First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

pmorlan, Louisville, KY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:41:40 GMT

Edwards had a great debate! But, will the national media really give him credit for it? The lead in the WAshington Post was about Hillary being the underdog. What nonsense. The NYT story was better than the Post but didn't really reflect in their headline. Will Hardball & Olbermann give Edwards credit where credit is due or will they follow the rest of the national press and keep trying to convince people that this is only a two person race?

How much longer is the press going to artificially prop up Hillary?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Frank Abbot, Boston,Ma. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:44:05 GMT

PRIOR RESULTS, SPEAK LOUDER THAN "FANCY" WORD. FOR REAL REALISTIC RESULTS THAT WILL BE "DELIVERED", IT'S HILLARY CLINTON. hillaryclinton.com

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stay Strong Stay Focus — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:47:33 GMT

January 5, 2008, 11:39 pm
New Hampshire and Those Labor Ads
By Kate Phillips

MANCHESTER, N.H. — As we’ve been driving around New Hampshire this week, we can’t help but hear the radio ads playing repeatedly. We’ve heard Ron Paul ads, John McCain ads and then ads that just stopped us — those for Hillary Rodham Clinton and against Senator Barack Obama.
We had to listen hard (and not veer off the road) to hear AFSCME as the sponsor at the end of one of the messages. And while we’ve been paying attention tonight to the debates, Mark Halperin’s item over at The Page caught our eye, and we thought we should share it with you.

As Mr. Halperin reported, several members of the International Executive Board protested loudly in a letter to AFSCME president Gerald McEntee that an independent expenditure unit run by two people had been using funds solely to attack Senator Obama (and no other Democratic candidate). Keep reading this letter, posted on The Page, and keep in mind that it comes at a time when Senator Obama has emerged victorious out of Iowa and is in a very tight race here in New Hampshire.
We are writing to protest in the strongest terms the negative campaign that AFSCME is conducting against Barack Obama. We do not believe that such a wholesale assault on one of the great friends of our union was ever contemplated when the International Executive Board (IEB) made its decision to endorse Hillary Clinton.
In fact, when the vote to make a primary endorsement was taken by the IEB, there appeared to be widespread agreement that we had a strong field of Democratic candidates all of whom had made a very positive impression on the IEB Screening Committee. The argument for endorsing Hillary Clinton was not that her positions were better than those of the other candidates or that she would be the better president for working families, but rather that she was the clear frontrunner, the most likely primary victor, and the strongest general election candidate.
……
We were therefore shocked and appalled to learn that our union-through “independent expenditures”–is squandering precious resources to wage a costly and deceptive campaign to oppose Barack Obama. As Barack’s standing in the polls has soared, according to numerous press reports AFSCME has spent untold dollars in Iowa and New Hampshire to send out mailings and run radio ads whose sole purpose is to undercut his candidacy. And now AFSCME has even registered a website with the explicit purpose of “opposing Barack Obama.”
It is also worth noting that the campaign that AFSCME is waging against Senator Obama is fundamentally dishonest and inconsistent with past positions of our union, i.e. attacking him for not forcing individuals to purchase health care even when they can’t afford it. The ads are misleading in attempting to give the impression that they are associated with John Edwards rather than Hillary Clinton and in their claims that Sen. Obama’s health care plan will exclude 15 million people when in fact every person will have the opportunity to participate. This dishonesty is giving our union a “black eye” among many in the media and the progressive community.
Earlier this week, The Concord Monitor reported that voters had received emails criticizing Mr. Obama’s health care plan as “a Band-aid solution” that would leave “15 million Americans uninsured.” (We are pretty sure Mrs. Clinton has used the same term — Band-aid solution — to refer to plans that weren’t hers.) These mails included comments by John Edwards that criticized the Obama plan, The Monitor said, which residents could have inferred meant they were backed by Mr. Edwards and his supporters.
But, no, they were financed by an AFCSCME committee. The Monitor reported that AFSCME had spent nearly $80,000 on such mailings recently. And it had paid for radio ads, as we mentioned earlier.
The issue of primary endorsements has been loudly debated among labor unions. And in fact, some unions or their umbrella organizations decided not to endorse in the primaries — sometimes citing the fact that the field was fairly strong. Others, remembering how they were stung by supporting a candidate who lost in previous cycles, were still skittish this time around.
If you read the entire letter by members of the board, you can sense their concerns about such a scenario. It’s pretty palpable.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stacy, Gloucester, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:49:53 GMT

I wonder how the vote will go if Edwards drops out? At this point I think he appeals to the voter who wants to continue to fight Republicans instead of work with them; so Clinton probably?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Barbara Reiss, Middletown, New Jersey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:51:28 GMT

Experience is the best mechanism for change. Ask anyone who has been around long enough to have acquired it if they would do the same things now that they might have before.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dave Cartwright, Sandpoint — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:54:31 GMT

Finally people are waking up to the fact that there is a difference between being a good actor that can pay lip service, from a man of substance. The hypocrisy of Huckabee was very apparent during last nights debates. He has been a whiner about what he calls “negative attacks” yet look at his poor behavior at the debate! Romney is the smartest, most successful, most secure individual running for office. He wants to serve the people of the United States, not for status, not for pay, but because he loves America, he loves Americans.

Have we forgotten why the majority of people on both sides of the isle loved and respected President Ronald Reagan? It was because he loved America. He put America first, before himself or anything else. Romney clearly demonstrates that same character trait. He has proved he will do what the people want him to do; he has been successful in everything he has done. So America, tell him what you want, he’ll deliver, believe that.

Those of us that had decent parents were taught that we needed to pay attention in school, work hard, and be honest so that we have a better chance of success in our lives. Mr. Romney was paying attention, and is a very successful American. Now the democrats as well as Huckabee and McCain would have you believe that his success is a sin, or that because of his success he should be disrespected or doubted. I have never in my life seen such a public display of jealousy in my 51 years. Only Romney with his proven track record is the man to fix the economy. McCaine has “been there, but not done that.”

As far as “foreign policy experience,” let’s not forget that Ronald Reagan didn’t have any either when he came into office, yet the hostages were released immediately when he took office. President Carter made several attempts through negotiations and militarily to free the hostages; all failed. How is it that after all the unsuccessful attempts of a seated American President (Carter), that merely the news of Reagan’s being elected caused the bad guys to free the hostages? Because the hostage takers knew they were in deep doo-doo with Reagan in office. They knew what his position and character was. What did Reagan posses that others didn’t? An ability to make the hard decisions! Firm principles of what is right and what is wrong, and a willingness to fully commit and stand up for what is right. In Romney you will see that again. And don’t forget Reagan set the stage and deserves most of the credit for the Berlin wall coming down and the fall of the USSR. You don’t necessarily need a man with experience in all areas, you need a man who is smart, a man with a background of character, a great negotiator with a proven backbone and a man that will put our Country before himself!

Give America and the world a break; elect Romney as president!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Brett, des moines. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:56:05 GMT

GO JOHN GO!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

tom — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:56:17 GMT

John Mccain is the only choice we really have a man of integrity, honesty,and the experiance to run this country,the rest of these people are liars cheatsw and seeking personal gain they have no clear formatand no clear vison no track record

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jason, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:57:48 GMT

This article was great

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:00:39 GMT

To your point about Clinton using the Richardson line about "what's wrong with a little experience?"

It'd be great for her to use if it were valid. It's not. She's done a great job of convincing voters that she's the candidate of experience. However, it's simply not true.

When she started to go into specifics about her "35 years of experience leading change" last night, what did she say?

To start, she highlighted some changes she made regarding children's healthcare in Arkansas Then when she moved on to her White House years, what did SHE mention as her greatest example of change? Her fight over healthcare. Remember, this was HER choice when discussing her resume of "experience."

Why doesn't somebody in the MSM start calling her on this claim? It'd do the Democrats a lot of good because if she gets the nomination, I'll guarantee the GOP won't let her off the hook. Her claims of "experience" will be a puff of smoke by November. And it won't be because of "slime" politics. It'll be because somebody will have actually looked at her resume and said, "ok, what has she actually DONE?"

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Amy, Apex, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:03:37 GMT

That poll you cite for the Democrats had part of its results taken BEFORE IOWA on Jan 2 and 3. Just saw on Meet the Press that the results of the 3-day poll taken on Jan 4, the day AFTER IOWA have Obama in a DOUBLE DIGIT LEAD OVER HILLARY!! THAT IS a BOUNCE, Mark Penn!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nancy Hoblin, Woodstock VT — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:04:52 GMT

Why does no one challenge Hillary on her 35 years? Being the wife of a gov and a pres does NOT equal "experience". The only real experience she can claim are her years as an elected US Senator - no outstanding legislation I am aware of. She keeps making this essentially false claim. Pillow talk does not count.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Fran, Brooklyn, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:06:04 GMT

The latest RASMUSSEN Poll taken AFTER Iowa have Obama leading Clinton 37% to 27%!!! Mark Penn, that is what I call a HUGE BOUNCE!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Leye, Richmond, Va — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:09:01 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ADREA SELIGSOHN, Bradenton, Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:10:34 GMT

On this morning's MEET THE PRESS, John McCain said that no one in 2000 knew that Sadam did not have WMD. That is untrue...the chief US Weapons Inspector, Scott Ritter
was on the lecture circuit explaining that he and his team had done a thorough search of IRAQ and found no WMD. I am continually appalled that Tim Russert doesn't challenge his guests on this point!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sierra, SF — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:11:10 GMT

On the Republican side..... the other candidates don't seem to like Willard Romney
He really seems like the 'Eddie Haskell' of the Republican field, a smooth talking phony

I can see why Ron Paul has such a loyal following
HE'S A LION !
He's the only one who tells the truth about foreign policy !!
The problem is THE AMERICAN EMPIRE !

I don't like Libertarianism, but RON PAUL IS HONEST
He's amazing !
Imagine, telling the truth in a Republican debate ?

The Republicans talked about BARACK OBAMA !!
He's the FRONT RUNNER
No other Democrat rates any notice !!
At least they got THAT RIGHT !!

Huckabee and Ron Paul had decent comments about Obama

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carol, Philadelphia — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:14:05 GMT

Obama looked and sounded and acted very Presidential last night.

Hillary looked rattled and wired, especially in that exchange with Edwards when he pointed out that she was lagging behind. Not very Presidential.

Obama is rapidly rising in the latest NH polls. He will win on Tuesday!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sierra, SF — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:15:40 GMT

Prior to the debate, the moderator noted that the Clintons were LIVID with Richardson

He sent his delegates to OBAMA !

[;-D

Sorry, Hillary you really are unlikeable !!

At one point, I noticed Edwards agreeing with Obama and Richardson, BUT NOT HILLARY !!

Hillary complained about a 'double team' ! [;-)

THE TIDE HAS TURNED !!

It's NOT OVER........
But, the door is beginning to close on Hillary
Especially IF SHE LOSES NEW HAMPSHIRE !!

Stay tuned
I think this story has a HAPPY ENDING !!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

sorry — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:20:28 GMT

Chuck Todd, you still don't get it.
Just take another look at what you have put into your comment, so shameful. I hope you do notice that this nation is in the process of wakenning up from being munipulated by media, no truth, no credibility, totally un-professional, all politics play. Where is that "charming""prpfessional""sharp" CHUCK ?Gone ! He has to make a living to follow Chris. I see that happened to Keith now, after renewed his contract. Victims. I feel deeply sorry about that. We still like "that Chuck". Hopefully he will be back soon. Have fun with your reporting and we are watching.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sarah, Vienna, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:24:20 GMT

ATTENTION DEMOCRATS!!!!

THE DEMOCRATIC WINNER OF IOWA HAS GONE ON TO BE THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE IN EVERY CONTESTED IOWA CAUCUS SINCE 1976, except one.

1976 - Carter won Iowa against Birch Bayh and others

1980 - Carter won Iowa against Ted Kennedy

1984 - Mondale won Iowa against Gary Hart

1988 - the one "off" year for Iowa Democrats who chose Gephardt (it was also an off year for the GOP who chose Robertson)

1992 and 1996 were not contested. 1992 had Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, a native son, and the other candidates did not compete. 1996, Clinton had no opposition.

2000 - Gore won over Bradley.

2004 - Kerry won over Edwards, Dean, etc.

IOWA HAS A GREAT TRACK RECORD IN CHOOSING THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!!!

LOOKS VERY GOOD FOR BARACK OBAMA!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kevin Madden, Winston Salem, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:27:10 GMT

It's about time the GOP candidates targeted Romney for the flip-flopping fraud of a candidate he is.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ron, TX — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:30:44 GMT

That poll is misleading, because it was taken Jan 2-4. The Iowa caucaus was on the night of January 3rd, meaning the results are inclusive of Obama's victory numbers bump.

If you look at the ONLY polls that are taken entirely after Obama's Iowa victory, a 10% bump is very evident. See the recent Ramussen Reports poll that has Obama over Clinton 37-27, and even -winning- over Clinton on electability. Mark Penn probably doesn't want to bring that up though. He'd prefer to continue talking about polls started before Obama's victory.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sierra, SF — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:32:04 GMT

Hillary not only lost the debate....

Her chief HillRaiser, Norman Hsu got sentenced this past week.....

Maybe you'll get a chance to join him, Hillary !!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tuck,Realiltyville, KS — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:35:31 GMT

But just last week First read said the biggest bounce is within the first 5 days.... now they say the bounce doesn't show because it's only been 3 days.

I wonderwhy the corporate media wants a republican president.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

sherry dupriest, cooper city, fl. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:36:02 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Anyone but Huckabee, Los Angeles, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:37:55 GMT

That attack on Romney last night was brutal. I lost a lot of respect for McCain, and the exchanges only increased my opinion of Romney. He held his own, especially against McCain who couldn't deny that he'd let illegal immigrants stay in the country - basically granting amnesty after they jump through some hoops.

I'd hardly count Romney as down and out - even if he doesn't win the most delegates in NH. He just picked up Wyoming, and is leading nationally as far as number of delegates. Huckabee will have a tough time outside of the religious south. McCain will lose a lot of votes after last night, and won't do well in states other than NH where's he's a favorite son of sorts. So that leaves Romney, who will finish first or second in almost every state, vs Giuliani who has yet to show us what he's got.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Norton, Salem, Or. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:43:14 GMT

iF A BIG IMPECHMENT MOVEMENT AGAINST THIS bUSH REGIME IS`NT FORTHCOMING, THEIR WON`T BE MUCH OF THIS COUNTRY TO RECONSTRUCT. bUSH IS WORKING HARD BEHIND CLOSED DOORS TO BRING US TO OUR KNEES. iF ANY OF THE NEW CANIDATES CAN RISE US UP AGAIN AND GIVE US HOPE FOR MY REMAINING YEARS i`LL GO WITH cLINTON. i THINK SHE SPEAKS WHAT`S RIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY AND NOT WHAT THE INDIVIDUAL CROWDS WANT TO HEAR.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

fabooj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:50:40 GMT

Can you explain why the media chose to run with the "Angry Edwards"? It's not true...just because he says things that the coddled and insulated Beltway insiders don't want to hear, doesn't make him "angry". Then again, if you--the media that is--gave him fair coverage, you'd know that. It's bad enough all the hit pieces the insiders write about him, with hardly any positive news reports coming out, but to have all media outlets put a label on him that just isn't close to the truth is really bad journalism.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jason, Salt Lake City Utah — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:51:27 GMT

I was a bit disappointed last night in the Republican debate. I'm an undecided Republican from Utah waiting to find the best candidate. However, I did not see anything Presidential last night in the Republican debate and was a little disappointed in McCain and his snide remarks against Romney. I'm fine with contrasting issues and each candidates record but come on... Then to find out McCain has gone totally negative with his ads this morning just as he accused Romney last night. I'm a bit exhausted with the hypocrisy.

I was looking to see something Presidential last night not a school yard fight. My opinion is that Guilani and Thompson had the best night. McCain and Huckabee's ganging up on Romney was a sad state of affairs for the Repulican party. I'm not an apologist for Romney either, I have my beef with him on issues as well. I just didn't see anything positive with the personal Piñata attacks.

Ironically, I was more impressed with the Democratic candidates last night than I was Repulicans and that is pretty sad.

Hopefully, Rudy can make a comeback and impress us all.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Frederick Mugul — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:53:09 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carl H., Houma, Louisiana — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:56:49 GMT

Here is some information about Barack Obama that the media refuses to talk about and will not discuss until the summer, giving the Republicans the opportunity to win the White House.

He supported an Energy Bill in 2005 that gave tax breaks to oil companies was larded with all kinds of special interest breaks, giveaways to the oil companies. Hillary voted NO!

Senator Obama's chair in New Hampshire is a lobbyist. He lobbies for the drug companies.

Four years ago he was for single-payer health care. Then he moved toward a rejection of that, a more incremental approach. Then he was for universal health care; then he proposed a health care plan that doesn't cover everybody.

He said he would vote against the Patriot Act; but came to the Senate, and voted for it. He said that he would vote against funding for the Iraq war; but came to the Senate and voted for $300 billion of it.

Let us look at Barack's accomplishments in the Community Organization in Illinois and the Illinois State Senate as well as the U.S. Senate. This info contained in articles from the Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune, boston.com - Mar 2006, The Nation Jun 2006, and Politico.com - Nov 2007. However these stories only lived 10 minutes.

He has been friends with Rezko on a social level for 10 years and was approached by Rezko re joining in a real estate venture while he was working to establish low income housing through the community group. He declined. However, when it turned out that Rezko was a slumlord in Obama's district, Obama pled ignorance.

He has been after Hillary to release papers from her
husband's administration. Yet he has ignored requests from the Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune to do the same for his time in the Illinois Senate. He now says he gave them all to his successor.

He voted against the Bankruptcy bill in the U.S. Senate but also voted against an amendment that would have capped interest rates at 30%.

He voted FOR the class-action "reform" bill which limited "frivolous" lawsuits which was denounced by the Democratic Party and most major civil rights and consumer groups.

He supported Joe Lieberman's re-election over Ned Lamont(an activist and anti-war candidate). Lieberman has been his mentor since he has been in the Senate.

Last but not least, after he was elected to the Senate, he was pretty mum on the war until until late in 2005 when John Murtha gave his press conference calling for troop withdrawal. Obama, five days later, came out calling for a drawdown in 2006 but pulled back on this when he appeared on Meet the Press in January, saying - as the neocons were- that withdrawing troops "would be irresponsible" - but
then in May 2006 again reversed himself and attacked the "stay the course" policy.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Obama08, Frank Furter, Independent @ large — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:01:18 GMT

Latest Rasmussen NH poll today Obama 39% Clinton 27% I wonder which advisor told Hillary to stop being a cold hearted bytch and warm up and flirt a little LMAO

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Politicien, Indiana — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:12:44 GMT

Clinton's campaign cracks me up. She is essentially saying everything she did from the age of 25 counts as "experience." For heaven's sake, why doesn't anyone point out that Obama has held elected office longer than she has? Fair enough, she has FOUR more years when it comes to the US Senate. The rest of her experience came as a PRIVATE CITIZEN who was married to a governor and then to a president. Her experience will not lead to change because it is precisely her experience in the White House that will be the source of acrimony, gridlock, and continue to perpetuate the status quo. You've had your turn, give the new generation and new breed of politics a chance.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mick — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:16:18 GMT

In the GOP debate last night, it was more like:

The kids on the playground finally said enough is enough and joined together to put down the biggest BULLY.

Romney had it coming.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Fritz Collins — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:16:20 GMT

Obama08, Frank Furter, Independent @ large - Latest Rasmussen NH poll today Obama 39% Clinton 27% I wonder which advisor told Hillary to stop being a cold hearted bytch and warm up and flirt a little?

An extremly brave one I would imagine. Hillary doesn't take to kindly when you ask her to do the impossible.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Shawna, Clearwater, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:19:58 GMT

I thought another interesting quote that I'm surprised hasn't been discussed much what Hillary calling both the Edwards and the Obama platforms "false hope". She then went on to say, "Isn't electing the first woman president enough of a change??" Her third mistake (IMO) was when she was the first to say, "I fear that we are facing a recession..."

I'm not sure who prepped her for the debate, but with a record number of new caucus goers, a record number of youth and minorities voting and the two first place finishers both positioned as agents for change, perhaps being the wet blanket wasn't the best way to go?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:20:20 GMT

Sherry - Obama didn't say he wanted to bomb Pakistan. He said he wants to focus on bringing bin Laden to justice, and if Pakistan wouldn't act when the opportunity arose, the U.S. would.

Yes we know, Clinton called this naive and reeking of inexperience.

But yesterday McCain said the same thing. He said he'd march "to the gates of hell" to bring bin Laden to justice. So...

Is the Clinton camp now going to send out press releases about how McCain is so naive and inexperienced on foreign policy?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Araliun — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:21:23 GMT

It's a mans world out there. Congratulations to the media. You have once again influenced the entire race for the Democrats. You have them believing all of the crap you are shoveling. I once believed that the FoX Network was the sole manipulator of truth. Now I realize all of you are in bed together. You have not scrutinized Obama. You have not investigated this man and revealed all truths that we need in order to assess him. What you have done is frame him and shaped public perception - and here we are. Frankly the Republicans would like nothing better than to see Obama the front-runner of the Democratic Party this fall - so they can destroy him.

The Democratic Party wants change? We all do. We want a Democrat in the Oval Office come 2009. But it is very apparent that the Republicans are fully enjoying this frivilous frolly that our bleeding heart liberals have bought into - albeit the medias doing. A one-term Senator is NOT going to change Washington D.C.. A one-term retired Senator is NOT going to change Washington D.C.. Hillary is the only battle-tested, battle-hardened candidate that can not only WITHSTAND Washington D.C. - but is the only candidate who can change it.

Wake up people.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marc, NY, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:22:24 GMT

Poor Romney. Last night's debate pretty much damaged his candidacy even more. He is no longer the inevitable GOP candidate. If he loses NH, MI may slip from his fingers, in which case he might as well retire from politics entirely. Maybe an acting stint in 'Big Love' is in his future?.....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

fabooj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:22:34 GMT

Carl H...you did post anything that wasn't known back in August. Did you guys do any new oppo research or do you think that the Clinton campaign is the only campaign with access to the "intertubes". You guys have got to come up with something different. The blogosphere dissected Obama's record before he became Senator. We all know how un-progressive he is. But he never has run saying that he was a Progressive. Unlike Clinton's "I'm a Progressive Liberal" line. Like we're too dumb to see she just using words and hoping someone out there is dimwitted enough to believe it.

Just like Sen. Clinton last night, you fail to note that Clinton also supported Lieberman, just like almost all the other Senators with a D behind their name. I believe she sent his campaign $500--the same as all the other Senators--after Lamont won the Democratic primary.

You failed to mention that Clinton's votes mirror Obama's votes. You fail to mention that because of backroom deals Harry Reid made with the WH or the GOP Senators, the Democrats hands were tied in some of these votes. They had to go on record and put that vote down, whether want to or not, because of Reid.

I think this oppo dump by the Clinton campaign is going to be a big failure simply because everyone already knows this. If this was last March, then you could have had something. Now, you got old news and a huge dump at one time, all of you have been hitting message boards on media sites pretty hard since the devastating loss on Thursday. It's becoming something of a joke you know? This does nothing but make the Clinton campaign look really desperate.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:27:36 GMT

Glad to see Bradley is on board. I like him, and if he had taken it easy on the cream soda he might just have won that nominating race. For those who don't remember, he took something of a hit when he was hospitalized for a couple days for an irregular heartbeat, and in some sort of weird way they (the infamous 'they' who say everything) said it was somehow tied to the monstrous amounts of cream soda he was sucking down on the campaign trail.

Bradley timed his endorsement well. New Hampshire Democrats seem to like that Tsongas, Bradley cerebral type candidate. And Obama plays to this constituency well, too.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Susan, Hubbardston, Ma — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:35:51 GMT

What the hell is wrong with people!!McCain is a liberal..open your eyes! The debate last night showed just how shallow McCain is. He keeps talking about Romney changing his mind...what about his stance on immigration! If McCain receives the nomination, a Democrat will be elected into the White House. We might as well call our country Mexiamerica! McCain has had his chance in Washington and done NOTHING! Mitt Romney is our only hope to change the way government runs and get our country on track! He did a great job in Massachusetts cutting the red tape and making people accountable for their lives...not giving handouts!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tom — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:37:22 GMT

Here's another one that came out yesterday:

NASHUA, N.H. -- As the Democratic presidential candidates prepare to debate this evening in this first-in-the-nation primary state, Sen. Barack Obama's campaigned announced an endorsement from Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

James, Los Angeles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:44:01 GMT

American voters are notorious for making huge mistakes when voting and then complaining when they see the disastrous effects. Electing Obama would be another HUGE mistake. Now is not the time to gamble. Obama is way in over his head and has clouded that with fanfare and hoopla that American voters are too caught up in to see through. When the dust settles Hillary will be the strong candidate standing.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dawn of VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:46:26 GMT

Why the hell do readers have to keep doing the job of "reporters" on this site to ensure fair coverage. You're leaving out a crucial part of your OWN new poll. The polling was done over a three day period. The first two days Senator Obama tied Sentaor Clinton, but yesterday's polling results showed a 12 point leave. If that's a not a bump, I don't know what the hell is!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Arshad, Newburgh, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:49:13 GMT

I don't think it's fair to say Obama piled on Clinton.
She started saying that Obama changed positions on Iraq and Patriot act and healthcare. He said John was unelectable and inconsitent in his positions. Clinton tried to create a situation where Edwards will join her and pile on Obama. But Edwards did not take the invitation and her plan backfired. Edwards were against Clinton's strength of protecting status-quo while he recognized that he has differences with Obama. Then the world saw almost like a nervous break down for Clinton. Staring at rivals, raising voice, mean looks...... So it's her who started and her again when Edwards backfired to her.

She also thinks inspiring people to get involved in their democracy, bringing independents and republicans to create a majority that will win elections and help the long standing problems the nation is suffering for decades are politics of "false hope" or "words".

Words do matter. Dr. Kings "I have dream" still inspires and inspired millions. JFK's "ask not what your country can do for you....." brought many people in public service. Words should translate to actions, true but it's also true there are powerful words that have profound impacts for decades to come on people.

Hillary is all about herself. I brought change, I will bring change, I won't answer because I will be attacked by Repubs later and I don't care if you people wants to know the answer and oh by the way just vote for me and I will show you magic. Obama believes change does not happen top down by one person. It's bottom up, by getting people involved, reflecting people's view in their government and leadership, let people know what the challenges are and what are the choices available and which choice is the best one and why. People should be involved in their democracy every step of the way.

It's clear, Hillary has no appeal among independents, no appeal among younger generation who has the most stake in this election. She does not have the support on union members (she has in endorsement but not in ballots), no strong support among democratic base and not even from women. So where she will get all the support needed to get elected in November even if she gets the nomination. THINK about it New Hampshire. Obama is the most electable democrat who transcend race, age, gender, political affiliation and all socio-economic groups.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tim, New York, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:49:20 GMT

It seems like Obama's supporters are more qualified to cast an episode of "The West Wing" instead of hiring the next chief executive and commander-in-chief of the United States. How "change" is more valuable than "experience" is mind-boggling! In any other situation that we face in life, would we prefer to hire someone, anyone, simply because they're different, as opposed to an experienced person that we know has produced results in the past?? This argument does not make sense and I'm scared for the future of this country if that's the criteria being used to choose the next president. This has the same logical validity as the "who would I prefer to have a beer with" test that was used in 2000. Look what that produced!

Sure, Hillary Clinton has her flaws. One of the biggest, and the one that's hurting her now, is her sour relationship with the media. This has resulted in her gleeful crucifixtion by the mainstream media, who have virtually ignored their responsibility to properly examine Obama's stance on the issues. As a result, he's been allowed to falsely present himself as the politically courageous candidate that doesn't live by polls because he was "opposed to the Iraq war from the start". In fact, he wasn't courageous at all-he was running for election in the most liberal district in Illinois. For him to be for the war, not opposed to it, would have been politically damaging. Obama has later been quoted in 2004 saying that, had he actually been a senator and had to make a real decision (as opposed to his firm make-believe decision), he very may well have voted for the war. He later explained his 2004 comments by saying he didn't want to upset the Democratic establishment in 2004 by saying he was opposed to the war. What?? Is this undermining his whole argument that he's anti-establishment?? He's also continued to fund the war, so how opposed to it has he really been?

Obama has also accused Senator Clinton of not releasing her White House documents, trying to draw a clear comparison between her and the secrecy of the Bush administration. However, when asked about his own documents from the Illinois legislature, Obama simply said he doesn't have any. That's it, end of discussion. No push back. No pointing out by the media that he's a hypocrite for attacking Hillary on this issue when he himself has no leg to stand on.

Obama has also criticized Hillary for triangulating and sacrificing principals for political gain. However, in the Illinois legislature, Obama voted "present" (instead of a clear yes or no) a significant amount of the time, including on key issues important to Democratic voters, such as abortion. Therefore, it should not be surprising to anyone that Senator Obama has missed 80% of the votes during his less than 2 years in the US Senate. Would you hire someone to be the CEO of a company if they had less than 2 years experience at their prior job, and then only showed up to that job 20% of the time? Am I the only one troubled by this?

Of course, Obama chose to play hookey at politically convenient times, such as the day when the Senate had to vote on whether to designate the Iranian army as a terrorist organization. Although he himself missed the vote, he did not miss the opportunity to slam Hillary for her stance (yes, she actually took a stance) on the issue. Senator Obama headed for the hills of New Hampshire to seek political cover. He then has the audacity to criticize her position. Is this not troubling for anyone else? Does this not undermine his triangulation/political convenience arguments against Hillary?

One of Obama's biggest criticisms of Hillary during the campaign came when he pounced on her for her, admittedly, rambling and twisted answer on drivers licenses for illegals. He, and the mainstream media crucified her for her response. However, Obama, when asked himself in the November debate, gave an even more convuluted answer to the question. Why did he not receive the same punishment as Hillary? Why is this guy getting a free pass? Oh, at the end of the day, she was on the right side of the issue (no licenses) and he was on the wrong side (licenses for everyone!)

The entire Obama phenomenon is very intoxicating. His brilliant speeches, Oprah endorsements and youthful appeal are impressive. However, when voters sober up and realize that they've given up "experience" for "change", the hangover is going to be brutal.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Les Holt — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:50:34 GMT

A black guy winning big in two states that are 98% white. Imagine that.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Concerned Citizen, Sioux City, IA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:52:35 GMT

Hilary was super in the debate last night. She was excellent and she should be angry at pea brain John Edwards.
Expect some unfavorable information to come out tomorrow about Obama.
He would not have even won Iowa if Bill Richardson had not thrown his 10 points to him. What a turncoat Richardson is. Bill Clinton appointed him as ambassador to the U.N. plus Entergy Secretary.
I remember seeing in a London Newspaper after Bush won in 2004 the headlines "How could 51 Million people be so stupid".
If the Democrats really should nominate such a "Novice" as Obama, that is what could be said again.
Bush has made a mess out of everything and he was inexperienced just like Obama is. Jimmy Carter was a novice too and a terrible president.
Wake up folks this guy will never cut it, I can't even stand to hear his voice let alone look at him.I will never vote for him.
Also He is ahead of Hilary by 1 delagate out of IOwa.
Please explain to me how that makes him the front runner this early in the game.
There are about 1700 delegates on Super Tuesday so please explain to me how 16 delegates for Obama and 15 for Hilary and 14 for Edwards adds up to him winning the nomination or even close to winning the nomination on Super Tues.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Linda Wright, Lake Forest, California — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:56:40 GMT

Edwards was my second choice under Hillary Clinton. Now he is off my list.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

--NSMsnbc — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:57:36 GMT

"His strategy seemed to be to go for the political kill on Clinton, thinking that he'll have a better chance beating Obama in a one-on-one than beating Clinton. Or it could be simply that he would prefer Obama over Clinton as his party’s nominee."
--Probably a little bit of both. I said before, he needs a two person race to compete (Obama or Clinton has to go). So, who does he challenge? The candidate with the 'mo' or the candidate and campaign entering 'panick mode'? Also, since Edwards sees himself as representing change and evidently doesn't think much of the Clinton machine, that he would likely favor Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Keith — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:57:41 GMT

Edwards won that debate and it's shameful how mainstream media is obsessed with Obama vs. Hillary instead of giving him his due, but....

Obama is the clear choice if you're Democrat. Personality/experience aside, at some point you have to crunch numbers like Karl Rove does for the Republicans. Obama might win in a runaway against a Republican. When I pose the following to Clinton fans, they don't disagree.

