<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx</link><description>
From Domenico Montanaro and Lauren AppelbaumClinton went up with a new health care ad in Iowa and New Hampshire over the weekend, featuring a man who says he asked for Clinton's help when his insurance company would not cover a bone marrow transplant</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472901</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:07:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472901</guid><dc:creator>John B, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Clinton must address trustworthiness now or it will be there for the GOP to use next Fall. &amp;nbsp;The Primary season needs to accomplish 2 things; 1) snag the nomination 2) innocculate against the mud that will be thrown in the general campaign. &amp;nbsp;A good candidate is one that's been tested in the primaries.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472909</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:10:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472909</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>I fully trust Hillary as my president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472916</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:12:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472916</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>I saw the Ad in NH but I don't trust it a bit because Clinton doesn't have a credibility to back the story up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It just another story to get her elected, she will do anything to win election. She is preying on a desperate person to shore up her support among men. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry Madame Clinton, it ain't gonna work.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472926</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:16:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472926</guid><dc:creator>JOHN DOE, CHICAGO, IL</dc:creator><description>NONE OF THEM CAN BE TRUSTED. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THEY NEED TO QUIT BASHING EACH OTHER AND TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW THEY PLAN TO TURN THE COUNTRY AROUND.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472927</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:17:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472927</guid><dc:creator>modernwoman, Anytown,USA</dc:creator><description>I remember something very similar to this during Hillary's Senate run in NY. &amp;nbsp;I am certain it was the same guy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Show goes on.........&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I think we should ask a few more New Yorkers just exactly HOW much THEY trust Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472934</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:19:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472934</guid><dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator><description>How will the &amp;quot;Novak affair&amp;quot; play into this? Bob Novak just appeared on Fox News to stand by his story that Clinton had some dirt on Obama and give more details: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/delving-into-novak-affair.html"&gt;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/delving-into-novak-affair.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472938</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:20:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472938</guid><dc:creator>Lek </dc:creator><description>You have to be smoking pipe for you to trust Hillary Clinton. She is the biggest fraud ever. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472941</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:21:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472941</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/wsjnbcpoll20071108.pdf"&gt;http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/wsjnbcpoll20071108.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national-primary.html"&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national-primary.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't let these cage-keepers control the flow of information, look at the internals of their poll and ALL of the most recent polls, yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472945</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:23:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472945</guid><dc:creator>Simon, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Bee, poor soul, nothing in life except hatred and lies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ever lived a life outside Faux News and Republican brown nosing, Bee?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472966</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:32:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472966</guid><dc:creator>Barbara Billings, Canton, Ohio</dc:creator><description>I trust Hillary will be the next President. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472973</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472973</guid><dc:creator>American Consumer</dc:creator><description>American consumer's are NOT buying what you're selling, Hillary!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472974</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472974</guid><dc:creator>Tofun,Disney</dc:creator><description>why not show the figures on who would be a stronger leader..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;obama comes in 3 amoung dems</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472976</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:35:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472976</guid><dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator><description>It's come back again, lookie here. hillaryclinton</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472982</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472982</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>Van:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You weren't that guy who was proclaiming John Kerry as president on MSNBC back in 2004 was you? &amp;nbsp;He had all sorts of polls and was just all going wild for Kerry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He sort of disappeared after 11 pm eastern that night...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One person and the hospital thought it would be good business and good karma for the hospital to eat the cost. &amp;nbsp;Let's see them do a three hour prime time special and have all these so-called great stories come out about Hillary....</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472984</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472984</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>Hillary CAN'T be trusted. &amp;nbsp;The man in the ad didn't &amp;quot;trust&amp;quot; Hillary, he HOPED Hillary could do something. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has failure written all over her health care fiasco of the 90s, but oh wait, Bill said the failure was -HIS- fault! Yeah, right Bill. &amp;nbsp;His excuse &amp;quot;the Republicans were on a vote against Bill&amp;quot; phase. &amp;nbsp;Well guess what, trust or not, the Republicans are going to be in a &amp;quot;vote against Hillary&amp;quot; phase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can you &amp;quot;trust her&amp;quot; on social security, when she has no social security plan? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;How can you &amp;quot;trust her&amp;quot; on Iraq, when she has no Iraq pullout plan?&lt;br&gt;How can you &amp;quot;trust her&amp;quot; on Iran, when her diplomacy of not talking to foreign leaders is exactly the same as the current administration's diplomacy practices?&lt;br&gt;How can you &amp;quot;trust her&amp;quot; to form bipartisan committees, her answer to all the hard questions, when her campaign slogan is to &amp;quot;turn up the heat&amp;quot; on Republicans, and each and every day, she slings mud into Republicans eyes. &amp;nbsp;How can we trust her to be get ANYTHING done that way?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#472991</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:41:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:472991</guid><dc:creator>diane</dc:creator><description>After that so called debate and the smear job this past weekend, what do you expect. &amp;nbsp;of course she is not trustworthy. &amp;nbsp;On top of it, she is a clinton.&lt;br&gt;Obama is honorable and trustworthy. &amp;nbsp;And has class unlike Hillary.&lt;br&gt;She is just a corrupt pol like Bill&lt;br&gt;Obama is of a new breed like Governors Patrick and Kaine and ex-gov Warner.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473000</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:45:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473000</guid><dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator><description>Hillary got caught in this one:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Novak speaks out about Clinton Smear attempt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thepage.time.com/"&gt;http://thepage.time.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Says on “Fox and Friends” Monday he trusts his sources, Clinton’s handling of it reminds him of Nixon. Watch it above.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473001</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:45:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473001</guid><dc:creator>Karen Rollings, Terry IN</dc:creator><description>When have you ever been able to trust the Clintons?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473003</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:46:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473003</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Bullard, TX</dc:creator><description>John Doe, Chicago is right. When their best shot is to shoot at their opponent, it leaves me convinced they are as shallow as a cup of water in an empty Olympic sized pool. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473004</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:46:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473004</guid><dc:creator>bjm, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>How can women especially trust a woman who not only stayed with a straying spouse, but attempted to castigate the women with whom he'd had affair? I find that notion unusual. The answer seems to be that President Clinton was used as a vehicle for his wife's own political ambitions. How else could she have publicly taken such ongoing humiliation? No. I do not trust her. Such personalities will &amp;nbsp;commit any deed to reach desired ends. Senator Obama should be very careful, observant, and diligent. Her campaign is likely to become quite lethal. He is to be commended for responding &amp;nbsp;quickly to the Novak issue.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473015</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:51:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473015</guid><dc:creator>modernwoman, Anytown,USA</dc:creator><description>why not show the figures on who would do the best in the general election against ANY of the Repub nominees?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama comes in at #1</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473029</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:56:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473029</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description> the undeniable fact remains hillary had the insurance and pharmaceutical companies write her healthcare plan, who do you think it favors?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; edwards has a healthcare plan that works for everyone, can be paid for, and is geared toward the consumer, if you don't believe me look at it yourself, it is by far the best plan.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473034</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:58:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473034</guid><dc:creator>Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa</dc:creator><description>After Dubya, I'd say the only people who will 'Trust' any politician of any Party, will be the most radical of their followers. &amp;nbsp;Like Reagan said to Frank Sinatra...I mean, Mikhail Gorbachev, &amp;quot;Verify.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473038</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:58:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473038</guid><dc:creator>Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY</dc:creator><description>Bob Novak compares Hillary's tactics to those of Nixon (against McGovern in 1972). &amp;nbsp;LMAO. &amp;nbsp;I'm wondering when the 'break-in' will occur. &amp;nbsp;Thanks for the link Daniel.&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473043</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:00:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473043</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Bee, poor soul, nothing in life except hatred and lies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ever lived a life outside Faux News and Republican brown nosing, Bee?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;---------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps, i should pose the same question to you. How about &amp;quot;Ever lived a life outside Hillary Clinton lies&amp;quot;? </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473044</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473044</guid><dc:creator>Mark Thieme</dc:creator><description>Now here is a poll you won't see the Clinton folks tacking up on the board...</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473045</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473045</guid><dc:creator>Mark Thieme</dc:creator><description>Now here is a poll you won't see the Clinton folks tacking up on the board...</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473046</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:01:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473046</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>Bob Novak appeared on Fox News to stand by his sources and repeat that the Clinton campaign was spread rumors that it had damaging information without saying what it was, comparing the tactic to Richard Nixon saying that he knew of communists supporting McGovern but that he would not say who because it would not be right&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Novak speaks out about Clinton Smear attempt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thepage.time.com/"&gt;http://thepage.time.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Says on “Fox and Friends” Monday he trusts his sources, Clinton’s handling of it reminds him of Nixon. Watch it above.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473065</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:07:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473065</guid><dc:creator>daveincolorado</dc:creator><description>I just don't understand the attraction for people to be backing HIllary. &amp;nbsp;Her husband was -arguably - a good president, but she is no Bill Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473068</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:08:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473068</guid><dc:creator>teddy, orlando </dc:creator><description>Trust Senator Clinton &amp;nbsp;- you cant be serious?!&lt;br&gt;I trust she will do and/or say what ever it takes to gain the top political job in the country. I trust she will use all the political tactics in the book to derail Obama. I trust she will say what ever any one wants to hear as long as you vote for her. But i also believe the country will again be in a deadlock that she cannot break trough... so more years of a divided nation is what we will have. so sure trust Senator Clinton and only in the end will we all say If I knew then what I know now. Thats the feeling I get when I listen to her Q and A session and speeches . Funny.... I dont get that feeling when Senator Obama speaks I actullay feel pretty good after one of his speeches and Q &amp;amp; A sessions. Think about it.... GO Obama!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473069</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:09:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473069</guid><dc:creator>mary  Davenport Iowa</dc:creator><description>Does Hillary think she's the only Senator to intervene and help a constituent? It's her job!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473070</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:09:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473070</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Don't turst THIS:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'I fully trust Hillary as my president. &lt;br&gt;Sierra, SF ...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This Clinton Cultists are at it again....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Put me down with the OVER 20% of Democrats who DON'T TRUST 'Slick Hilly' or 'Slick Willy' &amp;nbsp;!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton is as CROOKED as the day is long...&lt;br&gt;A Republican in Democratic disguise !&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton, 15 years of dishonesty, scandals and divisiveness&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473084</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:13:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473084</guid><dc:creator>Simon, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Perhaps, i should pose the same question to you. How about &amp;quot;Ever lived a life outside Hillary Clinton lies&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt;Bee (Sent Monday, November 19, 2007 12:00 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;of course, i lived a life with your beloved George Bush's lies:-). In fact, he returned me money for the extra tax I had paid. I am glad he ensured that any money i earned over 100K is not touched.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;George Bush gave me more money. But too bad i dont love him like you do, Bee:-)</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473086</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:15:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473086</guid><dc:creator>John B, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>Novak surfaces out of the black lagoon to say that Clinton &amp;quot;knows something&amp;quot; about Obama but won't reveal it. &amp;nbsp;This sounds like something out of the playbook of Novak's close friend Karl Rove. &amp;nbsp;At minimum suspicion is thrown on Obama without having to say or prove anything. &amp;nbsp;Ideally it damages HRC also, since Novak implies that Clinton is playing dirty politics, again without actually saying or proving anything. &amp;nbsp;And if ANYTHING that can be spun negatively, real or imginary comes up later the whole thing is resurrected again for bonus points. &amp;nbsp;And the anonymity of the sleazy source remains protected. &amp;nbsp;Novak is a scumbag and deserves to be treated with scorn.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473110</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:21:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473110</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>Wow, even a Clinton supporter on this board faked a message from a non-Clinton supporter. &amp;nbsp;Not only is lying and deception pervasive INSIDE the Clinton campaign, their supporters are adopting deceptive and disgusting tactics as well.