<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Lauren AppelbaumElizabeth Edwards defended her husband on the accusation that one of his biggest fundraisers is an oil lobbyist. "Campaigns go to journalists and try to feed them stories to try to get them to have us talk about things other</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540189</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:58:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540189</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Tn</dc:creator><description>Edwards claimed in Iowa yesterday that he would stop Bush from invading Iran. So guess he's talking about when he's President. I really doubt Bush will be trying to launch an invasion of Iran from Crawford Tx. Other than that he said he'd do exactly what Bush is doing right now. Working with our European allies, telling Iran to reveal all of their programs, or face sanctions. The silly emo party clapped and cheered. I'll be glad when the writers finish their strike so this guy can go back to his job as the page on 30 rock. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540195</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:03:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540195</guid><dc:creator>Mary , New York City</dc:creator><description>She is a loyal mate but maybe a bit outspoken. &amp;nbsp;Can hurt the husbank. </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540214</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540214</guid><dc:creator>John J. Rockefeller</dc:creator><description>John ,who paid for your $300.00 hair cut ?</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540217</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540217</guid><dc:creator>C.B.</dc:creator><description>It's all about change and experience. hillaryclinton.com</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540221</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:22:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540221</guid><dc:creator>Rick,ky</dc:creator><description>Does anyone else notice a visable change in Elizabeth's appearance? Is it her treatment's, the wear &amp;amp; tear from Non-Stop campaigning, or more Importantly, a decline in her health.If by chance, Edwards would become POTUS, are we as American's ready to deal with &amp;nbsp;our President losing his spouse while in office?I'm not suggesting anything here, &amp;nbsp;i just noticed a difference in her appearance lately. If anyone know's anything, i'd like to hear it.Thanx!</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540223</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:23:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540223</guid><dc:creator>--NSMsnbc</dc:creator><description>The special-interest/lobbyist argument seems to be blown way out of proportion for both Edwards and Obama, in my opinion. &amp;nbsp;I don't expect a miracle cure, but I do want the candidates to try and I do want progress. &amp;nbsp;Both Edwards and Obama do that. &amp;nbsp;They are both trying too hard to be more reverent than the other, but the main thing I see is that they are leagues ahead of Clinton on the issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mr. Edwards talks about fighting for change or whatever. &amp;nbsp;Even though he fights, he can't control his 527 interest group, which he 'asked them to stop'. &amp;nbsp;If he can't even win that fight, how will he ever fight the Republicans on all of the other issues. &amp;nbsp;Too much fighting. &amp;nbsp;I trust Obama's technique to actually accomplish goals.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540235</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:31:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540235</guid><dc:creator>Jerry, southfield, mich</dc:creator><description>This is the old clinton story..while they raise millions in the blue room, they &amp;nbsp;attack edwards who is working within the public finance system..where every candidate ought to be..the same as John McCain. &amp;nbsp;Elizabeth isn't just protecting her husband, she's telling the truth.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540256</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:44:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540256</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth E. in Iowa</dc:creator><description>John I think you need another $300.00 hair cut.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540267</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:52:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540267</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>I don't support either candidate, but I think the Edwards campaign looks bad here.&lt;br&gt;He's talking tough, but not walking the walk. &amp;nbsp;I just don't trust him. &amp;nbsp;Right now, I prefer any candidate to him. &amp;nbsp;Ok, not Gravel. &amp;nbsp;But anyone else.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540270</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:55:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540270</guid><dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator><description>JOHN HOW CAN YOU AFFORD A $300.00 HAIRCUT ?</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540279</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:01:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540279</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>Rickky - Well coiffed John Edwards is always ready. He made sure, before running, &amp;nbsp;that America will never be without a first lady if he becomes president. His new mistress and mother of lovechild -Reille Hunter - will be the next First Lady.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540280</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540280</guid><dc:creator>framecop, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>John F. Kennedy was ASSASSINATED in office. &amp;nbsp;The country survived.