Initial post-debate take...

Concerned Democrat, San Antonio, Texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:30:33 GMT

John Edwards won this debate hands down. If he received the same "free" exposure that Clinton and Obama receive he would be winning some of these primaries. Edwards easily had the best lines of the night and showed the most class yet I predict that all the news media will show on their recaps is the fighting between Clinton and Obama. Edwards said it best when he asked "Are there three people in this debate, not two?" There are three people and the news media need to pay equal attention to all three.

Initial post-debate take...

Bill R. Salem, Oregon — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:30:55 GMT

Hillary Clinton reinforced in this debate all the reasons voters across the party spectrum don't like her. Democrats were also reminded of the mixed legacy of Bill Clinton and the "elephant in the room" of his own record of lack of truthfulness with the American people, and therefore lack of credibility. The debate therefore is again about change. Do we want Clinton Dynasty Part II with all the character issues that went with it, or do we want a fresh start with a fresh perspective and a new idealism and new energy that an Obama candidacy offers.

Initial post-debate take...

Justin, Norfolk, Va. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:31:31 GMT

If the women in NH responded to an attacked HRC, then it'll probably pan out that the Clinton-Edwards tag-team against Obama will work to drive AfrAms to Obama's side. Was tonight Obama's "crying moment?"

(anybody else think the Obama in the middle of two attackers made for great tv?) w

Initial post-debate take...

Sean Going, Tucson, AZ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:31:37 GMT

For over the last year pundits have been saying, "the gloves have come off" (Jon Stewart's "Daily Show" covered this recently), but it looks as if they finally have! Tonight I saw an Obama that is more than just able to unify and serve as a likable candidate, but one that is also tough and strong. I'd call Obama the "winner," although I THOUGHT the debates where supposed to be about giving us information about each candidate and not a competition?

Initial post-debate take...

S, Wallace, Orlando, FL. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:32:19 GMT

Obama was under attack, at some points looking to his left and right batting away charges. But he did so without looking rushed or crazed. He attacked his attackers. He came off looking tough.

His line about not sometimes not being able to tell which Clinton he's running against was classic.

Initial post-debate take...

Stanton Schuler, Lake Oswego Oregon — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:32:30 GMT

I don't understand why more people can not see right through Clinton's and Edwards politics! Am I the only person in the world who can see that Obama is the most genuine candidate of the three? Is honesty not a quality we are looking for in our next president? How eaisly we have forgotten Monica-gate..."I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Has it ever occured to any democrate that all red-blooded neo-con republicans pray nightly that Clinton will win because they know how to fight her? People, wake up! Please stop, take a moment to think about who you are voting for and why. Don't vote for the sex and or race of the candidate. Don't listen to the media to decide, get involved and check their records for your self...internet! Insted, vote for competence, vision and electability...the republicans can't beat Obama!

Initial post-debate take...

Keith Gilbert, Silver Spring, MD — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:32:57 GMT

Hillary was once again the Queen of Mean but Obama fought back her crazy charges and got in some good counter punches. He never lost his cool and seemed totally presidential and in command. Edwards benefited by not being in the fray but overall this was Obama's night because he got the chance to show us there's no substance to the attacks from Hill and Bill. The Clintons represent the old politics while Obama will be a transformational figure in American politics. Obama had good arguments regarding a debate vs republicans on national security. He'll be able to change the terms of the debate rather than playing into their hand. It's time to move on to a new day in this country.

Initial post-debate take...

Jeff — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:33:34 GMT

Edwards won the debate and looked most presidential - which will happen when two others go at it and you can be above the fray. Clinton's (Bill and Hillary) attacks have gotten out of hand and I'm glad Obama stood up to defend them as best as possible without going into the mud too much himself. Hillary said in NH that its 'not a game.' The Clinton campaign's tactics seems to show they believe that it is actually a game. Most of Hillary Fact check entries are to berate Obama's record. Most of Obama's Fact Check entries are to defend Clinton's attacks. I've decided to vote for Obama.

Initial post-debate take...

Mary, South Carolina — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:33:49 GMT

Hillary came across as belligerent and shrew-like when she attacked Obama. Obama, to his credit, defended himself against both her and Pres. Clinton's attacks against him. He did a great job, and even sounded quite inspiring at times--something Hillary cannot ever do--though she desperately tries. The audience was clearly pro-Obama. I think the female voters of this country (and definitely South Carolina) are finally seeing Hillary for the opportunistic, anti-feminist, automaton that she is, and I think it's about time!

Initial post-debate take...

Mark Verstraete — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:34:20 GMT

Obama finally stod up and showed some backbone to the Clinton campaign. He has needed to do this for the last few weeks, rather than looking like he doesn't have answers. He was more articulate on national security and I thought his answer on health care was a better position than more Government mandates.
He pointed out one good consistant. The Clintons do not have enough ethics to put out factual truth. They would rather put out misleading inuendo. But what's new?

Initial post-debate take...

Keith Ashford, Goldsboro, NC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:35:20 GMT

I thought the debate was good for Obama. This article speaks for itself on all 3 cadidates. I'm tired and can't say anymore except - OBAMA '08.

Initial post-debate take...

Jeff, Mount Vernon, Wa — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:35:34 GMT

I found it unfortunate that Senator Clinton is being forced to ask the questions about Senator Obama that the news media should be asking but refuses to. The media is trying their best to simply hand the nomination to him. It has been the Clinton campaign's strategy to let Former President Clinton ask the difficult questions and critizise Obama, so that Senator Clinton can stay on message with her own ideas, but the media has repaid that with withering attacks on the Clintons, implying that by pointing out Obamas record(or lack of one) and statements that they are somehow dishonest or worse, racists.

In response to former President Clinton's recent comments, Good Morning America gave Senator Obama a "creampuff" interview with Robin Roberts, then(I believe as a warning)gave us all a worthless reminder story about Monica Lewinsky. Was the Lewinsky piece their way to tell Bill to lay off their appointed candidate? How transparently biased can they be? So it will be up to Hillary to take on the inexperienced(shows in his lack of debate skills)Obama, hoping that America will listen to her voice of reason and not let the biased media turn it into a voice of shrillness.

Initial post-debate take...

jade7243 — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:36:31 GMT

There were two winners tonight: Obama and Edwards. Obama fought back but in a very gentlemanly way. And i disagree that he got "throw off message." To the contrary he put Clinton in her place. And got her to fall for the trap of "going there..." She brings up Rezko, the door is now open to revisit the sins of the Clinton White House of which she claims to be such an integral part.

The other winner was John Edwards who was able to bring himself back into the spotlight. He was just hard enough on Obama to create a little tension, but if you were paying attention to them during the seated portion of the debate, it was clear that Edwards and Obama like each and Clinton was the odd woman out.

Her body language had her sitting away from the two men; they were turned into one another, were patting each other and joking. very affable. There was none of that affection from either man for Hillary.

She came off shrill, divisive, unnecessarily combative and negative, when she could have been more positive. She got booed TWICE. In my book, she was the Biggest LOSER.

Wolf Blitzer also allowed her to filibuster ad infinitum.

Initial post-debate take...

Paula von Loewenfeldt, Evansville, IN — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:37:54 GMT

Agree, agree, agree. Except that you omit an important distinction. Aside from the sparring in the first half (and that's a huge aside) the basic worldviews of the three candidates crystalized tonight:

Clinton's is inherently authoritarian and divissive; Edwards'is Johnsonian (vis-a-vis class); but Obama's is both inspirational and inclusive (ergo the reference to Reagan).

Initial post-debate take...

Fred C. Dobbs — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:39:01 GMT

Who won? The American people won this debate.

Who will win the nomination?

Hillary Clinton!

Initial post-debate take...

Trace, San Diego — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:39:15 GMT

The last two debates have made me very happy to accept any one of these three Democratic candidates as my President. Edwards won the debate though and I'll be voting for him. Any two of the three as a ticket is ideal.

Initial post-debate take...

Cheryl — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:41:03 GMT

Obama was a clear winner. He called Hillary and Bill on their lies. It did not look good for her. You can tell she was caught off guard. She attacked Obama stating that the Republicans had better ideas than Democrats. However, Obama came out and Hit her and Bill with their lies straight in their face. He told them he never said the republican policies were good. He said that Reagan brought the country together. He even got democrats to vote for him. Yes, Obama was correct. A lot of Dems did vote for Reagan. He is smart enough to know that is what it is going to take to win the general election.

Initial post-debate take...

JB Hull, IA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:42:56 GMT

John Edwards showed yet again why he is the only one who is really ready to take on the republicans. He is specific and focused on policy and his vision for the nation. Whenever John attacks another candidate, it is over something that relates directly to policy or approach, not petty personal attacks.

Initial post-debate take...

Sara, NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:42:58 GMT

Obama held his own in this debate and PROVED that he can stand up to anything the GOP throws at him. His performance tonight is an indication of how effective truth is as a debate tactic- great debate overall. I thought that Edwards made some very good points but I think that ultimately he will not be able to bounce back after winning only 4% in NV. Hillary on the other hand only affirmed what the web has been speculating- she will do/ say anything to win. It's a sad sad day to see a woman who claims to be strong minded lower herself to this extent (the comment she made about Obama failing to vote against sex shops near children (which was well answered by Obama)) was an indication of the kind of politics that have been clearly embraced by Clintons. I commend senator Obama for being strong, truthful and direct- I look forward to seeing him in the white house

Initial post-debate take...

