<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx</link><description>From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro

Clinton justified her 2002 Iraq war vote again on Meet the Press,
saying that she thought "it was a vote to put inspectors back in” so
Saddam Hussein could not go unchecked. She insisted that she was “told
by the White</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574102</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:46:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574102</guid><dc:creator>L Groezinger</dc:creator><description>At least Obama has gotten legislation passed. &amp;nbsp;I guess HRC thinks it's better to do nothing and then claim she has a great voting record. &amp;nbsp;If she is so stupid as to have believed the White House assurances, instead of READING the legislation, she does not deserve to be POTUS. &amp;nbsp;We don't need lazy stupid people as president, as Bush has shown us.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574104</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:48:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574104</guid><dc:creator>honestErnest, Pasadena, CA</dc:creator><description>Has Obama appeared on Meet the Press yet?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574106</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:51:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574106</guid><dc:creator>Rep0X</dc:creator><description>This liar needs to be called on her lie!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574109</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574109</guid><dc:creator>rosie, crestview, fl</dc:creator><description>The Clintons and the slime machine keeps on rolling.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574110</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:56:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574110</guid><dc:creator>Judy S, Dayton, Ohio</dc:creator><description>What we want are the candidates to speak to the issues and how to solve our present and future problems we have been left with from the Bush team. &amp;nbsp;Clinton does just that and she showed this again today when she stood up to Tim Russert and his &amp;quot;got you&amp;quot; comments. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574111</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:57:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574111</guid><dc:creator>Sally Cinamon, NY</dc:creator><description>Did she cry?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574113</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574113</guid><dc:creator>C. Moreno</dc:creator><description>Has everyone forgotten that there were many of us who knew that Cheney and Bush always had a secret agenda long before the first vote and then Clinton votes again to give Bush carte blanche to go into Iran. She is not change! And people saw one ungarde moment,but she and her husband are lifetime politicians who would use any tactic to win. They are not change. I am a woman. And, were she a woman with a vision for the future, I would be the first one to support her. But she is also one of the old guard. Only her gender is new.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574114</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:00:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574114</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, Me</dc:creator><description>I gave Clinton her hearing. I don't dislike Hillary, however she makes me tired, listening to her justify her vote to authorize Bush to invade Iraq. I don't think she is a born leader, she is a follower. Obama is a leader. I'd rather nominate him and take a chance the Repugs will beat him, than nominate Clinton and watch McCain become President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574115</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:01:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574115</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Gee, Senator Clinton gets an hour with Russert to talk about her candidacy, and thus far most of what I've seen is her talking about Obama. Big surprise.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574116</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:02:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574116</guid><dc:creator>Lynn Haynes, Fredericksburg, VA</dc:creator><description>Contrary to honest reporting, the use of one sentence made by President Bill Clinton without the preceeding sentence was tantamount to lying to your viewers. &amp;nbsp;The fairy tale statement was specifically descriptive of Senator Obama's statement on his lack of support for the war in Iraq and you know it. &amp;nbsp;If you don't know it your people did a lousy job of research, when the speech was readily available in its entirety. &amp;nbsp;You owe your viewers an apology and the truth.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574117</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:03:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574117</guid><dc:creator>Bernard, Scotch Plains, NJ</dc:creator><description>I'm just to disgusted with Senator Clinton after that interview...and why did she yell throughout the whole Meet The Press interview. &amp;nbsp;This woman is so calculating is makes me wanna throw up!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574119</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:04:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574119</guid><dc:creator>Bradley Glisson, Durham, NC</dc:creator><description>I wish that Russert would ask &amp;quot;Mrs. Clinton, we hear so much about your '35 years of experience'. &amp;nbsp;Being that 22 years of that was spent as first lady, how can you claim that your Husband's experience counts as your own?&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574120</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:05:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574120</guid><dc:creator>roberto, tempe, az</dc:creator><description>Excellent! The Clinton campaign is just trying to compare and contrast between Obama's record and her record. No racial issues here, i find all these critics jusr ridiculous. The Clintons have helped the black community more than any other black politican has done in recent times. &lt;br&gt;Go CLINTON</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574122</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:08:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574122</guid><dc:creator>Sally Cinamon, NY</dc:creator><description>I'm watching the interview now, and while she has responded to the Clyburn / MLK stuff fairly well, she clearly did so in a way that is accepting the black vote as being largely lost, so she may as well push the buttons and reap the positive. &amp;nbsp;I find it fascinating, as it is almost a Dem primary version of the Southern Strategy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574123</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:10:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574123</guid><dc:creator>HILLARY IS A LIAR</dc:creator><description>THIS WOMAN IS SO FULL OF IT.....MY GOD SHE UNWILLING TO RUN ON HER OWN CAMPAIGN.....SHE IS LIAR AND UNWILLING TO TELL THE TRUTH AT ANY TIME....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SHE PLAYED THE RACE CARD AND THEN BLAMED OTHERS&lt;br&gt;SHE VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR AND THEN BLAMED OTHERS&lt;br&gt;WHO DID SHE BLAME WHEN HER HUSBAND CHEATED THE REPUBLICANS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OR DID I FORGET TO SAY HILLARY CLINTON IS A LIAR &amp;nbsp;!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574124</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574124</guid><dc:creator>Denise D. Whitfield</dc:creator><description>Hello:&lt;br&gt;I am so disappointed in Tim Russerts' interview with Hillary Clinton this morning. What happened to the hard hitting questions Tim. The hour long interview with Hillary turned out to be nothing more than a &amp;quot;Hillary&amp;quot; commercial for her campaign for President. Since when does a guest tell Tim &amp;quot;Wait a minute I am not going to let you get away with that&amp;quot;. Tim allowed Hillary (on several occassions) to cut him off in mid sentence. The first twenty minutes were nothing more a campaign appearance by Hillary discussing all the reasons to vote for her and against Obama. I am unbeliveably disappointed. The only recourse (seems to me) would be to have Obama back on the show as soon as possible. I am sooo very disappointed in Tim Russert. What happened Tim, did you handle her with kid gloves because she is a woman and you didn't want women (of which I am one and have been a faithful viewer for many years) to offend women? Very disappointed in you!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574127</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:12:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574127</guid><dc:creator>Ben, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>If Clinton really didn't think her vote was to allow military force...for a WAR...then she is just too damn stupid to be President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574130</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574130</guid><dc:creator>Binish Jacob, Ft Lauderdale, FL</dc:creator><description>First of all, it was very impressive. For leadership, experience is the best teacher! We had economic prosperity and the world respected us during the Clinton administration. Ever since Bush took the office, we have lost millions of jobs, respect in the world, the economy is in danger of overheating amid rising inflationary pressure, and we are facing a record trade and budget deficit. Most folks hate Americans -- I don't know if you guys noticed that, but I visit foreign countries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Obama's personality, but I don't think he will win the nomination. It's just too hard for him to win other states. He is still unknown to most Americans and too new to trust. On the other hand, may be Obama doesn't practice Islam, but there sure is a lot of talk about him being Muslim, which could hurt him in the general election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need to regain what we have lost. Among other presidential candidates, I really like Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney, but I wish they had some experience, especially in foreign affairs and economy. I believe that Clinton is the best and most experienced candidate among both Republican &amp;amp; Democrat fields. Experience does count in this troubling economy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574131</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:15:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574131</guid><dc:creator>Amy, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>Hillary made a mistake appearing on this show. It certainly did nothing to help her campaign. She showed many flashes of her &amp;quot;thin skin.&amp;quot; Tim was masterful in his questioning. He was a perfect &amp;quot;gentleman&amp;quot;, but was very, very effectively able to debunk much of the stuff she and her campaign have been doing. The Clinton campaign CANNOT play the &amp;quot;poor Hillary was ganged up on&amp;quot; card with this interview by Tim. He was amazing! Kudos to Tim! Obama was the winner of this appearance! Hillary came across as shrill, petty, and petulant. Not a good Sunday morning for Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574136</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:19:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574136</guid><dc:creator>Bob, DC</dc:creator><description>Wow. All politicans lie a bit but Ms Clinton does it with such ease, it's scary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574138</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:19:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574138</guid><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><description>For someone who talks about &amp;quot;rhetoric vs reality&amp;quot; and then says she's accomplished so much for change, WHAT HAS SHE ACCOMPLISHED?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, she keeps saying she's a workhorse and that she has all these major accomplishments. &amp;nbsp;But we NEVER hear specifics.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574139</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574139</guid><dc:creator>Sandeep, CA</dc:creator><description>Go Hillary! Be strong and call spade a spade. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The world is not a mushy mushy fairy tale place. It's time Americans come back to reality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they dont, God help us! &amp;nbsp;(like He did for another talker &amp;amp; uniter in last 7 years)</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574140</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:20:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574140</guid><dc:creator>Rosie, Louisiana</dc:creator><description>I am a faithful viewer of Meet the Press and again Tim's personal dislike for Mrs. Clinton showed in his interview. &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Clinton argued points with pose and intellect. &amp;nbsp;As a follower of this 2008 campaign, many clips were taken out of context. &amp;nbsp;She was right on when responding to poll numbers presented. &amp;nbsp;I would have thought the media learned their lesson about relying on polls from the New Hampshire results. Stop getting egg on your face, remember 2000? &amp;nbsp;Ease up on the old gal, Tim when she's elected you'll be begging her to guest on the show.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574141</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:20:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574141</guid><dc:creator>F. Igwealor, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator><description>I think that one of the reasons Obama lost NH was because his campaign failed to respond forcefully to these Clinton attacks.&lt;br&gt;Their response here is similar to their response in NH where after the Clintons have leveled series of allegations, the campaign would pick and address only one of those issues.&lt;br&gt;Here, Hillary was talking about inconsistency in Obama's Iraq position, his relationship with lobbyists, and the ethic reforms (most or all of the allegations might be simple distortion of facts).&lt;br&gt;Obama's campaign should have addressed all the issues raised and at the end throw-in a counter punch too.&lt;br&gt;I know that Obama have addressed these issues time and again, but in politics, you must keep repeating your answers and defenses as long as your opponents are repeating their allegations.&lt;br&gt;That is politics, you cannot defend yourself enough, and people tend to forget your answers of yesterday in the light of your opponent's allegations today.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574143</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574143</guid><dc:creator>George Sears, Cedar City, Utah</dc:creator><description>Russert asked her what she learned from Iraq. She did not give a 'big' answer about why creating a secular, plural democracy might have been flawed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She says there is a big problem across the Middle East, but she gives no clue as to some general principles to make the region work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She says she just authorized inspections, basically, and negotiation. So where do we use force in the future? Bush defined the issue. She can't say she was 'wrong enough' to get out of Bush still defining her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She might have said &amp;quot;Look Tim, I backed the war when I thought we were winning, when the war was a winner. &lt;br&gt;When the war went really, really bad, I was less enthusiastic. Since I backed the war, I won't say it was wrong, but it hasn't worked out so well, and I do want to distance myself from failure.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574144</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:22:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574144</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>Hillary returned to her lying, misleading self with this interview. &amp;nbsp;The emotional, caring person in New Hampshire was gone. &amp;nbsp;I realized once again why Hillary would be a horrible President. &amp;nbsp;It was not a pretty sight. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574145</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:22:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574145</guid><dc:creator>Toni C</dc:creator><description>I understand Hillary trying to wiggle her way on the Iraq vote and the Levin amendment but I am distressed that she continues to characterize the Levin amendment as giving the UN a veto over the President. &amp;nbsp;That's the reason she cites for not supporting Levin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She said she hoped Bush would allow the inspectors to go back in, and other assorted nonsense about what she (falsely) hoped Bush would do when the vote was a vote for war authorization. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem I have with Clinton on this point is the she attacks Obama in one breath for shifting positions but in the next breath lies about the Levin amendment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Our resolution also affirms that the United States has at all times the inherent right to use military force in self-defense. There is no veto given the United Nations in this resolution of ours. Quite the opposite. We explicitly make it clear we maintain, of course, a right to use self-defense.