First thoughts: Some good GOP news

jaycee, Ventura, California — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:27:56 GMT

Some people seem to find some sort of conflict between Barack’s message of change and his welcoming old guard politicians like Ted Kennedy to his campaign. You knuckleheads still don’t quite get it, do you? Barack intends to send the folks who are determined to fight off to the sidelines, while a majority of Americans come together to solve problems. How does it follow that he has to exclude established politicians if we are trying to bring people together? I certainly hope Barack is a politician himself, or he is wasting my time. I’m counting on him to not only be a politician, but a shrewd one. He hasn’t let me down yet.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lynette, NYC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:34:28 GMT

The only thing missing: an overall delegate lead and a national primary poll lead.

HAHA these are the two things that he needs the most....

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lynette, NYC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:41:13 GMT

JAycee, he hasnt done a thing one way or another to " let you down" so that comment is inane. No one has done anything to let anyone down.

It is my belief that Howard Dean will maneuver a deal with these two and Clinton will bow out gracefully. then either that idiot hawk McCAin will win ( because if you dont think Hillary Clinton can over come him, think again) or Somehow Obama squeaks it out and then we can all sit back and say ok, what are you going to do now???

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Pat, Boston, MA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:45:56 GMT

I found Peggy Noonan's article compelling, for I too, believe Barack Obama has a real shot at this thing. But I'm not hearing this from the pundits. I can't tell if they're all downplaying the significance of his wins on Tuesday or perhaps I'm just missing something?

I thought he did a trememdous job on Tuesday. But that's not what I'm hearing.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Andrew, Williamsburg, VA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:48:25 GMT

I agree with jaycee. Is Obama supposed to denounce Kennedy's and Kerry's endorsements? To say publically that he neither wants, nor needs their support. Be realistic here.

I also question the assumption that McCain's apparent clutch of the nomination will put him in better stead than the Democratic nominee come November. I think a real, down-to-the-wire contest between Obama and Clinton could actually serve to excite and politicize Democrats and independents rather than destroy the eventual nominee.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

CitizenJ — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:49:12 GMT

The only thing missing: an overall delegate lead and a national primary poll lead.

HAHA these are the two things that he needs the most....

Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:34 AM)

Well Lynette, at the end of February, he will have the overall delegate lead. And I disagree with the fact that either of them need a national primary poll lead. You should get your "HAHA"s in while you can.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

sotiredofignorance — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:51:23 GMT

This is how the Clintons get themselves in trouble every single time. By not releasing income information, she will resurrect every old memory of her almost pathological need for privacy. Her inability to see that she needs to show every effort to be honest and aboveboard is what will cost her the election, and why a lot of us are very tired of the Clintons.

So to all you Clinton supporters, fair question...why won't Senator Clinton release tax returns? Senator Obama has....and that my friends is the difference between the two campaigns.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lynette, NYC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:52:45 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lynette, NYC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:56:47 GMT

Listen if Obama gets the democratic nomination, I will vote for him in Novemeber, but until that time, I am entitled to be in favor of the candidate I choose. Barack Obama is all talk and his rock star mantra is amazing. its BLAH BLAH BLAH to me. Its too bad that the media has crowned him their golden boy and the obamaites are flocking. I just hope its all worth it.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Ron, TX — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:57:00 GMT

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120241915915951669.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries --
Mr. Obama's achievement on Super Tuesday was solid and reinforced trend lines. The popular vote was a draw, the delegate count a rough draw, but he won 13 states, and when you look at the map he captured the middle of the country from Illinois straight across to Idaho, with a second band, in the northern Midwest, of Minnesota and North Dakota. He won Missouri and Connecticut, in Mrs. Clinton's backyard. He won the Democrats of the red states.
...
He is the brilliant young black man as American dream. No consultant, no matter how opportunistic and hungry, will think it easy--or professionally desirable--to take him down in a low manner. If anything, they've learned from the Clintons in South Carolina what that gets you.
...
Mrs. Clinton would be easier for Republicans. With her cavalcade of scandals, they'd be delighted to go at her. They'd get medals for it. Consultants would get rich on it.

The Democrats have it exactly wrong. Hillary is the easier candidate, Mr. Obama the tougher. Hillary brings negative; it's fair to hit her back with negative. Mr. Obama brings hope, and speaks of a better way. He's not Bambi, he's bulletproof.
XXXXXXXXXXX

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

RGO, California — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:57:26 GMT

It doesn't matter what McCain or the GOP do to try and unify their base, the GOP Pundits have spoken. They will not support McCain for betraying their party. The DEMS will win the White House in Nov. McCain is DOA before their convention even begins.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Buzz — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:59:29 GMT

Well, whoever wins the Vice-Presidency will have some pretty big shoes to fill. I just heard our idiot President say, at the CPAC gathering, that Cheney was the "best Vice President in history">

I'm still laughing. I'm also still hopeing whoever gets the final nod on the GOP side asks Bush to campaign for him.

What a loser!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

CitizenJ — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:59:50 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jodie, Austin, Texas — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:00:38 GMT

The Clintons should release their tax records NOW!! If they don't it will become a HUGE issue - not just during the primaries, but in the general election if she gets the nomination. We Democrats need to project TRANSPARENCY. I was for John Edwards. Have been leaning towards Obama. I will DEFINITELY vote FOR OBAMA if Hillary stonewalls on this tax issue. WHAT IS SHE HIDING??? It IS a real issue now that she is SELF-FINANCING her campaign. RELEASE YOUR TAX RECORDS HILLARY!!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Wendy PA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:02:48 GMT

I hope the state of Virginia votes for Huckabee and sends John McCain a message that the country doesn't
need another arrogant, angry republican in the white house.

A McCain administration is equal to giving George Bush a third term.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

MK,MO — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:06:28 GMT

to all the clinton fans, if the clintons have nothing to hide and their finances are on the 'up and up' why won't they release their tax returns for all to see? seems odd doesn't it?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Kevin, Tavernier, FL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:07:45 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Torie, Seattle — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:09:46 GMT

Has everyone seen the latest TIME poll which shows McCain vs. Hillary as a tie, but has Obama beating McCain by 6 opoints? Other polls are showing the same trend. Obama is definitely the best hope for the Democrats in 2008. This is a no-brainer. Conservatives may not love McCain, but they despise Hillary. Not liking someone as much as the GOP does not like Hillary can be a great motivator. Democrats, we would be very foolish to put up the Clintons vs. McCain. We need to nominate Barack Obama!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

HP Boston — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:13:02 GMT

Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, Jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton she will NOT vote but if its a McCain vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCain. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.
Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:52 AM)

---------------------------------------------------
You are definitely on to something Lynette, most definitely.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

chuck — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:14:35 GMT

Karl Rove and Sean Hannity on McCain wanting to face Hillary in the fall:

HANNITY: Karl, am I right in my thinking that if I'm John McCain, I would rather go up against Hillary than Barack Obama? We're short on time.

ROVE: Yes, absolutely. Everybody knows who she is and has strong opinions about her.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/karl_rove_on_the_democratic_race.html

Obama's the electable one. Republicans acknowledge it -- Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Peggy Noonan, George Will and many others.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Dancy Dess, Tampa, FL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:17:19 GMT

WE WANT TO KNOW WHY SENATOR CLINTON, WILL NOT RELEASE HER TAX RETURNS ?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Nashville_fan — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:17:54 GMT

The fact that so many Democratic voters who admire and respect both Hillary and Bill Clinton can't stomach the thought of them moving back into the White House should give the Clinton's and the Democractic Party pause.

If you can't get a majority of the people who like and respect you to support your candidacy, that is a MAJOR CLUE about her chances in the general election.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jack Brady, Lee, NH — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:19:27 GMT

Do the math: Huckabee does not have a chance, period.
Against Clinton or Obama, MCCAIN will win handsdown. Why? He is the stronger, more experianced, credible, leader we have to choose from. Differances aside, MCCAIN is the only one that will show the right change and make the appropriate *less tax* progress.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Sierra, SF — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:19:31 GMT

Hillary's 35 years of 'experience' includes:
Monica Lewinski
Gennifer Flowers
Juanita Broaddrick rape
Kathleen Willey rape
Whitewater
Cattle futures
Rose Law firm
TravelGate
HairCutGate
the NAFTA sell out
the WTO sell out
the Millenium Communications bill
Vincent Foster
Buddist Fund raising
Norman Hsu
Johnny Treu
Peter Paul
Marc Rich
Voting for the Iraq War
Voting for Kyl/Lieberman
Voting AGAAINST the cluster bomb ban
yada, yada, tada....

That's some interesting 'EXPERIENCE' Billary

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Pat, Boston, MA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:19:36 GMT

I'm also hearing that Senator Obama is going to win the next 7 or 8 contests. Doesn't anyone take a minute and wonder why these are automatic wins for Obama? How significant is this?

