<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Mark Murray and Domenico MontanaroAt 12:11 pm ET today, we -- and, as we understand it, plenty of other national political reporters -- received an email&amp;nbsp; that contained an unflattering video of Edwards, which shows him apologizing for</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524113</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:57:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524113</guid><dc:creator>In the know in Florida</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;I know exactly who's behind this...Ralph Nader. &amp;nbsp;He's starting a negative third party campaign already!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524132</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:02:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524132</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>Why not Clinton...they are known for dirty tricks and trying to make it look like another camp...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not saying they did just curious as to why you left them out and went immediately to Obama/</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524139</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:04:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524139</guid><dc:creator>cms</dc:creator><description>Nice piece. He put a tough one together against Clinton, &amp;nbsp;as I recall. This is tough as well, but not unfair. I actually didn't realize he voted for that horrific bankruptcy bill. I suppose Clinton did as well. What could Mr. Two Americas possibly have been thinking when he went along with that bill?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524144</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:06:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524144</guid><dc:creator>Dee of VA</dc:creator><description>You barely covered Bob Kerrey's 2-day racist smear campaign against Senator Obama, but you may issue of this? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524146</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524146</guid><dc:creator>Zane, Castle Rock, CO</dc:creator><description>Whose debate mantra has been &amp;quot;We need a President who will get it right the first time&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;Dennis Kucinich. &amp;nbsp;Why he is targeting Edwards, though... no idea. &amp;nbsp;Could just be a fanatical Kucinich supporter (aren't they all?) who believes Kucinich is more electable than Edwards who is often touted as the most electable candidate. &amp;nbsp;Both are wrong. &amp;nbsp;Biden is the most electable and the best candidate on either side.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524149</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:07:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524149</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Sioux City, IA</dc:creator><description>It was probably the Hillary campaign, they are worried of losing to Edwards and Obama in Iowa.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards-Obama 08</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524161</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:10:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524161</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>Now its official, First Read is anti-Edwards? I imagine you get dirty trick emails every day, why use your privleged position to broadcast this one?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524164</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524164</guid><dc:creator>truthinclintonact</dc:creator><description>The Clinton's. Someone else will be fired or resign soon. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524165</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:12:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524165</guid><dc:creator>Kathryn in Bham</dc:creator><description>It is truly a shame that with a year of this ahead of us we are already playing dirty! I have to say that hindsight's 20/20...I don't believe any of the candidates would say they have made the right decision the first time all of the time. I think that life in this day and time moves so incredibly fast; with the aid of today's media time is not always on our side. In today's dynamic world facts and circumstances are in a constant state of change and what is important is to take each moment for what it is; an opportunity; and make the most of it. From there we move forward. &lt;br&gt;Shame on whoever put this together. Not because I am an Edwards fan, but because this is a piece we can insert the face of many into. Lets move forward!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524172</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:14:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524172</guid><dc:creator>David Thompson, Chattanooga, Tn</dc:creator><description>This is not news. Edwards is gaining and this just proves it. Have no clue who put it out...could have been anyone including the repuds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EDWARDS 08!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524174</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524174</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>Why not find out who's behind it then report on it you jerks!!!!!&lt;br&gt;And why in the world did &amp;nbsp;you include the video?!?!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Edwards' campaing released &amp;quot;the politics of parsing&amp;quot; video, did you include it on first read?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Mark Penn kept using the word cocaine on Hardball did you include the video.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First Read is disgusting and it is a shame that you can't hide your negative feeling towards Edwards!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro are pathetic!!!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524185</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:20:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524185</guid><dc:creator>First Read Is Not Your Friend</dc:creator><description>so apparently to firstread any idiot with a computer can put forth a &amp;quot;sophisticated effort&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if this is such a professional hit, how come you guys can't figure out who made it, let alone released it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;weird.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524197</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:25:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524197</guid><dc:creator>Erin M, Jacksonville Beach, Florida</dc:creator><description>I doubt Biden's campaign is behind this considering Biden voted for the bankrupcy legislation too. My guess would be Obama. He has the most to lose if Edwards performs well in Iowa.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524199</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:26:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524199</guid><dc:creator>Mark Murray</dc:creator><description>Kevin -- Thanks for the feedback. Yes, we did write about the &amp;quot;Politics of Parsing&amp;quot; video, as well as tons of other campaign videos like the anti-Hillary &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; one. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/02/445146.aspx"&gt;http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/02/445146.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you can see above, this looks like a professional job -- much like the &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; one was. And, to us, that makes it news. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524211</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:32:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524211</guid><dc:creator>H P Boston</dc:creator><description>Why not find out who's behind it then report on it you jerks!!!!! &lt;br&gt;And why in the world did &amp;nbsp;you include the video?!?! &lt;br&gt;_______________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah what's up with that! &amp;nbsp;I was going to ask you guys the same thing, why post it when you have no idea who sent it and why.&lt;br&gt;Politics truly suck!&lt;br&gt;Was it Bush, was it Cheney?? Was it underdog? No, it was pathetic!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524212</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:32:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524212</guid><dc:creator>Dickie Flatts, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>This has Obama's boy Gibbs fingerprints all over it if you ask my opinion.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524213</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:32:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524213</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Mark Murray, I kinda agree with a few others here. What have you done to find out? Follow the IP, and see if its a computer registered to any campaign (like Blue Hampshire did, when outing seven Clinton staffers from its blog).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also disagree with those pointing the finger at Clinton here. Yes, I think she's dirty. But its in her interest to keep Edwards in the race. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524214</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:33:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524214</guid><dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator><description>Here it is again, hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524217</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524217</guid><dc:creator>diane</dc:creator><description>The names are probably fake. &amp;nbsp;That said, I doubt it's Obama as it's not his style. &amp;nbsp;Plus, the so called attack you guys keep shouting about was one sentence during a q and A yesterday. &amp;nbsp;Nothing more than off the cuff stuff they all do at these things. &amp;nbsp;Not an attack like what Hillary has been doing.