&amp;quot; (Sen. Carl Levin, Congressional Record, 10/10/02, p. S10251)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Going after Obama is fine, but Ms. Clinton you are lying about the Levin amendment and you know it. &amp;nbsp;I guess you are ready on day one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574148</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:24:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574148</guid><dc:creator>YouthVoter, USA</dc:creator><description>Amy, Raleigh, NC (Sent Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:15 AM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take the pink shade over ur glasses and then look at world. It is different, not a starry eyed fairy tale.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574149</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:24:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574149</guid><dc:creator>Bob, DC</dc:creator><description>I still don't get the idea that Obama has been inconsistent on the Iraq war. &amp;nbsp;He made one statement during the Kerry inaguration that sounded a bit inconsistent but he said that was because he had to be careful to not sound contradictaory towards nominees Kerry and Edwards who voted for the Iraq war. &amp;nbsp;Now, Hillary has been thoroughly inconsistent. She was been on Bush iraq war bandwagon until about a year ago when she realized that her position would never sell to the Democratic voters.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574150</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:24:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574150</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>I think she insulted the blacks who were offended by Bill and her because she continued to say people were misrepresenting them and taking them out of context and kept referring to Obama, when clearly there were others who were offended and clips were shown to prove it. &amp;nbsp;Her &amp;quot;emotional, soft side&amp;quot; seemed to be AWOL today, as was the new &amp;quot;friendly&amp;quot; Hillary. &amp;nbsp;When she said she doesn't pay attention to polls, she hit a new low in lying. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574152</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:25:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574152</guid><dc:creator>lynne, Little Rock, Arkansas</dc:creator><description>Even though Senator Clinton was grilled by Russert and he twisted facts at times. She came back each time with intelligent answers. &amp;nbsp;She never faltered once. &amp;nbsp;She was even gracious toward Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is wonderful and really showed that once again today on Russert's program. &amp;nbsp;He did not show those experience polls from N.H. that showed her winning 71% to Obama's mere 5%. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;One thing though that is very worrisome to me is a story that is now today being confirmed about Obama's Muslim religion. &amp;nbsp;Here is the link to at least one of the websites that it came out on today. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://news.newsmax.com/?yM.mDK2a1cvzjauo0KIShBRKzQy"&gt;http://news.newsmax.com/?yM.mDK2a1cvzjauo0KIShBRKzQy&lt;/a&gt; Here is a quote from the article And he adds: “All this matters, for if Obama once was a Muslim, he is now what Islamic law calls a murtadd (apostate), an ex-Muslim converted to another religion who must be executed. Were he elected president of the Untied States, this status, clearly, would have large potential implications for his relationship with the Muslim world.”&lt;br&gt;Americans you saw Senator Clinton on Tim Russert's show today and the worse thing he could drag up on her was the Lewinsky affair which as she said, everyone knows about that and that she accepted that and did the best she could when going through it.&lt;br&gt;Obama will soon be forced to come clean. Search and research his record and you will Vote for Hillary in 2008.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574153</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:26:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574153</guid><dc:creator>Paul NY</dc:creator><description>Once again the media is working against Hillary. The replay of Bill saying &amp;quot;Its a fairy tale&amp;quot; was just that. Russert did not play what is said before that which if you have seen the speach you will know Bill was talking about Iraq and not Obama's campaign. Incredible a show like Meet The Press can be so sensational!!!!! If Obama was such a stand up guy he would have said so and not played the race card.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DeKRwO0acE"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DeKRwO0acE&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574154</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:27:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574154</guid><dc:creator>Fran, Brooklyn</dc:creator><description>Winner = Barack Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big Losers = Hillary and Bill Clinton&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tim Russert was fantastic! He was respectful, yet penetrating in his questioning. He was absolutely brilliant in bringing out the most unattractive side of Hillary. He was able to let her go on at length, but then come back with zinger after zinger. But he never came across in a harsh, combative way. Hillary was the one who came across as harsh and very unappealing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barack Obama should be smiling! I know I am! A good day for Obama supporters!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574155</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:27:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574155</guid><dc:creator>Youth Voter, USA</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me change is new, I agree (not knowing every election Presidential politicians talk about change and nothing changes).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to hope so i start hoping. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to change, so I change my parents since they are past and status quo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My friends (fellow Obama supporters) tell me to repeat Hillary hate posts 100 times a day, so I do it. It's a change from my other work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to convince my other immature youth friends to cheer for change, I do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574156</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:28:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574156</guid><dc:creator>American Voter</dc:creator><description>She lies again &amp;amp; is not fit to be her party nominee much less POTUS!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574157</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574157</guid><dc:creator>Plano Independent, Texas</dc:creator><description>As an independent, the best way to make me vote for a Republican is to have Hillary as the democratic nominee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For Hillary, its all about her presumed right to be president. &amp;nbsp;In contrast, Obama is self-made and inspirational. &amp;nbsp;We will vote for Obama if nominated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My wife and I will never vote for Hillary - we are both socially moderate.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574158</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:29:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574158</guid><dc:creator>Ohg Rea Tone</dc:creator><description>Tim Russert is a Corporate driven media host who met his match with Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;She know that he is only looking for a sound bite, something he can use when playing 'Trivial Pursuit' with Chris Matthews.&lt;br&gt;Ohg&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/01/13/hillary-clinton-with-tim-russert/"&gt;http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/01/13/hillary-clinton-with-tim-russert/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574160</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:31:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574160</guid><dc:creator>justwaitandsee</dc:creator><description>The only complaint she can find on the Lobbying Bills is that they can stand up while eating,WOW.....And she couldn't even come up with that one on her own...She got the question from Charles Gibson of ABC.....The kind of excuses they give of the reason why Senator Obama shouldn't be President is stretching to say they least..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when they can't find any troublesome information on the Senator Obama, they either fabricate it or play to others internal prejudices....Then turn around and accuse others of what they created and some Americans are gullible and dumb enough to believe it...Everyone should just face the fact the Clintons never take responsibility for anything they do.....It's always someone else fault but never there own....</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574161</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:31:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574161</guid><dc:creator>Mo, New York, New York</dc:creator><description>I have lost all respect for Hillary. &amp;nbsp;She seems to think that if you repeat a lie enough, and with enough of a matter of fact expression, that people will believe you. &amp;nbsp;Obama was outspoken in his opposition to this war from the start. She was in a position to stop it. She did not. End of story. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a democrat, but I will not vote for Hillary if she wins the nod. &amp;nbsp;I refuse to reward the underhandedness both Clintons have shown with another trip to the White House. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574162</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574162</guid><dc:creator>Colin Mincy New York, NY</dc:creator><description>Denise,&lt;br&gt;Tim Russert did an outstanding job with Hillary this morning. &amp;nbsp;He was kind and gentle with her in delivery but his questions were dead-on and she flopped and yelled the whole hour. &amp;nbsp;I think she did a tremendous disservice to her campaign. &amp;nbsp;Truth is Edwards Obama and Clinton don't have a lot of experience. &amp;nbsp;Clinton can NOT use her experience as First Lady as experience..that's outrageous. &amp;nbsp;She was not an official elected by the people - that's not public service and for people to be brainwashed into thinking that angers me. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton is not her husband...voting for her is not brining Bill back. &amp;nbsp;I find her to be a calculating, mechanical windbag.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574163</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:32:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574163</guid><dc:creator>Carole Gardner, Montgomery, Tx.</dc:creator><description>After watching the show this morning, I am even more impressed with Hillary. &amp;nbsp;She certainly does not hesitate or waiver with her responses. It is very important to have the experience and understand the system. &amp;nbsp;It is just totally unrealistic to think that someone who is likeable (Obama) can waltz into the Washington polictical arena and make immediate changes. Yes in many minds this is a dream and Obama looks like a quick fix. &amp;nbsp;Wake up People. My vote goes to Hillary without a doubt.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574164</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574164</guid><dc:creator>c ilivuziman</dc:creator><description>Clinton Attacks Luther King&lt;br&gt;It took a white President to finish the dreams of a black leader Luther King who was killed in known circumstances. The Clinton's comments are more than shocking…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton Attacks Obama&lt;br&gt;It's shocking to see how Clinton is attacking Obama rather than defending her records: The Clinton have been in Washington for 8 years - not much have been done by them- no change has been seen - But during the last dems debate in NH- Clinton said that she has been doing changes for 35 years… Could she show one of the great changes that she has done for this country? What Clinton have really done to unite the country and its people, what did they do for education, health care, etc. We should judge people on their results, for now I don't see any tangible results from the Clintons. During their mandate, a genocide has been committed in Rwanda and injustice in America did not decrease…&lt;br&gt;I hope they have memory of having done no thing to stop the genocide in Rwanda, etc.&lt;br&gt;Obama&lt;br&gt;Obama is new in Washington and can't be held accountable for the past but he has to be judged on his record: He did oppose Irak war in 2002 and he is still opposed to it but as he explained one day, as America went to war in Irak he took his responsibilities when he voted for budget to help men and women in US Uniforms there and Obama said that he won't be in Washington to reduce America's force but to increase it by moral means as well as force if needed. Obama is the best choice for this time for America to show to the World how America is modern and smart state...&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574169</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:35:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574169</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>If it wasn't a vote for war... why did it take her two or three years to criticize the war? &amp;nbsp;Why didn't she stand up in March of 2002 when the first bombs were dropped and ACTUALLY SAY &amp;quot;This isn't what I voted for!!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you can't admit your mistakes, how do we know you won't make them again?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574172</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:37:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574172</guid><dc:creator>PLB</dc:creator><description>What we want are the candidates to speak to the issues and how to solve our present and future problems we have been left with from the Bush team. &amp;nbsp;Clinton does just that and she showed this again today when she stood up to Tim Russert and his &amp;quot;got you&amp;quot; comments. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;Judy S, Dayton, Ohio (Sent Sunday, January 13, 2008 10:56 AM)&lt;br&gt;________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't be serious&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574174</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:38:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574174</guid><dc:creator>Sally Cinamon, NY</dc:creator><description>I can't wait for the Daily Show on Monday.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574175</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:38:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574175</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Ottawa, Canada</dc:creator><description>I feel like we are debating the meaning of &amp;quot;IS&amp;quot; again!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this what Americans want?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't wait to see.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574176</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:39:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574176</guid><dc:creator>Marie C., Cooperstown, NY</dc:creator><description>I'm a professional woman of Hillary CLinton's generaion and would like nothing better than to see a woman president. &amp;nbsp;But she should not count on the support of women, just because of gender. &amp;nbsp;She appeared to use the Meet the Press time as an opportunity to bash Obama at every turn, esp. when she felt cornered. ANd she repeated her barbs on the show against Obama almost word for word re: his vote on the Iraq war- we heard you the first time, Hillary.&lt;br&gt; Tim Russert gave her a gracious opening with the Doris Kearns Goodwin quote about an important presidential quality being the ability to learn from one's mistakes. &amp;nbsp;Apparently, Hillary Clinton has never made any mistakes and so has nothing to learn. &amp;nbsp;This is not the type of president that I want - we already have a president who is unable to learn from his mistakes and so we continue in the disaster in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Finally, Hillary Clinton says she is just like regular people??? &amp;nbsp;Please, she has many good qualities and experience but comparing herself and her life to most of America is just ridiculous.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574180</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:42:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574180</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>Thought Russert might get in a question about what she meant when she said, &amp;quot;no woman is illegal.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And also thought he might ask her about her &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; a little more. She claims 35 years of public service. But some of those, as we all know, were working for a private Arkansas law firm. And of course much of this time was as state and national first lady. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the quality of this experience? Its a discussion that we haven't had. We've had shrill responses from both sides, with very little discussion. In a less shrill environment, I think we'd all agree her time in private law practice doesn't translate well to presidential-like experience. At least its nothing extraordinary - lawyers are a dime a dozen. So what are we to make of her time in Arkansas and the White House as the spouse?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its an interesting discussion. She claims, and certainly can point to indicators, that she wasn't just the first lady in Washington. I don't know anything about her in Arkansas. She was given health care to run with as a project. That in itself was unusual. But after that projects failure, she seemingly took a less visible role. We also know she was reported to be running the 'war room' during the impeachment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm guessing to get a better feel for the right answer here would entail looking back at the Clinton Administration in greater detail, and then trying to discern more about what she actually did there.