<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx</link><description>From NBC’s Domenico MontanaroA new AP-Pew poll shows Clinton ahead nationally and in the three early nominating states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. This poll will likely get a lot of play, because it is connected with a wire service, but</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493731</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:08:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493731</guid><dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator><description>Did anybody Notice this poll started a MONTH ago. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493741</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:13:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493741</guid><dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator><description>A second poll of Iowa out this morning has Clinton with an even bigger lead. It's conducted by the Iowa State University, and it is line with the Pew poll, with Clinton 7% ahead of runner-up Edwards. Numbers: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/and-plot-thickens-new-early-state-polls.html"&gt;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/and-plot-thickens-new-early-state-polls.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493753</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:17:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493753</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;A Month Out, Iowa State University Releases New Hawkeye Numbers&lt;br&gt;Monday, December 3rd, 2007&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dems: Clinton 31, Edwards 24, Obama 20, Richardson 11&lt;br&gt;GOP: &amp;nbsp;Romney 25, Huckabee 22, Giuliani 16, Thompson 9, McCain 8.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thepage.time.com/2007/12/03/iowa-state-university-releases-new-iowa-numbers/"&gt;http://thepage.time.com/2007/12/03/iowa-state-university-releases-new-iowa-numbers/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many momentum shifts will there be, and how many mood swings will we see here? It's going to be fun. In fact, it's fun right now...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493755</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:17:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493755</guid><dc:creator>Nashville_fan</dc:creator><description>I'm glad the Clinton campaign got some encouraging news . . . I was afraid her head was going to fall off if she got anymore bad news! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully this will calm her down enough so that she can regain her composure - I'm starting to see the springs falling out of her back . . .</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493759</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493759</guid><dc:creator>A.Brocco,Albuquerque, NM</dc:creator><description>Enough with polls! You look hard enough and you will find a poll that says &amp;quot;The Earth is Flat&amp;quot; and the first astronaut on the moon was filmed in Hollywood.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493761</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:19:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493761</guid><dc:creator>American Voter</dc:creator><description>Poll shmoll! She's gonna lose big! The thought of the low rent Clinton's back in the White House is nightmarish to most voters!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493765</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493765</guid><dc:creator>mike oh</dc:creator><description>Nice numbers!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't wait 'till this is over and Hillary can concentrate on beating the GOP nominee!! &amp;nbsp;We're going back to the Whitehouse, no more war, no more fading middle class. &amp;nbsp;It'll be safe to be an average American again.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493772</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:22:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493772</guid><dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator><description>Oh, let me guess the connection: Madeline Albright is PEWs advisor on foreign relations, so no thank you won't believe that poll that started a month ago, even before the last democratic debate!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493775</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:24:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493775</guid><dc:creator>Don, TX</dc:creator><description>No big deal, shows the same thing the other polls consistently show, Iowa is a tie. &amp;nbsp;The New Hampshire numbers obviously don't reflect the trend over the past month, but considering the poll started a month ago, no surprise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Expect Hillary's absurd attacks to lower her further in the polls</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493785</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:28:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493785</guid><dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator><description>Van...Chuck address this Iowa poll on MSNBC I believe he stated like the AP poll it is older than the Register poll ( note: they give NO DATES for the poll) even though they only released it today. &amp;nbsp;In addition the Register is considered the GOLD STANDARD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually that brings up a good question why would you take a poll and hold the results for several days &amp;nbsp;or weeks? &amp;nbsp;I guess you release them when your candidate needs them...you think?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493788</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:29:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493788</guid><dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator><description>Obviously, these polls by themselves don't point to a Clinton comeback. For one, the Pew poll was taken from November 7th to the 25th, muddying the results. Furthermore, there still remains a big problem for Hillary: She lags against both her opponents in the Pew poll when voters are asked their &amp;quot;second choice,&amp;quot; something that can obviously play a big role in the caucuses</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493793</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:31:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493793</guid><dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator><description>DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Democrat Barack Obama was endorsed Sunday by the mayor of Iowa's largest city and predicted more criticism ahead from presidential rivals as his political fortunes keep brightening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meeting with reporters, Obama trotted out Des Moines Mayor Frank Cownie, who last month won a second term. He has focused on global warming and other environmental issues. &amp;quot;Senator Obama has made a promise and is willing an open-minded enough to listen to the mayor of the capital city of Iowa,&amp;quot; Cownie said. &amp;quot;Together we can make change in Iowa.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493795</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493795</guid><dc:creator>cms</dc:creator><description>Exactly. I'm quite sure she is still ahead, both nationally and in the early states. Obama continues to be the long-shot candidate. Now hopefully everyone will calm down.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493799</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:33:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493799</guid><dc:creator>John, Lake Worth, Florida</dc:creator><description>Why does First Read only put Clinton in the headline as &amp;quot;leading&amp;quot;,when the same poll shows that Romney is also leading in Iowa?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493800</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:33:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493800</guid><dc:creator>Bee, NH</dc:creator><description>Another Mark Penn way of distracting the good news that is for Obama. We all know how Clintonite likes to play the game of psychology. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real poll that counts is the Desmoine Registered poll that started from Nov 25-28 2007. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton and Mark Penn (AP) polls started from Nov. 7 to 25&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=iowapoll07"&gt;http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=iowapoll07&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is what an educated reader and writer must ask themselves; which is more accurate? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it the one that was taken from Nov 7-25 or Nov 25-28? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sure the people of IOWA will take their hometown news paper more seriously. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493801</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:33:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493801</guid><dc:creator>Patrick, Waterville, ME</dc:creator><description>Seriously...done a month ago. &amp;nbsp;Why don't we have a new poll discussing how Huckabee is slipping because of a poll done a month ago. &amp;nbsp;Get your act together.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493803</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:34:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493803</guid><dc:creator>RGO, California </dc:creator><description>American Voter you need to visit pollingreport.com which lists ALL POLLS and you'll find Mrs. Clinton leading and beating every democrat and republican candidate. NOt sure where you are getting your data &amp;nbsp;....Jerry maybe???</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493812</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:36:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493812</guid><dc:creator>Jeremiah P., Austin, TX</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;God, please give us an election in which a Bush or a Clinton isn't on the ballot. &amp;nbsp;Amen.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493817</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493817</guid><dc:creator>bbln</dc:creator><description>What's most alarming is the press - trying to create a horserace of who's pulling ahead and who's losing - can the news stop trying to create the news and just cover it. &amp;nbsp;I'd much rather a thoughtful analysis of the variations of the different polls in Iowa, then the dramatic type of stories - Clinton Wounded, Obama Ahead, or Clinton is Inevitable (I don't believe she ever said that; it's been the press)...I'm starting to wonder what the difference is between Reuters and The Enquirer!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493823</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493823</guid><dc:creator>dale hendon, Sunnyvale, CA</dc:creator><description>Mike, Oh Mike oh &amp;nbsp;you have truly drank the cool-aid.