So who’s the front-runner?

Johnson, New Orleans, LA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:22:54 GMT

Hillary is still the person to beat in the democratic nomination. Obama has clearly gained ground. Just a few weeks ago, Hillary was suppose to be the "nominated" democratic candidate after Super Tuesday. That is, however, not the case. Although Hillary won both New York and California, Obama did very well in more states. I feel that Obama has the momentum. People will gravitate towards Obama as they get to know him more and more. This is going to be a close race all the way to the end with Obama playing catchup.

So who’s the front-runner?

Lynette, NYC — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:23:19 GMT

The hard numbers show her in the lead with the delgate situation, but it does seem that thus far he got more actual votes. After the Al Gore fiasco, Im sort of a fan of the popular vote. This delegate thing is dumb, whoever gets the most votes should win. If the margin is less than 5%, then some sort of system should be in play to account for human error. Something VERY BIG wil have to happen to sway people back or forthy. teh entire thing is very divisive

So who’s the front-runner?

Wilson, Seattle — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:25:50 GMT

A 100 super delegate lead? Who is the establishment candidate? Sorry, can't spin that number.

So who’s the front-runner?

Fred Cline, Brookfield, WI — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:26:39 GMT

Obama's greed will be the downfall of the Democratic Party. If he is nominated or not he has split the party and the Republicans will win the general election. He has raised false hopes without saying what he will do other than grand generalities with no substance. Obama is a true Chicago politician - it's only the bottom line that counts and who walks off with the prize. I wouldn't expect less from one of the Nations most politically corrupt cities.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sean Penn — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:27:20 GMT

Hillary is the front-runner in name only....mathews and olberman will slant each and every story toward obama and you can see by the so-called panel of experts that come on to back up the obama slant...they don't have any positive stats or information on clinton but instead they offer stats and information on what obama needs to do to win whichever upcoming primary that is being talked about that day....hillary now faces an uphill battle for those 1300 delegates she needs

So who’s the front-runner?

Enrique, Chicago — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:28:57 GMT

Let's not fool ourselves, the Clintons have been the frontrunners from day one.

So who’s the front-runner?

P Overley midwest city Ok — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:05 GMT

Clinton is the true leader of the race and will be the true leader of this country...clinton has the tools to step right in the first day and get this country back to where 'wild bill' had us when everyone was making money not just the republicans

So who’s the front-runner?

Brad, Morgantown, WV — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:49 GMT

Obama is the "establishment?" Is anyone really going to buy that?

I think the Clinton campain needs to break out those dictionaries because that makes no sense.

So who’s the front-runner?

J, OH — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:30:08 GMT

“There is no doubt … we hope and pray every night to run against Hillary Clinton,” - Ari Fleischer, on CNN last night.

Hopefully they don't get their chance. Because everyone knows she can't win against McCain. The Clinton supporters are just trying to fool themselves if they think Hillary will be able to win. She will only pull die hard democrats. She'll lose the independants, all the republicans, and will not get the enthusiastic new voters and younger voters that were for Obama. They'll stay home.

What platform can she stand on against McCain? Experience? Hah! John McCain will destroy her in that area. Military? Yeah... keep dreaming. Security? McCain again. Healthcare? Maybe she gets this one. And thats not even bringing up the tons of scandals over the years since they left office. For all those that want to say she stood up to the Republican attack machine... hardly. Bill did definately. Hillary did not. Her major fight with Republicans was on health care... which she lost horribly.

So who’s the front-runner?

Independent in CA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:30:20 GMT

I think both Dems showed well last night! I believe this race is very different from anything we have ever seen in our lifetime and in a world that moves fast...we need to slow down and take it race by race - state by state and let the voters choose.

To all the states that have yet to have their say- stand up and be counted! :)

So who’s the front-runner?

John Barnes, Overton, PA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:30:37 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Joyce Patterson — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:32:37 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Steve, Hartford, CT — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:34:03 GMT

Obviously there isn't a front-runner. Tuesday was a wash and they both know it. This is just the expectations game.

But I must say I find myself more pleased every day with this race. I look forward to next year's Inauguration, and I may well decide to go to Washington to see it.

So who’s the front-runner?

Robert Houston, TX — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:35:18 GMT

If Feb 5 was winner-take-all for the Democrats- Obama would be finished this morning!!!!!!! He is a lucky man- as Karl Rove said. Add up all the states he won- all the states Clinton won- make it winner-take-all and Obama gets slaughtered.

So who’s the front-runner?

Martha Benner, Foley, AL — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:35:30 GMT

In the general election it will be the Democrat to try and fix the mess that Bush is leaving us with. No one wants more war and we need to pay off debt.

Marti

So who’s the front-runner?

Eric, SI, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:37:03 GMT

Obama has run more ads than Hillary, spent more money, and is drawing huge crowds to his events. He is claiming that he is the underdog and that people are "just starting" to get to know him. I think the media should call him on the "just getting to know" stuff.

So who’s the front-runner?

Chris Weimar, Chapel Hill, NC — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:38:14 GMT

Clinton won by a field goal and long term she still has the edge. Obama will get several field goals and a touchdown in the next few weeks but Clinton will probably get three TD's with Texas, Ohio and Pa. Things can change but she won NH despite the Obama "tidal wave" and she more than held her own on "Tsunami Tuesday." I also think the super delagates are probably more aligned in favor of Clinton at this time and she will probably hold the edge there unless Obama can win two out of three in Tx, Ohio and Pa.

So who’s the front-runner?

Laura, Arlington, VA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:43:40 GMT

Robert, if the Democratic primaries were winner take all, Obama would have used a very different strategy, concentrating on California and Massachusetts from day 1. He didn't have much of an organization in those states because nobody thought he had a prayer, and that's what enabled Clinton to pull out bigger than expected wins. If it were winner-take-all, it would have been a very different race from the start. Obama's goal in California a few days ago was simply to keep Clinton from netting a ton of delegates...nobody believed he could win it until maybe 3 days ago, and I was skeptical even then.

So who’s the front-runner?

Carrie, Draper, UT — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:43:51 GMT

I still think Clinton is the front runner. I mean, she won California, which is a major win. What did Obama win? Utah? Sorry, I live here, and I know that win means absolutely nothing at the end of the day.

So who’s the front-runner?

cs ny — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:09 GMT

I was so happy to see that Clinton won in Mass. and CA especially. All of the media hype going on between Oprah, Ted Kennedy and the flip flopper JOHN KERRY who is just a complete moron. Clinton winning in these states was a kick in the face to all of them and I was glad to see it happen. And I am sick to watch MSNBC continue to downplay the success of Clinton. She had the least amount of resources, media support and momentum and she still held her ground. I am happy for her for that.

So who’s the front-runner?

