First thoughts: Debate double-header

pmorlan, Louisville, KY — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:09:43 GMT

I just hope that the media stops artificially propping up the Hillary campaign. She came in 3rd in Iowa but you guys continue to pretend that this is a two person race. You continue to ignore the 2nd place finisher. What is up with this? Do you cover the Olympics the same way -- ignore the silver medalist while giving massive coverage to the bronze medalists? Even non-Edwards supporters find what you are doing is really creepy. You better watch out because you're going to start to lose your viewers. If we can't trust you to fairly cover this election why should we trust you on anything else?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Hillycrats of America, USA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:12:29 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

MICK — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:18:30 GMT

Romney could have begun to "emphasize growth, strength and prosperity" years ago--instead of making his own millions at the cost of Thousands of voters' jobs with Romney's Forced Buy-outs of many American-grown companies.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

David Anders Pharr ,Tx. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:24:41 GMT

I just sentabuckforhuck, poor guy, how did he do it, with no money, maybe it was the loaves and fishes, i know one thing the most evilwoman in world got her butt beat. HOW CAN PEOPLE WITH ANY MORALS EVEN REPEAT HER NAME MUST LESS VOTE FOR HER

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Teddi, Norwalk, CT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:24:44 GMT

Barack Obama does not represent real change. He's a phony politician like the rest of them. He's about as "inspirational" as an after dinner mint. He was the right wing's agent in first destroying Hillary--and just wait for it now they'll go after him once they've destroyed her. I'm sure Obama's victory had the Republican right wing machine dancing in the streets. Did you see how giddy they have been on Fox and Friends? I, as a Dem, will NEVER vote for Obama. He's a closet conservative gay-hater in my book. So I guess I'll stay home this fall.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:31:16 GMT

Ugh, another debate. We've had so many, the answers have gotten almost as worn as the stump speech. Oh well, maybe Clinton can come up with a new line of attack. What else has his kindergarten teacher told them? Did he refuse to share to blocks once?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

John Alexander,Edinboro,PA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:32:26 GMT

'Huck and Chuck', sounds very unappetizing.
This is going to get more interesting as the days go by, candidates will need to get more specific especially on the economy after the poor showing with employment numbers.
Thanks Iowans, you got us started now on to New Hampshire!
It was interesting that David Brooks said on The News Hour that it was the medias fault that Biden, Dodd and Richardson didn't get much press because the media was more interested in showcasing the better known political personalities. I whole heartedly agree! Thats what you get when the news becomes part of the entertainment industry. The writers strike may be a godsend because without the new shows the news becomes more important.
Looks like we got a real horse race this year!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

ooek from a blog — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:40:39 GMT

Oh, Obama you so diappoint the hell out of me

You want a new alignment with Bush and theh GOP

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Sierra, SF — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:41:17 GMT

Clearly, Clinton has the lead in New Hampshire

She should win

A loss would be devastating for her

Especially if that loss comes after her return to gutter politics

Remember 'lovable (sic) Hillary' ?
Remember 'warm and cuddly Hillary' with her a
'adorable' mother and daughter ?

Well, that Hillary is GONE !!

Behold 'Gutter Fighter Hillary', the Battle Axe
That's gonna inspire America !

Now, she's digging up the dirt on Obama
She's getting ready to start slinging mud
To help prove to America how ready she is to 'lead'

How can Hillary 'lead' if nobody is following her ?
She came in THIRD PLACE IN IOWA !!

How 'electable' is Hillary if she CAN'T WIN IOWA ?
Hillary unifies the Republicans and energizes the right wing angainst her
(in a 'vast right wing campaign' ?)

Hillary will lose the 2008 election for Democrats

OBAMA '08
It's Time for REAL CHANGE

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Shadow, Hamden, CT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:43:15 GMT

Senator Dodd, I would argue, has not only maintained but elevated his status considerably with his Presidential run. Calls for him to be majority leader have become common among many progressives, and deservedly so, due to his diligent work this year in protecting Constitutional liberties. Congratulations to him; the entire country now knows that despite the fact that Connecticut has an embarassment for a Junior Senator, we have always had a Senior Senator we can be proud of.

I wish him the best as an Obama supporter (I declared my support a few days ago: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/3/174740/2308/300/428892 )

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Dot, Illinois — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:43:34 GMT

"We weren't able to write much yesterday about Dodd's and Biden's departures (mainly because there was too much else going on),"
------------------------------------------
With pure unmitigated sarcasm, I have to ask " So, what else is new?"

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Ron, TX — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:43:36 GMT

WHAM! New! New Hampshire Primay poll: Obama 37% Clinton 27%! Obama winning among democrats AND independents, as well as a staggering lead over Clinton on "electability"
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/new_hampshire/election_2008_new_hampshire_democratic_primary

Other points of interest:
"In New Hampshire, Obama leads Clinton by five points among Democrats and by sixteen points among Independents. The survey indicates that 40% of the voters will be Independents.

Eighty percent (80%) of Obama voters say they are certain they will vote for him. Seventy-three percent (73%) of Clinton voters say the same along with 64% of Edwards supporters."

"Obama is seen as the most electable Democratic candidate. Eighty-seven percent (87%) believe he would be at least somewhat likely to win if nominated. Seventy-six percent (76%) say the same about Clinton and 75% think Edwards would have a chance. Fifty-one percent (51%) of the Likely Democratic Primary Voters believe Obama would be Very Likely to win. Just 38% have such confidence in Clinton. "

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Gerald C. Smothers NH — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:45:10 GMT

Big media does not challenge Obama's false history as he wrote in his books using not real but COMPOSITE CHARACTERS.

Big media, get off your lazy a$$ and start checking out Obama, Huckabee, and other candidates who have never been invesigated or vetted.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Shadow, Hamden, CT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:48:46 GMT

I think the reason we didn't see Keyes after the DMR debate was because they threw him in a strait jacket. Unfortunately, they arrived too late.

Either that or he's campaigning to be Mike Huckabee's VP candidate. Now *there's* a ticket that would make the GOP elephant want to down his cyanide peanut.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

disgusted — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:49:25 GMT

Change Hope Change Hopem Change Change

Change is not a place, it's a process.

What will Obama do in the mean time?

What are his EXACT plans starting on day one to start "the change"?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Rick,ky — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:01:58 GMT

Lately, i've seen a lot of post that say something to the effect, that Iowa shoud'nt decide who voter's pick for POTUS. They are absolutely correct in their analysis. With that said, no one tell's You who to vote for, that is your Priveledge. If your candidate, does'nt make it to your states primaries when they take place, then WRITE IN your Preference of Choice. LET ME REPEAT, WRITE IN YOUR CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT or any other elected office thats on your ballot's.Your Vote will be counted, whether it's in ballot form, or on a peice of paper. So all this crap about Iowa choosing is nothing but NONSENSE.You can write in Elvis, mickey mouse, donald duck, underdog, etc.Excorise your right to vote for whom You want!!!!!!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:03:21 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Sierra, SF — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:04:44 GMT

Good bye Chris Dodd and Joe Biden
You both brought something to the table.....

Chris Dodd threatened a fillibuster against amnest for telephone companies that violated Americans privacy.
That forced 'lick spittle' Harry Reid to pull back a bill offering that amnesty
Thank you, Chris !!

Joe Biden stated that George Bush should be IMPEACHED if he attacked Iran !!
Joe is right !!

Thank you both

It's a time for CHANGE in American politics
Unfortunately you both ran during the wrong season for politicians with 'REAL' experience (as opposed the the Hillary Clinton 'experience' (sic) )

They probably won't endorse until AFTER Super Tuesday
Presumably Super Tuesday will decide the nomination

But, if Obama were to win New Hampshire AND South Carolina, it would be time for them to endorse

If Obama wins New Hampshire (a long shot) it might be time for Edwards to drop out

Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton is the prohibitive favorite in New Hampshire

With her lead and her organization, there's NO WAY she can lose in her 'Fire wall' state

She knows a loss in both Iowa and New Hampshire would be DEVSATATING for her campaign !!
She'd be view as a LOSER !

Hillary HAS TO WIN NEW HAMPSHIRE
and she HAS TO WIN BIG !!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Frank G. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:09:34 GMT

It's isn't a time for us to shrink from the "Democratic" principles. hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Scott, lithonia, Ga. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:14:33 GMT

OBAMA BLITZKRIEG, HILLARY BATTLE, EDWARDS BLEATS.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Take out the dog and Throw out the trash — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:37:32 GMT

If your looking for cheap and hollow words, then your Washington self serving paper hanger will for fill your personal needs.

Stump slogans, promises have no context to serving this nation. Being conjecture, scandal, open bald face lies, voting conjecture, careless research leading to voting, immoral consent to activities less that of a leader, being part of felon activities to buy the White House and the office of the next President, yes no experience rounds out why HRC is non electable!

Your future and the future of this country must have reform, but A washingtong self serving paper hangers method has failed of present and past! Fact: Congress is non function, because it is being run by self serving people with agenda which hobble addressing priority issues ""Millions of illegals, national defense, poverty, endless list. Shunning the present law and making more paper laws to mask real problems is what the Washington self serving paper hanger has done! A HRC vote is to continue more of the same!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

jerry/corpus christi texas — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:43:04 GMT

If Obama goes on to win the Democratic nomination, he can in part thank Dodd.

Maybe with a cabinet position.....

The netroots are becoming more and more like paint on the wall; nobody is paying that much attention to them at all. As crazy as they are, they were fun for awhile, now with the seriousness of picking a president at hand, they should just go away and drink their starbucks and listen to whatever crazy liberal professor is spouting in college.

If there was any time for Hillary to go after Obama, now is the time. But for her, it is too late. She tried almost every dirty, under the table trick to try and derail him and it did not work and it cost her votes in Iowa. If she continues trying to undermine him now, it makes her look like a desperate woman.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

DEMERYFORhunter — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:46:23 GMT

DUNCAN HUNTER TO END AMNESTY FOLKS ! WAKE UP !