Vivek Sharma, New York, NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:43:38 GMT

I think this hurt Obama! He came out angry and a bit whiny. Having said that, if the strategy was to give a clear signal to Clintons - Game On! it is misplaced. It is playing in Clintons' hands. And, if the strategy was to bring-out the alleged good cop - bad cop tactics of the Clintons' it seemed to be whiny! I am a Barack supporter and is interested to see how it is spinned in the media and by all three camps.

Initial post-debate take...

Judy, Pittsburgh, PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:43:41 GMT

Edwards played mediator?? He was the only one in the debate who came off looking presidential, composed, and stuck to the real issues. Please. Yet another example of him being marginalized. Thanks a bunch Chuck.

Initial post-debate take...

Cindy — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:43:42 GMT

Obama had to fight back especially after the dirty campaign the Clinton's have been running. He just couldn't sit back and let them get away with it. Barack you have my respect, my support and my vote!!!
Obama'08

Initial post-debate take...

Don, Mason, Texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:43:56 GMT

Hillary "Borg" Clinton continues her traverse through the galaxy. Tonight she made an effort to appear philisophical and professorial, formerly Obama's domain. Resistance is futlie. You will be assimilated.

Initial post-debate take...

K d, Atlanta, Georgia — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:44:29 GMT

I agree but not totally, in particular with regards to Obama actually responding to the multitude of charges from the Clinton campaign. With the Clinton campaign attempting to flood Obama with less than accurate charges, he would run the risk of looking like he is bowing to the Bill and Hillary tag team hit squad. Which could make the Dems question whether he'd be able to fight off attacks in the general election.

Initial post-debate take...

MJC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:45:49 GMT

This political circus hit an all time low tonight. Hillary and Barack screaming at each other was an embarrassment to the country.

Overall, Edwards came out the winner. He was the sane one in the circus. I feel Hillary did a good counterattack, but I wish she had stayed above the fray. Barack was totally out of line by going off-topic bringing up the fairytale comment, Reagan, etc. He also showed his anger which isn't a good thing. He can't deal with valid scrutiny and typical political mudslinging. That's not good for someone who wants to run in the General Election.

Initial post-debate take...

John — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:45:55 GMT

I agree for the most point, I thought Obama handled himself from the Clinton attack machine. I am glad he got to defend his Regan comment (which I find it ridiculous that Hillary claimed to take it the way she did) I also agree that Clinton looks HORRIBLE on the attack, I still think Dems lose th election if she wins the nomination, she is just too divisive.

Initial post-debate take...

Edward, Boston — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:46:53 GMT

I disagree with your assessment--Obama looked frazzled from the beginning and never regained composure. Sure, he got slightly more on target with some of the national issues, but that is only because it isn't entirely out of his realm of experience. He was weak.

Initial post-debate take...

RobK, Seattle, Wash. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:47:05 GMT

Hillary goin' to cry now?

Initial post-debate take...

JMC, NJ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:48:03 GMT

Though I do not think the attack mode bodes well for the Democrats in general - I think Obama showed he can handle himself and as someone who voted for Bill Clinton twice I have to say I am getting "Clinton Fatigue" already - how many of them are running for President anyway. John Edwards looked the best, staying mostly above it - but btwn the front runners I think this one goes to Obama

Initial post-debate take...

Lo Neal — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:48:07 GMT

Oh please. Obama won nothing!
I happen to love it when Hillary shows her strength. She can dish it out and she can take it.
John made great points. I hope he & Clinton make the ticket.

Initial post-debate take...

Frank , Rockville, MD — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:48:07 GMT

I think Chuck has it all very wrong. In fact, MSNBC should stop calling this race a 2 person race and give Edwards more coverage and consideration. The American public deserves nothing less. I have lost respect for corporate media and bias pundits who are distorting Edwards rightful place in these polls. Edwards is the Earnest, Authentic, and Original candidate for change and the other two Democrats are running campaigns imitating his successes. A win without Edwards for the Democrats will be impossible.

Initial post-debate take...

ClassyChic, Michigan — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:48:46 GMT

Obama won the black vote, Edwards will take the anti-Hillary vote and the independents sick of Obama and Hillary attacking each other, Hillary Clinton won the general population vote. Obama stepped right into her trap which I thought was fabulous. Obama has marked himself as the black candidate and he will win S.C. but it will be expected and Hillary won't be hurt by the loss. Hillary Clinton's performance tonight will appeal more to White voters and the general population. Obama needs to learn that winning only the black vote will not win him the nomination.

Initial post-debate take...

Linda Lee, Sedona, AZ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:49:26 GMT

Hillary spent 8 years trying to get healthcare with no results - Is that experience we need? She and Bill are also distorting facts (again). I had enough evasion and distortion from the Bush administration and am ready for change.

Voting present in Illinois is a strategy to negotiate for a stronger bill. It is not a non-vote. Another Clinton and Edwards (and pundit)distortion.

We need someone with the experience to bring diverse elements together to build coalitions to actually get things done and Barack Obama has that experience,and that leadership. I'm ready for an end to the divisiveness that has plagued this country for the past 7 years. Let's work together and actually get our problems solved.

Initial post-debate take...

John Doe — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:50:36 GMT

John Edwards came out looking good, but Hillary will go on to win the nomination. She might not win South Carolina, but Obama winning South Carolina will hurt his chances everywhere else. Remember it is because of race he will win South Carolina and because he won due to the race card he will lose everywhere else.

Initial post-debate take...

Dory — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:51:19 GMT

ABC!!
Anybody But Clinton!! out with the old and
in with the new!! Do we have to relive that era
again??

Initial post-debate take...

Brianna Jenkins, Columbia, SC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:51:42 GMT

Please everyone think, think, think. Remember this when the cameras are off and the show is done, whi is going to be the work horse and who was just the show horse. There is only one answer, Hillary Clinton. She has done, will do, and will always listen listn listen, help help help, and provie results. As a 28year old sinlge black mother, you have a really clear view. Hillary Clinton is and always has been the best person for President hands down. I'm urging eveyone to please really think, follow who you know and who has shown the strength experience and wisdom for this position. Bless you all.

Initial post-debate take...

Caroline, Bethesda, MD — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:53:24 GMT

Obama was the winner. No contest. This will be the night people remember as the crucial turning point. Obama will be the nominee, and our next president!

Initial post-debate take...

Healthcare Prediction — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:54:52 GMT

Great debate. Finally we saw some sparks. Same old twisting and spinning from Senator Clinton but at least everyone was engaged.

What's unfortunate is that Wolf Blitzer let Senator Clinton off the hook on the question of whether her healthcare plan would cover illegal immigrants. Both Edwards and Obama were forced to say no. Wolf did not hold Senator Clinton's feet to the fire.

How much you want to bet that over the next few weeks the Clinton campaign will wink and nod their way to the Latino community believing that Senator Clinton is the only one who will cover illegals?

Watch. I'll be stunned if it's not in a mailer in the next week...

Initial post-debate take...

RaymondA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:56:00 GMT

Chuck, a generally shrewd analysis, as always. But I beg to differ on one point. Obama has been subject to series of last-minute, but apparently very effective, negative mailers from the Clinton campaign in each primary/caucus. Those have gone unanswered -- until tonight. And I think he left undecided or less-than-fully-committed voters with the general sense that not every charge leveled by the Clintons is necessarily true, and that indeed many are false or misleading. That will do him a world of good in the long run, even if it made him look defensive for a few minutes tonight. And I could not agree more that, in the second half of the debate, Obama was able to convey that he'd rather be generous and highminded about his opponents if he had his druthers. So the overall impression was of a guy who will hit back if unfairly attacked but not of a guy who enjoys attacking and criticizing -- a reluctant warrior if you will. Hillary, in contrast, did not look a reluctant warrior, but instead looked like someone who enjoys attacking for the sport of it.

Initial post-debate take...

Savoie Faire, Is Everywhere, USA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:57:08 GMT

Who was the winner tonight, you ask? Actually, the American electorate was the winner in this latest episode of "Which Is Your Ultimate King And God, Savior and Executioner"... the answer to which is: None of you self serving twits. They call themselves presidential timber? More like used toothpicks derived from termite infested sapwood.

Initial post-debate take...

Bill Macomb MI — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:57:17 GMT

The pattern is becoming very evident. The
Clinton's (it is hard to tell who is running)
are just playing (dirty) politics - trying to
manipulate people. While Obama and Edwards
have a message, have a goal and a belief. They a
are trying to stay out of the mud but the
Clinton's keep trying to drag everyone down to
their pathetic desperate level.

Initial post-debate take...

lorna d voigt — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:00:42 GMT

so glad he finaly stood up to Clinton she had it coming between her and her husband all they have been doing is ganging up on him all week . She comes across as a bitter woman . My husband and i are indepents that lean republican but in the primary we voted for Abama and so did our reltives just to keep her out.

Initial post-debate take...

