<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx</link><description>





From NBC/National Journal’s Tricia MillerEdwards introduced his policy on corporate responsibility in a speech called “Renewing the Social Contract” in Des Moines this morning. 





“Over the course of our history, every generation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432614</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:31:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432614</guid><dc:creator>Ron Adams, Terre Haute Indiana</dc:creator><description>So Edwards thinks that the government telling us what to do gets us closer to our &amp;quot;ideals&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;It's no wonder Edwards's has become so irrelevent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He goes on to say:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;his administration would enact laws encouraging transparency in corporate reporting and more rights for shareholders, including “a say on executive pay.”&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would that include caps on what sue lawyers can make?</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432622</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432622</guid><dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator><description>it is clear that John Edwards is driving the democratic argument for the future. &amp;nbsp;Health care, retirement planning, help for the poor, a strong and smart policy on Iraq. &amp;nbsp;No matter what, if John Edwards isn't the democratic nominee, then none of us should complain in a year when either we get stuck with Mitt Romney or we spend the next four years triangulating ourselves with republican policies.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432637</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:40:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432637</guid><dc:creator>pat huntington</dc:creator><description>Social contract? &amp;nbsp;Dont make me sick.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432656</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:48:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432656</guid><dc:creator>K., Austin</dc:creator><description>he forgot the &amp;quot;ist&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432686</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:03:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432686</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>edwards is the only dem that can win the general election, and also the only one that cares about the american citizen, clinton and obama are corporate entities</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432692</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432692</guid><dc:creator>David, Chattanooga, Tn</dc:creator><description>John Edwards....A man with a vision for all Americans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EDWARDS 08</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432702</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432702</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>Yes a social contract. There are many domestic issues that our current administation have allowed to go to hell because their heads are stuck up Iran and Iraq's a--holes. Edwards would return our #1 priority to our own backyards, where it should be.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432717</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:15:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432717</guid><dc:creator>John B, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Social contract is a pretty good description. &amp;nbsp;As Americans we tend to believe that capitalism and democracy are almost synonomous but that isn't necessarily the case. &amp;nbsp;The nature of capitalism is to sell everything for the highest possible rate, concentrate wealth in the hands of those who control the means of production, and pay workers the least amount that results in a warm body. &amp;nbsp;Obviously the masses would not vote for that result. &amp;nbsp;For many decades we've mediated that conflict by allowing business owners, especially large business owners, to do pretty much as they please as long as they share enough with the middle class to keep them secure. &amp;nbsp;Now that social contract is unraveling and the foul mood of the electorate is partly a reflection of that. &amp;nbsp;If middle class security isn't restored democracy will force changes that probably will be an overreaction to the situation and hurt the country as a result. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432778</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:38:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432778</guid><dc:creator>Nick, Riverside, CA</dc:creator><description>John Edwards new campaign slogan&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Yea Socialism&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;all these socialist democrats are trying to get more control over peoples lives. &amp;nbsp;Soon the democrats will have what they want, we will live in a socialist country, and all the money and power will belong to the politicians. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432798</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:45:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432798</guid><dc:creator>Margaret, NYC</dc:creator><description>John Edwards is a Truth-teller - and the corporate media and TV talking heads retaliate by dissing and dismissing him.&lt;br&gt;The corporate media cares about corporate interests - not middle class interests - and promotes the Corporate Democrats who offer &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;nostalgia.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need John Edwards in the White House!