First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

jaycee, Ventura, California — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:22:08 GMT

I get the feeling that Hillary’s supporters still want to run the campaign we thought we were going to be running a year ago. We have to deal with the electorate that is actually out there today. Hillary’s self-portrayal as the seasoned political combat veteran is way off key this cycle. Most people have lost interest in fighting. Americans are waking up to the fact that we’re facing serious problems on many fronts, and we can’t get anywhere with the nation split down the middle.

The Clinton presidency, with the impeachment mess and subsequent election mess exemplifies the very worst of the Red/Blue divide for many voters. There’s no way for Hillary to escape that legacy, and in fact she’s implicitly running on it with her experience argument. Again, tone deaf. Where the kind of change Barack is talking about involves reaching across the divide to find common ground and actually get something done, to Hillary it apparently means little more than a gender change and more efficient management.

Hillary just isn’t the right candidate for this election cycle. It happens to politicians all the time, regardless of gender. The ceiling she’s hitting here is her 49% negative approval rating. For those of you who may be sincerely worried about Barack’s ability to do the job on day one, you can rest easy. This guy is more than up to the job.

We need to seize the moment. Hold your nose if you must. I’ve done it many times and it’s really not as hard as it might seem right now. If we all get on board we can roll this thing like a tidal wave. I’ve been on the receiving end of political tsunamis in the past and I’d like to see what it’s like to win a landslide for a change.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Dan Conners, Crawford TX — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:23:38 GMT

Texas is Hillary country ya'all!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

adam/NYC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:25:01 GMT

The Clintons have taken on the Republican Attack Machine….

AND FAILED EVERY TIME.

Healthcare Reform: A Massive Failure handing Congress to the Republicans for 14 years

Gay Rights: Bill Clinton caved and gave into the bigoted and hateful don’t ask don’t tell.

Genocide: Rwanda was a disgusting failure as the Clintons pandered to the Republicans afraid to make a mistake.

Iraq: Hillary Clinton caved into the Republican Drum beat to invade, and insane idea, she voted for it under political pressure to look tough. Perhaps a million people have died, been injured, or displaced.

Iran: See above, perhaps a million more might be afected

Bankruptcy: Hillary caved to the Corporate interest, although she was “glad the bill failed” she voted for it under political pressure from the right.

Time and time again, the Clintons are faced with Republican Political Pressure and they fail to stand up for what they claim to believe. Hillary has no moral courage, the defining quality that separates a leader from a politician.

Please step aside Mrs. Clinton, you are dividing and destroying a great Democratic Party.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Pat, Boston, MA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:25:27 GMT

It was a great night for Senator Obama. David Axelrod may have done the impossible - run an almost perfect campaign thus far. Cheers to him. As well as to Senator Obama; he's an excellent, excellent candidate. It would be a shame if he were to lose and have to exit the national stage. Our country needs an uplifting message after all we've been through these last 8 years.

I wonder how Roger Clemens will do today.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ed Willers, Bronx NY — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:27:03 GMT

So, where are all the people that sited Hillary being way up in the national polls in the last couple of months? You guys/gals have anything more to add to those comments?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Casey, Raymond, Maine — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:29:48 GMT

Nice Dodgeball reference boys.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Stacy, Virginia — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:30:37 GMT

Buckle your seatbelt Senator Obama. It is about to get mean and nasty. The Clinton's have nothing to lose by going negative and no one does personal destruction politics better.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Steve Myers, Lakeland FL — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:31:26 GMT

Didn't Hillary back in December say "This is the fun part." of the campaign? It doesn't look like she's having much fun though. Was she wrong?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

sarah, fountain, colorado — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:14 GMT

Any way you look at this media out and others have pumped obama up to where he is today. Anyway you look at it MI and FL will count Michigan has allocated their delegats according to the percentage of the vote, obama took his name off the ballot on his own free will, and he advertised in FL running ads on CNN & MSNBC and held fundraisers he still got stomped, TX, OH, PA and Super Delegates. How many rightwingers voted for Obama yesterday, so he would win then lose the General? http://robertbluey.com/blog/2008/02/12/why-i-voted-for-obama/
Super Delegates are going to decide this and if they care about this country they will vote for Hillary, obamas wins were known last night, however influenced by rightwingers, but his overall wins aren't going to win the general, and the racial divide in several states wont win the general.

The media needs to start doing their jobs in scrutinizing obamas rezko, exelon, lobbyist connections, his lies in advertisement claiming he has universal healthcare when he leaves out 15 mill. people, his lies and distortion of Hillarys record. DO your job MSNBC.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Bee — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:33:39 GMT

Obama does not need Edward endorsement if he is not ready to stand with him in tough time. What good does Edward endorsement means when he is hedging is bet? If he is a man of Principle, he should come out and endorse now.

The more he waits, the more irrelevant he becomes in this election. Obama is the man to beat at the moment and he has a huge base that is ready to stand with him come rain and sunshine. Edward indecision pretty much shows he doesn’t preach what he believes. If he is a man of Principle, he should come out now or forever remain silence

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Lynette, NYC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:34:41 GMT

The Edwards endorsement will be a day late and a dollar short for Clinton, and not necessary for Obama. Edwards has almost become irrelevant. I remain a Hillary clinton supporter, and I just like Joe Scarborough's mom feels very sorry for her. ( he stated this morning on Morning Joe.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

JohnnyU, WA State — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:34:49 GMT

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

the truth — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:35:23 GMT

go obama

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Cheri M Danbury WI — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:38:29 GMT

Sure Obama is on a roll now. His speaking ability is above par. But, what is his real message? CHANGE!! How can he keep that spin when he has the Kennedy factor behind him? Is not that old Washington? Give me a break. Start now, Mr. Obama and state what your exact "change" consists of. Start the debates now. A sign and speech does not cut it for me.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

PM, Miami, FL — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:42:18 GMT

FALSE HOPE vs REAL PLATITUDES = THE CHOICE BETWEEN OMABARAMA vs MICKEE CANE. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR PRESIDENT FOR THE 1ST TIME IN MY LIFE.HOW PATHETIC HAS AMERICA BECOME. THE HISTORIC MESS BUSH INC HAVE LEFT US REQUIRES SOMEONE MORE QUALIFIED THAN THESE 2 SELF ABSORBED BAD ACTORS TO LEAD.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Steve, San Diego — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:42:36 GMT

Chuck Todd- I agreed with your analysis last evening, and again this morning. Please do a total of all votes for DEM candidates vs. GOP candidates in jointly contested primaries and caucuses. I think the margin is nearly 2 to 1 DEM over GOP. I cannot believe these numbers will regress in the general election. I believe Senator Obama's total numbers will stay nearly the same against Senator McCain. I do think Senator Clinton's numbers will drop significantly against Senator McCain if she makes it that far (which doesn't look likely right now). If I am a DEM candiates for any office, federal, state or local, I want to be on Senator Obama's coattails; not HRC's. This should be a very convincing argument for super delegates to vote for Senator Obama.

On another note of interest to me, isn't it great that 2 of the biggest figures in the U.S. today are African-American...Tiger Woods and Barack Obama. And both have support across the widest spectrum in the land.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ted, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:42:55 GMT

I think this analysis is a little kind to Clinton. Considering the likelihood in Texas, due to the screwy semi-primary/semi-caucus system in place, that Obama and Clinton evenly split the state's delegates, it would mean Clinton would have to win an absolute overwhelming majority of votes in Ohio - and that's not going to happen.

And with regard to Edwards: Unless he thinks his endorsement is weighty enough to swing a significant number of voters (which it's not), a Clinton endorsement at this point is tantamount to hopping on a sinking ship. I don't think that's going to happen.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Gustavo Herrera, Baltimore MD — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:44:11 GMT

MSNBC is exactly right -- superdelegates are much more focused on winning and electability than voters. They are likely to run like rats from a sinking ship if they see Obama or Clinton with a clear lead in regular delegates.

And that seems likely to happen. Perceived momentum after a five-state sweep is just as good as the real thing, in fact, it likely was responsible for Obama's wide margins in the three Potomac primaries. An eight-state sweep has turned any perceived momentum into the real thing.
http://nationalscold.blogspot.com

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ivan, Washington, DC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:44:32 GMT

Please stop labeling one candidate the front runner on the Democratic side. This is more like watching a basketball game where the lead keeps changing hands.

Obama is still the challenger and if he is to win, he must deliver the a knock out blow to the Clinton machine.

The Clintons are still a very formidable candidate who has proven time & time again that they can come back.

Stay tuned....

