Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Dan, Cleveland, OH — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:55:34 GMT

Chuck Todd can't be serious. This shows your bias to Huckabee. Most conservatives are saying Romney won. Matthews was right, liberals in the media love big government Huckabee.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jan Toledo OH — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:03:12 GMT

I listened to you on Morning Joe this morning discussing the credibility of the media and how the American people distrust the coverage. I have become very distrustful lately because of the bias of the media. Issues aren't discussed. Polls are used that are outside the the norm. For example, the Zogby poll. I follow pollster.com so that I know that this poll was not indicative of the race, however, most people aren't that interested and if you believe the news media, you do not get the correct picture. Chris Matthews and Tucker Carlson spend almost their entire show bashing a certain candidate. All we hear is about the horse race. I feel that the news media is selecting our candidates. In a 24 hour news cycle, there should be time to discuss the issues from all candidates - not just a few. There is no in- depth coverage regardless whether it is CNN, MSNBC or Fox.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jan, Nashua, NH — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:19:59 GMT

I admit I didn't watch the debates. But what's with the whining about the questions.

Republicans can't be asked hard question about abortion??? They're the ones who want to change the law! Except for Republicans, there would be NO controversy over abortion whatsoever, because the majority of Americans support the law as it stands this minute.

As far as the gay general, I also don't understand the problem. REPUBLICANS are the ones who have a problem with gays in the military. Why shouldn't they have to answer a question from a decorated general about the issue?
Also, guns. It's Republicans who think we're all trying to take their HUNTING rifles away when we say the word ASSAULT rifles. If it wasn't for Republicans, I don't think we'd have a controversy over guns whatsoever either.

Personally, I'd rather hear from them about one of the major issues on the minds of Americans -- health care. But none of them have a health care plan they are able to articulate, so they probably didn't want any questions on that either.

Maybe they were better off when they just outright refused to have that debate with the black folk and the relatives of undocumented workers lured into our country to pick strawberries for pennies.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Adam Riveiro, Tampa FL — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:40:13 GMT

Huckabee was the obvious winner of the debate. He was head and shoulders above the rest. What happened to Romney? I thought he was supposed to carry the mantle of Ronald Regan? How many questions did he ACTUALLY answer? Also, take another look at his answer about what guns he owned. Talk about awkward!

Huck can go the distance, bottom line.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Doug Douglas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:52:44 GMT

Concerning Mitt Romney's disrespect for our flag, noone in South Carolina who takes pride in our heritage will vote for him.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Doug Douglas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:54:31 GMT

Why was there no questions on health care? Do the republicans not care about our health or is it because all those at CNN have adequate health care?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Brenda Bradley Linden Mi — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:59:23 GMT

They didn't come to debate questions asked by responsible Americans...they came with their one liners to get a laugh. Except for Paul and sometimes McCain no one answered the questions that were being asked.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Amy B Portland, Me — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:05:06 GMT

Mike Huckabee would be a shoe-in, if we were interviewing candidates for a manager's position at Applebees.'

None of the Republicans look presidential to me. None have the vision to lead the people. Bunch of wanna-be CEO's of corporate America, (except Ron Paul, whose presence just serves to highlight the lack of original thinking in the top tier candidates.)

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

modernwoman, Anytown,USA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:19:12 GMT

Hmmn.....this was the first Repub debate I had the stomach to watch. Even though I felt quite ill after. The questions about guns, the bible and abortion were absolutely off the wall. Of course, the worst part of the evening was when that poor retired general got up to make a speech and they cut off his microphone. Mistake? I doubt it. I liked Huckabee and McCain, although I have to admit I have serious disagreements with many of their policies. The rest are just a bunch of NUTS!!!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Anyone but Hillary, IN — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:20:04 GMT

Do any of you really believe that Mitt Romney OR Rudy Giuliani sound intelligent and presidential? There was no detailed talk on Iran, Iraq, Israel/Palestine, Russia, education, the economy, etc. All I saw were a bunch of hackneyed bumper stickers standing in front of podiums.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Rick, WS, NC — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:22:29 GMT

I hope they nominate hucksterbee...wait until the rest of america gets a load of his plans to convert this to a christian nation or else...he'll pull 30% in the general

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Lex — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:24:46 GMT

Romney and Giuliani were both lying through their teeth, both had the largest sanctuary cities in the country. Huckabee has the highest record of tax hikes in his home state (over 1/2 a billion) and supported amnesty he's a liar to, no wonder he was under investigation for ethics violations.

McCain reminds of Bush, with his blind denials he's completely unelectable

The only one I was impressed with last night was Ron Paul. He did a wonderful job and was so compassionate!

He's the only one that I feel truly cares about the American people

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

modernwoman, Anytown,USA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:26:38 GMT

If it were a Huckabee/McCain ticket, it would remind me some of GW & Cheney, except that Huckabee isn't an idiot & McCain is no tyrant. Hey, and Chuck Norris likes Huckabee!! And I don't care what any of you jerks out there say, I like Chuck Norris!!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:36:35 GMT

The Republicans are a "joke". Thanks G.W. !

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mitt — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:37:49 GMT

Go back to sleep Fred, there will not be another debate until a couple of weeks.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Giuliani — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:39:00 GMT

I want to know who's paying for last nights bar bill ?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

F. Thompson — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:40:51 GMT

Hey honey, please make sure to pack some warm cloths for the National Convention in Minneapolis/St. Paul.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Larry Craig — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:43:17 GMT

Memo to all Republican Candidates; When you arrive at the airport in Minneapolis this Summer for the National Convention.Please do not use the "mens" bathroom on ramp D2.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mary Meadows — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:52:37 GMT

It's never to late to come over to our side. It's easy, just go to hillaryclinton.com. "we'll keep it our secreat".

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ryan Bauermeister, Colorado Springs, CO — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:11:54 GMT

Absolutely right Mr. Todd. Huckabee did win, I believe by a wide margin. Romney looked so confused, especially on the question, "Do you believe every word in this book (The Bible)? Also, Romney cannot be taken seriously about abortion no matter what he says or does because of his pro-life stance in MA that helped him become governor. Fred Thompson showed that video of a younger Romney talking about how he is pro-life, yet Romeny says he.... changed. Please. I did like the exchanges between McCain and Paul too. I think McCain definitely won the battle between the two and I wish that if McCain doesn't win the nomination, then if a republican end up winning next November, they name McCain as either Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense (Only if Gates doesn't want it again, Gates is GREAT at what he is doing). As a young man (27) in this great country, many people I speak to say the same thing - If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, they will vote for him. If Hillary wins, then it really doesn't matter who wins the GOP nominaton because that's who they will vote for, be it Romney, McCain, Huckabee, or Rudy. Anything to have this monarchy of Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton stopped.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Tappy McWidestance, Minneapolis, Mn. — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:13:04 GMT

The continual channeling of Ronald Reagan's spirit is hysterical to watch. Reagan was a mediocre actor, a passable governor and a terrible President. All the Republican candidates claim to be like Reagan while their predominate policies line up with President Bush the Lessor.

