Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Hillary Clinton — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:22:56 GMT

Can someone, anyone find me a judge, so i can get an EPO against barack & all the other men who treated me so Baaad last night.HEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP!!!!!!!

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

F StLouis — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:25:34 GMT

Hes full of crap.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:28:44 GMT

Bravo! lets see what Clinton machine has to say. I know they've been knocked out by last night debate. Another bunch of fluffs.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:29:15 GMT

Bravo! lets see what Clinton machine has to say. I know they've been knocked out by last night debate.

I want Obama and Edward to hammer her on the critical issues.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

HMT-MI — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:30:01 GMT

The mre I see and hear the punches being thrown at Clinton by everybody(whatever the party)I can see she would be able to stand up for this country plus she is not a thief like George Bush or a bumbling idiot.She actually speaks in sentences.Any democrat is fine with me,but I do admire her guts to battle it out with these guys,without a whimper.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

ki houston — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:30:49 GMT

over 60,000 people who can be traced by a phone # and obama wins 30% to clinton 20% those are the kind of polls that can give real indication. Not that its the end all say all but i will take the american people over a obveously bias ras. poll of like 5or6 hundred people , plus are being managed by clinton supporters.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Tuck,Realityville, Kansas — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:33:08 GMT

ooohh, barak is so tough in a memo.. guess they saw the WaPo peice questioning his ability to stand up to the GOP and other enemies of American Values

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

--NSMSNBC — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:36:38 GMT

HMT-MI: I'm not sure where you get without a whimper. She has cried foul whenever an opponent or the media tries to clarify her positions.

I really like Obama, can somebody say Ma-a-a-n Crush? Vote-bama.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:38:55 GMT

Folks,

Check out Mark Penn spin on Hillary's answer. Hillary is toasted. I'll sugest she get her money back from Mark Penn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHOq-16cDDg

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Nick L, Elizabethtown, KY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:39:32 GMT

Cheney won't tell us know who he met with when they where deciding U.S. energy policy when he formed the task force? Also, a new article in the Wash. Post about the secret papers of Rudy Giuliani...what about that??? If the Clinton have to do play by a different standard then so should everyone else.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

vanreuter, NY NY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:40:36 GMT

October 31, 2007, 12:55 pm
Afscme to Endorse Clinton

By Steven Greenhouse

Gaining one of the biggest endorsements that organized labor has to offer, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is to receive the endorsement at 1:30 p.m. today of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, a union official said today.

The union is one of the nation’s largest, with 1.4 million members, and is especially powerful in Iowa, where it has 30,000 members, making it a major force in that state’s Democratic caucus."

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/afscme-to-endorse-clinton/

"Hillary Rodham Clinton won the endorsement of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees on Wednesday, an important boost for the Democratic presidential front-runner."

http://www.townhall.com/news/

A campaign that knows what it's doing scores again.

Van

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Toris — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:41:24 GMT

Here is another interesting perspective

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/10/obbidoddwardsson_versus_hillar.php

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Rufus Gibbons, DC — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:44:49 GMT

HMT I agree these attacks on Senator Clinton are not quite as bad as what the repub smear machines will use but they give her a chance to show how she handles these things.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:44:53 GMT

Folks, here is Marc's bottomline.

Bottom line, before all the analysis:

Obama confronted Clinton in his way, Edwards confronted Clinton in his way, and none of us writing about the debate can say with accuracy which approach voters prefer.

In this discordant symphony – ‘A Clintonian Lament’ -- John Edwards’s instruments of persuasion were sharper and louder; Barack Obama’s were more resonant and more subtle.

In music terms, Edwards played the French horn; Obama played the violin. Or, as the New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza told me during a commercial break, “It’s the difference between someone who goes to law school and becomes a prosecutor and someone who goes to law school and becomes a law professor.”

The question is, which do you prefer? Do you prefer a professor's approach or trial lawyer.

I think i prefer both.

Obama/Edward '08
Edward/Obama '08

I like them both

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Yiannis, Baltimore — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:47:16 GMT

without a whimper? she stumbled pretty badly last night. She got irritated, lectured and flip-flopped on immigration within the space of 1 minute.

Yep she is Bush-tough

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

jerry/corpus christi texas — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:48:55 GMT

Considering that Hillary has a public and private response when it comes to social security, one has to wonder what other public/private thoughts she has on other issues.....