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432849</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:02:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432849</guid><dc:creator>Betty H, Greensboro, NC</dc:creator><description>When I see Edwards standing up to big corporate interests NOW, I know that he would stand up to them after he is elected. He is standing up for regular people at a time when most candidates are trying to please special interests to keep fundraising dollars rolling in. I hope a lot of middle class Americans will hear about this, and stand with Edwards. Big corporations will certainly hear about this quickly, and double their efforts to help Edward's opposition win the election and maintain the status quo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for reporting on this, Ms. Miller and First Read! This is a big story that will likely get very little coverage.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432865</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:05:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432865</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>When reading this or other blogs, it's important to know that Mark Penn, Clinton's campaign manager is the invertor 'astro-turf'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'astro-turf' is fake grass roots.&lt;br&gt;It's a strategy to make it appear that real people are in favor of his clients, when he's really manufacturing phoney public opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This makes it appear that there's a groundswell of public opinion in favor of his clients (here, Hillary Clinton).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are all these pro &amp;nbsp;Clinton bloggers real ?&lt;br&gt;Are they paid Clinton staffers ?&lt;br&gt;You be the judge.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432868</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:08:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432868</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>It's nice to hear that John is still in the race. He is a good man with many good ideas. There isn't any question that he would be a better President than any of the republicans running.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432893</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:18:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432893</guid><dc:creator>Dot, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Senator Edwards is correct in his premise that we definitely need to work on the social issues here at home, and his plan sounds good, but as long as the war in Iraq continues to drain our nation's resources, and the national debt keeps rising, I don't think his plans will be easy to put into action. &amp;nbsp;All of his proposals are commendable, but will require major outlays of funds to implement. &amp;nbsp;Botom line, I guess, how do we pay for everything?</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432894</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432894</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Houston</dc:creator><description>Edwards couldn't be elected dog catcher in a national election! He has literally lived in Iowa the past four years and all he has to show for it is a three way statistical tie for first. His national campaign strategy is to win in Iowa- that is it! He has no staff at all in 21 states, he's taken others out of the Western strategy and flooded Iowa. He won't win his home state, nor will John Edwards be remembered after New Hampshire. Even is he wins a very close race in Iowa- he's finished after that. If he doesn't win Iowa- he's DOA on the spot. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432929</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:33:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432929</guid><dc:creator>Rick, WS, NC</dc:creator><description>Take it to the bank...anyone on here who decries social program are going to be BIG users of that social program...you know none of you ever turns down that SS check, medicare coverage, pensions, military and civil servant retiree benefits (talk about cradle to grave socialism), tax cuts or credits...you just bitch about the fact that someone else can take advantage of them but you never mention your social program loving selves...lmao </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432944</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:39:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432944</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>What a concept, government of the people, by the people and for the people. John will have his work cut out for him trying to wrest control from the plutocracy* running the country now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*a plutocracy is any form of government in which the wealthy exercise the preponderance of political power, whether directly or indirectly.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432984</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:57:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432984</guid><dc:creator>Amazed, Atlanta</dc:creator><description>I am starting to entertain the idea of supporting this guy. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#432992</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:00:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:432992</guid><dc:creator>American Voter</dc:creator><description>This loser will obviously say anything to capture a vote.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433004</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433004</guid><dc:creator>Hillary4prez 4 all of America</dc:creator><description>Edward and Obama, are out of it, TOAST, even the NYT's and msnbc, nbc, cbs, and abc, is behind Hillary, she is the one that will unite us all. So pack your bags and get onboard to victory in 08</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433016</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:11:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433016</guid><dc:creator>Mike Konkel, Fort Wayne, IN</dc:creator><description>We do not need John Edwards in the white house unless the toilets need cleaning. &amp;nbsp;Considering his socialistic fervor, what is next, communism from the lefties?