First thoughts: Debate double-header

V. Fox — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:08:19 GMT

HERE WE GO AGAIN. BRING IT ON ! hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Ronald W. Sprague — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:25:14 GMT

If Duncan Hunter had more of a chance to get free air time he would be a serious contender at this time, and what did congressman Hunter mean when asked about Mitt Romney's business (Bain Capital), and its connection to 3Com and the COMMUNIST CHINA'S Huawei Tecnology that gets information from 3Com, a leading information technology firm that helps the Department of Defense ward off cyber attacks from hostle forces? Hmmmm

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Rick Walker — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:28:55 GMT

Question for all of you in the Press, Are your questions about past statments and or policies negative or attack questions? The only truely negative things have been Hillary implying that Obama could have been a drug dealer and the press endlessly reapting it.
The press does not press the real issues and contrasts but just play got ya. How about real questions about things that really matter!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Russ Well, Maine — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:31:32 GMT

well i hope this debate isnt like all the others..What a farce...Lets get some serious question that put the cards on the table..Talk about imigration, manuf jobs overseas, Inflation, recession which we are slowly moving into...Loss of jobs,,,,some thing should be done about gas and oil luses now not 20 yrs from now...who can deliver we will never no if these debates are like the others... let get the american people involved and not the media or the self interest groups..Hard working Americans without ties should be doing the debates.Who am i just another frustrated American who sees his country going to the rich and wealthy.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Shadow, Hamden, CT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:41:00 GMT

jerry - Keep in mind that the netroots contributed more to Obama's campaign than anybody. I think you're talking about many of the self-appointed elites in the blogosphere, some of whom inexplicably had a huge bone up their butt about Obama. The thing is those people aren't really the netroots at all; the netroots is really just made up of individuals, and the impact of those individuals in defeating the Clinton machine and making Obama the next President of the United States cannot be discounted. Their influence has increased, not waned.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Dot, Illinois — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:45:28 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

ace — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:54:57 GMT

sierra, i would suggest to you as an independent myself that the independent vote will carry obama to victory in n.h.

mccain will not get as many independent votes as previously predicted because of obama's freight train.

i can't speak to what republicans will do(as far as crossover to obama) because i am not online with republicans enough to get a consensus and i don't attend the local talking spots that republicans hang out like i do with my fellow independents.

i said that the majority of independents in iowa were going to support obama. no one paid attention. it is going to be a massive push out of n.h. for obama. edwards is going to do better than people think as well.

they keep talking about hillary's organzation. obama has a fine tuned ferrari for an organization and it is getting bigger and sharper. i think dodd and biden will announce right after n.h.

all the lies and hates in the posts here will not change this. most americans want unity and aren't falling for divisive politics. they realize that is why we are in the mess we are in now.

one other thing. anyone interested in some truth go to this site:Understanding Government, a foundation devoted to better government through better reporting.

article by charles peters: judge him by his laws.
washington post.com

this may answer some quesions about obama's experience and substance. only those who wish to find out truth instead of make up untruths will go here.

good luck to all the democratic candidates. for those who will betray your candidate by not voting or turning republican if their candidate doesn't win instead of supporting the democratic party "go now". we don't need any benedict arnolds. please do us that favor.

get in line to support george bush's policy now instead of waiting for the general election.

just my opinion. i'm no expert.

GOOD LUCK TO THE DNC

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Denise Taylor, Atlanta, Georgia — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:56:47 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Huey Lee — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:00:23 GMT

Hilary Rocks! I will vote for Hilary anytime.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

R. Clark, Coatesville, Pennsylvania — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:02:47 GMT

"We weren't able to write much yesterday about Dodd's and Biden's departures (mainly because there was too much else going on)". I totally agree with "Dot", the way the media and pundits like Chris Matthews were obsessed with the "front" runners is truly shameful. Where is the balanced coverage? Where is the service to the electorate? Do you think this might be why it was necessary to create PBS? Sure, we had a lot of good folks to pick from on the Democratic side, but that's no excuse to not try to cover all the candidates fairly. Shame on you guys.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Anne C., York, PA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:09:37 GMT

Just what does America want in a president?

Someone who can make a good speech, or who will make a good president?

Someone who speaks well, or someone who thinks well?

Someone who wants to make a deal, or someone who is the real deal?

Someone who talks about change, or someone who has a plan for change?

Someone who follows on the issues, or someone who leads on the issues?

Someone who can buy an election, or someone who will work for an election?

Answer these questions, and you will know for whom to vote: John Edwards. Thus far, Obama & Clinton have copied Edwards on policy, and Obama, the pretend progressive, has lifted ideas and phrasings directly from Edwards' policy papers and stump speeches. His policy statements are vague, his healthcare plan is not universal, and he has lied about components of Edwards' mandatory healthcare plan.

Just because someone is an eloquent speaker does not give him substance. And my question also about Obama is this: If he is sincere about getting money and special interests out of politics, then why did he not forego private financing and utilize public financing? How can he change a system when the system is paying his way in this election? Don’t let his lofty populist rhetoric fool you; he has accepted as much money as Hillary has from big business interests--from Wall Street, the coal industry, healthcare industry, Exelon (which may explain his willingness to rely on nuclear power as an "alternative" energy source").

Folks, Barack Obama is not what he appears. In 2000, people voted for a guy they thought was "honest" and a regular guy. Don't get conned again. To vote for someone because he gives a good speech is patently ridiculous; you must look beyond into the substance. Edwards has more of it than any other current candidate. Check out his downloadable 80-page policy book on his web site; it's great! www.johnedwards.com

First thoughts: Debate double-header

JS, Houston, TX — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:10:58 GMT

OBAMA...OBAMA...OBAMA...OBAMA...ALL THE WAY!!!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Kevin, Winter Haven, Fl — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:12:08 GMT

Its all over for hillary!!!! and Edwardss!!! Newest Poll from Rasmussen has it like this:

Pres. Barack Obama 37%
Sen. Hillary Clinton 27%
John Edwards: 19%

This is all after the iowa caucusese!!!!!! HOPE!!!!!
OBAMA '08!!!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Ed - Houston, TX — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:12:24 GMT

To the guy who said he would never vote for Obama, apparently you're under the delusion that Hillary has a better chance against Republicans. Obama polls better than she does against all the Republican candidates. The Republicans are more concerned about Obama winning than Hillary, because they realize Hillary is so polarizing and so disliked they think they can beat her, and I think they are right. To the idiot who is basically saying Obama is a terrorist, well idiot is about all we can say about you, I don't understand how that post was allowed here.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Rick,ky — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:14:04 GMT

What are you all watching, that i'm Not watching.I try & catch Every Barack event on TV. I see people from all walks of life, young, old, middle age, not to mention a HELLUVA lot of Caucasion's in the Crowd's, which are HUGE.Do you have the PG-13 button on, that's only allowing your screen to show Young people. How young is young to any of ya? This is getting to be such a Lame arguement that some are making, that's it's Only Young people who attend his event's.Heck, i'm 52, if thats Young to ya, then Yes, IT IS A YOUTH MOVEMENT.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

M. Davis, New Hampshire — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:19:16 GMT

I think the pressure is on Obama right now since he is now the front runner. He is up 12 points in the latest polls in New Hampshire, some say he is up by as much as 15 points in New Hampshire. Obama has never been tested or attacked. How will he respond? I want to see more action and less fluffy talk. Will Obama's 12-15 point leadhold up in New hampshire through Tuesday night? I don't think it will.

Tonight, America will watch the debate. I am looking forward to waching it. Will have a house full of at least 20 people, many Independents.

I think many of us know that Obama is a great speaker, but he is the only candidate I know that can talk for an hour, make you feel good, but in reality, say nothing of substance. Where are the details, the concrete details of what this man wants to do for the America? What has he done for America as the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee? Nothing. he hasn't even scheduled a hearing. Why? Where does he stand on the issues? He talks a good game, but I don't see any game plan. Maybe tonight he will outline his plan with specifics. Many people are sick and tired of just hearing the talk from Obama.

Tonight, it is time for him to show that he is more than just a smiling face that talks about change. If we keep hearing "I want change" "I want change" from Obama, with no details of what that change is, or how he specifically wants to bring about that change, then what do we have, America? A candidate for the Presidency that can talk the talk, but can't walk the walk when it comes to putting forth real solutions to solve the real problems facing America.

America is watching Obama. Let's see what he is able to deliver in the debate without his telepromter and speech writers holding his hand.

Iowa picks corn, the rest of America, picks a President.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

DP, Wichita, KS — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:26:24 GMT

When people are desperate, they go on offensive--like Hillary. How electable was Third Place in Iowa? Obama rocks ! The more you despos attack him, the more he'll shine--just like in Iowa. Please attack him more.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Eddie, Washington, DC — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:29:04 GMT

I laugh my head off when I read people saying that the Republicans are dancing in the streets when Obama beats Clinton.

In some respects, that is true because of the fact that they can't stand the Clintons. But it is in no way because they feel better about beating Obama than her.

I have voted Republican every presidential Election since 1976 and I am voting for Obama. I have numerous other Republican friends who are doing the same.

For me, I am willing to roll the dice because I feel we need a major sweeping change in this country, similar to 1980 and Obama brings that to the table for me.