&lt;br&gt;And speaking of Hillary....have you checked on the possibillity it's from her. &amp;nbsp;This is more her style.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524222</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:37:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524222</guid><dc:creator>Tim, CT</dc:creator><description>have you googled the email addresses? &amp;nbsp;and other key words that appear in the text?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524223</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:37:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524223</guid><dc:creator>Van </dc:creator><description>Edward got caught like Hillary Clinton...</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524228</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524228</guid><dc:creator>raf</dc:creator><description>First Read - It's not news until you investigate and find out who is behind it. &amp;nbsp;Right now all you have done is disparage the Edwards and Biden campaigns. &amp;nbsp;This apprently was the e-mailer's intent in the first place. &amp;nbsp;You did the e-mailer's bidding. &amp;nbsp;It's like al jazerah playing a bin laden video to the Muslim world. &amp;nbsp;Man you guys are pathetic today.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524229</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524229</guid><dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator><description>Hillary is #1... hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524230</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524230</guid><dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator><description>bankrupcy legislation too. My guess would be Obama. He has the most to lose if Edwards performs well in Iowa. &lt;br&gt;Erin M, Jacksonville Beach, Florida (Sent Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:25 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe you me, this is a Clinton job, designed to have speculators thinking Obama campaign did it. Obama is not stupid, believe you me he would not resort to this, that is why he is ahead in the polls!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524232</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:39:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524232</guid><dc:creator>Seth, St. Louis</dc:creator><description>Patrick McMurphy was the name of the main character in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (Actually Randle Patrick McMurphy). Probably just a coincidence, but it would be funny if it was intentional.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's right, Mr. Martini. There is an Easter Bunny.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524236</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:39:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524236</guid><dc:creator>Mistery</dc:creator><description>I guess the Dodd campaign was responsible for the video. It could be Hillary Clinton...</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524241</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524241</guid><dc:creator>Uzoma</dc:creator><description>Mark, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's nice to know that you are reading the comments posted on this blog. So, let me ask you this: Did Obama not do a damn thing today?? Just curious. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524254</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:43:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524254</guid><dc:creator>Tim, CT</dc:creator><description>also, your techies may be able to find the IP address for the computer where the email originated. &amp;nbsp;Then do a whois and with any luck, it won't be a home address (such as Comcast or Cox) and it'll be a more specific... perhaps a business?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on! &amp;nbsp;I know you guys are political commentators... but you border on being reporters! &amp;nbsp;Join the information age! &amp;nbsp;lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you guys need some &amp;quot;tech-savvy Ron Paulites&amp;quot; on your staff! &amp;nbsp;You'd get to the bottom of this in just a few minutes. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Btw, I know I complain at times (who cares about Ric Flair??), but... overall, you guys do a pretty good job. &amp;nbsp;Now get crackin on that email!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe you should post an image of the email... we might be able to help you figure it out. &amp;nbsp;:)</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524256</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:44:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524256</guid><dc:creator>Ike Bonaventure</dc:creator><description>QUESTION 1&lt;br&gt;Who says America needs a President who gets it right the first time - DENNIS KUCINICH. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;QUESTION 2&lt;br&gt;Who benefits if voters believe that ALL politicians are the same, no exception - HILLARY CLINTON. If she manages to remotely pin this on Obama, she brings down two birds (Obama and Edwards) with one stone. Except, Obama hasn't had every vote right the first time and despite pressure from backers that he should link Clinton's and Edwards' Iraq war vote to the painful casualties, he NEVER DID - look it up.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I would bet money, that Clinton is involved, but from this piece, this might well be the work of a Kucinich person:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.pollsb.com/polls/poll/3356/kucinich-on-john-edwards-recent-apology-for-voting-for-the-iraq-war-apologies-are-a-little-bit-late-when-you-ve-got-dead-bodies-all-over-the-field"&gt;http://www.pollsb.com/polls/poll/3356/kucinich-on-john-edwards-recent-apology-for-voting-for-the-iraq-war-apologies-are-a-little-bit-late-when-you-ve-got-dead-bodies-all-over-the-field&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524257</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:44:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524257</guid><dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator><description>Really, this is a clear Clinton job, I bet one of her campaigns or supporters are linked to this in some way!!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524268</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:47:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524268</guid><dc:creator>Tim, CT</dc:creator><description>Cuckoo's nest... yeah... that comes right to the top on a google under wiki.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is fun... you guys should let us try to figure it out! &amp;nbsp;As well, you get work done for you... then give the info to Matthews and Olbermann... and they'll be on the national news tonight saying &amp;quot;as reported by Mark Murray&amp;quot; blah, blah, blah... you guys get famous and didn't have to do anything! &amp;nbsp;You just let your bloggers have some fun! &amp;nbsp;Come on... post the email!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524270</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:47:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524270</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>News Flash!!!! Hillary Clinton is responsible for that video</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524273</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:48:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524273</guid><dc:creator>Mark Murray</dc:creator><description>Uzoma, Obama got endorsed by Ken Burns. And he held a foreign policy forum in IA today. As soon as we get the dispatch from our Obama embed, we will post the report. Thanks for the note.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524278</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:49:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524278</guid><dc:creator>James</dc:creator><description>THE BUTLER DID IT !</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524282</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524282</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>Obama involved ? well daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524284</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:50:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524284</guid><dc:creator>Tim, CT</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;it would be funny if it was intentional&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patrick McMurphy is a play on Cuckoo's... no doubt. &amp;nbsp;But just because it's a fabricated email address doesn't mean we can't have fun investigating this.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524285</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:51:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524285</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>News flash Bee is full of s--- !</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524286</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:51:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524286</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>Mark-thanks for responding to my post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, myself and others have noticed that first read continuously ignore Edwards or puts a negative spin on any story written about him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there a reason for this?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524287</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:51:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524287</guid><dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator><description>How come Hillary Clinton's name wasn't included. She also got EVERYTHING WRONG:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- IRAQ WAR&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- IRAN LEGISLATION&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How convenient!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524288</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:52:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524288</guid><dc:creator>James</dc:creator><description>News flash again ! Bee did it ?