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473112</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473112</guid><dc:creator>Jeremiah   Hayden idaho</dc:creator><description>Thank you George Bush! &amp;nbsp;Thank you for being such a inept and ignorant leader. &amp;nbsp;I doubt that the Republican party can stop Hillary, thanks to you GW. &amp;nbsp;I am in the middle class, Hillary will fight for me just like Bill did when he was in office.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473116</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473116</guid><dc:creator>Sam I am</dc:creator><description>I don't trust Hillary at all!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473120</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:25:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473120</guid><dc:creator>Lyn,  MD</dc:creator><description>Based on these &amp;quot;trust&amp;quot; numbers alone...who do you think the American people will believe. &amp;nbsp;Obama or Hillary. &amp;nbsp;This validates everything everyone believes about her...aand they were hoping people would forget&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh Yeh...they want this to &amp;quot;GO AWAY&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;And the MSM is trying to help...but it won't go away.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473129</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:28:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473129</guid><dc:creator>Mark Thieme</dc:creator><description>Ron...&lt;br&gt;This happens here every day.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473130</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:28:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473130</guid><dc:creator>Mark Thieme</dc:creator><description>Ron...&lt;br&gt;This happens here every day.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473137</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:30:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473137</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>I am literally cracking up as I am reading some of this stuff. &amp;nbsp;Hillary does well so the debate is &amp;quot;so-called&amp;quot; but if Hillary does poorly the debate is excellent, the moderators were right on, etc. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The double standards are outstanding. &amp;nbsp;Truly.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473141</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:31:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473141</guid><dc:creator>AP from IL</dc:creator><description>Fellow Dems, if we put Hillary out there as our candidate we are setting ourselves up for another defeat. She is the single most motivating and unifying factor for Republican and conservative independents. They would vote for anyone to prevent another Clinton in the white house. If by some miracle she does win the presidency, what do we have? Another 4 years of acrimony and partisan bickering. Plus what is she planning to accomplish? She is pure system. Status quo is the ultimate goal. That is why she has so many corporate sponsors. They know she has no intention of rocking the boat. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a loyal Dem but will be extremely frustrated if we miss this chance. Obama is our best hope to throw the Republicans off their game and take back the country. For once, we will have a president that is not polluted by corruption and raw, self-serving ambition. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS, I can't believe anyone thinks Novak dreamed this up by himself. He is a political parasite who will attach himself to the most convenient and rewarding host. It's certainly not beneath the Clinton camp to use someone like Novak to do their dirty work and it makes perfect sense to do it now when they realize Obama is fast closing in Iowa. Just curious, do the Hillary fans support tactics like this? </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473153</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:34:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473153</guid><dc:creator>Jets NY</dc:creator><description>Honest men and women don't beg for people to trust them. Their words and deeds lead people to trust them. This is clearly not the case here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is like say ing, Eh! i helped a hobo find a home two weeks ago so i can be trusted to lead this country. Or Oh! trust me because i am a woman and i have all the connections to twist arms around the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a joke!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473161</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:36:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473161</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Simon, Iowa,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who in his right mind we love George Bush? I am tired of Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush? I don't want another Clinton, period. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more I think about all the candidates the more I am more likely to make a case against another Clinton. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No more Scandals, dynasty, lies e.t.c. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, there is one common factor between George Bush and Hillary Clinton - they are both liars. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bush lie on WMD, Hillary lie on NAFTA, Iran and Iraq’s vote. At least we both agree on something …Both George Bush and Hillary Clinton are liars. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anything else? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473172</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:38:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473172</guid><dc:creator>JorgePolanco, Bronx, New York</dc:creator><description>That is great Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;You can continue providing individual influence to help one person. We need a president who can provide this to All Americans. &amp;nbsp;As a new yorker we are privelaged to have you as our senator and we should continue to have you as our senator. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473200</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:52:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473200</guid><dc:creator>Jets NY</dc:creator><description>Honest men and women don't beg for people to trust them. Their words and deeds lead people to trust them. This is clearly not the case here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is like say ing, Eh! i helped a hobo find a home two weeks ago so i can be trusted to lead this country. Or Oh! trust me because i am a woman and i have all the connections to twist arms around the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a joke!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473211</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:56:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473211</guid><dc:creator>Penny Parker</dc:creator><description>Will all of you who are bashing Sen. Hilary Clinton leave her alone. &amp;nbsp;Her husband was an excellent President and I think she'll make a fantastic one also.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473217</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:58:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473217</guid><dc:creator>julie</dc:creator><description>Anyone who has to try to convince you they are trustworthy can't be trusted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473227</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:00:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473227</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Here is an interesting article on Madam Clinton and her so called experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/19/opinion/main3521300.shtml"&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/19/opinion/main3521300.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473232</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473232</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>I am voting for hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473233</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:02:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473233</guid><dc:creator>Farmer John</dc:creator><description>Plain and simple. &amp;nbsp;I trust Hillary. &amp;nbsp;I don't trust any media person who writes about her. &amp;nbsp;There's a gigantic Swift Boat attempt going on to derail her. &amp;nbsp;All kinds of lies are being told with no backing by several people in the media. &amp;nbsp;This has gone on for decades showing Hillary to be something she is not. &lt;br&gt;There's a lot of folk out there I feel confident I could sell the Golden Gate Bridge to. &amp;nbsp;You have to do research ourside the MSM to really know who Hillary is. &amp;nbsp;The media has protrayed her as someone she is not too much of the time. &amp;nbsp;The biggest scare about her to the GOP is not that she is all that liberal, but that she has the where with all to actually give power back to the people of this country and will stop the pocket lining of selective wealthy types and they are going to go all out to stop that, including to the point of tarnishing her reputation. &amp;nbsp;That's been going on for nearly two decades. &amp;nbsp;Don't let them win. &amp;nbsp;Vote Hillary !!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473245</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:05:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473245</guid><dc:creator>All Voters</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for president, D or R. Stop arguing about and just vore for her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473247</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:06:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473247</guid><dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator><description>Why are Democrats and Republicans doing this? They are both nominating candidates that I can't fathom ever voting for. If it comes down to Hillary vs. Rudy, I'm just going to stay home. Both parties are sacrificing their core values to nominate someone who can win an election. All I hear from Rudy backers is that &amp;quot;Rudy can beat Hillary&amp;quot;, and all I hear from Hillary backers is that &amp;quot;she is better than Bush&amp;quot;. These two are setting the bar dangerously low.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please don't let this election be yet another choice between the lesser of two evils. Please nominate someone worthwhile.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473253</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:08:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473253</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Don't trust this:&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;'...I fully trust Hillary as my president. &lt;br&gt;Sierra, SF...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can trust 'Slick Hillie' or 'Slick Willie' as must as you can trust THAT POST !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Count me among the OVER 20% of Democrats that DON'T trust 'SLick Hillie' !&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is she doing 'opposition research' against Obama ? &lt;br&gt;Why is she disclosing it ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that a page out of the Republican playbook ?&lt;br&gt;Mark Penn at work !!&lt;br&gt;Think they'll impress Iowa voters ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton, 15 years of dishonesty, scandals and divisiveness&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How true it is !!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473263</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:10:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473263</guid><dc:creator>Penny Parker</dc:creator><description>Ron, I will also be voting for Hilary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473265</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:11:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473265</guid><dc:creator>J C  West palm Beach florida`</dc:creator><description>I cannot see what and why people believe the Clinton's have any good for this country. She doesn't know how to answer a question that's asked and if she does....Bill comes to her rescue. if she can't handle this phase how will she handle people like Iran's President and Russia's president. I don't trust her. JC in Florida</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473266</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:12:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473266</guid><dc:creator>Bob Edmonsky Sacramento, CA</dc:creator><description>Gentlemen and women, here we go again; that congenital, intractable right-wing conspiracy to destroy Bill Clinton’s presidency until DNA spoke loud and clear. &amp;nbsp;What if there were no seamen on Monica Lewinsky’s dress, the latter would have been severely pummeled to a pulp. &amp;nbsp;The saving grace for Lewinsky came the moment the hair follicle was taken from Bill Clintonn as sample for DNA tests and the game was up. &amp;nbsp;The game changed from “l never had sexual relationship with that woman, Lewinsky” to “l did not have appropriate relationship with Lewinsky and l am sorry”. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you notices, Hilary Clinton’s campaign are not challenging Bob Novak to reveal his source and let the Democrat operative reveal the person in her campaign that was spreading such rumors. &amp;nbsp;Instead, they say it is Republican dirty politics taken from Karl Rove playbook. &amp;nbsp;It is always Right Wing Republican Conspiracy as mantra for deflecting genuine charges against unethical behaviors. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473267</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:13:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473267</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>I am voting for hillary! &lt;br&gt;Ron, TX (Sent Monday, November 19, 2007 1:02 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How cute, so not only are Hillary's Decepto-cons grasping for straws, they're down right disgusting and faking posts by people who are anything BUT in favor of Hillary Clinton getting the nomination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You all are in good company. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton does the same dirty tricks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need a government we can trust, change we can believe in!&lt;br&gt;BARACK OBAMA '08&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473268</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473268</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>I knew the guy that appeared in the Ad was phony. How can we trust her when her deeds are dishonest? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473276</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:16:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473276</guid><dc:creator>Renee, LaFayette Georgia</dc:creator><description>I listened to the gentlman's story about his son, I'm thankful things worked out for him. But if the truth be known, his insurance wouldn't pay because of the mess that Hillary Clinton caused with health care when her husband was President. His insurance probaly would had pay for the transplant before Hillary forced the &amp;quot;little man&amp;quot; to offer insurance to all the employees. That opened the door for the Insurance company's to raise their premiums, the deductibles and refusal to pay the higher costing medical treatments such as transplants, etc.because they know we have to have the insurance!! Do you really want her to continue to help the insurance companys control everything. Sure she stepped in and helped this child, it's election time. IF she wasn't running for President, how long do you think it would have taken her to response? Hillary and all of the other government officals do not care about the American people, they have everything they need set up to take care of them the rest of their life. So why should they be concerned about the people who have to work more than one job,or the children left at home or someone else (that you pray you can trust) to take care of them while both parents have to work to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table. What do they care that people who need disablity can get it but those who truly do not need it has no problem getting it. They only care about their image in public's eye, not the people who are seeing them. They are willing to help people in other country's but not the children and the adults in America who have the same needs. Hillary needs to stay where she is and stay out of Health Care or it could be that no one will be able to afford insurance.Doctors have already stopped seeing self pay patients in some area's. So where do these people go? They can't get any government help because they made a little bit to much the previous year or they don't have enough children in their house hold to quailfy. What do you do with those people who are basically &amp;quot;stuck between a rock and a hard spot&amp;quot;? Some things should not be based on the previous year's income. People don't plan to get ill,but when their health issues do change, they should be able to get the help they need. That's why we are taxed to death and have paided into Medicare.&lt;br&gt;It's sad when you pay co-pays that add's up to more than, or just as much as your insurance premiums every month. The elderly who are on several medications have to make a choice of getting their medications or eating each month. Our elderly should be taken care better than what they are!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473278</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:16:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473278</guid><dc:creator>Russell P. Fox     Wells, Maine 04090</dc:creator><description>I dont think there is a real good canadate running, most of those running are depending of the independents to carry them thru....This is the time for the independents to unite and find a canadate who will represent all of the people...I think money is determing canadates and hate to say it also the media is not giving equal time to those who arent as well known and dont have the money that the so call front runners do......wake up americans and get your country back....</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473294</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:21:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473294</guid><dc:creator>For Unifying the Country</dc:creator><description>Right on Bee. &amp;nbsp;I speak as a Republican and right now I think Obama is the one that can unite this country!! If HRC gets into office, we can only look forward to four years of lying, let alone dirty tactics that this woman will definitely do. &amp;nbsp;Let's keep any Clinton/Bush (Jeb?) from ever attaining the White House again....</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473314</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:30:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473314</guid><dc:creator>BEE ATTACKS, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Bee needs to find another hobby - rather than just bashing senator clinton - perhaps she can explain a positive vision that her candidate has for the future - not just bashing another candidate...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But something tells me BEE just likes to attack and not actually communicate...</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473329</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:35:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473329</guid><dc:creator>TR,  Ohio</dc:creator><description>That Hillary has high negatives should be a badge of honor. Those are the scars from years of going against the tide of Republican sli*me.