While this may work with the sheeple in the Republican primary, they will get crushed in the national election when they have to talk more about their policy beliefs and the independents realize they all really want to be George the III.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Marcus, Chicago — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:17:55 GMT

Huckabee's joke response to the reiteration of the question of Jesus and the death penalty was offensive. The man is spending time and money in Iowa with commercials that stress how his interpretation of Christianity is his guiding principle, but when he was asked to explain the rationale that allows him to support something that other Christian leaders DON'T support based on theological standards, he throws up a one-liner and avoids the question.

He's not a serious man. If the GOP lineup wasn't as weak as it is (and if Rove hadn't been so successful at fostering a fundy al Sadr-esque wing of the party), there's no way he'd be getting any traction at all. McCain, meanwhile, has gravitas and a record to run on. Let's hope that the sniping at the top results in strengthening of McCain's position in the field. Put him up against Obama next fall, and it makes the race much more competitive for the 40% of us in the middle of the political spectrum.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:18:54 GMT

This was not a debate it was the Swarmy/fake smile Romney, Gigolo Rudy, Golly I am nice/funny warm kind of guy minister,and the not ready for prime time second rate neo-cons( Hunter and Trancredo) show. Angry McCain and a totally lost Thompson along for the ride. Paul is the standout in this group of scary panderers;however; essentially ignored.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Chris — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:22:00 GMT

I've noticed (like everyone else) that Huckabee has been rising in the polls. It seems like the media actually believes he has the opportunity to win now.

Huckabee is just a regular guy with an incredible message. I checked out:

www.mikehuckabee.com
and
www.hucksarmy.com

and got some good info. I didn't know that Huckabee was a supporter of the fair tax...kinda cool.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Chris, Buckhannon, WV — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:22:31 GMT

I don't think many conservatives tuned in to see if Anderson Cooper and CNN would give them a fair shake.

Maybe the spineless Democratic candidates were onto something when they refused to debate on FOX. If they are afraid to try to win an ongoing war, they certainly couldn't take the kind of questioning Chris Wallace gave Fred Thompson Sunday.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

HP, Exeter, NH — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:23:32 GMT

Oh Yes! Big night for Huckabee. On her way to the bank, Hillary is going to steam roll over him and the rest of the Republicans over his stupid comment. What are you guys thinking? Is Huckabee paying the media somehow, to present dumb, moronic comments as a good performance. OK Mike I gotit! It was suppose to be a joke. Nobody is laughing........clean it up.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Patty Morlan, Louisville, KY — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:23:51 GMT

My favortie part of the debate was when the undecided voter picked John Edwards over the Republican candidates! It was great!

I thought the CNN Republican debate was as bad as the last one they did for Democrats. Allowing the audience to interfere with the debate was totally out of bounds. I also thought the questions that were picked were silly.

I hope CNN never stages another debate (and I do mean stages). The whole event had a circus like atmosphere.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

raf — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:29:35 GMT

If Jesus was so smart as to keep religion and politics separate, why can't Mike do the same?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

mikeeg,abdn,wa — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:30:23 GMT

the real question is how bad are the PACKERS gonna kick dallas *ss tonite?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Dot, Illinois — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:32:19 GMT

Does anybody ever do a poll or other type of questionaire on the effectiveness of TV debates? I would be interested to know if any voters actually change their minds based upon responses from the candidates to debate questions.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Rick Edmond — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:36:34 GMT

Spot on about Huckabee. I am a life-long-never-ever-voted-for-a-Republican-for-even-dogcatcher Democrat. But I think I am going his website and send him $25. He is a conservative that is not mean. I am a Fifty-something year-old African American who like most AAs tend to be conservative on social issues. We however tend to reject Republicans because they generally dont care "about the least of these". Huckabee appears to be different. If all Republicans were like him I might be in the party of Abe Lincoln. He and Obama are surging in Iowa because of their transparency. While the true politicians, Romney and Hillary, are falling cause can't you trust anything they say.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ron Sposato, Tucson, Az — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:39:44 GMT

I disagree..... Huckabee's performance was NOT inspired, or even credible.

He delivered nothing.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Steve C. — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:40:40 GMT

Agreed. Huckabee added depth to the package tonight. I have always felt you can't win elections in debates, but you can lose them. Guiliani did himself more damage, particularly with clumsy answers to gun control questions that are sure to show up in opponents ads soon. Look for Huckabee and Romney to fashion a ticket in the end...just have to work out who's on top..

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

jerry/corpus christi texas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:43:07 GMT

Huckabee did look good last night

The candidates probably weren't happy that CNN chose to linger on the retired general who asked about gays in the military.

And bad enough he was a plant from Hillary Clinton.
I have to take my hat off to her though; she will burn her bridges to win the White House and BBQ her husband over the ashes.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mabel — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:45:06 GMT

Chuck...you nailed it. Huckabee was the clear winner last night. People are tired of the kind of fighting we saw betwen Rudy/Romney/Thompson. Political dogfights are entertaining, but nothing is getting accomplished except attacks and counter-attacks. This country needs to change some things, but all Wash can do is fight. Have you noticed Huckabee's demeanor? He does not engage in the kind jugular attacks we saw last night (Romney/Guilini/Thompson)...he's diplomatic, he's presidential, he tempers his answers, but he gets his point across in a manner that is disarms his enemies. Huckabee CAN work with both parties and he CAN get something done! He's the most articulate and smartest speaker in either party. He's the republicans only hope to beat Hillary. You're going to see his poll numbers rise even more after this. He's definitely on the way to the nomination.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Nick1970 — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:59:33 GMT

Great debate! Fortunately, most Republicans could see through the bias on many of the questions. Giving the general the microphone for 4 minutes to make a statement instead of asking a question was clearly planted. My take: 1. Huckabee. 2. McCain. Rudy is who he is, but not for me. Romney had too much of the new car smell (plastic). Thompson can't debate. Rest of the field insignificant.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

bio mom, Wilmington, DE — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:04:53 GMT

You probably already know this and it should be included in your article. That gay general was associated with the Hillary Clinton campaign. Anderson Cooper apologized for using him in the debate, claiming CNN did not know. I will give them the benefit of the doubt about that.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jeremey, Indianapolis, IN — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:07:40 GMT

Dan, are you serious? Huckabee has won or came in second in EVERY debate. As a conservative, let me tell you, not only did Romney NOT win, he was extremely dissapointing, as someone who hasn't picked sides yet... Huckabee really spurred me to move, not any of the others, except Paul who spurred me to move to the bathroom to puke...

