<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum and Domenico MontanaroClinton turns her focus back on health care in a new ad in New Hampshire. The 30-second spot "Guard" highlights Clinton's experience and her efforts to work across the aisle. &amp;nbsp;With brassy presidential</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523631</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:26:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523631</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>Problem is we all know she's lying. Can't &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; that. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523635</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:26:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523635</guid><dc:creator>Barbara Moore, Orlando, Fl.</dc:creator><description>Yes ! here it is a real candidate that will get things &amp;quot;done&amp;quot;. Willing to work with both sides of the isle . hillaryclinton.com &amp;nbsp;,please come for a visit and join the conversation</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523637</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:27:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523637</guid><dc:creator>MSNBClinton</dc:creator><description>Wow you guys are just going full bore with the Clinton stuff today. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't want to spread the bias?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523646</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:30:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523646</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>PLEASE !! PLEASE !!&lt;br&gt;A few more stories on Clinton !!&lt;br&gt;What's she doing now ??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Bill have a new girl friend ?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523647</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:31:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523647</guid><dc:creator>Jessica Presley,Des Moines, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Hillary will win Iowa, the &amp;quot;momentum&amp;quot; to her is &amp;quot;strong&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523651</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:31:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523651</guid><dc:creator>Blue Grass Dem, Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>Five Clinton posts in a row, sweet. &amp;nbsp;Apparantly nobody else is campaigning today.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523655</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:33:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523655</guid><dc:creator>Carl Whetherspoon</dc:creator><description>This is way too funny. This on the heels of the Clinton's dragging G.Bush I into the 'We'll support Hillary!' gang. Of course, no one ever asked George the First about any of this stuff. Hillary doesn't even play well with Democrats, let alone Republicans. She is one of the most divisive politicians ever in American politics. This is just more window dressing and lies from the Clinton camp.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lindsey Graham impeached your husband Hillary. And he'll impeach you too!</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523674</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523674</guid><dc:creator>raf</dc:creator><description>Hillary, I bet that was a real tough fight working across the aisle with Republicans to get healthcare coverage for our troops. &amp;nbsp;Real tough. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523676</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:40:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523676</guid><dc:creator>Sierra, SF</dc:creator><description>Question of the week:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First Read, what is 'journalistic integrity' &amp;nbsp;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, yeah I know, it's an archiac concept&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ANYBODY ELSE running for President ?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523687</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:42:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523687</guid><dc:creator>truthinclintonact</dc:creator><description>more lobbyist on staff than any other candidate including the republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;64% of republicans will unite. undecideds are factored in. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523690</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:43:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523690</guid><dc:creator>truthinclintonact</dc:creator><description>john edwards no pac or lobbyist money.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523707</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:47:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523707</guid><dc:creator>Hank R. Smyrna DL</dc:creator><description>Hillary is my gal! &amp;nbsp;I'm voting for her because she's hot!</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523718</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:49:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523718</guid><dc:creator>Felix CO</dc:creator><description>Moderates and independents won't go for her no matter how bipartisan she is. While she's the liberal witch to Republicans, much of the Dem base sees her bipartisanship as quite genuine and not in a good way: &amp;nbsp;She's a corporate Dem hawk so naturally it's easy for her to cooperate with corporate Republican hawks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are no extra points for difficulty in elections. She has the highest percentage of voters who absolutely will vote to prevent her from becoming President. Edwards has the best numbers in match-ups with every Republican possibility. &amp;nbsp;Dems should take those numbers seriously. Picking a controversial, high negative senator from NYC is NOT a high percentage shot. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523732</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:53:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523732</guid><dc:creator>Sarah, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>Does anyone really think Hillary will be the best candidate to bring Democrats and Republicans together to tackle the enormous issues facing this country? She is extremely polarizing. No one else registers such negativity on either side. If the Democrats want to nominate someone who will energize the Republicans, like no other, then Hillary is the choice. She even has very high negatives among Democrats! Barack Obama would be a much more formidable candidate to go up against the Republicans. Wake up, Democrats! Don't go backwards to the 1990s - look forward, to someone who can inspire both Democrats and Republicans to come together and solve these problems which have been festering for decades, under both Democratic and Republican administrations. We need a fresh start! We need Obama!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. - I am so sick of the INTELLECTUAL LAZINESS &amp;nbsp;being shown by most of the media in adopting these &amp;quot;shorthand&amp;quot; terms of experience vs. change! Talk about a herd mentality! ALL of the candidates - on BOTH sides - have enough EXPERIENCE! It is their VISION for the future - their ability to INSPIRE - their capability in UNITING opposing sides - and their past JUDGMENT on key issues, such as Iraq and Iran - that are the key determinants as to whether they will be a great president. To me, the choice for the Democrats is a no-brainer. BARACK OBAMA should be our nominee. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523740</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:55:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523740</guid><dc:creator>KENN</dc:creator><description>wHY THEN YOU FOOL DID GEORGE OFFER ADVICE TO HILLIARY A FEW MONTHS BACK AND EVERYTIME YOU SEE A REPUBLICAN HES TALKING ABOUT WHAT HILLIARY SHOPULD DO WITH HER CAMPAIGN,GET YOUR IDIOT ELECTED FIRST WHOS IT GOONA BE MITT SPECIAL UNDERWEAR ROMMENY ANN COULTER LOVES HIM OR RUDY THREE WIVES ROGER AILS BEST BOY OR FREDDY,TUCKER THE BOY WONDER LOVES HIS LAZY STYLE PICK YOUR LOSER FIRST THEN WORRY ABOUT HILLIARY OH AND OBAMA SUPPORTERS HAVE FUN IN THE GENERAL ELECTION IM SURE KARL ROVE WILL TAKE IT EASY ON THE MADRASSAS AND PAST DRUG USE HE IS SUCH A NICE MAN.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523744</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:57:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523744</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Wow, that's a Clinton overload. Now about this notion of her being bi-partisan... What?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523745</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:57:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523745</guid><dc:creator>way to go, hillary</dc:creator><description>Considering it was the republican congress responsible for the mess at Walter Reed Hospital, as well as the no body armor for the troops, not to mention attempting to have wounded soldiers return their signing bonuses as they could not finish their tours, I imagine it WAS a bit difficult to get some of the republicans in congress to sign on to ANYTHING that is good for the troops.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523747</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:57:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523747</guid><dc:creator>disgusted </dc:creator><description>Breaking News*********&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Clinton just covered up another sexual scandal..</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523770</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:04:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523770</guid><dc:creator>get away from me clintonfreak</dc:creator><description>I'm sure the Republicans didn't want to give our troops healthcare I mean they haven't been screaming they're all about national defense for the last 6 years or anything...Give me a break! &amp;nbsp;ABH! &amp;nbsp;Anybody But Hillary!...wait sorry I take that back ADBH! Any Democrat but Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523771</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523771</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Man, I can practically hear the spine-tingling cackle coming from First Read today. Ease up, guys. Not even Hillary supporters care that much.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523784</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:08:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523784</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, The Peanut Gallery</dc:creator><description>Considering how the GOP's negotiating tactics these days consist of either getting their way or filibustering (and where are the cries of obstructionism when it's the GOP?!?!) I don't think that highlighting your &amp;quot;bipartisanship&amp;quot; is a good idea. &amp;nbsp;I'll take Dodd over Clinton specifically because he is willing to give the idiots across the isle the finger.