</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433051</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:22:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433051</guid><dc:creator>Toni Bourlon</dc:creator><description>George W. Bush was such a disappointment I changed from Republican to Democrat &amp;amp; voted for Edwards in the '04 primary. &amp;nbsp;I voted for him because he actually ADMITTED that politicians want to spend money, and that taxes would have to be raised to pay for programs. &amp;nbsp;That's political death talk. &amp;nbsp;He didn't win then, and I doubt he's got much of a chance now. &amp;nbsp;I don't even think it matters whether he's got good ideas or not, he won't get the nomination. &amp;nbsp;Probably Hillary will, and then you'll see another Republican in the White House.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433060</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:26:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433060</guid><dc:creator>David LV NV</dc:creator><description>What these republicans seem to forget, when they go on and on about how wrong Socialism is, and how THEY (the democrats) want to &amp;quot;Control&amp;quot; us...is they are either too rich or stupid to realize that CAPITALISM is now our MASTER and &amp;quot;CONTROLS&amp;quot; us. And it is NOT kind. Bye now.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433079</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:29:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433079</guid><dc:creator>Tom Robinson, Kansas, United States of America, Land of the free, home of the brave</dc:creator><description>To all of you neocon-lacky-republicans..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since the majority of you have been bought and paid for by either the Republican party, or corporate America, you have no idea what is going on in the real world.&lt;br&gt;Corporate America is ruined this country. Since when should businesses be allowed to call the shots in government? The amount of lobbiest that interact with our government is absurd. When will you all realize that this is paralizing my country. From pharmacuticals, to big oil. They call the shots, from the people we elected, and we stand by and let it happen. Every one, who is a legal citizen, should get free health care, free education, and a better way of life. Not just the &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; such as yourselfs.&lt;br&gt;Why in the year 2007 do we have people die, because they cant afford to go to the hostpital? How come the retired couple has to make a choice between staying warm, eating, or there medications?&lt;br&gt;They general sentiment in this country is &amp;quot;its not my problem&amp;quot;, well it is!! If we conutinue to let this happen, what will haappen to your children, to your grandchildren?? &lt;br&gt;It's time to fix &amp;quot;big&amp;quot; government, and time to do it now!! We elected these idiots, now we must hold them accountable. AMERICA-IT IS NOW TIME TO MAKE A STAND!!&lt;br&gt;FIGHT FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES FUTURE!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433085</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:32:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433085</guid><dc:creator>Lane , Ann Arbor </dc:creator><description>This story is much too important to be relegated to a little column comment. &amp;nbsp;The AP has slightly better coverage. &amp;nbsp;Clearly, we are ready to debate this as a serious issue. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, frankly, cannot begin to understand what segment of society would oppose policies based on the social contract which was a part of the original Declaration of Independence and writings by Thomas Paine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The vast selfishness, greed and domination which characterize the current diminishment of social contract is characteristic of a primitive psychology and sure to bring about an increasingly primitive and brutal social fabric. &amp;nbsp;That it has been brought to us by an administration which touts itself as champions of a &amp;quot;culture of life&amp;quot; is the big lie of all big lies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The current administration has brought us 6 years of greed, cronyism and corruption. &amp;nbsp;I'm fed up. &amp;nbsp;My tax dollars, and I would be glad to pay a bit more, should be going to improve my community, help my fellow man. &amp;nbsp;Instead all our resources are lining the pockets of the gluttonous, self-righteous, and cruel.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433103</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:38:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433103</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Merritt Island, FL</dc:creator><description>Why does the idea, not anyone proposed implementation, but the mere IDEA of universal health care scare so many rabid republicans? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;certainly you all cannot be for the large insurance companies that are more interested in making profits by securing as much of our health care premiums as they can while paying out as little as possible for actual care...you're not FOR those companies are you? &amp;nbsp;Because that's what it sounds like when you all bash the UHC idea. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get you dont like democrats and anyone who thinks America should be for ALL Americans is obviously a socialist sack of sh!! but have you ever wondered why so many of you rail against those fighting the machine, all while the machine uses YOU and spits you out without caring??? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyways, Edwards doesn't have a chance because he's too radical for those who CONTROL the dem party...the only ILLUSION is the one called CHOICE...there are no real choices. &amp;nbsp;There haven't been for about 50 years.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433106</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433106</guid><dc:creator>die hard dem</dc:creator><description>Just Vote democratic in 08!