<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx</link><description>
From NBC's Ken StricklandIt was leaked to the Washington Post late last week, but now NBC News has obtained a summary of the Government Accountability Office report assessing the Iraqi government's progress toward meeting 18 benchmarks laid out by Congress.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344146</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344146</guid><dc:creator>H P Boston</dc:creator><description>What does it matter what any report on Iraq states. &amp;nbsp;They will all be changed, ignored and disregarded by shrub&amp;amp;co. The repukes are awaiting for their end game just before the election so it can all fall to the fault of the Dem's. &amp;nbsp;That is the only political solution in Iraq the shrub scum want.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344151</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:31:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344151</guid><dc:creator>An Old Mop</dc:creator><description>Swifter, the quicker picker upper.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344162</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:36:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344162</guid><dc:creator>Kenn&amp;quot;we are all guilty&amp;quot;O</dc:creator><description>IGNORE the american people behind the curtain their opinion means nothing.GAO is non factor BUSH only wants yes men giving him reports.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344166</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:37:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344166</guid><dc:creator>RH Oregon</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;It was leaked to the Washington Post late last week,&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about finding and prosecuting the leakers! I'm tired of hearing about classified leaks, anonymous quotes, to remain anonymous because not allowed to speak, etc, etc. If it's classified, then its a crime to leak it. Both the leaker and the reporter, and editor should go to jail. If you can't report your sources name, then don't report it's then just gossip. Our media is as crooked as the politicians they report on.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344181</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344181</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>I'll wait for the real deal before I believe the national enquire, errrr, the national press.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344186</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:49:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344186</guid><dc:creator>Slade Bowman</dc:creator><description>Establishing governments is not graded on a pass/fail basis. &amp;nbsp;Once again, a government bureaucracy, this time the GAO, has failed us.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344192</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:51:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344192</guid><dc:creator>Kenn&amp;quot;Only true belivers turn in their families to the party&amp;quot;O</dc:creator><description>RH ......... Scooter leak anything ,Rove leak anything ,Armitige anything oh yea the name of an undercover CIA agent ,anything worse than betraying a fellow american,betraying the american people WMDs ring a bell maybe someone should have leaked that the administration were inventing leaks around the world ,the italian report on yellow cake being passed to the british ,where did the leak start the VICE PRESIDENTS OFFICE.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344199</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:55:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344199</guid><dc:creator>juan,ft lauderdale,fl</dc:creator><description>RH-Y ou are a typical right wing Republican. If the media reports anything that does not agree with predesposed beliefs it's a liberal media. You and other Republicans had no problems believing the garbage coming from Judith Miller's lies in The New York Times and no problems with outing a CIA operative. Again, can you say hypocrite and double standard. The media had become too complicit with sitting on their hands when they should have been exposing the lies of the Shrub and this most despicable administration. </description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344213</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:01:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344213</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>What does it matter what any report on Iraq states. They will all be changed, ignored and disregarded by the traitor DeMyopicRats. The DeMyopicRats are awaiting for their end game just before the election so it can all fall to the fault of the Republicans. That is the only political solution in Iraq the seat counting DeMyopicRat scum want. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day HP :-)</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344215</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:03:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344215</guid><dc:creator>jorge</dc:creator><description>Anyone who expects this Patraeus report to be anything but another Bush excuse to keep running the military into the ground until he leaves office is as crazy as the people who try to tell the GAO report is not believable. &amp;nbsp;It is all too believable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The surge is a failure as anyone with a brain knew it would be. &amp;nbsp;The only success it can report is a lessening of violence in Anbar and how did the administration do that? &amp;nbsp;By giving arms to the Sunnis. &amp;nbsp;If a democrat did that, all these Bush-lovers would be screaming bloody murder instead of blaming the GAO for telling the truth.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344234</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:10:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344234</guid><dc:creator>RH Oregon</dc:creator><description>Listen you chowderheads, go back and READ my post!!!&lt;br&gt;Is there anything there about rightwing, leftwing, anything???&lt;br&gt;It was a comment on media and their reporting standards, if any. Not on their bias. Get a grip and stop drooling on your keyboards.