Go with Obama and: 1) He'll get all the Gore/Kerry voters. 2) More independent swing votes than Gore/Kerry and certainly more Independents 3) A ton of new/young voters (who typically say they will vote but don't show up - ask Kerry about that) will actually vote. 4) When African-Americans finally realize that white voters are really behind Obama they would flock the voting booth in November in historical numbers. Obama might win 2 or 3 southern states (Florida, Virginia, and possible Arkansas or upset like N. Carolina). 5) With Hillary the Republicans are going to rally and send huge numbers out to vote. It's impossible for her to win a southern state. It will come down to one state again with her. Republicans aren't going to get a record turnout vote against Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ed, Syracuse — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:58:33 GMT

Well said Araliun if Obama is the nominee the Republican attack machine will clean his clock. I see John Kerry all over again.

In 2004 we had a front runner in Dean but decided against him at the last minute over a stipud scream that the media made fun of and then Democrats backed off Dean and nominated Kerry and look what happened. We all know that Dean would have cleaned Bushs' clock in the general.

Now we had a front runner in Hillary Clinton and again the democratic party is changing its mind to an untested Obama because of the media.

HAVE FUN WHEN OBAMA PULLS A KERRY AND WE GET ANOTHER REPUBLICAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE

If Obama is the nominee I'm not wasting my time voting because I know he will lose.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kaye — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:03:34 GMT

The message from Iowa to Hillary is that her message is old, old "experience" (I use that word lightly), old politics, old dirty tricks, old expectations. New Hampshire is sending the same message. So instead of whining and blaming, maybe she should "be presidential" and take charge of her campaign and run a real campaign aimed at what CURRENT voters want, CURRENT issues, CURRENT expectations. If she cannot even manage her campaign and Bill, how in the hell will she manage being POTUS?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Daniel Reddish, Philipsburg MT — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:08:13 GMT

To Tim Russert: On your show you just discussed the situation for Republicans in New Hamshire. You completely omitted any comment about and including the very name Ron Paul. I used to think you had credibility as an objective professional. As it turns out you are, in effect, a Judas goat for General Electric. The Rasmussen poll has Dr. Paul currently at 14 percent, which puts him in third place in New Hampshire, and you can't even so much as mention his name. Much as people put their dentures in a glass of water at night, I must assume that is where you have placed your nuts. How do you face your children? We are coming for people like you who have sold their souls to the media industrial complex. And guess what, buddy boy? We have more than pitchforks; we have the truth. Censorship by omission will not work any longer. Your father would be ashamed of you. You have helped destroy his America.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stacy, Gloucester, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:08:17 GMT

Clinton can not add to gains in the House and Senate. What good is it if the Dems win the battle (the Presidency) and lose the war (a real majority). If Hillary Clinton's experience, passion, and ability belonged to anyone else I would support them in a NY second but the double edge sword is that she IS a Clinton.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ed, Syracuse — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:10:03 GMT

I also agree concerned citizens. Barack Obama is the flavor of the moment and we are making a huge mistake nominating this guy.

The repulicans are gitty right now because we are falling into their trap of electing this un-tested candidate.

Why do you think they keep attacking Hillary? BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN'T BEAT HER!! That is all they want to do is STOP HILLARY because they know they can't beat the Clinton machine and they have much better chances against any other candidate.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sandy Smith, Kirkland, WA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:10:24 GMT

I was starting to lean toward Edwards, but his ganging up with Obama against Clinton really turned me off. I do NOT see Hillary as status quo at all! She had the b*lls to try to take on health care when no one else had. No, she did not succeed, but it wasn't because she is part of the status quo! It was because of the lack of support from other politicians. And speaking of status quo, I think most of us would love to have the opportunity to reelect Bill Clinton...that's not change, is it? No, but its what we would all truly want. Its not about the illusion of change, it's about making the right choice. I thought Hillary's response to Edwards was great. Edwards just put his support from me at high risk. I was ready to send him a check, but not at this point. And Obama.... nice guy... just don't get the support that is behind him right now. Yes, he does need more experience!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Concerned Voter in California — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:11:53 GMT

Frank Abbot (and all the others still pitching Hillary's "experience"):

She had a chance in last night's debate to finally put some meat on the bones and explain what she's actually ACCOMPLISHED when she says she's been getting change for the voters for 35 years.

I was on the edge of my seat, hoping that I'd finally hear some backup to the Powerpoint pitch. What did she say about her vaunted White House years? She pointed to her Healthcare effort. Remember, this was HER choice to highlight what SHE thought was her best example of accomplishing change.

As most Americans remember it, her Healthcare "experience" was not only an abject failure, it was also divisive politics at its worst.

We don't need that "experience."

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bill — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:15:34 GMT

Tim in NY,
To use your measuring stick of "experience," would you hire someone to be CEO because their husband had done a good job? Should Jack Welch's ex-wife be CEO because they talked about some of his decisions at GE?

You guys don't get it. Nobody (with the exception of Richardson who's not viable) that's left in the Dem field can make a claim for "experience." Whoever the GOP puts up will probably be able to claim more "experience."

The good news for the Dem side is that in case anybody's been watching, this election will be able a new start. America wants to press the reset button and be proud of its country again.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joe McConroy — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:20:46 GMT

I don't think America could vote for a trial lawyer for president and actually be able to live with themselves. Think about it. Whatever blood he didn't suck out of corporate america the first few go-arounds, he'll do when he's in office. You heard him last night. Need I provide further explanation? You think prices are bad now? Just wait until Edwards is in office!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Bass Lake Park, Ga — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:25:10 GMT

I still think Ron Paul may be the come back kid, It's not over until the fat lady sings. I really can't understand why he's not wining with a record like he has. www.ronpaul2008.com

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joe Nada — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:27:12 GMT

The media loves Obama, or they're afraid to be called racists if they treated her the way they've treated Clinton and Romney. The media has allowed Obama to skate on every single issue, from his questionable ties to land deals in Chicago to distribution of campaign money. Instead they hammer Clinton on every minute issue and trash Romney at every turn because it's easier to attack a woman and a religious minority than an African-American make. Obama doesn't have any experience whatsoever, whether Clinton or Edwards have experience is an entirely separate issue. Fact is Obama has never run anything his entire life. Would you trust a doctor that's never operated to do surgery on your child? Would you let someone with zero experience run a corporation? And yet people are willing and fawning to let him run a nation. Strikes in Pakistan that will strengthen the Islamofacists and massive social spending increases followed by higher taxes are only the start of what the experienced Obama will bring America.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rich, Michigan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:27:56 GMT

Bingo! Andrea S. you are so right. It's a lot of BS coming from warhawk McCain. Scott Ritter is the man! A very courageous man who bravely served his country. Don't vote for any war mongers! Also watch who the candidates choose for advisors. Call them out at town hall meetings on allying themselves with those who are death dealers around the country. We need candidates whose actions are always preceeded by the question, "How does this decision affect the least and marginalized citizens?"
We need to reign in our empire and concentrate on making our country more inhabitable for our citizenry.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Chuck Askin, Walnut Creek, CA. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:28:23 GMT

The suggestion that the Mason-Dixon poll referenced does not show a "bounce" for Obama is misleading. The poll in question is a tracking poll that includes numbers both before the Iowa results and after; the poll results after Iowa show Obama up 7 (with a small sample that needs to be supplemented by another day of polling). This showing is very similar to the Zogby poll, which is tied today but only half is based on post-Iowa polling (and Oboma is +8 in the post-Iowa polling). The following summary of the McClatchy/Mason-Dixon poll is from the McClathey print media in NH:

"But the poll may have picked up the beginning of an Obama rally. Obama trailed Clinton by 30-27 the first two nights of the polling, then surged ahead by 39-32 Friday night — the day after Iowa. The nightly sample of 200 was small, however, and subject to a greater margin of error."

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mark, Memphis, TN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:29:28 GMT

"Romney is the smartest, most successful, most secure individual running for office. He wants to serve the people of the United States, not for status, not for pay, but because he loves America, he loves Americans."

Last night he said during the debate he loves the pharmaceutical companies. How more out of touch with reality in America can Mitt Romney be?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Arshad, Newburgh, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:29:56 GMT

Concerned Citizen, IA,
Thanks for your effort supporting Clinton in IOWA but she appreciated your hardwork by saying IOWA does not matter, the have no track record of picking President. Really, why then three generatiosn of Clintons campaign there for months, $7M in advertisement, 5000 vehicles to transport people to caucus, 600 shovels and thousands of bags of salt and free day care........all for nothing, really?

Now the grape is sour. Now Richradson's fault. If his support is not viable, what you want these people to do. Go back home or support Hillary. Richardson was employed by Clinton but his supporters were not employed by him so that they would listen to whatever he said.

And talk about bad info coming out against Obama. You guys tried everything. From he being a muslim plant to he was a drug dealer. Still anything left??

Spend your time in digging dirt and you will find clinton deep in mud, alone, abandoned by people.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Lois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:35:14 GMT

Barak Obama and John Edwards couldn't stand on their own last night. What would happen if one had to debate the Republican without someone holding their hand?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Bass Lake Park, Ga — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:40:38 GMT

Daniel Reddish, Philipsburg MT... I do agree 100% Tim Russert is a Judas goat for General Electric

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kaye — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:44:29 GMT

Hillary has done the most recent and dramatic FLIP FLOP - nice, non envious Iowa campaigner to claws and fangs bared New Hampshire campaigner

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Liz S — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:44:43 GMT

Hillary got so angry in the debate that I thought she was going to get up and send John Edwards and Barack Obama to their room. She has a nasty temper.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Bass Lake Park, Ga — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:45:09 GMT

if you say anythign about Ron Paul it seen to get lost or pulled by MSNBC

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Josiah Bartlett, Miami, Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:46:32 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sarah, Vienna, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:47:07 GMT

On experience, probably our greatest president - Abraham Lincoln - had less "experience" before being elected in 1860 than Barack Obama will have this fall when he is elected president!

Lincoln had served eight years in the Illinois State Legislature (same as Barack Obama)

Lincoln had served two years in the US House of Representatives (Obama will have completed four years in the US Senate when he is elected this November!)

I'm very glad that the voters in 1860 didn't discount Lincoln on the issue of "experience!"

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jay Germaine, Sugar Land, Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:50:44 GMT

Concerned Citizen, Sioux City, IA, you need to check your facts. I'm not for Obama, but in the Iowa Caucus
Bill Richardson did not give his 10 points to anyone.
Obama's point, aa over Hillary were his points. I'm not for Hillary either.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:52:02 GMT

Hillary did not just recover a little. She recovered fully and won that round when Edwards double-teamed with Obama.
And all this talk about her being angry is total BS. She showed passion which you guys have accused her that she is not showing. She did an excellent job last night.

Leye, Richmond, Va (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:09 AM)
------------------

You Clintonistas keeps on thinking among yourselves that Hillary's meltdown last night was a moment of "passion". Please continue to delude yourselves. The more it gets played in the national media and by local media outlets across the nation, the more it begins to look like Howard Dean circa 2004.

Obama and Edwards attacking her on her policies and the things she's said on the trail that they could easily refute really knocked her off her game. She seemed rattled. Voters in NH and across the nation know we can ill afford to give the Presidency to someone that easily shaken. Sorry, people. She is down for the count.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Maureen Majury, Bellevue, WA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:53:26 GMT

When Hillary said, "Oh, that hurts my feelings." when it was pointed out that she wasn't viewed as likeable, it was a "huh?" moment. So unpresidential. So, if that is how she handles unpleasant news if she was elected, she would state, "Oh, that hurts my feelings."? This isn't high school. For me that was the most unprofessional response and made me shrink with embarrassment for her. A major faux pas.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Vaughn Culhane, Buffalo, New York — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:54:46 GMT

The last thing our country needs in a President is another on-the-job trainee, and despite all the rhetoric, that is exactly what we will get with the Senator from Illinois. I for one will not be choosing a Democratic candidate that fits the same pattern as the current occupant of the White House.
However, at least the general class of candidates appear to be much more intelligent than the incumbent, which is a good thing for our country. Still, being smart shouldn't be the determinant in choosing the nominee; a candidate should be a person of character and integrity, with ideas that are not just the parroting of others' work, or worse yet, no ideas at all, just the repeating of simplistic mantras ("9/11", etc.). When I choose a candidate, I want substance, not an empty glass with others' thoughts stuffed inside. Angry ranting and holier-than-thou doesn't cut it this year.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Steve, somewhere in the midwest. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:57:08 GMT

Obama may be intelligent and may even be a good presidential candidate.

The problem: He can't win nationally. There are far too many Americans overall who won't vote for him for the simple fact that he is black.

A majority of the young voters may like him and a majority of African Americans may like him but the democrats already get 90+% of the black vote. When it comes to election time, the young aren't the strongest voting block by % of age group. It is those who are 45 and above. Obama is not the winner in that age group.

Hillary can't win because she is too divisive and unlikeable. Simply put, she comes across as a bitch and doesn't connect well with most people. 20+% of the voters in a national election won't vote for her, simply because she is a Clinton, which is everything the moderate-right and far-right hate.

Edwards is the only one who can win a national election. He's a moderate southerner, who is a self made man. He is a man for the middle and lower class. He opposes lobbyists and big business.

Maybe if we get a president who can get rid of lobbyists, we can go back to a country where your representive votes for the people, rather than which interest he/she is being paid off.

National polls in from pollingreport.com showed, pre-iowa, against any Republican candidate, that Edwards could win.

Great Edwards VP pick: Evan Bayh of Indiana.

Unless you want another 4 years of a Republican president, the only choice is John Edwards

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Voter from Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:57:30 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

steve - Michigan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:59:19 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Peter Vernon CT — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:04:24 GMT

Mr. Obama seemed like he was in the twilight zone
detached, aloof and with no real substance to the questions he was asked. As A lifelong long democrat- I will probably not vote in the Presidential election this autumn if Obama is the nominee.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

dan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:07:08 GMT

Americans is about to make another huge mistake by voting for an empty suit in Obama.

People are naive and tend to vote on emotion. Bush was able to do it in 2000 while talking about unity and civility, integrity. Obama is copying Bush's script. It might work because people are too stupid, naive, and can be misled by emotional talks.

Get ready for another 4 disastrous years if Obama wins.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:07:47 GMT

why is obama so quick to bomb pakistan and talk peacfully to iran. i don' understand his thinking of the two different countries. i am concerned that we have already had two presidents, jimmy carter (hope)and bush (lets unite ) no experience and look where they took us. the young are impresionable but not nessessarly correct. we all were inspired as young people but our thought grew and changed as we matured.

sherry dupriest, cooper city, fl. (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:36 AM)
----------------

Are you really as ignorant as your post makes you out to be???? Obama will not just outright bomb Pakistan (although hiding Osama bin Laden would make them a potential target), he would only go into Pakistan if there is intelligence on the location of bin Laden and the Pakistan government/military will not act on it.

He isn't stupid enough to just outright attack a country with nuclear weapons. A Republican President like our current idiot might, but not someone that actually thinks before they act.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Michael, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:10:03 GMT

Susan, you obviously have no idea what you are talking about because McCain is the only republican who can attract republicans and independents in the general election. If you want a republican in the white house you better vote for McCain. Romney and Fred Thompson are not going to attract independents like McCain will and if either of them get the nomination THEN a democrat will win the election without much of a fight.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Douglas, Augusta, MI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:10:49 GMT

Hillary and her baggage! EXPERIENCE??

WHAT "EXPERIENCE"??

She can't take care of her husband, never mind a whole country!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

FlipFlop — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:23 GMT

there is no room for liers in american presidency.
Hilary, you are hilariously cold and insipide.
Go home you warmonger, sionist sucker.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Wendy, Kansas City, MO — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:31 GMT

How can any sane, reasonable person take McCain seriously? From his "bomb Iran" ditty (ala the Beach Boys) to his most recent comment about staying in Iraq for 100 years (watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM)he has proven that he is a dangerous, violent man.

I, for one, would feel far LESS safe if he becomes president!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

disgusted voter, Spokane, WA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:12:10 GMT

The coverage of last night's debates is another continuation of the deplorable state of our media. John Edwards is ignored and marginalized as the media tries to make this a two-person race, even though he finished second in Iowa. He's got quite a hurdle to overcome with all the free press the mainstream media gives to Hillary and Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:12:39 GMT

Edward's good nights will continue to pile, he is running for VP afterall.

My only question is why MSNBC is very negative with Clinton....are these the men who still despise women? Or do these guys think we're to stupid to read between the lines? Shouldn't you just report and let us decide? Give credit to all when it's due and don't mix yourself up in the race......You seem like the people you dislike when you only spill diaheria every time you speak out. Report, let's decide.....and be fair and balanced..not skewed

Frederick Mugul (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:53 AM)
----------

It could also be that the media has picked up that, as an electorate, we don't want the divisiveness that was the 1990s and the first 7 years of the 2000s to continue. Clinton represents the 1990s way of doing business and it directly lead us to where we are today. It isn't because she's a woman. If Bill could run again and was running, I think we'd still be having the same discussion. We're sick and tired of the us vs. them Washington debate that gets nothing done for regular Americans and only allows special interests, lobbyists, and others who have no interest in what we think and believe to continue to run things. F--k that. I'm tired of it and most people are too. We want the overall tone and way of doing business in Washington to change. Clinton does not represent that. She represents the complete opposite.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Xavier — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:13:49 GMT

I believe Hillary should passion when she defended herself again Edwards and Obama. I want to hear, see, and feel the passion from the future president. I get angry when I think about the state of our country. I want to feel as though the next president is on my side.

Obama can continue to use the word "Change" but he's not the man to actually bring about change. I'm with Hilary for 2008.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Chad, Warner Robins, GA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:17:44 GMT

Both BO and Huckabee get alot of anti-media votes. To vote for either one is to sin against the media. Go BO. Go Huckabee. Power to the people down with the media.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Charles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:17:53 GMT

Drop out Edward and endorse Obama, you will be the VP. Stop that Hillary machine now.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

had enough, Tyngsboro, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:18:41 GMT

After watching both debates last night, the choice is now clearer than ever.

Today's Republicans want perpetual war in Iraq and also with the entire Muslim world, who they believe are out to destroy Western civilization simply because they hate "freedom". According to Thompson, our meddling in the middle east over the last 50 years has nothing to do with anti-American sentiment. And they still call Iraq the central front in the "war on terror" even though everyone knows the war was based on lies and the real terrorists are thriving and getting stronger in Pakistan. This is willful ignorance.

Then you hear them trumpeting the virtues of "free market" capitalism which is just another way of saying 'more power to corporations' and let them do whatever they please - which since Reagan has resulted in the rich and powerful getting more wealth and power at the expense of the poor and shrinking middle class. When you have corporations with politicians in their pockets writing the laws for their benefit and often to the public detriment, you no longer have a democracy. When major government functions are privatized (as they all want) and the corporations start running the country, you have fascism, not democracy.

I ask: What have the Republicans done for the average man in this country? All across the board from jobs, health care, education, environment, consumer issues, and energy policy, the average person has been the big loser. Special interests, big corporations, and wealthy people with connections have won big.

The Democrat debate on the other hand addressed these issue with the welfare of the average person in mind. There was little of the smirking, sneering, and bluster than ran through the entire Republican debate. These were reasonable people with intelligent arguments about how to make America a better place to live, how to reclaim a more peaceful world while maintaining a position of national strength, and offering a clear change from the disastrous effects of seven years of right-wing Republican rule in the last seven years.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Robert Tirado — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:19:41 GMT

I am very happy for Hilary Clinton. She will definately win the Democratic election-we must be careful to remember that Obama's wife said some pretty racial and divisive things several months ago regarding white people. i do not want to see her as first lady. As per Obama, I feel that he is an amateur and not ready for such a strong position as the President of our country. He needs to also speak to his wife and remind her that not all white people are bad. Hillary is most experienced and will bring her husband's esperience to the House. Incidentally, I am NOT white-I am Latino.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

James — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:20:43 GMT

To those using the experience argument against Obama; Last night's debate clearly outlined his experience and his achievements in the state senate at illinois and on the federal level. He was able push and get passed a bill that would have initially not be passed had he not pulled republicans and democrats together (the ethics reform bill). I could elaborate more, but the underlying thing here is that he has the experience of bringing people together from both sides. Hillary does NOT have that kind of experience, not even within those claimed 35 years.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bonnie Gale, Ft Lauderdale, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:21:18 GMT

Think about it, if you owned a company and needed to hire a CEO, wouldn't you naturally prefer a seasoned, intelligent, person with a proven track record? Well the USA is the biggest company of all and requires the most skilled and experienced CEO out there. I don't mean Romney although he has a decent record in this regard. I do mean Hillary who has shown over the years amazing determination to succeed regardless of what instruments of destruction are thrown in her path. This is what the country needs at this point in time. After watching the two "boys" try to sandbag her, she held her ground and will continue to do so when negotiating with the Putins of this world.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Andy Andresen Baton Rouge La — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:21:43 GMT

THEY ALL BETTER START TO LISTEN TO US. WE WANT OUR BOARDERS CLOSED. DO THEY UNDERSTAND THIS OUR WHAT? CLOSED. NO MORE GIVING OUR RIGHTS AND MONEY TO FORIEGN AGENTS IN THE UN. WE ARE AMERICANS AND YOU ARE SUSPOSED TO WORK FOR US AND IF YOU DO NOT WORK FOR US WE WILL THROW YOU OUT. ALL OF YOU SLICK TALKING DORKS. YOU BETTER START TO LISTENING TO US. WE ARE GETTING VERY TIRED OF YOU.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jennifer, los angeles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:25:17 GMT

Romney did great. I was glad he calmly tried to step above the attacks. I believe he has a strong platform & I hope he sticks with it. I was disappointed in all of the attacks on Romney....specifically McCain's. I also think McCain is stong, but I lost some respect due to his attacks. As for Huckabee, I think he only appeals to the the extreme religious conservatives and I do not support him. I think the Rep party would fair better if they divorced these extremists & concentrated on the economy. Stay Strong Romney. We need a stong leader with business experience!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sarah Hines, Rocky Mount, North Carolina — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:27:04 GMT

I thought Edwards was fabulous in the debate last night! When he pointed out that he'd never taken bribes from special interests/lobbyists the others looked guilty and greedy. Imagine having someone in the oval office that doesn't have marionette strings tied to him....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott Ferguson, El Paso, Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:27:19 GMT

I concur with Concerned Citizen. Our country is in a desperate situation economically, militarily and in it's standing in the world. The last thing we need is another Jimmy Carter - i.e. a good man who is full of ivory tower knowledge but cannot get things done in the real world because all of the insiders will be gutting him. I do not see Obama being able to be tenacious enough to get the insiders in line. I do not see Hillary as being willing to oppose them, which at least means she might get some things done. And Edwards would oppose the insiders with the focus of a determined trial lawyer who (supposedly) will have fire side chat like broadcasts wherein he sets out what congressmen are opposing middle class legislation and who their donors are....he is the only candidate I have ever seen who could, in fact, have a chance to get true health care reform done. Failing him winning the nomination, we need Hillary. We cannot recover from eight years of "republican prosperity" with another Jimmy Carter, no matter how much they (both Barak and Jimmy) deserve our respect for being good and intelligent men. The very standing of the United States in the world is at stake! Unfortunately, neither the Democratic party nor the American People have proven very wise over the last few years in nominations and elections for president. Let us hope wisdom will eventually prevail in this one.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Boorda, Columbia, SC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:28:02 GMT

Let's be honest, not one of these candidates will "change" Washington and I would question anyone who casts a vote really believing that to be the case. At this point and time in our history, we NEED someone with experience to make the difficult decisions. There's a reason Sen. Obama and Gov. Huckabee won Iowa, more and more younger voters are speaking up. But, what they WANT and what the country NEEDS are two very different things. To them, I say: Be careful for what you ask for - you may get it!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike Steinmeyer Phoenix, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:29:13 GMT

All those who speak in such glowing terms about John McCain have obviously never had to endure his "service" for them in the Senate. The man is a loser from the get-go and this is one Arizonan who would rather not vote at all than cast a vote for the hypocrisy of McCain.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Korey in Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:29:36 GMT

"PRIOR RESULTS, SPEAK LOUDER THAN "FANCY" WORD. FOR REAL REALISTIC RESULTS THAT WILL BE "DELIVERED", IT'S HILLARY CLINTON." hillaryclinton.com

You mean like the action of authorizing us to go to war in Iraq which she VOTED FOR and has NEVER admitted it was a bad call?

Yeah those ACTIONS speak VOLUMES. I support Obama and I also respect Edwards, but Hillary? She's far too polarizing and the last thing this country needs is another polarizing President. Especially one who can't admit tehir errors..........

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob Miller, Little Rock, AR — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:32:03 GMT

Every iteration of this process on both sides just underscores how truly ****** we are.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kathy Carmichael Grand Island NE — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:33:49 GMT

Ask Mrs Clinton about how great she thinks the North American Free Trade Agreement is? The Clinton signing on that agreement has endangered more people in this country than any other agreement. In that agreement the United States agrees to only deport those illegals if they break any of our laws thus they don't have to worry about our laws they can walk up and kill or rape someone and get a free ride home.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

andy jaz — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:34:52 GMT

after faked primaries we shall have fraud election. It has to be that way after 9/11

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dan Mosiello — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:35:20 GMT

I know it is a well worn cliche, but there is really no substitute for experience no matter what arena.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

luigi,Tucson — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:35:24 GMT

obama has whole lots of white flag waiting when and if he gets elected and i don't think for one minute to think he'll be a good choice for this country .......................................

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carrie, Hershey, Pennsylvania — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:35:52 GMT

I hope Obama does get the Democratic nomination - because then us Republicans will have no trouble beating him!!!

Honestly, do you think he can win? Why, because everyone will vote for a black guy because it's a novelty? Get real - he'd be worse than Bush.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

lowell dunlap, chicago, il — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:36:44 GMT

John Edwards's comparison of himself with Teddy Roosevelt (whack the Trusts, etc.) raises the issue of which prototypes of past presidents each of the leading candidates implicitly or explicitly is presenting.
The debates reveal Edwards as a TR (attack dog vs. special interests); Hillery as a FDR (35 years of "program" creation; Obama as the "healing bridge" looks like Lincoln of the Second Inaugural; and McCain
as the courageous and wise foreign policy guru a la Eisenhower in the time of national peril.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kevin Savage, Gainesville, Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:36:50 GMT

Hillary really needs to tell people what the experience is that she keeps talking about. She has served one-and-a-half terms as a senator. She was President Clinton's wife. That cannot be counted as relevant experience. The only headstart that can give her is knowing where the towels are kept in the White House. Any experience she has can be matched by her competitors, other than perhaps senatorial achievements. But then Biden should have been the nominee.

And after she made the comment that a change in anatomy of the president is enough of a change she really ensured that I cannot vote for her. While I am glad that we are at a point in time when a woman can be a viable candidate, I do not think that we should vote for someone BECAUSE of gender. That is a terrible reason to vote for anyone.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bill san francisco california — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:37:32 GMT

I agree with your comments regarding the spectacular victory by Barack Obama in the first campaign of the 2008 primary election.

More than that, however, what a great statement his victory was to the changing quality of American society that a state like Iowa could cast a plurality of its votes for an African American candidate hopefully bringing to fruition the dream of Martin Luther King that a person be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. This offers hope for a changing America that will benefit not only African Americans but all citizens of this great experiment in melding cultures that is the United States.

That said, however, I am concerned about the Democrats nominating Barack Obama as their standard bearer in 2008, and that concern about an Obama candidacy isn't the fact that he's black, but rather that he's green. 8 years as a state legislator and 3 years as a U.S. senator are a start on the education of a person who desires to lead America in a world with many dangers and challenges but pale in comparison to the intimate knowledge required for the domestic and international problems that will be faced in the years ahead. Islamic fascism, Iran, and Russia, internationally, or recession, $100-a- barrel oil, or spiraling health care costs demand the long term involvement and work in these issues from candidates like Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Now that would be a ticket, McCain/Clinton or visa-versa.

Barack Obama's candidacy and victory in Iowa is great and cannot be understated as a tremendous step forward for the political culture, but now is not the time to take a chance on America's security and economic strength. We need Clinton or McCain now more than ever. It's great to have a honeymoon with your heart that Obama's candidacy represents but,over the long term, we need to have a marriage with our heads and know that the man or woman we elect is ready for the challenge on the very first day in the Oval Office.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pamela Stehn, Quad Cities, IL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:37:42 GMT

Although we have been Obama supporters thus far, we must honestly say that it looked like Edwards won last night's debate. He was vibrant, energetic, well spoken & stayed on task. I thought it was one of his best!! We would be wrong to dismiss what strengths he brings to the table.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ken, AL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:38:57 GMT

I am an independent conservative. If I vote Democrat at election time it will be for Obama. I think he is to far left leaning but he is a breath of fresh air and he is easy to like. I do not want to see another Clinton as President. We don't need any more embarassing soap opera in the White House.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Chad, Huntington, WV — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:39:29 GMT

I don't agree that when Edwards spoke about the "status quo" that it was a blow to Hillary. Hillary responded appropriately and forcefully that Edwards/Obama talk about change whereas she has a proven track record of delivering change. What these pundits are calling a blow I saw as one of her best moments of the debate.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Margaret, Crossville, Tennessee — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:39:36 GMT

It's Hillary all the way for me in Tennessee. She is the only one that can handle the problems we are facing today. She will tackle them right off the first day she is in the oval office. We need to end the war and spend money on our own country. We have people here without health care, food, people who do not have enough money to pay for gas to get to work, to keep warm and many other things. Today it takes lots of money to support a family of four. We need to take care of our people first and then if there is anything left over, let's share it.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Shital Green Dahal — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:40:07 GMT

Polls, Polls, Polls: Obama vs. Clinton
Let's put together all the polls released today and yesterday (carried in the last two days or so, most including Saturday).
##7NEWS/Suffolk Univ.(Sun): Obama 33% -----Clinton 35%

#Rasmussen Reports (Sun): Obama 39%---Clinton 27%.

#American Research Group (Sat):Obama 38%---Clinton 26%

#Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby (Sun): Obama 30---Clinton 31%

##MSNBC/Mason-Dixon (Sun): Obama 33%---Clinton 31%

##CNN/WMUR (Sat): Obama 33%---Clinton 33%

If we average all these polls, we should get a close to accurate picture: Obama leads Clinton by about 4%. But this math is true only from brute statistical/ mathematical perspective. If you like to believe the less known groups' survey is truer against the establishment surveys, as was the case in Iowa, Obama could be beating Clinton by 10-12% in New Hampshire.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Lori H — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:40:08 GMT

Today's votes all depend on the candidates charisma, long public service or experience seems to have gone out the window. If I was a republican, I would vote for John McCain and if I was a Democrat, I would vote for Richardson. Maybe a lot of you have forgotten, Richardson's public services. Richardson has been a congressman, a Secretary of Energy, a United Nations Ambassador, a Governor and he was involved in one or two middle east hostage negotiations, where he got some Americans and Europeans released and he's got a great and long standing diplomatic relationship with some middle east leaders and Asian leaders, especially North Korea. Remember the movie the Godfather, it is so true in this case, when he said, "keep your enemies close". Now, who could do that better than Richardson, remember we need to repair our image in the world as the most forward thinking country or society. So please think carefully before you vote.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dot, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:40:19 GMT

I have seen some comments about an Obama/Edwards ticket. Do many of you think that would be a possibility? I would think if the Republicans gave the nod to McCain, he would want a VP with more (here's that word again) experience.

I do think Senator Obama did a good job of providing specifics of his proposals last night. But, to be fair, so did Senator Clinton.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Redneck, memphis, tennessee — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:40:21 GMT

Hillary is a joke..her 35 yrs experience..has she been a senator that long..if not then what was her job when her whore husband bill was screwing around..or her job when her whore husband bill was a governor in arkansas..she hasn't had any jobs until now which means she hosted tea parties for bill...im sick of bush, clinton, bush again, and now another clinton i dont think so...they have made enough of the backs of us already..im sick of all of them we need someone with new ideas..instead of Hillary with her lying self..you all can lie about Obama if you want but im asking everyone i write to, know, talk to, and everything else to DONT BELIVE THE LIES OF THE ENEMY...

