First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

justwaitandsee — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:02:06 GMT

You would rather sacrifice the Soul of this Country just to spread your ridiculous hatred of Senator Obam. You would rather see this country destroyed not because you don't believe in the things that Senator Barack Obama is saying but because it is Senator Barack Obama who is saying it.
They are many Rich Politician who want to scare you with WAR.... They want you to be preoccupy because they want you to make same mistake a 3rd time....And if you do, mark my words, you think you are struggling now, it will become far worst than anything you can ever imagine.
Look at your politician.... Have you ever wondered how much they are worth financially.... I believe Senator Obama is probably the poorest of the group. He had every opportunity to make millions but it was his choice to stay and fight for the middle class and the poor.
And let me tell you if you elect Senator Clinton.... She will not look out for you she will only it make it worst for you.... She will take this Country deeper into a hole And then turn around and blame it on George Bush Administration's past mistakes....She voted for the war but blamed George Bush for it's failures... when his failures could not exist without her support.
And then soon you will one day come face to face with your deepest fear, the true meaning of poverty.... It will not just touch one of us it will touch all of us....And then your chance is lost.....Senator Obama will be only that, Senator Obama...You won't have the opportunity for 4 more years to repair the mistake you've made. We are at war but it's not with the world.....It is the Middle Class and the Poor against the Richest of the Rich. So I say, Republicans, Democrats and Independent who fits in the category of the less fortunate, make a choice, and think very hard at the choices you make because once you make it can not be undone...
Subtract yourselves from the propaganda....And ask the questions
How does your savings account look (many saving accounts no longer exists because many are living pay check to pay check)
Has the amount you pay for in gas taken away the type of food you buy (many are getting real familiar with TOP RAMEN)
How about the cost of housing (Now I don't own a home but come this January my rent will be rising to the cost of what a mortgage would be)
How about your health Insurance.... Well my employer just eliminated vision from our Healthcare Plan..... But they did give us the choice of purchasing it separately......Along with eliminating our vision they also increased the amount of premium we must pay for health care to and extra $50.00 making my monthly cost in Health Insurance balloon to $350 a month....
How about the price of Groceries (Well That has me struggling also)
Will you have money to send your children to college?
And with every cost of living on the rise the one thing that is excluded is how much we are bringing home from work. What we make to survive on is at stand still, while everything we need to survice it rising at impossible prices to pay for.
And I pretty sure that they are many many more questions that could be added on to this list
(The Richest of the Rich will have no problem answering any of the questions I have listed above with the highest of dignity.... Why many Americans are left to suffer)
So, Once again I say to subtract yourselves from the propaganda.....And ask the true hard to come to terms with questions......

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Chuck,SanD — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:05:03 GMT

Obama knows negative works, he's being using it for his campaign for months now.

oh, and why does obama approve of his using oprah but disapprove of the unions getting the message out?

is he classist? racist? does he dispise Oprah for drinking tea?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Salrock, Hilton Head, SC — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:12:52 GMT

Where do you think Richardson's and Biden's people go to when they don't acheive the required 15%? Do they go as a group? Like Richardson to Clinton because of VP possibility? Or do they go to their own way? Or does it depend on the location and the local leadership? If so what do you predict?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

C.B. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:24:22 GMT

Ladies and Gentelmen may I introduce to you, your next President. Hillary Clinton. come see why.. hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

diane — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:30:28 GMT

While I agree that Edwards has good support in Iowa and will end up well, I think when it comes to crunch time, some may end up going to Obama because they see his lack of money to run an effective long term race as a problem.
I have thought it would be 1 and 2 with Obama and Edwards in either spot.
I think Clinton will be 3rd.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Linda Rayborn Myrtle Beach SC — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:45:32 GMT

I believe the people of Iowa are smarter than to have a total change of vote because of a few negative ads run by a desparate candidate. Don't believe the drop in numbers for Huckabee and I believe he will win by a comfortable margin. He has a huge support base in SC. This man has shown how he can run a campaign on a shoestring budget. Makes you believe he could do a fantastic job running our country. Also, he says what he believes and sticks to it. You know what you are getting here. Love the guy.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Dickie Flatts, CHarlotte, NC — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:47:02 GMT

Zogby shows a Clinton lead outside the MOE and an Obama nose dive. Zogby does show strong upward movement for Edwards as well.

Summary of the polling with trendline:

http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/12/30/105548/35#commenttop

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

banko — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:56:58 GMT

Who's more electable? OBAMA

http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&vid=fe602cec-a6cf-4d56-91f3-d9f725631bff

ZOGBY poll: OBAMA is the most Eelectable.
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1404

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Natalie, Portland, Oregon — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:01:07 GMT

Just wanted to say that as a feminist, I really want a woman to be president - but NOT Hillary Clinton. I want a woman who has made it on her OWN merits to be the first female president. Margaret Thatcher's husband Dennis was not a factor in her success. She made it on her own. Does anyone seriously believe that Hillary would be running if she had DIVORCED Bill? Many people who are supporting Hillary are doing so because they want Bill to have a third term. They look at Bill as a co-president.

We need to nominate someone who has made it on his own merits. Barack Obama has 11 years of legislative experience - 8 in the Illinois State Legislature where he was famous as a consensus builder between Democrats and Republicans, and 3 years in the US Senate where he has also worked wonderfully across party lines. (also read in another post that Obama actually has more legislative experience than Abraham Lincoln had!) And - he has shown he has the BEST foresight and judgment of ANY of the Democrats as he was the ONLY one who OPPOSED the Iraq War from the very beginning.

I proudly support Barack Obama!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

C.B. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:05:01 GMT

HILLARY CLINTON WILL WIN IOWA. TRUST ME ! hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Susan, Tampa, FL — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:06:44 GMT

I think Hillary will finish fourth as did Howard Dean in 2004. I predict Obama will be the winner, Edwards will be second, and Biden will be a surprise third.

Iowans like to surprise us. I think the surprise will be the collapse of the Clinton Machine.

Barack Obama will go on to win in New Hampshire and will have the nomination secured by Feb. 5.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Russ Wells, Maine — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:07:04 GMT

Im so sick of reading peoples comments from those the represent not the majority of the people...So the best thing you can do is let the ordinary people express there feeling and you others keep off the internet with your phony ads. and misrepresentation of the canadates you represent...This is why the country is all screwed up from people like you...Whats in it for me and not what is best for the people......So take your polls and put them where the sun dont shine and let the people make up there mind.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

PulSamsara — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:14:31 GMT

America is a Democracy - We are not a Monarchy.
Wiser folks than us - saw to it long ago, that we be fortunate enough to realize this life blessing.
Nepotism may be fine for the old-corner-store but it will only serve to fail us again -as it has, most resoundingly, for the entirety of this millennium.

Voting for the worst policy decision in our life times does not make one 'experienced'. It -IS- high time America elected a woman as commander-in-chief. When a self made woman of conviction and talent stands up and demonstrates the character that can stand as an example for us all - we should stand behind her - with conviction and fortitude. Hillary Clinton is not that woman. She is the spouse of a former and popular President. In a nation, 300 million strong, are we to believe that the person most suited to be the President just happens to be related to the last President ?!
Are we really to believe this is the case ?
Will we make this mistake, again ?

Barack Obama has the strength and certitude to take America in a new and positive direction - a direction that our evolving nation - being formed all around us all as we pass through our daily lives - very much is in need of. There really is an immediacy of the 'now' that we all share. We truly must begin to think big again and to face the immense challenges before us in brave and selfless ways again - like those people in the old faded photographs on our walls did - for us. It really is time to wake up again America. The time is, most certainly, now.

Barack Obama for President of the United States of America.

It's time for America to Rise and Shine again.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

R.J. Utah — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:23:52 GMT

Mormons are a Cult!

WHAT DO MORMONS BELIEVE?

Mormons are some of the most exemplary human beings, especially in regard to their behavior patterns and their adherence to the fundamental values of our society. But their religious beliefs are, to put is simply, wrong. They believe that an angel named Moroni left some gold tablets in upstate New York and that these tablets were discovered by a man named Joseph Smith. From these tablets, Joseph Smith "translated" the Book of Mormon, which is the foundation upon which Mormonism is built. Mormons also consider two other books, Doctrine and Covenants and The Pearl of Great Price, to be divinely inspired.

Mormonism differs from biblical Christianity in several areas. Mormons do not believe, for example, that salvation comes through faith in Jesus Christ. Mormons must work their way to heaven. (B. R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine (Salt Lake City:1958), p. 191.)

Mormonism teaches that God is not the only deity and that we all have the potential of becoming gods. (Ibid., p. 576.) (Remember that Satan's fall came about because he wanted to be like God.) God, according to Mormons, is not just Spirit but has "a body of flesh and bones as tangible as a man's." (Doctrine and Covenants, 130:22.) They teach, "As we are, he was. As he is, we shall become." (Joseph Smith, "The King Follett Discourse," p. 9.) There has been constant revision of Mormon doctrine over the years, as church leaders have changed their minds on a number of subjects including polygamy, which was once sanctioned by the church.

In summary, the Mormon church is a prosperous, growing organization that has produced many people of exemplary character. But when it comes to spiritual matters, the Mormons are far from the truth.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Dawn — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:29:52 GMT

I hate Iowa! Why does the lilly white state have so much influence over the nomination process? They consistently pick losing Democratic nominees. And this year, if this poll is correct, will be no different. I take that back...it will be different in that an Edwards win will secure the nomination for Clinton and likely result in a win for the Republican candidate in November. The Clinton Camp wants Edwards to best Obama because they know Edwards has no chance in hell of winning any other state. He can NOT peel off any measurable percentage of female, African American and Latino voters from Clinton, which Obama can. Thanks, AGAIN, Iowa!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Wisdom Calls — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:37:13 GMT

Hillary is going to be the democratic candidate by the end of the primaries. Get that!

Bye bye Obama! Thank you for giving HRC a run for her money.

She deserves to win too! She is a real leader.

First read, your biased reporting is a shame. Thanks though.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Josh A — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:57:04 GMT

"In fact, this is the second-straight MSNBC/McClatchy poll that has Paul with a net-negative rating, leading us -- once again -- to wonder if Paul is running for the wrong party’s nomination."

Oh really?

Maybe George W. Bush was also running for the wrong party's nomination back 2000, right?