John Dewey — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:01:28 GMT

I watched this debate as I have all of the previous debates. It's getting punchy in there all right...but we knew it would especially with a Clinton (or should I make that plural) in the mix...I appreciate Chuck Todd's comment that Hillary "rarely answers a charge directly"...The only thing Chuck is you should change the word "rarely" to never...The Clinton's game plan IS never answer directly, choosing to carefully word answers without subject and verb and few adjectives using words and phrases right out of the latest opinion poll...Course I guess, it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is....On Obama, I understand his "anger" so to speak, but in my opinion it was justified...I like the guy, and quite frankly, this long time Republican voter (me) is seriously thinking about voting for Obama for President...I can't remember the last time I voted for a Democrat, but he thinks out of the box, and I liked his brave statements about Reagan this past week. We need a President who thinks BIG, reaches across all aisles for support in Congress....Demo's and Rep's can ONLY fix what needs to be fixed by coming together, which would never be the Clinton way of doing things....She prefers to hit the people over the head with a hammer until they are knocked out or give up from the pain...The country needs to wake up and give Obama the chance of a lifetime...He seems like the only one with a fresh vision of our country and what America can become with the proper respect and dedication.

Initial post-debate take...

KAOU,NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:02:02 GMT

Obama was awsome tonight! I WAS INDEPENDANT UNTIL TONIGHT. HE GOT MY VOTE! HILLARY WAS NASTY.
WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HER IF SHE WIN NOMINATION. I AM WHITE. THANKS

Initial post-debate take...

K Barnes — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:02:25 GMT

Health Care. These candidates are looking at it upside down. At least Clinton and Edwards are realistic in mandating coverage for everyone. Obama's contention that some people can not afford as his rationale for "not" requiring it for all, does not hold water. Those that can not afford health care would not be denied and obviously would only pay a minimum amount if any. The upside-down view, though, is that why would any self respecting billionaire or multi-millionaire want to invest in health insurance when they will go above and beyond what is health care the rest of us could afford, if necessary and without regards to cost. In other words they would opt out and have no incentive to buy in. Be realistic Obama, mandate required.

Odd, but it seems if both Clinton and Obama have latched onto the inititives of Edwards. It seems as both Clinton and Obama have come to support Edwards, or at least his positions and ideas. If they are not going to give him credit, at least they could send him a thank you card. His positions are better reasoned and thought out than any other candidate - period.

Initial post-debate take...

Kate, PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:03:00 GMT

Obama definitely won. I don't think Clinton or Edwards did bad, but Obama was significantly more fired up than he was in previous debates, and it was needed. I think the fire was planned by the campaign, and they all brought it back down a notch in the second half. Thank god, because my heart was beating like crazy the first half. It was great watching them get fired up.

Initial post-debate take...

Craig Roberts Pasadena, CA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:03:02 GMT

The role that Bill Clinton has played in this campaign so far is really not befitting an ex president. I worked on the Clinton campaign in 92 and 96 but will not be voting for Hillary either in the Primary or in the General if she gets the nom. It is obvious that Bill Clinton sees in this election an oppurtunity to rescue his legacy. If Hillary were to become President you can just about write Monicagate out of the history books. His urgency in campaigning is not to benefit a wife he has cheated on numerous times but to rescue his place in history.

Initial post-debate take...

Sam, Madison, Wisconsin — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:03:33 GMT

Barack may be a thinker (might explain the
Reagan comment this week), but Hillary is the
debater. She won on health care, Edwards too,
and overall, she looks strong and solid. This
is going to be won by strong and steady. Obama
will be ready in 8 years perhaps, but he isn't
now. And, he's not progressive enough. The idea
he has of playing to the middle was good in '92,
but it's not enough now. He seems to think he
has more interesting ideas and a more novel
take on things than he really does. Naive.

Initial post-debate take...

MDDemocrat — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:48:23 GMT

It's already too late for Hillary. There is no way Obama or Edwards supporters are going to vote for Hillary in a general election. That is the truth. That is just a fact.

Also to Hillary supporters that think playing the Race Card the way the Clinton's have been doing is going to work in marginalizing Obama. You are wrong. Its going to back fire. It already has. African Americans will not forget what the Clinton's are doing to Obama and thus the Democratic Party as a whole will suffer. The Clinton's are guaranteeing that a whole generation of Young African Americans become Independents or Republicans. Its sad to see a guy who is the future of the Democratic Party get trashed by the Clinton's. Its also sad to see Democrat's that think that Political Karma doesn't exist. Well It does.

Initial post-debate take...

F. CH, Lebanon, NH — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:48:29 GMT

The Clintons are the main reason why I will be a registered independent (instead of a democrat as I once thought) once I get my US citizenship in 2 years. Good job you mighty couple! It is so unfortunate to see an ex president stoop to such a low level during a campaign! The reason is simple, the Clintons think that getting into the White House is their right, while for the other candidates it is a privilege. They will stomp on anyone who dares to stand in their way! I hope their dirty trategy backfires if Mrs. Clinton becomes the democratic nominee. I cannot stand Mitt Romney, but if he is up against Mrs. Clinton in the general election, I would rather vote for Romney just to oppose her. BTW, the tears you saw in NH? You won't see them again as she is on her way to becoming the party nominee. That was a sign of panic, as the pre-primary polling in NH showed her headed for a second defeat. It's always all about her!

Initial post-debate take...

Greg — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:48:45 GMT

Is it really mud, when the points brought forth by Clinton are infact things that the American population should know and understand.

Initial post-debate take...

Brian King, Sacramento CA. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:49:55 GMT

I have been undecided for so long, but after watching all the debates, this one tonight has sealed the deal for me, and I will be voting for the candidate who is dignified, honest, authentic and most importantly electiable in 2008. and my vote goes to John Edwards.

Initial post-debate take...

Alice Giraud, Dallas, TX — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:51:13 GMT

WOW!! This was the best debate!! Obama won this hands down. Hill and Bill had it coming to them...it was long overdue. Obama had me very nervous in the beginning because he is usually almost too nice in debates, but he showed that he can be tough, confront and put "the establishment" (Hill and Bill) in their place. Obama then balanced it all out in the second half by showing his humor, comfort and ease in answering the questions.
Great job President Obama...oops...not yet.

OBAMA For REAL Change!!!

Addendum: Please notice Obama's transparency, unlike Clinton. Don't be blinded by the "Clinton" name.

Initial post-debate take...

JMR, Seattle, WA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:52:31 GMT

I echo the sentiments that commented on Obama's strength yet class in the face of the Clinton juggernaut. He has my vote. If HRC is going to trot Bill out to be her attack dog and if Bill is going to continue to act ungentlemanly and unpresidential to get his wife elected, they both need to realize the rest of his baggage (good and bad) is fair game so quit whining about the references to Lewinsky. I voted for him twice, but I am now quite ashamed of how he is behaving. Good for Obama for standing up for himself with dignity and grace.

Initial post-debate take...

John, Providence, RI — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:53:21 GMT

This is the second democratic debate I watched after the very first one before Iowa. It's shocking to see what a bitter attack machine that Hillary has become since then! She is using Karl Rove's tactics of going after Obama's strongest point - consistent opposition to Iraq war. John Kerry was swiftboated by the Republicans. Now, Obama is being swiftboated by his own party colleague - Hillary. Very sad. Hillary lost my respect. Go Obama 08.

Initial post-debate take...

Nancy, Portland, Oregon — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:54:23 GMT

If Obama can't take the heat now in his own party debates what will happen when the Republicans get him in their sights. He better be much cooler and quicker to pick up the defense than he has been with the Clintons. Maybe Hillary is just giving him a taste of what would happen if he were the Democratic candidate for presidency. He would be cross cut and filleted with the kind of answers he has been giving. How would he stand up to the Repub machine? If he lets his anger and outrage over a few minor distortions fluster his ego what will he do when it's a head on fight Don't you think for a moment that Barack Obama is not the Republican choice for a Democratic candidate.

Initial post-debate take...

Seth S Boise, Idaho — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:55:41 GMT

Anybody who thinks that Hillary or Obama won this debate has on blinders. I have watched 6 debates overall now, and I FIRMLY believe that Edwards has won 4 of them, with Biden winning the other 2. For me it really blows my mind how people are voting on "charecter and ablility to speak" Im guessing that 60% of voters really have NO CLUE to any of these candidates policies, because if they did, then every democrat would be voting for John Edwards.
John Edwards 08'!!!!!!!!!!

Initial post-debate take...

Steven Hall, Arlington, VA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:56:35 GMT

Something Dems need to think about--I've spoken to many people who want to vote for Obama but, if McCain and Hillary are the candidates, they will vote for McCain instead. That doesn't seem to make much sense, but I understand that point of view because there is a Clinton fatigue out there and every time she shows a mean side like tonight, and every time Bill Clinton acts as "bad cop," it shows a "politics as usual" that people are tired of. My 90s Clinton nostalgia is fading day by day. Go Obama!

Initial post-debate take...

David Higuera — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:58:03 GMT

As someone who worked for 3 of the past 4 years for the Arizona Democratic Party, engaged 100% in partisan battles, I am so happy we have a potential nominee who can take us all past the partisanship - above it. Someone who can bring many more people into our Democratic tent, who can attract millions of Independents and hundreds of thousands of thoughtful Republicans... And who can win the White House with an overwhelming mandate for change.

I am 100% SICK OF the hyper-partisanship of politics today, and I'm not the only Democrat who feels this way. The answer is not 8 more years of "fighting the Republican machine." The answer is dismantling the machine through bi-partisan support of meaningful legislation. Obama can get it done.

That's why I'm voting for Obama on Feb 5th.

Initial post-debate take...

teannah, st. louis, mo — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:59:15 GMT

I was originally for Hilary until she proved that she cannot run a campaign, let alone a country without good, ole Bill. I'm tired of Bush, Clinton, Bush Clinton. Hilary, should have run in the last election. Now it's time for change, real change. I will vote for a republican before I vote for the same-o, same-o. Go Obama!