And what does this say about Senator Clinton? Her support doesn't appear to be too vast in this country, considering she had a huge lead for a long, long time.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

MK,MO — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:20:05 GMT

kick back and watch the clinton machine go into hyperdrive, people in overcoats in dark allies exchanging envelopes of cash, hopefully not to many people will 'come up missing', obama has the people behind him, but the superdelegates are the establishment through and through, and hillary has already committed to keep their trough full, will they have the gall to vote against the will of the people? most likely

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

HP Boston — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:20:32 GMT

I am so tired of the MSNBC/OBAMA network. This is the only news station that has Obama winning the delegate count. CNN, FOX, AP, etc.. all have Hillary ahead. How is this possible? It is so frustrating hearing everyone from Matthews to Olberman, Tucker, etc. just keep bashing and slandering Hillary every chance they get. I wonder when she wins the nomination if they will all take the Ann Coulter stance and switch party lines because of how much they are Clinton haters.. We are all democrats here stupid....We need the white house in 08. I can't wait until Hillary gets the nomination.
Kevin, Tavernier, FL (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:07 AM)
------------------------------------------------
Kevin, the people who OWN the media are not DEMOCRATS!
The guys who report need to keep their jobs, they must do as they are told, KILL HILLARY.
Got it? They have no pride and no credibility. They had to do the same when the WAR was the push of the day. They are relentless. They are afraid.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

John — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:20:38 GMT

I just wanted to thank the people of Iowa for giving Conservatives John McCain. Way to think it through Iowa! If you had done your job we would have Mitt Romney as our candidate. I am now and forever will be a Romney Republican. ROMNEY 2012.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Paula, Drayton Plains, Michigan — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:21:45 GMT

Bottom line for Democrats:

If we want to win in the fall we need to nominate Barack Obama.

He can energize Democrats. Hillary and Bill have alienated many Dems, including me. I'll sit this one out if Hillary is the nominee. Too nasty a campaign for my tastes.

He can appeal to Independents. Hillary unlikely to win many, if any.

He can appeal to some in the GOP. Hillary can't. She unites the GOP for McCain!

So, if we want to win, the math is easy. 30% of people are Democrats. 30% are GOP voters. 30% are Independents. To win, a candidate must get votes from all three groups. McCain can. Obama can. Hillary cannot.

Therefore, Obama should be the Democratic nominee.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Sierra, SF — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:22:16 GMT

Now, the 'experienced' candidate is John McCain

The anti war candidate is Barack Obama

The pro war candidate is John McCain

The candidate who FLIP FLOPPED on war is Billary
She was pro war befor she was anti war

Want experience ? Vote for Joh McCain
Want wisdom and judgement ? Vote for Barack Obama
Want an opportunist ? Bring back Billary

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Daniel, NY — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:23:33 GMT

I have put together a basic chart of the most recent delegate allocations from every February 5th voting state. There are only 70 delegates outstanding right now, and you should check out these numbers which are very hard to find in most websites at this point: http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2008/02/february-5th-delegate-count.html

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Class Warrior, D.C. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:23:50 GMT

Unless the Huckster's God obligingly strikes McCain dead, it's mathematically impossible for him to get more delegates than McWars. Period. He can, however, try to jockey for a Veep position, but there are lots of right-wing zealots who do't even consider Hucklebury to be idealogically pure enough. And he'l have to contend with the loss of Crazy Annie Coulter, who has publically promised to campaign for Hillary (assuming Hil's the nominee, thus making a bigger ass out of her and herself) if McWars is the nominee; what a loss to the Republican Party!
As for the debate thing, yeah, Clinton sounds like an also-ran squealing for yet more boring-ass debates, and Obama ought to continue to act like the frontrunner. As for Michegan and Florida, remember that the press (at least) conclded that caucuses favored Obama, because no one wanted to look like a racist by voting for lily-white Hillary. So let them caucus...although I agree, it makes te DNC, and by extension, their nominee, look weak in handling---oh, let's say, Iran a year or two down the line. Otherwise, I say, send in the clowns and let them caucus, as it will probably help Obamarama more than Hilarity.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

JB Hull, IA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:23:52 GMT

Though the real election is nine months away, Sen. Barack Obama would fare slightly better than Sen. Hillary Clinton in a head to head match-up with Sen. John McCain if the general election were held today, a new TIME poll reveals.

Obama captured 48% of the vote in the theoretical match-up against McCain's 41%, the TIME poll reported, while Clinton and McCain would deadlock at 46% of the vote each. Put another way, McCain looks at the moment to have a narrowly better chance of beating the New York Senator than he does the relative newcomer from Illinois.

The difference, says Mark Schulman, CEO of Abt SRBI, which conducted the poll for TIME, is that "independents tilt toward McCain when he is matched up against Clinton But they tilt toward Obama when he is matched up against the Illinois Senator." Independents, added Schulman, "are a key battleground."

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

kevin FL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:26:34 GMT

Obama is a motivational speaker, yes. If you actually listen to him he is very inspirational. So is my preacher and he is not qualified to be the President of the US. His words have no substance. It's all about change change change, blah, blah, blah. I want the person who is going to be ready to tackle the horror of the White House after 7 years of you know what. I really hope that he accepts the challenge for the debates and is not a coward. We need to see more of him and what he is about. I hope he is not a coward

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Bill in NC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:28:04 GMT

Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, Jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton she will NOT vote but if its a McCain vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCain. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.

We've heard of a Jewish woman finding a Clinton easier to swallow before this election cycle.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Pat, Boston, MA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:28:47 GMT

Ron, Tx: Can you tell - does Senator Obama have a chance at being competitive with Senator Clinton in Texas?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

DANCY DESS,TAMPA,FL. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:28:58 GMT

WE WANT TO KNOW WHY SENATOR OBAMA, WILL NOT DEBATE SENATOR CLINTON ?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Sierra, SF — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:30:14 GMT

If you decide NOT to vote for the Democratic nominee...

It's IMPORTANT TO VOTE, ANYWAY

If the party splits on the Presidential nominee
we NEED TO WIN THE HOUSE AND SENATE

If you don't want to vote for the eventual nominee
skip that race, but vote for the 'down ticket' races

Vote Progressive, vote Democratic

I won't vote for Billary after the 'race baiting'
They've sunk too low for me
Not even, Clinton-Obama

But, I will still vote
And, I'll vote for Democrats in state and local elections and for ballot propositions

Hopefully, clinton and Obama supporters can agree on this

The thought of a Republican President with a Republican Senate and a Republican House is a nightmare scenario

Clinton and Obama supporters seem to be playing 'chicken' with each other in saying they won't support the other candidate.....

FINE, but vote Democratic in the OTHER RACES

IT'S IMPORTANT !!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Melissa Dess, Saint Petersburg, Fl. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:32:19 GMT

If you want to know why Senator Obama will not debate, Senator Clinton. We'll it's because he's afraid America will see him for what he is. "Not having the experience/knowledge to lead this great Nation at this time in our history.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Patrick, Indianapolis — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:32:34 GMT

Lynette,

You must have the pulse of all the Republicans in America. You think that because your boss would vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee all Republicans would. You must feel proud to have a boss that represents such a large cross-section of America. I guess I should just give up and not even vote since your staunchly conservative, religiou, jewish boss is going to vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee. Thanks for the information.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Michelle, Wallingford, PA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:33:03 GMT

Obama is a community organizer not the President of the United States, he has no experience and this country will go to hell in a hand basket, look what happened with the incompetence of Bush, and you all voted for him because you wanted to have a beer with him. Now you want to vote for someone who can preach, we don't need a preacher we need a President who is smart and tough and that's Hillary whether you people like her or not!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

converse — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:33:11 GMT

"By the way, can the Clinton campaign get away with their promise to wait to release their tax returns after the primary season?"

No. And, by that, I mean "No".

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lucy, Portland, Maine — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:16 GMT

Oh no, not MORE secrecy from the Clintons! If she doesn't release her tax records now this is going to become another in a long line of cover-ups by the Clintons. She opened this door by writing herself a check for 5 million dollars. This is just more fodder for the GOP. Democrats, are we going to let this secretive couple RUIN our chances for victory in the fall? Can't you just see the GOP smiling and rubbing their hands together with glee at the thought of Hillary as the nominee? It isn't rocket science, folks. The history of Hillary and Bill will be a treasure trove for the GOP. And this latest tax return issue is just another example. We Democrats will get just what we deserve - President John McCain - if we are so self-defeating that we nominate Hillary Clinton.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

oknOK — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:38:12 GMT

Why do people think Obama is a tougher candidate for McCain? I don't see somebody who is as vocal, headstron as McCain "laying down" for Obama. However, to some degree, McCain will face just what Clinton has which is that legitimate questions, comments are twisted to seem racial or attacking. Because of his race, it seems some have placed Obama in a "glass house". I also think that's part of why the media only shows positives about him. Before some of you Obama supporters come unglued, please be honest with yourselves. He is not a saint; he is not perfect. He should be subjected to the same scrutiny as other candidates.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Sierra, SF — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:38:21 GMT

David Shuster interviews Slick Willie:

'...DAVID SHUSTER: Bill, there's just something a little bit unseemly to me that Chelsea's out there calling up celebrities, saying support my mom, and she's apparently also calling these super delegates.

BILL PRESS: Hey, she's working for her mom. What's unseemly about that? During the last campaign, the Bush twins were out working for their dad. I think it's great, I think she's grown up in a political family, she's got politics in her blood, she loves her mom, she thinks she'd make a great president --

SHUSTER: But doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?...'