The masses needs to be educated, and so do professional journalists.

And I'm not even a Ron Paul supporter. ha!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

David, Baltimore, Maryland — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:05:15 GMT

Governor Romney is winning because his "attacks" are accurate. Notice that Huckabee hasn't specifically, point-by-point refuted the claims made by Romney in his ads. Huckabee DID raise taxes in AK substantially. Huckabee did support using our tax dollars to fund illegals going to college. Huckabee was more fiscally liberal than Bill Clinton. So why does the media keep calling Romeny's ads "attack ads" or "negative campaigning." They look like comparison pieces to me.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Rufus Gibbons, DC — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:08:14 GMT

How many millions of dollars have been spent on what is essentially a beauty contest?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

kristoph — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:10:24 GMT

Susan,

Statistically (assuming you accept at least some of the polling) Edwards is likely to win, followed by Clinton and Obama 3rd.

Edwards is currently in the lead, most of his people are previous caucus goers and he is the favorite second choice.

He is going to be real hard to beat.

(I don't support Edwards, I am just saying it how it is.)

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Felix Littleton CO — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:20:55 GMT

One thing is for sure. Almost NONE of those second choice votes will go to HRC. This gives me hope that my party can actually be prevented from making the worst mistake of my lifetime; nominating the hardest candidate to elect that we possibly could in a year that should belong to us at a time in which the election of another Republican will quite probably see the closing of the window of opportunity we have to undo the damage of two Bush terms.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Emily, Greensboro, North Carolina — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:20:55 GMT

I'm a Republican from North Carolina and I just want to say that we here in NC know that the reason John Edwards did not run for re-election to the Senate was that he knew from polling here that he could not win. He wasn't able to win NC for Kerry - which would have made Kerry win the election in 2004 - when he was his VP candidate. He is not liked here by both Democrats and Republicans because he is seen as a phony and an opportunist. He has a tin ear on perceptions with his 28,000 sq.ft. home and his $400 haircut. I honestly don't think he could carry NC if he is the presidential nominee. You probably doubt me because I am a Republican, but believe me, I am telling it like it is here in NC.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Rosalyn Atkinson, Columbia, SC. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:27:02 GMT

Mike is the man. God is in control!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

ikie12pts Lexington, Kentucky — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:31:24 GMT

Huckabee has broken one of Christ's basic rules. Don't take the name of God in vain. He's using God to try to get elected and that's an abomination and blasphemy to my way of thinking.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Rich, Laf, IN — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:35:52 GMT

Edwards seams to be there most electable, if there going to stay in the race anyhow.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

John O'Connor — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:37:25 GMT

Well, Russ, I'm just sick of it all. It makes no dif which one wins, either party. They're all corrupt...by the way, do you know Paul Bunyon?

I might vote for him, if he's running.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Brent Heath, Dayton, Ohio — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:49:42 GMT

The new polls show that Iowa is getting it right. Romney is the only person running who can run this country.

Go Mitt

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

mike-pa. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:52:02 GMT

biden is without a doubt the smart choice for the dems. if he recieved the same media time as the so called front runners he would easily have 40%.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Brent — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:52:43 GMT

There is a tightning in the polls my friends. Good chance that is how it will be at show time.
Of course, these polls are the earlier cauceses. I'm not so sure that the early states are going to influence this race the same way as other historical races.
Fantasy Politics...Dem nominee is Obama, GOP is Romney, independent is Clinton! Yes Clinton as an independent. Wow! An independent wins coming from the outside land down the stretch to win by 5 horse lenghts.
What I think will make a different for these potential front runners is their VP's.
If I were for the so called 2 party system(don't like it) I would pair clinton and Obama up.
GOP need a Romney to even keep with the DEMS. Dems are like on steroids folks!
I don't think the Dems want a Romney with all his experience. Very capable candidate as everything he touches turns to Gold. Apparently it is not luck. Has implemented very good systems that work.
How that all translates into a TKO against these behmouth DEM's will never know. Not to that race as of yet. All Fantasy.
The GOP do have alot on their plate and stand no chance if Romney sweeps the early states. Thus the Closesness of the race.
Guilini is a wolf in sheeps clothing. He is running as a GOP and should be a DEM. He would have been better off on the DEM ticket. Has some public rocgnition but no chance as a GOP. Maybe a DEM should put them as VP. I wouldn't because he has serious problems. WOlf in sheeps clothing. Not saying he is a bad person. Just his candidancy is flawed and should have been geared differently.
Would prefer Romney...Considering Clinton second.
Problem with Clinton is she is promising what she will not be able to complete or fulfill. The type of change they are propsing is pie in the sky. Some good change suggested...Just no way in heck it is going to happen. Atleast she has modified he game plan over the years. Alot of voters like her approach and believe she can create some change.
Chow!
Go Mitt

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Luke Liberty, Colorado Springs CO — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:52:47 GMT

I am not surprised by Huckabee's negative trendline. I gave $ to Huckabee's campaign before his surge in support, but don't support his candidacy any more. I agree with the Secetary of State - Huck's comments in the Foreign Affairs journal were ludicrous. They were a risky try to show some depth in foreign policy, but with opposite effect - like Pelosi breathlessly telling the world of her breakthrough with Syria while the Mideast was snickering at her. His amateur response to Bhutto was embarrassing. Talking about Pakistani illegals in the US? What? He did not know martial law had been lifted (wow-not a good sign if you are trying to sound serious) and I don't believe his explanation ("oh I meant reinstated") sounds like Edwards saying he wanted to learn about hedge funds so he invested in one that did subprimes in New Orleans. The Mormon innuendo has no place. I am an evangelical and thought MH was the one, gave money, wrote to Dobson and urged him to endorse Huck. But after the last 3 wks, one goofy statement after another, I no longer support him.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

ps — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:55:23 GMT

To Susan: And Obama will lose big in general election.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Bill C., in Iowa — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:00:24 GMT

Yes here it is again, Chelse.. hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Carol, Arkansas — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:05:09 GMT

If Huckabee runs the country the way he ran Arkansas we won't have a country for long.He comes across as a sweet, witty person but look out he is A Wolfe in Sheeps Clothing.I'm not a Romney supporter but his ads are telling everyone the truth. THE TRUTH HURTS when you have told so many lies.The Arkansas Times calls Huckabee the Worst Dope From Hope.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Mensah Koduah, Bronx, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:14:17 GMT

I think Hillary will win the Iowa caucus on Thursday and Obama will finish third. This Obama guy is a phony just like Romney. The media is complicit in his rise in the polls especially Chris Matthews who does not see anything wrong with Obama. He will be crushed on Thursday and that will be the end of his wife's dreams of becoming the first lady.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Jonathan, Cincinnati, OH — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:19:50 GMT

Your link to the Republican results of the MSNBC/McClatchly/Mason-Dixon poll actually links to the Democrat results. The article "Polls show Iowa caucuses too close to call," http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22440088/, does the same thing. Please fix this.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Julia Paliy Berkeley CA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:38:24 GMT

What kind of education does Hillary have? It is my understanding she never received any degree.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

CHUCKY MULLER — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:38:51 GMT

Here it is! BUSH HAS BEEN AND STILL IS ON COCAIN/BEER/ WHESKY. HAS BRAIN DAMAGE. WENT UA FROM HIS UNIT>HE SHOULD OF BEEN COURT MARSHLED AND HAD HIS ASS KICKED OUT OF THE AIR GUARD. BUSH IS A PIECE OF DOG SHIT. HE HAS GOT THIS COUNTY IN A MESS/ PONHY WAR/ AND CAUSED THIS COUNTY TO BE A COUNTY THAT HAS LOST ITS WAY.CHINA AND RUSSIA/ JAPAN/ WILL SPLIT THE U.S.A. INTO 3 PARTS. THE U.S. FLAG WILL BE TAKEN DOWN AND SHIT ON/ BECAUSE OF THE ASS HOLE BUSH. IMPEACH THE PIECE OF CRAP. NOW FOR THE BITCH/ HILLaRY. SHE IS A COMMIE/ SO IS OBAMA. BILLY BOY IS A COMMIE AND PEDIFILE. ALL THREE SHOULD BE PUT IN JAIL AND HUNG. ROMMY/ THOMASON/ RUDY/ARE TRUE AMERICANS. MACAIN IS A WETBACK / MEXICAN KISS ASS. HES A TIRD. THE # 1 MAN IS TOM METZER FOR PRESIDENT. HELL GET RID OF ALL ILLAGAL WET BACKS/ MUSLEM CAMEL HUMPERS/ ALL OTHER FORIEN PIECES OF SHIT. TOM METZER FOR PRESIDENT.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Galen Haugh, Rigby ID — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:43:53 GMT

The Bible offers some sage advice that applies to politics: "By their fruits ye shall know them", which can be applied to a candidate's past accomplishments as an indicator of their future performance. Romney has flaws, as do all the candidates, both Dems and Repubs. However, his record of accomplishments eclipses all the others by a wide margin. In addition, he's not a career Washington politician, which increases his chances of making similar headway there even more likely. I can easily see Romney being a good president--maybe even a great president.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Ian — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:46:36 GMT

Mike Huckabee is the only candidate running who is levelling with the American people about the unfixability of our tax system. There are only two choices- FairTax, or "Business As Usual."

I've lived long enough to know that meaningful tax reform on income is impossible. It's been tried for decades, and it fails. Why? Because of the inertial characteristics of Washington politicians, the system as its been distorted by the 16th Amendment, the Federal Reserve Act, and the institutionalization of withholding.

Our Founding Fathers could see the problem, and prohibited taxation without apportionment. Laurence Kotlikoff ( http://snipr.com/meltdowninprogress ) has shown how the current income tax system factors into an economic system destined for a crash because of profligate spending, the taking-for-granted of wage-earners' pocketbooks, disconnecting us workers from our earnings, causing us to have to labor more to meet savings goals because of the gov't monkey on our backs - in a progressive manner - keeping us working more, thinking less, chasing Freedom (by using our Chase Freedom (R) credit cards), while at the same time the government inflates prices at the cash register by taxing business and issuing Treasury notes so that the Fed can print more paper bills than there is production to justify them.

