<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Chuck ToddThere were a few moments where it appeared McCain and Romney would really started tangling in tonight's CNN/L.A. Times/Politico debate, but it was just that, a precious few moments. Romney wasn't happy about the criticism McCain leveled</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624875</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:11:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624875</guid><dc:creator>nancy, Keller, TX</dc:creator><description>Once again, the media gets it wrong. As the focus group on both Fox and CNN attest, Romney did great. He may not win but McCain looked small and snarky. If he gets the nomination its Bob Dole all over again. By the way MSNBC, since your all democrats and proud of it, dont pretend to be objective and knowledgeable. You consistently get it wrong when it comes to Republican primaries because you dont like or understand conservatives. This network is a joke. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624876</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:12:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624876</guid><dc:creator>Ryan, Helena, Montana</dc:creator><description>This article disgusts me. &amp;nbsp;It shows the typical media bias that suits their own needs and is no where near a true reflection of reality. &amp;nbsp;Romney is a stong and viable candidate who stands a great chance of winning the nomination. &amp;nbsp;The media, in a relentless attempt to sway the minds of the general public, continues to write daily obituaries for Mitt Romney's campaign. &amp;nbsp;Again, this article disgusts me.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624878</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:12:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624878</guid><dc:creator>Steph, Layton, Utah</dc:creator><description>Chuck must have seen a different debate than the rest of America. I've searched many of the web comments about the debate and Romney is by far the winner in the debate. I'd say 97% are in agreement with Romney and have definetly decided against McCaim. McCaim was angry and tongue-tied and simply couldn't answer the questions because he doen't have a clue about anything in our economy or anything else.Mitt Romney was and is brilliant, tactful and respectable. McCain simply is not. When we vote for Mitt Romney we are helping our country be successful just like Mitt. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624880</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:18:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624880</guid><dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator><description>Your bias for McCain is showing. Every blog I had read from the real time forum showed that McCain lost miserably, but keep trying to spin it...People are seeing thru it...Romney clearly was the winner!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624885</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:26:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624885</guid><dc:creator>Julius Caesar, Rome, Italy</dc:creator><description>Romney won this debate hands down as he has everprevioebate.The &amp;nbsp;The only thing McCain has is name recognition and the fact that you media wussies have treated him like your kindly --albeit surly -- old grandfather. Though I suspect in the general election you won't be so kind. But thats ok. If the benighted Republicans are intent on nominating their worst candidate, they deserve to lose.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624887</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:30:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624887</guid><dc:creator>Carol, Minnesota</dc:creator><description>I think the one time rebate will be just a short term fix. &amp;nbsp;After the rebate is spent families are in the same financial hardship as why were before the check arrived. &amp;nbsp;If you really want to help the families struggling with the higher cost of everything. &amp;nbsp;Do something that will give families long term financial relief. &amp;nbsp;Government has alot of control over 401-k accounts. &amp;nbsp;Give the American people the opportunity to NOT pay back their current 401-k loan (s) they have. &amp;nbsp;This would allow families to pay the higher cost of groceries, morgages, gas etc. and the American people may even have some extra money to start re-investing in the stock market/in our country again. &amp;nbsp;This would at least be a long term fix to help the American families with this recession.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624889</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624889</guid><dc:creator>Lorna Alexander</dc:creator><description>Romney was the most presidential in this debate as well as the others. He answered questions and revealed the depth of his understanding of the issues. McCain seemed like a tired and slightly irked old man. Huckabee was entertaining and I agree with much of what he says, but I agree with almost everything that Romney says, and he says it very well. It pleased me to see Romney mixing it up with McCain; he showed him up several times when all McCain could do was sit quietly and smile. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624893</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:41:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624893</guid><dc:creator>Patch in Portland, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Honestly, does Huck. have a chance in this any more? After McCain gets the Governator's endorsemen, and with Romney easing up on the TV ads and campaign schedule, is there any chance for Mike to catch the Iron Horse?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624894</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624894</guid><dc:creator>Rene Orozco, Houston, TX</dc:creator><description>I really like Governor Huckabee's connection with what matters to most Americans. He cares about life of unborn, purity and sanctity of marriage for our children's futures, a real and lasting conservative education, and balancing the budget while reducing our taxes, even when faced with 90% democratic representatives like he did in clinton's state. I was very disappointed with all the time cnn kept giving romney over huckabee, despite the known fact that all polls show Governor Huckabee beating mitt romney on the high delegate states like Georgia, Tenn, Alabama, Oklahoma and Missouri, while romney loses the other bigger states (NY, NJ, CA, ...) to Senator Mccain. cnn should have more respect for us national voters on a national debate before the major primary and not try to manipulate voters by taking away the time Governor Huckabee deserved with his high second place current national ranking. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624897</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:43:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624897</guid><dc:creator>tati, portland, or</dc:creator><description>I am very sad . Romney is the only one whom I trust.&lt;br&gt;McCain is a wrong candidate .Our country needs a&lt;br&gt;strong leader. We all have children and Romney is&lt;br&gt;a right person for the future of our country .&lt;br&gt;Vote for McCain is like vote for Hilary .&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624898</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624898</guid><dc:creator>singingusa</dc:creator><description>Why in the world should I be &amp;quot;comforted&amp;quot; that someone is willing to play hardball at the expense of telling the truth? &amp;nbsp;Especially one who touts he is committed to using &amp;quot;straigh talk?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Kumbaya or not, it should be entirely disconcerting that John McCain is so willing to distort the facts and misrepresent someone elses viewpoint at the expense of his own integrity. &amp;nbsp;Anyone who has gone back and examined not only the &amp;quot;timetables and milestones&amp;quot; quote made by Mitt Romney in April regarding the war in Iraq, but quotes by Romney on other occassions regarding the war in Iraq will find that Romney's position is clearly and in fact time after time consistent in that he supports staying in Iraq until great stability and measurable success is attained and the Iraqi people are on solid footing. &amp;nbsp;For McCain to use a partial quote and to present it so out of context shows anything but straight talk. &amp;nbsp;In fact, it's downright scary that he could be so brash in distorting the facts. &amp;nbsp;Just at a time when I was trying to come to terms with accepting John McCain as a front runner, I find myself seeing more and more McCain's true colors and I don't like what I see. &amp;nbsp;I hope the media and the American people will consider carefully the ramifications of electing someone who is so casual and seeminly unabashed at distorting the truth at the expense of another.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624900</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:45:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624900</guid><dc:creator>Jer, Fontana, CA</dc:creator><description>What does &amp;quot;BTW&amp;quot; stand for?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624903</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:47:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624903</guid><dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;He said it was a dirty trick because it came days before Florida. Well, maybe so, but it should also serve as a comfort to nervous Republicans about McCain's ability to play hardball in the general.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also said, along with every journalist, that it was a LIE. Yeah, that's really the kind of GOP nominee we want. A complete jerk who can lie and twist the truth to weasel away with a win. Straight talk my eye...</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624904</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:50:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624904</guid><dc:creator>Wayne massey, Memphis, Tennessee</dc:creator><description>Chuck...I don't know what debate you were watching but both CNN and FOX control groups picked Romney as the winner of tonights debate hands down, and that McCain sounded like the angry, arrogant old man he is. He wasn't a tuff candadant in Florida, he was a lier, and a hypocrite who laughingly you and the other media mooches keep calling the &amp;quot;Straight Talk Express&amp;quot;. Mark these words Todd....McCain has no chance what so ever of winning in November. He looks and sounds like the old man he is and will be another Bob Dole....Slaughtered. Just imagine for a minute, McCain and Gomer Huckabee, against Obama and/or Hillary....not a pretty picture. Our party won't recover from this poor choice for our candadant any time soon. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624909</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:57:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624909</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Ithaca, NY</dc:creator><description>I hope you all realize that we really will have Bill Clinton as President again if Hillary is elected. My stomach hurts at the thought of it. Bill will take over her Senate seat - that will give him official capacity and then he will be able to act as the co-President more easily. Vote for Obama - he is substantive (see his website for full disclosure of all policies) - experienced but not establishment - smart and moral. He also knows how to listen to people who do not agree with him. I doubt that you can say that about John McCain. &amp;nbsp; The debate tonight gave us a tiny taste of what kind of person he is. &amp;nbsp;Just imagine how he handles people who go up against him when no one is looking. &amp;nbsp;Not pretty. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;If Hillary Clinton wins the White House, Spitzer would likely appoint a fellow Democrat to take over her Senate seat. So far, speculation about potential successors has focused on New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and environmental lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose father once held the same Senate seat. &amp;nbsp;But Spitzer could just as easily appoint Bill Clinton, who, under New York law, would fill his wife’s Senate seat through 2010. A special election would then be held, and the winner would serve the final two years of her term, which expires in 2012.&amp;quot; Feb 18, 2007 9:57 PM by Bill Sammon, The Examiner </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624910</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 07:57:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624910</guid><dc:creator>Brandon Day</dc:creator><description>McCain is a mean man, a liar and a liberal. This is one guy who's going to vote for Obama (even though he doesn't say anything, and is also a liberal, I'm just hoping that he'll deal with the 5 generations of handouts to his fellow African Americans, and change them)over McCain. A Mitt supporter who will cross the lines, just to see what this guy who talks about change is all about.I have a feeling change is a code word for higher taxes, more handouts, etc.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624912</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:02:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624912</guid><dc:creator>John Boe</dc:creator><description>what happens to the delegates of the candidates who fall out?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624913</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:02:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624913</guid><dc:creator>Dallin Hardcastle, Provo, Utah</dc:creator><description>McCain is a joke. &amp;nbsp;How could he have won this debate? &amp;nbsp;I remember a question in which he was asked how he could be a leader for the economy. &amp;nbsp;He did not even TOUCH on the question. &amp;nbsp;Instead, he answered by saying something to the effect of: &amp;quot;The main problem in radical islam&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Blah blah blah. &amp;nbsp;That is ALL the man talks about. &amp;nbsp;I'm sorry, but he is not a &amp;quot;straight talker&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Instead he avoids questions and repeats himself over and over again. Come on John!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624915</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:05:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624915</guid><dc:creator>Nate, Dublin, CA</dc:creator><description>Your analysis here is weak and not representative of viewers. Romney came off much better in the Iraq exchange as McCain was caught in a lie. For a self-proclaimed &amp;quot;straight shooter&amp;quot; he shot himself in the foot. It was McCain who looked angry and spiteful throughout the debate. It's going to be tough for the conservative base to get behind him.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624921</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:12:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624921</guid><dc:creator>beyondrightwing, sunny so cal</dc:creator><description>I, as well as millions of my fellow citizens, will not vote for Flipper Mitt nor John McPain. Both are a joke and should not even be considered Republicans. We had a true conservative candidate in this race that 90+% of us could have supported and voted for. For the next 4 years my bumper sticker will read: &amp;quot;Don't blame me I voted for Fred&amp;quot; which I will do in a few days. Get ready to say, &amp;quot;President Clinton&amp;quot; once again. Republicans are a sorry lot to call either one of the remaining candidates their nominee. Looks like the only choice the American people will have is a liberal with a D behind their name or a liberal with an R behind it. Really, what's the difference?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624922</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624922</guid><dc:creator>Matt, Las Vegas, Nevada</dc:creator><description>Obviously Chuck Todd has no idea what people thought about the debate tonight. All of the message boards are full of comments about how well Romney and Huckabee did and how poorly McCain looked tonight.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624931</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:22:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624931</guid><dc:creator>Jennifer, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>There were four, yes four, candidates on that stage. &amp;nbsp;And yet, only two of them were allowed by the CNN moderators to dominate the air time. &amp;nbsp;Each candidate should have been allowed to speak with the same relative amount of time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Huckabee is polling first in many states, and second in many national polls. &amp;nbsp;This was the man who won Iowa in the first caucus! Why was he not allowed to participate in the same way that Romney and McCain were?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624940</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:49:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624940</guid><dc:creator>Allen Fuller</dc:creator><description>I agree with all those who are saying we need to stop splitting the conservative vote. &amp;nbsp;PLEASE if you want to see a conservative in the White House, switch to Huckabee! &amp;nbsp;It's time for the true conservatives to rally around the most conservative candidate left... which is Huckabee. &amp;nbsp;See for yourself who is more conservative, by their record and on the ISSUES, at the independent site OnTheIssues.org.