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Phred, NH — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:45:11 GMT

Congrats to yesterday's winners on both sides of the aisle and to the voters as well. For more than the candidates, those who participate in the voting process are the days true winners.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

PM — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:45:14 GMT

CHANGE at ANY COST?? ROLL THE DICE AMERICA. HOW SAD.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ariel,Jupiter Florida — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:48:47 GMT

The Obama campaign should hammer home to working class Democrats in the remaining primaries that Hillary Clinton speaks to their economic plight while refusing to release her income tax returns.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Joy F., Columbia, MO — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:50:38 GMT

I'm a 59 year old professional woman in Columbia MO... with a 19 year old son. Obama's life/work experience in hands-on work for the poor and unemployed, and in policy-making positions in government in IL and DC, exceed Hillary's. She was a corporate lawyer at Rose Law Firm (defending major corporations against ordinary citizens) in AK from 1977 to 1994 -- 15 years of that "35 years of experience" she repeats ad infinitum. She worked on the Children's Defense Fund (how? That's never spelled out.), yet the Edelman's who built the CDF abhor the impacts of how Bill executed Welfare Reform to the detriment and additional misery of the poor; especially children. In this sense, if those working directly with the poor feel that the way Welfare Reform was done was brutal against the poor, then what weight does Hillary's "work" in that regard ultimately carry? Since 1994, she's was a First Lady without policy-making roles except for the failed though valiant attempt to secure health care reform. She wrote a book about pets of the White House. Ok, now it's around 2000 and she serves as a Senator. That, according to even elementary school math, is about 8-10 years of valid job experience that could prepare someone for the Presidency...and only 8 years of it was policy-making. We're being duped by repitition of an untruth. I worked in Advertising for 20 years, where we were taught and saw everyday that "repitition works." In time, people believe what they hear if it isn't challenged often and well. That's what the media isn't doing, sorry to say... Our massive media outlets do not simply put her real-life resume on the screen to show the facts. So it's overwhelming and wonderful to see that Obama, with his real-life experience for the people and in policy-making and opposition to the war
is leading the Democratic contest... and is in a great position to win the Presidency, and put his vast experience and good judgement to work for all of us... from Day One!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Gustavo Herrera, Baltimore MD — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:51:01 GMT

Cheri M, if you are talking about Ted Kennedy then the "old Washington" factor is not even close to an issue. Ted is just a surrogate who's supporting Obama, and it's easy to keep the change spin -- I can write it myself: "even elements of the old Washington establishment have come to realize the time for CHANGE has come."

If you are talking about Obama evoking JFK from decades ago, again it's not about "old" Washington, it's comparing this new guy to another new, unproven senator who was younger than the opposition and ran on hope and inspiration.

One last point on the Edwards endorsement: MSNBC seems off here. His endorsement ONLY matters in the Democratic primary, as his supporters are torn between Clinton and Obama. If MSNBC's suggestion (that he won't endorse till it's clear who has a numbers advantage) is true, then he'll effectively waste his endorsement, using it past the expiration date. Of course he'll support whoever the Dem nominee is in the general election.
http://nationalscold.blogspot.com

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Lewis, Cincinnati, Ohio — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:51:49 GMT

Sarah from CO---that's ONE guy---ONLY one..and if you read the blog carefully you come away with the feeling that this republican blogger sort of thinks deep down that Obama does have a chance to unite the country like no other. I'm not so sure you're proving your point by citing this blog. I urge you to please do your research---The Chicago Tribune has researched this Rezko thing thoroughly..there's nothing there. Let's have a debate about the issues instead of trying to tear down one of our democratic candidates, OK?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

L- Utica NY — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:52:01 GMT

I am a single white working class woman who lives in Upstate NY. I am not a fan of Hillary, but I will not count her out until after TX & OH. I just hope that TX & OH keep it close for Obama. He will make a great President of the United States of America.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Robert Holmen, Burtrum, MN — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:59:52 GMT

Do the math.

This First Read article is the best analysis I have seen. The numbers advantage for Obama is growing to the point where this race could be over as early as March 4th barring landslide victories for Clinton on that date.

The First Read article also correctly points out that popular vote and pledged delegates will decide this election. For any pundits or the Clinton campaign to suggest that Superdelegates will reverse the decision of the voters is pure nonsense ... such an occurrence would jeopardize the Democrats chances against McCain and could set back the Democratic party for a generation.

That is also true for seating the MI and FL delegation on the basis of the uncontested voting results. Seating them after a new caucus or on a proportional basis according to the national vote may be possible. I don't always agree with Sharpton, but his comments about this issue ring true.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:00:11 GMT

Gustavo - I think a lot of super delegates will be primarily concerned with holding onto the two houses of Congress. I'm guessing many have already made the observation that would be easier with Obama at the top of the ticket, but just haven't announced their preference until they're sure Clinton is beat.

Undoubtedly more of them have longer standing ties to the Clintons than to Obama. This is the only thing keeping her going right now. Think of it this way - given that institutional advantage the Clintons bring into the super delegate race, its amazing so many haven't voiced their preferences, and among those who have, its amazing Clinton only holds an advantage of 90.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Martin — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:02:59 GMT

People will eventually find out that Obama is empty rhetoric - no one knows anything about what he has accomplished! His health care plan is right wing, he has strong ties to the criminal slumlandlord Rezko!

Hillary will win!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:03:49 GMT

jaycee, ventura, ca....
Just to let you know; I am a lifelong Democrat and I would not vote for Barrack Obama if he were running for DOG CATCHER.
If he gets the nomination, I'll vote against him any way I can. There are local movments already under way to organize McCain Democrats. If the current primary trend continues, I'll be working with them to encourage a cross-over vote.
I'll "hold my nose" alright.
But, when I do it I'll be pulling the lever for John McCain.
In the end, Obama will LOSE the general election. I promise you.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Independent Voter, Stuart, FL. — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:03:56 GMT

Sarah Fountain, Colorado

The DNC tried to play "Hardball" with FL and MI. Well the two states did not capitulate. Edwards and Obama took their names of the ballot in MI because of the DNC's ruling

Pertaining to your remark about campaigning in FL.
As a Floridian let me enlighten you

Hillary Clinton DID campaign in FL. prior to the election

Here is the account from the Sun Sentinel newspaper

Hillary Clinton DID campaign in FL. on Sunday at the Lucky Strike Lanes, a bowling alley on South Beach. She spoke for 30 minutes at the Lucky Strike and stood outside the bowling alley holding a homemade sign that read in part "We want a president that can keep a promise." She then headed to a developer's house for a second fundraiser. End of SS article. Above was on 1/27/2008. Primary was on 1/29/2008

So much for Democrats not campaigning in FL. So it must depend on what the "Definition of IS (Campaigning) IS.
The Clinton's make up their own rules and definitions. Hillary pretends to abide by the DNC's decision but changes the rules to suit herself in the middle of the game.

Edwards and Obama abided by the DNC's request to their detriment.

What would have been the war cry from the Clinton campaign if Obama had won FL and wanted the delegates seated.

Lest you should ask I am an Independent and could not vote in the FL. primary because it is a closed primary and in addition I have not decided who I will vote for in the general election

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Florida Republican — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:04:17 GMT

Thank you Obama! At last the Republicans will have a chance to win the General election. Oh, how the young and progressive elite can't see beyond their own self worship.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Martin — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:05:20 GMT

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

hbbean, Albuquerque, NM — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:06:22 GMT

This is, BY FAR, the most exciting election of my 40 + years on this planet! I love the history of Obama versus Hillary. It won't be over until March 4th or later and I will be watching straight through. I'm looking forward to seeing how both campaigns bring their economic policies to Cheesehead and Buckeye country! And, I personally love seeing the Republicans implode. McCain... really?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Paul McL, Winston-Salem, NC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:08:18 GMT

I support Obama, but the Clinton strategy has me very confused. She must be short of money and may not have the organization I thought she and Wild Bill had. If Obama wins in WI and HI, the whispers from her 'supporters' will increase and some of her marginal supporters will pull away. The money flow will also slow.

If Billary goes negative, it will come back to hurt her more than Obama.

In the meantime, Obama is going to get more specific in his positions and will more clearly define the differences between him and Billary. He is also going to be much harder nosed about her vote on the War and is going to link Billary to McCain. But his style and approach will not come off as going negative.

Wild Bill is in a very tough position. The SC mess he created has quieted him down and left him little room to move. I also suspect, his calls to Super Delegates are not being returned at the pace they were a few weeks ago.

Billary is in trouble.Her 49% negatives are coming back to to bite her - big time.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Carol - Ohio — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:08:40 GMT

I find it very interesting that Obama is attracting moderate Republicans. Does it occur to anyone else that there may be a method to their madness? The Republicans would prefer to face Obama in the general election.....so, cross over in the primary and vote for him to insure his nomination. And then clobber him come November. Sounds like a plausible plan to me.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ron, TX — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:10:32 GMT

All of the people asking what Barack Obama is going to change? Open your eyes! He's -already- changed the game! You have record breaking fundraising happening all over the place, Republicans and independents swooning over a democrat, young people -actually- voting, people -actually- realizing that Washington doesn't have to be a big sessepool... he's got Hillary scared to death of going negative and he's got her fundraisers walking on eggshells.

Wanna know what he's going to change? Start listening to what he says! Your lack of education on the subject is growing tired. Nobody likes a broken record, especially when it's a bad track.