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344235</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:12:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344235</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>RH - Where does this say that it was classified information? &amp;nbsp;It's a report prepared by the GAO, that will be discussed by Congress in a hearing this afternoon. &amp;nbsp;You are aware that most government reports, documents, etc. are not classified, right? &amp;nbsp;Then there are things like Sunshine laws and the Freedom of Information Act, whereby average everyday people are entitled to hear and see what the government is up to. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344242</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:15:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344242</guid><dc:creator>jjg, ms</dc:creator><description>jerry - confused again. &amp;nbsp;This IS the real deal. &amp;nbsp;This was the report put out by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), not a left or right group. &amp;nbsp;Just like last time, Bush will have his folks adjust some of the findings. &amp;nbsp;And, RH - it is a good thing that it was leaked... this was done because Bush had been re-writing these things prior to disclosing to congress and the American people, so the individual sent the data out there (correct, accurate, non-partisan and non-re-written data) before it could be tainted.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344295</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344295</guid><dc:creator>John B, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Whatsammater, RH, a little grumpy because the facts don't fit your chosen flavor of spin? &amp;nbsp;The facts continue to have a Liberal agenda.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344296</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:40:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344296</guid><dc:creator>JeanneGA</dc:creator><description>Ah, didnt meet 11 of the 18 benchmarks.What is it about this they don't understand?So Bush continues to play games with other peoples lives. Evil, evil.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344306</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:46:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344306</guid><dc:creator>Terry, Disabled Vet, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>RH Oregon, How about you start with the dunce in chief? &amp;nbsp;He stated that the CIA leak was a done deal and we should just move on. &amp;nbsp;The dunce in chief (leaker) does not care that a CIA operative was outed by his administration (which by the way, if a soldier did that they would be courts martialed for a treasonous act). &amp;nbsp;If you are tired of leaks start with the dunce in chief!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344334</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:03:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344334</guid><dc:creator>Greg R., Spokane, WA</dc:creator><description>The &amp;quot;leaks&amp;quot; &amp;amp; &amp;quot;leakers&amp;quot; are by design. &amp;nbsp;It's a way to get a jump on what the possible overall public opinion may be - a prototype if you will. &amp;nbsp;How many times have you seen something leaked, only to wonder where it went.....not enough public response, otcry, whatever to merit further ink....it's been leaking forever. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being able to notice these things in daily life enables observant people to be able to discern between fact and fiction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kill your TV</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344344</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:07:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344344</guid><dc:creator>CitizenJ</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I'll wait for the real deal before I believe the national enquire, errrr, the national press.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jerry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At this point, if you truly think that anything Bush (yes, Bush. Not Petraeus.) tells us is the &amp;quot;real deal&amp;quot;, then you are delusional.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Establishing governments is not graded on a pass/fail basis. &amp;nbsp;Once again, a government bureaucracy, this time the GAO, has failed us.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slade,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe the quote from the report was, &amp;quot;The Iraqi government met 3, partially met 4, and did not meet 11 of its 18 benchmarks.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it were simply pass/fail, there would be no &amp;quot;partially&amp;quot;. This means that they passed on 3, partially passed/failed on 4, and failed on 11.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And please, let us recall who it really is who has failed us.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344373</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344373</guid><dc:creator>Nick, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Yeah, let's blame the messenger and deflect the interest and maybe even the guilt. That's the Republican way as preached by Rove &amp;amp; co. Of course, when the media happens to be Fox News, the word is sacrosanct. The media asks the questions we'd ask if we had the access. The &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; in each and every person in that business relies upon and completely respects the US Constitution. Can we say with a straight face that the Bush Admin has the same attitude for that seminal document? The &amp;quot;real deal&amp;quot; will be a press release from the Bush clan indicating complete success in Iraq with the Surge. Or, they may also spin it to be a partial success with the necessity to have more troops sent to Iraq or have the ones already there stay longer, as more is better. I don't understand the double-standards in our country, as one president can be impeached for lying about having extra-marital sex and his successor lies about WMDs, torturing of prisoners, the presence of al Quaida being