J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:10 GMT

J in Ohio...are you on drugs?
Do you honestly put any stock in what a former Bush adminsitration official like Ari Fleischer says?
McCain would SMOKE OBama in the general election.
His grandfatherly charm, Vietnam Hero status, and moderate voting record in The Senate would galvanize The G.O.P. base, and cut into the independent votes that Obama is counting on.
Additionally, latinos would vote for McCain over Obama. They represent a larger voting block than African Americans do.
Nope, sorry, aint buying the electability thing anymore.
Because Hillary PROVED, in the face of all of Obama's endorsements from big names in the establishment, that she can still compete, and win.

GO HILLARY 2008!

So who’s the front-runner?

Chris, Youngstown, Ohio — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:24 GMT

I believe that Obama is the candidate of choice.
Because the clintons are grasping at straws in order to trip him up. It indicates to me that Obama is intelligent and wise. Because his past hasen't been a factor in the election. He handles himself with class and intelligence. He is a true leader who is ripe for the presidency.

So who’s the front-runner?

Ron, TX — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:38 GMT

I think Mark Penn is just hoping that no one stops to think about the actual definition of an "establishment".

Anyone with two bits of common sense will laugh at Penn trying to act like the title "establishment candidate" can change definitions or meanings. "Establishment candidate" is an entirely different concept than "front-running candidate".

It's entirely possible for an establishment candidate to be losing a fundraising race. It's entirely possible for an establishment candidate to be losing certain high profile endorsements. This just means they are no longer winning.

So who’s the front-runner?

Chris, MI — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:54 GMT

It's always nice to check these boards and see myself described as the "inexperienced/youthful" vote. My peers in their 30s and 40s are voting in large numbers for Obama, and we don't consider ourselves inexperienced voters. Also, to accuse black people of voting for Obama solely because of race is insulting. Despite statistic after statistic showing Clinton's huge support among women, and comment after comment from female Clinton supporters saying they're voting for her because they want a woman president, there hasn't been an overwhelming cry of misandry on these boards to equal the denegration of black voters. I don't vote with the color of my skin or with my ovaries, and I don't appreciate the implication otherwise.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sean, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:44:56 GMT

LOL, Hillary will say and do anything to get elected.
She blasts Obama for not having "years of experience" and now she'd like to call herself "underdog" - what a crap!!!

This is what it is all about. She cannot be trusted!!!
Yes, Hillary it was you & your campaign that injected the race and the gender card to your advantage! Shame on you!

So who’s the front-runner?

Craig Beitzel, Chincoteague, VA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:45:22 GMT

Hmmm... 2 months ago HRC was ahead by 25-30 points nearly everywhere. When it became close,she tried to lower expectations. They expected to be ahead by 400 delegates by now ... too bad. Obanma 13, HRC 8 (states) last night. Even in baseball, the closer is not needed for the last inning. This has been a steady bit gradual movement away from dishonesty & deceit, toward a fresh face that deserves a chance.A Clinton vistory would mean an automatic GOP win in November.

So who’s the front-runner?

Iowa — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:48:12 GMT

This is just the funniest yet! Hillary's camp claiming to be the underdogs! Is this for real? Obama has been the underdog from the beginning, and even though he is REALLY gaining ground, he will continue to be the underdog until this race is finished. The Clinton name is knows across this country, and every corner of the civilized world. The CLintons have HUGE connections within Washington, and have been pulling out all the stops. Name recognition alone will always be on Hillary's side-even though this may prove to work against her in the end! But look out Hillary!!! As EVERYONE can plainly see, Obama, is being embraced across the country-HE won 13 states, HE won more delegates yesterday. The Clinton spins are including Super delegates in their totals, but these super delegates are not elected delegates awarded yesterday. Obama won yesterday! It's the truth and EVERYONE knows it! Hillary was SAVED by California Even though he clearly won yesterday, he will continue to be the underdog, at least thru the weekend, where i truly believe he will come out with HUGE wins over Hillary, as well as taking in many more superdelegates. Then she can claim DEFEAT, but never that she is the UNDERDOG!!!!

So who’s the front-runner?

Al — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:49:22 GMT

I understand the dislike many have for the clintons, what i don't get is the excitement over obama, I really don't. His resume to lead this country is even more flimsy than bush's, he is proposing nothing new, dramatic or earth changing as a centerpiece of his campaign, he would have voted against the war is not the same as voting against the war and that argument disqualifies many other dems too, he has sucessfully deflected questions about his early days outside of his own autobiography by sicking his supporters on the questioner, how has he kept jesse jackson and al sharpton's mouth shut and what will it cost this nation?

So who’s the front-runner?

diane — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:49:54 GMT

Does Penn honestly think anyone is stupid enough to fall for the Obama is the establishment candidate line.
Somebody, please get this guy a brain.

So who’s the front-runner?

SQ in NJ — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:51:29 GMT

Mr. Barnes - Get your facts straight: Obama leads in exit polls among professionals and the "educated" - irrespective of color and gender. You also imply that the "knowledgeable" voters will come out in the general election...Are these the same idiots that voted for Bush? You call them knowledgeable.

I recognize that is the shills for every candidate are out there and its important to support your candidate. BUT, don't make outright misrepresentations and don't lie. I know that lying is somewhat habitual and a natural reaction for the Clintons, but according your post your last name is Barnes and not Clinton...so try not to embarass yourself by taking on this not so enviable character flaw.

On the topic at hand, Clinton is the establishment candidate if there ever was one. Look at the superdelegate count and the people running her campaign - they are all longtime DNC'ers - McCauliffe et al. Unfortunately, there are people in this country that believe the garbage / spin she is selling.

So who’s the front-runner?

CitizenJ — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:51:59 GMT

What platform can she stand on against McCain? Experience? Hah! John McCain will destroy her in that area. Military? Yeah... keep dreaming. Security? McCain again. Healthcare? Maybe she gets this one. And thats not even bringing up the tons of scandals over the years since they left office. For all those that want to say she stood up to the Republican attack machine... hardly. Bill did definately. Hillary did not. Her major fight with Republicans was on health care... which she lost horribly.
J, OH (Sent Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:30 PM)

And Obama is three times as bad so what's your point. Yes saying you were right one time on a political matter he didn't even have to make a choice on just doesn't cut it.

Joyce Patterson (Sent Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:32 PM)

Joyce,

Seeing as how the Iraq war is very unpopular for a large majority of the population and Obama opposed it from the start, I'd say Obama is in a stronger position there. Clinton voted for it, remember?

On healthcare, Clinton insists on mandates and even is considering garnishing people's wages to enforce that mandate. How do you think that will go over after the Republican spin? Obama's plan can't be spun the same way since he doesn't have a mandate. Again, Obama's position is stronger.

Then there is that whole thing where people want change. Obama would absolutely DESTROY McCain in this area. Clinton is establishment.

