<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Chuck ToddEdwards just connected the dots that some thought Obama would connect re: the Iran issue. Early on, he's doing a better job of drawing distinctions with Clinton than Obama. Dropping "neo-con" a few times in his response on Iran was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439192</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:25:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439192</guid><dc:creator>Theo, Cincinnati, OH</dc:creator><description>The video of the debate won't play on the website. Way to go...</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439196</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:25:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439196</guid><dc:creator>ye</dc:creator><description>MSNBC STREAMING ISN'T WORKING!</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439200</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:26:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439200</guid><dc:creator>Aidyn, NY, NY</dc:creator><description>what is &amp;quot;neo con&amp;quot;??</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439201</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:26:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439201</guid><dc:creator>Bob, Jesusville, TX</dc:creator><description>FIX THE LIVE VIDEO FEED</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439207</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:28:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439207</guid><dc:creator>Bustyn</dc:creator><description>What's the problem with MSNBC.com? &amp;nbsp;They have the &amp;quot;click to watch the debate live&amp;quot; picture at the top of their website, but of course the &amp;quot;video is not available&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Unreal. &amp;nbsp;The one time I would actually watch MSNBC and they've managed to screw it up.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439209</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:28:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439209</guid><dc:creator>Russell, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator><description>Your site's broken streaming video sucks a big fat one. We wouldn't need you to do this silly blog if you guys just fixed your video service. </description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439221</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439221</guid><dc:creator>Torrey, Myakka City, FL</dc:creator><description>talking points... talking points... talking points.&lt;br&gt;Once again, the Democrats offer nothing of substance, rather regurgitating the same old DNC memo highlighted points. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When will America wise up and read between the lines?&lt;br&gt;These people talk an awful lot for saying absolutely nothing. </description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439238</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:34:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439238</guid><dc:creator>Tibwa</dc:creator><description>Chuck, you are trying to spin it as you have been doing these days</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439252</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:38:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439252</guid><dc:creator>Brian Little, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Edwards, brings out a clearer distinction between himself and Clinton without being necessarily negative. I wouldn't be surprised if he overtakes Obama.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439306</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:46:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439306</guid><dc:creator>Robert P. Chapel Hill, NC</dc:creator><description>Edwards is doing what Democrats haven't wanted to, show what Clinton is really about.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439317</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:48:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439317</guid><dc:creator>Tami, Annapolis,MD</dc:creator><description>I agree with your comment. To me it looks like Edwards is calling out Clinton (like he said he would) more than B.O.&lt;br&gt;B.O. Is also going along with a lot what she is saying ( he also is studdering. Can we say thats what we want. A yes man or a do man.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439328</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:50:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439328</guid><dc:creator>Tami, Annapolis, MD</dc:creator><description>He's calling her out again. Go man! Go man!</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439346</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:53:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439346</guid><dc:creator>Tami, Annapolis, MD</dc:creator><description>Why is does she keep avoiding the questions by turning it around on Bush. What is she going to do about in office if she is elected. Stop concentrating on bush and start concentrating on yourself</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439409</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439409</guid><dc:creator>Renny</dc:creator><description>Edwards' use of the phrase &amp;quot;neo-con&amp;quot; works against him, I think. I look at each candidate from both parties before choosing the person I will vote for.&lt;br&gt;Phrases like &amp;quot;neo-con&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;leftwing nut&amp;quot; are off-putting. &amp;nbsp;Edwards needs to stick with the issues and drop the name-calling.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439467</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:15:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439467</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn Kagan, Providence, RI</dc:creator><description>What on earth is a neo-con? What are they talking about?</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#439478</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:17:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:439478</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn Kagan, Providence, RI</dc:creator><description>Please, what do they mean about neo-con? What is that? I've nevder heard that word.</description></item><item><title>Edwards Puts Clinton On Side Of The &amp;quot;Neo-Cons&amp;quot;</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/30/439182.aspx#457954</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:38:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:457954</guid><dc:creator>Jill, Cedar City, UT</dc:creator><description>Neo-con: Neo conservative. It is a social movement that rejects liberalism. &amp;nbsp;Both of the Bush's administrations have been based on neoconservatism. Most neocons were liberals that switched to the &amp;quot;other side&amp;quot; during the 70's and aligned themselves with Pres. Reagan in the 80's.</description></item></channel></rss>