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524290</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:52:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524290</guid><dc:creator>jannyj</dc:creator><description>Since Edwards and Biden are the ones mentioned I would assume these people are feeling insecure due to movement in the Edwards and Biden support.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524295</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:54:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524295</guid><dc:creator>raf</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Who is behind this Anti-Edwards Video?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well Mark and Dom, I really don't know; it wasn't mailed to me. &amp;nbsp;Here's an idea though. &amp;nbsp;You're the journalists, why don't you look into the matter and get back to us with the answer. &amp;nbsp;Right now you have everybody pointing fingers.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524296</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:54:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524296</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>It's a conspierecy. Dick Chaney ?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524298</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:55:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524298</guid><dc:creator>blu child</dc:creator><description>All I can say is that this video is not that highend..you take a person that knows anything about Adobe Premire and they could produce this very video or actuall even better...could just be another fan not afilliated with a party...</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524309</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:57:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524309</guid><dc:creator>Mark Murray</dc:creator><description>Kevin -- Even the best political journalists are far from perfect, and we here try to be as impartial as we can be. I can't tell you how many Obama folks think we're anti-Obama; how Hillary folks think we're anti-Hillary; and how Edwards folks think we're anti-Edwards. We try to call them like we see them, although we understand that mission opens us up to criticism. I would say that Edwards fans probably aren't too displeased with what we wrote in First Thoughts today. Again, thanks for the feedback</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524311</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524311</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>Oh no Bee did't do it ,she not smart enough.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524312</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:59:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524312</guid><dc:creator>Phil, Des Moines, IA</dc:creator><description>This is hilarious, if not unfortunate for the Johnny Come Lately populism of John Edwards. &amp;nbsp;I'm so glad that someone finally brought this to light.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524313</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:59:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524313</guid><dc:creator>Lynn, Millington</dc:creator><description>Okay, who knows maybe Edwards' campaign email the video to get some mileage out of it and to try and damage whomever. &amp;nbsp;The only person I know who has been hammering Edwards on his Senate record is Congressman Kucinich. &amp;nbsp;Maybe that is why the DMR stopped him from attending the debate. &amp;nbsp;No one talks about Edwards' Senate record at all but Congressman Kucinich. &amp;nbsp;Also, Congressman Kucinich likes to let everyone know that he got it right the first time on all issues. &amp;nbsp;I doubt he did this but it goes back to the 1st question maybe the Edwards campaign put it out themselves. &amp;nbsp;Alot of campaigns like to put out bad news before another campaign does it. &amp;nbsp;It makes sense, and I also read that this video is old. &amp;nbsp;We live a a you tube World, everything is over there and all someone has to do it attach and click.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524316</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:00:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524316</guid><dc:creator>Tim, CT</dc:creator><description>James... you're wrong! &amp;nbsp;It was the Care Bears and Punky Brewster. &amp;nbsp;They've got their fingerprints all over it! &amp;nbsp;Everyone knows that Edwards draws support directly from their preferred candidate: Angus MacGyver.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524320</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:02:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524320</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>John did it, he needed some attention.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524323</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:03:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524323</guid><dc:creator>LeRoy Brown</dc:creator><description>Who is behind the video? Gee, lets take a wild stab in the dark. Hillary perhaps?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524324</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:04:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524324</guid><dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator><description>Now Hillary, I told you not to go on this site. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524340</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:09:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524340</guid><dc:creator>Keith, Chicago</dc:creator><description>I'm not sure whose campaign was responsible for this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BUT, I will say, that while I really like and agree with a lot of the the things Edwards is saying on the campaign trail - railing against special interests in Washington and the &amp;quot;Two Americas&amp;quot; - I think that Edwards actions don't come close to living up to his rhetoric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He voted for the Iraq War, he voted for the bankruptcy bill, he voted for No Child Left Behind, he has accumulated $55 million in net worth from suing doctors, hospitals and the American Red Cross (3 times for the ARC), worked for a hedge fund in 2005 that was based out of the Cayman Islands (the same kind of offshore company that Edwards always rails against) and specialized in subprime mortgages that have taken advantage of poorer people, bought a 100 acre estate in North Carolina where he built a 28,000 mansion, and has received numerous $400+ haircuts from a celebrity stylist. &amp;nbsp;Not to mention, Edwards sponsored no legislation in his 6 years as senator that combatted special interests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And so if you were to ask me if I think that Edwards is sincere in his heated rhetoric against rich, powerful, special interests? &amp;nbsp;I'm just not buying it. &amp;nbsp;I honestly believe that his advisers/pollsters told him that he'd have the best chance of winning the Democratic nomination if he switched from being a centrist, Southern Democrat (which he was as senator) to a very liberal, populist candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure if I trust him to bring about change and represent true, Democratic/liberal ideals any more than I trust Hillary Clinton too. &amp;nbsp;I'd vote for Obama, Richardson, Biden, Dodd, or even Kucinich before Edwards or Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524345</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:11:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524345</guid><dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator><description>H I L L A R Y C L I N T O N . C O M</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524348</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:12:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524348</guid><dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I know Sen. Edwards has apologized all over kingdom come about having voted for the war. But you know what? Apologies are a little bit late when you've got dead bodies all over the field&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;- Dennis Kucinich.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Poor John. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Clintons hit Obama with kinder-gate, muslim-gate, drug-gate and experience-gate, but he's still standing strong like the cedar in Lebanon. They gave up. The guy is too hot for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, see if John has the strength to withstand apologies-gate. If he does, then nothing the GOP throws at OBAMA-EDWARDS 2008 will thrive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524352</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:13:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524352</guid><dc:creator>Merissa</dc:creator><description>I really believe it was John.It's lonely out there.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524355</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:14:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524355</guid><dc:creator>P.J.</dc:creator><description>Just in case you forgot.. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524356</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:14:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524356</guid><dc:creator>K., Austin</dc:creator><description>can't believe there is only one post on here blaming the Republicans. &amp;nbsp;They are of course the only ones who use dirty tricks. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524357</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:14:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524357</guid><dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator><description>I see Hillary Clinton all over the video.