&lt;br&gt;Your response reminds me of that scene in Dr. Zhivago when the communist take over and the old man asks what it is all about and the commorade starts spewing out the party line: &amp;quot;Each according to his needs each according to his work&amp;quot;, Marxist stuff like that which Hilary believes and will use if and when she can. She is a commie Mike. If you say she is not then you have not done your homework. Do you want a communist in the White House? Do you want the old &amp;quot;Bill and Hill show. Except this time there will be an unleashed Hillary. A meglomaniac with visions of grandeur and a cemetary full of the suicides and strange accidents. &amp;nbsp;May you not get what you wish for and may God spare the rest of us.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493835</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:45:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493835</guid><dc:creator>Adam, Sacramento</dc:creator><description>New Poll?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We've known this since November 25th it is now December 4th a full 10 days since the poll was released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spinnning an old poll as a new one is slightly ok very wrong. &amp;nbsp;I see at least 4 polls closing after it on real clear politics all of them with tighter timeframes making them more relevant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 10 day delay is a lifetime in primary politics.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493836</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:46:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493836</guid><dc:creator>heather</dc:creator><description>The AP poll is out of date.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493837</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:46:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493837</guid><dc:creator>steve  daytona beach</dc:creator><description>HAHAHAHA!! Funny when the polls show Obama leading they are gospel. And now that they show Clinton leading you find all these things wrong with it or say they don't mean a thing! You Obama supporters are just as phony as the candidate. There's still time to get on board with a winner! Wouldn't it be nice to finally be able to say &amp;quot;I voted for the democrat that won!&amp;quot;? Come on people! Wake up and recognize! Hillary Clinton IS going to be the nominee! Let's not give the republicans anything to attack her with, let's show our overwhelming support! You will all feel better about yourself and your hopes! Clinton '08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493843</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:49:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493843</guid><dc:creator>MK, Los Angeles, California</dc:creator><description>The Iowa State poll is not worth much given that it has a 6 percent margin of error. &amp;nbsp;Most reliable polls have a margin of error of less than 5 percent. &amp;nbsp;Thus the discrepancy that it shows Huckabee in second and Edwards in second. &amp;nbsp;All recent polls with less margins of error have shown Edwards in third and Huckabee in first. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the Pew poll it is a month old! &amp;nbsp;It includes what Iowans were thinking almost a month ago. &amp;nbsp;Alot has changed since then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If one looks at polls done recently (conducted over a three day period) with a respectable margin of error (less than five percent) three of the four show Obama and Huckabee ahead. &amp;nbsp;That is the state of the race in Iowa.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493850</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:51:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493850</guid><dc:creator>Mike Brooks, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Clinton is the worst possible candidate. In case no one has noticed, the reason Obama and Huckabee are winnning Iowa is becasue they are POPULISTS that propose ending or curbing outsourcing and guest workers (8 million Amercian engineers, scientists and computer programmers have lost their jobs to cheap young replacements from India and China --- 90% of new high tech hires are on those visas!). Now, the Clinton's *own* a company that provides those guest workers, Clinton as a part of her Senatorial career, travelled to India to promote even more H1-B workers. As we enter into this recession, remember that the greedy Wall Street crowd and outsourcing and &amp;quot;free traitors&amp;quot; just like Clinton are the very cause of it! Corrupt, dirty Clinton has no issues. Her &amp;quot;health care plan&amp;quot; is a 200 billion dollar give-away to the health industry and everything else she blathers about has to do with radical feminism and the most extrme gay rights nut jobs. Obama-Edwards for President...because this Democrat wont even vote Democrat, even for the local dog catcher, if Clinton is on the ticket!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493852</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:53:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493852</guid><dc:creator>Aaron, Saint Paul, MN</dc:creator><description>People, please!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What an irresponsible poll! These results were compiled over THREE WEEKS!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They say almost nothing of the CURRENT state of the campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is another shamefully biased and irresponsible poll!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493855</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493855</guid><dc:creator>Lynn, Millington</dc:creator><description>Iowa State University Poll has NO INFORMATION other than the margin which is 6 percentage points that is alot. &amp;nbsp;No dates when taken, etc. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493874</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:02:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493874</guid><dc:creator>votenic</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.votenic.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.votenic.com&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;"&gt;http://www.votenic.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.votenic.com&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Only Poll That Matters.&lt;br&gt;Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493904</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:09:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493904</guid><dc:creator>mike oh</dc:creator><description>Dale Hendon,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I enjoy a glass of cool refreshing kool aid often, black cherry is my favorite if you must know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A cemetary of strange suicides and accidents? &amp;nbsp;Someone's been reading too much Poe, or maybe Ann Coulter, they're both pretty scary, though Poe has a much better grasp of story structure. &amp;nbsp;If she's a commie for wanting tax breaks for the middle class (me and everyone I know), easier and cheaper access to higher education for the middle class (me and everyone I know) affordable health coverage for me and everyone I know, then I guess I'm all for communism, except the whole wearing burlap bags for cloths and picking potato crops, I wouldn't want to do that. &amp;nbsp;Do you think we'll have to??</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493917</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:14:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493917</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>if you can't find anything more meaningful to post than pre-historic poll numbers in an attempt to pump up the hillary, don't post anything, hillary ain't going to win and edwards is still very much a possibility much to your dismay</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493922</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493922</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>You know you cant win without hilliary supporters so keep up the trash talk during the primaries .Your hatred for hilliary wont help your canidate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493925</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:15:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493925</guid><dc:creator>Mitchell Feldman, Vestal, NY</dc:creator><description>As I've said before, Hillary people should realize that a good number of Democrats who support other candidates for the nomination, will not vote for Hillary in the general (were we so unfortunate to have her as the standard bearer). &amp;nbsp;She is as much of a wedge as she is a polarizer. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess that this fact shouldn't affect your support for her, as I am one who believes that you should support the candidate who most represents your beliefs, and not make the pragmatic choice, based on who has the best chance of winning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, rightly or wrongly (and I think this has as much to do with the insincerity of her husband, who with much fanfare, announced last week that he was against the war in Iraq from the beginning, haha, I guess he thinks that the propaganda machine can over-ride 'sex, lies and videotape') this is a fact and if Hillary does win the nomination it will not bode well for the Democrats. &amp;nbsp;Even Jerry, knows that.&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493928</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:17:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493928</guid><dc:creator>jean</dc:creator><description>attacking Obama's character has already caused Clinton to lose support among black voters. It was all over black radio this A.M. It is a fine line she has to walk and I think she may have just stepped over it. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493930</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:18:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493930</guid><dc:creator>CitizenJ</dc:creator><description>The Iowa State poll is not worth much given that it has a 6 percent margin of error. &amp;nbsp;Most reliable polls have a margin of error of less than 5 percent. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MK, Los Angeles, California (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 12:49 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly. The fact that the sample size is so large, yet the margin of error is also unusually large, indicates that the bigger the poll window, the less accurate the results. It has nothing to do with who is ahead. You actually can't tell who is really ahead with a margin of error that size.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493941</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493941</guid><dc:creator>David Anders Pharr, Tx</dc:creator><description>they must have done all their polls in san francisco, Hillary is a joke like her perverted husband who pardoned criminals, terrosists, and hard drug dealers for money, while Hillary was stealing the &lt;br&gt;whitehouse furniture, all you Clinton backers will be totally embarrased when all this is brought out in tv ads. &amp;nbsp;Just like the people in Arkansas giving her money, and forgetting she called them all hicks to her gf when she first came with Bill. &amp;nbsp;There will be a president from Hope Arkansas. I like Mike</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493943</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:22:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493943</guid><dc:creator>mike oh</dc:creator><description>Gee, these Obama people are sounding so ... what's the word I'm looking for here ... shrill????