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624942</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:50:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624942</guid><dc:creator>Will P, Hanahan, SC</dc:creator><description>UNRELATED COMMENT:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Richardson to endorse Obama on Friday in New Mexico. Slick Willie making emergency visit there today in vain attempt to thwart endorsement. This is all the information I have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624943</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:54:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624943</guid><dc:creator>Allen Fuller, Texas</dc:creator><description>In all seriousness, how can people say that we need to rally around the &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; Romney in order to stop McCain?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Romney is a conservative of convenience. &amp;nbsp;Just three years ago he was rated National RINO #8 by Human Events magazine, for his liberal stances on gay marriage, abortion rights, state-mandated health care, gun rights and more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now we're supposed to believe he's a rock-ribbed conservative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Huckabee is the MOST conservative candidate left standing, and has been consistently so. &amp;nbsp;In particular on the issues of LIFE which are the foundation of our culture, he is solid to the core.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In spite of the largely-Romney-funded attacks on his character as being a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;, more and more conservatives are realizing who their best candidate is. &amp;nbsp;Again, look at objective sources like OnTheIssues.org which describe Huckabee as a &amp;quot;hard-core conservative&amp;quot; and have him to the RIGHT of Romney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think for yourselves... research for yourselves... and come to your own conclusion. &amp;nbsp;I have decided to ignore the pundits this time around and vote the way my own research and thought have led me... for Mike Huckabee.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624944</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:59:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624944</guid><dc:creator>Mark Crawford, Dumfries, Va</dc:creator><description>One has to wonder why the Arkansas Huckster would deliberately siphon off votes from Romney. John &amp;quot;falsetalk&amp;quot; McCain will be crushed in November. Oh well, 4 years of Hillary before we can have a real republican nominee that we will support is a small price to pay and just may help drive the Republican party back to its roots.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624945</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:01:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624945</guid><dc:creator>William DePort 2nd Congressional District, (1 electoral vote) Nebraska</dc:creator><description>Swan song? This is a once in a lifetime, one of a kind, presidential election. When discussing this election, please use the phrase &amp;quot;free-for-all&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624948</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:06:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624948</guid><dc:creator>Fred, Vancouver, BC</dc:creator><description>There are a lot of holes in the profile of John McCain that the Democratic nominee, and to some extent Mr. Romney, could rip through them, and provided many people would like to listen and think! In the Republican debate he really looked terrible. &amp;nbsp;His stance on Iraq is based on a set of fabrications (WMD) and distortions (Qaida). There were no weapons of mass destruction and Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11. Also, the main objectives of the so called &amp;quot;surge&amp;quot; were not met. Would any judicious person doubt that the US can militarily make Iraq quiet? The US has enough weapons and spends more than 500 billion Dollars on its military budget; on the other hand Iraq is a backward third world country with rife illiteracy and poverty, and which has no army to defend itself. So, it is pathetic to brag about success in these circumstances and when such war should have never happened in the first place. &amp;nbsp;Finally, would the status of prisoner of war make a person a war hero? </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624949</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624949</guid><dc:creator>William DePort 2nd Congressional District, (1 electoral vote) Nebraska</dc:creator><description>I thought McCain looked insane when he was deciding how Mitt felt about laying in the weeds. He is too old.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624964</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624964</guid><dc:creator>sue england, jupter, fl </dc:creator><description>Am I the only person who saw McCain start to cry when Rudy endorsed him? &amp;nbsp;If Romney had cried it would have been all over the front page of every paper as a sign of weakness. &amp;nbsp;For McCain it just means that he is old and frail inside where it counts. &amp;nbsp;I am scared of MCain. &amp;nbsp;If he gets the nomination I will not vote. &amp;nbsp;Two democrats running in the general election will destroy our country. &amp;nbsp;McCain cannot admit to making a mistake. &amp;nbsp;He is a war monger. &amp;nbsp;Go Mitt Go</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624966</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:31:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624966</guid><dc:creator>Christian Cantu, Laredo, TX</dc:creator><description>You know - what isn't mentioned in most analysis is McCain's disdain for businesspeople. He believes profit is evil - why couldn't have Romney remind McCain that without profit (creation)there is no distribution (taxes from profit). Also, McCain stated that he never flip flops. However, in this debate he now claims that he would not even vote for his 2006 immigration bill? Without a doubt McCain sounded and looked like an old mean spirited Washington crony.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624971</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:36:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624971</guid><dc:creator>Steve Bonin, Duluth, MN</dc:creator><description>This issue on how Romney acted is critical. &amp;nbsp;it shows how he avoided taking a position on the surge until after he could determine if it would work. &amp;nbsp;When he was called on it, he said he didn't have to have a firm position at the time, because he was a govenor, and this was a federal issue. &amp;nbsp;Then he later in the debate actually tries to float out the spin that governors are better qualified to be president because they are &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;In fact, this whole episode shows why McCain would be a beter president: &amp;nbsp;When the time to support a critical decision came up, he stood up and put his career on the line for the good of the country. &amp;nbsp;When it paid off, Romney tried to rewrite history and jump on the bandwagon. &amp;nbsp;As an &amp;quot;outsider&amp;quot; Romney is sure an expert at old style political spin! &amp;nbsp;The problem is, the position of president demands an ability to make the calls based upon a moral backbone. &amp;nbsp;If a president has this, like McCain, I feel we are in good hands. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624973</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:37:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624973</guid><dc:creator>PaulKirk</dc:creator><description>John McCain won because, like him or not, agree with him or not, people trust him. &amp;nbsp;He admits his mistakes. &amp;nbsp;And, he is well within the decent, hard-working mainstream of Americans. &amp;nbsp;Romney wears his ambition on his sleeve. &amp;nbsp;He wants to be President. &amp;nbsp;McCain understands how Washington works and wants to lead this country forward by tackling the tough issues we face - social security, health care, national security, and immigration. &amp;nbsp;Voters can see the difference between someone offering ideas and being to take risks, and someone who has spent the campaign season simply attacking his opponent. &amp;nbsp;Americans want the battle-tested squadron leader, not the slick consultant.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624983</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:12:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624983</guid><dc:creator>Shaun Reilly, Richmond, Va</dc:creator><description>Help us Mr. Todd!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason it's so hard to find new things to talk about is because moderators like Cooper keep asking the same tabloid journalism questions over and over again. To help sharpen their skills here's a list of potential questions Americans would like the answer to:&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; How would you do to re-energize the hunt for Osama Bin Laden?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Do you consider Iran and North Korea &amp;quot;Evil&amp;quot;?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Besides abortion rights, how would you go about choosing a Supreme Court nominee?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; What would you do to address the continuing monopolies and oligopolies in key coomodities such as steel and Aluminum? Would you offer incentives for American companies to get into these markets to stop the reliance on foreign producers?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; What would you fo about the rising conflict in Kenya?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please help the American people really understand these candidates instead of them just repeating talking points and the list of supporters! Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624984</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:17:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624984</guid><dc:creator>Stan Makowski, Hendersonville, NC</dc:creator><description>I'm a McCain man and yes he won the back and forths with Romney. But he paid a price. He seemed grouchy, vindictive, even a little haughty. The visual disparity between his size and Romneys was staggering. And he should NEVER talk with a pen in his hand. Visions of Bob Dole.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#624988</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:624988</guid><dc:creator>larry whitfield  ,  sherman, texas</dc:creator><description>I found McCain to be extremely offputting in this debate. &amp;nbsp;He was smug, smirky and wrapped in his cloak of war hero. &amp;nbsp;For the true economic conservative this man is a disaster. &amp;nbsp;He will lead straight down the Bush road to bankruptcy.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625001</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:04:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625001</guid><dc:creator>Craig Startt, Atlanta, Georgia</dc:creator><description>Chuck,&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Did you watch the same debate the rest of the country watched? Did you see a tired old man rather arrogantly agreeing to lead the grand OLD party? Can you imagine a general election debate with Obama or Hillary? We will have an 8 year blackout, like Bob Dole and then see if we can win. This from someone who has voted GOP since Nixon. Not this year with McCain</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625002</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:11:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625002</guid><dc:creator>Nick, Alpharetta, GA</dc:creator><description>I find it frustrating that McCain is going to be the Republican nomination. &amp;nbsp;He's a joke! &amp;nbsp;He has no energy, all he ever says in response to every question is that he was a foot soldier for the Reagan Revolution and that's about it. &amp;nbsp;He won't be able to make it a few years if he were elected due to his age and the stress of the job, and then on top of all of that, he's a life long politician, not someone who understands what needs to be done other than keep the surge going in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;It's just ridiculous. &amp;nbsp;He can give no specifics of what he wants to do on anything besides Iraq. &amp;nbsp;He just lobs answers out there like, I'm a foot soldier, I will make it better, I will do good things, etc. &amp;nbsp;I think he'll be the nominee and this bothers me. &amp;nbsp;This guy was in Wedding Crashers for goodness sakes. &amp;nbsp;What kind of Republican President (if it comes to that) would appear in a movie like that!!!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625006</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:13:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625006</guid><dc:creator>Peter from NH</dc:creator><description>No matter how much he spends Mitt can't fun from his record. He is not honest and he is a conservative only in presidenbtial elections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abortion rights&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Herald Debate, 10/29/02&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Roe v. Wade continues to work its destructive logic throughout our society This can't continue.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Speech to the Massachusetts Citizens For Life Mother's Day Pioneer Valley Dinner, 5/10/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Immigration reform&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;With these 11 million people [here illegally], let's have them registered, know who they are....those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Lowell Sun, 3/30/06&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;One simple rule: no amnesty.If that [Kennedy-McCain bill] is not a form of amnesty, I don't know what is.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;New York Times, 6/4/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gun laws&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them. I won't chip away at them; I believe they protect us and provide for our safety.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Romney in 2002 gov. debate, Boston Globe, 1/14/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I'm a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 1/14/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amendment to ban gay marriage&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Mitt does not support it...As far as Mitt is concerned, it goes farther than current law, and therefore it's unnecessary.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Romney spokesman, Boston Globe, 3/22/02&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;When I was Governor, we took every conceivable step within the law to stop, block or slow down this unprecedented court decision.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Speech to National Right to Life Convention, 6/15/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;No new taxes&amp;quot; pledge&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I'm not intending to, at this stage, sign a document which would prevent me from being able to look specifically at the revenue needs of the commonwealth&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Associated Press, 3/27/02&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Signing the pledge now sends a very clear message to those in Washington who have voted against tax relief and for tax hikes that such actions will never grow our regional and national economies.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Romney spokesman, Boston Globe, 1/5/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Minimum wage&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think the minimum wage ought to keep pace with inflation. I think the minimum wage is a good thing to have in our economy and I think it ought to be updated.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 10/17/94&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;[T]he challenge with raising the minimum wage excessively is it is a hurt to those that are entering the work force, the very poor, those that are trying to get early jobs, get those first jobs.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Associated Press, 7/25/06&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cutting Social Security&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I don't think you go back and rewrite the contract the government has with people who've retired.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 10/17/94&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Personal accounts would be a big plus.&amp;quot;... [Romney]also said changing the retirement age could be considered, as well as basing the Social Security cost of living adjustment on a different inflation gauge.