Shuster: Chelsea's Being 'Pimped Out'

Now that you mention it, yes it is weird

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Independent in CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:40:26 GMT

The Tax returns...Hum....

Well no matter how much people like the Clinton's these are the types of things that make them come across a little less than transparent - also making Chelsea call the Superdelegates to ask for support is strange. It seems slightly creepy to me - is Obama suppose to have his young daughters start calling super delegates?....it seems like they are pimping her out politically.....

Kevin in FL: CNN, FOX and AP are adding the Super Delegates (Which they have to take the various campaigns word on)& which can switch sides (You apparently have not been paying attention to the details....) MSNBC is listing the totals each candidate has actually won to date....

Looks like Michigan will hold a Caucus as African Americans Democrats there have been pressuring the local party to actually be able to vote....

Florida on the other hand is suppose to speak to the credentials committee (Cheaper than a 2nd election) which will be made up of a Clinton and Obama group that should vote to split those delegates based on the popular vote of all states that have voted.

Anyone want to weigh in?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

J Pate, Raleigh NC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:40:57 GMT

About Hillary's reason for not releasing her tax returns....here's the reason....Bill has brokered a multi-million dollar deal with the Dubai Port Authority .....not too very long ago....suddenly Hillary is able to "loan" her campaign millions....this information came from one of the commentators on the FOX News channel....wonder how she will repay the Saudi's if she gets to be president? As for us Republicans, we will stand behind the Republican candidate no matter who that person is, because the country cannot withstand a democratic Congress and a democratic President....

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Lucinda,Albuquerque,New Mexico — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:42:29 GMT

McCain!?
Let's get real. Only a few people walking around wearing blinders think that G.Bush has done a good job. All the others (Rep. and Dems.) know how much damage he has done as PTOS. We need someone who is not wearing blinders to get into the White House. Be honest...isn't McCain just going to follow in Bush's footsteps? Do the majority of Americans want more of that guy?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Sierra, SF — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:46:41 GMT

From Campaign Diaries:

'...Total of pledged delegates allocated on February 5th:

Clinton: 817 delegates
Obama: 796
Outstanding: 70

Total of pledged delegates, including Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina:

Clinton: 865 delegates
Obama: 859

Outstanding: 70

The count is agonizingly close and will change as states finish reporting their delegate attributions. It is clear that Super Tuesday resolved nothing and that we are in this for the long-run. As Politico's Ben Smith wrote yesterday: "Indiana and N.C. vote on May 6, which may be the new April 22, after April 22 becomes the new March 4, which is already the new Feb. 5."...'

Too close to call
It's time for Obama to start talking about POCKET BOOK ISSUES

Social Security, Health care, taxes, education
THAT will bring in women, blue collar and Latino voters

Use the financial edge you have to start advertizing in Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania

SOCK IT TO ME !!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Whitney, Philadelphia, PA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:47:28 GMT

The media is lazy, misleading and flat often times because they won't do the hard work.

Super Tuesday results were simply a clear victory for the Dems and Obama. The Dems won the turnout numbers and Obama closed the gap and actually won the final delegate count. He did you say, check the final count. Folks try to spin it for Clinton, but how did she do? She won a lot of delegates from NY, her adopted home state. Okay! She also won Cali and a bunch of delegates. Facts are facts, close to 50% of the voters voted in Cali shortly after New Hampshire, which Clinton won. She had a 20 percentage point lead in Cali going into SC. If true, then Obama picked a 2:1 margin on election day, which pretty much matched the final day polls.

Instead we get fragmented discussions about absentee ballots and results. Obama closed an incredible gap in a very short amount of time. Unfortunately, the media was talking about the SC results two days after the election instead of focusing on Super Tuesday. As we go forward, Obama will probably inch ahead State by State, but because of the proportionality it will be impossible for anyone candidate to close this out. With that Hillary will argue for Michigan and Florida delegates to count in her count. While I understand her position, she wants to win, the argument shows a lack of class on her and Bill's part given the fact that they signed on to the party rule to not count these delegates. Plus, were she and Obama to compete there is not way her margin of victory would be upheld. Of course she realizes that as well. It should have never happened in the first place. Thanks Howard Dean.

To msnbc and other new outlets, do your homework, do the math and be consistent. Better yet, get rid of the maps and colored states. And by all means stop using blue and red colors. Simply list the states and percentages for each candidate, vertically. Also breakout regular delegates from super delegates. In addition, footnote whether the delegate count includes Michigan and Florida.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

E Heffron — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:47:54 GMT

Obama winning the caucus in Minnesota did not sway me a bit, we are the state that put Ventura in for govenor and Mondale ; noothing to be proud of. We are the state that picks the fringe candidates. And now the republicans are thinking about Pawlenty; our govenor for VP. He is a big failure as govenor.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Pattie — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:48:34 GMT

Here's evidence that McCain may have problems getting the conservative vote and that Obama has more crossover appeal than Clinton.

In a Utah poll, 30 percent of the voters chose McCain, 25 percent chose Obama, 11 percent chose Clinton, and 2 percent chose Huckabee (whom they blame for Romney's losses). 22 percent don't know what they will do now.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=2625332

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Karen Patterson, Roswell, GA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:49:11 GMT

Attention Superdelegates - Hillary cannot win in November.

How will she get more Independent votes than McCain? THAT IS THE KEY! THE INDEPENDENT VOTE!

OBAMA DOES APPEAL TO INDEPENDENTS! (and even some in the GOP!)

Superdelegates - Obama can win in November. Case closed.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

JT, Texas — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:49:59 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

AP from IL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:57:31 GMT

I agree with this theory: The Dems are moving to a landslide victory in the fall. Not only the presidency but a majority of senate and congressional seats as well. The Republicans know it and that is pretty much why Romney backed out as he did.

Romney and the conservative wing of their party is content to wait this thing out. They want Hillary as the nominee and potentially even the president for 1 reason. She is the rallying cause they need to unite their party again. She will do for the Republicans what Bush did for us. Every conservative pundit, editorialist and politician will spend the next 4 years in an all out assault against the new/old Clinton administration. Is that what people want to go through again?

Now maybe you can say Obama will get the same treatment but I don't believe it will be anything close to the blood bath their gearing up for against Hillary. Dems need to wake up and realize that on the surface both Obama and Hillary will make decent presidents. What we need to consider is the long term strategy of maintaining the white house and congress long enough to get something done. Obama is the only one who can who can do that.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

DJ,Spokane, WA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:57:46 GMT

Barack Hussein Obama
Louis Farrakhan
church leader J. Wright.

Please do your homework

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Bill C., Bangor,Maine — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:58:36 GMT

COME TAKE A LOOKSIE...hillaryclintoncom, no reservations necessary.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:58:41 GMT

Sierra - I think you're reaching with the Chelsea thing. There's nothing strange about a daughter working for a parent's campaign. The only thing with Chelsea is that she's been kept so silent for so long, its a little different that now we're seeing her play a bigger role.

Telling a 4th grader he was a member of the press and thus Chelsea couldn't talk with him was strange. Making phone calls on behalf of her mom isn't.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Rick — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:03:54 GMT

Mcwar is just going to give us a 3rd bush term on steroids...more wars...more deficits...more poorly qualifed, incompetent morons from rightwing law schools...more pandering to the christian right...more brownies, rummys and pat paulson, I mean hank paulsons....hope the dims get their act together and shove clinton over the side soon

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Harold Jackson, Memphis, Tn. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:04:26 GMT

Hey JT, Texas... Your absolutely correct, what is Obama hiding that he will not debate the issues "one on one" with Clinton. They have only debated one on on one "once". Are you all so bent on electing a President without a "full" and open discussion ? Let the debates begin now, Senator Obama !

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Harold Jackson, Memphis, Tn. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:05:30 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Larry Charleston, SC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:09:22 GMT

Hey Buzz, I think the greatest VP was Mondale. Oh yeah, remember the landslide Vs Reagan shortly thereafter. Cater / Mondale, worst embarassment in history!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Dominic Iacopino, Brick, NJ — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:09:44 GMT

To those who think Obama is more electable than Hillary, chew on these tidbits. If McCain campaigns on the question of "In a time of crisis and war who do you think will be a better President, people will decisively agree it is McCain. If Obama wins the nomination, the Republican "attack machine" will pin the label on him as the "Black Candidate". See the the Republicans know they don't need the black vote to win the election, all they need to do is galvanize the white vote. Also the Republicans will appeal to the blue collar and middle American voter, by painting Obama as an elitist, the darling of the liberal "wine and cheese" Kennedy wing of the Democratic party. They will portray McCain as "The Regular Guy" candidate, one you can sit down and have a beer with after a hard day's work. Hillary, well everyone knows her baggage, it's been out front for the last 16 years. There's not much left they can lob at her that we all haven't heard. If Obama is the nominee, who knows what dirt the Republicans will pull out of the closet to smear him with, for you see he has been the media darling to date, what happens when he and his record become more and more scrutinized in the glare of a general election. Just look at the exit polls, Hillary overwhelmingly carrys the blue collar vote while Obama carries the elitist upper class, college egghead Kennedy wing of the party. I think secretly the Republicans are dying to run against Obama, exactly for some of the reasons I stated above. Hillary has a lot of baggage, that's true but at least we know what it is. Remember, better the devil you know!!!!!!!