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abraham Lincoln lost a son and then was himself assassinated in office. &amp;nbsp;The country survived.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love Elizabeth Edwards and hope that she lives a long life, but the country can survive a President's spouse dying while he's in office, just like it can survive Presidents dying while in office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who keep bringing up that &amp;quot;what if she dies while he's in office&amp;quot; junk are either SHALLOW THINKERS, or Obama supporters.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540287</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:09:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540287</guid><dc:creator>Daniel, NY</dc:creator><description>And in major congressional news, GOv. Barbour just appointed a new Senator in Mississippi, and now the test will be in the courts as the GOP and Dems will battle it out on the timing of the special election. And a recent poll already has a Democratic challenger beating the newly-appointed Wicker. Full analysis: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/mississippi-has-new-senator-and-two.html"&gt;http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/mississippi-has-new-senator-and-two.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540291</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:12:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540291</guid><dc:creator>Pat Huntington NY</dc:creator><description>Happy New Year Democrats. &amp;nbsp;This is the big one we've been waiting for! &amp;nbsp;The last year of the Bush nightmare! &amp;nbsp;As for republicans, suk it.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540309</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:16:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540309</guid><dc:creator>Simon, IA</dc:creator><description>If the uneducated Americans can read, both Edwards and Obama have taken PAC contribution. Just check their funding page which they are supposed to disclose to Fed agencies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point is they have taken less PAC (or may be they didnt get enough PAC) money. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If taking PAC money is a crime then Obama, Edwards, Clinton all have done the crime. 10% crime and 80% crime is a crime at the end of the day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the semantics that we havent taken lobbyist money &amp;quot;AT ALL&amp;quot; is a lie. Yes, you havent taken Federal lobbyist money. That Fed guy can have state connections to pass on the money to you via other sources. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;May be some Americans are illeterate and can not read. So Obama and Edwards and other such politicians can claim anything and people fall for those lies.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540314</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:19:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540314</guid><dc:creator>Kristian O</dc:creator><description>John Edwards might not have won with John Kerry, but he's sure learned from John Kerry.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540318</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:20:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540318</guid><dc:creator>Felix, Littleton CO</dc:creator><description>Every candidate lives in a glass house where stone throwing over every contribution to another candidate is concerned. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Clinton campaign never gives up on looking for dirt, whether it's a contribution &amp;nbsp;to Edwards or Obama's admitted &amp;nbsp;youthful cocaine use. &amp;nbsp;Bad moves for the Clintons as there is probably more dirt, financial and personal, to be dug up on them than anyone and Hillary gets more support from the biggest corporate lobbyists, including in healthcare and pharmaceutical industries along with military industrial, than any other candidate, Republicans included. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to simply disagree with Hillary on votes and issues. &amp;nbsp;I used to oppose her because she is a corporate darling and neocon hawk. &amp;nbsp; More and more, I find her just plain despicable, even by Washington pol standards. &amp;nbsp;If there is a bit of difference between Rove's approach and her top operative's, it isn't at all apparent. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is simply no comparison on character issues between Clinton and Edwards. In fact there is no candidate in either party who better represents real family values, real devotion, loyalty, courage and fidelity through thick and thin, than John and Elizabeth Edwards. &amp;nbsp;If you're looking for real moral strength and courage, the Edwards have both proved over and over that they can take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stuff happens. &amp;nbsp;A candidate with a perfectly healthy spouse and children on Inauguration Day can learn the next month or the next week or the next day that the beloved wife or husband or child has an incurable, life threatening illness, has suffered a fatal stroke or been killed in a terrible accident. &amp;nbsp;Those things can happen to anyone elected President at any time. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever happens, we already know we can count on John Edwards to persevere with grace and courage. To disqualify him on the basis of His wife's illness is nonsense. To listen to Hillary's nasty little non-issue based attacks on any other candidate is ridiculous.