So you think the Republicans like hearing that?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

billy, camp lejeune, nc — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:32:17 GMT

ron paul

First thoughts: Debate double-header

ace — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:32:34 GMT

shadow, i went to the diary you provided. it was interesting. i have been researching the candidates for a year now. i have found a lot of things out. nothing suprising. as an independent i had the luxury of taking my time. i had set the end of the iowa caucus as my deadline.

i was deciding between biden, edwards and obama with biden as my first choice. it was easy researching joe biden and edwards. especially with me being a year round political junkie.

i remembered edwards last run and his stance on the issues in the senate. he has changed positions dramatically. he has learned from his previous experiences. the research on obama has taken a lot longer.

unlike others that chose to believe spin and make up lies, i wanted to check on this guy and watch him. so much has been put out on him that is half lies, lies and misrepresentations of his actions and the reasons for these actions. all the talk of no substance tells me people aren't interested in finding the truth. if they don't like him they just choose to hang on to their hate,dislike or need to not believe in something else than what has been pushed down their throat and minds the last 20 to 40 years.

it is sad because america has a chance to be so inclusive in the world and undivided at home. america could be great again to the world. something it hasn't had in a long time.

some of it is racial. some of it is establishment engrained belief and some of it is pessimistic views that we could actually change the country.

it is sad that so many are going to miss out on a very special event in the history of this country. a lot of countries and people in those countries around the world see the possibility of america becoming the shining light of the world once again and are hoping for that ending to occur.

some americans are so divided from the broken political system that has been practiced for so long that they can't change the way they think. they have become very non-progressive and the ability of forward creative thinking has departed from some americans.

i have made my decision as an independent and so many of my fellow independents are ready to make a difference in the direction this country is headed. we are tired of the racism, lies, slants on the truth and trusting the so called experienced politician that ends up being lap dogs to the system.

republicans don't want to see obama or edwards in the general election. they have no starategy to defeat them because of their representation of a different direction that most of america so strongly wants. thanks for your contribution.

good luck to the democratic party no matter who wins the nomination.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Nelson, New York, New York — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:33:48 GMT

More anti-Obama vitriol. His critics always say, he talks a good game and that's it.

Well you talk a lot too. Where are the problems with Obama? He just won with Democrats, Indys and Republicans. He is the strongest Democratic candidate. He has worked to build concensuses everywhere he has been. Give me something more specific than you're tired of hearing about hope!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Douglas, Benicia, CA. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:35:12 GMT

I have been watching CNN news for the past few days, particularly after the results of the Iowa Caucus and it seems as though Huckabee has been getting much more air time than Obama. This concerns me greatly. Yes, I believe that the news media has a big affect on elections. I realize that these two candidates are from different parties, but it is as if the news media has already decided that Obama will win the Democratic Nomination for the President of the United States and Huckabee will win the Republican Nomination.

I realized that there are biases and prejudices in all walks of life, I just wished this country and all form of the media would put these differences aside.

This country is in need of a great leader, not just a leader but a great one. CHANGE is what we need. It is very obvious that the path we are currently on is not the correct one. We need new ideas and approaches to the problems we are facing today. The people of Iowa got the right idea and in my opinion they clearly know what's going on and the challenges ahead.

We need a Great Leader not a Great Politician and there is a difference. If you don't know what that is by now, then God Help You.

Douglas

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:43:59 GMT

Dot - good point, and obviously I wasn't clear. I wasn't criticizing older voters. I was criticizing the older Washington set. That's where the childish trench warriors are.

I fully expect there are a lot of older voters who also want a president that doesn't instinctively take us back into those partisan trenches. And if I have to go to the younger candidate over the older one to find that maturity, so be it. I hope every voter older than me (I ain't so young myself) feels the same way.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Judie French Wolf Creek Oregon — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:47:53 GMT

Hillycrats of America: That is an outrageous, bigoted remark. It is not worthy of the electoral process.

Judie in Oregon

First thoughts: Debate double-header

SadStateofAffairs — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:50:55 GMT

Who is Barack Huessin Obama? The Audacity of Hope? Or a wolf in sheeps clothing......does anyone REALLY know? At least with Hillary, love her or hate her, you know who she is and what she has fought for. When it comes to confronting terrorism, I want someone who I know is tough as nails. And Obama....well he'd like to start a dialouge with them. NO THANK-YOU OBAMA!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

fumerop@YAHOO.COM — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:53:26 GMT

People, Obama Hussein is NOT electable. We are at war with most of the muslim world. Once a muslim always one. He's a hidden muslim no matter what he says. It simply can't be allowed. Now that the media has placed a crown on these guys on only 1 primary, what about the rest of the 49 other states? Sheesh what a farce.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

s gawlak, buffalo, ny — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:56:54 GMT

People are so enamoured with having a black president they have missed the boat on not only experience but judgment and knowledge. Obama made a big gaff the other day and you biased news people let it go...he said he would improve pay for teachers...HELLO..the federal gov has nothing to do with our salaries, individual school districts make that call in the individual states...our pay comes from our state governments. Oh well, at least I finally heard of something he is going TO DO and not just rhetoric set for a civil rights meeting..maybe MSNBC's Matthews who is so anti Hillary and so pro Obama ought to see what other little tidbits Obama promises that are false... and no, I personally have not decided whoto vote for but I know whoever it is will be honest and knowledgable

First thoughts: Debate double-header

John Doe, Doeville, Doeland — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:57:02 GMT

I wish ABC wouldn't be stupid in excluding Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel from the Democratic debate. Who do they think they are? If they are going to have a debate they should at least give everyone a fair shot. Now we have to watch as the "top" candidates, aka the candidates that the big media supports, talk about "change" that they will never follow through with. If the media would give everyone a fair shot more people would know people like Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.

Look at what Fox News is doing excluding Ron Paul, the only true Republican, shame on them. All they care about is supporting the rest of the Republican field which is full of hypocrites.

My biggest problem is that no one cares. Why aren't people boycotting and pointing out the injustices of the mass media. They are bias and controlling the outcome of the elections. Wake up people, think for yourself.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Simon, IA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:57:08 GMT

I keep hearing this perplexing though I believe honest question from stunned Clinton supporters. If Obama's policy positions are pretty similar to Clinton's, what's the change?

Can't speak for anyone else, but its not a wonkish difference I'm looking for. And those who have been on this message board since last winter might recognize some of what I'm about to say.

I think the partisan trench wars are childish. They're disruptive to effective governance and simply immature. If the old names can't be more mature, I'll look for a new name - someone I believe will work toward consensus when possible, will be more open and honest and will project an impression of authenticity.

I suspect this is what other recognize, too. We're looking at Obama because he seems to recognize Republicans aren't evil and independents aren't indecisive flakes. Ironically this time I seem to be joining many others in looking to the younger generation to overcome the childish behavior of the older one.

Sorry if that's too simple, but I think that's it.
Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA (Sent Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:03 PM)

Paul, action is bigger than talk and speeches. Look at Obama's voting records. He has voted way on the left and liberal and in 99% of those Republicans voted in the opposite direction.

It is just that Obama saw an opportunity to say he will work with everyone because he saw no one was talking about it. I can say the same but my past actions will prove who i really am. And if my "national" past is very small, I can escape that scrutiny by saying since I have no past, I am fresh and I am the change you need.

Just because someone has been in "national" scene for years, doesnt mean they are useless. Only new people think like that. As they say - Ignorance is Bliss!

I am not saying you are ignorant so please dont take it in a negative manner.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Simon, IA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:58:01 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Dot, Illinois — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:58:04 GMT

Paul:

I think my concern is that the Democrats not become so divided during the primary process that we fail to come together behind the enventual nominee in the general Election. With Gov. Huckabee leading the Rep field right now, I think we Democrats really need to stick together!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Michael Tunick, Los Angeles, Ca — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:02:54 GMT

Couldn't agree more about John Alexander's 1/5/08 comment regarding the Media's non-coverage of the Biden, Dodd and Richardson campaigns. These guys more than held their own in all of the debates, but the Media treated them as they were invisible. They showed a real grasp of the issues and gave real answers in a concise fashion with no hemming or hawing. I don't trust Hillary. I think Obama's a good man, but too green, and would have loved to see him in the VP slot behind Biden or Dodd. Russert, Matthews & Olbermann, why were you all MIA on this aspect of your coverage to date? A boat truly missed to the detriment of all Americans!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Liz, Houston, TX — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:04:11 GMT

Well, now Clinton supporters have no morals according to David from Pharr, Tx. But what else can we expect from a man and especially one from Texas.Men have beat her up and the only reason is she is a SMART WOMEN and men don't like her because she is smart and definitely smarter than most men. Maybe they could learn something from her but you have to have a brain to learn something.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Carolyn, Ashburn, VA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:04:18 GMT

I'm a 56 year-old white woman from the suburbs and a life-long Democrat. I SUPPORT OBAMA!! I could NEVER vote for Hillary and Bill!
We need a fresh start - not a rerun of the 1990s!

GO OBAMA!!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

zach, pennsylvania — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:05:48 GMT

to the dummy who wrote the article. You wold think you would inform the public of all participating candidates. You failed to mention Ron Paul. If you are going to be a journalist try to at least gather the minimum amount of info necessary to be taken seriously. Ron Paul is running and you are a poor reporter.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

midwest girl, MI — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:15:37 GMT

I'm tired of seeing the same old guy in the white house. I want REAL change.

OBAMA '08

First thoughts: Debate double-header

nadeem, Canada — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:16:04 GMT

Obama represent the kind of change the Democratic party fought 40 years to get. The very thing that drew the Clintons to politic so many years ago. To have a man judged based on the content of his charachter not the color of his skin.

Mayor Bloomgerg is telling his friends that if Obama wins he will not run. The reason, he does not want to been seen as retarding progress, and keeping the first African-American from becoming president.

This is what the Clintons risk doing, by fighting against a core principle of the Democratic party they appear petty an power hungry. How can they fight against the very thing they claim to have fought 40 years for, to have a black man afforded the opportunity to seek the presidency of the United States?

The more they fight against the Obama movement, the more they appear like the same people who told Dr. King to slow down, who told Dr. King that America was not ready for the type of equality he sought. THe very people who told Dr. King to wait till next time. They appear to be on the wrong side if history, to not understand the 'fierce urgency of now' A terrible place for their legacy to end.