Ethics reform, iraq, governmental transparency, energy reform, health care, foreign policy, diplomacy, etc etc the list goes on and on. You Clintonites harp that he's all talk, and then turn around and criticize his ideas in the very next sentence. Grow up.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Tim, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:11:11 GMT

I think it's very interesting how people don't seem to quite yet understand how much of a loser Hillary Clinton is.
She has repeatedly tried to dismiss Obama in every way she can. When the elections first started, she tried to smother him with the "no experience" stamp. That didn't worked out too well. She and her husband unfairly, very unfairly, tried to portray him as a minority candidate who would not be accepted nationwide. They even compared him to Jesse Jackson (unbelievable), despite his vigorous attempts to make his campaign about everything but race. Remember Hillary's smirk and claims that the rest of the country "including American Samoa" would be votin on Super Tuesday? It's kinda blown up in her face now, hasn't it? Most of those places have indisputedly proclaimed Obama their candidate. If it wasn't for California she would be out of this. If it wasn't for the Democratic Party's system of voting, she would be virtually non-existant.
Finally, with regards to this whole Michigan and Florida thing, I have to ask. Are the people who talk about those states crazy? The Democratic Party made an AGREEMENT to punish those states for moving up their elections. Obama and Edwards were both not on the ballot in Michigan. They were told not to campaign in Florida because it would not count. Talk about changing the rules. Talk about picking up a basketball in an NBA game and running all the way to the hoop to dunk it without even bouncing the ball. It's ludicrous.
By the way, how many times has Hillary Clinton changed her slogan or just basically copied Obama? First she had the experience to take back Washington, then she became the agent for change. Ridiculous. I am however quite shocked and in awe, quite frankly, that she's even still in the race.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Diane Ho, Canton OH — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:11:49 GMT

platitude: a flat, dull remark. McCain calling elements of Barack's speech platitudes?! Hilarious. I almost fell off the sofa when he said that. Hillary...is it my imagination or is she now copying Barack's articulate hand movements? Well, its obvious who is the natural leader, and who the wannabes are.

JohnnyU, WA State

Are they even platitudes? What Obama is preaching sounds more like what those corporate consultants do at those goofy team building seminars. There is really not much "there, there" for Obama.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Independent Voter, Stuart, FL. — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:12:56 GMT

Jaycee, Ventura CA

I log on every day to read the comments you have written. As always I find them insightful and well written. Please keep up the good work

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Susan, Las Vegas NV — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:13:43 GMT

I agree with the poster who said that the media has been hyping Obama and skating on "dishing" anything Clinton. (The most egregious remark put the reporter off the air). So, yes, MSNBC, do your job. I think Obama would be great next cycle, but now, to me he's "all flash and no photo".

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ron Allen — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:14:05 GMT

I prefer to put it this way: voters asking for change in Washington and in the way we conduct foreign policy are the front-runners, and voters asking for experience but the same politics are next to the front runners. The fact that over 95% of voters last night voted for Hillary on the basis of change tells me that Americans even don't know what "change" really means. They don't recognize that many of their representatives in Cognress have more years in politics than the Clintons, yet they are the ones engaging in fierce partisan wars.
I assume Hillary's "experience voters" have voted for Bush before and will probably vote for McCain since he has the long experience in policymaking than her. But remember Obam has more legislative experience than Hillry.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Anti Reaganess Big Talkers, Columbus Georgia. — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:14:16 GMT

OMG!!

Hope VS Platitudes,

Yes I think John McCain summed it up nicely.... It's almost exactly what millions of us are thinking....

As to the screaming fans, again, Rock Stars types, don't impress me, I like music too, I even play guitar, but... and again there are millions of us

In a rare moment of weakness Tucker Carlson, who has had an acid tongued critique of Hillary Clinton since the beginning of the campaign. While he was talking to Chris Matthews, last night Carlson said, "we need to find out who Obama is, we don't know this guy."

This is in direct contrast to Tucker Carlson's normal praise of Obama. For the last couple of months Tucker's praise for Obama has been so high, you'd have thought they were sleeping together. But for a moment Tucker was honest, unusual for msnbc, but it happens. Seems he has been caught up in the hype too....

Well may the best man win, but I'll take substance over rhetoric any day. Even if it's John McCain. Obama needs to start talking details, he already has all the "Blind Lemmings." of whom rhetoric means everything and deeds means nothing. But the Lemmings won't get him elected. He's going to need people like me, so he can "change" his talk and start talking specifics....

Unless of course he chooses to lead himself and his Lemmings over the cliff....

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Nashville_fan — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:14:46 GMT

I am really excited about the uplifiting campaign that Senator Obama has run. He is truly reaping what he has sown.

Obama '08

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

justanotherdummycrat — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:14:56 GMT

Put a fork in Hillary....she's done! It is quickly becoming mathematically impossible for her to continue,....and she's NOT going to even win Ohio,...she'll carry Texas, but not by the landslide numbers that are necessary....she'll win texas by about 55-45 and that's not enough....she's going to lose Ohio and maybe by alot and as far as Pennsylvania that's going obama's way at this point and even if it turns for hillary come election day 4/29, she'll barely pull it out...like 52-48 and that's just not enough....obama wins landslide victories in every other state from here on out

the sad part is that obama no longer needs to address direct questions about the issues he can coast from here on out...he doesn't even have to address hillary anymore he can start going after mccainn that's how bad it is for hillary.....and as far as the tuff questions during the ohio debate?? there won't be any for obama because MSNBC is running the debate and they are still spending 58 minutes of every hour fondling his genitils so they're certainly not going to ask him any tuff questions;.. in fact they'll go one step further and see to it that hillary doesn't get the opportunity to answer any good issue type questions as every question will be geared toward making her defend herself on an alleged alegation,...and thats really not how a debate is supposed to work but after all this is MSNBC and its there time to shine,...and gloat that they were able to predict the winner and they were able to influence decisions through media coverages...the love-in during last nite's returns was sickening...they were like little girls giggling in the schoolyard over a box of chocolates.....UGHH!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Sherri, Charleston WV — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:16:07 GMT

THe contrast with Obama and McCain came home to me last night.....my husband stated he'd stick with McCain over Obama, but when he saw the "crowd" with McCain's speech last night, contrasting with Obama's speech and his crowd, he was stripped of words. I'm tellin you ladies and gentlemen, this is it. Are you to choose a new chapter, a new leader, a new outlook, a new way? Or are we to stick to a choice that is palatable but not optimum, safe but not new, and familiar but not all inclusive? OBAMA '08.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Kevin, Wash, DC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:16:31 GMT

If you are confused as to what Mr. Obama stands for, Cheri, try directing your AOL browser to his website located here: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

Quite frankly, it really doesn't matter what his position is or what his goals are, as he won't be legislating as President. If you want a President that the world respects as a leader, that will restore our rights and liberties (and continue to add to those who may still not be equal), and that will not abuse the Executive office on senseless war, I believe Mr. Obama is the best choice.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Eyong,lawrenceville,GA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:17:07 GMT

one of the major themes of the Clinton campaign has been that the New York Senator is "battle-tested" and better prepared to take on McCain and the right wing attacks. But that has been turned on its head by the fact that a junior Senator from Illinois has ended up putting the Clinton campaign on the ropes. It's hard to argue that you can demolish John McCain when you can't decisively defeat an opponent who came from nowhere, with no national name recognition, in your own party's primary. That is just common sense.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Bonnie Crawford — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:17:13 GMT

Congratulations to Barack Obama! Our nation has sorely needed his message of hope for a long time. This is democracy at its finest, and I applaud the voters in this country who have come out in the rain, sleet, snow or whatever to exercise their right to vote. We are the real winners in this election. We all know that no one person can change the problems we face that seem insurmountable alone. "We The People" united have the ability and the power to attack our problems, to change and solve them. We have brilliant minds within our nation; economists, ecologists, administators, educators etc., to come up with workable plans for change. It's time we laid the groundwork for the future of our children and grandchildren. We need to pass the baton of knowledge while we can and are still alive. We need to think beyond today, because by 2050 most of us will gone. The world is watching us, and they're on the edge of their seats. Let's follow the ray of hope we've been given.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

John and Jen — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:17:17 GMT

I am sure the corporate owned media is gleeful this morning, as their 24/7 months long HIT JOB on Hillary Clinton is working. I have never witnessed such a blatant, shameless attack machine on a Presidential candidate. Hillary Clinton is clearly the most qualified candidate in the race of any party. The Dems are lucky to have her and foolish if they squander their best chance for victory in November. Rock on Hillary, you are coming to Ohio and OHIO LOVES HILLARY!!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Russ Elba, NY — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:18:09 GMT

It seems that John Edwards is not only becoming less and less relevant as time passes, but his endorsement could even be seen as a negative for the Obama campaign. If it appears that they've energetically courted him this late in the game, they look solicitous to his preening egotism. For someone presumed to be close to Edwards to suggest that the former senator is either waiting to endorse the clear winner or to bestow his benediction as if it would settle things should the race be deadlocked, makes any endorsement even less important. And if his endorsement was ever of any consequence, it needed to have been made before the bulk of his support amongst primary voters swung (it would seem so) to Senator Obama. It might be more than coincidence that the victories the Obama campaign has achieved became more resounding soon after Edwards dropped out.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

JohnnyU, WA State — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:18:59 GMT

Not a word last night from Hillary re the results in Maryland, D.C. & Virginia. No call of congrats to Barack, as is customary. Just straight to pandering in Texas. These folks are 1000% more intelligent than she gives them credit for.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Marie, Maryland — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:19:50 GMT

I hate that Hillary Clinton is unapologetically calling upon superdelegates to steal the nomination for her. She has lost the most states. She lags in pledged delegates AND the popular vote. I mean, really, if she doesn't have the popular vote OR pledged delegate lead, which she does not at this time and may not get back, why should superdelegates go with her anyway?! "Shame on you," a la Bill Clinton, if you think that they should. That just means you are willing to steal the election too.

