<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx</link><description>
*** UPDATE *** The Obama camp, which usually doesn't respond, to individual Clinton speeches, issued a statement.






From NBC/NJ's Athena JonesCEDAR RAPIDS, IA -- Clinton laid out proposals today she said would promote clean energy and create</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448508</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:44:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448508</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>As usual, Clinton is playing follow the leader. &amp;nbsp;Obama released a full energy plan MONTHS ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18227881/"&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18227881/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And might I say, it is FAR more developed than Clinton's... but who would have thought different. &amp;nbsp;Why would Clinton want to commit to ANYTHING that might be controversial?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448510</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:46:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448510</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>Very true....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary probably has two sides to this issue as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;well find that out at the next debate</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448516</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:50:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448516</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Really ?&lt;br&gt;Who's she pandering to here ?&lt;br&gt;Corn growers in Iowa ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's Hillary Clinton's position on IDs for illegal aliens ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's Hillary Clinton's position on releasing her White House records ?&lt;br&gt;She says she has 'experience' and First Lady ...&lt;br&gt;Why not release her records so people can see for themselves ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When will Hillary get us out of Iraq ?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448526</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:54:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448526</guid><dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator><description>Just another of her &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; agenda items. Make no mistake about it, Hillary is our leader. hillaryclinton.com &amp;nbsp;just come see why, it's free and you may just learn something.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448528</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:54:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448528</guid><dc:creator>Dickie Flatts, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>No comments. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems people get more excited over silly and baseless attacks than things that really matter like policy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder why the policy even got some time - what has Edwards not lobbed an attack in the last 5 minutes?</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448539</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:58:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448539</guid><dc:creator>MaryAnne Derry, NH</dc:creator><description>As I see it, just the mention of the &amp;quot;gender&amp;quot; card is proof enough she is more confused than ever. If in defending yourself because you cannot answer questions that men pose to you for the chance to run for the highest office, or attempting to evade answers because you don' t have any, is a sure indication that any excuse to hide behind your ignorance is just sheer stupidity. All the liberals and the feminists certainly have a problem if they need to keep convincing the public they are who they think they are. Hasn't it always been a fact that when you are secure in yourself there is no need to prove it? If her first response is to run to the feminists she is certainly not tough enough to lead a country. &amp;nbsp;And, another sign of ignorance is continuing to offer &amp;nbsp;promises that are so unrealistic it is a sure sign &amp;nbsp;that she will lose most or not all of those favored her. This woman cannot be trusted, it is quite obvious! &amp;nbsp;BYE BYE LADY&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448546</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:01:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448546</guid><dc:creator>VL North Carolina</dc:creator><description>Wow, so it took this long????</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448550</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:02:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448550</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>I wanted to make sure that Shadow had a chance to post first...&lt;br&gt;What we will see happening is Clinton touting policy initiatives while her opponents devote a portion of their stump speeches to attacking her. The less traction they get in the polls, the more time they will have to devote to things other than their policies and vision for the country. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448556</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:03:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448556</guid><dc:creator>Jan, Nashua, NH</dc:creator><description>I certainly appreciate any candidate who comes up with an energy policy that takes us farther away from oil-based energy policies. &amp;nbsp;I'm pretty sure the Republican candidates aren't talking about renewable energy at all. &amp;nbsp;I love this &amp;quot;green collar&amp;quot; jobs idea.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448559</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448559</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Where is the detail in this speech? I don't see any detail but another vague speech promoting plattitudes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spend $50 billion dollars on what exactly? &amp;nbsp;Strategic energy funds, how is that fund going to be funded? How does she intend to curb carbon emmission? That is the real question? Changing our light bulb will help but it won't do enough. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another play it safe from Hillary Clinton. What about renewable energy? </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448597</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:23:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448597</guid><dc:creator>Dot, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Bee:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be fair, I think there are details in this proposal. &amp;nbsp;Obviously, it is difficult for any candidate to give minute specifics about any policy during a campaign speech but I think this was well articulated.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448601</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:24:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448601</guid><dc:creator>Tareli, Fuquay Varina NC</dc:creator><description>Bee you can read the details of her plan here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/poweringamericasfuture.pdf"&gt;http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/poweringamericasfuture.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448604</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:25:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448604</guid><dc:creator>chrisf</dc:creator><description>No Dem candidate can really tout serious proposals on the environment/energy. It's all a lot of great rhetoric, but you know that it's going to get buried after Day 1 as POTUS...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.political-buzz.com/"&gt;http://www.political-buzz.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448607</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:26:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448607</guid><dc:creator>G</dc:creator><description>did anyone notice that Sierra almost always follows jerry here. I wonder why? Jerry is sierra or should I say sierra is jerry.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448609</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:27:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448609</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;What we will see happening is Clinton touting policy initiatives while her opponents devote a portion of their stump speeches to attacking her.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you Josh Earnest, for illustrating my point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448610</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:27:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448610</guid><dc:creator>Dante, Laurel, Maryland</dc:creator><description>OBAMA 08</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448611</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:27:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448611</guid><dc:creator>Class Warrior, D.C.</dc:creator><description>I'm glad Gore had a good influence on her. &amp;nbsp;Let's see if she walks the talk, though.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448612</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:27:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448612</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>Solve two problems at once. Put all the illegal immigrants pedaling stationary bicycles connected to generators. Now that's a green collar job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- just a joke; don't have a cow man.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448617</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:30:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448617</guid><dc:creator>VL North Carolina</dc:creator><description>And it looks like the response from the RNC:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Hillary Clinton’s failed solution of throwing money at any problem and increasing government involvement in every facet of our lives will be rejected by the American people. &amp;nbsp;Senator Clinton has not earned the trust of voters on Social Security, {openness and transparency}, immigration or tax policy and there is no reason to believe the energy issue will be any different&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;{openness and transparency}&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;I argee with Reps. on this one issues. IF Sen. Clinton gets the nomination, she is going to have a problem with trust issues. &amp;nbsp;How can you ask for someone's vote when you are hiding things in your past. Especially hiding things that you claim to draw your experience from? (The Clinton archive files) This will not go away, we already have a President in office who acts in secrecy.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448623</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:33:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448623</guid><dc:creator>John S Alexander,Edinboro,PA</dc:creator><description>The speech is about defining issues Bee, not details,&lt;br&gt;I know you dislike Hill but come on, beat her up with real arguments.&lt;br&gt;Sierra would also like to know who pulled the trigger on Vince, and other such nonsense, how about records for records, Clitons and both Bush folders, I wonder who would win?&lt;br&gt;Your sounding like that paper hanging guy.&lt;br&gt;In this media cycle, she knows to define issues early, that is why Edwards and Obama were wrong to attack so early. She has pulled ahead again and you guys just spit, smart politicians can do that to you. At least our people are defining issues, the repubs are still asking for recognition for their credentials. Time is tick tocking and the wildebeast are crowding around the water hole as it dries up, panic is in the air and the big cats smell fear and wish for blood. a quick movement (a few votes), and the last of the water is RED.&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Where is Dobson, he led us here, were is that other guy that has the odd couple name, his tracks are here also. Look out, there goes an 'ol' cougar, run for your lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Herd mentality equals extermination of the weak and infirm.&lt;br&gt;The predators feed their young.&lt;br&gt;People earn a living and the birds will build new nests, the consumption of goods and the offering of services will again churn the wheels, the universe goes on.&lt;br&gt;Ronnies morning in america was always a far gone conclusion, just look out the window, he was not clairvoyant, he just opened his eyes and saw the sun come up.