The Clintons may be better off dropping out sooner rather than later, and get behind the movement. Otherwise even if they win the nomination they will end up doing a disservice to the very movement tht drew them to politics in the first place.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jennifer Palmer, Cape Cod, MA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:22:07 GMT

Hillycrats - maybe you should actually address the issues and not be soooo stupid

Huey Lee -- Great the you think "Hilary Rocks". Too bad you don't know how she spells her name

I for one will watch the debates and hope that the candidates actually get asked some REAL questions about what they really want to change and how they are REALLY going to do it, Seems to me, as always, it is up to the Moderator to ask those questions and "flush out" the answers to the questions
and for the debaters to pay attention and not mudsling. We want a change not the same old political babble.

I'm tired of projection and sensationalism. This country is teetering on a precipice - both foreign and domestic.

Lets address the issues and try for solutions while understanding they won't happen overnight.

We're damned close to a recession and I believe that it is inevitable. Health care is in a pathetic state. We are still in Iraq -- why??? and how do we get out. And then how do we win back the respect of the rest of the world after such arrogant and deceitful behavior?

Let's start with those issues. That should fill up all the debate time and more.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Bob Wayne, Milwaukee, WI — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:24:47 GMT

It's time to get rid of the political elite of the U.S. they have failed us time and again. Let's stop letting multi-millionaires and their buddies run the country.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Aware, Hilo, Hawaii — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:30:49 GMT

Back to back substantive debates should be very revealing.

May the best candidate for president be recognized - not the crowd pleaser/inciter or media money maker. One candidate has had a FREE MEDIA PASS - no vetting -just adulation.

The Republicans will benefit from the frenzy!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Hope — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:31:51 GMT

Response to Hillycrats...wow....with comments like these...no wonder Hillary came in third...Americans are tired of negative attacks and lies...you need to find a better message...the American people are not fool enough to believe obvious lies about Barack Obama...one of the most decent, honest leaders we have seen in a long time........

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Rick,ky — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:31:59 GMT

Well, I see the true people have come out. True racists are showing their true colors. Just come out and say it, you don't like Barack Obama because he is black. At least be truthful instead of coming up with all of this nonsense.
Denise Taylor, Atlanta, Georgia (Sent Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:56 PM)

Denise, there are some left, but by far, they are in a very very slim minority.If you will read most post, Most of them disagree with that kinda post which bring race into it.America is a better Country than that. I have Faith in that, so just overlook them. When there racist comments are Put to bed by Everyone, they just fade into Cyberland.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Michelle. Coralville Iowa — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:32:06 GMT

I was a first time Cacus goer in Iowa and I am not a spring chicken to say the least, close to 50 now, so it did not all boil down to the younger voters, there are many elders backing him.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Suzi Antonucci, Port St Luci, Florida — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:35:20 GMT

Don't you people realize that men have been President since the beginning and they are alike. The only real one for change has to be a woman! Hillary, go girl. Love, Suzi Antonucci

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Justin, Evanston, IL — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:36:38 GMT

Here are a few excerpts from Barack Hussein Obama's Inauguration speech on 1-20-2009, My fellow Americans you forgot The CIA's description of "Sleeper Cells" and guess what you've all been fooled, I'am one of Osama Bin-Laden's Lieutenants and you idiots have elected me as your president. Therefore your property and life savings and sovernty is now the Worlds. Sorry, you should of paid better attention". You should of voted for Edwards or Hillary.

---------------------------------------------

Hillarycrats, are you serious?!? This shows that Clinton supporters are just as ignorant and prejudiced as the right wingers they claim to be against. Hilliary is just another old New Democrat, like her husband. New Democrat = Republican in a blue suit

Read a book, Hillarycrats. Maybe Obama's? That way you'll actually know something about the wonderful person you are talking trash about.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

RobK, Seattle, Wash. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:38:17 GMT

Since Obama will wrap up the nomination, who should he pick for his running mate?

My vote: Jim Webb.

Moderate Dem tough guy is what we need to balance out Barack's cheerful, inclusive demeanor.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Karen Shrum, Central Oregon — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:39:14 GMT

"Talking heads" are a dime a dozen. Obama is lacking in experience and leadership. We need to consider where we'll be in a year with the Mid East crisis with Obama at the helm.....a dangerous scenario. First time voters are taken with his "orative" style. Takes more substance than this to guide this country to where it needs to be...

First thoughts: Debate double-header

C.Y. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:39:31 GMT

Let's set the record straight. Hillary Rocks ! Rock on Hillary ! hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Suzi Antonucci, Port St Luci, Florida — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:41:38 GMT

Don't you people realize that men have been President since the beginning and they are alike. The only real one for change has to be a woman! Hillary, go girl. Love, Suzi Antonucci

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Justin, Evanston, IL — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:41:58 GMT

And teddi from CT, Obama a closet conservative gay-hater?!?!?!?! Have you ever been to Chicago? Do you know anything about what he has done? Hillary is the conservative one, not our man Obama. At least he's not in the pocket of the big money lobbyists.

This idiotic trash-talking has to stop. the intelligent conversations have to begin. Please, children, grow up.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

MGK, Las Vegas — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:43:03 GMT

I'm one of those "older voters" and I vividly remember another time when the idea of "change" was pushed very hard. The result was Jimmy Carter... not a bad guy, but not exactly the best leader this country has ever known. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama reminds me a lot of Mr. Carter. I hope I'm wrong, because I believe he'll be the next POTUS, unless by some miracle Mr. McCain manages some magic in NH.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Linda Keene ,N.H. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:45:12 GMT

Go Huckabee!!!! We will get results for our nation to get on the right path.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Mark, Dunkirk, NY — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:46:13 GMT

If in fact the campaigns are not doing negative advertising in the run up to New Hampshire, then that is a good thing. Negative politics has gotten us to this point. And of course the Clinton machine will hit Obama hard, hopefully we will see Hillary's dark side which will help Obama.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Sarah, Vienna, VA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:47:03 GMT

What happened to Chuck Todd who said right before Iowa that if Hillary came in third - even a close third - it would be DEVASTATING for her? He hasn't said that at all since Thursday night, when she lost to Obama by NINE POINTS and actually DID come in third!

Now he's saying if OBAMA doesn't WIN NH, it is OVER for HIM!!

Huh?? Obama won Iowa, and if Hillary wins NH, why would that NEGATE OBAMA'S WIN IN IOWA?? Seems to me they would be TIED at that point - just as Bush and McCain were in 2000, when Bush won Iowa and McCain won NH. The contest would then move on to South Carolina, Nevada, etc.

Also, the latest poll by "Rasmussen" that is the only one taken AFTER IOWA shows Obama with a 10 point lead over Hillary - 37% to 27%. So, hopefully, Chuck Todd's unfair set-up won't materialize.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jana K. Kernersville, NC — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:48:52 GMT

Does anyone ever wonder why the corporate republican media is gladly covering the Obama campaign with positive press more than Clinton's and Edwards' campaign?? Could it be that the Republicans want Obama to win the Dem nomination? What is Obama's experience? How come he sounds like Edwards in 2004? In my opinion, I feel that a vote for Obama makes it one vote easier for the republican party to win in Nov 08. I am glad because I want Huckabee to win! Democrats believe everything they see on Fox news and MSNBC:)

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Bill Crippen — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:50:35 GMT

You DO know that Ron Paul will be in the debate as well, don't you? I assume your ommission is an oversight and not deliberate like Foxnews is doing tomorrow.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jerry Teach, Graham, WA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:53:17 GMT

Why is Ron Paul not invited? He had double the votes of Rudy the democrat and yet Rudy (NWO's favorite son) is in and Ron is out? Blah...fair elections my foot.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Laura Hoffman, Houston, TX — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:53:40 GMT

So disappointed that more airtime was not given to Dodd and Biden. They are also solid Americans and have impressive service to the country histories.

I hope this continues for us and for them.

To all the contenders - thank you for this huge gift to Americans to even be out there given the media preponderance of destroying the 'individual' and the 'best of us' - instead of realizing what our country could realize.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Joy, Denver, CO — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:55:33 GMT

Am I the only person who finds it insulting that folks the media are shocked that white people would vote for Obama? As for Iowa being "overwhelmingly white," so are most states. Whites are the majority; hence the term "minority" for those of other ethnic backgrounds. It says something about the bias that those on the coasts have about the rest of us; do they think we're all home going to white supremacist meetings? Give us a little more credit. Some of us actually know and like black people--and no, I don't just mean Oprah!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Mark Forcelledo — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:57:03 GMT

The more thnigs change the more they end up staying the same. I am aware that is forty years removed from the conventional memory in respect to politics, however some of you need to dig through the archive and read up on the 1968 democratic nomination and the struggles and success of Eugene McCarthy. Igniting an apathetic but enthusiastic college student base. (Does this sound similar?) Humphrey, the defacto candidate after the assination of RFK was the nominee

First thoughts: Debate double-header

A. Moore-Kingsbury — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:57:44 GMT

Madam President. Now doesn't that sound great! Clinton for President! AGAIN!! That's right.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

A. Moore-Kingsbury — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:59:22 GMT

Madam President. Now doesn't that sound great! Clinton for President! AGAIN!! That's right.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Diane, Scottsdale — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:59:57 GMT

Amen about NBC's lame coverage of the Iowa Caucus results. ALL of the analysis was Obama/Clinton...Edwards barely rated a mention. It is obscene. They are so busy trying to handicap the race, they can't even stop to acknowledge the actual RESULTS. Yes, everybody loves Obama right now and they are in love with the word "change" whatever the hell that means. It reminds me of the Republican morons who voted for "family values" in 2000. Obama does not have a trademark on "change" and I don't even know what he will do day one in office because it is all platitudes and soaring rhetoric. At least Edwards is specific about exactly what kind of change he is talking about. It would be really nice if NBC news would start acting like an actual journalistic enterprise instead of a sideline cheerleading squad.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Dennis — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:01:12 GMT

Want to bet that EVERY Democrat who calls for universal health care wants to insist that abortion be paid for--at taxpayer expense? BTW, I'm a Democrat...you know, one of the pro-life ones that is only paid lip service every four years. Get some character, or you won't get my vote, Democrat or Republican!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Diane, Salt Lake City, UT, — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:03:30 GMT

I am so tired of this entire political candidate bashing.