Also, every reasonable pundit states that there is no way FL and MI will be seated in the way that Hillary wants them to be. I am not saying that they will not be seated; however, even IF they are, the delegate count is likely to be reduced to account for the unfairness, or they will be made to have a caucus or primary again.

Obama is brilliant. You do not graduate from Harvard law first in your class, and, dethrone the presumed heir to the Democratic nomination without being so. His campaign has been splendid -and I also believe he will better our great country. Inspiration is a part of the puzzle; the other part is he's just sharper than Hillary who is running using old tricks, old techniques and the fledgling support of old timers. I wish that she would exit with grace, and not become the Huckabee of the DNC -actually, even Huckabee doesn't have 47% of Americans stating that unequivocally would never vote for him.

I am proud to have voted for Obama yesterday, in his second winning sweep of the the month. I look forward to Hillary losing Ohio, Texas and/or Pennsylvania, all of which she has to win now. Here's to transparency and ethics!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Larry, Simi Valley, CA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:20:08 GMT

A sign and speech does not cut it for me.

Cheri M Danbury WI

Cheri,
You need to learn to read & listen. I felt the same about both candidates till I took the time to do some research. Niether candidate will spell out in detail what or how they plan their policies in ther "stump" speeches! No responsible citizen should make their decision based solely on general speeches or trust the info hand fed to them by the media. Listen to the last debate, look at their voting record and check their websites!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

SadStateOfAffairs — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:20:21 GMT

Geez, it's looking like an OBAMA NATION....

Vote for Mama, not Obama.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Seth Doria, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:21:34 GMT

Unfortunately for McCain, most people probably don’t know what the word “platitude” means. For the record, a platitude is “A trite or banal remark or statement, especially one expressed as if it were original or significant.”

(Trite means “lacking in freshness or effectiveness because of constant use or excessive repetition.” Banal means “Drearily commonplace and often predictable.”)

Note for McCain – when trying to convince a younger generation raised on pause and fast forward to vote for their great-grandpa instead of the cool guy, it’s best not to use words whose definitions also require definitions.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Michael — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:23:02 GMT

I still think Hillary's choice of an intro song at last night's rally should have got a little more notice (Where the Streets Have No Name by U2)- Opening lines- "I want to run, I want to hide..." Seems to be a mantra in the Clinton campaign these days.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

jodi from jerzeee — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:23:05 GMT

Obama is leading in all the delegate counts and popular votes. There's no use in people trying to deny his excellence in campaigning or speaking or in motivating. What's so wrong with giving people hope and believing that hope is a real vehicle of change? The skeptics about this guy continue to contradict themselves. Either you want things to stay the same way OR you don't. If you do, then you will support Obama. To Hillary's credit, she had her time and did some great things along the way. However, her time is up! She's now trying to sound more like him in order to become more appealing. It's not going to work, because it's not genuine. Take a bow and leave gracefully.

I wish Obama the best. I have heard his stance on issues. Those who have not must subcribe to selective listening. You can always go to his site barackobama.com . His positions on the issues are clearly outlined just as Hillary's is on her site. Plus those issues have been discussed THROUGHOULY in numerous debates. Just because the man is eloquent, convincing, and confident does not diminish his ability to be President nor does it stand in the place of his position on the issues. Get off your jealousy boats and give the man and his excellent campaigning credit where it's due. OBAMA 08! THE TIME IS NOW. PERIOD!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

shocked, pittsburgh, pa — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:24:26 GMT

if you people can't see what's going to happen if obama, oprah, jesse jackson, and al sharpton get in the white house then your blinded by his b.s. 99% of african americans are voting for him, if that doesn't tell all of you young white voters what's coming down the pike, nothing will. if he makes it into the white house, white people as a whole will be done. i'm 45 years old, i voted democrat all my life, but i'll vote for mccain before i vote for him.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Brian, MIllstone, New Jersey — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:24:51 GMT

I credit Obama for rising above the din of Clinton's attacks and for staying on message about creating a bright and secure future for ourslves and our children. A future where we regain our place of leadership in the world....not just economically, but morally too. Its pretty apparent that the Clintons are not the people to help us regain a leadership role when it comes to morality. Neither one seems to have an accurate moral compass.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Steven, Mobile, AL — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:24:52 GMT

I agree that the Edwards endorsement will be pretty much irrelevant after Texas/Ohio. I was an ardent Edwards supporter before he dropped, and now I oscillate between the two remaining candidates (sorry Gravel), having to decide between voting with my heart for a candidate who inspires me and yet I know next to nothing about, and have no clear plan on what his strengths would be in such an important administrative office (I'd hire the person as my speechwriter any day of the week, however); or voting for someone who I know would be apt in the position but would only certainly further the partisan, manipulative pocket-lining that has made the American government the oily crotch stain of the modern world.

Anyway, as much as I would've liked to see Edwards win the primary, his endorsement of either candidate for me would mean little. Endorsements can rarely if ever be taken at face value: that the endorser "belives so-and-so is the best candidate". Endorsements are just people hitching rides on gravy trains and trying to get into a position of favor with people of power. I don't place a bet on a horse because I think the horse would be the most suitable horse to lead the Kentucy Derby to prosperity. I just back a horse cuz I think that horse will win and I'll get my 2:1 odds payoff on it.

So Edwards endorsing either candidate wouldn't help me with my problematic decision.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Susan Garcia, US citizen in Bocas del Toro, Panama — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:28:12 GMT

Obama is the candidate who can carry us to victory. The choice in November will be clear: Continue on with the Bush agenda - perpetual war that will bankrupt the USA, more tax cuts for the rich, destruction of the civil liberties we hold so dear as Americans? That is McCain's platform and he is stuck with it. Obama will offer a CLEAR DIFFERENCE. He has steadfastly opposed all those things. While Hillary has supported many of them and she will NOT be able to run from her voting record. If forced to choose between BUSH and BUSH LITE, too many Americans will vote for the real thing - McCain. At least, they know he BELIEVES on continuing the Bush Agenda. Hillary will take us down in flames. Party bosses, take n ote: OBAMA IS THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE. Rebuke the people at your own peril.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Oscar, Tampa Florida — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:28:34 GMT

I'm sorry, I started this election ready to go to war for Hillary, but Barack has just won me over. I can't help but think that when he and McCain are standing side-by-side at the debates, people will not be able to take their eyes off of him.

I do feel for Hillary, and think she would have made a fine president, but the times have just changed.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Martin — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:28:44 GMT

The human brain is not fully developed till you're 25 - and most fanatic Obama supporters are under 25, so they should be forgiven. They will get wiser!

Hillary 08!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Democrat, California — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:29:23 GMT

To all of you Clinton Haters and Obama Lovers, just remember. If you don't get the Clinton Voters the democrats don't get the Whitehouse. Keep talking the TRASH. You have turned me off. I am voting for Mccain!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Jeff, Hoboken — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:29:36 GMT

Internal commmunication and memo's show that Clinton's strategy and campaign had some serious flaws reaching back to her 2006 senate re-election. Obama's appeal plus Bush Administration is helping to pick off larger numbers of independents, which has further hurt McCain.

However, I'd like to offer another alternative for Hillary and McCain's troubles. Candidates from the Senate who try to run for President. Obama, while I do believe he has the experience and leadership, has only been in the US Senate for 3 years. The last President that came from the Senate was Kennedy 47 years ago. All others since were either VPs or Governors. In this age of ever expanding media access, the senate is no place to bread a Presidential candidate. That branch of goverment breads a very different set of skills than those needed to run for President. And all those votes and high profile wheeling and dealing comes back to haunt future candidate. Hillary's vote for the war isolated parts of her base. McCain's vote against tax cuts isolated parts of his base.

When will politicians learn that congress is not launching pad to the White House. How many have tried and failed in this age of media since Watergate.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Martin — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:29:55 GMT

The human brain is not fully developed till you're 25 - and most fanatic Obama supporters are under 25, so they should be forgiven. They will get wiser!

Hillary 08!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Independent in CA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:30:12 GMT

The Clintons are still a very formidable candidate who has proven time & time again that they can come back.

Stay tuned....
Ivan, Washington, DC (Sent Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:44 AM)

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Ivan...

The Clintons have some problems this Morning
1) 8 Obama Wins in a row - no matter how you slice it - that's a fact.

2) Firing of Solis-Doyle is not sitting well with Latin Super Delegates ad other Latins...this has 3 weeks to become a real problem for the Campaign.

3) If you look at the exit polls and groups of people who voted - Obama is cutting into her base: Women, Working Class, White Men...she can't lose these groups in Texas and Ohio...if she wants to win

4) She keeps changing who she is. After Iowa - A group of Old people who looked like they were ready to tour an assisted living facility standing behind her...(Like McCain's crowd last night)After New Hampshire - signs read change and all young people behind her. Last night all Latin People behind her. Baracks Crowd consistantly Very large and Mixed. Hers seems to be hand picked by state.