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473341</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:40:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473341</guid><dc:creator>PBrown</dc:creator><description>Warning!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Hillary Clinton what you see is George W. Bush in female clothing… Her campaign is now appearing to be corrupt and sleazy…. Look at all the strange tactics that are now going on since things have gotten tight in Iowa… Look at all the strange things that are now going when they are forced to answer important questions…. They seem to always find a way to get off the subject, whether it’s planting a rudely crowd at the CNN shamed of the debate… Did her camp ask the planted rudely crowd to boo every time Obama or Edwards spoke…? In essence, preventing them from explaining to America what they would do to make this country better …. And lets talk about these all of a sudden push poll phones calls that are now taken place with other candidates… The planted stories in the paper… Anything humanly possible to change the subject so that they won’t have to answer important questions about the troubles of Americans… &amp;nbsp;Look America we have seen these sleazy tactics before… All you have to do is go back and look at each Bush Campaign for President… Everything tactics Clinton Campaign is doing, they have apparently learned from Bush… Ask your self this, has Bush ever truly answered and explained any question… Now ask yourself this, has Hillary Clinton…. If you haven’t before start to pay attention now…What clear and decisive answers has she provided...? “Fiasco responsibility” what does that mean? &amp;nbsp;Be careful not to get caught up in the Hype or we will end-up with 4 more years of George W. Bush….&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note: To the other Candidates... Stay on Topic...don’t allow the Clinton Camp to make you lose your focus... Right now they are desperate and will try anything…..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember America needs you…. American needs Change!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473342</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:43:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473342</guid><dc:creator>Philip,Iowa</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;What a statement! Everybody has or knows scandalous information on Hillary. She and Bill are worthless--I am sure that is in the bible somewhere and Nostradamus must have a chapter or two devoted to them and their shenanigans. Both their pictures can be found in the dictionary next to &amp;quot;Liar&amp;quot;.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473345</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:43:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473345</guid><dc:creator>Marcus the sailor man, San Diego California</dc:creator><description>Julie: &amp;nbsp;Great input. &amp;nbsp;Most people are trusted on what they do, not what they say. &amp;nbsp;The polls are just another way to convince people and make them feel comfortable in voting a certain way. &amp;nbsp;Honestly, her environmental issues have got me a little concerned considering she's giving till 2050 to get stuff done? &amp;nbsp;Meanwhile these energy companies are making big bucks. &amp;nbsp;I say 2020, 12 years to get this country off of oil and into something new. &amp;nbsp;She's giving the industry too long to get there act together in giving the consumers and the country what we need.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473347</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:44:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473347</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Sierra SF. You need to see the light, like I did this morning. &amp;nbsp;I had a dream, and Hillary was president. &amp;nbsp;I was so happy when I woke up, but saddened because it wasn't real. &amp;nbsp;I can't wait to cast my vote for Hillary in the primary and then in the general election. &amp;nbsp;I am so happy she's running for president! &amp;nbsp;Go Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473357</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:49:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473357</guid><dc:creator>Sunny, Tulsa</dc:creator><description>Penny,&lt;br&gt;When a person puts him/herself in the running for the office of the President of the US, they are fair game for criticism. &amp;nbsp;That includes Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Do not act that because she is a woman she is exempt. &amp;nbsp;When you run for such an office, you must be prepared to defend all accusations. &amp;nbsp;As a woman, I do not want to hear that she is being picked on by the guys. &amp;nbsp;She has been in the political business for years and hold her own with the best of them. &amp;nbsp;If she can't she needs to drop out - now.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473364</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:50:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473364</guid><dc:creator>Michael, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator><description>Barack Obama has unveiled a new line of criticism against Hillary: In speeches he's started to point to the allegation made in Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta's Hillary book that the Clintons secretly formulated a 20-year-plan to deliver the presidency first to Bill, and then to Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I'm not in this race to fulfill some long-held plan or because it was owed to me,&amp;quot; Obama said the other day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Asked if that were a reference to the Gerth allegation, an Obama spokesperson left virtually no doubt that it was, telling Newsday: &amp;quot;Barack Obama has not been mapping out his run for president from Washington for the last 20 years like some of his opponents.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the source that Gerth and Van Natta cited with supposed first-hand knowledge of this plan -- historian Taylor Branch -- has since vehemently denied that any such pact existed. &amp;quot;The story is preposterous,&amp;quot; Branch told The Washington Post, adding: &amp;quot;I never heard either Clinton talk about a 'plan' for them both to become president.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's hard to see how the use of Gerth's allegations could possibly play well among Dem activists. Many of them dislike Gerth for his role in &amp;quot;breaking&amp;quot; the Whitewater story and see Gerth's book as an anti-Hillary hatchet job.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473376</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:52:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473376</guid><dc:creator>Maureen, Grand Rapids, MI</dc:creator><description>GWB did accomplish ridding a country of a sadistic, dangerous family. &amp;nbsp;GWB had some inaccurate info regarding WMD's but then, so did his advisors, and oh yeah! &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton! &amp;nbsp;So if she says GWB lied, I guess she did too! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473388</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:56:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473388</guid><dc:creator>Bebs Siba, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>You idiot people, don't be fooled these two guys, who is critizing Mrs. Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Of course, they want to win to be as a President. Would you think these two guys are TRUSTED to? &amp;nbsp;I don't think so, they are all the same. I am voting for Senator Clinton. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473394</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:58:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473394</guid><dc:creator>TFOX, LUBBOCK, TX</dc:creator><description>Wow! I hadn't realized that there was so much Clinton-hating out there; that said, I'm not sure why. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think on the matter of trust, Hillary's work in public service speaks for itself. &amp;nbsp;Her measured, analytical and deliberate manner lends itself to being a leader one can trust; not distrust. &amp;nbsp;Any ambiguities that may create only means she is trying to consider all contingencies and balance all interests effectively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must say that so much of the animosity must be because she is a woman...that I find reprehensible. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473401</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:00:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473401</guid><dc:creator>Tim Morrison Warrensburg New York</dc:creator><description>If Mrs. Clinton gets the nod, mark my words &amp;quot;we lose&amp;quot;, then watch all ring their hands and say why did we support her. &amp;nbsp;When almost 50% of the voters do not see any postives in her, watch out. &amp;nbsp;I don't want the GOP to win and putting her as our number 1 makes their job a lot easier.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473418</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:07:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473418</guid><dc:creator>American Voter</dc:creator><description>The Clinton's were scum bags then &amp;amp; they're scum bags still. It's nightmarish to imagine those 2 frauds back in thr White house. What are you lefties thinking? Have you forgotten the international disgrace that was Bill Clinton?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473425</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:08:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473425</guid><dc:creator>Arshad, Newburgh, NY</dc:creator><description>Trust can not be earned by ad but by action i.e. by living a life that earns peoples confidence and trsut.&lt;br&gt;This couple, the Clintons, look into the TV camera, point fingures to the American people and lie with a straight face. They even can lie under oath. I am not making it up but just remembering from history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can we trust them again? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I don't want to earn shame for myself and I am a registered democrat.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473462</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:19:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473462</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Er, Ron? &amp;nbsp;The mud is flung from both sides of the fence. &amp;nbsp;There are plenty of people posing as Hillary supporters as well. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473469</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:21:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473469</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Bee:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who said he was phony? &amp;nbsp;All the piece said was that he had been in an ad for her Senate campaign. &amp;nbsp;It did not say, as you insinuate, that what he said in this ad or the other was incorrect. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473504</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:33:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473504</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>It is so encouraging to see that the majority of people that post on First Read are not supporting Hillary. &amp;nbsp;It gives me hope that we have a shot to win back the White House back in '08. &amp;nbsp;Obama/Edwars '08!!! &amp;nbsp;It's obvious that we are not as ignorant as the vast Hillary campaign conspiracy would like us to be. &amp;nbsp;Trust her? &amp;nbsp;About as far as I could throw her..I'm out of shape and her lower half looks like it weighs twice as much as her upper half so that's not very far at all...</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473506</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473506</guid><dc:creator>Ron, La Habra, California</dc:creator><description>I find this debate over Hillary Clintons trustworthiness fascinating. &amp;nbsp;Stop wasting time, this lady has been in the public eye for the last 30 + years, what has she done that we can not trust her to do a better job at running this country than George Bush or any other republican or democratic candidate in this race. &amp;nbsp;We, (Republican, Democrat and Independent), all know she has the most experience of any one in the race , and &amp;nbsp;ability to hit the ground running on day one. &amp;nbsp;Lets put the partisan politics aside and put the first woman and best candidate in this race in the Whitehouse and get this county back to where we need it to be. Some of you still trust George Bush, go figure. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473533</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:43:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473533</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>Bee wrote:&lt;br&gt;Here is an interesting article on Madam Clinton and her so called experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/19/opinion/main3521300.shtml"&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/19/opinion/main3521300.shtml&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, Bee maybe some of the Hillary express will get their heads out oof their proverbial a#s*s and wake up. &amp;nbsp;This lady will cost us the election and she is bad for the country. &amp;nbsp;It's such a shame too because I think the American public is ready for a strong woman to become President...just not this one not by a long shot. &amp;nbsp;She doesn't have the full support of Democratic voters, independants and most certainly Republicans and with good reason, no experience everyone with half a brain knows she changes her views and opinions based on polls as often as the wind shifts direction. &amp;nbsp;She stands for nothing and if it is something it's not the same something it was when it was nothing. &amp;nbsp;I wonder if we'll hear such gems as depending on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. &amp;nbsp;There are enough smart hard working people that should, should see what this wretched excuse for a Democratic Presidential nominee really is, we can only hope. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473539</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:46:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473539</guid><dc:creator>Katherine Maupin - Fayette, Mo.</dc:creator><description>I see the Clinton &amp;quot;haters&amp;quot; are in full force again.&lt;br&gt;I wonder how many of these &amp;quot;haters&amp;quot; trusted G.W.B.&lt;br&gt;when he ran for President. &amp;nbsp;Doubt any would admit&lt;br&gt;they trusted him then and still do today. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473540</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:46:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473540</guid><dc:creator>Joe </dc:creator><description>67% of New Yorkers voted for her re- election. She must of done something right. The more people see the real Hillary (not the image presented by cartoon characters on Am radio and Fox noise host)! Great Ad!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473550</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:48:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473550</guid><dc:creator>Paul  NYC</dc:creator><description>The pathetic repubs tryed to say Bill was untrustworthy and he was the most effective President&lt;br&gt;since FDR. &amp;nbsp;The Clintons are policy wonks, they love government that's why they are good. Repubs talk tough, come up with foolish economic policies that dems have to clean up,start wars,use divisive politics&lt;br&gt;and invade other countries. &amp;nbsp;The repub revolution will be offically over next November. &amp;nbsp;How can America vote for Guiliani if his own kids despise him.&lt;br&gt;Hillary 2008 The President of these United States Of America.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473551</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:48:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473551</guid><dc:creator>Bee, NH</dc:creator><description>Sierra SF. You need to see the light, like I did this morning. &amp;nbsp;I had a dream, and Hillary was president. &amp;nbsp;I was so happy when I woke up, but saddened because it wasn't real. &amp;nbsp;I can't wait to cast my vote for Hillary in the primary and then in the general election. &amp;nbsp;I am so happy she's running for president! &amp;nbsp;Go Hillary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did not approve this message. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473560</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473560</guid><dc:creator>Kaustav , mn</dc:creator><description>Everyone talking about change. what changes will be there and how do you know that the changes will be good in long term aspect.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473563</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:54:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473563</guid><dc:creator>John Q Public</dc:creator><description>I remember Bush saying that he would not nation build, he thought it was a bad idea, yada yada yada..4 years later, we have war with two countries, both preludes to nation building, and healthcare costs have skyrocketed along with the deficit. &amp;nbsp;I'm not bush bashing here, just using the example that none of them can be trusted. &amp;nbsp;I agree with the poster who said, tell us what your going to do..not what you've done. &amp;nbsp;I could care less if they smoked pot, had sex with a dog..doesn't matter..all that matters to me, is that they do what they say they are gonna do, and that they do it right. &amp;nbsp;I'm not about to put them to the moral compass test, because if we do that..we won't have any leadership fit to lead. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473573</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:57:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473573</guid><dc:creator>Josephine Shaffer, Johnstown, Pennsylvania</dc:creator><description> I want Hillary Clinton to be our next president of the united states &amp;nbsp;because i have faith in her and her leadership u go girl.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473589</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:01:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473589</guid><dc:creator>Herve NY</dc:creator><description>This why I hate you democrats. You have no guts. You are bunch of hypocrites fearing republicans and always cave in under their assaults. This is propaganda about hillary and you just get stuck and do the work of these dogs called Republicans. Look, they will vote any dog republicans to beat up Democrats. You never learn. Name any bad things about hillary. Why don't you shot your big mouth and vote the lady. Play the same game as the Republicans. As far as Obama and Edward they have no chance of survival in the general election. Obama will never be President because he is Black; this the truth and you can't deny it. On election day, the dreamers will give him a 10% and a republican will get the presidency with 90% of the vote. If he ever get nominated it is a 100% losss for the Dems. Be Practical and smart!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473597</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:04:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473597</guid><dc:creator>APRIL JONES, ATLANTA, GA.</dc:creator><description>*** LOOK AT THE LAST &amp;quot;REPUBLICAN&amp;quot; YOU TRUSTED TO BE YOUR PRESIDENT.. GEORGE &amp;quot;WORTHLESS&amp;quot; BUSH. TRILLION UPON TRILLION OF DOLLARS OF DEBT.TALK ABOUT A PARTY YOU CAN NOT TRUST, JUST LOOK NO FURTHER THAN THE REPUBLICAN...BUSH ADMINISTRATION. THEY ARE STEALING YOU AND ME BLIND !