Initial post-debate take...

Ron, Valencia, California — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:03:37 GMT

Obama looked really a fake to me. He tried to claim the cleanest record but he is not clean. He tried to take too much credit from to little record. I think he is a risk to the Democrats if he wins the nomination, and a risk to America if he wins the presidency.

Initial post-debate take...

RAL, San Francisco — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:03:53 GMT

I'll have to vote "Present" on who won that debate. It was good to see them arguing. Edwards was hopelessly frustrated being sidelined throughout the debate. May the best "Minority" win!

Initial post-debate take...

Ted Cortese — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:04:13 GMT

People complain about the Clinton Era,they don't want it again why not? Because she is a woman? If my memory serves me right,the working people of this country had it pretty good under the Clinton Era.

Initial post-debate take...

Carol S., Danbury Ct. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:05:11 GMT

Can we all just pause a minute and appreciate the irony of a Clinton challenging anyone on their ethics! How did Obama not laugh at her? It is high time that someone called her a liar to her face! The only sad note is that the two Arkansas grifters have dragged this decent man down into the muck with them.

Initial post-debate take...

Dave Z. Youngstown, OH — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:05:44 GMT

I definitely think that John Edwards' problem is the media. For the first part of the debate, CNN didn't even have him completely in the picture. You only saw half of his podium when they showed a "full" shot of the stage. There were also many times where they only showed Obama and Clinton on the screen. Hard to believe that was accidental. Edwards definitely looked the best overall, though all three made a lot of great points. I think the US will be lucky if any of them win. They have to stop the stupid fighting though. That REALLY looked bad and people of their caliber should be above that. That was school yard crap.

Initial post-debate take...

John Vidalia, Georgia — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:06:49 GMT

Obama has taken off the gloves, and he'll soon wish he hadn't. Clinton or Edwards both can out debate him with one hand tied behind their back. His inexperience really came to the forefront. His positions change with the wind, and he uses a different excuse every time sombody questions him about his voting record (or lack there of). He comes across like a crybaby when he complains about what Bill is saying, and he comes across like somebody that thinks he knows a lot more than he actually does. This is presidential polotics! Everybody spins what is said to fit what they want it to say. If he can't take it, he better get out now, because he ain't seen nothing yet! The GOP is chomping at the bit to unleash their attack machine, and if he can't take it now, he'll be in real trouble later. America won the debate tonight! Edwards came in second, Clinton third, and Obama lost big time. Welcome to the big league Obama!

Initial post-debate take...

VoteResponsibly08 — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:07:39 GMT

Hillary Clinton demonstrated her brilliance and answered all questions asked. She showed passion. Obama did not answer questions, he started and then shined over the issues with his usual BS. It was so clear that the audience no matter what Obama said they were on his side. Some were with Hillary. I found that no matter who is more qualified in SC the most of the black vote will go to Obama. It was clear that his experience is limited. Hillary and Edwards really stuck him to the floor about his no votes and again shined the vote with 10 words and did not answer the question. Someone that can not commit can not be our next president just like Edwards implied. After the debate I watched the larry King and he had a black lovely lady that I do not recall her name, however it was very interesting what she said. She was clearly on Obama's side but thatt is OK it is her choice. What caught my attention was what she said about the black women would be thinking after the debate in South Carolina,that the women in SC will not be saying they would be voting for Hillry because of her issues & not because she is a woman, but they would be voting for Obama becasue they were going to be thinking"This woman has disrespected my man" I can not believe this came out of her mouth! This was a debate, not a social event! and I really don't think the black women in this day and age would think something like this and she only insulted her people.
Hillary knew the issues, she answered all the tough questions, she defended herself and demonstrated passion and conviction. I can truly see that SC will probably be Obama. My opinion is tht Illinois demonstrate we are beyond race, howeverr I don't think SC is at thatlevel at this point. I truly wish I am totally wrong. My vote is now for Hillary Clinton, she demonstrated her experience and made her issues very clear. obama was a great ducker of the issues. Obama Said three words on the issues and then proceeded to change the subject with his usual we united and all that bs, that is not bs if it was followed with his real plans and tackle the real issues. Again He is a Jr. Senator and does not yet have the experience for us to put the future of our country who faces a recession in his hands. After all people its our Country, our livelyhoods, our homes and the future of our Nation~

Initial post-debate take...

MN mom — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:08:06 GMT

Give me a break Obama fans. The truth? Obama is just as full of it in his attacks as every other politician. It was a lie when he said Bill Clinton was making it a habit to distort his record. Check the facts folks...on all but one of his complaints against that sooo mean Bill there was no factual distortion at all. There's usually a heck of a lot more than that in a campaign (and the Clinton's have certainly had many more of their ideas, comments and questions on records distorted). It was an out and out lie to say that they were regularly distorting your record, Mr. Obama and it was a political lie to discredit anything else he may say against you and your record (miniscule as it is). O'bama has definitely fallen off the pedistal in my view. You sound nice, sir, but you don't practice what you preach. and "proved he could handle anything the GOP might throw at him?" Give me a break! He's been whining all day about so little...certainly nothing like what the GOP will throw at him...and he was stuttering and fumbling way too many responses. What will he do then? I really don't want to find out.

Initial post-debate take...

Ronald Allen, Fenton Mo. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:09:03 GMT

Blame it all on you folks in the media....ask questions in ways that create arguments and to hell with substance that john Q. public so desperately desires. For cnn, and msnbc, you folks need to understand that politics is not the guiding light, one life to live, or any other soap opera although that is exactly how you present your stupid debates. I dont know if the media or the candidates are more childish.

Initial post-debate take...

Don S,, Lake Stevens, WA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:09:43 GMT

In reading the comments, three things come to mind:

- People already inclined to support Obama ended up supporting Obama in their comments.
- People already inclined to support Clinton ended up supporting Clinton in their comments.
- The press and the public continue to marginalize Edwards.

In the end, I don't know who I will vote for. However, after hearing suggested by pundits for two weeks that I'm a racist if I don't support Obama, I know who is not getting my vote. Sorry, Barack, but your proxies out there are just as nasty in their rhetoric as are Hillary's.

Initial post-debate take...

Jim4prosperity — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:11:23 GMT

For those of you who enjoyed the debate, all I can say it was obvious who the strongest, most experienced and who addressed the issues. Hillary Clinton. However it was obvious the people in SC are not beyond the race card as the peoplel in IOWA.
Lets move on to the other states and may the most experienced person win, For times are hard and will get harder if we do not have a real leader in office.
I agree Obama in 8 years or maybe a vp

Initial post-debate take...

Don Whipple, Wenatchee, Wash. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:12:24 GMT

Hillary showed tonight that her position on everything is to resort to machine political ploys of discussing voting records on bills that include hundreds of measures unmentioned at the time. Yet, what goes unmentioned is Hillary could not get health care done when Bill was President and had a Democratic house. Yet, she wants to talk about every one else's voting record...How can anyone see her getting things done among the partisan bickering going on in Washington now? She will force it to unprecedented levels. She is the candidate of the Democratic machine and she is not what we need, now or ever, as a President. She most likely will not win a national election. She is too polarizing and will have uneducated voters and naysayers coming out in droves to deny her office.

As far as the mudslinging goes, the Clinton campaign started it when Obama won Iowa and it has gotten grown from there. Obama handled himself well tonight and it was a great chance for him to address much of the falsehoods stated against him with truthful answers.

Obama can win the national election. So can John Edwards. Think about it and vote accordingly!

Initial post-debate take...

wIll King, Jackson Tennessee — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:13:44 GMT

The press and the dem party are missing what is happen. I am white male dem who will vote republican if hillary is on the dem ticket. Msnbc should do a poll of obama supports and find out the truth of the damage the bill and hillary have done to the dem party. Obama or republican Howard dean can you hear me know

Initial post-debate take...

JR, Washington DC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:14:03 GMT

Please, no more dynasties or royal families. As a working (single) woman I resent Hilary counting as her "experience" the years she spent as First Lady, earned solely by her ability to stomach public humiliation--out of amibiliton. Not a good qualification for high office.

Initial post-debate take...

Kevin O'Brien — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:16 GMT

Barack Obama won hands down. He is the clear winer as he had to engage because he was under attack unlike Edwards but he stil was straightforward and focused on the policy isues. Edwards was a formidable, but distant second. Hilary came of as an atack dog in the way her husband has been portraying the part for her up until this point. It just goes to show you that America is so over the 90s and read to move into a new generation with Barack Obama as President. I think she is a wonderful person and I would love to se a woman in the White House, but this is not the type of politics we need now- more of the same. I could se her as Barack's runing mate potentialy so as to unite the party. What we need is a revolution that speaks to the American people and wil bring about real change.

Initial post-debate take...

Ralph, S Carolina — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:37 GMT

Let's be clear! Hillary and Bill Clinton are ready to lead the country again with dishonesty, sidestepping answers and excuses. They both are pros at twisting truth , manipulating facts until they satisfy their agenda. Honest, truthful people don't embrace liars. Hillary is willing to accept a dishonest man because it's something they have in common. To believe she is any different is naive. A fact and evidence of this was shown tonight when Sen. Edwards asked her if she would employ people from Special Interest Groups (drug and insurance lobbies) to which she didn't give a straight answer. So you can count on Health Care and Insurance companies to continue as usual with her as President. At least with Sen. Obama we'll get a fair and honest answer. I say NOT AGAIN to 4 more years of Clintons, because remember "birds of a feather fly together."