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Shadow, Hamden, CT — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:52:47 GMT

Obama and Edwards defeated Hillary convincingly in last night's debate, and were very effective in showing Clinton's unwillingness to be straightforward with her answers. At the point where she was going on and on about "processees" in a ridiculous non-answer about her sealed records from the White House, Obama turned around and decked her for her lack of honesty, and the irrationality of claiming Presidential experience via the position of first lady, and then sealing the records that show that history for voters to judge. That was probably the strongest point made by anyone all night, if not all year.

I'd say Obama did the best, followed closely by Edwards, then Dodd. All three campaigns advanced their causes forwards as a result of last night's debate, and Hillary has been damaged heavily.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:58:06 GMT

The Hillary train has been derailed. Now lets see if the MSM will stop handicapping the horserace and instead begin evaluating the candidates. We'll all benefit from that type of analysis.
Obama '08

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Tuck, realworld, kansas — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:58:53 GMT

let's see, obama is now resorting to "don't vote for hillary"

no reason to vote for obama except he's not hillary

he a homophobe
who misses votes and did NOTHING in illini congress.
yeah, lets elect him cause he's so inexperienced!

wheeeeeeee

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

RAH — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:05:07 GMT

The "politics of hope" doesn't mean holding hands and singing Kumbaya! It is being honest with the American people, restoring the constitution and bringing the people back into an open government. It is govening from strength and optimism. Hillary and her team doesn't seem to understand what the "policy of hope" means, but they surely demonstrates what it isn't.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Larry Heege, Bronx NY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:05:11 GMT

These are the only kind of wars the Democrats are willing to fight.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

ken — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:09:17 GMT

Phrases like "dead or alive" "bring it on" "last throes of the insurgency"Sometimes in life there are no simplistic answers to sum it up in a 30 secound sound bite. So the most stupid of the people are able to understand.Tlking to the lowest common denominator has gotten us this far, jingoism at its finest

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

mark — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:15:12 GMT

I find it hilarious Hillary's camp is whining about Tim Russert. If you are the front runner and are unable to answer questions, you do not deserve to be the democratic candidate.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

MK,MO — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:16:58 GMT

F StLouis adds / "Hes full of crap."

did you write that yourself? face it, obama and edwards speak the truth even though they are vaginaless, hillary is finally having to explain why she is so secretive, and she ain't liking it because the truth will be revealed and she will be kicked to the curb as any criminal "bush lite" politician should be.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Carrie, Eastern Iowa — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:19:10 GMT

I would like all of the other candidates to make public all of their emails and other communication between themselves and their spouses. If it is official White House business, then fine, but anything other than discussions on policy or the like should not be made available to the public.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Youngstown Ohio — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:30:12 GMT

Obama has my vote......However He needs a stronger voice when speaking. Obama & Edwards they would make a great "TEAM"

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Constance Nelson.Miami, Fl — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:33:40 GMT

I agree. He is full of crap.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Ron, TX — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:48:20 GMT

Sure democrats know why they will vote for Hillary - she wants to form a bunch of "bi-partisan committees" to find answers to "really complicated things".

During last night's debate, she said:
No, I didn't say that, Tim. I said that I'm in favor of doing something about the AMT. How we do it and how we put the package together everybody knows is extremely complicated....And there are a lot of moving pieces here....There's a lot of moving parts. So I'm not going to get committed to a specific approach...

Now THAT is the kind of leadership we need in Washington! <joke> Obama, of course, is 100% correct again. Hillary loves being secretive. She doesn't want to tell ANYONE ANYTHING.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Shadow, Hamden, CT — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:48:52 GMT

Carrie - The policy stuff is all I want to see. The personal conversations are nobody's business.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Markie Bee, Sacramento, Calif. — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:19:36 GMT

