326346</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326346</guid><dc:creator>Dahju</dc:creator><description>lets think, before we all go sounding off about SS, we all need to remember it if first an INSURANCE program, not a retirement program. &amp;nbsp;That is insurance even for you &amp;quot;lets think.&amp;quot; Second, like most insurances, you are buying protection against calamities that could occur now, not when you retire. &amp;nbsp;Does your term insurance policy return your paid premium if nothing happens to require you to exercise the policy? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326351</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:31:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326351</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>Am I the only one who remembers Sierra, San Fransico, is a man?</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326354</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:32:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326354</guid><dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator><description>Congrats on MSNBC for not talking Drudge at face value....but watch Foxnews run a report this evening.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326366</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:36:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326366</guid><dc:creator>Dahju</dc:creator><description>Congrads MSNBC, we are finally getting the major news media to call out those who are placing manufactured issues into the news stream. &amp;nbsp;Too bad, the same was not being done with the swiftees. &amp;nbsp;Again, thank you for calling on Drudge to clean up his act. &amp;nbsp;Now let us do the same for Ann Coulter.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326393</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:44:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326393</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, San Francisco</dc:creator><description>Oh! No!&lt;br&gt;It's the Clinton 'Army of Darkness' !!&lt;br&gt;They're here to enlighten !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It gets tough, defending the Clintons, doesn't it ??</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326394</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:44:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326394</guid><dc:creator>Leon Miller, New Orleans, LA</dc:creator><description>Give me a break! Neither Michelle Obama nor her handlers are that naive or stupid. She knew precisely what she was saying, what she meant to say, and how it would be taken. It shows that Obama is perfectly willing to take the low road when it suits him, AND, that he's willing to let his wife do his dirty work for him.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326414</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:51:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326414</guid><dc:creator>Rufus Gibbons, DC</dc:creator><description>OKc how about covering up for the pedophile Foley?</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326421</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:52:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326421</guid><dc:creator>Jennie Denver,CO</dc:creator><description>Cd- I posted a link with a story that he DID go to Iraq, refuting someone else's claim that he hadn't. And that he didn't meet Michelle until much later, when he had already experimented with all of that is exactly my point. He didn't leave his wife and kids to get high, he got it out of his system before having any real responsibilities- George Bush chose the fast life over his family.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326435</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:55:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326435</guid><dc:creator>Very confused</dc:creator><description>Sierra, I didn't know Jesus was lost. Why do you need Lorena Bobbit? I am very confused.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326478</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:06:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326478</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Drudge probably got a fundraising mailer from Clinton asking for money to combat the vast conspiracy of opponent spouses.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326487</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:07:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326487</guid><dc:creator>CD,  NC</dc:creator><description>Tuck...no he is still working for Hillary. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW you would only think it is &amp;quot;nasty&amp;quot; if there was some truth to it !!! &amp;nbsp; To close to home? &amp;nbsp;Hmmm !!!</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326488</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:08:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326488</guid><dc:creator>C C in Philly</dc:creator><description>This is why Drudge is a Repub. Repubs are always deceitful, lying dissemblers. Their motivation is never to educate or find the truth. It’s always to muddle, confuse and manufacture lies. Drudge can’t even be honest with himself about who he is.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326511</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:15:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326511</guid><dc:creator>RealB.G., Sacramento,California</dc:creator><description>Unfortunately, some news divisions did bite. &amp;nbsp;I was over at ABC and found the disturbing headline. Are the journalist on the campaign trail so long that they lose the ability to reason. &amp;nbsp;I know it is a lot to ask, but please just use some common sense. &amp;nbsp;I put a lot of time and energy in seeking out the real news so I can make informed decisions. &amp;nbsp;Sen. and Mrs. Obama are adults with a great deal of courage and integrity. &amp;nbsp;Thus far their comments, opinions, positions and solutions for our country have been thoughtful and direct. &amp;nbsp;Further, they stand by everything they say even in the face of adversity.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326513</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:16:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326513</guid><dc:creator>Ollie  frenchburg  ky</dc:creator><description>Amy, I just said that Sierra was a man. At 2:01</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326532</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:20:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326532</guid><dc:creator>Drudge Fudge</dc:creator><description>Drudge Is Karl Rove's lover. &amp;nbsp;They are both still in the closet. &amp;nbsp;Well, I can't remember, maybe only Karl Rove is still in the closet</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326536</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:21:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326536</guid><dc:creator>Jennie Denver,CO</dc:creator><description>Thanks for the link Henry L.- you should all consider reading the full statement, it becomes very obvious that there this was not an attack on the Clintons, but simply an explanation of how Michelle balancing her family life. The fact that so many people jumped to that conclution should be thought of as evidence that the Clinton family scandals are still fresh in everyone's minds. A little hypersensitive.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326559</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:27:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326559</guid><dc:creator>CD,NC</dc:creator><description>Jennie...my apologies on reread you were correct I confused you with bionoicWoman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My apologies, again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326583</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:34:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326583</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>Oh, you're right Ollie. Glad you and me are on top of this.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326616</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:45:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326616</guid><dc:creator>Preacher</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;If I live to a hundred there is no way I will recieve what I have paid and what that money would earned in private investments&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets think is obviously NOT THINKING HERE. Investing is NOT A GUARANTEE. Exactly how much would you have now if you had invested 100,000 dollars in Enron and another 100K in WolrdComm??? </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326642</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:52:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326642</guid><dc:creator>Republican Forever</dc:creator><description>CC in Philly &amp;quot;This is why Drudge is a Repub. Repubs are always deceitful, lying dissemblers.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Clinton is a Republican?