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523798</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:11:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523798</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>She got a Republican to agree to give someone in services related the armed forces health care!? &amp;nbsp;GASP! &amp;nbsp;Wow! &amp;nbsp;She sure knows how to reach across the isle... cause those Republicans, they HATE supporting men and women who serve this country! (that's sarcasm for the slow folk out there)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When it really mattered, when it was an obstacle tough to climb, Hillary Clinton collapsed, and universal health care got plundered. &amp;nbsp;Another good question: why is Hillary Clinton the top recipient of health care lobbyist money of ANY of the candidates? &amp;nbsp;Two-three times over anyone else, at that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The health care lobbyists bought the destruction of the last health care plan. &amp;nbsp;Will Hillary let them do it again? &amp;nbsp;After all, she ACTUALLY said that &amp;quot;lobbyists are people too&amp;quot;... &amp;nbsp;Just not your average everyday people, they're people with power, money, and Clinton on their side.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523806</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:14:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523806</guid><dc:creator>--NSMSNBC</dc:creator><description>Clinton says. &amp;quot;Now every member of the Guard and Reserve has access to the health coverage they need.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;--First of all, good for her. &amp;nbsp;Still, I guess I'd kind of like to see this ad fact-checked.&lt;br&gt;--Second, she fought to obtain ACCESS for health coverage. &amp;nbsp;Sounds more like Obama's plan. &amp;nbsp;I thought she was pro-mandate/anti-choice for a healthcare solution. &amp;nbsp;Her past still doesn't match her rhetoric. &amp;nbsp;It didn't when she failed in the 90's and it doesn't here in the Senate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523810</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:16:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523810</guid><dc:creator>mike, dallas,TX</dc:creator><description>First Read,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you guys show some balance here; 5 Hillary posts in a row! I know your name says &amp;quot;First Read&amp;quot; and may be you want to tell us the news quickly, &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; but how about the other candidates. Or does this mean you have fallen for the Hillary campaign tactic of media blitz and dominating the news with combination of worthy and not so worthy stuff. Aren't you supposed to report but discern news from propaganda?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523823</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:20:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523823</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Okay, just got done reading other sites for campaign news. Kerrey drops the madrassa stink bomb, Bill tells an audience that Hillary's first act as president would be to dispatch H.W. Bush to repair the diplomatic damage done by his son...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And all First Read has is a new Clinton ad and some supermarket story?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Must be the MSNBC Christmas Party today, because it seems you guys are off your game.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523846</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523846</guid><dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator><description>Clinton gets some good news in 7 general election state polls released this morning, in which she polls very strongly in states like Missouri, Minnesota and North Carolina. The only bad news is Ohio in which both Obama and her still trail. Full roundup: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/presidential-polls-coming-in-from-all.html"&gt;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/presidential-polls-coming-in-from-all.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523853</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:32:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523853</guid><dc:creator>Ed M., Greenville, SC</dc:creator><description>Everyone should really watch the interview that David Gregory did with her on the Today Show, and should check out David Brooks' recent article. Both highlight in clear ways why she is not the &amp;quot;uniter&amp;quot; that she claims to be. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523857</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:34:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523857</guid><dc:creator>Lyn,MD</dc:creator><description>Count Bush 41 out...Bill does it again FOOT IN MOUTH:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON (CNN) — Former President George H.W. Bush has shot down his successor Bill Clinton’s idea of a diplomatic mission under a Hillary Clinton presidency that would send him and other notables abroad to assure other nations that “America is open for business and cooperation again.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The move came one day after Bill Clinton made the suggestion on the campaign trail in South Carolina, in response to a question from a supporter about his wife’s “number-one priority” upon reaching the White House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a statement sent to CNN Tuesday afternoon, former President Bush’s chief of staff Jean Becker said that he “wholeheartedly supports the president of the United States, including his foreign policy. He has never discussed an ‘around-the-world-mission’ with either former President Bill Clinton or Sen. Clinton, nor does he think such a mission is warranted since he is proud of the role America continues to play around the world as the beacon of hope for freedom and democracy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“President Bush is excited about several of the excellent Republican candidates running for president, and looks forward to discussing their candidacy once the Republican nominee is determined.