What's Obama's health care position?

eNews Reference — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:30:45 GMT

I think the juice is in who's capable of bringing the country together to get it passed. One of the candidates has had an opportunity to do this in the past and maybe that experience will work well for her. http://www.enewsreference.com

What's Obama's health care position?

Pat, Cedar Rapids, Iowa — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:54:17 GMT

That candidate, Hillary Clinton only has experience failing on health care. Obama has a proven track record for success on health care in Illinois. And a proven track record for getting things done by bringing people together on many issues. The most outstanding difference between the two is Senator Obama's amazing ability for leadership.

What's Obama's health care position?

Pat, Cedar Rapids, Iowa — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:54:18 GMT

What's Obama's health care position?

Dr Coles, Los Angeles, CA — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:52:00 GMT

The government caused the problem with health care in America by over socializing (with mandates) medicine to the extent it is not completive, and we want to exacerbate the problem? Kids have health care. The needy already have health care. The U.S. is not a socialist state ( see http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl ). No one is entitled to be given a house, car, food or health care, etc. If we want these things, we have to earn them. The government does not earn money. Perhaps some of us should take a civics class and learn about America. We all have to labor for what we want. For those who need help there are the charities and state programs. We need to fix the health care issue but we cannot fix it unless we know how it is broken. For the answer, please see http://www.InteliOrg.com/

What's Obama's health care position?

Paul Lee, Austin, Texas — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:36:47 GMT

Republicans are fractured, yet they will all unite if Hillary wins the primary. Hillary has now become our Nader. Instead of sucking away votes from the Dems like Nader, she will push away votes that could have gone to the Dems. Nader voters were egotistical in their cause and did not see the folly in their voting pattern in 2000 and Gore could have won. Now we are going to see Mitt, Rudy, or whoever take office and again we are going to be left wondering why we voted for someone we may personally like, but who adversely offends independents. I will, from here on out, call her Hillary Nader.

What's Obama's health care position?

Gerry123 — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:10:46 GMT

Has anyone stopped to think about the possibility Barack Obama may be like many other perpetual presidential candidate -- a man with ideas energy an oversizeed ego and ambition whose time will never come.
In some ways he seems similar to George Wallace and Eugene McCarthy or even in some ways George McGovern and Hubert Humphrey. Or for that matter Al Gore -- individuals who spent their lives chasing he dream of being something that was inevitably always beyond their grasp. Which is not to say they dod not make sizable contributions to the history of ideas or politics.
In the end the difference between the two comes down to their understanding of the role of the president in accomplishing things or establishing the legislative agenda.
The real isue is which of the candidates can best manipukate Congress in agreeing to tackle a reasonable and visable legislative agenda -- The dreamer or the doer?