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574181</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:43:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574181</guid><dc:creator>Silvia, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Sen. Clinton's &amp;nbsp;interview shows her knowledge of the issues. &amp;nbsp;It seems that if her views do not agree with your views, then she must be lying. &amp;nbsp;That is an immature way of looking at things. &amp;nbsp;I think Mr. Russert should not compare a vote in the Senate with information given only to members of the Senate, to a statement (at an anti-war rally) that was part of a speech that Sen. Obama gave in Chicago in 2002. Sen. Obama, as a US Senator, has consistently voted with the majority of the senators to continue funding the war, which have always been put as supporting our troops. &amp;nbsp;Sen. Clinton has made dificult decisions, she has worked her entire adult life for children (Childrens Defense Fund), for the uninsured (coverage for children). &amp;nbsp;She was beat up very badly when she worked for universal coverage as First Lady, and was critised for having the nerve to work on something when she was only First Lady. &amp;nbsp;Please at least acknowledge that she does have experience, and she gets things done. &amp;nbsp;This is why I am supporting Sen. Clinton for President. &amp;nbsp;I know she will continue getting things done. &amp;nbsp;We need to make changes, she will do just that. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574183</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:43:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574183</guid><dc:creator>Caroline, Bethesda, MD</dc:creator><description>Obama has appeared on Meet the Press twice lately. He was on for the full hour on Nov.11, and for 1/2 of the show two weeks ago. He was very eloquent and forceful and impressive in both appearances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary was just awful today. She came across as snippy and unattractive. Her answers were almost laughable at times. One example was when Tim asked about how her campaign complained in Iowa that many working people couldn't vote, but are now complaining because Nevada will allow people to vote in their workplaces. What a hypocrite!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary did not have a good interview. Bet she wishes she could take it back!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go, Obama!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574185</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:45:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574185</guid><dc:creator>Arshad, Newburgh, NY</dc:creator><description>How many times Clintons or her campaign had to come forward so far to apologize, or fire campaign workers or needed to clarify all kinds of negative attacks on Senator Obama? Many times. Senator Obama never had to do it.&lt;br&gt;How many time Clinton mention being the first women president? Always. How many times Obama talks about first AA president? He does not want to be a president just because he is AA. He wants to because he is the most suitable candidate to work with everybody and lift this country from the mess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clintons distort records. Obama always have been against war. He always said this is a wrong war at wrong battle field. This is a war of ideology, not of reason. He said it's rush war, dumb war. No dispute, period. Now since the war has already been waged, 150,000 young americans are risking their lives in a war zone, it's his obligtation to support the troops until Iraq stabilizes. He has been consistent: against this war but committed to the troops. So what's the fairy tale here, Mr Clinton?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton's campaign has been caught to spread e-mail that he is a muslim plant, trying to take over this country. Her NH co-chair implied he could be a drug dealer in the past. With MLK, Senator said MLK'ss dreams were dream and would not have realized without a president (LBJ). So where this come from? What does it mean? A black man can only be a civil rights activist or can dream or talk about equality and fairness. That's all Obama can do as well as she implies. But ultimately we need a white President (LBJ and future Clinton) to make sure right things happen. The fact is again, Obama is not running as a Black candidate to promote black issue at national level. He recognizes the problems the country faces are color blind. It hurts some demographic little more than others but these are issues of all americans. Poor economy, lack of healthcare, a wrong war, global warming have nothing to do with black or white or hispanic or asian. These are american problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's unfortunate, Clintons look down on people. They insult people. Remember Bill Clinton's remark of voting for Obama is the &amp;quot;roll of a dice&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;this kid&amp;quot;. ONLY Clintons have monopoly in wisdom and judgment and qualification to run this country for decades. Clintons are making insensitive, disrespectful comment on TV, people are seeing them for what they are. Some people among Black community are voicing concerns. And somehow, without evidence, she is blaming Obama's campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So they make offenses, they apologize and spin for those offense but again they call foul on the other side. Look at Clintons in NV. The democratic party decided about having a few large precints in Las Vegas to make sure casino/hotel workers can vote without taking off from work. 10 months ago. The people who were part of making that decision are the same people filing law suit to take these precints away just because union of those workers supported Obama. If this is how Clintons will run next 8 years, better think twice before electing Clinton.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574188</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:46:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574188</guid><dc:creator>Jamis, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary says Obama doesn't have a track record for getting things done. How about Hillary's record? HILLARY FAILED MISERABLY at trying to get healthcare reform through in 1993. That failure set healhcare reform back 15 years and it gave ammo to the Republicans to sweep back into Congress in the 1994 elections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd rather have Obama's vision and leadership over Clinton's track record of failure.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574191</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:47:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574191</guid><dc:creator>Lance - SF</dc:creator><description>Clinton justified her 2002 Iraq war vote again on Meet the Press, saying that she “thought it was a vote to put inspectors back in” so Saddam Hussein could not go unchecked. She insisted that she was “told by the White House personally” as were others that that’s what the resolution was for and noted that Bush himself said publicly that the resolution was the best chance to avoid a confrontation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moderator Tim Russert pointed out that the title of the resolution was the “Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.”&lt;br&gt;__________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spare me! &amp;nbsp;If this is the kind of judgement that &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; gives, I'll roll the dice any day of the week. &amp;nbsp;I have alot of respect and admiration for Senator Clinton but, not a chance we're buying this weak and lame defense. &amp;nbsp;Just face it: &amp;nbsp;you made a mistake; acknowledge it, apologize and move on to your next bitter partisan battle in the long line you have to fight against vehemently anti-Clinton forces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It won't end... &amp;nbsp;the status quo will continue if she's nominated and her winning in the general election is highly dubious. &amp;nbsp;Don't do it... &amp;nbsp;turn the page; they've had their chance. &amp;nbsp;The moment is indeed now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA 08&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574194</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:47:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574194</guid><dc:creator>Youth Voter, USA</dc:creator><description>Obama tells me change is new, I agree (not knowing every election Presidential politicians talk about change and nothing changes).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to hope so i start hoping. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to change, so I change my parents since they are past and status quo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My friends (fellow Obama supporters) tell me to repeat Hillary hate posts 100 times a day, so I do it. It's a change from my other work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to convince my other immature youth friends to cheer for change, I do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama tells me to ignore experience, so I ignore my parents experience of knowing the world as again, they are past and status quo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ignore every old person who was served nationally as they are status quo. Your national service doesnt count in the new world of hatred filled starry eyed fairy tale following youths like me.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574195</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:47:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574195</guid><dc:creator>sonia hirt, blacksburg</dc:creator><description>Comments lik &amp;quot;obama is a leader&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Clinton is a follower&amp;quot; are excellent examples of sexism even when the comments are made by women. There are many studies in academia that men are more likely to get hired based on their future promise, whereas women are expected to already have a strong record. In other words, men with weak record are easily forgiven because they can sell the &amp;quot;visionary&amp;quot; thing. Women do not make believable &amp;quot;visionaries&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;leaders;&amp;quot; they have to rely on what they have already done because they do not receive the benefit of the doubt. If you don't believe me just imagine Obama as a woman (reagrdles sof race)? Would anyone believe that a female Obama is qualified for being president? It's a pity that even women buy the sexist bias--they prefer to follow a man than ask the tough questions.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574201</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:50:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574201</guid><dc:creator>Wisdom Calls, Palisades Park,NJ</dc:creator><description>Hillary did incredibly well with Tim. She stood her ground very well. Go Hillary Go!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574205</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574205</guid><dc:creator>James Springfield mo</dc:creator><description>I asked A lot of black people from Chicago about obama and what has he done &amp;nbsp;and they said to me (i thought i was going to get my ass whipped) expletive that expletive person.Then i asked about what do you think of hillary then to my surprise &amp;nbsp;most of them like her( if i whould have said anything bad about her i felt i would get my ass whipped) p.s i am a otr truck driver so i get around alot.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574211</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:53:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574211</guid><dc:creator>henrietta</dc:creator><description>I see that Hillary is still twisting and turning what ever she can to get herself and her husband out of the mess their comments have gotten them into.While they said awhile back that the comments that were being released from their camp was not going to be accepted,well I cannot see any differnce in the rhetoric that is being said now from her and her husband .In fact what they are spewing out is as bad.Hillary is not only flip flopping now she is in to doing the twist.Taking what everyone says that she doesn't agree with &amp;nbsp;and twisting it around and making it sound like what she precieves it to mean.I think she had better think before she speaks.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574213</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574213</guid><dc:creator>Ty, Dallas, Tx</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Clinton justified her 2002 Iraq war vote again on Meet the Press, saying that she thought it was a vote to put inspectors back in so Saddam Hussein could not go unchecked.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Russert pointed out that the title of the resolution was the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you serious? Who is suppose to hear ANYONE say that and trust ANYTHING that they say?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Micheal Vick funded a dog fighting ring. Her response would be ...&amp;quot;Does that mean he will have doghouse built to stop dogs from fighting each other&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it just me? Did she really mean what she said or it was a side joke...let us in on it Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I watched to hear more about her but she talked about Obama so much I know more about him than her. For someone so inexperience she had alot to say about him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow...the Republican party is looking better and better the more they air this stuff from Dems...maybe Obama need to switch parties before he starts talking like that...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S.&lt;br&gt;Don't Vote on anything else Hillary since you don't understand...If the title of the book is about Cats please expect that when you open the book it will be &amp;quot;about cats&amp;quot; </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574214</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:54:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574214</guid><dc:creator>Eric Cartman, South Park, Colorado.</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;King Kamehameha Beotch!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574215</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:54:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574215</guid><dc:creator>Cathy, Upstate NY</dc:creator><description>Paul Miller: &lt;br&gt;The reason Hillary HAD TO talk about Obama so much was because most of Russert's questions were ABOUT Obama. For those of you who did not think Hillary answered the tough questions, just how ignorant can you be? She answered EVERY question in detail, but you're so blinded by hatred you would rather sing the praises of your rock star candidate rather than actually address any real issues. Obama is the &amp;quot;New Elvis&amp;quot; and you people are lining up to scream, cry, and faint over your new Messiah, but what does he actually represent? Why is he playing the &amp;quot;race card&amp;quot; if he's such a strong candidate on the merits alone? It is completely dishonest to claim that your campaign is NOT about your race, but use it to your advantage at every turn, and then when things don't appear to be going your way or you need votes in SC, you pull out the racism and dicrimination tactics that have clearly been up your sleeve all along. How can the Obama cult not see this? Hypocrisy is alive and well in the Obama camp, along with dirty tricks and using racism to get votes, even though he's really a half white elitist who has NOTHING in common with real hardworking people in the black community. Hillary for President! (Not Hypocrisy)</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574218</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:56:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574218</guid><dc:creator>Pete Caloger   Bushkill, PA 18324</dc:creator><description>Mr. Russert, you are an equal opportunity interviewer and I enjoy watching you refuse to let politicians, no matter what their party, jive their way out of statements and actions.&lt;br&gt;What was the hell was Clinton thinking about when she agreed to appear on MTP? What was that nonsense about her war vote? Why would she not acknowledge that a couple of shady cards are being played in her primary campaign against Obama? I believe she did further damage to an already fatally wounded campaign, and I still hold out hope that she, Romney, and Giuliani will be out of the picture shortly. And I still want to know how she parlays 8 years as first lady and 1+ terms as a senator as 35 years of experience!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574223</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:58:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574223</guid><dc:creator>POLpursun</dc:creator><description>Sen. Clinton denigrated leadership through what she seems to think is valid criticism of Sen. Barack. &amp;nbsp;She, in the relevant statements on MTP this morning, appeared not even to understand what being a leader is.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574231</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574231</guid><dc:creator>saint jr, united kingdom, london</dc:creator><description>I THINK AMERICANS SHOULD REALLY LOOK AT THE PROBLEMS BEFORE THEM AND MAKE A GOOD JUGDEMENT ON WHO TO PICK AS THE NEXT PRESIDENT, A MISTAKE NOW WILL MEAN DOOM FOR THE COUNTRY. YES EXPERINCE IS GOOD, BUT IN WHAT.&lt;br&gt;OBAMA, IS A CHRISTIAN AND A GOOD ONE FOR THAT MATTER, LISTEN TO HIM ANSWERING QUESTIONS THEN YOU WOULD SEE A SINCER MAN, WHO TELLS YOU WHAT HE BELIVES.