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe Bill ment Bush 43 LOL</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523860</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:36:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523860</guid><dc:creator>mike, dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Barbara, from Florida&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many people have tried to go to hillary.com and have a &amp;quot;conversation&amp;quot;. Unfortunately there is no conversation on that site. Always there are only 3 or 4 threads in a day ,one of the threads almost always by Poll spin master Mark Penn and they generate very few and surprise, only friendly responses. No room for dissent or critisism. I don't know why people have to wonder what a Hillary presidency will be like . All you need to do is check her web. The message is tightly controlled and pre-polled and the scant &amp;quot;response&amp;quot; that they receive is only the echo of what they like to hear for themselves and not a real discussion about issues. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is in a drastic contrast with Obama's site where flourishing participation is in display with a whole range of opinions not always flattering but there is so much activity they have to provide so many threads every day. The campaign sets a tone of positive conversation rather than plant a pseudo story of that &amp;quot;kindergarten&amp;quot; stuff the Hillary campaign put on the web. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523864</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:38:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523864</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy CHICAGO IL</dc:creator><description>The military didn't trust her and her husband in the 90's and they certainly won't trust her now. No matter what she says she did for them, which probably isn't true anyhow.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523871</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:39:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523871</guid><dc:creator>C.C.</dc:creator><description>COME SE WHT HILLARY IS #1 hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523881</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:43:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523881</guid><dc:creator>SAY NO 2 Hillary</dc:creator><description>With no more debates to make herself look stupid aND INEPT, Hitlery prods on. Now Bill says George Bush Sr. will help her give credibility to the usa LMAO</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523887</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:45:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523887</guid><dc:creator>MK, Los Angeles, California</dc:creator><description>This new found love of bipatarnship is ironic given that Senator Clinton has been going around for months telling people how she ready to fight Republicans. &amp;nbsp;So what is it? &amp;nbsp;Do you want to fight them or listen to them? &amp;nbsp;Or is this just another poll-driven strategy where she sees how people are tired of partisan wrangling and now she wants to say she is for ending it as well.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523891</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:46:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523891</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>Speaking of Bipartisanship, everyone know about that &amp;quot;Ex-Presidents Tour&amp;quot; Bill was planning as Hillary's first action as President? &amp;nbsp;Well Bush Sr. shot it down. &amp;nbsp;Ironic that she's bringing up bipartisan ship when she can't even bring ex-presidents together...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That sure must be embarassing for the Clintons! &amp;nbsp;I've been waiting for Elder Bush to shoot down this idea ever since I first saw Clinton suggest it! &amp;nbsp;How is it, exactly, that Hillary plans on working across party lines when even an ex-President shoots her down?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and I remember the reason Bill said health care failed: &amp;quot;Republicans were in a vote against [Bill]&amp;quot; phase. &amp;nbsp;Well guess what, Republicans HATE Hillary, too!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about we elect a President who WON'T inspire the worst in people, who WON'T encourage partisan bickering?</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523892</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:47:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523892</guid><dc:creator>truthinclintonact</dc:creator><description>Another Clinton Donor Scandal Emerges&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RE:Former Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another Donor skips the country-Links to China&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.newsmax.com/smith/clinton_scandals/2007/09/0630351.html"&gt;http://www.newsmax.com/smith/clinton_scandals/2007/09/0630351.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clintonian politics of the past will be clitonian politics of the future. Read and learn about the supposed agent of change. part of hillary's experience in the white house hhhmmmm &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523896</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:49:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523896</guid><dc:creator>M.M.</dc:creator><description>WE LOVE HILLARY... come see why &amp;nbsp;hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523902</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:52:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523902</guid><dc:creator>Greg Okc</dc:creator><description>work across the asile? she spews the same hateful rhetoric as does Pelosi.... surley no one is that gullible?!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523912</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:57:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523912</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/18/elder-bush-nixes-clinton-trip-idea/"&gt;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/18/elder-bush-nixes-clinton-trip-idea/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill the freaking liar strikes again. If you wife ends up in the white house I hope every Republican circles the globe stabbing her in the back to pay you two back.