Tuck, Obama passed sweeping ethics legislation in Illinois and ended a capital punishment system that almost wrongly put 13 people to death. He reached across to Repugnantcans to get them to sign off on these bills, which then passed overwhelmingly. Homophobe? Where'd you get that news? He's been very outspoken on gay rights issues. Did the campaign make a mistake with McGurkin? Yeah. But Obama saw that he could bring up an important issue and that's inclusion. Just because McGurkin has a differing view, and Obama clearly stated he did not support McGurkin's views, Obama wasn't about to turn his back on him or any other citizen who may not hold the same opinions. Obama's tent is large and welcoming. On the experience issue, he's almost elected legislative experience than Clinton and Edwards combined. But Washington experience has gotten into the mess we're in now. I'd prefer someone with an outsider's view who shows good judment to someone who has made the wrong decisions or no decisions for 30 years as a senator or congressman.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Amy B Portland ME — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:21:37 GMT

Edwards/Obama...I would support that. I wish they would get together before the primary, however, and offer themselves just that way as an alternatie to Hillary. She has to be stopped. She can't win against Rudy.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Dot, Illinois — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:22:22 GMT

Carrie,

I agree with you on this one. If the info relates to official business, that's okay. Other than that, no.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:36:27 GMT

Carrie, Eastern Iowa,

Clinton need to be forthright with American people regarding her records. If she is claiming her white house experience as part of her records, i'd suggest she open it up for public scrutiny.

We need to know what her records look like. Anything short of this is unacceptable. We have right as a citizen to evaluate her past public service and determine if she will be able to use a better judgement to guide the country.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

nuanced — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:47:01 GMT

Sometimes you have to decide whether to go with someone who is open, honest and addresses the issues or someone who can get elected. The American voter and the press are at fault for always looking for the one gaffe or gotcha or disagreement that can be used as a reason to not vote for a candidate instead of focusing on the many areas of agreement as reasons to vote for a candidate. There seems to be a defect in the human brain when it comes to weighing alternatives, which is why we fear absurdly improbable events and are willing to give up freedoms for false safety. We give too much weight to small negatives and too little weight to larger positives in the candidates.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

CitizenJ — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:21:43 GMT

Tuck, realworld, kansas (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:58 PM)

Tuck,

I am glad that you have finally realized the irony in your previous moniker: "Tuck, Realityville, Kansas". However, I'm not sure that "realworld" is more accurate. Unless, of course, you are talking about the MTV show.

Van,

Congrats on Clinton's endorsement. But isn't there a thread about that?

I wonder if this will even get posted. I haven't seen anything new in a couple of hours. Maybe hire some more help?

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Vette58 — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:22:01 GMT

Finally, Obama is drawing the line in the sand and making Hillary accountable. The results... a big win at last nights debate. Just keep asking her the hard questions Senator Obama and let the people draw their own conclusion that you are the most qualified and electable candidate for 08.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Chris F, just o'er the border in Williconsinois — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:25:14 GMT

Bee (Sent Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:44 PM)

The question is, which do you prefer? Do you prefer a professor's approach or trial lawyer.

Bee, I like your analysis! I went to law school and became a public defender, so I must say I prefer the professorial touch. I was able to see Sen. Obama's/Sen. Edward's debate performance through sound bites only, so my perspective is somewhat limited. However, my concern is that Sen. Obama's deft and nuanced approach may be too subtle to capture the imagination of the electorate. On the other hand, a deft and nuanced approach to matters would certainly be a welcome change in Washington. Combine this with Sen. Edwards' energy, high spirits and willingness to (metaphorically speaking) get his hands dirty, and we've got ourselves a winning ticket folks!

I worked as a minor minion on Sen. Obama's senatorial campaign; initially, I did not want him to make a presidential bid. I wanted him to stay in Illinois and do something for the people who gave him a national platform. I see now that I've been selfish. Sen. Obama belongs to the nation. So, with respect, I believe the ticket should be:

Obama/Edwards '08
Embrace the Fate!

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Sara, Cedar Rapids, Iowa — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:42:44 GMT

"I would like all of the other candidates to make public all of their emails and other communication between themselves and their spouses. If it is official White House business, then fine, but anything other than discussions on policy or the like should not be made available to the public.

Carrie, Eastern Iowa "

Carrie, it is official White House business that Bill (who I adore) is refusing to allow the archives to release until 2012. Hillary wants to claim she was intimately involved in her husband's administration, but doesn't want to release the documents to back that up. Maybe you don't need to know what if anything her involvement in the WH was, but she continues to make claims, that others in DC are false. She has gone from claiming she authored the original s-chip bill and got it passed, to stating last night that she was "someone who helped bring...the children's health insurance program to fruition during the year at the White House..."