&lt;br&gt;AMERICANS SHOULD BE CAREFULL OF BELIVING TWISTED TRUTHS FROM THOSE WHOS ONLY INTENTIONS IS TO GET TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND MAKE FAME OR RECORD. CHEERS</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574236</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574236</guid><dc:creator>Donna, Myrtle Beach, SC</dc:creator><description>Oh, my. Poor, poor Hillary. This was a very bad performance. No way to spin this one. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574239</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574239</guid><dc:creator>Joe G</dc:creator><description>Hillary on meet the press was an hour of attacking obama and other forms of spin, i was very disappointed by the way she performed and twisted things around on meet the press, its just unfortunate that's all, i was initially an obama supporter and this only reinforces that, if she cant talk straight for an hour what are we gonna hear for the next four years, i have had no problems with her until i saw this, maybe obama lacks experience but hillary has made many mistakes and claims to have 35 years of experience when she has only been a senator for a couple terms, i dont follow that math, it would take to long to untwist some of that spin i saw, i dont want to be too hard because i dont think badly of sen clinton but i was just disappointed by this</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574244</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:07:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574244</guid><dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator><description>Hillary was attacked for the full hour and didn't get caught. All the repubs did. She is right about the authorization for war. Also, Russert didn't show the full clips. Bill was referring Obama being painted as a victim. Bill brought up how he started it with that indian email. Why was Russert asking about 1998?&lt;br&gt;Why didn't he ask why Obama bought a 2 million dollar house for 1.6 million from Tony Rezko on the same day he sold the adjorning lot to his own wife. The same Tony Rezko on trial for Political Corruption.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574249</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:11:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574249</guid><dc:creator>Anne, Columbus, OH</dc:creator><description>Yes, Obama appeared 2 times on MTP. On the hour long appearance, he spoke of HIS positions for the hour and did not attempt to characterize Clinton's positions. &amp;nbsp;Clinton spent her time completely lying about Obama's record. &amp;nbsp;Tell me why I should vote for YOU. &amp;nbsp;I am so sick of the Clintons NEVER taking ownership of their mistakes. &amp;nbsp;You chose not to read the National Intelligence Estimate prior to giving Bush the right to go to war Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;That is the judgment all your &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; has amounted to? &amp;nbsp;Democrats are asking to lose the House, Senate, and the White House by voting her. &amp;nbsp;I can only hope that the person who wins 2008 will have some ounce of integrity for a change.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574251</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574251</guid><dc:creator>Youth Voter, USA</dc:creator><description>If Obama was a female with so less experience and no specifics, may be I wouldnt follow her. But as a youth voter, I have been told to follow Obama because he is hip, he is cool and thats all I have wanted all my life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, he said he will bring change. (I dont know though that in all elections, politicians talk about change since democracy started).</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574255</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574255</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl Shank Pittsburgh, Pa</dc:creator><description>I don't know what &amp;quot;Meet the Press&amp;quot; you folks watched but I thought Hillary tamed Tim Russet masterfully. &amp;nbsp;She didn't shy away from any question. &amp;nbsp;She responded well to all of his &amp;quot;old&amp;quot; questions and he seemed unwilling to discuss the current events such as the economy. &amp;nbsp;She laid down timetables and numbers for troop withdrawal from Iraq. &amp;nbsp;She responded to the Dr. Martin King / Lyndon Johnson issue as well as the “fairy tale campaign”comment while give props to Senator Obama. Also, I think she brilliantly handled Tim's last question referring to her painful public display of her marriage trouble. Go Hillary!!!!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574256</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574256</guid><dc:creator>MAMN</dc:creator><description>For sen. Clinton: As a leading candidate she is running a highly controversial campaign strategy by playing gender card in many times, her broken down in tears which followed by remark &amp;quot;I don't want to see the country is falling backward, she claimed to be the most experienced by being first lady in WH and in Governor mansion, she stole &amp;quot;change slogan from rival candidate when it becomes famous, she played fear tactics before N.H.primary &amp;nbsp;like republicans, she ignites the race card by raising a controversial comments on MLK and lately her endorser in Nevada teacher union is suing the voting authu.to remove the precincts inside the casino-hotel area so union workers can not vote easily. All this indicate that she is playing a very destructive strategy which will eventually cause a huge wound to the Democratic Party. How she response?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574258</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:16:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574258</guid><dc:creator>MAMN</dc:creator><description>I understand the emotions is ok but she is crying not for the feelings for others but because she was loosing so badly. She thoughts her name will give her free ride to washington.She can not lift up the world nor this country because she has the most backing from the biggest lobyist.She took the most money from them and she will have the same war mentality like Bush. If we elect her we will repeat the 8 yrs of Bush. She practices the same fear tactics like the republicans which she did before the N.H. primary. And also she proves that she will break down easy if she faces any difficulties down the road, That tears is not her softness that her weakness in the face of tough work. &lt;br&gt;People should understand that we must needed a different domestic and foreign policy that will bring this country more united within rich and poor and all class and at the same time we need to bring a peaceful world in order to see our kids and grand kids live in peace and harmony year to come. If we really want this, Hillary Clinton can not bring this kind of change because she is too occupied to carry foreign and domestic lobbyist agendas other than our own agendas. She will never be the peoples’ president. A president can not do the job by himself, He needs partners of common interest and reaching to all the parties and to all who also carry different views and by this definitions, she won't be able to unite the country and form and a vast majority of collation partnership which will be included a boarder base bi partisanship.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574259</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:16:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574259</guid><dc:creator>RJ, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>I was excited about Obama and planing to support him, but now that he and his campaign is playing the race card, I cannot vote for him. His strategy of playing the race card will only divide the country and not unite it. I now find it hard to believe that he really wants to unite the country. This was bad strategy for Obama and his campaign. Any critical thinking person can see that the Clintons made no racial remarks. But if this is what we will get by electing an African American president...then no thanks.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574260</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574260</guid><dc:creator>Hillary4prez</dc:creator><description>Hillary explained her positions vry well and had Tim Russert Backing down, now as we go after Chris Matthews, MSNBC will begin losing viewers if he doesn't apoloize on the air to Hillary, and admit his hatred and bias of the Clintons</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574261</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:16:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574261</guid><dc:creator>Rishi, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>American politics needs to grow up. We are electing a president in 2008 and still bickering about Iraq vote and speech in 2002. This was Bush war and no speech or vote by any democrat would have made any difference. What has Obama done since 2002 to change the course of war in Iraq? Giving a speech in 2002 and doing nothing since is not leadership?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574262</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:17:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574262</guid><dc:creator>MAMN,PALM BEACH,FL</dc:creator><description>AT THE LAST DEBATE WHEN CLINTON WAS SAYING THAT “BARACK DID VOTE FOR THE FUND FOR THE TROOPS WHEN HE OPPOSED THE WAR, THIS IS NOT CHANGE.” WE NEED STRONG ANSWER THAT YES,EVEN CLINTON AUTHORIZE THE WAR AT THE EXPENSE OF LIVES OF OUR BRAVE GENERATIONS, BUT IT IS EVERONE MORAL DUTY TO SUPPORT THE TROOPS AT WAR, THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY POLITICS WITH THE FUNDING TO TROOPS BECAUSE WE MUST NEED TO STAY BEHIND OUR TROOPS.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574263</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:17:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574263</guid><dc:creator>Dee Ward, Mena, AR</dc:creator><description>I was so proud of Senator Clinton today. &amp;nbsp;I really hated to see her go on the Meet The Press show as I just knew Tim Russert would tear her to shreds as it is obvious that he just does not like her. &amp;nbsp;She answered all his questions and he really didn't get to talk nearly as much as she did. &amp;nbsp;Thank gosh. &amp;nbsp;She doesn't hesitate in her answers as obama does. &amp;nbsp;He hums and haws around while trying to think of the correct answer. &amp;nbsp;Senator Clinton did not let Russert get the best of her and stayed poised and cool throughout he program. &amp;nbsp;She will answer any and all questions on the campaign &amp;nbsp;trail and will win like she did in New Hampshire. &amp;nbsp;Now lets see Tim Russert have obama back on and try to discredit him as he has tried to discredit Hillary.No one questions him like they do Senator Clinton...He wants CHANGE (Bill Clintons words and hope, also Bill Clintons words) but he doesn't say what his change will be, just we want change. &amp;nbsp;The people need specifics like Senator Clinton gives. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT, doesn't this resonate well.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574267</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:18:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574267</guid><dc:creator>MAMN,PALM BEACH,FL</dc:creator><description>She said she will bring change. How come she will bring change when she works with the lobbyist and takes money from them? When I see her talking I feel the same notions that we are going to see the same war, proverty, recession and disrespect to the rest of the world and the same attitude.&lt;br&gt;Please be aggressive on her issues to open it up to the American people so they can see the real Hillary and understand &amp;nbsp;her double talk on issues.&lt;br&gt;This morning I was watching Former sec. Albright talking on C-span and she was talking same George Bush strategy that we should be more offensive on foreign policy other than constructive dialogue. &lt;br&gt;We can not afford to let her win this nomination to loose to the Republicans.&lt;br&gt;We must be more aggressive and be precise on our dialogue with the American people&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574268</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:18:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574268</guid><dc:creator>Gina, Williamsburg, VA</dc:creator><description>To me the Iraq War is the issue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Barrack Obama had enough wisdom and judgment to come out so forcefully against the war in 2002 and Hillary did not, that says it all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tim showed part of Obama's speech in 2002 where he voiced his opposition to the war and which painted a picture of exactly what turned out to occur. The man had brilliant foresight and courage to go against popular sentiment and stand for his convictions. Hillary had no comeback to that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I sincerely hope the Democratic Party will nominate Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574271</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:21:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574271</guid><dc:creator>L. Kennedy  Boyce, VA</dc:creator><description>It seems clear that the media makes the news. One day after NH Obama was &amp;quot;out&amp;quot;, after only a 2 point loss, with Hillary &amp;quot;surging&amp;quot;. WHat? America must be used to lies to support Hillary. And the cable news wants to sensationize everyday. It will be her dirty campaigning that will win the nomination. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574272</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:21:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574272</guid><dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator><description>Unbelievable!! Why &amp;nbsp;do you need to like a candidate&lt;br&gt;and why in the world does it matter if a candidate shows a soft side in order for you to support and&lt;br&gt;elect the most qualified individual for President.&lt;br&gt;Grow up America!!! I'm done listening to any further&lt;br&gt;debates presented by the media!! &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574273</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:22:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574273</guid><dc:creator>Paul Walker, Germantown, TN</dc:creator><description>This is another defining moment in American political life.&lt;br&gt;Will the electorate support a campaign built upon division and derision or a campaign built upon unity and integrity.&lt;br&gt;Only time will tell.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574274</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:22:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574274</guid><dc:creator>Roxanne, Austin Texas</dc:creator><description>Clinton clearly lied a number of times -- most obviously when asked about her knowledge of Bill's pardons. Her defense of her war vote leaves you to choose between whether she is a liar or is stupid! What a choice, America. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574280</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:24:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574280</guid><dc:creator>Tom Friday</dc:creator><description>As a regular viewer of MTP, I think Tim may not have been as tough on Ms. Clinton as he has been with other guests. Obviously, he had to be concerned with the perceptions, particulary after the debate in Philly. Frankly, the response on the disparaging remarks made about MLK were emplematic of the misteps her campaign has made an undoubledly she would also make as Commander in Chief. As much as I do not think a Republican is the best choice to run the country, I will certainly vote for McCain or Huggelby (sp?) if she were the nominee.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574281</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574281</guid><dc:creator>Russ    Well, Maine</dc:creator><description>Once again the Media and big money will determine who gets elected they seem to be campainging for certain individuals...And guess what the canadates get free Pubplicity...This is America and its best....</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574286</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574286</guid><dc:creator>christy</dc:creator><description>I am a faithful viewer of Meet the Press and again Tim's personal dislike for Mrs. Clinton showed in his interview. &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Clinton argued points with pose and intellect. &amp;nbsp;As a follower of this 2008 campaign, many clips were taken out of context. &amp;nbsp;She was right on when responding to poll numbers presented. &amp;nbsp;I would have thought the media learned their lesson about relying on polls from the New Hampshire results. Stop getting egg on your face, remember 2000? &amp;nbsp;Ease up on the old gal, Tim when she's elected you'll be begging her to guest on the show</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574288</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:26:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574288</guid><dc:creator>nadeem, Canada</dc:creator><description>My wife has an interesting perspective on Hillary. &amp;nbsp;Until wednesday she was a Hillary supporter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On getting emotional.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The pile up by the media was highly inapropriate and sexist. &amp;nbsp;Only God knows if it was real or not and we should give her the benifit of the doubt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama earned some of her respect for not pilling on like most of the MSM. &amp;nbsp;She thought he was very professional throughout.