</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433123</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:44:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433123</guid><dc:creator>s</dc:creator><description>Well, would you rather have a government that tells you what to do while tapping your phone, eroding your civil rights, emptying the treasury and sending it to mercenaries and defense contractors like Halliburton who then take that money out of the country; or one that tells you what to do while making sure you have enough to live on when you get old? Frankly, I don't like anyone telling me what to do, but if we're picking the lesser of two evils, from what I've read and heard, John Edwards has his heart and head in (at least the vicinity of) the right place. I hope he's not just another politician spouting rhetoric. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433155</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:52:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433155</guid><dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator><description>When corporate profits have been exceeding records in recent years, yet the corporations are cutting benefits, freezing wages, etc., there's a huge problem. And then management deigns to &amp;quot;grant&amp;quot; 3% raises--telling us these are merit raises and not COL raises--which barely allow us to stay even, let alone reap any rewards for our hard work. That's good? That's fair? That's capitalism at its best? Bullsh*t! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not socialism to expect that workers who make the products and provide the services that make corporations profitable should be paid enough to live on, and then some, and to be rewarded for a job well done. The establishment hates John Edwards because he dares to tell the truth and because he cares about regular folks who don't have the money to funnel into the political coffers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards is the only hope for the everyday &amp;quot;Joe&amp;quot; in this country!</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433158</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:53:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433158</guid><dc:creator>Gary, Seattle</dc:creator><description>Anyone who believes that John Edwards is anything but truthful in what he espouses is, at best, deluding themselves. &amp;nbsp;This is a good, honest, caring individual who wants to see the US flourish. &amp;nbsp;You talk about Socialism and Communism and Lefties, but you don't talk about what he is saying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Answer me a question, what is wrong with Nationalized Health Care? &amp;nbsp;What is wrong with paying fair taxes to use National resources? &amp;nbsp;What is wrong with wanting America to lead through peace and set an example of tolerance for the whole world? &amp;nbsp;What is wrong with expecting a company that lays off 2000 people not to pay its CEO $5 million in salary?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can only assume that the people who are calling all these things &amp;quot;Socialist&amp;quot; are not in a position to avail themselves of these programs. &amp;nbsp;I mean we know that the top 1% of the earners in this country are being taken care of right now, and these sort of programs may affect them. &amp;nbsp;So we really want to base what 100% of the citizens have available to them on what 1% of the citizens will fight against tooth and nail?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No wonder other countries are starting to slowly but surely position themselves to lead in the world once the New Roman Empire crumbles under its own hubris.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433207</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:06:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433207</guid><dc:creator>Richard Pearce, Topeka, Kansas</dc:creator><description>If a national Health Care System, a fair wage for workers (that is, everybody who is not rich) and a level playing field between business and unions is &amp;quot;Socialism&amp;quot;, then give me some &amp;quot;Socialism&amp;quot;, please. &amp;nbsp;Additionally, there are also far too many people in jail for non-violent crimes, and far too much enthusiasm in some circles for wars. &amp;nbsp;I vote for sanity.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433224</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:13:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433224</guid><dc:creator>Christian, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>My god. &amp;nbsp;All this anti-Edwards and anti-Dem talk of communism and socialism and government taking over our lives sounds like utter lunacy to me. &amp;nbsp;Under Bush and his merry band of &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; wackos, the gov't has intruded into my family's life more than ever. &amp;nbsp;Populism is not socialism or communism or the desire for gov't control of our lives. &amp;nbsp;Who or whatever convinced you of that is smoking something pretty fantastic.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433230</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:15:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433230</guid><dc:creator>Just leave me alone </dc:creator><description>Nothing is free especially life under socialist rule. It's failed every where it's been tried, and you still end up with all the same social problems and more. Just look at the way France stacks up it's immigrants in slums. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433243</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:20:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433243</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>MK,MO: '...edwards is the only dem that can win the general election,...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards is a good man.&lt;br&gt;But, Obama can win, too !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...and also the only one that cares about the american citizen, clinton and obama are corporate entities...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Listen to Obama's answers, MK,it's not as black and white as you think.