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dick Lamarre, Winter Haven FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:41:06 GMT

The main problem with Obama is that he continues to talk down at people other than talking to them. His high and mighty personnal is going to work against him once he gets out of New England.
Also what piece of significant legislation that he sponsored and was passed by the Congress

I have been a Democrat forever but I will vote for whatever Republican nominee will be running against Obama, my entire family feels the same way. It's not hard for adults to recognize a phony when he sees one

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John Davidson, Eugene, Oregon — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:41:11 GMT

Edwards won the debate in my mind by clearly and passionately pointing out the obvious: to know who the candidates are really going to represent, we just have to follow the money. View the "money web" at open secrets.org (http://opensecrets.org/pres08/moneyweb.asp?cycle=2008). Clinton, Obama, and most of the republicans are in this race courtesy of the same special interests: Wall Street, banking, securities, etc. See also http://opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?cycle=2008

Clinton, more than anyone, is captive to the lobbyists. Edwards is less beholden to the monied interests. Of course, Kucinich is least beholden, which is why ABC excluded him from the debates and the rest of the corporate owned press has done its best to marginalize him.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ogdeeds — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:41:30 GMT

Tim, thank you!! for doing the job of the press who has chosen to give obama a pass and not do a thorough assessment of him but to instead get caught up themselves (just like the did inthe runup to the war) instead of doing their job and vetting him like they have done to hillar all these years. I also agree with james and araliun...they, like me, see through all the hoopla...it is pathetic how the first read decides obama as a clear winner....they cant even manage to note that clinton had specfics on just about every topic while obama continues with his vagueness and edwards with his usual rant against special interests (of which he is part of, trial lawyers).

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

L Davis, Littleton CO — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:42:02 GMT

I'm a conservative democrat, 44, yoga mom -- and still don't believe there's anyone to vote for. Obama's message is great, but how's he going to implement? Hillary's experience is a plus, but her baggage is a literal drag. If McCain makes through the GOP nomination, he has my vote!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Michael Stewart. Worcester Massachusetts — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:42:10 GMT

Romney is indeed toast. He should have put more distance between his Gubernatorial days and his Presidential aspirations. There are a lot of people here in the North East who still remember well they way he re-distributed the Wealth of Massachusetts by slashing state services, causing property tax increases across the state, and then disguising the largest single tax increase ever to hit this state as a piece of health care legislation. There is a reason why his lieutenant governor lost in a record landslide to Deval Patrick. After the screwing Romney gave them the citizens of Massachusetts would have elected Attila the Hun as a moderate.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jerry, Alexandria, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:43:24 GMT

There is not a more capable person of being President in the whole field of candidates, both Republican and Democrats than Hillary Clinton. I just hope the folks out there wake up an see that she is the one to lead our nation the next 4 years. I am not a woman, but the women out there will never in their life time come closer to having a woman leader of the free world than they do now and they are close to blowing it. Come on folks, if you want a loser for your candidate, then continue to support one, Obama who due to his inexperience will take us down the wrong path yet again and I think 8 years of that path is enough. Go Hillary!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joe Sullivan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:43:51 GMT

Did anyone catch Bill Richardson's comment about speaking with the Soviet Union regarding nuclear weapons once he becomes President? I guess he's spent too much time in the small state of New Mexico to know that the Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore. So much for Bill's diplomatic experience and knowledge of world events. He shouldn't even be on the same stage with the other candidates. What a joke!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Concerned Citizen, Philadelphia PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:44:19 GMT

I have read a great many opinions here today, and to me..it's clearly cut and dry. I have seen the debates, analyzed the platforms, done my "gut-check" and just so you know, I am a lifelong Republican. If given the chance in a national election, I am voting for Obama. He is the clear choice. I am sure that I am not the only die hard Republican who feels this way, either!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

No Puppet To The Media, Murfreesboro, Tennessee — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:44:28 GMT

STILL FOR FRED!!!!!!!!!
Wouldn't vote for Guiliani and both Romney and Huckabee scare the hell out of me. All we need is another religious zealot with nothing to talk about, but their beliefs and convictions when justifying why they did or did not do something, in the White House.

Go Fred Go!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Travis K., Boise, Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:44:31 GMT

What irks me is that these top three (Clinton, Obama, and Edwards) get all the attention and the media leaves the other challengers out in the cold.

Richardson, while he may not have the charisma and young looks of Edwards, clearly is the most experienced out of the entire group. He has been governor over a state, he has foreign policy experience as a diplomat, is no-nonsense and has good logic, and is a member of one of the largest potential ethnic groups in the U.S. today.

He should be getting a lot more than 7 percent of the caucus vote and should be taken more seriously. Do you really want more of the same old government (aka Hillary or Edwards). At least I could stand an Obama-Richardson ticket because Obama has some great ideas that would go well with Richardson.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jerry, Denver, CO — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:45:41 GMT

Hillary's days are numbered. As Obama and Edwards begin to strategically pick her apart in the upcoming weeks, she will be unable to recover. This of course will lead to the eventual nomination of Barack Obama, who will choose his ally John Edwards as his V.P., and the two will make historic gains from "day one" (to use Sen Clintons own catchphrase). This is inevitable, and it is clearly in America's best interests. Unless, of course, you like the status quo in Washington. Obama '08!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Michael, Arlington, TX — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:46:04 GMT

McCain is the one with the negative ads. Romney's ads are just pointing out differences on where each candidate stands. McCain has yet to explain his position on Immigration, Taxes, and Health Care. As far as the fight against terrorism is concerned, I don't trust his policies. Being a POW doesn't give him the right to say he is more experienced when it comes to the war in terrorism. Give me a break! Being a POW made him a bitter angry man and that is understandable. As for Huckabee, he is no more different than Mr. Uriah Heep in Dickens' David Copperfield!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J. Kyle Howard, Fredericksburg, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:46:44 GMT

It is amazing to me that we are arguing over experience vs change. You can hire in experience which any President does. He seeks experience from other people. Unless you are running a second term how do you get experience being president.

Look at America's history. Every president we had was cut from the same cloth. Now we are at a point in history when the status quo won't cut it. We need to be different and make this world a better place for all of us.

Everyone of these candidates can do their parts. They don't have to be president to do it. The clash of egos does no one good

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

AL, Portland, OR — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:47:09 GMT

I'm a woman, but Hillary uses the gender card whenever possible. It doesn't work. She consistently comes across as hot-tempered, hypersensitive in the political area in which she calls herself "experienced", and arrogant--she is unattractive in her portrayal of herself as experienced. What experience, as many have pointed out? Living in a fractionated White House and abusing her staff? A failed, unrealistic health care plan? Devastating votes on Iraq and Iran?

Hillary is so deeply flawed as a candidate that the public finally sees she is the Emperor with No Clothes.

A serious misstep--that no one in the media caught--was her saying the change is a woman president. Change is an African American president with the message of hope and unifying all Americans. People resonate to this--I have never felt this enthusiastic about a candidate, but remember JFK when I was a child. The same message of hope will unify this country.

Vote Obama!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Charlie Schabel, Charlotte, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:47:10 GMT

Hiliary has been running for president since college. She doesn't care about the middle class, or any particular issue for that matter. She cares only for herself..to be president. It was not a matter of Obama being so likeable as it was her being non-likeable. I think she is the only Democratic candidate that could lose to the Republicans.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mark Odu — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:47:13 GMT

I am just curious why no one is asking Hillary Clinton about the Marc Rich pardon? What does she think about the pardon? She keeps talking about 35 years of service? Those years of service do not add up, since when did being a spouse of a politician count as actual hands-on experience.

Then untrained spouses of physicians should be seeing patients in our doctors office, claiming the experience of their physician spouse - if we were to believe Hillary. God help us.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sharon — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:48:08 GMT

Clinton's statement that she has been for change for thirty years sounds oxymoronic. If you haven't been able to change anything in thirty years of trying admit your failure and give someone else a chance to try.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kaye — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:48:43 GMT

I agree she is polarizing, no republican would ever vote for her and she will have a smaller percentage of independents than McCain or Guiliani. She changes her message and campaign as quickly as the political winds shift.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Reasta Man — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:50:33 GMT

Regarding age groups and support for either Clinton or Obama? Older Americans witnessed blacks using the back door at restaurants, sitting in the balcony at movies, etc. and I am guessing they prefer this arrangement. The young folks are appalled and cannot fathom such a thing.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

gth — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:50:52 GMT

John McCain is to damn old. (73) to run a nation and world power. AND ! he is a hot head too! Retire John, like everybody else in their 60's and 70's.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kaye — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:52:33 GMT

Also, for those Hillary whiners who keep saying the media does not support her, you might try tuning in to Cokie Roberts, she had so many ready made excuses for Hillary's Iowa loss - my personal favorite was that it was too cold for the older voters to come out to caucaus. From the other side of the coin there are quite a few pundits who are quick to defend Hillary - Eleanor Clift, Dan Rather, Cokie Roberts, Donna Brazil, George Stephenopolus - just to mention a few I saw on the Sunday AM shows today.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

cause and effect — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:52:33 GMT

i am sick of hearing about obma and clinton, edwards was great too, he stood up for the people instead of the others they are more for big bussiness and not for the people.
we never think of the little people of this country.we've had another but same old families.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mamorritt phoenix az — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:52:52 GMT

the thought that two states have such a powerful impact disturbs me. we need a national primary. I dont want to lose my choice . let the primaries play out before the media crowns the next nominee for the president of the u.s.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tim Moriarty Columbus Ohio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:53:45 GMT

I actually don't care who wins as long as they clean Hilary's clock.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

tony, Knoxvegas, TN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:54:30 GMT

In regards to posts stating Obama can't be elected because he's black, please wake up, those that would not vote for him because of his race will be voting for the republican candidate anyway, last time I checked Iowa is 94% white.
The "change" issue is being distorted, I think Obama's change is reaching across the devide- party, race and creed to find the common ground. I do not believe that Hillary is capable of that.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Truth Seeker00000 — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:55:47 GMT

Obama....Love him or hate him, this will help you decide copy and paste:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVe0kMzqN0U

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Linda, Kansas City — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:55:49 GMT

Wake Up Obama, bandwagon Americans! This is not football! This is the future of our country. Obama should be in Hollywood but not president! All he talks about are those on welfare and the "working" class...what happened to the "middle" class? Oh, they need to be taxed more according to him. Same old crap, political support for the poor or the rich and he's an extreme left liberal. He spouts out huge words, sounds impressive yet everyone needs to start to really pay attention to what this man is "really" about. Hot air balloon, folks. Vote for him and when the balloon pops if he becomes president, you won't see a thing but will feel the hot air. He will not unite this country, this from a very moderate person politically. We have "real" problems. The dollar has gone down in value and giving more dollars to those who aren't working for our country is not the answer. Just because Bush did a poor job doesn't mean we need to have our head in the clouds and vote for someone who pretends to have our best interest at heart because he has phoney charisma.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

bubba fruitcake San Lucas DOminican Republic — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:58:19 GMT

this is too early for presidental camapings because there is no incumbent to slow down the process it is just like a bunch of crazed labrador retreivers trying to featch a giant crazed tennis ball taht reminds me of the mechieane from the republic of the world that has haunted me in my meatloaf sandwitch and that is cool for me beucse i have been on fire when i was on charge of the world when i have to be there because there is a great way for me to do so when i have to become a giant pug and that is why the pug is for the beatnukers and the old christmas pie that i tried to eat it was christmas pie from two years ago and it have become all oh breakfest is ready charge and that is cool for me and that is for me and that is for me and that is for.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Michael, Valley Stream, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:59:15 GMT

The statement that Romney would be the first Massachusetts favorite son ever to lose a New Hampshire primary is incorrect. Ted Kennedy lost in 1980.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jeremy Harris Columbus, Ohio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:59:39 GMT

I believe that Barack Obama is our nation's best hope for the future. He inspires people with his words much like John F. Kennedy did in the early 1960's. Sen. Obama connects with young American's who feel that the U.S. Government doesn't work for or care about them. Sen. Obama may not have as much "experience" as Hillary Clinton, but he has something more powerful. The ability to mobilize and energize the American people to believe and to work for something bigger than ourselves. I was a huge supporter of Bill Clinton, but every time I watch Hillary in a debate or a campaign rally she seems stiff, cold, and quite honestly ....bitchy! I will support Obama till the end. If you truely want a better America for ALL...Obama is the best candidate to make it happen!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Assta B. Gettu — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:00:27 GMT

What ever points Obama scores now over Clinton, whatever change he thinks he will bring to America, and what kind of change, at the end, however, Americans will choose Clinton, not Obama because Obama has yet to answer many unanswered questions about his upbringing in Islamic culture.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Edna, Boise, Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:00:39 GMT

Mitt Romney you Have Broken Us, as always more flip flopping

More flip Flopping from Mitt Romney, do you really want a scumbag like this.

Governor Romney…imposed a slew of fee hikes and tax 'loophole' closures….The largest of these was $259 million worth of fee hikes in FY 2004, the bulk of which came from higher Registry of Deeds fees. Smaller fee hikes, including higher charges for boaters and golfers, we imposed in FY 2003 and FY 2005. Romney also sought $128 million worth of so-called tax loophole closures for FY 2004; $70 million for FY 2005; and $170 million for FY 2006, which were later reduced to $85 million due to backlash from business leaders."
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

"Romney continues to oppose the flat tax with harsh language, calling the tax 'unfair.'"
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

The Governor would also seek to raise $128 million in revenue by closing corporate tax loopholes (Rick Klein, “Massachusetts Governor’s Proposed Budget Includes Layoffs, New Fees”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 2/27/2003)

Despite the governor's pledge of no new taxes, his proposal does increase some taxes and fees: The administration says it can collect an additional $70 million by "closing loopholes" in corporate and sales tax rules (Scott Greenberger, “Massachusetts Governor Sets $22.98 Billion Budget Blueprint”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 1/29/2004)

“…business groups objected so strongly to a proposed $170 million tax increase that Romney snuffed the idea and proposed $85 million instead.” (Alexander Bolton, “Romney’s Tax Record Gets A Closer Look,” The Hill, 3/27/2007)

Governor Romney even raised taxes on some New Hampshire residents who worked in Massachusetts, taxing their income and their pensions. Learn more

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rudeboy — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:01:40 GMT

Face it folks(non believers. People are tired of the Bush/Clinton Administrations. We need change and the only way change can come about is if we elect Obama or Edwards. Putting Hiliary in the WH will only bring back the Bill Clinton folks......dont foresee any change happening!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nodding toward Fred — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:02:13 GMT

So many pundits are saying that Fred Thompson was the one that came out on top in the GOP debate last night. Yet, I do not see Thompson getting the acknowledgement of doing well in the mainstream media - with the exception of Stephanopoulus acknowledging his doing well last night. I really, really liked a lot of what he said. Not all of it, but, well - better than most.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Cathleen, Petaluma, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:04:17 GMT

I keep hearing from Mrs. Clinton (and the media)about how she has spent "35 years working for change", what I am wondering is why then, has nothing changed? We are still dealing with the same old corrupt political process that, I'm afraid, is what made the Clintons and they are not going to work to change that!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dot, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:04:41 GMT

"What irks me is that these top three (Clinton, Obama, and Edwards) get all the attention and the media leaves the other challengers out in the cold. "
----------------------------------------------------

Travis:

This has been the story since the beginning of the campaign. If fact, some of the other challengers (Senators Biden and Dodd have given up campaigning, not in small part, I think, because of their lack of attention from the media. You need media attention to bring in contributions and they weren't getting that.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

MRS, Sacramento, Calif — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:04:48 GMT

I am a younger independent voter and am finding all of the information and debates very interesting. After watching last nights debate, I know that I won't be voting for Hillary - she has limited youth appeal, limited experience, and appears selfish. I would love a woman president, just not want her.

As for experience verses non, I believe you have to have enough to be able to navigate and understand the system, but don't need to be in the trenches for umpteen years to be qualified. After too long, a person can become complacent and accepting of how things are - we need new blood and ideas to change things up.

My belief is that the next 10-20 years is going to be extremely difficult and a period of strong transition to create something entirely new, so who will lead us and take us there? My generation, and generations behind me is experiencing is something the baby boomers have never experienced, so what they know, may not be true in today or tomorrow. (Not that what they bring doesn't provide value) I am looking at the potential candidates for a leader in change, a visionary, and a listener to the people. Right now I am leaning to Edwards and Obama....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

F. Cohen, Detroit Michigan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:05:29 GMT

I am sick to death about hearing Hillary/Billary talk about her 35 years of experience. She has had an elected position for 7 years and that's it. She is no Ted Kennedy.
By the way, I'm an over 50 year old Jewish woman. A public school teacher. I've supported Obama since the very start and I'm not surprised by what's happening. To my over 50 friend, please think about what individual running has the most character and can unite this country, black and white, young and old. Which person would you want for your children and grandchildren to have as their president. I certainly don't want to have a soap opera in the White House. It should be an easy choice.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mary Correll — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:05:30 GMT

We do not need the Clintons back in the White House. If we had a full accounting of their We need someone who is completely above board and who really cares about our country. I am sick of politions, promises, and lack of real courage. I think we need tolook at the man who was in N. York when disaster struck. He has been there and he knows about the agony that was felt country wide. We haven't had a president worth his salt since Ronald Reagan. I am tired of politions using our military, our senior citizens, our children, and our lower income families as a means to get what they want. It has never happened yet. They promise and after being elected, they could care less.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dot, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:07:13 GMT

Oh, that hurts my feelings."? This isn't high school. For me that was the most unprofessional response and made me shrink with embarrassment for her. A major faux pas.
Maureen Majury, Bellevue, WA (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:53 PM)

I think she was joking, Maureen

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Khimad Abdul Shomad — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:07:46 GMT

Go OBAMA! Go OBAMA! We, American people, need You. It' s time to make the dream come true: Strong, dignified America and secured America. Hillary, I don' t know man!!! I don't think she would be ever able to make a national health care as she has promised.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stefanie, Fountain Run, KY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:08:08 GMT

I reaaly like John Edwards and I do not understand why the meida and everybody seems intent on putting him down. I have researched all three guys heavely and he has come out on top with the most direct answers to each question and seems to have the greastest concern for were this country is headed. It could be because I am in one of those middle class working american families and I am concern for my children. I realize that he is a lawyer and lawyers are good at representing themselves and what they believe anyone ever think that maybe the U.S. needs some major representation to get through this stage.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Amber Hawkins — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:08:11 GMT

The problem with America is evident with every single media corporation. It cannot tell the difference between an Saudi Iraqi, Turkish Iraqi and a Iranian Iraqi. The same is also evident when it cannot tell the difference between a black american and an African-European. Obama doesn't have the black support as yet, because they know he is not black american, but white America does'nt know the difference between the two. Why keep calling Obama Black when he is half colored and half white, and the color portion does not emanate from the U.S.A

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

G. C. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:08:22 GMT

If as a leader, one cannot make him/herself likeable, then what kind of support is that person expecting from the public? First, one has to have charisma, and then leadership qualities. Obama is the only democrat with both. I have seen time and time over where experience became a dangerous thing. The experiences one has, doesn't necessarily mean that he or she is "able" and/or "willing" to apply them. The ability to recognize the need for, and to then make the necessary changes is the hardest things to deal with. Hillary may have the experience, but, to identify the need for and to accept(make)changes, is a completely different issue; Obama is the real symbol of change for America, Hillary "Clinton" is not. Check it out.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Owens, Charlotte, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:09:06 GMT

Since it is apparent that NH seems to go the opposite of Iowa lately, Tuesday will be a day to look forward to. You do not have to win to still be in the race. Whoever places second, is still in great shape. Super Tuesday in February is the day that makes or breaks candidates. Why was Iowa so important when the top three candidates on the Democratic side received about the same number of delegates? John Edwards looks like a pouty little school boy who resorts to being a bully when he does not get his way. Obama can keep his "change" theme going if he starts to add some substance on how he is going to implement these changes. Change is good, but not without a plan. If people are not interested in experience, then take one look at our current president. He was criticized during his 2000 campaign that he had no experience, and voters said that was not an issue. Well look at what we got with him, and where our country is now. I can't think of any major legislation that has passed that benefits this country domestically. You can't institute change without the assistance of others. If you keep insulting the Washington crowd, how are you going to get their help when you get to the White House? Are you going to pass legislation all by yourself? Candidates should stop short of always insulting the status quo, because they should remember that they are already in the senate which makes them a member of the status quo. Don't discredit someone's senate record when you have not been present for key votes or you were not even a senator when a vote took place, or you have been involved in passing any legislation except for getting a few more post offices for your state.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dennis Concord, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:10:09 GMT

Regardless of results in NH this week, the time is NOW for a Obama and Edwards alliance (Pres and Veep.) We need to end this Hilary madness and position us to become a "government-in-waiting" verus the White House/Republican campaign as quickly as possible. This will increase our ability to take control of the political and legislative agenda and begin to speak with one voice on the war, the declining economic outlook, the environment and healthcare. Barack and John, talk this week and get a team together to stop the Republican-Lite, Hilary Clinton.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Steve, Pittsburgh — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:10:55 GMT

I respect all the Republican candidates but how can Republicans support anyone but Mitt Romney for President. He is the only candidate who has actually done something. He has accomplished much in both the private and public sectors. He talks not just of hopes and dreams but problems and solutions. He's the only candidate with a chance against the Democrats given the poor state of the Republican party this year.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

larry hobbs wilmington north carolina — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:12:47 GMT

Hillary is just like Bill always an excuse and totally innocent and ignorant to the fact everyone else is to blame or jsut picking on them. Just imagine her trying to defend our country at a world peace talk if she gets her feelings her she'll backbite them with that sourpuss look on her face and claimthey are ganing up on her.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ROB JOHNSON, LITTLE NECK, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:13:10 GMT

LET ME SAY RIGHT UP FRONT THAT I AM A 55 Y/O
DYED-IN-THE-WOOL, REGISTERED DEMOCRAT. LAST NIGHT I WATCHED THE NH REPUBLICAN DEBATE WITH KEEN INTEREST. I MUST SAY THAT I WAS IMPRESSED WITH THE LEVEL OF DETAILED UNDERSTANDING THAT MITT ROMNEY, JOHN MCCAIN AND EVEN FRED THOMSON POSSESSED WITH RESPECT TO THE QUESTION REGARDING OUR HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH I DISAGREE WITH ALL OF THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES WITH REGARD TO HEALTH CARE, I MUST SAY THAT MIKE HUCKABEE OFFERED AN APPALLINGLY BANAL AND OVERLY-GENERALIZED RESPONSE THAT WAS SHORT ON SPECIFICS AND LONG ON WIND. IS IT ONLY ME OR DOES ANYONE ELSE SENSE THAT GOVERNOR HUCKABEE IS ILL-EDUCATED OR ILL-ADVISED WHEN IT COMES TO THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ANY ISSUE THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE THE HOLY BIBLE? EURDITION DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIS STRONG SUIT. REPUBLICAN VOTERS BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Phelan Earp, Denver, Colorado — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:15:39 GMT

Sen. Clinton plead her case as being the experienced agent of change last night citing her ability to get a few thousand peole health care over the last 35 years? Besides this and her pro-choice, pro-gay marriage stance (which are shared by all other democratic hopefulls anyways) she has voted with the GOP on EVERY major issue since she has been a senator. Her voting for the Bankruptcy reform bill, that favored the big credit card companies exclusively, at a time when United Airlines was able to declare bankruptcy and default on billions in pensions for working Americans, many of whom were already retired and on a fixed income, particularly stands out. Agent of change? Sure, this is true if you want to talk about a democrat becoming a Republican (see Joe Lieberman.) She criticizes Obama for being all talk and yet when you look at her voting record and hear her claim to be an agent of real change in Washington it's not only "all talk," it's all lies. Her husband sent millions of jobs overseas and a lot of jobs across the border with his support for the WTO and NAFTA and she basicaly claims his experience as her own so I guess you can put her down as pro WTO and pro NAFTA which is as republican as it gets unless you look at Ron Paul who is the only true fiscal conservative running for the GOP nomination. She runs by far the most negative campaign of any Democrat and yet tries to paint herself as a victim of unfair attacks. People are flocking to the Obama campaign not because Sen. Clinton is a woman or unlikeable, it's because she's a pro-choice, pro-gay mariage Republican much like Rudy Giuliani. I of course am pro-choice and pro-gay marriage myself, but when these are the only issues a candidate has to support her claim to be a Democrat then it's time to call that Candidate what she is: a moderate republican. Go Obama!! Go Edwards!! Go Richardson!! It's about time we had a real Democrat in the office, something we haven't had since the 1970's!!!!!!!!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ATLANTA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:15:59 GMT

BARAKA HUSSEIN OBAMA

OBAMA NAME IN ITS SELF IS STRANGE. WE TAKE Saddam Hussein OUT OF Iraqi AND NOW WE HAVE BARAKA HUSSEIN OBAMA RUNNING AS OUR PRESIDENT.

WAKE UP WORLD AND CHECK THIS GUY OUT. HE IS MUSLIM!!!! NOW WHAT WOULD THE UNITED STATES DO IF WE VOTED HIM INTO OFFICE? WE WOULD BE SCREWED! CHECK OUT HIS FAMILY HISTORY. IT IS CRAZY. ALSO HE WAS INTO DRUGS AS HIS OWN BOOK HAS SAID.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Caricom, New York, New York — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:16:22 GMT

All those who vilify Hillary because she is bitchy and the like. Would you not rather have a person who can stand her ground in the zoo that is Washington and who knows the ropes of the political game than someone who is nice, likeable but gullible when it comes to dealing with world problems?
We have someone in the White House who is a likable person (I am a democrat) but about whom the majority of the American people is utterly embarrased.

It is not about being pleasing it is about having the skills to do the job and Hillary fits that description. So, take your pick!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pauline, Atl, GA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:17:11 GMT

What 35 years of experience is Hillary talking about, could someone please explain?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Seany Pat — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:17:23 GMT

Firts of all, Obama didn't win a white state; he won DEMOCRATIC VOTERS in one white state. You see...there are these people called Republicans and they get to vote to when it is time for the general election. As a democrat I am sad to see that once again my party is picking a candidate who cannot win the general election (just like when Iowa picked Kerry in 04')...so silly. Obama can't win a general elecetion because he is inexperienced, has skeletons in his closet that the Republicans WILL call him on (cocaine), and for the reason no one wants to talk about because it aint PC. Funny, people voting for Obama want change, but by voting for him they are ensuring that we will just have 4 more years of a Republican White House! great.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tim Harvey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:17:47 GMT

Isn't a great to live in America where a candidate may be supported for the most ridiculous of reasons. Personally, I saw the "attack" on Romney for what is was, an attack on the character of the person who could do the most good for this country. The bottom line is that most of the people on that stage want to lead this country for what it will do for them more-so than what they can do for it.

The reality of life is this. No-one is the perfect candidate because that person doesn't exist. All we can hope for is to elect someone who has honesty, integrity and a commitment to doing what is right for America's future generations. For me, the debates last night did nothing but solidify my support for the man who can make this happen. How can you respond any better to the "attacks' on him than to suggest that the comments be on issues and not personal. As an aside, did you see the look on McCain's face when he made the "change" insult. He was thrilled to be able to allude to an issue that has been explained very well I think. I thought Governor Romney handled each situation with dignity. If you are serious about wanting to know the man, study about the man and not what others are saying about him. The record is clear. And it is interesting to me that those who complained the most about the so-called negative ads have miraculously and sometimes very sneakily been using them themselves. My respect for Senator McCain went to the bottom of the well.

You have not seen the last of Mitt Romney. He will not give up! Go Mitt!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike, Boston, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:18:50 GMT

Am I the only one who didn't actually learn anything about Obama last night? He so general about wanting change that you don't really know WHAT he wants to change. And how does he get off with a question from Spradling about what he doesn't like about Republicans and Hillary gets insulted with a question about why no one likes her? Her response about how people voted for Bush because he was likeable was brilliant, though.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Victoria French — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:19:42 GMT

The media does not want the Democratic candidate to be John Edwards. It is much better press if it's Obama or Clinton. But EDWARDS won the debate last night and anyone watching could have no doubt. Unfortunatly the media won't acknowledge it because he is a white male. It's time to cry discrimination!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sally MItchell, Londonderry, NH — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:19 GMT

I think they were all like little children. I am very concerned for our country. But anything would be better than what is there now. Is there anyone out there who can tell the truth, be a moral compass for those that need to be lead, who can stick to one way of thinking but be flexible enough to know when is the right time to change their mind and admit it is a change and why?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

A Smolken, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:25 GMT

Obama listens to all the candidates in debate and then makes his comments - never really takes the lead. Will he continue to act in this manner when/if elected 2008? Edwards and Obama very "chummy". Courteous to one another and join their attacks on Clinton. Sorry for Mr. Romney - he is such a gentlemen over Edwwards and Obama. Because of certain remarks, rudeness, etc. I may just scratch Obama off my "maybe list" - this goes for Edwards as well. It will be very difficult to determine which way I will vote. I am very disappointed. Looks like people will be voting for the lesser of the evil. God help us all!! and God bless America

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Johnny, Union New Jersey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:32 GMT

As I am reading these comments, I am slowly detecting a slight sense of discomfort. The difference between H. Clinton and B. Obama is not between experience and change; I think it is more associated to which candidate will unite the country and the rest of the world.
Obviously, we (the United States of America) have an image problem. Among other important factors, we have surely lost our credibility. Our elected President will need to have charisma and the level of respect that is required to regain our global position that we once had. Who is the best ambassador of change, Hillary or Barack? Who is viewed as the most credible, Hillary or Barack? Who has the most leadership qualities, Hillary or Barack? Who is the most influential, Hillary or Barack?
The damage that we have endured during the past decade is clearly related to our ability to trust the wrong messenger. We need to take the necessary time to listen to the candidates to determine if they have these prerequisites and required qualities. And we need a set of laws that will punish organizations and individuals that promote \ publish falsified messages about our candidates. Otherwise, we will continue to err on the side of our feelings and fears.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J.Dickens — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:35 GMT

WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES HILLARY HAVE OTHER THAN BEING BILL CLINTON'S WHIPPING BOY.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Susan, Hubbardston, Ma — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:45 GMT

Some info on polling numbers:

Sunday, January 6, 2008
NH Poll Round-up
By Dr. Steven Taylor
Most of the major polls have both the Rep and Dem races tied at the top (although with the Dem race closer than the Rep race), with one exception noted below.

The sum of the polls would seems to indicate a likely win for McCain and a race far too close to call on the Democratic side.

Last night I noted the Concord Monitor/Research 2000 numbers, which show a 34-33 Obama-Clinton race and a 35-29 McCain-Romney race.

Via CNN: Poll: Clinton, Obama tied in New Hampshire

Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois are tied, with each grabbing the support of 33 percent of likely Democratic primary voters in the Granite State, according to a new CNN/WMUR New Hampshire presidential primary poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire.

Edwards has 20% , Richardsoin 4% and Kucinich 2%.

On the GOP side it isn’t quite as close, but with an MOE of 5%, it is still a possible tie:

Thirty-three percent of likely GOP Granite State primary voters support the senator from Arizona, with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney six points back at 27 percent.

Rudy has 14%, Huckabee 11%, Paul 9%1, and Hunter and Thompson are both at 1%2

According to Zogby:

Democrat Barack Obama has pulled into a virtual dead heat with Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire two days before the state’s presidential nominating contest, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on Sunday.

And on the GOP side:

Republican rivals Mitt Romney and John McCain are also essentially deadlocked as the White House races in both parties tightened ahead of Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary.

McClatchy/MSNBC:

Obama now leads Clinton by a margin of 33-31 percent, thanks to an apparent surge of support the night after he won the Iowa caucuses. Given the poll’s margin of error, the numbers amount to a statistical tie. But that still marks a gain for Obama, who has trailed Clinton in New Hampshire for months.

On the Republican side, McCain led the field by 32-24 percent over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. There, it was McCain who got a bounce, not Iowa winner Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas who still trails in third place and appeared to get no immediate traction from Iowa.

That is a significant lead for McCain.

The outlying poll is the American Research Group’s which has Obama at 38% and Clinton at 26% and McCain at39% and Romney at 25%. Those numbers seem rather unlikely.

James Joyner looks at the RCP numbers and McCain’s rise in NH.

Sphere: Related Content

But don’t worry, that’s the result of radical underpolling [↩]
Wow–how far has Fred fallen? Not that I am surprised… [↩]
Filed under: US Politics, 2008 Campaign | |
2 Comments »
On the ARG polls, I would say that one of them is rather unlikely. I do not have a lot of confidence in the ability of these polls to pick up the extent to which independents will choose to vote in one primary or the other. Many might wait till voting day to decide.

McCain and Obama have appeal to independents (earth-shattering contribution from MSS!), and so either of them could swamp his respective field. I would expect that to be Obama, and the projected lead for McCain thus to be a bit exaggerated.

As I always say, I do not make predictions, and they would be useless if I made them. BUT… I would not be at all surprised to see Obama 10-15 points ahead once the actual votes are known.

Comment by MSS — Sunday, January 6, 2008 @ 11:41 am

I believe the polls are certainly a bit incorrect on the Republican side. Mitt Romney demonstrated his intelligence and ability to get his point accross in a professional manner during last evenings debate. Everywhere I have been today, people are talking about how last night’s debate turned them totally against the Republican candidates who turned on Romney…especially McCain. Their snipping at Romney showed how frightened they are of his electability. I had been a long term Democrat and switched to an independant over the past decade. I certainly will vote for Mitt Romney…he is the best chance we have as a country to succeed economically, remain safe by securing our boarders as well as changing Washington away from the special interest groups. If we want tax cuts, a stable ecomomy , and our freedom, Mitt Romney is the main to lead our country!