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448648</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448648</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>vanreuter, NY NY: '...I wanted to make sure that Shadow had a chance to post first... &lt;br&gt;What we will see happening is Clinton touting policy initiatives while her opponents devote a portion of their stump speeches to attacking her...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, Van !&lt;br&gt;When Hillary is vague and deceitful, she should be attacked !&lt;br&gt;WHAT IS her position on IDs for illegal aliens ?&lt;br&gt;I'm waiting for your answer...&lt;br&gt;One word will do: 'FOR' or 'AGAINST'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is her psoition on releasing the White House transcripts ?&lt;br&gt;Will she ask Bill to release them ?&lt;br&gt;Or whill she hide the transcripts ?&lt;br&gt;WHAT IS SHE HIDING ?&lt;br&gt;She should be PROUD of her White House years ...&lt;br&gt;If she really wasr proud, she'd release those transcripts IMMEDIATELY !!&lt;br&gt;It shays volumnes that she's covering up her White House record.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is her position on Social Security taxes, van ?&lt;br&gt;Will she raise them or not ?&lt;br&gt;Or will she 'appoint a commission' ?&lt;br&gt;That shows no leadership !&lt;br&gt;It means she doesn't want to take an honest position&lt;br&gt;Is that what you're supporting, van ?&lt;br&gt;A gutless, empty pantsuit ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton, 15 years of dishonesty, scandal and divisiveness&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448672</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:55:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448672</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Dickie Flatts, Charlotte, NC: '...Seems people get more excited over silly and baseless attacks than things that really matter like policy...' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and some people get worried about Obama's 'big ears' and 'white ex-girlfriend', right Dickie ?</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448673</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448673</guid><dc:creator>CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSTON </dc:creator><description>PEOPLE ARE ASKING ABOUT THE DETAILS, HEY THERE ISN'T ANY ! REMEMBER THE CLINTON BABY OF 8 YEARS ( HEALTH CARE ) NOW SHE DIDN'T GET IT DONE IN 8 YEARS AT THE WHITE HOUSE WHY WOULD SHE CREATE A ENERGY &amp;amp; HEALTH CARE PLAN IN 4 YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE. </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448681</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:58:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448681</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;Just another of her &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; agenda items. Make no mistake about it, Hillary is our leader. hillaryclinton.com &amp;nbsp;just come see why, it's free and you may just learn something. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't need to go to her website, Bubba, to see that she's a two-faced liar like the clown running around the White House now playing cowboys and indians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry. Her proposal is to throw more money at the issue, while Obama's is a collaborative effort between government and the auto industry and other industries to fix the environment and help reduce global warming. Hillary sounds like she's just going to throw things down Detroit's throat. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I'll stick with my support of Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448682</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:58:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448682</guid><dc:creator>CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSTON </dc:creator><description>CLINTON'S ENERGY PLAN IS THE SAME AS AL BORE'S, IT'S WE'LL FLY PRIVATE JETS BUT YOU PEOPLE CAN RIDE BICYLES&lt;br&gt;&amp;amp; EAT CARROTS, O.K NOW YOU UNDERSTAND THE ELITEST IN THIS COUNTRY ! </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448689</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:01:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448689</guid><dc:creator>K Henry Eastston, Omaha NE</dc:creator><description>Hillary has as much chance of changing the climate as she does of slowing down Bill's playing around.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448694</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:02:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448694</guid><dc:creator>G</dc:creator><description>Jerry /Sierra,which one are you really?</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448697</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:03:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448697</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;I wanted to make sure that Shadow had a chance to post first... &lt;br&gt;What we will see happening is Clinton touting policy initiatives while her opponents devote a portion of their stump speeches to attacking her. The less traction they get in the polls, the more time they will have to devote to things other than their policies and vision for the country. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If taking swipes at her while delivering their own policy agendas for their proposed administrations causes the Hillary camp to actually ANSWER a question, more power to both Obama and Edwards. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Face it, Van. She LOST the debate last week. She was ill-prepared and totally side-swiped that her opponents would actually hold her feet to the fire to get her to open up about what she'd actually do if people are stupid enough to elect her President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She failed to justify her vote for Iraq, her vote on Iran, her lack of anything resembling a fix to Social Security, her double-speak answer on illegal immigration (Orwell's spinning in his grave, btw), and even on education. The only thing she was adamant about was that she would not release her papers as First Lady. Go figure, the one thing she's absolutely sure about, and it is something that's negative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I can't wait to see her come in 3rd in Iowa behind both Obama and Edwards.