And lastly (and most importantly, I think), conservatives aren't exactly enamored with McCain. This will keep turnout from being too high on the Republican side. Unless he ran against Clinton. Nobody can rally the conservative base like a Clinton. And not only that, most Independents would probably go with McCain. Against Obama, Independents would be split. And that is worst-case-senario. More likely, Obama would win the majority of them. And he might just create some "Obama Republicans". Can you realistically imagine a "Clinton Republican". If you can, I want some of what you are taking.

So who’s the front-runner?

HMT-MI — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:52:39 GMT

What happened to the Ted,Maria,caroline and Ophra show in Massachusetts and California.Do you think they are wondering what happened?I sure do

So who’s the front-runner?

Knowsbetter, SF, CA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:54:49 GMT

When the GOP says something the guliable young, and the never-will-learns eat it up! The GOP keeps saying they want to run against Hillary? Really? What other truths come out of their mouths? Obama is the weakest Candidate, They have nothing on HRC that hasn't already been disproven over and over and she is stronger than ever! You Obama fools talk about the future but keep bringing up the past! Thats exactly what the GOP wants! Wake up Neophytes, this is not a new game! REAL DEMS don't listen to GOP attack points and use them against another DEM!

So who’s the front-runner?

Interesting (Columbia, MO) — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:55:38 GMT

Classic racism and sexism at play right now in Democratic nomination. Republicans (e.g. Bill Bennett and Chuck Todd) want to have Obama to win to knock out Clinton (a woman). Then they will swiftboat his rear end like Kerry in 2004 (even though polls say he is leading) and he will lose the presidency to the Republicans. They want to kill two birds with one stone. That is why WHITE MEN are publicly going to Obama b/c they know the real threat is Clinton with her large women vote which is bigger than men in the U.S. Electorate.

But, Clinton is a fighter and you have to commend her ability to keep pressing on even though the media pundits (yeah you Chuck Todd) are trying to make this rock star (Obama) the front runner in the polls to sway opinion.

I hope you print my opinion. If you don't, the what I am saying above is true.

So who’s the front-runner?

Doc/charlotte — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:57:06 GMT

When all the smoke clears and the voter gets in the booth, the white male will vote for McCain, the young college kids will not get to the booth and Hillary will have put her foot in her mouth enough time for us thankfully to elect a Republican. We don't need more taxes and socialized medicine and someone who does not have a plan.(obama). Go McCain

So who’s the front-runner?

Teri, MA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:57:17 GMT

Maybe a good consideration would be for the Democrats to finally get together and run a Clinton/Obama ticket. This would give us the leadership we need and also give Senator Obama a chance to gain more experience that so many people are having such a challenge with. For now, I'm remaining with my candidate, Senator Obama, but some thought should be given to these two very strong, educated candidates to join forces.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sierra, SF — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:58:11 GMT

'...superior January fundraising, high-profile endorsements...'

Guess why they want 'DEBATE A WEEK' ?
NO THANKS

The gloves are off
Billary was playing nice in the last debate
She waas enbarrassed about 'race baiting'

She'll revert back to 'bbattle axe' Hillary
They want to smear Obama during a debate

NO DEBATES !
No THANKS !

So who’s the front-runner?

i.m.r. — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:58:16 GMT

Establishment:
4. The existing power structure in society; the dominant groups in society and their customs or institutions; institutional authority.
5. The dominant group in a field of endeavor, organization, etc.
--Per dictionary.com, per definition #4, Obama can never be the establishment this cycle, because no matter how strong he becomes, he will still the upstart in comparison to the established political roots that are the Clintons.
--However, per definition #5, either Clinton or Obama could be the establishment, depending on whom is the frontrunner.
**I have always envisioned definition #4, so have been confused by the MSM and the Clinton campaign. In my mind, the words establishment and frontrunner have always been separate, but that does not--by definition--seem to necessarily be the case.

Does anybody else have any advice on words to classify the candidates that are Hillary and Barack?

So who’s the front-runner?

K. Anderson — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:59:22 GMT

Hillary and Bill if elected will renew the fight between the right wing republicans and the democrats. Thus, four more years of a do nothing congress. We do not need Hillary telling us she knows how to fight the republicans. We need Obama with his soft voice and big stick to make things happen! Remember you catch more bees with honey than vinegar.

So who’s the front-runner?

Joe Jacques — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:02:53 GMT

Superdelegates should not be included. Let's let the people have their say before the politicians screw this thing up. BTW - If you are a superdelegate whose constituents went for a certain candidate, you have no business voting for the other one. This will become an issue if it occurs.

So who’s the front-runner?

CC, New York — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:06:33 GMT

What happen to the 35 years of experience gag? Having 35 years of experience and still the "underdog?" Doesn't paint a pretty picture for the next president of the United States! Yet of course with Billiary as president it would be the "Divided States Of America!"

So who’s the front-runner?

Bernard Larsen IV — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:07:45 GMT

if hillary wins, many dems, including myself will vote for Mcain. I am not interested in creating an inherited monarchy here in the U.S. the Clinton's had their time, if Chelsea wants to run then let her go for it when she turns 40. Hillary cannot win independents or republicans, they hate her. Obama has a good showing in the south and in the midwest, states the democrats lose almost every four years in the general election, imagine, a black man winning in the south, change in deed.

So who’s the front-runner?

Jim Wojantoski — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:08:29 GMT

GO OBAMA... I think that right now there is an issues with closet racism in our country.. (immigration) (a black president).. People would rather see a waivering woman in office than a stan strong minority.. (even if he's only half)

So who’s the front-runner?

Joyce, Sacramento, CA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:08:30 GMT

Someone insinuated that Blacks were voting for Barack because he is Black. Well, first off, Barack is half Black and half White. Secondly, I, as a Black woman, am not voting for him because he is Black and White. I am voting for him because he is the most fitted for the office of the Presidency. Today, our nation is in bad standing both at home and in the world. We need someone who possesses the highest skills of diplomacy and leadership to get things accomplished at home and abroad (regaining the respect that the US once had in the world, working hard to rectify the inequities established by the present administration between the most wealthy and the working class our our nation).

So who’s the front-runner?

Kaye, NC — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:08:37 GMT

John Barnes,Overton,PA
Look at some of the states that Obama won. Kansas, N. Dakota, Colorado, Idaho, Alaska, Utah, Minnesota (by the way, he SMOKED her in these states) ....I wonder what the proportionate ratio of black/white residents is in each of these states? (!)I'm sure you'll agree that we don't usually associate these western states with large groups of African Americans. Point is, yes, he's definitely winning the younger vote (and what's wrong with that-a vote is a vote, right?) as well as the blacks, but he's also appealing to many, many more WHITE people, of all ages. The winner in a general election HAS to bridge a very broad spectrum of voters. It's called ELECTABILITY. FYI, I am a 55 year old white female Democrat. My husband is a 56 year old white Republican....we'll both be voting for Obama in our NC primary (if it gets that far)

So who’s the front-runner?