Also for those who are clamoring for the Clintons to release their tax returns, may be they will when Obama gives us a plausible answer as to why he voted "Present" 133 times in the Illinois legislature and why all his records from that time were mysteriously shredded.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Tina Quinn, South Bend — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:13:28 GMT

As for Chelsea being "pimped out". She is being pimped, by her parents. Chelsea is an adult, and is able to make her own decisions, but yes, she is being used as a stage prop by her parents. It's embarrassing to watch.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Frank Hill, Port Townsend, WA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:14:49 GMT

Yeah, everyone knows y'all gotta keep your thing going,
but some of you just do not seem to understand: We
don't need good news FOR the GOP; we need good news
FROM the GOP. Like, positive economic news. Like, victorious military news. Like, big time "APE" (that's "athletic" "political" "economic") phonies IN JAIL news!
Otherwise, the news is just like the source: PHONY NEWS!
Thanks, Frank

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jick The Wonder Dog, Millersville, PA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:16:22 GMT

The best thing that could happen is to NEVER EVER have a Clinton in or near the White House again. The first Clinton was without a doubt the worst example of a president in American History. I say that as a Democrat for 20 years. It's people like the Clintons that caused me to switch parties. No matter who gets the nomination I will never vote for Hilary and her first Lady Billy.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Independent in CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:18:46 GMT

Who gives a damn about the Clintons tax returns, the IRS must have been satisfied with them. As for me I am more interested in hearing them debate the issues, but Senator Obama doesn't want that, people might realize he is not the second coming.
JT, Texas (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:49 AM)

*****************************************************
Dude - they have Debated 18 times where were you???????

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

no longer watch msnbc — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:19:32 GMT

How can so many voters be afraid of John Bush Mccain?I see the spoilers in the democratic party are still up to their devisive tactics.Destroy one dem to build up another.What is wrong with just saying good things about you voting choice?Do you have to destroy the one that may win the primary?You will be as much at fault as Jerry and sierra if the republicans once again sit in Bushs throne.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Hardworking American — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:19:36 GMT

Read this to understand who is needed most:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/opinio n/08brooks.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&a mp;oref=slogin

For real hard working Americans, Hillary is the one who is needed the most.

I always felt Obama supporters are rich selfish people who just need inspiration (as they get everything else easily in life) but they never understood the struggle which most Americans face.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Can you post this — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:21:06 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Belisarius — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:24:03 GMT

A MISSIVE TO THE TRUE 'FOOT SOLDIERS OF THE REAGAN REVOLUTION':

PRIMO: We face a double edged sword: stick to our conservative principles and not elect 'straight talk' McCain or swallow a bitter pill and pull a lever for Mac. If we compromise our core principles, then we are no better a party than the Democrats and will lose all support from our base.

SECUNDUM: The Reagan revolution did not occur in a vacuum. It was the result of a slow, deliberate grass roots movement which began in the 60's. If we are to regain the scepter, we must turn our backs to Mac and begin rebuilding again for 2012. Let us return to the basics: churches, town halls, and various social networks. Hopefully, from the ashes a true leader shall arise with our enthusiastic support.

TERTIUM: How did we start with Reagan (some would say Goldwater) and end up with Mac? We simply got lazy and allowed weak links to infiltrate our strong chains. Allowing various political parvenu (ie, Mac, Graham, Snowe, Lieberman) to claim the title of conservatives while harboring truly liberal values will only weaken our party.

QUARTO: Mac should be made an example of. By allowing him to wallow in a sea of emptiness, we will send a clear message to future candidates that our philosophy is not to be watered down. Ever.

QUINTO: Sweeping away the rubbish. Let us resolve to vote out false prophets and apostates alike. In congressional and regional elections, only vote for the true Praetorian Guards of the conservative GOP. Phonies need not apply. Our purity of dedication will attract others drawn to our dedication of principle over expediency.

SEXTUM: Do not let the nay sayers bring you down. Avoid getting to entangled the histrionics of the mainstream press. A loss in November does not spell doom for our party. Not too long ago, the Dems. were caually dismissed as irrelevant and anachronistic. They have since gained the House and Senate. We should persevere and patiently wait for 2012.

SEPTEM: Keep your chins up and move forward. No need to play the violins and feel sorry for yourselves.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

RGO, California — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:24:27 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

George Brainerd, Woonsocket RI — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:24:29 GMT

It is very simple. McCain and Hillary favor the war. Hillary, as a lawyer, had to understand that the Congress could not and should not have ceded their constitutional responsibility (to declare wars) to the Executive Branch.

Senator Obama is the only candidate that makes sense. As to his ability to succeed from the first day, he certainly seems to have quickly grasped how to run in a nationwide election, from day one.

Let's face it, no one is prepared to be President especially not Senators with no executive experience. So, we are left with choosing based on the candidate's values and judgement. Well, it has to be Senator Obama over Clinton or McCain.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

carbar, Marietta, GA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:25:12 GMT

TO ALL CLINTON SUPPORTERS I ASK THE FOLLOWING...
1. Does it bother you that she couldn't handle her campaign budget therefore a excellent examle she would overspend the nation's budget?

2. Does it bother you that she "pledged" not to count MI & FL delegates and now she changes her mind?

3. Does it bother you she's contrlling enough to garnish wages to ensure her healthcare plan is used especially when she's taken money from medical lobbyists?

4. Does it bother you she says on Meet The Press its a historical fact latinos doesn't vote for blacks when many blacks supporting her are in office from having the latino vote?

5. Does it bother you that Pres. Clinton's NAFTA is the reasons companies are overseas, and she has done nothing about it?

6. Does it bother you that her 35 yrs of experience is a reflection of her campaign budget a bust?

7. Does it bother you she's always a victim of some sort when she thinks she'll lose?

8. Does it bother you polls show she can't beat McCain?

9. Does it bother you she's not liked?

10. Does it bother you Bill's dealing with the M.E. built the new Dubai? See ?WSJ article last Fridy for $110M given to his foundation?

As an ex-liker of Hillary I've watched her closer than before and concluded she's a conniving, divisive, cold, calculating who craves power. My vote will definitely go to a Republican (McCain) especially if Huckabee's a VP for the 1st time.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jane, Cary, NC — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:26:52 GMT

This argument put forth by Chris Matthews that some staunch conservatives would rather see Hillary win than McCain is just another argument for nominating BARACK OBAMA!! He said this morning on "Morning Joe" that having Hillary in the White House would make people like Rush Limbaugh joyful as she would guarantee lots of material for him and other right-wing zealots. Well, let's not give Rush that opportunity! Nominate Barack Obama!

It just seems there is so much drama associated with the Clintons - either that they will fire up the GOP FOR McCain - or that McCain will force the Tom Delay's of the world to sit on their hands and not vote if Hillary is the nominee because they will love having her as a "punching bag" for four years. I want to say that judging by this Blog, as well as others like Politico.com, Huffington Post, Hotline, etc. there are HUGE NUMBERS OF DEMOCRATS WHO WILL SIT ON THEIR HANDS AND NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY - INCLUDING ME!! So I think the argument about people like Rush and Delay not supporting McCain in favor of Hillary is a non-factor because there are probably MORE on the Democratic side who will NEVER vote for Hillary and Bill!

So let's stop all of this madness and nominate a truly UNIFYING man - Barack Obama! This should not be some sort of "Machiavellian" contest to see who will alienate whom more, etc. It should be a contest between two good, honorable candidates - Obama vs. McCain - who have very different outlooks on major issues. But not a contest muddied up with all of this 1990s baggage that will come along with the process if Hillary and Bill are the choice of the Democrats.

NOMINATE BARACK OBAMA!!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Imran, Lawrence, USA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:28:22 GMT

Re: My staunchly conservative, religious, jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton she will NOT vote

Even if Joe Lieberman is McCain's running mate or Hillary's for that matter?

How about if it is a McCain-Huckabee ticket, would a conservative think 2012 here I come and vote for the two?

Yesterday Romney insulted millions of Americans by stating he was withdrawing to avoid surrendering to terror aka a Hillary or Obama victory in November.

That was a irresponsible and reprehensible statement and not one Democrat has said one word about it at least till now.

Millions of Democrat supporters are also proud
Americans and to insult them in this manner is totally unacceptable.

But then the "fear" card is the only card the Republicans have to play.

And to think all those "smarter than you are" pundits on CNN and CSPAN and DISHPAN were counting out the conservative neo-cons and thinking they were irrelevant.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

bot, a, stmichael, mn — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:29:46 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

gne britton — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:33:30 GMT

Wow! The Clinton haters are out today, ranting, raving and howling. They never talk about the issues. Well I live down here in Texas and I am going to expain a few facts of life to you. First, if you think that Obama will carry the red states that he has already won, you are sadly mistaken. He will lose lose all of the south and border states and if McCain is the nominee, he will lose Michigan, Ohio and Pa.The other red states of Alaska, Kansas, Idaho,Montana and Utah have very few democratic voters and some have never voted democratic since being added to the union of states. Dreams are one thing and reality is another. The republicans will use race and inexperience and rip him apart. Hillary, who has been attacked by them for years and is still standing has the best chance of defeating McCain. The bias media puts her at a tie with McCain aand Obama up by six points. This is before the attack machine has started, but I don't believe any of the polls the day of the election they were touting on MSNBC that she was down by 13 points in Ca.and played it and played it again and, and again. She won by 10 points and this is a swing of 23 points. MSNBC is just an Obama spin network.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

David Gergen — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:33:57 GMT

SENATOR CLINTON IS LOOKING FOR A FREE AIR TIME TO SHOWCASE HER STUPID "MANDATED" HEALTHCARE DEBATES.