</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473610</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:08:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473610</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>I find this debate over Hillary Clintons trustworthiness fascinating. &amp;nbsp;Stop wasting time, this lady has been in the public eye for the last 30 + years, what has she done that we can not trust her to do a better job at running this country than George Bush or any other republican or democratic candidate in this race. &amp;nbsp;We, (Republican, Democrat and Independent), all know she has the most experience of any one in the race , and &amp;nbsp;ability to hit the ground running on day one. &amp;nbsp;Lets put the partisan politics aside and put the first woman and best candidate in this race in the Whitehouse and get this county back to where we need it to be. Some of you still trust George Bush, go figure. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I neither trust GWB or HRC. Both of them are liars. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473611</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473611</guid><dc:creator>Dave - CO</dc:creator><description>WOW, i see why nothing will ever gets done in the White House. &amp;nbsp;No one trusts each other, Republicans don't trust Democrats, Democrats don't trust Republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How do you expect to end the war in Irag, get something done on Social Security, Iran and much more. &amp;nbsp;I guess people forgot what teamwork is all about. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't even trust a video, have you ever looked yourself in the mirror and asked, &amp;nbsp; Can I ever be trusted? &amp;nbsp; Maybe you should because doubters can never be trusted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What does it really take for you to trust anyone when you doubt that no one can be trusted. &amp;nbsp;Mission Accomplished!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473617</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:10:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473617</guid><dc:creator>Herve NY</dc:creator><description>I am sure that all of you against Hillary are Republicans deguised into Dems. I will vote her no matter what you say. Edward and Obama cannot and will not be President. 100% sure.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473654</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:19:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473654</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>This why I hate you democrats. You have no guts. You are bunch of hypocrites fearing republicans and always cave in under their assaults. This is propaganda about hillary and you just get stuck and do the work of these dogs called Republicans. Look, they will vote any dog republicans to beat up Democrats. You never learn. Name any bad things about hillary. Why don't you shot your big mouth and vote the lady. Play the same game as the Republicans. As far as Obama and Edward they have no chance of survival in the general election. Obama will never be President because he is Black; this the truth and you can't deny it. On election day, the dreamers will give him a 10% and a republican will get the presidency with 90% of the vote. If he ever get nominated it is a 100% losss for the Dems. Be Practical and smart! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt; How can we be practical and smart? By voting for whom? Please don't say Hillary because your credibility as a New Yorker will be put to test. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please tell us how we can be practical and smart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473675</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:23:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473675</guid><dc:creator>Cherie T., Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>same guy in ad in 2006 and now again in 2007? &amp;nbsp;sounds to me like he's the only one they can find in an entire year that TRUSTS Hillary Clinton! &amp;nbsp;Not such a great track record!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473678</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:25:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473678</guid><dc:creator>CitizenJ</dc:creator><description>Yada yada yada.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473683</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:26:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473683</guid><dc:creator>Bebs Siba, S,D,,CA</dc:creator><description>What Bill Clinton's did the past, doesn't do anything. At least, he didn't get put on America on BIG DEBT, HE LEAD THE COUNTRY FOR POSITIVE NOT IN NEGATIVE. Sen. Clinton &amp;nbsp;running for President for herself . &amp;nbsp;Come on American People wake up, she is the most electible and &lt;br&gt;experienced candidate we have compared this two guys who are bashing Sen. Clinton. Those who hate Sen. Clinton are machunist and racist because she is woman. &amp;nbsp;We are already in year 2000's&lt;br&gt;Let's face it there are equal opportunity now. &amp;nbsp;Let's give her a chance to lead the America for the shake of our children and grandkids in the future. Let's give our TRUST &amp;nbsp;to her,my fellow American be positive. Let's vote for Sen.Clinton. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473703</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:32:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473703</guid><dc:creator>Dee, Sioux City, IA</dc:creator><description>I don't think many would be so quick to trust Hillary if they thought honestly for one minute: do I really want Hillary to have the same powers George Bush has right now?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473723</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:40:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473723</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>You know how I know Hilliary is the next president all the topics seem to include her,which means she must be the most popular and the best sell for everyone right, left, and center.EVERYONE makes money,YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473728</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:41:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473728</guid><dc:creator>Andrew - Seattle,WA</dc:creator><description>Twice New York elected Hillary to the US Senate. &amp;nbsp;She works hard and she is very capable. &amp;nbsp;She definitely has her devisive issues and baggage concerns, but it would be great if we had someone who had the capacity and willingness to do the job. &amp;nbsp;Remember that Compasionate Conservative? &amp;nbsp;Was it worth suffering through Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield Neo Cons and their fake religious Christian fervor because nobody liked Al Gore's stiff personality and his supposed lies about the internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary takes a lot of criticism and abuse and has yet to walk away. &amp;nbsp;Maybe not a friend for me, but definitely a President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473733</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473733</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>Jerry we can follow up hilliary with BUSHS three hours of lies and why after Bushes lies do you care who is lying to you your just another sheep baaaying in the wind trying to sound like the other sheep at fox news.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473734</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473734</guid><dc:creator>Prescott E. Bush</dc:creator><description>GOBAMA. I'm not to big on the Clintons. I personally think with any agenda of the Clintons have a hidden agenda attached. welfare reform hurt more than it helped.Those on P.A was given work that could have went to the unemployed. So it took jobs away to give people on P.A a job for 6 months or a little longer and rotate those jobs with those on P.A with very little chance of keeping the job. With that said I fear what she plan for health care. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473746</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:47:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473746</guid><dc:creator>L.Bean</dc:creator><description>Please raise you hands if you trust Hillary. That's about 300,000,000 come election day &amp;quot;landslide&amp;quot;. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473793</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473793</guid><dc:creator>S.B. Stein E.B. NJ </dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton should have know something like this would happen; there is all the concern about her &amp;quot;trust&amp;quot; issues among other things. &amp;nbsp;If I were one of her advisors, I would have suggested that she stay in the senate. &amp;nbsp;Her issues along with many on the right would trash her up and down. &amp;nbsp;I would prefer that politics become a little cleaner. &amp;nbsp;I guess I am just a dreamer thinking that. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473805</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:13:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473805</guid><dc:creator>George, Philly</dc:creator><description>Hillary will fight for me just like Bill did when he was in office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeremiah Hayden idaho&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously you did lose your job to NAFTA</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473806</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:15:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473806</guid><dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator><description>Barack Obama is the most trust worthy of all Dems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hilary, l do not trust you. you are a fraud, a con/artist-politician and a liar!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are tired of dirty politics, we want to move forward not backwards and Senator Barack Obama will move America forward and will unite us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barack Obama will be the 44th president of the United state of America. l second an Amen to that!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473808</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:15:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473808</guid><dc:creator>Hungry in America and going Bush broke</dc:creator><description>Who do I trust ? Could it be the Rip off Republican/ oilmen $5.00 a gallon for gas group. Sure why not I don't need to eat anymore anyway. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473810</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:17:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473810</guid><dc:creator>Molly, Iowa City</dc:creator><description>Her husband was an excellent President and I think she'll make a fantastic one also.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Penny Parker &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on what? The fact she married Bill Clinton?&lt;br&gt;Penny be the first Clinton supporter to take the challenge name one actual legislative accomplishment of Hillary. Just one. If she's so great it can't be too hard. Actually Van you do it, ignore the polls and give a factual basis to support Hillary. I won't hold my &amp;nbsp;breath waiting, because she's done nothing on her own.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473814</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:19:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473814</guid><dc:creator>roger   Evans Colorado</dc:creator><description>I have been a democrat for over forty years. I am proud of my country, and I want the president of my country to be some one I can be pround of. How could we be proud of Hillary Clinton? She says she has thirty five years experience, experience at what? She was the first lady for eight years, and she could not get her health care off the ground. I belive the only experience she has is trying to cover up her husbands affairs. Now she was good at this trying to disgrace these women and not condeming her husband for his affairs. We all know this is not a marriage, but a partnership. Hillary has not proved anything on her own, but she needs her partner to help her win this election. We as democarts need a leader who will speak up, say what they stand for, what they will do to make our counrty great. We may not like all of what they say, but we will know &amp;nbsp;were they stand. Hillary can't answer a straight question, she won't tell us what she stands for, her answer is what do you what to hear me say today. Even though I can't be done. What is she going to tell foreign leaders yes,no, yes, no I did't say that what I said is yes, no, yes. Then Bill will fly in and tell the foregn leaders you better back off. Is this the kind of president we want, with no back bone, This democart thinks not. I hope you do your home work on hillary Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473821</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:22:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473821</guid><dc:creator>Molly, Iowa City</dc:creator><description> Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for president, D or R. Stop arguing about and just vore for her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All Voters &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on what? How about one fact. Not a conclusion, but a fact to support the conclusion. I don't doubt Hillary would be a fine President, and if she's the nominee I'll vote for her, but I don't understand why so many people support a candidate that they can't provide any factual basis for their support. They are quick to tear Obama down, who I'm also only supporting if he's the nominee, but they can't build their candidate up with facts. It really is sad!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473833</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:28:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473833</guid><dc:creator>Billy C.</dc:creator><description>Just goes to show ya ! hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473844</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:34:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473844</guid><dc:creator>Gary. LV, Nevada</dc:creator><description> That Hillary has high negatives should be a badge of honor. Those are the scars from years of going against the tide of Republican sli*me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TR, Ohio&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How do you figure? Years against going against the GOP tide, did you work with the Russian's re-writing history? Hillary failed at health care, because she foolishly though she could force her vision down congresses throats. There were 57 Democrats in the Senate, and several of the GOP were very progressive, it was basically fillabuster proof. Did she get reform passed? No she lost that battle, and in 94, largely because of dislike for her (her negatives were only less than Bills during the Lewinsky scandal) the house and Senate switched to GOP control. And we paid for that for 12 years!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Her 2007 health plan is identical to John Chafee's 1991 proposal that had 23 GOP co-signers in 93. It was low hanging fruit, it would have easily passed. But she wanted to go down in history as the person who changed our health care system. What a joke!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing more amazing than Clinton claiming expertise in health care reform, is that anyone buys it. As Chris Dodd said in September it makes no sense to use your biggest legislative failure as proof of &amp;nbsp;experience. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473864</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:49:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473864</guid><dc:creator>Greg  DM, IA</dc:creator><description> think on the matter of trust, Hillary's work in public service speaks for itself. &amp;nbsp;Her measured, analytical and deliberate manner lends itself to being a leader one can trust; not distrust. &amp;nbsp;Any ambiguities that may create only means she is trying to consider all contingencies and balance all interests effectively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must say that so much of the animosity must be because she is a woman...that I find reprehensible. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TFOX, LUBBOCK, TX &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't hate Clinton, I support Biden. But I would appreciate it if her supporters could please provide facts to support their claims.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.Hillary's work in public service speaks for itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, what work would that be? Her almost 7 years in the Senate, what has she actually accomplished in the Senate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.Her measured, analytical and deliberate manner lends itself to being a leader one can trust; not distrust. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, I don't understand. Do you mean her parsing, i.e. the Edwards youtube ad? Why do you think leaders can trust her, I'm not saying they can't, or don't, but facts please. I do recall the controversy when she kissed Mrs. Arafat. That was politically tone deal!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.Any ambiguities that may create only means she is trying to consider all contingencies and balance all interests effectively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand nuance, but she has said things privately (she'd support increasing the social security cap) and refuses to answer publicly. I do not think it is fair to expect people to support a candidate on blind faith. I understand she's running a general election campaign, but I for one believe voters are owed the truth. And when a candidate either takes polar opposite positions at debates, or outright says she won't answer a fair question I have a problem with that! And frankly so should you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473869</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:52:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473869</guid><dc:creator>Gary. LV, Nevada</dc:creator><description> Er, Ron? &amp;nbsp;The mud is flung from both sides of the fence. &amp;nbsp;There are plenty of people posing as Hillary supporters as well. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carrie, Eastern Iowa &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You claim to be a lawyer, where's your evidence that anyone is claiming to support Hillary that isn't. I think the anti-Hillary sentiment is high enough that most Clinton haters could handle pretending to support her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473893</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473893</guid><dc:creator>NY needs help</dc:creator><description>I live in NY - not the city - that is reserved for the folks who do not live in real America, as we do out in Western, NY. &amp;nbsp;If you want to help us out - vote her in - and then you;ll get her out of here. &amp;nbsp;She is trashing this state - please get her out.