1/6/2008

Two days before voters go to the polls in the New Hampshire Primaries, Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are in a statistical tie, according to a 7NEWS/Suffolk University tracking poll released this morning. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney and John McCain are deadlocked in the Republican Primary.

In the Democratic Primary, Clinton (35 percent) leads Obama (33 percent), John Edwards (14 percent), Bill Richardson (5 percent), Dennis Kucinich (1 percent) and Mike Gravel (1 percent). Eleven percent were undecided.

Steady gain for Obama
“Barack Obama has cut a seventeen-point deficit to just two points today,” said David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center. “He’s done this in four days with no sign of a slowing trend.”

Edwards remains viable at 14 percent, which is helping Clinton maintain a slight edge. However, if in the last 48 hours Edwards voters choose one of the top two candidates, survey research suggests that Edwards’ demographics already are predisposed to rotating to Obama.

Also, among likely voters ages 18-35, Obama extended his lead over Clinton to a whopping 51-percent-to-26-percent margin, compared to the previous tracking, where he led Clinton 44 percent-to-31 percent.

Ron Paul passes Huckabee
In the Republican Primary, the 7NEWS/Suffolk University poll shows Romney (30 percent) leading McCain (27 percent), followed by Rudy Giuliani (10 percent), Ron Paul (9 percent), Mike Huckabee (7 percent), Fred Thompson (2 percent) and Duncan Hunter (1 percent). Twelve percent were undecided. Paul is now polling ahead of Iowa Caucus winner Huckabee.

“Ron Paul could be to Mitt Romney what Ralph Nader was to Al Gore – a spoiler. He seems to be the repository of the disaffected, anti-establishment, libertarian-leaning conservative wing of the Republican Party,” said Paleologos.

Paul’s 16 percent showing among voters ages 18-35 is taking votes away from Romney, who leads McCain (29 percent-to-21 percent) in that category.

Romney continued to lead McCain in both Massachusetts bordering counties: Hillsborough (38 percent-to-23 percent) and Rockingham (35 percent-to-22 percent). These two counties account for more than half of the expected likely votes cast in the Republican Primary. McCain led Romney in the remaining eight smaller counties.

Methodology
The poll released today is the sixth in a series of daily tracking polls conducted by 7NEWS/Suffolk University leading up to the Jan. 8 Primary. Each poll consists of 250 likely voters statewide each day from the Democratic and Republican Primaries. A two-day rolling average of 500 Democrats and 500 Republicans is reported every morning at 9 a.m. on “7NEWS Today in New England.”

Suffolk University Adjunct Professor David Paleologos is available all week in Manchester, N.H., to comment on the latest trends and demographics and to offer political analysis. He may be reached at 781-290-9310 or 646-228-4448.

The 7NEWS-Suffolk University tracking poll was conducted Jan. 4 and Jan. 5. The margin of error for each party subsample of 500 respondents is +/- 4.38 percent at a 95 percent level of confidence. The 1,000-respondent margin of error is +/- 3.10 percent. All respondents were likely voters for the respective New Hampshire presidential primaries on Jan. 8, 2008. Charts, marginals and 54 pages of cross-tabulation data will be posted on the Suffolk University Political Research Center Web site on Jan. 6, 2008.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike Warzlow, Las Vegas, NV — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:21:46 GMT

Some of our best Presidents did not have experience when they took office. A vote for Obama is an investment in our future and it is worth the risk.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Natalie Rosen, Framingham, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:22:23 GMT

Romney is the biggest fraud since Enron. A friend of mine told me that she marched in a gay pride parade and there was Mitt trying to secure the gay vote. MMMM that's weird from a man who has changed SO dramatically on that issue. Oh yes, he also adamantly once upon a time running for Massachusetts governor supported a woman's right to chose abortion. Oh yes, he even hired illegal aliens even WHEN he had already been exposed for using them. He I guess "forgot" to fire them. Oh yes, then there is the Big Dig or as I like to call it the "Big Pig" because of its huge cost overruns and shoddy workmanship ... SO shoddy that a woman died when concrete paneling fell due to bad glue -- on Mitt Romney's watch. He was mad as a hornet alright. Do you think he was mad and sad that a person died...I say uh uh no way. I say he was furious because it made him look VERY bad because it came at the very beginning of his run for the presidency. He's a fraud and a phony and does not deserve to shine John McCain's shoes, a man who REALLY did serve and whose sons are serving as I write this. Ooops, I forgot what about Romney's sons? Aren't they serving in the armed forces? "Sure" says Mitt "they are serving because they are working for me." How's that for near blasphemy. I rest my case!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mike Maine — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:22:40 GMT

Hillary no way the poles show her 25 obama 45 hows that for a poll taker.....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Am I missing something? Sacramento, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:22:46 GMT

John McCain is a good man. But for President? Come on, do we really want to elect a military-driven hawk who prides himself on not changing his positions? Don't we have one of those in office already?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

pat white, silver city, new mexico — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:23:23 GMT

Of course, experience matters! Remember, we have endured a president for 7 years who had no experience of any importance prior to being appointed president. We have endured...but, I'm not sure we have survived. I believe any Democrat elected would do everything possible to change these 2 terms. I also believe someone with experience would be more effective at accomplishing this. Obama is an admirable, charasmatic young man, but Hillary's work in the U.S. Senate has proven that she is a devoted, hardworking and knowledgable candidate. The tragic condition our country is in today needs someone with experience and political instinct to lead us back to the days of being a world power.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jennifer Baum, St. Paul, MN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:23:41 GMT

Did I watch the same debate as New Hampshire? I thought Clinton trumped everyone in this debate hands down. Edwards' comment about the status quo COULD have been a put down if it weren't for Clinton's sharp comeback. She made it perfectly clear that she won't be any status quo. As for HER attack on Obama, which NO ONE IS TALKING about, she asked what he means by change and he never really answered. He just repeated his series of platitudes and generalities. Either he is hiding what his perceived "changes" are all about or he doesn't have a clear idea himself. We elected Bush into office, we'll elect Obama b/c "we can have a beer with him." Come on people!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Todd — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:25:03 GMT

I am a die hard republican however am leaning toweards Obama if he is nominated for the democrats nominee. What I would like to see is a huckabee against Obama race... that would be a good presidential race. In my mind Hillary is very crooked and people know it. If she is the nominee for the dems then people will flock to the republicans because of her dirty politics. Already she runs a negative campaign (which is not change that she talks about) Lets talk change people you need a leader that the country can follow not one who will tear apart the country like Billary...She has no experience anyways... can i say that my 20 years in the armed forces is foreign policy experience since I went to lots of countries... thats creative resume writing I think..

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

dontfearchange — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:25:30 GMT

of course, the real problem with the Democratic side of the debate was that Not all of the Candidates were there. in ABC's infinite wisdom (or perhaps there desire to control who we get to vote for)they decided not to let the only true Democrat and progressive thinker participate. Now i for one like to have options and like to listen to folks debate. Last night was no debate, more of an infomercial for four propective candidates. more of not really saying anything about THE ISSUES!!!! American's wake up and speak out. NO ONE should be excluded from a televised debate, if they are running for the highest office in the land. Hillary will keep us in a never ending grab for oil, same with Barrack, Edwards is pretty convincing for a multimillionaire, (how much did you make from wall st. this year John?)And Richardson's was a regular guy i really liked but beyond diplomacy (we could really use some of that) i was left wondering what else does he have to offer, what new, what really makes any of these candidates different from each other. NOT MUCH> On the Repulican side at least they included Ron Paul the only one of them to really address change. I have an idea Ron Paul and Dennis Kuchinich run together! Lol! Talk about mixing things up!
NOW please allow US CITIZENS to hear from all the candidates! Corporate media is controlling yet another electoral process and we are allowing it. America the worlds most spoiled and apathetic country.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marvin R. Z. GIbson — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:25:41 GMT

While I support Obama's race to the White House I'm afraid for him because I believe he's placing himself and his family in danger of getting a "white bullet" if his candidacy grows too strong particularly if prejudice "White America" sees him as a real election threat - a BLACK man leading the WHITE House.

I don't think Obama will be successful in the New Hampshire primaries but his win in Iowa was good. Clinton needed a wake up call to remind her that she is not as unstoppable as she thinks and this election whipping from Obama did the trick.

It was good to see new options in a presidential race, i.e. an African-American (Obama) and a woman (Clinton), instead of the normal lineup of old white men that had become so traditional.

White America, however, will not allow a black man to win over a white man and a white woman to lead in the WHITE House. Obama and Hillary will be defeated and John Edwards will most likely (considering Richardson here) be the candidate to represent the Democratic Presidential hope in November 2008.

It will be interesting to see who Edwards selects as his Vice. If Clinton does, by chance, fall into victory, it would be interesting to see who she selects as her running mate; I don't think Obama will even be considered.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Opara Micheal,Houston,Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:26:33 GMT

I believe that we as a nation should stand for change.And change is not easy if you do not have the experience to know how to go about it.When we say change we should know what was wrong and realistically have the armor to correct those wrongs and get on the path going forward.Our duty is to correct our previous mistakes and choose that someone who has the knowhow,the weapons and the desire to do the right thing.We know the right person for this job so let's all stop misleading ourselves and do the right thing.I admire Obama but Clinton is the right choice for here and now.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

harl boisvert — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:26:42 GMT

hillary has to win beacuse she has her husband to help her and she is a true fighter

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim, Santa Cruz — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:27:33 GMT

I believe that Hilary is best suited to serve America as a senator from New York. The democrat contest should be between Obama and Edwards, with perhaps both of them on the ticket. If the democrats can stay focused on defeating republicans, then there will be real positive changes come 2009. The huge turnout for democrats in Iowa is clearly a sign that the republicans are in deep. Huckabee seems to be the only republican who has figured it out.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Peter, Maine — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:28:02 GMT

Susan, Hubbardston;
Dear I'm afraid that it is you who needs to open your eyes. There is a big difference between changing your position, as McCain did on immigration, because the public whom he serves convinced him what they believe, and the flip flop style that Romney displays, changing his stance on so many issues just to remain popular. It shows the willingness of McCain to actually listen to the public that he serves, rather than try to buy or bs the public for ones own gain, such as it SEEMS Romney does. And MA is better off now? With mandated health care coverage?! Fines if you dont get coverage?! If one cant afford health insurance in lui of food on the table, how in the world will they be able to pay the fines levied against them?! Mandated health care is a disaster. Should the government step in and pay my medical bills? I think they should. should the rich get discounts for premiums, or be offered sample medications for free? no. Mitt Romney? NO.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marvin R. Z. GIbson — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:28:02 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ben Mehaffey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:28:29 GMT

As a long time conservative i am delited to see support for Clinton. She will bring out the conservative vote like no other candidate. I hope that she wins NH and continues the democratic momentum caused by GW's unpopularity.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

t s porter reno nevada — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:29:30 GMT

I found it hilarious how people keep talking about obama lack of experience when they say hilary has it.
Being wife of a governor and president is not experience. When will hilary learn to talk about her own experience instaed of trying to claim experience she does not have. Wise up to the truth. If you count obamas experience on the national and state level he has more experience than Hilary. I am getting sick of her lying about it. Enough of this I have to leave now to go out in the snow to canvass for obama to win the nevada democratic caucus on the 19th of january. Go obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Merrill Mcfayden, Gregory, SDakota — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:29:35 GMT

John Edwards defending Obama looks like he is covering his tracks and hopes at the very least to be a vice president contender for him. Gets tiresome watching them take shots a Clinton. She has my vote if for no other reason they dont leave her alone and stick with the issues.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Linda — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:31:43 GMT

Hillary is scary. She made that clear last night when it appeared as though she would eat one of her competition when they asked her a certain question which obviously got under her skin. Very scary indeed.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Josh, East Lansing, MI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:32:15 GMT

First, I disagree that Romney will be done for if he doesn't win NH. Michigan is coming up very soon where his father was governor.

I was really puzzled by Huckabee's 'preventative health care plan'. It would sure be great if we could do what he described (ie preemptively cure chronic disease) but I don't know what kind of government policy could do that...do we ban fast-food and mandate exercise for every American?? High ideals are great, but if they can't be transformed into a policy then it is just chaff in the wind.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mindy Lacrose, St. Louis, MO — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:32:15 GMT

Tirado,
I'm still trying to decide between Hillary and Obama. What racial comments did his wife make several months ago? I had not heard of any comments but I would like to know what they were before I decide who to vote for. I know there has been a lot of talk about African Americans supporting Obama however several black friends of mine stated they are split. Most of them like Hillary because of Bill. Some of them don't like Obama due to the fact that he was raised by his white mother/grandparents and they don't feel he has anything culturally in common with them. This small sample shows how you can't count on the blacks to support Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J. Bapties, Lawndale, Ca. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:32:34 GMT

It seems that most people have forgotten the un-American things that Hillary was involved in during her younger years. Even in NY this hasn't surfaced because of the political blinders that the NY establishment uses to control their population. Please be warned she it still with Slick Willy, NY. Arkansas hasn't forgotten about their nickname for Bill, Slick Willy, this is why they moved to NY… Now getting back to Hillary's experience, Hillary and three people boiled hot water a then poured it over a man's head that they thought was a CIA spy. They thought that was trying to infiltrate their organization of un-American activist. Believe me, she has experience on how to change our free and democratic government. Thank God that the American public, especially the voters of America, can see this in Hillary's eyes. She is not for the change that will be best for America. The changes Hillary will make could be the downfall of our system of government. Oh God, please be a careful voter of America

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:33:20 GMT

When asked to name an accomplishment from his years from the senate, Mr. Edwards could only name a failure. Pathetic.
While other posters have made a valid point in that Hillary cannot boast 35 years of experience, she has fought for liberal causes for over 35 years. Instead of engaging in traditional Republican tactics by questioning her donor list, let's take a comparative glance at the relative records of Obama, Edwards, and Clinton. What change initiatives has Obama led? What legislation has he written? What negotiations has he brokered? His colleagues in the Senate have called him a media hack. While other senators (Clinton) are in back-room negotiations and are reading information Obama is in front of the cameras.
Hillary embodies change. How many elections will it take for voters to learn that promises of change rarely result in change.
I don't understand how 15% of New Hampshire voters think that Obama is more experienced than Clinton.

Josiah Bartlett, Miami, Florida (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:46 PM)
-------------------

Hysterical, like your name. "A media hack"? Riiiiiight. Clinton is brokering legislation with Republicans? She must be in that back room talking to herself. No Republican in their right mind who wants to keep their seat will work with anyone named Clinton. Obama's name has appeared as co-sponsor of bi-partisan legislation. I'm not seeing anywhere that that is true with Clinton. He can work across the aisle. Clinton can't. She is not anyone, given her last name alone, that Republicans will work with. We don't need that crap any longer in Congress. The Republican minority would pull any legislative trick they possibly can to stifle anything she attempts to do while in office until the day they can, and likely would, regain the majority. It'd be Bill Clinton 1994 all over again.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Russ T. Hutchins — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:33:29 GMT

What is Senator Obama's platform on Public Education?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mark vancouver Wa. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:33:30 GMT

why is everybody so gung ho about obama I want to see his track record before I make a stupid decision man

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Liam — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:35:13 GMT

Regarding the EXPERIENCE debate among the democratic candidates, it is critical to set the record straight:
Clinton (and even Edwards) have consistently accused Obama as lacking “experience”. This is one issue where we can actually fact check, unlike many politically charged accusations that are hard to prove/disprove. I believe there is very little merit, on both a technical and conceptual level, to the claim that Obama lacks experience.

Technical

* Obama served 8 years in State government (Illinois state Senator), and been in the U.S. Senate for 3 years.
* Hillary Clinton has served 7 years in the U.S Senate, and has no prior experience in elected office.
* John Edwards served 6 years in the U.S Senate, and has no other experience in elected office.
*Bill Clinton served in State Government for 10 years (Arkansas Governor), and served ZERO years in national government.

Numerically, Bill Clinton had less experience in government than Obama. More importantly, Bill Clinton had ZERO foreign policy experience. John Edwards has less experience in elected office than any candidate running for president. The key point is that Obama's 8 years in the Illinois Senate have been completely overlooked, and warrant equal comparison to Bill Clinton’s only experience before he became president, which was also in state government for a very small/insignificant state with no major cities (Arkansas).
Hillary Clinton has consistently referred to her experience as first lady. Two problems: 1.) she was not an elected or appointed official accountable to voters, and for those of us that believe in democratically elected leaders, her claims of being "deeply involved and hands on" during Bill Clinton's administration should be viewed as problematic. The inherent problems related to not being an elected official but claiming to be deeply involved in Bill Clinton's administration is illustrated through the lack of paper trail detailing exactly what she did and in what areas/issues during his 8 years in office.2.) The evidence which has been pieced together through testimony of former Clinton officials shows that Hillary has greatly exaggerated her involvement in policymaking. The following article details the nature of Clinton’s experience as first lady: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22395503/

Overall, it is unprecedented for a candidate to claim they have experience at the highest level of government despite not being an elected or appointed official (aside from her healthcare failure in which she was appointed to a commission). Being a First lady, no matter how politically active, is not the same as being Secretary of State or National Security Advisor. For Clinton to portray her time as first lady as equivalent to being an official in the white house is not just a stretch, it’s disingenuous and undemocratic. Laura Bush for Pres?

Obama is the most well rounded of all candidates. Aside from his 11 years serving in legislatures, for many years he was a community organizer in Harlem and South Chicago (actually working with real people at a grassroots level, something Hillary has never done), a civil rights lawyer, and a law professor at the University of Chicago law school. Compare Obama’s current experience (age 46) to Bill Clinton’s when he first ran in 1992 (age 42), in which he was accused of not having enough experience, given that he had only served as governor of a tiny state and had no foreign policy experience. Clinton argued that a candidate can “have the right kind of experience or the wrong kind of experience. Obama has also used Clinton’s quote from 1992: “The people of America recognize that there are other measures of leadership and there are other measures of experience than simply having been in Washington. And so my experience is rooted in the real lives of real people, and I will bring real results if Americans have courage to change.”

Experience doesn’t equal good judgment—Cheney and Rumsfeld each had 35 years of “experience” in Washington, and this hasn’t led to good judgment.
Among all the major candidates, who got the single most important foreign policy decision of the last 30 years right? Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Aminah Yaquin Carroll, Gallipolis Ferry, West Virginia — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:35:33 GMT

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303303.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Here 's the FACTUAL answer on experience by Charles Peters from the Washington Post. Menawhile Billary's experience is in posturing, making promises s/he doesn't keep, covering up and deceiving, scamming in Whitwater savings and loans fraud, ruthlessness to override dissent and independent views, the stifling of democracy and destruction of our nation's social net, selling out state secrets to China...with that kind of experience why would the American people want Billary II?

Go Obama and may the force be with you. By the way it is only the rich over 50s who support Clinton I am one of those who was ruined by Clinton's dreadful capitulations to corporate entitlement and wealthy political placation at the expense of disenfranchisement and lifetime indebtedness for the working poor.i am a public servant whose toehold in the middle class has been destroyed by Billary I.

we need an honest and courageous leader who can unite USA for the common good, so we all win, not just the rich plutocrats.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

pasteeater, Orlando, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:35:34 GMT

I really enjoyed the debates last night. Even though on the rebublican side not much was really said. McCain tried once in awhile but did not assert himself. Rudy can only say 9-11 knowing the fear factor is the only thing that can get him elected. Thompson handled himself well like the a kindly old gentlman but no substance... kinda like the free market is everything so there is no work to do. Whatever happened to the politicians from Mass. Kennedys and Oneils? Romney reminds me of a republican John Kerry. his health care plan would not force people to get health care if they made enough but if they went to the hosital they would have to pay.. thats fine but what if they had serious bills would he just let them die.. He wants to improve health care, increase military, better education, and lower taxes. he will say anything to get elected. he seems to like the drug companies look at his life and how he thinks everything is a business... He doesnt even know what the middle class is much less care about them. Ron Paul was... well Ron Paul. Huckabee tried and made a few good remarks... I'm glad McCain has gained in the polls.

The Dems had a much better showing. Maybe because only 4 debated.. My opinion of all went up. wasnt overly impressed with Clinton. she even acts old establishment. Obama handled himself well, Richardson showed he had some intelligence. I didnt like when Edwards attacked Clinton and alighned himself with Obama.. I can see why he wants to because he's looking to the future but I still didnt like it.. But for now everything remains the same with me.. I would like to see McCain vs Edwards

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

polgirl Columbus, Ohio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:36:11 GMT

Hillary's message to voters last night in the debate was that we should check out and know the records of each candidate and not be caught up solely in the rhetoric. So, what is Hillary's 35 years of experience. She was the first STUDENT ever at Wellesley College to give a commencement speech and it was a speech directed squarely, in part, against the Viet Nam war. She graduated at or near the top of her law school class at Harvard when very few women were even accepted to Harvard Law. Soon after she graduated from Harvard law she found herself working for the Democrats in Washington who were involved in the investigation of Nixon for potential impeachment purposes after Watergate. After she married Bill Clinton and became First Lady of Arkansas, she was actively involved in developing and helping to pass State legislation having to do with health insurance for children and better educational resources for special needs children. While in the White house as First Lady , she continued her work for children in this country and in third world countries. She was a first hand witness to the tensions and demands hoisted on a daily basis upon the President. She travelled all over the world, personally knows most of the leaders of the countries in this world and has an excellent reputation worldwide that can only help her as President. I hear people and pundits say: Oh, but she didn't even have security clearance. Can you imagine the bad press she and Bill Clinton would have received if she were given such clearance.She then had a pretty tough race the first time she ran for Senator from New York State, especially in upstate New York which is overwhelmingly Republican. Yet,once in the Senate, her ability to work in a bipartisan way with the republicans in congress, her developing significant relationships with the military leaders ( something a new President must have), her advancement of the S-Chip insurance for our children, etc. so impressed New Yorkers from all over the State of New York, that her second run for NY Senator was accomplished with ease. I find it hard to understand why it is that this country is so taken with candidates who have virtually no experience in getting things done in Washington but rally around such candidate, apparently because they are "likeable" , they say they can "change" it all, and can say some inspiring words yet do not have any record to speak about that will make them accomplish changes in Washington. If you haven't lived the system and you don't even know how it works, but just criticize it, how do you know what to change , and more importantly, how do you go about making the change? I say: Hillary for President. But, as happened in 2000 and 2004, we will probably get the president we deserve; someone we'd like to have a beer with.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Anthony, New jersey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:36:44 GMT

This is what I think should happen. I think that if Hillary wins the nomination ,then she should ask Obama to be her running mate and if Obama wins then he should ask Hillary to be his running mate. It's a win-win situation for the democrats. They get both experience with Hillary and "change" with Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J Offman — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:37:22 GMT

Why have a blog, it's sensored anyway. You all know that the nigger is gonna win and he'll be riding a wave on the biggest recession and the start of the biggest race riot in history. By the time he's done the country will be so destroyed, no one will want to be an american. This is our end.
Sensor this, but it's the truth. The end is here.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Isadore Boni, Phoenix, Arizona — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:37:45 GMT

As a San Carlos Apache living with AIDS, I went from being rejected and ostracized from my own family and tribe. To make matters worse, funding was cut during the past 5 years since my diagnosis. I was never into politics due to the lack of broken treaties done by the "dominant culture". I have faith that Clinton will help people in our country who have been overlooked for the past few centuries when WE discovered Columbus.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

No Puppet To The Media, Murfreesboro, Tennessee — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:38:38 GMT

To Sarah in Virginia concering your comment on how great Lincoln was with little experience....Yeah he was so great he put the country in Civil War and turned out to be the president that developed the income tax and the only president to raise an army to destroy a portion of his own country. Not even Bush has done that....Yet.
To Andy in Baton Rouge...it's borders man...borders not boarders, unless you are really unhappy with a renter or something.
Hey is it just me or does Romney look and act like he is really a cyborg? I keep expecting the Governator to show up.
Huckabee cannot be against gay people...I recently saw a picture of him and Chuck Norris titled "Huck and Chuck", now how gay is that?

Fred Dalton Thompson for President "08"

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:39:29 GMT

Looks like media is on its mission to crown BO the democratic candidate without examining his stands on multiple issues including some (when he was in illinois house where he was afraid to take any stand). play fair to edward and clinton.

Voter from Illinois (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:57 PM)
----------------

Really? I believe they have dissected his record very well. They have dissected his personal life and his life prior to his public service both in Illinois and Washington very well. You Clinton fans just can't admit that there isn't anything there to throw mud at. Give it a rest already. Clinton is getting desperate and angry while Obama AND Edwards are calm and composed and able to articulate themselves clearly and effectively.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ed Mears — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:39:48 GMT

I continue to be amazed that people refer to Clinton's "experience". She is no more experienced than the others and much less so than Richardson. Besides being US senator for 8 years her only experience is being the President's wife. She has his political organization working for her but please give the experience talk a "reality break", as the senator calls it.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ron Doss, Alamogordo, NM — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:39:50 GMT

I'm not really happy with the field in either party this election year, but of those remaining, I prefer John Edwards. People deliberately misinterpret his anger or his passion. It's not directed at politicians but at those greedy corporations that have a stranglehold on our democracy. I don't see Edwards as a divider in politics, but he would anger or frighten the moneyed "powers that be." Republicans like to sneer about "class warfare" and such, but government has been for hire by the rich during this administration. Gigantic rebates to big corporations his first year in office, tax cuts that benefited the wealthy far more than the scraps thrown to the working Americans...this has been the class warfare, and the Republicans have thrown the gauntlet down, but the electorate is too befogged by all the emotional and irrelevant "value" issues that they love to hide their chicanery behind. It is "us versus them," unfortunately, the "us" being those of us who have to work for a living, and the "them" being comprised of wealthy heirs, CEOs who get millions when their corporations lose money for the stockholders, and all those who look down their noses from their Olympian heights at people who enable them to enjoy their idle lifestyles.

Take off their masks and see who is really running this country. It's not "the people" as envisioned by Jefferson and Jackson, but the luxuriating conservatives at the top of our economic heap. John Edwards is the only person who's telling it like it is, and for that he's ignored by a captive media.

I have no dislike of Hillary, but she shows a mean streak against her opponents, despite her calculatingly girlish smile at times, and she doesn't seem willing to sever her ties with the corporations and the special interest groups that don't help me or you.

McCain would've gotten my vote at one time, but after seeing him campaign for George W. Bush, his independent credentials have been consigned to the sewer. The Republican debate I saw was largely focussed on immigration and little else, which is another red flag issue to distract voters while they pick their pockets to please their wealthy backers. They should be consigned to the dismal minority status they've historically had.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott, Portage, IN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:41:15 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

alex — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:42:07 GMT

Hillary = Dukakis = Mondale = Gore = Kerry

Obama = JFK. Obama is actually liked by Republicans who don't want him to vote. He's a uniter after 20 years of continuous Bush-Clinton depressing politics. He will trounce any Rebublican in a general election and will turn out to be a very good president. Are you people so biased for Hillary that you're not even listening to the man speak? He is clearly the most in touch on policy with regards to American public. He was the ONLY ONE smart enough to call the insanity of Iraq ware BEFORE the invasion when 80% of the country and many Democrats were all for it. Unlike Hillary who has been so wrong on so many things he is always right on target. Hillary and Edwards were wild banshees while Obama stayed right on message and did great putting HIllary in her place when she tried tired old attacks people are sick of. You people comparing Obama to George Bush is beyond outrageous. Hillary is part of the problem and no type of solution. She's resorting to Dick Cheney/Karl Rove tactics "fear the terrorists with young president" nonsense now that she has clearly fallen behind. She's desperate and should just bow out graciously because the she's getting bounced...thankfully. She should have been happy with being the senator from NY.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ogdeeds — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:43:11 GMT

Tim, great post and so true! thanks for doing the media's job who are suppose to be vetting the candidates for us. instead, they have been sucked into their own hype about obama rather than see what he is really made of. as usual, they give little or no credit to hillary's superb performance and knowledge of the details, not to mention the details of how she is going to get things done.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Whosure, Indianapolis Ind. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:43:14 GMT

It's ALWAYS, something or someone against Billary.

Give it a rest lady. Your just now seeing real people in America finally getting their chance to react to you. You carpet bagged your way into N.Y.(once read where that state was like a prostitue to you) and now that you get to see America's reaction to you it causes your claws to come out.

Richardson shame is not enough 'money' to get noticed. Edwards has baggage from '04. Don't let this 'young' vote from pundits change your mind. I was the first 18 yr old to vote and shocking "Nixon Won' Then I thought at the time, some day we will be in office and the machine placed a Bush run by Chenney/Wove.

I don't want a wimp like the Viet Vet in there. I don't want a pothead like Osama either. AND I don't want my vote wasted. Maybe Another Actor to fool us all, again? So again, I'm left with voting for the bottom of the barrel like always.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Josh, East Lansing, MI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:44:54 GMT

My impression from the GOP debate was that Romney was the most knowledgable of both his and the other candidates positions HANDS DOWN. I think that Huckabee is probably the most polite of the GOP candidates, and I am impressed with his demeanor--but not with his thoroughness.

The other candidates seem to gang up on Romney because they are afraid of him. I think he would decimate any of them in a 1 on 1 debate. I would like to see the GOP field narrow a bit more (Romney, McCain) so that the issues can be discussed in greater depth.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim, Santa Cruz — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:45:06 GMT

J Offman - you are a fine example of what we have to change in America through a better educational system.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mike payne, harrisonburg, va — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:45:23 GMT

Anyone, and/or anything would be better than the Hil-da-beast Clin-toon. If America votes for her I can guarentee you will get just what you need and deserve. And - that is not a good thing. I hope you get from this that she is obvious, and two faced. And thank you to MSN for letting us comment.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John M. , Manchester, New Hampshire — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:46:45 GMT

Concerning the debate; Hillary looked weak and avoided questions, Edwards was good, but Americans are tired of angry politics, we want to come together to find solutions not beat each other up, Obama looked calm, presidential, and ready for the task. Before the debate I was undecided, but now I support Obama. Also, I believe that he is the most electable. I recently spent some time over the holidays visiting family in Illinois. I was shocked to see the strong support he has there. Democrats and Republicans alike were planning on voting for him. Not to degrade those in rural areas, but I was talking to this guy in Southern Illinois. He was what you would call your stereotypical "hick" (Beat up pick up truck, Bush / Cheney sticker on back)I asked him who he was supporting because I wanted to get a pulse on the republican race. Yet, when he responded he said, "I'm voting for Obama". I was shocked! Obama has the best chance at winning the general and the best chance of brining this country together. I can see a new era over the horizon and I won't turn back now.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

DW — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:47:05 GMT

concerned Citizen I don't know what debate you watched last night - but Hillary was not great she was just I, I, I, which can not make a change. Now you not being able to stand Obama's voice - You need to pray about your own racial issues.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Wendi, Watertown, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:47:13 GMT

I loved last night's debate. I'm a Republican, but I'll tell you that Obama was the only one up there that I'd follow with loyalty into a war. He has the calm, soothing presence that a leader needs. He's tactful and not condescending. Hillary, however, needs to leave my state and the run for office. She's a carpetbagger who wants more facetime.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dave Phoenix — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:49:26 GMT

Backing Obama is a mistake. Experience is needed.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Upset Older Woman, Charlotte, North Carolina — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:50:20 GMT

Not all older women are for Hillary! A woman president, a black president, a jewish president, it does not matter to me. What matters is a person who can do the job and people can trust. From the 1st months of Bill's presidency, when Hillary was acting like she was the president, I have had no regard for her, and she has done nothing in all these years to make me like her any more. And, no, I am not jealous--I am a highly educated, successful wife, mother, and grandmother--almost 60. I have a huge distrust and dislike of Hillary, and resent being lumped in the group of people--older women--who support Hillary.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Steve, New Hampshire — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:50:47 GMT

First, Edwards sounded as though he is looking to be second seat to Obama. Second, you can bash Hillary all day about her experience, what has your candidate done? Edwards has made a career as an ambulance chaser. What has Obama done since being in the senate? The answer is little. Obama's position that he was the only one saying that he was against the Iraq war from the beginning is simple false. In his speech to the national convention in 2004 he said that he didn't know which way he would have voted.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

salvatore sauro,montreal,quebec — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:50:52 GMT

As a Canadian I think change is good . It's time for Americans to tell the Clinton's and the Bush's to move over and let some fresh ideas lead America into the 21st century.
Learn from Canada,we elected a new prime minister and our economy is stronger than ever and a high Canadian dollar , the likes of which haven't been seen since 1976.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John Doe, Los Angeles, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:51:28 GMT

There are 3 fundimental issues here first and foremost is the murder of innocent lives called abortion. Second is the redefinition of marraige which also lumps into the sodomite agenda. The third is WINNING the war in Iraq. All these dumb liberals who are looking toward either chick or a muslim to lead us need to grow a brain and wake up! The Republicans don't really have a clear choice either but I do see McCain who is a true blue Patriot being able to stand up and lead us to victory in Iraq how he stands on the first 2 issues is not so clear. I like Huckabee because he's a Christian like me but I'm not sure of his ability to lead.