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524361</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:15:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524361</guid><dc:creator>boynLA, LA, CA</dc:creator><description>in all honesty, i don't care who made this video. &amp;nbsp;the fact of the matter is IT'S TRUE! &amp;nbsp;His entire campaign is based on the premise of taking on the Washington establishment, a feat he never accomplished when it was actually his job to do so! &amp;nbsp;It's time Dems start taking this election seriously if we want the White House back. &amp;nbsp;Obama's a nice enough guy, but he will be eaten alive in the general election. &amp;nbsp;Love her or hate her, HRC is the only one who can win the White House. &amp;nbsp;Do we really want 4-8 more years of GOP. &amp;nbsp;The Clintons know how to beat them, and they will! &amp;nbsp;Go Hillary. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524365</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:16:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524365</guid><dc:creator>raider dem, maryland</dc:creator><description>It makes no sense that the Clinton Campaign would be behind the video.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They need Edwards to knock out Obama in Iowa, because if they lose it would be a heck of a lot better to lose to Edwards than Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love that everyone is automatically pinning it to Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Why dig themselves a grave? &amp;nbsp;Beyond Clinton winning, they only way she can lose is to Edwards. &amp;nbsp;That's the only way to stop the bleeding if Iowa doesn't swing her way. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's not who she needs to knock down a peg, its Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Common sense people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't worry John, we still love ya.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524366</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:18:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524366</guid><dc:creator>Carrie, Eastern Iowa</dc:creator><description>Let me get this straight. &amp;nbsp;A video that displays Edwards in an unflattering moment is a dirty trick? &amp;nbsp;A video that, might I add, truthfully points out two votes he wishes he could take back. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't get what the fuss is about. &amp;nbsp;I dare say if it was of Hillary instead of Edwards, most of those screaming in outrage would be hooting with laughter and rushing to high five whomever is responsible for it. &amp;nbsp;But Edwards...well, he's a nice guy, so how dare anyone point out that his votes on two important issues. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nerve!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524374</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:20:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524374</guid><dc:creator>John M., San Diego, CA</dc:creator><description>Why on earth would Obama go on offense when he's up in Iowa? &amp;nbsp;Could always have been an overzealous supporter, I guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, oh my god... the journalists at first read are actually reading the comments section. &amp;nbsp;Neat.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524376</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:21:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524376</guid><dc:creator>CitizenJ</dc:creator><description>Anyone think it might be Edwards? Let everone speculate and blame each other? Sounds like a good strategy to me.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524391</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:25:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524391</guid><dc:creator>Banko</dc:creator><description>John Edwards cannot lead the democratic ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADwjvAs9J-0"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADwjvAs9J-0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;John Edwards and Hillary Clinton did not read the NIE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJFujflVmY"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJFujflVmY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Obama SmackDown Series: Smacks down Edwards on Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4x_KnWEDjs"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4x_KnWEDjs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards Feeling Pretty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q"&gt;http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524402</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:32:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524402</guid><dc:creator>Ava</dc:creator><description>If Hillary is going to lose to anyone in Iowa, she’d prefer to lose to Edwards because he doesn’t have the funding to advertise beyond more than the first few states. But even though she’s willing to lose to him in Iowa, doesn’t mean that she’s not going to eviscerate him in later states. She’s probably just planning this to start weakening him so she can really go after him later.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524404</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:32:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524404</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Washington State</dc:creator><description>What's wrong with showing John Edwards being honest? &amp;nbsp;Is it a little too out-of-the-box to contemplate such a thing?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As soon as you all realize you can't agree on who did it, just use Karl Rove as your Pavlovian fallback. &amp;nbsp;Just ring the Rove bell and start drooling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, with no horse in the Democrat race, I'd like to say that First Read actually seems evenhanded in the information it presents on the candidates, Republicans and Democrats alike. &amp;nbsp;They can't be responsible for your own distortions and biases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ones of you who complain the loudest are the most biased. &amp;nbsp;Jeez, what a bunch of whiners! &amp;nbsp;You should appreciate that First Read gives you a forum in the first place. &amp;nbsp;Don't bite the hand that feeds you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524423</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524423</guid><dc:creator>Jay, MS</dc:creator><description>Why are we so concerned about who did the video we are taking our sites off the fact that the video is factual and true and it will be a huge mistake to nominate Edwards?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Republicans will kill him.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524433</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:45:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524433</guid><dc:creator>Rosie, Crestview, FL</dc:creator><description>I actually think it makes JRE look like he is completley the opposite of Bush and is not afraid to standup and make corrections when he is wrong. &amp;nbsp;I think is shows JRE that he will be the change candidate. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524440</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:49:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524440</guid><dc:creator>Jeff, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>A curious connection: in an Op. Ed. a couple of days ago, Peggy Noonan describes Bill Clinton in the White House as like Patrick McMurphy in _One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest_, running crazily through the halls. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/"&gt;http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's an hypothesis: Bill Clinton, and those around him (Penn, Wolfson, etc.) surely noticed and got a laugh out of Noonan's characterization. &amp;nbsp;So, a sender in the Clinton campaign, alias Neil Dooley (an actor whom I know nothing about - someone else will have to figure out that reference), cc-s it &amp;nbsp;to McMurphy as inside joke for Bill.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524453</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:57:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524453</guid><dc:creator>Yiannis, Baltimore</dc:creator><description>I think this is not as straight forward as it looks. It's possible that these are simply aliases or plants intending to provoke and muddy up someone.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524466</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:04:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524466</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Ava - Hillary wouldn't need to eviscerate Edwards later (unless she just wants to because old habits are hard to break and its fun for her).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards, after winning Iowa, would have no where to go. He won't win New Hampshire or South Carolina. I really don't know how he'd do in Nevada, but that seems like a lesser of the earlies. He's certainly &amp;nbsp;not going to do well in Michigan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know. Do any Edwards supporters have a credible scenario in mind for him to actually win the nomination?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524474</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:09:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524474</guid><dc:creator>tuck,kansas,realityville</dc:creator><description>Obama goes negative again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CLinton wouldn't do it... edwards takes votes from obama, She wants him to do well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;obama is panicing .. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524475</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:09:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524475</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Ah, but Jeff, what if someone knew we'd figure out that Patrick McMurphy-Bill Clinton connection, and use it to unfairly paint this one on her? Then again, what if the Clinton camp knew we'd figure that out, and use the name Patrick McMurphy to convince us it wasn't them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My head hurts. I think I'll go watch the Princess Bride.