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

newagegop — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:09:00 GMT

I'm a Fred head and I promise you Huckabee dominated. To anyone but the most devote conservative what Huck said sounded a lot better than the rest. If he could convice fiscal cons (and a no tax pledge helped), I could easily see him winning. The man is smooth as butter.

Huckabee/Mike Steele 08 would win by a landslide. They'd get more minority votes than any republican since Lincoln.

If Fred could speak like Huck, you would have a new Reagan.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jose Alemar — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:45:48 GMT

One thing for sure the Republican debate now, more than ever made possible the transfer of undecided and an avalanch of new voters to the democrats. Each of the issue was a sure win-win for the democrats.
To my view the Republican presidential wan-a- be are lost in their own mini world.
Issues hlping democrats:
Immigrants: All immigrants have relatives, friends or are inteconnected (more voters for Dems. I know, becuase I am up to date with the Hispanics/latinos way of thinking
Abortion: Women rights violation: More votes for Dems.
Iraq: Family and friends not happy with the war and killing votes for Dems.
Religion: The majority of followers are finding out that they been used by Republicans, especially the religios Mid class and those that represent the majority of religion followers.
TAx Issues: The majority of the hard working American already know who is been receiving the benfits and they wiil show a support for the Democrats whom they beleive represent them better.
Pick any issue and you will see that the shift is on the run to democrats.
On the other hands the debate shows that and is apparent that the presidents want-a- be don't have any real social issues that could improve the existing conditions in which this administration has driven this nation to be.
For sure there will be anew sheriff in town in 2009

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jose Alemar — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:54:22 GMT

I wonder, my dear friens, what is the todays definition of (conservatives) Do they really exists or there is a use of a prostituited issue. For what I see The radical right wing took over not only the Repoblican Party but the good old conservatives. We could say that the republican today is concentrated in an extreeeeeeeme elite with fascist and totalitarian impliications.
The truth is that if we care about our America we need to over take ther ight wing and tream thier wings very short

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Michael, lancaster, PA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:55:01 GMT

I think McCain deciding to attack Ron Paul, and Huckabee taking his no IRS platform shows the effect Ron Paul is having on the campaign. Even though he only got 7 minutes Ron Paul spouted more factual intelligent info than any other candidate and didn't need to resort to "poo-slinging". I think that people will be surprised when they see which candidate inspires people to actually vote.
"No war can stop an idea whose time has come."

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ken, Hamilton, NJ — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:58:00 GMT

As always Ron Paul did win this debate simply because of being honest and the only real candidate with an honest agenda. Everybody else was there to trash him including the media. So shameful. He deserved better. Nevertheless, he was the winner in my opinion.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

mark l. , tn — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:58:38 GMT

If any of these guys wants to win the primary, they need to become a Bush loyalist, quick.

While Bush's approval rating is low, among the gop primary voters, it remains incredibly strong.

Rudy's acceptance by the gop voters largely stems from his close association with bush, post 9/11.

McCain's problem: his message on Iraq is "It's rumsfeld's fault." This is a strange assault on Bush, as it comes accross as Bush-bashing by proxy. When rumsfeld left, his approval rating may have been low, but the same people who supported Bush, also supported rummy.

Huckabee is risng in Iowa, but is running fifth in NH. He has 5 days, if and after winning Iowa, to stop the disaster in NH.

Things go in reverse for Romney-a decent showing, but failing to win in Iowa will draw attention to him, and then he can make the mini-'comeback-kid' if he goes on to win in NH.

20% undecided? I think they are split between Thompson and McCain...both huge figures in the gop and well known by party members but Mccain's criticsim of Bush policy, by attacking rumsfeld is a losing recipe.

Fred? He looks older. You see law and order episodes, and he looks great, and then you see him on tv and he looks like he could make it thru half of his first term. I don't doubt his credentials, but the guy makes mcain look young.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Barbara B, Greensboro, NC — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:03:51 GMT

Huckabee clearly WON that debate last night. Romney and Rudy couldn't say where they stood on basically anything! But.......WHY, with polls now in Iowa and Florida saying Huckabee is in the lead does the media CONTINUE to assign him as a "VP" candidate? It just blows my mind!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Matt, Silver Spring, MD — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:11:29 GMT

I can't believe any honest observer would declare Romney the winner of this debate. His answers seemed either woefully unprepared or over-rehearsed. He was obviously scared-stiff when answering the bible question, afraid it would expose him as - GASP a Mormon! And his deer in the headlights expression after the Thompson attack ad was priceless. He seems to say whatever he thinks will be necessary to win an election.

The vast majority of online and telephone "flash" polls put Huckabee in first place (or 2nd after RP thanks to the dozen web-savvy maniacs who pump RP in every online poll).

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ron, Silverthorne, CO — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:14:00 GMT

To Jan in Nashua, NH....

Turns out CNN was taking questions from people involved in Edwards' and Clinton's campaigns. Where do I start?

First, why would these people want to hear the Republicans' answers to their questions? They won't be voting in any Republican primary. It's not like they were honestly trying to decide which candidate to vote for. Clearly they were trying to make candidates look bad and/or generate a quote that could be used in the general election.

Second, there is a certain irony surrounding your point about the campaigns complaining about tough questions. Your side of the aisle wouldn't even show up on FOX because they were affraid they wouldn't get thrown the normal debate softballs they're used to (aside from Tim Russert - and boy did we hear the Clinton campaign whine).