Joel Herring, Kansas City, MO — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:09:32 GMT

John Barnes, Overton, PA, sorry, I guess you haven't been looking at any exit polls. Obama is leading handily across the country in college educated, or post-graduate voters of ALL races. Look it up yourself.

So who’s the front-runner?

Bianca, Franklin, TN — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:09:42 GMT

"Take out the inexperienced youth votes and the blacks voting along racial lines and you will see who is voting for Obama."

I just wanted to comment on John Barnes. Just because we are young voters doesn't mean we shouldn't be as important as older voters. It also doesn't mean we did not do our homework, and we are the future of the country. Our votes as well as african americans count wheither it be for Obama or Clinton. My vote counts as much as yours and expirence does not mean anything.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sierra, SF — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:09:59 GMT

Fred Cline, Brookfield, WI: '...Obama's greed will be the downfall of the Democratic Party...'

That's right, Fred.... DEMONIZE YOUR OPPOSITION
It's an old Clinton trick
The 'Politics of Personal Destruction'
Did you pay attention to the slams on Ted Kennedy for supporting Obama ?

THAT'S why Bill got impeached !
(besides deserving it)
Build up a partisan environment

So who’s the front-runner?

Jim Wojantoski — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:10:13 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

CA Indy — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:11:06 GMT

John Barnes, Overton, PA,
I hope MSNBC will post this. You sir, are sadly mistaken. Go look at the demographics instead of spouting your nonsense. The highest-educated area in the country last night voted for Obama (Silicon Valley and the Bay Area) and he would have won California had it not been for non-college educated Latino and Asian voters in Southern California. I'm a mid-thirties Ivy League-educated white male who would happily compare resumes and intelligence with you and any of the so-called "mature and intelligent" voters who blindly march in lockstep to the Clinton pied-pipers who constantly push your buttons without you even realizing it. Your racist innuendos are right, although not in the way you intended them. It was race in the Latino and Asian communities that was the swing here.

So who’s the front-runner?

Phred, NH — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:14:17 GMT

Yesterday's winners first and foremost were the voters!! Those who didn't vote, don't complain. Be a part of the solution, not part of the problem.

McCain has emerged as GOP front runner, Clinton or Obama, too close to call. As the process continues, how muddy does the water flow?

So who’s the front-runner?

Democrat, California — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:14:26 GMT

WOW, more stupid talk from the Democrats. This is sick! The republicans will win in November because of the division in this party.

So who’s the front-runner?

Mark Thieme — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:14:30 GMT

Tuesday, February 5, 2008 will go down in history as the night the Clinton train derailed.

Stopped.

Steam pouring out of the smoke stack, it just sits there and waits.

For Godot? No.

The Obama bullet train just swooshed by.

Toot.

So who’s the front-runner?

Kevin, New York, New York — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:15:13 GMT

I love that so many people on this board use phrases like "everyone knows." Nobody knows anything right now about the outcome of this race or of the presidential match ups that are possible. You have opinions. Opinions don't win elections, individual votes do. They're both excellent candidates, we should all be cheering that for once we don't have to choose between Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. I think we can leave that to the Republicans this year.

So who’s the front-runner?

Mike W. Lafayette, IN — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:16:13 GMT

John Barnes nice of you to tell us that the black and young voters are unkowledgable and obviously too immature to make a decision in this election. I guess they should just all go home and let those of us who have created the following: disaster in Iraq, huge national debt, economy in the crapper and a government that can't seem to get anything right; see if we can't screw things up a little bit more. Your statement is absurd and hints of racism. If you have thoughts and ideas, feel free to express them, but to make the statement you made, makes you look like the one who is uninformed and immature. Obama does have a plan and if you did a little investigating, I'm sure you could find it. By the way, I'm white and 37, do I meet your standards for adulthood and intelligence.

So who’s the front-runner?

Pete, Albany, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:16:38 GMT

Rewind to the end of 2007, before Iowa. Hillary was supposed to have the nomination at the very least well in hand this morning. Last night was supposed to be her coronation.

Not so fast.

She finished with a lead, but not the one you would have or should have expected from someone who was supposed to have the inevitable candidacy.

Do us all a favor, folks...spare us your, "He doesn't talk issues," whining and feel free to do your own research on where Obama stands on the issues...the man has a web site, ya know!

...or do you prefer to have your candidates spoon-feed you?

So who’s the front-runner?

Desiree, Colonial Beach, virginia — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:19:02 GMT

Believe it not, Hillary will become the front-runner and, will be able to campaign against McCain. For decades she and her family have been scrutinzed from her every tear drop to her wearing pants-suits and, she has been able to over-come this negativity. Do you think the Republicans will not touch Obama? You are dead wrong. They will dig into his past 20 years "so-called friendship" with Rezko and, divulge more dirt than we can ever imagine. He and his "establishment" is naive if they think this will be an easy Republican take-over. Just sit back and enjoy this long ride to the White House!

So who’s the front-runner?

Gaines L Burns — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:20:54 GMT

Im not sure who will win this Race.But at least I feel that we have some decent Canidates this time...maybe we can finally get our noses out of other countrys business

So who’s the front-runner?

PhillyEagles4Life, Philadelphia,PA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:21:08 GMT

John Barnes, Overton, PA
I guess you are also voting along racial lines. How come when a black person votes for another black person, it is along racial lines, but when a white person votes for another white person...that is just perfectly normal. Apparently, to some of you, black people don't have a mind of their own, they just follow the herd..kinda like you don't have a mind of your own when you vote, you just follow the herd.

So who’s the front-runner?

Ed, Fresno, Ca — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:23:20 GMT

First Read the day before listed polls that had a tie between these two dems in Calif.

Calif vote totals:
Hill over by 16 %. (53 to 37)

Once again they were totaly off base.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sierra, SF — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:25:11 GMT

J, OH: '...What platform can she stand on against McCain? Experience? Hah! John McCain will destroy her in that area. Military? Yeah...

J, she can say she's decided to FLIP FLOP on the war

She can say if her war against Iran fails, she'll FLIP FLOP and say she was 'mislead'

Don't worry, she'll say McCain fathered a 'black baby'.....
It worked in 2000 !!

So who’s the front-runner?

James, New Brunswick, NJ — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:25:45 GMT

Yeah...Obama's the establishment. Sure.

If anyone thinks Obama is tearing the party apart the way Fred is suggesting, then I would point to 1996 when Bill Clinton and the DLC tore the party apart but claimed it was a "transformation" of politics in the Democratic party.

If nominated, Barack can actually beat McCain. Hillary is hated by a sliver of Dems and pretty much the entire GOP. Wanna tear apart the Democratic party, Fred? Want to continue old school politics and backstabbing, Fred? Want to guarantee a loss in November, Fred?