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What turned her away from Hillary were two factors subsiquent to the emotional reaction to the question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) &amp;nbsp;Both the content of her reaction and her acceptance speech were all about her. &amp;nbsp;My wife stated she said &amp;quot;me or i&amp;quot; at least a dozen times. &amp;nbsp;Clearly she is emotional about her plight but not nessesarily the plight of the people. &amp;nbsp;She saw a contrast to the various speeches by Obama where he talkes about we.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) She began to do exactly what the media did, exploit the moment. &amp;nbsp;The media tried to exploit it in a bad way, she is exploiting it in a good way, nonetheless it is still exploitation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wy wife is not supporting Obama but does say the Obama campaign is about WE and the Clinton campaign is about HER.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record i am an Obama supporter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just thought i'd share this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, the Clinton position on MLK and Fairy Tale will not play well. &amp;nbsp;They should just apologize for a poor choice of words and get on with it. &amp;nbsp;Continuing to defend the statement is like arguing over the definition of &amp;quot;IS&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574290</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:28:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574290</guid><dc:creator>PLB</dc:creator><description>Youth Voter, USA (Sent Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:47 AM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you serously JUST GROW UP....If you can't understand the meaning of it all then you still have some learning to do......&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574292</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:28:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574292</guid><dc:creator>Nadia, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Her refusal to admit the error in her judgment on the war vote (where Obama made the correct call!) shows an inability to learn from the past and likelihood to repeat the error (the same reason sometimes why a women who is being cheated on and lied to by her husbands stays with him ... lack of strength to learn from the past and change her behavior). </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574293</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:28:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574293</guid><dc:creator>Greg, Dallas</dc:creator><description>I read somewhere in the press that what we have here in 2008 is akin to a reality show entitled &amp;quot;Who Wants To Be The Leader Of The Free World.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This election is, indeed, fascinating and of immeasurable entertainment value. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't quite decided on who I will vote for, but I'll vote for who I think is the best candidate, republican or democrat. &amp;nbsp;Given that there are currently no republican candidates who deserve my vote, if I were to vote today, it would be for Hillary. Let's face facts, Bill Clinton is the most qualified person to be the &amp;quot;Leader of the Free World.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574294</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:28:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574294</guid><dc:creator>Kristian O</dc:creator><description>You guys and gals whine about Hillary and Barack when there just might be a better option out there in John Edwards. Be careful ya'll. You just might get what you're asking for.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574298</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:30:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574298</guid><dc:creator>Nadia, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Do we really want another Bush and Cheney type team in the white house?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574299</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:30:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574299</guid><dc:creator>Frank Sorrell, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>Hillary was as slippery as an eel by always going on the attack or asking to look at the full context of the point. The time was a stump speech and her political nature showed throughout. &amp;nbsp;How can she possibly attack Obama for being political since she defines what a political person looks like.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574301</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:30:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574301</guid><dc:creator>Charlie, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator><description>I guestion why the independents and Republican are for Obama. Are they seeing what I see, that in truth he is a smart, inspirational man that lacks experience. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps with the country in the state that it is, he is the only Democratic candidate that gives them a chance to keep the White House! &amp;nbsp;Once he's nominated the truth will be told. &amp;nbsp;My basis for this is that I don't buy the change thing when Congress makes and passes the law. &amp;nbsp;His record in Congress isn't very good with all his &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; votes. &amp;nbsp;Illinois elected him to be their Senator but he's taken a leave of absence while he runs for President. &amp;nbsp;Seems he would be paying a little more attention to what is going on in Congress if he wants change from the status quo. &amp;nbsp;Also I haven't seen where he has been very good with his answers when they haven't been pre-scripted for him. &amp;nbsp;I hope he isn't the one that decides to bomb Pakistan to get BinLaden and forgets to tell Pakistan. Nuclear war between Pakistan and India isn't very appealing</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574304</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:31:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574304</guid><dc:creator>jh, nyc</dc:creator><description>I'm sick and tired of hearing that vote described as a war vote. &amp;nbsp;It's a sin to tell a lie, Barack. &amp;nbsp;I'm also sick and tired of the way they're twisting Bill Clinton's words and hers to play to the African-American community. &amp;nbsp;I knew exactly what Bill meant, and it's no disrespect to Martin Luther King to say that without Lyndon Johnson the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act would at least have been delayed by years. &amp;nbsp;Kennedy couldn't get them through Congress, and people forget that they weren't an easy sell at the time. &amp;nbsp;In fact, Barry Goldwater -- the Republican nominee that year -- voted against BOTH of them.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574306</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:31:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574306</guid><dc:creator>Preston Winters</dc:creator><description>HRC tries blame Bush for her vote authorizing the war in Iraq, claiming that she was misled by him. Interesting. But it is, unfortunately, a typical misleading post hoc self-justification. Let us recall that 23 Senators (including nearly half the Democrats then in the Senate) and 133 Representatives who voted AGAINST the resolution were not misled. Is this the kind of vision we need in our President? Let us also recall that HRC didn't bother to read the National Intelligence Estimate which Bush used as a justification to authorize military action. Is this the kind of attention to detail relating to vitally important decisions that we must demand in our President? Finally, her unwillingness to acknowledge, even in retrospect, that her vote was a mistake is frighteningly reminiscent of the arrogance of the current President. Is this what we are looking for in our next President? I don't think so.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574309</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:32:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574309</guid><dc:creator>ron unger  sarasota, florida</dc:creator><description>The response to this mornings Meet The Press clearly illustrates by the e mails the diversity and different interpertations of the interview. If you are a student of body language then you witnessed a sincere and heart felt interview in which HRC showed true emotion and enormous range of facts and articulation. I was duly impressed with the way HRC handled the onslaught of attacks by Russert, (who I felt was unduly critical). I do feel a Presidential candidate has every right to interject, hold on there, lets get the facts right. As so often, a small snipet out of context was put up on the screen. HRS got it right and illustrated more than ever why she is qualified to be President. Do Americans really want to place the fate of our Country, Our Economy and our future in a well spoken but untested and inexperienced young man, who really has no real qualifications except rock star status-to run this troubled country.Every four years we hear the word change, this is nothing new. What we do not hear are politicians who are really willing to tackle the tough issues a President faces. HRC this morning impressed me as a passionate, compassionate well versed candidate who deserves the opportunity to identify her alternatives to the complex issues facing this country. This morning we were exposed to a real look at HRC. A bright, sensitive and electable candidate, who appears to have studied the issues and who also has at least taken a position. Right or Wrong she does have an actionable history from which to measure her skills. This was a truly outstanding morning for an outstanding candidate.&lt;br&gt;Ron Unger-Sarasota-Florida</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574310</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:32:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574310</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth, Dallas, TX </dc:creator><description>Mr. Russert should have asked about her 35 years of experience that she touts because we all know that Wolf Blitzer won't dare to ask her that when CNN has their Dem debate in SC. Obama, to me thus far, seems to hold integrity and you can tell a lot by a person by the way that they react and Hillary is really hurting herself here. She stated that she doesn't like to talk about herself, but we hear a lot of &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;'s. Obama at least inspires people to understand that they can be involved in the government that they pay for with their tax dollars!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dallas for Obama '08!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574313</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574313</guid><dc:creator>MLGC, Orange California</dc:creator><description>Comments lik &amp;quot;obama is a leader&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Clinton is a follower&amp;quot; are excellent examples of sexism even when the comments are made by women. There are many studies in academia that men are more likely to get hired based on their future promise, whereas women are expected to already have a strong record. In other words, men with weak record are easily forgiven because they can sell the &amp;quot;visionary&amp;quot; thing. Women do not make believable &amp;quot;visionaries&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;leaders;&amp;quot; they have to rely on what they have already done because they do not receive the benefit of the doubt. If you don't believe me just imagine Obama as a woman (reagrdles sof race)? Would anyone believe that a female Obama is qualified for being president? It's a pity that even women buy the sexist bias--they prefer to follow a man than ask the tough questions.&lt;br&gt;sonia hirt, blacksburg (Sent Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:47 AM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;___________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comments are riduclosu and manipulatives at best...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Name one time when Hillary has stepped out on her own and been against or for something....Each and everytime she voted for something she waited to see what others were going do....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that's not a follower then I don't know what is...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574314</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574314</guid><dc:creator>Polarbear, Anchorage, AK</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton had a great interview on Tim Russert's show today. &amp;nbsp;She was New York tough - precisely what is needed against the Republicans in November. &amp;nbsp;Thinking back to the start of the Iraq war, what I was thinking as a citizen at the time matches what Senator Clinton was thinking at the time, and, I think, matches what most Americans were thinking at the time. &amp;nbsp;We were fed bad information and misled by the Bush administration. &amp;nbsp;I cannot fault Senator Clinton when I did no better. &amp;nbsp;And regarding Obama's position she is exactly right - Obama said one thing and did another by repeatedly voting to extend and fund the war. &amp;nbsp; Hillary Clinton not only handled Russert, but dragged him kicking into a discussion of the economy and her major speech this past week. &amp;nbsp;In the end, she was in control of the debate. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton is the candidate who can win in November.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574315</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574315</guid><dc:creator>Norm, Hillsboro, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Judging by the comments, I think it's clear Hillary while she may be qualified and has experience, she would never be elected President. People either love her or hate her and if at least 49% of the public hates her, how can she get elected? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's all about nominating a candidate that would have the best chance to win in November. Personally, I think either John Edwards or Obama gives the Dems the best chance to win. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574318</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574318</guid><dc:creator>anthony santucci bermuda</dc:creator><description>I hate the Clinton, slime machine.&lt;br&gt;I will vote republican before I vote for the Clinton's</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574319</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574319</guid><dc:creator>Ashley, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is a bold-faced liar. Now she didn't know the resolution to start the war in Iraq was for war???WHAT!!!&lt;br&gt;Oh my goodness, the Clinton double-talk spin machine was in full swing today.&lt;br&gt;Also, she spent the majority of the time talking about Senator Obama, even when she was supposed to be answering questions about HER policy....she's obsessed with Obama. She'd likely be voting for him if she herself wasn't a candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO MORE LIARS IN WASHINGTON!&lt;br&gt;THIS IS GETTING TO BE RIDICULOUS!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was not a good interview for Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama still has my vote! GO OBAMA!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574320</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:34:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574320</guid><dc:creator>Craig CT</dc:creator><description>Was Hillary wearing an earpiece?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574322</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:35:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574322</guid><dc:creator>jh, nyc</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Her answers were almost laughable at times. One example was when Tim asked about how her campaign complained in Iowa that many working people couldn't vote, but are now complaining because Nevada will allow people to vote in their workplaces. What a hypocrite!!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what WAS this &amp;quot;laughable&amp;quot; answer? &amp;nbsp;Are we supposed to take your word for it? &amp;nbsp;Sorry, no. &amp;nbsp;Russert asking an accusatory question is nothing new (he seldom asks any othe kind), but it is rarely the last word with Clinton.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574323</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:35:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574323</guid><dc:creator>Dorothy Kincaid, Alcoa, TN</dc:creator><description>I am a 62 year old Black female who as Hillary says has been there, I have not heard about it - I've been vetted. Let Obama win, let the repugnants come into power again. If that happens then those who voted against Hillary because you brought the rhetoric - will get exactly what it is what they are going to throw at you. Hillary I am in your corner and if you don't win - then it is the country's lost. I so admire you and there isn't anyone at MSNBC that I like or trust (a part of the system to destroy)</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574327</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:36:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574327</guid><dc:creator>Noah Thomas</dc:creator><description>In 2002 Clinton had over 30 years of experience and she voted for the war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2002 Obama had the better judgement on the outcome of the war if we get involved. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2009 Obama will have the better judgement to get our troops out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2009 Clinton will still have the experience</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574328</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:36:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574328</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Brooklyn, NY</dc:creator><description>Time and time again Clinton &amp;nbsp;refused to directly answer Russert's and interrupted his attempts to get her to stop turning the &amp;quot;interview&amp;quot; into a Hillary campaign promotion. &amp;nbsp;Russert should be ashamed of himself for wimping out and letting her take charge of the program. This wasn't Meet the Press, it was Meet Hillary</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574331</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:38:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574331</guid><dc:creator>Ms. Davis, Birmingham, AL</dc:creator><description>As an African American professional female, I have always been and continue to be an admirer and supporter of Senator Clinton. I have listened for years to people, women and men, villify her because I beleive that many in this country cannot handle a strong, smart, independent woman. I beleive she will make a fine president that will not be an embarrasment to our country. Let's judge individuals on their merits, not their race or gender.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574332</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574332</guid><dc:creator>Aidyn, NY</dc:creator><description>Hilllary has again proven how smart and straight forward she is. She always says the same thing about the War. I am very impressed and I think she did awesome.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574335</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:40:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574335</guid><dc:creator>VW, Norwalk, CT</dc:creator><description>I agree Hillary came off terribly this morning. &amp;nbsp;She seemed to do nothing, but express annoyance at being questioned, why did she yell the whole time and keep interupting the questions. &amp;nbsp;I also don't think she is an agent of change, but a throw back to the 90's. &amp;nbsp;It was interesting in the NH exit polls that 58% of the people that voted for her said they would rather be voting for Bill. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need someone to inspire and unite this country. &amp;nbsp;Obama is the only one saying &amp;quot;We are democrates, independents, and republicans together.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need a uniter, a true uniter. &amp;nbsp; Hillary is a divisive personality. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also find myself more and more rupulsed by her based on her recent behavior. &amp;nbsp;And as for the cry ... I don't want a president that cries under pressure. &lt;br&gt;As a business woman I find this insulting, I wouldn't last 5 minutes playing the victim card and crying when things get tough. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am surprised that more isn't being made of a small comment in an MSNBC article about NH, that Obama lost because of all the pre-election press about the polls and indepentents voting for McCain, because they thought Obama had it all sewen up. &amp;nbsp;This seems more on target. &amp;nbsp;I am also glad Kuchinage is requesting a recount. &amp;nbsp;The outcome was suspicious. &amp;nbsp;It implies that Hillary took all the undecided voter. &amp;nbsp;Odd. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574337</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:40:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574337</guid><dc:creator>J. Garl, New York, New York</dc:creator><description>Dear Tim,&lt;br&gt;Please take the time to read some the comments posted here. We are disappointed about the way you carried out this interview. Is this what you called meet the press? Or let put it this way...Meet the Clintons? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;come on Tim... we know you to be one of the best guys out there. show your true color.. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574338</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:40:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574338</guid><dc:creator>J Dent</dc:creator><description>1) How was a resolution authorizing the use of military force the same as returning inspectors to Iraq? I don't see anything in the authorization of the USE OF MILITARY FORCE that places an emphasis on getting inspectors back into the country. Depends on what the definition of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Re: Obama's record...what was HRC up to when he was organizing change in Chicago's south-side? If by fighiting for change she means hiding after failure (i.e. &amp;nbsp;healthcare) then spinning it as though it is a victory a decade later, then HRC is for change.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574340</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:41:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574340</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>Hillary defeats the master questioner, she did it by indepth knowledge of the issues, brilliance in delivary. The right wing Media is promoting &amp;nbsp;Barack Obama so to confuse the Democratic party voters, but he does not have the world stature, and &amp;nbsp;command of issues as Hillary Clinton &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574342</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:41:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574342</guid><dc:creator>Alan Soposnick</dc:creator><description>ATTACK..ATTACK..ATTACK..The Clinton attack machine makes the Republican tactics seem tame....REPEAT..REPEAT..HIllary seemed very relaxed using the same &amp;quot;scripted, mostly out of context quotes, both of her and Obama. But when Russert directly challanged her with some questions whe was unprepared for, she became agitated and defensive.&lt;br&gt;ENOUGH..ENOUGH..ENOUGH!!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574343</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:42:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574343</guid><dc:creator>Erik, Bowie MD</dc:creator><description>The start of the Iraq War wasn't 25 years ago and all our memories are hazy about it. It was 5 years ago. Like everyone else, I knew that resolution was to authorize the invasion of Iraq. Hillary Clinton is lying. As a Democrat, I will never vote for her, even in the general election if she is our nominee.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574344</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574344</guid><dc:creator>Joel, Buffalo NY</dc:creator><description>How can Senator Clinton say she &amp;quot;thought&amp;quot; the 2002 legislation was not for a pre-emptive war when the resolution was titled &amp;quot;authorization for the use of military force&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I do not think she is stupid, I think she did not want to go against the political and popular tide of setiment against sadam. &amp;nbsp;Basicaly she was a coward. &amp;nbsp;Obama was against the war when it was unpopular. &amp;nbsp;His explanation that in 2004 he did not want to contradict his party's nominees seems honest and believable. &amp;nbsp;I just get the feeling that Senator Clinton only takes one side of an issue after she has figured out which side is politically expedient. &amp;nbsp;Until then she will dance both side of an issue. That's not what I want in a president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574347</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:43:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574347</guid><dc:creator>EddyNewHope</dc:creator><description>Hillary is just pissed because now she has to eat standing up (per Obama's ethics reform bill) with her lobbyist friends while she and Bill take their pay-offs. &amp;nbsp;But count on politics as usual from the Clintons: attack Obama and assume that the American people are too stupid to look it up and see the Clinton's hypocrisy. They can hee and haw about her Iraq vote all they want - they voted to give Bush MORE war powers against Iran just recently. No more Clinton/Bush in the White House.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574354</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:45:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574354</guid><dc:creator>mort levine</dc:creator><description>Anyone who saw Hillary on Meet the Press today and still doesen't get it as to why she is the one to lead this country,is never going to get it.She was brillient,tough and human.She stood up to Russert and his one sided attacks on her with grace and poise.She refuted the racial inuendo from the press and the Obamaites by reminding them that JFK and MLK not only talked the talk,they walked the walk.Something else thats lost on the Obama folks. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574355</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574355</guid><dc:creator>Thorne</dc:creator><description>One thing Obama's people need to be very careful of is playing the race card in reference to Clinton's Obama remarks. &amp;nbsp;As someone else said here, no one has been more involved in the black community as a past-president than Bill Clinton. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I supppose folks like Jackson and Sharpton are probably unhappy that Oprah is getting all the press these days, so stand by for more from these two. &amp;nbsp;Can Obama distance himself from these two historically devisive and contentious characters down the road?? &amp;nbsp;Only time will tell. The Sharpton effect will not have positive outcomes on a broad scale. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure Obama is as completely sensative to the issue of &amp;nbsp;being a black candidate, as Hillary is to being a female candidate - both candidates will be walking a fine line depending on how those characteristics are portrayed (e.g. positive vs negative spin). &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While B. Clinton is at times a questionable x-factor with regard to how beneficial he is to Hillary's campaign, a racist he is not. &amp;nbsp;Bill is just Bill - get over it. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And to all the experts that know exactly how each dem candidate would do as president and that assure us with equal certainty as to who can and can't win as dem nominee - you may as well be predicting the weather......you don't really have a clue and no one else does either. &amp;nbsp;Good luck with your predictions. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;George Will says in his editorial today that Hillary has only a remote chance of winning as the dem nominee.....and I guarantee you with equal certainty that Will is (and always has been) a McCain junkie. &amp;nbsp;What else would anyone expect him to say??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some people are indeed more predictable than the weather. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574356</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574356</guid><dc:creator>Jogn ,Chicago</dc:creator><description>This is stupid to blame hillary for useless allegations.Tim doesnt like hillary alongwith arrogant questions.Bot she overcame with all.Look at her.How strong she is.The media should not biased anyone.That will be questioning to the creditability of journalism.MSNBC need stop to &amp;nbsp;play partisan politics.dont go like fox republican channel.You have to c the facts not trying to bring useless questions. I was watching all tim with Sen.Clinton.&lt;br&gt;Today I decided to go with Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574357</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:47:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574357</guid><dc:creator>JMO, Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is being truthful. &amp;nbsp;While I don't agree with it, her position on the War has been consistent. &amp;nbsp;She is not running away from it or changing to pander. &amp;nbsp;She is also correct in pointing out some inconsistencies with Obama's record on the issue. &amp;nbsp;I don't understand why this leads to personal attacks (lying, racisim) from Obama supporters. &amp;nbsp;Obama should just address the issues she raised and we can all move on. &amp;nbsp;Did he take the statement down from his Web site when the war was going well? &amp;nbsp;Did he say he agreed with how Bush was conducting the war? &amp;nbsp;These assertions can be verified and checked. &amp;nbsp;If they are true, I am sure Obama will have reasonable explanations for his actions. &amp;nbsp;Whatever happened to and end to politics as usual? &amp;nbsp;Does that not apply to the Clintons?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574358</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:47:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574358</guid><dc:creator>EddyNewHope</dc:creator><description>The Republicans won't beat Obama. They do not want him on the ticket. They know how to deal with Clinton's but Obama throws them off their game because he doesn't react to their distorted attacks, and he speaks above the partisan bickering that has worked so well for them (and the Clintons recently). That's why Karl Rove launched an all out assault against Obama. They can divide America over Hillary, but that won't work with Obama's message of a working coalition of Americans rather than bitter partisan politics.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574359</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:47:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574359</guid><dc:creator>Paul Wertz, Eugene, Oregon</dc:creator><description>America seems to have a death wish that it is carrying out by making sure the only honest candidate, John Edwards, is off-loaded. &amp;nbsp;How predictably sad. &amp;nbsp;Two years ago when Don Imus asked out loud why more than 50% of America still believed Saddam Hussein and Iraq had a connection to 9/11, a sidekick blurted out, &amp;quot;Because we're a nation of morons.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574361</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574361</guid><dc:creator>kathaleenmarie  CO</dc:creator><description>Me??? &amp;nbsp;I'm an OBAMA MAMA!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574362</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574362</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>It seems as if this blog &amp;amp; its users serve no purpose other than to find a way to demean themselves. &amp;nbsp;The comments posted on the site are insulting &amp;amp; belittling to Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;They have no merits in supporting any of the claims against Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;So these bloggers only mean is to make stupid comments when they disagree with the senator &amp;amp; can't seem to find any ways to counter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the Republicans &amp;amp; the pundits truly want change, they only have themselves to blame for crowning Bush in 2000. &amp;nbsp;The Clintons have left this nation w/ surplus &amp;amp; record economic growth. &amp;nbsp;In 2000, it was also the Republicans who voted for changes &amp;amp; now we ends up in a dung hole. &amp;nbsp;Obviously, bloggers here don't seem to learn. &amp;nbsp;Here is an advice, try voting for someone with a proven experience of positive change for this nation. &amp;nbsp;Voting for a candidate with no experience (such as Senator Obama) is in essence making the same fatal mistake as in voting for Bush in 2000 as an agent of change. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574363</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:48:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574363</guid><dc:creator>Becky Las Vegas NV</dc:creator><description>Oh come on people give me a break....when Obama was on Meet the Press Tim asked soft questions...When Hillary is on he goes for the throat and she fought back....She isn't going to take Tim's crap or anyone elses that try their best to distort her positions...YOU GO HILLARY YOU DID GREAT!!!!!!!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574365</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:48:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574365</guid><dc:creator>Dean, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Jesuitical?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Defined, according to the Oxford English Dictionary as, &amp;quot;Having the character ascribed to the Jesuits; deceitful, dissembling; practising equivocation, prevarication, or mental reservation of truth. Often used in sense ‘hair-splitting’, keenly analytical.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why would she choose, in anger, to attempt to refute Tim Russert's line of questioning with a word that disparages a respected order of the Catholic Church? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This impulsive willingness in the heat of the moment to diminish others in order to defend or elevate herself now includes Martin Luther King, Catholics and who else?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Words do matter. This person has no business representing our country as president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574367</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:49:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574367</guid><dc:creator>Jim Rozanc</dc:creator><description>The hatred for Hillary Clinton, Why? &amp;nbsp;She was painted by the extreme right because she tried to get national Health Care and she became a whipping post for all who wanted to be against Bill Clinton. &amp;nbsp;The truth is she is brilliant, thoughtful and knows deep down Americas problems. &amp;nbsp;Just look at her educational backround, her experience, her advisors, all these things would be a benefit to all of us. &amp;nbsp;She has worked closely with republicans and democrats in the senate. &amp;nbsp;Even the most extreme right applauds her as knowing her job very well. &amp;nbsp;What we got with all the rest are people who are fanatics, religious zealots, political hacks, and old retreads. &amp;nbsp;Its time for everyone to look at the facts not the crap you see on televison or in political ads. &amp;nbsp;Take a honest view and you will see that we need someone who has a grasp on all the subjects the next president will face. &amp;nbsp;We dont need someone who has training wheels on, its a dangerous time and we cant afford to try someone cause it feels good.