Third, you point to several issues where there is active debate within the Republican Party. Debate is a good thing. The Democratic Party requires strict adherence to its doctrines, which will be its ultimate un-doing - Intellectual Stagnation. Try being a pro-life Democrat. You won't last long.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mike, Denver, CO — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:14:40 GMT

I tried to watch the debate on CNN but it was painfully obvious to me that the whole thing was set up by liberal Democrat producers who selected questions THEY have of conservative Republicans. It was inappropriate for a Republican primary debate. It would have been inappropriate in a general election debate if all of those questions were the only ones asked. The questions would be appropriate at a breakout session at the DailyKos convention titled "understanding conservatives", where the presenters and the attendees alike have a preconceived picture of conservatives to ratify in their heads.

And then I wake up this morning to Michelle Malkin's information that at least four of the questioners were not even Republicans, they were declared, public supporters of Edwards, Obama and Clinton. And one of the showcase questions CNN devoted the greatest time to and followed up from the audience was from a Clinton steering committee member.

Now I know why the Democrats refuse to do a debate on FOX: the think that FOX would be as biased and underhanded against them as they know CNN is for them. Kind of like the serial cheater accusing his wife of cheating when she notices another man's glance because he knows he finds a way to get the number when a women glances at him. It's called projection of their own bad behavior. Never mind that FOX wouldn't stoop to that level of unrelenting bias, since they know CNN does (and did spectacularly last night).

Last night's debate was simply not informative to me as a Republican. The issues were not the ones I cared to learn about, they were trivial and trite. They were issues that only people with caricatures of Republicans would find important. Last night's debate served only to highlight just how biased CNN and the mainstream media are, and to what lengths they'll go to coronate the Democrat this cycle. Planting nothing but Democrat hacks as "ordinary Republican questioners" convicts them of the charges leveled.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

sally-- jefferson iowa — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:16:15 GMT

To me, Huckabee is the only choice. No one else came close. And, if he gets the nomination..we won't have a mud sling fest... I doubt he has much mud on his boots. For once, in politics, that will be a welcome change.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:23:37 GMT

Huckabee may be very well spoken and articulate;however; do all you who are even considering voting for a baptist minister truly believe he will be elected? Are you kidding me? Our founding fathers would be rolling in their graves. We are suppose to be a secular nation and not a president who believes that life began 6,000 years ago, outlaw all abortions, and some kind of force re-education camps for gays because it is a choice. If I wake-up on 11/4/08 Huckabee and/or Romney is President I am heading North to Canada.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

A Stoner — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:27:57 GMT

I really love Jan, Nashua, NH response.

Lets see, if liberal (read lunatic democrat appointed supreme court justices) had not gone far far away from the constitution in finding Roe v Wade there would be a state by state debate about abortion, as it should be. You want Constitutional rights not already in the Constitution, AMEND IT.

Gays in the military. Nice question, don't care about it. What I do find disturbing is the significant number of questions that were fielded to the Republican PRIMARY candidates by self professed Democrats. This is a REPUBLICAN primary and REPUBLICAN concerns need to be the ones addressed.

Second Amendment rights. Once again, we have to go back to the Constitution. What does it say? It says that we need to protect ourselves from who? From Government. The last Supreme court decision on the matter found that it pertained to individual manned, operated and fielded weapons which would include assault riffles as LEGAL. Is the weapon something that the military would issue to a single individual? In the case of assualt riffles, the answer is yes. Is the weapon commonly used in the military, once again the answer is yes. Of course, we have a new ruling coming up before the next election. The finale thing about the second amendment is that it is a right that is inalienable and is intended to prevent the government from abusing the power entrusted to it from the people which is where the power comes from.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Steve, Marietta, GA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:32:16 GMT

Having watched last night's debate, I now know how each candidate would, as president, make the tough choices:

Giuliani: I'll decide based on what I did in New York.
McCain: I'll decide based on experience.
Romney: I'll pass and let someone else decide.
Thompson: I'll let you know when I decide.
Huckabee: I'll decide based on principle.
Paul: I'll bring the troops home and then decide.
Tancredo: I won't let illegal aliens decide.
Hunter: I'll build a wall and then decide.

Contrast these approaches with that of Hillary Clinton: "I'll have my people conduct an opinion poll and then decide."

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ron B., Minot, North Dakota — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:35:51 GMT

Kudos to Chuck Todd for acknowledging what everyone in the heartland saw: Huckabee won this debate hands down.

I think most commentators on NRO, etc. are too inside-the-beltway, too northeastern to understand this.

Rommey was awful. I wanted to like the guy, but his answers to the gun & bible questions made everyone in my family cringe. It made him look a like a phony.

Guiliani's charges against Romney made him look small. McCain's answer on torture made him look soft on terrorism. Paul, Hunter and Tancredo are uninteresting to me.

I was a Fred Thompson supporter, then a Romney supporter, but after this debate I am changing to Huckabee. Fred is just to tired-looking. No energy. I was hesitant to support Huckabee due some questions about his fiscal conservatism but friends of mine in Arkansas has laid these concerns to rest. And Huckabee has more charisma and warmth than all the rest of the candidates put together.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Greg, Chattanooga TN — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:00:05 GMT

Juan, enjoy Canada.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

jerry/corpus christi texas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:01:16 GMT

If I wake-up on 11/4/08 Huckabee and/or Romney is President I am heading North to Canada.

juan,ft lauderdale,fl (Sent Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:23 AM)

Just remember Juan......
A doctor's visit in Canada can take up to 6 months...

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

jerry/corpus christi texas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:03:44 GMT

Someone brought up an interesting question at the party I was at last night........

If an Officer man/woman and a enlisted woman/man are having an affair, they can kick them out....

But it begs the question...

If the officer and the enlisted gay people are having an affair, doesn't that fall under don't ask/don't tell?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Julie--Orange County, CA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:04:01 GMT

I was disappointed by the inequality regarding the amount of time and number of questions each candidate received...I wanted to hear more from Ron Paul, who answered very articulately whenever given the opportunity, which wasn't often at all! I also noticed that his video was presented at the very end of the program. I too noticed others picking up on RPs ideas, such as abolishing the IRS and focusing on states' rights. I gotta say--Ron Paul has a message that resonates with me, and evidently with a lotta other people!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jose alemar — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:13:36 GMT

To: Steve Marrietta;
I beleive your paragrph makes a lot of sense. You are on the right track.All of them were in the same track; I did that it was I,I,I,I,I,. What a shame that none of them say anything about the real issues.
COMMENTS: Check the diversity on the Democrats side.
Black,Female And anglo. That is the real thing, When you look at the Republican you se an elite that could care about the socail pains that our nation is in.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Robyn van Eck, Dallas, Texas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:22:20 GMT

Great analysis! CNN's commentators were just as biased as their moderator - they tried to make it look like all the republicans did badly. I'm glad to hear someone out there with an objective eye/ear.