5) In order to stay in the game she has to win by large margins going forward about 60% to stay competitive according to the math....

6) If Barack Wins Wisconsin (which she is not campaigning in - Mistake) and Hawaii that gives him 10 in a row. She has come back from a loss or two but not 10 in a row. There is a Psychological game going on with voters too - and people are seeing this.

I am not saying she can't come back...She may but even her supporters have to admit it's a total up hill climb. They are still paying for Bills bad behavior on the campaign trail and Caucus and negative AA comments they have made and may continue to pay.....in Votes.....

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

John Mehan, San Francisco, CA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:32:02 GMT

Jaycee's message is right on. In case you still have doubts about Obama, I recommend the excellent article in the December issue of Atlantic Monthly entitled "Goodbye To All That: Why Obama Matters" (it's on line).

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

nuanced — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:33:27 GMT

"To encourage a country with only rhetoric rather than sound and proven ideas that trust in the strength and courage of free people is not a promise of hope. It is a platitude"

why is McCain dissing Reagan?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

yodacohen, Houston, TX — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:35:27 GMT

I am a 59 year old male caucasian life-long Democrat and have been a somewhat resigned Clinton supporter in Texas. My political views are moderate, but I'd almost NEVER vote for a Republican. I have been thoroughly disgusted with the past seven years of Republican and conservative control.

I have been in sales for 35 years and have learned something about the art of sales, an honorable profession.

Over the past 48 hours I have found myself drawn to Barack Obama after listening to three of his speeches. I've sat back in the past 24 hours and analyzed why.

Barack Obama is not talking about himself. He is talking about his audience and positioning himself with his audience. He is making it very clear in his communication that he is one of us and that TOGETHER, WE can make things happen. Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't doing that, and she is destroying herself in the process. She is using the word "I" and making everything about her in the process. This style no longer sells product, and it doesn't sell concepts.

The marketplace changed over the ninties and into the 00's. A new generation came of age. Clinton's campaign may have Mark Penn and his micro-targeting. That's important, but it is only one piece of the jigsaw puzzle. The message is just as critical if not moreso. I get the impression that the balance of her staff are PR flacks and that there is a lot of in-fighting and fear in the management ranks. If anyone on her staff REALLY knows how to A+ market in today's marketplace, they aren't being listened to. Unfortunately, most likely it is WAY too late to totally revamp the message. Additionally, my suspiscion is that Ms Clinton wants the style and message to be what it is--it is the essential Hillary Clinton. I think she has some great ideas but she doesn't have a clue how to sell them nor, I suspect, does she understand how to manage people. Yes, she has some very loyal staffers. But are they loyal out of inspiration, or are they loyal out of fear?

During Bill Clinton's presidency, he lost both Houses of Congress, inadvertently helped drive a strong influence of conservative politicos, and through poor personal behavior, set the nation on a course of extremely poor policy and governance over the past 8 years.

Through their approach to life, Bill and Hillary Clinton have triggered incredible hostility and hate on the other side of the aisle. Granted that the Republicans have been viscious in their opposition. However, effective salesmanship and better understanding of people and how to communicate could have mitigated a lot of the ill will. Hillary Clinton is hated by so many in this country because she has been unable to sell herself and relate to people beyond New York State.

Fact is, Barack Obama isn't hiding his positions on the issues. He isn't hiding his plans for government. It's all laid out on his website. Anybody who has access to the Web can read it. However, Obama and his speechwriters know how to win friends and influence people. They know what people want and how to effectively communicate with them. People don't enjoy listening to policy wonk speeches, and they don't like to sit and listen to people talk about themselves. Obama knows that.

In my book, if you have the right policy positions, and if you know how to communicate with people, understand what makes them tick, and how to motivate them, you'll be an effective leader and great manager.

Hillary Clinton may have the right policy positions, but she couldn't manage the health care bill project in the early '90's, and she still can't manage a well run campaign. She doesn't understand that it's about the voters, not about her.

Barack, you just won my vote.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Wess, Ridgeland, Mississippi — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:35:58 GMT

I am a Democrat and a Hillary supporter in Mississippi. Ya'll can talk up Obama all you want, he will never win one dang State in the South in the general, he will loose the western hispanic population and for all his talk of hope.. well he can hope his way to killing the democratic party. Him against McCain is an easy choice: McCain! If Hillary doesn't win the nomination, get ready for 8 more years of the same. McCain has already taken Hillary's motto of ready on day one. They can't wait to trounce on his drug use, using his full name Barrack Hussein Obama, his muslim school, etc. You guys in the media are giving Obama a cakewalk into his downfall, and God help us but I believe he wil take down the Democratic party with him. Its too bad you guys won't jump on anything that the Republicans are waiting for to attack him on, but love to trounce Hillary's shortcomings. Its amazing how she is winning the blue states or coming close and the red states are going overwhelmingly for Obama. Thats a sign people! WAKE UP AND VOTE WITH YOUR MIND!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Carrie D., Yorktown, Va — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:36:11 GMT

Although Obama is a remarkable presidential candidate, the 8% of republicans who voted for Obama accounts for probably 4% of republicans who sacificed a republican vote in order to make sure "the Clintons" would be stifled.
When entering my polling place, I had to choose either a rep. or dem. paper ballot thus squelching any discrete plan of doing this myself. As I voiced my disappointment that all candidates were not listed on one ballot, a fellow next to me said he " I know what your thinking" with a grin. Later, as we were exiting simultaniously, I found out he had considered the same tact. in the end we both voted for McCain

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Ken, Long Island, New York — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:36:35 GMT

Watching those two star-struck liberal losers Keith Olberman and Chris Matthews fawning all over Obama was pathetic. Those two "reporters" were still saying that McCain was barely winning Va. while the results at the bottom of the screen showed his margin increasing to over 40,000.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Sierra, SF — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:38:14 GMT

Cheri M Danbury WI:'...Mr. Obama and state what your exact "change" consists of. Start the debates now. A sign and speech does not cut it for me...'

Obama seems to be running a pretty good campaign on his own.
If you REALLY want to know what he stands for, do a little READING. That's pretty simple... Isn't it ?

Obama is doing just fine the way he's campaigning

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Montana in Montana — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:55:28 GMT

shocked pittsburg-You are telling us that you are not voting democrat (the way you have your whole life) because Obama is black? What kind of democrat are you? What kind of person are you? If you want to continue down the path of destruction that our current president has sent us, then leave your lifelong party and vote for McCain. I guess he MUST be the right person for the job just because of the color of his skin!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

SL, NJ — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:56:55 GMT

McCain vs Obama

Win - Win in my book. Two men who love their country more than themselves and are willing to respect the other side. Either will have to work with a closely divided Congress, so comprimise will be key to passing legislation.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Carol — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:59:48 GMT

I amd pleased at Obama's victory last night. Onward and upward. Go Oboma!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Martha, Tobyhanna PA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:06:03 GMT

Obama has a lot of Republicans voting for him and it looks like all is going as they've planned. If Obama ends up being the Dem nominee, the Republicans will wipe the floor with him. He'll never ba able to run again untarnished with the same blind rock-star cult following he has today. McCain will be a one-tern President, and Hillary will run again and win the Presidencey in 4 years.

I challenge MSNBC to publish this comment!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Kim, Pasadena, CA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:07:05 GMT

First, as someone who has loads of family living in Texas, I wholeheartedly agree with the reporter about the Tex-Mex in Southern Texas-- anyone who can should check it out. It is amazing. If I could, I would have it delivered weekly.

Second, I know some of the moderate Republicans voting Obama (in fact, I have swayed some of them). These folks are voting for Senator Obama because they long (like many of us) for a President who actually works for the People and the good of the Country, rather than the next election. They are also disenchanted with the way their own party exercised power. Considering the sadness and yes, embarrassment generated by the incompetence and corruption of the last 7 years who can blame them?

Third, Senator Kennedy, Senator Kerry and the other Senators and Representatives behind Senator Obama give him something he needs: skilled legislators in the Congress ready and able to help craft workable legislation and push Senator Obama's legislative agenda through Congress. As Senator Obama repeatedly says "Yes we can." He knows he cannot do this alone; instead, he asks all of us to assist.

Fourth, to all of you who spout such venom with regard to Senator Obama, or who still feel he lacks specifics, I encourage you -- no, I DARE you -- to go to Senator Obama's web site:

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/contact/

and listen with your mind open, or read his detailed policy proposals without bias.

If you do this, I believe you will find that Senator Obama is exactly the right candidate for this moment to be President of the United States.

Yes we can, America, believe it! Obama '08.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Sophia, Los Angeles Ca — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:10:12 GMT

Well Said Ron, Tx

All of the people asking what Barack Obama is going to change? Open your eyes! He's -already- changed the game! You have record breaking fundraising happening all over the place, Republicans and independents swooning over a democrat, young people -actually- voting, people -actually- realizing that Washington doesn't have to be a big sessepool... he's got Hillary scared to death of going negative and he's got her fundraisers walking on eggshells.

Wanna know what he's going to change? Start listening to what he says! Your lack of education on the subject is growing tired. Nobody likes a broken record, especially when it's a bad track.