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But here's a question for Clinton supporters. Are you confident it won't get traced back to your campaign? </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524488</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:17:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524488</guid><dc:creator>RASCIE, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>I think FIRST READ is missing the boat here. &amp;nbsp;The most likely candidate to put this out is GOV. BILL RICHARDSON. &amp;nbsp;He has the most to gain by bringing down Sen. Edwards and smearing Sen Biden by implication.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, the tag line -- We need someone who gets it right the first time -- is really a Rep. Kucinich line. &amp;nbsp;But, I would expect Kucinich to come right out and tout the video. &amp;nbsp;Unless he is still upset with Sen. Biden for leaving him off of the &amp;quot;Joe is Right&amp;quot; advertisement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Bill RICHARDSON's campaign may be the culprit.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524496</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:23:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524496</guid><dc:creator>Gary Schear, Bozeman Montana</dc:creator><description>Will it be possible for Republicans to talk about a President &amp;quot;getting it right the first time&amp;quot; with out being laughed at, shouted down, and having things thrown at them?&lt;br&gt;Look at the joke their bloodline has produced and wave good bye to them.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524497</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:23:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524497</guid><dc:creator>The Butler</dc:creator><description>I have proof Bee did it.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524499</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:24:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524499</guid><dc:creator>C.B.</dc:creator><description>H I L L A R Y C L I N T O N . C O M</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524503</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:27:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524503</guid><dc:creator>RASCIE, Washington, DC</dc:creator><description>This video has been up on YouTube for FOUR days. Why don't you try to track down the creator that way!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still wonder why truthfully showing that another candidate is wrong, lying, incompetent, etc. constitutes a smear job or an attack ad. &amp;nbsp;It seems like people should know that a candidate has been wrong -- a lot. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524520</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:32:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524520</guid><dc:creator>Travis, Louisville, Ky.</dc:creator><description>Why not Clinton? Uhm, it's called reasearch - neither of those names has ever, historically, backed a Clinton yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are people seriously this blinded by the Republican attack machine that they think she's even half as evil as they would love to make her look.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's old and outplayed.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524522</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:32:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524522</guid><dc:creator>diane</dc:creator><description>Mark Murray, I don't think you are anti anyone. &amp;nbsp;I get frustrated with you guys at times because it seems you guys get stuck on a storyline that is simply wrong or something but, I never think you are out to get someone or have any particular agenda against any candidate.&lt;br&gt;That is why I come here instead of going to sites like Taylor Marsh. &amp;nbsp;lol.&lt;br&gt;You probably upset people of different camps but, I think as a whole most people know you guys are reporting and not promoting some candidate.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524543</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:43:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524543</guid><dc:creator>SoCal for Edwards</dc:creator><description>You could take short clips from any candidate out there, piece them together and make anyone of them look bad. Doesn't matter who did it, it won't change the mind of any true supporter of any candidate. Definately not a high-end piece of work.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524549</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:48:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524549</guid><dc:creator>Lawdog90</dc:creator><description>Mark and Domenico, gullible, you posted it. &amp;nbsp;You, along with Dooley and McMurphy, are behind it ... suckers!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524555</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:53:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524555</guid><dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator><description>Clinton didn't vote, Obama voted nay and Edwards wasn't even in office when the bankruptcy bill was voted on. &amp;nbsp;It was in March of 2005.&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00044"&gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00044&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524560</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:54:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524560</guid><dc:creator>Stephen Diamond, Joshua Trie, CA</dc:creator><description>First of all, it isn't aimed at Edwards, but rather at Obama. Obama is the candidate who has emphasized getting Iraq right from the start. The origin in Obama is so obvious that the document must have been created for that very appearance. Its purpose is to make Obama look bad. The candidate with the strongest interest in pulling down Obama (and without concern about hurting Edwards) is Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524581</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524581</guid><dc:creator>Edrie, Arlington VA</dc:creator><description>Way to go! &amp;nbsp;The idea of spreading this around was just too good to be held back by anything like, oh, say, JOURNALISTIC ETHICS.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524587</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:08:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524587</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Washington State</dc:creator><description>Travis, Louisville, KY:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After spending a fair amount of time on First Read I've honestly come to the conclusion that where Hillary is concerned, the Republican attack machine has nothing on the Democrats that don't like her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you did come pretty to the Pavlovian conditioned response to blame it all on Rove/the Republicans. &amp;nbsp;A napkin will help.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524600</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:18:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524600</guid><dc:creator>Terri, Plantation, FL</dc:creator><description>Are you kidding? &amp;nbsp;You asked Obama because they were 'engaging'? They each said a sentence about a difference in policy and the media makes it out to be a major attack war! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember awhile back Salon.com did a piece about the constant emails they got from the Clinton campaign forwarding potentially damaging stories against Obama and Edwards. &amp;nbsp;Where was your outrage about that? &amp;nbsp;Tell me you guys don't get the same thing. &amp;nbsp;(btw, they also said they never got the same thing from either Obama or Edwards).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the link:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/10/30/hope/index.html"&gt;http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/10/30/hope/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now somebody does a video against Edwards and you ask Obama but not Clinton? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who knows who did this. &amp;nbsp;Could have been anybody. &amp;nbsp;Maybe Clinton's campaign had nothing to do with it, though their actions would make intelligent people think about asking them before asking someone with the integrity Obama has shown. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You want to bemoan this kind of thing? &amp;nbsp;Be consistent. Tell me you don't get this kind of thing all the time from somebody associated with the Clinton campaign. &amp;nbsp;Salon sure made it sound like it was a widespread thing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524611</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:25:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524611</guid><dc:creator>Edrie, Arlington VA</dc:creator><description>The line &amp;quot;We need a president who will get it RIGHT the first time.&amp;quot; has been used repeatedly by which Democratic Presidential candidate? &amp;nbsp;This is NOT a trick questions. &amp;nbsp;Go back to the debate tapes. &amp;nbsp;(Hint: he's from Ohio and his initials are .... DK)&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524613</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:26:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524613</guid><dc:creator>CE, Kenosha, WI</dc:creator><description>I like Edwards too but, his record does get in the way of his rhetoric at times. He also supported favorite nations trading status with China and we are now getting bombarded with faulty products from the Chineese that need to be recalled. Iwas thinking this was Obama but now I remember that Kucinich has been using the tag line that the President needs to get it right the first time.