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448701</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:03:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448701</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Much Ado About Nothing&lt;br&gt;A Commentary by Douglas Schoen&lt;br&gt;Monday, November 05, 2007&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;With the publication of two polls this week showing no change in the Democratic nomination for President, it seems clear that Hillary Clinton's position is most likely more secure than many in the media and her opponents would like it to be.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_commentary/commentary_by_douglas_schoen/much_ado_about_nothing"&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_commentary/commentary_by_douglas_schoen/much_ado_about_nothing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's really messing with the new narrative...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448709</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:06:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448709</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;quot;What we will see happening is Clinton touting policy initiatives while her opponents devote a portion of their stump speeches to attacking her.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you Josh Earnest, for illustrating my point. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it is their right and responsibility to get the answers from her. They're unning campaigns of openness and honesty. She's hiding behind the name and legacy of her husband.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It isn't an attack when they say &amp;quot;On energy policy, I will do A, B, and C, and I will fund it by means of X, Y, and Z. This is certainly more than Senator Clinton has given the American people.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That isn't an attack. It's a statement of fact. It's how political campaigns are run. If she can't take the heat of the position of supposed front-runner, she needs to step aside for someone who can.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448718</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:12:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448718</guid><dc:creator>Bubba Nicholson, Tampa, FL</dc:creator><description>The senior Bush murdered JFK, personally. &amp;nbsp;He's the umbrellaman and admitted it to me. &amp;nbsp;The junior Bush raped hundreds of girls by drugging them with the same drug set (a clear vaporous liquid) that senior Bush used to send Manchurian-Candidate assassins to murder anyone who got in his way: &amp;nbsp;Innocent Lee Oswald, Bobby Kennedy, MLK, George Wallace, Gerry Ford, Ronald Regan, and Pope John Paul, II. &amp;nbsp;They also killed dozens of witnesses and vocal rape victims. &amp;nbsp;Who were victims? &amp;nbsp;Condi Rice &amp;quot;did everything&amp;quot; for W and his friends when she was under age 17. &amp;nbsp;Cheryl Williamson Grey was a victim in Dallas fed to John Tower when she was eleven years old. &amp;nbsp;Harriet Miers was the madam running the Dallas operation. &amp;nbsp;Serial rapists and serial killers lead the republican party. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton has always been a fine, decent person, if more outspoken than most women. &amp;nbsp;Her love and devotion to her husband should inspire families to stay together and reflects true family values. &amp;nbsp;It is just wrong to hound her with unjustified demands to go fishing yet again in her private papers, and the professional politicos doing that evil know themselves for what they really are. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448727</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:16:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448727</guid><dc:creator>Susan, NC via LA</dc:creator><description>This doesn't sound any different that what we've already heard.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448729</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448729</guid><dc:creator>Tuck,Realityville,KS</dc:creator><description>let's see what obama has led on in his senate time&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NADA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not peace&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not energy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not healthcare&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not childcare&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not family leave not&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not fair trade (he favors free trade for corporations)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not conservation&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nothing</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448737</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:20:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448737</guid><dc:creator>John S Alexander,Edinboro,PA</dc:creator><description>OK OK OK ,&lt;br&gt;Slow down boys and girls, lets calm the CAPS and please re-read your script, WHEW, for a very slow news day we gettin a little sweaty round the collar..&lt;br&gt;Sierra, don't need to re-read, re-write is in order! Hire one of them hollywood writers while they are on strike. I tell you what, that is a great thing, no new garbage for those Desperate Housewives to deal with, they can cool their thighs for awile.&lt;br&gt;Too bad though, that leaves Earl still in jail.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448753</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:24:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448753</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>I have Sean Hannity on right now and listening to Bill Clinton talking on tape having a massive coronary about his wife and Tim Russert, one has to wonder if the Clinton's are totally losing it. &amp;nbsp;bad enough Hillary has no plans and no plans for the future, now her husband has to come to her rescue. &amp;nbsp;With Obama and Edwards coming after her, one has to wonder if Hillary will survive politically. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sierra, I've already caught Van in a lie about social security and Hillary; refusing to release the WHOLE statement she made. &amp;nbsp;He is nothing more then a Hillary stooge, but we already knew that. &amp;nbsp;Van, you better get with your girl and try to siphon the blood out of the water. &amp;nbsp;i think it is too late myself, but then again it is good political theater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was watching the Cowboy-Eagles game last night....&lt;br&gt;What was this about Philadelphia going green??????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They failed miserably....&lt;br&gt;Something about turning off the lights......&lt;br&gt;The Phillies baseball stadium was ablaze; baseball season is over.....&lt;br&gt;Franklin field had something going on with about 100 people in the stands, why couldn't they do that during the day?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You liberals that are pushing this green nonsense, you are about as big a morons as Al Gore......</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448773</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448773</guid><dc:creator>sg, michigan</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...working hard for Corporate America for 15 years and counting (lobbyists are people too, you know).</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448775</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:32:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448775</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;Much Ado About Nothing &lt;br&gt;A Commentary by Douglas Schoen &lt;br&gt;Monday, November 05, 2007 &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;With the publication of two polls this week showing no change in the Democratic nomination for President, it seems clear that Hillary Clinton's position is most likely more secure than many in the media and her opponents would like it to be.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, did I miss the convention in my own backyard???? Those are national numbers. I want Iowa numbers. I want to know how they feel she did in the debate. I want it done by either the University of Iowa or the paper in Cedar Rapids of Des Moines. None of these other groups that are pandering to one side or another.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bet she won't feel as comfortable looking at THOSE results.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448792</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448792</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>I hate the people that are running around saying &amp;quot;no other First Lady has had to release her papers.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Name me one other First Lady in the 231 years of our country that has run for President?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She continues to want her cake and to eat it to saying &amp;quot;My time as First Lady and in the Senate make me qualified to be President.&amp;quot; Well, her time in the Senate is mostly public record through her votes and bills she's sponsored or co-sponsored, etc. Her time as First Lady is not as public and it should be. If she continues to want to tout her time as FL as qualifications to be President, don't just TELL us what you did (besides f--king up the healthcare issue in 93 and standing by Bill's side during Monicagate), but SHOW us what you did.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448811</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:45:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448811</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Mike - She is leading in the U of I poll. &amp;nbsp;The Gazette, as far as I know, does not do polling. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure if there is a more recent Register poll, but as of 10-7 she was 6 points ahead of Edwards and 7 ahead of Obama. </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448879</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:11:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448879</guid><dc:creator>--NSMSNBC</dc:creator><description>Let's not forget that it was my ancestors who first coined the term &amp;quot;green collar&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;And that is why every March 17th we dye the Chicago River, beer and anything else not nailed down--and even some of that too. &amp;nbsp;We do our part for this planet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really hope the term &amp;quot;green collar&amp;quot; jobs doesn't catch on. &amp;nbsp;It took me 5 years to come around to the term 9/11; I'm okay, I suppose with WTCs, I think; both the term and the existence of WMDs is highly questionable; and I absolutely refuse the term 24/7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Oooo, we're taking votes as to what other names Jerry goes by. &amp;nbsp;I vote nuanced, because between them, they are the funniest people on this blog.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448885</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:13:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448885</guid><dc:creator>common sense democrat</dc:creator><description>All dems! Vote democratic on election day! Lets get the repubs out of office!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448894</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448894</guid><dc:creator>Pillory Hillary</dc:creator><description>Thank god we'll *finally* have a President who mandates the type of light bulbs we'll use.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448908</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:18:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448908</guid><dc:creator>Shrl. </dc:creator><description>Edwards is &amp;nbsp;a desparate, nasty &amp;nbsp;little man, he wasn't qualified to be vice president and he's definitely not qualified to be President. &amp;nbsp;His wife is the one who should be running not him. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#448917</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:20:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:448917</guid><dc:creator>Barbara C., Pompano Beach, FL </dc:creator><description>And the Republican Plan for Energy Conservation and Global Climate Change is what?? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449019</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:43:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449019</guid><dc:creator>Crystal (Time for change)</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;A Brief Look At The Post-ABC Poll&lt;br&gt;04 Nov 2007 12:14 pm&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being among the first to notice that Hillary Clinton regularly broke the 50% barrier in Democratic primary polls, there's a responsibility to point out when that barrier reseals. In the Post-ABC poll published 9/30, Barack Obama had 20 percent of the net leaned vote; he has 26 percent in the poll ending 11/1. Clinton inched down from 53 to 49. That's a net change of ... well, enough to take notice of and to see whether other polls pick it up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, 81% of Democrats are satisfied with their field; 57% of Clinton supporters are &amp;quot;strongly&amp;quot; in favor of her. 50% of Obama's supporters are strongly in favor of him. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the late September poll, 35% found Clinton to be the most honest and trustworthy; 34% do now; Obama's numbers in the field ticked up from 26 to 29.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among the Republicans, the biggest gainer -- actually, the only gain outside the margin of error -- is John McCain, who has 19 percent of the net leaned vote, up from 12 on 9/30.&lt;br&gt;Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney are stagnant; Mike Huckabee holds steady at 5%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newsweek's latest shows a race relatively unchanged from last month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*************************&lt;br&gt;Only can go up from here!!!! Obama 08&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449069</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:52:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449069</guid><dc:creator>James, Santa Monica, CA.</dc:creator><description>Go Hillary!!!&lt;br&gt;Interesting that Obama the king of hope is now regularly responding to Hillary with negative attacks learned from loser Edwards. &amp;nbsp;Since they’re both going down, apparently they’ve nothing to lose. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has been the front runner from day one and will continue to be and that is because she is the best candidate; she doesn’t have to resort to attacking other democrats. Pathetic Edwards and Obama are resorting to attacks since obviously they are not strong enough candidates to win on their merits. &amp;nbsp;Hillary will be an excellent president!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449174</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:08:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449174</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Los Angeles, CA.</dc:creator><description>You can tell morons are in the house when they say stuff like “I introduced my plan first and it was longer.” &amp;nbsp;Hillary will win…so you Hillary haters will just have to suck it up!</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449218</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449218</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>let's see what obama has led on in his senate time &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NADA. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not peace &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not energy &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not healthcare &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not childcare &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not family leave not &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not fair trade (he favors free trade for corporations) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not conservation &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nothing &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tuck, that sounds like Hillary Clinton......&lt;br&gt;Guess they both haven't done anything</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449310</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:33:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449310</guid><dc:creator>lets think</dc:creator><description>People do you really want the government to pick out your light bulbs. What if you have more than one child. Now you cant have a suv or no it will be only very wealthy people will be able to drive a suv. I promise you people that love class envy. This will be huge. You will be able to buy credits (if you have the money) if you dont then its 1200 sq ft home max. 50 mpg Yugos and keep your thermostat at 80. You people are opening up a can of worms here. You have been complaining about keeping the govt out of your bedroom, now here you are giving them access and control of your whole house. This is a nightmare and you are egging it on. Remember the rules will not go for them, only the middle and lower classes. Gor, Clinton, Edwards will still live in their 10 to 15000 sq ft homes. Still drive gas hogs and fly on private jets. Their lives will not change. You will be the ones at bus stops, sweating or freezing!!! WAKE UP!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449414</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:54:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449414</guid><dc:creator>grip time? ; AZ</dc:creator><description>my GOD, Clinton jumping on another tail coat! Has she ever come up with some thing original!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This Washington self serving Paper hanger jumps on every little thing the media puts out. but be aware she is a liar hidden by her self serving agenda's.