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473897</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473897</guid><dc:creator>IMPEACH</dc:creator><description>*** LOOK AT THE LAST &amp;quot;REPUBLICAN&amp;quot; YOU TRUSTED TO BE YOUR PRESIDENT.. GEORGE &amp;quot;WORTHLESS&amp;quot; BUSH. TRILLION UPON TRILLION OF DOLLARS OF DEBT.TALK ABOUT A PARTY YOU CAN NOT TRUST, JUST LOOK NO FURTHER THAN THE REPUBLICAN...BUSH ADMINISTRATION. THEY ARE STEALING YOU AND ME BLIND ! &lt;br&gt;APRIL JONES, ATLANTA, GA. (Sent Monday, November 19, 2007 3:04 &lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;People who voted for the worst president ever can never ever be trusted, Do not let them vote ever again. They are ill informed and a bunch of bleating sheep all named repuklet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473915</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:15:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473915</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>APRIL JONES, ATLANTA, GA. &amp;nbsp;Not to defend the Republicans but half of those trillions of dollars went to Democratic projects as well. &amp;nbsp;The real problem we have is that if we elect this untrustworthy power hungry woman we will unfortunatly get much of the same. &amp;nbsp;She doesn't know how to do anything else, if I thought he could win I'd say let's pull for Richardson he doesn't live and breath in the beltway. &amp;nbsp;All of these people want to do is spend our money and appeal to special interest groups Hillary's almost as bad as the idiot we call president..almost. But the candidates that will make the most difference for our party are Edwards/Obama and they have the best shot at beating a republican, face it too many of us don't like or trust Hillary with good reason, same goes for the independants and everybody knows the republicans are a bunch of ignorant blind lemmings that will follow the current idiot we call president off a cliff.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473917</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:15:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473917</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Larry:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Hillary quite a bit, and would be happy to have her as my president. &amp;nbsp;I'm also happy to report that my head is not up my ass. &amp;nbsp;I have doubts about yours, however, judging by the few comments I have seen from you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473919</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:16:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473919</guid><dc:creator>randy, chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>How silly and inane people are to believe the lies out of Bob Novak's mouth. He acknowledges that he has second hand information from an undisclosed source. Well, if anyone (Clinton or any other campaign) were conducting a word of mouth campaign insinuating skeletons in Obama's closet, you'd think there'd be minions of anecdotal affirmations. Oddly, there's not even ONE. No one has stepped forth to say that they received a phone call, or an e-mail referencing any of this. WAKE UP, Obama supporters. The enemy is not your fellow Democrats, it's the spin meisters working for the GOP.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473920</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:18:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473920</guid><dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator><description>Anyone who has to try to convince you they are trustworthy can't be trusted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I concur- she is practically BEGGING people to trust her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473921</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:19:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473921</guid><dc:creator>Katy, TX</dc:creator><description>All,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To what degree do Democrats view the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution as a guide for the appropriate role(s) of government in our nation?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#473975</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:49:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:473975</guid><dc:creator>Bobby Pearson, Oakhurst NC</dc:creator><description>That is one thing that is true about Hillary. She never said she was trustworthy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474005</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:07:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474005</guid><dc:creator>Dan, CA</dc:creator><description>Why do you care about Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. I just care about who would be best for the people of the U.S</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474010</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474010</guid><dc:creator>mbot565, la jolla, ca</dc:creator><description>Trusworthy Clinton? That's like an oxymoron. &amp;nbsp;Two words that don't belong together. &amp;nbsp;When she, her husband &amp;amp; her campaign have to say 3 different things on any given subject, just so she can't get pinned down and actually think it's a smart thing to do?&lt;br&gt;Well, she maybe smart but to think that she's actually trusworthy? You need to be really delusional to actually believe that. &amp;nbsp;She never was one &amp;amp; never will be. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474023</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474023</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>Herve NY wrote: &amp;nbsp;I am sure that all of you against Hillary are Republicans deguised into Dems. I will vote her no matter what you say. Edward and Obama cannot and will not be President. 100% sure. &amp;nbsp; Whatever Herve I'm convinced you're part of Hillary's campaign team. &amp;nbsp;How can you say an Edwards &amp;amp; Obama can't be President? &amp;nbsp;That notion is ridiculous they are no where near as dividing as Hillary and if you actually paid attention you'd see they stick with their positions and ARE trustworthly. &amp;nbsp;Regardless sounds like camp Hillary is worried if she's got shlubs like you planting on these forums. &amp;nbsp;your moniker should read Herve for hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474037</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:31:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474037</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>Carrie, Eastern Iowa. I like Hillary quite a bit, and would be happy to have her as my president. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay Carrie but it seems the few who support Hilary here have failed to mention something substantial like WHY? &amp;nbsp;Why do you support her what has she done? Anything? &amp;nbsp;Except being married to Bill what makes her more qualified to do the job? &amp;nbsp;I've seen several examples of how and what the other candidates have done and acomplished, all great things. &amp;nbsp;What has this woman done? &amp;nbsp;I will await your long, long, long, silence, followed by one maybe two trivial acomplishments that she may or may not have done. &amp;nbsp;Then hopefully your head can come out of your a#s and you will see the light. &amp;nbsp;One can only hope... </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474049</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474049</guid><dc:creator>Ruth, IL</dc:creator><description>With those daggers for eyes, who can trust Hillary Clinton? &amp;nbsp;I've just been waiting for the tactics to come out, well, starting with the last debate, the gloves are off. &amp;nbsp;She is clearly using the fact that she is a woman to her advantage. &amp;nbsp;The male candidates were afraid to challenge her after the &amp;quot;prepped&amp;quot; hecklers in the audience booed them. &amp;nbsp;Boy, she worked it behind the scenes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now this baloney of smear. &amp;nbsp;Here it comes! &amp;nbsp;I wanted a woman for president, but I absolutely did not want Hillary. &amp;nbsp;She does not represent decency. &amp;nbsp;If she wants the prize, she doesn't deserve it, if she's going to run these tactics. &amp;nbsp;I'm so disappointed. &amp;nbsp;She could win without the tactics as I think the polls up til now have so strongly shown.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474085</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:09:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474085</guid><dc:creator>Romeo, Elk Grove, CA</dc:creator><description>I think all this Hillary bashing is funny. The Hillary haters are saying that Obama is more trustworthy, he's been in the Senate for only 8 years. Hillary worked to help get Nixon impeached, but yet Hillary is Bush and Cheney like, according to Obama? Huh? Lets think, hmmmmm, who is Bush and Cheney like? Heres a hint, google Nixon and read about him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets think about when Bill Clinton was president. Things were great then, Bill had an approval rating over 60%. How many people actually believes that Hillary had no say or opinions on Bill's policies? Let me just say that to say that Hillary had nothing to do with Bill's policies and Hillary is too polverizing is contradicting eachother.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All this talk about planted questions and planted audience in UNLV is just crazy. First of all, planted questions on a campaign are common, everyone knows that. What was the question? What will Hillary do about Global Warming? People are outraged, saying that that was a soft question. Suggestion people, google Bush's planted questions and compare them to Hillary's planted questions, oh yeah, good luck on finding lots of planted questions on Hillary's campaign. Now the planted UNLV crowd. Do people know that Hillary leads Obama by over 20% in the polls in NV? Look it up, dont have to trust me. Lets think, hmmmmmm, maybe, just maybe the crowd liked Hillary more because she is winning in NV and all of the other states? I know its hard to imagine, but when people go where they are liked, that person would most likely be liked. I know, seems crazy to me too, who knew.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One more thing, for the people who do not know her stance on issues, look it up.....majority of the people in America knows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To all the Hillary supporters, just remember, all this nonsense and bashing on Hillary isnt new. They said the same thing when she ran for Senator in New York and won twice. They did the same to Bill when he ran for president, yet he won twice, plus, the Supreme Court didnt have to hand the WIN to Bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Attacking the Clintons will only make them stronger, they attacked Bill in the 90's and yet he came out with over 60% approval rating. I would not make the same mistake with Hillary.&amp;quot;..........Mary Mandeline on Meet the Press.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh one more thing for the Dems, if you find yourself arguing with anyone who voted for Bush, let alone voted for Bush twice, just remember, you are arguing with someone with really bad judgements. So stop wasting your time.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474097</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:25:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474097</guid><dc:creator>Broke in Seattle</dc:creator><description>Will someone please trust me, and lend me $10 bucks. So that iI can get some gas to go to work and probably be laid off by the end of the day. Thanks George &amp;quot;worthless&amp;quot; Bush !</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474124</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:43:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474124</guid><dc:creator>George &amp;quot;worthless&amp;quot; Bush, a leader against weapons of mass distruction</dc:creator><description>Famous last words..&amp;quot;trust me&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474162</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:59:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474162</guid><dc:creator>Aly</dc:creator><description>Hillary gets my vote because she is the most qualified period. She has a well laid out exit plan for the war and has a solid healthcare strategy to top the list. &amp;nbsp;I welcome anyone who doesn't understand what she stands for to do more research. She will pull this country out of the disastrous state we are in. &amp;nbsp;AND, we will get 2 for the price of one. &amp;nbsp;Bill will continue to be an international embassador for us and will help regain some of the lost trust the world has for us. &amp;nbsp;Think about it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474178</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:03:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474178</guid><dc:creator>Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY</dc:creator><description>Romeo: Hillary voted for the war three times and that's three times too many for me. &amp;nbsp;She is under the auspices of great triangulators and masters of doublespeak. &amp;nbsp;I will never be able to trust her.&lt;br&gt;My goal is not to get the Republicans out so that we can replace them with an ersatz Republican. &amp;nbsp;I want real change.&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474180</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:04:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474180</guid><dc:creator>Amy Camp, West Burlington, IA </dc:creator><description>Does it occur to anyone that someone had to pay for that medical procedure and it wasn't Hillary Clinton? &amp;nbsp;The total issue of health insurance and medical care needs a comprehensive study and I think a government headed by Barack Obama might be able to do that.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474189</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:13:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474189</guid><dc:creator>JR, New York </dc:creator><description>Sick of hearing Obama &amp;amp; Clinton and all their empty promises. Obama sounds like Bush 8 years ago about being the &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; of change and Hillary sounding like Bush &amp;amp; the other Clinton on the war on terror . Time for a real change, 3rd party !</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474193</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:17:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474193</guid><dc:creator>JR, New York </dc:creator><description>Sick of hearing Obama &amp;amp; Clinton and all their empty promises. Obama sounds like Bush 8 years ago about being the &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; of change and Hillary sounding like Bush &amp;amp; the other Clinton on the war on terror . Time for a real change, 3rd party !</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474207</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:33:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474207</guid><dc:creator>Someone's got to do it!</dc:creator><description>The first lady wants to send your job to Peru.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474208</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:36:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474208</guid><dc:creator>FACT  / AZ</dc:creator><description>What a cheap shot,, load the front pages with some more of these tear jerking stories. Now this is a real Media Con!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just how does America stomach all the immoral B.S. whlie they were in the White house. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There will be no Washington self serving paper hanger in the oval office this next time. A vote for leadership,common sense, moral being to bring America out of this strangle hold congress has put this country in!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474222</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:46:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474222</guid><dc:creator>threeriverscrossing, Raleigh, North Carolina</dc:creator><description>What? The hospital is going to absorb the cost of the bone marrow transplant? &amp;nbsp; Really... &amp;nbsp;Most likely the hospital is going to pass the cost on to you and me through higher premiums. &amp;nbsp;Is not this tactic counter to lowering health care cost? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474224</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:47:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474224</guid><dc:creator>Amy Camp, West Burlington, IA </dc:creator><description>I would like to question the assumption that Hillary Clinton has more experience than Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;I understand that Senator Clinton has only held the elective office of Senator from New York. &amp;nbsp;Barack has been a Senator from Illinois and has served in the legislature of Illinois. &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Clinton was not elected to an office when her husband was President and though close to power was not really responsible for any decisions to the electorate. &amp;nbsp;Even now I believe that she and Bill have diferences of opinion and obviously she didn't approve of all he did as President. &amp;nbsp;This is not overwhelming experience as a political leader.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474242</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474242</guid><dc:creator>john doe</dc:creator><description>I wouldn't trust hilliary clinton in a sh__ house with a muzzle on, much less in the white house without a muzzle.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474245</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474245</guid><dc:creator>Lane Ferm Huntington Beach, Ca</dc:creator><description>Clinton has served in the US Senate and met many trust factors many times over. She's under a microscope, and has been for a very long time. IF there was anything to suggest untrustworthiness, it would have comeout a long time ago. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474246</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:19:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474246</guid><dc:creator>Imogene</dc:creator><description>I don't trust Hillary, period! She is a habitual liar.&lt;br&gt;I will not be voting for her. Any democract candidate but her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474270</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:51:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474270</guid><dc:creator>Romeo, Elk Grove, CA</dc:creator><description>To the people who say that Hillary isnt trustworthy, ask yourselves, what has Hillary done to wrong this country?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To the people who say that Hillary as president will be the same as Bush, you are way out of touch with reality. To prove yourselves wrong, compare the Clinton Admin. to the Bush Admin. Who did a better job?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just stupid. After Reagan and Bush 41, we were in a high deficit, the Clinton Admin took over and we ended up with surpluses and the world loved us. W's Admin came along and look where we are now. We are going down the toliet now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, America is at the most troubling time since the Nixon Admin. The persons who are most qualified are Clinton and Biden, Biden isnt going to win, we all know that, he'll be a great Secratary of State. Now Hillary is our best bet to clean up this mess by the Bush Admin. So what do people do? Bash our best canidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary untrustworthy? Ask yourselves this. Did I trust Bill Clinton?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474272</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:54:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474272</guid><dc:creator>Sharon, Memphis TN</dc:creator><description>Excuse me, so she gets bashed because she forgave her husband and kept her family together, because Mr. Novak made up a story today to get Mr. Obama all upset, because as First Lady she got shot down over trying to get a health plan going (more than any other First Lady tried to do, because she's strong, because she was accused of illegal activities that US taxpayers paid millions of $ and proved there was no wrong doing, and because she did something good for a little boy and his family. &amp;nbsp;By the way Senator Clinton is the ONLY one, true to her promise, who isn't bashing the other democratic candidates. &amp;nbsp;Seems trustworthy to me. Further she's the one who already knows the ropes in the White House and will have the shortest learning curve to clean up this mess that baby Bush and his cronies have made. She has my vote!