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524624</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:35:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524624</guid><dc:creator>Dot, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Edwards, after winning Iowa, would have no where to go. He won't win New Hampshire or South Carolina. I really don't know how he'd do in Nevada, but that seems like a lesser of the earlies. He's certainly &amp;nbsp;not going to do well in Michigan&lt;br&gt;Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA &lt;br&gt;-----------------------------------&lt;br&gt;I tend to agree with you with respect to Senator Edwards' chances in states other than Iowa. I've been wondering if he does win Iowa, would that hurt Senator Clinton more than Senator Obama or vice-versa? &amp;nbsp;I can see both sides of that discussion.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524646</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:50:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524646</guid><dc:creator>Ron, Brookfield, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>My vote's with the Clintons; they've consistently played dirty. Edwards is doing better, so it would make sense for them to leave Obama alone for time being. However, I agree with the earlier posters. Check the IP and do some investigative reporting before airing this video. It's not THAT sophisticated.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524659</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524659</guid><dc:creator>Karl Rove, Texas</dc:creator><description>I did not have anything to do with planting this story</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524670</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:03:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524670</guid><dc:creator>Ruth Bethinger, New York, New York</dc:creator><description>When I began reading this post, I expected a personal attack on Edwards, because that was what we have been seeing recently.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I was surprised to see that there were no dirty attacks in the video. &amp;nbsp;Edwards truly did change his position on many extremely important issues, and pointing that out is not dirty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no clue who put out the video, although it actually, oddly, has the feel of some of Edwards's own videos, such as his &amp;quot;Politics of Parsing&amp;quot; video.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524674</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:07:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524674</guid><dc:creator>Heslop, Ft. Lauderdale Fl;</dc:creator><description>The truth is the truth..one should own up to his record..all that was said is a repeat of what was said ..who did it who cares?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524685</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:17:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524685</guid><dc:creator>sr, WA</dc:creator><description>cms, Edwards voted for an earlier bankruptcy bill that, while imperfect, actually closed some loopholes that allowed people to scam the system. &amp;nbsp;You're thinking of the tremendously mean spirited 2005 bankruptcy bill that even the credit card companies didn't push for. &amp;nbsp;Biden was a major pusher of the bill and Clinton didn't vote either way. &amp;nbsp;Dodd and Obama voted no but Obama opposed an amendment limiting credit card interest to 30% (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00020"&gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=1&amp;amp;vote=00020&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;nbsp;Edwards, who was out of the Senate by then, wrote against it (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/bankruptcy/archives/2005/04/index.php#005440"&gt;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/bankruptcy/archives/2005/04/index.php#005440&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;nbsp;Not specifying the bill in question is part of the intential smear of this ad. &amp;nbsp;Mark should point this out.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524689</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:24:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524689</guid><dc:creator>Simon, IA</dc:creator><description>Ah, but Jeff, what if someone knew we'd figure out that Patrick McMurphy-Bill Clinton connection, and use it to unfairly paint this one on her? Then again, what if the Clinton camp knew we'd figure that out, and use the name Patrick McMurphy to convince us it wasn't them? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My head hurts. I think I'll go watch the Princess Bride. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But here's a question for Clinton supporters. Are you confident it won't get traced back to your campaign? &lt;br&gt;Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA (Sent Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:09 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Paul, I think you are smart enough to know that Clinton camp wont do this. They are already painted by MSM as dirty, etc. And now when they could see some good things in Iowa (a close fight between Edwards and Obama is good for them), why would they disrupt that. And you know Edwards can win Iowa, Clinton can win NH. That helps whom in the long run?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who is finished if he doesnt win Iowa? Think about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dont let hatred for Clinton blind you all the time and blame everything on her.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524694</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:29:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524694</guid><dc:creator>PJL</dc:creator><description>Why do you think this was put out by anyone's campaign? Anyone can easily create a video. &amp;nbsp;Have you guys heard of You Tube? Duh! &amp;nbsp;This article is inflammatory. &amp;nbsp;The video speaks to the truth, about Edwards votes in the Senate, however, and he claims to be a fighter. This is exactly what the GOP will run if Edwards were the Democratic nominee.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524696</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:31:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524696</guid><dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator><description>We are living in a world of widespread access to internet and sophisticated software programs (obvious statement, I know ;). &amp;nbsp;I think that anyone who has the ability to use a video editing program could have made this and disseminated it. &amp;nbsp;It would be interesting to know if there is a connection &amp;nbsp;to a certain campaign, but there is a strong possibility that it was made by a completely disconnected private citizen.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524698</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:31:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524698</guid><dc:creator>Lynn Dravis, San Dimas, CA</dc:creator><description>Come on, folks . . . who cares about negative campaign tactics? Look at John Edwards for who he is. Look at his contributions to poor people, look at the positions he takes to protect the interests of working people, look at the fact that he is not afraid to confront tough personal and political issues and then ask yourself, 'What else matters?'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524719</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:54:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524719</guid><dc:creator>bob, Gastonia, North Carolina</dc:creator><description>I dont care who did it, its a masterpiece. &amp;nbsp;Now can we get one showing how fake Obama is?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524726</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524726</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Indiana</dc:creator><description>This certainly isn't breaking news. Edwards' votes are known. The video is a clever attack ad. But where's the news? Are you going to now publish EVERY attack video that crosses the transom? I didn't think so. Set yourself up for that one...find out who did it and if they're associated with another campaign THAT would be news. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524728</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524728</guid><dc:creator>Garrett, Seattle</dc:creator><description>Re: Blue Child saying this video isn't high end because it could be made on pedestrian software...I think the issue is that this video is powerful and potentially effective (indicating someone with talent/expertise), not that it is made on professional equipment. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that this ends up hurting Obama more than anyone since he's the one people are looking to for explanations about where it came from. &amp;nbsp;(Even though obviously no candidate is stupid enough to put something like that out).</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524764</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:23:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524764</guid><dc:creator>Ellis B. Kingman, az.</dc:creator><description>If the video is factual I applaud John Edwards, they say owning up to mistakes is more noble than denial. Speaking of denial, does anyone recall&amp;quot; I did not have sex with that woman!&amp;quot;,&amp;quot; the accusation is a right wing conspiracy!&amp;quot;, &amp;quot; I smoked pot, but I did not inhale&amp;quot;, ect, ect. And what if George Bush were noble enough to admit all his lies and mistakes, where would we find enough space to store all the videos? The bottom line is the Edwards video is not news at all, it is tabloid slander and will benefit Edwards by displaying his honesty.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524770</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:28:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524770</guid><dc:creator>Jade7243</dc:creator><description>C'mon Chuck Todd -- you're supposed to be a professional journalist at a professional news organization. Do the research first, then post the stupid thing. There is no need to rush this &amp;quot;news flash&amp;quot; out to the public. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will probably turn out to be some You-Tube stunt that you all fell for. The high school students behind it are probably laughing their pimply little a**es off.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524783</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524783</guid><dc:creator>Mark, NY</dc:creator><description>Can't be a clinton job, She's guilty of all of the same 'sins' as Edwards highlighted in that video. &amp;nbsp;She'll never admit she's sorry tho.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524789</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:41:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524789</guid><dc:creator>OhioMom</dc:creator><description>Like the video said, that was then, this is now. &amp;nbsp;Sad fact is that 90% of the American public would have &amp;quot;voted&amp;quot; for the war, and Edwards talked then about how important it would be for the administration to &amp;quot;get it right&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;by providing security while a new Iraqi gov't was being formed. &amp;nbsp;Tom Friedman and Newsweek's Fareed Zakaria said the same thing (Guess George and Dick weren't listening.) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problems with NCLB are mostly due to implementation and poor funding, and you can't blame a senator for that. &amp;nbsp;What we need is a president who can look at the facts in front of him, recognize an error, and CHANGE COURSE before it's too late. Edwards is the anti-Bush, the 180-degree turn from the stubborn and narrow-minded thinking that got us into the mess we're in today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, Edwards co-sponsored 203 bills in the Senate, was the first to introduce anti-spyware legislation, played a key role in developing patient's rights bill, and worked closely with McCain on campaign finance reform. &amp;nbsp;He also spent about six months saving Bill Clinton's ass from impeachment. &amp;nbsp;(He deposed Monica, for one thing ... an interesting few hours, I'm sure). &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524804</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:49:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524804</guid><dc:creator>John Alexander,Edinboro,PA</dc:creator><description>I went out to the barn four days ago and found all the goats gathered around the laptop (I can only provide one laptop to the animals in the barn and the goats always hog it, gets the cows in a tizzy and the horses don't speak to the goats anymore) but anyways, they were the ones who produced this video, I admonished them and they are not to blog for a week (made the horses happy and the cows are now in charge of all internet functions in the barn). Sorry, no political dirty tricks here, just some animals having fun. I guess the goats got your goat, HA HA.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524812</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:51:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524812</guid><dc:creator>Joe, Des Moines, Iowa</dc:creator><description>I could care less I am voting for Edwards. I hope to God democrats are not so stupid as to pass by the sure thing. Seriously, if you put Edwards up against a Republican in the next race it will be a landslide. Put up Obama or Clinton for the obvious reason, whether right or wrong, you are taking a risk.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524819</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:58:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524819</guid><dc:creator>Mark From NY</dc:creator><description>This can't be the Clinton campaign, Hillary is guilty of all these haunts too.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524864</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:35:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524864</guid><dc:creator>k. austin</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Are people seriously this blinded by the Republican attack machine that they think she's even half as evil as they would love to make her look.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;- &amp;nbsp;That's great Travis....I'm still disappinted though that it took this long for the party line to be floated. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524865</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:35:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524865</guid><dc:creator>TK, Long Beach, CA</dc:creator><description>This is sub-gossip column reportage.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524876</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:43:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524876</guid><dc:creator>Emmanuel Otis, Reston, Virginia</dc:creator><description>Hillary you are such a DEVIL. Now you go after Edwards after attcking Obama. We must get to the bottom of this AD to save our lives and IOWA from making a wrong choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bet you all that after the truth has been revealed about hillary being behind this ad, the race will focus on Obama and Edwards only. This is not Obama and I can swear to it neither is it from iden. This smells of Hillary all the way from 1000miles away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;America and Edwards supporters please wake up and see this for what it is; bush lite political tactics from the Clintons. God help us all. I hope after this video all Edwards supporters will vote Obama to teach Hillary a lesson because Obama has the support and resources to keep Hillary away from the White House.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524897</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:00:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524897</guid><dc:creator>CoffeeKid</dc:creator><description>SeriouslySoSorry = Reille Hunter</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524931</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:43:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524931</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Staten Island, NY</dc:creator><description>if it turns out to be Obama it will be a one day story if that. &amp;nbsp;If it turns out to be from the Clinton camp it will be a week or more before this story is done with.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524939</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:51:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524939</guid><dc:creator>carl mertz sidney,ohio </dc:creator><description>I THINK IT IS GEORGE W.DOING THIS. I know for a fact he been trying to get into hillary knitter's for a long time since bill won't so he's trying to help her out ?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524945</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:57:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524945</guid><dc:creator>Ross, Sulphur, LA</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Doesn't anyone remember that Saddam was playing games with when and where inspectors (U.N. INSPECTORS NOT U.S.) go? &amp;nbsp;Wasn't that enough to arouse suspicion? &amp;nbsp;If there were no WMD's... why not just let UN inspectors go in take a look and be satisfied. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cmon folks. &amp;nbsp;Saddam was hiding something, he beat us at it and we are now paying the price for not acting fast enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And even if I am wrong, it would appear just about every politician was dead wrong also (Clinton, Bush, Edwards, etc, etc, etc), the only difference is that Edwards is MAN enough to admit it, and he is getting CREAMED for it. &amp;nbsp;I don't blame Bush one bit for standing his ground, especially considering he is caught on the other side of the ball by not having the luxury of admitting any mistake to those who would still like to take us out. &amp;nbsp;Not exactly the kind of recruiting stuff you want to give them...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I will say this: &amp;nbsp;Better the sword and shield of the United States is extended, to give and receive blows in combat at afar, that they may not land on the body.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524947</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:58:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524947</guid><dc:creator>carl mertz sidney,ohio </dc:creator><description>I THINK IT IS GEORGE W.DOING THIS. I know for a fact he been trying to get into hillary knitter's for a long time since bill won't so he's trying to help her out ?</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524960</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:12:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524960</guid><dc:creator>Tony the Misfit, Paterson, N.J.</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp; I think the video is less than impressive. Only 4 apologies and on is an &amp;quot;it has to change (NCLB)&amp;quot; statement. Yucca Mountain and the Bankruptcy bill are not killers politically and Edwards voted on hundreds of bills. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; It is ridiculous to think that of all the candidates on both sides, Edwards is the only on with mistakes or changing his opinion on an issue (think Giuliani...immigration, Dodd...intelligence, Romney...abortion, Clinton...NAFTA, for example).&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; 75% of Americans and mostly all of the Senate and House got it wrong on Iraq. Bush was the one who violated the terms of the legislation that gave him power, as a last resort, to go to war in Iraq. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; As far as who put it on...ask yourself, like Sherlock Holmes, who benefits most? Clearly the contents are to harm John Edwards, the one Democrat who beats all the Republican candidates handily.