Here original claims regarding her involvement in the language and passage of S-chip were disputed by the GOP and Democratic Senators who actually were involved in writing and passing it, and now her involvement is watered down to she's "someone who helped bring...to fruition during the year at the White House..."

You may not believe that Hillary owes the voters facts to back up her claims, even when her claims are disputed, and appear to be false. But I believe she owes the voters a duty of full disclosure. and without full disclosure any one who votes for her is allowing emotions, gender pride, or a desire for the return of the glory days of Bill Clinton, not the facts, to guide their support. To me, blind faith is naive. I prefer to fully educate myself prior to supporting a candidate, and if a candidate prevents that, either through double talk, refusing to release records, or other means, I will not support them.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Sierra, SF — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:48:33 GMT

Shadow, Hamden, CT: '...I'd say Obama did the best, followed closely by Edwards, then Dodd. All three campaigns advanced their causes forwards as a result of last night's debate, and Hillary has been damaged heavily...'

Last night I liked Edwards better, Shadow
The wheel fell off hte Forked Tongue Express, last night.

Hillary couldn't give an honest answer on Social Security, Iran, Iraq and IDs for illegal immigrants.

Obama and Edwards should have been doing this months, ago

Actually, Biden had a good night
Dodd is good on Iraq, but he's toooooo wordy.

Hillary Clinton gives the Republicans the best chance to win the Presidency.
Don't give them that chance !!

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:48:52 GMT

Van, you read the post on First Read, Gerald McEntee, president of AFSCME is a close colleague of Bill Clinton's. This endorsement was a given. Man, are you grasping for straws.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Sierra, SF — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:54:49 GMT

Bee: '...Folks, Check out Mark Penn spin on Hillary's answer. Hillary is toasted. I'll sugest she get her money back from Mark Penn http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHOq-16cDDg ...'

Great link, Bee
Mark Penn says she supports IDs, then he says she doesn't support IDs

The Forked Tongue Express !!

Obama did OK, but I liked Edwards performance better
Give 'em Hell, Johnny !!

The dark cloud is lifting ......

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

vanreuter, NY NY — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:06:59 GMT

Yeah Mitchell, It's Clinton supporters who are grasping at straws.

Van

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

BionicWoman, Tucson — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:11:21 GMT

Anyone see Leno last night?

He said the debate was with Hillary the frontrunner and Mr. Desperate, Mr. Very Desperate - and everybody else.

That about sums it up.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Yiannis, Baltimore — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:14:57 GMT

Carrie,
Your candidate was for and against giving drivers license to undocumented immigrants within the same minute.

I'm glad you agree with her.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Carrie, Eastern Iowa — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:27:27 GMT

Yiannis - I don't have a candidate, thank you. Nor have I ever made a statement regarding drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants. Try again, please.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Bee — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:31:12 GMT

Chris F, just o'er the border in Williconsinois,

I surely agree with your assessment. I like both professor's approach and a trial lawyer's approach. Subtle + passion gives resounace and candour. This is a winning ticket come November 2008.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

cheryl, mesa, az — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:57:37 GMT

why didn't they just hold the debate in a boxing ring between Edwards, Obama & Clinton. That was awful. Thought i was watching the destruction of the democrats. Obama and Edwards needs to focus on their own platforms instead of acting like attack dogs. I was very disappointed by them lst night.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Richard, Washington State — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:18:29 GMT

In essence, Sara from Cedar Rapids is saying that Clinton is basically a lightweight who claims more substance and accomplishment than is really the case.

Has Sara been listening to Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh the past couple of years?

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Richard, Washington State — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:23:13 GMT

Hmm, just what I thought. "Resounace" and "candour" are not in the dictionary.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Wang — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:42:48 GMT

I really liked the 90's I know it's almost 2010 but cant we just go back to the same stuff again? I dont want to evolve. Im for Hillary.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Richard, Washington State — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:48:29 GMT

Cheryl, mesa, az:

I hear you. Even though I didn't watch, from what I'm seeing here it would be prime material for "Celebrity Smackdown" that claymation thing from a few years ago that's a popular video game now.