</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493949</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:25:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493949</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description>This has been one heck of a time for Hillary......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;attacks Obama for having a PAC, then we learn she got money from it....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;her husband contends he was against the war all along, yet the facts shows he backed the President.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some nutjob takes people hostage in her offices.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She takes some quotes from Obama about wanting to be president when he was 4 years old....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and it's only Monday.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493958</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:27:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493958</guid><dc:creator>Margaret, NYC</dc:creator><description>Iowa Rep. Braley endorses John Edwards!!&lt;br&gt;Braley is one of 3 Iowa Dem U.S. reps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/3/111422/479"&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/3/111422/479&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493970</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:32:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493970</guid><dc:creator>Mike. MD</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;???</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493973</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:33:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493973</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>attacking Obama's character has already caused Clinton to lose support among black voters. It was all over black radio this A.M. It is a fine line she has to walk and I think she may have just stepped over it&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought i was the only one that heard it. She is going to loose big on this issue of &amp;quot;Character&amp;quot;. The AA community are getting upset with Hillary Clinton for attacking Obama's childhood. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493979</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493979</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description> if you can't find anything more meaningful to post than pre-historic poll numbers in an attempt to pump up the hillary, don't post anything, hillary ain't going to win and edwards is still very much a possibility much to your dismay&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MK,MO (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:14 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice to see that you're arguing about polls now rather than against them...Here are the polling and end dates for the most recent polls. The Iowa Univ. numbers aren't available yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DMR poll 11/25-28 end date 11/28&lt;br&gt;ARG &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/26-29 end date 11/29&lt;br&gt;RAS &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/26-27 end date 11/27&lt;br&gt;Pew &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/07-25 end date 11/25&lt;br&gt;SV &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 11/23-25 end date 11/25&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which poll is pre-historic? There is a four day difference between the end dates for the polls with the ARG poll having the latest end date.&lt;br&gt;Dates for all the polls can be found here;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/"&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Even though I post these links most every morning, so many seem unwilling or unable to follow a link before treating everyone to their half-baked analysis.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The polls all indicate that the race is a close contest between the top 3. As an Edwards supporter, what can he do to keep his name in the news and not be crowded out by all of the Clinton v. Obama coverage?&lt;br&gt;I know you hate Clinton, but Edwards CAN'T be third in the caucus if he wants to go forward, and that means that he must defeat one or both of them. How's he do it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493980</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:36:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493980</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me give you a straight answer &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot;. Don't ask my why? But if you do, here is my answer &amp;quot;I don't trust her&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493989</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:41:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493989</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>Mike. MD / no I won't back hillary if she's nominated, bush-lite doesn't appeal to most voters, she can't win the general election anyway, if the dems want to be in the whitehouse come 08 they best nominate edwards, no other dem can win the general election, that's just the cold hard facts</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493992</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:41:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493992</guid><dc:creator>Anita, Savannah, GA</dc:creator><description>Obama is a phony - NOT a populist!&lt;br&gt;Obama voted to - confirm Condi Rice, voted FOR more NAFTA via the Oman FTA last year and supports the Peru FTA!!&lt;br&gt;Obama endorsed and campaigned for Joe Lieberman - and as soon as he was elected to the senate, Obama began voting FOR every war funding bill for a war he supposedly &amp;quot;opposed.&amp;quot; He suddenly began voting against war funding when he became a presidential candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Corporate lobbyists and PACs have funded Obama's political career from Illinois to the Senate. But he stopped taking their money in 2007 when he became a presidential candidate. ha! as if they won't remember who paved his way.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493993</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:41:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493993</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>Its a fine line to cross well unfotunatly the line is &amp;quot;Now the brothers and sisters are going to run things&amp;quot;Thats &amp;nbsp;MAYOR STREET after his election .Philadelpia couldnt be more dangerous.I moved when I realized we had a racisrt mayor.I would rater have someone who supports blacks ,whites and any color we may have,than prove to any race</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493996</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:42:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493996</guid><dc:creator>mike oh</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Let me give you a straight answer &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot;. Don't ask my why? But if you do, here is my answer &amp;quot;I don't trust her&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; -- &amp;nbsp;Bee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good to see you'll be helping keep our kids over in Iraq, maybe they'll get to see Terhan under President Guilliani too.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#493998</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:493998</guid><dc:creator>M</dc:creator><description>well, although I think Edwards is the most electible, he is still trailing in the polls... It amazes me that no one else sees that...</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494003</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:47:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494003</guid><dc:creator>jerry/corpus christi texas</dc:creator><description> One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;???&lt;br&gt;Mike. MD&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me give you a straight answer &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot;. Don't ask my why? But if you do, here is my answer &amp;quot;I don't trust her&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bee (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:36 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least she doesn't give five answers like Hillary does......</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494009</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:49:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494009</guid><dc:creator>Gary Schear, Bozeman Montana</dc:creator><description>Mike. MD--I am not a Hillary Hater and I will support her if she is the nominee but I am hoping for a nominee who can win big, not just win. We do not need a close election. We need a shut out. A humiliating trouncing for the Republicans. By all that I read and in watching the Republican Debate audience reaction, Senator Clinton is red meat to their base. She angers and energizes. We need a nominee that moderate Republicans and Conservative Democrats can support. We need a nominee that disgruntled Republicans can feel comfortable enough with to allow them to stay home to punish the GOP for abandoning classic conservatism. We need to throw out our usual play book and try being smart...FOR A CHANGE.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494010</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:49:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494010</guid><dc:creator>Wayne, Silver Spring</dc:creator><description>The most reliable poll is the Des Moines Register Poll.. However, to make sure the Clintonaites are not cozzy up on this &amp;quot;SINGLE&amp;quot; poll..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some more references where Obama is leading&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ABC/Wash Post, Obama +4.0&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1051a1IowaDems.pdf"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1051a1IowaDems.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;American Res. Group, Obama + 2.0&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/iadem8-713.html"&gt;http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/iadem8-713.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strategic Vision (R), Tie&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/iowa_poll_112807.htm"&gt;http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/iowa_poll_112807.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, the trend is Obama is on an upward trajectory!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bye bye Clinton&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494018</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:54:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494018</guid><dc:creator>anti bee sting</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democratic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD &lt;br&gt;---------------------------------------------------- &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me give you a straight answer &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot;. Don't ask my why? But if you do, here is my answer &amp;quot;I don't trust her&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bee (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:36 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;----------------------------&lt;br&gt;I ask you WHY? &amp;nbsp;WE do not trust YOU to know why so don't bother. Go find some repuke blog and make them happy with your nitwit posts.