The unholy triumvarate, (bankers / lobbyists / politicians) have destroyed the purchasing power of our dollar steadily over the decades since the Federal Reserve was created (to ostensibly preserve the power of same). The first thing the then-new "small group of dominant men" (-Woodrow Wilson, 3:30 into http://snipr.com/freedom2fasciasm ) did was to crash the economy (1929), and permit its warned-in-advance members to buy up plenty of "bargain basement" assets to increase their own wealth. They've since created loopholes in securities oversight legislation (that was supposed to protect consumers) that is now destroying companies (the source of consumer employment http://snipr.com/nakedshortgdarkside ) all because well-intended, honest, civil citizens refuse to see how they've been robbed, believing that such skull-duggery could never happen in this great land of, by, and for the People.

The FairTax is revenue neutral, which means that it will support programs in place. But the way in which it will change tax collections will stop the damage that is being done by the income tax, and the montstrous tax code. Having restructured the tax system, we may attend to Congressional spending, the Federal Reserve, and the markets fiasco that is next up on the agenda.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Brent Heath, Dayton, Ohio — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:58:14 GMT

RJ from Utah, your comments are completely out of line. Biggots have no place in the political process. I know we have all read this a thousand times but apparently RJ is too stupid to catch on so I will state it again. We are electing a President, not a Pastor. I don't care what his religeos beliefs are, so long as he can fix the economy, save social security, level the playing field on foreign trade, fix our health care system, and yes, even fix our issues with foreign policy. Mitt is the only man with the chops to do that. Your fond of quotes so here is one for you Mathew 7:16 "by their fruits ye shall know them" Look at the fruits of Mitt Romney and compare them to everyone else. He is the only man that can run/save this country.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

MikeJ, Murrieta, CA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:00:52 GMT

I agree with Luke's assessment of the Huckster. I think the ads contribute to Huck's demise, but it's really Huckabee himself, his atrocious record as Governor and his terrible gaffes. His foreign policy is something he's picked up out of a cracker-jack box and there's no question America can't afford to have someone like that in the White House. Iowans and Evangelicals are finely looking at this with both eyes.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Brent Heath, Dayton, Ohio — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:02:00 GMT

chuck muller comments are completely innapropriate. please take them off the blog site.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Diogenes — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:04:49 GMT

What kind of education does Hillary have? It is my understanding she never received any degree.

Julia Paliy Berkeley CA (Sent Sunday, December 30, 2007 2:38 PM)

If you can type and read well enough to post this stupid question, you can Google one of the thousand or so websites with bios of ALL the candidates. There is a difference between ignorance and stupidity...

From the White House official biography;

"As an undergraduate at Wellesley College, Hillary mixed academic excellence with school government. Speaking at graduation, she said, "The challenge now is to practice politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible."

In 1969, Hillary entered Yale Law School, where she served on the Board of Editors of Yale Law Review and Social Action, interned with children's advocate Marian Wright Edelman, and met Bill Clinton. The President often recalls how they met in the library when she strode up to him and said, "If you're going to keep staring at me, I might as well introduce myself." The two were soon inseparable--partners in moot court, political campaigns, and matters of the heart.

After graduation, Hillary advised the Children's Defense Fund in Cambridge and joined the impeachment inquiry staff advising the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives. After completing those responsibilities, she "followed her heart to Arkansas," where Bill had begun his political career."

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Almost Native Texan — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:06:21 GMT

Aren't you glad you don't live in Iowa right now? Talk about liar overload. Clinton and Edwards and Romney and Giuliani need not try their crap down here in Texas. We can tell a liar from across the room, and yes, sometimes we elect them (they are, after all, OUR liars)--but none of these losers need apply.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Peter, New York, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:09:59 GMT

I think the Mike interview and comments on this blog just show the anti Christian sentiment that is prevalent in the US even among christians themselves. Majority of Americans are christian and the public loathe anybody with any tie to christianity. Mitt Romney is a Mormon and I have not heard any interview where his religion has been made an issue in the campaign. Look at the interview on Mike. His faith was being challenged. Democracy is appearing to be a race for the Minority and that is why there has been so much attack against christian institutions in the US. I blame Christians themselves because like myself, we have not been interested in politics and we love to turn the other cheek which is great but we are asked to pray for leaders and those in authorities because their actions affect us. If you are a christian and you follow the race and you think it is okay. I say shame on you. Contrary to popular opinion, it is the Christians who are being assaulted in the US. America takes Democracy to other part of the world and even toppled Sadam Hussein who is a Sunni Minority ruling a predominantly Shitte community. With these attacks on the majority (christians) and anything religious, what moral justifications do we have to interfere in Iraq. What democracy are we importing to other parts of the world. I am really disgusted and if you are a Christian and you are observing this, you should be disgusted.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Fred C Dobbs, Sierra Madre, New Mexico — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:12:51 GMT

I tell you folks, Friday can't get here soon enough. The only winners will be the radio and television advertisers.

Obama was on Meet The Press - a lot of tough questions and I'm giving him a C- on his responses. He looks fine out on the stump but not so great when the heat is turned his way. A bit of flip flopping.

Hillary Clinton is the one I trust to get the job done!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

jfog, Hopkinton, MA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:19:54 GMT

Romney! All the way. He is the only one in that race with a clear track record. A winning well planned victory in every task he has taken on. I am not really in favor of his faith, but thats not why I choose a president. He is the best hope we have. Maybe that's just me belief because I have lived so many places and I prefer to call Masschusetts home. While I can say all the success in Mass. is not Romney he did not push us back in any way only forward. We cannot take chances here guys and gals this is our future and I for one would like our leader to be a winner.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Mike T. Los Angeles — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:21:13 GMT

Yuck. I'm a Democrat and can assure MSNBC Ron Paul would be no more welcome in our party than in the Repubs or in America in general. It's not suprising he has the highest neg/pos ration of any candidate. For example, last week on Meet the Press he claimed the Civil War was a mistake and there should have been no action to free the slaves (he said they could just wait until the institution died out). We Democrats want nothing to do with this vile, offensive, angry old man. (Hypocritical too-- Russert nailed him by showing stats that he is the biggest porker in Washington, adding tons of earmakrs for his district)

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Sally, Tampa, FL — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:30:45 GMT

Susan, Tampa, FL:

Totally wrong ! You should put it like this:

"I predict Hillary will be the winner, Edwards will be second, and Biden will be a surprise third.

Iowans like to surprise us. I think the surprise will be Obama comes fourth because they realized that counting on "speech guy" "just won't do for this election.

Hillary Clinton will go on to win in New Hampshire and will have the nomination secured by Feb. 5. "

Sorry, Susan, you should know better, Obama doesn't get "Y" in our state and he will have no chance to win the election, like Joe said in his morning show, "Republicans are scared if Hillary wins, and Republicans don't have to say a word if Obama is the nominee, are you kidding me ?"

With Hillary, people know at least know what she is fighting for, and she makes sense when she talks.
With Obama, people have no clue what he is talking about, and he can't talks right except pre-prepared speech. That is just the right reason Republicans are open their arms and welcome Obama on baord, AND THEN, TEAR HIM IN PIECES. He has no chance. Hope is hopeless.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

David Anders Pharr,Tx — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:34:14 GMT

REMEMBER THE OLD SONG DO THE HUCKABUCK, DO THE HUCKABUCK, IF YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO IT THEN YOU'RE OUT OF LUCK mR. IVY LEAGUE LYING ROMMNEY NEEDS TO LEARN THE HUCKABUCK

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

RobK, Seattle, Wash — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:36:34 GMT

Iowa has a history of picking losers.

Same thing with Democrats. They'll nominate Hillary and it'll be another eight years of Repuglican rule.

Politics is really pissing me off b/c people of this country are so stupid.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Peter, New York, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:48:21 GMT

Now on Romney, when two newspapers in the state where he governed for just one term, came out and not only did they not endorse him, they gave an anti endorsement against him. That to me is very serious. And Romney felt he had to inflate his accomplishement to be the President...One or two times could be counted as a mistake but several times is a symbol of being a lair. You can fool some people all the time but you cannot fool all the people all the time...It is time that Romney's lies be brought to light (I am pro gun rights..in fact I have hunted all my life....sorry Iam really not a hunter.okay...I had support of NRA when I ran for governor...Sorry...I really did not that is after NRA spoke out..I marched with Martin Luther and I saw my father march with him...the press challenged him...okay I got caught...I really did not see my father march nor did I...Okay... I was pro choice and now I am pro life...I could not support the taking of life..oh sorry I signed a government copay for abortion...I did not raise taxes..infact others did raise taxes...Actually I raised fees for over $500B. Fees are not taxes right....Summary, Romney has credibility issues aka John Kerry and cannot win the presidency)American politics need to be purged for us to have any impact and respect in the world. We have to say no to liars who are ashamed of their positions in running for office. Russia has been getting a lot of credibility not of their own doing but because of America's failure and credibility around the world. Iowans, please do us a favor and say No to Romney. We need more honesty in our politics.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Sue, Pittsburgh, PA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:51:08 GMT

Democrats - Barack Obama is about to speak live at an event on C-SPAN. Senator Kent Conrad just gave a rousing intro where he mentioned something I didn't know. Abraham Lincoln served only two years in the House of Representatives before his election. Obama will have four in the Senate! The crowd cheered! kind of makes a mockery of the experience issue.

He also brought cheers from the crowd when he said that Obama was the only Democrat to be against the war in Iraq from the very beginning.

Democrats, we must make the right choice. Vote for Barack Obama!!

(and turn on C-SPAN now!!)