Then vote the Clinton ticket.

Me, personally. I wouldn't trust her to watch over my dogs, forget about watching over the country.

So who’s the front-runner?

World Citizen — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:27:08 GMT

Opinions are like.... well, you know. Everybody's got one. At least in Illinois the corruption is EXPOSED on a regular basis, and not continuously hidden beneath a thin veneer of "we're just nice, wholesome people, not like our nasty neighbors to the south at all".... What a truckload of b.s. Sell it to Mississippi, I hear they're buying.

So who’s the front-runner?

Nancy, Huntsville, Alabama — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:27:24 GMT

I watched Obama's news conference this morning and was truly amazed at his inability and stumbling in trying to answer the questions from reporters, especially the one from Suzanne --- he fumbled for words. What happened to his great orator skills?! It was embarrassing to watch him, and I immediately thought of our current President Bush... It was clear he was not sure how to answer the questions posed him, and I sure hope the American people wake up and realize that simply having the ability to verbalize words reflecting change will not be enough for the hardest job in the world - President of the United States!
I was also amazed at how MSNBC and CNN immediately cut him off when he was fumbling for words when he was trying to answer Suzanne's question... sure signifies that they don't want us to see where he is lacking - substance on the issues!
The more I see him, the more I believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton should be our next president!!!

So who’s the front-runner?

cisom — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:28:39 GMT

The Democrats could win a presidential election in the current political climate if they would just stop trying to push the most ultra-liberal candidate on the majority of the nation. The country is not ready to see Billary Annoited Queen.
The reason the Democrats lost the last two presidential elections was their insistance on going with the most ultra-liberal person possible. This strategy only serves to further divide the country. The DNC just doesn't get it, and until they admit the trurth that the MAJORITY of the nation is not ultra-liberal they will continue to divide the nation and loose presidential elections. IF the DNC were to nominate a moderate candidate they would stand an excellent chance of winning this election but they refuse to make a decision based on data. Instead they prefer to base their decisions on emotion, politics as usual, and their desire for an ultra-liberal president.

So who’s the front-runner?

sp — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:31:21 GMT

The press wouldn't want to name Obama the frontrunner as then they'd need to take him to task and provide the level of scrutiny they have given Hillary - wouldn't want to burst his bubble.

So who’s the front-runner?

John Hefner — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:31:53 GMT

It frightens me to think that the Clinton's could possibly be in office again! The american public needs to look at the mess they left. Do you really think the president has the power to create jobs for individuals and bring prosperity single handedly? Do you not understand that they inherit the previous presidents programs for the first four years? The Clinton's were responsible for downsizing of our defenses and failed to provide security for you and your families. Do you want that to be the case again? Wake up America, please!!!!

So who’s the front-runner?

Blake, Durhanm, NC — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:33:48 GMT

You really crack me up. A politician says I am going to do this and that. You hear something you like and you jump on the band wagon. The problem with that is the President does not write or pass legislation. That person must have the ability to effectively negotiate to not only get such a bill written, but get it to the floor for a vote and to get the necessary votes to pass it. That is why no meaningful legislation has been passed in years unless there was clearly a dominate force in congress and a sympathetic President. It takes more than a plan. You need someone who can make it work. That is a flaw in Hillary that I am not convinced she can overcome.

As for the whole mess with delegates, etc, I think they should do away with this early voting, the two party system, and the individual state voting patterns that we see. This is stupid. We need to have a bunch of candidates, a mid year primary to cut to some number (maybe 2-3 or all candidates whose combined votes equal 60-70%), then a runoff. Make them stand on their experience, knowledge, skills, and plans. forget about the parties. Now that's an election.

So who’s the front-runner?

FRANK D ATLANTA GA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:34:12 GMT

I LIKE CLINTON AND I AM VOTING FOR HER ME & MY SPOUSE SIMPLY PUT FOR US WHO GO TO WORK EVERYDAY SHE UNDERSTANDS THE OTHER PERSON WHO"S RUNNING DOES NOT UNDERSTAND. SO I AM VOTING FOR HER SHE WILL BEAT MCCAIN POINT BLANK SO CMON WORKING CLASS FOLK VOTE FOR HER I DO NOT VOTE BUT I AM THIS TIME AROUND OH YES

So who’s the front-runner?

JB Hull, IA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:34:34 GMT

If you are a democrat and you want to beat John McCain, think carefully about who you vote for in the primaries. Recent polls show McCain beating Hillary in a general election. The candidate with overwhelming victories in the south, midwest and other traditionally 'red' areas is Obama. He can campaign where she can't, and he brings in many more new voters, independent voters and crossover republicans. He cannot be accused of "flip-flopping" on the key issue of Iraq, as Hillary will be. McCain will indeed unite his party (especially if Hillary is the nominee), and they will have a good chance to win unless we put up our strongest challenger: Obama. Voting for Obama should be a simple matter of pragmatism for democrats. We need to win, and we need to win big. The stakes are too high to take a chance on Hillary.

So who’s the front-runner?

Curious — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:34:50 GMT

Last night, a woman drove over 100 miles with her two young sons in fog, ice, and 40-below-zero weather to vote for Barack Obama in Alaska.

She is a Republican.

I have a question for Hillary supporters: Every Republican analyst out there says things like Ari Fleisher did last night (Please, please give me Hillary Clinton to run against in November,) because they know how divisive she is and that her negatives will most likely send many Independents to vote for McCain.

Knowing this, how do you rationalize continued support for Hillary?

I'm just curious, please don't see this as any kind of attack...

So who’s the front-runner?

PhillyEagles4Life, Philadelphia,PA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:35:08 GMT

Interesting (Columbia, MO)
I'm glad you can print your opinion too.
turd-infested opinion @ best , but hey, its a fre country.

So who’s the front-runner?

Kevin B, PA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:36:31 GMT

John from PA...I have to disagree you. Obama carries college educated voters in a big way. It's Hillary that is getting the non-college educated vote. As for the younger voters. I think it's safe to say that the younger adults these days are much more in touch with the issues then older Americans. They have access to the internet and have been taught about the Bill Clinton Administration in history class. I would be willing to put Obama's younger voters against Hillary's older voters in a debate any day!

The older boomers have not given us a meaningful president in decades. What makes you think the older voters are so good a picking the right candidate when they haven't been able to elect one? The closest they came to electing a decent president is Bill Clinton and if anyone takes a serious look back at his term, they will see that it was not that good. Yet they cling to that mantle because of a good economy he had nothing to do with. Once the .com bubble burst in 2001, the Clinton economy was done and we were only left with NAFTA and good jobs moving abroad. That is his true legacy.

So who’s the front-runner?

kevin mcneal — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:36:42 GMT

Give me a break...seriously. This guy actually just said this about himself.