&lt;br&gt;Union Leader, 6/7/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adoption non-discrimination&lt;br&gt;Governor Mitt Romney and a legislative leader yesterday delivered unwelcome news to the Catholic bishops of Massachusetts, who plan to seek permission from the state to exclude gay and lesbian parents from adopting children through its social service agencies. The governor said he was not authorized to give such an exemption...&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 2/17/06&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;And then another slide along the slippery slope. The Catholic Church was forced to end its adoption service, which was crucial in helping the state find homes for some of our most difficult to place children... Now, even religious freedom was being trumped by the new-found 'right' of gay marriage.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Speech to National Right to Life Convention, 6/15/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stem cell research&lt;br&gt;[Romney]endorsed embryonic stem cell research, saying the controversial science might one day help treat his wife's multiple sclerosis....&amp;quot;I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research. I'd be happy to talk to [President Bush] about this, though I don't know if I could budge him an inch.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 6/14/02&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;FACT: Governor Romney Opposes Using Taxpayer Money to Fund Embryo-Destructive Research.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;MittRomney.com A Record of Protecting Life&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bush tax cuts&lt;br&gt;Governor Mitt Romney refused yesterday to endorse tax cuts at the heart of President Bush's economic program...In addition to refusing to endorse the president's tax cut, the governor surprised several people at the meeting by saying he is open to a federal increase in gas taxes.&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 4/11/0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[Romney] said it was &amp;quot;absolutely critical&amp;quot; to renew tax cuts proposed by President George W. Bush. Letting them expire would result in a &amp;quot;massive tax increase&amp;quot; that would retard economic growth, Romney said.&lt;br&gt;Detroit Free Press, 2/8/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reagan Republicanism&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Herald, 10/27/94&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Ronald Reagan is ... my hero. ... I believe that our party's ascendancy began with Ronald Reagan's brand of visionary and courageous leadership.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 1/19/07&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Desire to serve in Vietnam&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I was not planning on signing up for the military. It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam...&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Herald, 5/2/94&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Boston Globe, 6/24/07&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625010</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:23:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625010</guid><dc:creator>Lynn, Plano, TX</dc:creator><description>This is still a three person race. Conservatives to not have to have McCain. Huckabee is a legitimate conservative and very electable. Romney is not. (Money can't buy you like-ability)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Huckabee:&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro life.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro second amendment.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro tenth amendment.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro family and anti government intervention&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro strict constructionist judges&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro main street and anti regulation and litigation.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was pro fence and anti sanctuary cities.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always lower taxes (FAIR tax frees up working capital, makes us more competitive in a global economy, and abolishes the IRS).&lt;br&gt;Is now, always was an experienced governor.&lt;br&gt;Is now, always a very effective communicator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think about it. It isn't over until it is over.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625012</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625012</guid><dc:creator>Vito Danelli, Norwalk, CT</dc:creator><description>Looks like this guy is auditioning to be McCain's press secretary. McCain came across to me as a vindictive, pompous airbag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todd, too bad you're under a gag order not to talk about Ron Paul. You and your fellow MSM shills should be ashamed of yourself with the unfairness of your coverage.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625017</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:39:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625017</guid><dc:creator>Travis, Portland, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Romney should have said that other than McCain's heroic military service, he is a disgrace to the Republican Party. &amp;nbsp;McCain is not a &amp;quot;good republican,&amp;quot; he is moderate at best who opposed the Bush tax cuts twice. McCain is for allowing illegals amnesty. &amp;nbsp;He helped block President Bush's Federal Judges with the gang of 14. It looks like the republicans are going to choose McCain. &amp;nbsp;No surprise that the Governor of California endorses McCain either, as Arnold is just as much as a liberal as McCain is. &amp;nbsp;We needed someone more aggressive than Romney. Romney was a true conservative, but he did not know how to fight for what was right. I will be voting democrat in November. It's the only way I can help save my beloved republican party. &amp;nbsp;McCain is no conservative, and has no right to claim any allegiance with the great President Regan.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625018</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:41:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625018</guid><dc:creator>Dan Schwartz, Canton, MI</dc:creator><description>Mr. Todd, I hope you are wrong about Gov Romney.&lt;br&gt;Choosing between McCain &amp;amp; Hillary will be a disaster. &amp;nbsp;This will be the first time in 40 years that I will not vote for a presidential candidate.&lt;br&gt;I cannot in good conscience. &amp;nbsp;McCain and Hillary are both untrustworthy and vindictive. &amp;nbsp;Not the traits that you want in a leader.&lt;br&gt;Gov Romney, now, is our only hope for economic strength and freedom around the world. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625028</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:00:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625028</guid><dc:creator>Craig M, Columbus, IN</dc:creator><description>I am amazed at how little you so-called experts know what is actually going on in middle-America. &amp;nbsp;Maybe you should interview someone outside of New York and California. &amp;nbsp;It is obvious that the News Media is trying to dictate who should win (McCain or Romney). &amp;nbsp;Guess what, conservatives don't trust Romney. &amp;nbsp;He is John Kerry light. &amp;nbsp;Huckabee is the only true conservative, and I hope people don't listen to the media. &amp;nbsp;If they don't and vote on the issues, Mike Huckabee will do very well on Feb. 5. &amp;nbsp;He has a better chance of being 2nd in delegates more than Romney. &amp;nbsp;No way Romney wins in the south. &amp;nbsp;Bank on it!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625031</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625031</guid><dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator><description>God bless John McCain!!!! I hope he wins big next Tuesday........&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625033</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:06:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625033</guid><dc:creator>Keith Baker, Rochester, NH</dc:creator><description>The reason you are having difficulty &amp;quot;finding new things to say&amp;quot; about the candidates is because these stupid election campaigns go on for too darned long!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of these clowns started traipsing around my home state of New Hampshire nearly 3 years ago! Then there were the non-stop political ads on TV, and then my telephone rang off the hook for nearly a month prior to the actual primary. &amp;nbsp;It got to the point where I didn't dare answer the phone for fear of having to tell yet another pollster to take a hike.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We ought to look at the way Canada runs their elections. &amp;nbsp;There, once Parliament dissolves, the candidates have just a month or so to run for their seats. &amp;nbsp;Then the election is held, and the party who wins the most seats in the House of Commons gets to run the Government. &amp;nbsp;Period. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, the REAL reason our elections drag on for so long is because, like everything else in this country, elections have now been taken over by hopelessly corrupt media corporations (like yours) who are making BIG BUCKS (to the tune of Trillions (with at &amp;quot;T&amp;quot;) dollars out of it all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only when elections stop being &amp;quot;big business&amp;quot; will you and your compatriots have something &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; to talk about on the campaign trail.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625038</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:09:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625038</guid><dc:creator>Michael, St. Louis</dc:creator><description>I must have viewed a different debate than Mr. Todd. &amp;nbsp;McCain is the mainstream media darling, of course. &amp;nbsp;McCain has a Mexican official serving in his campaign and, yet, he insists that we believe that he will secure the border. &amp;nbsp;U.S. citizens do not want the Kennedy-McCain-Bush Amnesty Plan for illegals!! &amp;nbsp;Mitt Romney's demeanor clearly out-classed McCain last night.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625039</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:09:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625039</guid><dc:creator>Dean, Waterbury, CT</dc:creator><description>Thank you Obama supporters for electing John McCain the next president. You are also I suspect the ones who elected George Bush in 2000 by falling for the baloney that Bush and Gore were the same and therefore justifying your vote for Nadar. &amp;nbsp;Where are you Michael Moore, Phil Donahue, Susan Sarandon, and Mr. Sarandon now?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again I call upon ALL Clinton supporters to pledge to vote Republican in the fall if Saint Barack is the nominee of our party. &amp;nbsp;Believe me the Obama lovers are thinking the same thing if Hillary is the nominee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary DESERVED (YES DESERVED) the nomination as long as Al Gore wasn't running. &amp;nbsp;And don't tell me that no one deserves it, you have to earn it, yeah sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now the media has fallen in love with this 2-bit nobody Obama and created the atmosphere whereby even if Hillary were to win the nomination it would be worthless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since you can bet your last nickel that the Repugs will win in the fall anyway, I say pledge now to vote against Saint Barack. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am trying to get Clinton supporters to pledge a vote against Obama. &amp;nbsp;Please email only if you concur to:&lt;br&gt;deblasiogwae@hotmail.com</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625041</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:13:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625041</guid><dc:creator>JT, Texas</dc:creator><description>I for one am getting a little tired of I led a squadron or whatever he led in the Navy being the answer to everything. &amp;nbsp;He actually used that when asked a question about the economy, what the hell does that have to do with the enconomy. &amp;nbsp;In the military all the people below you are required to follow your orders, and that may serve well for the Commander in Chief, but guess what, congress doesn't have to obey your every command, nor do the American people.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625042</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:13:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625042</guid><dc:creator>Burl, New Albany IN</dc:creator><description>Chuck Todd,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your take it pathetic. &amp;nbsp;You are SO BIASED! &amp;nbsp;McCain was the one who looked bad last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you, the media have made your decision on who will be president.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Edwards/Rudy Guiliani/etc are NOT Kingmakers. &amp;nbsp;The MEDIA is!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625044</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:16:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625044</guid><dc:creator>Susan, MA</dc:creator><description>Romney is a professional and a gentleman, a real conservative. There is no need for Romney to lower himself to McCain's level.&lt;br&gt;McCain is untruthful. McCain has the endorsement of so called republican mainstreams...why...Romney will clean house in Washington stop the fat cat favors.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625049</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625049</guid><dc:creator>Dale Boyce, West New York, NJ</dc:creator><description>I think Mike Huckabee was the clear winner last night, and I still find the ohter candidates' reaction to Ron Paul unsettling. It's as if they know he's right and are afraid people will start to take him seriously.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625050</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:20:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625050</guid><dc:creator>Tomas Cody,Andover,MA</dc:creator><description>What debate were you watching? The MSM strikes again. Romney can't win - if he's too aggressive 'he's negative', now he's too polite. Call it like it is - Romney was far more poised providing much more substantiative answers. McCain rambled, has absolutely no vision or cohesive economic strategy and his stock answer of leading his squadron to answer every damn question is getting old. A presidential leader is NOT how you move the troops around, but why you committed the troops there in the first place. McCain has absolutely no experience in making EXECUTIVE tough decisions that may effect people in both positive and negative ways. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more McCain has to answer, account for his actions (ie.the more 1 on 1 debates) it is clear he is VERY weak on many issues. The MSM wants McCain because it is very obvious that Obama or Clinton will destroy him on 1:1 debates. The Republican blue bloods are supporting him because they don't want the change that Romney will bring. The Republicans are far too comfortable in their shoes. America better wake up.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625055</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:24:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625055</guid><dc:creator>David Kinsella, Manassas, VA 20110</dc:creator><description>Clearly, McCain won the day before the debate ended. With the dual endorsements of Giuliani and Schwarzenegger, McCain goes forward with an incredible tail wind. McCain wins because of his perceived character and leadership qualities. He is a known quantity. On the other hand, it is very hard to know exactly who Romney is as a person and a leader. Republicans need the strongest candidate to go into the general. John McCain is that man!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625062</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:31:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625062</guid><dc:creator>Tony Silva, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>Why is it that Huckabee's &amp;quot;Mr. Nice Guy&amp;quot; is always enough to siphon off conservative votes from Romney but Romney's $35 Million personal investment in a leveraged buy-out of the Oval Office is not thought of as siphoning off votes from Huckabee?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What makes this whole process so absurd is that McCain claims there is too much money in politics and he is the &amp;quot;frontrunner&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Romney spends too much money and he's the &amp;quot;runnerup&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Huckabee, with only a few million in the bank and a small army of devoted follers is neither &amp;quot;frontrunner&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;runnerup&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;He's merely the guy who should be taking all of these primaries in a walk.