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Blake Nelson, Nashville, TN — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:21:05 GMT

Please link the GOP poll results correctly both links lead to the dem results... come on msnbc this is a dumb coding error

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

pearl elliott,Elizabethtown,Ky. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:33:49 GMT

i hope and pray that Hillary gets elected, she is the very best running, she is the one and the only one that can put this country back on its feet, she has got my vote and has always had it, she has led the national polls from day one, and still leading so we are not alone in wanting the best person to lead this country

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Steven Rennie Fillmore, NY — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:35:38 GMT

Does anyone monitor this site? How did the post from Chucky Muller make it through? Freedom of speech is one thing but that racist, brain-dead diatribe hardly meets any standard for publication. The "Please Read" warning regarding comments posted here means nothing. If Chucky Muller is a real person, he is certainly a coward and hopefully does not exercise his right to vote. In fact, he is a good excuse for creating a national voter intelligence test before being given that right. You probably can't read this, Chucky, but do us all a favor and move to an island outside U.S. sovereignty.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Tracy Dallas — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:36:17 GMT

Hillary will win because she's Judicial Watch's #1 on 2007's Most Corrupt Politicians. Yes, Obama is on too for insider trading (that's a felony).

www.judicialwatch.org

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

chuck, san d — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:59:45 GMT

If you're looking for stupic robk, try a mirror.
;)

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Caroline, Bethesda, MD — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:03:15 GMT

Wow!! Just heard Barack Obama give an absolutely beautiful speech on CSPAN from Newton, Iowa. He is the answer we have been looking for in the Democratic Party! It was moving, inspirational, and just brilliant! Obama will be this generation's John F. Kennedy! I hope CSPAN will rerun it later tonight.

Please Iowans, caucus for this man. He is phenomenal!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Arp Hester, Ada, Oklahoma — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:10:34 GMT

I don't know why I read this "First Read" anymore. I was pleasantly suprised today to find some news about Ron Paul, and then disappointed once again when they take a swing at him, saying he's running for the wrong party despite being the most conservative member of Congress! Well done at distorting perceptions once again. You guys must be sweating the Iowa caucuses hoping he doesn't place, cause all your swipes at him are on the record.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Rich C, Windsor, California — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:20:58 GMT

Tim Russert,

I guess after launching all the bullets, rockets and motar at Rudy and Romney the only thing you had left to launch was all the soft balls for Huckabee.

Did you split the show with Huckabee and Obama because neither one of them have enough experiance or accomplishments to fill up the whole hour?

I'll bet Rudy and Romney would have liked to have that 1/2 hour of soap box time. Mike Huckabee likes to tickle your ears when he speaks, but when you look for the substance of what he says, there is little there, what is there is his cowboy attitude in foriegn affairs, He recited a few statistics about Pakistan after being prep'd but on the stump he shows his lack of knowledge.

Huckabee is a liberal with an angry streak, he is just like McCain except McCain is a war hero. If you look at McCain and Huckabees political positions they are just like Joe Liberman, a good man, Just too liberal who almost always votes with the Democrats, but then so does McCain.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Susan, Tampa, FL — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT

I firmly stand by my predictions about who will win, and who will come in second, third , and fourth in Iowa.

Barack Obama - First

John Edwards - Second

Joe Biden - Third

Hillary Clinton - Fourth

Iowans will give us a surprise like they did four years ago with the collapse of Howard Dean. This time it will be the collapse of Hillary Clinton.

And Obama will go on to win the nomination - and the Presidency! He will win the nomination because he was the one candidate who was right in 2002 in his opposition to the Iraq War, and he has proven his ability to get things done in his legislative career by being a uniter - not a polarizer. He will then win the Presidency by appealing, not only to Democrats, but to Independents and Republicans. This will truly be a change election - a change for a better America.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Chad, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:33:23 GMT

I am so sick of Upchuckabee's garbage. It's just another redneck the South wants to force upon us. Seriously, where does he get off calling other people dishonest. I'm sorry, he likes rapists, murderers, and drunk drivers. At least, he doesn't think they belong in jail as long as they contribute to his cause. We absolutely do not need a slimeball redneck like him as President. Please, let's vote for anyone but this dirty, hyprocritical, lying, redneck preacher. As if the last two Southerners we've had in the White House weren't bad enough, the South wants to force Huckabee on us. Republicans and Democrats: it's time to take our country back and stop voting for stupid southern rednecks. JUST SAY NO TO UPCHUCKABEE!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Bill C. in Iowa — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:33:28 GMT

Here it is again, Chelse.. hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Don L Latimer — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:37:41 GMT

With all the emphasis being on Clinton, Obama and Edwards I feel both the electorate and the media is overlooking the best candidate - I refer to Governor Bill Richardson of NM who is generally running 4th amoung Dems.This man has the experience, UN Ambassador, Secretary of Energy, 2 great terms as Governor, former member of Congress and numerous foreign trips to Africa and North Korea to settle our problems. Think about it, he is the one we need.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

John, Raleigh, North Carolina — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:37:59 GMT

Obama poor? lol He is like 20 years younger than most of the other Dem candidates. He is no poor guy.....I hate to say it, but on Super Tuesday he is going to get creamed in the South and Hillary will be crowned....even if she looses Iowa and NH, she will win at the end...Obama and Edwards ONLY hope is for her to be 3rd in eah of those two state. Heck, you would think Edwards and Obama would be doing better than Hillary in SC! I believe SC will be where Hillary takes off.

Obama cares about poor people? lol I guess you are a Oprah fan huh?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Rick King — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:39:27 GMT

I was alive and paying attention during Bill Clinton's presidency, all eight, glorious, wonderful years of it, and I'll take in a heartbeat another eight years of ANYONE related to him, be it his wife, his daughter, his dog or his cat.

Mitt Romney is the closest thing to GWBush I've ever seen, nothing but a rich spoiled silver spoon ego pig who wants to be President so he can say he was, not because he cares about anybody or anything. Just like Bush, if he's elected, on day one it will be, "uh, DUH, WHAT NOW?"

Just hope and pray America that we all get some DEMOCRATIC SALVATION in November 2008, and let all the Republican candidates ROT!!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Chad, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:43:29 GMT

ikie--i couldn't agree with you more about Huckabee using God-taking His name in vain-to further his campaign.
RJ-your summary of Mormon views are inaccurate. Since you like to cite Mormon literature in your arguements, please re-read (as I'm sure you already have read it once) the 4th article of faith which clearly states that faith in the Lord, Jesus Christ, is necessary.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

GTH New Hampshire — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:47:22 GMT

I Like John McCain but don't believe that he would make a good President.
Secretary of Defence maybe?
He is so very weak in the foreign affair area, and just as bad in Immigration. I agree that he is a nice guy ! And I agree that he is an all American! man. However, Presidential he is not. And besides, I'm not sure that a Canidate in their late 70's like McCain or Guliani can go the distance in a street battle like the one coming up in 08. If it's Hillary, Obama or even Edwards on the Democratic ticket, it will take a Republican Candidate that is at the top of thier game. A Candidate with a clear plan for the better future of America, and fortitude to go the distance. One who is clear on all facts from Foreign Affairs to Immigration and Healthcare. That's why I'm standing with Mitt Romney for President. Gov Romney has been tested. He has been proven. He has risen to enormous challenges and in every case brought change for the better. His policies have rescued failing businesses and organizations, and I believe that they will work for America also. So I don't really care what news paper say's what. It's only their opinion, and I don't put much faith in a newspapers opinion anyways.

GTH

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

ME, Santa Ana, CA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:50:11 GMT

No one will bring out the GOP voters like Clinton.

No one will create a political stalemate like Clinton (if she wins).

No one would have a shorter "honeymoon" with the GOP than Clinton.

Is this because of anything Clinton has done? Perhaps, perhaps not. Does that matter? NO. All that matters is that Clinton as the nominee would add a huge number of GOP and independent "anyone but Clinton" votes. Clinton as President would assure us of 4 years of acrimony and no progress.

If we allow ourselves to go Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton, we guarantee ourselves years of finger-pointing, accusations and investigations. We just can't afford that.

Obama is SMART. Edwards is SMART. Both are engaged and will surround themselves with engaged advisors. The experience argument means far less than the scandal gridlock that will grip Washington for 4 years if Clinton is elected. This is NOT because she has necessarily done anything. It is simply a FACT that the GOP just LIKES going after Clinton.

Dear Iowa: Please select either Edwards or Obama. Send us in the right direction: Forward. Do not send us back to hate-filled scandal-mongering. Don't give the GOP an excuse to stall the Democratic agenda.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Jeff Thurman, San Bernardino, CA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:50:52 GMT

Hey Folks,
Don't be surprised by a very strong showing by Bill Richardson.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Chad, New York — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:51:45 GMT

RobK- you are talking about something that has been a problem for a while. We pick uneducated people... Bush... Clinton... people who have no clue what they're doing, but using charisma (in Clinton's case) and scare politics (in Bush's case) to fool us into voting for them. It's not a Republican/Democrat issue. It's who knows what they're doing and who doesn't. Huckabee is Clueless. Really, there are only four individuals whose education makes them worth considering: Hillary, Obama, Mitt, Guiliani. The rest just need to take a hike--especially Huckabee who claims to have gotten his degree is religion... but it was actually in communication. And, then he has the audacity to call other people dishonest? At this time in our history, with the economy a mess, the Middle East a mess, and our morals a mess, we need to vote for someone who has a clue. Please let's not make the mistake we made in the past and let a moron fool us into voting for them.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

D. Johnson American Fork, Utah — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:52:25 GMT

The dollar is dropping. The euro and US debt are skyrocketing. The nation is shopping. The youth are pill popping. China is working. US courts are jerking the worker around. US wastelines are bulging. US dumps are exploding. Our schools are imploding. Our cost of living expanding. Our economy near collapsing.

There is no security on borrowed money not even for America.

Debt will be the terroist of the 21 century. The Youth of tomorrow will not honor the debt their profligate parents rack today.

And one president is going to cure all that. hmm

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

RB, Iowa — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:54:13 GMT

Mitt is the Man!! The truth hurts old Huck doesn't it! There is only 1 man that can fix our problems and that is Mitt Romney. I would not consider ANY other candidate. I hope all Iowans can see the light before even considering voting for Huckie the liar.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Carrie, Eastern Iowa — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:14:30 GMT

The thing about Iowa is that it is difficult to know going in what each caucus will be like. I have no idea who will be viable in my precinct. I'm going to caucus for Biden, and people around here are always asking "Who will you switch to when he doesn't make it?"

That is such a tough question to answer because, as I said, there is no way of knowing who will be viable. I moved to this neighborhood over the summer and am not well-acquainted with anyone. I don't notice a lot of political signs at all. Sure, there are a few scattered around, but nothing that would give me any sort of feel for the overall preferences among Democrats.

For all I know, Biden could be the overwhelming choice in my precinct. I could just as easily be the only one supporting him. At the same time, there may be almost no support for one or more of the front-runners. The only thing I am almost positive of is that Mike Gravel will not be viable, if for no other reason than that he has not campaigned at all in Iowa. Probably the same is true for Kucinich.