Might be seen by more viewers/players, too, with higher ratings than MSNBC.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Sierra, SF — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:08:33 GMT

cheryl, mesa, az: '...That was awful. Thought i was watching the destruction of the democrats. Obama and Edwards needs to focus on their own platforms instead of acting like attack dogs. I was very disappointed them lst night...'

It's called a debateby, cheryl
That's how you determine the differences between candidates.
If your the front runner, you have to answer questions
It got rough last night because Hillary didn't answer the questions honestly.

Remember 'I did not have sex with that woman' ?
That was a lie
The Clintons don't like telling the truth
That's what gets them in trouble

Maybe Hillary should withdraw from the race if she can't stand the heat.
That's a win-win situation for America

Hillary Clinton, the Forked Tongue Express

Oh ! cherly, what IS Hillary's position on IDs for illegal aliens ?

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

sonya, atlanta, ga — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:17:47 GMT

I was proud of the Democratic process. I want truth telling and vision no more of these games. There is too much at stake. If you got the creds then prove it, state your case and let the american people decide.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

FACT # 9 /AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:18:33 GMT

Where in the word """Illegal""" states one has Rights to a Drivers licence? The law states ""one who illegally enters this country will be deported!!!

Enforce the law!

This debate showed Clinton makes the law only to be self sering for the moment """LIKE ALL HER OTHER VOTING RECORD SHOWS COMPLETE SELF SERVING AGENDA!!!

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

FACT or fiction /AZ — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:25:44 GMT

Wiley Coyote just threw in the towel for Hillary!

Send your towels to Hillary Clinton.com

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Carrie, Eastern Iowa — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:31:42 GMT

Sara - I responded to you yesterday; however, most of the comments I left yesterday were never posted and my response to you was one of them.

I think the Clintons should make available any relevant policy paperwork within the same timeframe as any other former president and first lady. I have no knowledge of how long it typically takes for such information to get released.

However, unless I heard incorrectly (and it is possible that I did), Russert asked if she was going to turn over all communications between herself and Bill during his presidency. I don't think that is necessary. Personal communications not dealing with government and policy should remain private. Anythign else is fair game.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

RuthieM — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:08:13 GMT

So this is their strategy, to first cry whatever happened to the politics of hope everytime Obama sneezes and then now to get away with 'murder' because she stands among all men. Hillary Clinton and her campaign should be ashamed of themselves for treating the American people this way, for wanting to dodge, weave and hide all the way through the elections. What Hillary is telling the American people by doing this is: I really don't care about the American people, I really don't care about what you think, I really don't care about what questions you have of me, I just care about landing my butt in the white house, you jerks. If she really didn't feel this way she and her campaign would not be continuing to hide her in the dark and scream victim when they and she know that these men are not 'piling' on her but are actually confused and tired of her double talk and fence straddling and getting away with it. What she and her campaign are really saying is they actually have no respect for America or the American people by reacting as they do.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

OBAMA in '08 GIVE US REAL CHANGE, Pittsburgh PA — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:45:45 GMT

Has anyone seen Obama's latest interview in which he offers to sit down with the Iranians, without preconditions, to try to solve the problems between us? Now there is a leader who does not jump at every opportunity to use the military option. This country needs Barack Obama to bring true change to Washington. Hillary is way too evasive and carries too much baggage to win the general election in 2008. She saber rattles as much as any Republican candidate. This is the best chance the Democrats have had in years to regain the White House and possibly a solid majority in Congress. Americans desperately want a new direction...new ideas to solve the problems of education, health care, the environment. They want a president who will work in a bipartisan way and will work to unite blue states and red states into one nation. Barack Obama has the character and the integrity to do the job. He is beholden to the people's interests and not the special interests. Experience does not always equal good judgement. Hillary, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden and John Edwards all voted to support Bush's invasion of Iraq. Obama opposed this foreign policy disaster from the outset. He is the clear choice to succeed George W. Bush on January 20, 2009.

Obama re: Clinton: 'Secrecy'

Harmony — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:31:23 GMT

Hillary was losing it - I saw the steam coming out of her ears. We need someone cool, calm and collected under pressure. Now she has resorted to the blame game about how they were picking on her.

Bush also loses his cool, and blames others when he wont take responsibility. It's all about appearances and manuvering instead of what you stand for.

What else do they have in common? Scarey.