<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum and Andy MertenSeveral issues could have stood in the way of the National Right to Life Committee endorsement Thompson received today: his refusal to agree with the 2004 Republican Party platform on abortion, his opinion on</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#464981</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:464981</guid><dc:creator>Bill Rochester NY</dc:creator><description>I look at it as Rudy, Obama, and Clinton all look like they might do a good job. Clearly Rudy will be the rep. can., but have to wait and see who with be the dem. can.. I will wait till the dem's make their decition then do a little research on who's views I like better. It will be 4 years of cleaning up after Bush...and I see Bush as a dictator reather then a rep., so the so my vote could go either way. I just hope they don't start the mud slinging...it really turns me off as a voter... they are all out to make money and help out their friends...and really all 3 of them have pretty good records...yes you can find something bad...but that counts for every one in politics. No mater who wins this time I have to say I would be happy if any of the 3 of them win...but really would like to see a woman or a minority win just to level the playing field in future elections.&lt;br&gt;Don't worry every one, it will be all good in 08' LOL.</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465005</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:22:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465005</guid><dc:creator>Joel Gaines, Tucson, AZ</dc:creator><description>I like Fred Thompson for his consistency when so many others have blown in the wind on Abortion. I find it most interesting that anyone could consider Giuliani a pro-life candidate. His reinvention is almost as complete as Hillary's was. </description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465029</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:34:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465029</guid><dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter who the leaders endorse. It's obvious from all the buzz going on that the followers who are not power blinded but for principles are for Mike Huckabee. </description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465040</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:38:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465040</guid><dc:creator>Greg Gab , Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>It doesn't matter who the leaders endorse. The most important endorsement is from the followers who are not blinded by power but for principles. They are choosing Mike Huckabee by the thousands everyday.</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465041</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:39:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465041</guid><dc:creator>Bruce St. Helens, OR</dc:creator><description>Mr. O'Steen says that he wants judges who interpret the Constitution according 'to its actual text'. I don't recall reading anything in the Constitution regarding Social Security, Medicare, or the Air Force or Marines. &amp;nbsp;Does O'Steen believe that these and so many other Federal entities should be abolished?</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465066</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465066</guid><dc:creator>Chris Hatcher  Kennesaw Ga</dc:creator><description>The ONLY true &amp;quot;pro life&amp;quot; candidates are Ron Paul and Huckabee! The Thompson endorsement would have shocked me last week but the Pat Robertson support of Guliani has numbed me to most anything now.&lt;br&gt;We're in a LOT of trouble!</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465076</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:52:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465076</guid><dc:creator>Lee in CA</dc:creator><description>Joel-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The Los Angeles Times reports that possible GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson once did lobbying work for the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing DeadFred is consistent about is licking the sewage off his money. (And looking like a basset hound.)</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465089</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:57:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465089</guid><dc:creator>pat huntington ny</dc:creator><description>Bill Rochester NY - sorry, but if you thought Bush was a dictator, just wait for Emperor Rudy!</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465288</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:24:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465288</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Wood River, IL</dc:creator><description>Fred lobbied for Planned Parenthood, opposes a federal ban on abortion...yet the NRLC endorses him? &amp;nbsp;This is laughable. &amp;nbsp;Their primary platform is to enact a federal ban on abortion. &amp;nbsp;Mike Huckabee firmly supports this, yet they've endorsed Thompson because they feel he has a &amp;quot;better chance of winning.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Or so I was told on the phone today by someone at their DC office. &amp;nbsp;I told them, &amp;quot;then you need to remove your support of a federal marriage ban from your website.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call them at: 202-626-8800 to voice your opinion.</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#465354</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:00:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:465354</guid><dc:creator>Ben Kelly, Tampa, Florida</dc:creator><description>GO FRED GO!!!</description></item><item><title>More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/13/464879.aspx#468865</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:12:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:468865</guid><dc:creator>Joel, Tucson, AZ</dc:creator><description>Lee,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Understood. I have seen Fred's response to that issue. He did work for a law firm that had that organization as a client. He has stated that he made a few phone calls and sat in on a couple of meetings. That hardly makes him a pro-abortion activist. I would be more likely to look at how he voted on measures intended to become policy for the US, instead. </description></item></channel></rss>