Initial post-debate take...

Jim , Eugene , Oregon — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:59 GMT

What came out of this debate for me is ; Hillary Clinton thinks exactly like George Bush.She is a very dishonest person that will say or do anything to get elected. It's not about the American people with her , it all has to do with personal gain at all cost.

Obama really exposed Clinton a couple of times , and the Walmart line pretty much sums up her clain to 35 years experience. It was the best line of the night.

Edwards did better tonight then he has been doing , but i think the best he can hope for is a VP slot.

Basically if you like the way things are right now , vote for Clinton , because she is like a Bush clone.

If your sick of the way this Country is , vote for Obama , because he is the only one out of the three that can pull this country together and actually get something done.

Obama won the debate.

Initial post-debate take...

Russ D — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:11 GMT

I am a lifelong Democrat. But I will not cast a vote for H Clinton. If she wins, I will vote independent or not at all for prez. She is a "pure" politician. The worst kind. And watching her husband flail in the press to help her beat down a candidate by twisting his words has turned me away from him too. PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR HER. It will likely lead to a republican win for president. Too many democrats passionately dislike her.

Initial post-debate take...

Phil Glover, Johnstown, PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:17 GMT

I am so ticked off at Clinton's comments about the union in Las Vegas. The same union they will be asking for support from if she win's the nomination. I am in PA and if he's still there for our primary will vote Obama.

Initial post-debate take...

jennifer, austin, texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:25 GMT

It is so disappointing that the media does not focus on Edwards at all! He is a class act and his heart is genuine! I think he works twice as hard as the other candidates and is in this because he cares beyond himself and not just about himself. He is a breath of fresh air and never gets the attention that he deservesl

Initial post-debate take...

Define This, Chicago Illinois — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:48 GMT

Edwards stood out tonight. I loved how he asked Clinton about taking money from lobbyists and when he did not get a strait answer he said "was that a yes or a no?"
Edwards sticks to the issues and dose not play the name calling game.And yes, he clearly is the best way to take the south from the GOP. I can see him and Obama as great running mates.

Initial post-debate take...

Jerry S. Oakland, CA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:56 GMT

Not to erate Hillary, but it would have been better if we had a different woman, because this is not about gender but a polarized Democratc Party. There are very creative and intelligent women out there who probably would beat both Obama and Edwards, period.
Hillary might teach the country that women in politics are lik what she is, which definitely isn't the case. The time for a woman president is NOW, but Hillary would make a horrible presidential role modelfor many aspiring women politicians who are more itnerested in serving the nation, NOT desperately seeking power.

Initial post-debate take...

Define This, Chicago Illinois — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:19:17 GMT

Initial post-debate take...

Margaret — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:19:34 GMT

If President Clintons "PAST" can count against Hillary, and it was BILL' past not hers, then in all fairness Obama's drug use should be a factor as well. Be honest, if Hillary had used cocaine, it would be a huge smear..after all, look how they chastized Bill for smoking pot.

Initial post-debate take...

Phil Glover, Johnstown, PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:19:40 GMT

Initial post-debate take...

Eric Riggs, Los Angeles CA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:02 GMT

So what would be so wrong if there was another "Clinton" era? The economy was terrific, it was the longest peacetime in decades. I was much better off then than I am now. I think it will be great having another Clinton in the White House. It's about time. HILLARY WILL WIN IT ALL BIG TIME!!!

Initial post-debate take...

rash, ny, ny — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:13 GMT

God Bless Obama.

Initial post-debate take...

Rumps, Denver CO — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:56 GMT

People, you are naive to think that the former first lady's experience is something this country needs. If experience is what you're looking for, then I'm sure Cheney or Rumsfeld would also exicte you. Obama is a man of principle, sound judgement and reason. Ms. Clinton is a democrat scorned, who would only keep this country in political regression. 35 years of experience; is she taking credit for high school class president? It is hard to imagine that people can't see just who picked a fight tonight. I'm proud of Barack for standing up to typical Clinton mud-slinging. It is the sign of a desperate woman running a desperate campaign. Obama is for America. Hillary is for herself.

Initial post-debate take...

Keith, Salt Lake City, Utah — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:24:34 GMT

My GOD you people. CLEARLY, if you actually listened to the debate, you would see that Hillary won on every single issue. I was an undecited voter going into "Super Tuesday", but now - it is crytal clear that she has the experience and knowledge to rescue us all from the disastrous Bush years. GO HILLARY!!!!

Initial post-debate take...

CC, Chicago,IL — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:24:52 GMT

I vote Republican on a regular basis... I will definitely vote for the Democrats this time around, anything to keep Hilary out!!! I am a white woman and there is no, none, zilch, Girl Power attitude with me... she's nasty!

Initial post-debate take...

Erik, Bowie MD — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:24:54 GMT

Obama definitely gets helped most by the debate, so he's the winner. For the first time we saw a strong, aggressive Obama that wasn't afraid to throw a punch. He looked presidential. It also didn't hurt that he was in the middle and got to show off his height advantage. It was a commanding performance by Obama. He also highlighted some differences I hadn't heard him speak to before. For instance, what will be the penalty under Mrs. Clinton's health care proposal if one doesn't buy health insurance? She never says.

Initial post-debate take...

John, Morgan Hill, California — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:24:55 GMT

I for one am thrilled that Obama started counter punching some of the Clinton-Clinton tag team attacks. A few weeks ago Bill Clinton claimed that he was against going to war in Iraq from the start, which was clearly a lie ... then he has the audacity to try and paint Obama as a flip-flopper.

This country does not need a Restoration of the Clinton Dynasty. Everyone should recall that Bill won 43% of the vote in '92 and 49% of the vote in '96. Those kinds of numbers are hardly the makings of a mandate.

Hillary seems to require an enemy to get her motivation up. Her campaign comes back time and time again to the theme of fighting Republicans. Guess what, many Republicans are also looking for real solutions to our problems and are looking for an intelligent leader to help us get to those solutions. The rhetoric of war does nothing to move our country in a new direction TOGETHER.

If Hillary is the nominee we may well end up with another narrowly decided election in November while with Barack we have a real chance at seeing an entirely new electoral map of the United States.

Initial post-debate take...

San Diego Man — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:28:14 GMT

Whoa! The Obamans came out in full force to bandy that he won SCarolina's debate. NOT! He may be a good orator, but a debater he's not. Clinton and Edwards showed mastery of the issues while Obama seemed lost at times. Nice try!

Initial post-debate take...

Jee Wilson — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:29:13 GMT

Those who have decided aganist Hillary probably know the least about her. She understands politics and can work with those across the aisle.

The military respects her now after getting to know her from her work on the foreign relations committee, and her support of veterans benefits.

It's sad that so many people think she's only been a First Lady. She has been an excellent senator. Just ask all those Republicans in red counties in New York who voted for her resulting in a landslide re-election. She's been good to them.

Initial post-debate take...

pam, austin, texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:29:46 GMT

I have to say that Edwards won the debate tonight. Of course it is much easier to stay above the fray when the other candidates know that you aren't really in the race. I am sick to death of Hillary and Bill lying about Obama's record and I was glad to see Obama call them on it. It would be nice if the press would do their job and point out the lies so that Barack wouldn't have to crawl in the gutter with them.

Initial post-debate take...

sam, Silver Spring, MD — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:11 GMT

I think Obama wether you like or not is the winner. He is more relaxed, focused, articuled, united....frankly more presidential. On the other hand HRC seems triangulated,old fashioned politics,too divisive(polarizing) ....frankly senatorial. I always vote Clinton, but not this time if she is the nominee because she can't win GE.
Good luck Obama!

Initial post-debate take...

Kevin Ratt — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:23 GMT

Hillary and President Clinton are typically trying to run this kid out of the race. However, like most Americans we know that the Clintons have a weakness with truthfullness.......I admire Obama for his comment on Reagan, it shows how broad minded and inclusive across the divide he will be able to mold the best policies for our Great nation. Go Obama !!keep your head up because its only going to get tougher. I was an indepedent before tonight , looks like it wont be for long. You got my VOTE - Obama 08.

Initial post-debate take...

Bogey, Chicago, IL — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:53 GMT

Obama won this debate. Finally. His best performance to date.

Sharp, quick on his feet. He counterpunched her very effectively. And he was able to press home the theme of his campaign which is that he is far more of a transformative change agent, and change comes from bottom up.

She is the 3rd most divisive figure in American politics, after W and Cheney, hence his comments on Reagan and "coalitions", and he blunted one of her themes, which is "experience" - a curious argument since she for eg. has no foreign policy experience (certainly not much more than he does) she didn't even have security clearance as First Lady.

And of course there's her Iraq vote which was merely a politically convenient exercise to cover her considerably sized behind, which other Dems also had to do, considering how disastrously wrong they were with their votes on Gulf War One.

Edwards was good on debate point, but let's face it he's not a viable candidate, and the results in his home state will prove the point.

I just wish the country had seen this Obama in the New Hampshire debate.

Initial post-debate take...

