<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Romney not buying more ads?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624386.aspx</link><description>From NBC/NJ's Erin McPikeThe AP is reporting that at this juncture, the wealthy Romney won't be deluging us with any more ads like the campaign has done for months and months.&amp;nbsp;Several
minutes before this story went up, spokesman Kevin Madden was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Romney not buying more ads?</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624386.aspx#624440</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:10:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624440</guid><dc:creator>asher</dc:creator><description>This is a strange thought, but if Romney is not going to spend his fortune on the campaign, who is the stronger alternative to McCain. &amp;nbsp;My guess it would be Huckabee. &amp;nbsp;Huckabee already has a base in the south. &amp;nbsp;He may come out of super tuesday with more delegates than Romney. &amp;nbsp;Romney problem is that he has to spend close to $15-$20 million just to stay competitive (where not talking winning, just being competitive). &amp;nbsp;My guess is that Romney is waiting to see some poll data before he decides his next move. &amp;nbsp;The problem with that; Time is not on his side.</description></item></channel></rss>