SHE TOUTS "EXPERIENCE" AS HER STRENGTH AND THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND THE FAR-RIGHT CONSERVATIVES NEO-CONS ATTACKS!

INVOKING THE POLITICS OF PERSONAL ATTACKS AND SMEAR CAMPAIGN AS HER STRENGTH? WHAT A MUDSLINGER...SHAME ON THE BILLARY'S!

TALKING ABOUT "EXPERIENCE"...A LOOK AT GEORGE BUSH PRESIDENCY WILL TELL YOU THAT ANY DUMMY CAN SIT IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

BUT WE NEED CHANGE FROM THE BUSH/CLINTON STATUS QUO!

GO OBAMA!!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

just asking — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:34:36 GMT

I wouldn't give you MY tax returns if I didn't have a reason to. Why should I? My business is none of your business unless you vote me into a position where it is.
Hillary has said quite clearly that if she is the nominee she will release her records. If she is not the nominee, it's not relevant, and therefore none of your business.
What part of that is so hard to understand?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

John,Columbus,Ohio — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:36:21 GMT

MSNBC's OBAMARAMA PROMOTION MUST END. ENOUGH ALREADY. Obama cannot win a general election, because he's not qualified to be President. Ask yourself why the corporate owned media would be so shamelessly promoting him? They fear Hillary. Hillary Clinton is the best candidate of any party, she's the most experienced, most intelligent, most politically skilled with the best grasp of domestic & international issues of any candidate. The Dems are lucky to have her! I trust that voters will wake up and realize Obama would sink our chances of victory in November.His thin resume of "I was a community organizer in the south side of Chicago and Senator for a couple of years" would be laughed off the stage. Obama should gracefully exit the race now so the Dem party becomes unified and no more money and time would need to be spent on the primaries.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Ron, TX — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:36:32 GMT

Ron, Tx: Can you tell - does Senator Obama have a chance at being competitive with Senator Clinton in Texas?
Pat, Boston, MA (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:28 AM)

Yes, I think so. The trouble with saying it's very competitive, or tilting to Obama, is that Texas is very large, and the cities have very different atmospheres. I am sure Obama will win Austin, it's highly educated, and college students are a large percentage of the Austin (50k attend UT, 10-20k at various other colleges in Austin, 600k total population). Many other parts of the state just don't like Hillary simply because of the Republican tilt. Dallas and Houston have very mixed populations. Her only benefit would be with latinos, which Texas has a LOT of. If Obama can figure out a decisive way to court these voters, and inform them of his stances on Latino issues (which are generally much stronger than Hillary's stances), I think it will at least be very close between the two.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

azbenny — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:37:08 GMT

Hillary, release your tax returns. You are preaching transparency in government. As a presidential nominee, you owe us that.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Emily Bartek, Wilmette, Illinois — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:37:32 GMT

In the next four weeks Obama has agreed to debate twice. What is all of this griping about from the Clinton camp?

It is Freshman Political Science 101 that the person who feels they are losing demands numerous debates. Hillary is acknowleding that she is losing by demanding round-the-clock debates. Also, she wants the free media. She better be careful what she wishes for. How will she answer a most-likely question from Tim Russert about her Tax Return non-disclosure?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Imran, Lawrence, USA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:38:27 GMT

Re: Bill has brokered a multi-million dollar deal with the Dubai Port Authority .....not too very long ago....suddenly Hillary is able to "loan" her campaign millions....this information came from one of the commentators on the FOX News channel....wonder how she will repay the Saudi's if she gets to be president?

unquote:

First please explain how a Dubai deal translates into repaying the Saudis, unless you think the 9/11 hijackers were Iraqis?

Secondly you quote FOX.

FOX is a pseudo neo-con TV network that will support "family values" while also offering the most degrading and nasty TV shows.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Ron NEw Port richey FL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:40:20 GMT

McCain will win. The GOP will not allow Rush to hijack this campaign. The conservitives are upset but will come around to Mccain after we know who the dems put up. Niether BO or HRC will be able to garner support from independants because Mccain will hammer them on the issue of the Iraq surge.He was absoultly correct. He has been for WINNING the war since day one. BO & HRC will be crucified by him on this issue and independants will come to the realization that niether can be trusted with national security.

All the libs may think this war was wrong, however when it comes to the job of President the most important issue is Defense, all the other issues are secondary. If this country is not able to protect its people how can any other issue matter.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

ladydemocrat — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:40:42 GMT

Tax returns for ALL U.S. citizens are public domain information, that is, once they are filed. Last I heard, April 15, 2008 is the filing deadline, unless you apply for an extension. My guess? The Clintons have filed for several extensions and won't be required to file their tax returns until 2009 or beyond. Er, January 15, 2009.

Sadly, by covering-up their tax information only feeds into the viable argument of privacy they are willing to wage against the more transparent actions of Obama. If Clinton is professing "change", wouldn't complying with this kind of transparency show a true attempt to be so? To validate her definition of "change"? The actions to back up her words?

Um, I think not. She is incapable of such displays of truth, honesty, transparency. And by resisting, she's only adding fuel to her own pyre!

Oh! and on the topic of demanding debates! LOLOLOLOL! Isn't it "usually" the underdog who wants, vies for, offers, demands, asks for, requires further debates? Obama is acting like the class-act that he's proven to me that he is, by agreeing to two more--but wait!!!!! He's the underdog, right?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

kevin, fl — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:42:41 GMT

Can a past of Islam change the path to president for Obama ...

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

H R Coursen — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:44:04 GMT

As Andrew points out, an early verdict for McCain does not necessarily mean good things for the Republicans. McCain will be explosed as a self-righteous little man. Obama and Hillary will make news. The leads in all the papers on on all the networks will be the Democratic campaign. And Obama will gain the advantage thereby of increasing exposure. In contrast to McCain, that will be decisive when November finally arrives. Familiarity with Obama will (I hope) defuse the latent racism underlying the American electorate.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Florida Republican — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:44:58 GMT

Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton she will NOT vote but if its a McCAin vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCAin. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.
Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:52 AM)

As a Republican conservative who doesn't like Hillary Clinton, when it comes down to it I would prefer the more moderate Clinton to the leftist Obama. While Hillary is left of center she isn't far left and I can see her as a Commander-in-Chief; however, I never can see the pacifist Obama in that role and would do whatever I could to see that he and his elite liberal backers don't steal the Presidency with false promises. Yes we don't like Hillary, but we can't stand a whinning left-wing liberal who thinks he's better than everyone else.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

rodeo, ellensburg, wa — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:46:57 GMT

Hillary's entire strategy depends on the aura of inevitability and an early knockout. She tried and failed to do this to Obama in Iowa, spent too much money, and has found her sources drying up as the Obama campaign catches fire and her "aura" is destroyed. The "loan" is a sympathy ploy, just like the tears, her staffers are being paid, she just wants to be able to brag about her fundraising ability and this was the only way raise money for her.
The superdelegates are laying low to see how this comes out, and will shift as the convention grows near and the outcome is clearer. Hillary may have them now, but they can change allegiance and WILL if necessary.
In Washington state, Hillary's campaign is robocalling to remind folks to VOTE for Obama, tho it's the CAUCUS that counts. (source: a campaign staffer)more dirty tricks, on every level, and in every state. They CANNOT be transparent--it does not fit the campaign mode of 1992, which is all the Clintons know and is non-operable today.
If the Clintons have dirt on Obama, it WILL be used before the convention, which should innoculate him from Republican hate radio well in advance of the general election.
Our next President will have to tell Americans many things they don't want to hear: the war has ruined our economy and destroyed our reputation in the world, providing healthcare, education and safety for our citizens will cost us more taxes, not less. We'll have to rejoin the world community on the environment and in the UN for political stability and peace. Personally, I don't see how the Clintons can do this, having demonstrated in two previous administrations that they (and that's a deliberate "they") can't solve these problems. I'm looking forward to the "Straight Talk Express" meeting the "Audacity of Hope" with the result being a stronger, safer, smarter America regaining its preeminence in the world.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

juan,ft lauderdale,fl — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:47:05 GMT

Sierra, you are sounding alot like JERRY with your list: Whitewater-wasted tax $ on failed land deal that Gop cooked up to get the Clintons, Travelgate-PLEASE; Vincent Foster-Suicide or prove otherwise; Alleged rape; Monica- Another please(consenting adults); Iraq vote- which everyone in Congress voted for except 1 female representative from California and I believe a few senators. Obama, if he was in the Senate, possibly would have voted yes and/or present. It is easier to say you were against the war from day one when he did NOT HAVE TO VOTE ON RECORD. Finally, you are sounding so much like the conservatives vis-a-vis McCain. Whomever comes out of this the winner between Hillary/Obama gets my vote. I am like Swizterland.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Bob, Buffalo, NY — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:48:12 GMT

I'm sorry, did Ron Paul concede the race and nobody informed anybody besides MSNBC? Why only mention huckabee?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Eze — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:51:17 GMT

If you think we should end the culture of super delegates, sign this petition: www.myspace.com/endsuperdelegatesnow

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

FREEMAN FEMALE, DALLAS, TX — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:51:49 GMT

1. Hillary wants more debates so she can try to bury Obama and she need free advertising.

2. Hillary did the loan to spur more donations. It worked. HOWEVER, Obama has received almost 1.5 to 2 times the amount of money she raised in the same time period.