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523913</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:57:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523913</guid><dc:creator>Gina,Des Moines, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Word on the street in Iowa, is that Hillary will win the state. hillaryclinton.com ..come see why</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523920</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:58:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523920</guid><dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator><description>He &amp;quot;disgusted&amp;quot; go ---- your self and have a nice day.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523962</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:11:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523962</guid><dc:creator>Davela,</dc:creator><description>the NYTImes republican pundit, david brooks , admits he wants obama as the nominee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;easier to beat, ya know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;todays NYTimes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and paul krugman nailed barak and his playing footsie with corporations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;vote obama! vote for corporate power</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#523971</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:13:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:523971</guid><dc:creator>boynla, LA, CA</dc:creator><description>This election is going to hang on electabolity and its HRC who is the most electable dem. &amp;nbsp;Edwards doesn't have a leg to stand on in his own central argument about corportate greed ($400 haircut anyone?), and the GOP will eat obama alive in the general. &amp;nbsp;Come on Dems...it's time to rally around Hillary if we really want the White House back. &amp;nbsp;As the saying goes, it takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524004</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:24:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524004</guid><dc:creator>S. B. Stein E.B. NJ</dc:creator><description>I would hope that all of the candidates reach across the isle to the other side. &amp;nbsp;That doesn't seem to be happening this time around in the Senate. &amp;nbsp;There are something that the Republicans seem to be stopping. &amp;nbsp;Has Hillary made any calls to them to ask for comprimise? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many sites do fact checking on all of these claims that the candidates make? &amp;nbsp;I would love to see all the mistakes that they make. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524006</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:24:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524006</guid><dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator><description>LOOKIE HERE, CHELSE HERE IT IS AGAIN..................hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524008</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:24:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524008</guid><dc:creator>for the record</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot; cause those Republicans, they HATE supporting men and women who serve this country!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No - they hate BEING the men and women who serve this country - got lip service for tham all day long. (No sarcasm whatsoever for you FOX SPEWS types.)</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524009</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:25:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524009</guid><dc:creator>Lisa Stevens, Birmingham AL</dc:creator><description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Count Bush 41 out...Bill does it again FOOT IN MOUTH: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Clinton's need some serious medical care. It used to be that they would have a smidge of truth when ever they told their lies. Now, nothing matters any more. What ever sounds good at the moment, just let it rip. Pretty soon they'll be saying that the Pope is flying the Hill-a-copter and the Dalai Lama makes them breakfest in bed.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524019</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:27:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524019</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Clarksburg WV</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton can be bipartisan? &amp;nbsp;You have got to be kidding me! &amp;nbsp;Whatever, the true believers of Senator Clinton will believe anything and there is no changing thier minds (they don't let little things like facts and history color thier thinking). &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was going to go into a long list of examples of her not being bipartisan but what is the point, folks will believe what they will. &amp;nbsp;If you see this article for the joke that it is then good for you, and if you actually think this proves how bipartisan Senator Clinton is... well good for you as well.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524048</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524048</guid><dc:creator>Obama Supporters Anonymous, San Jose, Ca.</dc:creator><description>Waaah waaah waaaah, I'm Sierra and the rest of the Obamites, I'm now just gonna complain because the media is covering Hillary. Boo hoo, it's so saddening that my candidates complete charisma alongside his shallow AND uneven voting and lack of vote casting records can't generate consistent poll numbers and we just can't stand that ugly Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boo!