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;inventing Bonds and now magic water, what is next&amp;quot;&amp;quot;diapers for monkey's in the zoo?? </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449527</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:21:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449527</guid><dc:creator>carl pittsboro nc</dc:creator><description>If Obama and Edwards do not attack Hillary we will never get the truth from her she will keep on not answering the qnestions so bring it on</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449565</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:36:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449565</guid><dc:creator>Alan in Phx</dc:creator><description>As the only regular poster here that is in the green energy business, Hillary is full of BS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, cap and trade is a ponzi scheme that is generally illegal in most instances, but fly a jet and plant a tree. It is crap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next the CFB instead of regular light bulbs are full of mercury and cost 10 times to produce and cost more to make then regular bulbs. You have to own one for 15 years for it to make a difference. Save money now buy a regular bulb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The goal is to make more power than reduce power. It is electric power that made the US what it is and it is electric power that will take third world countries out of the dark ages. After Edison developed electric power the industrial revolution exploded, because motors could be made smaller and faster. The goal is to bring power to the people and yes renewables can help but they are not the only solution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oil is important to everything in our lives and if we could drill where we have oil and gas our dependance on foreign oil would be less, but the dem loving environs do not want us drilling anywhere near the American coast, but the Chinese can drill off Key West north of Cuba - thats stupid, but liberal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary has never been in the energy business and has no clue as to what it takes to find, develope and produce energy. She should apply for cap and trade for all the CO2 that she spews that means nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She was in a windmill plant and neglected to talk about all the regulations that keep them from going in. Sen. Kennedy, her good friend, is against the cape wind project, can't have those outside my back porch on the cape! No one asked her about that. More and more regulations are being written to keep wind power from coming to certain areas. Just like drilling, the coasters want the power but not what makes it. Hypocrites. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She wants to TAKE from the oil companies and make a fund, that does not make the world better. It just punishes the oil companies for being in business. When can we punish the government for being in business. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#449803</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:17:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:449803</guid><dc:creator>De</dc:creator><description>You Obama and Edwards people need to let the two attackers know &amp;nbsp;that their HOPE is over.Go Hillary,you are the true WINNER and those two boys will have each other forever.Disgusting all the attacks on our future President Senator Clinton.All of you nasty bloggers should do something POSITIVE for your country &amp;nbsp;or help someone in need like in a 3rd world country!!! &amp;nbsp; writing these hate filled blogs against HRC &amp;nbsp;all day shows the miserable life you have. I'm sorry for each of you. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#450320</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:14:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:450320</guid><dc:creator>lili, cali</dc:creator><description>This is embarrassing that any of you consider yourselves educated. Hillary Clinton has had her Energy Policy Specifics posted on her website for MONTHS. This is the press release. i'm not going to explain to you the details of her policy because apparently with your quaint vocabularies you can all read. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and I'm kinda sick of this archives thing. Really. She can't do a damn thing about it. Her and Bill have been the most persistent presidential couple to have their papers released except for their personal letters between themselves. which after the thousand page detailed discussion of his sex life, i can kinda understand why.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if you want to be pandered to and believe in HOPE whatever that means, then i guess you can go with the 2-year experienced senator whose record never has really been tested and ran away crying when he should've been voting on Iran. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that'll lead america out of the dark ages.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#450801</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:450801</guid><dc:creator>JT, Warren, ohio</dc:creator><description>It's nice(sarcasm) that everyone wants to attack the auto industry as it crawls out of its grave. &amp;nbsp;Just quit hugging trees, drill in Alaska, sell the gas for 2.00 a gallon and put ALL of that money into researching alternative fuels. &amp;nbsp;Just don't attack the auto industry...let them heal their wounds first.</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#451235</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:27:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:451235</guid><dc:creator>kmnecole, st louis, mo</dc:creator><description>As posted by Van&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'Much Ado About Nothing &lt;br&gt;A Commentary by Douglas Schoen &lt;br&gt;Monday, November 05, 2007 &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;With the publication of two polls this week showing no change in the Democratic nomination for President, it seems clear that Hillary Clinton's position is most likely more secure than many in the media and her opponents would like it to be.&amp;quot; '&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big Surprise here:&lt;br&gt;Schoen was President Bill Clinton's research and strategic consultant during the 1996 reelection campaign&lt;br&gt;-and this was included at the end of the article- nice to leave this info out Van- seems you're picking up on that great SPIN idea- must be learning it from your issues dodging candidate</description></item><item><title>Clinton's energy, jobs policies</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/05/448498.aspx#452773</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:13:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:452773</guid><dc:creator>Ronald, Los Angeles, California</dc:creator><description>We need real Change. and if we are gonna change, lets go big or dont go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA or EDWARDS 08</description></item></channel></rss>