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625071</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:38:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625071</guid><dc:creator>4000 killed and 30, 000 injured</dc:creator><description>Can someone explain the logic of the Republicans’ strategy with 4000 killed and almost 30,000 injured in these wars? &amp;nbsp;Wow, have any of you lost anyone, do you know someone who has? &amp;nbsp;What is the purpose of the war anymore and why do people let McCain get away with not answering questions on the economy, our future of education, addressing our energy issues?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625072</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:38:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625072</guid><dc:creator>Doug, Rockaway Park NY</dc:creator><description>Romney came off looking far better than McCain. HE was poised yet strong. Mac pushed the LIE which was stupid and he sat there with that toady smirk on his face. This behaviour is why righties despise McCain. When he's behind he's all humble and patriotic. When he gets an advantage he comes over as crass, petty, spiteful. I agree with your assessment on the state of Mitt's candidacy now - but McCain will have serious problems in Nov - So Mitt '12 or '16 is great.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625089</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:49:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625089</guid><dc:creator>NY, NY</dc:creator><description>So let me get this straight, McCain can strech the truth about Romney's record on Iraq and not be called a liar by the press but is labeleed &amp;quot;knowing how to play hardball&amp;quot;, but Bill Clinton can stretch the truth about Obama's Iraq record and he's called a liar by the same people in the press. &amp;nbsp;MSNBC is a joke. &amp;nbsp;The media is pushing Obama and McCain and both of them have gotten a free ride from the press. If Obama supporters cannot see the double standard of what is going on, then they are just flat out liars. &amp;nbsp;Dan Abrams did a nice segmant on how the media has been pushing Obama and beating up on Hillary. &amp;nbsp;He brought up the fact that the media will use polls all the time but when 1.8 million voters vote in the Democratic Primary in Florida, the media will not use any of the numbers, none of the exit polls to see if there is any trends for Hillary or Obama. In this case every exit poll taken favored Hillary with the exception of the black vote. &amp;nbsp;So therefore, the media will not use it. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625095</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:53:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625095</guid><dc:creator>Ken S</dc:creator><description>Liberal pundit Todd gets in all backwards. McCain has never had a problem getting &amp;quot;dirty&amp;quot; with fellow republicans, or spitting in their face (McCain Feingold, McCain Kennedy, McCain Lieberman, Gang of 1, Bush Tax Cuts,etc). He has always been more confortable in the comapny of LEFTIES.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625101</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:58:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625101</guid><dc:creator>Chris P., Port Orange, FL</dc:creator><description>You might have something to write about if you actually asked the &amp;quot;Maverick&amp;quot; some real questions that held his feet to the fire. &amp;nbsp;It's a shame that it took Janet Hook of the Los Angeles Times to ask the questions people want answers to. &amp;nbsp;Of course Slim Shady McCain spun every answer to his war record and and how great he is. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does time in the Navy and as POW make you a leader with wisdom that understands the economy? &amp;nbsp;Bush's lack of foreign policy experience brought us Iraq, what will McCain's lack of economic experience (except the Keating 5 savings and loan scandal) bring? &amp;nbsp;The next Great Recession? Wake Up America!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625106</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:03:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625106</guid><dc:creator>Tim Wojton, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>Dear Chuck,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually have a different take on the McCain/Romney battle we saw last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my view, Romney came off more presidential. &amp;nbsp;McCain seemed very snippy and childish, particularly when contrasted with what I regard as Romney's smooth, calm, cool-under-fire demeanor, (something that will suit him and the GOP well in a debate with the equally smooth Obama.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lastly, I believe Romney won the &amp;quot;timetable&amp;quot; argument AND the &amp;quot;immigration&amp;quot; argument. &amp;nbsp;Not only do I personally believe that Romney handled these spats very well, but apparently, based on the hoots, hollers, and applause from the crowd, they thought so too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, I think you're right about Huckabee. &amp;nbsp;If Romney gets whipped on Tuesday, it will be due to Huck's candidacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Tim W. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625133</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:14:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625133</guid><dc:creator>Rick, WS, NC</dc:creator><description>It don't look good for mittflip...the fearful &amp;nbsp;republicans are going for more of the same, a 3rd bushie term...I still wonder how many chickenhawks will send their kids to die and be maimed in mcwars wars?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625134</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:14:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625134</guid><dc:creator>karlos</dc:creator><description>if i recall correctly mccain had the most fisically restrained tax cut in 2000, more so than bush or gore. i also believed his tax cut excluded the top 3% that bush gave the biggest cut to. in this instince he statement on this issue is probably correct. i tried to vote for him in 2000 but bush got the nod and there was no way i would vote for bush as i considered him incompetent at any level and still do.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625140</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:19:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625140</guid><dc:creator>J Scott</dc:creator><description>Spoken from the mouth of a true liberal, working for the liberal press. &amp;nbsp;It is only according to your own political perspective and agenda. &amp;nbsp;Todd, you and the MSM know full well that McCain can't win in the general election. &amp;nbsp;That is why you are wagging the dog so hard that your head might slip out of it's rear end. &amp;nbsp;This totally slanted article is a perfect example.&lt;br&gt;Joe Scarsborough wondered aloud on his show this morning why Huckabee seems to hate Romney. &amp;nbsp;For God's sake guys, Huckabee (the former ordained Baptist Preacher - as you guys are so fond to point out every time you say his name) hates anything Mormon. &amp;nbsp;Always has, always will. &amp;nbsp;You guys are just afraid to ask, too politically correct to say bigot.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625144</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:21:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625144</guid><dc:creator>Sandy (Virginia)</dc:creator><description>I'm a Dem, but watch the Republican debates to stay informed. I'm astonished that the media crowns McCain the winner in last night's debate. McCain (whom I greatly admire and respect for his honorable service to this country) scared me to death last night. He seemed uncontrolled, petty, and hot-tempered. &amp;nbsp;I was left wondering if he would destroy this country in order to make sure we didn't have another Vietnam (fold our tent and beat it). My take on the debate was that Romney was &amp;quot;presidential&amp;quot; but not politically savy, McCain was spooky, and Paul is sincere but unrealistic. &amp;nbsp;That leaves Huckabee, who sounded the most reasonable, seemed to be the most honest, and had the best experience. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625147</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:22:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625147</guid><dc:creator>Glenn Thompson , Mufreesboro, TN</dc:creator><description>Mike Huckabee really connect with people and is by far the most true conservative that we have running for President. &amp;nbsp;After last night debate I believe more people are connecting with him. &amp;nbsp;Go Mike Huckabee. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625151</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625151</guid><dc:creator>GS Carol Stream, IL</dc:creator><description>Sounds like your getting ready to pop the question to McCain, he won this debate before it started? REALLY? On CNN they had real time analysis of the debate on a running bar graph which was being turned by undecided voters, and every time McCain spoke the bar dropped dramatically. When Romney spoke, it turned right back around and went up to 90%. McCain is lost in his own world; he couldn’t even stay on track of what he was arguing about. BTW McCain doesn’t have a chance against Billary or Obama.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625160</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:28:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625160</guid><dc:creator>Mordecai, Louisville</dc:creator><description>I am very sad . &amp;nbsp;McCain is the only one whom I trust. &lt;br&gt;Romney is the wrong candidate. &amp;nbsp;Our country needs a &lt;br&gt;strong leader. &amp;nbsp; McCain is &lt;br&gt;a right person to restore the dollar's health through fiscal restraint so that our children have a better future. &lt;br&gt;Vote for Romney is like vote for Hilary - you don't know what either of them really believe. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625162</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:28:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625162</guid><dc:creator>HP, Kansas</dc:creator><description>Chuck, You must be deaf, as well as blind and dumb. Did you even watch the debate? McCain looked, and sounded like an old man that was being beaten on every issue, and he didn't know how to answer.&lt;br&gt; I couldn't believe how many times I was hearing the same thing out of him over and over. ......&amp;quot;I'm proud of my record, look at all my endorsements, radical islamic extremism..blah, blah, blah........&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;I gave the debate to Romney. I don't like him, but he won the debate.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625167</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:30:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625167</guid><dc:creator>HP, Kansas</dc:creator><description>Vito, I agree, Ron Paul made a lot of sense last night.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625192</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:38:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625192</guid><dc:creator>Speedzzter, Nationwide</dc:creator><description>Huckabee won the debate with his thoughtful answers, poise, and good humor.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Far from winning, Mitt Romney showed he was not ready for prime time. He interrupted McCain repeatedly and kept repeating the same canned &amp;quot;lawyer talk&amp;quot; over and over -- not about the facts but about the timing of when the &amp;quot;timetables&amp;quot; issue arose. &amp;nbsp;Mitt also repeatedly would not answer questions directly, preferring to drift back to cherry-picking his slim and decidedly mixed record in Massachusetts. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625211</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:45:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625211</guid><dc:creator>Bill Banks, Toronto(center of the Universe)</dc:creator><description>Honestly now, how could you possibly laud the arrogant, sometimes condescending attitude of Mr. McCain? Not to mention his weak response on the Immigration questions, and economy questions-the most important &amp;nbsp;questions on people's minds-His unbecoming attack on Romney as regards Iraq timelines was embarrasing. It it abundantly clear that Mr. Romney was never in favour of a timel;ine for withdrawl, and that he was consistent about other matters, and put forth a favourable agenda as a president-Huckabee was reasonable and relaxing, but thin in overall presidential &amp;quot;heft&amp;quot;-Romney would be a good candidate to contrast with the &amp;quot;O/C&amp;quot; candidate. By the way, my dear American friends, Romney, a Conservative 0f all things, has actually implemented a health plan aimed at ALL people ( in Mass., ) it isn't perfect, but he actually did something that all the democratic talk over the last several years has ended up in hot air- Take a longer look at Romney.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625219</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:47:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625219</guid><dc:creator>GS Carol Stream,IL</dc:creator><description>Not only did McPain not win this debate, he came in dead last. Even though Huckabee and Paul had about one tenth the amount of time, they trounced him. As for all his endorsements, guess who’s going to be spending all our tax dollars repaying all those guy’s for the next few years instead of spending his time to get the job done. Schwarzennger should be ashamed of himself for his endorsement. Also, look at these guy’s as if you were going to hire them to work for your company, and it’s just astoundingly obvious you would’nt hire McCain. Romney would be on the job for 4 years without a penny to gain or pay back to anyone. Go Mitt!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625223</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:47:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625223</guid><dc:creator>Sandy (Virginia)</dc:creator><description>It is obvious to me that Republican Party leaders have collectively decided to back McCain, regardless of his performance in last night's debate. Anyone watching last night could not help but notice how badly McCain performed. He might have been able to get away with his &amp;nbsp;constant return to sound bites responses had his body language been better. Instead, he slumped (making him look even smaller and more stoop-shouldered next to Romney), used too many hand gestures, smirked, and rarely made eye-contact when confronting Romney. It was a very poor debate performance. Why is the media spoon-feeding the country McCain?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625225</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:48:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625225</guid><dc:creator>Allen Ridge, annapolis md</dc:creator><description>McLiar looked like a snotty old man in the debate last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So much for the &amp;quot;straight talk express&amp;quot; maybe McLiar should change it to the &amp;quot;staight lying-talk express&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It''s ashame that most of McLiar''s support comes from our wolfpack press and other politicians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney is clearly the best candidate running from either party but it''s hard for him to overcome the &amp;quot;good olde boy&amp;quot; network of politicians and the propaganda promotion that McLiar is getting from our liberal wolfpack press.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really sad indeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Americans want change in 2008 and it''s looking like we are going to get McLiar vs. Clinton Rotten-Clinton .........&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of the contest that We The People want and that is Romney vs. Obama - aka &amp;quot;the change agents&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625231</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:49:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625231</guid><dc:creator>Russ, Mount Pleasant, MI</dc:creator><description>Romney did NOT win. &amp;nbsp;Neither did McCain. &amp;nbsp;CNN did, Politico did. &amp;nbsp;LA Times did. &amp;nbsp;Mike Huckabee did (if anyone bothered to listen to him) &amp;nbsp;The American people are not sheep that will vote the way the establishment Republicans or the Liberal news media want them too. &amp;nbsp;VOTERS, rise up and revolt. &amp;nbsp;Vote MIKE!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625239</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:51:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625239</guid><dc:creator>John Trudel, Concord, NH</dc:creator><description>This is what I understand after reading this article; You never watched the debate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain was driving the Double-Talk Express at full speed last night. McCain never really answered a question, and when he talked about Mitt Romney, he outright lied. McCain was repulsive, hateful, and sounded like an angry child.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The general media (as skewed to the left as they are) has yet again twisted the facts, and spit out rhetoric. You are supposed to report the news. News is &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; items of &amp;quot;fact.