&lt;br&gt;Obama is a good and thoughtful man, too.&lt;br&gt;Obama or Edwards would be a good choice.&lt;br&gt;Certainly Edwards is pushing populist policies.&lt;br&gt;But, he and Obama both operated in the same DC culture.&lt;br&gt;It isn't like one is good and one is bad.&lt;br&gt;They're both reformers.&lt;br&gt;Let's not let perfection be the enemy of the good.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433244</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:20:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433244</guid><dc:creator>Nick, Riverside, CA</dc:creator><description>Thats right just keep adding more unnecessary cost to business's. &amp;nbsp;They are already heavily taxed whats one more expense. &amp;nbsp;No wonder more and more industries are leaving the USA. &amp;nbsp;It's getting too expensive to opperate within the country. &amp;nbsp;The only saving grace to businesses right now, and especially manufacturers is that the dollar is taking a dive, increasing our exports. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433259</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:24:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433259</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Sierra - What relevance does your comment re: Hillary's grass roots have to do with a story about John Edwards? &amp;nbsp;Hillary wasn't even mentioned. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to be obsessed.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433267</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:26:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433267</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>die hard dem / 'Just Vote democratic in 08!'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; sorry chief if hillary gets the nomination me and a whole bunch of other people won't be able to, and hillary is the only dem candidate that commands that level of negativity </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433277</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433277</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>The idea of a social contract is nothing new. &amp;nbsp;It was popularized in the 17th and 18th centuries by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. &amp;nbsp;All a social contract theory refers to is some sort of agreement by which people form a nation and maintain a social order. &amp;nbsp;In such an agreement, the people give up some rights to the government in exchange for social order. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I like John Edwards. &amp;nbsp;He seems to come up with all sorts of hooks. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure he will be able to win the nomination but he's not a bad guy at all.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433286</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:34:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433286</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>Sierra, SF / 'Edwards is a good man. &lt;br&gt;But, Obama can win, too !!'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433289</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:34:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433289</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>Sierra, SF / 'Edwards is a good man. &lt;br&gt;But, Obama can win, too !!'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433380</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:58:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433380</guid><dc:creator>Bruce, NV</dc:creator><description>If you folks think that Companies are shipping jobs overseas now, wait to you see what happens when Mr. Edwards' mandates take place. Required healthcare and retirement?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If companies are required to give certain benefits to workers in one place, butnot another, who do you think they'll hire? </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433383</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:58:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433383</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>MK,MO: '... get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MK, we're in synch.&lt;br&gt;I think this country will really lose an opportunity&lt;br&gt;if we don't nominate an insurgent/reformer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Hillary wins, it'll be 4 long, corrupt years and then another Republican takeover.&lt;br&gt;And who knows for how long.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll buy my daughters airline tickets to Canada...&lt;br&gt;'Cause they're not gonna spill their blood for Iraqi or Iranian oil !!&lt;br&gt;Or for the American Empire ....&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433426</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:09:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433426</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Detroit, MI</dc:creator><description>Edwards is the one pushing all the important issues. We need this guy. Not another reactionary panderer.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433453</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:20:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433453</guid><dc:creator>Ellis B ( aumgarner),Kingman Az.</dc:creator><description>Those that would choose Hitlary over Edwards have very short memories. Have they forgotten travelgate,filegate, whitewater, rental of lincolns' bedroom and air force #1, the missing subpoenaed files Hitlary claimed were lost until just before the FBI were about to raid the whitehouse? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;And where are the fiscal conservatives that have been in control of the Federal government the past six years? During their reign we have went from a balance budget to the largest national debt and trade deficit in the history of the world, American workers are working more and saving less that at anytime since the great depression, Americans have maxed out their credit, our economy is on the verge of freefall and most of the good paying manufacturing jobs have been shipped to near slave labor countries who have little respect for human rights or the environment. As a longtime supporter of conservative ideology I have had enough of the war mongering and isolation of wealth, it is high time for social reform and a resurection of the oppertunity for the American dream.And Edwards is the only candidate with the integrity and courage to take on &amp;quot;special interest&amp;quot; and corporate America </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433475</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:29:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433475</guid><dc:creator>ROGER ACKLEY</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp; IF YOU HAVE A GOVERNMENT OF ,BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE THE ONLY ONES THAT FEAR GOVERNMENT ARE NOT AMERICANS .&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; AND IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THEIR PART IN THE SOCIAL ORDER ,THEN GET OUT .THEIR ARE PLENTY OF FASCIST REGIMES AROUND THE GLOBE THAT THEIR GREED WILL FIT INTO .THAT IS IF THAT GREED DOSENT POLUTE AND POISON ALL OF &amp;nbsp;MANKIND FIRST .&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;THESE ANTI SURVIVALISTS THAT LOVE MONEY MORE THEN FRESH AIR AND A FUTURE, SHOULD BE IN STREIGHT JACKETS (DIAMOND STUDED OF COURSE).</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433487</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:33:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433487</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>The current administration has brought us 6 years of greed, cronyism and corruption. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Lane , Ann Arbor (Sent Friday, October 26, 2007 1:32 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--- Lane, your whole posting was nicely put. &amp;nbsp;But I would add the deaths the US and world has suffered because of this administration. Many, many deaths.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433489</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:33:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433489</guid><dc:creator>Bruce, NV</dc:creator><description>Sorry, Ellis, but &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;edwards&amp;quot; don't go together. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433514</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:41:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433514</guid><dc:creator>Marta Case, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>Edwards is the one for 08! &amp;nbsp;My gosh, do we really want 4 more years like we have had?? And why do we have to label everything like socialism, communism, etc. &amp;nbsp;Just listen to what Edwards is saying and he has not veered off message.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards is the only one that is for ordinary citizens! &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433601</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:04:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433601</guid><dc:creator>Ellis B. , Kingman, Az.</dc:creator><description>Bruce you misinterpreted, my vision of conservatism and that of the present Administration are in conflict. I suppose I should have said &amp;quot;former conservative'</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433612</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433612</guid><dc:creator>Michael, Midland TX</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Would that include caps on what sue lawyers can make?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Ron Adams, Terre Haute Indiana&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mr. Adams, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trial lawyers receive a portion of the amount awarded by the JURY or the amount the defendant AGREES to settle for, according to an agreement with the client. &amp;nbsp;The JURY decides how much a trial lawyer makes when it determines the value of damages caused to the plaintiff. &amp;nbsp;However, many of the cases are settled out of court, and why would a defendant settle for a large sum of money if they did nothing wrong? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are two other ways an attorney is paid. &amp;nbsp;Either according to an agreement between the attorney and their boss, or according to a contract with the client which lays out an hourly rate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So how do you prefer to limit the amount of money a trial lawyer can make? &amp;nbsp;Should the jury be excluded from the process, should the defendant be forced to go to court and disallowed from settling out of court, should a client be prohibitted from voluntarily entering into a representation agreement with an attorney of their choice?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now the frivilous lawsuits the rightwing loves to talk about. &amp;nbsp;The system has a rule designed to deal with lawsuits which can be characterized as frivilous. &amp;nbsp;Look up Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and (to the best of my knowledge) all states have enacted a similar provision.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433638</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433638</guid><dc:creator>Gary,Walhalla,SC</dc:creator><description>GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!!THE MOST ELECTABLE CANDIDATE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.WAKE UP DEMOCRATS!EITHER DRAFT GORE OR VOTE EDWARDS IF YOU WANT TO WIN.THAT IS THE TRUTH!</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433640</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:15:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433640</guid><dc:creator>Gary,Walhalla,SC</dc:creator><description>GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!!THE MOST ELECTABLE CANDIDATE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.WAKE UP DEMOCRATS!EITHER DRAFT GORE OR VOTE EDWARDS IF YOU WANT TO WIN.THAT IS THE TRUTH!