Remember don't be fooled Obama is a Muslim period that should disqualify him right there and then there is the Hillary what a joke a woman leader!!! American has fallen asleep and seems shes having a hard time waking up and pray to our Lord to forgive us for all of ungodliness!!! We need to get bak to our roots!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Don Perreira, SF — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:51:44 GMT

At a debate at Drexel University in Philadelphia on October 30, 2007, Clinton committed to support of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Two minutes later, she recanted the position and blamed the Bush administration for not passing immigration reform. The following day, she clarified her position in a prepared statement by coming out in support of Spitzer's bill. Two weeks later, after Spitzer abandoned the plan due to widespread opposition, Clinton reversed her position on the issue once again, stating: "I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal. As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system." At a University of Nevada, Las Vegas debate on November 16, when asked again if she supported granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, she gave a one-word answer: "No."

Where does Clinton's alliance lie on any of the important issues? Do you realize that illegal immigration is costing our country $330 billion? Do you want this "pillow talk" qualified politician running our country?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RC Keith, Portland, OR — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:52:36 GMT

Has electing GW taught people in this country nothing? Experience counts and John Mccain is the most qualified candidate in either party, period. Foreign policy is a mess and the country is slipping into a recession, you don't want to elect some newbie one term wonders like Obama or Edwards thats for sure. Mitt? Come-on look at the state of MA, it's a mess. Hillary? Actually I would take her as my second choice based on experience. Yes she was only the second lady but don't discount having a two term president to advise and guide her that counts for a lot.

Experience people, figure it out.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

asalliman — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:53:37 GMT

Americans will make a big mistake if they make Obama their choice. It will be like WB.
The republicans will run over him in November.

Hillary is the best choice to get things done and balance budget

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rick Cain, Tulsa, OK — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:53:44 GMT

Has everybody forgotten that John McCain was one of the KEATING FIVE?

Integrity? Hah!

Ron Paul is the only GOP choice for the integrity voter.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

samuel, staten island, new york — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:54:36 GMT

Hilary, that your husband, while in bed, told you what he did in office as governor or as the president does not constitute experience.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott, lithonia, Ga. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:55:10 GMT

HUCKABEE SHOWS HIS TRUE COLORS. A TWO BIT POLITICIAN WHEN CHALLENGED BY A THREE DOLLAR BILL.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jeannine, kingston, ga — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:55:35 GMT

17 Obama, 16 Edwards, 15 Clinton
It's anyones win................

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim Harron — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:57:16 GMT

I LOVE WILL ROGERS! As he once said: "If you took all of Congress and put them in charge of General Motors, G.E. and AT&T, they would run them all out of business in three months." I agree, and therefore don't place much emphasis on "experience." My man is OBAMA. He is intelligent, knowledgeable, has charisma, makes more sense then any other candidate. Also, and most importantly, I believe hin to be HONEST!! An old Marine, Jim Harron

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mart — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:58:06 GMT

John Edwards will do well as president, and Hillery as the VP. John McCain wants to be president for himself. He has been playing both ends against the middle.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Santi, Margate, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:58:08 GMT

A victory by Obama seems to be conveniente to Republicans . They know that when this nation get to be faced with electing by racial divide, although the relative progress against racism, the majority will elect a "clean" white conservative. In few words: at the end it will be easier to defeat Obama than Hilary.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carl Common Sense — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:59:10 GMT

Arshad - ALL VERY good points... But also, Hilary doesn't even beat McCain or Giulian in a heads up presidential vote. The Republicians would LOVE to run against her - because 47% of the voters do not even like her! That is very important in a general election. How do you think George Bush got elected, he lost every debate, but people generally like him.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

worried, northern VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:59:52 GMT

I was so disgusted by the ridiculous immature bullying last night in the GOP debates. It was like watching my children fight before they were capable of winning with intelligent thoughts. I am for Mitt since he got into the race - as I want change as well (without losing integrity and becoming the welfare country the big government dems have pushed since the civil war)- someone who has shown being capable of winning over foes with intelligent informed proposals. I think integrity and commitment (doesn't a successful marriage/family matter anymore)are most important in the leader of the greatest country in the free world!

No one is perfect - I appreciate someone who can admit to changing their mind - who hasn't in their maturing process ????? We just don't however get assailed as flip flopping for it! I don't feel the way I did 30 years ago based in great part on my experiences as well as having to admit to myself that I was wrong before.

I have since I first was allowed the priviledge to vote always gone Republican in Pres elections as those candidates most followed what I wanted for myself and this country - I have always worked FOR those I supported but must say after last night I will do anything in my power to see to it that McCain nor Huckabee end up as one of my choices......so when it comes to VA I will absolutely work equally hard AGAINST those bullies! They were shameful and having seen their negativity first hand I want nothing to do with them.

I grew up in CA lest my current domicile lead some to feel I care about the civil war in that manner - lets work towards a better tomorrow for our children - have we learned nothing from those times that absolutely divided this country and killed more than all our foreign wars to date!

I work in international development and it is our failure to do as we say that confuses our friends and foes alike. We have priviledges won by patriots past and defended by lives of many today that are so meaningless when we don't avail ourselves of the most precious right we hold - the right to vote and speak our minds wihout fear of DEATH!

Change? How about we hear nothing out of the mouths of those who don't vote (you don't care so why do I have to listen to anything you say).

Why don't we really show change this election....could maybe 65% of those able to vote actually get off their duffs and do it!

Shame shame on all of us for getting to such a low spot....our patriots fought for better.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mart — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:00:28 GMT

John Edwards will do well as president, and Hillery as the VP. John McCain wants to be president for himself. He has been playing both ends against the middle.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Josh, East Lansing, MI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:00:42 GMT

Romney for healthcare--affordable for all without eliminating personal responsibility..Brilliant!!!

Let's get a business man with a time and again proven track record (1. numberless business ventures including Staples, Brookstone, Domino's Pizza, Sealy, and Sports Authority 2. 2002 Olympics 3. Massachussetts health care) A stronger Economy provides more goods and services for everyone on the whole. ELECT ROMNEY!! He will whip this nation's economy into shape.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

"Idaho Independent", Boise, Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:01:00 GMT

Romney was the ONLY one who had a clear plan for any of the issues. While the other GOP candidates talked ideas and principle, Romney was telling us how he is going to get it done! I believe the American public is smart enough to see past the rhetoric. McCain has been the "flip flopper" on campaign finance reform, immigration and other issues. Every single candidate has changed their position on one issue or another. It's been a label used against McCain that was particularly damaging and now he's trying to use it against someone else. I used to have great respect for Senator McCain. Romney has made a living and is an expert at taking faltering systems and making them productive. He needs to drive this fact home! It is what will make him the best suited for our President since we have many failing systems: Healthcare, Education, etc... Romney is the best Candidate and they all know it, hence the gang approach to the debate. I experience AND change are important. Romney's experience is exactly what is needed to make change.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Robert Katz, Stamford,CT — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:02:04 GMT

Edwards may have done well in the debate but the reality is he is going to finish third. The question is really is the United States better off today then it was 7 years ago. Outside of Obama the rest of the candidates are considered to be stale. Obama does generate excitement and he gets the most out of the younger voters who very well might determine the outcome. Giuliani is running a dumb campaign. He now concentrates on Florida while there is no one to run against. When the Republicans come to Florida and begin to dissect Giuliani apart about his relationship with Bernie Kerik and all the scandelous affairs that he and his wife have participated in people will conclude they do not want him as president.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tadii, Chicago, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:04:22 GMT

Obama for President. It is time for change. Hillary Clinton is the pea brain look at her failed effort for universal health care. It is time for a change, a real change people. Obama for President, he is universal!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Suzanne, Los Angeles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:04:23 GMT

Obama looked likeable but lite-weight to me during the debate. He looked like he was reviewing his notes on issues as they came up...like cramming for an exam. Edwards is the smooth trial lawyer, asking for "30 sec" and then going on and on. Hilary looked tired but serious. She seemed like the "teacher's pet" type well-informe and capable but not so approachable. I'll vote for Hillary. She does have the experience, no question. And she did engage in "change" with the healthcare reform attempts during the Clinton years. She was a change agent while Obama was still on his skateboard, practically. The Repubs talked about Pbama to give him a boost, they know they can beat him when the heat is really applied.
Just like the play-offs, people, it is experience and being able to execute down the stretch that counts.
However much we love the "rags to riches" stories, the Horatio Algers, the presidency is not the place for a rookie. rookies make rookie mistakes. Noew bck to football. Later.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Gary O'Brien, Kailua Kona, HI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:04:27 GMT

For Progressives, John Edwards is the only viable choice. He's intelligent and courageous. Don't let the corporate media regulate him to the wings because they are scared of his zeal to go after corrupt corporatations. Have you noticed how he is not getting equal time? They think he'll be too tough on them if he gets elected but his policies will actually promote the economy with jobs and revolutionary green technology advancements and good businesses with fair policies to promote workers and help families. Let's start talking about an Edwards/Obama ticket. Now that's a duo with electability and experience. And how about Bill Richardson as Secretary of State the experienced voice of calm diplomacy? They will temper one another and the brainpower and compassion between them will propel this country into a peaceful and prosperous future.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott, lithonia, Ga. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:06:18 GMT

Seems like Fred Thompson and Rudi aren't done but rather over-cooked and put in the garbage disposal.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

CN, Greenbay, WI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:09:34 GMT

Not one honest person in the bunch. Everyone of them would sell their souls to taste the power. VOTE NONE OF THE ABOVE!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mai, Placer County, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:11:20 GMT

Hillary Clinton can tout her "experienced" position, unfortunately it is only true that she has experience in cover ups, manipulation, and dirty politics. As a short time Senator, I do not have confidence in her ability to lead and direct this country. Obama has a every chance of being elected! Let Hillary change New York first!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jay Hill, Boston, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:12:34 GMT

sherry dupriest, cooper city, fl. (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:36 AM) wrote:
" why is obama so quick to bomb pakistan and talk peacfully to iran. i don' understand his thinking of the two different countries. i am concerned that we have already had two presidents, jimmy carter (hope)and bush (lets unite ) no experience and look where they took us. the young are impresionable but not nessessarly correct. we all were inspired as young people but our thought grew and changed as we matured."

Ms. Sherry - Obama is 100% right. Pakistan is the most dangerous nation with military, intelligence all taking American billions and aiding and abetting every terrorist on the earth. If you have some basic knowledge, you will realize this. Sept 11 and Bi n Laden are directly or indirectly the creation od Pakistanis. They are training so many terrorists in their camps even today who are ready to go and kill Americans and destroy America. Unfortunately George W Bush keeps sending billions to these ultra terrorists.
Obama is the only candidate who is speaking truth even with his limited experience. I hope you can do your research and figure this out.
Iran is bad country but they are not running terrorist camps to destroy America.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Barbara Schmidt Shawano, WI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:13:09 GMT

Hilary Clinton is not the what America needs in the White House. She talks of Health Care and what she has done although she failed miserably to do anything of consequence when she was given the opportunity during the Clinton era of the Presidency. Edwards is the best choice for the Presidency and deserves the chance to prove that. There is a time when a woman inevitably will become the President but I pray that it is not someone like Hilary. I believe that the debate clearly showed that she is not capable of resolving the many challenges that we are facing as a nation.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ron Doss, Alamogordo, NM — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:13:14 GMT

To Scott of Portage:

The government has gotten out of our way during the Bush years. The Katrina disaster was a perfect example of that. The trouble is, when the federal government is weakened by enormous tax cuts for those who don't need it, then when public services are wanted or needed there's little to be had, or it's grossly inefficient. Telling government to get of our way so you can do your thing is somewhat like the highwayman telling the sheriff to get out of his way and let him do what comes naturally to him. Capitalism does have to be restrained and regulated else it naturally tends to excess, an excess which would eventually threaten its own existence. Capitalism is strongest when the public is protected from abuse, and who but the government can serve as protector? I'm a veteran and a senior and I always paid my own way, even to an undergraduate degree, and never even got a penny from Workers'Comp or Unemployment Compensation, but I'm glad those things are available to those who need them on a temporary basis. We've had nearly 8 years of Bush conservatism, and I hope to see this country turn around and be realistic and responsible before I die.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carrie, West Lafayette, IN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:13:36 GMT

I hate Edwards keep attacking Clinton too. Obama is a joke. He got to be elected to Illinois senator because his opponent is a jerk. He answer "present" to most of the proposals. People are believeing he can bring change, what wrong with these people! If Obama is elected, it is another Bush coming.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Susan, Hubbardston, MA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:14:06 GMT

Peter of Maine..
The poor are not mandated to buy in to health insurance..they are totally covered as they have always been. The mandated insurance has given a push to those qualified for free coverage to sign up, have insurance and stop using the ER! People's insurance premiums are based on their income. Those on welfare, disability, etc. do not pay, those whose income is just above the poverty level, may not pay pay at all either, or pay a few dollars.The small premium amount(if needed) is nothing compared to the cost of using an ER, having to pay full cost of prescriptions, but most importantly of all...preventive, health promotional health care is in place! People do not have to go without healthcare or choose between going to the doctor or eating. I am a RN, this insurance program has increased the medical care of children, adults and elders. What an improvement in the qulity of life!!
So, you see...you are the one who doesnot know what you are talking about. I like to think that you are misinformed as to how our health insurance works. I believe anyone who knows the facts of Romney's health insurance mandate would agree, it work very well.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Richard Sturgess, Savannah, GA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:14:56 GMT

SPEAKING OF ANGRY, HAS ANYONE NOTICED HOW ANGY CHRIS MATTHEWS GETS WHEN HE SPEAKS OF HILLARY CLINTON. YOU CAN SEE THE VEINS SWELL IN HIS THROAT! AND POOR ELIZABETH EDWARDS, MAKING SUCH AN ISSUE OF BEING 2ND IN IOWA WHEN HILLARY SCORED 1 MORE DELEGATE THAN JOHN. WE HAVE A VERY LONG WAY TO GO PEOPLE, AND IN CASE YOU ARE UNAWARE, THE CLINTON'S DO NOT GIVE UP WITHOUT A FIGHT! AS OF TODAY IT IS OBAMA 16, CLINTON 15, EDWARDS 14 AND WHO KNOWS WHAT TUESDAY WILL BRING! I DO HOWEVER BELIEVE THAT WHEN THE DUST SETTLES, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL ENBRACE HILLARY AS THEIR CANDIDATE. AND FURTHER, I WOULD IMAGINE THAT WE WILL SEE A CLINTON/OBAMA TICKET LATER THIS YEAR!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

KAYTE, MEMPHIS,TENNESSE — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:17:12 GMT

obama, osama sounds too much alike and im black. i dont like the fact that hes' a first generation american, his dad is kenyan, and as black woman i kn ow africans really donot like BLACK AMERICANS, I LIVE IN A COMMUNITY OF AFRICANS AND BLACKS AND THEY ARE VERY UNFREINDLY. IM GOING FOR HILARY. I WANT SOMEONE WHOSE PARENTS CAN TELL STORIES OF THEIR LIVES IN AMERICA NOT KENYA!!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ebkruger — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:19:35 GMT

If WI Gov. endorsed Obama, shame on him.. It is up to the people of WI to decide... NOT HIM.. The gang up by Edwards and Obama is just sickning.. Their anti-woman attitudes are showing..and it is not working for them whether we are 21 or 71..

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

David, Los Angeles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:19:44 GMT

I can't even watch Hillary anymore. I just skip the parts where she talks and only really bother to hear what Edwards, Obama, and Biden (before he dropped out) had to say.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

isabelcatherine — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:20:02 GMT

You can check out Obama at these to cites for more accurate information. Cut and paste the links below into your browser. The first site details his voting record and the other site focuses both on the biographical and political.

http://en.http://www.vote-

smart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Eric B — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:20:23 GMT

A relative of mine is a journalist in the quad cities. They told me that the Clinton's motorcade was used to try and keep Obama from being able to reach the airport to depart for NH. Why doesn't this kind of dirty trick get more press? I guess I should ask that of my relative.

Personally I'm voting for McCain but I'll take the corpse of Joe Stalin over Clinton.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RM, Massachusetts — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:21:18 GMT

Let's just be clear about one thing here: Many in the state of MA to the south do not consider mister Romney our favorite son. We tried it for six years, and it left a sour taste. We wanted changed and only got more rhetoric. He is not what this country needs.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

SadStateofAffairs — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:22:06 GMT

Tim of New York,

Well said. When the euphoria wears off, and we find ourselves with an inexperienced front runner, those who voted their hearts and not their minds will be scratching theirs heads and saying "Gosh darn it! Fooled AGAIN!"

Can't wait to see the headlines from the BBC. It will read something like this "How could 51% of Americans be so Dumb.......Part 2".

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joe Blow Average Texan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:22:24 GMT

Obama is a Fuggin self proclaimed muslim! what the hell is a east coast thinking??!! Look back 6 years ago in Chicago! what the heck! Now he says he is from the Church of Christ? Muslims believe that once you decry that you are Muslim if you ever denounce they put out a death warrant on you.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Toni Eder, Sharon Springs, KS — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:22:29 GMT

Seriously, if you're a voter and wanting change. Then Ron Paul is the only one you should be looking at and voting for. As Americans we are a people who say we love the constitution. Paul really does and his voting record reflects that. He tells the truth whether you want to hear or not. This country does need change. So the real questions becomes, is the U.S. constitution out of date? If it is, then look to all the media's choices. If it's not. Then you and the media better look long and hard to Ron Paul

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim Harron — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:24:13 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

K. Gilchrist, Greenville, TX — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:24:27 GMT

My question is: If hillary can not stand the heat now. How is she going to be able to stand up for the U.S.A. She is not supported by the military.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

nbctjon sfca — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:24:28 GMT

I keep hearing and reading about the 40 percent of NH voters who are listed as independant and can vote in either primary. How can the majority of these independants not go for Ron Paul instead of John McCain? How anyone can look at McCain as an independant is beyond me. He's been kissing Bushs' a**hole since 2000.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marcus Parrish, Salem, OR — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:26:36 GMT

This is historic for a number of reasons but one factor that my sound silly is "The American Idol" factor. People, mostly young, have been trained to vote and with such a dynamic contest going on, they are voting. They don't really need a compelling reason to choose a favorite. It's fun. It's cool. Other people who don't usually vote now also have many choices - the first woman or Mormon or black or hispanic or gay or mayor-to-president or oldest or elf or pastor-down-the street president ever! But who will win it all? It has to be Barack Obama because Hillary represents going backwards. Edwards is even tacitly supporting Obama by attacking Hillary. It's amazing. The Bushes and the Clintons are different sides of the same coin. That's why the Republicans want to run against Hillary. It would be their chance to get revenge and use ALL of their Bill material against her. Can you IMAGINE the ads!? They'd accuse her of harboring a terrorist in the White House! Because Obama will crush any of the Republicans for a similar reason, it doesn't even matter who wins the nomination. The Republicans need to appear as progressive as possible but that means, by definition, going against the Bush doctrine. This will alienate the 25-30% who adore Bush. They can't win by siding with Bush either. McCain is too old and looks it. Those sweaters aren't fooling anyone. Mormon CEO? Not gonna happen. Rudy? Nope. The whole "I'm not competing" strategy is stupid. Being the mayor of NYC on 9/11 isn't a qualification for anything. I would think that because of his war experience, McCain would be disgusted by the idea of killing people. Apparently not He's too old to learn. Simply put, the Republicans will crash and burn in 2008. And finally, I suspect that something lewd will be discovered about Huckabee. He just has that vibe. It could be the water in Hope.

Peace By 2010!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Very Concerned Independent, Detroit, MI — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:28:06 GMT

This is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us
here in our own United States...better heed this.

Who is Barack Obama?

Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita, Kansas.

Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocate to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a
Catholic school.

Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, "He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school."

Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical. They say Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best.

In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct
influence over his son's education.

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta. Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western w orld. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major
public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background.

ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran.

Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches.

Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.

The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rose, Knoxville, TN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:28:08 GMT

Well, I've read all the comments posted and it began to sound like the teachers and parents on the Charlie Brown specials. Wah, wah, wah, wah. My recommendation is to vote for the person you believe will get our country back on track. Democrat, Republican, we need a leader! Enough already!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ERIC HANASFIRTH — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:28:38 GMT

HOW SCARY IT IS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY IN SUCH AN IMBALANCE. LOOK AT ALL OF THE RUNNERS, WOOOOOWWWW! IF OBAMA WINS, HE'S LIKELY TO BE ASSASINATED BY SOME IDIOT AND THAT COULD JUST WELL BE THE SAME FOR HILARY, DEMOCRATICALLY SPEAKING, OBAMA THE SO CALLED BLACK GUY AND HILARY THE WOMAN, DOUBLE EDGED SWORN. THEN, WE HAVE THE GOOD OLE REPUBLICANS WHOM I DISLIKE VERY MUCH, I CAN ONLY PRAY AS SHOULD EVERYONE.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

T LANE, NC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:30:53 GMT

I HOPE THE REPUBLICANS DO CRUSH OBAMA AS STATED BY ARALIUN.
OBAMA IN THE OVAL OFFICE. WASHINGTON, DC WOULD BE A GHETTO.
HE MIGHT BE BLACK/WHITE MIX. HE MARRIED A FULL BLOWN BLACK WOMAN AND THAT SAYS WHAT HE IS.
AL SHARPTON AND JEESE JACKSON TYPES ARE DROOLING I'M SURE.
AMERICA NEEDS A CHANGE BUT NOT THIS KIND.............

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Oakville, Ontario Canada — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:31:04 GMT

Everyone ought to pray that the Lord's will be done. Look at Bush! How are the mighty fallen you ask? It was God's will that Bush perform as poorly as he did to show us that "the Most High lives in the kingdoms of men and gives it to whomsoever He will". My point? Don't be too gratuitous about Hilary and don't sweat over whether Obama has enough experience to run America and the free world. Don't be overconcerned about his youth either. Our God can raise up children from stones if need be. You see, America is God's country, America is home to a large percentage of His saints. Obama is also one of his saints. God can make him worthy to be the president of the great USA!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

David, Eatonville, Wash. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:31:10 GMT

To Dave Cartwright from Sandpoint, if you want to know why the prisoners were freed, you just have to read some history books written about that event. The Republican party bokered a deal that released the prisoners when Reagan won the White House, and by keeping the prisoners detained, purposely made Carter look like a fool; very dirty, dishonest politics. The result of this brokered deal was a little scandal known as the Iran-Contra affair. It's funny how short peoples' memories are, or maybe some people just don't care. Obviously the knowledge of this came out later, and I realized only then that I had voted for an unscrupulous party; one that clearly refuses to change it's ways. To note, I consider myself an independent. Good luck.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

raymond r. daly lake stevens, wa. 98258 — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:32:04 GMT

How come these politicians withall their experience,voted to invade Irag?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Paul Delvecchio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:32:37 GMT

I was happy that Romney finally got a taste of his own mud-slinging.
He has made it his priority to criticize and point his finger at the others. He must divert attention away from his own inadequacies and lack of experience
somehow, I suppose.
It was amusing to see Romney sit there with that continual smirk, unable to defend his own ignorance.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

pork, nyc — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:33:36 GMT

i am truly torn between hillary and obama. i even like what edwards says! maybe more than the others! corporations are the root of all evil! but i am baffled by the extreme seemingly reasonless hatred of hillary. i can understand not liking her or not wanting her to be president but i don't get the viciousness of the attacks. i have yet to see a valid excuse: because she's cold? because she stayed with her husband after he cheated on her? the only conclusion i can come to is that she is a woman - a strong, smart, driven woman. all qualities that would be praised in a man. in a president. i'm not even the biggest hillary fan! she's way too conservative for me. but to see her attacked essentially for not being a stereotypically "feminine" woman (especially by other women!) just galls me. most hillary haters probably wouldn't admit it but it seems pretty obvious to me and if they were to look in the mirror and really analyze their feelings i think they would realize it too. don't vote for her if you don't like her positions but not because she has the attributes that would make her a great president. also, did no one notice when the republican candidates were asked about obama? i haven't seen one report or post about it. they all said they would attack him based on his inexperience! in a general election i'm afraid the republicans (running on a platform of fear) would wipe the floor with him. it's obvious they relish the possibility of running against him. can we really risk having another republican president? i think hillary might be our only chance. and with obama as her running mate, the pair would be unstoppable. can you imagine? talk about change. a woman president and an african-american vice-president. then he can be president in 2016!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Craig — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:34:50 GMT

I can't wait to hear what excuses Hillary has to offer when she gets trounced in new Hampshire

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mamie Rogers — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:35:38 GMT

I thought Ron Paul opened some eyes/minds. Insightful and intelligent. Why doesn't he get more press coverage?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nancy Haysville, KS — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:38:09 GMT

All the candidates can promise change in Health Care but they will not determine if there is change that is only in the hands of the Insurance lobby which influences Congress strongly. The insurance and health care lobby is the real reason Hillary's healthcare plan did not work as well as the lame drug benefit under Medicare. Mitt Romney's health care plan in Massachusetts is forcing all citizens to get insurance whether they can afford it or not {if you do not choose the insurance carrier the state does it for you) . I believe this is the same thing that will occur with the Obama plan or else 15+ million people will still be without insurance.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jack Marino — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:39:37 GMT

Way to go, Huckabee!
Not only does he have the most experience in government, but his answers were articulate, honest, and intelligent.
Notice..he never avoids a question, is always direct, and unlike the smirking Romney, whose main focus is mud-slinging, Huckabee stands his ground and yet, refuses to engage in the silly bickering.

It's about time we elected a knowlegeable, moral leader with proven capability like HUCKABEE!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kurt W., Tempe, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:40:29 GMT

I'm still a strong Kucinich supporter, and I find it ridiculous that he was not included in this debate. He is the true progressive. Obama is my second choice, but Kucinich gets my primary vote in AZ.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kathy Casey, Palm Bay FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:41:38 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

C.Fargo Endwell,NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:42:30 GMT

After listening to both Republicans and Democrats debate, I feel the true leader would be Hillary. Remember how naieve Jimmy Carter was? Barack is the same way. Whether anyone wants to recognize it, You have to know Washington and be able to compromise to get anything done. So many negative things have been said about Hillary that were never true has got people believing the lies. I have yet to seea man do well so let's try a woman. They are much more capable of multi-tasking.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jim, new hampton, iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:42:49 GMT

You anti-Obama people are hillaryous. Wake up. You are the reason why young people are siding with Obama. We are sick of being told by experienced people how naive we are. Our votes count the same as yours and we will change American politics.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jenny L., Ny, NY. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:42:59 GMT

What does it matter.. black or white, male or female?
If you vote for a candidate based on race or sex, what a stupid waste!
Based on the intelligence, experience, and morality of the candidates in last nights debate, I must pick Mike Huckabee.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

William Phillips, INdianapolis, IN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:45:30 GMT

It appears that "cousin" Kate is an Obamanut. She has bought his snake oil pitch,

Reality bites, but if Obama is the Demo nominee he will be the McGovern of the 21st century. The Frankenmedia has been cheer leading for him in order to not be accused of racism. The Republicans will not be nice.

Let see. Obama "won" Iowa with less than 40% of the 10% of Iowans who caucused. The vast majority of voters are not as liberal as the OBama supporters who packed the caucuses. Why do you think Republicans have been beating up on Hillary while giving Obama a free ride to this point? They want him to win the Demo nomination because they know the electorate. It guarantees a GOP win in November.

Racism is not dead in this country. It is in hiding. While it will lie to pollsters, it will show up in the privacy of the voting booth. Bank on it.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Guitar Al, North Brunwsick NJ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:48:41 GMT

One of the fundamental flaws in the Bush II presidency was the bringing along of the Bush I old guard like Cheney & Rumsfield. There was a legacy to defend. Hillary & Bill will bring the same sort of problem to any Hillary administration. This created a vice president Cheney with much to much power & influence. Bill will likely cause all sorts of similar problems in a Hillary administration. In addition, her experience is a self creation (if it were true Bill would release the documents from the preidential resords to prove the case), She would undoubtably rely heavily on Bill & his people. NO more Bushes No more Clintons. The nation needs new blood at the top to make a break with the anomosity of the past 16 years. It's hard to believe that Reagan & Tip O'Neil regulary met to chat & share a yarn or two. Enough with this bickering.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Arleen WebbOklahoma City, OK. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:51:00 GMT

I admire John McCain and appreciate all he has sacrificed for this country. To me he is the best choice and the most experienced. As unpopular as this notion is we will never again be safe, 9/11 showed us that and we need a man like John McCain to make sure that nothing like that happens here again. I trust him to know how to do that. I trust him to know first hand how Washington works and he will therefor be able to make the changes needed.He has earned the right to lead our country and like I said before I trust him to do the right thing.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nancy Haysville, KS — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:52:04 GMT

No candidate that has finished first in the Iowa Caucuses has ever gone to win the nomination of their party. President Bush even finished third in Iowa and you see where he ended up.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Matilda Jones — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:57:22 GMT

Well I think Obama or edwards will do the American people more good get rid of the lobbyists and get rid of some of the older senators they should have a time limit on them. And i think the senators should be put on Social Security. They would sure get something fixed then.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Peter Vernon CT — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:57:49 GMT

Mr. Obama has proved to be an overly ambitious dim witted pawn of the drug and oil companies.

His health care plan is ZERO-Mitt Romney did more in Massachusetts-if the Democrats are so stupid to nominate Mr. Obama- me as a lifelong Democrat who has NEVER voted for a Republican will sit out the election-unless Mr. Romney wins the GOP nomination.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Driene Herring — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:57:50 GMT

Here comes the smear campaigns. One against the other. The way I see it, Hilary doesn't have the experience she claims to have. Huckabee's taxes in his own state went through the roof. Romney is trying to buy the presidency. McCain is stuck in the old ways of talking.And remember that guy who used to be the mayor of New York? Well people in New York don't even like him!He's out but I hope he keeps "this" wife and then there's Obama. I don't care what his name is, I listen to the content of his speeches and I for one can't wait to vote-for him! It will be so refreshing to have someone in the White House that isn't corrupted by the way things have always been. Let's start anew. For what we've been through with ol' Bush-whack, our values,morals and constitution need loads of uplifting and let's not even talk about the deficit,economy and the war!!GO PRESIDENT OBAMA!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dot, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:57:59 GMT

Susan, Hubbardston, MA (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 4:14 PM)

I have a question--serious, not sarcastic. I don't fully understand the health care proposals of any of the candidates. I know that health insurance is mandated, but is there a minimum coverage requirement? There are so many variables in health care plans, what is covered in some is not allowed under others. Would people be allowed to buy the cheapest plan available that offered very little coverage--I don't see how having such a plan would increase the quality of health care. If insurance doesn't cover an illness, are those who own such a plan going to get the necessary treatment or will they do without? And if they do without, how does the fact that they have health insurance (of a sort) lead to better health care for them?

I realize that this is a complex issue--I'd appreciate your comments.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

allen currinn cookeville tn. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:58:15 GMT

well a lot of double teaming by edwards and obama didnt impress me . how come we elect our presidents as a beauty contest? edwards done/ the magor companys dont want him, they cant buy him , that why obama doing so well. oboma medical insurance has a lot of hole in it and no real way of paying for it,no experiance with oboma. n.h. wake up edward is done and stop the beauty contest funny how all those college kids caucused for oboma and they should lived to under stand how good it started in late 90,s

good by bush you had no experience and neither does oboma . thank you former edwards voter. hellow hilliary
ive voted since the 60 and democratic if inxperiance get the nomination ill vote republican for first time in my life.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Glenda, Seattle, Wash. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:59:21 GMT

I, too, was galvanized by Obama's speech at the Dem. convention, and thought his "Audicity of Hope" a winner on many counts - but his smug, unwarranted self-righteousness since then, his convenient absences from key votes and then "make-believe" votes following, and his attacks on Clinton for being indecisive in one debate and consequent indecisiveness on the next debate regarding the same issue (license)were telling.