Joe, NY, NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:31:13 GMT

I love how when Obama can't answer a question with any substantial information, he then starts talking about unity, hope or some other "high-minded" idea to deflect the fact he doesn't know what he's talking about. I also love the fact that Hillary brought up Obama's scandalous connection to Tony Rezko. Everyone needs to read the in-depth investigation that the Chicago Sun-Times has done about Obama's seedy connection with the "slum lord." Obama helped Rezko to get millions of dollars worth of property as an Ilinois State Senator, which eventually became slums. Rezko in turn has donated over $100,000 to Obama's campaign. He even helped Obama buy a mansion (which Obama couldn't originally afford) by helping to get it at $300,000 less than the asking price. Looks like a political favor to me. Rezko will go to trial on Feb. 25th. Finally, Obama's shady dealings are coming to the surface.

Initial post-debate take...

Amparo — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:34:24 GMT

I thought there was a truce between Obama and Hillary,but the press did it again, instigating the racial issue, On the issues Hillary like always, came
as the candidate that we despertedly need in these
trouble times. Go Hillary Madam President 2008. Dear
press corps all included, no more gladiator scenes,
for the love of this country STOP!! That is if you love this country.

Initial post-debate take...

Andrew, Bellingham, Washington — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:35:25 GMT

I was very disappointed with the negativity and the attacks of the debate tonight. If the American people want a robot for president so be it, but I prefer a candidate with heart and soul. Obama has the character needed to be president and bring together a divided nation. Hillary's cold calculating, divisive nature is not what this country needs, especially in times like these. No matter how much we democrats are ready for the Bush administration to move on, we must remember we are all on the same team and we all want to move forward.

Initial post-debate take...

Scott, Cambridge, MA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:42:35 GMT

At the beginning of this election season I was a strong supporter of Obama (as were alot of my fellow college students), but the recent ploys of his campaign have made me doubt his leadership style and his complete lack of talking about any substantial point of his platform, except spouting "change" every 5 minutes, has left me doubtful at his abilities to govern at all. The media keeps supporting him at every turn without ever looking at what he is actually saying while they cut pieces out of the clinton's speeches to bring them into the worse light. Hillary (or bill for that matter) never said anything about race except for a minor thing about regarding MLK (which was again taken out of context, go back and look at the complete statement and you'll see that it was about pragmatism vs idealism), but the media took this as the clintons being racist and Obama's campaign took advantage by portraying themselves as the victim and began playing the race card since then (look at his statements and speeches and you'll see that most of them involve race directly) and now today's speech of his he directly compares himself to MLK. Personally I'm sick of his campaign and the way that he's decided to try to get to the white house. He has lost my vote along with many of my fellow students. I'm thankful that I still had time to change my vote since my state's primary has not happened yet.

After looking at the other candidates platforms and campaigns I've chosen to follow Hillary Clinton for 2008!

Initial post-debate take...

Nancy Frazier, Las Vegas, NV — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:43:12 GMT

Actually Edwards came off looking the best. Obama the worst. His stuttering, stammering and trying to find an answer showed he is not ready yet. He played the race card, the victim card and the bully card whenever he could. He has no substance, but may grown into some given time. Hillary never fails to amaze me. She has the answers as does John. Obama just has hope. Can't say I want that in my president.

Initial post-debate take...

DC Voter — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:45:01 GMT

Senator Obama really showed his true colors tonight. He has come across over the past two days as a "pouty don't gang up on me let's take it outside Bill" immature candidate. His reactions and attacks upon a supportive spouse are disrespectful. Fortunately, Senator Clinton handled it with professional grace. If Hillary had called Michelle out to the woodshed, Obama's reaction would likely be perceived or feared as threatening if not violent. This kind of immature reaction is not what we need in a President. In addition, his limited view became very apparent when he continually spoke of race without regard to inequality of genders. Senator Clinton speaks of both and continues to work for both as does Senator Edwards. His deflecting answer about President Clinton's dancing ability, while humorous to the audience, is actually insulting to others not of his race and thereby a racist joke. This sort of inappropriate response is not what we need in a President. We already have a bigot in office that is hated around the world. Senator Clinton is clearly the most mature and most knowledgeable agent of change. Senator Edwards has some great ideas but does not strike me as capable of working within Washington because he has not formed the necessary partnerships with other leaders. Senator Obama has a lot of growing up to do and maybe in 2016 after Senator Clinton's two terms as President, he will have matured and learned from her examples to become President at that time. In any case, I would like to see Senator Clinton win the nomination and bring all the democratic candidates into her administration along with some of the Republican candidates to show the unity we need to show to the world.

Initial post-debate take...

Elizabeth Massaro Wooster Ohio — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:46:34 GMT

Go Obama, you are a wonderful example coming from a single parent family. It gives hope to all that would otherwise would not have it. Happy to see you finally put Hillary in her place. Her facial muscles said it all tonight. I do not want a bitter woman as our president. Her husband disgraced the office by his morals. He did not and does not respect marriage. Only Power.... He fights for Hillary, makes her look like she can't stand on her own. Any woman that has been humiliated and betrayed for all the world to see and can still run for President does not need protected. She is strong, but she is weak in bringing people together, Yeah Obama

Initial post-debate take...

D.Briones, La Mirada,Ca — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:48:10 GMT

I am still undecided between Hillary and Obama. I felt that Obama looks as though he is the candidate that really represents change. I think that he was realistic about health care, and people not being able to afford it. Clinton looked very polished and to me able to take on the Republicans in the fall. I remain impressed with all three candidates. I believe if you are voting for experience it will be Clinton, and if its for change and charisma it will be Obama.

Initial post-debate take...

Everywhere in America — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:52:15 GMT

Hillary did a great job of demonstrating to America just how slimy she really is. Great job at handing over all of your voters! On the otherhand, Obama did an excellent job fending off her bogus attacks. This live debate served as the perfect platform for both!

Initial post-debate take...

Jamal, Austin, Texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:57:54 GMT

Not really close. Obama won. Ms. Clinton looked stunned and uprepared to respond to Obama calling her out for what proved to be apparrent half truths. It was interesting to see her default to dirty politics (the slumlord comments) out of reflex to a well targeted criticism. Obama's "attack" was different. It was aggressive but for the purpose of pulling us up not down. I liked that he was calling her out so that we could debate truthfully instead of politically. Not really close on this day folks. Obama, Edwards a close second, and Clinton a distant third.

Initial post-debate take...

Carrie — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:57:59 GMT

Those of you that think Hillary's health care plan is more 'realistic' have not read an ecnonomics book or have looked at the mess Mass. has on their hands. Mandating that people buy something that they cannot afford is a disaster and will never ever ever work. Period. If people can't afford heat or electricity --or food, how in the heck can you 'make' them buy health insurance??

Initial post-debate take...

Lenny Clinton — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:58:18 GMT

If I have to listen to the John Edwards "I grew up in a mill town, dad worked in the mill, I never took money from blah, blah, blah" again I'm going to be sick. This guy has NO CHANCE. He KNOWS he has NO CHANCE. And yet he thinks he can what?? Garner another VP nod??? If this guy's SOOOOOO concerned about his "two Americas" crap and poverty and his momma and poppa, then he should DONATE a BULK of HIS PERSONAL WEALTH to SOUTH CAROLINA!!! OPEN UP YOUR OWN MILL JOHNNY!!! CREATE NEW JOBS WITH YOUR MONEY!! HELP GET SOME OF THOSE 200,000 VETS OFF THE STREET JOHNNY!
START A HALF-WAY HOUSE FOR DISABLED VETS WITH YOUR MONEY!!! John Edwards is a HACK at best and a HYPOCRITE at worst!!! This guy couldn't carry his own state four years ago and he says he can compete NATIONALLY???? Is he smokin' some of that tobacco road product??? PLEASE JOHNNY.... GET OUT NOW!!! Do America a favor and take your "Aw Shucks" crap back home to the MANSION and COUNT YOUR CASH!!!

Initial post-debate take...

aware — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:58:25 GMT

This was supposed to be Obama's night, but he blew it.

Obama doesn't handle scrutiny or confrontation well and doesn't seem authentic or transparent when he tries. He does seem to have a higher opinion of himself than he deserves. This evening did prove Obama is not ready to be president in 08. Hopefully he will improve over time.

I enjoyed Edwards for the first time. Maybe less is more in this case.

Hillary, as always, was articulate and forthright!

Who won - who cares. I learned something from and about each candidate.

Initial post-debate take...

Joe M. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:00:58 GMT

I was undecided until tonight. I was leaning towards Hilary Clinton, but I realized she doesn't look good when she is on the attack mode. I've changed my mind. Obama won this debate and he convinced me that he is the most HONEST candidate out of the three. Obama has my vote.

Initial post-debate take...

Susan Camp Hill Pa — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:04:30 GMT

I have not decided between Hillary and Obama but think Hillary has every right to defend herself against false accusations. I hate that she's called shrill. Notice that word is never used on a man. She is one smart cookie and I will vote for whichever candidate I think will beat the evil Repubs.

Initial post-debate take...

Deanna, Seattle, Wash — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:05:13 GMT

I've tried to be fair while watching all the debates. I thought Hilary performed better in the Nevada debate and I thought it was even in New Hampshire. But tonight clearly goes to Obama. He had two wonderful answers (among many tonight) that Hilary and Edwards just could not beat. 1) He is the only Dem candidate that can reach out to independents and R's; and 2) MLK would not have endorsed any of them. Instead, he would have urged the American people to hold them accountable. Brilliant!

Initial post-debate take...

Tony, San Diego — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:05:55 GMT

The primaries are an important process and a candidate needs to prove that he/she are able to respond to dirty fighting. It would be great to have a campaign where all candidates transcend the negative and send a positive message, but negative politics works. From what I can see, Arkansas must be rough, both the Clintons' and Huckabee's campaigns have, either directly or indirectly, participated in dirty politics.