Ethics reform, iraq, governmental transparency, energy reform, health care, foreign policy, diplomacy, etc etc the list goes on and on. You Clintonites harp that he's all talk, and then turn around and criticize his ideas in the very next sentence. Grow up.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Peter, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:11:50 GMT

Obama just doesn't have the guts to make the tough decisions. If Hillary doesn't get the nod, I'll take a serious look at McCain although my biggest concern is that McCain could appoint some Supreme Court justices that are just too conservative.

However, I believe that both Clinton and McCain could stand up to international threats, although I think Clinton is the only one that can pull America back from the economic precipice.

Obama's just another pretty face with pretty words. I want a president with a backbone, not a wishbone.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

PM — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:12:50 GMT

CLINTON did NOT CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA but I WATCHED & OBAMA COMMERCIALS IN THE LEAD UP TO THE FLORIDA PRIMARY> WHEN ASKED OBAMA SAID (just like your average POLITICIAN) THAT HE WASN't AWARE THAT THE NATIONAL BUY THEY DID WOULD ALSO SHOW IN FLORIDA. HOLY COW!! HE"S SOOOOOO BRILLIANT HUH? HE SOUND LIKE A LIAR OR A FOOL LIKE W> GET REAL OBAMA SUPPORTERS THE TRIAL OF HIS BUDDY--THE CHICAGO SLUM LORD IS COMING IN MARCH --GO AHEAD AND NOMINATE THIS DO NOTHING--VOTE "PRESENT" --"YES WE CAN" NOTHING INFO-MERCIAL AND WATCH THE TRAIN WRECK HAPPEN IN NOVEMBER!!THEN ALL THE AIRHEADS THAT THINK HES SO FAB WILL WINE ABOUT ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF IRAQ under MCCAIN!! VOTE ON ISSUES AND TRACK RECORD --SO MANY THINK THEY CAN VOTE ON THEIR PERCEPTION OF THE CANDIDATES CHARACTER--PLEEEEEEEZ---HOW MANY OF YOU VOTED FOR BUSH BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT GORE WAS A KNOW IT ALL AND YOU COULDNT STAND THE IDEA OF HIM AS PREZ AND COULD SEE YOURSELF HAVIN A BEER WITH W. THANKS SO MUCH FOR THE SOLID JUDGEMENT THAT VOTERS THEN AND APPARENTLY NOW OFFER US IN THE MIDDLE CLASS!! MORE POLITICS AS USUAL AND ANOTHER TRILLION BUCKS DOWN THE DRAIN--BECAUSE YOU T-H-I-N-K OBAMAARAMA IS DIFFERENT. GIVE ME A BREAK!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Vote On Paper, Findlay, OHIO — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:13:10 GMT

OHIO Republicans are voting for OBAMA in the primary AND in the general election.

No matter how outstanding any one candidate may be as President of the United States, he or she cannot do the job alone. The President must connect with the nation: he or she must inspire the country if not the world to get off our posteriors, turn off the television, get outside into our neighborhoods and communities and do the things that must be done that collectively will make our nation a Great Nation.

I submit that the best candidate for the job of President of the United States is not a hammer, but a healer. Not all of the problems we face are nails. I reject any candidate that summarily assumes that all members of the opposing party are the enemy, and the leaders of nations in turmoil will not meet us on common ground.

Mine is not a position of idealistic youth, but rather practicality. The old way of sticking out one’s chin and inviting the first blow doesn’t work. The most effective route to change I have seen begins with leading by example. We must strive to live by the highest ideals and principles of our culture rather than resigning ourselves to our lowest common denominator. If we lapse, we must try again. If we succeed, we must not be satisfied.

Obama in the Oval Office
20 January 2009

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Krs, Keizer, OR — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:14:47 GMT

Obama will not get my vote. I have found his campaign to be insincere and the cult following just plain bizarre.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

LB, Washington DC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:15:10 GMT

While some Republicans might have crossed over to stop Hillary, I think it was a small amount. Most of them were making their protest vote (in VA anyway) with Huckabee. One of my friends, who is very conservative, said to me the other day, "Even though that Obama guy is a Muslim, I still really like him." There was no point in correcting her, but it made me smile. What's wrong with wanting a president with enough hope and inspiration to fill all of our hearts? We who live in the DC area are so sick and tired of political infighting--it's around us day and night. That's why Hillary lost this area, not because of the black vote but because of the "we're sick of you" vote. I feel badly for her, but she should have known that after 8 years of the Clinton presidency, though we loved Bill, we were sick of the division. People couldn't even have dinner together anymore, wouldn't let their kids play together, stopped talking...The Clintons polarized our nation and we in the DC area can't forget it. I'd much rather have someone in there who can mend fences, and though I will completely support Obama, John McCain would be more acceptable to me than Hillary.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Richard, Golden, CO — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:15:49 GMT

I love it! Place a Clinton ion a corner and watch the nastiness begin. As a conservative without a dog this year it is so nice to see the Dems destroy themselves. Maybe there is hope after all?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

JMK — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:16:02 GMT

The game ain't over yet. Just another reason the media should be reined in during campaigns. Hillary is doing VERY well and could gain the advantage with a few of the big states left.
Why no criticism of Obama? All this non-thinking by 'Bama nuts is nauseating.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

raider dem, maryland — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:17:09 GMT

New Mexico's 26 is still undecided last I heard. So even if she gets those, she'd still be behind in Pledged Delegates. But, its a mute point, as that's not how the system works and you can't change the rules mid way through.
BL, Cincinnati OH
-----------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your input BL. According to your numbers and mine, we had very different counts for CO and MD (though I mistakenly did not include American Samoa or the Virgin Islands).

My overall point was in response to the comment that IF the Dem system were winner take all, that Hillary would be getting pulvarized right now, that she wouldn't be relevant. Clearly, not the case.

Any way you slice it, its still close.
Not trying to change the rules, just trying to make a point.

Thanks for the feedback.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

MC, WI — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:59:09 GMT

I'm glad to see so many people would be willing to send their friends and family off to a war they shouldn't be fighting in let alone dying in for the next 100 years by voting for McCain,just in spite of Barack Obama. Kudos to you guys for taking this country so seriously.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Don't drink the Obama-Aid — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:02:56 GMT

Well Obama has tried to play JFK and MLK and now he is playing a new role: SC (Santa Claus) and FDR. Promises a quarter of a trillion dollars to create jobs in "green" industries and infrastructure construction. Oh and it's already paid for, according to BO. End the war (paid for with debt), increase corporate taxes and taxes on "wealthy" individuals (increased taxes).

I especially liked the line where he says this GM auto plant can be around for another 100 years if it retools, WITH THE GOVERNMENTS HELP (corporate welfare)

Where's the change BO? More government spending, increased taxes, and socialistic corporate welfare. Looks like a Dem, smells like a Dem, talks like a Dem....must be a same old tax and spend liberal.

Keep it coming BO. You'll rally the conservative base before it's over with!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Dave in NM — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:04:33 GMT

I'm amazed how many people still don't get it. Lots of people don't know much about Obama, or think he lacks experience, but lots MORE folks ABSOLUTELY HATE HILLARY!! Nominating her is the only thing that will wake the sleeping and dispirited right-wing giant. Nominate Hillary, you suffer through 4 years of President McCain (or, as is not statistically unlikely given his advancing years, some period under the thumb of McCain's VP - President Romney? President Huckabee? RIP USA).

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Dave, Sun City, AZ — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:10:06 GMT

I admire John McCain for his military service to our country, but we are now talking about the Presidency. He is preaching the same rehashed crap from the past eight years, which we don't need. I think he should be Swiftboated the first day of the campaign in September. He says he was a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution, well let's see about that. Does the name Keating 5 sound familiar Senator? Gee, you were part of destroying the S&Ls in this country through deregulation and greed. Would we have the subprime mess now if the S&Ls had not been destroyed? What did you do in the Iran-Countra War daddy? We sold missiles to our sworn enemy and negotiated with terrorists, something Alzheimer Ronnie said he would never do. Gee, I think that's treason under the Constitution. Do we want somebody party to treason as president? I don't.

Go Obama!!!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Democrat LA CA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:10:21 GMT

Martin,

Exactly what do you mean with strong ties with slumlord Resko?-- we know what a foto of smiling Hill, Bill and Resko at the whitehouse means. Throw in Lincoln Bedroom and you get a better picture!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Rock 4 Obama, SC — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:24:23 GMT

Hillary can't even win her own party by a landslide despite her brand name. McCain would straight crush her, not to mention people coming out of the woodworks to stop a Clinton. We need a president for the FREE people not a CHOOSEN dictator like Hillary or McCain. Obama's wave of hope/new voters should crush the opposition just like Clinton.

Also why should he talk too much? Hillary would just copy it. He should save it catch the GOP off guard.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Dave in NM — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:38:14 GMT

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Laura, Sammamish WA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:38:48 GMT

John and Jen I agree with you totally. I live in Washingon State where I caucused. Delegates are proportional to the vote count. Voters were allowed to vote without: showing voter registration card;
proof of address;proof of age;proof of citizenship;
nada. I could have been from Mars with earthlings
address. One late comer to the causus asked the area cordinator "where do I go" "I want to vote"
"I'm a republican". The cordinator said who are you voting for? The man answered, "Obama". The cordinator motioned with his hand to a crowd across the room and said, "Over there". He did not tell the man that he had to find his precint number by his address, he just sent him over there to the Obama crowd. I questioned not having any proof of any kind for all these people voting to select who will be the nominee on the Democratic ticket. He said, "we just have to trust them."