</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524050</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:35:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524050</guid><dc:creator>truthinclintonact</dc:creator><description>Establishment Candidate&lt;br&gt;Preffered by Wallstreet&lt;br&gt;Campaign Strategist(Mark Penn)Lobbyist on loan&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Monica Lewinsky&lt;br&gt;Denied having sexual relations&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Relationship with Paula Jones (extramarital affair)&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Clinton found in civil contempt for Jones testimony&amp;quot;-April 12, 1999&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Clinton Disbarred From Supreme Court&amp;quot;-Oct. 1,2001&lt;br&gt;Clinton ordered to pay more than $90,000. for contempt in Jones case&amp;quot;-July, 29, 1999&lt;br&gt;Clinton pays Paula Jones $850,000 to settle lawsuit-1998.&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Jaunita Broaddrick accuses Clinton of rape when he was Attorney General of Arkansas&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Kathleen Willey Schwicker-accuses President Clinton of groping her in the Oval office. Lawsuit filed.&lt;br&gt;-Schwicker children and family threatened.&lt;br&gt;-Schwicker personal records released by Clintons in an attempt to damage her name, credibility and reputation.&lt;br&gt;-ciil suit filed against The Clintons. Hillary involved.&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Whitewater-1998&lt;br&gt;-Hillary claims 99 times that she couldn't recall her work for Madison Guaranty Savings &amp;amp; Loan.&lt;br&gt;-document prepared by Hillary, value Whitewater property at $400,000, when the government got only $38,000 for it six years later.&lt;br&gt;-Why was a second check-from the trustee account of theClinton's Whitewater partner, James McDougal - made out for the exact amount needed to pay off a $27,600. loan? Why did it contain the notation &amp;quot;payoff Clinton&amp;quot;?&lt;br&gt;------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton-Rose Law Firm (fraudelent real estate deal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524055</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:37:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524055</guid><dc:creator>Travis, Louisville, Ky.</dc:creator><description>He has never discussed an ‘around-the-world-mission’ with either former President Bill Clinton or Sen. Clinton, nor does he think such a mission is warranted since he is proud of the role America continues to play around the world as the beacon of hope for freedom and democracy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“President Bush is excited about several of the excellent Republican candidates running for president, and looks forward to discussing their candidacy once the Republican nominee is determined.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe Bill ment Bush 43 LOL &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How, again, exactly, is America this wonderful symbol still? People around the world hate us, and our true ELECTED PRESIDENT Al Gore even blasts us on international airtime. Yeah GHW way to stand up for your inept smirking chimp of a son... but we all know he's nothing more than a coked up cowboy with a humongous inferiority complex. It's not like your presidency was actually successful or memorable either.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524059</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:40:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524059</guid><dc:creator>Rufus Gibbons,  DC</dc:creator><description>Bipartisanship is something we could use a lot more of it has been rare since Newt came in with his contract on America. When we have a congress which delights in gridlock and a president who won't talk to any country that doesn't like us. We need Hillary Clinton's leadership.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524125</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:00:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524125</guid><dc:creator>csh, IL</dc:creator><description>Great ad - great candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary 08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524224</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524224</guid><dc:creator>Paul Lyons</dc:creator><description>GO HILLAR GO hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524250</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524250</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>I wish Clinton supporters would learn how to spell Clinton family first names.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524252</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:42:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524252</guid><dc:creator>lisa, pa</dc:creator><description>Didn't she say earlier in the campaign that she should be elected because she will give the 'publicans a beat down. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess putting them in a headlock or sleeper hold until they gave in is how she'll work across the aisle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I pray daily that Hellary will NOT be the next Pres.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524289</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:52:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524289</guid><dc:creator>ace p   washington, d.c.</dc:creator><description>She said she was the one that would go to washington and know how to fight the republicans. now she is trying to pretend she is a change agent. she is trying to use biden, richardson and obama's words. she has shifted throughout the entire campaign. remaking her image. now she is trying to say her campaign is on the uptick when it is edwards that is on the uptick.