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494019</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:54:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494019</guid><dc:creator>Rick in NC</dc:creator><description>No wonder you dims can't win the big one...listen to yourselves patter on about low rent rubbish...clinton is just more of what we've had for 16 years from the bushies and clintons, trianglation, promises broken, lying chiefs of state, partisan hatred, rise of the religious kooks, rise of the globalist kooks, we can't take it anymore...anyone but a clinton or bushie and please no bushie lite like rudy and mitty</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494026</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:56:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494026</guid><dc:creator>RJ/Hampton/VA</dc:creator><description>Come on guys and girls, do you really believe these so-called new polls. Look at the times they were conducted. The Des Moines poll has always been accepted as the only one that matters in Iowa. This old poll stinks of Clintonomics.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494030</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:57:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494030</guid><dc:creator>Chuck,San D.</dc:creator><description>lets face it ,,,,, obama is a repubican.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He prefers republican programs- destroying SS, ending medicare,attacking pakistan,support NCLB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494032</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:58:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494032</guid><dc:creator>Gary Schear, Bozeman Montana</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton polling big among Democrats doesn't mean squat. How are her numbers against any given Republican? You know, the other party that runs in that General election thingy that we have managed to lose to George W. Bush?....Twice! Once I can see but Twice?!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494042</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:00:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494042</guid><dc:creator>Annie Roberts</dc:creator><description>National poll? Let me guess, AP, right? Yup. Another Clinton friendly organization.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With CNN spiking the questions from previous debates, does anyone believe any of the poll results or the media anymore? You've got a very select group of people providing the news, setting the agenda, and all of these peopl have an obvious bias. Why should anyone believe what these people/organizations are telling us?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494044</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494044</guid><dc:creator>RJ/Hampton/VA</dc:creator><description>Bee, you are correct about Lieary loosing support in the African American community. Actually, Edwards is more popular here in my area than both Lieary and Obama. However, the black radio shows are blasting her in Hampton Roads. She is toast and won't win VA.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494057</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:07:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494057</guid><dc:creator>M</dc:creator><description>It all depends on who the GOP nominee is: if it's Mitt or Rudy, Hillary is our girl. If it's Huckabee it's gotta be Edwards who'll beat him. I am sorry, but as charming as Obama is, he doesn't feel like a winner..</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494077</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:13:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494077</guid><dc:creator>Cee Cee, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>Well Folks, It's official, MSNBE has chosen their canidate, by george, IT'S HILLARY CLINTION!!. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494078</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:13:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494078</guid><dc:creator>Deep</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No....I will not vote for Hillary...I would prefer to see a republican than Hillary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494083</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:17:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494083</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Conway</dc:creator><description>The proper title should be &amp;quot;Clinton leads in old polling&amp;quot; because both of these supposedly &amp;quot;new polls&amp;quot; were conducted before the 4 polls that show the race trending in Obama's direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Iowa State poll was &amp;quot;compiled through phone interviews between Nov. 6-18&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/ISU_poll_dec_03.html"&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/ISU_poll_dec_03.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not relevant anymore other than confirming that Hillary has since lost her lead.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494087</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494087</guid><dc:creator>Bee </dc:creator><description> The Democratic Party runs a risk of loosing to the Republican Party if they nominate someone that can't win over the republican moderate and independent voters. Evidence in the last few years showed that Hillary Clinton can’t win over the republican moderate let alone the independent voters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Hillary Clinton has a natural tendency of bashing her opponent and that is not good for general election. She likes to portray opposing view as evil even when she is wrong. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is the most polarizing figure aside from George Bush in the American politics. Please don’t ask me why she is polarizing, ask Bill Clinton. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494103</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:28:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494103</guid><dc:creator>Jen C</dc:creator><description>RE: President Clinton's Secretary of Labor Condemns Hillary's Attacks Against Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those ardent Hillary supporters out there. You may want to read a blog by Robert Reich (Secretary of Labor under President Clinton) that was posted just today. &amp;nbsp;Its title is &amp;quot;Why is HRC stooping So Low?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2007/12/why-is-hrc-stooping-so-low.html"&gt;http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2007/12/why-is-hrc-stooping-so-low.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If President Clinton's own Secretary of Labor is rebuking her, you know she's gone over the top. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494110</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:30:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494110</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>Folks, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is the news break ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Retired Brigadier General John Adams Endorses Barack Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama’s ability to listen and inspire will allow him to shape a new domestic strategy of working together as Americans to safeguard our constitutional liberties and secure the blessings of prosperity for all our citizens,” said John Adams, Brigadier General, US Army (retired). &amp;nbsp;“His sound judgment and ability to make tough choices under pressure will help him to shape a new international strategy of cooperating with our friends abroad to enhance global peace and security. &amp;nbsp;We need his vision and integrity to address America's domestic and international challenges.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The challenges we are facing both domestically and globally require a willingness to change the way we approach problems. &amp;nbsp;I am proud to have the support of General Adams and I look forward to relying on his sound judgment on international issues and his knowledge of the challenges people are facing in Arizona,” said Senator Barack Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494112</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:30:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494112</guid><dc:creator>Jen C</dc:creator><description>Regardless of what any &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; polls might say, the fact is that Hillary would not be going bezerk if her internal polling did not tell her that there is some meat behind Obama's ascent in the polls. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Usually she hides behind her henchmen, so if she's showing her own teeth it's because she feels there's something to be worried about. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't start reaching back to quote essays written by a 5-year-old, and attacking a guy's character because his approach to delivering universal healthcare is different from yours unless something is wrong. Say you don't agree that his approach is best, but when you say it's indicative of a character problem after professing to be &amp;quot;above the politics of personal destruction&amp;quot;, there's more going on here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Within one week, we've heard this from Hillary's team to Obama: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Take down your healthcare ad, it’s misleading. &lt;br&gt;2. Your PAC is illegal, shut it down. &lt;br&gt;3. Obama’s got “character” and “courage” issues. &lt;br&gt;4. When you were 5, you said you wanted to be the President, so now you’re flip-flopping.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, as Hillary said on Sunday, there's more to come. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're throwing the entire playbook at him to stop him. This is the behavior of a campaign that is afraid. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Hillary's supporters don't see that, you are blind.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494136</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:39:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494136</guid><dc:creator>ace p washington, d.c.</dc:creator><description>anita, your facts are half truth and half false. it would help you if you did a little research first. it would help us all if we did some research instead of everything that came out by the media. including the polls. some of this stuff is out right lies or slanted that we aren't getting the entire truth people.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494144</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:44:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494144</guid><dc:creator>Lyn,MD</dc:creator><description>Why is HRC stooping so low?