As Sara said in another post a few days ago, the only thing we know for sure about Iowa is that we don't know anything (or something to that effect). From where I am sitting, it's anybody's ball game. While that is very exciting, it is also very nerve-racking. There is no clear consensus, even amongst the top three candidates. Anything is possible.

There was an article in the local paper about how turnout will be key, and I have no doubt that is true. As has been reported, Edwards has the suppot of a lot of very experienced caucus-goers and that does bode well for him. However, the parties are predicting record turn-out (if the weather holds, and as of now it looks like it will be storm-free) based on the number if inquiries they have gotten about where to caucus and what happens in the caucus, particularly from people who have not been active in the party. The suggestion has been that higher turnout favors Obama, but do we really know that for sure? As I said, I don't think we know anything for sure.

It's also uncertain what effect the recent events in Pakistan will have. My mother and I spoke today about that, and she is more convinced than ever that we need someone familiar with foreign policy in the White House. If her feelings are any indication of the general consensus (and I believe they might be), that bodes well for people like Biden and Richardson, and also for Dodd, and not so well for Obama and Edwards, particulary Edwards. On the Republican side, I think that helps McCain and probably Rudy, and definitely hurts Huckabee, who is seen as having no foreign policy experience whatsoever.

Whatever the pundits predict, they don't really have a clue of what is going to happen on January 3. No one does. We can speculate all we want, but that is just what it is - speculation.

As for me, I am going in believing that Biden will be viable. Stranger things have happened.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Jeff B, Los Angeles, CA — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:48:38 GMT

You guys are all SO out of touch with what is really going on here. We have everything in place to plunge this country into total tyranny. Nobody is talking about the fact that ALL of the candidates (with one exception) are paid for by interests counter to the people and are paid to shred the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

I wonder how many of you are going to vote in the primaries. Despite the lies I've heard parroted on the news, I will vote for Ron Paul. Restore the Constitution, get the hell out of Iraq, and restore the value of the US dollar.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Don Verona,Maine — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:01:04 GMT

John Edwards is the only Democrat that has a change of winning, No one I have spoken with trust Hillary and no one in the big coops. would ever support Obama. And putting a republican back in will not happen, so John we will have to try and make you work for us "WE THE PEOPLE"

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Don Verona,Maine — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:05:57 GMT

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

MM,Houston, TX — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:16:50 GMT

I am excited to see that Mitt Romney is resurging in Iowa! Way to Go Iowa! Mitt Romney has my vote for President of the United States of America

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Triker — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:35:05 GMT

I'm an independent and I am voting for Romney because I believe he is the right man for the job....But if he doesn't get the Rep nomination, I'm voting for Edwards.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Brent Heath, Dayton, Ohio — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:51:15 GMT

Peter from NY, your facts are awfully screwed up.

First of all, the fact that a Mass (liberal) newspaper gives an anti-endorsment of Romney conservative) is hardly a surprise.

He has already explained the NRA endorsement comment. He did have a phone bank of the NRA campainging for him and he understood that to be an endorsement. It was not, and he apologized for that. So, not a lie. and Mitt does support the second ammendment which is the part that we care about anyway.

As far as marching with Dr King, he never claimed to have personaly marched with him. He did say that he "saw his father march with Dr. King" He later clarified that statement to say that he was aware of his fathers efforts for cival rights. Anyone who has ever made the statement "I saw how hard my father worked to support our family" but never actually went to work with their dad, either has to accept Mitts explanation or call themselvs a liar too. The fact is that George Romney was very active and influential in the cival rights movement. Something for which Mitt has a right to be proud of and for which we should all be grateful. So in a very real sense Mitt did see his father "march" with Dr. King even if he did not see him actually put one foot in front of the other. So again, not a lie.

As to abortion, he has already explained this a thousand times and his response has been very reasonable. He knew he was running in a very pro-choice state and so he promised to support all existing abortion laws in Mass. Which he did. He also blocked every new piece of funding for new abortion related funding, much to the chagrin of Harvard, his own school. Which means he both kept his promise and yet still governed as a pro-life governer. So not only was he honest in this, he was a genius.

As to taxes, he promised he would not raise taxes but he was facing a 3 billion dollar deficit. So, he eliminated 2.3 billion in wasteful spending and raised the rest through fees. Again, this was an act of shere genius and he kept his promise, he did not raise taxes. Something the Huckster was obviously not able to do.

I think his record more than shows him to be pro-life, pro-gun, and a fiscal conservative. Not only does he hold our values but he also has shown an ability to execute on those ideals in the most hostile of environments and actually get things done. When I look at Mitt, his life, and his family I wonder how its possible for any one man to be that amazing. We are lucky to have him running.

Go Mitt!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Eric Nicholes — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:52:55 GMT

I believe the Democrats are pushing Huckabee up in the news and making a big deal out of his rise in the polls. The havent made that big of a deal on other candidates. Why? I believe they do not want Mitt Romney to win in Iowa, NH, with his plan because he is the main rival that would pose the Democratic party the biggest challenge. Are any of us to naive to believe that either party is pushing the others weakest to the top. Lets pull our head out and vote for Mitt Romney

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Jake Spraggins West Plains MO — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:57:55 GMT

I am so tired of people (PulSamsara) calling our form of goverment a democracy. Franklin said in answer to the question- "We have given you a Republic,if you can keep it." Democracy is mob rule; do we really want that? Given the state of our education, I think not.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Wanda O'Reilly -Breckenridge, Colorado — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:10:21 GMT

Here I go, wasting my time again. What the hell good is it to even debate the IOWA -reeks of corruption- debates. Even to call them debates is an insult to the word debates. Get all the cattle into one corrale and BRAINWASH them into thinking they're making a free choice. Its a joke... sadly, its a twisted, sick, pathetic joke and it's on us...it's on U.S. Edwards, Obama and Hillary... if you have eyes, then have a see - they're cheffing up for us a black man, a woman and if that don't work - the -fall back on- white man. They are no better than the republicans we tried to ouster... their voting and track records attest to that. They're all plumped and packaged by the corporations, lobbies and presented by the whores for our pleasure. If you eat of this feast, you suffer all humanity.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

ME, Santa Ana, CA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:26:58 GMT

The reality is that GOP and a hell of a lot of independent voters will vote ABC - Anyone But Clinton. How much will this ABC mentality harm the Democratic ticket? Who knows, but it is one hell of a risk. This country can't stand another 4 years of GOP rule in the white house.

FYI: The reason the GOP keeps talking up Clinton is that they KNOW this and want her to energize their base for them (they can't do it - not with this field and not with the last 8 years of disaster).

Not affiliated with any campaign. Will take Obama, Edwards.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Sharon Belknap, Terre Haute, Indiana — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:47:04 GMT

Please stop making your decisions based on electability. This isn't a horse race. Support the person who isn't wrong on your issues. Support them with a few dollars, a bumper sticker, a few minutes of your time. I recommend you visit Dennis4President.com.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Anne C, York, PA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:01:34 GMT

John Edwards is the ONLY Democratic candidate who can beat any of the Republicans. The matchup polling data has shown this over months of polling, with only one or two polls showing otherwise. Dems, if you want to win in Nov. '08, you have to nominate Edwards.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Pat Smith Mesa, AZ — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:01:36 GMT

At the risk of offending someone's sensibilities I have to say that I am on "old broad." I was in the work force before Affirmative Action started and I can remember when a manager shouted that he would do whatever he could to keep women in their place. (He was also pounding on the bar) I can remember when women applied to compete for promotions and couldn't get an interview. I can remember when men automatically made more money for the same job because they had families. Do I want a woman who is of the generation who helped women overcome these barriers to become president. You bet I do and Hillary's the woman who can and will do it. I trust her to hit the ground running to undo the mess made by GWB. I trust her to help women continue their good fortune. I trust her to help our young people obtain and continue their educations. I trust Hillary to work to give people health coverage. I trust Hillary because I have followed her career. I know that in 1992 the Republicans hired special operatives to follow every move she made and to twist and exaggerate every nuance of anything she did. Hillary has my vote and the vote of several of us old AZ Broads.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Shame, your paper hanger promises — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:53:44 GMT

Paper Hangers have no shame, America is annoyed with common lies and conjecture. Nothing and not one of these clowns will address real issue. Promises and hope. a leap of faith. Christ is even being called upon! And they still want us to listen to more!

Is this not just pure shame?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

IRS Les Iowa — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:05:48 GMT

Huckabee and the Fair Tax in "08" Tax time is comming up, when Huck get the fair Tax thru, it will be no more IRS audits, for all you poor that have never been through an IRS audit because you don't pay any taxes, it is where the IRS tries to get more money form you to give to the poor. get a job Fair Tax "08"

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Douglas Johnson, San Francisco — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:19:01 GMT

I'm appalled at the lack of basic education in the use of the English language, let alone ability to reason effectively, of 90% of the bloggers printed here. Sounds like a bunch of five-year-olds doing one-up-man-ship on a playground with their goal of what's-in-it-for-me. I suspect the Statue of Liberty is hanging her head in embarrassment.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Tom Smith San Jose California — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:44:35 GMT

Obama's lack of knowledge is apalling, e.g. "Anyone making over $100,000 is rich, and should be heavily taxed to support health care" not realizing that in states such as California $100,000 is barely getting by and is the income of the middle class. Six years as a state senator or assemblyman hardly qualifies him to assume the presidency. Secondly dissing the very people that made his candidacy a possibility (the people that fought for civil rights in the sixties and the seventies) is yet another example of his shortsighted shallow thinking. While it is true Hillary's position is enhanced by her gender and who she married she is the most knowledgeable presidential candidate in the field knowing how and when to use the levers of power in Washington. Obama on the other hand is clueless, and his mantra change for change sake falls short.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

tig — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:48:08 GMT

I keep reading and hearing that Romney has been running attack ads. As it turns out, the ads are very mild and respective comparisons of the candidates. Shouldn't he do this? These comparisons are what people need as they try to make a good decision. It is particularly telling when Huckabee literally does start ugly attacks against Romney, when Romney only compared records. Romney is much more presidential and hard working than any candidate I can remember.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Aaron Jeffries, Independence, OR — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:57:52 GMT

I agree that Mitt Romney is indeed a winner. He succeeds, just look at his record. He was an impressive leader in his very liberal, democrat-blue state of Massachusetts. If anyone can make a difference and work with Democrats, it's Romney! He turned the business side of the Olympics in Salt Lake from a disappointment, into a huge success. He was an impressive and very successful leader in his own business. If you look closely at each candidate and his/her accomplishments, you will see who tells the truth. Mitt has integrity, and it shows. If confronted with what appears to be a misstatement, Mitt does not dog peddle or cover up, he makes it right. He may make comparisons (with sources) on TV ads on issues, but he does not desperately lash out and make unfounded comments on personal integrity (Would you want a president doing that to leaders of other countries?). See for yourself. Look at the ads at campaigncircus.com or go to his website mittromney.com.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Christy Jeffries — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:11:59 GMT

HUCKABEE--Ashamed of the truth. ROMNEY--Proud to be a winner. I want to be like Romney!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Christy Jeffries, Independence, OR — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:14:15 GMT

HUCKABEE--Ashamed of the truth. ROMNEY--Proud to be a winner. I want to be like Romney!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

TS, Beavercreek, Ohio — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:45:23 GMT

Peter, New York, New York,

I'm sorry but I'm embarrassed for you.
Where have you been? Romney's religion not coming up??