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574368</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:50:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574368</guid><dc:creator>Ruth White, Las Vegas, Nevada</dc:creator><description>The best thing that I heard from the interview on Meet the Press interview with Hillary is when Tim &amp;nbsp;revealed that the woman who asked Hillary the question about how she was doing and caused her to cry went on to vote for BARACK OBAMA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574369</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:51:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574369</guid><dc:creator>Doreen, Augusta, Maine</dc:creator><description>So, we can see that Senator Clinton spent a couple of days after the New Hampshire primary practicing her comebacks -- actually, she is great at comesbacks (which is not a compliment). &amp;nbsp;She is so practiced and phony besides being a liar and messenger of shame. &amp;nbsp;Please, women, understand what you are voting for -- she is not a woman of change, she is just a woman who has been around playing in the dirt for so long that she doesn't know how to be honest and above board. &amp;nbsp;What a shame!!! &amp;nbsp;It makes me embarrassed to be a woman listening to her. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574371</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:52:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574371</guid><dc:creator>June, Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>I only managed to catch the last half of MTP, but I saw Hillary showing the grace under pressure that her critics seem to dislike and I personally admire. &amp;nbsp;How many times does she have to tell you people that her vote in 2002 was cast based on the facts as she knew them at the time? &amp;nbsp;If she knew now what she knew then she would have voted differently. &amp;nbsp;What is there about it that you can't seem to assimilate? &amp;nbsp;For those who seem to believe that charisma and emotion trump wisdom and experience, I suggest you read about how shallow Sen. Obama's experience really is. &amp;nbsp;Another eight years in the Senate will season him to be the President Obama I'd like to lead the country beginning in 2017.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574372</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:52:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574372</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Ashley, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>If you're interested in 4 more years of the Washington Spin Machine, go ahead and vote for Hillary.&lt;br&gt;Can you believe the double-talk about not knowing the vote in 2002 was for war....WHAT DID SHE THINK IT WAS FOR??? THE WORD WAR IS IN THE TITLE!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is getting to be ridiculous. Come on Americans, let's STAND FOR CHANGE WITH OBAMA! No more of this non-sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This interview was a mess. Hillary, you keep convincing me that my support for Obama is the right choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Obama!</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574878</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:15:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574878</guid><dc:creator>AJ, Boston Mass.</dc:creator><description>This is really about politics as usual. Hillary is a very talented politician. I am not sure her resume is that accomplished except by marriage. It was difficult at times to appreciate her attempts at spinning her campaigns comments. This is goodness though. The republicans will attack Obama and are thrilled to see Hillary's attempts to tear him down. This should be viewed as a necessary proving ground for Barrack...demonstrating an ability to ensure his message is heard over the many attempts from the Clintons to attack him.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574879</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:18:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574879</guid><dc:creator>Bobbie Campbell, Terre Haute, Indiana</dc:creator><description>Wow.&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry I missed the interview. I'm curious though. While I am pleased to see so many comments reflective of Hillary's inability to fool all of the people all of the time I'm curious where y'all have been? Hillary &amp;nbsp;Clinton has been after the Whitehouse since she sat wih Slick Willy in 1992 when he was caught with his pants down (with Genifer Flowers) and acted for all the world as if she were behind him. She was behind him all right--all the way to her own presidency. If we allow this then we deserve the scorn of the entire world.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574881</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:19:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574881</guid><dc:creator>PB,Rochester,Minnesota</dc:creator><description>Hillary on Iraq - She was briefed by everyone at the White House and outside the White House and still voted to give Bush whatever he wanted. Then she voted to give him a blank check on Iran. They are still ramping up to go to war with Iran,(Watch the video tape released by the IRA today)and it is my belief Bush will have us at war with Iran soon! This is the judgment she would show as president. &lt;br&gt;Hillary touts and spews about her 35 years of experience and refuses to release her experience with Bill Clinton in the White House. She says how she cares about the working class people while the Clintons started NAFTA which has brought this country to it's knees and must be stopped. On this subject all she can say is that it didn't go as they thought it would. This is the kind of judgment she would bring as President. Hillary was on the Board of Directors for one of the biggest corporations destroying the middle class - WALMART. There she could have used her experience to improve pay, HEALTH INSURANCE, EQUALITY for WOMEN in the workplace but chose the BIG CORPORATE way of life! She couldn't help thousands of working class people in one corporation and wants us to believe she will do something for the whole country! This is the kind of judgment she will bring as President! Obama spent years actually working to change life in Chicago - then Illinois - then the United States. &lt;br&gt;Hillary says she wants to bring transparency to our government - &amp;nbsp;What a JOKE! It was Senator Obama who got the internet website to post where our money is being spent(WASTED) in this government. Who has gotten some legislation passed to reform this government! She says it will not be done quickly but he HAS STARTED in that direction. It amazes me how she tries to sound more like Barack everyday. &amp;nbsp;Sorry Hillary you will never be an OBAMA. &amp;nbsp;He has good JUDGMENT, is one of the PEOPLE, is not a LIAR, is a THINKER, a UNITER and SHOULD BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES.&lt;br&gt;For those of you who keep throwing this MUSLIM religion crap out there you should really check out his religion and listen to him speak on his religion. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Most intelligent people know that you don't name yourself! I think his name has drawn many people to check out the man behind the name and those of us who have will be PROUD and HONORED to have BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA to give us back our PRIDE and HONOR at home and in the world! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574905</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:39:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574905</guid><dc:creator>Mary Kay Coleman San Jose Ca</dc:creator><description>The entitlement of the Clintons is beyond belief. Putting up with Bill all those years seems to have given Hillary the believe she has the White House coming to her. Dealing with the Monica Lowensky scandal that Tim brought up at the end of the interview, must be part of the 35 years &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; she refers to so often. ( I would like to have seen some tears then) So now Bill, in the musclebound roll of ex-president, defends his poor &amp;quot;piled on&amp;quot; wife with some pretty outrageous attacks on Obama. Yes, words do matter. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574907</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:41:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574907</guid><dc:creator>JMO, Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;He(Obama)always said this is a wrong war at wrong battle field.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This isn't true. &amp;nbsp;Obama has consistently voted to fund the War and did not say that it was the wrong war at the wrong time during the 2004 elections. &amp;nbsp;The questions Clinton is asking are legitimate. &amp;nbsp;They don't make her a liar or a racist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still would support Obama for president but the reaction's to CLinton's remarks are the same old politics of destruction that Obama says he is trying to change.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574909</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574909</guid><dc:creator>Dot, Illinois</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;But when Chuck Hagel, who helped to draft the resolution said, 'It was not a vote for war,' What I was told directly by the White House in response to my question, 'If you are given this authority, will you put the inspectors in and permit them to finish their job,' I was told that's exactly what we intended to do. ”&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must confess I have never read this explanation of the 2002 war vote before. &amp;nbsp;Has this been around and I missed it or is this something new? Is this more mis-information from the Bush admininstration? But even so, &amp;nbsp;if the bill was titled authorization for military action, shouldn't someone have made absolutely certain of what was being voted on? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574915</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:47:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574915</guid><dc:creator>BionicWoman, Tucson, Az</dc:creator><description>All you Hillary bashers: keep up the nastiness. &amp;nbsp;Us women are tired of you and your attacks. &amp;nbsp;We will see to it that she is in the White House. &amp;nbsp;You are making us all mad. &amp;nbsp;She did a wonderful job this morning and I am proud of her. &amp;nbsp;If you despicable - rotten people can't see that - then I pity you. &amp;nbsp;But she will fix the system for you too and then you can get on your knees and thank her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574925</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:53:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574925</guid><dc:creator>ed s,southampton mass.    </dc:creator><description>God bless the sheep.The press has led you to ignore the fact that a polarizing person will lead to more gridlock.As the oceans rise,politician point fingers until I have oceanfront property.The things that should be critical to older women go ignored.1.medicare is not free 2.Social security is taxed if you have a pension.3 widows don't get their husbands SSI unless they are old enough to retire.In some state teacher get none at all if they have a pension.35 years of experience in politics,but how many years of altruistic deeds like Bill,George and Barbara Bush,Jimmy and Roseline Carter.Helping the public does not require power.She may be the current best hope for a women president,but electing a women for the sake of history makes as much sense as electing father and son for the same reason.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574929</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:55:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574929</guid><dc:creator>Dan, Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>I watched this interview on MTP this morning. I was curious to see how HRC would respond to the article in the State Newspaper (I read it yesterday while waiting to be checked out at WalMart)I am completely satisfied with her response(s). Furthermore, I could give a rats a-- for her not apologizing on the war authorization vote - it is what is, it was yesterday, in the past, why do people FAIL to accept that we were OUTRIGHT LIED too, by the current administration on the basis for the illegal war and wasted taxpayer dollars - WHEN will the american taxpayer get their refund for this lie? NEVER. HRC is my choice for the democratic nomination. However should BHO recieve the nomination - I will support him - PERIOD. Should Edwards get it - I will support him - PERIOD. I just want to see the neocons gone - PERIOD. I read these postings and find it amazing that so many people state that if there choice candidate does not get the democratic nomination then they will vote on the other party's ticket. I'd glady accept a democrat in the WH after these &amp;quot;dicey&amp;quot; eight years of neocons, their lies, deceptions, and condscending everthing is beneath them attitudes. Democrats need to stick together regardless of the nominee. BHO had it right when he said the candidates running will have to earn our vote - it will not be handed to them - PERIOD. They are all in this running for the WH, it is up to us to decide which applicant gets the position in November. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574950</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:09:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574950</guid><dc:creator>Glenn, Baton Rouge, La.</dc:creator><description>Hey Clintons (Bill &amp;amp; Hill),&lt;br&gt;I know this always works for you in the MY community (I'm Black), when ever someone does not agree with you it's time to attack them. Most of the time you have been on the mark. This time you are wrong. I know that you can't see it but all of your views come from your world not ours. You both come across as if you know what it is to be Black in America. You seam to think that only you can speak for Blacks. That a Black man can't speak unless he has been beaten, gassed, arrested or treated like crap by whites. You are off the mark.&lt;br&gt;Want to know what its like to be Black in America try this.&lt;br&gt;Pick any Black male, put him in a $2500.00 suite in downtown New York (your turf), then you or Bill stand 10 yards past him with jeans and shirt on. Both signal for a cab. See who gets one. You can also try this in any city in America and get the same results.&lt;br&gt;If I'm wrong I will go back to supporting you. Thats the other thing until the past week I was for you 100% but after seeing what you both have had to say of late not now or ever. &lt;br&gt;You can think you know us and feel our pain but you don't and never can. I'm not changing because of race but because both of you come across as if Blacks owe you something, we don't.&lt;br&gt;Obama may be only half Black, may have been raised under in a different environment than most Blacks but he still has a better understanding of what Blacks and all minorities (by color or class) have to go through each day in this country.&lt;br&gt;That cab would pass him by 9 out of 10 times. Not so for you or Bill.&lt;br&gt;As for me I'm retired from the US Navy and I have always been a Dem. I'm now and have always been involved with politics. The Clintons and the party should see what Obama brings to the party. That being people all over this country who would nrver, ever vote again for a Clinton. Many may not vote for a Black but we know they want vote for Clinton. Check her negatives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fired Up; Ready to GO.....Go Obama&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574962</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:22:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574962</guid><dc:creator>Amy B Portland, Me</dc:creator><description>sonia hirt, blacksburg. Well, I wouldn't call Gloria Steinem or Margaret Thatcher or Ophrah Winfrey a follower, they are leaders, Hillary is not. She didn't lead the opposition to the Iraq War when she was in a position to do so, in fact, I didn't see her leading the opposition to Bush on anything. I gave Hillary a hearing, I wanted to support her, she has disappointed me and she is not the one I want. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574970</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:32:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574970</guid><dc:creator>Washington DC</dc:creator><description>It is apparent that the media misquoting or misleading what the candidates are saying...when will the news reporter and/or when will the American people stop buying into cheap or giving in to cheap slanderous stories just to sell papers or just to get rating due to misquoting or again using BLACK FOLKS again...&lt;br&gt;NOW everyone saw the clip and it real plain and SIMPLE that the Clinton’s was talking about Obama voting records on the war....WHY can't Obama come on and defend his record regarding the war vote that he his being questioned on. And then (Obama) voted to fund the war...we can go on and on regards the records of the candidates. We need to stop letting the media drags the &amp;quot;BLACK FOLKS&amp;quot; into something that is not true again...when we will say enough is enough or are we running off of hope and not reality....Obama never has given any real suggesting or ideal on how is going to do the things that he says “give us hope” like Janet “what has he done for us lately” and is Obama playing the race card just because he’s BLACK or BLACK MUSLIM what has he done for black America….I did not hear anything from this brother until now and I still don’t see or understand the change he talking about….WHERE IS HIS AGENDA FOR US? I think Hillary put into action her Health Care plan, Economy plan, and her stance to get bring the troop home…All I hear from Obama is a promise once I become president what are going to do before u get there? Let focus on the main issue of why these candidates are running for PRESIDENCY….and earn our votes our fore father’s fought for and not to give it away just because your black….