I'm a mid-thirties Ivy League-educated white male who would happily compare resumes and intelligence with you and any of the so-called "mature and intelligent" voters who blindly march in lockstep to the Clinton pied-pipers who constantly push your buttons without you even realizing it.

Your Ivy League education seems to have really paid off. I can only assume you aced your Ego courses on your way way to attaining your Holier than Thou degree. Too bad your vote counts the same as all those poor, insipid, less fortunate, non-white upper middle class drones that vote for HRC. I'm guessing you actually think your vote should count for twice as much as the people that clean your Ivy League Hallways and scrub the toliets of your Ivy Tower. Way to show support...you must be proud.

So who’s the front-runner?

will San Jose, CA. — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:36:52 GMT

H.Clinton is the front runner, also
Look America H.Clinton will need Obama in Nov. there
is no way she can win with women and the latinos
votes in Nov the numbers will not add up
She will need young voters, white
males & black voter. The party will lose its steam
if he's not in the race in Nov. Because those voter
will not come out an vote for her.

So who’s the front-runner?

Nick Jackson — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:40:31 GMT

For the dems there was no progress for a clear winner but I think that this favors Obama, when you look at the states that are left to vote mostly on the 9th Obama seems to have the upper hand in 80% of those states. So even though Clinton is technically the front-runner Obama I think has the best shot.

So who’s the front-runner?

Bianca, Franklin, TN — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:42:10 GMT

I as a young person was inspired to go vote because of Obama and what he stands for. Most of the time the candidates are so-so. Honestly if we have another Clinton in the White House I would rather stay home.
In my opinion she seems very fake and manipulative. I would not want her as the leader of our nation.

So who’s the front-runner?

Vivi , Memphis, tn — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:46:28 GMT

I'm glad Hillary won Ca. and Mass.

I'm happy Ms. Clinton won Ca. and Mass. The Msnbc men simply refuse to say anything positive in their coverage of her. Even the women pundits are showing their bias. The kennedys got a kick in the pants. Keith took great pains to throw cold water on Ms. Clinton's wins with a "but" or "this doesn't mean this or that". Obama is their choice.
Vivi in Tenn.

So who’s the front-runner?

cs ny — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:48:03 GMT

Go to thomas.gov ---someone posted this site on a blog previously. It will show you the work done by Clinton and Obama. Clinton's record is really impressive as far as what bills she sponsored and actually made it through congress. You can do a specific search to compare the two and make informed decisions on their ability to work with congress and get things done. And stop paying attention to how many delegates or states each candidate won.

So who’s the front-runner?

JeanneGA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:48:27 GMT

Hillary will win Ohio, Maryland, Texas and Pennsylvania and that will be all for Obama. No more BO-he stinks!

So who’s the front-runner?

Candy B — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:50:31 GMT

It's amazing how so many (white) people still can not conceive of a black man with a real chance of becoming our next president. Just look at the language from these posts and it is clear that some people still are making excuses as to why (President) Obama did so well last night. He is in a dead heat with Clinton. He appeals to the (sane) masses, which is more than I can say about any Republican candidate. Thank GOD, he allowed us to see what taking a self righteous (Republicans) stance will get you........Bush. What a legacy! A lot of these (white) folks from the older generation, and with the Jim Crow mentality are dying. Now that's truly God blessing America!

So who’s the front-runner?

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:51:14 GMT

cisom-Calling Hillary an ultra liberal candidate is laughable. The women voted to go to war and co-sponsored a bill to outlaw flagburning. That's called pandering to the conservative, neo-cons, and I CAN BE JUST AS CRAZY AND MACHO AS THE VILLAGE IDIOT BUSH. You are watching too much of Fox news and listening to that fat druggy Rush.

So who’s the front-runner?

CJ — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:51:27 GMT

I haven't met a single person down here who said they would vote for Hillary, even my wife(we are both Dems) and her family don't want to vote for the spouse of an ex-president. I work with white men of all ages..republicans/dems.. they all prefer Obama over Clinton. By the way live in Alabama, work in Georgia. She can win hard core dems but it is a mistake to assume she can win outside of her identity groups. I think it's rediculous that some here still say Obama is only succeding because of the racial vote.

So who’s the front-runner?

A Concerned Citizen - Columbus, Ohio — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:53:45 GMT

Hillary is far too divisive and hence, she is simply not electable. So many people simply despise her - not because of her political views, but because she's a compulsive power-hungry liar. And those who vote for her are just too gullible to see through her slick exterior. If the democrats want to lose the general election, vote for Hillary! But if the democrats want any hope of beating a guy like John McCain, then Obama is the only answer. And if by some random chance, Hillary actually could win the general election...having her in the oval office would tear this country apart. The only way we can get anything accomplished is if we work together. Hillary would have just the opposite effect and our country would be more bi-partisan that it's ever been.

So who’s the front-runner?

Marianne, Beacon, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:54:47 GMT

You know what Sierra, I like Fred's thinking, I dont trust Obama! What experience does he have? and he will certainly screw this up for the Democrats, because I for one will switch if he is the only democratic choice

So who’s the front-runner?

Marianne, Beacon, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:55:47 GMT

Experience means everything!

So who’s the front-runner?

RMB, Seattle — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:56:42 GMT

It is statements like "if Hillary wins the nomination, I will vote for McCain" that make Obama supporters look like a bunch of spoiled brat "American Idol" voters. Do they really not care about his stand on the political issues, which is nearly identical to Clinton's? Also, Obama is supposed to be the candidate that stands for "building consensus" and yet these vacuous twerps claim they will vote for continuing the war in Iraq (perhaps to infinity?) and making tax cuts for the wealthiest americans permanent (to name just two of the things McCain has promised). They claim they will do this rather than do the alternative, which would be to "build consensus" within the Democratic party. This is very revealing about who these people are. Fortunately, true Democrats will vote in November for whichever candidate gets the nomination. The Democrats are the majority party. In addition, the majority of the people in this country no longer support the Bush administration's failed policies, which McCain has repeatedly pubicly supported. Couple those two facts together and there is no reason that either of the current democratic candidates could not win the election in November.

So who’s the front-runner?

Stacy, Virginia — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:58:46 GMT

Take out the inexperienced youth votes and the blacks voting along racial lines and you will see who is voting for Obama. When it gets down to the more knowledgeable and adult voters Obama will not win a national election. Fancy slogans can only go so far as ultimately you have to come up with more than fancy talk to get elected.
John Barnes, Overton, PA

Actually John, Barrack Obama won White men in the South and he won the white vote, both men and women in CA. He also carried Kansas, Colorado, and Missouri....not exactly filled with people of color. If he is doing well among the youth in America that can only be positive because isn't it wonderful that they are doing their civic duty and waking up to their responsibility in how government works. To say that he is only winning because of race is insulting and ignorant.