First, I have yet to figure out why people love to bash the candidates, particularly Hillary. What has she done to deserve this pray tell? She is a politician just like all of the rest. None are above reproach and none without baggage.

Next I have a problem with Obama and those trying to support him because he is black. Or playing the race card with Obama and saying people are against him because he is black. Excuse me, but the last I knew he was half white, raised by a white mother and white grandparents. Yet HE is the one playing the race card by emphasizing his "blackness" so he can have people like Oprah onstage with him. Strange that he rarely ever gives credit to those who raised him. Evidently not politically expedient.

I will vote for the democrat, no matter who gets the nomination. There is not a candidate on the republican side deserving of my vote.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Joaquin — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:06:15 GMT

Um...Where's Ron Paul in the Republican debates?? Didn't he more than double Giuliani in Iowa?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jerry King — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:06:47 GMT

As an Independent, I'm surprised that the Democrats don't realize that John Edwards is their only electable candidate. There are simply too many voters who would vote Repulican before they would vote for Hillary or Obama. Their negatives in the polls are as large as their positives. I'm indeed ready for a change, but not to either of those two. Unless the Democrats nominate Edwards, they will elect another Republican.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Frank, McHenry Il — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:12:43 GMT

Based on what? The thousands of people coming to see him, the almost unheard of enthusiasm he's generating?
.. and the Fact he won Iowa.

You people are as bad as any Republican I've ever seen. Call yourselves progressives but you're just as backwards as the rest. For all the naysaying I've read about Obama for months and about how "horrible" he'll do, you've been wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Get over it, the guy may not win, but he sure as hell is performing far better than responders on this blog would have you believe. To read this blog, you'd thing Edwards is the greatest thing since slice bread but to most of the Democratic party he is an also ran (yet again). Hillary is still riding on the shoulders of her husband and when the fog clears there sits Obama. The guy everyone here wishes so much ill fortune on yet somehow manages to still be a top dog in the campaign.

Try opening your eyes and realizing that most folks in the US don't think like you, and in this case it appears that the general population is far more willing to be "progressive" on this than most people here.

Obama will be our next Prez......Thank Gawd

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Roland Lauther Plattsburgh NY — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:15:27 GMT

Supporters of Obama claim he is an agent of change. Clinton backers boast that she is more experienced. The populist supporters of Edwards say he will be the middle class guardian.

There is one candidate who voices an opinion that is not always matching the mainstream of his party. That same candidate has experience in many areas and knows the ways of Washington DC. This candidate is a straight talker and not a flashy personality with $400 haircuts. Additionally, this candidate has character that has been tested by the most rigorous and horrendous conditions.

John McCain is the finest of the fields in either party. His honesty, character, experience in life and forthrightness are far superior to all the others, Democrats or Republicans. Americans should see fit to send this outstanding man, filled with mature wisdom and unique personal experience to the White House.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jo O'Connor — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:19:21 GMT

Please spare all of us from another debate. What purpose is served by allowing sound bytes to permeate the MSM channels? Try listening to Kucinich or Ron Paul. They make sense. Neither is racist nor "wear your Christianity on your sleeve."

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jack Humphrey, Long Beach, CA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:20:32 GMT

To: "Hillycrats of America"

Your comments say more about the Hillary campaign than most of us would like it to. Talk about vile character assassination! May you and yours get your 'comeupance' on Tuesday!

As for Teddi in Norwalk -- please DO stay home on election day. You clearly have no understanding of the American political process.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Big Horn, Helena, MT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:28:26 GMT

It looks like the scale is tilting towards the tall dark and handsome guy on the liberal side with the big ears and it could possibly go to the rich Morman guy or the old mean looking ex POW on the Red side. The Arkie Bible thumper from down in the Ozarks could pull it off for the Christians.
It also appears that its the wrong time of the month for the ex-first lady, you can tell she is having "Hot Flashes". She is too old for PMS.

May The Best BS-er of them all WIN! and then may the losers hopefully fade away out of our site forever.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jack Humphrey, Long Beach, CA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:29:16 GMT

Uh, M. Davis of New Hampshire, Joe Biden is the Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, NOT Obama. How well informed is that?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

john — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:29:52 GMT

OBAMA IS NOT EXPERIENCED! I DON'T WANT A MAN OR WOMEN THAT HAS NO KNOWLEDGE ON HOW OR WHAT IT TAKES TO RUN A COUNTRY! I DON'T WANT TO LIKE MY PRESIDENT I WANT THEM TO DO THERE JOB! GROW UP AMERICA THIS IS NOT HIGH SCHOOL THIS IS OUR COUNTRY! HILLARY 08!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Honestly Curious — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:31:02 GMT

Seriously - McCain and Thompson tied at 13%, Ron Paul at 10% and he doesn't get invited to talk in NH? Doesn't that seem a bit strange? Not that they ever give him a chance to speak even when he is invited, but even Richardson made the cut. Conspiracy theorists unite!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Becky, from New York — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:32:08 GMT

The only reason these guys are now ganging up on Obama is because he won unexpectedly in Iowa, and he could potentially be the first black President of America, come on guys get over the race card and learn to unite this is the 21st century for crying out loud...

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Dot, Illinois — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:32:44 GMT

Couldn't agree more about John Alexander's 1/5/08 comment regarding the Media's non-coverage of the Biden, Dodd and Richardson campaigns. These guys more than held their own in all of the debates, but the Media treated them as they were invisible. They showed a real grasp of the issues and gave real answers in a concise fashion with no hemming or hawing.

Michael:

I agree with you. I think the media thought the Senator Clinton/Senator Obama back and forth was more appealing as a news story, so those candidates who remained focused on the issues were considered to be unexciting and therefore, not worthy of coverage.
I am really disappointed in the election coverage so far.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Robert Williams, Buckeye, AZ — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:33:45 GMT

For those of you who deride Obama for his great speaking, remember this: A great leader must first inspire the people. It is only then that the people follow and be the ones who make change happen. Ask youself this: Of all the candidates, Republican and Democrat, which one inspires their followers the most? I think you know the answer. We are at the threshold of history.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

mark smalling — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:36:39 GMT

Would one of the Obama supporters please explain the in and outs of how the Senator is going to accomplish any of what he says. Because so far, the Senator certainly hasn't.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Amanda Payne Birmingham, AL — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:40:22 GMT

Obama will provide change for sure. If he is elected president, your life as a US citizen will be forever changed. There is no doubt in my mind he will give you that. When he stands in front of a podium, as he has done many times, and relays promises and delivers assurances of his dedication to change, know that he means that. Our nation will no longer exist as we all know it today, yet resemble the lands of our enemies that demonstrate hate and lack of freedom. It has been said that our enemies are working from the inside out. How ironic. If you are black, don't just vote for this man b/c he is black. Don't just want to make a mark in history. Vote for the right reasons. Color isn't the issue here as someone stated earlier. If you think that, you are racist. Review the facts. The color of his skin is irrelevant. I love that diving moment in history as well, but Obama becoming president could become a defining moment you will never forget. Unfortunately, I don't think it will be the moment in history you're wishing for. Think about it.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Terry Weiser, Overland Park, Kansas. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:44:07 GMT

Obama's positive message is what resonates with independents. The return of our nation to 1990 for the Democrats or 1950 for the Republicans just does not register. To read some of the sickening and undemocratic comments about Obama being a musilim terrorist is beneath comment. These comments are made out of ignorance and fear. We can not allow fear and ignorance to rule. It is time for the populace to stand and take our country back from special interests and the hack politicians who serve them The United States needs to live up to what our founders birthed and what each generation has strived for since, equality and a fair opportunity for all of its citizens to achieve a better life. Obama ,John Edwards and Mike Huckabee embrace those tenets. Hilary and Mitt are for special interests. It is time for change not the same gridlock we face. As for expereince what has that gotten us to date. In debt to China, economy in shambles ,the middle class being overtaxed and the United States a paper tiger in the world. It is for these reasons why this is a change election.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

betty, rochester mn — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:46:04 GMT

I find it interesting that the conversation here has been exclusively on Clinton, Obama and a little on Edwards and not a word about Bill Richardson. Yes. He is short on charisma. But long on experience. He has demonstrated that he can talk to those we disagree with. As governor of a border state, he has dealt with the immigration issue. He has had cabinet and legislative experience. AND he is the only one who will at least TRY to get the troops home soon. I'm looking forward to tonight's debate where he will hopefully have more attention than in previous debates.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Betsy Johnson, Greensboro, NC — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:51:13 GMT

I do not understand for the life of me why everyone hates Hillary Clinton. I truly believe it is because she is a woman. She has more experience than any of the other candidates. Even her Republican rivals in the Senate applaude her had work and her willingness to form coalitions to get things done. The rest of the world thinks far better of her than many Americans. Someone, please tell me what is so bad about her?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Sandy, Charlotte, NC — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:57:06 GMT

I am somewhat doubtful of poll results, but I think Congrats are owed to two polls which were amazing!

The Des Moines Register Poll last week was mocked by many in the media - but they nailed it almost perfectly! They showed Obama winning by a huge number, they had Clinton and Edwards far back within one point of each other(though in reverse order), they said there would be a huge first-time caucuser turnout, and they said Indepependents and Republicans would caucus for Democrats. Pretty good results! Well done!