By the way, in a primary shouldn't a debate center on questions the primary's voters are thinking about? I understand that CNN and YouTube really want to grill these guys, but no one who thinks abortion is a great idea is going to be voting in this primary!! For any republican voters who haven't seen it yet - watch the Values Voters debate online from a few months ago. The questioners there asked the questions that you are wanting asked - it was great!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Drew, Cedar Falls IA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:27:32 GMT

i don't see how a genuine god fearing man in Mike Huckabee can be called fake and unreal. He clearly won and is the most genuine candidate. Mitt Romney is tied to a religion that has a bad name due to polygamy and other questionable ideas. Huckabee is the man to continue the dream of America when the pilgrims came over for religious freedom. He will treat the people fairly and he will get the job done in presidency like he did in arkansas with a largely democratic congress

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

e. denny, san jose ca — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:35:30 GMT

If I wake-up on 11/4/08 Huckabee and/or Romney is President I am heading North to Canada.

juan,ft lauderdale,fl (Sent Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:23 AM)

Two things. Bring heavy socks. Also, could you stop by and pick up Sean Penn and take him with you?

Many thanks.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Brian Farmer, Appleton, Wisconsin — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:41:42 GMT

Reasons to beware of Mike Huckabee:
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin411.htm
and
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin414.htm

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Curtis, Udall, KS — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:48:46 GMT

Juan - give my regards to Prime Minister Harper

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Joe, Indianapolis, Indiana — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:49:24 GMT

Come on! Huckabee is the Howard Dean of 03' and when it gets to be about 10 days away from the Iowa Caucus...just watch how he will drop in the polls. National Security and Immigration are the two big issues and Huckabee (although he sounds tougher on illegal immigration now) has NO National Security creds...and we need them now more than ever.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Tadpole, Udall, KS — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:56:55 GMT

Please please please... when checking out Mike Huckabee and the charges leveled against him consider the context.

http://therepublicanevaluator.blogspot.com/

Gov Huckabee is not the 'perfect' candidate, but he sure as heck is a lot more of what this country needs right now than any of the other candidates.

For all of you that think that Romney won (including Bill Bennett) - get real, he was tripped up on a number of occasions and got into a petty argument with Rudy where all he could do is repeat himself and even after demanding an answer didn't get one.

Huckabee is the class of the field right now - and there is nothing to indicate he is interested in a christian theocracy (it didn't happen in Arkansas did it?). If you don't like his positions, fine - but at least be honest about what he is about.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Benny living in South Dakota — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:16:32 GMT

Huckabee is surging in Iowa because the religious conservatives are beginning to think about voting their heart instead of just trying to defeat Hillary. I worry that the next time we have a huge national catastrophe with President Huckabee, the policy will be to just leave it in God's hands. Plays well, but no accountability.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

MJ, Missoula, MT — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:17:54 GMT

Huckabee was articulate, sincere, and convincing even though he is the candidate least in line with my views. Romney sounded like a used car salesman and he might be toast after last night's preformance. The debate was a “push” for the other candidates.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Richard C., Yorktown, VA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:44:43 GMT

Juan,
Our founding fathers did not consider being a man of faith as a disqualifying trait for national leadership. This is the same issue JFK had to contend with 48 years ago. I thought we had gotten over that. Huckabee's and Romney's values are just that, their values, not an agenda for how they want to reprogram the US to their beliefs. Rather than attack them because of their faith, go to their web sites and read about the issues they care about and what they would do about them. If you agree with them, vote for them. If not, vote for someone else. But it is really ignorant to display such histeria over a man of faith changing the US from a secular nation.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Daniel Thomas — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:47:10 GMT

I thought Huckabee was the winner of the debate. Romney was just looking to say whatever the thought people wanted to hear. The "time is not now" for gays in the military or "the time has not yet come" for a ban on abortion. Take a stance, Mitt!

I disliked seeing the candidates smirk at Ron Paul each time he was given a chance to answer. Too bad that the Constitution is that much of a joke. Remember the 10th amendment?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ginger Wood Mena, Ar — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:48:13 GMT

Relax, Huckabee was not upset about some of the lame questions in the debate and he answers the really important ones on his web site at Mikehuckabee.com.
Come on over and meet the next president of our United States!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Phil, Arlington, VA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:48:51 GMT

Huckabee did not win that debate. Romney smacked down Giuliani on sanctuaries and then turned around and smacked Huckabee down on state tuition for illegal immigrants. Romney took this round hands down. Well, unless you count Ron Paul who always wins because he actually answers questions and has something interesting to say.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

bio mom, Wilmington, DE — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:00:34 GMT

I agree 100% with Mike in Denver. Those of you saying where were the topics of importance to people, like education and healthcare, forget that the questions asked were chosen by CNN. The candidates had to answer what was asked. Out of 5000 submitted. So, we are to believe no one asked about the "surge" in Iraq and the prospect of victory there? No one asked about Pakistan, or Iran, or Al Queda? Are you kidding??? These are the number one issues to Republican voters, along with immigration and the economy. CNN stacked the deck with questions to present their idea of what Republicans think is important, not what they actually think is important. By the way all of you Democrats and lefties posting here, Republicans are also mothers, fathers, grandparents, etc. We care about health care, education, etc. too. We just have a different philosophy about solving the problems than you do. Why can you not engage in reasonable discussions about these things instead of casting insults and cheap shots at people?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Josh, Jeffersonville, IN — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:04:53 GMT

Huckabee definitely won the debate and would have recieved more attention had he been asked more questions. It seems Mitt and Rudy were getting all of the limelight. Mitt looked like a Ken doll with all of his answers being rehearsed, off the cuff Romney looks awkward and insincere.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

REO, North Carolina — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:07:20 GMT

No Juan. We are not supposed to be a secular nation. The idea you are referring to is the prohibition of the establishment of an official religion of the state. All of the founding fathers believed in the Bible in much the way Huckabee explained his understanding of it last night and on a regular basis not only looked to it for guidance, but referred to God's divine hand in many of the fouding documents:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Etc.
Just as you have the God given right to change the channel, you have the right to ignore God. The Founders wanted to ensure you could do that by not having an official religion, so each could practice his own way. But in no uncertain terms did any of them EVER indicate that they felt we should become a secular nation.