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540320</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:23:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540320</guid><dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator><description>Let the Days of darkness end quickly. &amp;nbsp;With Edwards you get a person that demands change. &amp;nbsp;Team that up with the diplomatic VP Obama and you have Not only a winning ticket but create an oppportunity for success for the next 16 years.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540331</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:31:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540331</guid><dc:creator>Gerald Sobel</dc:creator><description>does not take money from lobbyist, now we know it is a bunch of baloney. A lobbyist is a lobbyist is a lobbyist, period. Edwards takes money from lobbyist and is therefore a liar and a phoney!&lt;br&gt;G. Sobel</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540334</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:32:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540334</guid><dc:creator>Mark, Hartford CT</dc:creator><description>Obama/Edwards 08&lt;br&gt;Edwards/Obama 08&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2008 will finally mark the end of the Clinton &amp;amp; Bush monarchies.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540346</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:40:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540346</guid><dc:creator>ROY, CRESTLINE, CA</dc:creator><description>TOO BAD THE CLINTON MACHINE IS SO ACTIVE IN BEHIND-THE-SCENES MACHINATIONS AGAINST ANYONE PERCEIVED AS A THREAT. EDWARDS WILL LIKELY SURPRISE MANY IN IOWA, AND IS PROBABLY THE BEST ABLE TO ACTUALLY WIN THE PRESIDENCY. HILLARY IS JUST TOO DIVISIVE TO WIN.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540356</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:50:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540356</guid><dc:creator>KenL Cranberry Twp</dc:creator><description>People should just wake up and smell the coffee. If they had really listened to what has been said by Clinton, Obama, and Edwards they would realize that the choice is very simple. Clinton offers more of the same DC indifference to the people. Same politics as usual, with Obama I see a good man with a plan, and with Edwards I also see a major plus for the country. I used to be a Hillary Fan but I now &amp;nbsp;realize She will give us nothing but more of the same rhetoric. I'm voting for Edwards with Obama as my second choice. </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540362</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:51:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540362</guid><dc:creator>banko</dc:creator><description>The Many Apologies of John Edwards &lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pOZML6P0Vg"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pOZML6P0Vg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards cannot lead the democratic ticket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADwjvAs9J-0"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADwjvAs9J-0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards and Hillary Clinton did not read the NIE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJFujflVmY"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJFujflVmY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Obama SmackDown Series: Smacks down Edwards on Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4x_KnWEDjs"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4x_KnWEDjs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards 2002 Vote for the Iraq War &lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY6BZgkI0kI"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY6BZgkI0kI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards Feeling Pretty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q"&gt;http://youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540365</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:52:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540365</guid><dc:creator>Ellis B. Kingman, Az.</dc:creator><description>Typical Clinton campaign tactics &amp;quot;take a page out of the republican smear book&amp;quot;. If you have no strengths or issues to talk about try to discredit the other guy. We all know husband Bill is morally bankrupt and is a sexual preditor yet Hillary continues to stand by her man when most other women would have thrown him to the dogs.&amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; Why would a woman stand by a man that has cheated on and humiliated her several times that we know of and how many that we do not? It can only be because Hillary's standards are not much higher than Bills. So with all the skeletons the Clintons have in their closet how dare them question the character and integrity of John Edwards</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540368</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:54:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540368</guid><dc:creator>R. Stelling, Chandler, AZ</dc:creator><description>Just one more time Candidate Edwards hides behind his wife. &amp;nbsp;Voting for Edwards will only be &amp;quot;politics as usual.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;If he were to get the nomination, he would pick a veep to be his attack dog, &amp;quot;politics as usual.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;At least his wife could then get a rest, but the rest of us would hear what the candidate is afraid to say for himself.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540371</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:54:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540371</guid><dc:creator>Simon, IA</dc:creator><description>John F. Kennedy was ASSASSINATED in office. &amp;nbsp;The country survived. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abraham Lincoln lost a son and then was himself assassinated in office. &amp;nbsp;The country survived. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love Elizabeth Edwards and hope that she lives a long life, but the country can survive a President's spouse dying while he's in office, just like it can survive Presidents dying while in office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who keep bringing up that &amp;quot;what if she dies while he's in office&amp;quot; junk are either SHALLOW THINKERS, or Obama supporters. &lt;br&gt;framecop, Raleigh, NC (Sent Monday, December 31, 2007 1:02 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL shallow thinkers or Obama supporters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arent they the same?:-)</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540393</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540393</guid><dc:creator>Thoughtful, Denver, CO </dc:creator><description>Hey now Framecop, I'm an Obama supporter and I'm not worried if Elizabeth dies in office. In fact, since she is demanding that he run regardless of her condition, I think that the sacrafice on her part will only galvanize his convictions to do what's right. Which is why I'm also an Edwards supporter. </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540404</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:23:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540404</guid><dc:creator>D Ellis,Tucson,Az</dc:creator><description>Who cares how much the haircut costs?Talk about the real issues you Limbaugh parrots!</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540411</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:28:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540411</guid><dc:creator>Aaron, Indiana</dc:creator><description>Sometimes reading the comments following the First Read blog I get confused. &amp;nbsp;My assumption would be that those reading the blog are interested in the subject and, for that matter the political process. &amp;nbsp;However, when reading the comments, very few provide substance and further the discussion on the subject presented. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While we each have opinions and those we would like to see win the election, there is an appropriate way to add value to the discussion. &amp;nbsp;Asking about the $300.00 haircut doesn't not add anything to the discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to the post from Lauren, I think that full transparency of campaign gifts would allow for a better picture of who is receiving and accepting support from lobbyists. &amp;nbsp;While this may be discouraged for other reasons, it would better answer the question at hand. &amp;nbsp;Public financing, to some degree makes the process more transparent.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540412</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:29:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540412</guid><dc:creator>S.B. Stein E.B. NJ</dc:creator><description>It may be all well and good that the candidate who is running for the Whitehouse isn't taking any lobbist or PAC money, but the problem is that other people are. &amp;nbsp;How would a president be able get anything done if other people are influenced the other way? &amp;nbsp;If the president sends something to Congress that they don't like. &amp;nbsp;It isn't going to get done. &amp;nbsp;I hope that Mrs. Edwards remembers that.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540448</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:53:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540448</guid><dc:creator>MK,MO</dc:creator><description>Simon, IA / 'May be some Americans are illeterate and can not read.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;that is preciecly the reason some people think hillary is still a contender</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540501</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:29:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540501</guid><dc:creator>Beth, Webster Groves, Missouri</dc:creator><description>Why hasn't John Kerry endorsed John Edwards?? Is Kerry still angry that Edwards wasn't able to win his home state of North Carolina for their 2004 ticket?? </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540556</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:53:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540556</guid><dc:creator>Ray Roberts, Denton, Texas</dc:creator><description>David sent a message, &amp;nbsp;31 Dec 07, saying that Edwards had a mistress and child, Reille Hunter. &amp;nbsp; Is this true? &amp;nbsp; If true, that would leave very little between him and Bill Clinton on moral standards. &amp;nbsp;If he is to become President, I hope it is not a true statement</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540568</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540568</guid><dc:creator>Tuck, Realityville, Ks</dc:creator><description>obama has very young kids. Let him stay at home and raise them, Black kids need a father figure(his own words) according to Obama. so let him be one.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540570</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540570</guid><dc:creator>Big Al from Chicago</dc:creator><description>Edwards- a trial lawer, made millions stealing from people who worked a lifetime to build businesses and medical practices. Edwards has the largest house (28,200 sq ft) in Orange county. Remember, after the Electrical Workers Union, the second largest PAC contributor to the Democrats is the Trial Lawyers Association. There is no bigger hypocrite than a Mercedes Marxist! A multimillionare lawyer who says he represents the interests of the middle class and working man is full of crap! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote Early and Vote Often!