Obama's 2 years in the Senate have been lackluster and lacking in substance (when he has been THERE)hence his attacks against the "status quo" who have tried to get the job done for democrats against Bush's vetoes. Ganging up with Edwards, his supposed VP against the Clintons in general, and Hillary in particular, are mean-spirited, and quite the opposite of the compassion he supposedly feels for people -- he has run an egomanical campaign, and will run (if nominated as the Republicans are cozying up to him as they know they can beat him) the Democratic party into the ground in the process. Clinton DOES have bona fide experience and has had a positive impact in REAL ways as Senator, plus a thoughtful, realistic way of outlining what she can, and will, do if elected (and bombing Pakistan is not part of the agenda)and needs to be the nominee. I hope the American people are not fooled by Obama's 'smoke and mirrors' in their understandable quest for change after all of these years of Republican chaos and subterfuge.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pat Perraglio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:59:24 GMT

Ask the candidates to go "to the back of the line" and find out just how long it takes to get ANY response; even acknowledging receipt of the letter/request to emigrate. FIVE-SIX YEARS!They all need to learn a few things.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jolynn, Ohio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:59:31 GMT

I wonder if Hilary's likeability would be a factor if she was male? Her personality comes across no different from that of the other candidates but hers is the one targeted. She is smart, experienced, knowledgeable and has served this country and its people. Out for herself; give me a break. Who could be more out for themselves than a man who is elected to the Senate and almost immediately begins focusing on a presidential run? Haven't we had enough of those with little to no national and foreign policy experience? Haven't we had enough of those who talk a good game but bring little to the table? If we haven't and we don't elect Hilary, then let's not complain later on.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pat Perraglio — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:00:22 GMT

Why all the mud slinging fuss about CHANGE??
I never asked for change.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Eve Raisen — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:01:40 GMT

Go Barack Go.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:05:06 GMT

McCain will continue to allow the onslaught of illegals into our country. If he ends up the nominee I will not vote at all. Judging by his track record and what he has said on the issue he loves them streaming over the border.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John, Fairfax, VA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:05:29 GMT

I think people are just rolling over an accepting what they hear as far as Mr. Obama's experience. Has anybody really looked to see for his or herself what he has or has not accomplished? I think you should look because you may be pleasantly surprised. The other thing about experience is the issue of what you have experience doing and did it leave the country better than it was left. Everyone is shouting experience when we have had the same bunch of idiots downtown DC for the last 3 or 4 decades and haven't done a darn thing for the public. So far the Washington DC "experience" has yet to get us universal healthcare (Hillary included; and by the way, what ever happened to her first plan during her husband's administration? Shouldn't we have a better system since she was so great and experienced? We got nothing. She got $800,000+), has allowed our dollar to diminish, keeps minimum wage far below liveable levels, refused to accomplish anything concerning our energy policies and the criminals we currently have in office that went there with $30 million of Halliburton's money in their pocket, and continues to accept that corporate America should be allowed to pay them for representation the average American can not get. If that is experience, I will take my chances with change. I'm sick of this mess. If you want change, it isn't coming from the same people we have, and nothing changes with high aspiration and sacrifice.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dem101, Littleton, Colorado — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:05:46 GMT

What about Gov. Richardson? He is treated by the press like a "step-sister". All the work and none of the glory. It is time the press started realizing we have 4 candidates in the Democatic Presidental race. Last night they did not even show his picture with the other 3 runners. How one sided is that?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kevin Brady, Redondo Beach, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:05:49 GMT

The national polls mean nothing. Iowa and New Hampshire have educated themselves
extensively on the candidates. This is why Hilary's lead is slipping. They realize that she is a
polarizing figure and Obama can bring people from both parties together. America has already
had polarizing figures as their President long enough. Obama can unify the two parties and the country again as well as regain the respect from the rest of the world. He can motivate people from all walks of life. He is the right President for this country now. Iowa, New Hampshire, and Oprah get it. Lets hope the rest of the country does.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jane dixon — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:07:19 GMT

I don't know what debate some of you guy's were watching but anyone watching last night's national debate could clearly see that Hilary knocked them all out of the water,Obama didn't make much sense especially on national defense,He looked like he didn't know what was going on. Hilary will make it all the way regardless of these 2 small states -what do they know?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mark Smith — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:07:52 GMT

Gooday from Australia,

As a well travelled businessman, I can tell you Americans that Hope is returning here in Australia and South Pacific countries that FINALLY the free world has found a leader in Obama. I have never seen people hate Americans so much as I have seen in the past 7 years of Bush rule. Finally, Barack Obama is giving people back Hope and people in this part of the world are hoping that Obama will be the next President of the free world.

People in this part of the world and in many others that I have travelled to are sick and tired of the same old politicians like the Bushes and Clintons.

Great leaders did not necessarily have experience when they became great leaders like Gandhi and MLK. Any person who can speak and unite people at the most defining moments in history are the ones who have etched their name into history as the greatest leaders of the world like Gandhi or MLK.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott Simpson New Gulf Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:08:12 GMT

McCain is the only candidate with a REAL BACKBONE............you honestly can't say that about hillary and obama or romney or huckleberry....America cannot afford to have FLIP-FLOPS in office who are more concerned with the next election, a sad but true fact.......i can only imagine what the State Of The Nation would be if john kerry and the ambulance chaser edwards had been in office on sept. 11. Americans should thank their lucky stars every day that we had President Bush in office because if he hadn't been i think we would have been far worse off....i know some of you osama and hillary supporters hate to hear that but it's true, just like hillary voted to go to war in iraq....oop's yeah i know, sometimes the truth hurts.

good luck yall, i know sometimes the truth can be hard to swallow, just make your vote count. Vote McCain!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nick,orlando ,florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:08:13 GMT

these hilary koolaid drinkers make me laugh.I am an independant who has voted republican the last two elections.I could see myself voting for Obama even if I don't agree with everything he stands for.He seems like he truly believes in what he stands for.I don't pretend to have all the answers,so I am willing to try new ideas.But for hilary and her fans to think that we can actually believe her experience is really what she claims it is,I find that very insulting.The person who falls for that one is probably on her payroll or not to informed.I guess if you say a lie over and over you will begin to believe it.But I doubt she even believes that one.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joan Metula Elizabeth, New Jersey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:08:50 GMT

I am very upset that Obama does not salute the American flag nor say the Pledge of Allegience because of the word God. How can we possibly elect a president that does not respect what this country was founded on?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Phyllis Amro, Phoenix, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:09:51 GMT

Regarding Hillary's experience: Hillary did more for education in Arkansas than ANYONE has ever done. Her study made the teacher's accountable. At the time there were many teachers there who couldn't pass the simplest test to prove that they were able to educate the children. Experience doesn't always have to come in the form of government service. She has been working and serving this country in many ways since she was a high school student in Illinois.

She's been a successful mother, wife, lawyer, and Senator. Apparently, she's done a good job as Senator representing NY because they re-elected her. There is no one who will argue about both her and the former President's success as parents. There are many people who wish they'd done such a good job with their children. I suppose you could make an argument about her success as a wife, but they're still together after more than 20+ years and that's a success in my book.

After the one debate that I actually watched, I came away believing that there's not a democratic candidate that I couldn't support in the general election and that pleases me. I do believe that with the experience that Hillary has gained over the years, plus the very real knowledge that the former President shared his political views with her for many, many years and I assume by that, that she shares them and we may find a return to the economic status that we had during the Clinton presidency and that would be a huge blessing to many of us. WE might also return to the status the US had on the world stage during the Clinton presidency. Maybe not, but I think it's a pretty good bet. Barack Obama is a good man and I wish he'd waiting a few years to try for the Presidency. Edwards is a passionate fighter for his beliefs and that's honorable. I was very impressed by Bill Richardson. He's a very intelligence and experienced person. I wish he had more charisma. He'd be a truly good President, I believe. I think we should stop tearing them all down, and find the person that we believe best satisfies what we want as a President. For me, that's Clinton, but the others would be OK for me too. There is no Republican that I could, or would, support. I used to believe that I might be able to support McCain, but that was before he became so supportive of the Bush white house and the war in Iraq. None of the others would do for me.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mark Smith — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:11:37 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Randi Probst, San Diego, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:12:05 GMT

It took the remarks of a couple of talk show comedians to derail Dr. John Dean's 2004 Presidential campaign because he yelled before a college crowd. When will the constant media hype about Obama stop?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

foxinsox, Fayetteville, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:12:16 GMT

The mere thought of TWENTY-EIGHT STRAIGHT YEARS with individuals from two families having a stranglehold on our nation is pretty scary. That thought alone should be enough for people to want to keep Hillary from getting this nomination.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim Purcell Milford, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:12:51 GMT

It's amazing that experience is a bad word in this election. You need experience to make change. I wonder if some of these canidates even know what needs to be changed.
I'll tell you. It's this idiotic primary system.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:14:55 GMT

“What have the Republicans done for the average man in this country?”
Typical: you start off with the wrong question, you invariably get the wrong answer.
What we most need from government is to get out of our way and let us make our own decisions and be responsible for our actions.
The left’s solution: Regulate, beaurocratize, and micromanage our lives. Find anyone who has been successful in spite of our government, and punish them with high taxes. Only Obama was smart enough to point out that any mandate for companies to cut carbon emissions would eventually be paid for by the customers of those companies.

If corporations lose money, Democrats are there asking why government hasn’t helped them succeed better. Once a company makes profit, Democrats rail against their greed and demand that they be more socially-minded. (Read: give their profits to the Govt.)

American voters need to realize that the companies these Democrats despise (Oil, Pharmaceutical, Insurance, Microsoft, Airlines, etc) employ Americans.
What they don’t spend on overhead (material, salaries, benefits etc,) becomes their profit – which does benefits their stockholders.
Many middle-class Americans own those stocks to fund their retirements, kid’s college tuition, etc.

Keep dragging down anyone who is successful and wonder why YOU aren’t getting anywhere….

Scott, Portage, IN (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 3:41 PM)
------------------

Except your major corporations are sending the jobs overseas, cutting the jobs that remain here, giving millions to CEOs for cutting costs (re: labor) and basically giving the average American nothing. Healthcare is a joke. Most corporations are slashing their healthcare programs because they'd rather add that money to their bottom line.

What retirement plans? Many people have had to take the hit tax wise to save their homes, pay their bills, pay for healthcare and the everyday costs that have risen and risen and risen all for the wealthy to get even more so. Who do we have to thank for that? The Republicans who still believe in that whole trickle-down economic policy that most have known for a while now doesn't work worth a damn.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jane dixon — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:15:30 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

pkdot boston, mass — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:15:37 GMT

where's the so called vaunted national press when romney says he balanced 4 budgets and didn't raise taxes? he mandated by the mass state constitution to balance the budget, and as for not raising taxes he raise fees to the tune of 700 million! you tell me the difference! i just wish someone would call him on it

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

cruiser95fm, Chicago, Ill — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:16:16 GMT

What experience is Hillary refering to? Could it be "Travelgate"? How about Vince Foster? Her failed healthcare plan? Does she think we are all that stupid to forget all the scandals when the HillBilly administration was in office? Hello, Monica? Those ignorant of history will find history repeating itself. I'm resigning the UTU because they endorsed her of all people!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Very concerned in N.C. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:16:23 GMT

After watching the debates last evening I am more concerned for our country than ever before. The U.S. has become a dangerous place with the threat of terriorism hanging over our heads. That being enough in itself is only a fraction of our problems.
We need a strong intelligent leader who can lead us as a nation in case of an attack. We need someone who can deal with leaders of foreign countries who think very differently than we do. And, we need someone who can help solve our many other problems. Obama is NOT presidential material. He has not shown the strength, intelligence, leadership qualities or knowledge that our country needs in the next president. Wake up people.
Much of what he said last evening was just repeating what Edwards or one of the others had just said. Didn't anyone else pick up on that? I listened to some of his other comments after the Iowa results were in. All he could say then was how no one thought they could do it etc..etc It's NOT only about winning. IT'S WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WHEN YOU BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE US. DO YOU HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO BE THE MOST POWERFUL PERSON ON THIS PLANET?
That was the time to reinforce to everyone how he would work to make our country safer for all citizens, solve problems that we are faced with everyday here at home, job security, education, health care.
He didn't speak about the serious issues that our country is faced with. Seems to me that he only wants to get in the white house and promote his own personal agenda.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kate McCaan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:17:32 GMT

Someone should tell Hillary that the "experience" line is a two-edged sword. Ken Lay was "experienced" too, but I wouldn't have wanted him for president.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Randi Probst, San Diego, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:17:54 GMT

Is criticism about the influence by the entertainment media concerning politics a taboo subject?
Sincerely, rp

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

tom bucks county ,pa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:18:06 GMT

regarding mr norman shu ...he also was a obama contributer but i guess they cant find a picture to splash on the screen or just opt not to.and just wait till the media gets obama alone .and find all the dirt they can to exploit him once hillary is gone.you reep what you sow. if this guy wasn't around you would all be praising mrs. clinton.if obama wins so do the republicans i assure you!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

susu. Queens, New York — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:18:49 GMT

I am glad that some people in America can read tea leaves. The media is the problem, they don't report the news they analyze them. we all saw the debate and we do not need your bias input. Obama will not win the presidency because as soon as Hillary drops out you will scrutinize.
Wake up America, do not let the media fool you. Every election year the media choose the president for the people and when things go bad they blame the voters for choosing a wrong candidate.Americans, this election is not about Hillary's past it is about you. We are all human beings with flaws. Americans, get out and vote for your president who is ready to lead on day one.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jen Lanteri bever;ly hills florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:20:42 GMT

Obama will be a huge mistake! He's full of it all the way. Hillary will make a great great president and will be the only one to step up on day one. This would not be a good election to TRIAL someone for our president-There are huge foreign issues-No we need a President WITH experience NOT A PLAYER! GO HILLARY!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

HARRY HERBERT, chowchilla, ca — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:21:30 GMT

REGARDING THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES DEBATE ON ABC, I HAVE DECIDED, AS AN INDEPENDENT, TO VOTE EITHER MITT ROMNEY, THE REPUBLICAN, OR BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATE. ALL THE OTHER CANDIDATES ARE A JOKE.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carol S. Knoxville TN — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:22:21 GMT

It is Hillary Clinton that should be our next President we need her. This country needs her she is the one that can lead not the others. Obama is total not it !

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sherre, Chandler, Arizona — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:24:53 GMT

Explain: When a question is posed to the Rebublicans, they are promted to stay on course and answer the questions presented to them. Yet when a question is presented to Hilary, she answers by attacking her fellow nominees and justifying herself with no thought to the question posed. And why does the question not continue to be prompted until answered by all Democratic candidates? Surely topics about the war and health care solutions are more relevant than who has a spotless record or '35 years of expirience' with nothing to back that ego up. It frustrates me to see a big show put on without ever getting straight answers from candites running for the presidency. They would rather concentrate on demoralizing one another than let the good citizens of America have an honest answer about what they plan on doing for us, the people, once in office. No, they are concentrating on their own self-centered personal agenda's. A pathetic display that I would be ashamed to present to my children. Please lets stop squabbling, retain some dignity, and answer the questions at hand. Our future depends upon it.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

73 year old from far hills, new jersey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:30:05 GMT

who is the nit wit who says Hillary graduated from Harvard Law at the top of her class?? check your facts. she graduated from Yale at the bottom of her class. where she did well academically was at her all girl undergrad school.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J. Decone — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:30:50 GMT

I am still trying to figure out how Clinton can use the Experience card over and over. Her health care plan failed totally and was never fulfilled at all. She had no security clearance and wasn't actually directly involved in what was going on when Bill was in office. Her trip to the Sudan was in connection with a Music Group, not as a Diplomat or other official reason. She managed to misplace some very important and requested papers that suddenly reappeared mysteriously later. Her husband was, and still is a womanizer who has been disbarred. And she wasn't a resident of New York long enough to be qualitied to run for her current position when she did it the first time. She also stated that she had personally done her own investigation on the war for several years when she voted for it. Now she is saying it was all news to her. Her only real experience came after Bill's time in office and she probably shouldn't have gotten the 1st 6 years of that because she had not lived in NY long enough. Being the wife of a president has never qualified any one else to run for president.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RHo, Toronto Canada — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:31:08 GMT

According to the debate at New Hampshire, Americans are demanding for a change, a change for better or for worse? A change is always good, but sometimes it has an opposite result, there is too much damage done already during the past, now Americans should be more careful when they are looking for a change, what USA needs now, is to find a more reliable president to count on, than a change to someone who is entirely new and inexperienced, it is like playing Russian Roulette. Bill clinton's adminsitration was proven to be very successful, and Hilary Clinton, being influenced by her husband, will help to improve the situation now USA is suffering.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Concerned Independent, Hutchinson, Kansas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:32:29 GMT

Please, someone has GOT to call Hillary on this "Experience" crock. She has accomplished nothing to speak of during her senate tenure. Her attempt at a healthcare bill during her husband's administration, although containing some great ideas, was handled so poorly that it galvanized the opposition. And as someone else said, pillow talk isn't experience.

She came off as mean and short tempered last night in addition to misrepresenting of some of Sen. Obama's positions. Nothing presidential there. I fear that if we elect her then we elect the status quo. We only gain more bickering with the Republicans (they can't stand her or what she stands for), more gridlock, more partisanship, more of the same ole same ole. Sorry, she is "likeable enough", but she isn't what we need as a country. It's not enough to have "experience" or want "change", you have to be able to steer it through the mess that we have in Washington to gain any ground for the rest of us. Hillary says that she can change things. Sen. Obama seems to realize what a lot of us are starting to realize, and that is that only WE can change things. He is willing to guide us in that effort.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Hama, Dallas, Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:32:44 GMT

Much contention has arisen regarding importance or non-importance of experience in this race. It's well to remember that none of the presidential contenders have ever been presidents. Ultimately, whoever occupies the Oval Office will actually be a presidential neophite. Throwing "experience" around is disingenous and a mere political slight of hand.

Obama seems to have identified the core of the national sentiment in his thesis of "change." His fellow contenders seem to agree with him in that they have very quickly adopted that mantra which is now echoing from strange places. He certainly may not boast longevity in Washington, but he demonstrates the analytical ability that enables him to identify core issues of concern among the people. Such insight seems to elude many of the contenders. I am neither Democrat nor Republican, but I surely welcome the emotional intelligence issuing from Obama's political camp.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

M. Libkie, Anchorage, AK — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:32:51 GMT

From what I've heard over and over again; Clinton is out, she even made the statement once herself when she and her husband's papers were being confiscated; 'I don't want them in here going through out papers! We're the President". Aside from that then, she's already served two her two terms....smile.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ritch Roberts — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:33:46 GMT

In this campaign i have failed to see what anyone tell me about free trade..any why this government is allowing the Big three auto groups to go down south for a $1.70 and hour and not tax the hell out of them brining them back into this country if they want to take our work south of the border then they should go through hell to get them back here. I also believe we should get rid of the property tax and the IRS thier are so many illegal immgrants in the this country living here free if we tax all of us 10% tax across the board we would have more money than we can count. Futhermore i think we need to look at these non_profit org. like little league baseball why do we all have to pay to play but they get away with paying nothing for their property in which they get for free.Their are many cities that could use the taxes from these non-profit group that assume their above the law. Of coarse no one wants to talk about the welfare issue and really see who is worthing and who is not. I'm waiting for a President to step up and declare that this is going to stop and in order to get my Vote

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

sean — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:34:11 GMT

When exactly is the press gonna stop giving Obama a free pass?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jorge Morales — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:34:50 GMT

HILLARY WILL BE A GREAT PRESIDENT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Yolande M. Agble Rego Park New York NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:34:53 GMT

Anyone but Hillary Clinton or Rudolf Guilliani as president, both will be disastrous for America, nationally and internationally. It was heartening to read that a few intelligent people are asking the same questions my friends and I have been asking- what exactly is the experience that qualifies Hillary Clinton over the others to be president? We woud really like this looked into and discussed. It is indeed a false claim, in our view But then it is not the only one, is it? John Edwards and Barack Obama would be a good team.

Yolande M. Agble

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Don Zoutte, Knovxville, Iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:38:10 GMT

Although I am from Iowa I can’t speak for all Iowans but it seems to me that a lot of the people that voted for Obama and Edwards weren't really voting for them more than they were voting against Hillary. The Clintons have long endorsed the North American Union and the NAFTA highway taking the sovereignty of the US away. The Republicans are trying to White Wash something named George Bush. There was and is only one candidate that has told the truth from day one and that is Ron Paul. When I took my oath at the time I joined the Air Force as millions of other men and women have since we promised to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, pretty much the same oath that our elected officials take. It is time that the Politicians stepped up to the plate and did their jobs. There isn't one politician in the group aside from Ron Paul that can look at their record and say that they have done so. Hillary is one of the worst of the bunch. So Hillary go away then let the rest fight out who should be the Democratic nominee. The Clinton Days are gratefully over!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Kevin Brady, Redondo Beach, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:38:35 GMT

Obama never seems to get emotional and angry with his answers like the other candidates. He responds calmly and with intelligence and stability. It's like he's more evolved and above all that. A President need to make decisions that aren't based on emotions, but on what is best for the country and the world. His speech after winning Iowa was on another level from the other candidates. We have a goofball President right now and a President before that that cheated on his wife in the White House! It's about time we get one that acts professional and speaks like a President.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pittsburgh, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:38:52 GMT

Go Edwarsds!!! I'm hoping that Shillary drops out and it becomes a one-on-one between Edwards and Obama. I like both of them but Edwards really speaks of the realities of 28 years of disasterous Reagan/Clinton Voodoo economics.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mary Ann Rathbun, Port Charlotte, Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:39:05 GMT

I believe Barak Obama has the charm, personality,
and charisma to become our first African American
President. It will be interesting to know how the
big cities are going to vote for him. The small towns
and suburbs will jump on the bandwagon. If you
remember, John F. Kennedy was the first Roman
Catholic candidate to become president. The press
followed JFK and they are doing the same with Barak
Obama. He is young, likeable and speaks well.
Senator Robert Kennedy said after Martin Luther
King's assassination that some day we will have a
black president. Is the time right?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ray Coppler, Pittsburgh, Pa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:39:30 GMT

First of That poll that has Obama up by 12 points is not at all reliable and targets a specific segment of voters so it is not a genuine cross section or sampling.

Secondly, I am truly impressed by the level of some of the moronic posts on this blog. For someone to biasly assert that Hillary defending herself adamently against a status quo good old boy tag team attack of false assertions as imploding is absurd to say the least. She clearly won the debate and was the only candidate of substance that answered any questions with responses that were more than the same tired old Obama and Edwards rhetoric of generalities. How soon the Idiots like the bloggers here forget or misrepresent the fact that she has been instrumental in effectuating change for over 35 years, which dates back to her work out of law school working for a non-profit focusing on childrens issues. The reality is people are quick to forget about the last time an outsider promising change was elected, Jimmy Carter, and how badly that turned out. By his own admission he was Naive and ill prepared for the challanges that he faced and did not have the savey to effectuate change.I suspect that many of the bloggers here, by the substance of their comments, are high school students who are not even eligible to vote.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RickP, Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:39:31 GMT

To all of you XXXXX generation, really study history, and the issues, just because someone leads you to a bridge, does not mean that you have to jump. Why is it that Mccain and Huckacow are attacking Romney, If he was not a threat to their power grab then they would not team up against him, remember that their is a reason that they are attacking Romney, they are running scared, McCain is nothing more than a RHINO, He has left the Republican Party long ago, Hucklebee is nothing but a slick talking preacher, who in the past was a self proclaimed Liberal not a conservative. Why is it that you all keep picking the ones who tell you what you want to hear all the time, I signal The DANGER DANGER Beware. I am a Disabled Veteran and have been around the block a time or two. look at the real issues beyond the tip of your noses, go dig into what each candidate has said not what they are telling you now.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rick, Eugene OR — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:40:11 GMT

I appreciate the number of well thought-out comments in the posts. Two recurring themes I see in certain posts that I feel a need to challenge are those that refer to Hillary’s gender and Barack’s racial background as some type of insurmountable barrier to getting elected. I know there are people who are sexist and I know there are probably even more people I would consider racist. Change is generational. Certain people are just either unwilling or incapable of updating their belief systems, that is just a sad but true fact. But I seriously challenge the premise that in the 21st century there are sufficient numbers of those type of individuals that it would preclude either candidate from prevailing in November all other things being equal. Granted, Hillary could do poorly in the general for other reasons. In my own extended family, I have one aunt who wouldn’t vote for Hillary, not because she is female, rather she uses the “b” word to describe her, that is her opinion, not mine. I personally have no problem with Hillary, she has just been so vilified by the right that I find her path a bit more insurmountable. My aunt would also not vote for Barack because, IMO she is a closet racist. However she is a Republican and hasn’t voted for a Democrat since before Reagan so her racism would have no effect on the outcome regardless. I think the general feeling among us youngsters (those of us under 50) is that race and gender shouldn’t and don’t matter, period. If I am wrong, it saddens me, maybe I am just blessed to live in an area of the country where I think race and gender for the most part really just don’t matter anymore. Our country has a wondeful opportunity to put so much of our ugly divisive history behind us once and for all and make history in the process. He inspires my hope, he inspires my confidence, and after years of feeling ashamed of my government, I can sincerely and honestly say that in November, I will once again feel pride in calling myself an American.

-Just another middle-aged white guy for Barack-

Obama in ’08!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Laura Elwin, Sammamish, Wa. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:44:42 GMT

Watching closely...I am observing a very close resemblence of Obama to George as he demonstrates
an ego taking over his personality as did George
Bush when folks pegged him as the one they would
like to have a beer with! Obama is getting the
same "likeability" tag by the media as Bush did
and I just don't see it as equating as what we are
looking for in the president we need to rescue our
country from the distruction cause by electing Bush...the so called "likeable" candidate. Wake up
and see how the media is just looking for an opportunity to cash in on "first black candidate",
all the while critizing Clinton if she so much as
mentioned "first woman". Who is behind Obama?
The neocons were behind Bush. I find it a life
saver that President Bill Clinton would be behind
a Pesident Hillary Clinton.... Maybe our country would have a chance to repair our standing in the world. Hillary Clinton has the brillance, experience, respect for her work in Washington.
Obama can be anti-establishment, but he is the
establishment since he is in politice. He started
calling Hillary dishonest, and then let Edwards take
over attacking Hillary...not to noble. I would vote
for a African American, but would choose a man more
like Powell (unfortunately Bush spoiled that possibility). I love Oprah...however, as a champion for women over the years (which has been
what gave her fame and adoration) I am unhappy that she has abandoned women in her support of Obama.

Could go on, but will finish with "WAKE UP AMERICANS... USE YOUR BRAINS...WE NEED A DEMOCRATE
CANDIDATE WHO CAN LEAD OUR COUNTRY !!! After 8 years of an unqualified president, my vote goes to
proven leadership, not emotional rock-star hype and
it is time the media stops saying Hillary is not likeable... She is not running for Miss America,
she is running for the most important position available and just because she is a woman, the media
is having a problem with their own egos...good lord...let's have a reality check. Jealousy rears its ugly head and some of you sound like Ann Colter.
Quite small.

My vote goes for Clinton who will change history by
giving us back a country we can respect and the world
can respect. She has the broad perspective of world
problems and the intellectual brain to figure out the
best way to solve them. Just heard Obama say that he would unite parties, before and after he said that
he would make the red states blue. Duh! Hillary has
worked with the Republicans on Capital Hill to pass some constructive bills for the people and she is
respected by them.

Get Smart American....no more international crys about how stupid the American people are. After 2004
we should have a learned something. Sure hope that
we get the voting machines corrected for an honest
election.

Laura Elwin, Sammamish,Wa.

PS. I agree with Linda. Very dissapointed with Edwards. I was terribly dissapointed with Elizabeth
Edwards when she went negative on Hillary...really
shocked. I really admire her, but that was not nice.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dan Mason, Rochester, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:46:30 GMT

What experience does Hillary have? She's a con-artist, and conned idiots into thinking that sharing a bed with a former governor and president gave her "experience." The only experience she has is failed healthcare reform in the early to mid-90s. She's introduced absolutely 0 good legislation, and if you look at her voting record, has voted in favor of taking away civil liberties, giving our tax money away to other nations, and supporting these absurd wars and propaganda such as the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (their ARMY) as being terrorists!

Wake the hell up America, you are being conned.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ruteger — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:48:05 GMT

what makes me laugh is how hillary is such an option for change when all i see at her rallies are old hens.hillary clinton needs edwards to stay in this race.obama would slaughter her in a one on one match and her campaign knows it! i hope hillary is the nominee, she is being proven a high risk candidate. the gop will own her in the GE.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stephen Brigantine, Phoenix, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:48:09 GMT

I've been thinking about who everyone would pick to run with them for V.P. I'm sure Obama would pick Edwards. Hillary would probably go with Richardson. On the other side, I think Giuliani would take McCain and vice versa if either one of them got the nod. I'm not sure who Huckabee would pick. Thompson, maybe? Everyone's been beating on Romney so bad, I can't even try to predict who he would take. Of course, I'm probably wrong on all of these.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

noteasilyswayed, ATL,Georgia. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:48:11 GMT

Obama still doesn't have my vote after this debate. I find it hard to understand why so many people are buying into his "change" slogan yet has nothing to back it up with. I could go on the campaign trail and start yelling to everyone...change, change we need change America, doesn't mean I have experience to do it or that I WILL do it. I'm in two of the groups that the candidates are "fighting" over the under 30 and the Independents. But I use common sense in choosing who I want to run our country not oh that's nice words he is using let me vote for him! Talk is cheap America and anyone can use it to score points still doesn't make it true. As for Edwards he just went along with Obama because he pretty much knows he is losing this election and if backing Obama he can at least be Vice President. And last but not least Hilary, I wanted to vote in the first women President but I don't like her policies over all. My vote for President is undecided as of now but at least I know who I WON’T be voting for!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nick,orl.florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:48:52 GMT

I think Hilary does have the experience,but since so many people can't trust her I say she drops out of the race and endorse Laura Bush,she has just as much experience and not that many people dislike her...

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Adam , Pittsburgh, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:49:26 GMT

Tim, New York

You are clearly a professional working for Clinton.

Stop the trolls in public discourse.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Karen Mosiman Beattyville Kentucky — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:50:29 GMT

Yes someone please ask Hilary what her 35 years experence is, I was all for her until she cried they are picking on me because I'm a woman come on if your gonna play with the big dogs be one. I beleive Obama is the one, this country needs change and something new not the same old thing.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tim — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:50:52 GMT

It was disgusting to see Edwards leaning into Obama in the debates and ganging up on Hillary. Edwards is an oportunist and will sway with the Political wind. I disrespect a man that will not put his political ambitions on hold when his wife is on Kemo. Hillary is not out by any stretch of imagination and still our best choice in my opinion!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

GEORGE E., LOS ANGELES, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:51:00 GMT

I am sick and tired of hearing that someone has "experience" and "no experience" to be President. The President of the United States is the most unique job in this country and, unless the incumbent is running for reelection, no candidate has the experience! Other than the incumbent, every candidate does not have experience to be President (I am sorry, being mayor of a city is not experience, being Governor does not make you experienced to be President). Ironically, of all the candidates running, the only person who has "experience" to be President is Hilary, because she has actually seen up close and personal what a President does, day in and day out. But does that qualify her to be President, no!

If you say one has to be Governor or CEO to be President, then that rules out McCain and Thompson and all the democrats. If you say being a one term Governor is enough to be President, look what happened with Bush and Carter.

So, please let's stop this crap discussion about experience - since Bush is not running again, no one in the campaign trail has any experience to be President. NONE.

That is why you have to look at intangibles - who has the best potential to unite this country for a common good, who has the best potential to give people hope and strength to achieve great things, who has the best potential to look after the middle class, who has the compassion to be concerned about the downtrodden rather than wash their hands and claim capitalism will take care of it, who has the worldview to navigate these tricky times without looking at the military from the get go. Those are the things that make a great President in the mold of JFK, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Washington) etc.

I personally think Obama and Huckabee meet those criteria although Huckabee's religiousness is scary (Church and State separation). Romney is a snake oil salesman with a perpettual phony smile who will say anything to get votes and better suited for a boardroom. Guiliani is a cad who claims to be Mr. Security but did nothing between 1993 when the WTC was bombed to 2001 when it was bombed again and actually was dumb enough to put the fire response center in the WTC contrary to fire department calls for relocation. McCain is a warmonger hawk whose time has come and gone. Thompson will be the most absentee and disinterested President ever and God bless us with someone like that. I am sorry, but I am just plain tired of Republican politics of fear, hell and damnation coming in the form of Islamic jihadists (fundamentalists or whatever fear word they care to come up with). I am just plain tired of being told be fearful and scared all the time.

Hilary will be the most divisive President ever and will never unite the country. Edwards I like, but he is a one-issue crusader more suited for trial lawyer work than a consensus builder. Richardson is boring, uninspiring (too bad for someone who is latino with such a resume!).