</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326650</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:54:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326650</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>MSNBC is way out ahead on this issue. I was just on CNN, and the headline changed in front of my eyes, from &amp;quot;Obama's Wife takes Swipe at Hillary&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Obama Denies his Wife took a Swipe at Hillary.&amp;quot; Because I visit First Read I knew the back story. It just goes to show CNN is a rinky dink outfit compared to MSNBC.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326662</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:57:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326662</guid><dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator><description>Leon Miller you are exactly the type of person who drinks whatever koolaid phoney news feeds you...this is why it is important to call out &amp;quot;news&amp;quot; that isn't news. Just because it is in print doesn't mean it's real. And Sierra...yea you are Jerry..or a close approximation.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326686</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:04:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326686</guid><dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator><description>ABC news actually reported on the Obama's response to the Drudge report false claim so they did not lift it directly from that site. Still it's a shame that website has become a GOP rumor mill that has the ablility to drop such false items.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326715</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326715</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Jeannie - Perhaps because everyone is used to people jumping to conclusions when it is Hillary or Edwards or another candidate who is speaking? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Sierra - it's not difficult to defend Hillary at all. &amp;nbsp;In the infamous words of our president, bring it on. </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326783</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:35:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326783</guid><dc:creator>G</dc:creator><description>Jerry and Sierra are one in the same.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326917</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:33:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326917</guid><dc:creator>RAH</dc:creator><description>Didn't Chicago Sun-Time report it first? &amp;nbsp;Sun-Times is a Clinton supporter and usually bash Obama. &amp;nbsp;I think they did it first then Drudge ran with it. Tut tut. &amp;nbsp;I wouldn't be surprised if it's not a Clinton's doing to set up the Obamas.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#326977</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:02:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:326977</guid><dc:creator>Wolf Blitzer, CNN-RD (RD stands for Rinky-Dink)</dc:creator><description>Amy --&amp;gt; &amp;quot;It just goes to show CNN is a rinky dink outfit compared to MSNBC.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that's saying something. &amp;nbsp;To be behind MSNBC, CNN would have to have hampsters running in their exercise wheels to power the lights!</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327064</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:31:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327064</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>Republican Foreverclueless -- if A implies B that does not mean that B implies A. &amp;nbsp;It is called logic; I learned it in High School. Try it sometime.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327069</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:33:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327069</guid><dc:creator>John Stewart</dc:creator><description>CNN, Chicago Sun-Times, ABC -- please, please stop hurting America.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327135</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:15:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327135</guid><dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator><description>It was a slam at the Clintons. &amp;nbsp;Now, obama wants to back peddle once again and pretend she meant something else. Mr and Mrs obama know full well what they are saying. &amp;nbsp;Their handlers see to that.&lt;br&gt;Btw, Drudge is good reading.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327177</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:43:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327177</guid><dc:creator>Republican Forever</dc:creator><description>nuanced - We've all seen your logic here, and I think we can all agree, it is at the high school level.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327246</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:02:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327246</guid><dc:creator>RealB.G.</dc:creator><description>I have to say that I was surprised to see Chuck Todd on Hardball this evening talking about this story with much less candor and attention to facts than he put in writing. A little consistency would be nice. </description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327341</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:09:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327341</guid><dc:creator>Chima Ordu, York, PA</dc:creator><description>Michelle Obama has used that line in several of her speeches, referring to family values and her philosophy on managing her family. Anyone who has seen her on CSPAN would know that. Why is the Chicago-Sun Times fabricating a controversy? &lt;br&gt;Talk about dishonest journalism. Sadly, many media outlets have just run with this story and are claiming she attacked Hillary. Why don't these media outlets take a few minutes to research whether Michelle did attack Hillary or whether she was talking about something else? Our media is just looking to create a fight where there is none...much to the detriment of the American public which deserves just the facts and not this BS.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#327561</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:32:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:327561</guid><dc:creator>JimmieFromDaytom</dc:creator><description>You can bet that the Clinton slime machine is in full effect. They want to take the attention off their candidates' record. Cocopuffs fall in line everytime the clintons fabricate controversy. They fail to realize that this is the peoples movement and we will not yeild. We're going to take our government back from these crooks and cronies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama 08!</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#328596</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:57:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:328596</guid><dc:creator>T. Carrington, Los Angeles, CA </dc:creator><description>Do we really want an angry women that speaks out because she thinks her husband is too weak to do it. &amp;nbsp;I wish we heard more from Barack and less from his wife. &amp;nbsp;Or did he not get permision from her to speak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dito to Liz Edwards too. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary speaks for herself - The guys need to grow some B--- and do thier own dirty work.</description></item><item><title>Anatomy of a controversy</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/325945.aspx#328718</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:48:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:328718</guid><dc:creator>Nick Dorsey</dc:creator><description>Gee, I wonder who First Read is pushing for the Democratic nomination?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michelle says something which is susceptible to the interpretation The Drudge gave it, yet now Obama can claim innocence. &amp;nbsp;Maybe true , maybe not but still cuts too close to the bone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the same time, without any real critical review, First Read declares that Clinton says the surge is working, which is far from what she actually said. &amp;nbsp;Clearly her comments were selectively and deliberately taken out of context. &amp;nbsp;She actually said there was limited progress but overall clearly implied a military solution would not work. &amp;nbsp; Pretty much said what Obama and other &amp;nbsp;Dems said, even Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then no apology, no retraction, just a muddled clarification, still without a full text explanation of what Clinton actually said. &amp;nbsp;That was the least First Read could have done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leave it to the brain dead to only read the headline or limited quotes and gleefully leap at the interpretation that is nearest and dearest to a Hillary Haters heart(less).</description></item></channel></rss>