3.Obama raised a good point of tax returns. He has ALREADY BEEN IN THE HABIT OF FULL DISCLOSURE. The Clintons, Bushes and the Cheneys NEVER want that. He is different already.

4. MCCAIN is a war candidate. MY 1ST QUESTION to him is WHERE DO WE GET THE TROOPS? No one is volunteering to go to the war but the poor and the disenfranchised and that is NOT FAIR.

5. SEAT THOSE DELEGATES IN FL/MI to the DEMOCRATS' FAILURE. you will have an UPROAR that makes the MCCAIN BOOING YESTERDAY seem like hot burning valentine's loving COMPARED to the Democrats response(i.e. THE AL GORE STOLEN ELECTION if you need a reference)

thanks for reading.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jim Banks, Towanda, PA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:53:00 GMT

Anyone who listens to Chris Matthews needs to get thier head examined. As usual Matthews doesn't have a clue. The most liberal Senator doesn't have a chance in the general election. Not to mention if all the deligates were assigned from all the elections including Florida where all the Democrats were listed on the ballot Saint Obama would be losing just as he will in a general election. Put your wine glass down my fellow elitists and look beyond the hype. The Ted Kennedy candidate never wins.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

JoAnn Butcher, La Mirada, Ca — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:59:47 GMT

I as a long Democrat do not believe that Obama can win in the fall against McCain. Obama will leave the Latinos and some women voters home, while Hillary will pick some of the African American Group. It would be a devastation for us to have four more years of George Bush politics and if the Dems do not unite, well that is what we will have.
Michelle Obama, your answer if Hillary was the nominee, should have been....I am a Democrat, but I plan to vote for my husband.

Kennedy, and establishment.......we need the votes in November, think before you speak. Obama WILL NOT WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE LATINOS WILL STAY HOME.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Pete, Albany, NY — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:01:40 GMT

"WE WANT TO KNOW WHY SENATOR OBAMA, WILL NOT DEBATE SENATOR CLINTON ?
DANCY DESS,TAMPA,FL. (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:28 AM)"

Thank you, Dancy Dess...I knew somebody was going to throw that same tired argument out there! You didn't disappoint!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

K. Kelly — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:01:47 GMT

Please, please, please!!! All of you HIllary supporters are driving me crazy! To the person who stated Barack doesn't want to debate her becuase she'll expose him for what he really is???? Okay, what happended in the last 16 or so debates? AND to the one who steated that he's no more than a preaching community organizer...Well, America is ONE HUGE COMMUNITY that needs someone with the skill set to "organize" and bring it together! America's leader MUST realize that together, YES WE CAN and seprate, no we can't! If Barack is the preacher that compels America to listen, to take responsibility, to help each other and to build bigger, better, stronger relationships within this American Community then I say...Get out of his way and let him loose. If Barack is the Community Organizer that puts things in perspective so that we (the people of the community) can see better...Then get out of his way and allow the "preaching, community organizer" do what he needs to, so he can get us (the American Community) where we need to be.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

How about a real argument — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:02:49 GMT

I cant believe how many ignornant americans there are ....actually I can ...they all voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. Both Hillary and Obama can beat McCain ..HANDS DOWN !!!. Remember McCain wants to continue with the Iraq war even if it takes us "100 years" .... there is no way in HELL people will vote for that man (not event the independents). A vote for McCain is a vote for more years of Bush policies.
RGO, California (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 11:24 AM)

Just goes to show how stupid you are with that "100 years" crap. Anyone with a brain knows that he has no intention of having combats troops in Iraq for that period, but was only referring to that fact that America has troops stationed in various countries many years after hostilities have ended. Anyone who implies he wants to continue a war for that long of time is either a political hack or just brain dead. Not everyone is as dumb as you.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Richards, Santa Barbara, CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:03:26 GMT

How can anyone respect a woman who had no self-respect and not leave her husband for all the humiliations she went through and the country went through.Is American woman that forgiving and a big heart.
Hillary is WEAK and she can not lead a country like US.
May be her tears will get sympathy from world leaders when we have a crisis.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jim, Cantonment, FL — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:08:55 GMT

Florida on the other hand is suppose to speak to the credentials committee (Cheaper than a 2nd election) which will be made up of a Clinton and Obama group that should vote to split those delegates based on the popular vote of all states that have voted.

Anyone want to weigh in?
Independent in CA (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:40 AM)

Sounds like that came from an Obama source in Florida. All Democrats were on the ballot here and Clinton won by a large margin. Florida isn't going to give it's deligates out based on anything other than the wishes of the voters of Florida.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Alex, Phildelphia — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:08:59 GMT

"About Hillary's reason for not releasing her tax returns....here's the reason....Bill has brokered a multi-million dollar deal with the Dubai Port Authority .....not too very long ago....suddenly Hillary is able to "loan" her campaign millions....this information came from one of the commentators on the FOX News channel....wonder how she will repay the Saudi's if she gets to be president? As for us Republicans, we will stand behind the Republican candidate no matter who that person is, because the country cannot withstand a democratic Congress and a democratic President....
J Pate, Raleigh NC"

Fox News ? Must be right then...

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

L R — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:10:25 GMT

I am a very conservative person. I voted for Huck. I am having lots of trouble bringing myself to vote for McCain in November. There's only one thing right now that can make me vote for him: if Billary is the other candidate. If it's Obama, I'll vote for a third person to make a point.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Kevin, Orlando, Florida — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:15:57 GMT

Nothing will unite the conservatives around McCain better than a Clinton nominee. You will have every conservative running from his or her trailer to their truck to drive to the nearest polling station to vote against Billary's scandal-ridden past. Whitewater, Monica, Paula Jones, Kazakhstan, etc. 35 years of experience? 35 years of scandal and vice!

Look at every theoretical matchup between Hillary and McCain and McCain almost always holds a slight edge nationally thanks to independent and moderate support. BUT he loses in every single matchup with Obama thanks to his weak GOP base support and Obama drawing independents and moderates away from him. Not to mention that Hillary voted FOR the war and flip flopped against it, while Obama gave a 2002 speech opposing the war from the beginning, aligning himself with 75% of US public opinion. McCain doesn't have a prayer of defeating Obama.

McCain has the next 8.5 months to raise money and solidify his base now that he will be the nominee. I predict the GOP will spend the next two concentrating their attacks on Obama because they know that Hillary is their only chance to help the dems snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again.

Obama is powered by the people, Clinton is powered by lobbyists and special interests. McCain-Feingold anyone? Another Achilles heel of the Clinton-McCain matchup as she yields the moral highground once again.

Vote for hope, not fear or vengeance.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Dante — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:16:24 GMT

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire endorsed Barack Obama for president Friday, providing a last-minute lift to the Illinois senator on the eve of the state's hotly contested Democratic caucuses.

Gregoire, announcing her choice in an interview with The Associated Press, said that taking sides in the close contest for the Democratic nomination was tough, given her great admiration for Sen. Hillary Clinton.

But she said Obama is a charismatic and skilled leader who can bring the country together, help solve nagging problems, and restore the country's image abroad.

Gregoire planned to join Obama in a major campaign rally at Seattle's KeyArena on Friday....

Gregoire was the state's first female attorney general and is only the second woman governor in Washington since statehood. Washington is the only state with a female governor and both U.S. senators.

But Obama is quite popular in the Democratic strongholds of Seattle and other urban areas, and the Obama endorsement could help centrist Gregoire there.

"Lots of people said, 'Just stay out of it,'" said Gregoire, who faces a potentially tough re-election campaign of her own this fall.

"But all of my friends are going to caucus on Saturday and will be asked to make up their mind, so why shouldn't I? It was time for me to make up my mind."

Fellow Govs. Janet Napolitano of Arizona and Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas also have endorsed Obama.

...

"I gave it a lot of thought and it was a very difficult decision because I think Democrats and the nation are very blessed to have two outstanding candidates, both of whom would make a great president.

"Back when I was 18 years old, if anyone had told me in my lifetime we would have a choice between the first woman president and the first African American, I would have laughed out loud," she said. "They are both breaking the glass ceiling if you will."

Gregoire said Obama brings hope and inspiration to young and old alike.

"He is leading us toward a positive feeling of hope in our country and I love seeing that happen," she said. "I believe the nation faces significant challenges domestically and internationally and Obama is the person who has the ability to reach across artificial divides and move our national forward. Barack is that kind of leader."