&amp;quot; blogs Robert Reich, an old Clinton friend and cabinet secretary -- albeit one who was on the losing side of the key economic policy battles of the Clinton White House. &amp;quot; I’m becoming increasingly concerned about the stridency and inaccuracy of charges in Iowa -- especially coming from my old friend.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Worse still:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yesterday, HRC suggested O lacks courage. &amp;quot;There's a big difference between our courage and our convictions, what we believe and what we're willing to fight for,&amp;quot; she told reporters in Iowa, saying Iowa voters will have a choice &amp;quot;between someone who talks the talk, and somebody who's walked the walk.&amp;quot; Then asked whether she intended to raise questions about O’s character, she said: &amp;quot;It's beginning to look a lot like that.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just don’t get it. If there’s anyone in the race whose history shows unique courage and character, it's Barack Obama. HRC’s campaign, by contrast, is singularly lacking in conviction about anything. Her pollster, Mark Penn, has advised her to take no bold positions and continuously seek the political center, which is exactly what she’s been doing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/"&gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even her friends are taking note:</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494145</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:45:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494145</guid><dc:creator>Chuck,San D.</dc:creator><description>'Evidence in the last few years showed that Hillary Clinton can’t win over the republican moderate let alone the independent voters. '&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;except of course, CLinton slaughted Rudy, with the Upstate republican vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but then facts are a weak point for barak</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494160</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494160</guid><dc:creator>Praying for anyone but clinton to get the nomination</dc:creator><description>Yeah but according to Hillary she doesnt believe what the polls say..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OH wait thats only when they say she sucks..</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494167</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:56:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494167</guid><dc:creator>sg, michigan</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No. &amp;nbsp;I lost all my patience defending Bill when he was president. &amp;nbsp;Furthermore, the more I see Hillary's fiendish tactics (plants in the audience, arm-twisting correspondants, skewing polls, corperate sponsorship, fraudulent fund-raising, etc.), the more it reminds me of GWBush. &amp;nbsp;I would rather vote independant or even an honest Republican like Ron Paul.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494176</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:00:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494176</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>From WSJ.com Opinion Journal:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...PEGGY NOONAN&lt;br&gt;Death, Taxes and Mrs. Clinton &lt;br&gt;Only two of them are inevitable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Friday, November 30, 2007 12:01 a.m. EST...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'....the Clintons perfected a new method of scandal&lt;br&gt;management that starts with &amp;quot;These are lies spread by&lt;br&gt;a partisan conspiracy,&amp;quot; proceeds to &amp;quot;That's old news,&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;and ends a few years later, when detailed books come&lt;br&gt;out, with &amp;quot;That's rehash for cash.&amp;quot; This strategy is&lt;br&gt;not a constructive contribution to our political&lt;br&gt;culture, but it has worked in the new environment.&lt;br&gt;They'll teach it in political science media management courses in the future....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This strategy covers up everything&lt;br&gt;Any scandal is 'managable' by the Clintons&lt;br&gt;They are the most corrupt Democrats in history&lt;br&gt;But, the Clinton Cult denies everything.....&lt;br&gt;Divisive Hillary ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494183</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:05:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494183</guid><dc:creator>Keith, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>ISU poll was conducted NOV 6-18th. Which raises a question: why were both of these polls embargoed for so long? </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494185</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:05:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494185</guid><dc:creator>Bob, DC</dc:creator><description>Old stale data. The latest polls show Obama in the lead. Check realclear. &amp;nbsp;Please try to keep up.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494191</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:09:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494191</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>'....Mrs. Clinton is acting as if she's scared. She&lt;br&gt;insists to Katie Couric that she's the next&lt;br&gt;president--&amp;quot;It will be me&amp;quot;--and she's back to using&lt;br&gt;the language of aggression -- there's been a lot of&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;beat,&amp;quot; as in they've been trying to &amp;quot;beat me.&amp;quot; In the first 60 seconds of her Couric interview she used some variation on the word &amp;quot;attack&amp;quot; five times. If Mitt Romney talked like this, they'd be asking who put the Red Bull in his milkshake....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where's the 'inevitable' Hillary ?&lt;br&gt;Where did SHE go ??&lt;br&gt;Running scared ??&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's Hillary doing her 'George Bush' impersonation&lt;br&gt;Her campaign manager, Mark Penn is a Rove 'wannabe'..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...She continues her political kleptomania in terms of themes from the 1988 presidential campaign, which&lt;br&gt;seems to preoccupy her. A few months ago she was&lt;br&gt;saying she was born in the middle of America in the&lt;br&gt;middle of the century, which is what George H.W. Bush&lt;br&gt;said of Dan Quayle....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Coincidence ?&lt;br&gt;The Republican play book !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'....She proceeded to call herself famous but unknown,&lt;br&gt;which is what was said of Mr. Bush at the time...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow !!&lt;br&gt;Annother George Bush !!&lt;br&gt;Just what America needs !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...Now she calls herself ready from day one to be&lt;br&gt;president. Old Bush's tag line in his '88 commercials&lt;br&gt;was &amp;quot;Ready on day one to be a great president.&amp;quot;...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Becuase she was a 'glorified housewife'&lt;br&gt;At least she should be ready from day one to be prepared for Bill's wandering eyes....&lt;br&gt;And if Bill has a bunch of cigars......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...This is the first time she's faced a real threat, in Barack Obama, and it's left me thinking about how being The Inevitable is a high-risk game. You can get far being the inevitable choice. A lot of people will believe it and support you, specially the weak, and the pragmatic. They give you early support and early money. Others see the endorsements and contributions. &lt;br&gt;Another level of giver and supporter kicks in. It&lt;br&gt;starts to show in the national polls. Everyone knows&lt;br&gt;you're inevitable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But there are two problems with this strategy. One is&lt;br&gt;that your support is by definition broad but shallow.&lt;br&gt;You have a lot of people, but they won't crawl over&lt;br&gt;broken glass for you. When I talk to Hillary&lt;br&gt;supporters they mostly enact a facsimile of what they&lt;br&gt;think passion is, and are reduced to a dulled&lt;br&gt;aggression. &amp;quot;We're gonna win.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second part of the inevitability problem is that&lt;br&gt;once you seem no longer inevitable--once the polls&lt;br&gt;stop rising or start to fall, once that air is out of&lt;br&gt;the balloon and the thing that made everyone fall in&lt;br&gt;line is gone--well, what do you do? If the main&lt;br&gt;argument of your candidacy is you're inevitable and&lt;br&gt;suddenly you're evitable, where does that leave you?&lt;br&gt;What does it leave you with? Mere hunger. Insistence:&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It will be me.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And anger at this nobody who wasn't even in the Senate when you took the big votes, this cream puff who was a functionary in Chicago when you were getting your head beaten in by Ken Starr. What does Mrs. Clinton do when she's feeling angry? What has she done in the past?&lt;br&gt;Goodness, this won't be pretty....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No it won't....&lt;br&gt;At least J Merle Stanley has been sedated....&lt;br&gt;That's a start ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton, 15 years of dishonesty, scandals adn divisiveness</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494192</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494192</guid><dc:creator>Mike Brooks, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Who on earth did they poll to get this result? Bill Gates' household? One of the hotels where American high tech companies house Indian H1-B guest workers? Only a suicidal fool would support Clinton, the Queen of outsourcing, the &amp;quot;Senator From India&amp;quot;, the Wall Street dolly, &amp;nbsp;and I don't know many of them. I've been a life long Democrat and I wont vote for her. I'll vote Republican - McCain, Huckabee, Paul, Thompson, maybe even Guliani - before I'd vote for Clinton. The economy is heading into a RECESSION! We have lost million of jobs do to outsourcing and guest workers (and Clinton is part owner of a company that provides H1-B guest workers). We need somepone who will tax Bill Gates for every H1-B worker he has and do the same for IBM and HP and Intel and every other corporation using these tax payer subsidized indentured servants, a 100% salary tax to make it unprofitable to fire perfectly competent older American workers or workers with families (and, consequently higher medical costs), we need a president who will add duties and fees and taxes on goods and services that are produced as a result of outsourcing. We need a leader who understands that we cannot survive in a &amp;quot;service based economy&amp;quot;, that we need JOBS! Jobs trump &amp;quot;choice&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;gay rights&amp;quot; and even Wall Street's gobs of money tossed into our political campaigns. Forget Clinton!