&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574988</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:48:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574988</guid><dc:creator>Sharon Mattingly, South Daytona, Fl</dc:creator><description>Hillary did an outstanding job today. She never let tim Russert get by with anything he tried, including showing only clips of what he wanted us to see. She is a strong person &amp;amp; has plans already in place when she is elected. She was all I thought she would be today. Go Hillary. You have my vote along with all my friends.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#574999</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:56:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:574999</guid><dc:creator>Chris Daniels, Huntsville, AL</dc:creator><description>As a middle-aged female college-educated voter, I was hoping more from Hillary this morning when I watched the interview. &amp;nbsp;I felt we received the usual parsing and well rehearsed Washington response in which she blamed others for her and Bill’s comments and actions. &amp;nbsp;She accused Obama and his campaign and others with numerous phrases like deliberately distorting facts, unfairly and inaccurately characterizing comments by taking them out of context, giving out information in a selective way and not providing an entire quote concerning the situations. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A large part of her response precisely utilized such tactics. &amp;nbsp;It would have been better to apologize for the offending remarks and move on to issues instead of trying to place blame on others for their actions and comments. &amp;nbsp;If this type of “style” used by the Clintons is what the future will entail then I vote for a different direction that does not include the Clintons and their style of campaigning or governance. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She had a chance for my vote and she lost it with her own style of rhetoric. &amp;nbsp;I have always voted Democrat, but I would vote for someone like John McCain if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination with such style and tactics that she has displayed thus far in the campaign because it is not uniting but dividing our country and we need to unite and move forward not backwards. &amp;nbsp;It makes the case that she cannot unite our country, as we need the next president to do.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575062</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:33:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575062</guid><dc:creator>LV</dc:creator><description>I watch Meet the Press every week and do not recall ever seeing a guest wear an earpiece as Senator Clinton did. &amp;nbsp;Is it at all possible that she was receiving information during this interview?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575078</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:43:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575078</guid><dc:creator>FJ Stratford, King Of Prussia PA</dc:creator><description>So Obama's record on ethics reform is not as stellar as he wants us to believe. You cant talk to lobbyists while sitting down but you can do it while standing up? Yuck! Is that the &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; that we can believe in? Personally, I think that is not much of a change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also used to think that he opposed the war from the get go and has been consistent since then. Was I surprised to know that he did not oppose the war after he made that speech. If this is &amp;quot;change&amp;quot;, I dont believe it. Change is about action not talk! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At work, I have had enough of self-aggrandizing Ivy Leaguers who know only how to talk and self-promote - that's why they get ahead. But you cant rely on them to deliver.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575079</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575079</guid><dc:creator>Sarah, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>First Read - Where are my two comments which I tried to post on this thread around 1pm and 2:30pm???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is there a HUGE GAP between 11:54am and 5:09pm with NO POSTS on this thread??? There were many &amp;nbsp;posts on OTHER threads during this time. Hard to believe that there were not many posts attempted on this thread during this large window of time - from 11:54am through 5:09pm - especially when you see how fast and furious they were coming in up until 11:54am. Very strange, to say the least.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a pattern here. This is the fourth time in a week that I have seen this happen, where if there are a large number of ANTI-HILLARY posts, you suddenly, and effectively, shut down the thread by stopping the posting for hours at a time. This is what I tried to post here at 2:30pm today after my 1pm post never showed up. What's going on?? Creative editing?? Very unprofessional. If someone takes the time to post, they don't want to think their thoughts will be censored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I wanted to say on this thread was that I thought Tim Russert did a fantastic job of drawing out the real Hillary. He cleverly showed how she is incapable of admitting mistakes. She blames everyone else - and never accepts responsibility herself. Tim was very polite and let Hillary give long answers. But he was able to very effectively demonstrate her and her campaign's misstatements and falsehoods. Bravo to Tim!! Hillary came across as extremely unappealing and shrill. Not a good performance.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575086</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:45:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575086</guid><dc:creator>Sara in Iowa</dc:creator><description>Did anyone notice that to almost EVERY question that was asked, Hillary replied &amp;quot;It's not fair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;we need to put it into context&amp;quot; or It was taken out of context&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!! &amp;nbsp;Will this woman EVER fess up to anything that her or her husband say or do? &amp;nbsp;She must really be living in a &amp;quot;Fairytail&amp;quot; if she thinks the good people of America are going to take her seriously. &amp;nbsp;More LIES! &amp;nbsp;I'm not even sure that she should be allowed to go back to the Senate after all of this! Way to go Hill, more garbage flowing out of your mouth for all the world to see!&lt;br&gt;Obama 08</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575105</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:56:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575105</guid><dc:creator>Victor Prim</dc:creator><description>I have read all the emails, and it is shocking to me that when she mentions the fact that Obama voted for funding of the war, she is lambasted by all of you. Perhaps when the lights go ouit he is somebody else. How would you know? I certainly do not. Thats why I will vote for whomever the canadate is. I have listened to Barak, but i do not buy the hope speech. I need to see his work and just as Clinton's past recoed is looked at I want to see his as well. I remeber during the last election many bloggers were furious if you talked about Bush. Well, it turned out to be a mess. I read one bog that says he does everthing Barak tells him to do. That is scary. To all of youi who despice her even more I ask what do you think the Republicans will do with him, should he become the nominee; join hands and sing. All I am saying is look at Obama's past record and compare it to what he is saying, not just what you want to hear. But what you don't, because the Republicans sure will. I am a young Black man that is supporting Hillary. Not becuse like many she is a great orator or she can do no wrong, but because she has been hated talked about and did not fall. I want to see Barak not just hear him. People said that aboyut George Bush and look what happened. Perhaps Hillary is correct, Obama needs to be looked at closely as she has. And regarding Matin Luther King, I believe masny of you as I believe that their words were taken out of context. I read where Jessie Jackson's son who is with Obama's camp made a remark comparing O. Simpson and a black man and white woman in a senereo and none of you said one thing? Why. I for one will look at Obama past more closley. Like I said I will vote for whomever the democratic nominee is. But they all have to be looked at. UI still can't believe someone would say I'll do whatever Obama tells me. See a doctor, quick. Scary. </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575114</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:01:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575114</guid><dc:creator>Sarah, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>OK, First Read - I see you are slowly backtracking with your posting of people's comments. I just posted you had a HUGE GAP of no posts between 11:54am and 5:09pm. Since I sent in that post a few minutes ago you have added posts going back to 4:15pm! Now the GAP is only four plus hours with no posts (including my two at 1pm and 2:30pm) from 11:54am and 4:15pm! Keep it up!! Now just go all the way back to 11:54am! You're getting there!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575128</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:07:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575128</guid><dc:creator>Sue Gayle, Tampa, Florida</dc:creator><description>I want a President that can take a punch, throw a punch and who has thick skin. &amp;nbsp;Go Clinton </description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575131</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:10:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575131</guid><dc:creator>truthinpolitix, USA</dc:creator><description> Regardless of what tipped the vote in her favor – and I think there were a number of factors – I can’t help but think the voters in New Hampshire made a big mistake when they gave Hillary that victory. Had she lost there, I think it would’ve been nearly impossible for her to stop Obama’s momentum. As it is, a huge battle lies ahead.&lt;br&gt;It is crucial that voters in Nevada, S. Carolina, and the Super Tuesday states do not repeat New Hampshire’s mistake. Obama is far more electable than Clinton, and a far more inspiring choice to move the country past the divisiveness of the Bush-Clinton years.&lt;br&gt;Now, don’t get me wrong, I think that the frothing-at-the-mouth hatred that Hillary inspires in so many Republicans borders on the insane (and it’s certainly idiotic), but Democrats ignore that antipathy at their own peril. If Democrats want to do the most powerful thing they can to turn out the *right-wing* base in November, the choice is simple: nominate Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;Obama, on the other hand, is the one candidate that Americans across the political spectrum can get behind. How do we know? Because they did it in Iowa. He trounced Hillary among independents, brought out unprecedented numbers of young people, and even defeated her by a percentage point among women there. Even in New Hampshire, he beat her handily amongst independents and young voters. He is a *true* uniter, something that Bush and Mrs. Clinton, unfortunately, can never be.&lt;br&gt;Imagine a contest between Obama and McCain. Barack would destroy the old guy in a general election. Clinton? I’m not so sure. Certainly, after seven years of the Bush fiasco, any Dem nominee *should* be able to beat any Republican, but given the way Hillary infuriates and riles up Republicans, it would be a huge risk to give her that responsibility. And really, do voters – even those who appreciate Bill Clinton’s presidency – really want to hear all those same old attacks and innuendoes and slanders repeated for another four or eight years? It’s time to turn the page, finally, and only Obama can do that.&lt;br&gt;Lastly, we should adress this silly “experience” issue: JFK only served a single full term in the Senate before becoming one of our most beloved presidents, and Lincoln, probably the greatest president ever, had served only *one* term in the House before his election. And of course, Bush was a two-term governor when he was elected, and we know how that worked out…There are other, *better*, metrics than mere time-in-office, and Obama’s obvious intelligence and good judgement – remember, he was right about Iraq from the beginning – are ample evidence of the strong leadership he would bring to the White House. &lt;br&gt;Democrats have a choice, a choice between unity and division, between the future and the past. Do we want to risk another Republican president, or four more years of Bush-Clinton bickering? Or do we want to turn the page to a new chapter in American life? Get out and *vote* in your primaries, and vote for Barack Obama.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575150</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:23:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575150</guid><dc:creator>mrb, arizona</dc:creator><description>Is Hillary a bad liar? Or, is she just stupid?</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575203</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:07:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575203</guid><dc:creator>Lenedone</dc:creator><description>Tim had an average to fair show with Hillary today, focusing too much on her past,I thought, &amp;nbsp;seeming to repeatedly invite her to comment or compare herself to Obama. &amp;nbsp;There was only one substantive issue discussed namely the housing crisis. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I watch Meet the Press every Sunday and would hope that Tim will in the future, &amp;nbsp;let the focus be on issues such as the economy and heatlthcare.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps it was just me, but I did sense considerable tension between Tim and Hillary, they both seemed circumspect with almost no pleasantries exchanged during the entire hour. I would like to know if anyone else observed this too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will have more to say on my blog later this week on the voting record of both Hillary and Obama at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://neutralpolitics.blogspot.com"&gt;http://neutralpolitics.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575735</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575735</guid><dc:creator>jack, ann arbor, michigan</dc:creator><description>So much of what I read here is venomous, sick and, well, just plain misinformed and unintelligent. &amp;nbsp;Is this what our American people are? &amp;nbsp;Good grief. &amp;nbsp;I truly hope Obama has better support than what is represented here. &amp;nbsp;It tends to push me towards voting for Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#575906</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:26:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:575906</guid><dc:creator>erin beyers santa moinca ca</dc:creator><description>Ouch. &amp;nbsp;I was watching closely for any positive responses in an effort to possibly support Hillary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;This was such a huge disappointment. &amp;nbsp;If Tim Russert's simple questions can such defensive convoluted responses from her... she just lost me.&lt;br&gt;Hopefully this show will re-air. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#576088</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:19:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:576088</guid><dc:creator>PulSamsara</dc:creator><description>Barack Obama TOOK A STAND against the IRAQ INVASION when it MATTERED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton PLAYED politics when it MATTERED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything else is just BUNK !</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#578383</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:04:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:578383</guid><dc:creator>Fred Werner</dc:creator><description>Shame on you, Chuck Todd and the rest of MSNBC!!! &amp;nbsp;Even after a judge admonishes your manipulation of the electoral system, you are appealing the decision?!? &amp;nbsp;How DARE you exclude a presidential candidate from a debate?!?? &amp;nbsp;Let Kucinich debate. &amp;nbsp;Who do you think you are? &amp;nbsp;Stop playing kingmaker and limiting our choices. &amp;nbsp;Let us hear ALL of the candidates and decide for ourselves who we want to vote for. &amp;nbsp;There is only ONE poll that matters, and that’s the one where WE pull the lever. &amp;nbsp;Let Kucinich debate. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shame on you!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton justifies war vote, hits Obama</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/13/574097.aspx#633064</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:46:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:633064</guid><dc:creator>Maxine Harrison, Piedmont, MO</dc:creator><description>After reading the comments posted I am again reassured that millions of Americans don't get the facts or have a clue what they are talking about. Maybe it's a bunch of the same fools that believed Bush would be a good president. Obama is a likeable guy but is full of more hot air than anything else. He has never run anything, even the smallest business and has gotten where he is on all talk and very little in the way of results. He may be a nice guy but is sure not ready to run the country. He is little more than a likeable used car salesman running for president. I wonder how many idiots will vote for who they like rather than the person that will do the best job.</description></item></channel></rss>