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; It was a Republican, a Republican candidate, a Republican support group, or the Republicans National Committee. They love dirty tricks and thoroughly enjoy &amp;nbsp;wedging Democrats apart, divide and conquer.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524988</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:48:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524988</guid><dc:creator>Mike Brooks, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Actually, it's no secret. Go take a look at the businesses behind outsourcing and H1-B guest workers. What is especially troubling about this is that MSNBC is fully aware of it but is playing cute with us here. It isn't just business interests behind this, either. There is every evidence that the governments of India and China have been funneling millions of dollars in campaign donations, through minimum wage earning dishwashers and store workers in New York, San Francisco, all over. If nothing else, this ought to have ben the biggest story to hit the press this year. Instead we get treated to garbage about Paris Hilton, the Clinton's imagine remaking, and nonsense about why the Congress doesn't do anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards is the Lou Dobbs of candidates, the one that fired a shot across the bow of American corporations, investors, bankers, and the rest of those wretched crooks. He said he was going to put an end to guest worker visas like the H1-B, force globalization onto a level playing field, and force the parasites of Wall Street to act ethically and in the interests of this country and to stop our government trading off American jobs as a part of official foreign policy initiatives (or, worse, for campaign donations). &amp;nbsp;They are frightened to death of Edwards. The American people are complete dolts for not supporting him. Remember this, next year, when you are standing in the unemployment line, when your kids are hungry, when you loose your home, when the dollar falls so low that inflation sky rockets, when violent and property crime rates climb to all time highs because millions of young men cannot find jobs, when all of that foreign investment that has been propping up our ramshackle economy leaves and the U.S. collapses. Merry f***** New Year! Morons.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#524991</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:50:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:524991</guid><dc:creator>Mike Brooks, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Actually, it's no secret. Go take a look at the businesses behind outsourcing and H1-B guest workers. What is especially troubling about this is that MSNBC is fully aware of it but is playing cute with us here. It isn't just business interests behind this, either. There is every evidence that the governments of India and China have been funneling millions of dollars in campaign donations, through minimum wage earning dishwashers and store workers in New York, San Francisco, all over. If nothing else, this ought to have ben the biggest story to hit the press this year. Instead we get treated to garbage about Paris Hilton, the Clinton's imagine remaking, and nonsense about why the Congress doesn't do anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards is the Lou Dobbs of candidates, the one that fired a shot across the bow of American corporations, investors, bankers, and the rest of those wretched crooks. He said he was going to put an end to guest worker visas like the H1-B, force globalization onto a level playing field, and force the parasites of Wall Street to act ethically and in the interests of this country and to stop our government trading off American jobs as a part of official foreign policy initiatives (or, worse, for campaign donations). &amp;nbsp;They are frightened to death of Edwards. The American people are complete dolts for not supporting him. Remember this, next year, when you are standing in the unemployment line, when your kids are hungry, when you loose your home, when the dollar falls so low that inflation sky rockets, when violent and property crime rates climb to all time highs because millions of young men cannot find jobs, when all of that foreign investment that has been propping up our ramshackle economy leaves and the U.S. collapses. Merry f***** New Year! Morons.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525015</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525015</guid><dc:creator>James</dc:creator><description>I can't believe this is even an arguement, it's obviously someone connected to the Kucinich campaign! &amp;nbsp;That's been his motto lately, hasn't it? &amp;nbsp;Further more, Edwards and Kucinich are both fighting over the same piece of the pie, the left wing of the democratic party.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525089</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:25:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525089</guid><dc:creator>TR</dc:creator><description>The Clintons can make racist comments towards Obama all week and the media feeds on it yet nobody complains nothing which has to do with foreign policy or issues, yet one little video of Edwards using his own words and everbyody says its a negative video. The Clintons and the Republicans will have a field day with this guy. &amp;nbsp;6 years as a Senator (he actually has the least experience out of all the candidates yet he gets a pass, he couldnt even carry his own state in 2004 and running on the sympanthy of his wifes condition. &amp;nbsp;Politics, what a joke!!!</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525109</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:46:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525109</guid><dc:creator>Everett Duclos</dc:creator><description>NBC could have &amp;quot;investigated&amp;quot; the video without serving as a conduit for it. Since the beginning of the campaign, this important election has been covered as a horse race and they've decided the horses they want and have covered them accordingly. The two most unelectable democrats are thus touted as the only contenders. This has been a disservice to not only John Edwards, but to every candidate that has been in the race. You can look for a surprise in Iowa as the voters take these choices seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everett Duclos</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525115</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:54:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525115</guid><dc:creator>Pope</dc:creator><description>The media underscores the power of &amp;quot;Change.&amp;quot; The people: Young, Old, White, Black, Red or Blue, thirst for change, we are clamoring for serious change. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EXPERIENCE IS MEANINGFUL IF ACCOMPANIED BY SOUND JUDGEMENT&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The majority of Americans aren't Stupid or Racist And CAN SPOT A PHONY.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA is CHANGE, OBAMA has SOUND JUDGEMENT, with OBAMA AMERICANS WILL BELIEVE AGAIN</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525168</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:06:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525168</guid><dc:creator>Doles, Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>Keith, Chicago, those are the concerns I have about John Edwards. &amp;nbsp;We all know that such points will be raised in the general election. &amp;nbsp;The reasons they have not been overamplified have been that the focus has been more on Clinton and Obama. &amp;nbsp;Say what you will, I think the candidates that have been more thoroughly examined have been Clinton and Obama. &amp;nbsp;My opinion is that Clinton will probably have a better chance at winning the whole thing but the gridlocks will continue for another four years. &amp;nbsp;Obama, if wining, I think, will probably unite the country more. &amp;nbsp;I can imagine how many will feel on the morning after his victory and how the country will feel even for one day on his inauguration.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525189</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:23:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525189</guid><dc:creator>MJL</dc:creator><description>It's coming down to the wire, and guess what?? The two so called &amp;quot;front runners&amp;quot; aren't front runners after all.&lt;br&gt;Oprahbama and repulsive Hillary are nervously swiping at each other while John Edwards is roaming Iowa on a mission. I love it!!! &lt;br&gt;Dirty politics..it comes from people who have no integrity or morality. They can't compete with someone who lays it all out there for American's to hear. THE REAL DEAL.. So that being said, we can't really distinguish whether it was Obama or Hillary but I bet it came from one of the two. </description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525308</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525308</guid><dc:creator>craig farmer</dc:creator><description>Now both Fox and CNN have Hillary up big in NH</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525411</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:49:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525411</guid><dc:creator>nuanced</dc:creator><description>Dear Chuck, Mark and Domenico,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is what you do. If you are using Outlook as your email reader, open the email, click on VIEW, OPTIONS and then highlight the text in the Internet Headers box, do a copy and then paste into this column. &amp;nbsp;Some smart person will be able to give you some clues as to where the email came from.</description></item><item><title>Who is behind this anti-Edwards video?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/18/524093.aspx#525499</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:13:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:525499</guid><dc:creator>Lynne </dc:creator><description>Well, Dennis Kucinich used that EXACT phrase in a debate, and it was also Dennis, who slammed Edwards, at that same debate. I believe it was the Nevada debate...so I say it was Kooch.</description></item></channel></rss>