&amp;quot; I feel you have reported what you want the lemming to think because you are afraid of Mitt Romney. It would be easier to put a liberal against a liberal. Further, it would be easy for Clinton to say any charges from McCain are &amp;quot;lies, just like he lied about Mitt Romney.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stop trying to sway the general public and do your job. Report the news (you know what that is right?). Report facts. Almost all the points you made about McCain are as false as McCains accusations against Romney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Atleast this guy is honest: TemperatureGauge.Blogspot.com</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625240</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:52:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625240</guid><dc:creator>TrueHawk, Sprat Hall, St. Croix, USVI</dc:creator><description>These focus groups are really getting to be suspicious. &amp;nbsp;Besides, folks who have not yet made up their mind may not be the best to listen to about anything. &amp;nbsp;We need to know exactly how the focus group was chosen among the so-called undecideds. &amp;nbsp;How was that determined, etc?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625285</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:08:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625285</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Denver, CO</dc:creator><description>Todd's point, while biased and pathetic, might be true. &amp;nbsp;He is saying that it didnt matter how bad Mccain't may have looked last night. &amp;nbsp;He is getting big endorsements. &amp;nbsp;It sucks for all of us given the choices we may have in Nov. &amp;nbsp;We the people need for Romney to get Huckabee on board with a Romney administration and then, and only then can we stop Mccain't. &amp;nbsp;He is the worst nominee that we have had in my life. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625315</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:19:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625315</guid><dc:creator>Pink Elephant, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>I see the Romney campaign staff are out in full force. Romney didn't win the debate. He didn't answer any of the questions he was asked, and if you look at the CNN postings and feedback during the debate, you'll see that. He made it very clear that he will continue to beat around questions without really answering anything. Also, Luntz has the same people in his focus groups after every debate. You'd think that they wouldn't still be &amp;quot;undecided.&amp;quot; Romney's message was completely unclear. He repeatedly said that Washington is broken, Washington needs an outsider, etc. However, he also continued to praise Bush. Who is more Washington than Bush, may I ask? His statements were disregarded by not only McCain, but by the other candidates as well. Ron Paul refuted after Romney's grandstanding that he was arrogant and misled to think that a President would run the United States Economy. He was also refuted by Huckabee who made it clear that he has served over 10 years as Governor of his state. Romney = less than 4 and wouldn't have been reelected. The fighting, I agree, was silly. Nothing has changed in the dynamic...but the CLEAR, honest winner was Mike Huckabee. I can say that without being a Huckabee supporter. He was clever, concise, answered the questions, and got the Governator to laugh a bunch of times. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625317</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:19:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625317</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Carlisle PA</dc:creator><description>Ironic that the debate was held at the Reagan library. Character is no longer king in the GOP, is it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I lost all confidence in McCain when I realized he graduated rock bottom of his class, cheated on his wife, abandoned his kids and married his rich mistress who is financing this campaign. His debate performance was like watching the rantings of a weary old man. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, wait- it was exactly that!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625320</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:20:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625320</guid><dc:creator>Caroline Bowman, Williamsburg, Virginia</dc:creator><description>If John McCain were such a &amp;quot;leader&amp;quot;, why couldn't he &amp;quot;lead&amp;quot; the Senate to reign in spending within the over 20 years he has been a Senator? &amp;nbsp;If he is qualified to deal with illegal immigration solely based in the fact his state is a border state, why in the world has he done nothing to stop the most egregious illegal entry way into the U.S., ARIZONA? &amp;nbsp;Here in Virginia, we have a serious illegal immigration problem, and these people didn't swim here, they came here through a border state. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If he's such a straight talker, why does he embarrass himself and everyone else by answering every question (i.e. the economy, etc) with a posturing on his support for the surge in Iraq? &amp;nbsp;Can he actually talk about something other than his POW experience and his support for Iraq? &amp;nbsp;BTW, military people are humiliated if their military assignment was a failure- I'm not convinced his POW experience wasn't tied to some kind of military failure, and I don't see why I should vote for someone just because they were a POW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If John McCain obstinately insists that &amp;quot;benchmarks&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;milestones&amp;quot; were Democratic &amp;quot;code words&amp;quot; for withdrawal from Iraq, as a &amp;quot;leader&amp;quot; isn't he obligated to educate the country on what the Democrats secret language is? &amp;nbsp;Plus, if he's conversant in this secret code, doesn't that tell you the state of Washington D.C. that he has been a part of for over 20 years? I can't understand why he humiliated himself by refusing to back down when he was totally caught in a lie about Romney's comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really thought that Huckabee, Paul, and Romney all made interesting comments, that I could agree with. &amp;nbsp;John McCain came across like a complete stubborn idiot. &amp;nbsp;I am truly absolutely amazed that the pundits on t.v. can say with a straight face he did well. &amp;nbsp;If this had been the first debate, everyone would have thought this guy was in first stages of dementia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, and I despise the Clintons and the astounding vacuum of character and decency that is them, but I don't know how I could vote for someone who obstinately and irresponsibly refuses to believe that at almost 72, he is simply too old to be president. &amp;nbsp;For every 72 year old in good health, I could show you 20 in poor to very poor health. &amp;nbsp;My goodness, do people READ anymore?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625329</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:22:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625329</guid><dc:creator>Linda, Merrimack, NH</dc:creator><description>John McCain quotes from Debate:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;April was a very interesting year in 2007&amp;quot; --What???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Your own Lieutant Governor has been on the campaign trail with us.&amp;quot;---Are you kidding me, Romney's Lt. Gov. was Kerry Healey a supporter of Mitt's McCain mistaking referred to Governor Jane Swift who was Romney's predicessor and the one that left the mess for him to fix!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He is just a Grumpy Old Man that can't even communicate the english language. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625338</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:24:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625338</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Detroit Michigan</dc:creator><description>McCain is not a uniter or a Republican. &amp;nbsp;Democrats will be dancing in Washington when there is a presidential race between Hillary and McCain. &amp;nbsp;TWO LIBERALS! &amp;nbsp;A DREAM COME TRUE! &amp;nbsp;I am not voting for a president this &amp;nbsp;year if McCain is our nominee. &amp;nbsp;I respectfully bow out. &amp;nbsp;Please all you Huckabee supporters , start looking at the &amp;quot;Jesus Juice&amp;quot; your slick preacher turned politician is drinking. &amp;nbsp;He is not a conservative by any standard. &amp;nbsp; Praying for a true conservative leader. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625361</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625361</guid><dc:creator>Rose Shepard Davenport, Fl</dc:creator><description>The Florida primary only shows that a Morman cannot be elected because the evangelic Christians, and some conservatives, will not vote for Romney for that reason. Hello Bob Dole 2.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625365</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:35:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625365</guid><dc:creator>Clear Conservative, Anytown, USA</dc:creator><description>McCain is a nasty, bitter, old-school Washington 'insider' politician with a personal agenda, a left leaning record and NO experience in anything but defense. He has single-handedly fractured the Republican party by pandering and most times, siding with, the Democrats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only reason the media, PMSNBC included, has propped him up is so that they have an easier win in November. This should be obvious to even the most casual observer. Winning &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot; primaries in states that allow persons other than Republicans to vote is a joke, one of the biggest scams in history. Ban the media, move all the primaries to ONE day and send all the MSM talking heads back where they belong. Obscurity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally cannot wait to see the media fall over backwards when this one backfires in their collective face and McCain is exposed for who he truly is. A bad senator, a horrible politician, and the medias favorite fish with which to stock their pond for 'easy fishin'. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625374</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:37:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625374</guid><dc:creator>lcw</dc:creator><description>It is clear that the media wants the deomocrats to win the election in November. &amp;nbsp;They are making fools &lt;br&gt;of the American people. &amp;nbsp;When something is black, it's black--not white. &amp;nbsp;They don't even go so far as to say there is gray! &amp;nbsp;When the government takes over the air waves, they will be misrepresented along&lt;br&gt;with the rest of us. &amp;nbsp;McCain is the patsy and deserves the loss for be claiming to be a leader for the conservative cause--he's a joke--and the media puts him on a pedastal.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625375</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625375</guid><dc:creator>jane doe   longport nj</dc:creator><description>Did you all get to see the &amp;quot;senior&amp;quot; moment when McCain was asked a direct question about the economy? &amp;nbsp;He made no sense and when he came to the word &amp;quot;subprime&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;he paused and lost his train of thought. He was spewing memorized rhetoric. This is not an intelligent man whereas Mitt is. &amp;nbsp;McCain graduated 5th from the BOTTOM of his class at Annapolis. &amp;nbsp;Mitt on the other hand has a Law Degree from Harvard &amp;nbsp;AND &amp;nbsp;a masters in business. All magna cum lauda &amp;nbsp; why wont people stand up for Mitt who do not want McCain, who is definitely too old, has a flashpoint temper, and is not intelligent enough to understand economical issues. &amp;nbsp;The Republican party should be ecstatic they have such terrific man who is inline with conservatives, intelligent,and with CLASS unlike McCain to represent the party. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625376</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:38:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625376</guid><dc:creator>Mike Olyphant PA</dc:creator><description>McCain will be well on the way to being the nominee next Tues. He will clean Romney's clock on super Tuesday. Romney was on the defensive for most of the debate with McCain bobbing and weaving getting his shots in. Romney may have had the most facts and statistics like &amp;nbsp;a Harvard debate team member, but McCain won the debate. He walked all over Ronmey and showed that he is a sly hard hitting politician- no match for someone who spent most of his life in the ivory tower of a board room.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625381</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625381</guid><dc:creator>G C</dc:creator><description>The reason the article sounds like Romney is on his way out is because Romney is on his way out. &amp;nbsp;The problem with the movement conservatives is they fell for the wrong guy. &amp;nbsp;He is a poor candidate. &amp;nbsp;He makes money, but that is it. &amp;nbsp;He has never led anything; he's too calculating to lead. &amp;nbsp;He follows the popular line which will get him votes which will make him more money. &amp;nbsp;He has never held a single position consistently. &amp;nbsp;He does not seem to believe in anything but his own abilities and, specifically, his ability to turn a profit. &amp;nbsp;He was, is, and always has been a poor candidate. &amp;nbsp;Talk radio and movement conservatives have shot themselves in the foot with this guy. &amp;nbsp;He is a John Kerry Republican. &amp;nbsp;Folks see him for what he is.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625398</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:45:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625398</guid><dc:creator>GWB,  Denver, CO</dc:creator><description>It’s very sad to say, but McCrankypain probably will get the nomination and if George W. was running I think even he would be a better choice.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625411</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:48:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625411</guid><dc:creator>Bill Templin, Alpharetta, GA  </dc:creator><description>In watching the debate last night it showed how petty and small McCain really is. &amp;nbsp;Romney stated facts and backed them up. &amp;nbsp;Romney won the debate hands down. &amp;nbsp;What really sickens me now is how the establishment Republicans are now endorsing McCain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first time I voted I was a soldier in Vietnam and have voted Republican ever since except once (Carter in 76) please forgive me. &amp;nbsp;Anyway if McCain is the nominee I will be sitting this one out. Hopefully all Republicans will wake up by next Tuesday and vote Romney. &amp;nbsp;If not the Conservations will being staying at home. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625416</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:50:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625416</guid><dc:creator>Sister and Brother-in-law are Heroes just like John McCain, Robbinsville, New Jersey</dc:creator><description>Looks like you guys are censoring the &amp;quot;comments&amp;quot; you get on these debates, so in an effort to give MSNBC a chance to prove that Joe McCarthy is not back in town, I'll post my comment again:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What was it &amp;quot;the Mac&amp;quot; was saying about &amp;quot;down in the weeds&amp;quot; and the buzz word &amp;quot;timetable&amp;quot; as proof of Romney not being in support of the surge? &amp;nbsp;Forget &amp;quot;the Mac,&amp;quot; I want to know what kind of weed your smoking that would allow you to give &amp;quot;the Mac's&amp;quot; debate performance such high ratings. &amp;nbsp;One need only the use of one ear to realize that his performance last night was demented, but nonetheless you &amp;quot;write him up&amp;quot; as the &amp;quot;winner-in-chief.&amp;quot; On another note, what's with the censorship of Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee? Congressman Paul seems to be the only one who has any grasp of what our economy is facing both short and long term. &amp;nbsp;He actually understands our flawed monetary policy and foreign policy!!!! &amp;nbsp;How refreshing!!!! &amp;nbsp;Now will somebody please do some real political analysis, otherwise get &amp;quot;down in those weeds&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;the Mac&amp;quot; was talking about and stay there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, my sister and brother-in-law served this country in the armed forces. Together they put their lives on the line for over 30 years. &amp;nbsp;They are just as much heroes as John McCain, but they don't wear it on their sleeves, or use it to put people down the way McCain did last night, bragging about his patriotism and service to his country to cover-up his obvious lack of experience and understanding of our nation's serious economic issues. And you guys just give him a free pass. &amp;nbsp;Pathetic.