</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433660</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:17:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433660</guid><dc:creator>ftroit, DC</dc:creator><description>Any body but Hillary!!!</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433734</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:35:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433734</guid><dc:creator>Patty Morlan, Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>Judging by the amount of comments on this blog entry I'd say that Edwards should be getting much more coverage than he is getting. How about it Todd? When is Hardball going to do some honest to goodness coverage of Edwards? And I don't mean nasty haircut comments...Get Edwards on Harball and let's talk about his new proposals. I think your viewers would LOVE IT! We'd also love to see him on Olberman and Dan Abrams show.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433883</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:28:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433883</guid><dc:creator>marsha truman, Blackfoot, idaho</dc:creator><description>So interesting how the right throws out &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; words like &amp;quot;communism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;socialism&amp;quot;, and frets about how much money it would cost us to insure or educate our own citizens. &amp;nbsp;They haven't worried at all about &amp;quot;fascism&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;corporatism&amp;quot;, or how much money has been wasted on stupid wars, or just got lost(!)in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;Their priorities are whacked.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433964</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:03:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433964</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>Carrie, Eastern Iowa (Sent Friday, October 26, 2007 2:30 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--- thanks for the excellent thumbnail on the social contract.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#433981</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:06:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:433981</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>I second Patty's motion. &amp;nbsp;More face time with Edwards even if it does cut into your political advertising revenue.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434081</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434081</guid><dc:creator>Q, Medford, OR</dc:creator><description>To those of you who revile the idea opf a social contract and call it socialism:&lt;br&gt;Who holds the power NOW? And how are they helping starving children right here in America? How are they helping the working poor who must go into debt to have their basic survival needs met?&lt;br&gt;Are you helping these people? Oh, I forgot. It's not YOUR problem.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434160</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:09:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434160</guid><dc:creator>Valjeanne SF CA</dc:creator><description>Chuck Todd already let it slip that Edwards is detested among the DC elite. Why? because he is a threat to their business as usual corporate run policies. The press has nothing but negatives for him because thats what they are ordered to do. Edwards is the one for &amp;quot;the people&amp;quot; We should demand the powers that be give him the press coverage he deserves. As of now the press has been lousy and biased to the max, and &amp;nbsp;might add not in his favor.He has led on every issue this entire campaign, yet he has been marginalized, ridiculed, and up to now neutralized by a complicit media. 'We the people' should demand journalistic integrity! More Edwards coverage on hi many substantive policy proposals, no more tired RW memes...&lt;br&gt;John Edwards 2008 'The Peoples President' fighting to return the government back to the people.. Now we the people need to fight for HIM.....</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434312</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:39:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434312</guid><dc:creator>Jim bridges, Lakewood, Ca</dc:creator><description>John Edwards is a good man with good ideas, there fore he has no chance of being elected. What we will get is who ever the special interest choose to finance. It will be 4-8 more years of incompetence, mismanagement and favoritism. Oh yes, and more and expanding war. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434439</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:19:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434439</guid><dc:creator>Mad Jayhawk, Madison, SD</dc:creator><description>Republicans go to bed at night praying that John Edwards is the Democratic nominee. &amp;nbsp;Ron Paul could even beat him. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434445</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434445</guid><dc:creator>Mad Jayhwk, Madison, SD</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;This is a good, honest, caring individual who wants to see the US flourish. &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that all it takes to be President of the United States I guess I am your man. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards (and Hillary Clinton and Senator Obama &amp;nbsp;for that matter) have not accomplished one significant thing in their lives. &amp;nbsp;List ten, no make that five, of accomplishments he has had in the past 10 years that do not include fuzzy and worthless resume enhancing words like 'led', 'supported', 'voted for', and, my personal favorite, 'fought for'. &amp;nbsp;Bet you can't. &amp;nbsp;These people have no experience. &amp;nbsp;None. &amp;nbsp;Zip. &amp;nbsp;Nada. &amp;nbsp;Zilch. &amp;nbsp;Talking about doing something is in a difficult league than actually have done something. Anyone can talk about doing something. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434452</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:33:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434452</guid><dc:creator>Mad Jayhawk, Madison, SD</dc:creator><description>The end is near. More to come. &amp;nbsp;This is going to get nastier than a night in Michael Vick's backyard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,305485,00.html"&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,305485,00.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434584</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:20:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434584</guid><dc:creator>Change4thegoodofall</dc:creator><description>It takes courage to stand and say what needs to be said, as John Edwards does. It takes intelligence to formulate plans of real change for the good of all citizens of this country. It takes vision to lead on the issues as he has. It will take bold change to make the needed repairs to this nation after Bush, Clinton and Bush. The American people deserve better. Mr. Edwards has my vote. </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434886</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:33:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434886</guid><dc:creator>patch</dc:creator><description>You guys rock. &amp;nbsp;Keep up the good work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; How about Edwards and Ron Paul?</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#434990</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:09:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:434990</guid><dc:creator>Mike Henry, Quanah, Texas</dc:creator><description>The national budget tells us what our values are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A zero based overhaul of the national budget under an Edwards administration, based on this contract, would look much different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recognizing that national defense is the government's first priority, it is yet possible, I believe, to construct such a budget, keep it revenue neutral, and maintain a healthy business climate.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#435056</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:56:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:435056</guid><dc:creator>Lawdog90</dc:creator><description>John Edwards must know he won't raise the big bucks that Clinton and Obama raise with positions like this. &amp;nbsp;There are not many business-types who see that the viability of their companies is tied to the viability of the U.S. - from the needy all the way to the mega-billionaires.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously, John Edwards is less concerned about the number of dollars he raises than he is about being transparent of what his presidency will be about. &amp;nbsp;The further he goes along in the campaign and reveals himself, the more impressive he is! &amp;nbsp;This contract is one of the boldest and most forward-thinking expression of leadership ever heard from a U.S. presidential candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#435319</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:44:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:435319</guid><dc:creator>Cybercitizen, Bartlesville, OK</dc:creator><description>According to an article in the Week in Review section of today's (Sunday, Oct 28) New York Times, Mr. Edwards, for instance, was known for choosing his cases with care. &amp;quot;'He was very selective,' said James P. Cooney III, who defended a dozen medical malpractice cases brought by Mr. Edwards. 'He only took the best cases, and by that I don’t mean the ones with the highest damages. I mean the ones where somebody had done something really bad.'&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards works hard, does his research, plans with care, and that's why I support him for President.</description></item><item><title>Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/26/432588.aspx#457482</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:10:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:457482</guid><dc:creator>Son Offar,  Fresno, Calif.</dc:creator><description>So what did he say?&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;where opportunity is truly shared by all&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Sounds good but I wonder, does all mean ALL?&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;new universal retirement account requiring every business to automatically enroll its workers in at least one plan&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Again the all question comes to my mind, Does this include people have no legal right to work in this country, but do?&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;universal health care&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Are we going to provide health care for every person found within the borders of the United States? &lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;the strengthening of organized labor&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Having been a member of O.L. for many years I can affirm that O.L. has a tradition of leaning pretty heavily on the socialist side of the wall. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;a say on executive pay&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Does this include a say in the pay of U.S. Presidents, Senators, Representatives?? Probably not.&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;John F. Kennedy once said, 'The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated.'&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;While not an ardent admirer of JFK, I think it is important that we not his use of the combined words 'all Americans' and 'our fellow Americans'. Can you find these word combinations in Mr, Edwards Speech? &lt;br&gt;Could the word Socialist be applied to Mr. Edwards speech? &amp;nbsp;Is there a difference between a socialist, a modern democrat, and an American Communist? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Could you tell me what it is?&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>