Obama is a novice but he inspires. He makes someone hopeful and motivated, which is what this country needs at this time. And even though he is Christian, a name like Hussein should bring some measure of calm and thought to the middle east countries that maybe America finally has someone who can understand that region. And even though he is American, finally Africa will finally warm up to the USA and open its cast resources to a native son - mark my words people, Africa is the next frontier for world events!).

So all in all I think Obama is the best person in this present field to take us to the next stage in America's place in the world.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mike K, Denver — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:52:56 GMT

I live in Florida and have hundreds of Democratic and Independant friends and co-workers. Not ONE says they will vote for Obama. That should be a wake up call because Florida is full of Yellow Dog Dems who will not vote for him. We do not care what two very small northern states have to say. We are a huge state with alot real pull in who becomes president and he will not make it. Hillary is a moderate and most live in the moderate world of politics.
And yes, MSNBC is becoming Fox News. I am switching to CNN and even CNBC.
Edward is off my list and many others also. I will vote for McCann before I will vote for Obama or Edwards or the combo.

Kathy Casey, Palm Bay FL (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 4:41 PM)
---------------

You and your friends are definitely a minority then. You really need to read and do research and not vote for or against any candidate based on superficial reasons. People dislike Hillary because of her real-life baggage and her continued lying about "35 years of experience" of which most of us can only count 7. There is her voting record in the Senate. There is how she came to NY to run for Senate in the first place instead of from Arkansas where she knew they'd never vote for her. So, if you'd vote for Hillary, ask yourself about what you're getting: The same s--t as the last 7, if not worse.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Laura Elwin, Sammamish, Wa. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:53:10 GMT

Watching closely...I am observing a very close resemblence of Obama to George as he demonstrates
an ego taking over his personality as did George
Bush when folks pegged him as the one they would
like to have a beer with! Obama is getting the
same "likeability" tag by the media as Bush did
and I just don't see it as equating as what we are
looking for in the president we need to rescue our
country from the distruction cause by electing Bush...the so called "likeable" candidate. Wake up
and see how the media is just looking for an opportunity to cash in on "first black candidate",
all the while critizing Clinton if she so much as
mentioned "first woman". Who is behind Obama?
The neocons were behind Bush. I find it a life
saver that President Bill Clinton would be behind
a Pesident Hillary Clinton.... Maybe our country would have a chance to repair our standing in the world. Hillary Clinton has the brillance, experience, respect for her work in Washington.
Obama can be anti-establishment, but he is the
establishment since he is in politice. He started
calling Hillary dishonest, and then let Edwards take
over attacking Hillary...not to noble. I would vote
for an African American, but would choose a man more
like Powell (unfortunately Bush spoiled that possibility). I love Oprah...however, as a champion for women over the years (which has been
what gave her fame and adoration) I am unhappy that she has abandoned women in her support of Obama.

Could go on, but will finish with "WAKE UP AMERICANS... USE YOUR BRAINS...WE NEED A DEMOCRATE
CANDIDATE WHO CAN LEAD OUR COUNTRY !!! After 8 years of an unqualified president, my vote goes to
proven leadership, not emotional rock-star hype and
it is time the media stops saying Hillary is not likeable... She is not running for Miss America,
she is running for the most important position available and just because she is a woman, the media
is having a problem with their own egos...good lord...let's have a reality check. Jealousy rears its ugly head and some of you sound like Ann Colter.
Quite small.

My vote goes for Clinton who will change history by
giving us back a country we can respect and the world
can respect. She has the broad perspective of world
problems and the intellectual brain to figure out the
best way to solve them. Just heard Obama say that he would unite parties, before and after he said that
he would make the red states blue. Duh! Hillary has
worked with the Republicans on Capital Hill to pass some constructive bills for the people and she is
respected by them.

Get Smart American....no more international cries about how stupid the American people are. After 2004
we should have learned something. Sure hope that
we get the voting machines corrected for an honest
election.

Laura Elwin, Sammamish,Wa.

PS. I agree with Linda. Very dissapointed with Edwards. I was terribly dissapointed with Elizabeth
Edwards when she went negative on Hillary...really
shocked. I really admire her, but that was not nice.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dian E. Ferguson, Tukwila, WA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:53:26 GMT

Experience versus change seems to be the theme in the debate on who is most qualified on the Democratic side. Actually both Obama and Hillary represent experience and change. Experience is gained everyday of our lives in what we do, graduating from college, getting married, reading the news, serving as a legislator, being the first black to do this, the first women to do that. Let's give them both credit. Many of Hillary problems derive from the fact that she is a woman who is tougher than many men. Men do not like this characteristic in women. Either one of them would make good Presidents and bring to the table different skills, talents and experience. The bottom line is George Bush has not served the American people well. He has utilized the tragedy of 9-11 to define the purpose of his administration and its blunders and ill defined purpose has failed us all. I'm still undecided, however, I am liking what I see in Obama and his message of possibilities and hope. I am watching Hillary to see how she overcomes adversity and disappointment in Iowa and to see if she can even acknowledge that she made some mistakes and have the ability to correct them and move forward. The Democrats are fortunate to have some great candidates including Dodd and Biden who dropped out. The only Republican candidate who seems to be real is Huckabee. McCains public policy stance on Iraq is scary. He seems to be unable to grasp the pluse of the nation on this issue. America cries out for a "new" leader who can restore some creditability to the U.S., who can restore the value of the American dollar and who will not sell out the country to the rich. Bush, Cheney and Condolence has not served the American people well. This administration is a disappointment to all Americans who care about what we stand for as a nation, a place of hope and possibilities for all people.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

bob, mt. miew missouri — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:54:43 GMT

you cant perdict whos going to win , look who got elected two times it took 8 years fot the people to get it ,think they can do it in less than a year now( dont think so) i my self dont want to go have a beer with them or tell me they will do something and then ,say (congress wont let me I tryed) they know today what they can and cant do if they will

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Brenda Ferguson, Coraopolis, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:57:58 GMT

I support Huckabeee then Mccain. They are both very stron leaders at a time that we need strength in this country.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jamie, Salt Lake, Utah — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:58:09 GMT

Never underestimate a Republican Actor. Go Thompson!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Brenda Ferguson, Coraopolis, PA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:00:17 GMT

Governor Huckabee has the strenth that is needed in these troubled times. It does not hurt that he is a man of God when it seems that is just what our country is in need of to prevail over the terrorist thugs. He has hte strngth of President Bush but more brains.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stan Z, Sayreville, NJ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:01:27 GMT

Experience doesn't tell you about ability, but about survivability. Just because you spent more years in the Senate, doesn't mean you are the best Senator. Is Roger Federer the most experienced tennis player or by far the best? Sports is different, but the concept is the same.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

tlee,baltimore,md — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:01:41 GMT

I was wondering if anyon noticed that Obama never has people of color standing behind him on stage , or at rallys is that a coincedence or a plan?I also did not like the attack on Hillary by Edwards and the big smirk on Obamas face when she was being attacked!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marvin Rhea Granbury TX — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:01:51 GMT

question? why is romney being scruntized because of his religion?

I have not seen anything concerning sen oboma and his religion?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Louinel Jean, Jmaica, Mandeville — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:03:15 GMT

The discussion lacks taste because it is too often brought to a simple matter of race.Some people look at the Obama win with disdain simply becaue he is black. Hey!This the 21st sentury wake up folks.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Louinel Jean, Jmaica, Mandeville — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:04:55 GMT

The discussion lacks taste because it is too often brought to a simple matter of race.Some people look at the Obama win with disdain simply becaue he is black. Hey!This is the 21st century. Wake up folks.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

mark grindle — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:05:07 GMT

in my personal opinion and as a free american i believe the white house should stay just that the white house wake up people

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bogey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:07:06 GMT

hey Tim

who you crappin'?

or have you been paid by the Clinton administration?

Dodd, Biden and even Richardson have more "experience" in their pinkies than Hilary.

also, it seems to me that both Rumsfeld and Cheney came into office with tons of arguably successful experience in both govt and private sector.

that didn't turn out that well.

Instincts and good advisors is what matters.

Obama has both. As did Reagan.

I'm waiting for the paid Hilary shills to bring up "electability"

Now it takes a lot of chutzpah and nerve/arrogance to talk about someone else's electability when you are the 3rd most divisive in the country and have by far the biggest baggage/negatives of anyone in the race.

And your "unelectable" challenger, smokes you in ability to draw in independents, disenchnted Republicans and every demograhic under 60 as well as bringing new people/voters into the process.

Are you going to argue this with a straight face?
as in - we'll beat Repubs by a couple of percentage points , but that guy will beat them by 10 or more?

Hilary would be a competent president. but nothing more. She could never bring about change because of her baggage and her divisiveness and lack of a mandate because she can only win in a tight election.

I want more. I want more than a "competent caretaker" I want Obama.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

shawn holliday — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:07:30 GMT

As usual, the Democrats let their ideology get in the way of a how-do-we-win strategy. The Republicans are masters at playing the racial card in politics, because it works, unfortunately. Remember Willie Horton? The dirty secret of American politics is that Obama, who is a talented, intelligent, nice guy, can't win. Hillary brings Bill, who is a liability everywhere but the Democrat party faithful, who are loud but not numerous, who always ignore the meat-and-potatoes values of the core of their party, and who as a result never win elections. The Republicans are past masters at smear campaigns (Kerry's military record was supposed to be an asset, remember?) and they must be drooling contemplating a no-holds-barred shot at Bill a/k/a President Without Portfolio. Heaven help us, the Democrats are well on their way to giving us another eight years of short-sighted scandal-ridden holier-than-thou Republican leadership. Again.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

average joe — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:07:36 GMT

edwards is a flake, hillary is transparent and obama, well he's WAY to full of himself and i have yet to see a real reason WHY he actually thinks he deserves to be our President, unless it's to feed his fat ego. i'd vote for the ted "the drunk" kennedy before wasting a vote on obama....President obama........if the doesn't make you want to puke i dont know what will.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Alfia Johnson, Washington, DC — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:07:47 GMT

To Concerned Citizen - And Ronald Reagan was an "experienced" President just like Clinton, and look at the economic mess he put this country in, not to mention his foreign policy that was a slap in the face to all oppressed people around the globe, including the economic and military aid given to the Baby Doc regime in Haiti and other countries. As Scott (thank you Scott) pointed out, regarding Clinton, she has experience doing what exactly?? What has she done that is so profound that outweights the legitimacy of anyone else because she has had titles behind her name? There are a ton of people who have had experience in civil service, public sector, international diplomacy,etc., but that does not mean that they have any vision or new approach as to how to change the course of this country through a new paradigm. As Scott says, somebody needs to really look at her resume and start asking pertinent questions about what all this "experience" really means. As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama has initiated key legislation, and has been a public servant throughout his career. Anyone can go to Wikipedia and look at what a candidates professional and personal life has represented. Your point is what?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Stacey — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:09:11 GMT

My husband is a surgeon. I married him in college, put him through med school, supported him through two residencies, and helped him establish his practice. He's been recognized as one of the top surgeons in his field. I just finished my first year of med school. So... how many Clinton supporters want me to operate on them. Please stop touting her experience. She can't use it to bring change. She won't even apologize for her vote on the war. Remember that fellow democrats. SHE voted for the war and refuses to apologize. SHE voted for the recent vote on Iran labeling the Iranian argument as a terrorist organization. I can't understand how a democrat can vote for her. Experience without judgement is useless and Clinton has neither.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

alan lane 31 l&s ln epsom nh 03234 — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:11:51 GMT

i like mike and my bike likes mike

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

forHillary, St. Louis, MO — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:11:53 GMT

I couldn't believe the double-team attack by Obama and Edwareds. Then Richardson trying to make it look like Clinton was being negative. It looked like she was set up. I originally thought we have three very good candidates. If Clinton didn't win, I wouldn't mind Obama or Edwards winning. I don't think that any more. I am so disappointed in both of them. It's the boy's club all over again. Let's get real. Clinton isn't popular with men. Men have a problem with her. If you look at the breakdown, with gender, it is majority of men do not like her. Honestly, I don't believe it is her but just any woman who would run. Women can now die for our country but can't run for President.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:13:07 GMT

'THE CHURCH' doesn't need competition from ANOTHER Joe Smith.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

C. Williams, Louisville, KY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:13:16 GMT

I am amongst the young voters and I am looking for change! I was personally affected by the events of 9/ll and was for President Bush's team. I supported his efforts of his fight against terrorism, now I am left wondering what other intentions were there to continue on at this stage. Hillary calls this a "contest," I call this the most important decision of my life. Who I vote for will not be someone who just has experience and that's all that have to tell me to count on as we pay my $521 health insurance premium every month, but someone who I think and feel has the best interest of me and this country at heart. Call it what u want, but changing the heart of Washington is very important to me and it begins with our leadership. The after effects of 9-11 showed what the heart of America feels and looks like. I'm looking for a leader who will keep that momentum going in the hearts of the American people.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

C.Williams, Louisville, KY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:14:05 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Dot, Illinois — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:14:58 GMT

Is criticism about the influence by the entertainment media concerning politics a taboo subject?
Sincerely, rp
Randi Probst, San Diego, CA (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 5:17 PM
-----------------------------------------------

I thought the debate last night may have been a step back to dealing more with issues than fluff, but then when you read the stories and comments here, I just don't know. One of these stories even mentioned that Senator Clinton missed Senators Biden and Dodd during the debate. Perhaps if they had been given some media coverage they would still be in the race--quite frankly, I think the debate was lessened by their not being there.

I don't understand why we spend so much time discussing things like charisma, a candidate's laugh, whether a candidate gets angry when criticized, whether a candidate seems to be tired, etc. instead of focusing on THE ISSUES. To me, this is a disservice from the media--they have the ability to change the focus of the debate but they seem to perfer it to remain on the more trivial, celebrity type stories.

We seem to be judging these candidates with our hearts and emotions, and while that may be a good thing, I think we should also judge with our heads as well. For my money, I want a candidate that I am confortable with, whose character I admire, but also one who I believe has a firm grasp of the issues and who has the best proposals for dealing with those issues.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

D Jones — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:15:01 GMT

I second the earlier comment regarding McCain's interview today on Meet the Press.

McCain either lied, or is grossly informed, when he said 'no intelligence agency' indicated there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq BEFORE the invasion. There is confirming evidence from two high-level CIA operatives that a memo was placed on President Bush's desk some two months before the war that Sadam Hussein had abandandoned his program to manufacture nuclear weapons several years earlier (see the Sidney Blumenthal article...don't remember which paper).

Further, it is apalling to me that McCain could possibly justify the invasion of Iraq for the sole purpose of toppling Sadam, again either ignorantly or disingenously suggesting he was one of the worst dictators of our times. Compared to Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, and the Japanese in WWII, Sadam was a humanitarian.

I used to respect, and would have even conceivably voted for, John McCain. Listening to the BS he paraded today with Tim Russert leaves that respect merely a dying ember.

How sad....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Concerned Senior Citizen, Riverside, California — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:15:46 GMT

I think that they all need to back off and regroup..
I do not feel any of them are qualified to be President.. Look what G.Bush has done to our Country.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

JOHN DOE — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:16:27 GMT

SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME THAT THE COMMENTS I'VE BEEN READING WERE SENT BY BY PSYCHOTIC IDIOTS LODGED IN AN INSANE ASYLUM. iTS MIND BOGGLING TO THINK ANYONE WOULD VOTE FOR A CANIDATE THAT WOULD KEEP IMPLEMENTING THE SAME POLICIES..,MITT, HUCKLEBERRY, FREDDY, HILLIARY, NcCAIN, DOESN'T CARE ANYTHING ABOUT YOU PEOPLE..THE ONE THAT CLAIMS EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWED HOW MUCH SHE LISTENS TO THE PEOPLE...NOR WILL SHE COMMIT HERSELF TO ANY ISSUES. THE ONLY TWO CANIDATES THAT WILL BRING CHANGE TO HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS AND POOR IS JOHN EDWARDS, AND OBAMA. THE REST OF THE CANIDATES ARE IN A POPULARITY CONTEST.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:18:50 GMT

THE STATE should VOTE FOR HEALTHCARE/gay marriage.

ABORTION will ALWAYS remain A PHYSICIAN 'CHOICE'.

INSTEAD of RICH PROTESTANT MINISTERS demogogueing GAYS and abortion:
ADMIT THAT YOU COULD JUST WITNESS WEALTHY MD NEIGHBOR;
ADMIT THAT ATTRACTIVE MEN are WORTH 'sexual reorienting'for FEMALE parishioners.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ozzy, Boca Raton, FL — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:19:33 GMT

Hillary is done.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Edwards/Obama 08 — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:21:08 GMT

If Hillary did not support the war this race would be hers for the taking. She Has herself to Blame!!!Her problem is she started running for the general election back in 2008 and forgot about the primary.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:22:04 GMT

HOW DOES-VALEDICTORIAN MIT ROMNEY-lose debate to 'LAST IN CLASS' JOHN McCAIN; MASS MEDIA MAJOR. . .MIKE HUCKABEE???

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Brian Kimber,Boca Raton,Florida — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:22:05 GMT

What does Hillary stand for? It seems to change on location, audience,and timing opportunity. She is an apparent phony even as politicians go.It is readily apparent from her demeanor that she has no faith in her convictions so why should any voter with the sense God gave a goose.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:26:04 GMT

SLOW TALKIN' slim pickin' FRED THOMPSON: ONLY CHILD OF USED CAR SALESMAN.

6'7" actor with YOUNGISH ATTRACTIVE LAWYER WIFE.

-not RONALD REAGAN-experience.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

snorre,Pittsburgh Pa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:26:22 GMT

IOWA WAS NOT "FOR" BUT "AGAINST"
It surprises me that nobody--not even the professional commentators---have realized that the votes by the democrates, republicans and others in Iowa were not for any specific candidates at all. It was rather a most solid and uniform way of the residence of Iowa--regardless of polical party, age, sex and social background--to express their extreem frustration with the current White House.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:28:09 GMT

i just can't stand HILLARY. . even if her politics are less offensive than OBAMA's.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jonathan, Wilkes Barre, Pa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:28:35 GMT

Vote for the candidate who understands the principles this country was founded upon. Go Ron Paul! Go America!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Mac Pleasantville, Iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:30:22 GMT

Four years President Clinton-We just had eight years of President Clinton-There will be no changes If Clinton Is Elected-Who Is Obama- Keep Charging John

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ACampos IA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:30:31 GMT

Obama is a breath of fresh air and a candidate that I can stand behind. Hilary last night at the debate looked evil when attempting to validate herself.

It's crazy that as a country we have to contemplate the safety of a candidate because of their race or religious. Is this the United States of America or is this Pakistan or a number of other countries we tout as politically barbaric?

For those individuals who are trapped in the past and have learned nothing about progress get over your bigot and hate. The future of this country isn't buying into it. Voting for Obama wasn't about race but a vote for "CHANGE".

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:32:12 GMT

JOHN McCAIN crashed 3 planes-graduated last in class-no executive experience. "OPEN BORDER and 'mccain FEINGOLD"

-after 25 yrs in Senate-

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

m jim, arizona — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:33:08 GMT

I knew when barak gave his keynote address at the democratic convention that he would be a serious contender for presidency someday. It seems funny that people are so afraid of his audacity that they want to dig up any scrap of dirt they can find to potentially damage his crediblity. the only thing is that he wrote his book "audacity of hope" and spilled his own beans. imagine that, someone getting honest from the get go. I can speak for many native americans in saying that someone who can cross so many barriers, not just race but party lines included, we are greatly honored that he is even running in the first place.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Eric F., RockSprings, Wyoming — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:33:08 GMT

Everyone acts so surprised to find that Obama is ahead of Hillary, or that Huckabee won in Iowa. They are also quick to offer explanations and excuses for such events. While I am sure that many of the points made by those who explain the complicated political arena to us are true and/or accurate, I would like to offer the observation of a political amatuer and outsider. Whenever (or so it seems) most of the candidates make statements or speak in public forums, it seems that their entire rhetoric is scripted, out of touch with average citizens, and thereby making it sound untrustworthy. What I have noticed from both Huckabee and Obama is sincerity. They speak clearly and intelligently, but, more importantly, They appear warm, friendly, and truly concerned with the well-being of ALL people. For both Obama and Huckabee, of course, responses to many issues may be researched, coached, and even scripted; but it feels like they at least care enough to care.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bryan, Kansas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:33:40 GMT

Experience isn't the great vehicle for change, experience is the greatest catalyst of complacency. Experience brings more rituals than progress. Clinton is the closest thing to a republican the demo party has seen in a while, I'd like to see her campaign to anyone besides the rich or women. "I'm just a poor white girl..." Give me a break!!!

Edwards and Obama are by far better candidates, and provide more to the table than a sympathy vote, and a obligation to continue the reduancy of American politics.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

ME, Santa Ana, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:34:17 GMT

Does Clinton have experience? Yes. She has experience enraging Republicans. We just can't afford another X years of divisive politics where nothing gets done.

Edwards or Obama can do it. Clinton will just bring back decades-old grudges and political in-fighting.

Clinton will bring out Republicans in hordes in the general election JUST TO VOTE AGAINST HER. Independents don't like her either. That will not only boost the Republican candidate but also harm tight congressional races.

NH: Send us someone who can not only win, but can bring us all together, not bring back old arguments.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nancee Phoenix, AZ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:34:41 GMT

Obama has charisma, charm, a bright smile, personality, but, to me, he is a nothing more than a "celebrity" candidate-
To be a good president, it takes enough experience not to make a worse mess of things than they already are.
Can you imagine, if elected, what his inexperience can cost the US??Can we afford to risk anything now??

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:36:32 GMT

OBAMA IS TALKING UNIONS-with NAFTA/GATT Hillary-next podium.

Obama IS-flowery rhetoric-zippo.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Richard, Rochester, NY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:37:35 GMT

Edwards is just not going to happen,,, I am so tired of hearing about his parents in the mill....try being on welfare ( 1960's)because of your father getting injured and cant work,,,your mother trying to work PT at a grocery store and raising 8 kids at the same time!
I simply wont vote for Obama,,,IMHO he isnt ready...he hasnt lead anything.and cant put a sentence together.
Hillary, I wanted but I am wondering about her,
BUT she is the best of the 3,,,but being in the political field for 35 years IS a help,,,if you think a wife isnt "learning" from her husband the President,,,remember Mrs. Roosevelt?
It is going to be a very tough decision this year.
The new president will inherit some terrible problems. We just have to figure out who can deal with them the best way. And, not use the office in this critical time as a training ground.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:38:01 GMT

I SEE RON PAUL on all the porn sites I vist.

-too old to get it up-though.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Julie, Springfield, Missouri — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:38:41 GMT

This is to Dave Cartwright, Sandpoint: I lived in Massachusetts for over 20 years. In the 1980's,there was a little company called Bain Investments that went under- it's President was Mitt Romney. I suggest you look into it before you keep on praising Mitt Romney for being a great American. Mitt's millions come from robbing other Americans - check it out.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

KATHY — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:40:24 GMT

I GUESS THE REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO WIN AGAIN UNLESS MARTIN LUTHER KING WORSHIPERS CONTINUE THEIR VOTES. I THINK SOMEBODY NEEDS TO GIVE EDWARDS CREDIT AND QUIT SAYING IT IS A 2 WAY MATCH.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Marty Zeenota, San Diego, CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:40:41 GMT

Here is the Real Issue concerning Hillary Clinton: First of all, she is not her husband even though everyone is trying to put her in that camp. You can't literally fool everyone into believing that she is her husband (even though he was not that great). Second, America really wants some change this time. Obama offers that option over Hillary. Hillary appeals to the Rob Reiner's and Barbra Streisand's of the world. In other words, Liberals over 60 years old. America has had enough of the Liberals over 60 years old. Obama will will the Democratic Nomination. This is a fact and it will happen. Edwards may come in second. It is hard to say at this point, but it sure looks that way. Hillary needs to drop out of the race soon or be disgraced. Hillary also needs to stop acting like her feelings are hurt in debates. Hillary has no feelings and she has demonstrated that over and over again. All Hillary Clinton wants is pure power. She is a female Adolf Hitler just waiting in the wings....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nikki Cappelli, Providence Rhode Island — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:41:07 GMT

I would be a little sceptical jumping on the bandwagon for Obama. He's a good talker says all the right things but he lacks experience. People will bring about change because they know that the American people are sick of being lied too. We do not
know this man, he has not been around long enough to prove himself. Don't be blinded by alot of words. Hilary Clinton seems to be a very strong contender. Edwards was impressive and alot of people have not decided yet. Everyone seems to be professing themselves to be a Christian. They talk the talk lets see if they walk the walk. It doesn't seems to matter much who is jumping in to support candidates,what will matter is when Preachers across this country get up on the pulpit and will encourage their congregation
to vote on moral issues. That will make the difference. Congress voted to go into Iraq and continue to support this war. The President didn't act alone. I would not be so quick to vote for Obama.
Who the heck is he? Where did he come from? Hello! Does he have some hidden agenda? Why in the picture that was going around the internet was he not saying the Pledge of Allegiance with his hand on his heart. He is a Muslim professing to be a Christian. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Randy from Muscatine, Iowa — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:41:27 GMT

Obama has the mo...???

Is it true that when Obama was sworn in as US Senator, he used the KORAN instead of the Bible?

Mobama??

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

polgirl — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:43:26 GMT

Dear 73 year old in Far Hills. I stand corrected. Hillary opted to obtain her law degree from the #1 law school in the country, Yale, rather than Harvard. Thank you.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Sheri Oseni, Gardena CA — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:44:25 GMT

Senator Clinton is intelligent. She was well prepared with last night debate. I'm sure she will win in NH

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jj — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:44:27 GMT

It's THOMPSON/GUILANI and THOMPSON' Lawyer wife as VP.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Deremy, Amarillo, Texas — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:47:47 GMT

If Edwards gets the nom for my party, I won't be voting.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rita Levy, Princeton, NJ — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:47:47 GMT

After watching the debates, listening to the so called experts analyze said debates and then read what other viewers say, I must live on a different planet. There is no way that Obama came across as a winner. He was far less knowledgeable than Hillary. This nonsense about change sounds good but it isn't realistic without an experienced president.
I am beginning to believe that Americans, and that includes women, would rather see anybody in office rather than a woman.
I have come to the conclusion that most of the people in America are followers and if an expert says Obama won, they won't think it through (that's if they even watched the debates) but follow the leader and change their votes.
The Iraqi war has destroyed this country and the most important thing we can do is elect a president that will get us out of the war, improve the economy, get rid of special interest groups and repair the image of the US. We need a president who is experienced in politics and is also very smart. Obama and Edwards don't seem smart enough or experienced enough to do what needs to be done. Hillary should be elected!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Evelyne Daguin, Passaic Park, N.J. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:50:15 GMT

One French author of the 19th century, after being slaughted by the polls runned by the press on his last book, asked the press,"The public! always the public! How many idiots do you need to make a public?" That qestion is still asked by the French votes these days - they don't trust any press in the world, they are looking for the truth through different ways, especially through their own investigation behind the scene.
As a teacher for many years, I never relied on my students'I.Q. to determine their intelligence - according the American based I.Q. tests, the French Canadians and the Black American students had a lower scores just because the I.Q. was not made taking into consideration their different cultural backgrowns.
Watching all the polls, coming from the press which are bombarding us every day, makes me shout,"Please, spare us!"

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Andrew Warthen, San Antonio, TX — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:51:21 GMT

Is it just me, or was Bill Richardson running for Hillary's Vice-presidental pick hard last night?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Elizabeth, Or. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:52:46 GMT

Subject: Obama
Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. a black Muslim from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white atheist from Wichita, Kansas.
When Obama parents divorced. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a radical Muslim from Indonesia. The family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a muslim school in Jakarta. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim.
Wahabism is the radical teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorist who are now waging Jihad against the western world.
You do understand that Obama is now the leading candidate to oppose the Republican nominee in the
presidential election. I for one do not want a Muslim for a President. do you ??????.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

George e. Los Angeles — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:56:45 GMT

People please! No candidate running for president has experience to be President of the US! It is a unique job and only a President running for reelction has experience. What experience does McCain have as a 25 year senator? Same as a 4 year senator. What experience does a one term governor have to be president? or pre-911 failure of a city mayor? Get real people...this experience thing is a smoke screen. Ironically, only Hilary has the "experience" of what a President does day in day out, but that will not make her a good President. Wake up...not a single one of the candidates have the experience to be President. There is no such thing, unless you by a President running for reelection. O

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

earnestine Reno, NV — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:57:31 GMT

What is wrong with a little experience? When you hire a tax lawyer or a brain surgeon, do you really want somebody who is youthful, idealistic and does not know how to work the system? I think not. Why are you looking for these pretty boy charcteristics in the President?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RickP, Idaho — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:57:53 GMT

Julie, Springfield, Missouri. I suggest that you take your own advice, Bain Investments is one of the biggest and most sucessful companies in the market.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

D. Gray — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:59:15 GMT

where exactly is Hillary's experience.did she have some role in her husband's administrations that has heretofore NOT been disclosed.
remember the travelgate and whitewater fiascos;and her time with the Rose law firm.
maybe someone w/ a little less "experience"would have a new perspective.
who needs more of the Clinton legacy. It's time to move on.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Organicas Colon Cleanse vs Dr Natura Colonix ,los angeles California — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:59:32 GMT

What year to be alive. Clinton wrote living history. Obama seems to be defining it. We are living in the the most you can country in the world. Young peple vote and they make a difference.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joan Pearce, Tampa, Fl — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:04:15 GMT

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR, YOU JUST MIGHT GET IT.

Change is not enough, we need change for the better!
These candidates are interviewing for the most important job in American. When applying for a job, you are hired based on your experience and knowledge not the fact that you got an A in public speaking. Once you are hired, you better be able to back up what your resume says or you will be out of a job. Are we just looking at the pretty boy smile and hearing words we hope are true, or are we going to check their qualifications and background to make sure they can do the job they say they can. We don't have the luxery to say the 90 day probation period is up and it just didn't We will have this President for four years, and if you look back over the past seven, tney can be very long years and a lot of damage can be done.

This country is already in shambles because four years ago people voted for a President based on his religeous belief instead of his qualifications, see where it got us.

We need someone that can get it done and knows how to get it done, not just think they can. Edwards or Hillary either one can do that.

If the Democrats don't wake up and unite, we will have another Republican in the White House.
God help us all!

he position, not because you can interview well.
So far all Obama has showed us is that he speaks well in public. Having charisma does not make you a good president. He barely has experience in the Congress. Just because a president WANTS to do something doesn't mean that if will pass Congress. He hasn't a clue. If the Democrats don't wake up and see thru the smoke screen, we will have another Republican in the White House. God help us.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pat, Bountiful, UT — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:05:01 GMT

Tim from New york--you got it right. Obama is sticking to generalities and trying to appear above the fray. Democrats should be looking closely at his record now and not waiting for the Republicans to do so. It is also worth noting that he is the one Democrat that Sean Hannity keeps lauding while excoriating Hilliary. There must be a reason. Hillary must actually be the more formidable foe. After watching the debates last night, I actually gained respect for McCain, but lost it for Edwards. Enjoyed Hillary's sense of humor and ability to withstand the arrows directed her way. She seemed to be more presidential than anyone. And, yes, experience does count; without it change is nearly impossible to implement. I believe she understands the interests of the American people. And being the wife of a president may or may not count as experience. Perhaps Mamie or Pat or George W.'s mom might not, but Hillary was involved with politics actively from the beginning. She learned a great deal just from her experience with trying to help the American health care system for the American people. Too bad the pharmaceuticals and the insurance lobbyists were out to get her and us. I sincerely hope she gets another chance to use what she has learned about getting it done in Washington. Hope New Hampshire is listening, thinking, reading. No matter whom they select, I wish them well.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

David Goff, Winston Salem, NC — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:06:53 GMT

Democratic Voters of New Hampshire: wake up!
With 14 years in Congress, 2 cabinet positions, and a govenorship to his credit, Bill Richardson is so obviously the best qualified candidate to bring about change. It is mystifying that he is so far back in the polls when he alone has the combination of vision and experience that is needed. Obama has a great vision, but insufficient experience. Clinton has neither experience nor vision. Edwards has insufficient experience and no realistic plan or vision.

Richardson is the best person for the job on the Democratic side. Wake up and vote for the combination of experience and vision!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Charles King, Boston, MA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:07:57 GMT

I want to vote for Obama because the need for change is so evident. However, I need evidence of his brilliance,a grasp of the details that devolve from his admirable but more abstruse political philosophy. Alan Greenspan said Bill Clinton had the best grasp of the details of economics and finance of all the presidents he served under. Academic qualifications or even experience are not enough. Those framers of the constitution were obviously extraordinarly brilliant men with a genius for the detail that trumps the devil. Every generation has the right to expect that they can find such men to lead, we don't need dynasties.