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:59:27 GMT

I guess I'm one of those uneducated older voters, (I'm a few courses shy of my M.A.) and OMG!!! and female, I'm also disabled and poor. So if the educated upper class voters went for Obama, then they essentially voted for Bush Lite. I love the way voters in MASS told their two white male senators where to get off after they both endorsed Obama. Even Hillary didn't expect to win that state. You can call it racism all you want, and Obama will have to because race is the only card he knows how to play. He had a mediocre record in the Illinois Senate and missed 83% of his votes in the U.S. Senate. Hillary just keeps on working hard. And for what I hope is the final time, HE WASN"T in the U.S. Senate when they voted on Iraq, so of course it's easy for him to say he was against the war from the beginning. It didn't MATTER! It doesn't take an uneducated Latino female to figure out that that it's HIS record that sucks. As for white males calling Asian Americans and Latinos poor and "non-college educated," you are exactly the kind of supporter Hillary Clinton doesn't want and apparently doesn't need. Let the rich white college-educated males stick with Obama -- and see how fast they turn on him in the general election. BTW, Dubya has an ivy-league education, for all the good it's done him -- or us.

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:00:00 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Teka, TX — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:06:57 GMT

Two clear and undoubtful options are now left.If Obama wins the nomination, just forget it he will absolutely beat Mccain. Just no problem for that.
If Hillary gets the nomination, the dem party will lose the presidency as usual. Because Bill and Hillary have already annoyed millions of Americans specially Africa Americans. They are now organizing by e-mails to vote against her if she is gonna be the nominee.

So who’s the front-runner?

rodeo, ellensburg, wa — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:07:05 GMT

If Hillary would get rid of the spinmeisters, she'd be doing better with educated voters who are tired of listening to her (and Bill) constantly insult our intelligence. Billary have been running since 2000 when they had to leave office and their tricks are shopworn and transparent. THERE IS no indication that Bill would not be running the show if she wins, or even if she is Obama's VP and she has Bill bail her out at every rough patch. We need a President who has not ridden Daddy's/Hubby's coattails to the White House. Peggy Noonan said it best last night--Obama is the Non-Hillary and that's the reason he's doing well.

So who’s the front-runner?

Dee/Tucson — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:07:25 GMT

What thrills me the most about yesterday is how Clinton won in Ma and Az. How those voters told Nepolitano and the Kennedys to shove it. Such highly touted endorsements and what did it get Obama. Two big losses. Too funny. Keep it up News Media so you can get more egg on your faces.

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri, Chicago, Illinois — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:08:11 GMT

So as long as Obama calls last night a "big victory" I suppose the male dominated media will buy it hook, line and sinker. In comparison, Hillary's speech was compassionate (she mentioned the victims of the tornados), understated, and went straight to the issues -- and it was short. Obama rambled on and on and used the words hope and change like he has all along -- except all they do is remind voters that he has a nothing record and nothing to offer voters besides me to John Edwards and ME TO Hillary Clinton. I don't think is so-called friends that talked him to running without any real experience in either domestic let alone foreign issues, did him any favors. And his white male endorsements particulary from those 2 guys in MASS absolutely backfired. The thing is I think he had the potential to be a really good U.S. Senator from Illinois. That's why I voted for him for that job. I've been disappointed ever since.

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri, Chicago, Illinois — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:08:11 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Dee/Tucson — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:08:17 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:09:52 GMT

Independents decide elections. Independents tend to like Obama and dislike Clinton. Independents also tend to like McCain.

Clinton v McCain - result is a GOP blow-out.

Obama v McCain - a battle of the titans. I can't recall any time in the past when both parties have put their best candidate with regard to independents forward. But Obama wins it because of all the situational factors favoring Democrats this time.

To nominate Clinton is to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And that's not even mentioning how she would energize the Republicans like no other nominee could.

So who’s the front-runner?

Paul, San Rafael, CA — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:10:25 GMT

When I talk to my Republican relatives about the campaign, they seem lost and somewhat despondent. Then I mention the name Hillary Clinton, and it's like somebody shot them full of adrenaline. Her positive numbers among the whole of the electorate - the only one that counts come November - never crack 50%. The GOP attack machine has been polishing their old Clinton scandal tidbits for years, hanging them on the mantle like a well-oiled rifle. Do we really want a fall campaign dominated by evasive answers to straight questions, accusations of flip-flopping on Iraq, reminders that these are the people who can't define the word "is?" The old hardline party Democratic voters need to step out of their "we just love Hillary" bubble and realize the simple fact - the Clintons will polarize this country, and cause us to lose the general election, yet again. Don't let it happen.

So who’s the front-runner?

Wasline, Brooklyn, NY — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:15:52 GMT

I don't think Hillary will be a good candidate to run this counrty b/c when her husband committed adultuary she did not have the strenght and the respect she deserves has a wife to stand up for her self and divorce him.I think she will run the country the same way. she is not going to be strong enough to make the type of the decision that this counrty needs right now to survive. I know that situation is totaly personal but when it envolve someone that works in the office it is not personal anymore.

So who’s the front-runner?

pat huntington ny — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:16:28 GMT

Hillary's victory in the AMERICAN SAMOAS shows she can run strong among people of color.

So who’s the front-runner?

Jim, Santa Cruz — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:16:54 GMT

They'll be neck and neck going into the clubhouse turn!

Get ready for a barnburner convention.

And who is Al Gore going to support?

Obama's greater oratory skills will energize the delegates and decide the contest.

So who’s the front-runner?

Marcia, New York City — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:17:13 GMT

Please ask Hillary why, if she worked so hard for 35 years and accomplished so much, we still need to address the same issues of health, education, safety, etc. etc. An analysis of the promises she and bill made when Bill ran for election and those she makes now, suggests that nothing will change with her in office. They had eight years! I also do not forget that they cost the taxpayers a lot of money because they would not tell the truth about Monica Lewinsky. We must not send those who still have old scores to settle to "clean" the people's White House.

So who’s the front-runner?

Shawn Carter — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:17:55 GMT

It appears to me that it was a draw between Obama and Clinton. Hillary can rightly brag that she won the most populous states (CA & NY). Obama can brag about winning more states total.
I believe that Obama has momentum, but Clinton is well organized and politically savy. I would give the edge to Clinton merely because she has long standing relationships with the Democratic party leaderhip which will become more important with super delegates.

So who’s the front-runner?

Mimi D, Miami, Florida — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:21:41 GMT

I am a regitered Republican. I will vote for Hillary if she is nomitated by the Democrats, if not, I will vote for the Republican if it's not Romney. I believe Hillary has the experience needed to lead this country. Let's not forget that politician many times say whatever people want to hear and not necessarily what they intend or can do. I believe that when Hillary speaks she is saying not necessarily what people want to hear, but what she feels she intend or can do. It is not just now that she promises to do things for the working class to gain votes (as others do). She has a tracked record. Additionally we must not forget the importance of the US int he international arena. We need an experienced President to be able to re-position the US in the international front. Hillary is better prepared to do so.