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474301</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:29:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474301</guid><dc:creator>jonathan scobie</dc:creator><description>Hillary doesnt care about you. Are you kidding, she plants questions in the crowd, she ripped STAN LEE, the creator of spiderman off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She hides secrets and we dont need 24 years of CLINTON-BUSH DYNASTY crap. She works for the globalist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I challenge MSNBC to not censor my comments.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474303</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:34:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474303</guid><dc:creator>donna seattle wa</dc:creator><description>Chuck Todd -- I just viewed your discussion about Obama's confrontation with a 64 yr old woman in Iowa about terrorism and immigration. &amp;nbsp;Would you please take a look at this footage -- shot at the same time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/11/19/obama-takes-the-tough-questions/"&gt;http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/11/19/obama-takes-the-tough-questions/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;you are continuing to misrepresent this -- either because you never viewed the exchange in its entirety -- or perhaps you edited it to suit your agenda. &amp;nbsp;Either way you are negligent because you are perpetuating a narrative that is FALSE. &amp;nbsp;Please examine what you are doing. &amp;nbsp;You owe Senator Obama and the public an apology. &amp;nbsp;For those interested here are some other link: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/obama-takes-terrorism-deadly-serious/"&gt;http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/obama-takes-terrorism-deadly-serious/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474308</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:44:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474308</guid><dc:creator>Cybercitizen, Bartlesville, OK</dc:creator><description>On February 21, 2007, when asked about universal health care, Hillary Clinton said &amp;quot;Well, I want to have universal health care coverage by the end of my second term.&amp;quot; That was during the AFSCME Democratic primary debate in Carson City, NV. But many people can't wait five years; they need health care ASAP.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474313</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:49:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474313</guid><dc:creator>Cybercitizen, Bartlesville, OK</dc:creator><description>Regarding the &amp;quot;interesting article on Madam Clinton and her so-called experience&amp;quot;...the article was written by Deroy Murdock, who also wrote an article titled &amp;quot;Three Cheers for Waterboarding&amp;quot;, in which he called waterboarding &amp;quot;something of which every American should be proud.&amp;quot; Oh, please don't make me gag.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474340</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474340</guid><dc:creator>Penny Hardwick, Muncie IN</dc:creator><description>I like Hillary quite a bit, and would be happy to have her as my president. &amp;nbsp;I'm also happy to report that my head is not up my ass. &amp;nbsp;I have doubts about yours, however, judging by the few comments I have seen from you. &lt;br&gt;Carrie, Eastern Iowa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-----&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet another Hillary drone with crap in her hair.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474367</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:25:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474367</guid><dc:creator>Robert Hale, Minot, North Dakota</dc:creator><description>Interesting how Clinton helped. &amp;nbsp;Seems like she or an aide called the hospital and &amp;quot;suggested&amp;quot; they absorb the cost. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure that kind of help is very inspiring and certainly has NOTHING to do with trust that I can see.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474369</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:27:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474369</guid><dc:creator>Bob, Anytown, USA</dc:creator><description>We seemed to miss the bigger story... Since when does a hospital JUST ABSORB the cos??? Someone paid to it and it was us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474402</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:34:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474402</guid><dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator><description>As for trust they are all politicians which means they cannot be totally straightforward and get elected, it's all a dance, so what we have to do is see past the steps, and I do trust Hilary to do what is best for our country. I feel she is passionate about incorporating some positive change. She's got some fancy foot work but I do think it is legitimate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474429</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:09:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474429</guid><dc:creator>Mike Frazier</dc:creator><description>My political philosophy is libertarian, and while I have voted for several Republicans in my life I have never voted for a Democratic candidate for president. I do not trust Hillary's ethics, morals or veracity; I do not agree with her politics. And if she is the Democratic candidate next November, I will be voting for Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why? Because she is, at heart, ruthless, tenacious and savage, and in my opinion these qualities make her the ideal defender of America against 21st century terrorism. She won't do it for the right reasons, but she will do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote Hillary in 2008.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474449</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:37:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474449</guid><dc:creator>James Thomas, Denver, CO</dc:creator><description>I still don't understand what being 1st Lady really proves as far as being trustworthy or even competent for that matter. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She was a union buster at a leading anti-union law firm and then she was on the board of directors for Wal-Mart busting unions some more. &amp;nbsp;(Don't believe me? &amp;nbsp;Look it up!) &amp;nbsp;That was her career before she hitched her star to an up and coming politician who happened to be a Dem so she followed him to the Dem side. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We don't trust her because she changes her mind all the time and plays dirty if you ask me. &amp;nbsp;Don't get me wrong I have nothing but respect for Bill but how does that make her a good candidate? As I recall it was just her and Joe Lieberman left pushing the Iraq war long after it was obviously going way wrong and that's why I'll never trust her. &amp;nbsp;She only changed her tune on Iraq after it destroyed Joe as far as Dems are concerned and then she made the purely political calculation to cut bait on that particular issue. &amp;nbsp;No points there for smarts or integrity. &amp;nbsp;I don't think she really cares about politics at all, only power. &amp;nbsp;That's why I'm for Obama and Edwards. &amp;nbsp;Now if only they can just form a dream ticket and change the game for good!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474457</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:28:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474457</guid><dc:creator>SD, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>You can call her &amp;quot;Billary&amp;quot; or you can call her “Hillary” or even “Madam Clinton”. I really don't care. This woman/PERSON, sorry guys, is the BEST bet our country has of going forward. She cares about where OUR country is headed. She wants to bring OUR country back together, a place where we haven't been in years. She is going to have it her way, Not Bill's way. And why not use your husband to deal with foreign affairs? It is a lot better than having the &amp;quot;First Lady&amp;quot; open rose gardens. Times have changed. The Glass ceiling is about to fall, and after 50 years of beating the ceiling myself all I can say is it is about time. GO HILLARY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Quote what ever you like. I know that none of you have ever gotten caught in a bad business deal. I am also sure that no one other than Bill Clinton had an extra-marital affair. And by the way, why do we care. The last I checked everyone is human. At least there marriage was strong enough to get through it. Was/is yours? Our country tried to impeach Bill over this. But it is ok to lie about WMD’s? &amp;nbsp;Personally I think that is more of an impeachment issue. But I haven’t seen anyone pushing for that. So, lying to the American public is ok, but dear GOD don’t have an affair. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I am reading from many of you is everyone NOT running for president is perfect. Does this mean that the one’s who ARE running for President are all liars? At least putting themselves out to the public and also putting their private lives and views under the microscope. They have the guts to do so. You are not going to find someone that you agree 100% with. That is a constant in life. So stop complaining, do your own homework on each candidate. Don’t think that everything you hear is true. Do some digging on your own. Encourage those who don’t vote to do so. And use your internet and find your OWN answers. Make a decision based on what YOU find. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474469</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:36:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474469</guid><dc:creator>Sue Strand, Prescott Valley, AZ</dc:creator><description>Obama's campaign is based on his principals. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's campaign depends on which way the wind is blowing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have just had experienced men in power and we got deceit, shredding of the constitution, and total inept leadership. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I go for openness, honesty and a man of principals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think about it. &amp;nbsp;We NEED a &amp;quot;Mr Smith goes to Washington now more than ever. &amp;nbsp;The Bush admin. has run this country and it's reputation into the ground.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474470</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:36:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474470</guid><dc:creator>Sherrie, Nebraska</dc:creator><description>I am voting for Hillary also. Do any of you remember the condition of this country when Bill left office. Life was good. Look what W has done. How many of you Hillary slammers voted for W? </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474481</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:08:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474481</guid><dc:creator>Texx</dc:creator><description>Hades will freeze over before I'll put another Clinton, or Bush, in the White House. &amp;nbsp;Vote third party, for America.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474494</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:44:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474494</guid><dc:creator>James Wilkes, Lake Mary, Florida</dc:creator><description>Here is a scary message for the Clinton Camp. I have a Step-Mother Inlaw, a Mother Inlaw and my wife who are all registered democrats. I however am a registered republican, just wanted to clarify that fact first. When I asked all three women in my life if they would vote for Mrs. Clinton each of them came back with the same answer. I wouldn't vote for her She can't be trusted. These are all women who voted for Bill twice and said they would vote for him again. That still blows me away when they say that!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474511</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:20:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474511</guid><dc:creator>pat j niles ohio</dc:creator><description>Hillary is the best for president.Trustworty and smart, you have my vote.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474515</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:36:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474515</guid><dc:creator>It's all Bush's Fault</dc:creator><description>Hungry in America and going Bush broke &amp;quot;Who do I trust ? Could it be the Rip off Republican/ oilmen $5.00 a gallon for gas group. Sure why not I don't need to eat anymore anyway. &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny but you can afford a computer and an Internet connection. &amp;nbsp;Maybe if you had your priorities straight you would ditch the computer for some food and get a job instead of wasting your time complaining about how bad your life is...wait you can afford a computer you have the luxury to sit around and post messages online and you obviously have some kind of Internet connection (that costs money) yet you can't afford to eat because of Bush. &amp;nbsp; Not only do I not trust you but I think you are a fool. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474518</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:38:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474518</guid><dc:creator>Legal in Texas, TX</dc:creator><description>GO HILLARY! It's about time America gets a President we deserve. You people need to look beyond your hate for the Clinton's and allow this country to move forward the way it is meant to be. When has ANY president ever delivered what they promise? He who hath no sin, cast the first stone! We are ALL liars! This is typical of all you &amp;quot;I love Jesus&amp;quot; liars. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474521</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:40:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474521</guid><dc:creator>BIGOLDTEXAN</dc:creator><description>I AM NOT VOTING FOR hillary clinton!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA '08</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474534</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:59:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474534</guid><dc:creator>Roger Thomas</dc:creator><description>My vote will go to Hillary or I'll stay home.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474569</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:30:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474569</guid><dc:creator>Juliet</dc:creator><description>Romeo, Elk Grove, CA &amp;quot;After Reagan and Bush 41, we were in a high deficit, the Clinton Admin took over and we ended up with surpluses.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Romeo, seems you are extremely misinformed. &amp;nbsp;While Bill was a great President he benefited from the Reagan tax cuts and did not change what Reagan had in place. &amp;nbsp;This resulted in the surplus that he gets credit for and Bush 43 has spent like a drunken sailor. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474584</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:37:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474584</guid><dc:creator>Proud Liberal</dc:creator><description>IMPEACH &amp;quot;People who voted for the worst president ever can never ever be trusted, Do not let them vote ever again. They are ill informed and a bunch of bleating sheep all named repuklet.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impeach WOW! &amp;nbsp;That sounds just like something Hitler would say &amp;quot;Do not let them vote&amp;quot; . &amp;nbsp;Sorry I have some serious trust issues with someone who would take away anyone's right to vote in this country Republican or Democrat. &amp;nbsp;That is not the way of the Democratic party and it's people like you that give Democrats a bad name. &amp;nbsp;The people that voted for Bush obviously see that they were wrong just look at the polls everyone is against this idiotic war in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;I'm sick of nutcases like you giving Liberals a bad name. &amp;nbsp;Maybe you should move to China or some place where your rights will not be allowed, seems you would be much happier. &amp;nbsp;Too many fools claiming to be Liberal you are the type of person that hurts our cause.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474595</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:45:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474595</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>Mike Frazier &amp;quot;She won't do it for the right reasons, but she will do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks Mike from hillaryclinton.com we'll keep that in mind. &amp;nbsp;I on the other hand will vote for Obama and Edards for the right reasons and get it right the first time. &amp;nbsp;It's time for change people don't seem to understand Hillary is of the same Washington mold as Bush totally compliant to special interest groups. &amp;nbsp;Bill and Hillary have become extremely rich and so have their constiuants. &amp;nbsp;Bush has made billions for himself Haliburton and big oil. &amp;nbsp;We as a people have to stop this dangerous trend or before we know it the regular working man and woman will be a thing of the past. &amp;nbsp;Hillary doesn't care WAKE UP! &amp;nbsp;Obama/Edwards '08 or Edwards/Obama '08 </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474598</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:47:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474598</guid><dc:creator>Johnny T.</dc:creator><description>I don't trust Baraka Obamba.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474601</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:48:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474601</guid><dc:creator>Freddy M., Teneck, N.J.</dc:creator><description>I certainly don't trust Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474607</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:49:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474607</guid><dc:creator>Rock Balllboa, Phili.</dc:creator><description>Look into Obama eyes, he's shifty. Can't trust that guy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474646</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:08:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474646</guid><dc:creator>Mike Henry, Quanah, TX</dc:creator><description>If you see your election strategy as a broken field rush for the goal, with every other player on the field representing a platform or following on one side or another and the country polarized around single issues, the question is, how can any candidate be honest with the electorate all the time? &amp;nbsp;You have to duck and dodge, if you expect to get there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, I suppose you don't have to duck and dodge if your election strategy is to put yourself before the electorate as an honest candidate, acknowledging that there are differences, but willing to risk disagreement and criticism for the principle of honesty. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will people vote for a candidate they disagree with because they believe he or she will be honest with them? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this first post George Bush election, they might. Indeed, I very well might. &amp;nbsp;I could be willing to unpolarize myself. &amp;nbsp;Now, which of the candidates is willing to bet the race on it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that if anyone is, that will be the leader America needs and we should support him or her with enthusiasm.