And the last Zogby poll right before Iowa had the ORDER correct, showing Obama winning, Edwards second, and Hillary coming in third. They even got the order correct for the GOP with Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, and McCain. Good job!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Athena Evan, Valparaiso, IN — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:00:58 GMT

Edwards is the man to win this race and the only democrat who could take red states. I do not see the South voting for a woman or a black man. This country is in need of dire change and we cannot risk this election by picking a democrat who could lose to the republicans.

People need to pick the right man...John Edwards because he means what he says. Don't forget that Edwards came in second in Iowa and beat Clinton!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg, Nashua, New Hampshire — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:01:30 GMT

"Change or no change" appears to be the bigger debate. Look at the condition of our country and the presidency; do any one person think that the "old school" candidates can do any better than whats been already done? It is going to take a fresh mind and fresh approach to politics in order to get this country back together again. I don't see the logic of placing "old school" politicians in the presidency to dwindle down economics within the next four years with dead, old school politics. What good is yesterdays experience when we are dealing with many "NEW" economic issues today? How are the "old school" politicians suppose to swing it? Obama appears to be the only candidate that seems to realize the state of economy and politics the country is in and realizes that it will take a fresh new approach for change in order to deal with it. I like Hillary and went through the roof when Bill made president however, that WAS yesterday and today is today. Things are different now and I don't see where experience from over 8 years ago benefits the country today. In my opinion, so far, the other candidates speak in the sense of "micro-managing" washington and not addressing problems as a complete system or process. Obama is the only candidate that speaks in term of complete resolution to many of our problems, he's been most consistant and I like the fact that he stands by his opinion on things such as the war. He didn't vote in favor of it in the beginning and morally, he stood strong by his decision and purpose up to today. If that isn't an independent and strong motion of leadership then I don't know what is! No other candidate has taken this type of strong position; not even Hillary! I like a candidate that can stand behind their views and do so with a firm position. This is a candidate that will get things done and not so easily be persuaded to abandone purpose, idea or change. Wishbone will no longer do; it is time to have a condidate in the house that has Backbone! Unlike Bush, a person that has a mind and think for themself and have a view, opinion or firm decision about situations. One that will be persistant to get things done. I don't know if I can trust a president that makes excuses as to why they voted in favor of an unjustified war; like they don't have a voice of their own... And the other candidates have not done a good job answering that question... not even Hillary.

"The War"
Are we truly that strong? Are we truly winning? Every week you hear about more american solders being killed in Iraq from suicide attempts and strategic attacks. People, this is a different type of war and America is NOT exempt from being attacked by it! Yes we may have a very strong military but, how do you fight an enemy that blends in with any and every John Doe? Sometimes negotiation and dialogue is imperitive; especially when you are EXTREMELY vulnerable! To threaten a terrorist does nothing more than create more terrorism! For example, if a person wanted to commit suicide by jumping off a cliff would you go up to them and tell them to jump? Many americans probably would but, I would imagine that you would try to get the person to understand the value of life as NOT to jump. Well, we can't always negotiate with countries by threatening them! America can sometimes be notorious for a very blunt or harrassing approach to situations. That doesn't help resolve the issue, it helps to escalate the problem! We need a fresh new approach to these problems. Not the approach we have today.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Concerned in Ohio, Dayton, Ohio — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:01:39 GMT

I just want to urge everyone to get the FACTS on each candidate before casting a vote. I had my vote set for Obama until I read about his positions on important issues...I disagree with almost ALL of his positions. He is, however, very personable (just like Bush) and very smart.

Don't vote on color or gender...vote on a person's morals and records!

Obama really disappointed me...almost to the point where I was angry about his positions (and he didn't do anything other than be who he is - AND WILL BE IF ELECTED PRESIDENT).

GET THE FACTS AMERICA. Don't rely on the media...it cannot be trusted. Inform yourself because ignorance is not your friend.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Chloe, Seattle — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:10:17 GMT

The latest Rasmussen poll taken AFTER IOWA, shows OBAMA LEADING HILLARY BY TEN POINTS!!

Obama has 37% to Hillary's 27%!

That's what I call a BOUNCE!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Steve, Hartford, CT — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:26:17 GMT

Obama DOES have the experience necessary to enact change. How do I know? I have judged him by his laws!\

Read this article about Obama's biggest legislative accomplishments and see what I mean:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303303.html

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg, Nashua, NH — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:28:06 GMT

- Obama and Democracy -

When I ask myself the question "what is democracy?" I reflect back on the Declaration of Independence. My goodness what a powerful statement that was presented as the overall thoughts of a collective of people. Strength comes in numbers and the way America truly became America is when "We the People" declared our Independence.

When I think of Obama's recommendations, they seem to deal with being a true collective of people that work and share common vision and goals to get things done. To me, you can't get any better than this especially when you consider how America was truly liberated as a country. In history, the American people came together no matter what their differences were and worked together to liberate this country and for many years to come, it was the foundation of building this country. Somehow, this value got lost in history though, it was the most valuable asset we had as a people to make America what it is.

When I listen to Obama, I hear a person that is saying that we need to stop sub-dividing and look at our sources as a whole. We need to be concerned about everyone no matter what color or classes. We need to work together (as our forefathers) as a nation to get things TRULY done! To me, this is a true democracy and I hear this coming from only one corner; Barak Obama's... Can this be done? OF COURSE! The victory in Iowa was initiated by the people of America and merely the beginning of what can be a host of changes for the better and for everyone; not just for a few or the elite! I think Obama AND the state of Iowa is demonstrating for the rest of this continent that there is some substance to what he is saying, truth and potential and if they can start it, then the rest of the country can ban together and help Iowa and Barak get this country back together again! And we can do it respectively as "We the People."

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Lisa Green, Niles, Michigan — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:33:51 GMT

Hillary Rocks! I will vote for her anytime! YOU GO GIRL! :) And Bill, He was the most intelligent Prez this country has ever seen! What a dream team! :) ***HAPPY NEW YEAR, INDEED***

First thoughts: Debate double-header

David, Los Angeles, Ca. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:51:24 GMT

Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton?? You call that democracy?

How much $$ have these 2 family's made in office?

Wake up America...after 20 years, get some new blood in office.
Maybe one day we will have a President that really works for the people and not for special interest.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

concerned, mesa, az — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:44 GMT

we will be hearing all Obama voters crying the blues if he is elected President just like people did with Bush. Know one pushed Bush on issues because he was fresh and a uniter. Was going to bring change. boy he did that! Vote for Obama if you know where he stands not because the media is treating him like a rock star. Remember he works in Washington just like the rest. Don't be gullible.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

DAVID ANDERS , PHARR, TX. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:15:05 GMT

THE DEMS ARE PLAYING THE NEW DEMOCRATIC GAME CALLED HIDE THE CIGAR INVENTED BY NO OTHER THAN THE DEM ROCKSTAR BILL CLINTON. YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW CLINTONS AND TO YOU CRITIZING ME, WAIT TILL YOU SEE THIS ON TV ADS PLUS MUCH WORSE EVERY TIME YOU TURN YOUR TV ON. GOD YOU PEOPLE ARE SICK

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Leebo Wheaton, IL — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:18:32 GMT

The "Muslim/terrorist" attacks on Barack are hysterical. Seriously, keep it up and we'll have an absolute landlside in the general. He is not now, nor ever has been, a Muslim. And for the veiled terrorist thing - beyond a response. The idiocy speaks for itself.

"Hussein" is like "John"...I had a student named Hussein Husseini. But, please continue with the histrionics. Desperation has a way of backfiring and just ends up looking sad. The cream will rise to the top.

Obama '08!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

DAVID ANDERS , PHARR, TX. — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:18:54 GMT

JESSEE JACKSON WOULDNT COMMIT TO OBAMA, YOU KNOW WHY, HE WANTS TO KEEP THE BLACKS DOWN, WHERE HE CAN EXPLOIT THEM LIKE THE CLINTONS DID. AMERICA IS SICKER THAN THE CLINTONS

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Mark Fischman — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:19:09 GMT

I hear a lot of talk that Obama has no concrete plan or policies. Real leaders bring people together to work up a plan together and that's what he talks about. Bringing everyone to the table while being the leader. That's what the great leaders do. Not just come with their idea that they cram down others throats. That's not leadership. Great leaders get the most out of those around them to all work for the common good. We need someone like him with vision and good judgement. Something he has demonstated over and over again which much of Washington rarely does. A different way of seeing things and working is what we desperately need. For those using the Hussain pitch, shame on you. There's no place her for that. Dialogue is where it's at, not name calling.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Gene L., Chicago, IL — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:19:23 GMT

In his earlier stump speeches, Senator Obama did get into more specifics, but the professorial lecture tended to bore people.

As far as the change that Obama is going to bring, I would reference conservative columnist David Brooks of the NY Times, who notes that the change that Obama is offering is a change from the old categorizations of the Baby Boomer generation that have led to polarization and partisanship in our government. This may seem nebulous to some, but if you think about it, it is actually quite profound. Unfortunately it's something that can't be legislated, can't be quantified in policy points. It requires leadership, vision, and integrity, which is the metapoint that Senator Obama is promulgating, I believe.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

George, Austin, Texas — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:28:31 GMT

Amazing how many people make racist comments here.

Obama had a Muslim father. Big deal! How many of you here know a Muslim? Many that I know love this country and don't show any signs of being a terrorist.
As for the Middle East, the West has played it's hand in the troubles there. In Iran, the U.S. put the Shah in power. In Iraq, the U.S. supplied Saddam with weapons to fight Iran. In Afganistan, the U.S. worked with Osama Bin Ladin so he could help defeat the Soviets. We support Isreal because their money is in the pockets of our elected officials. Then there's the Saudi's where the U.S. turn away from their issues because of OIL. The U.S. is in Iraq now because of OIL. So tell me, what were the religions of the people in office over the last 60 years who have put this county to this point?