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625418</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:50:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625418</guid><dc:creator>lfr</dc:creator><description>You're part of the problem Chuck Todd. You, the media, continue to give McCain a free pass and NEVER hold his feet to the fire! You're afraid to press a former POW! It's time to look beyond that and see him for what he is....a very angry old warmongering man who's not very bright!&lt;br&gt;Romney won the debate hands down and I'm so glad he called McCain out.....something you don't have the b@lls to do!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625420</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:50:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625420</guid><dc:creator>GS Carol Stream, IL</dc:creator><description>Mitt Romney won this debate. He looked crisp, sharp, had facts at his command, and exuded confidence. &lt;br&gt;McCain not only looked old and tired, constantly leaning on his arms and speaking in a monotone, he made a very poor showing in trying to falsely stretch a Romney quote from April into an endorsement of a withdrawal. That's not only ridiculous, it's blatantly a smear. &amp;nbsp;The reason McCain won't back down on this is that he painted himself into that dark corner of being a liar, so in order to keep people from thinking he's a liar, he can't back down. John McCain himself in January 2007 actually did talk about ending the mission if surge milestones didn't get met by the Iraqi government, making this a pretty dumb choice for an attack on Romney. And even Anderson Cooper had to talk over John McCain to tell him he got it wrong. McCain said that he hadn't yet decided on precise benchmarks. &amp;quot;They'd have to be specific, and they (Iraqi government officials) would have to meet them,&amp;quot; he said. Asked what penalty would be imposed if Iraq failed to meet his benchmarks, he said: &amp;quot;I think everybody knows the consequences. Haven't met the benchmarks? Obviously, then, we're not able to complete the mission. Then you have to examine your options.&amp;quot; So what was McCain talking about? More troops, or not completing the mission? He didn't use the word &amp;quot;timetables&amp;quot;, but unmet benchmarks have to have timetables to be unmet, and clearly McCain had some timeframe in mind with this remark.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625448</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:59:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625448</guid><dc:creator>Jack, Easton, PA</dc:creator><description>John McCain, besides being a liberal on many major issues, has conducted himself in a disgusting way this entire campaign. &amp;nbsp;Mr. Straight-Talk outright lies about Romney's record, while deflecting criticisms about his own. &amp;nbsp;Notice how McCain WILL NOT answer the question about if he'd vote for his amnesty bill again? &amp;nbsp;That's because he WOULD. &amp;nbsp;His use of personal attacks constantly against a much better Republican just makes him seem like the petty, vindictive man he is. &amp;nbsp;Romney, while not perfect, is the conservative alternative to McCain. &amp;nbsp;He has the money to go the distance. &amp;nbsp;I am a conservative who will NEVER vote for John McCain, whether it is in the primary, or the general election. &amp;nbsp;And I am not the only one.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625464</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:05:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625464</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>I agree with the majority of those that have commented. &amp;nbsp;McCain was an embarrassment in this debate. &amp;nbsp;He looked smug, incompetent, and untrustworthy. &amp;nbsp;I thought Romney has the best answers of the night, but McCain dragged him into the mud. &amp;nbsp;Maybe Romney should have dropped the issue, but I think he had to defend himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the only candidate that came out smelling like a rose was Huckabee &amp;nbsp;All of his questions were softballs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this was a poorly managed debate. &amp;nbsp;Ron Paul and Gov. Huckabee were basically ignored. &amp;nbsp;I think McCain was hurt, but since Huckabee looked best, it ultimately hurts Romney more.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625481</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:09:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625481</guid><dc:creator>Jess Pannoni</dc:creator><description>I have learn through my years in the military that if a person has tell people he is a war hero, he most likely wasn't one (John Kerry case in point). &amp;nbsp;Dan Daley, Ira Hayes, Chesty Puller, Mike McGreevy were war heros. I was voting for Ron Paul, I unfortunately now cannot vote him because the importance of our party, and my country depends on my vote. &amp;nbsp;So am casting my vote with some disdain for Romney. &amp;nbsp;A president doesn't treat people like John McCain treated Romney last night. &amp;nbsp;And as liberal as John McCain is he should just be call McHillary.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625494</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625494</guid><dc:creator>Paul Marsh  Butler, ohio</dc:creator><description>Listen carefully to what Romney is telling America. He is going to force everyone to buy insurance even though you don't have one dollar left from check to check or you will pay a penalty. &amp;nbsp;Check and see which insurance companies he has millions of dollars worth of stock in.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625495</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:14:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625495</guid><dc:creator>Dick, Concord, NH</dc:creator><description>Most of these posts are hilarious. &amp;nbsp;Having watched Mitt as governor of Massachusetts for the past few years, I am amazed that anyone seriously considers this guy presidential. &amp;nbsp;He'd be great on a sitcom playing a president, but he hasn't a clue as to what he really stands for. &amp;nbsp;McCain is just proclaiming more endless war, more wasteful military spending, and no clue as to how to address our urgent domestic needs. &amp;nbsp;Huckabee? &amp;nbsp;Sure, let's have a United States of the Right Wing Christian God. &amp;nbsp;Then our religious extremists can go after their religious zealots and we can proceed directly to Armageddon. &amp;nbsp;Great platform there, Huck. &amp;nbsp;The corporatocracy has now forced all the good progressive candidates out of the Democratic side of things, so we have the ultimate corporate huckster Hillary and the great unknown in Barack. &amp;nbsp;You want REAL change? &amp;nbsp;You won't get it from any of these folks. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625504</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:17:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625504</guid><dc:creator>Bernardo, Orange County, California</dc:creator><description>I don't know what debate Chuck Todd watched but according many blogs &amp;amp; focus groups(i.e. Fox News-Frank Luntz Focus Group), Romney won the debate. Romney looked Presidential, he was well versed on the issues &amp;amp; cleared up a out &amp;amp; out lie by McCain in regard to his stance on the surge. It's funny, the media is saying that McCain has all the backing of Republicans. Not so fast my friends. McCain has the endorsement of liberal Republicans (i.e. Giuliani, Schwazeneger, etc.)Not exactly conservative Rebpublicans. We'll see what happens on super Tuesday. I can't believe people will vote for someone like McCain who's never managed anything. Not even a 5 &amp;amp; dime store. Meanwhile, Governor Romney has successfully managed in the private sector (i.e. CEO of the Bain Co., Founder of Bain Capital), non profit sector (i.e. 2004 Salt Lake City Olympics), &amp;amp; in the public sector (i.e. Mass. Governor). The basically life long politician McCain voted NO twice on the Bush Tax cuts, part of the Gang of 14 to keep out conservative judges from being nominated, co-sponsor of McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy bills, etc. For the first time in my life, I'm considering not voting for a Republican in a general election if McCain is the nominee. To me there's no difference between him &amp;amp; Hilary. Romney gets my support &amp;amp; he deserves yours! &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625508</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625508</guid><dc:creator>Terry Mazerolle, Cornwall, Canada</dc:creator><description>There were two things I noted last night: &amp;nbsp;The disproportionate amount of time that Mr. Romney had to speak and the particularly poor job by Mr. McCain every time he opened his mouth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The rare moments when Mr. Huckabee or Dr. Paul were able to speak were the only time I think the energy of the candidates created more light than heat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the republicans are to chose between Mr. Romney or Mr. McCain, they are poorly positioned for November.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625510</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:21:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625510</guid><dc:creator>Susan, MASS</dc:creator><description>I along with most of the bloggers believe McCain is an old, angry man who has to resort to lies because he has no clue how to tell the truth.&lt;br&gt;The media pushes McCain...he is liberal and you know it.&lt;br&gt;We the people want out borders sealed, economy uplifted, health insurance, low taxes...and someone who is truthful and can do it. &amp;nbsp;McCain;s record shows how he sold out Arizona and the rest of us with his alliance with the dems.&lt;br&gt;The blogs and radio are filled with people who say McCain is done....he is not the choice for Our American president...so get on the bandwagon, media!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625520</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:25:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625520</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Hinde, Brookings, SD</dc:creator><description>I can't believe that such an astute commentator is surprised that John McCain might play dirty. &amp;nbsp;Like most politicians (!), past campaigns and debates demonstrate that he is not the angel who can do no wrong, as some in the mainstream media seem to think. Is the statement, &amp;quot;I served my country for patriotic reasons not to make a profit,&amp;quot; even an acceptable (or persuasive) retort in our society?? &amp;nbsp;Your observation that Huckabee is mainly taking votes away from Romney is also interesting, since the former governor of Arkansas is not generally perceived by conservatives as one of them!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625527</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:27:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625527</guid><dc:creator>Richard Fiddler, Woodland, CA</dc:creator><description>Chuck,&lt;br&gt;What kind of Republican disses the profit motive and the managers of the countries businesses??&lt;br&gt;McCain needs some real world work experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625556</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:34:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625556</guid><dc:creator>Walt, Somonauk, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Someone said that Huckabee was siphoning votes from Romney. I think it is the other way around. Mitt has no shot in this thing yet the media which he owns part of by the way keeps ramming him down our throat as one of the supposed 2 front runners. Huckabee can sweep the south and will be 2nd in delagate count after Tuesday. Mitt needs to do conservatives and our country afavor and step aside so Huckabee can give McCain a true run for it.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625571</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625571</guid><dc:creator>Layne Pitcher, ID</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Romney just doesn't come across well when he's angry&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;Says you. &amp;nbsp;The Dial testing that CNN did tells another story. &amp;nbsp;Everyone knows that McCain is still stretching the truth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/01/luntz_group_says_romney_wins.html"&gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/01/luntz_group_says_romney_wins.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You where right about one thing though, &amp;quot;[Romney] said it was a dirty trick because it came days before Florida. Well, maybe so...&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Are we are at a point where integrity is dispensable? &amp;nbsp;If you listen to how the liberal Media is now brushing this under the rug you would think so. &amp;nbsp;If true, is it a sad day for America.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625578</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:44:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625578</guid><dc:creator>Paul Linford - Dallas - TX</dc:creator><description>Wake up!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625596</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:53:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625596</guid><dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator><description>See this is a perfect example. &amp;nbsp;Media kissing the back side of McCain. &amp;nbsp;Why do they like him. &amp;nbsp;Because he is a democrat. &amp;nbsp;So no matter who wins... Hillary or McCain they will get what they want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain lied big time over the past week. Straight talk express… bah!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the media would call McCain out on his lies and show America who this guy really is then he would loose period!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blantent Demonstable lies and no one in the national media calls him on it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt is the conservative that can win if the other nobodies would drop out. Huckabee and Paul drop out and Mitt will get their votes. Mitt should court one or both of them to support him. Though I think Huckabee would not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There were so many stumbles by McCain that people should be weary of.&lt;br&gt;“April was a good year”&lt;br&gt;McCain also notes that Romneys’ lutenant Governor supported McCain? Hu… hello Senator. You mean Jane Swift who was the Governor before Romney? Heley was Romneys LT Governor and she backs Romney not you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain is not a conservative, Romney is and people should wake up!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Want McAmnesty... or maybe Crush the fist Amendment McCain... or kill the auto industry? &amp;nbsp;He will be the death of the Republican party as it has been known... plus he can not win. &amp;nbsp;He will be destroyed by the Clinton Machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney was the clear winner last night. &amp;nbsp;He slapped McCain down hard more than once... was more eloquent than the fumbling bumbing liar John McCain.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625599</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:54:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625599</guid><dc:creator>Mary, Illinois</dc:creator><description>As so many others have said, Chuck Todd must've seen a different debate. &amp;nbsp;McCain came across as a nasty, under-qualified and small while Romney, as usual, was intelligent and dignified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only differences I see between McCain and the 2 Dem front runners is that McCain seems crazy enough to nuke somebody. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625625</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:02:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625625</guid><dc:creator>Melissa, Alameda, CA</dc:creator><description>McCain sounded like a broken record - &amp;quot;Islamic terrorists&amp;quot; was his answer to even the question of &amp;quot;How, as president, would you be particularly qualified to manage the economy?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;He needs to broaden his lyrics. &amp;nbsp;Romney definitely won the debate &amp;amp; I'll be voting for him Feb. 5.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625723</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:33:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625723</guid><dc:creator>Marie Thomson, Seattle Wash.</dc:creator><description>FRED HEADS, HUCKABITES AND PAUL PEEEPLE. &amp;nbsp;UNITE BEHIND ROMNEY OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF HAVING ONLY MCAMNESTY, OBAMA OR CLINTON TO CHOOSE FROM.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625739</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:39:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625739</guid><dc:creator>maggiethecat- Little Rock, AR</dc:creator><description>I was so proud of Mitt Romney last night. &amp;nbsp;Right after the debate I really saw some &amp;quot;spinning&amp;quot; going on!!! &amp;nbsp;The CNN newsman started &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; and said the complete opposite of what had just happened in the debate!! &amp;nbsp;Then the panel got on and I think all except Bennett personally hated Mitt Romney! &amp;nbsp;Therefore, they said terrible things about Mitt that just was not true! &amp;nbsp;How can they get away with that? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had a pretty good opinion of McCain until last night. &amp;nbsp;I was going to vote for him if &amp;quot;push came to shove&amp;quot; in November but now I will vote democratic and completely change my party if he is the only person to vote for. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney is the only one of them you can trust. &amp;nbsp;His morals are above reproach. I know him personally.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625780</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625780</guid><dc:creator>Julie Seal</dc:creator><description>I am glad to know that after reading the above posts that I am not the only one who thinks that John McCain is the worst Republican choice that can be made. &amp;nbsp;Just about anyone left in is better than him. &amp;nbsp;Romney clearly showed poise while McCain showed a hotheaded old croney lack of professionalism. &amp;nbsp;If he becomes the nominee I will cross party lines and vote for Obama. &amp;nbsp;If its Clinton vs. McCain, I won't vote. &amp;nbsp;What else can voters do when elections are decided by the secret deals of fellow politicians who endorse one another based on promises of personal gain? &amp;nbsp;Its educating for us all.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625783</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:55:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625783</guid><dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator><description>McCain is a liar and a nasty little Boy. &amp;nbsp;He is no longer a man in my eyes.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625826</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:07:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625826</guid><dc:creator>norb</dc:creator><description>Mitt Romney won the debate and I think is a formidable challenger to the Dems this fall. However, it seems the Republican's think if McCain can get the nomination, they will be able to conrol him better. Romney is just a better politician, better versed on the issues and is just a plain better choice. John McCain was hunched over the entire night and looked tired and old. Somebody needs to tell his people a little about getting there candidate ready for prime time television. &amp;nbsp;McCain may get the nomination, but the Democrats are going to win the election in &amp;nbsp;a land slide. Hey Joe Lieberman. &amp;nbsp;Don't let the door hit ya on the way out!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625892</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:27:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625892</guid><dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator><description>to the ridiculous anti-war people who have posted on this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What part of war do you not understand? People die and get injured.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For that matter people die and get injured crossing the street sometimes. Let's just outlaw that and crossing guards to be safe. Let's face it, crossing guards are evil because they lead you across the street. No matter how necessary it is to cross it. I mean, hey, you could die or get hurt.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625939</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:37:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625939</guid><dc:creator>Jennifer Nesslar,Pomona, CA</dc:creator><description>It was very clear that voting for McCain would be four more years of the same- lies, arrogance and completely ignoring what the American Citizen wants! &amp;nbsp;His immigration policy would destroy America!! &amp;nbsp;He sounds more and more like a left-Democrat. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a 22 year registered, voting Democrat who would love to vote for Mit Romney in November. &amp;nbsp;This Tuesday I'm going to vote for the Democrat that would more than likely loose to Romney. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All Republicans that care about American soveriegnty-- please vote for Romney on Tuesday. &amp;nbsp;All other votes for Huckabee and Paul unfortunately would only help McCain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625949</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:41:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625949</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Boise, ID</dc:creator><description>Playing hard ball and flat out lying are two different things. &amp;nbsp;McCain was schooled by Romney in the debate. &amp;nbsp;Is this who you want running against the D's. &amp;nbsp;I bet MSNBC would be more than happy to have two democrats running in the General Election.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625993</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:54:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625993</guid><dc:creator>Chris P., Port Orange, FL</dc:creator><description>I was just waiting for the moment that McCain fell off the stage to confirm Bob Dole has passed the torch. &amp;nbsp;When you are endorsed by Schwarzenegger (aka Maria's do boy) and Giuliani (did I tell you about 9/11) enough is said. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone remember Reagan at the end of his 2nd term? &amp;nbsp;The mind is a funny thing?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#625994</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:54:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:625994</guid><dc:creator>Mickey Grogan, St. Louis</dc:creator><description>Ahh -- the best way to know someone is losing is to watch his behavior as the losing starts to set it -- the lashing out like a trapped animal. &amp;nbsp;Such is the tone of all the Romney supporters on this board. &amp;nbsp;You guys look as weak as your candidate. &amp;nbsp;My favorite debate moment was when Mitt told McCain -- a decorated war hero who spent 6 years as a POW -- that Mitt &amp;quot;was the commander of my National Guard unit!&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;LOL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626010</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:57:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626010</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Bessler, Carlise, PA</dc:creator><description>I continue to be disgusted at the media's continued label of Romney as &amp;quot;conservative.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;He is anything but. &amp;nbsp;Any intelligent voter out there knows that the media is not coming down harder on Romney is because he owns practically half of all radio and television news through Bain Capital's stake in Clear Communications! &amp;nbsp;Give me a break already. &amp;nbsp;For the real facts on Romney, check out www.massresistance.org.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And stop excluding Huckabee from the debates! &amp;nbsp;He's a true conservative and the media is doing the electorate a disservice that would make Thomas Jefferson turn in his grave by not treating him fairly. &amp;nbsp;Why do you always refer to him as &amp;quot;former pastor Huckabee&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;Gov. Huckabee?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Romney's a Mormon deacon, but you're keeping mum about that, aren't you? &amp;nbsp;Huckabee was Governor much longer than Romney and did it the right, conservative way. &amp;nbsp;Give him some credit and fair coverage for a change.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626017</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:59:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626017</guid><dc:creator>tati, portland, or</dc:creator><description>I am very sad . Romney is the only one whom I trust.&lt;br&gt;McCain is a wrong candidate .Our country needs a&lt;br&gt;strong leader. We all have children and Romney is&lt;br&gt;a right person for the future of our country .&lt;br&gt;Vote for McCain is like vote for Hilary : &amp;nbsp;he is&lt;br&gt;a liberal .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626023</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:00:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626023</guid><dc:creator>Karen, Austin, TX</dc:creator><description>McCain is getting old republican establishment politician endorsements and liberal ones like yourselves- &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These people obviously wouldn't want a Washington outsider who doesn't owe them any favors to stir things up in Washington. &amp;nbsp;They want someone who will do more of the same and try to make them all happy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every time McCain starts naming off his Washington friends who are voting for him, I feel more inclined to vote for someone who is not intertwined with all these politicians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's show Washington that we want someone in office who will work for &amp;quot;we the people&amp;quot; and not for them &amp;quot;the politicians&amp;quot;! &amp;nbsp;Mitt '08</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626027</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:02:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626027</guid><dc:creator>Andy, Texas</dc:creator><description>I thought both McCain and Romney came across poorly in this debate. &amp;nbsp;McCain was the worse for wear, but Romney didn't reassure either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a darn shame that the only candidate that sounded presidential last night, Mike Huckabee, has been spurned by the talking heads in the media and the party establishment. &amp;nbsp;Despite the rigged &amp;quot;We love Mitt&amp;quot; dial-a-meters, in whatching the debate Huck sounded heads and shoulders above McCain and Romney and that other guy on stage.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626066</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:18:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626066</guid><dc:creator>Phil Larsen, Bountiful, Utah</dc:creator><description>Romney won the debate last night. He should have (and could have) knocked McCain out over that ridiculous assertion of the timetables, but he still cleaned McCain's clock. He exposed McCain for not being the straight talker people think he is. Whether or not it works, we'll see. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626089</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:25:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626089</guid><dc:creator>HP, Kansas</dc:creator><description>Caroline Bowman, You watched the same debate that I watched. The experts on CNN and this site, could not have seen or heard what we did.&lt;br&gt;If McCain is our next president........we're in trouble. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626100</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:29:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626100</guid><dc:creator>Sam, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Why does LYING equate to &amp;quot;playing hardball&amp;quot;. Lying is lying plain and simple. I always hear that &amp;quot;we&amp;quot; are disgusted with dishonest Politicians, yet &amp;quot;we&amp;quot; continue to put these BOZO'S in power to control our lives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When is America going to wake up and see that the King IS NOT wearing &amp;quot;new clothes&amp;quot;...He is naked. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626119</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:33:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626119</guid><dc:creator>tati, portland, or</dc:creator><description>I am very sad . Romney is the only one whom I trust.&lt;br&gt;McCain is a wrong candidate .Our country needs a&lt;br&gt;strong leader. We all have children and Romney is&lt;br&gt;a right person for the future of our country .&lt;br&gt;Vote for McCain is like vote for Hilary .&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626147</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:44:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626147</guid><dc:creator>Toni, NY</dc:creator><description>Todd, I usually listen with great interest to your analyses on MSNBC and most times agree with you but I think you may have had too much bubbly before watching the debate. &amp;nbsp;Romney behaved the gentleman he's always been while McAmnesty was the pompous ass we've grown accustomed to seeing. &amp;nbsp;His arrogance holds no bounds and that should give EVERYONE pause in the dangerous world we live in. &amp;nbsp;The straight talk express has gone off the track and I hope the many comments I've read above lead to his defeat.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626181</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626181</guid><dc:creator>Voter, Staten Island, NY</dc:creator><description>Chuck, don't you get exhausted by the barage of Mitt voters who chastize you -- and anyone else -- for ever suggesting that Mitt is anything but wonderful! &amp;nbsp;I thought the e-mailer listing Romney's various contradictory quoted statements said it best about where Mitt Romney stands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I always enjoy your analyses and, once again, I agree with your analysis today: &amp;nbsp;In the main, the debate uncovered nothing new -- and all candidates offered up the same old lines (other than Huck who always manages to put a delightful new spin on everything he says and thus manages to sound refreshing). &amp;nbsp;Other than the ridiculous bickering which, in my opinion, made both Romney and McClaim look smallminded and which was a tremendous waste of viewer time, there were no winners and no losers -- thus McCain arrived with a strong wind at his back and left the same way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will note that, in my opinion, these focus groups always seem a little out of it to me. &amp;nbsp;But, for the record, the Fox focus group did not declare Romney the winner. &amp;nbsp;Rather unusually, almost the same amount of group members were impressed by Huckabee as they were by Romney. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626211</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:03:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626211</guid><dc:creator>tati, portland, or</dc:creator><description>McCain is a liberal . MaCain doesn't understand &lt;br&gt;a condition of our economy .McCain is a &amp;quot;WAR&amp;quot;- leader.&lt;br&gt;As a register republican I don't trust McCain .&lt;br&gt;ROMNEY is a right candidate .Romney shows the depth&lt;br&gt;of his understanding of all issues . He is a &amp;quot;family&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;man. &lt;br&gt;McCain is a mean and rude man . McCAIN IS A LIAR .&lt;br&gt;He is avoiding 'straight' talk . For years in a Senate&lt;br&gt;he learned how to talk &amp;quot;about nothing&amp;quot; . The WAR --&lt;br&gt;that is ALL the man talk about .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626262</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626262</guid><dc:creator>Jan, Dallas, Texas</dc:creator><description>I, too, must have watched a different debate. It was SO obvious the difference between McCain lazily leaning on the desk and Romney standing dignified and tall. The other obvious thing was that you had a fifth-from-the-bottom of his class trying ineffectively to spar with a cum laude Harvard MBA and JD! McCain can never compare to Romney. That's why he refused Romney's request to debate one-on-one Sunday on Meet the Press. McCain's afraid to go up against a smarter, more poised and dignified man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So how will he handle himself with world leaders? He'll be the same old man with the same chip on his shoulder. I'm really scared that McCain will be the nominee. In the Navy his men had to follow him, but real leadership occurs when people CHOOSE to follow their leader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope Republicans across the nation wake up and fight Tuesday to be sure we nominate Romney. My state doesn't vote until March, so I think it's up to all of you! Our fate is in your hands.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626284</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626284</guid><dc:creator>Mary C. Hall  Payson Ut. </dc:creator><description>McCain carries something that none of the others do: honor, proven patratrism and proven leadership. &amp;nbsp;He is more than willing to reach across party lines and best of all he doesn't blink when confronted with strong opposition. &amp;nbsp;Romney May be a great manager but not a leader. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626289</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:24:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626289</guid><dc:creator>Jane, Nesbit, MS</dc:creator><description>Can any of you guys explain why Republican leaders could overlook McCain's flaws and line up with the NY Times and Joe Lieberman to endorse him? Are they blinded by his war record? Do they think name recognition makes him electable? (Mickey Mouse has that)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having Huckabee stay in the race with neither the support nor the money to be our candidate helps McCain. And if McCain is the Republican candidate, the media will expose him as a bad-mannered, angry, boring, untruthful liberal.