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474725</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:35:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474725</guid><dc:creator>Bash'em, Miami, Florida</dc:creator><description>When they found Vincent Foster, many quarts of blood were missing from his body. The problem was, the missing quarts of blood were not on the ground where they found his body there next to the Potomac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You must ask yourself &amp;quot;Why was Vincent hushed up?&amp;quot; When the Clintons want to hide something, they do - and get it swept under the rug quickly. When ya vote for Hillary, don't forget ya get Bill - the one who was &amp;quot;Impeached&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474755</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:46:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474755</guid><dc:creator>Molly, Iowa City</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot; I am sure that all of you against Hillary are Republicans deguised into Dems. I will vote her no matter what you say. Edward and Obama cannot and will not be President. 100% sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Herve NY &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The above post shows the problem with Hillary supporters. I'm a very active Democrat, and will support her if she is the nominee. Unfortunately if she is the nominee, the President being sworn in on January 20, 2009 will be the GOP nominee, and the country will remain as divided as ever! I wish that were not true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ignore the poll numbers if Hillary wasn't very concerned about Iowa (not merely failing to win, but coming in &amp;nbsp;worse than second) she would not have hired 100 new staffers effective 11/1. She wouldn't be spending more time in Iowa than Edwards or Obama, especially this close to Thanksgiving. Last night as I was leaving an event for Sen. Biden at the Penthouse suite of Mark Moen and Bobby Jett at the Hotel Vetro &amp;nbsp;, I ran into former Governor Vilsack (he endorsed Hillary after she paid off his campaign debt) who was checking in. He was there to meet up with his wife Christy and Hillary who were coming in from an event at the &amp;quot;Blue grass cafe&amp;quot; in Tama Iowa. Hillary wouldn't be working so hard if her internal numbers weren't causing her concern. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure Hillary enjoyed learning upon her arrival at the hotel at the end of her long day campaigning, of the over flow crowd in Mark and Bobby's suite (I don't know square footage, but Mark owns the 5 star Vetro hotel and his apt. takes up the entire 13th floor), while she had to &amp;quot;pretend&amp;quot; she enjoyed being at the cafe in a rural Iowa town.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; At the Biden event there were 200+ people, most of whom stood the entire time. When I left a little after 9 (2 hours after the event started) over half the crowd was still there asking him individual questions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People like Herve, operate under the misguided belief that most people think like them, and if someone doesn't like Clinton they MUST be a republican. I like Senator Clinton, and I will vote for her if she's the nominee (as my sister says &amp;quot;What choice do we have&amp;quot; Answer: none), and if she is the nominee I will pray everyday that the best candidate is elected. (Hillary is not the best Democratic candidate by a long shot, but she is by far better than any GOP running)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Her supporters are blind to the fact that her negatives over all are close to 50% (48%) but with independents (the people who actually decide elections) her negatives exceed 50%. Her supporters claim she can win them over and point to her landslide re-election victory in 2006. Anyone using that as a basis to claim Hillary can win over moderate independents, and even some GOP are either not reality based thinkers, or like Clinton's campaign operatives they don't respect the intelligence of their audience, &amp;nbsp;or they would not insult it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the 2006 election no one thought for a minute Clinton would be seriously challenged. The early front runner for the GOP nomination was Jeanine Pirro. Pirro has more skeletons in the closet than imaginable. Seriously, Law and Order has used her family story as the plot line several times. Her announcement got national headlines only because she read directly from a multiple page speech and page 7 (or another number) was missing, and stumbled around looking for it, it was so bad it looked like an SNL parody. She withdrew after several months of poor campaign performance. It's pretty bad when your shinning campaign moment is your screwing up your campaign announcement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton apparently isn't loved by all Democrats, because she did have a primary battle from Democratic anti-war activist Jonathan Tasini. Herve, are you claiming that Tasani isn't a Democrat, he didn't merely post something on the web, he had the audacity (like Biden, Dodd, Edewards, Obama &amp;amp; Richardson) to actually run against Hillary, and he even got 17% of the vote! 17% of NY Democrats didn't vote for Hillary to be their nominee! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton's general election Republican opponent was John Spencer, who every one but John knew, had no chance against any Democrat, let alone one with the funding of Clinton. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton won the general election with 67 percent of the vote to Spencer's 31 percent, and she carried all but four of New York's sixty-two counties. Sounds formidable doesn't it. This is the part Clinton backers tout. But it's a false story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now for the &amp;quot;rest of the story&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Clinton spent $36 million in her reelection bid against a candidate with no chance, and who the national GOP wouldn't give a penny. Hillary spent more than any other candidate for Senate in the 2006 elections, or any prior Senate race, despite never having a real race. Frankly this is what makes me most upset with Clinton, she could have won easily without spending more than 5-10 million (or with her free media even less), but because her Presidential election strategist wanted an overwhelming re-election victory in order to make the false argument that this proves she is electable nation wide, she spent an obscene amount of money to get re-elected. In doing so Hillary showed it's all about me! Most candidate's for federal office in easy re-election bids donate campaign funds to candidates within their party, who could use their help. But Clinton's &amp;quot;it's all about me attitude&amp;quot; prevented her from being a loyal Democrat! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of helping Harold Ford Jr. in his tight Senate race, or Chris Shay's Democratic opponent, Hillary spent more than 3 times what she needed for an easy victory, in her failed attempt to show she has cross over appeal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why was this a failed attempt? Easy, not only did she not even have a race against a viable candidate, but she won her Senate race by LESS (YES LESS) than Eliot Spitzer did in his 2006 race for Governor. Spitzer won the Governor's race 69%-29%. They ran at the same time, and Spitzer wasn't running for re-election, he was running for the open Governors seat, that was &amp;nbsp;held by GOP Governor Pataki. Clinton received less support than Senator Chuck Schumer did in his 2004 re-election race. Schumer won 71%-24%, and 2004 wasn't even a good year nation wide for Democrats. The GOP running against Clinton in a very bad year for Republicans received 6% more support in NY than the Republican who ran against Schumer in 04, a very unfavorable year for Democrats nationally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474756</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:46:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474756</guid><dc:creator>Not a fan of Hillary</dc:creator><description>John T Freddy M and Rock B, &amp;nbsp;Dear Hillary Clinton supporter, please space out your posts so it's not so obvious. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama/Edwards '08!!! &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474786</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474786</guid><dc:creator>Mark,  Des Moines</dc:creator><description> 67% of New Yorkers voted for her re- election. She must of done something right. The more people see the real Hillary (not the image presented by cartoon characters on Am radio and Fox noise host)! Great Ad!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well that would be one way of looking at it. Another way would be she ran against a weak opponent. Spent 36 MILLION DOLLARS, more than any candidate in any Senate race ever, against a candidate with absolutely no chance to beat her. NONE! And yet she received less votes than Spitzer did running for the open Governors seat. and Clinton received 6% less support than Schumer did in 04, a difficult year for Senate Democrats (we lost seats!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Few people question whether she's an adequate Senator, or competent, but a lot question whether she can win a general election. All of you supporting her now (not if she's the nominee, when the choice is gone)who have no doubt that she can win in November 08 are living in a fantasy world. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474792</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:58:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474792</guid><dc:creator>mary  Davenport Iowa</dc:creator><description> This why I hate you democrats. You have no guts. You are bunch of hypocrites fearing republicans and always cave in under their assaults. This is propaganda about hillary and you just get stuck and do the work of these dogs called Republicans. Look, they will vote any dog republicans to beat up Democrats. You never learn. Name any bad things about hillary. Why don't you shot your big mouth and vote the lady. Play the same game as the Republicans. As far as Obama and Edward they have no chance of survival in the general election. Obama will never be President because he is Black; this the truth and you can't deny it. On election day, the dreamers will give him a 10% and a republican will get the presidency with 90% of the vote. If he ever get nominated it is a 100% losss for the Dems. Be Practical and smart!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Herve NY &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know if an African American can win the general election. I hope that race wouldn't prevent it, but I recognize it could. But if you believe Hillary can win a general election you need to put down the crack pipe. It's illegal, bad for you, and prevents you from thinking straight!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474793</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:59:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474793</guid><dc:creator>Anthony, Manchester, NH</dc:creator><description>Why don't you all stop this nonsense about trust. &amp;nbsp;Unless you know somebody personally, how can you make judgement based on what you read or heard in the news? &amp;nbsp;All I know is I am going to continue to do what I have always done. &amp;nbsp;Follow the news every day, and not just when we are getting ready to vote. &amp;nbsp;This way, I can compare for myself what the politicians are saying during the campaign against what they said years ago and their voting record in the house or senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Use your brains, America. &amp;nbsp;And not your partisan emotions. &amp;nbsp;As far as I know, I have not seen anything that will make me not trust any of the candidates, Republican or Democratic; except of cause for my natural scheptism toward politicians in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This election is very important to let our emotions get the best of us as it did during the 2000 and 2004 caimpaing. &amp;nbsp;When we are all consumed with partisan emotions, we get what we deserve; poor governance.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474798</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:00:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474798</guid><dc:creator>TS, NJ</dc:creator><description>I follow the current events closely both at national level and international level. I am not sure where why there are many people that dont trust Hillary Clinton. Is it because she stood with her man and somehow made her marriage work? Is it because she was found to be evasive during white water hearings which most of us did not fully understand? If any of us have a prosecutor with a huge cash reserve and hatred on our back then how are we supposed to provide the preception that we can be trusted? In the end nothing was provan except that there was a lot of negative publicity for the Clintons. Should the American public be a little more fair for our own good and consider the circumstances so that we can find a leader who may not be perfect (and no one is) but are not damaged by the partisan divide? If at all we must reject Karl Rove type politicians who advocate &amp;amp; excel at dividing up people on wedge issues and using hatred provoking agenda to win elections (like gay bashing). If we as public are not fair minded about any candidate we end up with what we deserve as a nation. A nation that has lost a lot in the last 6 years! Next time a person or a press try to throw mud on anyone let us ask what is the reason for this? Do they have substance or just propagating hate messages and thereby manipulating the public? Ask if you are getting manipulated?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474812</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:04:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474812</guid><dc:creator>cj ross</dc:creator><description>[[When they found Vincent Foster, many quarts of blood were missing from his body. The problem was, the missing quarts of blood were not on the ground where they found his body there next to the Potomac. ]]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary is a vampire. No other proof is needed.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474814</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:05:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474814</guid><dc:creator>J.Rand</dc:creator><description>Hillary went to the wall to fight for health care. The republican army tried to destroy her and after 8 years of republicans screwing up health care, I fully trust Hillary. How stupid are americans to have a great health care system (duh) when every day more and more americans can't afford it. Bush veto's care for children because he is afraid that a middleclass family man may abuse it. Well quess what thanks to Bush and his friends the american middle class is also disappearing and going into foreclosure. That's another thing, they will bailout the banks but screw the family homeowner. Any Dem. is better then all the Repubs candidates put together.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474830</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:09:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474830</guid><dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator><description>I absolutely trust Hillary on health care. 90% of the reason people bash her is for trying to put in this way over due reform back in the 90's. This is her passion and she learned a lot from before about how the best plans for the American people can be undermined by those who govern by dollar signs and for business over people. Hillary has to be vague, otherwise these same people will swift boat her and that is the real scandal of current politics. What is right is no longer the goal. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474831</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:10:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474831</guid><dc:creator>Sara,  Cedar Rapids, Iowa</dc:creator><description> Larry:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I like Hillary quite a bit, and would be happy to have her as my president. &amp;nbsp;I'm also happy to report that my head is not up my ass. &amp;nbsp;I have doubts about yours, however, judging by the few comments I have seen from you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carrie, Eastern Iowa &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carrie, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree Larry's comments were rude, but you have stated you are an attorney. If you were opposing a motion for summary judgment that claimed Hillary was not as competent, experienced qualified etc, as Biden, Dodd or Richardson, and even Kucinich, how would you defend the claim. What would be in your &amp;quot;statement of undisputed material fact&amp;quot;. I suspect you would not be able to defend the claim with actual facts. For months no Hillary supporter has supported their claims of experience, etc, with factual information. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't expect you to provide a factual defense (i.e. Hillary sponsored this legislation, Hillary did this specific thing) of Hillary on line, but I ask you to think seriously about this before 1/3/08. If you can't provide concrete reasons why she is better than Biden, or others, than why would you caucus for her?</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474853</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:20:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474853</guid><dc:creator>JIM WHITTAKER</dc:creator><description>Hill's experience? &amp;nbsp;WHAT experience? &amp;nbsp;She was the WIFE&lt;br&gt;of a small-time governor. &amp;nbsp;She was the WIFE of a&lt;br&gt;scandal-plagued president. &amp;nbsp;Her ONLY experience in&lt;br&gt;actual government was the HIllaryCare disaster! &amp;nbsp;She&lt;br&gt;has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of note in her senate&lt;br&gt;career, except to suck up to those who can help her&lt;br&gt;advance her presidency hunger. &amp;nbsp;She has spent her&lt;br&gt;ENTIRE political life digging herself and Bill out of&lt;br&gt;self-caused scandals, and terrorizing and destroying&lt;br&gt;their political enemies. &amp;nbsp;She will NEVER unite this&lt;br&gt;country, she can't, too many people know the REAL&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;WAKE UP PEOPLE! &amp;nbsp;Do we REALLY want&lt;br&gt;four or eight more years of gridlocked government and&lt;br&gt;nonstop political infighting? &amp;nbsp;This is ALL the Clintons know how to do: Destroy their enemies...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim Whittaker&lt;br&gt;Hemet, California</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474856</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:21:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474856</guid><dc:creator>JIM WHITTAKER</dc:creator><description>Hill's experience? &amp;nbsp;WHAT experience? &amp;nbsp;She was the WIFE&lt;br&gt;of a small-time governor. &amp;nbsp;She was the WIFE of a&lt;br&gt;scandal-plagued president. &amp;nbsp;Her ONLY experience in&lt;br&gt;actual government was the HIllaryCare disaster! &amp;nbsp;She&lt;br&gt;has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of note in her senate&lt;br&gt;career, except to suck up to those who can help her&lt;br&gt;advance her presidency hunger. &amp;nbsp;She has spent her&lt;br&gt;ENTIRE political life digging herself and Bill out of&lt;br&gt;self-caused scandals, and terrorizing and destroying&lt;br&gt;their political enemies. &amp;nbsp;She will NEVER unite this&lt;br&gt;country, she can't, too many people know the REAL&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;WAKE UP PEOPLE! &amp;nbsp;Do we REALLY want&lt;br&gt;four or eight more years of gridlocked government and&lt;br&gt;nonstop political infighting? &amp;nbsp;This is ALL the Clintons know how to do: Destroy their enemies...