Who ever is voted in, I hope they help the world rather than help ruin it. No matter what religion they are.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Lars, Gig Harbor, WA — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:39:46 GMT

To Hillycrats of America, USA. If you choose to expose your incredible ignorance to the world, you might at least use your spell checker.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

G. Miller — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:42:13 GMT

to funecrap; "Once a muslum always one". Give me a
break. The idiots are already lining up to sling the
"muslum" card on Obama when he is nothing of the sort. He is a Christian. I suggest you read more on him rather than throw out the right wing lies.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Glen — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:05:13 GMT

The true intelligence of America seems to be represented in many of your posts here. I wish these people would read more than one source for information, and as for the racism, we can take them out back and shoot em.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

nadeem, Canada — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:17:34 GMT

I hope the real majority of Americans, the ones that are rational and intelligent will judge Barak Obama based on the content of his character not the color of his skin, or how his name sounds.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

K Kincaid, Marshalltown IA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:20:17 GMT

it is so nice to back a candidate that does not sling mud not have mud slung at him. : ) Richardson does not get much media attention but that is OK- he is the man for the job and perhaps when everyone gets disgusted with all the negatives they will actually read about Governor Richardson and back someone who has the experience to get the job of leading this nation in the right direction.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Timbo Twiddly — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:21:00 GMT

Hey Hillycrat,

If you had graduated from high school, you might HAVE (not OF!)learned proper grammar.

Nothing a redneck like you will have any real effect on this campaign. LMAO

First thoughts: Debate double-header

ellen g cincinnati oh — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:26:29 GMT

Is obama really a change? he is so busy talking about change that it never quite gets around to policy and how and what he will do that will be different. People are saying that by electing Hillary we will be getting four more years of Bill Clinton, well what would be so bad about that the 8 years he was president we were better off then the last 7 with George.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Linda, Raleigh, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:36:10 GMT

Just read on MSNBC.com a piece that questioned the value of Iowa. Called it "quirky."

Well, I wanted to pass along something I read on another site.

EVERY DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE SINCE 1976 HAS FIRST WON IN IOWA WHEN THE CAUCUS WAS CONTESTED - EXCEPT ONCE! (in 1988, Dick Gephardt won in Iowa, but did not win the nomination)

(in 1992 Tom Harkin was not challenged as he was a Senator from Iowa)

So the odds are certainly with OBAMA to get the NOMINATION!!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

concerned — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:55:56 GMT

Why do they not ask question about moral values. The president wanted to know what will keep them true in hard times and they danced around everything but moral values.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Mike, Charleston SC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:12:11 GMT

New Hampshire will vote for Obama, just like the sheep they are. Obama wins in Iowa so New Hampshire wanst to "jump on teh bandwagon" of teh leader, I recall when New Hampshire was independent, now they vote based on what the media and other states tell them

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jerry King — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:14:13 GMT

It will be a shame if a Republican is elected President because the Democrats didn't nominate an electable candidate. Neither Hillary or Obama can win the Independent vote.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

E.J. San Antonio, Tx — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:18:37 GMT

If Obama can win in NH, then he will have to be considered the favorite for the Democratic nomination, and everyone who dislikes him now will have to find a happy place to hide for the next few months or learn to accept someone who wants change and can accomplish it by hiring the best advisors America has to offer.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

RobK, Seattle, Wash. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:26:35 GMT

ABH! ABH!

Anyone but Hillary!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Scott Packard, Altoona, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:31:34 GMT

It seems to me that once again the players with the big war chests are the ones who receive the most attention from the media. Likewise, the American public are like a bunch of sheep. I feel, for a change, let's look at Gov. Bill Richardson from New Mexico. I feel he is the only person qualified to lead this country.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

RobK, Seattle, Wash. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:47:19 GMT

Let's talk running mates for Obama now.

1st choice: Russ Feingold
2nd choice: Jim Webb

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Tony , Wickenburg, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:54:51 GMT

Total Public Debt Outstanding; http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway

01/03/1994 US Treasury Debt under Clinton 4,512,315,337,989.71

12/31/1999 5,776,091,314,225.33
12/29/2000 US Treasury Debt under Bush 5,662,216,013,697.37
12/31/2007 9,229,172,659,218.31
And the Debt dollars stop at the door of the US Consumer , and the Government , which still is relying on the US Consumer , and the Only beneficiaries from all these years are who after Clinton Implemented the Tariff free trade policies in 1995 that did not end until 2005 ,,, WTO Trade partners , Government Officials , and Financial Organizations , that the Fed keeps pumping dollars back into every time Credit defaults loom , go figure ........Its time for some new Directions , that pack along with it some real Solutions . Go Get em Barack, hes the only one thats neutral , and won't be bought off by Big Money . And don't forget to tell everyone that the idea that Corporate Employees could Integrate their Work to their Home , and cut down the Driving on a weekly basis , and cut the gas consumption by 35% - 45 % in 2008-2010 , cut the Emissions , and Improve the quality of Life , and Profit from it to Boot , there is no reason that this would not work , with Secured Servere Systems like today , like a Microsoft " Go-to-Meetings" system , and the Technologies that Corporate America uses today that could be used at Home to accomplish the same things , it would allow more people to stay home more days out of the work week , and cut the road travel down thus reducing Costs even in healthcare just because of the lower stress on Society . Just think what the money saved by the people that are able to practice this type of work function , the overall benenfits would create solvent solutions . Thanks and have a Great day in the USA .

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Tony , Wickenburg, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:56:51 GMT

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Joe, Des Moines, Iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:27:27 GMT

At tonights debate...
Hillary seemed too political and mad. She is also full of herself.
Obama seemed boring or tired. He seems to be letting Edwards do his dirty work, while he looks the other way and talks about not being negative.
Edwards seems to be full of charisma and he just has the look of genuine concern and care for the American people.
I honestly don't get what people see in Obama, I don't see it. I think the problem is the general public in the United States lets the media brainwash them. First Hillary was the media darling, now its Obama. Will Edwards get his turn so he can get all the media coverage, which in turn results in a bump in poll numbers. The media influence is truly pathetic.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg Harrisburg Pa. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:33:29 GMT

the people of N.H. have got to remember what Hillary has done for them. Hillary is right you can talk about change or you can do it. Hillary has been about change all her life. 35yrs. of change for the people. She never sold N.H. out. And she has challaged the states quo. When in "93" when she had a health bill, and tried to pass it. She challeged the S.Q. So Edwards or Obama donot have the dibs on that. Hillary has been fighting for all of our rights for 35yrs.And N.H. I pray that N.H.remembers that when they vote. Obama is out of his league when it comes to comparing his ex. to Hillary's. And that's includes Edwards.. greg

First thoughts: Debate double-header

greg Harrisburg,Pa. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:40:52 GMT

Go Go Go Hillary... You are the Star of change....greg

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Patricia Allison Orlando, Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:54:32 GMT

Mr. Chuck Todd: I would like to thank you for your professionalism each time you are a guest on a news program. I could say the same of Craig __________ (don't know his last name).

I used to watch Hard Ball every night but have turned Chris Mathews off. His distaste for Mrs. Clinton is daily made evident while it is clear he appears to be "in love" with the hope that Mr. Obama ia a throw back to the Kennedys (Bobby and John).
I'm a huge fan of Bobbys but Mr. Obama is no JFK no matter how much Mr. Mathews wants him to be. If you have received similar comments, then you will do whatever you feel is appropriate. As for me, I will watch Keith Olberman, because to my mind, he is the only MSNBC/NBC news host who remains impartial during his show and/or is not trying to make his own professional reputation by playing "gotch ya" with candidates.

Thanks for the opportunity to express my point of view.
Sincerely,
Patricia Allison

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Jay, Groton, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:54:52 GMT

Edwards epitomizes what has been wrong with the Democratic party the last two elections. He is doing the dirty work for Obama in attacking Clinton apparently for his own gain (to become Obama's running mate) and in the process backing a candidate running on sound bites instead of a sound platform of solutions. The Republicans must be licking their chops. Edwards should just switch parties now, he is doing more damage to the Democratic party than Rove ever did.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Joe, Des Moines, Iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:06:41 GMT

Obama seems to dull to ever be able to make serious change like he says. He looked like he was asleep. I just don't see what has people so fired up about him? I suppose we could go from the dumbest president ever to the dullest. I still like John Edwards! He just seems ready to go. He is inspired and looks to bring on major changes in the way business is done in Washington!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

S. Nagarajan Randolph NJ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:06:56 GMT

I found the latest post about CNN's coverage and the possibility of waning viewership downright LOLable. I stopped watching CNN or for that matter any news channel 5 years ago.
Obama cannot win, Hillary we have to wait and watch but One thing I am sure of -30% of americans are going to vote for either Romney or Huckabee. You cannot get these folks to vote for a democrat. That leaves 40% of white folk + 30% of others to vote democrat. Now it is safe to say that the winner is not going to get more than 45% of the vote. 30% is guaranteed for the Dems. That leaves 40% of the white folk with the either staying the course or looking for change. I doubt if the white folk have been affected enough by this war to affect that change.So I predict the Huckster or Romney as the next president.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Joe American — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:45:19 GMT

People stop being stupid Obama is not a sleeper agent or a Muslim. What he represents is the younger generation 18-39 view of our country. Yes Clinton may have 36 years of service as a politician, and to that I say good job. However 36 years of politics is what got America in this mess to begin with. The only reason that I am voting for Obama is because he is young, stick to his idea of party unification and limits his negative ad campaign. If there was a tree preaching his ideas I would vote for it. I think that the theme here is it does not take a rocket scientist to run the country (Bush) just some one that will hear the people and stop the downward spiral that we are in. It's time for old government to move to Florida for the winter and let the young bloods rule.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

susan, annapolis md — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:48:26 GMT

i'm flat out glad to see the youth of this country take back their country! the kids of today are voting, this year this time, for THEIR future, plus our "old foggey's" future. i'm guessing they are realizing, from watching we baby-boomers care for our aging parents, that they too will one day be in our shoes and they want it better than we have it now. i am a 51-year-old white female (registered democrat since day one) and i too will be voting FOR Obama.

p.s. i turned off to Hillary a long time ago. she sent out a mailing requesting donations toward her "senate" race. well, i live in maryland and why would someone running for a new york senate seat be wanting to raise funds from maryland residents?