Have fun in the Great White North.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Cole Skinner, Los Angeles, CA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:08:48 GMT

Romney won the debate? Are you kidding? I agree with Nick and Matt - Romney is all 'new car smell' and has no idea what he actually thinks about anything. Just because Romney 'looks presidential', i.e. tall with a pretty set of teeth, doesn't mean he'll make a good president.
On almost every question, you can almost see Romney trying to figure out how he's going to wrangle a politically expedient answer. He's a political animal in much the same way as Clinton.
And another thing bothers me about Romney, and that's the idea that you can have a strong faith in God but that your faith won't enter into your politics. Huh? Look, if you believe in God, any version of God, and even bother going to church or temple or whatever, how could you possibly say that you wouldn't seriously consider the tenants of the source of all that is good and wise in the universe when you're making your decisions? Ridiculous. You're either lying about your faith or lying about your decision-making process. Whether Christian or Muslim or Buddhist, I'd like to think that someone in a leadership role believes in a higher authority that they're answerable to. The rest of us just need to figure out if we agree with their interpretation of what God wants from us (i.e. there are surely Muslims whose faith mirrors closely the values that Christians have, and there are obviously Muslims whose interpretations of their faith are reprehensible to us.)
And to Juan in Ft. Lauderdale: Enforcing the laws that protect personal freedom, freedom of religion, and believing in everyone's right to make decisions for themselves is NOT in conflict with Christianity, save perhaps the issue of abortion - but you have to appreciate that some people believe that abortion is murder - they may be wrong, or partly wrong, but it doesn't make them evil. If you believed that legalized murder was happening on a large scale in America, it would no longer be a simple matter of "personal choice" to you, but a terrible tragedy that required national action. You're not seeing the other side, here.
Finally, why so hostile toward Christianity? Don't confuse Christianity with the fools like Falwell and Robertson who claim to represent it - people have done much good and much bad under the same banner. If I live in Florida and kill somebody, do I represent all Floridians? Or all Southerners? Do you really find Huckabee's faith so abhorrent? He seems to be a pretty strict adherent to Sermon-On-The-Mount Christianity, which basically tells you to be humble and put your self-interest secondary to the needs of your fellow man. Wouldn't mind seeing that philosophy in Washington for a change...

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ron, Akron, Ohio — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:18:31 GMT

It is a sad moment when the secular humanist speaks fear about people of faith. Because a man is a minister, must he be a religious tyrant? Of those who have a more compassionate view on immigration, Huckabee stands out by defining his reason as based on faith. I feel pity for the liberal that is so frightened of the faithful who are more likely to stand to principle and take a bullet for a liberal than their similarly inclined "friends." I wish you could understand the gift of faith and what it does for your opinion of your fellow human beings. I will be voting for the candidate who is least afraid of this truth and, thankfully, Mike Huckabee also won the debate. If you all head to Canada, I hope you come back and can share in world that the humble will extend to all.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Oceanlake, Lincoln City, Oregon — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:25:02 GMT

Huckabee lost my respect utterly when he made that crack about Clinton. He's just another whitewashed tomb.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Terry Hilderbrand Edna,Ks. — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:33:24 GMT

Huckabee appears to be truly honest what a breath of fresh air.This democrat will be voting republican.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:35:50 GMT

Richard C in Va << Huckabee's/ Romney's values are just that ;their values not an agenda for how they want to reprogram us.....>> SAY WHAT! We have had 7 years of the right wing fanatics in control of our government, dictating so-called holier-than-thou moral values, faith based education program (god forbid no sex education in school), Evolution can not be taught, no equal protection under the law when it comes to gays, dictating that you have no rights to determine when you end the life of a loved one Schiavo) . Our founding father's did want a separation of church and state and and for those judgemental ones like e denny who judges me for being liberal...WE DO NOT LIVE IN A THEOCRACY NOT YET !

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:44:28 GMT

Remember Jerry you may lose job, hlthcare coverage, get into a horrible car accident in critical condition and averted to emergency room and wait for hours, go bankrupt paying for it, etc and/or have service/coverage that is denied because of corporate greed. I will take my chances in a goverment that offers universal hlthcare. Hopefully, you are not a vet, because we know what type of tx you get in Walter Reed on an outpt basis.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ginger Partington — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:45:58 GMT

"what would Jesus have done?" I don't know... He would have DIED on the cross and resurrected himself three days later.

asking Jesus about the death penalty is about as stupid as it gets, but par for the course with this travesty of a debate. Huckabee is only a second-rate comedian at best and noy quite ready for prime time.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Josh, Jeffersonville, IN — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:57:19 GMT

What if we really could send Hillary to the moon...?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mike, Baltimore MD — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:58:07 GMT

"Republicans can't be asked hard question about abortion??? They're the ones who want to change the law! Except for Republicans, there would be NO controversy over abortion whatsoever, because the majority of Americans support the law as it stands this minute. "

No, less than 20% of Americans support unrestricted access to abortion.

"REPUBLICANS are the ones who have a problem with gays in the military. Why shouldn't they have to answer a question from a decorated general about the issue?"

How 'bout watching the debate? Figures the ignorant liberal is on here ranting when she didn't even watch the debate to know what the hell she's talking about. The question was fine...what was absurd was the way CNN kept dwelling on it. And it's the MILITARY who has problems with gays in the military, not the Republican Party.

"It's Republicans who think we're all trying to take their HUNTING rifles away when we say the word ASSAULT rifles. If it wasn't for Republicans, I don't think we'd have a controversy over guns whatsoever either."

The Second Amendment wasn't about hunting... it was about your God given right to the means to self defense, and the need for the ability to keep criminals, foreign enemies AND the state at bay. Furthermore, many want to take ALL firearms away (have you heard of the case going before SCotUS in the spring?). And, do you know what an "assault" weapon is as per the law? It was a retarded law because hunting rifles were often more deadly than the banned "assault" rifles. Being an "assault" rifle has nothing to do with anything except that the word creates a stigma with liberal dolts like the reporters on CNN who repeatedly call Semi-Automatic weapons Automatic.

"Personally, I'd rather hear from them about one of the major issues on the minds of Americans -- health care."

This debate is for the REPUBLICAN primary. It should have questions that are important to REPUBLICAN voters.