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim Whittaker&lt;br&gt;Hemet, California</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474858</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:21:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474858</guid><dc:creator>Jane Melford, Hartford, Conn.</dc:creator><description>Thats what I'm going to do when Hillary is President. On April 15th of each year, rather then me paying my taxes, I'm calling Hillary and telling her to &amp;quot;Absorb the costs&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#474921</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:44:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:474921</guid><dc:creator>Geoff, L.A CA</dc:creator><description>Is there really a debate over trusting any politician? &amp;nbsp;Everyone &amp;quot;on the stump&amp;quot; right now will do or say anything necessary for votes...Duuhhhhh. &amp;nbsp;There in not a single candidate out there that would not step on their own mothers neck with golf shoes on if it meant one more vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pick the candidate that you distrust the least and VOTE for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least HRC is not being endorsed by pro wrestlers a la Huck!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475025</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:37:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475025</guid><dc:creator>Barbara C., Pompano Beach, FL</dc:creator><description>I am working for Hillary down here in Florida. &amp;nbsp;There...I said it! &amp;nbsp;That is NOT to mean I will not vote for Barack Obama if he is the Nominee. &amp;nbsp;I would also vote for Biden, Richardson or Dodd on the 2nd tier of Dem Candidates. &amp;nbsp; On the trust issue...I trust her but if the country does not, I will go with my country and see how it goes and get behind the Dem Candidate all of us choose.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475059</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:53:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475059</guid><dc:creator>Aud in New York</dc:creator><description>We (me and my family) trust Hillary Clinton completely. &amp;nbsp;Our trust began when Hillary made a promise to her NY constituents that she would serve her full term in the Senate and not run for President in 2004. &amp;nbsp;She kept her promise, even though every poll at that time showed her in the lead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barack Obama on the other hand, made the same promise to his Illinois constituents. &amp;nbsp;And he broke it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475107</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:10:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475107</guid><dc:creator>James,  Georgia</dc:creator><description>SD, San Diego, CA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Long post, full of superlatives, completely lacking in facts to back up a single superlative. Hillary isn't evil, the devil, etc., but if all her supporters can only talk about how wonderful she is, and not back it up with one concrete fact, it makes me wonder if they are really supporting Bill. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Clinton was great, but does anyone believe if he had died of his heart attack in 2004 that anyone would want Hillary in the WH. Face it, you support Hillary because you want Bill back. If that isn't the reason then give a reason one actual fact why Hillary would make a good, let alone great President that doesn't include Bill! </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475130</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:23:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475130</guid><dc:creator>Jack  marengo</dc:creator><description> I am voting for Hillary also. Do any of you remember the condition of this country when Bill left office. Life was good. Look what W has done. How many of you Hillary slammers voted for W?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sherrie, Nebraska &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have never voted for a Republican for President, unless you count John Anderson's (former GOP congressman from Ill.)independent bid for President in 1980. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've worked hard on all the past Democratic Presidential campaigns since 1984. I will support Hillary if she is the nominee, but Hillary not Bill will be President, and they aren't the same!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Hillary is the best for president.Trustworty and smart, you have my vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;pat j niles ohio&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey Pat, care to back up your statement regarding Hillary being the best with facts!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475138</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:25:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475138</guid><dc:creator>Robert Cadalso</dc:creator><description>Hillary's got my vote!</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475151</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:30:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475151</guid><dc:creator>Linda Collins, Escanaba MI</dc:creator><description>I am voting for Hillary also. Do any of you remember the condition of this country when Bill left office. Life was good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Life was good. Until that first plane hit. Not a good idea to ignore the warning signs for nearly a decade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, I'm voting for Hillary too, in the primary - open voting in this state. She'll be the easiest to beat in the general. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475169</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475169</guid><dc:creator>Cindy,  Altoona IA</dc:creator><description> &amp;quot;I am not sure where why there are many people that dont trust Hillary Clinton. * * *Is it because she was found to be evasive during white water hearings which most of us did not fully understand? * * * Ask if you are getting manipulated?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TS, NJ &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know why I don't trust Hillary, and why she is running the please trust me ad in Iowa. Clinton will not answer a question. Go look at John Edwards youtube video titled &amp;quot;parsing&amp;quot; Hillary was over heard in Iowa privately telling a teacher on the rope line that she would consider raising the cap on social security tax from its current level of 97,000. When asked publicly (either with a mike in hand at a forum, or at a debate) she refuses to say whether she'll consider it, and gives false numbers regarding the social security problem. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't trust a candidate who is unwilling to be honest with the voters. When you refuse to answer legitimate questions you cause distrust. That is why I don't trust Clinton. I assume she'll do the right thing if elected, but I resent having to assume a candidate will do the right thing. I believe voters have a right to know the candidates actual positions. The other Democrats are answering questions, not Hillary. When she takes them, and when they aren't planted, she rarely actually answers what she is asked. That is why Hillary has an &amp;quot;Iowa problem&amp;quot; and that is why she is trusted.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475173</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:36:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475173</guid><dc:creator>Larry L</dc:creator><description>mary Davenport &amp;quot;Look, they will vote any dog republicans to beat up Democrats.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Doesn't mean we have to follow their lead mary and vote the dog Hillary in. &amp;nbsp;People are ready for a change don't you get it!?! &amp;nbsp;Not the lesser of two evils in Hillary. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475175</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:37:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475175</guid><dc:creator>UB, Brooklyn NY</dc:creator><description>BJM and AP, &amp;nbsp;I like Obama but he cannot win White america will never vote for a black man to be president. Politicians tell you what they want you too hear and that's all of them including Hillary once they get into office they cannot do much without the senate and the congress. &amp;nbsp;So wake up america!! That is just how it is. &amp;nbsp;Why would someone bash a woman regarding her husband cheating on her. &amp;nbsp;She married him and thousands of women do it everyday they are just not in the public eye. &amp;nbsp;Leave the woman alone that's her marriage.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475182</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475182</guid><dc:creator>Joey, Cedar Rapids</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot; Is there really a debate over trusting any politician? &amp;nbsp;Everyone &amp;quot;on the stump&amp;quot; right now will do or say anything necessary for votes...Duuhhhhh. &amp;nbsp;There in not a single candidate out there that would not step on their own mothers neck with golf shoes on if it meant one more vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pick the candidate that you distrust the least and VOTE for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Geoff, L.A CA&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That isn't true, there is one politician who can be trusted. Joe Biden. He is the only candidate answering the actual questions asked at his events. Not just responding with words, but actually answering the question. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And he is the only one who has said in debates, and on the stump &amp;quot;there are some things worth losing an election over.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I'm not claiming that none of the &amp;nbsp;other candidates can be trusted, but only one answers honestly, and completely, and lets the chips fall where they may.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475297</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:18:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475297</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>Ron, I will also be voting for Hilary! &lt;br&gt;Penny Parker (Sent Monday, November 19, 2007 1:10 PM)&lt;br&gt;---------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then the both of you should stay home election day and not bother wasting your vote on a candidate no one trusts, no one likes, no one believes can unify the country, no one believes can fix the core issues our country faces both domestically and internationally...shall I go on?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're going to believe she's the right person to fix this mess, stay home. </description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475311</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:20:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475311</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>I've since seen the two ads. It's the same guy. I don't trust his story AT ALL. Why use the same man in two different ads, for two different reasons, in two different campaigns. Only the writers union is on strike. I don't recall SAG going on strike just yet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475374</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:42:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475374</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>Wow! I hadn't realized that there was so much Clinton-hating out there; that said, I'm not sure why. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think on the matter of trust, Hillary's work in public service speaks for itself. &amp;nbsp;Her measured, analytical and deliberate manner lends itself to being a leader one can trust; not distrust. &amp;nbsp;Any ambiguities that may create only means she is trying to consider all contingencies and balance all interests effectively. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must say that so much of the animosity must be because she is a woman...that I find reprehensible. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;TFOX, LUBBOCK, TX (Sent Monday, November 19, 2007 1:58 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-----------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where to start with this pile of s--t post...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is there so much Hillary-hating? Because she claims to have years upon years of public service, and the only thing ANYONE can point to are a few years in the Senate and 8 years as First Lady. Exactly what policy decisions does the First Lady get to make other than what china they will serve at functions and what ornaments to place on the Christmas Tree?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She f--ked up Bill's otherwise lofty policy goal of universal healthcare nearly single-handedly. That &amp;nbsp; f--k up gave us Newt Gingrich, the Contract with America, and 6 years of some of the most acrimonious interactions between Executive and Legislative branches all leading to the impeachment of Bill Clinton. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SHe's deliberative and calculating to a fault. This reminds myself and many others I've spoken to of Karl Rove--the mind always racing on what answer to give to dupe the American public to buy the heaping pile of manure I'm wanting to serve them so I can continue towards my goal of becoming filthy rich. She has pushed nothing through the Senate of any meaningful reach. She voted for the war and will not, unlike her opponents who also voted for it, to apologize for that vote. She continued her unapologetic view by voting to allow the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to be named a terrorist organization meaning that George Bush has carte blanche to attack Iran. She has offered no policy for fixing healthcare, the economy, education, the environment, Social Security, Iraq, our fractured alliances with most of the world, instead stating that all these need &amp;quot;bipartisan committees&amp;quot; to investigate and study the problems. The problems have been studied to death. Solve them! As President that's the job the people elected you to do. Besides, for as much mud as she's slinging at the other side, God only knows who'd be stupid enough from the Republican party to work for her without losing his or her job next time they're up for re-election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for piling on her because she's a woman? Are you out of your mind? She's gettign piled on, not because she's a woman, but because she wants the highest job in the country, if not the world, and has offered us nothing as to why she is even remotely qualified to hold it other than standing by her man when he had his dick in some other woman's mouth. In other words, it's name recognition alone and in the dangerous, fractious times we live in, that ain't gonna cut it. She either needs to live with the abuse she's taking on the road or she needs to go home.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475381</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:44:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475381</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;I find this debate over Hillary Clintons trustworthiness fascinating. &amp;nbsp;Stop wasting time, this lady has been in the public eye for the last 30 + years,&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;30 years?????? I might be young at 31, but the first I ever heard of the woman was 1991. Dunno about anyone else with the exception of those living in Arkansas prior to that.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475385</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:46:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475385</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;&amp;lt;I see the Clinton &amp;quot;haters&amp;quot; are in full force again. &lt;br&gt;I wonder how many of these &amp;quot;haters&amp;quot; trusted G.W.B. &lt;br&gt;when he ran for President. &amp;nbsp;Doubt any would admit &lt;br&gt;they trusted him then and still do today. &amp;nbsp; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Voted for Gore in 2000.&lt;br&gt;Voted for Kerry in 2004.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never trusted that smirk on Dubya's face from the first time I ever saw it. I wish someone would ahve had the cojones to knock it clean off his face a long time ago.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475772</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:45:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475772</guid><dc:creator>Kevin J, Terre Haute, IN</dc:creator><description>[[[I never trusted that smirk on Dubya's face from the first time I ever saw it. I wish someone would ahve had the cojones to knock it clean off his face a long time ago.]]]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why don't you ahve [sic] a go at it Mike? Lets see how tough you are. My bets are on George.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#475848</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:02:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:475848</guid><dc:creator>stephen powers,asheboro N.C.</dc:creator><description>hilary cliton can not be trusted-she will do any thing to be president,sell her soul to the devil.she has done ilegal stuff raising money to get elected to her office &amp;nbsp;and for president.i would not trust her to watch my grandmothers grave.she is a facade and power hungery liar.she is evil.i have heard on the news that she is hatefull to staff and putting question to people to ask her in town hall meetings.that should tell you how bad a person she is.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#476658</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:57:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:476658</guid><dc:creator>Mike Frazier</dc:creator><description>I saw something interesting and sad on the news yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some Jane Q. Citizen in a town meeting asked Obama what he would do to make the country safe from terrorist attacks, like 9/11 -- a substantive question, right? His response to was get angry and say that no one could question his patriotism. Did you get that? He didn't answer the question. He didn't give her substance. He gave her posturing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Granted, I haven't been going out of my way to watch him, but that's the first time I've seen Obama be publically dishonest -- calculatedly dishonest, pretending to answer a question while avoiding it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's too young. It's not so much the fact that he avoided the question, which is something a lot of politicians do. It's the fact that he copped an attitude while doing it. He should have come across all sage and wise, the kind of thing Sen. Lloyd Bentsen (D-Ark.) used to do. He doesn't have enough experience, and this kind of thing shows it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote Hillary in 2008.</description></item><item><title>Clinton and the trust issue</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/19/472887.aspx#479316</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:15:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:479316</guid><dc:creator>Ed Johnson</dc:creator><description>how can any one trustclinton when she changes her mind evert 20 min . all she is iterested is power. she don't give a dam about us or the USA. don't beleave? chechk her record!!</description></item></channel></rss>