SO AMERICANS, THIS IS THE "NEW AMERICAN MAJORITY" (that's what Obama is now calling Americans).

WELL I'M IN THE MINORITY. THE DISENFRANCHIED VOTER. I AM NOT ONE OF THE REPUBLICAN (OR AS OBAMA CALLS HIS "OBAMACANS") VOTERS WHO CROSSED OVER IN THE CAUCUSES AND THE OPEN PRIMARIES. I AM A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT VOTER WHO LOATHS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, BUT IF HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT ON THE TICKET I WILL WRITE IN HER NAME. MY HUSBAND IS A REPUBLICAN AND SAID HE WOULD VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON IF SHE IS ON THE TICKET.

I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S METHODS OF SELECTING OUR CANDIDATE IS ILLEGAL AND INJUST TO THE AMERICAN VOTER. THE POPULAR VOTE IS BEING RIGGED FOR OBAMA IN THESE CAUCUS. THE MAJORITY OF REPUBLICANS WILL GO HOME TO THEIR PARTY IN THE FALL. THE MEDIA AND REPUBLICAN MACHINE ARE READY WITH ATTACKS THAT WILL SEND ALL THE CROSSOVER REPUBLICANS RUNNING HOME TO THEIR PARTY.

TO THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS, ASK YOUR SELF IF OBAMA'S TWO VOTES TO GIVE BUSH MORE MONEY FOR THE WAR TO CONTINUE IS OKAY. IF BUSH DID NOT RECEIVE MORE FUNDING FOR THE IRAQ WAR, HE WOULD HAVE HAD TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME IMMEDIATELY. ALSO, ASK YOURSELF IF YOU FORGIVE COLIN POWELL FOR LYING TO YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ABOUT IRAQ'S WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRUCTION, AND CONDI RICE'S STATEMENT ABOUT NUKES STRIKING THE UNITED STATES? COLIN POWELL WAS BUSH'S FOOT SOLDIER AND BUSH BETRAYED HIM. BUSH BETRAYED OUR COUNTRY AND HE BETRAYED HILLARY CLINTON'S TRUST AS WELL. SO IF OBAMA DEBATES MCCAIN HE CANNOT SAY THAT HE NEVER SUPPORTED THE IRAQ WAR.

Let the chips fall where they may, the Republicans can clean up Bush's horrible mess. I am left with out trust in the Media, Government, Repubs, or even the Democratic Party at this stage of this election.
I feel as if I attended an election in a Third World country.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Tom from Texas — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:00:34 GMT

I did the math myself using the results from CNN. The numbers quoted here do not add up.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

DS, Seattle, WA — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:17:07 GMT

No comment whatsoever from Hillary Clinton after Obama swept the latest primaries?? Not terribly presidential of her!

Her health care plan is largely irrelevant as her governing style - e.g. threatening to "crush" Representative (Democrat) Jim Cooper in 1993 for not going along with her health care plan - would not result in the vast majority of her policy plans being carried out.

Doesn't it make more sense to elect someone who has a solid history of actually getting things done with people who don't agree with him rather than someone who has run a bitter, nasty campaign without any apparent experience working WITH people to accomplish something rather than intimidating and bullying people?

And this "the media is destroying Hillary" nonsense? Give me a break. Were they destroying her when she was 20-30 points ahead too?

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Grant — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:21:52 GMT

I don't see what Hillary can do for this country. Especially in the aftermath of the Bush administration. Sure, if the preceding president had done a semi-decent job of running the country, I would say Hillary would do good with upgrading and streamlining national policy. However, the country is in a terrible state, and we're going to need a lot more than a tune-up. The fact is, Hillary can't revamp this country. The way she has run her campaign simply says she can't do it.

Obama on the other hand, who has carved out his place in national polls and defied sentiments that this race would be over by the end of Super Tuesday, is the man for the job. Face the facts. Hillary is losing her edge. Never mind experience and promises. Obama is going to rebuild this country.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

CHN, Katy, TX — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:44:46 GMT

yodacohen, Houston, TX, your observation is right on the mark. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are directly responsible for their success or lack thereof, not the media or anyone else for that matter, because of the choices they've made this campaign.

Obama's message of hope and unity that together "we" can has been well received by the people compared to Clinton's more self-centered "I" & "me".

It's clear Obama is more in touch with the people he wishes to lead and has managed a very effective campaign. Clinton undercut her claim of "experience" with her poor judgement and her "ready" to battle the Republicans is just not credible since those battles have resulted in her defeat after defeat after defeat. America reward based on achievements not entitlement, the next President will need to bring this value system back to the White House.

The Clinton fans have not given Obama his due credit, Ombama astutely surveyed the land and campaigned accordingly and found great results. The fact of his success against Clinton so far is self evident the criticism of "inexperience" and "no-substance" is not valid...If it is what does that make Hillary Clinton.

Obama fans will dispense with the insults of Clinton and her fans, your day on the big stage is coming and you will need your brothers and sisters from the Clinton camp if "we" are to repair damage inflicted by the current regime and restore America to its rightful place.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Henry, Oakland, CA — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:17:37 GMT

Wess in Mississippi-

Your incredibly reductive racist assessment shocked me until I saw where you were from. "Cakewalk"? Really - you should be ashamed of yourself!

It looks like our country truly needs Obama. He has my vote.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Michael — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:18:46 GMT

OK, Obama, it looks like it is yours. All I have to say is that you had better WIN. You'd better DELIVER. Else, a lot of Democrats will never forgive you for blowing the best opportunity I have seen in my lifetime, thus far, for a Democrat to win the White House by using charisma and charm to thwart the chances of a proven more qualified, battle-tested candidate.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Rick, Boston, MA — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:20:26 GMT

As a third year law student here in Boston I can tell you with certainty that becoming president of Harvard Law Review is the same kind of beauty contest that Obama is waging now.

There are plenty of exceptionally talented law students who don't even get on law review who are better legal scholars and writers.

Its about how close you are to the faculty advisor and how many people you can convince to vote for you. That process rarely involves substance.

Don't be fooled.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

ORB, Landover, MD — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:04:25 GMT

Sarah from Colorado wrote:
"How many rightwingers voted for Obama yesterday, so he would win then lose the General?"

Sarah needs to take a look at the margins of those votes. If the rightwingers allegedly voting for Obama had any significance in the outcomes, no democratic candidate has a chance this fall. Your defeatism is overwhelming. I was a poll watcher for the Donna Edwards campaign in Maryland's 4th congressional district. There aren't enough right wingers in the whole state of Maryland to make up the difference in my precinct alone. And the ones that were there were too busy trying to defeat McCain to bother about the Democrats.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Brian, Hawaii — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:31:21 GMT

Aloha,

Chuck, you're the man! I also did the math on Sunday after Maine and it is clear that the Clinton campaign did not. Even with any kind of win in OH, TX, PA, or even KY, Obama still comes out ahead, by some 200 delegates.

I'm an American Indian (and white) living in Hawaii and it was wonderful to sit with my son and hear Obama mention Indian people as well (in South Carolina & Wisconsin). He is building the true coalition of support, igniting the hearts and souls of all kinds of Americans. He wants to unite, while the Clinton campaign continues to play one group against another. Come on! Their trying to pit so-called "non-college" whites and Hispanics against everyone else. To late, they are everyone else. We are everyone else. And the Clintons are a relic of the past.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

cyberislanddude, Hamilton ON — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:48:17 GMT

Clinton v. Obama on Legislative Experience: Senator Clinton, who has served only one full term (6yrs.), and another year campaigning, has managed to author and pass into law, (20) twenty pieces of legislation in her first six years. These bills can be found on the website of the Library of Congress (www.thomas.loc.gov), but to save you trouble, I'll post them here for you: 1. Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site. 2. Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month. 3. Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor. 4. Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall. 5. Name courthouse after James L. Watson. 6. Name post office after Jonn A. O'Shea. 7. Designate Aug. 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day. 8. Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day. 9. Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial of his death. 10. Congratulate the Syracuse Univ. Orange Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship. 11. Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship. 12. Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemorative Program. 13. Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda. 14. Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express condolences on her death. 15. Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost their lives on duty. Only five of Clinton's bills are, more substantive. 16. Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11. 17. Pay for city projects in response to 9/11 18. Assist landmine victims in other countries. 19. Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care. 20. Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected in the wilderness preservation system. There you have it, the fact's straight from the Senate Record. Now, I would post those of Obama's, but the list is too substantive, so I'll mainly categorize. During the first (8) eight months of his elected service he sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced 233 regarding healthcare reform, 125 on poverty and public assistance, 112 crime fighting bills, 97 economic bills, 60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills, 21 ethics reform bills, 15 gun control, 6 veterans affairs and many others. His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and co-sponsored another 427. These inculded **the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006 (became law), **The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, (became law), **The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the Senate, **The 2007 Government Ethics Bill, (became law), **The Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, (In committee), and many more. In all since he entered the U.S. Senate, Senator Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1096. An impressive record, for someone who supposedly has no legislative record.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Tim West Allis WI — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:55:36 GMT

I have one thing to ask. How are we going to pay for Obama's plans? Are we going to borrow from China? Are we going to raise taxes?
I keep hearing repeal the Bush tax cuts. Does that mean no more child tax credit? Say what you will about Bush but my taxes really fell for the first time ever from his tax cuts and no I'm not rich. I make $80K and my wife stays home to raise the kids. If our taxes go up we wil not be able to buy anything besides food and shelter. There are millions of people like me. This will kill the economy and shoot us into recession like we haven't seen in a long time.