Did I misunderstand you?
Romney just handles it properly. Separation until forced.

David Anders, Hillary would shred your Huchabutt up one side and down the other for lunch and spit him out. He doesn't want to "tit for tatt" or "play dirty"
The comparisons Romney has put out on Huck is nothing, I'm telling you, you haven't seen anything yet, he'd be considered her before supper snack!
He can't take heat now, and it is on low!

Go Romney 08

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Justice, USA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:00:07 GMT

Well, at least Huckabee is excelling at something people!

He beat out Scooter Libby on Judicial Watch's “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007... so that's saying something.

6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR): Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics record. According to The Associated Press: “[Huckabee’s] career has also been colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.” And what was Governor Huckabee’s response to these ethics allegations? Rather than cooperating with investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to shut the ethics process down.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

bert,miranda,ca — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:27:06 GMT

Are you telling me Chucky Mullers' comments are appropriate.I for one will not be tuning into your blog again!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Gloria, Paso Robles CA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:35:57 GMT

I have relatives and friends who live in Iowa. They are all voting for Hillary. They say they feel Obama is a lot of talk and makes a lot of promises, but doesn't have that much substance in his ideas as most are answered in generalities. And, Edwards they feel is too slick. He comes across often a the "tricky" lawyer. Since they are there are have been bombarded with ads, calls, etc. I'd say they have a good handle on the candidates.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Roger Arvada, Colorado — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:57:39 GMT

I am voting Romney this election.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Dave, Blanding, Utah — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:08:44 GMT

Why you should vote a democrat into the Oval-Office.
-To finally end this great long lasting economy.
-To turn tax paying workers into unemployment
collectors.
-Sell missile technology to China for election fund
donations(oh wait, Billary already did that).
-While were at it might as well raise taxes.
-Preach separation of church and state, then go to
churches to be hypocrites and preach politics.
-Last but not least, cut the military, bargain with
the terrorists & ask them to not hurt us in
exchange for converting to Islam and obeying their
Sharia law.
And to Chucky Muller, DITTO

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

TRH, Colorado Springs, Colorado — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:10:31 GMT

I'm amazed at the arguement of 'experience' being the question for the better of the two between Obama and Clinton. Biden is easily the most experienced among the Democrats. It seems to be more of an emotional choice that a real legitimate choice. If I were a Democrat, and I am not, I would think that if it were a question of experience then Biden would be 'the guy'. But it isn't that is it? It's Clinton being a Clinton 'and/or' a female or Obama being an African American. It's sad to me . . . racism and sexism isn't just discrimination in a 'negative' and I'll keep you down sense, it can 'and is' also be I'll vote for you because you are one a woman or an African American. You Democrats seem to be divisive by your own nature, if all of the different groups of people were getting along it would seem that you wouldn't have a reason to exist any longer!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Richard — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:35:59 GMT

I don't know why I keep reading this garbage. Masochism, perhaps. The seemingly endless barrage of moronic offerings depresses me. I would love to have a president who is intelligent, independent, and makes decisions based on our country's best interests rather than how it will play politically or to the religious nuts. I respect people of faith but Judeo-Christianity seems to have as many extremists as the nutcases we are fighting the "war on terror" against. Mitt Romney scares the hell out of me on one hand, and on the other I believe he is a total fake so perhaps I shouldn't be afraid of his religion. None of the prominent candidates has the courage to address some of our most pressing issues, and it seems that most of our citizens are too focused on their pet issues to take a wider view. We have twice elected a president who seems to not believe in our constitution and the balance of power, not to mention the separation of church and state. It is not shallow, dishonest politicians who scare me; it is the American voter who keep electing them.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Louis Nardozi, Chesapeake VA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:36:02 GMT

The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.

This is what's happening to YOUR house. All the 'money' and 'equity' you though you had saved - eliminated! The equtiy through falling house prices - and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you're reading about gets created by printing money and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less - where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He's the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Allen W. Hoof, Mililani HI — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 07:47:02 GMT

Two points:
One, there is no one running, idealist, visionary, political hack, whatever, who can match Senator McCain's resume. There is no one running who can even conceive what he has endured. I was a Marine infantry officer who spent almost two years in Vietnam on two tours of duty, and who had some trying experiences, and I can't conceive of what he went through. But he did, and he survived. He's been in public office for many years, but he has not surrendered his integrity (despite what uncritical citations of his involvement with the Keating Five may suggest) nor has he lost his common sense. Indeed, alongside his experience and honesty, his common sense is probably his greatest asset. I would follow him to hell and back. He is outstanding. Any other choice is second best--in a word, ordinary. Another thought: too bad Ambassador Richardson can't be on the ticket with him. The President needs primarily to have experience in, and lead in, international affairs. Local politicians are well able to deal with local issues. We don't need a national politician imposing his--or her--one-size-fits-all solutions on localities with many and varied different problems. Our senators and representatives are well able, if they can bring themselves to it, to craft national domestic programs when they are needed. The President can--indeed should--provide input in domestic policy formulation, but that should be a secondary role; international leadership is primary. None of the other candidates can offer the knowledge and experience in international relations that Senator McCain has, or that Ambassador Richardson has.
Point two: Please let's keep God out of the discussion. All the Mormons out there may have it just right. Or maybe the fundamentalist Protestants have it figured out. Perhaps the Pope is indeed infallible. Or Muhammed is indeed the last prophet--which kind of negates Joseph Smith's revelations--or the Buddha did achieve enlightenment, or bathing in the Ganges actually is important. Or maybe none of our beliefs is true. Do I think I have the right answer? Absolutely not. And neither does anyone else. So let's keep our personal beliefs personal, and not try to impose them on one another, as happened to my daughter recently, when a friend told her, "If you don't join our church, you are going to hell." What incredible, arrogant, ignorant cheek! Let's keep this discussion secular. Let's save our proselytizing for another forum, a different pulpit.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Michelle Millsaps — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:23:34 GMT

All I know is that I don't want a preacher for my president. If there is supposed to be a separation between church and state, then leave religion out of it. Huckabee is another Bush, he has no idea what he's doing, and this country will be worse off than it is now. If you really listen to him, he's scary in his views and policies. Edwards won't do, he talks a good talk, but he doesn't seem tough enough to me to cut through the crap that is Washington, it might mess up his $400 hair cut. Obama is arrogant, and so not ready, he even says if elected he will employ the "The Clinton" people. My vote is for Hillary, she's smart and tough, I know many do not like her, why? Because she's a woman? All I know is that I was happier in the 90's, my paycheck went a little farther, and we all enjoyed a striving economy, jobs were available and crime was lower. Listen to these candidates very carefully, do you really want an under qualified preacher? Do you want another 4 or 8 years of Bush? The only person qualified for this difficult job is Hillary Clinton and she's got my vote.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

power freak — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:55:30 GMT

The queen of the braying Jacka@@ club, She is kicking down the walls of no experience. Ha Ha, snort, ""let me tell you"",, I sat in the White House and took every thing into account, Ha Ha snort!!

He lied to the people, this gave the right to the liars club.

He didn't stick it in, but its been hard to kiss him.

I have no regrets, because I will command this country!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

david a tx. — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:47:30 GMT

Funny to see the arkansas food stamp group bashing Huckabee, you need to geta job and support your illegitamae children, the only time a democrat doesnt kill a life with abortion, is when they need it for welfare.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Janell Norris, Jacksonville, Florida — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:01:49 GMT

If Romney thinks his false statements against Mike Huckabee are going to get him nominated, he is in for a big surprise! I and many others have investigated what the truth really is about Huckabee. Romney is nothing but a cheat, liar, and coward in trying to dupe the people with his inaccurate and misleading statements. Time will tell that the 2008 Presidency CANNOT be bought with money or lies...sorry, Mitt!

GO HUCK!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

John Alexander, Edinboro,PA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:01:44 GMT

Iowa
Clinton 1
Edwards 2
Biden 3
Obama 4
Richardson 5

Romney 1
Huckabee 2
McCain 3
Thompson 4
Guliani 5
Just my prediction before the new year, Happy New Year Everyone!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

joseph, Grand Rapids, MI — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:20:55 GMT

Romney is going to win IA and NH! Over the past year even with all the attacks, he continues to gain strength on the national level. Huckabee doesn't stand a chance! He is too busy running for pastor in chief. Romney has my vote!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

phil,bryson city,nc — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:16:07 GMT

wake up america! washington has gone too far and there's no chance that one person is going to fix our problems.the politicians up there don't care about us unless they think they're losing their job.i may not be speaking about everyone up there but most, i'm sure.health insurance so high we can't afford it...even though it seems to me if the drug companies would quit spending millions of dollars for tv commercials and give some discounts to people who have to make a choice between food,utilities and prescriptions ..yeah like that's gonna happen.and don't get me started on the crooked oil companies.oh and have you ever felt your blood pressurte rise when you watch "it's your money" on the evening news? all of the money the government wastes on bull____.why don't they use it on better things like reinvesting into our social security so our elderly people can have a better life instead of studying fruitflies in france???sorry to say that politicians are politicians but quite possibly there may be someone out there running for president who is not lying just to get elected. whether it be a democrat or republican i just hope whoever gets elected, they can at least try to help make life better for us here in the usa, especially the ones who need it and deserve it. one candidate is right in the fact that the large businesses/corporations are controlling washington just like influentials have a hold on everyone down to your own city council. ask someone what is it going to take to stop this bull____(the best word i know on how to describe politics)and they will say vote, but like i said, i believe theres no turning back now.....it's gone too far.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

rob, EO, New Jersey — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:47:31 GMT

Despite the Barack Obama zeal, I believe Clinton will prevail. And if she is the nominee, I believe she is the most electable and least vulnerable Democratic candidate to face the Republicans.