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494195</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:10:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494195</guid><dc:creator>Alex W., Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>This feels liek deja vu. &amp;nbsp;I don't dislike Hillary, but she has the best chance of losing a general election out of the three candidates. &amp;nbsp;There are southern independents that would consider edwards or obama but would do ANYTHING to avoid clinton.....so if clinton wins the primary, it looks like 4 years of huckabee trying to figure out the capital of canada or romney trying to figure out what he even believes in anymore....</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494196</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:10:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494196</guid><dc:creator>Adam, Sacramento</dc:creator><description>Mike,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No I won't vote for Hillary under any circumstances. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am looking at the next presidential term as one very similar to carter's term in 1976. &amp;nbsp;An economy off the rails, An energy crisis and massive international political headaches as well as domestic polarization. &amp;nbsp;In my opinion it's a four year term election as it will take more than 4 years to turn us around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I don't have a democrat I'm confident will put into place policies designed to change our course and get us on the correct one, I'll be more than happy to have a republican holding the bag on those four years instead and I'll look to a real democrat for 2012-2020.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion hillary is Bush-Lite at best. &amp;nbsp;Polarizing and warlike but talking a compassionate game. &amp;nbsp;I'm not buying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll likely vote 3rd party if she wins the primary. &amp;nbsp;I just don't see Hillary healing the wounds but rather ripping open new ones.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494202</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:13:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494202</guid><dc:creator>John M, San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>Would I support Hillary if she became the democratic nominee? &amp;nbsp;I would vote for her because the alternatives are worse. &amp;nbsp;Does that constitute support?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These particular polls are less meaningful to outcome of the Iowa primaries than the recent ones that show a range from Obama +4 to Clinton +2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The AP poll was initiated when Clinton still had a ~5% lead in Iowa and it closed a week ago. &amp;nbsp;So it's probably &amp;nbsp;not the best current indicator of the state of the race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Iowa State poll is a registered voter poll, not a likely voter poll like the rest of the Iowa polls released - so it doesn't have much to do with who is going to actually show up and vote at the caucuses. &amp;nbsp;I would expect Hillary to have a significant advantage among non-LV RV's due to name recognition as those voters are less likely to be engaged and paying attention to the race.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494211</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:17:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494211</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>ISU poll was conducted NOV 6-18th. Which raises a question: why were both of these polls embargoed for so long? &lt;br&gt;Keith, San Francisco, CA&lt;br&gt;-----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Mark Penn should answer your question. By now you should know that the Clinton's machine will do anything to sway public opinion. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The poll was in their favor but the AP held unto it, perhaps, they are planning to release it for their own narrative. Guess what? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Their manipulation is not going to work beacuse people are paying close attention. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494213</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:17:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494213</guid><dc:creator>Chuck,San D.</dc:creator><description>sierra, glad to see you quote a republican idiot (points of lights, Raygun) ,proving again that obama supporters are truely republicans who want to keep the democrats out of the white house</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494217</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:19:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494217</guid><dc:creator>Don, TX</dc:creator><description>I still can't get past the fact that she actually said attacking democrats was &amp;quot;the FUN part&amp;quot;!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494218</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:19:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494218</guid><dc:creator>B/B</dc:creator><description>T'S NOT TO LATE TO JOIN THE WINNING TEAM. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494220</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:20:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494220</guid><dc:creator>Roger, Orland,FL</dc:creator><description>I'm sorry, but the IOWA caucus is a JOKE. &amp;nbsp;Look that the process and the rules and tell me that it isn't the most manipulative thing going. Hell, if you are just 17 but will be 18 when the general election is held you are premitted to caucus. &amp;nbsp;There is so much ability to essentially buy off every vote in the state and that is what the money rich campaigns are doing. &amp;nbsp;Obama can't win outside of IOWA because his money and organization cannot manipulate the vote like they can in IOWA. &amp;nbsp; That is why Clinton is the better general election candidate. Wake up Obamites or we will end up with another Republican and all those wonderful Supreme Courts judges that will send us back to the 19th century.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494227</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:23:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494227</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>mike oh: '....Good to see you'll be helping keep our kids over in Iraq, maybe they'll get to see Terhan under President Guilliani too....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No !!&lt;br&gt;I won't vote for Hillary, either&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary VOTED FOR Lieberman/Kyl to go to war with Iran !! &lt;br&gt;She's no less war-like than Giuiliani....&lt;br&gt;She VOTED FOR WAR WITH IRAQ&lt;br&gt;She supported the iraq war until public opinion turned&lt;br&gt;(why didn't she listen to anti-war Bill ?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for keeping our troops in Iraq.......&lt;br&gt;Hillary says she won;t get them out before 2013 !!&lt;br&gt;No thanks !!&lt;br&gt;NO SALE !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Better Ron Paul than Clinton&lt;br&gt;Better Huckabee than Clinton&lt;br&gt;Better Nader than Clinton&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton, cold, calculating, dishonest, unethical</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494235</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:25:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494235</guid><dc:creator>Kira, Utah</dc:creator><description>Jeremiah- AMEN!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494242</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:28:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494242</guid><dc:creator>lynn, millington</dc:creator><description>The Iowa State poll was taken almost 3 weeks ago. &amp;nbsp;Come on, MSNBC play fair. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494252</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:32:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494252</guid><dc:creator>HILLARY 08</dc:creator><description>Robert Reich (Secretary of Labor under President Clinton) that was posted just today. &amp;nbsp;Its title is &amp;quot;Why is HRC stooping So Low?&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;So you can see her and hear her you little stub of a man. &amp;nbsp;Your level is so close to the ground we are all low to get a look at YOU!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494283</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:42:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494283</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Chuck,San D.: '...'Evidence in the last few years showed that Hillary Clinton can’t win over the republican moderate let alone the independent voters. ' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;except of course, CLinton slaughted Rudy, with the Upstate republican vote....'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck, Hillary NEVER RAN AGAINST RUDY !!&lt;br&gt;Rudy pulled out of the race&lt;br&gt;So, how could she 'slaughter' him ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'...but then facts are a weak point for barak...'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please see above, Chuck...&lt;br&gt;How did you manage to bring Barack into this ?&lt;br&gt;What 'facts' did Obama miss ?&lt;br&gt;(other than Bill ALWAYS being anti-war?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh !! and where do the flying saucers figure into your little tale ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494284</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:42:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494284</guid><dc:creator>las vegas joe</dc:creator><description>i thought the hillary political machine was smarter that this, why would they bring this four year old obama story,it plays in favor of him ,if a four old boy say he wants to be president 42 years down the road, he is runing for president doesnt that show he is destined to be president? oops</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494285</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:42:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494285</guid><dc:creator>Chester Circle City Ca</dc:creator><description>I'm sorry, but the IOWA caucus is a JOKE. &amp;nbsp;Look that the process and the rules and tell me that it isn't the most manipulative thing going. Hell, if you are just 17 but will be 18 when the general election is held you are permitted to caucus. &amp;nbsp;There is so much ability to essentially buy off every vote in the state and that is what the money rich campaigns are doing. &amp;nbsp;Obama can't win outside of IOWA because his money and organization cannot manipulate the vote like they can in IOWA. &amp;nbsp; That is why Clinton is the better general election candidate. Wake up Obamites or we will end up with another Republican and all those wonderful Supreme Courts judges that will send us back to the 19th century. &lt;br&gt;Roger, Orland,FL (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 3:20 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;I agree Iowa is a joke. &amp;nbsp;All the anti posts here are all from repuglcans. &amp;nbsp;The trolls do the dirty work day after day for the rnc and the worst is they have to pretend to be Dem's, must pay well .&lt;br&gt;Politics, a curse and a pyrrhic system.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494292</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:44:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494292</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>This has been one heck of a time for Hillary...... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;attacks Obama for having a PAC, then we learn she got money from it.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;her husband contends he was against the war all along, yet the facts shows he backed the President..... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some nutjob takes people hostage in her offices..... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She takes some quotes from Obama about wanting to be president when he was 4 years old.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and it's only Monday..... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;jerry/corpus christi texas (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:25 &lt;br&gt;-----------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just do what I do, Jerry. Keep thinking to yourself &amp;quot;one more month of Hillary. One more month of Hillary.&amp;quot; It is like the Wizard of Oz, afterall, and she's the Wicked Witch of the West in this dream sequence...</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494294</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:44:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494294</guid><dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator><description>Mike, no i won't vote for Hillary, i would vote for a Republican before i vote for Hillary (and i am hoping that Huckabee gets the nomination). Take it how you want to take it. It is what it is.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494300</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:45:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494300</guid><dc:creator>DA</dc:creator><description>So it's ok for everyone and their dog to attack Hillary's character, but somehow it's not a legitimate question to ask who this Obama guy is anyway? &amp;nbsp;This if how GW got elected, by not asking the real questions. &amp;nbsp;You think the Republicans are not going to ask questions about Obama's character?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494309</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:48:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494309</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>if you can't find anything more meaningful to post than pre-historic poll numbers in an attempt to pump up the hillary, don't post anything, hillary ain't going to win and edwards is still very much a possibility much to your dismay &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MK,MO (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:14 PM) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice to see that you're arguing about polls now rather than against them...Here are the polling and end dates for the most recent polls. The Iowa Univ. numbers aren't available yet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DMR poll 11/25-28 end date 11/28 &lt;br&gt;ARG &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/26-29 end date 11/29 &lt;br&gt;RAS &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/26-27 end date 11/27 &lt;br&gt;Pew &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;11/07-25 end date 11/25 &lt;br&gt;SV &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 11/23-25 end date 11/25 &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which poll is pre-historic? There is a four day difference between the end dates for the polls with the ARG poll having the latest end date. &lt;br&gt;Dates for all the polls can be found here; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/"&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Even though I post these links most every morning, so many seem unwilling or unable to follow a link before treating everyone to their half-baked analysis.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The polls all indicate that the race is a close contest between the top 3. As an Edwards supporter, what can he do to keep his name in the news and not be crowded out by all of the Clinton v. Obama coverage? &lt;br&gt;I know you hate Clinton, but Edwards CAN'T be third in the caucus if he wants to go forward, and that means that he must defeat one or both of them. How's he do it? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van &lt;br&gt;vanreuter, NY NY (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:36 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;----------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey van. Even the First Read article mentions that the dates of THIS specific poll began on 11/5. There's been a debate and a lot of other crap said and done since a lot of those people were polled. Given what I read on MSNBC last night, it appears that Obama, not Hillary, is leading Iowa at the moment.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494313</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:50:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494313</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>Obama is a phony - NOT a populist! &lt;br&gt;Obama voted to - confirm Condi Rice, voted FOR more NAFTA via the Oman FTA last year and supports the Peru FTA!! &lt;br&gt;Obama endorsed and campaigned for Joe Lieberman - and as soon as he was elected to the senate, Obama began voting FOR every war funding bill for a war he supposedly &amp;quot;opposed.&amp;quot; He suddenly began voting against war funding when he became a presidential candidate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Corporate lobbyists and PACs have funded Obama's political career from Illinois to the Senate. But he stopped taking their money in 2007 when he became a presidential candidate. ha! as if they won't remember who paved his way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anita, Savannah, GA (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:41 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;---------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I am sure you'll provide us with the appropriate links to legitimate websites that'll verify your allegations and mud-slinging, right?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494321</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:57:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494321</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>Besides, didn't MSNBC have as one of its top headlines last night that the present leaders in Iowa are Obama and Huckabee?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494341</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:06:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494341</guid><dc:creator>Hillary Baltar</dc:creator><description>So it looks like the Cylons have found their candidate! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494345</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:07:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494345</guid><dc:creator>Chuck,San D.</dc:creator><description>sierra, i know you like to lie,it's a gop trait, and explains your support of obama but why not be honest for once in your life?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494356</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:13:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494356</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>sierra, glad to see you quote a republican idiot (points of lights, Raygun) ,proving again that obama supporters are truely republicans who want to keep the democrats out of the white house &lt;br&gt;Chuck,San D. (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 3:17 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;---------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really? I'm an Obama supporter and it's to keep a Republican from calling 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue home for at least the next 8 years, if not longer.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494369</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:17:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494369</guid><dc:creator>Mike K, Denver</dc:creator><description>So it's ok for everyone and their dog to attack Hillary's character, but somehow it's not a legitimate question to ask who this Obama guy is anyway? &amp;nbsp;This if how GW got elected, by not asking the real questions. &amp;nbsp;You think the Republicans are not going to ask questions about Obama's character? &lt;br&gt;DA (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 3:45 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You obviously haven't read the man's books or listened to him speak outside of the debates, or been to his website. Who he is is very much who you see in front of you campaigning.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494384</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:23:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494384</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>just read through this or any other political blog and you will clearly see that hillary is the most loathed ,divisive, and polarizing dem candidate, nobody else even comes close, ignore the media and vote for true change, edwards, he can win the general election, neither of the novelty candidates have a chance</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494398</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:31:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494398</guid><dc:creator>avram jack, alexandria,va</dc:creator><description>HILLARY WILL DOOM TH DEMOCRATS.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;It is possible that Senator Clinton is the best candidate. &amp;nbsp;However, even though many may like the policies that Senator Clinton proposes, they should also consider her record, just as Senator Clinton insists.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;The last Clinton Administration, when faced with the fact that protection rackets where assaulting, torturing and murdering people with poison and radiation, chose to avoid its responsibilities to incarcerate the criminals and to protect the citizenry. &lt;br&gt;.	&lt;br&gt;Instead, they made a deal with the criminal gang stalker protection rackets to leave them alone and to consequently abandon the citizenry. &lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Do we want a President who sells out the citizenry for votes? &lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Do we want a President who sends a &amp;quot;crime does pay&amp;quot; message to society?&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Would you vote for a President who signed nonaggression deals with the KKKlan or the Nazi party? Gangs that torture with poison and radiation are much like the KKKlan and Nazi Party.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;We do not need a sellout President. We need a principled leader President.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;If you are one of the few who do not know what the above refers to, do a web search for “gang stalking” to see the tip of the dirtberg. &amp;nbsp;Please do it before you decide to reply to my post. Here let me make it easy for you: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22gang+stalking%22"&gt;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22gang+stalking%22&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494402</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:32:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494402</guid><dc:creator>CitizenJ</dc:creator><description>And I am sure you'll provide us with the appropriate links to legitimate websites that'll verify your allegations and mud-slinging, right? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike K, Denver (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 3:50 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't hold your breath, Mike. You might not live to hear her answer.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494414</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:37:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494414</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Roger:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, you are completely wrong. &amp;nbsp;The beauty of Iowa is that it CAN'T be bought and the candidates know that. &amp;nbsp;They know if they want to win Iowa, they have to show up, they have to articulate their positions and prove to the people (not the media) that they can get the job done better than the others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm curious as to why you think it is so easily manipulated. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494438</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:48:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494438</guid><dc:creator>BIGOLDTEXAN</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:32 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO-WAY MAN......I WILL BACK/VOTE HRC.......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IT IS OBAMA/EDWARDS 08'.........................&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA/EDWARDS 08'&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494441</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:48:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494441</guid><dc:creator>ace p washington, d.c.</dc:creator><description>wow, now you guys are insulting each other and calling names. the amazing thing about it you don't know each other. the only thing you know about one another is that you don't or do support the same candidate. that is disrespectful. the bar here has been lowered tremendously.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494448</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494448</guid><dc:creator>JoAnne Wislowe</dc:creator><description> Robert Reich (Secretary of Labor under President Clinton) that was posted just today. &amp;nbsp;Its title is &amp;quot;Why is HRC stooping So Low?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;So you can see her and hear her you little stub of a man. &amp;nbsp;Your level is so close to the ground we are all low to get a look at YOU!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HILLARY 08&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=============&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gee, and to think that I thought 'HILLARY 08' was some low level operative, or a Hillary worshipper posting here. Turns out, it's really Hillary, the Queen of Mean!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494486</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:09:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494486</guid><dc:creator>Chester Circle City Ca</dc:creator><description>OBAMA WILL DOOM TH DEMOCRATS. &lt;br&gt;. &lt;br&gt;It is possible that Senator OBAMA is the best candidate. &amp;nbsp;However, even though many may like the policies that Senator OBAMA proposes, they should also consider his record, just as Senator OBAMA insists. &lt;br&gt;Do we want a President who sells out the citizenry for votes? &lt;br&gt;. &lt;br&gt;Do we want a President who sends a &amp;quot;crime does pay&amp;quot; message to society? &lt;br&gt;. &lt;br&gt;We do not need a sellout President. We need a principled leader President. &lt;br&gt;. &lt;br&gt;Why should Obama be our president? &amp;nbsp;What has he done? &amp;nbsp;What will he do? Did he stop taking drugs? &amp;nbsp;Does he still drink to excess?&lt;br&gt;I believe he is to soft and inexperienced. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494546</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:37:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494546</guid><dc:creator>Don, TX</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-03-poll-clinton-giuliani_N.htm"&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-03-poll-clinton-giuliani_N.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's &amp;quot;massive lead&amp;quot; tanks in NEWEST (i.e. NOT -three weeks old- and just released like some polls) national poll!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494564</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:46:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494564</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Greg</dc:creator><description> One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike. MD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No. &amp;nbsp;I'll vote for one of the Independents...&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494879</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494879</guid><dc:creator>Disliking Hillary More and More</dc:creator><description>Hillary is the one that hates, she hates anything that gets in her way. She couldn't care a lick about the public. Just like her husband, she's on some kind of weird power trip. The sooner she's out of the race the better. She's trying to cobble together some strange set of voters to try and win the election. It's not happening, and now she is frantic. What a pitiful display being put on by her and her husband. The real fools are the 20-30 percent of people that will vote for her. The question is, why? Other then hate, what does she bring to the table? Hillary has no skills, no vision, and no experience. She just has a third rate husband on the same power trip as her. Go riddance when she's gone from this race.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494943</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:44:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494943</guid><dc:creator>jds</dc:creator><description>mike i will never vote for Hillary, either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm extremely antiwar, and Hillary has shown herself to be as much a war monger as the repubs, so what's the difference? &amp;nbsp;She has no intention of withdrawing our troops. (She didn't even TRY to deceive people into thinking she was anti war until earlier this year.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll stay home if she's nominated.</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#494979</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:05:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:494979</guid><dc:creator>dan, paris</dc:creator><description>a poll that started a month ago???? well from planting questions to.... i wont be surprised if the clinton campaign has a hand in manipulating and bringing out a poll result which does not reflect the desires of americans. it is time for change... and i see change in OBAMA. </description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#495259</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:14:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:495259</guid><dc:creator>Chester</dc:creator><description>Why should Obama be our president? &amp;nbsp;What has he done? &amp;nbsp;What will he do? Did he stop taking drugs? &amp;nbsp;Does he still drink to excess? &lt;br&gt;I believe he is to soft and inexperienced. &lt;br&gt;Chester Circle City Ca (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 5:09 PM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ask you again the above question. Why no answers? &amp;nbsp;Has no one an answer to why anyone should vote for OBAMA? &amp;nbsp;Can we have some details of all his experience and great accomplishments? &amp;nbsp;ANY?</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#495280</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:25:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:495280</guid><dc:creator>H P Boston</dc:creator><description>You obviously haven't read the man's books or listened to him speak outside of the debates, or been to his website. Who he is is very much who you see in front of you campaigning. &lt;br&gt;Mike K, Denver (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 4:17 PM)&lt;br&gt;===================================================&lt;br&gt;His website comes to me every day as all the candidates do, I simply signed on to all. &amp;nbsp;I am not impressed with Obama, all the web sites tout the same political voodoo.&lt;br&gt;I read his book and so what. Drugs and alcohol?&lt;br&gt;What ever happened to a principled, God fearing, upstanding youth striving to be the best of the best? &amp;nbsp;Has America reduced all it's standards to the the Bush level? &amp;nbsp;Inside or outside the debates his speech should be different??? I see a man with ambition, ego, stumbling inexperience and way over his head!</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#495352</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:59:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:495352</guid><dc:creator>BIGOLDTEXAN</dc:creator><description>One question I have for you Hillary haters is&amp;quot; As a democrat who would love not having a republican in the white house in 09, will you support Hillary IF she becomes the democatic nominee&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt;Mike. MD (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 1:32 PM) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO-WAY MAN......I WILL NOT BACK/VOTE HRC.........&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IT IS OBAMA/EDWARDS 08'......................... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA/EDWARDS 08' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BIGOLDTEXAN (Sent Monday, December 03, 2007 4:48 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton leads in new polling</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/03/493717.aspx#495370</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:09:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:495370</guid><dc:creator>Sara,  Cedar Rapids, Iowa</dc:creator><description> Iowa State University Poll has NO INFORMATION other than the margin which is 6 percentage points that is alot. &amp;nbsp;No dates when taken, etc. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lynn, Millington&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6% MOE is low, all these polls are statistically invalid, they may end up being right (doubtful), but that will be by chance. If your target audience is &amp;quot;likely caucus goers&amp;quot;, and everyone knows the best indication of future caucus attendance, is past attendance, and not one person polled is an independently verified prior caucus goer, you are placing total reliance on survey respondents claiming they have or will attend. George Gallop discovered, by prospective review of voting records that over 20% of the 98% polled stating they were definitely voting in the Presidential election failed to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only polls that have polled verified prior caucus goers has been campaigns internal polling. It is clear from whats happening on the ground that Clinton's poll numbers aren't good, other than that no one knows where the race stands. </description></item></channel></rss>