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I can't document the following, but based on exit polls I've seen online, Independents did indeed vote in the Republican Primary and McCain's edge came from them. And according to what FL friends have told me, many Independents and Democrats registered as Republicans to vote in the primary. If Dems' votes had counted in their own primary, they would remained Dems. And for the general election, they will cross back.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626337</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:40:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626337</guid><dc:creator>Noteasilyfooled, PA</dc:creator><description>Typical media, siding with the liberals, even if they are sheep in wolves' clothing. McCain's no more a true upstanding conservative who values treating others with respect and dignity than Hillary is a Mother Theresa!!!!!! &amp;nbsp;Come On NBC! I expected better from you!</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626345</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:44:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626345</guid><dc:creator>Just A Dumb Arkansas Country Boy, Pleasant Hill, AR</dc:creator><description>This is really amusing. &amp;nbsp;The conservative base of the Republican party supports Mitt Romney and abhors John McCain. &amp;nbsp;Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the other right wing talking heads hate McCain. &amp;nbsp;While the Republican political class, read as Republican elected officials, loathes Mitt Romney. &amp;nbsp;Please note the endorsements for McCain that are beginning to role in and will continue to role in including those from conservative Republican office holders such Governor Perry of Texas and the up coming ones from both Republican Senators in Georgia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike Huckabee has far more to gain by staying in the race than by dropping out. &amp;nbsp;There is a feeling expressed often here in Arkansas that Huckabee is none too fond of Romney who he views as little more than a very wealthy conservative of convenience and a lying flip flopper. &amp;nbsp;If Huckabee denies delegate votes to Mitt Romney, he will be fondly remembered by John McCain and in Republican party circles. &amp;nbsp;I also expect he will be pretty happy with himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney is in other words toast. &amp;nbsp;Oh by the way, there are plenty of southern evangelical Christians who will never vote for a member of the LSD. &amp;nbsp;They will just not say so to judgemental outsiders. &amp;nbsp;So the great hope of the business class, Mitt, is going down. &amp;nbsp;And that will make the conservative base of the party extremely unhappy. &amp;nbsp;But take heart, it really does not make much difference because no matter who the conservative base has supported and watched get elected in the last thirty years has stabbed them right in the back. &amp;nbsp;And that includes both Bush Presidents and the pathetic spendthrift Republican congress we put up with for twelve years. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Money talks and politicians listen. &amp;nbsp;Conservatives and liberals are both minorities in the country. &amp;nbsp;As I see it, your going to get slicked one way or the other. &amp;nbsp;The Democrats believe the rich should get richer and the federal government should solve all our problems while the Republicans believe the rich should get richer and big business should solve all of our problems. &amp;nbsp;Get a grip. &amp;nbsp;Pick your own poison. </description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626356</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:47:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626356</guid><dc:creator>Todd, Tampa, FL</dc:creator><description>A few thoughts on debate and posts:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) McCain has every right to be testy &amp;amp; grouchy. Romney has continually attacked his opponents more than sell himself. &amp;nbsp;There must be a time to get nasty back. Romney does have some good policy points, but his persistent disingenuousness dooms him to fail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Please, Republicans! Stop this nonsense about voting for Obama over McCain or not voting at all. Regardless the GOP candidate, we MUST coalesce. Look, if you are worried about certain policies or judge nominations, lets hold him accountable, just like we held back amnesty and kept the surge alive. &amp;nbsp;Two things we do know, McCain will be militarily sound, and fight to hold back spending.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Give Mike Huckabee another look. &amp;nbsp;If you look at what he did in Arkansas with a democratic congress, his conservative social positions, as well as his uncanny ability to connect with people, he looks A LOT like a modern day Reagan. &amp;nbsp;Resist passing judgement based on Rush/Hannity/Levin. He probably isn't the right guy now, as a national novice, going against Hillary or Obama, but he deserves a rediscovery by conservatives looking for a future leader of our party.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626369</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:51:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626369</guid><dc:creator>J Bishop</dc:creator><description>If Romney is such a financial whiz, what has it cost him per vote in all these primaries as compared to cost per vote for the other candiddates?</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626401</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:02:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626401</guid><dc:creator>sue england</dc:creator><description>Has anyone thought to ask for a current bill of health for John McCain. &amp;nbsp;He is so dishonest that his cancer could have re-remerged and be coursing thru his viens and those large nodules protruding from his left neck. &amp;nbsp;Three times his cancer has activated. &amp;nbsp;Why aren't the press looking into this? because they want McCain and not Romney to be elected. They don't care if the republicans have an honest candidate. &amp;nbsp;He should be required to be vetted at a hospital that will report unbiased to the people. &amp;nbsp;What a farce this man is.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626425</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:08:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626425</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn, E. Bridgewater, MA</dc:creator><description>Chuck Todd: &amp;nbsp;What debate were you watching last night? &amp;nbsp;Mitt Romney was in command of all the issues and facts, unlike the mean spirited John McCain. &amp;nbsp;Mr. McCain even got perturbed at the questions being asked of him. &amp;nbsp;And didn't you notice, he didn't answer any of them? &amp;nbsp;Unlike Mitt, who was quite forthright and informative. &amp;nbsp;I for one do not want our country to have another arrogant president who can't articulate issues well. I think you need to take your liberal glasses off when you critique a republican debate! &amp;nbsp;It appears they were rather foggy!! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626437</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:12:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626437</guid><dc:creator>Suzanne   Simi Valley, California</dc:creator><description>If he were President how do you suppose John McCain would go over when meeting with the leaders of other nations? &amp;nbsp;Would his smug, smirking, hot-tempered attitude be well received? &amp;nbsp;Would he twist their words and claim they said and meant things they did not? &amp;nbsp;Probably not..he would be too busy pretending to be someone else. &amp;nbsp;Is not a President, or a Presidential candidate, required to behave in a Presidential manner.... &amp;nbsp; Mitt Romney outclasses all of the Republican candidates in my opinion. &amp;nbsp;No candidate is perfect, but it would be sad to see a nasty, dishonest, liberal pretending to be conservative, President running our country.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626554</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:42:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626554</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Denton, Texas</dc:creator><description>ARE YOU KIDDING? &amp;nbsp;Romney crushed McCain last night. &amp;nbsp;See people meter: Romney vs. McCain at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.cnn.com/video/?iref=videoglobal"&gt;http://www.cnn.com/video/?iref=videoglobal&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626558</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:44:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626558</guid><dc:creator>Dave, Denton, Texas</dc:creator><description>Romney has changed positions, but he has become conservative. &amp;nbsp;McCain, in contrast, has become liberal. &amp;nbsp;See below!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;January 30, 2008, &amp;nbsp;4:31 pm &lt;br&gt;Romney’s Ideal Victory&lt;br&gt;By CHRIS SUELLENTROP&lt;br&gt;TAGS: FLORIDA, JOHN MCCAIN, MITT ROMNEY&lt;br&gt;Does Mitt Romney have a victory to cling to in Florida? Joshua Trevino, one of the founders of the conservative blog RedState, breaks down the numbers on his personal blog. &lt;br&gt;“Mitt Romney is in a bad way,” Trevino writes. “He blew through $10 million in Iowa and lost; and outspent McCain eight to one in Florida, and lost that too. But for all this, Mitt Romney is not done yet and the reason lies in the breakdown of this evening’s Florida vote.” He continues:&lt;br&gt;CNN has the exit-poll numbers, and they reveal some surprising things:&lt;br&gt;•	Romney won pro-lifers. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the mainstream religious. (Huckabee won the very religious &amp;#172; less than one-fifth of the pool.) &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the Protestants. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney tied Huckabee with Evangelicals. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the pro-GWB voters. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney is the primary second choice of Giuliani voters, Thompson voters …. and McCain voters. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the immigration hard-liners. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the upper-middle class, earning between $100,000 and $200,000 annually. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the terrorism-oriented voters. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the self-identified conservatives and the self-identified very conservative. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the values-oriented voters. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the white voters. &lt;br&gt;•	Romney won the tax-cutting voters. &lt;br&gt;In short, Mitt Romney won the Republican Party’s idea of itself &amp;#172; and that, too, is a big deal. If you’re white, Protestant, anti-abortion, go to church on Sundays, think well of the President, want lower taxes, hate terrorists, make a good living, want to do something about immigration, and live in Florida, chances are you voted Romney. The question before Florida was whether McCain could win a closed Republican race, and now we know he can. The question now is whether he can win conservatives &amp;#172; and in Florida, he did not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626575</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:48:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626575</guid><dc:creator>DAVE, DENTON, TEXAS</dc:creator><description>I CAN'T BELIEVE THE MEDIA ANY MORE! &amp;nbsp;ONE REPORTER SAID ROMNEY EARNED A &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; ON THE DEBATE AND MCCAIN EARN A &amp;quot;B&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;I FEAR FOR OUR COUNTRY'S FUTURE BASED ON HOW THINGS ARE PLAYING OUT. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626703</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:29:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626703</guid><dc:creator>Chas, KC, MO</dc:creator><description>For those who actually believe what Juan McCain says, look into how he dumped his disabled wife for a 25 year old cheerleader who's daddy owned the 2nd largest Budweiser distributorship in the U.S., and greased/financed his entry into Politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, Romney earned his money with Harvard education, brains and hard work. &amp;nbsp;And he has stayed with his HS sweetheart wife of 38 years, who has Multiple Sclerosis. &amp;nbsp;McCain would have dumped her in a heartbeat. &amp;nbsp;Because he already did it once.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626714</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:32:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626714</guid><dc:creator>Robert W. Martin, Minot, North Dakota</dc:creator><description>My Fellow Republicans--I have read, yea with a tear in my eye, your approbation for Romney--and I despair. &amp;nbsp;He was the governor of the most liberal State in the Union, he has flipped so often on so many issues that he could be a fry cook of SpongeBob's caliber--yet many of you still suffer form McCain Derangement Syndrome. &amp;nbsp;John McCain has a lifetime rating from the ACU (that's American Conservative Union--note there is no &amp;quot;L&amp;quot;) of 83%. &amp;nbsp;Newt's is only 84%. &amp;nbsp;John is a conservative, he is a Republican, and he should be the nominee of our Party. &amp;nbsp;Or would you really rather have the words President Hillary Clinton emblazoned accross the news for the next four to eight years? &amp;nbsp;Stop whining and get behind McCain--he is going to be the candidate, so as his Mom said &amp;quot;Hold your nose&amp;quot; if you have to--but vote McCain.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#626770</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:51:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:626770</guid><dc:creator>Tom, Dayton, OH</dc:creator><description>Very disappointed in McCain last night. &amp;nbsp;I don't always like the way Romney comes across, but at least he can understand a question and give a coherent response rather than sitting and cackling in his chair like Jabba the Hutt. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is going to be a long election year watching McCain and Hillary try to gratify their supersized egos. &amp;nbsp;Romney needs to spend a year in the woods shooting varmints and getting comfortable with guns, followed by two years volunteering for anti-abortion groups so that he can be more credible in 2012.... &amp;nbsp;Seriously, I hope that he still has the desire to run again.</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#627264</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:31:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:627264</guid><dc:creator>Stephen, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>McCain accuses Romney of spouting the buzzword “timetables”, but it was the interviewer who asked about timetables. &amp;nbsp;Romney disagreed with the kind of timetable that would withdraw troops on a certain date (allowing the enemy to wait it out) and instead promoted something different. &amp;nbsp;The very next phrase in that interview explains…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Romney: “You want to have a series of things you want to see accomplished in terms of the strength of the Iraqi military and the Iraqi police and the leadership of the Iraqi government.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He spoke of timetables for those kinds of benchmarks and milestones, not for retreat and withdrawal. &amp;nbsp;He was promoting timetables for steps leading to a more stable Iraqi government, which eventually would complete the mission there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Romney's swan song? </title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624574.aspx#636237</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:23:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:636237</guid><dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator><description>I'm watching McCain's campaign manager and she is either as dishonest as McCain on why he failed to support Bush's tax cuts, or she has been given misinformation. He originally said he didn't support the tax cuts because they helped the rich. Now he claims he didn't support them because there were no spending cuts. Suppose he were telling the truth now. As a veteran legislator, he is surely aware that he could have supported them and then initiated his own bill to produce spending cuts if he had been so inclined. I missed Romney's speech a couple of minutes ago, but I am willing to bet he hasn't changed his mind about Huckabee's right to stay in the race. McCain's campaign manager insists that he thinks Huckabee should drop out. Is she as dishonest as McCain about this fact, or does she listen to his take or what? Imho, both McCain and his campaign manager have been unto Romney. McCain refuses time and again to give us the straight talk he touts.</description></item></channel></rss>