Obama has been off message for a few weeks because of the Clintons' attacks and I disagree with Chuck Todd. I think Obama's message tonight was that he is running against two Clintons that are creating unfair and inaccurate stories.

With that established, he returned to policy and I agree with Chuck Todd, Obama faired well in this second part of the debate.

Initial post-debate take...

Steve W., Willamsport PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:09:57 GMT

I must have been watching a different debate than many of you, because Obama lost the debate I was watching. Before you all gang up on me, let me explain my reasons for saying this. Boiled down, the Obama-Clinton race is a choice between Inspiration and Experience. Obama's appeal is that he seems to be above the fray...a politician untainted by the normal political scheming. Tonight, he was the first to try and make a personal attack, only to be surprised when Edwards at times changed things up and sided with Hillary in countering Obama as opposed to teaming up with Obama like before. Obama tried to play nasty and toss in the comment about Hillary having once been on the board of Wal-Mart, only to have Hillary return the favor by talking about him working on a case for a slum lord. Both of those attacks exaggerate their opponents participation, but still strike certain nerves with voters. Worse yet for Obama, it was an exchange of cheap shots that he began. Edwards really nailed Obama a couple of times, most notably reinforcing the idea that he hesitated to make touch choices when he voted present 130 times. Obama tried to make it sound like an Illinois custom, but it sounded like a weak response. Edwards also nailed him rather hard when he pointed out that Obama is just as guilty as Hillary when he complained she was taking a small number of votes out of context and putting them in the worst possible light. This debate likely won't hurt him in South Carolina, but it may be a problem down the line as it leaves him looking like just another politician. It also doesn't help that when Hillary got upset, she responded simply by counter punching his attacks, while Obama was left looking angry and frustrated a number of times in the first part of the debate.

Initial post-debate take...

Adam Milwaukee, WI — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:11:06 GMT

Obama was amazing tonight. Yes, there was bickering and scrapping between Obama and Hillary. But Obama had to stick up for the Clinton Machine's Slander. Its very unfair that Hillary can go and stump; while at the same time, but different location, Bill gets to stump as well and get similar size crowds. Hillary crowds are told about her bid for pres. While in the very similar capacity crowds Bill stumps and throws in the negative and obviously false claims about Obama. It has to be hard to defend yourself from one candidate...but one candidate, who's husband was a very popular former president and is acting like he's on the Ticket as well. I lost a lot of respect for Bill. Generally ex presidents do not get back into politics after their term is up. It messes with peoples minds.

Edwards Rocked tonight as well!! Obama/Edwards '08

Initial post-debate take...

Larry Rogers, Indianapolis, IN — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:15:08 GMT

Wake up America. It's very obvious who is the smartest of these three candidates. Senator Clinton by far. She is the one that will get the job done for she is so intelligent. She is not trying to be a Princess or Queen, a President who wishes to make America Great again. Given the opportunity, she will prove why she ran and why she continued even with attacks on her. She is a strong woman. Women in particular should see her strengths.

Initial post-debate take...

Jon, DC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:05 GMT

This article is ridiculous: praising Clinton for NOT responding to criticism (whether accurate or not) and admonishing Obama for explaining how everything he was attacked on was wrong? Insane! I never thought this before, but the media really is having an underhanded effect on this race.

Oh, and Edwards clearly won this debate, but no one will mention it at all: except Chris Matthews who will call him a dirty trial lawyer.

Initial post-debate take...

stunned GA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:57 GMT

I'm not sure Obama and Edwards won as much as it was apparent Hillary lost. It is hard to crawl off a broom and look presidential. She reinforced her status as Bill's surregate with her somewhat hysterical "He's not here...". Of course he was not there; it would be illegal, and besides I'm fairly sure he was probably tired after spending days alternating between race-baiting and pandering to the humble masses. I'm sure his presence and actions were in part responsible for Atlanta's Black ministers' endorsement of Huckabee.

If Bill stays out there stumping around until November there will be no need for us to even field a candidate, any republican would win. I think African-Americans (and women) have finally relized we do not owe 'Mr. Bill' another vote. He did nothing for us before and there ain't no reason to think he's gonna let his missus do different.

Hillary, you defended Bill far beyond reasonability when he was sporting around with his women and now you are defending him while he's tearing out the heart of the party. Get it together girl. You let him make you the fool once and now you are doing it again. Anybody as easily used as you is not presidential but pathetic.

Initial post-debate take...

Mark B, Tulsa, OK — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:18:13 GMT

Hillary stood up and finally fought for herself. Have all of you really fallen into the media frenzy that is Obama? I would never let someone fix my car unless they were an experienced mechanic. Im certainly not going to vote for someone with no REAL experience. Yes ideas are great, and I welcome them, however, ideas mean nothing if you cant make them a reality. Hillary can, open your eyes and look at what our country really needs. Those of you who are Democrats should be ashamed.

Initial post-debate take...

John Doe, Miami, Fl — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:18:49 GMT

The question for democrats is plainly who can win in Novemeber, any of the three will be a vast improvement from any republican running. I do not think Obama can take on the republican machine, I do not belive they will hesitate to tie Obama to Islam every chance they can, and in America thats gonna motivate our vast number of ignorant voters to vote against him... Ill take my chances with Hillary to win. She can handle it all and wont back down, thats what we need to win.. Obama's position about winning over republicans and independants sounds good but has no chance in Amerrca 2008

Initial post-debate take...

CJ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:54 GMT

I still don't know who I like the best because I need to hear more from them about the issues, especially illegal immigration!
For those of you who say you will vote Republican if Hillary is the Democrat nominee,
JUST REMEMBER, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WANT!!
AND IF THE GOP NOMINEE IS MCCAIN, WE WILL BE AT WAR WITH ANYONE (PROBABLY IRAN) WITHIN 6 MONTHS!!!!!!!!!
THINK ABOUT IT TOTALLY WHEN THE TIME COMES!!!!!!!!

Initial post-debate take...

Lole, San Antonio, TX — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:20:24 GMT

It was about TIME that Hillary pointed out something from Obama's past record. Why is it that YOU, the MEDIA, have NOT brought out anything on Obama's past record; that is, his Illinois senate record? Why is it that Obama thinks that he has never made a political mistake and many people are so gullible about this? If it is because of your dislike or disdain of Hillary, you all need to be more objective and look at this with an open mind!!! This guy is inspirational to a degree, but he is NOT PRESIDENTIAL!!! He fumbles once he loses his cool; he is NOT ready to be OUR PRESIDENT! I want somebody who is experienced, knowledgeable, and tough! Hillary is my FIRST choice and Edwards is my second choice. By the way, if African Americans vote for Obama just because he is black, something is wrong with our country. I AM a HISPANIC FEMALE, but I never supported BILL RICHARDSON (even though I like him) simply because I did NOT see him as presidential, even though he DOES have much more experience. But there is something about him that I felt that he wasn't prepared to be in that position! I don't think Obama is neither!!! I think Hillary handled herself very well and I'm glad she brought up things about Obama's past record and thrilled that Edwards followed-up. We need to be more objective about our country's issues and ignore racial/gender voting. I think that everything started when OPRAH endorsed Obama: Everybody is aware that the ONLY reason she endorsed him is because HE IS BLACK!! I have always like OPRAH, but once she did that I completely lost respect for her. After all the years she has been in showbiz, she had NEVER endorsed anybody for President. If Obama would have been white (which he is part-white), do you think she would have endorsed him? I DON"T THINK SO!!! Here is where RACE started coming into this political RACE!

Initial post-debate take...

gregg — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:20:40 GMT

Clinton went to a debate with everything going up against her. SHE WAS TOUGH SMART AND VERY PRESIDENTIAL. sOMETHING LACKED BY THE OTHERS. Obama, to me is unprepared for presidency. It takes more thasn an inspirational speech to get my vote. You have to prove you worth it. Tonight Mrs. Clinton did that.

Initial post-debate take...

CJ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:20:45 GMT

Initial post-debate take...

Robert, Long Beach CA. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:23 GMT

While I don't think that having any of the top three Dems as President would be a mistake...the clear winner thus far is John Edwards.
He's has a plan, he has integrity, he is passionate and he's not a puppet.
It's a little disconcerning to me that he seems to be continually marginalized by the media, when his numbers are right up there with the other two.
Do yourself a favor and do a little research on your own, don't base such an important decision on the sound bites (or lack of them) that the media puts out.

Initial post-debate take...

ed benoit victoria,tx. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:49 GMT

who is barack obama running against really i'm confused. is it hillary, or ole bubba bill the brother

Initial post-debate take...

DCSteve — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:53 GMT

For the Obama or Edwards supporters that shrilly proclaim their inability to vote Democrat if HRC wins the nomination you deserve another 8 years of a George W. Bush clone.

And for those who think Democrats need a broad coalition to get things done, look what the Republicans were able to do with 6 years of the White House and both Houses. We as Democrats need to pull this country from the edge where 8 years of GWB have left us.

And finally for you people that think you can reach across the aisle to the Republicans -- get real. What planet are you from? Do you honestly think health care reform is possible with the Republicans in the pocket of the insurance and the drug companies? Also, did they reach across the aisle when they were in control? Did they reach across the aisle in the last year with the Democrats in control? If your political aspirations are based around building a coalition with the Republicans, As Obama professes to want to do, well, he has not been in Washington long enough. A cynical observation, but true.