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524401</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:31:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524401</guid><dc:creator>vanreuter, NY NY</dc:creator><description> She said she was the one that would go to washington and know how to fight the republicans. now she is trying to pretend she is a change agent. she is trying to use biden, richardson and obama's words. she has shifted throughout the entire campaign. remaking her image. now she is trying to say her campaign is on the uptick when it is edwards that is on the uptick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ace p washington, d.c. (Sent Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:52 PM)&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Previous&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're wrong, of course and willfully misinterpret the difference between touting one's ability to get elected and one's strategy for governance.&lt;br&gt;Fighting the republican attack machine and standing up to their (and now your) smears is something that Hillary HAS done for 15 years. Promoting a centrist agenda and reaching across the aisle to do so has been Hillary's philosophy since her election in 2000, and demonstrably so. To imply otherwise is to deny the facts, which are readily available.&lt;br&gt;Please use the links I post daily to examine things like bills passed (thomas.com) voting records, liberal/conservative ratings (nationaljournal.com)and other pertinent information that would allow you to check you contentions against the facts.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;It is one thing to be opinionated, and another entirely to put forth a CONSIDERED opinion that is buttressed by factual information. If you say that senator Clinton has, &amp;quot;shifted&amp;quot;, on issues, it should be simple enough to produce some evidence of this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would have to believe that there has never been a candidate for any office in world history who hasn't said that their campaign was on the rise, and despite your allusion to omnipotence, whose campaign REALLY is on the upswing is unclear to even the most savvy political pundits. Your contentions are more evidence of your own &amp;nbsp;misunderstanding and bias than a considered independent opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Van</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524443</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:51:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524443</guid><dc:creator>Rob, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>Memo to Obama supporters: Please get ready for the media to begin to scrutinize your man and turn on him. It is coming, trust me. The media can take away what it has given very fast. Face it, Obama has gotten a FREE PASS from the media and political pundits. It won't last and it won't be pretty when it ends. It's coming very soon. Trust me. Soon the media will begin to reprt that Obama doesn't have much of a record after all. That he misses 80% of his senate votes. That he votes &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; many times to avoid casting a decisive vote. That he didn't even cast a vote in the Iranian guard vote, but yet is critical of Clinton for her vote decalring that the guard is a terrorist organization. Yes very soon, the media will begin to fuel the fire that will be the Oprah backlash. Soon the media will report that Obama plays loose with the facts in NH about his own healthcare plan and misrepresents Hillary's plan. Yes soon things will balance out because they always do. </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524510</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:28:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524510</guid><dc:creator>Mary Bergfeld, Eugene, OR </dc:creator><description>....and when her skills are threatened or questioned the Clinton's make stuff up! George Bush senior has reputiated the Clinton claim that he would be an envoy for Hillary (see CNN ticker) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524895</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:59:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524895</guid><dc:creator>Barry, Durham, NC</dc:creator><description>Travis, Louisville, Ky., you're right about the Gore thing. &amp;nbsp;You should have STAYED over there Gore instead of pulling one of your Jane Fonda moments. &amp;nbsp;America isn't perfect, but don't air our dirty laundry on foreign soil and think you're &amp;quot;one of us.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Typical elitist shill.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#524996</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:59:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524996</guid><dc:creator>sonya, atlanta, ga</dc:creator><description>So her turn up the heat on the Republicans message at Iowa's JJ dinner has turned into lets hold hands and sing kumbaya. &amp;nbsp;There are so many Hillary faces spinning, it reminds me of the little girl in the exorcist.</description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#525293</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:10:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525293</guid><dc:creator>Any Democrat but Hillary</dc:creator><description>To all of those blind Hillary supporters and campaign workers that keep posting her website I have one from all of us who will not be zombies for her cause stophillary.com </description></item><item><title>Clinton ad highlights bipartisanship</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/523616.aspx#525303</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:14:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525303</guid><dc:creator>Any Democrat But Hillary!</dc:creator><description>go to stophillary.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama/Edards '08 &amp;nbsp;GO barackobama.com </description></item></channel></rss>