<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Courtney KubeIn an extremely rare public reprimand of a four-star U.S. general, Sen. John McCain expressed "serious concerns" in his opening statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee about Gen. George Casey's nomination to be Army chief</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47574</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:49:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47574</guid><dc:creator>ex-marine,vietvet,america</dc:creator><description>I seriously question Caseys decesions in iraq, it was under Casey that things went to hell in a hand basket, although I realize Casey was hamstrung by lame duck/vice lame duck and rummy, if Casey cared about america as much as his career he would have said somethig.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47579</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:53:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47579</guid><dc:creator>Scott Kimball III, Victoria, Texas</dc:creator><description>It's kind of wierd that McCain supports Bush's policy but criticizes Casey's execution, and accepts Bush's falsehoods but blasts Casey for repeating them.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47602</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47602</guid><dc:creator>catwoman, Chico, CA</dc:creator><description>Now that's the pot calling the kettle black</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47641</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:33:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47641</guid><dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator><description>Doesn't this count as "blaming the troops"? A General is not a civilian...</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47642</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:34:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47642</guid><dc:creator>Nancy Bush, Aiken, SC</dc:creator><description>This guy has already proven that he's congenitally unable to just keep his mouth shut--
This election cycle's new John Kerry--
Enough of these perennial candidates!</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47648</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:39:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47648</guid><dc:creator>Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa</dc:creator><description>You don't get four stars by telling the President what he doesn't want to hear.  That is the Legislative Branch's job.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47729</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:30:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47729</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>Maybe McCain is providing cover for Casey to blame it all on Bush. Maybe Casey is going to come back and tell the senate that the President's office ordered him to lie...the plot thickens.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47742</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:39:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47742</guid><dc:creator>Robert Stelling, Chandler, AZ</dc:creator><description>If the Joint Chiefs of Staff are nothing more that Title X Motherf------s, as described by General Tommy Franks?  Who cares who is named to that Postition?  What we need to do is revisit the Goldwater-Nichols Act as has been suggested by many General officers, including the retiring Commander of NATO. </description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47762</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:50:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47762</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, The Peanut Gallery</dc:creator><description>After what happened to Gen. Shinseki it's no wonder that Casey turned cheerleader for this administration.  Generals may not be civilians but the military is a viable career option and once it became clear that this administration would hang any dissenters out to dry -and Shinseki's great sin was only that he felt they needed more troops, not actual opposition to the Iraq blunder- it became a good career move to swallow doubts and get in line.  Sen. McCain, on the other hand, has no excuse for cheerleading this administration.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47782</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:05:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47782</guid><dc:creator>Mike Ivy</dc:creator><description>He's no Shinseki.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47790</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:14:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47790</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, NW Iowa</dc:creator><description>A general is not a civilian, but neither is a general properly fit in with the broad label of "troops"...particularly when that general is essentially in charge of the whole operation.  One would think that you would want someone in that position who would speak candidly and honestly about the situation, building upon decades of service to make realistic assessments of what is actually going on.  But that is not the way of things in this Administration.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47844</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47844</guid><dc:creator>Seattle Sue</dc:creator><description>John McCain====One more flip-flop.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#47876</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:30:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:47876</guid><dc:creator>Brian, Cedar Hill, TX</dc:creator><description>What the hell side of the fence is this Bush brown nosing lackey McCain on? Talk about flip-flop, isn't this flip-flop-flip, tah-dah? He's becoming quite a gymnast lately.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#48033</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:45:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:48033</guid><dc:creator>catwoman, Salem, OR</dc:creator><description>Maybe McCain'n not appearing to know whether he's coming or going has something to do with his age.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#48083</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:04:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:48083</guid><dc:creator>Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa</dc:creator><description>catwoman.  Maybe you could give him one of your lives, y'know, for the sake of the country.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#48379</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:48379</guid><dc:creator>Charles Swanson, Sierra Vista, AZ</dc:creator><description>The only way to register their concerns, not with words like McCain and others, but with their VOTE to NOT approve of his nomination as USA Chief of Staff.  That is the ONLY WAY to get the attention of the administration (but it won't happen - something to do with spines).  I am a 24-year retired vet and a life-long Republican.

</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#48402</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:34:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:48402</guid><dc:creator>beverdambob</dc:creator><description>Does anybody know the answer to this question? At some point in time, didn't McCain have to vote on the approval of Casey to his command? kind of weird if he did, then attacks him for it. Seems he would then have to blame himself for his vote. Oh, excuse me, I forgot the republicans never take the blame for anything that goes wrong, must have been Bill &amp; Hillary's fault.</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#593969</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:29:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:593969</guid><dc:creator>tom                 tecumseh, MI.</dc:creator><description>for the x-marine-vietnam vet. Don't you know there is&lt;br&gt;no such thing as an x-marine? unless of course you&lt;br&gt;may have a questionable discharge? I spent time in the Air Force and the only way you should call your-&lt;br&gt;self an x-something is if you've a questionable dis-&lt;br&gt;charge. STand up and be proud of having been one of&lt;br&gt;the proud and the few that are able to call themselves marines. Marine! Now carry on! Now as for&lt;br&gt;Casey's clusterflops.....</description></item><item><title>McCain concerned over Casey</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/01/47548.aspx#593980</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:32:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:593980</guid><dc:creator>tom                 tecumseh, MI.</dc:creator><description>for beverdambob. Of course it was clinton's fault.&lt;br&gt;and all the rest of the demokrats also!</description></item></channel></rss>