<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx</link><description>From NBC/NJ's Erin McPikeROCHESTER, N.H. – On the same night that Mitt Romney returned to New Hampshire and re-inserted John McCain into his stump speech, an anti-Romney student turned up to dog him on flip-flopping. Soon after broaching the economy and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531439</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:37:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531439</guid><dc:creator>Jacktar, Berkeley, California.</dc:creator><description>McCain is a nice man with integrity. &lt;br&gt;He lost to George Bush before, and is &lt;br&gt;71, too old, and has had serious cancer.&lt;br&gt;Is he really electable since he lost&lt;br&gt;to George Bush before? &amp;nbsp;He's not nearly&lt;br&gt;as energetic as Romney, for example, let&lt;br&gt;alone Clinton or Obama. &amp;nbsp;Can he campaign&lt;br&gt;effectively, and more importantly, can&lt;br&gt;he run the country (a job that ages one&lt;br&gt;quickly) the way a younger person could?&lt;br&gt;I say Romney's the best Republican &lt;br&gt;candidate. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531497</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531497</guid><dc:creator>ain't no joke</dc:creator><description>he got it right each time. she changed each time she was wrong. yeah that is learning but it isn't good judgement at all. richardson would have got this right. biden would have got this right. dodd would have got this right. john edwards would have got this right. hillary good judgement. look at her judgement to date.</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531612</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:57:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531612</guid><dc:creator>Greg Kelly</dc:creator><description>Jacktar, you clearly haven't seen the Senator in action.</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531689</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:58:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531689</guid><dc:creator>Scott from AZ</dc:creator><description>Come on home to Arizona John.... Time to retire and take up golfing. You have failed us on Immigration for years.... At this point you would lose an election for Senate in Arizona.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Time for a change, Romney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain is part of the problem in DC, not the solution.</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531693</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:59:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531693</guid><dc:creator>Chandler, AZ</dc:creator><description>Romney = Change the DC spening spree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need Mitt Romney</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531771</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:55:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531771</guid><dc:creator>Cameron  Kaysville Ut</dc:creator><description>how can anyone support McCane there are rumors he will put in a democrat as VP what if he croaks then what.</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#531796</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:19:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:531796</guid><dc:creator>TS Ohio</dc:creator><description>Jacktar, you are so right. We hav not seen him in actions Kelly, why is that? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;This country so needs Romney's genious and vitality! &lt;br&gt;He has our votes!!!! &lt;br&gt;Go Romney 08</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#532005</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:06:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:532005</guid><dc:creator>BT Lowery</dc:creator><description>Folks, if you think that Romney will curb spending, just look at the mess Mass. is in now. &amp;nbsp;Pretty sure it's due to the novel health care program Romney instituted currently bankrupting the state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do we want that to happen at the federal level?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why did McCain oppose the tax cuts? &amp;nbsp;Two words: fiscal responsibility. &amp;nbsp;He wanted a balanced budget and thought that tax cuts should be associated with appropriate spending cuts. That just makes good sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain = fiscal responsibility = fiscal sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote McCain 08!</description></item><item><title>Proof McCain's rising? Romney attacks</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/22/531363.aspx#532031</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:11:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:532031</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Milwaukee, WI</dc:creator><description>Romney has not shown genius or vitality in his campaign. &amp;nbsp;All he's done is pour tons of his own money into his campaign and purchased tons of advertising. &amp;nbsp;That is not ingenius. &amp;nbsp;Moreover, it's not fiscal conservatism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt is not ingenius. &amp;nbsp;He's disingenuous and a flip-flopper.</description></item></channel></rss>