in cahoots with Saddam and misleads us all about everything to do with Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I believe the British general who quipped that he couldn't trust our Secty of Defense since Rummy's intelligence was bankrupt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many more deaths need to be seen and experienced in that sad, forelorn country of Iraq, before we see the truth that nothing we do can ever fix the situation we allowed (even encouraged with our invasion) to exist and grow? They are in a civil war and we are outsiders. We gave them the chance to fight and they stole our money and arms and began to kill each other as well as our soldiers. It is past the time to get the &amp;quot;H&amp;quot; out. IF we wish to help with peace in Iraq, we should get involved politically with other countries in the region, but only if they want us to be involved. We cannot use military to force anyone to be democratic. Of course, that is probably not the true reason for us being there. The real reason(s) lie in the minds of the architects and POTUS and VPOTUS. We have been taken for a ride the past 7 years and it's way past time for a change in our leadership. Fortunately, we have term limits and 2008 will see someone new. My only hope for us lies with a Dem Administration and one which does its level-set best in correcting all of the mistakes of the Bush Administration.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344411</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:37:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344411</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>RH: 'How about finding and prosecuting the leakers! I'm tired of hearing about classified leaks, anonymous quotes, to remain anonymous because not allowed to speak, etc, etc. If it's classified, then its a crime to leak it.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What did you say about Scooter Libby ?&lt;br&gt;Should HE be in jail now ?&lt;br&gt;He put a CIA agent at risk.&lt;br&gt;Should Republicans be allowed to leak ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As mentioned about, how about Karl Rove leaking ? &lt;br&gt;Should he be prosecuted ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about Alberto, should HE be prosecuted for Perjury ? for lyinbg to Congress ??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whaddaya think ?</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344418</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:43:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344418</guid><dc:creator>JIrby, Colorado</dc:creator><description>Calculated rumors and leaks are used by incumbents in the White House as a way of deciding how a proposed action will sit with the people. If a great squak goes up about something, the press sec may nuzzle up to the podium and deny any truth to the rumor. Otherwise, the rumor will be affirmed as true. This may not be used so much by the Bush White House, since Bush doesn't seem to care what the people think, or wants to give the impression he doesn't, but there may be instances where the Bushites would use this technique. So in such a case, the leaker would be someone in the White House. </description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344421</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344421</guid><dc:creator>Nick Dorsey</dc:creator><description>From the past history of this Administration which is replete with stonewalling, misdirection, and outright lies; if it were not for leakers, we might as well have a government run by the Gestapo.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344429</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:46:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344429</guid><dc:creator>G</dc:creator><description>Dave, ha ha, so glad us dems piss you off so much....big baby... sissy boy.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344444</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:53:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344444</guid><dc:creator>Ivy League, U.S.A.</dc:creator><description>7 out of 18 goals met - isn't that passing with flying colors in a world where GWB can get degrees from both Yale and Harvard?</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344469</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:03:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344469</guid><dc:creator>RH Oregon</dc:creator><description>Geez. Make one straight forward comment on the state of our media reporting and you guys manage to turn it into a BushBashing. WOW! I was not even refering to the GOA report, only in the sense that it was initially &amp;quot;leaked&amp;quot; to the W.Post. Not what it contained, etc. And you dolts start in with Rove, Libby, Gonzalez, etc. Ha.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I said without political qualifications:&lt;br&gt;How about finding and prosecuting the leakers! I'm tired of hearing about classified leaks, anonymous quotes, to remain anonymous because not allowed to speak, etc, etc. If it's classified, then its a crime to leak it. Both the leaker and the reporter, and editor should go to jail. If you can't report your sources name, then don't report it's then just gossip. Our media is as crooked as the politicians they report on.&lt;br&gt;Now move on. (not .org)</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344573</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:46:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344573</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>RH - You still have not answered my question. &amp;nbsp;Where did you read that this was classified?</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344583</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:50:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344583</guid><dc:creator>Terry, Disabled Vet, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>RH Oregon, you missed the point. &amp;nbsp;If you want leakers stopped you need to start with the biggest fish per se: &amp;nbsp;(the dunce in chief and his administration seems that the leak involving the CIA operative was a done deal and an attitude of so what, let's move on). &amp;nbsp;That was commicated by the dunce in cheif himself.