Hilary's failing on the other hand has been that so far she has never been able to defend the details of any of the great initiatives she has brought to the table. With her access to good advice that shows a superficial grasp of "the devil in the detail" (a lawyer's term) that has plagued this present regime.

Obama has not impressed me, yet, with his grasp (beyond his lawyerly level of aprehension) of that kind of detail. I'm still waiting. As an independent, I can just as easily switch to Huckabee, or Guiliani if given the choice, or no better choice, these men have got IT although I don't go for the Conservative party line at all, nevertheless I will unless either of the three Democratic front runners can demonstrate to me that they have the kind of comprehensive grasp of where the pieces belong and don't have to work things out on the job. Given free reign the Conservative hard line will wreck the American economy, but these two are not hardliners.

That's a half of the difference between a visionary and a person who's just highly competent. Bill had that half, he is a brilliant man, although the other requirement, a more lofty ethos than the common man seemed to have escaped him somewhat at the time.
I'm still not sure Obama knows how the pieces of world dynamic fit together, whilst at least Hillary still has Bill as a sounding board.

A leader needs to be first among equals,(primus inter pares),otherwise he's going to be led around with a ring through his nose by the other brilliant people he has to lead or interact with, like Bush. He/she needs to be able to look at the genius sitting across the table from them and say, "Good God, man it can't be that!" and then tell him/her why.

I've encountered a few of those in my life, a very few, and I don't think Hillary has it, and I'm not sure Obama does yet. Bush sure as hell doesn't, that's the problem. Huckabee and Guiliani both seem to have it, but I don't like the line they'll have to toe. So it boils down to this. Dependent on who wins the nomination, unless Obama, Hillary, or even Edwards can impress me with their talents and not just their polical acumen(heavily scripted anyway) I'll vote for Guiliani or Huckabee depending on who wins their nominations. I'd vote for any one of those five, unless they fail to come up to my standard or fall below it, against any one of the others. With the exception of McCain, who seems sound but lacking the spark, they seem to be either, too kooky,obsessed,or one dimensional; figureheads or hidden agenda types, or both. Some of them though brilliant or admirable in some respects seem to lack the pragmatism to bite the bullet and take the hard choice over the lofty ideal or obsession. On the rare chance that none of thos five are available I won't vote.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tammy Fenton MO — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:08:09 GMT

I'm going all in for Hillary, she does have what it takes. Obama is just to young, and how many present did he say instead of voting? I think it would be different if we was not at war... But we are and health care well it is costing the tax payers a lot of money for everyone that does not have health care.. EVEN ADULTS.. Why is it better that a baby have it or my husbands 101 grandma who can't work either.. Hillary has done a lot, she is a lawyer, she has set her whole life in motion for what she wants and has fought hard for it... No one speaks about all the places Obama mom took him and his fathers.. This is not fair either.. But I guess that is life.. I say GO HILLIARY AND BILL, GO ALL THE WAY, YOU DID IT ONCE DO IT AGAIN, BUT HEY THE FIRST TIME KEN STARR WAS ALL OVER YOU, SO THIS IS A PIECE OF CAKE... YOU HAVE MY VOTE AND MY FAMILY WHICH ARE ALL OVER THE AGE OF 18...

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Eric, Philly, PA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:09:18 GMT

O8ama... the time is now.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Guillermo Vanegas, San Ramon, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:09:27 GMT

What is REALLY Hillary Clinton's EXPERIENCE, other than her time in the Senate and (if that is relevant EXPERIENCE) having been the First Lady for 8 years? Is she talking about her experience, or her husband's?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Doug, Mt. Carroll, Illinois — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:10:41 GMT

For David Cartwright of Sandpoint, regarding Ronald Reagan and the fall of Communism, it seems that moderators and our history books have failed to note that Pope John Paul II probably had something to do with it too.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Elizabeth, Or. — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:11:26 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nick Lagala Camarillo, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:12:43 GMT

In the debate, Edwards showed he is for the little guy. Why does the media and news reporters not pounce on his stance? Maybe because they are all in the $250,000 a year catagory and don't like what they hear.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Nick Lagala Camarillo, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:12:44 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

sean milwaukee wis — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:13:56 GMT

Is it at all posible that the 'BIG MO", for Obama is really due to the "BIG O", what is the impact with her on his side?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott, Portage, IN — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:15:15 GMT

To Ron Doss of Alamagordo:

Thank Heaven, for someone who thinks before he writes.
However, you misunderstood me; I’m not advocating for unrestrained capitalism or the anarchy your highway trooper analogy implies.

Our federal government is hardly weakened by tax cuts, despite the tax RATE decrease, taxes collected by the Feds actually increased due to economic growth.
In fact, in the past 40 years, Fed Revenue has increased by 232% (inflation-adjusted) and is at an all-time high, but spending has increased 259%. It’s not weakness of revenue, it’s their weakness for spending that’s the problem. Has the quality of life in this country improved by 232-259% in the past 40 years? Not according to most voters, apparently.

What do we have to show for all this spending? Programs like Mediare, Medicaid, and Social Security that account for 60% of federal spending are set to double in the next few decades and be bankrupt within 10 years. We have schools that are failing to graduate ever-growing numbers of children. The more money we throw at a problem, the worse it seems to get.

We agree, government’s job is to protect citizens from abuses of Capitalism and to provide a safety net for those who temporarily need help, but what happens when the government is the greatest abuser of the public trust?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:20:00 GMT

McCain = RAPID MAD DOG FOAMING AT THE MOUTH and you want HIM??? for president?
GO RON PAUL GO...

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John, Brooklyn, NY — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:20:22 GMT

The democrats have a history of being retards when choosing there candidate for persident. If they choose Obama as their nominee they deserve to lose. Republicans are going to have a good time riping this guy to shreds that is why they are proping him up over hillary. Secretly I think they want to run against him. My fellow democrats vote with your head because a lot is at stake. We dont need another rookie in the White House.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Colin Mincy New York, NY — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:22:24 GMT

I hate to break it to you folks but at the Democratic debate last night the most below the belt line was when Clinton inferred that Edwards' ability to "convince" Bush and the Republicans to pass a Patient's Bill of Rights led to Nataline Sarkasis' death. OUTRAGEOUS.

Quite frankly Linda, if Hillary Clinton was your first choice I doubt Edwards wants your vote anyway. Clinton is the status quo through and through. She doesn't have 35 years of relative experience. Being a First Lady gives you some insights to how government works but is not a qualification to be a good President. Quite frankly, Hillary is a fraud - she's neither experienced or transformational.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bob, Concord, California — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:24:16 GMT

Most rapid-fire polls such as those predicting a winner in a Presidential primary election are done over the telephone; over "land lines" and some are done in person, one-on-one.
Amazingly, the huge base of youthful support for Obama does not have "land lines" and are probably relieved that they receive few or no cellphone calls eating up their "minutes" asking their opinions.
Historically the young (18-25) do NOT turn out to vote, however. Despite these encouraging polls recently for Obama, it leaves us with the two possibilities of either a substantial "stealth" win in New Hampshire for Obama or a nasty tie with the status quo candidate, Clinton.
Oh yes, have you noticed that "Hillary" is running for the Presidential nomination and NOT "Clinton"? Could it be that the "Clinton" Whitehouse already had it's opportunity, and "Hillary" knows that? While obviously running on her own failed healthcare position and not very much other experience, except her husband's policies (status quo), she doesn't think we will notice that besides being a woman, she is also a "Clinton"? Or, then again, as the bird-brained tabloids might predict, maybe "Hillary" really is going to divorce "Bill" once in the Whitehouse.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Terry Ryan, Austin, Texas — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:26:33 GMT

Richardson, is a Clinton lover and all he is doing is trying to get himself either on the ticket or another cabinet position, if she is elected. If he truly wanted to be president he would be attacking her for her stances as well. After watching a number of debates I have lost a lot of respect for him. He should drop out of the Presidental race and endorse Clinton and get it over with.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

James, Emeryville, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:29:35 GMT

Hilary just has to battle through to super Tuesday and she'll be fine.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Scott, Portage, IN — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:32:55 GMT

Mike K in Denver,

The high price of taxation is a leading factor in sending your jobs overseas. As is Americans’ short-sighted purchase of so many Chinese products. It’s not wealthy, “dirty” Republicans like Cheney I see shopping at Big Lots or WalMart. When you don’t buy the more-expensive American products, why do you think those American companies seek out cheaper labor overseas? That’s the only way to lower overhead. You shop at WalMart because you get a better deal there for your family. Companies go overseas for the same reason – they are “shopping” for cheaper labor. Do you think companies are operating charities?

The three greatest contributors to any business’s overhead: labor costs, litigation, taxes.
If you want your jobs back, support policies that limit the runaway trial attorneys and don’t punish corporations for being successful. Until then, it’s a free world. Companies are doing what you do; they shop for the best deal. We need a President/Congress that understands that anti-business sentiment will only cut our own throats. Is J. Edwards going to personally employ everyone once he puts their employers out of business?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rich, Michigan — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:34:48 GMT

I was enjoying these comments until I got to J Offman. Guess what pinhead, they didn't sensor you! It's shallow, short-sighted biggots like you that are the real threat to this nation.

And you, cowardly John Doe from Los Angeles - So called Christian. Do you think dropping bombs on civilians in Iraq and shooting them is what Jesus would do?? Don't you think the people you are spewing your hate at are not children of God? No wonder Christianity gets such a bad name in this country. Why don't you volunteer your time, treasure, and talent to helping the elderly or homeless. I know there are a lot of them in LA.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jon Smith, hartford, ct — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:37:37 GMT

Lets face it people, Obama is the best candidate. We've already been through the Clinton era and it was so horrible that we're still dealing with the big mess.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Rob Hough — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:38:14 GMT

It isn't that the media is down on one candidate or the other. It is that the American people are actually chosing for themselves who they want to the their nominees. I am a strong Republican who personally think our Pres is a great disappointment(yes I am being polite). I also think that Barack Obama is a fresh breath of air. The rest of the candidates are the same old hash, recycled. John McCain, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee and the rest of the Repubs and Hilary, John Edwards and the rest of the Demos, just don't get it. Barack we are jumping up and down for joy. You bring something the election process hasn't seen since Bobby Kennedy was running for the Presidency-EXCITEMENT AND ENTHUSIASM! Imagine the smile on Abe Lincoln's face were he to see what he made possible.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carole Moyer — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:39:56 GMT

John McCain is the man. Obama is scary, Clinton won't make it, so there's only one choice for this election and that is John McCain.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jeff, Portland, OR — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:41:21 GMT

People need to stop feeling sorry for Romney last night. He was being retaliated against for all his false attack ads against everyone else. It was a consequence of his negative ads. The other candidates weren't just going to sit around and take his phony BS. He is the one who started with the negative ads back in the fall and has routinely shoved it down the throat's of the voters in Iowa and they rejected him for it. New Hampsire shouldn't fall for it as well.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Valerie, Montgomery, AL — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:44:48 GMT

Why is everyone stuck on "experience"? The president is ending his 2nd term which means he had previous experience, as president. He also had experience before he obtained his current position. Yet, people are having to decide between food, medicine and how much gas is from one minute to the next. Sometimes it's good to start off with a clean slate. And don't forget the thousands of lives lost in a war that at first wasn't such.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Carole Moyer — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:45:40 GMT

From Prescott, Arizona.....John McCain is the man for the Presidency.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Elnigoumi, Falls Church,VA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:45:54 GMT

Hillary, with the Abilities to Bring the Nation's on the Right Track.
Alert,Honesty and Integrity of the Voting Process!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John Doe, Seattle, Wash. — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:46:34 GMT

Not allowing debate with other bloggers kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? I would think that interaction with other bloggers would be the best semblance of a public space for debate. (Of course, the down side is that people tend to make it personal. But I suppose that is the price to pay for a democratic forum.)

Anyway, my two cents worth: All of the candidates, except Ron Paul, are playing politics and will do nothing different. And, unfortunately, I don't agree with his libertarian position, though he is right in criticizing the US foreign policy. Since the image might make a difference - maybe Obama will try to live up to the hope he creates, or maybe some else will, and not the political commitments he has forged - I say change the picture.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Proctor FOB NARAY AFGHANISTAN — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:50:05 GMT

there is only one candidate that has any real chance of doing the right thing in office and that is McCain he is the only candidate who knows what soldiers want and need.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Catherine Galma-Tucker, Kingston, Jamaica — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:50:43 GMT

That bit of a fight on the subject of experience versus change or change in place of experience may well have the Democrats a bit divided on their choice for presidential candidate. Take a note of what transpired in Jamaica and Australia recently. Even though people revere experience, the need for 'change' triumphed in both countries. The change is gradually taking place in Jamaica, and in the end, it is what is best for the country that matters. Peace and prosperity for America, and the world. When you sneeze in Washington, the rest of the world, particularly the African,Caribbean and Pacific countries catch the cold. May the best candidate win.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Subodh Mishra — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:51:04 GMT

Go Hillary, Go! You are better than Barack and John Edwards combined. You can and will bring much needed change to this country. Be the first, once again, as you have done so many times in your life so far.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joe — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:54:56 GMT

Has anyone noticed how Hillary can't even keep Richardson on her side? Earlier debates, Richardson often played the role at lobbying the assaults at Obama. Now he's steering delegates toward him. With promises of "Vice President", Hillary can't even keep Richardson as an ally. How will she ever build a coalition to implement any change?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

J.W. Campbell, O'Fallon IL — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:55:45 GMT

Hey Concerned Citizen, experience doesn't insure success, nor does inexperience insure failure. Itelligence and good judgement are innate qualities. Guess who one of this country's most inexperienced president was? A guy name Abraham Lincoln. As for the experienced crowd, the architects of the Iraq War were two guys with lots of governmental experience, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfield.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Iowa — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:01:24 GMT

"It doesn't seems to matter much who is jumping in to support candidates,what will matter is when Preachers across this country get up on the pulpit and will encourage their congregation
to vote on moral issues".

Why should I be more afraid of Muslims when we have Christians Extremists on a Crusade right here? Why can't this country get the seperation of church and state swung back into practice? The forefathers new a thing or two but the nimrod religious richt can't seem to figure this out. Criticize all the Muslim Extremists you want when we have Christian Crusaders protecting fetuses to send them to war later.

"I would be a little sceptical jumping on the bandwagon for Obama. He's a good talker says all the right things but he lacks experience. People will bring about change because they know that the American people are sick of being lied too. We do not"

Your preacher is a good talker and says all the right things as well and has probably got his experience through the George Bush School school of garbage and propaganda.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

JH, CHARLOTTE, NC — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:05:00 GMT

TO: Susan, Hubbardston, Ma (Sent Sunday, January 06, 2008 12:35 PM)
ON HER COMMENTS "what about his stance on immigration! ...a Democrat will be elected into the White House. We might as well call our country Mexiamerica! McCain has had his chance in .."

SUSAN, I'M NOT AT ALL FOR JOHN MC CAIN, BUT "CALLING......MEXIAMERICA.." DID YOU COMPLETE HIGH SCHOOL? JUST IN CASE YOU DID NOT, ..THE UNITED STATES IS ONE OF THE MANY COUNTRIES (ALONG WITH CANADA, MEXICO, GUATEMALA...AND SO ON) LOCATED IN THE AMERICAN CONTINENT. WHAT DO YOU CALL YOURSELF? A: UNITEDSTATING PERSON? FOR EXAMPLE, THE PEOPLE FROM CANADA (WHICH JUST HAPPENS TO BE LOCATED IN THE AMERICAN CONTINENT ALSO) CALL THEMSELVES CANADIANS. PLEASE LET ME KNOW.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Amy Black, Sacramento, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:06:13 GMT

Experience?

Hillary claims "35 years of experience" -- what exactly has that experience and the "changes" she has made, amounted to?

<crickets>

If I were Hillary Clinton, I would stop with that argument.

Experience is overrated.

Integrity and honesty and the ability to recognize and deal with the truth and do what is right are underrated, but they are catching up.

It's coming, people. Hang in there.

Remember, we are the country that elected George W. Bush -- twice. Let's learn from our mistakes.

Barack Obama can and will win and he will be the best president we have had in at least the last half century.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Joseph Zarate — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:11:07 GMT

I think, Obama would be my pick, thinking of the Clintons, they have done their thing, Bill Clinton of course have been President already, Hillary First Lady, and now she wants to be President, they say of change, so lets not go back to the 90s, lets look to the future, I believe Obama gives us this outlook, do we really want to look back and say here we go again? Another soap opera.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Davina Latham, Crossville, TN — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:11:14 GMT

Young people like myself are fed up with the wealthy, older people running this country. It's time for someone new in office. Obama is the clear choice. A lot of us like the fact that he doesn't have a lot of experience. It means he isn't jaded by the government yet.

I have never voted before, but I registered Friday so that I can vote for Obama!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Michael Wallace, Tracy, Ca. — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:18:21 GMT

Black, White, Purple or Yellow I believe America deserves a President who will act on the countries behalf. J.F.K did not have much experience either but he was truly a man of his time. I think his passion and love for the country he governed over was second to none. I miss J.F.K spirit and courage! A true leader surrounds himself or herself with advisers that speak for all Americans! Americans need to take back it's own country! Unfortunately greed is now what's holding our country back from greatness again! Every one wants to be on top! Well guess what as a country we cannot afford it! It is the middle class people that make this country of ours strong! As a country we need to stop blaming the other guy and take a long look in the mirror and we need to make a choice to do the right thing to help fellow Americans. We can actually pull this off if we want to! Trying feeding a poor hungry family for a month, take some of the pressure off our greedy government then you can say you have done your part as an American citizen. The government is easy to run when your foundation is built on greed! Every one wants to gain from doing their part, what if you did some thing great as an American Citizen and didn't expect anything material in return. I do it once a month and it is not important for people to know who I am or where it came from! They are poor people who need our help, we can do it as a country but not as a single soul! I pray that the Lord will give me the wisdom I need to choose the best President we as a country can have! God Bless America and all the world!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Denny, Alaska — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:18:39 GMT

I'm sorry, this HRC "35 years' experience" thing is wearing thin. Who does she think she's fooling? And no, eight years as First Lady does not count; it counts only for being "First Lady for eight years."

Did she ever have a security clearance?

Did she ever pass the DC bar exam?

Anyone?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Tarek Farag, St. Charles, IL — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:22:47 GMT

I heard Hillary saying that "She had experience of more than 35 years" and all that she achieved was health care coverage for 2800 kids. How long the Nation then will need to get health coverage for all Americans?
She indicated that the major change she will bring is just having a woman to be President. Is this the major change people are looking for?

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jorge, Paterson, NJ — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:24:11 GMT

Democrats have began to pave the way for another republican term in the white house. Wake up!.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Brett, Pocatello, ID — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:28:37 GMT

watching the republican candidates gang up on Romney was brutal and disgusting. If any of them get the nomination I will vote democrat this fall and I've never voted democratic in a presidential election.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Jim, Santa Cruz — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:28:38 GMT

The real question to answer is which candidate in either party will fix the mess that George W Bush and the neocons have made. A process of elimination would start with any candidate who has defended W or his policies - so Romney, Rudy, Freddy and Johnny McCain are out. That leaves Huckabee and Paul on the GOP short list - but the paranoia rampant in the party will actually make it hard for Huckabee and I bet they pick Rudy eventually. Next you could say we don't want another Clinton, just because we don't - Bill was a good president, but Hillary is a risk, and divisive and could lose to a republican, so she's out. Then you have a fairly decent group of democrats left, but Richardson, Dodd, Kucinich and Biden just don't have enough juice. So now you are left with Obama who is clearly charismatic and Edwards, who has some popular appeal, but not the star quality of Obama. And you got Al Gore, who will be key in whomever he backs, and he will likely back Obama. Obama will be the democrat candidate and will be the next president, because if the young people continue to galvanize around his candidacy and actually get out and vote this time, no amount of Karl Rove fear propaganda will stop him. In fact it will add fuel to the fire.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Ray, KY — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:29:42 GMT

These are historical times we're living in. The first ever woman or african-american man being elected president of the United States? I'd love to see that happen in my lifetime. But things haven't changed one bit in this country. Prejudice against both women and african-american's still prevail even in the 21st century. Being elected to congress or the senate is one thing, however running the highest office in the country is another. It doesn't matter how much experience you have or what your views are the pressing issues. Sure this one or that one maybe leading in the polls but it's electoral votes, not the popular vote that gets one elected. This is evident in both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. If the Powers That Be allow Clinton or Obama to elected it will be a very historic moment indeed.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Barbara C., Pompano Beach — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:29:51 GMT

What has happened in the past week with (R) and (D) has been nothing short of amazing. Obama and McCain in the lead? I felt from the beginning that name recognition made Hillary break early....and then the country woke up and started paying attention. What a race!!! I see Obama as the Bobby Kennedy of our time. If the Republicans win this year, it will be because the Dems blew it....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

H Lambert, Los angeles, CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:32:06 GMT

Leading the United States of America is the biggest responsibility there is. I would not ever tell someone how to choose a president. But, I think it is important to ask yourself what qualities are essential and then, research each candidate. Don't choose based on gut feelings. Do the work. Read biographies, for example the Biography of Tony Blair, a real politician and leader with deep, proven beliefs and ACTIONS. This is our country and we are part of the world, not the leader of the world. THINK ABOUT THAT!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Alvis Tinnin — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:33:07 GMT

A Black Republican for Barak Obama!

I am a black Republican. I will vote for Obama if he wins the Democratic nomination. I am very impressed with Obama's credentials and his character.

One good book I read said "you can judge a tree by the fruit it bears and you can judge a man by his works..."
Obama graduated Harvard Law School at the top of his class. Obama is the first black man to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Upon graduating Harvard Law School at the top of his class, my guess is he could have gone on to find an entry level position earning from 250-500K/year. What did he do? He volunteered to perform community service for the underprivileged in the inner city of Chicago. This speaks volumes about his character and what is important to him.
As a product of a white mother and a black Father, young Barak had to develop resilience and a strong sense of self, which is very evident by his present position.
Many of the Negro civil rights activist who are endorsing Clinton over Obama should ask themselves who would Martin have voted for?
Barak Obama volunteering for community service after Harvard is as great a sacrifice for human rights, equivalent in my opinion to the March on Selma. Some of the older Negro leaders say Barak is not black enough. I say thank God! Then I ask, what does that mean? Is Flava Flav black enough? Is Little Wayne black enough? Maybe we need a new standard for what it means to be a black man. Barak Obama is an excellent role model for black men and all Americans to strive for. The issue in 2008 is not about race, it is about changing a political paradigm that is broken. Barak is the man with our help who can fix it. I am voting for Barak the man not the black man. I
am calling on all thinking people of every stripe to take our country back and vote for Barak Obama in 2008.
Let's end this Bush Clinton Family Feud. Hillary in 08, Jeb Bush in 2012, Chelsea in 2016.... The names are different but the paradigm is the same. Let's wake up and take our country back!
Andy Young, John Lewis, Al Sharpton ask yourself, who would Martin vote for. May God bless us all!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Lynn Marshall, Portsmouth, NH — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:33:32 GMT

At the end of the day, this is a job interview. A job interview for the most important job in the country... in the world. I am really shocked to see how many of Clinton's supporters switched at the last minute because a great orator like Obama is able to "inspire" people to think beyond their own problems. His great speaking abilities contrasts to our current President's inability to articulate what color his socks are. However, that said, and I really do like Obama -- he is inexperienced (even for those who think Hillary isn't as experienced as she says). This is his second year as a Senator. Prior to that, Obama was/is an academic. He has great ideas! He has great speaking abilities! But he does not have the experience to perform the "horse trading" and negotiating that needs to happen in order for us to achieve all the things he says he wants. Most of us in the business world knows that the biggest differentiators between a "good" company and "great" company is not who has the biggest idea. It's who can execute. It's who can generate results. This is the most important position in the land, and this election is the most important and hardest job interview anyone can ever have. So when we're going to the polls, let's not forget why we hire people in our own companies. What's the most important thing you look for when you make someone an offer. It's someone who knows how to do the job. It's someone with, shall I say it... experience. It's not a easy race, and frankly I think all 4 Dem candidates would do a good job. But who do I think will truly effect lasting change, it's Hillary Clinton.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John Doe — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:33:38 GMT

I think Paul Ron was the most honest GOP candidate yesterday. Unlike other GOP candidates, Paul dared to challenge the strategies of the White House. His observation on economy was unique and correct in my view. What people don't realize is that the war costs too much and lasts too long which has a negative impact on the value of $. This in turn makes Oil, Gold, and other basic materials more expensive. Now, people have to understand that the inflation is inevitable. I would like to hear from Paul how he can make the necessary change so that this negative cycle can turn positive. Also, I would like to see Paul finding a way to overpower Romney who uses his young and stronger voice to crash on Paul's weak voice in the debate. Paul should not hesitate to attack Romney who seems to have more and more enemies.

On a side note, I found Giuliani aggressive and very Bush alike. I liked how McCain expressed his unique views. Huckabee was pretty convincing. But Huckbee needs to use shorter sentences. He tends to talk too much on something very simple.

It was the first time I saw Democratic party debate. I liked all of them. I think Richardson was too nervous. He kept hitting the table, making some weird sound. I really wanted to like him. But I failed to do so. I think Obama was very calm and articulate. I liked the way he fought out of the very dangerous trap Clinton sets to him on the flip-flop issue. I think Edward should look at the screen without blinking too much his eyes. He was convincing to some extent. But to be able to be presidential, he has to look more mature and more powerful. Clinton was very good. She is very smart woman. I think people should give her a chance. She could be the first woman in history to be US president. She has the caliber.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Don Roberts, Los Angeles - CA — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:34:17 GMT

Ms Clinton had a great debate, not for young GOP because we want to see how they're can be handled for one whole nation / or world not just a congress. Please remember for that, No bully to get voters.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Very Concerned Independent, Detroit, MI — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:36:15 GMT

This is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us
here in our own United States...better heed this.

Who is Barack Obama?

Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita, Kansas.

Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocate to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a
Catholic school.

Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, "He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school."

Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical. They say Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best.

In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct
influence over his son's education.

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta. Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background.

ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran.

Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches.

Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.

The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

John — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:38:37 GMT

I like John Mcain he definitely has the experience, but his age and the sense that he really just represents a lot of the same old politics (no real changes) is a concern.

Ron Paul is an interesting face in the race. He is refreshing and real. Although at times he seems too much of an isolationist and a bit of an extremist. But he has some honest answers regarding real problems. Not fluff rhetoric.

On the Dem side, Obama is the fresh face, a a young intellect that probably reminds one of JFK and camelot, but people must think about his core ideals to solve problems. Tax tax tax. I'm sorry Mr Obama, I admire your passion and ideals, but taxing to fix problems is never a way to solve problems. I ask you to look back in history at another compassionate caring Democrat named Jimmy Carter. Look at what his politics brought to our economy.

Mrs Clinton I really am not sure. More of the same? Edwards, another good man, but again he looks like a tax to fix problems type of politician.

This is going to be a very interesting election. I hope we all look seriously into the objectives of these candidates and not the marketing/media imagery and hype. I know a lot of people arent doing this, because on the Dem side, one of the best candidates was actually John Biden.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Her Lao, Minneapolis, MN — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:38:39 GMT

Per Sarah, Vienna, VA's observations:

Iowa has a good track record of choosing the ultimate DNC primary winner.

Out of the last 4 --- Carter, Mondale, Gore, Kerry --- only Carter went on to ultimately win the general.

As far as neutral statistics go --- not as I personally see it, though I do see it that way, too --- hose are rather BELOW average records in terms of truly winning the ultimate prizes these men compete for.

Remember, use statistics responsibly!

I am a registered Democrat and a true, proud Liberal, so I don't say this with any malice. I would have been happy if Mondale, Gore, and Kerry all had won. They did not.

The GOP are able to plan better, not that their candidates have always been better. Out of the three in recent memory, George H. W. Bush was the most intelligent; but not ulike Carter, H.W. failed big times, too.

Reagan is the most worshipped. Apparently conservatives and GOP are idol worshippers, with intellectual calibre of the average middle school students, for as Gore Vidal says, Reagan was nothing but a big, dumb, and handsome Hollywood script reader. He indeed read well, due to his acting ability.

And, yes, the $5 billion USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier does float very well, too!

Anyway, I would be just happy, whether Obama or Hilary wins.

But against another alpha White male --- from the GOP camp, a man who will scare us to death and then calm us by promising to kill all evil doers in the world --- I put my money on John Edwards, a southern middle of the road Democrat, who reminds me of Robert F. Kennedy, another tragic historical case....

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

liza, somerville, New Jersey — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:41:56 GMT

i join the group who has had enough of the Hillary experience, accomplishments and smarts. she was in the bottom half of her class at yale, failed the bar exam for the district of columbia and couldn't get even a starting jump on her health plan--with all of that 35 years of experience. so much for the nations smartest woman. hah. I am 65, considered "well off" and would never vote for her.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Disable Vet Joseph, Missouri City, Texas — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:42:34 GMT

If you people really want change send a message that it is time to unite the White House and Congress. It is time for everyone to stop making excuses on why they will not go the polls and vote.

It is time Washington makes Election Day a paid day off so people will have the time to vote. It is time to make any employer that comes up with an excuse for not letting people get off from work in time to vote a felony offense. It is time we all send a message to Washington that enough is enough. All of Washington is betting on people not going to vote. If everyone who has posted something on here would vote and bring someone else they know that has not voted to the polls on Election Day think what kind of message that would send to Washington.

Everyone who posted a comment has a right to their opinion. But reading through the posts here, it is clear that racism and bigotry is alive and well in America. Twisting the facts about each candidate is truly an American work of art. Clouding the issues, a time honor skilled.

The truth is all the American people want. Washington thinks we are all too naive to deal with the truth. Big money runs this country because people will not vote.
WE THE PEOPLE need to take back our country. WE THE PEOPLE need to tell Washington we are tired of being lied too. WE THE PEOPLE need to rise up and show Washington WE run this country.
My challenge to everyone here is to show Washington we are really tired of "Business as usual". We need to turn out in record numbers to show our support for the candidate that can truly stand up and tell the truth.
We Americans know good and well there is no squeaky clean politician. We have all did something wrong in our lives and have hopefully learn from it. Anyone that believes a politician needs to have committed no wrong in order to lead us is truly lost. I want someone who is willing to take a change, go out on a limb, and test the waters however you want to put it. I want someone who can say “I made a mistake”. I want someone that does not play to the big money fat cats.
I want someone who can change their mind if new information comes. All too often people are criticized for changing their minds. If new and better information comes out, then change. Don’t continue down the wrong path.

I happened to be working in Washington during the Clinton days. I have only one beef with Hillary. You are NOT better than all the American people. You do not have the right to walk on the average person just because you are the President’s wife. And if you can’t take care of your own home, how the hell do you expect me and all of America to believe you can take care of us.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Bruce McGhee, Apple Valley Ca. — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:43:01 GMT

maybe I was just hearing and seeing things, but it was sad when Hilary Clinton wrote the people of Iowa off as just being weird and strange..

She said that they are not representive of what America thinks...wake up Politicians...Iowa is just as American as the other states.

How arrogant and stiff lipped to call a whole state weird...

Before Iowa...i had not made my mind up about him...But after listening to Hilary Clintons cookie cutter reply...I'm Obama all the way...

I like Obama's call for change and Hilary's actions have shown that there is time for change in America...

I love seeing the young people getting involved in the future of our great country, and the fact that a mans potential is looked at rather than what he looks like....

All those old hands that support Hillary and the status quote elite will one day be gone and hopefully they will take with them the things that has caused this country to be devided and so many to be disenfranchised for too long...

Right on for the Democratic Process!!!!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

jerry kincade, s.c.w. az. — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:45:07 GMT

As president of our great country ,your first prioty and allegence is to the good old u.s.a..Obama indicated on the ophra show that he had converted from the muslim religion to the trinity church of christ mission .The church of christ,s web site ,www.tucc.org/about.htm ,spells out where Obama,s allegence may ly----- v ery interesting.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

RG, Japan — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:45:38 GMT

Obama is the hot new TV show who is going to get creamed if he is the nominee.

Hillary Clinton has been around. She knows what will work and what won't.

Keep following the political rock star of the day, but good luck if you do. You'll need it.

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Pat, Bountiful, UT — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:46:59 GMT

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Steve Morgan, Erwin, NC — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:47:47 GMT

MSNBC is really behind the curve re. polling data. Could it be someone is trying to aid Hilary? She voted FOR THE WAR. Stop schilling for her!

First thoughts: McCain leads, Obama with the Mo

Fred Powe, Plan, Texas — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:48:58 GMT

It's really amazing how Clinton on more than one occassion stated she had 35 years of experience, but when Bill R. specifically stated his actual positions/office held within and on behalf of the U.S. government Clinton could name a single comparable office. Sound like more lies. We definitely need a change in the caliber of Leadership whom represent the American People.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!