"But none of them have a health care plan"

Thank God for that! At least the Republicans pretend that they're going to keep the Federal Government to its enumerated powers in the Constitution.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Julie--Orange County, CA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:05:35 GMT

My biggest problem with Huckabee is that while governor he had 14 complaints to the Ethics Commission, resulting in 5 violations. I would like to know more about these before I decide on his character...

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mike, Baltimore MD — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:07:58 GMT

"Separation of Church and State" is not the correct phrase. The Constitution prohibits the establishment of a state church, or the adoption by the US Government of a church as the official religion of the United States. It also promises that all can worship freely without liberal whack jobs hindering them.

Anyone who thinks that means we can't have a president who's religious is completely missing the point. Many of our presidents have been very religious people. And they have the right to their faith as much as everyone else has the right to theirs.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mike, Baltimore MD — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:38:33 GMT

Juan,

"Evolution can not be taught"
That's just not true.

"no equal protection under the law when it comes to gays"

They get equal protection. They just can't get married, but that's OK, because marriage isn't a right. Marriage is a legal status granted by the state to recognize a certain type of relationship which it defines. Saying that gays don't get equal protection is like saying that LLPs don't get equal protection because they have different legal standing than LLCs.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Alex, Lancaster, CA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:44:13 GMT

to juan,ft lauderdale,fl...
Our founding fathers founded this country under God, read what's on your money, and pick up a history book or two. This country needs a conservative who has unchanging morals and can lead this country in the right direction. Mike Huckabee definitely appears to be the one for the job.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ginger Partington — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:31:30 GMT

"As for the rest of the field: Paul does a pretty good job of sounding rational when posed with somewhat irrational questions. His trilateral commission answer didn't sound conspiratorial even though the whole premise of the question is just that: conspiratorial."

I35 exists and Giuliani supporters have designated it a holy site. They think it is fulfillment of biblical prophecy and will cure you of homosexuality. Youtube has a video of Pat Robertson's related news segment.

Yet Ron Paul supporters are considered nuts? The CFR and The Trilateral Commission have websites and real membership rosters. NAFTA, WTO, NAU, ALCA, SPP, etc. ditto. I35 is a real road.

There is no conspiracy but conspiratorial ideologies among certain political leaders who place corporate gain above national sovereignty and actually see the latter as an impediment to their profit lines. No big shock here. Neither is it a surprise that they have stacked this election in their favor after 28 years of ruling the US.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

raf — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:33:30 GMT

"This country needs a conservative who has unchanging morals and can lead this country in the right direction." Alex, Lancaster, CA

That's exactly what they said about George Bush seven years ago, and now look at where we are!!! Personally I much rather have a president who knows something about foreign policy. Biden, Dodd and McCain come to mind.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Larry Crowley — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:34:46 GMT

What if we really could send Hillary to the moon...?

What do you have against the moon?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Vito Danelli, Norwalk, CT — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:40:15 GMT

Looks like the memo went out to the Mainstream Media asswipes. Is it just a mere coincidence that so many so-called pundits say Huckabee "won" the debate? HOW??? did he win? Based on what criteria?? His dumb jokes?? At least Robert Novak got it right about Huckabee. I can't wait for the next Ron Paul money bomb to go off. That will really piss off the MSM scum

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Chris Peterman, Greenville, SC — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:54:35 GMT

Juan, you are an idiot. Im sorry to tell you this, but you are. I may not be the smartest person in the world but I know that 50 something percent of America believes that life began 6000 years ago. They also believe that murdering children is a crime and should be stopped. And they believe that homosexuality is a sin and that those who practice it need help. Hate to break it to you but its the truth. Oh, by the way... America is a Christian nation that was founded on Christian principles and rooted in the Word of God. Our founding fathers would have no problem electing a baptist minister to office because back then, before the Democrats rewrote the Constitution, there was no such thing as separation of church and state. Oh wait, it still doesnt exist in our Constitution, it is just a lie made up by the Liberal Democrats. Read the Constitution if you dont believe me. Anyway, your vote for Hillary Clinton, or whatever other Democrat you vote for, is going to be wasted come November because the Republicans are going to win. Also, I hope you have a Merry Christmas! Yes, I said that horrible curse word...Christmas (oh no...)!!!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

reekingwithsarcasm — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:29:47 GMT

Mike in Baltimore, you are correct, the First Amendment to our Constitution should not be interpreted as barring persons of faith from running for public office. Having said that, I personally don't want another religious nut in the White House.

I do have a solution though. Perhaps we could have a "don't ask, don't tell" policy for religious ideologues who want to serve in our federal government. It would work pretty much the same way the discriminatory "don't ask, don't tell" policy works with gays in the military. You'll be free to serve so long as you keep your religious convictions to yourself. What do you think? Fair enough?

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale, fl — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:31:51 GMT

Mike in Baltimore-You have no glue about what it means to be a gay man in this homophobic times. My partner and I have been together over 6 years and we do not have the benefits of heterosexual couples in terms of joint income tax, hlth coverage that covers partners (unless you work in a progressive company); no legal inheritance, 31 states still allows companies to fire you because you are gay; no legal adoptions in Florida although we are raising our 16 y/o teenager who is turning out great, rights of hospital visits, not able to serve open in the military etc. Unless you have personally been descriminated against YOU have no idea what it's about. Why should I pay taxes to a federal government that makes a mockery of No taxation w/o egual representation. I and my partner want the same rights and privileges that are given naturally to straight couples like in Spain, Canada, Belgium and other progressive countries. PERIOD!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Danny — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:54:01 GMT

Juan from Ft. Lauderdale must not know what are founding fathers were doing. Maybe Juan from Ft Lauderdale has another revisionist view of our history.
Please do your research before you embarrass yourself on a national forum.
Huckabee is honest enough to do this job.

Every Liberal threathenes to move to Canada at election time if their agenda isn't the champion of the day and every one of them stays here bringing down our gene pool intellectually.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Kevin Haggerty — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:07:10 GMT

I had a rough day at work yesterday, and was more than a little tired last night... did I really hear Ron Paul say that we brought 911 on ourselves because we 'occupied' Saudi Arabia? If he thinks that, he just offended his way out of my vote. I'm a Republican (although not a terribly loyal one)and so far I'm voting for Obama!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ginger Partington — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:16:16 GMT

Kevin,

Ron Paul said Bin Laden, a Saudi, attacked the WTC on 911 because of the US base in Saudi Arabia among other things. those are OBL's words.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Ron, Silverthorne, CO — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:24:03 GMT

Juan in Florida...