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Al, San Diego, CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:18:45 GMT

If you are for less government, less taxes, strong military, better foreign policy and a secured homeland go Republican. But, if you are for the opposite of what I said at the top then vote for Billary (you got two for the price of one and all their negatives) or Obama who lack experienced to become CinC.

In my own opinion this country is not ready to have an African American as their CinC. I do believe that a Republican will take over the WH again this coming election because the Democratic Party does not have the foresight to field a stronger candidate compare to the other party.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

SW GR, MI — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:19:20 GMT

I didn't know where to post this so I'm putting it here. Don't be fooled.
The tax "rebates" we are to get as part of the stimulus package are only advances on next years refunds. No where on MSNBC is this being explained. We have to pay it back within 12 months mostly by our 2008 tax return. So if you think this is "free money" be warned that next year you will probably have to pay taxes and won't get a refund.

From CNN:The checks are an advance on next year's refunds, and most, if not all of the money, will be deducted from taxpayers' refunds in 12 months' time.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

norb jackson michigan — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:19:56 GMT

Someone should tell the McCain people that he doesn't need to be seen with Joe Lieberman as often as he has.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Dante — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:20:03 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jeremy, Fontana, CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:21:15 GMT

Last night I watched back-to-back episodes of 'Headliners and Legends' on MSNBC: the first on Hillary Clinton, the second on John McCain. Great segments, both. What really struck me is that if the election comes down to a contest of character/personality, as it inevitably does in the general, then McCain will win it hands down. My own mom, a staunchly pro-choice liberal, even said she'd vote for McCain over Clinton. Why is Hillary so unpopular even among so many women? Were McCain to be so inately unpopular among lots of veterans, I think it would be very legitimate to ask why.

The one clip that really stuck out in the Hillary segment was when she gloated to the TV camera, "Well, I guess I could have been a stay-at-home mom and baked cookies my whole life, but instead I chose to fullfill my career."

Is it really sexist to consider such a person a [female canine]?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

David Rosenberg — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:28:47 GMT

The thought of McCain winning makes me sick. But the thought of Billary is unacceptable. If people go to Jewish doctors, but don't let them into their country clubs, I am quite comfortable with a black man who was president of the Harvard Law Review being the president of the USA for my grandchildren.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

FJR in L.A., CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:30:22 GMT

KEVIN from FL

Are you watching the same MSNBC Network?

Well, maybe we are because I agree that Chris Matthews and Mika ("What's her name?") are both openly and brazenly for Obama.

The rest of the network including its top News Honchos, Brian Williams and Tim Russert, have been drinking The Clintons Kool Aid for years.

Remember how these two ganged up on Obama at the Las Vegas debate with their "GOTCHA" moment about the 4-page fax.

We found out later that fax never accused Clinton of racism or anything: it only directed Russert to where he could find the comments of the SC Congressman Clyburn who reacted personally to HRC's MLK/LBJ comment.

This was after Brian Williams asked Obama some softball about all the lying emails and faxes they get non-stop everyday without identifying the source of them or asking Mrs. Clinton to ask her campaign to stop clogging their machines up.

She got off free and Obama had to apologize for being guilty of "keeping the racial issue going" for helping them do their job and reporting on these things. Instead, they made his help the story.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

joe — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:30:33 GMT

Obama is like George Bush. No experience like Bush, Stutters like George Bush, went to Harvard like Bush, irresponsible and naive like Bush, no foreign policy experience like bush. Obama running on same rhetoric like Bush did in 2000--Change. Obama says I'm a uniter, not a divider...just what Bush said in 2000 while he was running for office. Not convince yet??? just listen and read all of Obama's cult-like supporters, then compare that with all of George Bush's followers in 2000. Exactly the same. Sadness!!!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Banzai, Omaha NE — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:32:48 GMT

Lynette-
To your sample of one conservative who would vote for McCain over Obama but sit out against Clinton, I offer my own perspective. 46 years old, consistent conservative voter who has never supported a Democratic candidate. If the Dems nominate Sen Obama, he has my vote. If the Dems nomintate Sen Clinton--I'm going with Sen McCain.

Why? It's the kind of politics he espouses, and the absolute necessity of getting past the politics of destruction of the Clinton (and yes, Bush 43/Rove) years. I think Sen McCain would also reach past that, but in the international arena Sen Obama's intent to talk to opponents and try new ideas is superior. To those who think that is shocking--hey, 45+ years of demonstrably failed policy (embargoing Cuba) is probably enough, and we talked to the Soviet Union. As for Al Qaida, counterinsurgency doctrine shows that the best way to drain the swamp is to convince the uncommitted that there is hope in working with you.

McCain vs. Obama is the ultimate in "change vs. experience." Given the hunger for change, which side of that dynamic do you want to be on? And as for age, look at previous "young-old" races: Nixon-Kennedy, Bush 41-Clinton, Dole-Clinton. Again, which side of that do you want to be on?

McCain-Clinton allows McCain (an obvious maverick who appeals to independents) to take the moral high ground on issues from torture to financial disclosures/campaign finance. Despite her campaign's appeal as the first to elect a woman president, the active role of her husband and their obvious push for a "Clinton restoration" significantly muddle the message of "change." And for every conservative who can't stomach voting for McCain, I will offer at least one Democratic voter who has been sickened by many of the tactics used by the Clintons in their race to hold off Obama.

And whether or not you think it is her fault, the fact remains that many Republicans (my wife for example) have a visceral reaction to Sen Clinton. When the opposition is fractured, why help them unite? Even if Sen Clinton wins, it is likely to be a 50%+1 Rove-style victory at best--guaranteeing more filibusters and tired hate-driven politics. We can do better than that, just as a nation of 300 million people can do better than Bush(VP), Bush(VP), Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton.

Obama '08--now is the time to change!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Robert, Illinois — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:34:04 GMT

Obama is a phoney, charming con artist, who very few people know anything about. And, of course, mindless and foolish people are willing to vote for him because he says he wants to change the country-but with little to back this up.
Just like after 911, the common sense has been sucked out of the atmosphere above the US. Brainwashed Americans ready to follow this guy off a cliff if he asks them.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

chuck — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:34:40 GMT

This is for all those "pro-Romney Republicans" --

do you really believe he's the conservative that he's been saying he is the past month or two ? do you have any idea how liberal he was when he ran for governor of Mass? It's not even the same person.

Maybe you're just uninformed about his record and his stances from just a few years ago but he was to the left of Giuliani and it's silly to say that he's a "true conservative."

Now, it's possible that he really is as conservative as he says now and that he simply pretended to be more liberal to get more elected in Mass. But, if that's the case, why would you support someone who simply changes his opinions so freely just to get elected and how could you trust him now?

He's not, or at least hasn't been in the past, as conservative as you think.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Oh the Saintly Obama Crowd — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:35:02 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Patrick, Indianapolis — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:36:35 GMT

Gene,

I am so thankful for you and your time machine. I mean to be able to tell people what is going to happen this November is amazing. I guess I shouldn't vote at all now since the race has already been decided. Thanks for the information Gene! Your ability to see into the future is astounding.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Bruce, St. Helens, OR — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:37:47 GMT

I have no idea whether Sen. McCain is a good or poor frontrunner, but my years of campaign involvement tell me that there is a significant difference between being a part of a contested primary and being the 'unofficial nominee'. In the former situation, everything is relative - "I am more conservative/liberal than the other candidates" but once annointed as the probable nominee, the candidate will be faced with absolutes such as, "As President, what characteristics will you look for in selecting Supreme Court nominees?". If Sen. McCain is faced with that question he will have to draw a clear distinction between himself and the Democrat contenders and he will have to offer an answer that pleases the right wing of his party. Just an example of what causes front runners to often stumble.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

ladydemocrat — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:46:55 GMT

To: The one clip that really stuck out in the Hillary segment was when she gloated to the TV camera, "Well, I guess I could have been a stay-at-home mom and baked cookies my whole life, but instead I chose to fullfill my career."

Is it really sexist to consider such a person a [female canine]?

Jeremy, Fontana, CA (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 12:21 PM)
----------
Um, no, it's not sexist at all. Her own statement verified her own contempt toward the feminine movement that did achieve rights for women. Contempt toward it, because she didn't get any credit for helping us out <cue tears>.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jack H, Long Beach, CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:47:42 GMT

"Kevin, Tavernier, FL "

Maybe you should consider watching another coverage if MSNBC's views anger and frustrate you to such a (puzzling) degree. Why continue watching something you really don't agree with? And that goes as well for all of you out there complaining about their coverage!

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

oknOK — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:48:17 GMT

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Independent in CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:50:32 GMT

Attention Obama supporters. The novalty of him will wear off by Nov. He will lose by 20 points. He has not been vetted, the latins will go for McCain, and indepenant whites will go heavely to the right. Sorry.
bot, a, stmichael, mn (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 11:29 AM)

*****************************************************
I think it may be different in the fall if the Latins are not given "walk around Money" and they start to realise the way our Health care system is - no one is going to just give Hillary a blank check to take away all their profits.

Large Rich Heathcare Corporations run America. Obama's partial program makes sense as we are the land of the free home of the rich - think people.