Free hand outs are never free. Free health insurance will result in a greater than 50% tax rate. Just like it does in every industrialized country that has it. How will we compete with China then?

What's next, just sign your pay check and send it to Obama and he'll decide how to spend it for you?

Please vote for anyone but Obama. I'd even be willing to deal with another 8 years of Clinton rule.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Michelle, Corvallis OR — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:07:25 GMT

Why do so many people act as if rhetoric is a bad thing? If I am not mistaken, rhetoric is a huge part of the presidency. Setting the tone and the agenda for American policy is no small part of what the president should be doing. If Obama can have this kind of an effect on a cynical American population, think of what influence he can have on the international political scene!

Of course he has to put his money where is mouth is, but Obama isn't the one following the hot topics like a lost puppy dog. Obama's messaging has been clear from the start, and it's spot on. This democracy we're supposedly fighting for is worthless if it isn't based on the power of its citizens, whose rights and voices have been sorely abused by the Bush administration.

Only one democratic contender is taking money from lobbyists. And I find it hilarious that everyone is seizing on the Rezko example. Doesn't anyone remember Whitewater? If Obama weren't spending so much time running a positive campaign based on empowering US citizens, he would almost have time to go through and capitalize on every shady contact and semi-contact Clinton has ever had. I'm sure Obama really regrets those 5 hours he spent lawyering for a crook . . . because amazingly enough, he admits his mistakes.

And one other thing: unifying people isn't just about getting votes - you need to find common ground for other things like, I don't know, getting things passed through congress! As much as I know republicans **love** Clinton (cough), I have a hard time believing they wouldn't give her as hard a time as possible if she tried to get anything done.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Lee, NY — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:44:59 GMT

Obama has run an entire campaign on the word change or at least his campaign advisors have said it's okay
to just say change, that works for those dumb american voters, you don't have to do anything, just say change. Then ask them to have hope you and them will make changes, without ever saying what the change is. I'll tell you what it is, a White House with a man of color, with no plans at all. Things will go on
as usual in Washington. Obama has been absent from the Senate votes, because he is too busy, lying about bringing change, and his campaign staffers bullying people at the caucuses to caucus for him. All I am going to do is sit back, and watch the Democrats cry
about what a lousy President they elected, if they will admit it, it took the republicans 7 years to admit electing Bush, Mr. Unifier President was a mistake, and it will be a mistake for the Democrats as well.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Johnny — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:09:29 GMT

What a sad message this sends to the American people.
A preacher with good rhetoric gains momentum and wins primaries. I can only blame the media for this fiasco,
Especially MSNBC's Chris Matthews, Nora O'Donnell, Morning Joe and his side kick et al. From the moment Obama set foot in the presidential arena, the media went nuts about him. WHY? Because he sounded like MLK?
However, they (the media) also endorsed the war in Iraq. They played the Iraq war up and made it look like we were doing the right thing. They (media)praised the White House and Bush for being so bold to undertake such a mission. They hyped the war in Iraq and we fell for it. They told us the lies that the Bush administration fed them and they made us believe them. NOW they Hype up Obama and make us believe that he is the one to lead our country. I blame MSNBC for playing a major part in the selection of (presumably) our next canidate for the presidency. Shame on the media, especially MSNBC. When all is said and done and Obama is in the White House, (God help us)Where will the media be? Or where will the young voters be? When the sh** hits the fan and Obama has to take some kind of action, his inexperience to do the job will show, and the media will have their heads up their asses once again probably saying... 'but he was so full of hope and inspired us, We thought he could do the job'.
Trust me I would rather have a democrat in office than a republican war machine like McCain.
Shame on the media... Shame on MSNBC.
Vote Hillary.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

notaobamalover — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:15:51 GMT

I got to tell my family and friends, "I told you so!" after they voted for Bush twice. Now it looks like I might have to say it again, because they voted for Obama. Obama's going to take us from a recession to a depression, because he is not qualified or tough enough to lead our country back into prosperity. He will endanger our lives, and further destabilize the middle east, because he is weak on defense and has no idea of how to handle Iran, other than...."we'll talk". Talk is cheap, and nice guys finish last. Halperin's right.....he's a pussy!

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

manish,Boston, MA — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:22:37 GMT

Hi guys, I am Not an American citizen, not eligible for voting and here on a student visa. I was never before interested in politics and always believed in higher intellect of Americans but most of the above comments and most of the blogs makes me feel wrong about that.
Go Hillary, Go Macain, Go Obama......FOR WHAT?? why support anyone over other...

Guys you have to go beyond the statements and through the stated policies to make your mind, free yourself with prejudices.

Illegal Immigration: whats the solution most of the candidates have? lock down the borders, crack down on the immigrants.....thats not a solution but continuous fighting against the problem.
Obama's solution?? Extend a hand to the latin american nations to help them improve their economies so that there is no incentive for any one to resort to illegal immigration....NOW thats Creative Thinking

Health care: Universal healthcare, if you don't buy the insurance we would come after your wages to get you healthcare.....why do you think that people who don't have healthcare don't buy it? BECAUSE THEY CAN"T AFFORD IT.

Obama's Solution?? Work with healthcare providers and insurance companies to LOWER THE HEALTHCARE COST, to the point of affordability by everyone and INVEST in Preventive healthcare......NOW THAT's a REAL SOLUTION.

These are just some examples so what this guy's policies are. He a clear progressive thinker, one who can and will work towards betterment of all.

So everyone just wake up and don't waste your vote on race, gender and experience. This election is not about what someone did but about what someone intends/ is capable of doing. If by any stretch of imagination Obama loses, that would be a huge shame for this country for not recognizing a gem they had. I wish there could be an Obama in every country or maybe this Obama leads all the countries not just America.

I haven't yet donated to Obama campaign because I am still waiting for my student loan check to arrive, but if you are ableto donate do so by all means, also you can use the link below to make your donations. Donate if you believe in

HOPE for a change
CHANGE for a better world
BETTER WORLD for peace and prosperity for all
PROSPERITY for progress
PROGRESS of a HOPE

http://my.barackobama.com/page/outreach/view/main/mm

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

manish,Boston, MA — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:23:13 GMT

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

John Franklin Philia PA — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:53:04 GMT

Some Clinton supporters are just like the Clintons are accused of being, vindictive, petty and sore losers. If they don't get their way they threaten to destroy the party. What happens if Hillary loses, and her supporters are seen as costing Obama the election out of being spiteful? Number one the party will lose millions of members, number two the Clintons and maybe the party will never again get a black vote and Clinton's legacy will be dirt, She'll never be able to run for a national election, she won't even be able to hold onto her Senate seat.

Real Democrats put nation and party above any candidate. When one person states that we will be in Iraq for 100 years and is mentally unbalanced and you would rather vote for him then support your own party then good, leave, you aren't a democrat let alone a good person. I will support Clinton, how much longer I don't know. maybe Hillary gets blamed for some things because the attitudes of some of her supporters hurts her image.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Don't drink the Obama-Aid — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:52 GMT

Obama will lose handily in the general. The two coasts with CA and NY are not enough to win the electoral college. He will not win the South, if you think the total primary votes for Dem will equate to equal #s for him in November, you're wrong. Other than Illinois, he doesn't win another significant Midwestern state. He doesn't win Texas or the inland Western states. Come to think of it...PLEASE NOMINATE OBAMA CLAUS

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Charlie Groome, London — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:31:11 GMT

Obama & McCain are both sound on trade - they both critcize the absurd agricultural subsidies that are damaging the US economy and hampering developing countries economic growth. Clinton by contrast is big on the protectionist rhetoric & her voting record is badly mixed.

Obama vs. McCain is a healthy competition - it's a real debate over foreign policy and how America views the world/the world views America.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

Biff, Milwaukee, WI — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:44:35 GMT

Democrats for McCain? A new definition of oxymoron. McCain would not take California if Mike Gravelle were the candidate, let alone Obama or HC. Bill C. can blame himself in part if his wife loses, his personal behavior prevented Gore from becoming POTUS, though I think Bill far outshines any presidency in terms of policy since JFK. I have no doubt Obama will defeat McCain in the general election, he appeals to many who voted for GW Bush twice, the same is not true for HC.
Not fair to her maybe, but that is reality. November prediction, Obama 55%, McCain 45% popular vote. Go back to the Senate Hillary and think about your stupid war vote in 2002.

First thoughts: Mr. Front-runner

arita wyclef,seattle,wash — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:23:05 GMT

i think that if hillary is going to run on bill clitons successes, then she ought to swallow his failures too.