You mix up issues in your last post. There are legal documents that can fix some (not all) of the obstacles you mention: Inheritance (with a properly drawn will), health care decisions (with a HC Power of Attorney), etc.

You then end with a rant about taxation without representation. Have you lost the right to vote because you are gay? I don't think so. It is just that not enough people agree with you to get your way. Welcome to democracy. You don't like it? Try N. Korea or Iran. I'm sure you'll be welcomed there.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:59:47 GMT

Danny- It is the right wing fascist/rascist idealogues like yourself that have done the most damage to this country throughout our history by first judging, condeming, discriminating and if that this not work;enslaving/ lynching blacks , denying Indians their land and placing them in reservations, giving women less pay for same jobs, and all in the name of religion. Spare me your condescending putdowns/insults because I have liberals beliefs and by the way my gene pool is pretty good with a doctor, 2 lawyers, teacher and I have a Master's degree. To homophobes likes Chris Peterman and Larry Craig's who rails against homosexuality by using scriptures and turn out to be self-loathing closet cases. HYPOCRITES!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Jim Crown Pt, IN — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:21:32 GMT

This media bias towards Huckabee is really silly. Huckabee should stick to preaching. He is obviously trying to ingratiate himself with the neo-con warmongerers who make up the base of the Repubs and cloak himself with this false veneer of the great compassionate Christian, in order to get in line for Guiliani's VP or, less likely, Romneys VP. Besides being pro-war and pro death penalty (so much for the Christian act) he is an establishment liberal faking to be conservative to get votes. He raised taxes by more than 500 million in a poor state as Governor! The national sales tax will not reduce taxes either. He is for all kinds of govt spending. How is he a conservative, other than being a bible thumper and a war lover? Oh I forgot that is all it takes to pass as "conservative" with the Repubs nowadays. When he starts pandering and begging to be on the ticket with pro-abortion Guiliani, it will be that much more obvious what a hypocrite and liar he is.
None of these pathetic Repubs, except Ron Paul of course, have an ounce of intellectual credibilty or integrity, and while the war hawks will cheer them on in the primaries, none of them have a chance of winning the Presidency. So deal with it.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Pat Swartz — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:52:22 GMT

This is an exciting time to be an American. WE THE PEOPLE have the opportunity to CHOOSE who our next leader will be. I agree with many of the comments that the CNN debates last night were setup by the Dems in an attempt to make the GOP look bad, and for some of those on stage it did just that. For too many years this country has been going in circles because neither party is willing work with the other.
From what I can see, there is only on candidate that is capable of actually getting something done --- Mike Huckabee. You may not agree with everything he says, and that is cool, but at least he is willing find the middle ground.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Eric C. Seattle, WA — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:52:22 GMT

Two men presented themselves as authentic. Huckabee and Paul. Authenticity is rare and important. It speaks to integrity--whether one agrees with their positions or not. The remainder of the candidates pander in the worst sort of way--especially Romney. Beware of the masks--we don't really know what's behind them. Lots of masks last night.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Bryan, Tucson, AZ — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:01:58 GMT

I hope we can hold you to that Juan.

Huckabee has proven himself to be the only sincere conservative who has the ability to beat the Clinton machine. He has run against and won elections in Arkansas on three seperate occasions with the Clinton's leading the charge against him. He now stands as the only republican in the past 15years to have beaten the Clintons. For that reason alone he should be the GOP nominee.

But for most of us true conservatives, Huckabee supports those things that we believe in. Who among us is not interested in a fairer and simpler tax code. Who among us thinks more children should be killed to preserve a womans right to be irresponsible, who among us wants to leave Iraq without a significant victory over muslim terrorist. and the list goes on.

Our founding fathers would've rolled over in their graves if they had been able to see what this country has become. We are not and never have been a secular nation. We are a nation who pays honor to faith but does not impose a given faith upon our citizens. We are a nation who through faith, saw fit to work to develop laws to afford basic rights to all people regardless of their religion, race, or political loyalties. If all of this is so offensive to you that you wish to preserve it as we conservatives do, then by all means, when President Huckabee takes office, I would encourage you to make that move...

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Janelle Stephens, Ames, IA — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:24:51 GMT

Huckabee looked and sounded fantastic on the CNN debate.I plan I wake up to the news that Mike Huckabee is our new president. I like it just fine in Iowa, where lots of people are liking Mike. No plans to escape to Canada. I'll be too busy celebrating my new President Huckabee.

Right now I am doing all I can to get Iowans to the caucus to support Mike.
Thank you!

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Janelle Stephens, Ames, IA — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:26:19 GMT

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Mike, Denver, CO — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:59:09 GMT

Pat, you are right in that "for too many years this country has been going in circles because neither party is willing work with the other."

But, from what I can see, there is only one candidate who is capable of actually getting something done --- Rudy Giuliani. You may not agree with everything he says, and that's okay, but at least he is willing find the middle ground. See, as Mayor of New York he, a Republican was elected in the most Democrat city in America, and re-elected with over 70% of the vote. The 30% of Democrats who opposed him were and are a very vocal bunch. But he had the support of more than half the Democrats in NYC and all of the Republicans. Rudy has worked across the aisle effectively and earned the support of voters regardless of party affiliation. You might not like what he has to say about some issues any more than fiscal conservatives like what Huckabee has to say about some issues. But at least he is straightforward with you about those issues and not trying to recreate himself like Romney is.

Rudy is a proven leader, a leader with a unique ability to re-unite Americans behind their leader. There will always be that 30% on either side of the aisle that refuses to budge. But I'll take 70% of voters in NYC (which translates into about 85% nationally when you rebalance for party registrations) who chose Rudy Giuliani not once, but twice.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Pedro, Dillon, SC — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:12:49 GMT

To Juan,ft lauderdale,fl
Pack your bags Juany... we won't miss you. Please take a few more with you. We're supposed to be a secular nation? You need to read your history. To insinuate that we shouldn't vote for him because of his religion makes you a bigot.

Post-Midnight TiVO'd Thoughts

Darell Wallace Taylors, S.C. — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:09:51 GMT

Although I donot agree with Ron Paul's stand on the death penalty (I believe in Capital punishment) I will concede that, in defense of his strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution. We need him to help us get back to adhering to the Constitution. We are so far off of it to what the founding fathers intended that it isn't funny. Out of all the Republican contenders, he is, at least, consistant with the use of the Constitution.