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big Al</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540571</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:56:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540571</guid><dc:creator>Kristian O</dc:creator><description>Yo Beth, Gore lost Tennessee in 2000 and he waas at the top of his ticket. Your point is what?</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540572</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:56:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540572</guid><dc:creator>Big Al from Chicago</dc:creator><description>Edwards- a trial lawer, made millions stealing from people who worked a lifetime to build businesses and medical practices. Edwards has the largest house (28,200 sq ft) in Orange county. Remember, after the Electrical Workers Union, the second largest PAC contributor to the Democrats is the Trial Lawyers Association. There is no bigger hypocrite than a Mercedes Marxist! A multimillionare lawyer who says he represents the interests of the middle class and working man is full of crap! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote Early and Vote Often!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big Al</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540624</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:13:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540624</guid><dc:creator>John E., in Iowa</dc:creator><description>Anyone know where I can get a good $300.00 haircut ?</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540761</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:46:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540761</guid><dc:creator>Big Eazy, Albuquerque New Mexico</dc:creator><description> Mr. Edwards how good can a $300 dollar haircut look ... comparatively? I've been getting them for $15 + tip. Does Edwards tip? 23000 + square foot house? Definitely someone who is touch with the majority ... will he promise $300 haircuts for the rest of us? Issues? What issues? We don't have to show you any stinking issues? </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#540944</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:27:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:540944</guid><dc:creator>300haircutsforfree</dc:creator><description>Lot's of shallow thinkers here today. Those of you who worry about a $300 haircut are simpletons, just some Limbaugh loafers. &amp;nbsp;Have you checked into Mitt's makeup costs, what about Hillary's or how about snakeoil for Huckabee? &amp;nbsp;If you can't get past a haircut, how the hell do you get to work, or even get dressed! &amp;nbsp;Dumbasses, all of you. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#541045</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:48:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:541045</guid><dc:creator>N. Sims</dc:creator><description>Wow, the Clinton people are out in force....digging up any dirty story they can, true or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Elizabeth is doing VERY well. &amp;nbsp;She actually looks better than ever due to dieting, and has more energy than anyone on this board.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Felix knows what he is talking about, see above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no love child for Edwards. &amp;nbsp;Ridiculous story from Nat'l Enquirer and/or Clintons. &amp;nbsp;The baby's father has been revealed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Edwards!!! &amp;nbsp;Everything is looking great!</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#541060</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:51:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:541060</guid><dc:creator>Rosemary McAninch, Indianola, Iowa</dc:creator><description>Come on you guys - just because Edwards haircuts cost what they did and he lives in a large house - think about it. &amp;nbsp;Just because he came from a family that didn't have much - does that mean he should stay that way - what he was taught was to work hard and better yourself which he is trying to do for the &amp;quot;below and middle class&amp;quot;. Also in regards to Elizabeth having &amp;quot;breast/bone cancer&amp;quot; doesn't mean it is a &amp;quot;death sentence&amp;quot; and believe me I am a living example of what she is going thru. &amp;nbsp;I also had breast cancer in 1986 (21 years ago) and then in 2003 had it go to my bones but I am doing fine, Thank God!!. &amp;nbsp;I take a 10 mg pill twice a day and my oncolist doctor said in his own words &amp;quot;you will not die from this as we have lots of different medicines in treating this&amp;quot; I totally believe that Edwards will make the best president because he has lived and is living exactly what a lot of us are living. </description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#542033</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:46:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:542033</guid><dc:creator>DAVID ANDERS     PHARR,TX.</dc:creator><description>MRS. EDWARDS YOU ARE A NICE LADY, BUT MAKE YOUR TIGHTWAD HUSBAND GIVE YOU MONEY FOR A HAIRDO. &amp;nbsp;HE PAYS 400 DOLLARS AND YOU GET YOURS IN A BOX AT WALMART.</description></item><item><title>Elizabeth Edwards defends stance</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/31/540166.aspx#543059</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:55:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:543059</guid><dc:creator>James S, Portland, OR</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;John Edwards will be a great President:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards on the Issues&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://johnedwards.com/issues/"&gt;http://johnedwards.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meet John Edwards: Selected Clips:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MeetJohnEdwards"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MeetJohnEdwards&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>