<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More oh-eight: Left out</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/01/542038.aspx</link><description>For the upcoming New Hampshire debates, the New York Times reports that “Fox has invited five of the Republican candidates to a televised forum in Manchester on Sunday, but not Representative Ron Paul of Texas, right, who has placed fourth in some recent</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>More oh-eight: Left out</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/01/542038.aspx#542063</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:19:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:542063</guid><dc:creator>Ann, Iowa</dc:creator><description>More flip Flopping from Mitt Romney, do you really want a scumbag like this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Governor Romney…imposed a slew of fee hikes and tax 'loophole' closures….The largest of these was $259 million worth of fee hikes in FY 2004, the bulk of which came from higher Registry of Deeds fees. &amp;nbsp;Smaller fee hikes, including higher charges for boaters and golfers, we imposed in FY 2003 and FY 2005. &amp;nbsp;Romney also sought $128 million worth of so-called tax loophole closures for FY 2004; $70 million for FY 2005; and $170 million for FY 2006, which were later reduced to $85 million due to backlash from business leaders.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Romney continues to oppose the flat tax with harsh language, calling the tax 'unfair.'&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Governor would also seek to raise $128 million in revenue by closing corporate tax loopholes (Rick Klein, “Massachusetts Governor’s Proposed Budget Includes Layoffs, New Fees”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 2/27/2003) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite the governor's pledge of no new taxes, his proposal does increase some taxes and fees: The administration says it can collect an additional $70 million by &amp;quot;closing loopholes&amp;quot; in corporate and sales tax rules (Scott Greenberger, “Massachusetts Governor Sets $22.98 Billion Budget Blueprint”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 1/29/2004) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“…business groups objected so strongly to a proposed $170 million tax increase that Romney snuffed the idea and proposed $85 million instead.” (Alexander Bolton, “Romney’s Tax Record Gets A Closer Look,” &amp;nbsp;The Hill, 3/27/2007) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Governor Romney even raised taxes on some New Hampshire residents who worked in Massachusetts, taxing their income and their pensions. &amp;nbsp;Learn more &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>More oh-eight: Left out</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/01/542038.aspx#542070</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:26:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:542070</guid><dc:creator>Ann, Iowa</dc:creator><description>More Flip Flopping from Mitt Romney &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How Gov. Mitt Romney started same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts - despite what he says now! &lt;br&gt;Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; is still NOT legal in Massachusetts, and was NOT created by the Supreme Judicial Court's Goodridge ruling. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Timeline documents Mitt Romney's role in creating same-sex &amp;quot;marriages.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, it was Governor Mitt Romney who was ultimately responsible for same-sex &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot; taking place. The Supreme Judicial Court only issued an opinion and advised the Legislature to act (which it never did). Even the Court acknowledged that it had no power to change the law. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Governor Romney created these &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot; through an unconstitutional and illegal directive to his Department of Public Health (to print new &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; licenses), and through his legal counsel threatened to fire any Town Clerk or Justice of the Peace who failed to implement the (non-existent) &amp;quot;new law&amp;quot;. He was not required by any constitutional mandate to do these things. On the contrary, his actions clearly violated his oath to uphold the laws of Massachusetts. &lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>