Initial post-debate take...

Christine, Perkasie, PA — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:22:21 GMT

Has the whole country forgotten that Mrs. Clinton's husband, the former President who is fervently campaigning for her and bashing Sen. Obama, had a very public liason with a White House intern and lied about it under oath - WHILE HE WAS IN OFFICE, was thought to have had a 12 year affair with Gennifer Flowers who had tapes of their intimate conversations, was brought up on impeachment charges, agreed to a five year suspension of his Arkansas law license and the paying of a $25,000 fine to the Arkansas Bar Assoc. the day before he left office so he would avoid criminal liability and both were investigated for the Whitewater controversy.
Is this what we as a country want back in Washington?
The Bush era is coming to a close - we all agree we need change, but voting for another era of Clintons in the White House is not what this country needs.

Initial post-debate take...

Lisa, Iowa — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:23:56 GMT

Obama can't win either way because if he defend himself which he has a right to go after Hillary for twisting the truth than some of the media say he's off his game. But if he didn't set the record straight then the media says he's weak so what do you expect him do. I'm proud that he went after the Clintons because sometime you have to go in the gutter to get some people off your back. It's called Respect.

I watched the Joe's in morning show every day and Meka comes off so.....messy. Chris please find your voice again, I love watching you and keep playing hardball.

Initial post-debate take...

V.Baker, Milan, IN — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:26:14 GMT

Enough of the Clintons’ & Obama (Hatfield & McCoy) antics. Edwards is by far the best person to be nominated as democrat contender for president. I believe Edwards is extremely intelligent, experienced, honest and willing to do whatever is best for the country. Edwards is the only person in the democrat party that I would even consider voting for. I’m a registered republican and intend to vote for McCain; however, if he does not win the nomination as republican contender for president, I will not vote for either Romney or the ex-mayor of NY.

Maybe we should look at what really matters: honesty first then experience and qualifications, someone that has concerns for the security for our country and is willing to make the changes that we desperately need!

Initial post-debate take...

Aaron Kessinger, New Albany Indiana — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:26:21 GMT

I continue to be amazed at how so many in this country look at a Presidential election like a high school prom king/queen vote. I especially like the comments of "I just don't like him/her" etc. I spoke with someone last week who was so convinced about their vote until I shared with them their candidate's views on gun control, education and taxes. They were so resolute on their candidate until they realized that candidate's position on these issues - why? Because of what they/we perceive, and so many end up voting for a candidate that does not represent their best interests. We should care less about who barbed who in a debate - and who seems nice. I am not looking for a popular President - I am looking for one that has shown a proven record of executing a plan - not one who has the best chances of being homecoming king or queen. I created an excel spreadsheet for my friends and family with the 9 top issues and each candidates position. It has been an eye opener for many – and I was sure to keep it factual. How many voters do you think do this – not enough – so don’t play into the media’s hands on this election. Get your facts straight and vote for the candidate that best fits your interests – not one that gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.

Initial post-debate take...

Dave T. — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:27:02 GMT

Clinton and Edwards won it hand down. But, of course, Edwards has won them all.

But lets look at Obama. Again, said nothing. Never said what he 'stands for'. But when Hillary and Edwards attacked Obama, Barack never had a solid answer. But, still, what are Obama's "issues"? He doesn't have any!!!

Hillary and Edwards won this debate hands down. She showed that Obama isn't a 'doer'. He doesn't vote. He doesn't take any positions on tough issues. He is just 'there'.

Initial post-debate take...

SJ, NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:27:33 GMT

I don't understand why Hilary's "ready to lead on day one" experience is never questioned - because her husband was president? Does that mean that most Americans could simply step in to their spouse's job on day one? I realize as first lady she
was involved in many decisions (as I am in my Spouse's career), has made relationships with the politicians in Washington (8 years ago) and around the world (as the spouse of a President) and served the country well in her position as FIRST LADY (not president) - so then Laura Bush or - Barbara Bush (who has seen 11 years of family in the oval office) could do the job tomorrow????? I would love to see a woman president - and I thought Bill did do a great job running the country in the 90's - however - I do not believe in Hilary or this campaign - I cringe every time I see her.

Initial post-debate take...

Garza,R. Laredo,Texas — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:27:42 GMT

My hats off to Sen. Hillary Clinton, she stood her ground and could answer w/o having to ponder on any given question...facts and figures...above and beyond were here answers...

Initial post-debate take...

norb jackson michigan — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:28:31 GMT

Wow! All three candidates are good people with good intentions. Please, this is a race for the presidency. Politics is a nasty game. As the saying goes, "if you can't stand the heat.........get out of the kitchen." Obama needs to be tested. He sure wasn't tested when he won his race to be Senator from Ilinois. Please remember the Republican candidate at that time (his opponent) dropped out due to a scandal and the Republican's brought in a token candidate from out of State, had him set up residnecy for the required six months in order to run. That my friends, was about as easy as a victory as anyone can imagine. Tough questions need to be asked of all of the candidates including Obama. You have to earn it.

Initial post-debate take...

Nate, Ada, Ohio — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:28:42 GMT

What is the point to all the arguing? They both lie, they are politicians that's there job to lie to the American people. Honestly forget both of them and give Edwards the nomination.

Initial post-debate take...

Ray, New Jersey — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:28:52 GMT

Im laughing at all of you who thin Obama won? Won What? Hillary put him in his place. There are NO LIE's that The Clintons have put out there. Everything they have said has been the truth and Obama thinks he is above everyone and dosent have to respond to it. He is a BABY!! What about all the present votes? He still did not answer them?

Initial post-debate take...

Ed, Atlanta — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:30:00 GMT

I just wish Obama and Edwards would come to some arrangement and run as a team. Maybe they already have. The Republicans are salivating over having Hillary (The Great Divider) as their opponent. Hillary would lose all those Republicans who would come to the Democrats for change, because she only offers the same old tired D.C. business as usual. This country has changed from the "Land of Opportunity" to the "Land of Opportunists". Barack and Edwards want to change that, Hillary doesn't.

Initial post-debate take...

Cecil Paul,Brooklyn, NY — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:30:08 GMT

The Clinton's are dirty politicians.Hillary was arrogant and nasty towards Obama.Their trick is to viciously attack Obama with innuendos and half truths, get him off course and bring him down to their level of dirty politics.He had to respond to protect his character. He must stand up to King William and Queen Hillary but not go off course on his message of CHANGE.America need Obama to usher in a new type of PEOPLE'S GOVERNANCE.The Clinton's and the Bushes' see the Presidency as a Monarchy to rule in turns.They have together controlled the White House for 20 consecutive years and are still not satisfied.I hope its Edwards-Obama or Obama-Edwards. WAKE UP DEMOCRATS. YOUR PARTY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE RULE OF KINGS AND QUEENS.
Cecil.

Initial post-debate take...

TCampbell, Durham, NC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:30:48 GMT

Doesn't character matter any more in this country? What have we become? Why do so many people continue to support Hillary and Bill? It was so obvious last night that the Clintons will distort the truth if necessary to win. Anyone who is a reasonably intelligent observer of people can tell who had the character last night. Even John Edwards stooped low when he attacked Obama on the "voting present" issue. He knows this can be a strategic tactic in trying to move legislation forward. Obama clearly has the most integrity. I am an Independent and will cast my vote for him.

Initial post-debate take...

Michael Ajayi, Bolingbrook, IL — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:30:57 GMT

Guys give me a break. Obama is the weakling. Obama started the jab, but when Hillary came with the upper-cut, Obama is running for cover. How in the world will anybody gives the debate to Obama? Hillary is battle tested, and she is ready. You go Girl'''

Initial post-debate take...

Sandy ,Hot Springs Ar — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:31:16 GMT

Clinton and Obama both lost a valuable venue to address important issues . If this is how they intend to conduct business in the White House we don't need either one. John Edwards won by staying out of the bashing. I'm beginning to hope for an independent. These "leaders" haven't done much to impress me lately.

Initial post-debate take...

Ed Tilley, Wilmington, NC — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:32:08 GMT

It is really fascinating to watch as the Clintons are swift boating Obama. He is coming off as being whiny and unfocused. The Clintons really know how to play politics. Give them credit for that.

Initial post-debate take...

Ray, New Jersey — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:32:50 GMT

You wonder who is dividing our party. Look at these comments. All from Obama babys who say they will not vote whne she wins. They are already calling it because they know she will win. I for one amd I big supporter of Hillary but will vote for whoever wins the nomination. Dosen't look like Obama cult memebers would do the same. Obama started this all over Bill's comments about his record being a fairy tale. He pushed this story and by doing so has split the party. The Mayor of Atlanta said something about it yesterday, they are still milking the story, that was all a lie to start off with.

Initial post-debate take...

Domenico Montanaro — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:50:50 GMT

We are no longer accepting comments for this post.

Initial post-debate take...

donald and barbara sanders harrodsburg, ky — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:22:58 GMT

we need clinton and edwards because they for the poor and lookig out for the small people and so enocomy and ending the war, so many young people are getting killed and leaving family and small childrenbehind. it is time for a change

Initial post-debate take...

donald and barbara sanders harrodsburg, ky — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:25:14 GMT

i hope clition picks edwards for vice predsident. iwll vote for clinton and edwards he is a good person will help the poor. /they will make a great predsient and vice predisdent. go clinton and edwards