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344596</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:57:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344596</guid><dc:creator>Kenn&amp;quot;ypur past is repeating&amp;quot;O</dc:creator><description>Dan Elsberg, ring a bell,Vietnam, Pentagon Papers we shoulod have such leakers again</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344600</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:58:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344600</guid><dc:creator>M. Boley</dc:creator><description>Well, RH, if the report isn't classified then why the hell are you carrying on here? Let's try this: put your obvious partisanship back on the shelf and just stick with the facts, k?</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344625</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:11:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344625</guid><dc:creator>REG; East Valley Phx. AZ</dc:creator><description>Leaked or not leaked, appropriately or not appropriately, simply is not materially important as we all understand that the information is being massaged and enhanced for effect and to manipulate public opinion, which is aimed to rationalize, justify and disquise so they can just continue as planned. &amp;nbsp;In the mean time, American troops are being killed and injured, 100s of billions of tax payers dollars are being wasted, there is a largely neglected and simply marginal real effort against al Quaeda, bin Laden and the terrorist, all while we have been lied to, to justify the attacking of Iraq, and offered substantial subterfuge in the reporting throughout and are still consistently being given totally deceptive rhetoric to continually rationalize what is going on, and get this, all of it being belligerently done just so Special Interests and a select few can experience significant benefit. &amp;nbsp;It is criminal the way they are, without conscience, using their offices and America's resources for private gain. &amp;nbsp;It has been so consistent with an in-your-face arrogance, and never with any real benefit to the average American, that there can be no doubt as to their self-serving intent, which regrettably has been completely and constantly supported by so many of our representatives. &amp;nbsp;Drastic and complete change is desperately needed!</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#344634</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:17:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:344634</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle, Wash</dc:creator><description>Bush lied to get us in the war, he lies now. This will not sway congress from caving like a house of cards. &amp;nbsp;If any congressman or woman votes for funding, please do not vote for them. &amp;nbsp;This is the only way we can get out of this debacle.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#345233</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:14:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:345233</guid><dc:creator>William, Little Rock, Ar.</dc:creator><description>Let me see if I get this stright.&lt;br&gt;1. Senator Craig outed 3 weeks before the release of the surge report.&lt;br&gt;2. The Washington Post leaks the &amp;quot;nonpartisan&amp;quot; GAO report 2 weeks before tht release of the surge report.&lt;br&gt;3. NBC obtains a summary of the &amp;quot;nonpartisan&amp;quot; GAO report 5 days before the release of the surge report.&lt;br&gt;I can't wait to see what you guys at NBC come up with in the next 5 days. I know it will be hard to top your phony &amp;quot;Iraq is in a civil war&amp;quot; routine but I am rooting for you.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#345268</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:42:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:345268</guid><dc:creator>Class Warror, D.C.</dc:creator><description>The GAO report IS the real deal...that's why it will be buried and ignored by te Liar in Chief in his Lying Lapdogs. The only way evil men like Cheney/Bush (or should I put it his way, evildoersss)can win is if the Democreatic Congress caves in and does nothing, as usual.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#345283</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:21:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:345283</guid><dc:creator>mad in Madtown</dc:creator><description>Why must you constantly regurgitate what the current regime throws at you? &amp;nbsp;Why can't you think for a change and write about truth? I dare you to present Keith Olbermann's Special Comment from last night. &amp;nbsp;He alone has the guts to present the truth. &amp;nbsp;The rest of you &amp;quot;journalists&amp;quot; are cowards and sheep.</description></item><item><title>Excerpts of GAO report on Iraq</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/04/344131.aspx#346145</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:08:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:346145</guid><dc:creator>Slade Bowman</dc:creator><description>If it were simply pass/fail, there would be no CitizenJ - &amp;quot;partially&amp;quot;. This means that they passed on 3, partially passed/failed on 4, and failed on 11.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And please, let us recall who it really is who has failed us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently, the GAO. &amp;nbsp;First off, what in the world would they know about the war effort? &amp;nbsp;Second, they say partially met for many items, but don't say if the partial is better, worse, or the same from last time. &amp;nbsp;The report is meaningless without that information. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, again, what does pass or fail mean? &amp;nbsp;By what measure? &amp;nbsp;Did they grade that 90 is an A, 80 is a B, etc.? &amp;nbsp;Was there any extra credit? &amp;nbsp;Can someone retake the test? &amp;nbsp;What if you were sick when the test was given, do you get a zero? &amp;nbsp;Was there this really smart country that screwed up the whole curve for all the other countries?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This report is meaningless. &amp;nbsp;Just another report from someone that doesn't know what is going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>