First thoughts: Debate double-header

pamlobsp, Chicago, IL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:56:23 GMT

I lived in Obama state senate district for 6 years, he did nothing. He has done nothing as our US Senator, but run for President. He has never had a serious opponent (he beat Alan Keys). I enjoy his speeches too. But, that is all it is TALK no action. Illinois is losing jobs and healthcare our budget is a joke. There is no Hope in Illinois our Senate and House leaders don't speak to each other. Thankfully we have Dick Durbin or we would be in more trouble than we are now.
On bringing people together, Obama has single handly divided people in his orginal district. He ran against Bobby Rush a democrate. He is all out for power and to enrich his elite friends.
You guys keep this up and we will be saying President McCain. The media is not looking into him, but I bet the Republicans are.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Diane, Salt Lake City, UT, — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:09:22 GMT

I really could not believe Edwards last night. He certainly is Obama's hitman. I was totally appalled by his attacks on Hillary. I totally agree with Jay from Groton, MA. If he was the nominee, I think that I might have to sit this one out.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

HP Boston — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:45:15 GMT

"I seem to be joining many others in looking to the younger generation to overcome the childish behavior of the older one.

Sorry if that's too simple, but I think that's it.
Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA (Sent Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:03 PM)

----------------------------------------------------

I tried to post a similar comment on another story but it didn't work, so I'll try here. I would most respectfully suggest that if Senator Obama becomes the nominee of his party, he will need the support of people OF ALL AGES; not just the younger voters. The Obama supporters on this site might consider muting their criticisms of "older" Americans lest they alienate those people whose support their candidate may need in November. They also need to realize that everyone, old and young, is entitled to support the candidate of his or her choice without being insulted or demeaned. Your candidate seems to realize this; I would suggest that as his supporters you do the same.

Making such broad generalizations about "older" voters is so counterproductive; older people could(and do in many cases) do the same thing about the young, but what does that accomplish? For real and meaningful change in government, I think a blend of youthful enthusiasm and experienced judgement are needed. Your candidate says he want to bring the people of this country together; some who post here would do well to remember that.
Dot, Illinois (Sent Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:45 P
__________________________________________________
Dot you are correct, we need more than the unseasoned kids to decide who will be president.
Be careful with that troll and plant Paul, he is no Democrat and claims to be all things to all candidates. He sometimes hears things he may just tell you about but then coyly try to say well maybe not but he suspects or feels, he has a gut feeling but can't say for sure. He is a true gossip girl!.. He is soooo undecided and has no pick for a candidate. He loves to spew the garbage with jerry/cc and D Andres the other TX scumbag.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg, New Hampshire — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:45:18 GMT

To my fellow Americans:

Please help me understand. Many candidates are battling and debating their "experience." If none of them actually functioned as the United States President, how do ANYONE (including Hillary) justify their "experience?" Hillary is the only candidate that came close; as the "first lady" (NOT the President). And this was as far back as the Rock Ages!! Does that qualify as "experience?" More like delusions of grandeur. Now stay focused with me. I am sure every American knows that the only way to gain experience to be the President is to BE the President. When I look at all of the candidates, I see potentials in several and some more than others. I don't think a few years as the first lady over 8 years ago exactly makes Hillary capable to run the nation. Does that mean any candidate is any more qualified as her? No.. But it does mean that we should recognize that NONE of these candidates have functioned in the role of the United States President and none of them are any more qualified than the next. No offense towards Hillary; I did vote for Bill when he ran and I think he did a wonderful job as president but I don't think Hillary should use Bills experience as the United States President to justify "brownie points" to make herself look good. If she wants to be the president then she should be viewed in all truth as any other candidate with no more experience than any other candidate. I don't see how people are easily blinded by this smoke screen. Bill is standing BESIDE Hillary; he is not on the ticket. I don't see how HIS experience all of a sudden makes Hillary the most experienced candidate on the ticket. If the american people do NOT understand the role of "first lady," maybe you ought do a little history lesson and research the responsibilities of the American President. You may be surprised to know that with all of the President's advisors, department leaders, etc, there is no mention of associating graphical presidential information with the "first lady." In fact, the presidency is designed to be operated by a single figure head; spouse is NOT a mandatory. And the president will still have all necessary resources to run this country. How does a position of "first lady" qualify Hillary's experience as the United States President? On that note, I suggest the american people to make their decisions based on honesty and truth, possibility and potential; NOT experience because experience as the President can ONLY be obtained as the President. Avoid smoke screens and unrealistic statements like "I have 35 years experience"; Doing WHAT?? Being the first lady? Anyone or at least everyone should know that advisors are there for the president to run the country; first lady is not necessary.... What experience and from where? Wake up America and choose the most honest, loyal, truthful, candidate that shows the greatest potential to do open door politics. Obama 08!!

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg, New Hampshire — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:35:05 GMT

What is the difference between having "potential" and having "experience"??

Potential: means you may not know everything about the job but, have the abilities that suggest your capability of doing the job.

Experience: comes with DOING the job. People, do remember that NONE of these candidates have former experience in being the United States President. Now try to focus on "POTENTIAL." Potential cannot so easily be weighed on what was accomplished as a "senator" because we ALL know that being a senator is oceans different than being the President. We need an honest, loyal, committed leader. We need a leader for change but also make themselves aware of the genuine needs of the American public. Not a leader that moves only on their selfish ideas. Personal and selfish agenda's should be easily discredited. Open your eyes! Don't be so easily brought on the "experience" phrases and the idle promises. This country and economy is hurting and we don't need the ongoing repeats of "old" politics.

Did John F. Kennedy have a lot of experience to become the American President? NO! He barely had the attention span to keep himself awake in meetings. That did NOT stop him from going forward to become one of the most significant Presidents in the history of the United States and made MANY significant changes! When I hear Barak Obama, I hear a voice that reminds me of the genuine character of John F. Kennedy; a President that didn't just go forward to become the President but, became a president that changed the lives of Americans for years to follow.

Barak Obama is appropriate for the time, age and issues we are dealing with. He comes accross as the new age JFK. Yes there were many issues that were outstanding when John F. Kennedy took office as well; did he do half bad? NO! He did EXCELLENT!! Have faith people. This is NOT the first time we are looking at significant change. Sometimes true change appears to be hard but on the end, we always benefited greatly. Open your ears and listen and do remember that the honesty and nobility of a character is 10 times more important than their agenda; agenda's can be rewritten but good morals can be hard to change or come by...

For example, what happens when a candidate comes into hard times trying to push one of those "promises" you are hearing now? I hope you realize that their moral character will say a lot about how they will stand against the bills and the fights to get things done for you. I will give Obama one thing; he stands firm behind what he believes in and he doesn't fall so easily. His objection to the war was strong as a senator and I am truly amazed that he has NOT changed his firm stand on the issue and is just as candid about it today. I like a person that can be honest and take an unmovable stand on issues until change is inevitable. I have NOT seen that sort of strength in any of the other candidates and from much of any president since John F. Kennedy. A fresh up-to-date mind, sound morals and a firm foot.

As far as experience, NO ONE can claim fame to experience working in a capacity they haven't worked before! They ALL are a bit inexperienced at being the United States President. Question is, who shows the most strength, values, loyalty and potential to get through it???

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Katrinka Yobotz, IL — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:23:43 GMT

Just to set the record straight, Alan Keyes was campaigning in Iowa from December 27 through the caucuses. You can't be blamed for not knowing that. The media refused to tell you. So if that's where you get your information, you wouldn't know.

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Red Stater — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:17:43 GMT

Duncan Hunter finished Third in WY and is currently in third in the national delegate count. Hunter needs to be added to any additional debates since several candidates have zero delegates at this time.

Duncan Hunter represents the "Republican wing of the Republican party" according to the Missouri Republican ASSY.

Duncan Hunter is the most like Ronald Reagan according to Michael Reagan.

GoHunter08

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Greg, New Hampshire — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:36:33 GMT

As a middle-class citizen, we don't exactly anticipate having to fall on the HARDEST of times. We try to save a little and be prepared but sometimes economical blunders can sometimes take us beyond our savings. I ran into those hard times and as I saw a lot of middle-management and services be outsourced to other countries, I knew I was in trouble.

I had to go BACK to school (at my late age) to try to establish a different career direction. Times got harder. However, there is one thing that has helped me out greatly. Some of you may have heard of "Earned Income Credit" on your federal taxes. Well, As a student with virtually NO income, this tax status has given me a little bonus every year that has helped me over some of my hard times. When I consider that Barak Obama played a key role in passing the bill on "Earned Income Tax Credit," a significant bill that directly impacts our society, I have to say that I put my money on the candidate that can make THESE types of changes. Charles Peters, the founding editor of the "Washington Monthly" is president of "Understanding Government," a foundation devoted to better government through better reporting. Charles done a wonderful job putting together an article in the Washington Post that tells you a bit about Barak Obama's credible achievements. You may be surprised to realize that Barak seems to be a very "MODEST" candidate in his campaign when you come to realize the work he has done along with his firm stand on issues and persistance to prevail. You may be convinced that he IS the most qualified candidate and has the greatest potential to be the next United States President. He makes change that truly matters! Visit Charles Peters article at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303303.html

First thoughts: Debate double-header

Judy, NC — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:47:13 GMT

Duncan Hunter is the BEST qualified to run our country and our military. www.gohunter08.com