A compromise makes more sense. Canada,the UK and France have had their systems in place for a long time. There is little or no precident for going from what we have now to a socalized/Public system. A gradual overhaul of the system makes sense. Telling people we will have a system as soon as Hillary hits the oval office is not realistic.
In her 35 years of experience and 8 years in the white house we did not get it - and Bill ran promising this last time. Please don't have amnesia. Please think realistically about this. :)

Obama's plan makes sense even if you don't like him. Hillary's plan is in never never land.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

ksmith199, Corona,CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:51:43 GMT

True conservatives will not vote for McCain under any circumstances. We cannot vote for someone who so lacks in character and thus has not earned our trust or respect. If you don't trust or respect a person, how can you possibly cast a vote for that person? Nothing he can say now will bring us around so he might as well forget about "healing the wounds", it won't happen. My vote will go to Fred Thompson in November. He is pure in his convictions and has earned my respect and trust. This election is about more than who will be President, it's about returning to the principals of our founding fathers and the constitution.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Dillon — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:52:52 GMT

You know, people like Peggy Noonan are the only ones with enough courage to state the most obvious fact of this election: That the only people who don't realize that Barack is the best candidate for Democrats are...Democrats! But hey these are the same people who voted for John Kerry, Micheal Dukakis and Walter Mondale. We possibly have the next great leader in our party ready to roll a tidal wave through this country in the general election and what do we do? We want to elect the most devisive candidate in the easiest election for Democrats in history. Go Figure.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Gary, Indianapolis, IN — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:59:06 GMT

To my democratic colleagues… we may be in for a phenomenal letdown at the end of this primary nomination process that has been energizing, exciting, and hopeful as we look to move past the Bush debacle of the past 8 years. I have this sinking feeling in my gut because what I see playing out is an energized democratic electorate that will most likely be split right down the middle… in two separate camps clinging to both of their powerful leaders. (Look at these posts) If Hillary and Barack do not play this right, the winner of the nomination may well be given the chance to be the loser in the general election because the “losing” camp may not come out to support our candidate in the general election. Example… Barack comes out saying that we cannot afford to return to the President Clinton years of 1992-2000 where Bill hurt the Democratic Party. Hillary’s campaign is allegedly marginalizing Barack. Barack says that Hillary will polarize the electorate. Hillary says that Barack does not have the experience. Then there’s the common judgment that we all know…. Barack is inspirational and idealistic and Hillary is realistic and ready to deliver (which I believe is a true assessment… I want both) Hillary wants to debate and Barack does not. Hillary wants to include Florida and Michigan delegates and Barack does not. Hillary gets the big states and Barack gets the small states. Hillary and Barack have distinct age, gender, and ethnic electorates that are solidly behind each of them. The pledged delegates will be statistically even and it will come down to two camps of Super Delegates.
We are heading for two camps and if Barack and Hillary do not find a way to bring the two camps together at whatever point we can have a nominee… we are toast in November as these two distinct camps will not fully support the other because of the points I’ve made. The only way I see this working out is that Barack and Hillary focus their campaign comments on the strong differences with the Republican Party and the President Bush ideology for the remainder of this campaign. The more they focus on each other’s differences… the gulf between the two camps will only become further apart. And if it goes to the credentials committee in the DNC, forget it… it will be a nightmare scenario.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

kevin, fl — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:59:55 GMT

We are in a war on terror. I am very worried about Obama'a past muslim upbringing. He attended a radical Islamic school. His father, step-father, grandmother, grandfather are all muslim. The Quran says once a muslim always a muslim unless you infiltrate to gain power. This has to be comsidered.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Republican in Nebraska — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:00:09 GMT

In the GOP race...
If it comes down to McCain and Clinton in November, I would vote for McCain. But if it came down to McCain and Obama, I would vote for Obama!!

If it comes down to Huckabee, he has my vote every time, against either of the Dems.

I think Huckabee could beat the Dems in the election. I don't like McCain, but he is better than "the Clintons".

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

oknOK — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:00:57 GMT

I'm having a hard time understanding why the FL votes cannot be counted because they "broke the rules". Yet, we'll give them another chance and they can do it over and those can count. Waste of money and time. It should never have happened. The state dictated when the primary would be held; the DNC has no right to penalize voters for what their state government dictated. It is ironic, too, that there are always so many complaints that more people don't vote. Yet, here we are with people who did their civic duty but are going to be penalized. Thank you, DNC, for making such a mess of this! If there's any kind of deal to "split" the delegates, then it better be on a true percentage basis and none of "proportional" rationing system which STINKS.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Independent in CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:15:56 GMT

[Sounds like that came from an Obama source in Florida.] All Democrats were on the ballot here and Clinton won by a large margin. Florida isn't going to give it's deligates out based on anything other than the wishes of the voters of Florida.
Jim, Cantonment, FL (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 12:08 PM)
*****************************************************No Fox and MSNBC yesterday - but thanks for the compliment! :)

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Kevin, Tavernier — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:16:28 GMT

Jack,
I have stopped watching the Obama network in favor of CNN and even FOX. I urge all who stand for Hillary to do the same. Matthews, Olberman, Tucker, Todd, slander Hillary at every chance they get.

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Jim, California — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:21:55 GMT

I enjoy reading all of the comments on each of the canidates.. Democratic party is a very tight close race.... My hats off to both of them... People talk about the Super Tuesday as a big win for Obama and Hillary. But if you look at the totals and the seperation. You would have to say althou Obama won more states, his lead dimension in the sepeartion.
What is alarming is Obama carrying the smaller states and more is losing the larger states. If this was a general election, we could have another Bush / Gore race where Obama if the Democratic front leader would win the popular vote but lose the electorial vote.
Hillary carrying the larger states stands a good chance.. if Michigan and Florida had not been pentalized on seating thier delegates, you would see a definite larger seperation with Hillary getting the nod as the front runner.
Second, this is not heard of in the Primarys to see larger turn outs, althou larger in history this go around, question is when the true vote is required, how many of the young voters stay mobilized and vote. Historically, this has not been the case. So if Obama does not get the nod, does the young voters fail to show up to vote.
We are seeing history made, on one side someone who is motivating the youth of this country, on the other side experience.
I am torn between which to support and I have heard a number of reasons to support both. Thank you all for some of the insights. However, what holds me off from voting for Obama is 80% of voting present but failing to take a stance. If you are present go on record if you do not agree and vote against a political issue. If you support it then go on record and say so. As for his tax returns, Has he included his housing deal showing how he is questionable.... I do not want to see either of their returns.... Honestly. I want to see what they have done historically. Hillary althou judged by Bill's actions should be viewed at what has she done... Yes questionable acts, but a long history as well...
It is going to be interesting to say the least.. One last note.. Why would all of the Republicans stand up and shoot Hillary in a debate and forget about Obama...??? Simple, Obama they feel is thier strongest hope in a General election to win. Hillary, scares them.. Polls has shown Obama would win in a General.. Look at History, Gore in the Polls was suppose to beat Bush and won the popular vote and lost the election...
Vote smart, stand up and be heard.. We as America need change and be it Hillary or Obama.. change is coming.. Problem is.. as much damage that Bush has brought to us... No elected President in a 8 year term is going to fix it all.. to much damage was done..

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

equal opportunity criticism please — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:22:21 GMT

What's wrong w/ saying you didn't stay home and bake cookies and bring up the kids? If a man said that you wouldn't think twice. In fact, you'd think he was a big wuss if he stayed home. Not everyone is cut out from the same mold. You keep saying she's not honest. This was an honest statement of fact as it relates to HER life.
Nothing wrong w/ a stay at home mom, but you sure don't have the worldy exposure and experience you need to run for public office.
Would you elect a stay at home dad?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

HMT-MI — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:22:46 GMT

I voted in the MI primary and was told by the DNC that it would be counted because the nominee would request it be counted.Now Barack says no?Why?If it is not I am sure that many of us will find attorneys to represent us because our voting right has been violated.The state paid millions of dollars for this primary and now they want a do-over?At whose expense?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Thinking out Loud — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:23:47 GMT

Boy, Georgia, Arkansas, Tennessee are having some bad times lately. Seems like ever since Super Tuesday? Could it be someone's not too happy with them? For some reason?

First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Independent in CA — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:39:45 GMT

A little more on bias. Bill and Hilary have both said they'd back Obama if he wins the nomination. Yet, Michelle Obama, when asked if she would support Hilary said, "I'd have to think about that." Did the media run with that comment? If Bill sneezes, it can be twisted into something negative. Yet, this woman can make a statement that certainly doesn't coincide with her husband's message of unity and nobody says a word.
oknOK (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 12:48 PM)
*****************************************************I have heard this commented on on several programs. But in what I heard they commented on Michelle saying about Clinton, I would have to consider her tactics, her tone....

What Michelle did not say is it is widely believed that the Clinton's want to be back in the White house so badly they will pay for the nomination by bribing Superdelegates (lets just pout it out there) and if that's how they win it - by hook and by crook (No matter what the popular vote looks like and how many states Obama actually wins) - I would think even all serious Hillary supporters would be disappointed about having that kind of leader - someone who uses those tactics as POTUS?

Bill as former President also needs to be concerned about how the History books will view him from here on out....not too well I fear.......