I was more uncertain a year ago when she announced her candidacy. Then she had recognizable strengths but at the same time possessed familiar handicaps both political and personal. She was routinely portrayed as contrived, a woman whose high intelligence had an impersonal edge and whose real identity was difficult to locate.

That was then. Today Clinton has forged herself into a formidable political leader. She has undergone a remarkable journey. In the face of unending autopsies on her personal and political past, unrelieved targeting at both Democratic and Republican debates, the punishing demands imposed on a woman candidate, she is still standing unflinchingly in place.

This is the mark of thoroughbred candidates. They take the fire. They survive the wounds. And while voters relish the spectacle of office-seekers squirming under adversity, something else happens at the same moment. If candidates demonstrate they can bear that kind of public barrage with conviction and ready composure -- and Clinton has done that -- they cross a crucial threshold in the public mind. They are viewed as able to compete and win a national election and able thereafter to govern in perilous times.

Why the most electable Democrat? Because after a year of being tightly measured, Clinton has won a public acceptance that she has the intellect and inner confidence to do the job. She has reached beyond her political inheritance and shaped a political presence all her own. Hillary belittlers still abound, to be sure. She is still caricatured as calculating. But the senator has taken on some different markings. Gone is the defensive bite, on hand is a new openness to concede mistakes, often with glints of humor.

If she does capture the nomination, she will see her standing soar overnight. Nomination is a transforming passage. What was viewed by some as calculation becomes smartness, impersonalness becomes thoughtful deliberation.

Once nominated her campaign will undergo another transformation. Her candidacy will take on an historic aura as it confronts an historic question -- can a woman, this woman, be elected president? Americans will be caught up in crossing one of the country's great divides. Voters of both parties, not just proud women, will be favorably disposed to make that crossing. Americans like the good feeling of removing barriers.

This gender phenomenon showed up in the Geraldine Ferraro campaign, which I managed. At every stop, huge crowds turned out, eager to be part of history in the making. By campaign's end, two things seemed clearer to me: there is inherent goodwill for a woman seeking power but a far sterner demand she be up to the challenge. That higher bar asked too much of Ferraro. Clinton has already cleared the bar.

Why the least vulnerable Democrat? The day the Democratic nominee becomes obvious the Republican attack machine will spring to action. Always, the opponent is a target to be eviscerated. If Obama is the Democratic nominee, a man less intimately understood and less defined, Republicans will rush to manufacture their own brutal definition. Can Obama withstand that kind of barrage? Does he have the personal makeup to be as relentless as his opponents? Do past political positions leave him vulnerable? Because the risks are sky-high, these questions need to be reasonably raised and answered beforehand.

Clinton is well past negative redefinition. Unlike John Kerry's 2004 campaign in which veterans opposed to Kerry's candidacy challenged his war record, it will be difficult to ram a Swift Boat into her candidacy. If there is a convict in her political past, as with Willie Horton during the Dukakis 1988 campaign, he will already have been exhumed. Besides, the Clintons are veteran enough to mount a withering counterfire of their own.

The most vulnerable Democrat, Clinton is not. The most electable, she is. America's political landscape, this time around, looks fertile for the right Democratic candidate. But one day, surely, the country will elect a woman president. I sense that moment - and that woman - President...oops....Senator Clinton - has arrived.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

eric las vegas nv — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:55:19 GMT

america discovered by a white men,founded by a great men,america is still and forever govern by a white men and women.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Tony E, Chicago, IL — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:55 GMT

It's a shame that anyone in Iowa would vote for Mitt Romney. In my opinion, the guy is sleaze and will say anything to get elected. So Huckabee pardoned 1033 people in 10 years as governor. Romney pardoned NO ONE. This is leadership? No, it's politically covering your rear because you are afraid that something could come back and bite you. Read the story of Anthony Circostas if you really want to see Mitt Romney's "leadership". Mike Huckabee is a good man, and will make a fantastic president!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Alan Ellman — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:35:07 GMT

It astounds me that this and other artcles talk about cadidates "going negative" as if it were some errant behavior and wondering who's going to do it. All candidates go negative for one reason... because it works. It's just a question of how long it takes them to get there.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

s.a. orlando florida — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:57:01 GMT

The only candidate who is CANDID is Obama. He is honest, has integrity and character; and rises above all in his vision for our nation which befits a great leader. Obama,Go get them on jan.3rd!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

DCH — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:12:35 GMT

See this interesting link on the role of the Clinton administration in the Rwanda genocide

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200109/power-genocide

Samantha power, who has endorsed obama, told the truth about rwanda several years ago. this was worse than not intervening. Bill clinton purposely acted to deny help for those poor people.

Excerpt:

"In March of 1998, on a visit to Rwanda, President Clinton issued what would later be known as the "Clinton apology," which was actually a carefully hedged acknowledgment. He spoke to the crowd assembled on the tarmac at Kigali Airport: "We come here today partly in recognition of the fact that we in the United States and the world community did not do as much as we could have and should have done to try to limit what occurred" in Rwanda.

This implied that the United States had done a good deal but not quite enough. In reality the United States did much more than fail to send troops. It led a successful effort to remove most of the UN peacekeepers who were already in Rwanda. It aggressively worked to block the subsequent authorization of UN reinforcements. It refused to use its technology to jam radio broadcasts that were a crucial instrument in the coordination and perpetuation of the genocide. And even as, on average, 8,000 Rwandans were being butchered each day, U.S. officials shunned the term "genocide," for fear of being obliged to act. The United States in fact did virtually nothing "to try to limit what occurred." Indeed, staying out of Rwanda was an explicit U.S. policy objective."

Link to article: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200109/power-genocide

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

HoleinOne, Boston, Mass — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:41:00 GMT

Just saw Obama's financials. Seems odd that he has miminal assets except a $1.9M house that he recently purchased. Don't expect our President to be rich but also don't want him worrying about paying his bills.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Lane Ronnow, Bakersfield, California — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:07:00 GMT

Response to RJ from Utah. I'm sick and tired of the accusation that the mormons are a cult. Yes, they believe in three seperate personages in the godhead and they belive in baptism for the dead and they believe in marriage for time and all eternity. And yes, all these "doctrines" are clearly deliniated in the "Bible". They are not merely christian traditions. Check the scripture references not some hatemongers diatribe.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

John, Monument, CO — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:11:14 GMT

Anybody that would vote for Romney has blinders on. One only need to look back at the scandal surrounding the Salt Lake Olympics (remember, the gifts to olympic officials and other illegal perks given out so Salt Lake would win the bid) to be reminded that mormons will lie, cheat, steal, even stab their own mother in the back to get their way. And it will be done while smiling in your face.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Kate, Boston, MA — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:20:42 GMT

Anyone who believes anything Romney says or does is most probably extremely wealthy, very desperate and hopelessly naive. He is the ultimate flip-flopper. I saw what very little he did for MA while "governor", that is when he was actually at work & not furthering his personal political agenda elsewhere under the cloak of the MA business. If he couldn't work with the MA legislature, he thinks he could work with the Congress? Romney embodies politics as usual and that's very bad. He only knows how to make the wealthy wealthier.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Gilbert Taylor, Eagle Mountain, Utah — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:26:12 GMT

I thought it very interesting the other day. A man called in to one of the national talk shows stating that he was a union member from Iowa. He said that they had taken a straw vote among the 500 union members and Hillary din't get ONE vote. Isn't it going to be interesting?

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Mike, Austin Tx — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:54:53 GMT

Huckawho? a month from know we won't even remember who he was. I'm not sure what the fascination ever was with Huckabee - Being a Christian myself - I find it absolutely disturbing that he has attempted to use the "GOD CARD" in pretending that he is some holy being. Does he move his eyebrows well when he talks? yes. Does he wiggle his ears, and smile at all the right times? yes - what else has he done? Lets see - He spares no gap in telling us he's Christian, He assures us that his opponents probably aren't Christian, He uses campain money wishing us a merry christmas, and yet he doesn't discuss his record. Bottom line - the media hyped him up - but people are begining to get tired of his hollier than Romney, McCain, Guliani approach. Huckawho? Hucka tax raiser, Hucka rapist releaser, Hucka liar, and most importantly Hucka manipulator.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Florence Lawrence... Grants Pass, Or. — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:24:10 GMT

I think the scripture: 'By Their Fruits, ye shall know them".. fits Mitt Romney very well... He is loyal and strong in his standards and convictions. Just being a good faithful husband and father is very impressive to me. He has high standards and this is one thing we really need in our government.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

R.E S'Chevalier — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:29:16 GMT

After having read the majority of the posts here, I'm of thought it would be wise to place brain into gear prior to posting. I believe we have some very evil minded Moslems making posts here to increase confusion. Also, the "justwaitandsee" poster is a leading example of a person with a minupulated thinking pattern. Both the snake oil pushers Clinton and Obama are typical con artists, and Edwards would prove himself being just another George W. Bush, and possibly worse. The only Republican worth an ounce of salt is Romney, and presently having proven to be the least of the worst of choice. Paul needs returning to Brazoria, Texas and forgetting about politics, and McCain is a tired old donkey needing to be placed out in the pasture and forgotten. Of course I realize the Clinton doggie lovers will not agree about what I have written here, but why would any person wish to place a shrewd lying whore monger back into the White House for a third term, and a vote for Hillary Clinton is exactly a vote for Billy-goat Clinton. Both Cintons have been of the beliefs for many years that the populace of the Republic have far too many liberties. Actually, I'm not a Romney supporter, but of all the politicians in the race, he is the least tinted. Have a nice day, and please do get your priorities straight, and that is the continuence of our Republic.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Aware, hilo, Hawaii — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:17:57 GMT

Romney and Huckabee both have religious baggage. Mormons and Southern Baptists(SBC)are scary when you dig into their belief systems. Don't vote for either of them!