So who’s the front-runner?

Sharon-ann Baltimore Maryland — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:22:11 GMT

I am a 57 year old white female who makes approximately $37,000 a year. You would think I would be voting for Hillary Clinton--NO WAY!! I believe it's time this country voted for a true expert in thwarting terrorism--John McCain. No one before him could really boast of any military experience (Clinton, Bush) that's why we have so many problems-we have people who are running (or have run) who have no business being "Commander and Chief" over the military because they have NO EXPERIENCE (Bush comes to mind). Wake up people while this is still a free country.

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri, Chicago, Illinois — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:22:30 GMT

I love it that those who bet against Hillary and called everyone who voted for her older, uneducated, and poor. Well, thanks for lumping me in that category even though I'm just 3 courses shy of my M.A.. I really love it that Ted Kennedy and John Kerry must be crying in their beer after their endorsements BACKFIRED in their own state. I don't think women and other minorities like being told what to do by 2 white men. If the establishment Dems keep treating Hillary and Bill like SH**, then you are looking at a McCain presidency and we will be in Iraq for about a 100 years. But since I'm so OLD because I didn't vote for Obama, then I won't be around to worry about it.

So who’s the front-runner?

jerry/corpus christi texas — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:24:22 GMT

What is so funny about The Clinton's is that she could have wrapped this up last year if they hadn't given five answers on the drivers licenses for illegals problem.

That is when he world caved in when they screwed up that easy answer.

So who’s the front-runner?

AHoye — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:24:58 GMT

It seems as if the media-TV and print-want to be the king makers and annoint Obama as the democratic candidate. But since Senator Clinton will not go away they-the press- are stuggling.
I am so tired of being told who I should vote for.
Dragging out Ted Kennedy and Maria Shriver and Oprah does nothing but make me want to change the TV station or turn the page in the newspaper.
I will support whoever ends up as the democratic nominee but I think things should play out and the convention should be what it used to be-a place where the candidate is actually chosen.

So who’s the front-runner?

Koll — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:26:04 GMT

Stop criticizing all the candidates.
They all have something to offer.
Just wait and see who wins.
Anybody would be better than who we have in office now. Yes anybody or anything.

So who’s the front-runner?

kirt Kansas city Mo — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:26:20 GMT

oday I hope that we learn something from Ronald Regan Democrate should not say ill words about another democrate. If Clinton/Obama or a Obama/Clinton ticket occures, bring alone Bill Richardson with John Edwards then the white house gose back to democrates. If we fracture we give it back to the republicans. Think about it!

So who’s the front-runner?

S. Awasthi — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:26:42 GMT

Obama did not win the states that provide lead to a democratic candidate in November election. Winning red states does not mean much since in Novemeber they will surely go republican, what will democrates do if Obama is the candidate. Can not count on red state much.

So who’s the front-runner?

Lorraine Taube Brockway Township, Michigan — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:28:32 GMT

Hillary scares me to death with her socialist ideas. Besides she is not a nice person. My brothers have a name for her which I will not repeat. Besides,people, we care at war. We need someone who knows how to fight. Those Iragis,Muslims, are not fooling or playing games. I like some of Ron Paul's ideas but righyt now we need John McCain. Red Hot temper and all. GW is just too nice. Too kind. GO JOHN1111

So who’s the front-runner?

Meri, Chicago, Illinois — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:29:18 GMT

Just a reminder, Hillary Clinton was working for civil rights before Barack Obama even knew what it was. She encountered more sexism than he did racism, since he was born in Hawaii and spent his early years in Africa. She helped women form a black studies dept as an undergrad. She worked for the Children's Defense Fund in Arkansas. She's walked the walk. Obama wants to talk the talk, but he's no MLK, let alone JFK. Even Ted Kennedy couldn't catch on that Camelot died with his nephew off the coast of Martha's Vineyard in 1999. He was NEVER the heir to Camelot and it wasn't his legacy to pass on. And that's exactly why his endorsement and other white male endorsements of Obama backfired. As for Obama's trying to find out about "women's issues ONE week before Super Tuesday, here's a hint, "TO LITTLE, TOO LATE!

So who’s the front-runner?

nadeem, Canada — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:30:07 GMT

Jeff,

There is nothing false about hope

We are the 'one' we've been waiting for

- Barak Obama

So who’s the front-runner?

Kathy Casey — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:33:35 GMT

Hillary has won all the largest populated states so far and will continue to in Texas (Latino vote) strong incumbent support too, Ohio, the governor and the Senator endosed her, Penn, Ed Rendall, I need to say no more, Washington, Senator Cantrell and governor endosement, and probably Louisana with the reduction of the black race in New Orleans and endosements by the State Senator. Kentucky will vote for Hillary and so will Virginia and probably Maryland. Closer in Maryland. DC is Obama country mostly black and 5 delgates. That leaves Wisconsin NC
West Virginia, Nebraska and a couple of small states up for grabs. Go Hillary with your 100 delegate lead at least with Super Delegates

So who’s the front-runner?

Ed A. — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:38:23 GMT

Obama is idealistic and therefore caters to the young collegiate folks who are hell bent on changing the establishment without having any clue of what that means and he also caters to the affluent middle class and much wealthy moderates. Obama also caters to the African American voters cause he is black, if any african american tells you otherwise its not true. The Clintons have done more for african americans than barack ever did in the illinoise state senate, but yet they vote for barack because they identify with him. Hispanics remember who was on their side and therefore they stay faithfull to the clintons. Time and time again, Clinton wins the votes of those making under $75K....last I checked the democratic party is made up of primarily the poor, lower to middle class people. A couple ivy leaguers have posted on here and I say to you my friends....you vote your moderate ways...Hillary stands for the very poor to lower middle class folks.....you my friends are not true democrats you my friends are what we call in the closet republicans who dont believe in all the bible thumping.

So who’s the front-runner?

kirt Kansas city Mo — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:40:58 GMT

So who’s the front-runner?

Hillary — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:45:30 GMT

You knew it had to happen...the dems are now eating their own...why is it that white ivy league guilt ridden do gooders think their votes for a black candidate makes them "cool" or part of the "new" generation?

So who’s the front-runner?

ny reality — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:45:43 GMT

John McCain's experience? Experience to keep us in Iraq for a hundred years? Experience to have more wars and more wars and more wars? Or perhaps it's his experience before his decades in the Senate? That was all in the military right? I think the American people are looking for a little bit more in terms of experience, or a least a little bit more in terms of vision than war, war, oh yes, more war. And that's not counting the wars he's having within his own party which is sure going to add to his experience in being able to bring the country together when right now he can not even bring his own party together