As for the Dems - Things have already changed in this volatile world. We need a steady hand at the helm. We don't need a self proclaimed Messiah Obama with Bushian egomania or an agitated angry Edwards. Biden would be fine if he could only keep his foot out of his mouth and Dodd would make a great VP. No comment re: Richardson. Hmmm - I think I'll vote for Hillary!

Thanks for the forcast, but I think America will be smarter this time around.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Aware Hilo, Hawaii — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:30:26 GMT

Well said rob, EO, New Jersey! Vote for Hillary!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Dave, Murrieta, California — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:32:15 GMT

Check the record - Where Romney goes, success follows!He knows how to get things done the right way. He's probably the most experienced ready for the White House candidate we have had in along time. Check his list of leadership accomplishments. Name calling is so childish and ignorant.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

C.T.G., Kentucky — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:58:42 GMT

Subject: Who is Barack Obama

Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice.

If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts
...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us
here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it.

We checked this out on " snopes.com". It is factual. Check for yourself.

Who is Barack Obama?

Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born
in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a bla ck MUSLIM
from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from
Wichita, Kansas.
Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two
years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His
mother then married Lolo Soetoro , a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia.?
When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocate to Indonesia. Obama
attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a
Catholic school.

Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is
quick to point out that, "He was once a Muslim, but that he also
attended Catholic school."

Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that
that he is not a radical.

Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this
influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned
to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct
influence over his son's education.

Lolo Soeto ro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham,
introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school
in Jakarta.

Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim
terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world. Since
it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major
public office in the United States, Bar ack Hu ssein Obama has joined
the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim
background. ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he
DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran.

Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor
will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands
over their hearts, Obama turn s his back to the flag and slouches.

Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential
candidacy.

The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside
out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the
President of the United States, one of their own!!!!

Please forward to everyone y ou kno w. Would you want this man leading
our country?...... NOT ME!!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Mike, Green Valley, AZ — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:10:25 GMT

Iowa caucuses do NOT represent the will of the electorate of Iowa! How can a "process" called a caucus be representative when it involves at most 1% of the voting electorate? FORGET Iowa. Other states' primaries DO reflect the will of the voting electorate!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

RJM — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:32:42 GMT

Yes, it's true that Mitt has a great history of successful turnarounds. Without a doubt he has the most experience in running organizations and turning them into winners. It's starting to look like if you want to see Mitt's organizational skills in action, just look at his campaign. Like him or not, you MUST agree that his campaign has been the most well organized, he has worked the hardest, and he continues to demonstrate what a real winner looks like. He definately is the most qualified.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Christine Michelle — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:51:22 GMT

Guess what? I am neither an American, nor an illegal, I am from Europe, and from what I see, most Democrats do not EVEN realized what the cost will be on the socialized medecine, i.e. waiting weeks or months to get medical care or test, and you think the insurance companies are bad right now,as certain procedures must be approved? wait and see when the Government takes over and decide if you should get the surgery or not, or treatment that you need to desperatly,I lost My grand-mother because she had bronchitis, they did not do a thing as she was too old ... don't you see the people that works for the government are? They have only one speed, slow...my heart will not go out to you, because you wanted this, as I lived most my life In Europe, in which it is a very wealthy country as I experienced this so called Socialized medecine for over 50 years, so, go ahead, and vote for the Democrats ,and see what happen next...thinking you will save a buck? thinking the Government will pay for it all? WRONG!!!!
Also, I am impressed With Mr. Mitt Romney , he is articulate,he has class, and is highly educated.
We just need to Vote on what America was founded on, and to vote for the ones that will make this country and safer and better place to live. The democrats do not even realized that if we pull out of these wars, it will be a great disaster in this country.
We have to pay a price for freedom, and this is why we pay taxes ( I pay taxes by the way) as otherwise, we could be like these other countries such as Israel that are constantly having bombs here and there...At the least, In America, thanks to our Soldiers,these Democrats are free to knock this war down as it is very wrong on their part.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

AZ, Monterey, CA — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:23:07 GMT

If you want this country to go forward. Vote for Mitt. The only person that can turn this country to gold.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

AZ, Monterey, CA — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:25:13 GMT

If you want this country to go forward. Vote for Mitt. The only person that can turn this country to gold.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Daniel — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:47:42 GMT

Go Romney!!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Thomas — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:20:31 GMT

Why oh why, do socialists feel they can steal money and be self-righeous about it. Where does their overweening moral indignation spring from? They seeth with hatred for the rich (read: anyone more successful than themselves) and an envy that almost screams for a tribal blood sacrifice (Read: of someone else, of course.)

What a future for mankind with lunatics on the right and left all trying to force the rest of us into the pointy-headed little models they have created for themselves in their cramped little minds. Happy New Year everyone and the devil take the hindmost.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Paige James, Seoul, Korea — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:37:01 GMT

ROMNEY ALL THE WAY!!! I personally think that he would make the best president and a great one too! I’ve realized that he has great values and by his fruits he should be known. I think that he can shape this country better than any other candidates can, and that he has one of the best track records in recent politics. Sure, I also would like to see a women president, but I don’t think Hilary Clinton’s past history fits the job. Still she’s a great person, but then again I vote Romney! I was amazed how he has been running, and he deserves this role to be President. He tells the truth, and I like that in a person. I also don’t understand how a person, who is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints can not be considered a Christian. Personally I think that we should choose our next president on accomplishments and not by their religion. Don’t you want your president to tell the truth, and shape this country to it’s best potential??? THEN VOTE MITT ROMNEY!!!!!! WHY WOULDN’T YOU? Think about it, he’s the BEST! So, VOTE, VOTE, VOTE for him of course!!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Kristen — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:47:36 GMT

Mormon bashing is getting old! It's the same hateful mentality that murdered millions of Jews and enslaved millions of Africans. I've never once voted for/against a candidate because of their faith. All religions contain beliefs that sound ridiculous, but that is where faith comes in. Get over it!!!

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Jose Saul Duran — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:55:02 GMT

It is perplexing to see Mitt Romney garner any amount of support at all, let alone be the "leader". What is wrong with the GOP rank-and-file. Can they not see this man believes in nothing but his own ambition? Could his record put this fact on display any clearer than it does? The hyprocrisy and cynicism of this man is beyond belief, even by the standard newly set by the current administration. GOP voters: exactly how gullible are you? Does the future of the Republic really matter so little to you that you are willing to throw your support behind whoever tells us the better lie about himself and us, most believably, with the most aplomb, the best production value? Exactly how far are we willing to go in our pact with the devil? God save the United States and may it ruin the GOP if it chooses Mitt Romney.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

saul — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 06:06:18 GMT

It has happened once again. Somebody gives his/her out-of-context spin on something Ron Paul says. I bothers me. I check it out for myself. I come away even more convinced that Ron Paul is the only candidate on either side that is worth his salt.

I respect Mike T.'s impression of the Meet the Press segment in question. I would encourage everybody reading this to watch it on youtube and judge for yourselves. In my opinion, Dr. Paul clearly dresses Tim Russert down, despite Mr. Russert's best efforts at snaring him. Specifically,

a) Dr. Paul has an intelligent response to the porker accusation: the money belongs to the people, a corrupt system has taken it from them, he will do his job and get it back to them, just as he takes every tax credit he can, as we all do. This was Mr. Russert's best attempt of the segment, and it almost sticks, but no cigar.

b) Mr. Russert attempts to question Dr. Paul's "strict constitutionalism" by pointing out that Dr. Paul wants to amend the Constitution. Apparently Mr. Russert is unaware that the Constitution provides for amendments. Mr. Russert walks away from this point looking infantile.

c) On Al Queda. Mr. Russert does his very best to paint Dr. Paul as what the neocons call a "blame America first" type. Again, no cigar. Dr. Paul repeats simply states once again the only lucid and logical foreign policy being proposed by any of the candidates at present -- which, incidentally, the best argument against Dr. Paul's foreign policy stance I have yet to hear is in summary that it is different from what we are doing today -- as if doing something stupid for a long time is reason enough to keep doing it.

Mike T. -- I used to be a moderate Republican. With the advent of W., I ran. I looked to the Democractic party to oppose this president, the neocons to whom he handed the party, and the entrenched oligarchy he represents. To my unending dismay, I found that the Democratic party has no spine and is not likely to develop one any time soon. At least the necons care about ideology, the Democratic leadership cares only about their careers. In the end they will give us a diluted copy of whoever the neocons are putting forward because they dont really know what they believe. Look around, Mike, your party has failed you, surely you see that -- where are you going to go from here? There's a third party coming. It will be different and will not get everything right from day one, but the alternative is the end of the Republic as anything resembling what it was intended to be. We have to play the hand that we've been dealt -- there is no rewind button.

First thoughts: Huck down in Iowa

Kira, Utah — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:39:38 GMT

This blog has been interesting because posts are about so many different candidates.

That being said, I'm still going to comment on my current first pick- Romney.

David/baltimore and luke liberty have it right. Romney's ads were comparative not negative- and he complimented his opponents in both of them. The first truly heinous attack ad was Huckabee's- which attacked character... on the very points Huckabee's own character should be questioned. He could have addressed the points Romney made, instead he just acted like an immature, name calling child.

Romney's ads may have caused people to think, but I believe the real reason for Huck's drop in the polls are his own embarrassing gaffes over the last week or so....such as his idiotic and incorrect comments on tying Butto's assasination to immigration, his mistake about Marshall Law in Pakistan, and his pathetic attempt to be holier-than-everyone by "pulling" an ad that he actually showed. He just wanted it to be broadcast for free- how shallow, cheap, and dispicable. May I remind you that he took off a whole day to MAKE the ad? His endorsement was on it- what a way to spend the Sabbath, don't you think? Not very Christian of him!

By the way, John, if you could get passed your outdated anti-mormon rhetoric, you might realize that Romney FIXED the olympics... the Mormons were not responsible for screwing it up. Get real!

Romney is a good candidate. He is intelligent, educated, experienced, and driven. What he doesn't know as much about, he makes an effort to learn. He is informed (more than can be said about others). If I vote republican, he is the only choice for me.